Is COVID-19 infection more severe in kidney transplant recipients?

Humoral responses to multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants after two doses of vaccine in kidney transplant patients

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to millions of fatalities globally. Kidney transplant (KT) patients, given their comorbidities and under immunosuppressant drugs, are identified as a high-risk group. Though vaccination remains pivotal for pandemic control, some studies indicate that KT exhibits diminished immune reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Therefore, evaluating the vaccine responses in KT, especially the humoral responses against emergent variants is crucial.Methods: We developed a multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 variant protein microarray, incorporating the extracellular domain (ECD) and the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike proteins from the variants. This was employed to investigate the collective humoral responses after administering two doses of mRNA-1273 and AZD1222 vaccines in KT under immunosuppressive drugs and in healthy controls.Results: After two doses of either mRNA-1273 or AZD1222, the KT generally showed lower surrogate neutralizing and total antibodies against spike ECD in multiple variants compared to healthy controls. Although two doses of mRNA-1273 induced 1.5-2 fold more surrogate neutralizing and total antibodies than AZD1222 in healthy controls, the KT subjects with two doses of mRNA-1273 generally exhibited higher surrogate neutralizing but similar total antibodies against spike ECD in multiple variants. There were moderate to high correlations between the surrogate neutralizing and total antibodies against spike ECDs.Conclusion: This study offers pivotal insights into the relative vulnerability of KT concerning humoral immunity and the evolving mutations of SARS-CoV-2. Such findings are useful for evaluating vaccine responses and recommending vaccine episodes for KT.

Safety and infectious outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant recipients after COVID-19 vaccination: A pediatric nephrology research consortium study

BACKGROUND

Adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) fully vaccinated against COVID-19 have substantial morbidity and mortality related to SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population. However, little is known regarding the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccination series in pediatric KTRs.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective observational study was performed across nine pediatric transplantation centers. Eligible KTRs fully vaccinated against COVID-19 were enrolled and data were collected pertaining to SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence and severity, graft outcomes and post-vaccination safety profile, as well as overall patient survival.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were included in this investigation with a median age at transplantation of 11 years (IQR 5-15). SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in 30/110 (27.27%) of fully vaccinated patients, tested post-transplant, within the defined follow-up period. Of these patients, 6/30 (18.18%) required hospitalization and 3/30 (12.12%) required reduction in immunosuppression, with no reported deaths. De novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were found in 8/86 (9.30%) of DSA-tested patients with two experiencing rejection and subsequent graft loss. The overall incidence of rejection and graft loss among the total cohort was 11/247 (4.45%) and 6/247 (3.64%), respectively. A 100% patient survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Observationally, infectious outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 in fully vaccinated pediatric KTRs are excellent, with a low incidence of infection requiring hospitalization and no associated deaths. Though de novo DSAs were observed, there was minimal graft rejection and graft loss reported in the total cohort.

ARDS in solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 based on the 2023 new definition

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are more likely to suffer complications after being infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the clinical features of SOTRs infected with SARS-CoV-2 and to assess independent risk factors associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following COVID-19 infection in SOTRs based on the new ARDS definition.

METHODS

358 SOTRs infected with SARS-CoV-2 were recruited and divided into two groups, patients with ARDS (n = 81) and patients without ARDS (n = 277). Demographic data, initial laboratory findings, therapeutic measures, and outcome indicators were compared between the two groups. The association between the onset of ARDS and related factors was analyzed using a logistic regression model. A nomogram was created to estimate the probability of developing ARDS.

RESULTS

Approximately 22.6 % (81/358) of hospitalized SOTRs infected with SARS-CoV-2 developed ARDS. In comparison to patients without ARDS, those with ARDS presented with more underlying conditions, decreased lymphocyte counts and serum albumin levels, but increased levels of leukocytes, serum creatinine, nitrogen urea, uric acid, and inflammatory markers. Cerebrovascular disease, leukocyte counts, albumin levels, and IL-6 levels were independent risk factors for the development of ARDS in this population. Furthermore, a nomogram prediction model was created utilizing the aforementioned factors to facilitate early prediction of ARDS, exhibiting an AUC (area under curve) of 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebrovascular disease, leukocyte counts, albumin levels, and IL-6 levels were independent risk factors for the development of ARDS following COVID-19 infection in SOTRs.

Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Subgenomic RNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Remdesivir

INTRODUCTION

There is no reliable microbiological marker to guide responses to antiviral treatment in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the dynamics of subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR before and after receiving treatment with remdesivir compared with genomic RNA (gRNA) RT-PCR and its use as a surrogate marker of viral replication.

METHODS

We analyzed gRNA and sgRNA at baseline and after remdesivir treatment in KTR who received remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 infection from November 2021 to February 2022.

RESULTS

Thirty-four KTR received remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median time since transplantation was 80 months (IQR 3-321) and 75% of patients had previously received 3 doses of a mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Three patients (8%) were classified with mild, 25 (73%) with moderate, and 6 (17%) with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirty-two (94%) patients received 5 doses of remdesivir and two patients received 2 doses. The median time between symptom onset to remdesivir treatment was 5 days (IQR 3-8.5). The median days of hospitalization were 6 (IQR 2-112). gRNA was positive in all patients at baseline and after remdesivir. Five (15%) patients had negative sgRNA at baseline and 20 (59%) after receiving remdesivir. Patients presenting with negative sgRNA at baseline were discharged from hospital in ≤ 6 days without complications. Moreover, those with negative sgRNA after remdesivir therapy did not require ICU admission and had favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, patients with positive sgRNA after antiviral treatment presented worse outcomes, with 47% requiring ICU admission and the three (9%) recorded deaths in the study were in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, we hypothesize that sgRNA may have clinical utility to help monitor virologic response more accurately than gRNA in KTR who receive remdesivir. Moreover, patients with negative sgRNA at baseline may not require antiviral treatment and others presenting positive sgRNA at day 5 could benefit from prolonged or combined therapies.

SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies, B Cell and T Cell Immune Responses after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 is essential for vulnerable solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients who are at risk of infection. However, there are concerns about suboptimal immunogenicity, especially in humoral immunity (HMI), and limited exploration of cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses. The primary objective of this study was to assess the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in SOT recipients. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors that affect immunogenicity and adverse events (AEs) following immunization in SOT recipients.

METHODS

All adult SOT recipients who received the two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine at a 12-week interval underwent measurements of HMI by evaluating anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels and CMI by investigating SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses before and after complete vaccination, around 2-4 weeks post-vaccination, and compared to controls. AEs were monitored in all participants.

RESULTS

The study included 63 SOT recipients: 44 kidney recipients, 16 liver recipients, and 3 heart transplant recipients, along with 11 immunocompetent controls. Among SOT recipients, 36% were female, and the median (IQR) age was 52 (42-61). The median (IQR) time since transplant was 55 (28-123) months. After the second dose, the median (IQR) anti-RBD antibody levels were significantly lower in SOT recipients compared to those in the control group (8.3 [0.4-46.0] vs. 272.2 [178.1-551.6] BAU/mL, p < 0.01). This resulted in a seroconversion rate (anti-RBD antibody > 7.1 BAU/mL) of 51% among SOT recipients and 100% among controls (p = 0.008). Receiving the vaccine beyond one year post-transplant significantly affected seroconversion (OR 9.04, 95% CI 1.04-78.56, p = 0.046), and low-dose mycophenolic acid marginally affected seroconversion (OR 2.67, 95% CI 0.89-7.96, p = 0.079). RBD-specific B cell responses were also significantly lower compared to those in the control group (0 [0-4] vs. 10 [6-22] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.001). Similarly, S1- and SNMO-specific T cell responses were significantly lower compared to those in the control group (48 [16-128] vs. 216 [132-356] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.004 and 20 [4-48] vs. 92 [72-320] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.004). AEs were generally mild and spontaneously resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

SOT recipients who received the full two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine demonstrated significantly diminished HMI and CMI responses compared to immunocompetent individuals. Consideration should be given to administering additional vaccine doses or optimizing immunosuppressant regimens during vaccination (Thai Clinical Trial Registry: TCTR20210523002).

The humoral immune response to the BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatrics on renal replacement therapy

INTRODUCTION

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, data published on the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatric patients receiving renal replacement therapy are scant. Our primary objective is to study this population's humoral immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine.

METHODS

Pediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTRs) and hemodialysis recipients (HR) at our center who received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine were included. Transplant and HR who had PCR-positive COVID-19 infections during the study, regardless of their vaccine status, were also included. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein (S1/S2) IgG was measured after the second dose of the vaccine and after any PCR-positive COVID-19 infection as routine clinical practice. Data on demographics, induction, maintenance immunosuppressants, type of transplant, and posttransplant or dialysis duration were included.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients included, 19 were dialysis recipients who received two doses of vaccine without subsequent infection (HV), and 42 were kidney transplant recipients. All dialysis patients and 33 (78.6%) transplant recipients received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162b2 vaccine. A total of 33.3% (11/33) of the transplant recipients who received vaccination developed COVID-19 infection (KTH) at a median time of 13 days after the second dose of vaccine. Nine transplant patients had pure COVID-19 infection without vaccination (KTI). The seroconversion rate in the HV group was 94.7% (18/19) compared to 50% (11/22) in the kidney transplant vaccine recipients who did not develop subsequent COVID-19 infection (KTV) (p < .001). The median S1/S2 IgG titers for the HV group were 400 AU/mL versus 15 AU/mL in the KTV group (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in the duration of the test from the second dose of the vaccine between HV and KTV (55 vs. 33.5 days, p = .095). The KTH had higher titers than KTV group (370 vs. 15 p < .0001). The median duration of the test after vaccination in the vaccine group and those with hybrid immunity was similar (35 vs. 33.5 days, p = .2).There were no clear predictors for seroconversion in the PKTRs. Natural infection alone was as good as the vaccine in eliciting humoral immune response.

CONCLUSION

The humoral immune response to two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in PKTRs without subsequent COVID-19 infection is suboptimal compared to that in hemodialysis recipients and in PKTRs with hybrid immunity from both infection and vaccination.

Clinical Research in Renal Transplantation: A Bibliometric Perspective on a Half-century of Innovation and Progress

BACKGROUND

Groundbreaking biomedical research has transformed renal transplantation (RT) into a widespread clinical procedure that represents the mainstay of treatment for end-stage kidney failure today. Here, we aimed to provide a comprehensive bibliometric perspective on the last half-century of innovation in clinical RT.

METHODS

The Web of Science Core Collection was used for a comprehensive screening yielding 123 303 research items during a 50-y period (January 1973-October 2022). The final data set of the 200 most-cited articles was selected on the basis of a citation-based strategy aiming to minimize bias.

RESULTS

Studies on clinical and immunological outcomes (n = 63 and 48), registry-based epi research (n = 38), and randomized controlled trials (n = 35) dominated the data set. Lead US authors have signed 110 of 200 articles. The overall level of evidence was high, with 84% of level1 and -2 reports. Highest numbers of these articles were published in New England Journal of Medicine , Transplantation , and American Journal of Transplantation. Increasing trend was observed in the number of female authors in the postmillennial era (26% versus 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights important trends in RT research of the past half-century. This bibliometric perspective identifies the most intensively researched areas and shift of research interests over time; however, it also describes important imbalances in distribution of academic prolificacy based on topic, geographical aspects, and gender.

A prospective observational cohort study of covid-19 epidemiology and vaccine seroconversion in South Western Sydney, Australia, during the 2021-2022 pandemic period

BACKGROUND

It is known that COVID-19 disproportionally adversely affects the immunocompromised, including kidney transplant recipients (KTR), as compared to the general population. Risk factors for adverse outcomes and vaccine seroconversion patterns are not fully understood. Australia was uniquely positioned to reduce initial case numbers during the 2021-2022 pandemic period due to its relative isolation and several significant public health interventions. South-Western Sydney Local Heath District was one of the predominant regions affected.

METHODS

A single centre, prospective cohort study of prevalent renal transplant recipients was conducted between 25th July 2021 and 1st May 2022. Baseline characteristics, COVID-19 vaccination status, COVID-19 diagnosis and outcomes were determined from the electronic medical record, Australian vaccination register and Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Assessment of vaccine-induced seroconversion was assessed with ELISA in a subpopulation. Analysis was performed using SPSS v.28.

RESULTS

We identified 444 prevalent transplant recipients (60% male, 50% diabetic, median age 58 years (Interquartile range (IQR)21.0) and eGFR 56 ml/min/1.73m2 (IQR 21.9). COVID-19 was identified in 32% (n = 142) of patients, of which 38% (n = 54) required hospitalisation and 7% (n = 10) died. At least one COVID-19 vaccination was received by 95% (n = 423) with 17 (4%) patients remaining unvaccinated throughout the study period. Seroconversion after 2 and 3 doses of vaccine was 22% and 48% respectively. Increased COVID-19 related deaths were associated with older age (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.004-1.192, p = 0.040), smoking exposure (aOR 8.2, 05% CI 1.020-65.649, p = 0.048) and respiratory disease (aOR 14.2, 95%CI:1.825-110.930, p = 0.011) on multi-variable regression analysis. Receipt of three doses of vaccination was protective against acquiring COVID-19 (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.287-0.796, p = 0.005) and death (aOR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.007-0.523, p = 0.011), but not against hospitalisation (p = 0.32). Seroconversion was protective for acquiring COVID-19 on multi-variable regression independent of vaccination dose (aOR 0.1, 95%CI: 0.0025-0.523, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 was associated with a high mortality rate. Older age, respiratory disease and prior smoking exposure may be risk factors for increased mortality. Vaccination of 3 doses is protective against acquiring COVID-19 and death, however not hospitalisation. Antibody response is protective for acquiring COVID-19, however seroconversion rates are low.

Prevention and treatment strategies for kidney transplant recipients in the context of long-term existence of COVID-19

The sudden outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in early 2020 posed a massive threat to human life and caused an economic upheaval worldwide. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) became susceptible to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to their use of immunosuppressants, resulting in increased hospitalization and mortality rates. Although the current epidemic situation is alleviated, the long-term existence of COVID-19 still seriously threatens the life and health of KTRs with low immunity. The Omicron variant, a highly infectious but less-pathogenic strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has raised concerns among transplant physicians regarding managing KTRs diagnosed with this variant. However, currently, there are no clear and unified guidelines for caring for KTRs infected with this variant. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the ongoing research on drugs that can treat Omicron variant infections in KTRs and explore the potential of adjusting immunotherapy strategies to enhance their responsiveness to vaccines. Herein, we discuss the situation of KTRs since the emergence of COVID-19 and focus on various prevention and treatment strategies for KTRs since the Omicron variant outbreak. We hope to assist physicians in managing KTRs in the presence of long-term COVID-19 variants.

Preexisting renal graft dysfunction as a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant pneumonia: A postinfection cross-sectional study of 312 immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia poses significant challenges to health systems worldwide, particularly, in severe and critical cases. Immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients appear to be at a particularly high risk for severe or critical COVID-19 illness. However, few studies elucidated the risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A postinfection cross-sectional survey was conducted in 312 renal transplant recipients and 503 age- and sex-matched controls to explore risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The results showed that renal transplant recipients had a much higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (48.1%) after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant than controls (5.6%). The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis identified older age, lower creatinine clearance before infection, and higher dose of prednisone before infection as risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Preexisting renal dysfunction was a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, with an odds ratio of 3.27 (1.01-10.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Preexisting renal graft dysfunction was a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant pneumonia. It is suggested that high-risk renal transplant recipients should undergo computed tomography scanning within 14 days after infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Early pandemic in-hospital outcomes and mortality risk factors in COVID-19 solid organ transplant patients

Background

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of mortality than those without COVID-19. However, it is unclear how SOT patient outcomes compare to the general population without SOT who contract COVID-19.

Methods

We used the National Inpatient Sample from January to December 2020 to investigate inpatient outcomes seen in SOT recipients after contracting COVID-19 compared to nontransplant patients. We identified our study sample using ICD-10 CM and excluded those <18 years of age and those with dual organ transplants. Inpatient outcomes were compared in SOT and non-SOT COVID cohorts, and we further evaluated predictors of mortality in the SOT with COVID population.

Results

Out of the 1,416,445 COVID-19 admissions included in the study, 8315 (0.59%) were single SOT recipients. Our analysis that adjusted for multiple baseline characteristics and comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19 in SOT patients was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-3.02, P < 0.01), lower rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, P < 0.01), and similar rates of cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, circulatory shock, cerebrovascular events, and in-hospital mortality. Age >65 was associated with mortality in SOT patients.

Conclusion

In this nationally representative sample, SOT patients presenting with COVID-19 experienced similar rates of mortality compared to those without SOT. SOT patients were more likely to develop acute kidney injury. Further research is needed to understand the complex relationship between transplant patient outcomes and COVID-19.

Disparities in COVID-19 mortality amongst the immunosuppressed: A systematic review and meta-analysis for enhanced disease surveillance

BACKGROUND

Effective disease surveillance, including that for COVID-19, is compromised without a standardised method for categorising the immunosuppressed as a clinical risk group.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether excess COVID-associated mortality compared to the immunocompetent could meaningfully subdivide the immunosuppressed. Our study adhered to UK Immunisation against infectious disease (Green Book) criteria for defining and categorising immunosuppression. Using OVID (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Transplant Library, and Global Health), PubMed, and Google Scholar, we examined relevant literature between the entirety of 2020 and 2022. We selected for cohort studies that provided mortality data for immunosuppressed subgroups and immunocompetent comparators. Meta-analyses, grey literature and any original works that failed to provide comparator data or reported all-cause or paediatric outcomes were excluded. Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of COVID-19 mortality were meta-analysed by immunosuppressed category and subcategory. Subgroup analyses differentiated estimates by effect measure, country income, study setting, level of adjustment, use of matching and publication year. Study screening, extraction and bias assessment were performed blinded and independently by two researchers; conflicts were resolved with the oversight of a third researcher. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022360755.

FINDINGS

We identified 99 unique studies, incorporating data from 1,542,097 and 56,248,181 unique immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 infection, respectively. Compared to immunocompetent people (pooled OR, 95%CI), solid organ transplants (2.12, 1.50-2.99) and malignancy (2.02, 1.69-2.42) patients had a very high risk of COVID-19 mortality. Patients with rheumatological conditions (1.28, 1.13-1.45) and HIV (1.20, 1.05-1.36) had just slightly higher risks than the immunocompetent baseline. Case type, setting income and mortality data matching and adjustment were significant modifiers of excess immunosuppressed mortality for some immunosuppressed subgroups.

INTERPRETATION

Excess COVID-associated mortality among the immunosuppressed compared to the immunocompetent was seen to vary significantly across subgroups. This novel means of subdivision has prospective benefit for targeting patient triage, shielding and vaccination policies during periods of high disease transmission.

Increased Risk of Invasive Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Patients With Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Viral Shedding >8 Weeks, Retrospective Case-control Study

Background

Immunocompromised patients now represent the population most at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019. Persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral shedding was reported in these patients ranging from several weeks up to 9 months. We conducted a bicentric retrospective case-control study to identify risk and prognostic factors associated with persistent viral shedding in immunocompromised patients.

Material and Methods

Symptomatic immunocompromised adults with persistent SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding >8 weeks were retrospectively included between 1 March 2020 and 24 April 2022 at 2 university hospitals in Paris, France, and matched with a control group consisting of symptomatic immunocompromised patients without persistent viral shedding.

Results

Twenty-nine immunocompromised patients with persistent viral shedding were compared with 40 controls. In multivariate analysis, fever and lymphocytopenia (<0.5 G/L) were associated with an increased risk of persistent viral shedding (odds ratio [OR]: 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-11.09) P = .048 and OR: 4.3; 95% CI, 1.2-14.7; P = .019, respectively). Unvaccinated patients had a 6-fold increased risk of persistent viral shedding (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.7-25.1; P = .006). Patients with persistent viral shedding were at risk of hospitalization (OR: 4.8; 95 CI, 1.5-15.6; P = .008), invasive aspergillosis (OR: 10.17; 95 CI, 1.15-89.8; P = .037) and death (log-rank test <0.01).

Conclusions

Vaccine coverage was protective against SARS-CoV-2 persistent viral shedding in immunocompromised patients. This new group of immunocompromised patients with SARS-CoV-2 persistent viral shedding is at risk of developing invasive aspergillosis and death and should therefore be systematically screened for this fungal infection for as long as the viral shedding persists.

Excess mortality among kidney transplant recipients: Impact of COVID-19-related deaths during the pandemic

BACKGROUND

Because COVID-19 has been associated with high lethality rates among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but also with a severe disruption and delays in overall healthcare, this study aims to evaluate the excess mortality in the pandemic era among KTR in a high-volume Brazilian transplant center.

METHODS

This study used data from a single center that provides follow-up on all its transplant recipients. The population of interest included all the patients who were transplanted between August 31, 1983 and December 31, 2022 and who were live from January 1, 2014. Using the "AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average" forecasting algorithm, the expected mortality for the pandemic era (2020-2022) was modeled from the pre-pandemic era (2014-2019).

RESULTS

There were 12 077 KTRs at risk of dying in the entire observation period. In the pre-pandemic era, there were 21 deaths per 1000 patients at risk. In the pandemic era, there were 1429 observed deaths (rate of 47 deaths per 1000 patients at risk) versus the expected 587 deaths, resulting in an absolute number of 842 excess deaths, or an observed-to-expected ratio of 2.4, or an absolute rate of 26 deaths in excess per 1000 patients at risk. The excess deaths exhibited a temporal pattern mirroring that of the surges in new cases and lethality rates of COVID-19. COVID-19-related deaths drove 94% of excess mortality in the pandemic era.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of KTR under centralized follow-up, more than twofold excess mortality was primarily driven by COVID-19-related deaths, highlighting the vulnerability of this population to the most severe presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection unique to solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are not published. We describe outcomes including readmission, allograft rejection, allograft dysfunction, allograft failure, and death.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mostly unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19 from March 2020 to November 2021. Disease severity was assigned by NIH criteria. Data included demographics, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes and are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (range).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight SOTR were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a median of 5 (IQR 3-8) years post-transplant with a mean age of 57 ± 12 years at diagnosis. Forty-one recovered at home; 97 were admitted. 12/32 (37.5%) SOTR with critical disease expired during initial admission. Among those who recovered, 48/126 (38.0%) had asymptomatic or mild infection, 31/126 (24.6%) had moderate, 27/126 (21.4%) severe, and 20/126 (15.9%) critical infection. 38/85 (44.7%) of SOTR who survived initial admission had 74 readmissions within 180 days (Figure 1). The 6-month mortality rate among those who survived infection was 4/126 (3.2%). The mean time from initial infection to death was 32 ± 66 days in inpatient deaths and 95 ± 39 days in those who were discharged or never admitted. Six-month graft dysfunction occurred in 18/125 (14.4%) and graft failure in 9/126 (7.2%); five failures were deaths with function.

CONCLUSION

Readmissions after COVID-19 infection were frequent after the index admission. Rejection was relatively infrequent; graft dysfunction at 6 months post-infection was more common than rejection. Six-month mortality following COVID-19 recovery in SOTR was significant; close follow-up of patients is warranted.

COVID-19 waves in an urban setting 2020-2022: an electronic medical record analysis

Background

Global and national surveillance efforts have tracked COVID-19 incidence and clinical outcomes, but few studies have compared comorbid conditions and clinical outcomes across each wave of the pandemic. We analyzed data from the COVID-19 registry of a large urban healthcare system to determine the associations between presenting comorbidities and clinical outcomes during the pandemic.

Methods

We analyzed registry data for all inpatients and outpatients with COVID-19 from March 2020 through September 2022 (N = 44,499). Clinical outcomes were death, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Demographic and clinical outcomes data were analyzed overall and for each wave. Unadjusted and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations between age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, and mortality.

Results

Waves 2 and 3 (Alpha and Delta variants) were associated with greater hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and mortality than other variants. Chronic pulmonary disease was the most common comorbid condition across all age groups and waves. Mortality rates were higher in older patients but decreased across all age groups in later waves. In every wave, mortality was associated with renal disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary disease. Multivariable analysis found that liver disease and renal disease were significantly associated with mortality, hospitalization, and ICU admission, and diabetes was significantly associated with hospitalization and ICU admission.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 registry is a valuable resource to identify risk factors for clinical outcomes. Our findings may inform risk stratification and care planning for patients with COVID-19 based on age and comorbid conditions.

Characteristics of COVID-19 Disease in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background and Objectives: Kidney transplant recipients are at risk of developing more severe forms of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical course of COVID-19 infection among kidney transplant patients and a control group. Materials and Methods: We examined 150 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Patients were divided into study (kidney transplant recipients, n = 53) and control (without a history of kidney transplantation, n = 97) groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment data, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: The median patient age was 56.0 (46.0-64.0) years, and seventy-seven patients (51.3%) were men. The median Charlson comorbidity index was higher in the study group (3.0 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001). There was a higher incidence of hypoxemia in the control group upon arrival (52.6% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.001) and a higher NEWS index median (2.0 vs. 1.0 points, p = 0.009) and incidence of pneumonia during hospitalization (88.7% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.023). In the study group, there were more cases of mild (26.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.023) and critically severe forms of COVID-19 infection (26.4% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001), kidney failure was more prevalent (34.0% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and a greater number of patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (22.6% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and died (18.9% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that treatment in the intensive care unit correlated with a higher mortality rate than transplantation itself (HR = 20.71, 95% CI 2.01-213.33, p = 0.011). Conclusions: The course of the COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients is heterogeneous and can be more severe than in the general population. Even though patients may be hospitalized with fewer symptoms, complications and death are more likely to occur.

A Retrospective Study Comparing Mortality Rates between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: With the emergence of vaccines for COVID-19, mortality and severity of disease have decreased. However, patients with certain comorbidities, such as immunosuppression, CKD, and renal transplant, still have higher mortality rates as compared to the general population. Current data suggests that the risk of developing COVID-19 among transplant patients was reported to be about 5%, which is significantly higher than the risk rate of 0.3% in the general population. Studies utilizing larger sample sizes (i.e., multiple cohorts, sites, hospitals) comparing COVID-19 outcomes among renal transplant patients with a control group are lacking.

Objective: The purpose of this descriptive study was to compare the mortality rate between vaccinated and unvaccinated kidney transplant recipients.

Methods: Participants were recruited at a community-based transplant clinic in West Texas.

Results: Among the group of participants who tested positive for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022, higher mortality rates and longer hospital stays were noted among those unvaccinated (72% unvaccinated had greater than 5-day length of stay vs. 33% vaccinated).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that vaccination against COVID-19 decreases mortality rates in kidney transplant recipients.

.

Multi-omics Approach in Kidney Transplant: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose of Review

Multi-omics approach has advanced our knowledge on transplantation-associated clinical outcomes, such as acute rejection and infection, and emerging omics data are becoming available in kidney transplant and COVID-19. Herein, we discuss updated findings of multi-omics data on kidney transplant outcomes, as well as COVID-19 and kidney transplant.

Recent Findings

Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics revealed various inflammation pathways associated with kidney transplantation-related outcomes and COVID-19. Although multi-omics data on kidney transplant and COVID-19 is limited, activation of innate immune pathways and suppression of adaptive immune pathways were observed in the active phase of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

Summary

Multi-omics analysis has led us to a deeper exploration and a more comprehensive understanding of key biological pathways in complex clinical settings, such as kidney transplantation and COVID-19. Future multi-omics analysis leveraging multi-center biobank collaborative will further advance our knowledge on the precise immunological responses to allograft and emerging pathogens.

Management of the kidney transplant recipient in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation is the ideal treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease. While centers are performing more transplants every year, the need for organ transplantation outpaces the supply of organ donors. Due to a growing population of patients with advanced kidney disease and a scarcity of kidneys from deceased donors, patients face extended wait times. By the time patients approach transplantation they have multiple comorbidities, in particular cardiovascular complications. Their risk of complications is further compounded by exposure to immunosuppression post kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are medically complex and may require acute management in the intensive care unit (ICU), as a result of cardiovascular complications, infections, and/or respiratory compromise from lung infections and/or acute pulmonary edema. Acute complication of immunosuppression, such as thrombotic microangiopathy and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome may also warrant ICU admission. This review will cover assessment of high-risk complications and management strategies following kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

For intensivists caring for KTRs, it is imperative to understand anatomical considerations of the transplanted kidney, unique infectious risks faced by this population, and appropriate modulation of immunosuppression.

SUMMARY

Recognizing potential complications and implementing appropriate management strategies for KTRs admitted to the ICU will improve kidney allograft and patient survival outcomes.

Evolving Trends in Kidney Transplant Outcomes Among Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Advancements in medical technology, healthcare delivery, and organ allocation resulted in improved patient/graft survival for older (age ≥65) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, the recent trends in these post-KT outcomes are uncertain in light of the mounting burden of cardiovascular disease, changing kidney allocation policies, heterogeneity in candidates' risk profile, and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Thus, we examined secular trends in post-KT outcomes among older and younger KT recipients over the last 3 decades.

Methods

We identified 73 078 older and 378 800 younger adult (aged 18-64) recipients using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (1990-2022). KTs were grouped into 6 prepandemic eras and 1 postpandemic-onset era. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine temporal trends in post-KT mortality and death-censored graft failure.

Results

From 1990 to 2022, a 19-fold increase in the proportion of older KT recipients was observed compared to a 2-fold increase in younger adults despite a slight decline in the absolute number of older recipients in 2020. The mortality risk for older recipients between 2015 and March 14, 2020, was 39% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.75) lower compared to 1990-1994, whereas that for younger adults was 47% lower (aHR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.48-0.59). However, mortality risk during the pandemic was 25% lower (aHR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.61-0.93) in older adults and 37% lower in younger adults (aHR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) relative to 1990-1994. For both populations, the risk of graft failure declined over time and was unaffected during the pandemic relative to the preceding period.

Conclusions

The steady improvements in 5-y mortality and graft survival were disrupted during the pandemic, particularly among older adults. Specifically, mortality among older adults reflected rates seen 20 y prior.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known for its effects on the respiratory system. Three years after the pandemic morbid and mortal consequences, growing evidence is showing that the disease also has adverse outcomes and complications on additional organs including the kidneys. This study aims at investigating the effects of COVID-19 on hemodialysis patients receiving services at Palestine Medical Complex (PMC) kidney dialysis department, and to identify mortality related risk factors.

Methods

In April 2022, data was collected using the electronic medical records system for the dialysis department at PMC. The study included all PMC hemodialysis patients that were infected with COVID-19 between January 2020-April 2022. The collected data included patient demographics, clinical features, laboratory tests, dialysis frequency and the disease outcome.

Results

The results showed that the patients' outcomes and dialysis frequency were impacted by their blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (SCr) and calcium levels. About one third of the study population died after being infected with COVID-19. The frequency of dialysis was also affected by the presence of comorbidities like hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) and myocardial infarction (MI).

Conclusion

This study found that there was a high mortality rate within the hemodialysis patients infected with COVID-19. Having comorbidities affected the frequency of dialysis following COVID-19 infection. Dialysis patients should be protected from infections such as COVID-19 and their comorbidities should be monitored and kept under control as much as possible.

Clinical experience of treatment of immunocompromised individuals with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection based on drug resistance mutations determined by genomic analysis: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of antiviral drugs that neutralize antibody drugs and fight against SARS-COV-2 is reported to be attenuated by genetic mutations of the virus in vitro. When B-cell immunocompromised patients are infected with SARS-COV-2, the infection can be prolonged, and genetic mutations can occur during the course of treatment. Therefore, for refractory patients with persistent COVID-19 infection, genomic analysis was performed to obtain data on drug resistance mutations as a reference to determine which antiviral drugs and antibody therapies might be effective in their treatment.

METHODS

This was a descriptive analysis with no controls. Patients were diagnosed as having COVID-19, examined, and treated in the Kansai Medical University General Medical Center between January 2022 and January 2023. The subjects of the study were B-cell immunocompromised patients in whom genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 984 patients with COVID-19 were treated at our hospital. Of those, 17 refractory cases underwent genomic analysis. All 17 patients had factors related to immunodeficiency, such as malignant lymphoma or post-organ transplantation. Eleven patients started initial treatment for COVID-19 at our hospital, developed persistent infection, and underwent genomic analysis. Six patients who were initially treated for COVID-19 at other hospitals became persistently infected and were transferred to our hospital. Before COVID-19 treatment, genomic analysis showed no intrahost mutations in the NSP5, the NSP12, and the RBD regions. After COVID-19 treatment, mutations in these regions were found in 12 of 17 cases (71%). Sixteen patients survived the quarantine, but one died of sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

In genomic analysis, more mutations were found to be drug-resistant after COVID-19 treatment than before COVID-19 treatment. Although it was not possible to demonstrate the usefulness of genome analysis for clinical application, the change of the treatment drug with reference to drug resistance indicated by genomic analysis may lead to good outcome of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.

Factors Associated with COVID-19 Severity Among Kidney Transplant and Non-Kidney Transplant Patients at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Background

The COVID-19 epidemic is a rapidly shifting situation that has resulted in significant regulatory reforms and widespread initiatives to deal with the initial crisis and its effects. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on transplantation activities. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused various important challenges in the kidney transplant industry.

Objective

To identify the factors influencing COVID-19 severity in kidney transplant and non-kidney transplant patients at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. This study included 364 patients (182 kidney transplants and 182 non-kidney transplants). A systematic random sampling was used to select the respondents. Professional nurses collected data for this study using a data extraction tools. Data were analyzed by using SPSS version 25 software. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between independent variables and COVID-19 severity with adjusted odds ratio (AOR), and 95% CI for AOR and P-value for testing significance.

Results

This study included 364 patients. Off the total, 34.1% developed severe COVID-19. In Multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with 60 years and above age groups (AOR = 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86, 12.02), aged 40-59 years (AOR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.17, 6.22), chest congestion (AOR = 4.49; 95% CI: 2.37, 8.50), history of muscle or body aches (AOR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.99) shortness of breath (AOR = 3.03; 95% CI: 1.36, 6.74), changed or lost sense of taste or smell (AOR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.34, 5.71), and muscle pain (AOR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.40, 6.65) were significant variables associated with COVID-19 severity after adjusting for other variables.

Conclusion

The study revealed that 34.1% of patients had severe COVID-19. The majority of these patients underwent non-kidney transplants. Age groups and symptoms, such as chest congestion, shortness of breath, changed or lost sense of taste or smell, and muscle pain, were significant predictors of COVID-19 disease severity.

Outcome of COVID-19 in Egyptian living-donor kidney transplant recipients and relation to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: a pilot study

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in kidney transplant recipients is a subject of much debate and became of interest to nephrologists amidst the pandemic. The main concerns are the influence of the chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs, the viral-related risk of acute rejection, and the long-term outcome of allograft function. This single-center prospective study included kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection. Patients were maintained on immunosuppressive regimens. The severity of disease was defined as oxygen saturation < 94%, the need for hospitalization and/or hemodialysis, the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and mortality. Seventeen patients (54.8%) required hospital admission, four patients needed hemodialysis (12.9%), twelve patients (38.7%) had AKI, and three patients died (9.7%). Oxygen saturation < 94% showed a positive correlation with the presence of diabetes (p value 0.031) and a negative correlation with the maintenance steroid dose (p value 0.046). A negative correlation existed between the need for hemodialysis and average Cyclosporin level (p value 0.019) and between the need for hospitalization and average Tacrolimus level (p value 0.046). Severity of disease was associated with the presence of lymphopenia (p value 0.042), the cumulative steroid dose (p value 0.001), increased serum levels of LDH (p value 0.010), Ferritin (p value 0.020), AST (p value 0.047), and ALT (p value 0.006) and D-dimer levels more than 0.5 mg/L (p value 0.038). This study highlighted that the immunocompromised state of renal transplant recipients may not be regarded as a disadvantage in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Studies on a larger scale are needed to validate these results.

Impact of immunosuppression regimen on COVID-19 mortality in kidney transplant recipients: Analysis from a Colombian transplantation centers registry

BACKGROUND

The impact of immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. The knowledge about the behavior of different immunosuppression schemes in clinical outcomes is scarce. This study aimed to determine the risk of death in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 under two different schemes of immunosuppression.

METHODS

We describe our experience in kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in seven transplant centers during the first year of the pandemic before starting the vaccination programs in the city of Bogotá. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, immunosuppression schemes at presentation, and global treatment strategies were compared between recovered and dead patients; survival analysis was carried out between calcineurin inhibitors based regimen and free calcineurin inhibitors regimen.

RESULTS

Among 165 confirmed cases, 28 died (17%); the risk factors for mortality identified in univariate analysis were age older than 60 years (p=.003) diabetes (p=.001), immunosuppression based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (p=.025) and patients receiving steroids (p=.041). In multivariable analysis, hypoxemia (p=.000) and calcineurin inhibitors regimen (p=.002) were predictors of death. Survival analysis showed increased mortality risk in patients receiving CNI based immunosuppression regimen vs. CNI free regimens mortality rates were, respectively, 21.7% and 8.5% (p=.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the calcineurin inhibitors probably do not provide greater protection compared to calcineurin inhibitor free schemes being necessary to carry out analyzes that allow us to evaluate the outcomes with different immunosuppression schemes in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab Decreases the Rate of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab monoclonal antibodies were previously authorized for pre-exposure prophylaxis for immunocompromised individuals. We aimed to determine if tixagevimab/cilgavimab could prevent breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in SOT recipients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective single-center study of SOT recipients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared with those who did not. Demographics, type of transplant, immunosuppression regimen, COVID-19 vaccination status, and tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration data were collected. Participants were interviewed for 6 months or until they tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, whichever came first. Kaplan-Meier SARS-CoV-2-free survival curves were created based on the tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration date and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The log-rank test was used for comparison. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were constructed.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 323 patients. Two hundred forty-eight received tixagevimab/cilgavimab, and 75 did not (control). COVID-19 vaccination rate was higher among tixagevimab/cilgavimab recipients than nontixagevimab/cilgavimab recipients (99.6% vs 92.0%; P < .001). Twenty-six patients in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group (10.5%) and 23 in the control group (30.7%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, receipt of tixagevimab/cilgavimab and duration from transplant were both associated with reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (hazard ratio 0.431; 95% CI 0.224-0.828 and hazard ratio 0.917; 95% CI 0.861-0.978, respectively).

CONCLUSION

During the study period, SOT recipients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab had a significantly lower rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There were no differences in symptom frequency, illness severity, hospitalization rate, or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Factors That Predict a Sustained Humoral Response to COVID-19 Vaccines in Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) produce a weak humoral response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. However, the factors associated with the quality of the serological response to three doses of COVID-19 vaccine have not been unambiguously identified.

METHODS

We included KTRs followed in the Nephrology Department at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) between June and December 2021 who had received three doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (or two doses plus an episode of polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19). The lack of a humoral response was defined as an antibody titer below 7.1 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, and an optimal response was defined as an antibody titer above 264 BAU/mL.

RESULTS

Of the 371 patients included, 246 (66.3%) were seropositive, and 97 (26.1%) had an optimal response. In a multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with seropositivity was a history of COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR) 87.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.88-965.0); p < 0.0001], while the main factors associated with non-response were female sex [OR 0.28; 95%CI (0.15-0.51); p < 0.0001], less than 36 months between kidney transplantation and vaccination [OR 0.26; 95%CI (0.13-0.52); p < 0.0001], a higher creatinine level [OR 0.33; 95%CI (0.19-0.56); p < 0.0001], the use of tacrolimus [OR 0.23; 95%CI (0.12-0.45); p < 0.0001], the use of belatacept [OR 0.01; 95%CI (0.001-0.20); p = 0.002] and three-drug immunosuppression [OR 0.39; 95%CI (0.19-0.78); p = 0.015]. A history of COVID-19 was associated with an optimal response [OR 4.03; 95%CI (2.09-7.79); p < 0.0001], while an older age at vaccination [OR 0.97; 95%CI (0.95-0.99); p = 0.002], less than 36 months between kidney transplantation and vaccination [OR 0.35; 95%CI (0.18-0.69); p = 0.002], a higher creatinine level [OR 0.60; 95%CI (0.38-0.93); p = 0.02], three-drug immunosuppression [OR 0.45; 95%CI (0.27-0.76); p = 0.003] were associated with a poorer response.

CONCLUSION

We identified factors associated with a humoral response to a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in KTRs. These findings might help physicians to optimize vaccination in KTRs.

Cellular immune response of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Evidence has demonstrated inferior humoral immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population. However, data on cellular immune responses in this population have not been established.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and included studies reporting cellular immune response rates in kidney transplant recipients after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Studies that reported factors associated with cellular immune responders or non-responders were also included (PROSPERO: CRD42022375544).

Results

From a total of 1,494 articles searched, 53 articles were included in the meta-analysis. In all, 21 studies assessed cellular immune response by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISPOT), 22 studies used interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), and 10 studies used flow cytometric analysis. The pooled response rate after two doses (standard regimen) and three doses of vaccination was 47.5% (95%CI 38.4-56.7%) and 69.1% (95%CI 56.3-80.6%) from IFN-γ ELISPOT, 25.8% (95%CI 19.7-32.4%) and 14.7% (95%CI 8.5-22.2%) from IGRA, and 73.7% (95%CI 55.2-88.8%) and 86.5% (95%CI 75.3-94.9%) from flow cytometry, respectively. Recipients with seroconversion were associated with a higher chance of having cellular immune response (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.89-3.54). Cellular immune response in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients (OR 0.24; 95%CI 0.16-0.34) and the general population (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.07-0.14). Age and immunosuppressants containing tacrolimus or corticosteroid were associated with inferior cellular immune response.

Conclusion

Cellular immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients and the general population. Age, tacrolimus, and corticosteroid were associated with poor response. Cellular immune response should also be prioritized in vaccination studies.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022375544.

Conversion From Intravenous In-Hospital Belatacept Injection to Subcutaneous Abatacept Injection in Kidney Transplant Recipients During the First COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Order in France

The first COVID-19 stay-at-home order came into effect in France on 17 March 2020. Immunocompromised patients were asked to isolate themselves, and outpatient clinic visits were dramatically reduced. In order to avoid visits to the hospital by belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during the initial period of the pandemic, we promptly converted 176 KTRs at two French transplant centers from once-monthly 5 mg/kg in-hospital belatacept infusion to once-weekly 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept injection. At the end of follow-up (3 months), 171 (97.16%) KTRs survived with a functioning graft, 2 (1.14%) had died, and 3 (1.70%) had experienced graft loss. Two patients (1.1%) experienced acute T cell-mediated rejection. Nineteen patients (10.80%) discontinued abatacept; 47% of the KTRs found the use of abatacept less restrictive than belatacept, and 38% would have preferred to continue abatacept. Mean eGFR remained stable compared to baseline. Seven patients (3.9%) had COVID-19; among these, two developed severe symptoms but survived. Only one patient had a de novo DSA. Side effects of abatacept injection were uncommon and non-severe. Our study reports for the first time in a large cohort that once-weekly injection of abatacept appears to be feasible and safe in KTRs previously treated with belatacept.

Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice.

METHODS

We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis.

RESULTS

By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

Acute Kidney Injury in Kidney Transplant Patients in Intensive Care Unit: From Pathogenesis to Clinical Management

Kidney transplantation is the first-choice treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at higher risk of experiencing a life-threatening event requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mainly in the late post-transplant period (more than 6 months after transplantation). Urosepsis and bloodstream infections account for almost half of ICU admissions in this population; in addition, potential side effects related to immunosuppressive treatment should be accounted for cytotoxic and ischemic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), sirolimus/CNI-induced thrombotic microangiopathy and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Throughout the ICU stay, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) incidence is common and ranges from 10% to 80%, and up to 40% will require renal replacement therapy. In-hospital mortality can reach 30% and correlates with acute illness severity and admission diagnosis. Graft survival is subordinated to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), clinical presentation, disease severity and potential drug nephrotoxicity. The present review aims to define the impact of AKI events on short- and long-term outcomes in KTRs, focusing on the epidemiologic data regarding AKI incidence in this subpopulation; the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AKI development and potential AKI biomarkers in kidney transplantation, graft and patients' outcomes; the current diagnostic work up and management of AKI; and the modulation of immunosuppression in ICU-admitted KTRs.

Optimizing COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyze the early humoral and cellular response in 64 adolescents KTx recipients, after two or three doses of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 against different variants of COVID-19. After 2 doses, 77.8% % of children with no history of infection had a positive humoral response with a median anti-S IgG level of 1107 (IQR, 593-2,658) BAU/mL. All the patients with a history of infection responded with a higher median IgG level (3,265 (IQR, 1,492-8,178) BAU/mL). In non-responders after 2 doses, 75% responded after a third dose with a median Ab titer at 355 (IQR, 140-3,865 BAU/mL). Neutralizing activity was significantly lower against the delta and the omicron variants compared to the wild-type strain and did not improve after a 3rd dose, while infection did provide higher levels of neutralizations against the variants. T cell specific response correlated with humoral response and no patient displayed a cellular response without a humoral response. Adolescent KTx recipients exhibit a high seroconversion rate after only two doses. A third injection, induces a response in the majority of the non-responders patients but did not counterbalance the strong decrease in neutralizing antibody activities against variants highlighting the need for boosters with specific vaccines.

Outcomes of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Sri Lankan Experience

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes severe illness in the immunocompromised. This study aimed to describe the severity and outcomes of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated for COVID-19 during the first 16 months of the pandemic in Sri Lanka. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all nephrology centers in Sri Lanka using a self-administered electronic data collection sheet. All practicing nephrologists were invited. KTRs who had been treated/were under treatment for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 were included. Data on patient demographics, management practices, and outcomes were collected. Outcomes included graft loss, requirement of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), duration of hospital stay, highest level of treatment setting, highest level of respiratory support, and mortality. Fifteen nephrologists (12 centers) responded with data regarding 58 KTRs with COVID-19, 10 of whom were receiving ongoing treatment; 47/58 (81%) were male. Forty (69%) were between 30 and 59 years of age and 15 (25.9%) were aged 60 years or above. Fourteen (24.1%) were within 1 year of transplantation. Fifty-three (91.4%) were on triple immunosuppression. Antiproliferative was reduced/withheld in 89.1% and calcineurin inhibitor was reduced/withheld in 42.1%. Overall mortality was 16/48 (33.3%). Seventeen (29.3%) required intensive care. Six (10.3%) received noninvasive ventilation, and 11 (19.0%) received invasive ventilation. Ten of the ventilated patients died. Six needed acute KRT, five of whom died. One patient survived with a loss of graft. There was no association between modifications to the immunosuppression and outcomes. COVID-19 causes poor outcomes and severe illness in KTRs. Special preventive and therapeutic strategies are urgently required.

Analysis of Acquisition of COVID-2019 Neutralizing Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This study confirmed the kinetics of antibodies acquired by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in solid-organ transplant recipients and examined their association with the development of COVID-19 and immunosuppressive status in organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

We measured COVID-19 neutralizing antibody titer in 21 organ transplant recipients vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine and 14 nontransplant recipients (control group) 3 times before and at 1 and 6 months after the third dose of vaccine. By confirming the kinetics of the acquired antibodies, we examined the relevance of the background characteristics of organ transplant recipients, such as the development of infectious diseases and immunosuppressive status.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with neutralizing antibodies was significantly higher in the nontransplant group than in the transplant group. Neutralizing antibody titers were significantly lower in transplant recipients when they were compared before the third dose and 1 month later. In the transplant recipient group, 11 patients were positive, and 10 were negative for neutralizing antibodies. When the causal relationship between the neutralizing antibody titer and background was examined, a positive correlation was found between the antibody titer and the number of years since transplantation, and a negative correlation was found between the tacrolimus trough values, amount of mycophenolate mofetil or steroids taken internally, and antibody titer.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the effectiveness of vaccination in transplant recipients is associated with the post-transplant period before vaccination and the dose of immunosuppressive agents.

The efficacy of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in transplant recipients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Transplant recipients (TRs) are at high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used for treating mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, reports comparing the efficacy of COVID-19 treatment without/with mAbs in TRs are limited. We assessed the efficacy of casirivimab/imdevimab against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in TRs.

METHODS

Forty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated. The duration until defervescence, oxygen (O₂) requirement ≥5 L, and neutralizing antibody levels were compared in TRs with COVID-19 without/with casirivimab/imdevimab.

RESULTS

Casirivimab/imdevimab was correlated with shorter duration until defervescence and non-requirement of O₂ ≥ 5 L in TRs with COVID-19 [mean: without/with: 6 vs. 2; P = 0.0002, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3333, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1763-0.6301; 15 vs. 8; P < 0.0001, HR = 0.5333, 95% CI = 0.2878-0.9883; P = 0.0377, HR = 0.1502, 95% CI = 0.02511-0.8980]. Casirivimab/imdevimab was associated with early defervescence after adjusting for sex and age (P = 0.013, HR = 0.412, 95% CI = 0.205-0.826). The antibody levels between patients without/with casirivimab/imdevimab on the day of hospitalization were not significantly different (P = 0.1055), including 13 TRs with vaccination. Antibody levels were higher in patients with casirivimab/imdevimab at 3-5 days after hospitalization than in those without, at 7-9 days after hospitalization (P < 0.0001, mean, without/with: 414.9/40000 AU/mL).

CONCLUSION

Casirivimab/imdevimab was effective and increased the neutralizing antibody in TRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, it may contribute toward preventing the progression.

Protection from successive Omicron variants with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and monoclonal antibodies in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk of severe COVID-19, even when they are fully vaccinated. Additional booster vaccinations or passive immunization with prophylactic monoclonal antibodies are recommended to increase their protection against severe COVID-19.

Methods

Here, we describe the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Delta, Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 variants, firstly by 39 serum samples from vaccinated KTRs exhibiting anti-spike antibody concentrations ≥264 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL and, secondly, by tixagevimab/cilgavimab.

Results

No neutralization was observed for 18% of the KTRs, while serum from only 46% of patients could neutralize the five variants. Cross-neutralization of the Delta and Omicron variants occurred for 65–87% of sera samples. The anti-spike antibody concentration correlated with neutralization activity for all the variants. The neutralization titers against the Delta variant were higher in vaccinated KTRs who had previously presented with COVID-19, compared to those KTRs who had only been vaccinated. Breakthrough infections occurred in 39% of the KTRs after the study. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab poorly neutralizes Omicron variants, particularly BA.5, and does not neutralize BQ.1, which is currently the most prevalent strain.

Discussion

As a result, sera from seropositive vaccinated KTRs had poor neutralization of the successive Omicron variants. Several Omicron variants are able to escape tixagevimab/cilgavimab.

Convalescent Plasma Treatment of Patients Previously Treated with B-Cell-Depleting Monoclonal Antibodies Suffering COVID-19 Is Associated with Reduced Re-Admission Rates

Patients receiving treatment with B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies, such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and obinutuzumab, either for hematological disease or another diagnosis, such as a rheumatological disease, are at an increased risk for medical complications and mortality from COVID-19. Since inconsistencies persist regarding the use of convalescent plasma (CP), especially in the vulnerable patient population that has received previous treatment with B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies, further studies should be performed in thisdirection. The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics of patients with previous use of B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies and describe the potential beneficial effects of CP use in terms of mortality, ICU admission and disease relapse. In this retrospective cohort study, 39 patients with previous use of B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies hospitalized in the COVID-19 department of a tertiary hospital in Greece were recorded and evaluated. The mean age was 66.3 years and 51.3% were male. Regarding treatment for COVID-19, remdesivir was used in 89.7%, corticosteroids in 94.9% and CP in 53.8%. In-hospital mortality was 15.4%. Patients who died were more likely to need ICU admission and also had a trend towards a longer hospital stay, even though the last did not reach statistical significance. Patients treated with CP had a lower re-admission rate for COVID-19 after discharge. Further studies should be performed to identify the role of CP in patients with treatment with B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies suffering from COVID-19.

Co-infection of coronavirus disease 19 and cytomegalovirus in a kidney transplant recipient

It has been suggested that severe SARS-CoV-2 infection could be a risk factor for Herpesviridae reactivation due to the state of sepsis-associated immunosuppression. We presented the case of co-infection of CMV and COVID-19 infection in a 43-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease.

Predictor factor for worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients infected with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a massive impact on the health sector, especially in patients with pre-existing comorbidities. This study aims to define the predictor factors for worse outcomes in kidney transplant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have analyzed in these patients their prior medical history, their clinical symptoms, and their laboratory results.

METHOD

We assessed outcomes of kidney transplant patients with confirmed COVID-19 until July 2021 from PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Scopus, and EBSCO. We performed meta-analyses of nine published studies to estimate predictor factors. The analysis was analyzed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and then using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULT

Our analysis demonstrated that the most significant risk factors for the worse COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant patients included: age of 60 and older [MD 9.31(95% CI, 6.31-12.30), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], diabetic nephropathy [OR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.49-3.04), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], dyspnea [OR 4.53, (95% CI, 2.22-9.22), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 4.53 (95% CI, 1.10-5.21), p = 0.03, I2 = 58%], and some laboratory markers. Many patients had two or multiple risk factors in combination.

CONCLUSION

Age and several comorbidities were the most significant factors for COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.

COVID-19 associated acute transplant failure after AB0-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation - a case report

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased risk of severe courses of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with frequently delayed viral clearance. We report a case of an acute kidney transplant failure in persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with absolute B-cell depletion after administration of rituximab for AB0-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 34-year-old unvaccinated patient is diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection four months after kidney transplantation. With only mild symptoms and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 44 ml/min/1.73 m², therapy with molnupiravir was initially given. Within the next eight weeks, transplant biopsies were performed for acute graft failure. These showed acute T-cell rejection with severe acute tubular epithelial damage with only mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (BANFF cat. 4 IB), and borderline rejection (BANFF cat. 3). A therapy with prednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulins was performed twice. With unchanged graft failure, the third biopsy also formally showed BANFF cat. 4 IB. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization detected SARS-CoV-2 viruses in large portions of the distal tubules. After nine weeks of persistent COVID-19 disease neither anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG nor a SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immune response could be detected, leading to the administration of sotrovimab and remdesivir. Among them, SARS-CoV-2 clearance, detection of IgG, and improvement of graft function were achieved.

CONCLUSION

Lack of viral clearance can lead to complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection with atypical manifestations. In kidney transplant patients, before initiating therapy, the differential diagnoses of "rejection" and "virus infection" should be weighed against each other in an interdisciplinary team of nephrologists, infectious diseases specialists and pathologists.

Ferric carboxymaltose and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced immunogenicity in kidney transplant recipients with iron deficiency: The COVAC-EFFECT randomized controlled trial

Background

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have an impaired immune response after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Iron deficiency (ID) may adversely affect immunity and vaccine efficacy. We aimed to investigate whether ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) treatment improves humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in iron-deficient KTRs.

Methods

We randomly assigned 48 iron-deficient KTRs to intravenous FCM (1-4 doses of 500mg with six-week intervals) or placebo. Co-primary endpoints were SARS-CoV-2-specific anti-Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers and T-lymphocyte reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 at four weeks after the second vaccination with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-BNT162b2.

Results

At four weeks after the second vaccination, patients receiving FCM had higher plasma ferritin and transferrin saturation (P<0.001 vs. placebo) and iron (P=0.02). However, SARS-CoV-2-specific anti-RBD IgG titers (FCM: 66.51 [12.02-517.59] BAU/mL; placebo: 115.97 [68.86-974.67] BAU/mL, P=0.07) and SARS-CoV-2-specific T-lymphocyte activation (FCM: 93.3 [0.85-342.5] IFN-ɣ spots per 10⁶ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), placebo: 138.3 [0.0-391.7] IFN-ɣ spots per 10⁶ PBMCs, P=0.83) were not significantly different among both arms. After the third vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific anti-RBD IgG titers remained similar between treatment groups (P=0.99).

Conclusions

Intravenous iron supplementation efficiently restored iron status but did not improve the humoral or cellular immune response against SARS-CoV-2 after three vaccinations.

Outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalised immunocompromised patients: An analysis of the WHO ISARIC CCP-UK prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immunocompromised patients may be at higher risk of mortality if hospitalised with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with immunocompetent patients. However, previous studies have been contradictory. We aimed to determine whether immunocompromised patients were at greater risk of in-hospital death and how this risk changed over the pandemic.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We included patients > = 19 years with symptomatic community-acquired COVID-19 recruited to the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK prospective cohort study. We defined immunocompromise as immunosuppressant medication preadmission, cancer treatment, organ transplant, HIV, or congenital immunodeficiency. We used logistic regression to compare the risk of death in both groups, adjusting for age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, vaccination, and comorbidities. We used Bayesian logistic regression to explore mortality over time. Between 17 January 2020 and 28 February 2022, we recruited 156,552 eligible patients, of whom 21,954 (14%) were immunocompromised. In total, 29% (n = 6,499) of immunocompromised and 21% (n = 28,608) of immunocompetent patients died in hospital. The odds of in-hospital mortality were elevated for immunocompromised patients (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI [1.39, 1.50], p < 0.001). Not all immunocompromising conditions had the same risk, for example, patients on active cancer treatment were less likely to have their care escalated to intensive care (adjusted OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.7, 0.85], p < 0.001) or ventilation (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.56, 0.76], p < 0.001). However, cancer patients were more likely to die (adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI [1.87, 2.15], p < 0.001). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, comorbidities, and vaccination status. As the pandemic progressed, in-hospital mortality reduced more slowly for immunocompromised patients than for immunocompetent patients. This was particularly evident with increasing age: the probability of the reduction in hospital mortality being less for immunocompromised patients aged 50 to 69 years was 88% for men and 83% for women, and for those >80 years was 99% for men and 98% for women. The study is limited by a lack of detailed drug data prior to admission, including steroid doses, meaning that we may have incorrectly categorised some immunocompromised patients as immunocompetent.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunocompromised patients remain at elevated risk of death from COVID-19. Targeted measures such as additional vaccine doses, monoclonal antibodies, and nonpharmaceutical preventive interventions should be continually encouraged for this patient group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 66726260.

Efficacy of three COVID-19 vaccine doses in lung transplant recipients: a multicentre cohort study

QUESTION ADDRESSED BY THE STUDY

Do three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses induce a serological response in lung transplant recipients?

METHODS

We retrospectively included 1071 adults (551 (52%) males) at nine transplant centres in France. Each had received three COVID-19 vaccine doses in 2021, after lung transplantation. An anti-spike protein IgG response, defined as a titre >264 BAU·mL^-1 after the third dose (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 3.0 (1.7-4.1) months), was the primary outcome and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Median (IQR) age at the first vaccine dose was 54 (40-63) years and median (IQR) time from transplantation to the first dose was 64 (30-110) months.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) follow-up after the first dose was 8.3 (6.7-9.3) months. A vaccine response developed in 173 (16%) patients. Factors independently associated with a response were younger age at vaccination, longer time from transplantation to vaccination and absence of corticosteroid or mycophenolate therapy. After vaccination, 51 (5%) patients (47 non-responders (47/898 (5%)) and four (4/173 (2%)) responders) experienced COVID-19, at a median (IQR) of 6.6 (5.1-7.3) months after the third dose. No responders had severe COVID-19 compared with 15 non-responders, including six who died of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Few lung transplant recipients achieved a serological response to three COVID-19 vaccine doses, indicating a need for other protective measures. Older age and use of mycophenolate or corticosteroids were associated with absence of a response. The low incidence of COVID-19 might reflect vaccine protection via cellular immunity and/or good adherence to shielding measures.

Outcomes and risk factors for death among hospitalized children and adolescents with kidney diseases and COVID-19: an analysis of a nationwide database

BACKGROUND

Patients with kidney diseases (KD) appear to be at particularly high risk for severe COVID-19. This study aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes and risk factors for COVID-19-related death in a large cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients with KD.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of all pediatric patients with KD and COVID-19 registered in SIVEP-Gripe, a Brazilian nationwide surveillance database, between February 16, 2020, and May 29, 2021. The primary outcome was time to death, which was evaluated considering discharge as a competitive risk by using cumulative incidence function.

RESULTS

Among 21,591 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 290 cases (1.3%) had KD. Of these, 59 (20.8%) had a fatal outcome compared with 7.5% of the non-KD cohort (P < 0.001). Pediatric patients with KD had an increased hazard of death compared with the non-KD cohort (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.85, 95% CI 2.21-3.68, P < 0.0001). After adjustment, the factors associated with the death among KD patients were living in Northeast (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.13-4.31) or North regions (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.57-7.80), oxygen saturation < 95% at presentation (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.30-4.10), and presence of two or more associated comorbidities (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.08-4.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with KD had a higher risk of death compared with the non-KD cohort. The higher risk was associated with low oxygen saturation at admission, living in socioeconomically disadvantaged regions, and presence of other pre-existing comorbidities. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

COVID-19 and kidney transplantation

The COVID-19 pandemic affects the transplant recipients since March 2020. Transplant centers quickly organized themselves to optimize the management of the immunocompromised patients and to progress in the knowledge of this new disease. To this end, a French Registry was created, which includes all solid organ transplant patients who have developed a SARS Cov2 infection. Numerous studies have been carried out using these data to describe this new disease in transplant patients, to characterize its clinical and biological risk factors and to define its prognosis. The 60 days-mortality of transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was evaluated at 23% and renal failure plays a major role in the poor prognosis in addition to the classical risk factors described in the general population. The advent of vaccination has been a great relief but transplanted patients have shown a poor vaccine response keeping them at risk of severe disease even after an adapted vaccination scheme. Specific strategies was proposed in this particularly fragile population like increasing vaccine doses or using anti SARS Cov-2 monoclonal antibodies.

A Multicenter Cohort Study From India of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Post-COVID-19 Patients

BACKGROUND

There is a dearth of data regarding the consequences of ABO-incompatible kidney transplant (ABOiKTx) among post-COVID-19 candidates.

METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective, multicentric cohort study across 11 sites in India, from August 2020 to December 2021. The data for ABOiKTx conducted for post-COVID-19 candidates were investigated. The primary outcome of biopsy-proven acute rejection was compared with the ABO protocol implemented through Kaplan-Meier analysis. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, patient survival, and infections.

RESULTS

A total of 38 ABOiKTx with candidates of median (interquartile range) age of 38.5 (31.25-47.5) years were performed. Nineteen cases had mild COVID-19 severity, while 9 cases (23.6%) had an oxygen requirement. Six (15.7%) donors also were post-COVID-19. The most common ABO incompatibility reported was A to O in 14 (36.8%) pairs followed by B to O in 10 (26.3%) pairs. The maximum isoagglutinin titer cutoff was 1:2048 and 1:64 for baseline and pretransplant levels, respectively. The median time from COVID-19 infection to surgery was 130 (63.2-183) days. Biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, and mortality were 13.1%, 2.6%, and 2.6%, respectively. The Breslow-Wilcoxon's P value in Kaplan-Meier plots were 0.57 and 0.93 for thymoglobulin-based induction and high dose rituximab-based regimen, respectively. The incidence of reinfection was 2.6%. Two (5.2%) urinary tract infections were reported. No cytomegalovirus or BK polyomavirus infection was reported. The median serum creatinine at 1 year of follow-up was 1.1 (0.8-1.3) mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report implies that ABOiKTx in post-COVID-19 candidates can be successfully performed with no major deviation from standard ABO protocol.

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis is associated with lower breakthrough infection risk in vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients during the omicron wave

The neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination of tixagevimab/cilgavimab has been shown to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals during the Alpha (B.1.1.7) and Delta (B.1.617.2) waves. However, data on the efficacy and safety of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients during the Omicron wave is limited. To address this, we conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing 222 solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis and 222 vaccine-matched solid organ transplant recipients who did not receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 11 (5%) of SOTRs who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab and in 32 (14%) of SOTRs in the control group (p < .001). In the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group, SOTRs who received the 150-150 mg dose had a higher incidence of breakthrough infections compared to those who received the 300-300 mg dose (p = .025). Adverse events were uncommon, occurring in 4% of our cohort and most were mild. There was no significant change in serum creatinine or liver chemistries in kidney and liver transplant recipients, respectively. In conclusion, we found that tixagevimab/cilgavimab use is safe and associated with a lower risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients during the Omicron wave.