1
|
Del Bello A, Vionnet J, Congy-Jolivet N, Kamar N. Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100871. [PMID: 39096886 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Department of Vascular Biology, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), France.
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation Center and Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Laboratory of Immunology, Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR1043-CNRS 5282, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drachenberg CB, Buettner-Herold M, Aguiar PV, Horsfield C, Mikhailov AV, Papadimitriou JC, Seshan SV, Perosa M, Boggi U, Uva P, Rickels M, Grzyb K, Arend L, Cuatrecasas M, Toniolo MF, Farris AB, Renaudin K, Zhang L, Roufousse C, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Kandaswamy R, White S, Burke G, Cantarovich D, Parsons RF, Cooper M, Kudva YC, Kukla A, Haririan A, Parajuli S, Merino-Torres JF, Argente-Pla M, Meier R, Dunn T, Ugarte R, Rao JS, Vistoli F, Stratta R, Odorico J. Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:362-379. [PMID: 37871799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maike Buettner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexei V Mikhailov
- Department of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Division of Renal Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcelo Perosa
- Beneficência Portuguesa and Bandeirantes Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Pablo Uva
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Krzyztof Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Arend
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lizhi Zhang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Candice Roufousse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Nephrology/Medicine, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Rainer Gruessner
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - George Burke
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Argente-Pla
- University Hospital La Fe, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raphael Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Richard Ugarte
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Sushil Rao
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parajuli S, Odorico J, Breyer I, Zona E, Aziz F, Lorden H, Garonzik-Wang J, Kaufman D, Mandelbrot D. Analysis of Individual Components of Frailty in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney, and Solitary Pancreas Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1523. [PMID: 37649788 PMCID: PMC10465099 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds It is not known which of the 5 components of the Fried frailty score have the most predictive value for outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and solitary pancreas transplant (SPT) recipients. Methods In this study, we sought to investigate the association between pretransplant overall frailty and individual frailty components, with posttransplant outcomes among SPK and SPT recipients. Outcomes of interest were length of stay, kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF), readmission within 30 d after discharge, cardiovascular events, acute rejection, pancreas death-censored graft failure (DCGF), kidney DCGF, and death. Results Of the individual frailty components among SPK (n = 113), only slow walk time was associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.99; P = 0.03). Among SPT (n = 49), higher sum frailty scores (coefficient correlation 0.29; P = 0.04) and weight loss (coefficient correlation = 0.30; P = 0.03) were associated with prolonged length of stay. Similarly, weight loss among SPT was associated with an increased risk of DCGF (aOR: 4.34; P = 0.049). Low grip strength was strongly associated with an increased risk of early readmission (aOR: 13.08; P = 0.008). Conclusions We found that not all components of frailty contribute equally to predicting outcomes. Objective measurements of slow walk time, unintentional weight loss, and low grip strength were found to be associated with less optimal outcomes in pancreas transplant recipients. Targeted interventions may improve posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| | - Jon Odorico
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Isabel Breyer
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Emily Zona
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| | - Heather Lorden
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Dixon Kaufman
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoo A, Riedel A, Qian I, Bartosic A, Soltani R, Kibria G, Haririan A, Drachenberg CB, Abrams PL, Odorico JS, Cooper M, Bromberg JS, Scalea JR. An Initial Analysis of the Baseline Levels of Dd-cfDNA After Pancreas Transplantation: A Prospective Study From High-volume Centers in the United States. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1459. [PMID: 36935870 PMCID: PMC10019258 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation offers patients with diabetes an opportunity for glucose homeostasis. Current blood tests to surveil for rejection have poor sensitivity and specificity for identifying rejection, and pancreas biopsies are challenging and associated with morbidity and graft loss. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is shed from transplanted organs and detectable in peripheral blood. Thus, a potential dd-cfDNA blood test assessing rejection would be clinically advantageous. Methods One hundred eighty-one dd-cfDNA samples (n) were collected from 77 patients (N) up to 132 mo posttransplant. Results The median dd-cfDNA level among all subjects was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.71%). In simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.29% (0.13%, 0.71%), and it was 0.23% (0.08%, 0.71%) in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. When isolating for when without infection or rejection, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.64%) for SPK and 0.20% (0.00%, 0.32%) for PTA. Both transplant types approached 1.0% ≤1 mo posttransplant followed by a decrease in median dd-cfDNA. During episodes of rejection or infection, median dd-cfDNA levels were greater among all transplant types. Conclusions The mean dd-cfDNA level for all pancreas transplant recipients is <1.0%, consistent with the published kidney transplant rejection threshold (>1.0%), regardless of SPK or PTA. Early posttransplant dd-cfDNA levels are transiently higher than later measurements. Dd-cfDNA elevation also correlates with rejection and infection and thus is a promising biomarker for surveilling pancreas transplant dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Yoo
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alexandria Riedel
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ian Qian
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Bartosic
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rudi Soltani
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Gulam Kibria
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cinthia B. Drachenberg
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Jon S. Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | | | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph R. Scalea
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loretelli C, Pastore I, Lunati ME, Abdelsalam A, Usuelli V, Assi E, Fiorina E, Loreggian L, Balasubramanian HB, Xie Y, Yang J, El Essawy B, Montefusco L, D'Addio F, Ben Nasr M, Fiorina P. eATP and autoimmune diabetes. Pharmacol Res 2023; 190:106709. [PMID: 36842542 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purine nucleotide adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is released into extracellular spaces as extracellular ATP (eATP) as a consequence of cell injury or death and activates the purinergic receptors. Once released, eATP may facilitate T-lymphocyte activation and differentiation. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the role of ATP-mediated signaling in the immunological events related to type 1 diabetes (T1D). RECENT FINDINGS T lymphocytes mediate immune response during the onset of T1D and promote pancreatic islet or whole pancreas rejection in transplantation. Recent data suggest a potential role for eATP in early steps of T1D onset and of allograft rejection. In different preclinical experimental models and clinical trials, several drugs targeting purinergic signaling have been employed to abrogate lymphocyte activation and differentiation, thus representing an achievable treatment to prevent/revert T1D or to induce long-term islet allograft function. SUMMARY In preclinical and clinical settings, eATP-signaling inhibition induces immune tolerance in autoimmune disease and in allotransplantation. In this view, the purinergic system may represent a novel therapeutic target for auto- and allo-immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Loretelli
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ida Pastore
- Division of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ahmed Abdelsalam
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vera Usuelli
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Emma Assi
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Emma Fiorina
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lara Loreggian
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Hari Baskar Balasubramanian
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Yanan Xie
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, China; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Yang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, China; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Basset El Essawy
- Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt; Transplantation Research Center, Nephrology Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura Montefusco
- Division of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Addio
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Moufida Ben Nasr
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; Nephrology Division, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paolo Fiorina
- International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy; Nephrology Division, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rovira J, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro-Garcia N, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Piñeiro GJ, Montagud-Marrahi E, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Cuatrecasas M, Campistol JM, Ricart MJ, Diekmann F, Garcia-Criado A, Ventura-Aguiar P. Immune Profiling of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells at Pancreas Acute Rejection Episodes in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10639. [PMID: 36466442 PMCID: PMC9715609 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Profiling of circulating immune cells provides valuable insight to the pathophysiology of acute rejection in organ transplantation. Herein we characterized the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a biopsy-matched cohort (n = 67) and compared patients with biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR; 41%) to those without rejection (No-AR). We observed that CD3+ T cells, both CD8+ and CD4+, as well as CD19+ B cells were increased in patients with BPAR, particularly in biopsies performed in the early post-transplant period (<3 months). During this period immune subsets presented a good discriminative ability (CD4+ AUC 0.79; CD8+ AUC 0.80; B cells AUC 0.86; p < 0.05) and outperformed lipase (AUC 0.62; p = 0.12) for the diagnosis of acute rejection. We further evaluated whether this could be explained by differences in frequencies prior to transplantation. Patients presenting with early post-transplant rejection (<3 months) had a significant increase in T-cell frequencies pre-transplant, both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (p < 0.01), which were associated with a significant inferior rejection-free graft survival. T cell frequencies in peripheral blood correlated with pancreas acute rejection episodes, and variations prior to transplantation were associated with pancreas early acute rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gaston J. Piñeiro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ricart
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angeles Garcia-Criado
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Pedro Ventura-Aguiar,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Rovira J, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro N, Lazo M, Cuatrecasas M, Garcia-Criado M, Liang N, Swenerton RK, Cofan F, Cucchiari D, Esforzado N, Montagud-Marrahi E, Oppenheimer F, Piñeiro G, Revuelta I, Torregrosa V, Ahmed E, Soboleva K, Kaur N, Zimmermann BG, Al Haj Baddar N, Demko ZP, Escrig C, Tabriziani H, Gauthier P, Billings PR, Amor AJ, Ferrer J, Campistol JM, Diekmann F. Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Shows High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pancreas Graft Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1690-1697. [PMID: 35289777 PMCID: PMC9311279 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas graft status in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKTx) is currently assessed by nonspecific biochemical markers, typically amylase or lipase. Identifying a noninvasive biomarker with good sensitivity in detecting early pancreas graft rejection could improve SPKTx management. METHODS Here, we developed a pilot study to explore donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) performance in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection (P-BPAR) of the pancreas graft in a cohort of 36 SPKTx recipients with biopsy-matched plasma samples. dd-cfDNA was measured using the Prospera test (Natera, Inc.) and reported both as a fraction of the total cfDNA (fraction; %) and as concentration in the recipient's plasma (quantity; copies/mL). RESULTS In the absence of P-BPAR, dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in samples collected within the first 45 d after SPKTx compared with those measured afterward (median, 1.00% versus 0.30%; median, 128.2 versus 35.3 cp/mL, respectively with both; P = 0.001). In samples obtained beyond day 45, P-BPAR samples presented a significantly higher dd-cfDNA fraction (0.83 versus 0.30%; P = 0.006) and quantity (81.3 versus 35.3 cp/mL; P = 0.001) than stable samples. Incorporating dd-cfDNA quantity along with dd-cfDNA fraction outperformed dd-cfDNA fraction alone to detect active rejection. Notably, when using a quantity cutoff of 70 cp/mL, dd-cfDNA detected P-BPAR with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 93.7%, which was more accurate than current biomarkers (area under curve of 0.89 for dd-cfDNA (cp/ml) compared with 0.74 of lipase and 0.46 for amylase). CONCLUSIONS dd-cfDNA measurement through a simple noninvasive blood test could be incorporated into clinical practice to help inform graft management in SPKTx patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M.A. Garcia-Criado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Federic Cofan
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Esforzado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federic Oppenheimer
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Piñeiro
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicens Torregrosa
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ebad Ahmed
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karina Soboleva
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Navchetan Kaur
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bernhard G. Zimmermann
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nour Al Haj Baddar
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zachary P. Demko
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cesar Escrig
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hossein Tabriziani
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Gauthier
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul R. Billings
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio J. Amor
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Endocrinology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Argente-Pla M, Martínez-Millana A, Espí-Reig J, Maupoey-Ibáñez J, Moya-Herráiz Á, Beneyto-Castello I, López-Andújar R, Merino-Torres JF. Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana. Cir Esp 2021; 99:666-677. [PMID: 34674986 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented. METHODS Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4 ± 5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1 ± 3.4 kg/m2, mean duration of diabetes 25.5 ± 6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91.3%, 91.3% and 89.5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2% and 93.6% at one year, 88.2% and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3% and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P = 1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2%, 69.1% and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5% and 80.6% at one year, 64.7% and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P = .0109). Post-transplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS In 13 years' experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Argente-Pla
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | - Jordi Espí-Reig
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Maupoey-Ibáñez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Moya-Herráiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
10
|
Shih MS, Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. Pancreas transplant with enteric drainage at a single institute in Asia. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:412-418. [PMID: 34364767 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup. RESULTS There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-Shan Shih
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bor-Uei Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bor-Shiuan Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shih-Chin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shin-E Wang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Solid-organ Transplant Diagnostics: Indications, Limitations, and Future Directions. Transplantation 2021; 105:1203-1211. [PMID: 33534526 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The last few years have seen an explosion in clinical research focusing on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in solid-organ transplants (SOT). Although most of the literature published so far focuses on kidney transplants, there are several recent as well as ongoing research studies on heart, lung, pancreas, and liver transplants. Though initially studied as a noninvasive means of identifying subclinical or acute rejection in SOT, it is rapidly becoming clear that instead of being a specific marker for allograft rejection, dd-cfDNA is more appropriately described as a marker of severe injury, although the most common cause of this injury is allograft rejection. Multiple studies in kidney transplants have shown that although sensitivity for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection is excellent, it is less so for T-cell-mediated rejection. It is possible that combining dd-cfDNA with other novel urine- or blood-based biomarkers may increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of rejection. Irrespective of the cause, though, elevated dd-cfDNA seems to portend adverse allograft prognosis and formation of de novo donor-specific antibody. Although current data do not lend themselves to a clear conclusion, ongoing studies may reveal the utility of serial surveillance for the management of SOT as following levels of dd-cfDNA over time may provide windows of opportunity to intervene early and before irreversible allograft injury. Finally, cost-effectiveness studies will be needed to guide the ideal incorporation of dd-cfDNA into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kukla A, Ventura-Aguiar P, Cooper M, de Koning EJP, Goodman DJ, Johnson PR, Han DJ, Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M, Saudek F, Vantyghem MC, Augustine T, Rickels MR. Transplant Options for Patients With Diabetes and Advanced Kidney Disease: A Review. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:418-428. [PMID: 33992729 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.02.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of β-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Eelco J P de Koning
- Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David J Goodman
- Department of Nephrology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul R Johnson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Duck J Han
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Martha Pavlakis
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Frantisek Saudek
- Diabetes Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marie-Christine Vantyghem
- CHU Lille, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Inserm U1190, Translational Research for Diabetes, Univ Lille, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, Lille, France
| | - Titus Augustine
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Michael R Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kovac D, Choe J, Liu E, Scheffert J, Hedvat J, Anamisis A, Salerno D, Lange N, Jennings DL. Immunosuppression considerations in simultaneous organ transplant. Pharmacotherapy 2021; 41:59-76. [PMID: 33325558 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients in the end stage of heart, lung, kidney, and liver failure. For patients with more than one failing organ, simultaneous organ transplantation has emerged as a viable treatment option. Immunosuppression strategies and outcomes for simultaneous organ transplant recipients have been reported, but often involve limited populations. Transplanting dual organs poses challenges in terms of balancing immunosuppression with immunologic risk and allograft damage from surgical complications. Furthermore, transplanting certain organs can impose considerations on the management of immunosuppression. For example, liver allografts may confer immunologic privilege and lower rates of rejection of other allografts. This review article evaluates immunosuppression strategies for simultaneous kidney-pancreas, liver-kidney, heart-kidney, heart-liver, heart-lung, lung-liver, and lung-kidney transplants. To date, no comprehensive review exists to address immunosuppressive strategies in simultaneous organ transplant populations. Our review summarizes the available literature and provides evidence-based recommendations regarding immunosuppression strategies in simultaneous organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Kovac
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jason Choe
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Esther Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jenna Scheffert
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Hedvat
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anastasia Anamisis
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Salerno
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas Lange
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas L Jennings
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Argente-Pla M, Martínez-Millana A, Espí-Reig J, Maupoey-Ibáñez J, Moya-Herráiz Á, Beneyto-Castello I, López-Andújar R, Merino-Torres JF. Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana. Cir Esp 2020; 99:S0009-739X(20)30312-2. [PMID: 33341241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented. METHODS Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4±5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1±3.4kg/m2, mean duration of diabetes 25.5±6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91,3, 91,3 and 89,5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2 and 93.6% at one year, 88.2 and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3 and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P=1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2, 69.1 and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5 and 80.6% at one year, 64.7 and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P=.0109). Postransplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS In 13-year's experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Argente-Pla
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, España.
| | | | - Jordi Espí-Reig
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Javier Maupoey-Ibáñez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Ángel Moya-Herráiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, España; Departament de Medicina, Universitat de València, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Honeyman C, Stark H, Wang HC, Hester J, Issa F, Giele H. Biomarker and surrogate development in vascularised composite allograft transplantation: Current progress and future challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 74:711-717. [PMID: 33436335 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Vascularised composite allograft (VCA) transplantation is now a feasible reconstructive option for patients who have suffered significant soft tissue injuries. However, despite numerous technical advances in the field over two decades, a number of challenges remain, not least the management of transplant rejection. Part of the difficulty faced by clinicians is the early recognition and prevention of acute rejection episodes. Whilst this is potentially easier in VCAs than solid organ transplants, due to their visible skin component, at present the only validated method for the diagnosis of acute rejection is histological examination of a tissue biopsy. The aim of this review article is to provide an evidence-based overview of progress in the field of VCA biomarker discovery, including immune cell subsets, immune cell effector pathways, and circulating markers of allograft damage, and to discuss future challenges in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calum Honeyman
- Canniesburn Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Stark
- Transplant Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hayson Chenyu Wang
- Transplant Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Joanna Hester
- Transplant Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Fadi Issa
- Transplant Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, United Kingdom
| | - Henk Giele
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Roufosse C, Drachenberg C, Renaudin K, Willicombe M, Toulza F, Dominy K, McLean A, Simmonds N, de Kort H, Cantarovitch D, Scalea J, Mengel M, Adam B. Molecular assessment of antibody-mediated rejection in human pancreas allograft biopsies. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14065. [PMID: 32805760 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Pancreas transplant longevity is limited by immune rejection, which is diagnosed by graft biopsy using the Banff Classification. The histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are poorly reproducible and inconsistently associated with outcome. We hypothesized that a 34-gene set associated with antibody-mediated rejection in other solid organ transplants could improve diagnosis in pancreas grafts. The AMR 34-gene set, comprising endothelial, natural killer cell and inflammatory genes, was quantified using the NanoString platform in 52 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pancreas transplant biopsies from 41 patients: 15 with pure AMR or mixed rejection, 22 with T cell-mediated rejection/borderline and 15 without rejection. The AMR 34-gene set was significantly increased in pure AMR and mixed rejection (P = .001) vs no rejection. The gene set predicted histological AMR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.714 (P = .004). The AMR 34-gene set was the only biopsy feature significantly predictive of allograft failure in univariate analysis (P = .048). Adding gene expression to DSA and histology increased ROC AUC for the prediction of failure from 0.736 to 0.770, but this difference did not meet statistical significance. In conclusion, assessment of transcripts has the potential to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in pancreas graft biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Cinthia Drachenberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Frederic Toulza
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Kathy Dominy
- Molecular Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Adam McLean
- Imperial Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| | - Naomi Simmonds
- Dept Cellular Pathology, Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Diego Cantarovitch
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Joseph Scalea
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Benjamin Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Al-Qaoud TM, Odorico JS, Al-Adra DP, Kaufman DB, Sollinger HW, Leverson G, Welch B, Redfield RR. Pancreas transplants from small donors: are the outcomes acceptable? A retrospective study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1437-1446. [PMID: 32749728 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite good organ quality, pancreata from extremely small pediatric donors (<30 kg) are generally avoided by many centers because of concerns of reduced islet cell mass and early technical failure. Therefore, we sought to compare the outcomes of small pancreas grafts (<30 kg) to those from higher weight donors from transplants performed between 1994 and 2015 (n = 1183). A total of 33 pancreata were from donors' ≤30 kg (3%), with a mean weight of 23.8 kg and mean age of 7.8 years. Patient survival was similar at 1, 5, and 10 years between recipients of ≤30 and >30 kg donors (≤30 kg: 96.8%, 86.8%, and 78.1% vs. >30 kg: 96.8%, 89.5%, and 79.1%, P = 0.5). Pancreas graft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was also similar, ≤30 kg: 93.9%, 73.2%, and 61.0% vs. >30 kg: 87%, 73.3%, and 58.3% (P = 0.7). This graft survival pattern was also seen when comparing pancreata from ≤20 kg donors to those from >20 to 30 kg. Cause of graft loss, and metabolic and physiologic outcomes did not differ between the groups. After assessing the impact of donor weight as a continuous variable and calculating recipient-to-donor weight ratio (RDWR), we observed no effect of donor weight on patient and graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talal M Al-Qaoud
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David P Al-Adra
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Dixon B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hans W Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen Leverson
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Bridget Welch
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival. SUMMARY The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.
Collapse
|
19
|
Tremmel DM, Feeney AK, Mitchell SA, Chlebeck PJ, Raglin S, Fernandez LA, Odorico JS, Sackett SD. Hypertension, but not body mass index, is predictive of increased pancreatic lipid content and islet dysfunction. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1105-1115. [PMID: 31715064 PMCID: PMC7103563 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic steatosis is thought to be a negative risk factor for pancreas transplant outcomes. Despite considering donor body mass index (BMI) and the visualization of intercalated fat as indicators of donor pancreas lipid content, transplant surgeons do not use a quantitative method to directly measure steatosis when deciding to transplant a pancreas. In this study, we used nondiabetic human pancreata donated for research to measure the pancreatic and islet-specific lipid content to determine which clinical markers correlate best with lipid content. Interestingly, we found that BMI and age correlate with increased pancreatic lipid content (Panc-LC) in men, but not women. Our findings further suggest that total Panc-LC correlates with an increase in islet lipid content for both men and women. We noted that pancreata donated from individuals with a history of hypertension have increased Panc-LC independent of donor BMI or sex. Moreover, we identify hypertension as a risk factor for reduced islet function after islet isolation. Together, our findings emphasize differences in pancreas graft quality related to pancreatic and islet lipid content, which may not be predicted by assessing BMI alone but may be influenced by a donor history of hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M. Tremmel
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA.,Co-first authors
| | - Austin K. Feeney
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA.,Co-first authors
| | - Samantha A. Mitchell
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| | - Peter J. Chlebeck
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| | - Sierra Raglin
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| | - Luis A. Fernandez
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| | - Jon S. Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| | - Sara D. Sackett
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aziz F, Jorgenson MR, Parajuli S, Zhong W, Hidalgo LG, Djamali A, Mandelbrot D, Odorico J, Sollinger H, Astor BC, Mohamed MA. Polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus infections are risk factors for grafts loss in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13272. [PMID: 32112710 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published literature on predictors of polyomavirus (BKV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant and their impact on allograft outcomes remain sparse. We hypothesize that BKV and CMV viremia infections decrease allograft survival in SPK. Identifying modifiable predictors of BKV and CMV may help tailor immunosuppression and improve allograft survival. METHODS All SPK recipients at our institution between January 2000 and April 2016 were included (n = 757). Thirty-nine recipients had BKV only and 25 had CMV only, and infection occurred at median follow-up times of 217 and 163 days, respectively. Event density sampling was used to match recipients with BKV or CMV to up to 10 recipients without infection by age, sex, and HLA mismatch status, and these were followed for a median of 4.3 years after infection. RESULTS Older age (HR 1.49 for each decade; 95% CI: 0.95, 2.35; P = .083) and tacrolimus use (HR 20.6; 95% CI: 2.37, 179.53; P = .006) were associated with increased incidence of BKV, but not CMV, infection. Both BKV and CMV infections were associated with increased risk of allograft failure for both pancreas (BKV [HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.47, 3.208; P = .000], CMV [HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.077, 2.687; P = .023]) and kidney (BKV [HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.765, 3.984; P = .000], CMV [HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.295, 3.308; P = .002]). CONCLUSION Older age at time of transplant and tacrolimus may help predict BKV infection in SPK recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Weixiong Zhong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hans Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brad C Astor
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Maha A Mohamed
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wallace DF, Bunnett J, Fryer E, Drage M, Horsfield C, Callaghan CJ. Early allograft pancreatectomy—Technical failure or acute pancreatic rejection? Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13702. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David F Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Joanna Bunnett
- Statistics and Clinical Studies NHS Blood and Transplant Bristol UK
| | - Eve Fryer
- Department of Cellular Pathology Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK
| | - Martin Drage
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In patients with type 1 diabetes with extreme glycemic variability, the restoration of pancreas endocrine function is potentially and completely achieved with islets of Langerhans (tissue derived from whole organ) or pancreas (whole organ) transplantation. The aim of our review is to report on the latest studies and to highlight the benefits and risks of the two procedures, providing clearer, more selective, evidence-based clinical indications that also consider the impact on the degenerative complications of diabetes as a potential benefit. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical experience in this field has been dynamic over the last three decades, and has been characterized by the development of more standardized protocols and a clearer definition of clinical outcome. On the contrary, the recommendations thus far are not well delineated and tend to overlap, and the past ADA position statement for pancreas transplant alone has also been applied to islet transplant alone, without differentiation. Both outcome-driven and non-outcome-driven criteria are considered in the conclusions, in an attempt to streamline indications for islet-alone or pancreas-alone transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Maffi
- Diabetes Research Institute - Internal Medicine and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Antonio Secchi
- Internal Medicine and Transplant Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Uva PD, Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB, Toniolo MF, Quevedo A, Dotta AC, Chuluyan E, Casadei DH. Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:466-474. [PMID: 29985562 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the "sentinel" organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection-related pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo D Uva
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,CEFYBO-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cinthia B Drachenberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - María F Toniolo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandra Quevedo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana C Dotta
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Domingo H Casadei
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Samoylova ML, Borle D, Ravindra KV. Pancreas Transplantation: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 2018; 99:87-101. [PMID: 30471744 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation treats insulin-dependent diabetes with or without concurrent end-stage renal disease. Pancreas transplantation increases survival versus no transplant, increases survival when performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus deceased-donor kidney alone, and improves quality of life. Careful donor and recipient selection are paramount to good outcomes. Several technical variations exist for implantation: portal versus systemic vascular drainage and jejunal versus duodenal versus bladder exocrine drainage. Complications are most frequently technical in the first year and immunologic thereafter. Graft rejection is challenging to diagnose and is treated selectively. Islet cell transplantation currently has inferior outcomes to whole-organ pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariya L Samoylova
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3443, Room M114, Yellow Zone, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Deeplaxmi Borle
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3443, Room M114, Yellow Zone, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kadiyala V Ravindra
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 330 Trent Drive Room 217, DUMC Box 3512, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Utilization of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Ochsner J 2018; 18:190-192. [PMID: 30275776 DOI: 10.31486/toj.18.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
26
|
Jiménez-Romero C, Marcacuzco Quinto A, Manrique Municio A, Justo Alonso I, Calvo Pulido J, Cambra Molero F, Caso Maestro Ó, García-Sesma Á, Moreno González E. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Experience of the Doce de Octubre Hospital. Cir Esp 2017; 96:25-34. [PMID: 29089105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) constitutes the therapy of choice for diabetes type1 or type2 associated with end-stage renal disease, because is the only proven method to restore normo-glicemic control in the diabetic patient. METHODS Retrospective and descriptive study of a series of 175 patients who underwent SPKT from March 1995 to April 2016. We analyze donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative variables and immunosuppression, post-transplant morbi-mortality, patient and graft survival, and risk factors related with patient and graft survival. RESULTS Median age of the donors was 28years and mean age of recipients was 38.8±7.3years, being 103 males and 72 females. Enteric drainage of the exocrine pancreas was performed in 113 patients and bladder drainage in 62. Regarding post-transplant complications, the overall rate of infections was 70.3%; graft pancreatitis 26.3%; intraabdominal bleeding 17.7%; graft thrombosis 12.6%; and overall pancreas graft rejection 10.9%. The causes of mortality were mainly cardiovascular and infectious complications. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5-year were 95.4%, 93% and 92.4%, respectively, and pancreas graft survival at 1, 3 and 5-year were 81.6%, 77.9% y 72.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our 20-year experience of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, the morbidity rate, and 5-year patient and pancreas graft survivals were similar to those previously reported from the international pancreas transplant registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Jiménez-Romero
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - Alberto Marcacuzco Quinto
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Alejandro Manrique Municio
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Iago Justo Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Jorge Calvo Pulido
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Félix Cambra Molero
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Óscar Caso Maestro
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Álvaro García-Sesma
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Enrique Moreno González
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wisel SA, Gardner JM, Roll GR, Harbell J, Freise CE, Feng S, Kang SM, Hirose R, Kaufman DB, Posselt A, Stock PG. Pancreas-After-Islet Transplantation in Nonuremic Type 1 Diabetes: A Strategy for Restoring Durable Insulin Independence. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2444-2450. [PMID: 28489277 PMCID: PMC5573612 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2017] [Revised: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Islet transplantation offers a minimally invasive approach for β cell replacement in diabetic patients with hypoglycemic unawareness. Attempts at insulin independence may require multiple islet reinfusions from distinct donors, increasing the risk of allogeneic sensitization. Currently, solid organ pancreas transplant is the only remaining surgical option following failed islet transplantation in the United States; however, the immunologic impact of repeated exposure to donor antigens on subsequent pancreas transplantation is unclear. We describe a case series of seven patients undergoing solid organ pancreas transplant following islet graft failure with long-term follow-up of pancreatic graft survival and renal function. Despite highly variable panel reactive antibody levels prior to pancreas transplant (mean 27 ± 35%), all seven patients achieved stable and durable insulin independence with a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. Mean hemoglobin A1c values improved significantly from postislet, prepancreas levels (mean 8.1 ± 1.5%) to postpancreas levels (mean 5.3 ± 0.1%; p = 0.0022). Three patients experienced acute rejection episodes that were successfully managed with thymoglobulin and methylprednisolone, and none of these preuremic type 1 diabetic recipients developed stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease postoperatively. These results support pancreas-after-islet transplantation with aggressive immunosuppression and protocol biopsies as a viable strategy to restore insulin independence after islet graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SA Wisel
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - JM Gardner
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - GR Roll
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - J Harbell
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - CE Freise
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - S Feng
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - SM Kang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - R Hirose
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - DB Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI, United States
| | - A Posselt
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - PG Stock
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Scalea JR, Redfield RR, Arpali E, Leverson G, Sollinger HW, Kaufman DB, Odorico JS. Pancreas transplantation in older patients is safe, but patient selection is paramount. Transpl Int 2017; 29:810-8. [PMID: 26859581 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas transplant outcomes have progressively improved. Despite this, some centers have continued to employ historical age limits for pancreas transplant candidates. We sought to determine the importance of chronological age in determining patient and graft survival rates after pancreas transplantation. A single-center, retrospective study of adult, deceased donor simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) and solitary pancreas transplants (SP, including pancreas transplant alone and pancreas after kidney transplants) in recipients ≥ 55 years (55 + ), occurring between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2012, was performed. Seven-hundred and forty patients underwent pancreas transplantation, of which 28 patients were 55 + . Patient survival was comparable for younger and older pancreas transplant recipients. Both non-death-censored and death-censored pancreatic graft survival rates were similar in younger and in older patients. Patients aged 45-54 and those aged 55 + had more frequent cardiovascular events than younger pancreas transplant recipients. There was no difference in renal graft survival for SPK patients when compared with diabetic kidney transplant alone recipients aged 55 years and older. Older pancreas transplant recipients had acceptable long-term patient and graft survival rates, although complications may occur. Chronological age alone should not exclude a patient for pancreas transplant candidacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Scalea
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Emre Arpali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen Leverson
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hans W Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Dixon B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Niclauss N, Bédat B, Morel P, Andres A, Toso C, Berney T. Impact of graft implantation order on graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 2017; 29:627-35. [PMID: 26987785 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Revised: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The optimal order of revascularization for pancreas and kidney grafts in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has not been established. In this study, we investigate the influence of graft implantation order on graft survival in SPK. 12 700 transplantations from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were analyzed retrospectively. Graft implantation order was determined based on the reported ischemia times of pancreas and kidney grafts. Pancreas and kidney graft survivals were analyzed depending on graft implantation order at 3 months and 5 years using Kaplan-Meier plots. Significance was tested with log-rank test and Cox regression model. In 8454 transplantations, the pancreas was implanted first (PBK), and in 4246 transplantations, the kidney was implanted first (KBP). The proportion of lost pancreas grafts at 3 months was significantly lower in PBK (9.4% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.011). Increasing time lag (>2 h) between kidney and pancreas graft implantation in KBP accentuated the detrimental impact on pancreas graft survival (12.5% graft loss at 3 months, P = 0.001). Technical failure rates were reduced in PBK (5.6 vs. 6.9%, P = 0.005). Graft implantation order had no impact on kidney graft survival. In summary, although observed differences are small, pancreas graft implantation first increases short-term pancreas graft survival and reduces rates of technical failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Niclauss
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Benoît Bédat
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Morel
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Axel Andres
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Berney
- Divisions of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parajuli S, Arpali E, Astor BC, Djamali A, Aziz F, Redfield RR, Sollinger HW, Kaufman DB, Odorico J, Mandelbrot DA. Concurrent biopsies of both grafts in recipients of simultaneous pancreas and kidney demonstrate high rates of discordance for rejection as well as discordance in type of rejection - a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2017; 31:32-37. [PMID: 28672081 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
| | - Emre Arpali
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Brad C. Astor
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
| | - Robert R. Redfield
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Hans W. Sollinger
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Dixon B. Kaufman
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplant Surgery; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; Madison WI USA
| | - Didier A. Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Uva PD, Odorico JS, Giunippero A, Cabrera IC, Gallo A, Leon LR, Minue E, Toniolo F, Gonzalez I, Chuluyan E, Casadei DH. Laparoscopic Biopsies in Pancreas Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2173-2177. [PMID: 28267898 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
As there is no precise laboratory test or imaging study for detection of pancreas allograft rejection, there is increasing interest in obtaining pancreas tissue for diagnosis. Pancreas allograft biopsies are most commonly performed percutaneously, transcystoscopically, or endoscopically, yet pancreas transplant surgeons often lack the skills to perform these types of biopsies. We have performed 160 laparoscopic pancreas biopsies in 95 patients. There were 146 simultaneous kidney-pancreas biopsies and 14 pancreas-only biopsies due to pancreas alone, kidney loss, or extraperitoneal kidney. Biopsies were performed for graft dysfunction (89) or per protocol (71). In 13 cases, an additional laparoscopic procedure was performed at the same operation. The pancreas diagnostic tissue yield was 91.2%; however, the pancreas could not be visualized in eight cases (5%) and in 6 cases the tissue sample was nondiagnostic (3.8%). The kidney tissue yield was 98.6%. There were four patients with intraoperative complications requiring laparotomy (2.5%) with two additional postoperative complications. Half of all these complications were kidney related. There were no episodes of pancreatic enzyme leak and there were no graft losses related to the procedure. We conclude that laparoscopic kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies can be safely performed with very high tissue yields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P D Uva
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Hospital de Alta Complejidad "Pte J. D. Perón", Formosa, Argentina.,CEFYBO-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - A Giunippero
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - I C Cabrera
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Gallo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L R Leon
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - E Minue
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Toniolo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - I Gonzalez
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Hospital de Alta Complejidad "Pte J. D. Perón", Formosa, Argentina
| | - E Chuluyan
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,CEFYBO-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D H Casadei
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata. Transplantation 2017; 100:1103-10. [PMID: 26950720 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imported pancreata accumulate cold ischemia time (CIT), limiting utilization and worsening outcomes. Flow cytometric crossmatching (FXM) is a standard method to assess recipient and donor compatibility, but can prolong CIT. Single-antigen bead assays allow for detection of recipient donor-specific HLA antibodies, enabling prediction of compatibility through a "virtual crossmatch" (VXM). This study investigates the utility and outcomes of VXM after transplantation of imported pancreata. METHODS We retrospectively compared outcomes of 153 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation at our institution over a 3.5-year period. RESULTS Three patient groups were analyzed based on geographic source of the pancreas graft and the type of prospective crossmatch performed: (1) imported VXM-only, n = 39; (2) imported VXM + FXM, n = 12; and (3) local VXM + FXM, n = 102. There were no episodes of hyperacute rejection and 1 episode of early antibody-mediated rejection (<90 days) in the imported VXM group. Death-censored graft survival, patient survival, and rejection rates were comparable among the recipient groups. For pancreata imported from United Network of Organ Sharing regions 3 and 4, proceeding to surgery without an FXM reduced CIT by 5.1 hours (P < 0.001). The time from organ arrival at the hospital to operation start was significantly shorter in the VXM-only group compared with the VXM + FXM group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Virtual crossmatch helps minimize CIT without increasing rejection or adversely affecting graft survival, making it a viable method to increase pancreas graft utilization across distant organ sharing regions.
Collapse
|
33
|
Valenzuela NM, Reed EF. Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:2492-2504. [PMID: 28604384 DOI: 10.1172/jci90597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a curative therapy for hundreds of thousands of patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term outcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 years after transplant. One of the major challenges facing clinical transplantation is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by anti-donor HLA antibodies. AMR is highly associated with graft loss, but unfortunately there are few efficacious therapies to prevent and reverse AMR. This Review describes the clinical and histological manifestations of AMR, and discusses the immunopathological mechanisms contributing to antibody-mediated allograft injury as well as current and emerging therapies.
Collapse
|
34
|
Acute and Chronic Micro- and Macrovascular Lesions in Pancreas Transplants: Implications for the Diagnosis of T Cell-Mediated and Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-017-0143-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
35
|
Valenzuela NM, Hickey MJ, Reed EF. Antibody Subclass Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2016; 7:433. [PMID: 27822209 PMCID: PMC5075576 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term outcomes in solid organ transplantation are constrained by the development of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and other targets, which elicit antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, antibody-mediated graft injury represents a broad continuum, from extensive complement activation and tissue damage compromising the function of the transplanted organ, to histological manifestations of endothelial cell injury and mononuclear cell infiltration but without concurrent allograft dysfunction. In addition, while transplant recipients with DSA as a whole fare worse than those without, a substantial minority of patients with DSA do not experience poorer graft outcome. Taken together, these observations suggest that not all DSA are equally pathogenic. Antibody effector functions are controlled by a number of factors, including antibody concentration, antigen availability, and antibody isotype/subclass. Antibody isotype is specified by many integrated signals, including the antigen itself as well as from antigen-presenting cells or helper T cells. To date, a number of studies have described the repertoire of IgG subclasses directed against HLA in pretransplant patients and evaluated the clinical impact of different DSA IgG subclasses on allograft outcome. This review will summarize what is known about the repertoire of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets in transplantation, focusing on the distribution of IgG subclasses, as well as the general biology, etiology, and mechanisms of injury of different humoral factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Valenzuela
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle J Hickey
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schinstock CA, Gandhi MJ, Stegall MD. Interpreting Anti-HLA Antibody Testing Data: A Practical Guide for Physicians. Transplantation 2016; 100:1619-28. [PMID: 27140516 PMCID: PMC4961613 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The development of sensitive methods for alloantibody detection has been a significant advance in clinical transplantation. However, the complexity of the data from solid phase and crossmatch assays has led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. The goal of this review is to provide a practical guide for transplant physicians for the interpretation of antibody data to supplement consultation with local tissue typing experts. Sources of variability in both the solid phase and crossmatch assay are discussed as are recent data regarding C1q binding antibodies and IgG subclass testing. Although definitive approaches to alloantibody testing are not possible with our current knowledge, we outline a pragmatic approach that we hope will enhance clinical management in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Schinstock
- 1 William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Redfield RR, Rickels MR, Naji A, Odorico JS. Pancreas Transplantation in the Modern Era. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2016; 45:145-66. [PMID: 26895686 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2015.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The field of pancreas transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure in the 1980s to become a routine transplant in the modern era. With short- and long-term outcomes continuing to improve and the significant mortality, quality-of-life, and end-organ disease benefits, pancreas transplantation should be offered to more patients. In this article, we review current indications, patient selection, surgical considerations, complications, and outcomes in the modern era of pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/772, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| | - Michael R Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 2-134 Smilow Center for Translational Research, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ali Naji
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/772, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Troxell ML, Lanciault C. Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Evaluation of Rejection and Infection in Organ Transplantation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140:910-25. [PMID: 26759930 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0275-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT -Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue biopsy specimens is a crucial tool in diagnosis of both rejection and infection in patients with solid organ transplants. In the past 15 years, the concept of antibody-mediated rejection has been refined, and diagnostic criteria have been codified in renal, heart, pancreas, and lung allografts (with studies ongoing in liver, small intestine, and composite grafts), all of which include immunoanalysis for the complement split product C4d. OBJECTIVES -To review the general concepts of C4d biology and immunoanalysis, followed by organ-allograft-specific data, and interpretative nuances for kidney, pancreas, and heart, with discussion of early literature for lung and liver biopsies. Additionally, practical applications and limitations of immunostains for infectious organisms (Polyomavirus, Adenoviridae [adenovirus], and the herpes virus family, including Herpes simplex virus, Cytomegalovirus, Human herpes virus 8, and Epstein-Barr virus) are reviewed in the context of transplant recipients. DATA SOURCES -Our experience and published primary and review literature. CONCLUSIONS -Immunohistochemistry continues to have an important role in transplant pathology, most notably C4d staining in assessment of antibody-mediated rejection and assessment of viral pathogens in tissue. In all facets of transplant pathology, correlation of morphology with special studies and clinical data is critical, as is close communication with the transplant team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian Lanciault
- From the Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Important trends are being observed in pancreas transplantation in the USA. We will describe recent trends in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation related to immunosuppression, treatment of rejection, and transplantation for patients of advanced age and C-peptide positive diabetes. Recent findings Rates of pancreas transplantation have declined, despite improved pancreatic graft outcomes. Regarding immunosuppression, trends in SPK transplantation include T-cell depletion induction therapy, waning mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use and steroid use in greater than 50% of pancreas transplant recipients with few patients undergoing late steroid weaning. Rejection of the pancreas may be discordant with the kidney after SPK and there is a greater appreciation of antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft. De-novo donor-specific antibody without graft dysfunction remains an active area of study, and the treatment for this condition is unclear. SPKs are being performed with greater frequency in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and in patients of advanced age, with exemplary results. Summary The current state of the art in SPK transplantation is yielding superb and improving results.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection of the pancreas remains a major clinical problem. In addition to cellular rejection of the pancreas, antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas is now a well-described entity. The 2011 Banff update established comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of acute and chronic AMR. The pancreas biopsy is critical in order to accurately diagnose and treat pancreas rejection. Other modes of monitoring pancreas rejection we feel are neither sensitive nor specific enough. In this review, we examine recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreas rejection as well as describe practical diagnostic and treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| | - D B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| | - J S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Salvadori M, Bertoni E. What's new in clinical solid organ transplantation by 2013. World J Transplant 2014; 4:243-66. [PMID: 25540734 PMCID: PMC4274595 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Revised: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Innovative and exciting advances in the clinical science in solid organ transplantation continuously realize as the results of studies, clinical trials, international conferences, consensus conferences, new technologies and discoveries. This review will address to the full spectrum of news in transplantation, that verified by 2013. The key areas covered are the transplantation activity, with particular regards to the donors, the news for solid organs such as kidney, pancreas, liver, heart and lung, the news in immunosuppressive therapies, the news in the field of tolerance and some of the main complications following transplantation as infections and cancers. The period of time covered by the study starts from the international meetings held in 2012, whose results were published in 2013, up to the 2013 meetings, conferences and consensus published in the first months of 2014. In particular for every organ, the trends in numbers and survival have been reviewed as well as the most relevant problems such as organ preservation, ischemia reperfusion injuries, and rejections with particular regards to the antibody mediated rejection that involves all solid organs. The new drugs and strategies applied in organ transplantation have been divided into new way of using old drugs or strategies and drugs new not yet on the market, but on phase Ito III of clinical studies and trials.
Collapse
|
42
|
de Kort H, Mallat MJK, van Kooten C, de Heer E, Brand-Schaaf SH, van der Wal AM, Roufosse C, Roelen DL, Bruijn JA, Claas FH, de Fijter JW, Bajema IM. Diagnosis of early pancreas graft failure via antibody-mediated rejection: single-center experience with 256 pancreas transplantations. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:936-42. [PMID: 24712331 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2013] [Revised: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Early pancreas graft loss is usually attributed to technical failure while the possibility of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is generally overlooked. To investigate the role of AMR in early pancreas graft loss, we retrospectively assessed 256 patients with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) between 1985 and 2010 at our institute. We included 33 SPK patients who lost their pancreas graft <1 year after transplantation. AMR was diagnosed based on donor-specific antibodies, C4d and histology in 7 cases, 8 cases were suspicious for AMR and 18 pancreas graft losses were not due to AMR. Acute AMR occurred >1 month after transplantation in 6/7 cases, whereas all other causes typically led to loss <1 month after transplantation. Thrombotic lesions occurred equally among the 33 cases. In 12/18 concurrent kidney specimens, the diagnostic results paralleled those of the pancreas graft. All patients with acute AMR of the pancreas graft lost their renal grafts <1 year after transplantation. In the setting of a thrombotic event, histopathological analysis of early pancreas graft loss is advisable to rule out the possibility of AMR, particularly because a diagnosis of acute AMR has important consequences for renal graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H de Kort
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Haas M, Sis B, Racusen LC, Solez K, Glotz D, Colvin RB, Castro MCR, David DSR, David-Neto E, Bagnasco SM, Cendales LC, Cornell LD, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Farver CF, Farris AB, Gibson IW, Kraus E, Liapis H, Loupy A, Nickeleit V, Randhawa P, Rodriguez ER, Rush D, Smith RN, Tan CD, Wallace WD, Mengel M. Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:272-83. [PMID: 24472190 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1086] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 11/04/2013] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19-23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2-day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter-observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis ("isolated v") represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|