1
|
Casas S, Tangprasertchai NS, Oikonomaki K, Mathers S, Sollet ZC, Samara S, Liu J, Burlinson ND, Constantoulakis P, Villard J, Viard T. Multi-centre analytical performance verification of an IVD assay to quantify donor-derived cell-free DNA in solid organ transplant recipients. HLA 2024; 103:e15518. [PMID: 38733247 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been widely studied as biomarker for non-invasive allograft rejection monitoring. Earlier rejection detection enables more prompt diagnosis and intervention, ultimately improving patient treatment and outcomes. This multi-centre study aims to verify analytical performance of a next-generation sequencing-based dd-cfDNA assay at end-user environments. Three independent laboratories received the same experimental design and 16 blinded samples to perform cfDNA extraction and the dd-cfDNA assay workflow. dd-cfDNA results were compared between sites and against manufacturer validation to evaluate concordance, reproducibility, repeatability and verify analytical performance. A total of 247 sample libraries were generated across 18 runs, with completion time of <24 h. A 96.0% first pass rate highlighted minimal failures. Overall observed versus expected dd-cfDNA results demonstrated good concordance and a strong positive correlation with linear least squares regression r2 = 0.9989, and high repeatability and reproducibility within and between sites, respectively (p > 0.05). Manufacturer validation established limit of blank 0.18%, limit of detection 0.23% and limit of quantification 0.23%, and results from independent sites verified those limits. Parallel analyses illustrated no significant difference (p = 0.951) between dd-cfDNA results with or without recipient genotype. The dd-cfDNA assay evaluated here has been verified as a reliable method for efficient, reproducible dd-cfDNA quantification in plasma from solid organ transplant recipients without requiring genotyping. Implementation of onsite dd-cfDNA testing at clinical laboratories could facilitate earlier detection of allograft injury, bearing great potential for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Simon Mathers
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zuleika Calderin Sollet
- Transplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - June Liu
- CareDx, Brisbane, California, USA
| | | | | | - Jean Villard
- Transplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drachenberg CB, Buettner-Herold M, Aguiar PV, Horsfield C, Mikhailov AV, Papadimitriou JC, Seshan SV, Perosa M, Boggi U, Uva P, Rickels M, Grzyb K, Arend L, Cuatrecasas M, Toniolo MF, Farris AB, Renaudin K, Zhang L, Roufousse C, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Kandaswamy R, White S, Burke G, Cantarovich D, Parsons RF, Cooper M, Kudva YC, Kukla A, Haririan A, Parajuli S, Merino-Torres JF, Argente-Pla M, Meier R, Dunn T, Ugarte R, Rao JS, Vistoli F, Stratta R, Odorico J. Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:362-379. [PMID: 37871799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maike Buettner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexei V Mikhailov
- Department of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Division of Renal Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcelo Perosa
- Beneficência Portuguesa and Bandeirantes Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Pablo Uva
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Krzyztof Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Arend
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lizhi Zhang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Candice Roufousse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Nephrology/Medicine, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Rainer Gruessner
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - George Burke
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Argente-Pla
- University Hospital La Fe, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raphael Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Richard Ugarte
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Sushil Rao
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ranch D, Fei M, Kincade E, Piburn K, Hitchman K, Klein K. Utilization of donor-derived Cell-Free DNA in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A single center study. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14582. [PMID: 37550268 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
High donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels indicate transplant allograft injury and can identify graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we evaluated the use of dd-cfDNA in pediatric kidney transplant rejection monitoring and treatment. METHODS Forty-two pediatric kidney transplant patients were enrolled between February 2020 and August 2021. Dd-cfDNA was tested before and after biopsy/rejection treatment. There was a total of 61 allograft biopsies (44 for-cause, 17 surveillance). RESULTS Graft rejection was found in 35/61 biopsies. Rejection was more common in basiliximab induction compared to rATG (77.1% vs. 22.9%, p = .0121). Median dd-cfDNA was higher in those with rejection (1.2% [0.34-3.12] vs. 0.24% [0.08-0.78], p < .0001). Dd-cfDNA was highest in biopsies with AMR and mixed AMR/TCMR. In addition, dd-cfDNA in basiliximab induction was higher compared to rATG (0.92% [0.27-1.8] vs. 0.26% [0.08-2], p = .0437). Median change in dd-cfDNA after rejection treatment was -0.57% (-1.67 to 0.05). Median time to dd-cfDNA <1% post-rejection treatment was 8.5 days (3.0-19.5). Dd-cfDNA in AMR was higher compared to TCMR or mixed rejection, and levels remained higher in AMR after treatment. In surveillance biopsies, 4/17 had rejection. Median dd-cfDNA was not different in those with versus without rejection (0.48% vs. 0.28%, p = .2342). Those without rejection all had dd-cfDNA <1%. In those with rejection, only one patient had dd-cfDNA >1%, and all had TCMR. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support dd-cfDNA as a useful indicator of graft rejection and response to treatment. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of dd-cfDNA in graft health surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ranch
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mingwei Fei
- Biostatistics Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elisabeth Kincade
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Kim Piburn
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kelley Hitchman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kelsey Klein
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang H, Wang D, Sun X, Wang H, Lan Y, Wei L. Diagnostic performance of GcfDNA in kidney allograft rejection: a meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2024; 14:1293402. [PMID: 38264334 PMCID: PMC10803602 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1293402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In this comprehensive meta-analysis, our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of graft-derived cell-free DNA (GcfDNA) in kidney allograft rejection and explore associated factors. We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, spanning from their inception to September 2022. Statistical analysis was executed utilizing Stata 15, Meta-DiSc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software. The combined pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve from the synthesis of findings across ten studies were as follows: 0.75 (0.67-0.81), 0.78 (0.72-0.83), 3.36 (2.89-4.35), 0.32 (0.24-0.44), 8.77 (4.34-17.74), and 0.83 (0.80-0.86), respectively. Among the ten studies primarily focused on GcfDNA's diagnostic potential for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), the optimal cut-off threshold demonstrated substantial diagnostic efficacy, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve values of 0.83 (0.74-0.89), 0.75 (0.70-0.80), 3.37 (2.64-4.30), 0.23 (0.15-0.36), 14.65 (7.94-27.03), and 0.85 (0.82-0.88), respectively. These results underscore the high diagnostic accuracy of GcfDNA in detecting rejection. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off threshold proves effective in diagnosing ABMR, while a 1% threshold remains a robust diagnostic criterion for rejection. Notably, for ABMR diagnosis, droplet digital PCR digital droplet polymerase chain reaction emerges as a superior method in terms of accuracy when compared to other techniques. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongji Yang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Duo Wang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Sun
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center and Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hailian Wang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Lan
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Liang Wei
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park S, Sellares J, Tinel C, Anglicheau D, Bestard O, Friedewald JJ. European Society of Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Testing for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection. Transpl Int 2024; 36:12115. [PMID: 38239762 PMCID: PMC10794444 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.12115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
To address the need for improved biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection, European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated working group comprised of experts in kidney transplant biomarkers to review literature pertaining to clinical and subclinical acute rejection to develop guidelines in the screening and diagnosis of acute rejection that were subsequently discussed and voted on during the Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the Working Group on Molecular Biomarkers of Kidney Transplant Rejection are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sookhyeon Park
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Claire Tinel
- Dijon University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1098 Right, UBFC, Dijon, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, INSERM U1151, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - John J. Friedewald
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cucchiari D, Cuadrado-Payan E, Gonzalez-Roca E, Revuelta I, Argudo M, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Ventura-Aguiar P, Rovira J, Bañon-Maneus E, Montagud-Marrahi E, Rodriguez-Espinosa D, Cacho J, Arana C, Torregrosa V, Esforzado N, Cofàn F, Oppenheimer F, Musquera M, Peri L, Casas S, Dholakia S, Palou E, Campistol JM, Bayés B, Puig JA, Diekmann F. Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 39:114-121. [PMID: 37715343 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope. METHODS ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool. RESULTS Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (β -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Cuadrado-Payan
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Gonzalez-Roca
- CORE Molecular Biology Laboratory, Biomedical Diagnostic Center (CBD), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Argudo
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria José Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Judit Cacho
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolt Arana
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vicens Torregrosa
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Esforzado
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Cofàn
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Oppenheimer
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Lluís Peri
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Campistol
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Anton Puig
- CORE Molecular Biology Laboratory, Biomedical Diagnostic Center (CBD), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ali NM, Herati RS, Mehta SA, Leonard J, Miles J, Lonze BE, DiMaggio C, Tatapudi VS, Stewart ZA, Alnazari N, Neumann HJ, Thomas J, Cartiera K, Weldon E, Michael J, Hickson C, Whiteson H, Khalil K, Stern JM, Allen JR, Tuen M, Gray-Gaillard SL, Solis SM, Samanovic MI, Mulligan MJ, Montgomery RA. Immune response, phenotyping and molecular graft surveillance in kidney transplant recipients following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14122. [PMID: 37707287 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding immunogenicity and alloimmune risk following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in kidney transplant recipients is imperative to understanding the correlates of protection and to inform clinical guidelines. METHODS We studied 50 kidney transplant recipients following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and quantified their anti-spike protein antibody, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), gene expression profiling (GEP), and alloantibody formation. RESULTS Participants were stratified using nucleocapsid testing as either SARS-CoV-2-naïve or experienced prior to vaccination. One of 34 (3%) SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants developed anti-spike protein antibodies. In contrast, the odds ratio for the association of a prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection with vaccine response was 18.3 (95% confidence interval 3.2, 105.0, p < 0.01). Pre- and post-vaccination levels did not change for median dd-cfDNA (0.23% vs. 0.21% respectively, p = 0.13), GEP scores (9.85 vs. 10.4 respectively, p = 0.45), calculated panel reactive antibody, de-novo donor specific antibody status, or estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 vaccines do not appear to trigger alloimmunity in kidney transplant recipients. The degree of vaccine immunogenicity was associated most strongly with a prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Ali
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ramin S Herati
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sapna A Mehta
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jake Miles
- Medical Affairs, CareDx, Inc, Brisbane, California, USA
| | - Bonnie E Lonze
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Charles DiMaggio
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vasishta S Tatapudi
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zoe A Stewart
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Henry J Neumann
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey Thomas
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Elaina Weldon
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Karen Khalil
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Stern
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph R Allen
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Tuen
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Sabrina M Solis
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marie I Samanovic
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark J Mulligan
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert A Montgomery
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benning L, Morath C, Fink A, Rudek M, Speer C, Kälble F, Nusshag C, Beimler J, Schwab C, Waldherr R, Zeier M, Süsal C, Tran TH. Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy-Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11899. [PMID: 38020751 PMCID: PMC10654198 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) identifies allograft injury and discriminates active rejection from no rejection. In this prospective study, 106 kidney transplant recipients with 108 clinically indicated biopsies were enrolled at Heidelberg University Hospital between November 2020 and December 2022 to validate the clinical value of dd-cfDNA in a cohort of German patients. dd-cfDNA was quantified at biopsy and correlated to histopathology. Additionally, dd-cfDNA was determined on days 7, 30, and 90 post-biopsy and analyzed for potential use to monitor response to anti-rejection treatment. dd-cfDNA levels were with a median (IQR) % of 2.00 (0.48-3.20) highest in patients with ABMR, followed by 0.92 (0.19-11.25) in patients with TCMR, 0.44 (0.20-1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.20 (0.11-0.53) in patients with no signs of rejection. The AUC for dd-cfDNA to discriminate any type of rejection including borderline changes from no rejection was at 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.83). In patients receiving anti-rejection treatment, dd-cfDNA levels significantly decreased during the 7, 30, and 90 days follow-up compared to levels at the time of biopsy (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection from no rejection. Decreasing dd-cfDNA following anti-rejection treatment may indicate response to therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00023604, identifier DRKS00023604.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annette Fink
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Rudek
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Kälble
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Waldherr
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Thuong Hien Tran
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mantios E, Filiopoulos V, Constantoulakis P, Liapis G, Vittoraki A, Casas S, Marinaki S, Boletis JN. Assessment of Donor Derived Cell Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) at Surveillance and at Clinical Suspicion of Acute Rejection in Renal Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11507. [PMID: 37901296 PMCID: PMC10603235 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
In our prospective, unicenter cohort study, we collected blood samples from 30 newly kidney transplanted patients, at month 1, 2, 3, and 5 for dd-cfDNA analysis, along with creatinine/eGFR and DSA monitoring, and from 32 patients who underwent an indication biopsy and whose dd-cfDNA levels were measured at the time of biopsy and 1 month afterwards. Fourteen of 32 (43.8%) patients in the biopsy group were diagnosed with TCMR and 5 of 32 (15.6%) with ABMR. Dd-cfDNA proved to be better than creatinine in diagnosing rejection from non-rejection in patients who were biopsied. When a dd-cfDNA threshold of 0.5% was chosen, sensitivity was 73.7% and specificity was 92.3% (AUC: 0.804, 0.646-0.961). In rejection patients, levels of dd-cfDNA prior to biopsy (0.94%, 0.3-2.0) decreased substantially after initiation of treatment with median returning to baseline already at 1 month (0.33%, 0.21-0.51, p = 0.0036). In the surveillance group, high levels of dd-cfDNA (>0.5%) from second month post-transplantation were correlated with non-increasing eGFR 1 year post-transplantation. The study used AlloSeq kit for kidney transplant surveillance for first time and confirmed dd-cfDNA's ability to detect rejection and monitor treatment, as well as to predict worse long-term outcomes regarding eGFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Mantios
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, School of Medicine, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis Filiopoulos
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, School of Medicine, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - George Liapis
- Pathology Department, School of Medicine, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Vittoraki
- Immunology Department, National Tissue Typing Center, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Smaragdi Marinaki
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, School of Medicine, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - John N Boletis
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, School of Medicine, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mubarak M, Raza A, Rashid R, Shakeel S. Evolution of human kidney allograft pathology diagnostics through 30 years of the Banff classification process. World J Transplant 2023; 13:221-238. [PMID: 37746037 PMCID: PMC10514746 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i5.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide. This activity was, however, accompanied by many issues and challenges. An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of causes of graft dysfunction were and still are, a big challenge. Kidney allograft biopsy played a vital role in addressing the above challenge. However, its interpretation was not standardized for many years until, in 1991, the Banff process was started to fill this void. Thereafter, regular Banff meetings took place every 2 years for the past 30 years. Marked changes have taken place in the interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies, diagnosis, and classification of rejection and other non-rejection pathologies from the original Banff 93 classification. This review attempts to summarize those changes for increasing the awareness and understanding of kidney allograft pathology through the eyes of the Banff process. It will interest the transplant surgeons, physicians, pathologists, and allied professionals associated with the care of kidney transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Mubarak
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Amber Raza
- Department of Nephrology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Rahma Rashid
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Shaheera Shakeel
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chancharoenthana W, Traitanon O, Leelahavanichkul A, Tasanarong A. Molecular immune monitoring in kidney transplant rejection: a state-of-the-art review. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1206929. [PMID: 37675106 PMCID: PMC10477600 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1206929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Although current regimens of immunosuppressive drugs are effective in renal transplant recipients, long-term renal allograft outcomes remain suboptimal. For many years, the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and of several causes of renal allograft dysfunction, such as chronic subclinical inflammation and infection, was mostly based on renal allograft biopsy, which is not only invasive but also possibly performed too late for proper management. In addition, certain allograft dysfunctions are difficult to differentiate from renal histology due to their similar pathogenesis and immune responses. As such, non-invasive assays and biomarkers may be more beneficial than conventional renal biopsy for enhancing graft survival and optimizing immunosuppressive drug regimens during long-term care. This paper discusses recent biomarker candidates, including donor-derived cell-free DNA, transcriptomics, microRNAs, exosomes (or other extracellular vesicles), urine chemokines, and nucleosomes, that show high potential for clinical use in determining the prognosis of long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation, along with their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiwat Chancharoenthana
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Tropical Immunology and Translational Research Unit (TITRU), Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Thammasat Multi-Organ Transplant Center, Thammasat University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Opas Traitanon
- Thammasat Multi-Organ Transplant Center, Thammasat University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Asada Leelahavanichkul
- Center of Excellence on Translational Research in Inflammation and Immunology (CETRII), Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Adis Tasanarong
- Thammasat Multi-Organ Transplant Center, Thammasat University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Raszeja-Wyszomirska J, Macech M, Kolanowska M, Krawczyk M, Nazarewski S, Wójcicka A, Małyszko J. Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation. Ann Transplant 2023; 28:e939750. [PMID: 37580899 PMCID: PMC10439677 DOI: 10.12659/aot.939750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
A number types of extracellular DNA (eg, cell-free, cfDNA) circulate in human blood, including mitochondrial, transcriptome, and regulatory DNA, usually at low concentrations. Larger amounts of cfDNA appear in any inflammatory condition, including organ damage due to a variety of reasons. The role of cfDNA in solid organ transplantation is discussed in this review as a valuable additional tool in the standard of care of transplant patients. Post-transplant monitoring requires the use of high-quality biomarkers for early detection of graft damage or rejection to be able to apply early therapeutic intervention. CfDNA complements the traditional monitoring strategies, being a risk stratification tool and an important prognostic marker. However, improving the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA detection is necessary to facilitate personalized patient management, warranting further research in terms of measurement, test standardization, and storage, processing, and shipping. A diagnostic test (Allosure, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA) for kidney, heart and lung transplant patients is now commercially available, and validation for other organs (eg, liver) is pending. To date, donor-derived cfDNA in combination with other biomarkers appears to be a promising tool in graft rejection as it is minimally invasive, time-sensitive, and cost-effective. However, improvement of sensitivity and specificity is required to facilitate personalized patient management. Whether it could be an alternate to graft biopsy remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Raszeja-Wyszomirska
- Department of Hepatology, Transplantology, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Macech
- Department of General, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Marek Krawczyk
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sławomir Nazarewski
- Department of General, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Jolanta Małyszko
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rizvi A, Faiz S, Thakkar PH, Hussain S, Gamilla-Crudo AN, Kueht M, Mujtaba MA. Kidney Allograft Monitoring by Combining Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and Molecular Gene Expression: A Clinical Management Perspective. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1205. [PMID: 37623456 PMCID: PMC10455393 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may safely assess kidney allograft rejection. Molecular Microscope (MMDx®) gene expression may offer increased precision to histology. This single-center retrospective study monitored kidney transplant recipients for rejection at specified time intervals by utilizing creatinine (SCr), proteinuria, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and dd-cfDNA. A clinically indicated biopsy sample was sent for histopathology and MMDx®. Patients were categorized into rejection (Rej) and non-rejection (NRej) groups, and further grouped according to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) subtypes. Rej and NRej groups included 52 and 37 biopsies, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 506 days. DSAs were positive in 53% and 22% of patients in both groups, respectively (p = 0.01). Among these groups, pre- and post-intervention median SCr, proteinuria, and dd-cfDNA at 1 month, 2 months, and at the last follow-up revealed significant difference for dd-cfDNA (all p = 0.01), however, no difference was found for SCr and proteinuria (p > 0.05). The AUC was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.91), with an optimal dd-cfDNA criterion of 2.2%. Compared to histology, MMDx® was more likely to diagnose ABMR (79% vs. 100%) with either C4d positivity or negativity and/or DSA positivity or negativity. Hence, a pre- and post-intervention allograft monitoring protocol in combination with dd-cfDNA, MMDx®, and histology has aided in early diagnosis and timely individualized intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asim Rizvi
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplant Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA; (A.R.); (P.H.T.); (S.H.); (A.N.G.-C.)
| | - Sara Faiz
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Parin H. Thakkar
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplant Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA; (A.R.); (P.H.T.); (S.H.); (A.N.G.-C.)
| | - Syed Hussain
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplant Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA; (A.R.); (P.H.T.); (S.H.); (A.N.G.-C.)
| | - Ann N. Gamilla-Crudo
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplant Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA; (A.R.); (P.H.T.); (S.H.); (A.N.G.-C.)
| | - Michael Kueht
- Department of Transplant Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA;
| | - Muhammad A. Mujtaba
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplant Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA; (A.R.); (P.H.T.); (S.H.); (A.N.G.-C.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Molecular Diagnosis Might Be Clinically Useful in Discrepant Kidney Allograft Biopsy Findings: An Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Transplantation 2023; 107:485-494. [PMID: 36117252 PMCID: PMC9875837 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) may overcome histology shortcomings. Previous studies have simply examined discrepant findings but have not attempted to determine clinical endpoints. To measure performance, clinical outcomes are strongly required. METHODS This single-center cohort study described discrepancies between MMDx and histology from 51 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and analyzed 72 indication biopsies, including 21 follow-up biopsies. Clinical performance was assessed by a combined endpoint of graft failure, rejection on follow-up biopsy, de novo donor-specific antibody, and improvement of kidney allograft function upon antirejection treatment. RESULTS MMDx agreed in 33 (65%) and differed in 18 (35%) of 51 KTRs. Most discrepancies occurred in biopsies called no rejection by MMDx and rejection by histology (15/24, 63%). In contrast, in biopsies called rejection by MMDx, 3 were classified as no rejection by histology (3/27, 11%). Discrepant findings between MMDx and histology occurred following delayed graft function and MMDx from biopsies with a low percentage of cortex. Among 15 biopsies classified as no rejection by MMDx but rejection by histology, the clinical course suggested no rejection in 9 cases. Six KTRs reached the endpoint, showing predominant t ≥ 2 lesions. CONCLUSIONS The most often occurring discrepancy is rejection by histology but no rejection by MMDx. As more KTRs do not meet the combined endpoint for rejection, MMDx might be clinically useful in these discrepant cases. Although strong histological findings have priority in indicating the treatment, clinical implementation of MMDx could strengthen treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang E, Haas M, Gillespie M, Sethi S, Peng A, Najjar R, Vo A, Jordan SC. An Assessment of the Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Surveillance in Patients With Preserved Kidney Allograft Function. Transplantation 2023; 107:274-282. [PMID: 35913057 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a biomarker validated to detect rejection when measured to assess kidney allograft dysfunction. However, it remains unclear whether routine surveillance with dd-cfDNA provides additional information over standard monitoring of kidney allografts with creatinine and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), particularly among those with little suspicion of rejection or injury. We investigated the value of measuring dd-cfDNA in patients with preserved allograft function and describe its association with future events. METHODS Three-hundred seventeen kidney transplant recipients with a creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL, no current DSA, and no prior rejection were assessed with dd-cfDNA and categorized into low (dd-cfDNA <0.5%; n = 239), moderate (dd-cfDNA 0.5% to <1.0%; n = 43), and high (dd-cfDNA ≥1.0%; n = 35) groups. The occurrence of rejection, DSA, graft loss, and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate over time after dd-cfDNA assessment was compared. RESULTS Over follow-up, rejections were more commonly found among patients with high vs low dd-cfDNA (17% versus 5%; P = 0.01); a similar nonsignificant trend was observed among patients with moderate compared to low dd-cfDNA (12% versus 5%; P = 0.13). DSA development was uncommon and not different between groups (low: 4%; moderate: 3%; high: 0%; P = 0.52). There was only 1 graft loss in a patient with low dd-cfDNA, and dd-cfDNA was not associated with graft dysfunction over time. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with elevated dd-cfDNA in conjunction with preserved allograft function remained stable over follow-up without deterioration in function or graft loss. Studies are needed to differentiate patients with elevated dd-cfDNA who will develop adverse outcomes from those who will remain clinically stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Matt Gillespie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Supreet Sethi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alice Peng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Reiad Najjar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huang E, Mengel M, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Jackson AM. Diagnostic Potential of Minimally Invasive Biomarkers: A Biopsy-centered Viewpoint From the Banff Minimally Invasive Diagnostics Working Group. Transplantation 2023; 107:45-52. [PMID: 36508645 PMCID: PMC9746335 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With recent advances and commercial implementation of minimally invasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation, new strategies for the surveillance of allograft health are emerging. Blood and urine-based biomarkers can be used to detect the presence of rejection, but their applicability as diagnostic tests has not been studied. A Banff working group was recently formed to consider the potential of minimally invasive biomarkers for integration into the Banff classification for kidney allograft pathology. We review the existing data on donor-derived cell-free DNA, blood and urine transcriptomics, urinary protein chemokines, and next-generation diagnostics and conclude that the available data do not support their use as stand-alone diagnostic tests at this point. Future studies assessing their ability to distinguish complex phenotypes, differentiate T cell-mediated rejection from antibody-mediated rejection, and function as an adjunct to histology are needed to elevate these minimally invasive biomarkers from surveillance tests to diagnostic tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Experimental and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mayer KA, Omic H, Weseslindtner L, Doberer K, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Viard T, Tillgren A, Haindl S, Casas S, Eskandary F, Heinzel A, Kozakowski N, Kikić Ž, Böhmig GA, Eder M. Levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA and chemokines in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14785. [PMID: 35894263 PMCID: PMC10078585 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) carries a risk of irreversible allograft injury. While detection of BK viremia and biopsy assessment are the current diagnostic gold standard, the diagnostic value of biomarkers reflecting tissue injury (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) or immune activation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL]9 and CXCL10) remains poorly defined. METHODS For this retrospective study, 19 cases of BKPyVAN were selected from the Vienna transplant cohort (biopsies performed between 2012 and 2019). Eight patients with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), 17 with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 10 patients without polyomavirus nephropathy or rejection served as controls. Fractions of dd-cfDNA were quantified using next-generation sequencing and CXCL9 and CXCL10 were detected using multiplex immunoassays. RESULTS BKPyVAN was associated with a slight increase in dd-cfDNA (median; interquartile range: .38% [.27%-1.2%] vs. .21% [.12%-.34%] in non-rejecting control patients; p = .005). Levels were far lower than in ABMR (1.2% [.82%-2.5%]; p = .004]), but not different from TCMR (.54% [.26%-3.56%]; p = .52). Within the BKPyVAN cohort, we found no relationship between dd-cfDNA levels and the extent of tubulo-interstitial infiltrates, BKPyVAN class and BK viremia/viruria, respectively. In some contrast to dd-cfDNA, concentrations of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 exceeded those detected in ABMR, but similar increases were also found in TCMR. CONCLUSION BKPyVAN can induce moderate increases in dd-cfDNA and concomitant high urinary excretion of chemokines, but this pattern may be indistinguishable from that of TCMR. Our results argue against a significant value of these biomarkers to reliably distinguish BKPyVAN from rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Haris Omic
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thierry Viard
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Susanne Haindl
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Casas
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Eder
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dandamudi R, Gu H, Goss CW, Walther L, Dharnidharka VR. Longitudinal Evaluation of Donor-Derived Cellfree DNA in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1646-1655. [PMID: 36302566 PMCID: PMC9718036 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03840322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Donor-derived cellfree DNA (cfDNA) is a less-invasive marker of allograft injury compared with kidney biopsy. However, donor-derived cfDNA has not yet been extensively tested in children, where the test may have different characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We assayed donor-derived cfDNA (AlloSure; CareDx) from 290 stored plasma samples from a prospective biobank at our center, collected from 57 children monthly in the first year postkidney transplant between January 2013 and December 2019. We assessed the kinetic changes in donor-derived cfDNA levels within the first year post-transplant. We analyzed donor-derived cfDNA levels for associations with biopsy-proven acute rejection using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to longitudinal plasma and urine BK viral loads using linear mixed models. We analyzed the prognostic effect of an elevated donor-derived cfDNA level on the eGFR 30 days after the assay via Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample tests or on measured GFR or interstitial fibrosis at 12 months post-transplant. RESULTS The donor-derived cfDNA levels in children remained persistently elevated for at least 4 months post-transplant, more so if there is greater disparity in size between the donor and the recipient, before reaching a steady low level. A donor-derived cfDNA level of >1% discriminated between biopsy-proven acute rejection with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.93). During BK viruria or viremia, patients had a significantly higher median donor-derived cfDNA than before or after and a significant rise within the same patient. A donor-derived cfDNA of >0.5% predicted a wider spread in the eGFR over the next 30 days but not the 12-month outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In children, donor-derived cfDNA is a valuable, less invasive biomarker for assessment of allograft rejection and injury. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_10_27_CJN03840322.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Dandamudi
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Hypertension and Pheresis, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hongjie Gu
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Charles W. Goss
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Leslie Walther
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Hypertension and Pheresis, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vikas R. Dharnidharka
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Hypertension and Pheresis, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jian Q, Ma Y. Pattern recognition receptor AIM2: Activation, regulation and the role in transplant immunology. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE 2022. [DOI: 10.1360/tb-2022-0661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
20
|
Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor specific antibody testing as non-invasive biomarkers for rejection in kidney transplantation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15061. [PMID: 36064740 PMCID: PMC9445050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) have lead to substantial progress in the non-invasive monitoring of the renal allograft by being able to detect or rule out subclinical rejection and guide immunosuppressive changes. In this study we sought to analyze the clinical, de novo DSA (dnDSA) and histological determinants of dd-cfDNA levels. The study included a cohort of stable renal function kidney transplant (KT) recipients who underwent anti-HLA dnDSA and dd-cfDNA testing between September 2017-December 2019. Statistical models were constructed to detect association with predictors of dd-cfDNA levels and other clinical characteristics. 171 renal allograft recipients were tested for dd-cfDNA and dnDSA at a median 1.06 years posttransplant (IQR: 0.37–4.63). Median dd-cfDNA was 0.25% (IQR: 0.19–0.51), 18.7% of patients having a dd-cfDNA ≥ 1%. In a multivariate linear regression model the presence of dnDSA MFI ≥ 2500 was the best independent determinant of dd-cfDNA level (p < 0.001). Among patients tested, 54 had concurrent dd-cfDNA determination at the time of an allograft biopsy. dd-cfDNA had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.91; p < 0.001) and of 0.96 (95% CI 0.87–0.99) to discriminate any rejection and ABMR, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, the models that included ABMR (R = 0.82, R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001), or ptc (R = 0.79, R2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) showed the best correlation with dd-cfDNA level. We are confirming a strong association of dd-cfDNA with dnDSA and underlying alloimmune-mediated injury in renal allograft recipients in a cohort of patients with unsuspecting clinical characteristics for rejection and excellent allograft function. Our findings support the need for noninvasive biomarker surveillance in KT recipients and we propose that dd-cfDNA may complement dnDSA screening.
Collapse
|
21
|
Benning L, Morath C, Kühn T, Bartenschlager M, Kim H, Beimler J, Buylaert M, Nusshag C, Kälble F, Reineke M, Töllner M, Schaier M, Klein K, Blank A, Schnitzler P, Zeier M, Süsal C, Bartenschlager R, Tran TH, Speer C. Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in previous non-responder kidney transplant recipients after short-term withdrawal of mycophenolic acid. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:958293. [PMID: 36059830 PMCID: PMC9433830 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.958293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination are significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy cohorts. Adaptive immunization strategies are needed to protect these patients from COVID-19. In this prospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 76 kidney transplant recipients with no seroresponse after at least three COVID-19 vaccinations to receive an additional mRNA-1273 vaccination (full dose, 100 μg). Mycophenolic acid was withdrawn in 43 selected patients 5–7 days prior to vaccination and remained paused for 4 additional weeks after vaccination. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and neutralization of the delta and omicron variants were determined using a live-virus assay 4 weeks after vaccination. In patients with temporary mycophenolic acid withdrawal, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and donor-derived cell-free DNA were monitored before withdrawal and at follow-up. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies significantly increased in kidney transplant recipients after additional COVID-19 vaccination. The effect was most pronounced in individuals in whom mycophenolic acid was withdrawn during vaccination. Higher SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody titers were associated with better neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants. In patients with short-term withdrawal of mycophenolic acid, graft function and donor-derived cell-free DNA remained stable. No acute rejection episode occurred during short-term follow-up. However, resurgence of prior anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies was detected in 7 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Louise Benning,
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tessa Kühn
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heeyoung Kim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirabel Buylaert
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Kälble
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marvin Reineke
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Schaier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Klein
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Blank
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Schnitzler
- Department of Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ralf Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division Virus-Associated Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thuong Hien Tran
- Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit Heidelberg, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cox DRA, Low N, Goh SK, Lee E, Vago A, Jackett L, Lokan J, Braat S, Jones R, Testro A, Dobrovic A, Muralidharan V. Low Levels of Hepatocyte-Specific Methylation in Cell-Free DNA Are a Strong Negative Predictor for Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection Requiring Treatment Following Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1024-1038. [PMID: 34919754 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Graft-derived cell-free DNA (gdcfDNA) quantification is a promising, minimally invasive tool for detecting acute T cell-mediated rejection (ATCMR) following liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the utility of measuring hepatocyte-specific methylation in cfDNA (HS-cfDNA) to quantify gdcfDNA, examining its accuracy in detecting ATCMR in a prospective, cross-sectional study. Blood was collected from LT recipients immediately prior to graft biopsy for suspected rejection. HS-cfDNA was quantified using droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction. Prebiopsy liver function tests (LFTs) and HS-cfDNA levels were correlated with biopsy results and the primary outcome of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). A total of 51 patients were recruited; 37 had evidence of rejection on biopsy and 20 required treatment. As much as 11 patients needed inpatient treatment for rejection. HS-cfDNA significantly outperformed LFTs in identifying patients with tBPAR, particularly those needing inpatient treatment (area under the curve, 73.0%; 95% confidence interval, 55.4%-90.6%; P = 0.01). At a threshold of <33.5% of the total cfDNA fraction, HS-cfDNA had a specificity of 97%, correctly excluding tBPAR in 30/31 patients. Quantifying graft-specific methylation in cfDNA has a major advantage over previous gdcfDNA techniques: it does not require genotyping/sequencing, lending it greater feasibility for translation into transplantation care. Low levels of HS-cfDNA were a strong negative predictor for tBPAR (negative predictive value, 86%) and may have a future role in triaging patients prior to invasive graft biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R A Cox
- Department of Surgery - Austin Precinct, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Translational Genomics and Epigenomics Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas Low
- Department of Surgery - Austin Precinct, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Su Kah Goh
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eunice Lee
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela Vago
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louise Jackett
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Lokan
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sabine Braat
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,MISCH (Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical Health Research Hub), Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert Jones
- Department of Surgery - Austin Precinct, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam Testro
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander Dobrovic
- Translational Genomics and Epigenomics Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vijayaragavan Muralidharan
- Department of Surgery - Austin Precinct, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kant S, Brennan DC. Donor Derived Cell Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: The Circa 2020–2021 Update. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10448. [PMID: 35721467 PMCID: PMC9198901 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The routine surveillance of kidney transplant allografts has relied on imperfect non-invasive biomarkers such as creatinine and urinary indices, while the gold standard allograft biopsy is associated with risk of bleeding, organ injury and sampling errors. Donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is being employed as a biomarker that addresses limitations of these surveillance methods, albeit has inherent drawbacks. This review provides an update on the enhanced understanding of dd-cfDNA and its expanded use beyond the conventional indication of detecting allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Kant
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- *Correspondence: Sam Kant,
| | - Daniel C. Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Steggerda JA, Pizzo H, Garrison J, Zhang X, Haas M, Kim IK, Jordan SC, Puliyanda DP. Use of a donor-derived cell-free DNA assay to monitor treatment response in pediatric renal transplant recipients with allograft rejection. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14258. [PMID: 35340104 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) reliably identifies allograft rejection in pediatric and adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Here, we evaluate the utility of dd-cfDNA for monitoring response to treatment among pediatric renal transplant recipients suffering graft rejection. METHODS 58 pediatric transplant recipients were enrolled between April 2018 and March 2020 and underwent initial dd-cfDNA testing to monitor for rejection. Allograft biopsy was performed for dd-cfDNA scores >1.0%. Patients with histologically proven rejection formed the study cohort and underwent appropriate treatment. Results of dd-cfDNA, serum creatinine (SCr), biopsy findings, and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Standard statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS Nineteen of 58 (31%) patients had dd-cfDNA score >1.0%, of which 18 (94.7%) had biopsy-proven rejection. Median dd-cfDNA value was 1.90% (interquartile range 1.43%-3.23%), and biopsy results showed 11 patients (61.1%) with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), 2 patients (11.1%) with T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), and 5 patients (27.7%) with mixed AMR/TCMR. SCr at time of biopsy was 1.28 ± 1.09 mg/dl. Following treatment, dd-cfDNA scores decreased for all types of rejection but still remained >1.0% in both AMR (1.50% [0.90%-3.10%]) and mixed (1.40% [0.95%-4.15%]) groups. Repeat dd-cfDNA values were <1.0% for patients with TCMR (0.20%-0.28%). SCr showed minimal change from pre-treatment levels regardless of rejection subtype. CONCLUSIONS Patients with TCMR may be reliably followed by dd-cfDNA; however, it remains unclear whether persistently elevated dd-cfDNA levels in AMR is a reflection of ongoing subclinical rejection or an inherent limitation of the assay's utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Steggerda
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Helen Pizzo
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Garrison
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark Haas
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene K Kim
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dechu P Puliyanda
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Van Loon E, Lamarthée B, Barba T, Claes S, Coemans M, de Loor H, Emonds MP, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Proost P, Senev A, Sprangers B, Tinel C, Thaunat O, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Schols D, Naesens M. Circulating Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Associate With Immune Activation Independent of Kidney Transplant Histopathological Findings. Front Immunol 2022; 13:818569. [PMID: 35281018 PMCID: PMC8904423 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.818569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the critical role of cytokines in allograft rejection, the relation of peripheral blood cytokine profiles to clinical kidney transplant rejection has not been fully elucidated. We assessed 28 cytokines through multiplex assay in 293 blood samples from kidney transplant recipients at time of graft dysfunction. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified a subset of patients with increased pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. This patient subset was hallmarked by a high prevalence (75%) of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA) and histological rejection (70%) and had worse graft survival compared to the group with low cytokine levels (HLA-DSA in 1.7% and rejection in 33.7%). Thirty percent of patients with high pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and HLA-DSA did not have histological rejection. Exploring the cellular origin of these cytokines, we found a corresponding expression in endothelial cells, monocytes, and natural killer cells in single-cell RNASeq data from kidney transplant biopsies. Finally, we confirmed secretion of these cytokines in HLA-DSA-mediated cross talk between endothelial cells, NK cells, and monocytes. In conclusion, blood pro-inflammatory cytokines are increased in kidney transplant patients with HLA-DSA, even in the absence of histology of rejection. These observations challenge the concept that histology is the gold standard for identification of ongoing allo-immune activation after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Van Loon
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baptiste Lamarthée
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Barba
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sandra Claes
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Henriette de Loor
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Priyanka Koshy
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul Proost
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Claire Tinel
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominique Schols
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guo L, Shen J, Lei W, Yan P, Wang M, Zhou Q, Wang H, Wu J, Chen J, Wang R. Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Levels Are Associated With the Inflammatory Burden and Macrophage Extracellular Trap Activity in Renal Allografts. Front Immunol 2022; 13:796326. [PMID: 35386710 PMCID: PMC8977515 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.796326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have confirmed the role of plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) as a reliable non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury after kidney transplantation. Whereas the variability of plasma ddcfDNA levels among recipients has limited their clinical use. This study aimed to explore the intrinsic factors associated with plasma ddcfDNA elevation by investigating the impact of Banff lesions and inflammatory infiltrates on ddcfDNA levels in kidney transplant recipients. From March 2017 to September 2019, a total of 106 kidney transplant recipients with matched allograft biopsies were included, consisting of 13 recipients with normal/nonspecific changes, 13 recipients with borderline changes, 60 with T cell-mediated rejection, and 20 with antibody-mediated rejection. Histologic classification was performed according to the Banff 2017 criteria by two experienced pathologists. Plasma ddcfDNA fractions ranged from 0.12% to 10.22%, with a median level of 0.91%. Banff histology subelements including glomerulitis, intimal arteritis, and severe interstitial inflammation were correlated with increased plasma ddcfDNA levels. The inflammatory cell infiltrate in the allografts was phenotyped by immunochemistry and automatically counted by digital image recognition. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between macrophage infiltrations in allografts and plasma ddcfDNA levels. Additionally, macrophage extracellular trap (MET) activity was significantly associated with the rise in plasma ddcfDNA levels. Our findings demonstrated that plasma ddcfDNA could reflect the inflammatory state in renal allografts and suggested the potential role of METs in the pathogenesis of allograft injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luying Guo
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Shen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenhua Lei
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pengpeng Yan
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Meifang Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huiping Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianyong Wu
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rending Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Hangzhou, China.,National Key Clinical Department of Kidney Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephrology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Early Experience Using Donor-derived Cell-free DNA for Surveillance of Rejection Following Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1321. [PMID: 35415217 PMCID: PMC8989777 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Allograft biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing graft rejection following simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant. Intraperitoneal biopsies are technically challenging and can be burdensome to patients and the healthcare system. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is well-studied in kidney transplant recipients; however, it has not yet been studied in the SPK population. Methods. We hypothesized that dd-cfDNA could be utilized for rejection surveillance following SPK transplant. We prospectively collected dd-cfDNA in 46 SPK patients at a single institution. Results. There were 10 rejection events, 5 of which were confirmed with biopsy. The other 5 were treated based on dd-cfDNA and clinical data alone with favorable outcomes. Among all patients who did not have rejection, 97% had dd-cfDNA <0.5%. Dd-cfDNA may also help differentiate rejection from graft injury (ie, pancreatitis) with median values in rejection 2.25%, injury 0.36%, and quiescence 0.18% (P = 0.0006). Conclusions. Similar to kidneys, dd-cfDNA shows promise for rejection surveillance in SPK transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Huang E, Jordan SC. Donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation: evolving concepts and potential limitations. Kidney Int 2022; 101:676-677. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
29
|
Al Jurdi A, Gassen RB, Borges TJ, Solhjou Z, Hullekes FE, Lape IT, Efe O, Alghamdi A, Patel P, Choi JY, Mohammed MT, Bohan B, Pattanayak V, Rosales I, Cravedi P, Kotton CN, Azzi JR, Riella LV. Non-Invasive Monitoring for Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients After SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination. Front Immunol 2022; 13:838985. [PMID: 35281011 PMCID: PMC8913529 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.838985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Studies have shown reduced antiviral responses in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, but data on post-vaccination alloimmune responses and antiviral responses against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant are limited. Materials and methods To address this issue, we conducted a prospective, multi-center study of 58 adult KTRs receiving mRNA-BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines. We used multiple complementary non-invasive biomarkers for rejection monitoring including serum creatinine, proteinuria, donor-derived cell-free DNA, peripheral blood gene expression profile (PBGEP), urinary CXCL9 mRNA and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Secondary outcomes included development of anti-viral immune responses against the wild-type and Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. Results At a median of 85 days, no KTRs developed de novo DSAs and only one patient developed acute rejection following recent conversion to belatacept, which was associated with increased creatinine and urinary CXCL9 levels. During follow-up, there were no significant changes in proteinuria, donor-derived cell-free DNA levels or PBGEP. 36% of KTRs in our cohort developed anti-wild-type spike antibodies, 75% and 55% of whom had neutralizing responses against wild-type and Delta variants respectively. A cellular response against wild-type S1, measured by interferon-γ-ELISpot assay, developed in 38% of KTRs. Cellular responses did not differ in KTRs with or without antibody responses. Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in KTRs did not elicit a significant alloimmune response. About half of KTRs who develop anti-wild-type spike antibodies after two mRNA vaccine doses have neutralizing responses against the Delta variant. There was no association between anti-viral humoral and cellular responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Al Jurdi
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rodrigo B Gassen
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thiago J Borges
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Zhabiz Solhjou
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Frank E Hullekes
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Isadora T Lape
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Orhan Efe
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Areej Alghamdi
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Poojan Patel
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Y Choi
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mostafa T Mohammed
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Clinical Pathology Department, Minia University, Minya, Egypt
| | - Brigid Bohan
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Vikram Pattanayak
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jamil R Azzi
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lum EL, Lee S, Zuckerman J, Bunnapradist S. Subclinical non-HLA AMR detection and monitoring with surveillance dd-cfDNA in a kidney transplant recipient. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
31
|
Lewis D, Glehn-Ponsirenas R, Gulbahce N, Hooey LJ, Chaffin JM, Miles J, Woodward R, Duarte S, Beduschi T, Zarrinpar A. High levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA in a case of graft-versus-host-disease following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:973-976. [PMID: 34825479 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after solid organ transplantation is made difficult by its variable clinical presentation and lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers to evaluate the immune state of transplant recipients. Emerging noninvasive diagnostic techniques like the quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for surveillance may improve the current standard-of-care. Herein, we report the use of this methodology in a patient with GVHD and corresponding levels of dd-cfDNA without any evidence of graft injury. Correlation of dd-cfDNA levels with the clinical course and its novel application here could lead to improvements in the rapid diagnosis of GVHD and in monitoring of response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Lewis
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Natali Gulbahce
- Research & Development Department, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California
| | - Leah J Hooey
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Joanna M Chaffin
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jake Miles
- Medical Affairs Department, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California
| | - Robert Woodward
- Research & Development Department, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California
| | - Sergio Duarte
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Thiago Beduschi
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lezoeva E, Nilsson J, Wüthrich R, Mueller TF, Schachtner T. High PIRCHE Scores May Allow Risk Stratification of Borderline Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2022; 13:788818. [PMID: 35250973 PMCID: PMC8894244 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.788818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnosis of borderline rejection (BLR) ranges from mild inflammation to clinically significant TCMR and is associated with an increased risk of allograft dysfunction. Currently, there is no consensus regarding its treatment due in part to a lack of biomarkers to identify cases with increased risk for immune-mediated injury. Methods We identified 60 of 924 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with isolated and untreated BLR. We analyzed the impact of predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) score on future rejection, de novo DSA development, and recovery to baseline allograft function. Additionally, we compared the outcomes of different Banff rejection phenotypes. Results Total PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs with BLR compared to the entire study population (p=0.016). Among KTRs with BLR total PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs who developed TCMR/ABMR in follow-up biopsies (p=0.029). Notably, the most significant difference was found in PIRCHE scores for the HLA-A locus (p=0.010). PIRCHE scores were not associated with the development of de novo DSA or recovery to baseline allograft function among KTRs with BLR (p>0.05). However, KTRs under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were more likely to develop de novo DSA (p=0.033) than those with tacrolimus, whereas KTRs undergoing retransplantation were less likely to recover to baseline allograft function (p=0.003). Conclusions High PIRCHE scores put KTRs with BLR at an increased risk for future TCMR/ABMR and contribute to improved immunological risk stratification. The benefit of anti-rejection treatment, however, needs to be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Lezoeva
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rudolf Wüthrich
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F. Mueller
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Thomas Schachtner, ; orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-4798
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Westphal SG, Mannon RB. Emerging biomarkers in kidney transplantation and challenge of clinical implementation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:15-21. [PMID: 34939960 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite improvement in short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation, long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Conventional biomarkers are limited in their ability to reliably identify early immunologic and nonimmunologic injury. Novel biomarkers are needed for noninvasive diagnosis of subclinical injury, prediction of response to treatment, and personalization of the care of kidney transplant recipients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent biotechnological advances have led to the discovery of promising molecular biomarker candidates. However, translating potential biomarkers from bench to clinic is challenging, and many potential biomarkers are abandoned prior to clinical implementation. Despite these challenges, several promising urine, blood, and tissue novel molecular biomarkers have emerged and are approaching incorporation into clinical practice. SUMMARY This article highlights the challenges in adopting biomarker-driven posttransplant management and reviews several promising emerging novel biomarkers that are approaching clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Westphal
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Complements De Novo Class II DSA in Detecting Late Alloimmune Injury Post Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1285. [PMID: 35187211 PMCID: PMC8806361 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
35
|
Nie W, Su X, Liu L, Li J, Fu Q, Li X, Wu C, Wang J, Deng R, Chen E, Yang S, Li S, Zhang H, Wang C. Dynamics of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA at the Early Phase After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:814517. [PMID: 35071284 PMCID: PMC8777035 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.814517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) has been suggested as an indicator of allograft injury in adult and pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx). However, the dynamics of ddcfDNA in pediatric KTx have not been investigated. In addition, it has not been demonstrated whether donor-recipient (D/R) size mismatch affect ddcfDNA level. Methods: Pediatric KTx recipients with a single donor kidney were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. ddcfDNA, calculated as a fraction (%) in the recipient plasma, was examined longitudinally within 3 months post-transplant. D/R size mismatch degree was described as D/R height ratio. The 33rd percentile of D/R height ratio (0.70) was used as the cut-off to divide the patients into low donor-recipient height ratio group (<0.70) and high donor-recipient height ratio group (≥0.70). The dynamics of ddcfDNA were analyzed and the impact factors were explored. Stable ddcfDNA was defined as the first lowest ddcfDNA. ddcfDNA flare-up was defined as a remarkable elevation by a proportion of >30% from stable value with a peak value >1% during elevation. Results: Twenty-one clinically stable recipients were enrolled. The median D/R height ratio was 0.83 (0.62–0.88). It took a median of 8 days for ddcfDNA to drop from day 1 and reach a stable value of 0.67% (0.46–0.73%). Nevertheless, 61.5% patients presented ddcfDNA>1% at day 30. Besides, 81.0% (17/21) of patients experienced elevated ddcfDNA and 47.6% (10/21) met the standard of ddcfDNA flare-up. Donor-recipient height ratio was an independent risk factor for ddcfDNA flare-up (odds ratio = 0.469 per 0.1, 95% CI 0.237–0.925, p = 0.029) and low donor-recipient height ratio (<0.70) was found to increase the risk of flare-up occurrence (odds ratio = 15.00, 95% CI 1.342–167.638, p = 0.028). Conclusions: ddcfDNA rebounds in many stable pediatric KTx recipients without rejection. This may be induced by significant D/R size mismatch and may affect its diagnostic performance at the early phase after pediatric KTx in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijian Nie
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xirui Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiali Wang
- Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ronghai Deng
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - E Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shicong Yang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shujuan Li
- Department of Cardiovascular Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yatim KM, Azzi JR. Novel Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:2-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
37
|
Bu L, Gupta G, Pai A, Anand S, Stites E, Moinuddin I, Bowers V, Jain P, Axelrod DA, Weir MR, Wolf-Doty TK, Zeng J, Tian W, Qu K, Woodward R, Dholakia S, De Golovine A, Bromberg JS, Murad H, Alhamad T. Validation and clinical outcome in assessing donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring insights of kidney allografts with longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study. Kidney Int 2021; 101:793-803. [PMID: 34953773 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The use of routine monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) after kidney transplant may allow clinicians to identify subclinical allograft injury and intervene prior to development of clinically evident graft injury. To evaluate this, data from 1092 kidney transplant recipients monitored for dd-cfDNA over a three year period was analyzed to assess the association of dd-cfDNA with histologic evidence of allograft rejection. Elevation of dd-cfDNA (0.5% or more) was significantly correlated with clinical and subclinical allograft rejection. dd-cfDNA values of 0.5% or more were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in risk development of de novo donor specific antibodies (hazard ratio 2.71) and were determined to be elevated a median of 91 days (inter quartile range of 30-125 days) ahead of donor specific antibody identification. Persistently elevated dd-cfDNA (more than one result above the 0.5% threshold) predicted over a 25% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over three years (hazard ratio 1.97). Therefore, routine monitoring of dd-cfDNA allowed early identification of clinically important graft injury. Biomarker monitoring complemented histology and traditional laboratory surveillance strategies as a prognostic marker and risk-stratification tool post-transplant. Thus, persistently low dd-cfDNA levels may accurately identify allograft quiescence, or absence of injury, paving the way for personalization of immunosuppression trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Akshta Pai
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Memorial Hermann Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chang JH, Alvarado Verduzco H, Toma K, Sritharan S, Mohan S, Husain SA. Donor-derived cell-free DNA and renal allograft rejection in surveillance biopsies and indication biopsies. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14561. [PMID: 34913202 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the role of circulating dd-cfDNA in allograft surveillance in immunologically high-risk patients, a retrospective cross-sectional study of 261 kidney transplant recipients who underwent outpatient allograft biopsy at our center between September 2020 and August 2021 was performed. Of the 236 dd-cfDNA results included, 37 samples were obtained at the time of a surveillance biopsy in sensitized recipients and 199 at the time of a clinically indicated biopsy. The median serum creatinine at the time of the biopsy was 1.3 mg/dl and 2.1 mg/dl for surveillance biopsies and clinically indicated biopsies, respectively (p<0.001). Rejection was diagnosed in 27% of surveillance biopsies and 29% of clinically indicated biopsies. Among surveillance biopsies, sensitivity and specificity to detect rejection were 0% and 89%, respectively, and among clinically indicated biopsies they were 28% and 96%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity to detect antibody-mediated rejection were 0% and 91% among surveillance biopsies and 50% and 94% among clinically indicated biopsies. Nine biopsies without rejection findings had corresponding dd-cfDNA of ≥1%. Our data does not support dd-cfDNA as a biomarker for kidney allograft rejection, even in immunologically high-risk patients in the absence of graft dysfunction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Hyung Chang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hector Alvarado Verduzco
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Katherine Toma
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sharlinee Sritharan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, United States
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Loupy A, Mengel M, Haas M. 30 years of the International Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology: The Past, Present and Future of Kidney Transplant Diagnostics. Kidney Int 2021; 101:678-691. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
40
|
Chopra B, Sureshkumar KK. Emerging role of cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. World J Exp Med 2021; 11:55-65. [PMID: 34877265 PMCID: PMC8611196 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v11.i5.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Monitoring kidney transplants for rejection conventionally includes serum creatinine, immunosuppressive drug levels, proteinuria, and donor-specific antibody (DSA). Serum creatinine is a late marker of allograft injury, and the predictive ability of DSA regarding risk of rejection is variable. Histological analysis of an allograft biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing rejection but is invasive, inconvenient, and carries risk of complications. There has been a long quest to find a perfect biomarker that noninvasively predicts tissue injury caused by rejection at an early stage, so that diagnosis and treatment could be pursued without delay in order to minimize irreversible damage to the allograft. In this review, we discuss relatively novel research on identifying biomarkers of tissue injury, specifically elaborating on donor-derived cell-free DNA, and its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavna Chopra
- Nephrology and Hypertension, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Kalathil K Sureshkumar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United State
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jerič Kokelj B, Štalekar M, Vencken S, Dobnik D, Kogovšek P, Stanonik M, Arnol M, Ravnikar M. Feasibility of Droplet Digital PCR Analysis of Plasma Cell-Free DNA From Kidney Transplant Patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:748668. [PMID: 34692738 PMCID: PMC8531215 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.748668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing research demonstrates the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a biomarker for monitoring the health of various solid organ transplants. Several methods have been proposed for cfDNA analysis, including real-time PCR, digital PCR, and next generation sequencing-based approaches. We sought to revise the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based approach to quantify relative dd-cfDNA in plasma from kidney transplant (KTx) patients using a novel pilot set of assays targeting single nucleotide polymorphisms that have a very high potential to distinguish cfDNA from two individuals. The assays are capable of accurate quantification of down to 0.1% minor allele content when analyzing 165 ng of human DNA. We found no significant differences in the yield of extracted cfDNA using the three different commercial kits tested. More cfDNA was extracted from the plasma of KTx patients than from healthy volunteers, especially early after transplantation. The median level of donor-derived minor alleles in KTx samples was 0.35%. We found that ddPCR using the evaluated assays within specific range is suitable for analysis of KTx patients' plasma but recommend prior genotyping of donor DNA and performing reliable preamplification of cfDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Jerič Kokelj
- Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Štalekar
- Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - David Dobnik
- Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Polona Kogovšek
- Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Ravnikar
- Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jackson AM, Amato-Menker C, Bettinotti M. Cell-free DNA diagnostics in transplantation utilizing next generation sequencing. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:850-858. [PMID: 34600770 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to interrogate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a transplant diagnostic provides a crucial step in improving the accuracy of post-transplant monitoring of allograft health. cfDNA interrogation provides a powerful, yet minimally invasive, biomarker for disease and tissue injury. cfDNA can be isolated from a variety of body fluids and analyzed using bioinformatics to unlock its origins. Furthermore, cfDNA characteristics can reveal the mechanisms and conditions under which it was generated and released. In transplantation, donor-derived cfDNA monitoring provides a tool for identifying active allograft injury at the time of transplant, infection, and rejection. Multiple detection and interrogation methods for cfDNA detection are now being evaluated for clinical validity and hold the promise to provide minimally invasive, quantitative, and reproducible measures of allograft injury across organ types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette M Jackson
- Duke University, Department of Surgery, DUMC Box 2645, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Carly Amato-Menker
- West Virginia University, Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Maria Bettinotti
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Pathology, 2041 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Burke RM, Dale BL, Dholakia S. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Relevance in Solid Organ Transplantation. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms221910721. [PMID: 34639062 PMCID: PMC8509131 DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The NOD, LRR, and pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) protein has been established as a central component of the inflammasome and regulates the inflammatory response to a myriad of environmental, microbial, and endogenous danger stimuli. Assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome results in the cleavage and activation of caspase-1, in turn causing release of the pro-inflammatory interleukins 1-beta and 18. This activation response, while crucial to coordinated innate immune defense, can be aberrantly activated by the likes of cell-free DNA, and cause significant autoimmune pathology. Complications of autoimmunity induced by aberrant NLRP3 inflammasome activation have a great degree of mechanistic crossover with alloimmune injury in solid organ transplant, and stratagems to neutralize NLRP3 inflammasome activation may prove beneficial in solid organ transplant management. This article reviews NLRP3 inflammasome biology and the pathology associated with its hyperactivation, as well as the connections between NLRP3 inflammasome activation and allograft homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M. Burke
- CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA 94080, USA; (R.M.B.); (B.L.D.)
| | | | - Shamik Dholakia
- CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA 94080, USA; (R.M.B.); (B.L.D.)
- Oxford Transplant Center, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ehlayel A, Simms KJA, Ashoor IF. Emerging monitoring technologies in kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2021; 36:3077-3087. [PMID: 33523298 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-04929-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive technologies to monitor kidney allograft health utilizing high-throughput assays of blood and urine specimens are emerging out of the research realm and slowly becoming part of everyday clinical practice. HLA epitope analysis and eplet mismatch score determination promise a more refined approach to the pre-transplant recipient-donor HLA matching that may lead to reduced rejection risk. High-resolution HLA typing and multiplex single antigen bead assays are identifying potential new offending HLA antibody subtypes. There is increasing recognition of the deleterious role non-HLA antibodies play in post-transplant outcomes. Donor-derived cell-free DNA detected by next-generation sequencing is a promising biomarker for kidney transplant rejection. Multi-omics techniques are shedding light on discrete genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic signatures that correlate with and predict allograft outcomes. Over the next decade, a comprehensive approach to optimize kidney matching and monitor transplant recipients for acute and chronic graft dysfunction will likely involve a combination of those emerging technologies summarized in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulla Ehlayel
- Children's Hospital New Orleans, 200 Henry Clay Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA
| | - K'joy J A Simms
- Children's Hospital New Orleans, 200 Henry Clay Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA
| | - Isa F Ashoor
- Children's Hospital New Orleans, 200 Henry Clay Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, LSU Health New Orleans, 200 Henry Clay Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Akalin E, Weir MR, Bunnapradist S, Brennan DC, Delos Santos R, Langone A, Djamali A, Xu H, Jin X, Dholakia S, Woodward RN, Bromberg JS. Clinical Validation of an Immune Quiescence Gene Expression Signature in Kidney Transplantation. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:1998-2009. [PMID: 35419538 PMCID: PMC8986041 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0005062021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite advances in immune suppression, kidney allograft rejection and other injuries remain a significant clinical concern, particularly with regards to long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of immune activity can provide information about rejection status and help guide interventions to extend allograft life. Here, we describe the validation of a blood gene expression classifier developed to differentiate immune quiescence from both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Methods A five-gene classifier (DCAF12, MARCH8, FLT3, IL1R2, and PDCD1) was developed on 56 peripheral blood samples and validated on two sample sets independent of the training cohort. The primary validation set comprised 98 quiescence samples and 18 rejection samples: seven TCMR, ten ABMR, and one mixed rejection. The second validation set included eight quiescence and 11 rejection samples: seven TCMR, two ABMR, and two mixed rejection. AlloSure donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was also evaluated. Results AlloMap Kidney classifier scores in the primary validation set differed significantly between quiescence (median, 9.49; IQR, 7.68-11.53) and rejection (median, 13.09; IQR, 11.25-15.28), with P<0.001. In the second validation set, the cohorts were statistically different (P=0.03) and the medians were similar to the primary validation set. The AUC for discriminating rejection from quiescence was 0.786 for the primary validation and 0.800 for the second validation. AlloMap Kidney results were not significantly correlated with AlloSure, although both were elevated in rejection. The ability to discriminate rejection from quiescence was improved when AlloSure and AlloMap Kidney were used together (AUC, 0.894). Conclusion Validation of AlloMap Kidney demonstrated the ability to differentiate between rejection and immune quiescence using a range of scores. The diagnostic performance suggests that assessment of the mechanisms of immunologic activity is complementary to allograft injury information derived from AlloSure dd-cfDNA. Together, these biomarkers offer a more comprehensive assessment of allograft health and immune quiescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enver Akalin
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Matthew R. Weir
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel C. Brennan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rowena Delos Santos
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anthony Langone
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Specialties Clinic, Veteran Affairs Hospital Renal Transplant Program, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Hua Xu
- Research and Development, CareDx, Brisbane, California
| | - Xia Jin
- Research and Development, CareDx, Brisbane, California
| | - Sham Dholakia
- Medical Affairs, CareDx, South San Francisco, California
| | | | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Garg N, Mandelbrot DA, Parajuli S, Aziz F, Astor BC, Chandraker A, Djamali A. The clinical value of donor-derived cell-free DNA measurements in kidney transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100649. [PMID: 34507254 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Early diagnosis is critical to minimizing the damage rejection can do to the transplanted kidney. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) represents non-encapsulated fragmented DNA that is continuously shed into the bloodstream from the allograft undergoing injury, with a half-life of about 30 min. This article reviews the available evidence regarding the diagnostic value of dd-cfDNA in kidney transplantation, as a result of which two assays, Allosure and Prospera, have garnered Medicare approval. We provide information on important scenarios and contexts including antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell mediated rejection, pre-test probability of rejection, timing of the test, repeat transplants, and background cell-free DNA levels to help our understanding of the test characteristics and utility of these assays in clinical practice. Data on multimodality assays including gene expression profiles and serial monitoring of dd-cfDNA in high risk situations are emerging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neetika Garg
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Brad C Astor
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Anil Chandraker
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA to Diagnose Graft Rejection Post-Transplant: Past, Present and Future. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2030034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a non-invasive biomarker that is more sensitive and specific towards diagnosing any graft injury or rejection. Due to its applicability over all transplanted organs irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, and the non-requirement of a donor sample, it emerges as a new gold standard for graft health and rejection monitoring. Published research articles describing the role and efficiency of dd-cfDNA were identified and scrutinized to acquire a brief understanding of the history, evolution, emergence, role, efficiency, and applicability of dd-cfDNA in the field of transplantation. The dd-cfDNA can be quantified using quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, and droplet digital PCR, and there is a commendatory outcome in terms of diagnosing graft injury and monitoring graft health. The increased levels of dd-cfDNA can diagnose the rejection prior to any other presently used biochemistry or immunological assay methods. Biopsies are performed when these tests show any signs of injury and/or rejection. Therefore, by the time these tests predict and show any unusual or improper activity of the graft, the graft is already damaged by almost 50%. This review elucidates the evolution, physiology, techniques, limitations, and prospects of dd-cfDNA as a biomarker for post-transplant graft damage and rejection.
Collapse
|
48
|
Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury. Nat Rev Nephrol 2021; 17:591-603. [PMID: 34031575 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-021-00428-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, the use of minimally invasive damage biomarkers that are more sensitive and specific than plasma creatinine will be crucial to enable early, actionable detection or exclusion of structural kidney damage due to acute or chronic rejection. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), which can be quantified, for example, through next-generation sequencing, droplet digital PCR and quantitative PCR, is a candidate biomarker with great potential for enabling comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury. dd-cfDNA has a favourable overall diagnostic performance for the detection of rejection and its high negative predictive value might be especially useful for avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels have been shown to be detectable before graft injury can be clinically identified using current diagnostic methods. Moreover, dd-cfDNA falls rapidly to baseline levels after successful treatment for rejection owing to its short half-life. dd-cfDNA can detect graft injury caused by immune activation owing to insufficient immunosuppression and might therefore also help guide immunosuppression dosing. The fractional abundance of dd-cfDNA can be affected by changes in the recipient cfDNA (for example, due to infection or physical exercise) but the use of absolute quantification of dd-cfDNA overcomes this limitation. Serial dd-cfDNA determinations might therefore facilitate cost-effective personalized clinical management of kidney transplant recipients to reduce premature graft loss.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lum EL, Nieves-Borrero K, Homkrailas P, Lee S, Danovitch G, Bunnapradist S. Title: Single center experience comparing two clinically available donor derived cell free DNA tests and review of literature. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2021.100079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
50
|
Mayer KA, Doberer K, Tillgren A, Viard T, Haindl S, Krivanec S, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Eder M, Eskandary F, Casas S, Wahrmann M, Regele H, Böhmig GA. Diagnostic value of donor-derived cell-free DNA to predict antibody-mediated rejection in donor-specific antibody-positive renal allograft recipients. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1689-1702. [PMID: 34448270 PMCID: PMC8456909 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Circulating donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) do not necessarily indicate antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) as an add‐on to DSA detection. The study included two independent cohorts of DSA+ kidney allograft recipients, 45 subclinical cases identified by cross‐sectional antibody screening (cohort 1), and 30 recipients subjected to indication biopsies (cohort 2). About 50% of the DSA+ recipients had ABMR and displayed higher dd‐cfDNA levels than DSA+ABMR− recipients (cohort 1: 1.90% [median; IQR: 0.78–3.90%] vs. 0.52% [0.35–0.72%]; P < 0.001); (cohort 2: 1.20% [0.82–2.50%] vs. 0.59% [0.28–2.05%]; P = 0.086). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 and 0.69 for dd‐cfDNA, and 0.88 and 0.77 for DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), respectively. In combined models, adding dd‐cfDNA to DSA‐MFI or vice versa significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy. Limited diagnostic performance of dd‐cfDNA in cohort 2 was related to the frequent finding of other types of graft injury among ABMR− recipients, like T cell‐mediated rejection or glomerulonephritis. For dd‐cfDNA in relation to injury of any cause an AUC of 0.97 was calculated. Monitoring of dd‐cfDNA in DSA+ patients may be a useful tool to detect ABMR and other types of injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Susanne Haindl
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sebastian Krivanec
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Eder
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Casas
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Markus Wahrmann
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinz Regele
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|