1
|
Sato S, Ebisawa M. Precision allergy molecular diagnosis applications in food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 24:129-137. [PMID: 38529801 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Precision medicine has become important in the diagnosis and management of food allergies. This review summarizes the latest information regarding molecular allergology, an essential component of food allergy managements. RECENT FINDINGS Component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) can be used to investigate sensitization to allergens based on symptoms and to reveal co-sensitization and/or cross-sensitization in patients with allergies. The following allergen components are known to be associated with symptoms: ovomucoid from eggs, omega-5 gliadin from wheat, and many storage proteins (Gly m 8 from soy, Ara h 2 from peanut, Cor a 14 from hazelnut, Ana o 3 from cashew nut, Jug r 1 from walnut, and Ses i 1 from sesame). Recent studies on allergens of macadamia nuts (Mac i 1 and Mac i 2), almonds (Pru du 6), fish (parvalbumin and collagen), and shrimp (Pem m 1 and Pem m 14) have provided additional information regarding CRD. In addition, Pru p 7 is a risk factor for systemic reactions to peaches and has recently been found to cross-react with cypress and Japanese cedar pollen. SUMMARY CRD provides information of individualized sensitization profiles related to symptoms and severity of allergies in patients. Clinical practice based on CRD offers many benefits, such as higher diagnostic accuracy and improved management of individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakura Sato
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldberg MR, Appel MY, Tobi K, Levy MB, Epstein-Rigbi N, Holmqvist M, Östling J, Nachshon L, Lidholm J, Elizur A. Validation of the NUT CRACKER Diagnostic Algorithm and Prediction for Cashew and Pistachio Co-Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2024; 12:1273-1282.e5. [PMID: 38382880 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the high cross-sensitization among tree nuts, the NUT CRACKER (Nut Co-reactivity-Acquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations) study proposed a diagnostic algorithm to minimize the number of required oral food challenges (OFCs). OBJECTIVE To validate the algorithm for cashew and pistachio allergy and determine markers for allergic severity. METHODS Patients (n = 125) with a median age of 7.8 (interquartile range, 5.9-11.2) years with suspected tree nut allergy were evaluated prospectively with decision tree points on the basis of skin prick test (SPT), basophil activation test (BAT), and knowledge of the coincidence of allergies. Validation of allergic status was determined by OFC. Markers of clinical severity were evaluated using the combined original and prospective cohort (n = 187) in relationship to SPT, BAT, and Ana o 3-sIgE. RESULTS Reactivity to cashew in SPT, BAT, and Ana o 3-sIgE and the incidence of abdominal pain on challenge were significantly higher in dual-allergic cashew/pistachio patients (n = 82) versus single cashew allergic patients (n = 18) (P = .001). All 3 diagnostic tests showed significant inverse correlation with log10 reaction doses for positive cashew OFC. The algorithm reduced overall the total number of OFCs by 72.0%, with a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.0% and 99.0%, respectively. Cashew false-positives were observed primarily in hazelnut-allergic patients (P = .026). In this population, Ana o 3-specific IgE could diagnose cashew allergy with a sensitivity of more than 90% and a specificity of more than 95%. CONCLUSIONS The NUT CRACKER diagnostic algorithm was validated and reduced the number of diagnostic OFCs required. Markers for severity phenotypes may guide oral immunotherapy protocols, improving the risk/benefit ratio for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Goldberg
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Michael Y Appel
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | - Katz Tobi
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | - Michael B Levy
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | - Naama Epstein-Rigbi
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Liat Nachshon
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Arnon Elizur
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riggioni C, Ricci C, Moya B, Wong D, van Goor E, Bartha I, Buyuktiryaki B, Giovannini M, Jayasinghe S, Jaumdally H, Marques-Mejias A, Piletta-Zanin A, Berbenyuk A, Andreeva M, Levina D, Iakovleva E, Roberts G, Chu D, Peters R, du Toit G, Skypala I, Santos AF. Systematic review and meta-analyses on the accuracy of diagnostic tests for IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy 2024; 79:324-352. [PMID: 38009299 DOI: 10.1111/all.15939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is updating the Guidelines on Food Allergy Diagnosis. We aimed to undertake a systematic review of the literature with meta-analyses to assess the accuracy of diagnostic tests for IgE-mediated food allergy. We searched three databases (Cochrane CENTRAL (Trials), MEDLINE (OVID) and Embase (OVID)) for diagnostic test accuracy studies published between 1 October 2012 and 30 June 2021 according to a previously published protocol (CRD42021259186). We independently screened abstracts, extracted data from full texts and assessed risk of bias with QUADRAS 2 tool in duplicate. Meta-analyses were undertaken for food-test combinations for which three or more studies were available. A total of 149 studies comprising 24,489 patients met the inclusion criteria and they were generally heterogeneous. 60.4% of studies were in children ≤12 years of age, 54.3% were undertaken in Europe, ≥95% were conducted in a specialized paediatric or allergy clinical setting and all included oral food challenge in at least a percentage of enrolled patients, in 21.5% double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. Skin prick test (SPT) with fresh cow's milk and raw egg had high sensitivity (90% and 94%) for milk and cooked egg allergies. Specific IgE (sIgE) to individual components had high specificity: Ara h 2-sIgE had 92%, Cor a 14-sIgE 95%, Ana o 3-sIgE 94%, casein-sIgE 93%, ovomucoid-sIgE 92/91% for the diagnosis of peanut, hazelnut, cashew, cow's milk and raw/cooked egg allergies, respectively. The basophil activation test (BAT) was highly specific for the diagnosis of peanut (90%) and sesame (93%) allergies. In conclusion, SPT and specific IgE to extracts had high sensitivity whereas specific IgE to components and BAT had high specificity to support the diagnosis of individual food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Riggioni
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
- Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Cristian Ricci
- Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research (AUTHeR), North-WEst University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Beatriz Moya
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Dominic Wong
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Evi van Goor
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Bartha
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Betul Buyuktiryaki
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sashini Jayasinghe
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah Jaumdally
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andreina Marques-Mejias
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexandre Piletta-Zanin
- Division of Pediatric Specialties, Department of Women, Children and Adolescents, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anna Berbenyuk
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Margarita Andreeva
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Daria Levina
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Iakovleva
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Graham Roberts
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Derek Chu
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - George du Toit
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Isabel Skypala
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy and food-induced anaphylaxis in children is increasing worldwide. Cow's milk, hen's eggs, and wheat allergies in young children have a more favorable prognosis with a relatively early outgrow, while allergies to peanuts, tree nuts, and seafood are more likely to be persistent. Although our understanding of the mechanism underlying the resolution of food allergy is incomplete, the roles of dendritic cells, regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells are important. Many past studies on the natural course of food allergy were retrospective analyses of specific study groups, but large-scale population-based prospective studies are now being published. This review summarizes recent studies of the natural course of cow's milk, hen's eggs, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, soy, sesame, and seafood allergies. The potential factors affecting the natural course of food allergy include symptom severity on ingestion, age at diagnosis, allergic comorbidities, skin prick test reaction size or serum food-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels, changes in sensitization degree, IgE epitope specificity, ratio of food-specific IgE to IgG4, food-specific IgA levels, component-resolved diagnostic profile, diet, gut microbiome, and interventions such as immunotherapy. Since food allergy places a significant burden on patients and their caregivers in daily life, clinicians should be able to provide relevant knowledge on the natural course of food allergy, appropriately evaluate its resolution, and offer therapeutic options whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyunguk Jeong
- Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sooyoung Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Konstantinou GN, Baker MG, Yu J, Ford LS, Bencharitiwong R, Grishina G, Sampson HA, Sicherer S, Nowak-Wegrzyn A. Citrin: a novel food allergen in citrus seeds and citrus-derived pectin that shows cross-reactivity with cashew and pistachio. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 131:759-765.e3. [PMID: 37659472 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.08.603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients exquisitely sensitive to cashew/pistachio are at risk for allergic reactions to citrus seeds and pectin. OBJECTIVE In this study, we sought to evaluate whether pectin is contaminated with citrus seeds, to identify a culprit antigen in citrus seeds, and to assess for cross-reactivity among allergens in citrus seeds, citrus pectin, and cashew or pistachio. METHODS Proteins from orange seed coats, orange seed endosperms, lemon seeds, grapefruit seeds, citrus pectin, apple pectin, and grapefruit pectin were extracted. Protein concentrations in all extracts were determined and visualized using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis technique. Immunoglobulin E-binding capacity was determined with Western blot analyses and tandem mass spectrometry for the identification of the culprit allergen in citrus seeds and pectin. RESULTS In subjects with citrus seed, pectin, and cashew allergies, there was strong immunoglobulin E-reactivity to bands between 17 to 28 kDa and 28 to 38 kDa. The tandem mass spectrometry analysis of these bands indicated the presence of citrin as the culprit allergen. Citrin and Ana o 2 are both 11S globulins belonging to the cupin superfamily, and significant homology was found between these proteins. CONCLUSION Citrus pectin may be contaminated with citrus seeds. Citrin, a newly identified allergen in citrus seeds, seems to be the culprit antigen in citrus seeds and contaminated citrus pectin. Citrin is highly homologous with Ana o 2 in cashew and Pis v 2 in pistachio, suggesting potential for cross-reactivity and providing an explanation for co-allergenicity of cashew or pistachio, citrus seeds, and citrus pectin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Konstantinou
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 424 General Military Training Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Mary Grace Baker
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Joyce Yu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara S Ford
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia; Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ramon Bencharitiwong
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Galina Grishina
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Scott Sicherer
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kallen EJJ, Bollemeijer JF, Knulst AC, Ehlers AM, Welsing PMJ, van Ree R, Le TM. Component Ana o 3 versus extract for cashew nut allergy: A diagnostic test accuracy study in adults. Clin Exp Allergy 2023; 53:880-882. [PMID: 37246614 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J J Kallen
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette F Bollemeijer
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - André C Knulst
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M Ehlers
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thuy-My Le
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anagnostou A, Lieberman J, Greenhawt M, Mack DP, Santos AF, Venter C, Stukus D, Turner PJ, Brough HA. The future of food allergy: Challenging existing paradigms of clinical practice. Allergy 2023; 78:1847-1865. [PMID: 37129472 DOI: 10.1111/all.15757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The field of food allergy has seen tremendous change over the past 5-10 years with seminal studies redefining our approach to prevention and management and novel testing modalities in the horizon. Early introduction of allergenic foods is now recommended, challenging the previous paradigm of restrictive avoidance. The management of food allergy has shifted from a passive avoidance approach to active interventions that aim to provide protection from accidental exposures, decrease allergic reaction severity and improve the quality of life of food-allergic patients and their families. Additionally, novel diagnostic tools are making their way into clinical practice with the goal to reduce the need for food challenges and assist physicians in the-often complex-diagnostic process. With all the new developments and available choices for diagnosis, prevention and therapy, shared decision-making has become a key part of medical consultation, enabling patients to make the right choice for them, based on their values and preferences. Communication with patients has also become more complex over time, as patients are seeking advice online and through social media, but the information found online may be outdated, incorrect, or lacking in context. The role of the allergist has evolved to embrace all the above exciting developments and provide patients with the optimal care that fits their needs. In this review, we discuss recent developments as well as the evolution of the field of food allergy in the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Anagnostou
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Section of Allergy, Immunology & Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jay Lieberman
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Food Challenge and Research Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Douglas Paul Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Courses Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service and Children's Allergy Service, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Carina Venter
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - David Stukus
- Section of Allergy, Immunology & Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Helen A Brough
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Courses Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service and Children's Allergy Service, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dramburg S, Hilger C, Santos AF, de Las Vecillas L, Aalberse RC, Acevedo N, Aglas L, Altmann F, Arruda KL, Asero R, Ballmer-Weber B, Barber D, Beyer K, Biedermann T, Bilo MB, Blank S, Bosshard PP, Breiteneder H, Brough HA, Bublin M, Campbell D, Caraballo L, Caubet JC, Celi G, Chapman MD, Chruszcz M, Custovic A, Czolk R, Davies J, Douladiris N, Eberlein B, Ebisawa M, Ehlers A, Eigenmann P, Gadermaier G, Giovannini M, Gomez F, Grohman R, Guillet C, Hafner C, Hamilton RG, Hauser M, Hawranek T, Hoffmann HJ, Holzhauser T, Iizuka T, Jacquet A, Jakob T, Janssen-Weets B, Jappe U, Jutel M, Kalic T, Kamath S, Kespohl S, Kleine-Tebbe J, Knol E, Knulst A, Konradsen JR, Korošec P, Kuehn A, Lack G, Le TM, Lopata A, Luengo O, Mäkelä M, Marra AM, Mills C, Morisset M, Muraro A, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Nugraha R, Ollert M, Palosuo K, Pastorello EA, Patil SU, Platts-Mills T, Pomés A, Poncet P, Potapova E, Poulsen LK, Radauer C, Radulovic S, Raulf M, Rougé P, Sastre J, Sato S, Scala E, Schmid JM, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schrama D, Sénéchal H, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Valverde-Monge M, van Hage M, van Ree R, Verhoeckx K, Vieths S, Wickman M, Zakzuk J, Matricardi PM, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2023; 34 Suppl 28:e13854. [PMID: 37186333 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE) as a mediator of allergic diseases in 1967, our knowledge about the immunological mechanisms of IgE-mediated allergies has remarkably increased. In addition to understanding the immune response and clinical symptoms, allergy diagnosis and management depend strongly on the precise identification of the elicitors of the IgE-mediated allergic reaction. In the past four decades, innovations in bioscience and technology have facilitated the identification and production of well-defined, highly pure molecules for component-resolved diagnosis (CRD), allowing a personalized diagnosis and management of the allergic disease for individual patients. The first edition of the "EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide" (MAUG) in 2016 rapidly became a key reference for clinicians, scientists, and interested readers with a background in allergology, immunology, biology, and medicine. Nevertheless, the field of molecular allergology is moving fast, and after 6 years, a new EAACI Taskforce was established to provide an updated document. The Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0 summarizes state-of-the-art information on allergen molecules, their clinical relevance, and their application in diagnostic algorithms for clinical practice. It is designed for both, clinicians and scientists, guiding health care professionals through the overwhelming list of different allergen molecules available for testing. Further, it provides diagnostic algorithms on the clinical relevance of allergenic molecules and gives an overview of their biology, the basic mechanisms of test formats, and the application of tests to measure allergen exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christiane Hilger
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rob C Aalberse
- Sanquin Research, Dept Immunopathology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Acevedo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Lorenz Aglas
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Friedrich Altmann
- Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karla L Arruda
- Department of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo, Brasil, Brazil
| | - Riccardo Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Italy
| | - Barbara Ballmer-Weber
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Domingo Barber
- Institute of Applied Molecular Medicine Nemesio Diez (IMMAND), Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
- RETIC ARADyAL and RICORS Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Beatrice Bilo
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Allergy Unit Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Torrette, Italy
| | - Simon Blank
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp P Bosshard
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heimo Breiteneder
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helen A Brough
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Merima Bublin
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dianne Campbell
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Jean Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Celi
- Centro DH Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica ASST- MANTOVA (MN), Mantova, Italy
| | | | - Maksymilian Chruszcz
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Adnan Custovic
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Czolk
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Janet Davies
- Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Emergency Operations Centre, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nikolaos Douladiris
- Allergy Department, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Bernadette Eberlein
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Anna Ehlers
- Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Gadermaier
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francisca Gomez
- Allergy Unit IBIMA-Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Spanish Network for Allergy research RETIC ARADyAL, Malaga, Spain
| | - Rebecca Grohman
- NYU Langone Health, Department of Internal Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carole Guillet
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christine Hafner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert G Hamilton
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Hauser
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Hawranek
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Tomona Iizuka
- Laboratory of Protein Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Alain Jacquet
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Bente Janssen-Weets
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uta Jappe
- Division of Clinical and Molecular Allergology, Priority Research Area Asthma and Allergy, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany
- Leibniz Lung Center, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Dept. of Pneumology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tanja Kalic
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Sandip Kamath
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sabine Kespohl
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jörg Kleine-Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Edward Knol
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - André Knulst
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jon R Konradsen
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Korošec
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Annette Kuehn
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thuy-My Le
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Lopata
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Olga Luengo
- RETIC ARADyAL and RICORS Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Madrid, Spain
- Allergy Section, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mika Mäkelä
- Division of Allergy, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Pediatric Department, Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Roni Nugraha
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Aquatic Product Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kati Palosuo
- Department of Allergology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Sarita Ulhas Patil
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Departments of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas Platts-Mills
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Pascal Poncet
- Institut Pasteur, Immunology Department, Paris, France
- Allergy & Environment Research Team Armand Trousseau Children Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Ekaterina Potapova
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars K Poulsen
- Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Radauer
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Suzana Radulovic
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Monika Raulf
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Pierre Rougé
- UMR 152 PharmaDev, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Faculté de Pharmacie, Toulouse, France
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy Service, Fundación Jiménez Díaz; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES); Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sakura Sato
- Allergy Department, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Enrico Scala
- Clinical and Laboratory Molecular Allergy Unit - IDI- IRCCS, Fondazione L M Monti Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Johannes M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Denise Schrama
- Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Hélène Sénéchal
- Allergy & Environment Research Team Armand Trousseau Children Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Marcela Valverde-Monge
- Allergy Service, Fundación Jiménez Díaz; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES); Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kitty Verhoeckx
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - Magnus Wickman
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Josefina Zakzuk
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shen Y, Yu T, Wang Z, Li X, Wu Y, Chen H. Non-thermal processing of cashews: irradiation reduces allergenicity by altering the structure of Ana o 3. Food Funct 2023; 14:1962-1970. [PMID: 36723115 DOI: 10.1039/d2fo03057h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Traditional thermal processing of cashews not only results in nutrient loss and harmful by-products, but also does not significantly reduce allergenicity. Irradiation could be an important non-thermal processing method to reduce cashew allergens' allergenicity and retain their nutritional properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of gamma irradiation processing on the structure and potential allergenicity of Ana o 3. The Ana o 3 solutions were gamma-irradiated at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 kGy. The structure change was monitored by Tricine-SDS-PAGE, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. The potential allergenicity was tested by immunoblotting, indirect competitive ELISA, and the human basophil KU812 degranulation assay using serum from cashew allergy patients. The results of CD spectroscopy showed that the content of α-helices decreased from 46.8% to 30.9% after 3 to 10 kGy, while the content of random coils increased from 23.7% to 33.3%. Meanwhile, a large number of hydrophobic regions were exposed, resulting in an increase in the hydrophobic surface of the protein. In terms of allergenicity, the IC50 values obtained by the competitive inhibition ELISA after irradiation increased from 0.628 to 4.054 μg mL-1, indicating that irradiation reduced the IgE binding capacity of Ana o 3, which was consistent with the results of western blotting. In addition, the basophil degranulation analysis showed that the release of IL-6, TNF-α, and histamine was decreased. It was shown that the potential allergenicity of the irradiated Ana o 3 was remarkably decreased since irradiation could mask or destroy the allergen epitopes, providing a new approach to reduce the allergenicity of cashew products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunpeng Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,College of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, P R. China.,Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Tian Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,College of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, P R. China.,Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Zhongliang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,College of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, P R. China.,Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Xin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,College of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, P R. China
| | - Yong Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Hongbing Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. .,Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Packi K, Matysiak J, Matuszewska E, Bręborowicz A, Matysiak J. Changes in Serum Protein-Peptide Patterns in Atopic Children Allergic to Plant Storage Proteins. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24. [PMID: 36675318 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Next to cow's milk and eggs, plant foods, i.e., legumes, tree nuts and cereal grains, most often sensitise atopic children. Storage proteins constitutes the most relevant protein fraction of plant foods, causing primary sensitisation. They exhibit strong allergenic properties and immunogenicity. Our goal was to analyse sensitisation to 26 plant storage proteins in a group of 76 children aged 0-5 years with chronic symptoms of atopic dermatitis using Allergy Explorer ALEX2 and to discover changes in serum protein-peptide patterns in allergic patients with the use of MALDI-TOF-MS. We reported that 25% of children were allergic to 2S albumins, 19.7% to 7S globulins, 13.2% to 11S globulins and 1.3% to cereal prolamins. The most common allergenic molecules were Ara h 1 (18.4%), Ara h 2 (17.1%), Ara h 6 (15.8%) and Ara h 3 (11.8%) from peanuts, and the mean serum sIgE concentrations in allergic patients were 10.93 kUA/L, 15.353 kUA/L, 15.359 kUA/L and 9.038 kUA/L, respectively. In children allergic to storage proteins compared to the other patients (both allergic and non-allergic), the cell cycle control protein 50A, testis-expressed sequence 13B, DENN domain-containing protein 5A and SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2 were altered. Our results indicate that the IgE-mediated allergy to storage proteins is a huge problem in a group of young, atopic children, and show the potential of proteomic analysis in the prediction of primary sensitisation to plant foods. It is the next crucial step for understanding the molecular consequences of allergy to storage proteins.
Collapse
|
11
|
Brettig T, Dalziel K, Koplin JJ, Dang T, Lange L, McWilliam V, Sato S, Savvatianos S, Perrett KP. Ana o 3 sIgE and diagnostic algorithms reduce cost of cashew allergy diagnosis in children compared with skin prick test: A cost comparison analysis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33. [PMID: 36003046 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the absence of a clear clinical history of reaction, diagnosis of cashew allergy using skin prick tests (SPT) or cashew-specific IgE requires a high number of oral food challenges (OFC). By using Ana o 3 sIgE alone, or a two-step diagnostic algorithm using cashew sIgE followed by Ana o 3 sIgE, there is a reduced need for OFC. We aimed to perform a cost comparison for both of these approaches compared with cashew SPT alone. METHODS Pooled individual-level data from 6 studies were used to determine diagnostic accuracy and OFC rate. Two studies used cashew SPT (n = 567, 198 allergic), with 95% positive and negative predictive values of ≥12 mm and <3 mm. Four studies were included in the pathways for Ana o 3 sIgE alone or a 2-step algorithm incorporating cashew and Ana o 3 sIgE (n = 271, 156 allergic). Cut-offs used were ≥8.5kUA/L and ≤0.1kUA/L for cashew sIgE and ≥0.35kUA/L and ≤0.1kUA/L for Ana o 3 sIgE. Costs were constructed based on unit prices from hospital inpatient admissions, expenses incurred by families, individual patient data on allergic reaction types and rates, and adrenaline autoinjector carriage, applying a health system perspective. RESULTS Modeled data through the Ana o 3 pathway resulted in a 46.43% cost reduction (€307,406/1000 patients) compared with using cashew SPT alone (€573,854/1000 patients). The 2-step algorithm resulted in a 44.94% cost reduction compared with SPT alone (€315,952.82/1000 patients). Both the Ana o 3 pathway and 2-step algorithm resulted in a 79%-80% reduction in OFCs compared with SPT. CONCLUSIONS Using Ana o 3 as a standalone test for cashew allergy diagnosis or a 2-step algorithm incorporating cashew sIgE and Ana o 3 sIgE is accurate and results in a large reduction in both OFCs and health system costs compared with cashew SPT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Brettig
- Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food and Allergy Research (CFAR), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food and Allergy Research (CFAR), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thanh Dang
- Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food and Allergy Research (CFAR), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Vicki McWilliam
- Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sakura Sato
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Savvas Savvatianos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food and Allergy Research (CFAR), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brettig T, Koplin JJ, Dang T, Lange L, McWilliam V, Sato S, Savvatianos S, Perrett KP. Cashew allergy diagnosis: A two-step algorithm leads to fewer oral food challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2022; 10:1652-1654.e2. [PMID: 35074601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
13
|
Labrosse R, Graham F, Caubet JC. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of tree nut and seed allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:194-201. [DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Borres MP, Sato S, Ebisawa M. Recent advances in diagnosing and managing nut allergies with focus on hazelnuts, walnuts, and cashew nuts. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100641. [PMID: 35493774 PMCID: PMC9020091 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus P. Borres
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sakura Sato
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
- Corresponding author. Sakura Sato, M.D., Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, 18-1, Sakuradai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0392, Japan.
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stege H, Grabbe S, Saloga J. Souvenir aus Mittelamerika - allergisches Kontaktekzem auf Cashewnuss. Allergo J 2022; 31:56-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-022-4983-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Dang TD, Peters R, Neeland MR, Brettig T, Green H, McWilliam V, Tang MLK, Dharmage S, Ponsonby AL, Koplin J, Perrett KP. Ana o 3 sIgE testing increases the accuracy of cashew allergy diagnosis using a two-step model. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13705. [PMID: 34821421 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of cashew-specific IgE (sIgE) is often used to confirm sensitization but does not reliably diagnose clinical allergy. Ana o 3 is the dominant cashew allergen detected in 75-100% of patients with cashew allergy but not currently used in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES To determine if component-resolved diagnostics using specific IgE to the 2 S albumin from cashew, Ana o 3, improves the accuracy of diagnosing cashew allergy, thereby circumventing the need for an oral food challenge (OFC) in some patients. METHODS A population-based sample of 5276 children was recruited at age 1 year and followed up at age 6 years. Children with positive cashew skin prick test at age 6 underwent an OFC to clarify allergy status. Forty-seven children (mean age 5.02 ± 0.2) (33 cashew-allergic and 14 cashew-tolerant) had cashew sIgE and Ana o 3 sIgE quantified by ImmunoCAP System FEIA. RESULTS A cutoff of >0.32 kUA/L for Ana o 3 sIgE provided 95% specificity and 90% sensitivity and correctly identified 90% of clinical cashew allergy. At the same specificity, the sensitivity for cashew sIgE (>8.5 kUA/L) was only 26%. Sequential measurement of cashew sIgE followed by Ana o 3 sIgE diagnosed 90% of children with cashew allergy without the need for an OFC. CONCLUSION Ana o 3 sIgE testing provides higher diagnostic accuracy than cashew sIgE. Sequential measurement of cashew sIgE followed by Ana o 3 removed the need for a food challenge from 66% down to 12.8% (5-fold) of children compared with cashew sIgE testing alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh D Dang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie R Neeland
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Brettig
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hayden Green
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicki McWilliam
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shyamali Dharmage
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Allergy and Lung Health Unit for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne-Louise Ponsonby
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Allergy and Lung Health Unit for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Koplin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Weger WW, Sprikkelman AB, Herpertz CEM, van der Meulen GN, Vonk JM, Kamps AWA, Koppelman GH. The dilemma of open or double-blind food challenges in diagnosing food allergy in children: Design of the ALDORADO trial. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13654. [PMID: 34435396 PMCID: PMC9293118 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is of major importance to diagnose food allergy accurately. Current guidelines support the use of oral food challenges to do so. The double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) has been regarded as the 'gold standard' for decades. However, DBPCFCs are costly, and time- and resource-intensive procedures. Structural implementation of less demanding open food challenges will only find support if research demonstrates that their outcome is comparable to DBPCFC, yet this has been proven difficult to investigate. METHODS We performed a literature review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of oral food challenges and interviewed 19 parents of children with proven or suspected food allergy about the design of a trial to study this. RESULTS An overview of the dilemma of diagnosing food allergy using oral food challenges, and the methodological issues and parents' opinions to study this. No comparative studies have been performed using the latest guidelines on oral food challenges. CONCLUSIONS There is an urgent need to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of different oral food challenge protocols. We present the rationale and design of the ALDORADO trial (ALlergy Diagnosed by Open oR DOuble-blind food challenge) that has been set up to investigate whether the outcome of the open food challenge is comparable to DBPCFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter W. de Weger
- Department of PediatricsMartini HospitalGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Aline B. Sprikkelman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Judith M. Vonk
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard H. Koppelman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Röntynen P, Kukkonen K, Savinko T, Mäkelä MJ. Optimizing tools for evaluating challenge outcomes in children with cashew nut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 128:270-278. [PMID: 34896310 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cashew nut anaphylaxis is increasing and there is a need for accurate diagnostic tests. Age-specific cutoffs in children are lacking. Changes in serum tryptase levels are not well documented in pediatric food allergy, except in anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of various tests to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. We also investigated changes in tryptase and their correlation to reaction severity. METHODS We performed an open cashew nut challenge on 106 children (aged 1-16 years), who were sensitized to cashew nut with either previous allergic reaction to cashew nut or no known exposure. We analyzed the accuracy of Ana o 3 immunoglobulin E (IgE), cashew nut IgE, skin prick test, basophil activation test (BAT), and combinations thereof to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. Tryptase level was measured at the baseline and during an allergic reaction. RESULTS A total of 72 children had positive challenge outcomes. Ana o 3 IgE seemed to be the best single test to diagnose cashew allergy, with a 0.97 kU/L cutoff exhibiting 94.1% specificity and 61.1% sensitivity. Though BAT values of at least 22.8% best predicted reaction severity, with 91.7% specificity and 60.7% sensitivity, the cutoffs were age-specific. Tryptase levels increased substantially 1 to 2 hours after the first allergic symptoms compared with baseline. CONCLUSION Ana o 3 IgE seems to be the best diagnostic test in pediatric cashew nut allergy, and test combinations do not seem to improve the diagnostics. Cutoffs are age-specific. BAT is promising in predicting reaction severity. Tryptase levels should be measured 1 to 2 hours after initiation of an allergic reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petteri Röntynen
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Kaarina Kukkonen
- Children's Hospital and Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Terhi Savinko
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika J Mäkelä
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mattison CP, Vant-Hull B, de Castro ACR, Chial HJ, Bren-Mattison Y, Bechtel PJ, de Brito ES. Characterization of Anti-Ana o 3 Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Application in Comparing Brazilian Cashew Cultivars. Antibodies (Basel) 2021; 10:antib10040046. [PMID: 34939998 PMCID: PMC8698838 DOI: 10.3390/antib10040046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ana o 3 is an immuno-dominant cashew nut allergen. Four monoclonal antibodies to Ana o 3 (2H5, 6B9C1, 19C9A2, and 5B7F8) were characterized by ELISA and in silico modeling. The 2H5 antibody was the only antibody specific for cashew nut extract. In addition to cashew nut extract, the 6B9C1 and 19C9A2 antibodies recognized pistachio extract, and the 5B7F8 recognized pecan extract. All four antibodies recognized both recombinant Ana o 3.0101 and native Ana o 3. ELISA assays following treatment of purified Ana o 3 with a reducing agent indicated that the 6B9C1 and 19C9A2 antibodies likely recognize conformational epitopes, while the 2H5 and 5B7F8 antibodies likely recognize linear epitopes. In silico modeling predicted distinct epitopes for each of the anti-Ana o 3 antibodies. Screening extracts from 11 Brazilian cashew nut cultivars using all four antibodies showed slight differences in Ana o 3 bindings, demonstrating that these antibodies could identify cultivars with varying allergen content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P. Mattison
- Southern Regional Research Center, FPSQ, ARS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | | | | | - Heidi J. Chial
- BioMed Bridge LLC., 3700 Quebec Street, Suite 100-230, Denver, CO 80207, USA;
| | - Yvette Bren-Mattison
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
- New Orleans Louisiana Neuroendocrine Tumor Specialists (NOLANETS), Ochsner Medical Center, Kenner, LA 70065, USA
| | - Peter J. Bechtel
- Southern Regional Research Center, FPSQ, ARS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA;
| | - Edy Sousa de Brito
- Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza 60511-110, CE, Brazil; (A.C.R.d.C.); (E.S.d.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fuhrmann V, Huang HJ, Akarsu A, Shilovskiy I, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, van Hage M, Linhart B, Focke-Tejkl M, Valenta R, Sekerel BE. From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack. Front Immunol 2021; 12:742732. [PMID: 34630424 PMCID: PMC8496898 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanuts and tree nuts are two of the most common elicitors of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy. Nut allergy is frequently associated with systemic reactions and can lead to potentially life-threatening respiratory and circulatory symptoms. Furthermore, nut allergy usually persists throughout life. Whether sensitized patients exhibit severe and life-threatening reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), mild and/or local reactions (e.g., pollen-food allergy syndrome) or no relevant symptoms depends much on IgE recognition of digestion-resistant class I food allergens, IgE cross-reactivity of class II food allergens with respiratory allergens and clinically not relevant plant-derived carbohydrate epitopes, respectively. Accordingly, molecular allergy diagnosis based on the measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels to allergen molecules provides important information in addition to provocation testing in the diagnosis of food allergy. Molecular allergy diagnosis helps identifying the genuinely sensitizing nuts, it determines IgE sensitization to class I and II food allergen molecules and hence provides a basis for personalized forms of treatment such as precise prescription of diet and allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Currently available forms of nut-specific AIT are based only on allergen extracts, have been mainly developed for peanut but not for other nuts and, unlike AIT for respiratory allergies which utilize often subcutaneous administration, are given preferentially by the oral route. Here we review prevalence of allergy to peanut and tree nuts in different populations of the world, summarize knowledge regarding the involved nut allergen molecules and current AIT approaches for nut allergy. We argue that nut-specific AIT may benefit from molecular subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) approaches but identify also possible hurdles for such an approach and explain why molecular SCIT may be a hard nut to crack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Fuhrmann
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Huey-Jy Huang
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aysegul Akarsu
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Elisyutina
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Musa Khaitov
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University, Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgit Linhart
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margarete Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bulent Enis Sekerel
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang LJ, Mu SC, Lin MI, Sung TC, Chiang BL, Lin CH. Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021. [PMID: 34519995 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies (FAs) are an emerging health care issue, and a "second wave of the allergy epidemic" was named. There are extensive data that documented the prevalence rate as high as approximately 10%. FAs are immunological adverse reactions, including IgE-mediated mechanisms, cell-mediated mechanisms, or mixed IgE- and cell-mediated mechanisms. A diagnosis of FA is made by specific symptoms encounter with food, detailed past history, sensitization tests, and oral food challenges (OFCs) if necessary. The component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) test can distinguish true or cross-reaction. "Minimal elimination" from the results of CRD and OFC could avoid unnecessary food restriction. Strict food limitation is harsh and stressful on patients and their families. Children with FAs experience a higher rate of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and bullying than others. In the last 20 years, oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) are treatment strategies. OIT and EPIT are the most two encouraging treatments for FA. This review aims to introduce FAs in diverse clinical disorders, new perspectives, and their practical implications in diagnosing and treating FA.
Collapse
|
22
|
Turner PJ, Patel N, Ballmer-Weber BK, Baumert JL, Blom WM, Brooke-Taylor S, Brough H, Campbell DE, Chen H, Chinthrajah RS, Crevel RWR, Dubois AEJ, Ebisawa M, Elizur A, Gerdts JD, Gowland MH, Houben GF, Hourihane JOB, Knulst AC, La Vieille S, López MC, Mills ENC, Polenta GA, Purington N, Said M, Sampson HA, Schnadt S, Södergren E, Taylor SL, Remington BC. Peanut Can Be Used as a Reference Allergen for Hazard Characterization in Food Allergen Risk Management: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Meta-Analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021:S2213-2198(21)00907-7. [PMID: 34438104 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Regional and national legislation mandates the disclosure of “priority” allergens when present as an ingredient in foods, but this does not extend to the unintended presence of allergens due to shared production facilities. This has resulted in a proliferation of precautionary allergen (“may contain”) labels (PAL) that are frequently ignored by food-allergic consumers. Attempts have been made to improve allergen risk management to better inform the use of PAL, but a lack of consensus has led to variety of regulatory approaches and nonuniformity in the use of PAL by food businesses. One potential solution would be to establish internationally agreed “reference doses,” below which no PAL would be needed. However, if reference doses are to be used to inform the need for PAL, then it is essential to characterize the hazard associated with these low-level exposures. For peanut, there are now published data relating to over 3000 double-blind, placebo-controlled challenges in allergic individuals, but a similar level of evidence is lacking for other priority allergens. We present the results of a rapid evidence assessment and meta-analysis for the risk of anaphylaxis to a low-level allergen exposure for priority allergens. On the basis of this analysis, we propose that peanut can and should be considered an exemplar allergen for the hazard characterization at a low-level allergen exposure.
Collapse
|
23
|
Bager J, Tedner SG, Andersson N, Ballardini N, Borres MP, Konradsen JR, Nilsson C, Westman M, Kull I, Bergström A, van Hage M, Melen E, Asarnoj A. Prevalence and early-life risk factors for tree nut sensitization and allergy in young adults. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51:1429-1437. [PMID: 34357659 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tree nut allergy may cause anaphylaxis. There are limited population-based studies on prevalence and early-life risk factors. METHODS We evaluated the prevalence of reported symptoms and allergic sensitization to tree nuts at age 24 years in the BAMSE population-based cohort study and assessed early-life factors associated with the development of tree nut allergy. We estimated tree nut allergy prevalence, by analysing questionnaire data on tree nut ingestion and symptoms at age 12, 16 and 24 years, and IgE sensitization at age 24 years to hazelnut, walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, Brazil nut, almond extracts and allergen molecules Cor a 1, 9, 14 (hazelnut), Jug r 1 (walnut) and Ana o 3 (cashew). We evaluated eczema, asthma, food allergies, inherited risk of allergy and gender as potential early-life risk factors. RESULTS Data were available for 2215/4089 (54%) BAMSE study participants, for estimation of the prevalence of tree nut sensitization (21.2%), tree nut allergy symptoms (9.8%) and combined sensitization and symptoms (7.9%, 2.1% for storage protein sensitization and symptoms, 4.3% for any sensitization and non-mild symptoms). Sixty-three per cent of sensitized individuals (295/470) were asymptomatic, but only 76/470 (16%) storage protein sensitized individuals. Egg allergy (ORadj 8.50 95% CI 2.15-33.6), eczema (ORadj 2.53 95% CI 1.21-5.32) and asthma (ORadj 5.59 95% CI 2.35-13.3)) at pre-school age were associated with future development of tree nut symptoms and storage protein sensitization. At age 24 years, tree nut allergy was associated with current eczema and with markers of current asthma severity. Sensitization to storage proteins was more strongly associated with symptoms than sensitization to whole extract for all tree nuts evaluated. CONCLUSIONS In this Swedish cohort, we found tree nut whole extract sensitization is common but usually asymptomatic. Storage protein sensitization is a more reliable indicator of tree nut symptoms. Tree nut allergy is associated with early onset, persistent and severe atopic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bager
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sandra G Tedner
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niklas Andersson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Natalia Ballardini
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Dermatology and Sexual Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus P Borres
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jon R Konradsen
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Nilsson
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marit Westman
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Asthma and Allergy Clinic S:t Göran, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Inger Kull
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Bergström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Melen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Asarnoj
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Duan L, Celik A, Hoang JA, Schmidthaler K, So D, Yin X, Ditlof CM, Ponce M, Upton JE, Lee J, Hung L, Breiteneder H, Palladino C, Atkinson AR, Kim VH, Berenjy A, Asper M, Hummel D, Wong S, Alexanian‐Farr M, Magder A, Chinthrajah SR, Mukai K, Tsai M, Nadeau K, Galli SJ, Ramani AK, Szepfalusi Z, Eiwegger T. Basophil activation test shows high accuracy in the diagnosis of peanut and tree nut allergy: The Markers of Nut Allergy Study. Allergy 2021; 76:1800-1812. [PMID: 33300157 DOI: 10.1111/all.14695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut and tree nut allergies are the most important causes of anaphylaxis. Co-reactivity to more than one nut is frequent, and co-sensitization in the absence of clinical data is often obtained. Confirmatory oral food challenges (OFCs) are inconsistently performed. OBJECTIVE To investigate the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in diagnosing peanut and tree nut allergies. METHODS The Markers Of Nut Allergy Study (MONAS) prospectively enrolled patients aged 0.5-17 years with confirmed peanut and/or tree nut (almond, cashew, hazelnut, pistachio, walnut) allergy or sensitization from Canadian (n = 150) and Austrian (n = 50) tertiary pediatric centers. BAT using %CD63+ basophils (SSClow/CCR3pos) as outcome was performed with whole blood samples stimulated with allergen extracts of each nut (0.001-1000 ng/mL protein). BAT results were assessed against confirmed allergic status in a blinded fashion to develop a generalizable statistical model for comparison to extract and marker allergen-specific IgE. RESULTS A mixed effect model integrating BAT results for 10 and 100 ng/mL of peanut and individual tree nut extracts was optimal. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.98 for peanut, 0.97 for cashew, 0.92 for hazelnut, 0.95 for pistachio, and 0.97 for walnut. The BAT outperformed sIgE testing for peanut or hazelnut and was comparable for walnut (AUROC 0.95, 0.94, 0.92) in a sub-analysis in sensitized patients undergoing OFC. CONCLUSIONS Basophil activation test can predict allergic clinical status to peanut and tree nuts in multi-nut-sensitized children and may reduce the need for high-risk OFCs in patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Pfaar O, Blumchen K, Boateng E, Hamelmann E, Iinuma T, Jakob T, Krauss-Etschmann S, Nagase H, Nakajima S, Nakano T, Renz H, Sato S, Taube C, Wagenmann M, Werfel T, Worm M, Izuhara K. Precision medicine reaching out to the patients in allergology - a German-Japanese workshop report. Allergol Select 2021; 5:162-79. [PMID: 34079922 DOI: 10.5414/ALX02234E] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An expert workshop in collaboration of the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) and the Japanese Society of Allergy (JSA) provided a platform for key opinion leaders of both countries aimed to join expertise and to highlight current developments and achievements in allergy research. Key domains of the meeting included the following seven main sections and related subchapters: 1) basic immunology, 2) bronchial asthma, 3) prevention of allergic diseases, 4) food allergy and anaphylaxis, 5) atopic dermatitis, 6) venom allergy, and 7) upper airway diseases. This report provides a summary of panel discussions of all seven domains and highlights unmet needs and project possibilities of enhanced collaborations of scientific projects.
Collapse
|
26
|
Foong RX, Dantzer JA, Wood RA, Santos AF. Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Food Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021; 9:71-80. [PMID: 33429723 PMCID: PMC7794657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of food allergy can have a major impact on the lives of patients and families, imposing dietary restrictions and limitations on social activities. On the other hand, misdiagnosis can place the patient at risk of a potentially severe allergic reaction. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis of food allergy is of utmost importance. The diagnosis of food allergy is often established by the combination of the clinical history and allergen-specific IgE; however, without a clear history of an allergic reaction, the interpretation of IgE sensitization tests can be difficult. There are also rare cases of clinical food allergy in the absence of IgE sensitization. For that reason, testing for suspected food allergy ideally requires access to oral food challenges (OFCs), which are currently the gold standard tests to diagnose food allergy. As OFCs are time consuming and involve the risk of acute allergic reactions of unpredictable severity, the question remains: how can we improve the accuracy of diagnosis before referring the patient for an OFC? Herein, we review the predictive value of different tests used to support the diagnosis of food allergy, discuss implications for therapy and prognosis, and propose a diagnostic approach to be applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-Xin Foong
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer A Dantzer
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brettig T, Dang T, Mcwilliam V, Peters RL, Koplin JJ, Perrett KP. The Accuracy of Diagnostic Testing in Determining Tree Nut Allergy: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2021; 9:2028-2049.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
28
|
Kabasser S, Hafner C, Chinthrajah S, Sindher SB, Kumar D, Kost LE, Long AJ, Nadeau KC, Breiteneder H, Bublin M. Identification of Pru du 6 as a potential marker allergen for almond allergy. Allergy 2021; 76:1463-1472. [PMID: 33020913 PMCID: PMC8247360 DOI: 10.1111/all.14613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral food challenges have demonstrated that diagnosis of almond allergy based on extract-sIgE tests displays low specificity. Molecular allergy diagnosis is expected to improve accuracy, but its value in diagnosing almond allergy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to identify relevant almond allergens and examine their ability to improve almond allergy diagnosis. METHODS IgE-reactive proteins were purified from almond kernels. IgE binding to almond extract and the allergens was analyzed by quantitative ELISA using sera from 18 subjects with a proven almond allergy. The control group consisted of sera from 18 subjects allergic to peanut and/or tree nuts but tolerant to almond. RESULTS Three IgE-binding proteins were identified: legumin (Pru du 6), alpha-hairpinin (Pru du 8), and mandelonitrile lyase (Pru du 10). Positive IgE (≥0.35 kU/L) to almond extract showed 94% sensitivity but only 33% specificity. IgE to Pru du 6 maintained high sensitivity (83%) and provided superior specificity (78%). Sera from almond-allergic subjects had significantly higher IgE levels to almond extract (P < .0001) and Pru du 6 (P < .0001) than sera from tolerant donors. Sensitization to Pru du 6 was highly specific for almond allergy, while frequencies of sensitization to legumins from peanut, walnut, hazelnut, and cashew were similar in both groups. IgE to Pru du 8 and Pru du 10 was less sensitive (41% and 67%), but showed specificities of 100% and 61%. CONCLUSION The use of almond allergens markedly increases the diagnostic specificity compared to the extract. Pru du 6 is a potential new molecular marker for almond allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Kabasser
- Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Christine Hafner
- Department of Dermatology University Hospital St. Poelten Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences St. Poelten Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Dermatological Research St. Poelten Austria
| | - Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Sayantani B. Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Divya Kumar
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Laurie E. Kost
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Andrew J. Long
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Kari C. Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
- Department of Pediatrics Stanford University Stanford CA USA
- Department of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Heimo Breiteneder
- Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Merima Bublin
- Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Amat F, Benharoun-Stern R, Benissa MR, Just J. Usefulness of r Ana o 3 assessment before oral food challenge to pistachio. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:615-618. [PMID: 33305430 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Flore Amat
- Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology Unit, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.,EPAR, UMR-S 1136 INSERM, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | | | - Mohamed-Rida Benissa
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Suisse
| | - Jocelyne Just
- EPAR, UMR-S 1136 INSERM, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France.,Department of Pediatric Allergology, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, AP-HP, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dreskin SC, Koppelman SJ, Andorf S, Nadeau KC, Kalra A, Braun W, Negi SS, Chen X, Schein CH. The importance of the 2S albumins for allergenicity and cross-reactivity of peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:1154-1163. [PMID: 33217410 PMCID: PMC8035160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Allergies to peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds are among the most important food-related causes of anaphylaxis. Important clinical questions include: Why is there a variable occurrence of coallergy among these foods and Is this immunologically mediated? The clinical and immunologic data summarized here suggest an immunologic basis for these coallergies that is based on similarities among the 2S albumins. Data from component resolved diagnostics have highlighted the relationship between IgE binding to these allergens and the presence of IgE-mediated food allergy. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo experiments provide strong evidence that the 2S albumins are the most important allergens in peanuts for inducing an allergic effector response. Although the 2S albumins are diverse, they have a common disulfide-linked core with similar physicochemical properties that make them prime candidates to explain much of the observed coallergy among peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds. The well-established frequency of cashew and pistachio nut coallergy (64%-100%) highlights how the structural similarities among their 2S albumins may account for observed clinical cross-reactivity. A complete understanding of the physicochemical properties of the 2S albumins in peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds will enhance our ability to diagnose, treat, and ultimately prevent these allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Dreskin
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo.
| | - Stef J Koppelman
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb
| | - Sandra Andorf
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Anjeli Kalra
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo
| | - Werner Braun
- Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex
| | - Surendra S Negi
- Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex
| | - Xueni Chen
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo
| | - Catherine H Schein
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex; Institute for Human Infection and Immunity, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Čelakovská J, Bukač J, Vaňková R, Salavec M, Krejsek J, Andrýs C. Allergy to walnuts and hazelnuts in atopic dermatitis patients and analysis of sensitization to molecular components. FOOD AGR IMMUNOL 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2021.1874883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J. Čelakovská
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - J. Bukač
- Department of Medical Biophysic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech republic
| | - R. Vaňková
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - M. Salavec
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - J. Krejsek
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - C. Andrýs
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Food allergy (FA) has become an increasing problem throughout the world. Over the last 2 decades, the frequency of FA has increased in both children and adults. The prevalence differs according to the research methodology, age, and geographic regions, ranging between 2.0% and 10.0%. The most common form of FA is immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated FA. In this form, patients may present with life-threatening conditions, such as anaphylaxis, or milder conditions, such as urticaria, angioedema, sneezing, and nausea alone. The gold standard in the diagnosis of FA is oral provocation tests. Epidermal skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements, as well as component-resolved diagnostic techniques are helpful in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients. In this review, the epidemiology, diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of IgE-mediated FA in children and adults were discussed and some specific forms of FA, such as pollen FA syndrome, alpha-gal allergy, and food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis were explained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebru Çelebioğlu
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayşegül Akarsu
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Asthma, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ümit Murat Şahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Asthma, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ring J, Beyer K, Biedermann T, Bircher A, Fischer M, Heller A, Huttegger I, Jakob T, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Kugler C, Lange L, Pfaar O, Rietschel E, Rueff F, Schnadt S, Seifert R, Stöcker B, Treudler R, Vogelberg C, Werfel T, Worm M, Sitter H, Brockow K. Leitlinie zu Akuttherapie und Management der Anaphylaxie - Update 2021: S2k-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie (DGAKI), des Ärzteverbands Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA), der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Allergologie und Umweltmedizin (GPA), der Deutschen Akademie für Allergologie und Umweltmedizin (DAAU), des Berufsverbands der Kinder- und Jugendärzte (BVKJ), der Gesellschaft für Neonatologie und Pädiatrische Intensivmedizin (GNPI), der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG), der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und Immunologie (ÖGAI), der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und Immunologie (SGAI), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pharmakologie (DGP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin (DGP), der Patientenorganisation Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund (DAAB) und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Anaphylaxie - Training und Edukation (AGATE). Allergo J 2021; 30:20-49. [PMID: 33612982 DOI: 10.1007/s15007-020-4750-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
34
|
Foong RX, Santos AF. Biomarkers of diagnosis and resolution of food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:223-233. [PMID: 33020989 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is increasing in prevalence, affecting up to 10% of children in developed countries. Food allergy can significantly affect the quality of life and well-being of patients and their families; therefore, an accurate diagnosis is of extreme importance. Some food allergies can spontaneously resolve in 50%-60% of cow's milk and egg-allergic, 20% of peanut-allergic and 9% of tree nut-allergic children by school age. For that reason, food-allergic status should be monitored over time to determine when to reintroduce the food back into the child's diet. The gold-standard to confirm the diagnosis and the resolution of food allergy is an oral food challenge; however, this involves the risk of causing an acute-allergic reaction and requires clinical experience and resources to treat allergic reactions of any degree of severity. In the clinical setting, biomarkers have been used and validated to enable an accurate diagnosis when combined with the clinical history, deferring the oral food challenge, whenever possible. In this review, we cover the tools available to support the diagnosis of food allergies and to predict food allergy resolution over time. We review the latest evidence on different testing modalities and how effective they are in guiding clinical decision making in practice. We also evaluate predictive test cut-offs for the more common food allergens to try and provide guidance on when challenges might be most successful in determining oral tolerance in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-Xin Foong
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Midun E, Radulovic S, Brough H, Caubet JC. Recent advances in the management of nut allergy. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100491. [PMID: 33510829 PMCID: PMC7811165 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanut/tree nut allergy is common and has been associated with particularly severe reactions. Epidemiological data have shown that the prevalence ranges between 0.05% and 4.9% for tree nut and between 0.5% and 3% for peanut. These large variations can be explained by differences in the age of included patients and the geographical region. In addition, the food consumption modality (ie, raw versus roasted) plays a major role, as heat treatment has the capacity to modify the allergenicity of nuts and legumes. Nut allergies tend to persist into adulthood and consequently have a high impact on quality of life. Recently, it has been demonstrated that a significant proportion of nut allergic patients are able to tolerate other nuts. As opposed to the avoidance of all nuts, this approach is currently proposed in several tertiary allergy centers. However, diagnosis of nut allergy is particularly difficult due to co-sensitization leading to high rate of false positive skin prick tests and/or specific IgE to whole allergen extracts. The use of component resolved diagnosis leads to major improvement of diagnosis, particularly to distinguish between primary and secondary nut allergies. The basophil activation test has been suggested to be useful but is still used mainly as a research tool. Thus, diagnosis remains mainly based on the oral food challenge, which is considered as the gold standard. Regarding treatment, avoidance remains the cornerstone of management of nut allergy. Oral immunotherapy is increasingly proposed as an alternative management strategy.
Collapse
Key Words
- Component-resolved diagnostic, CRD
- Cross reactivity
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenge, DBPCFC
- Food allergy
- Lipid transfer protein, LTP
- Oral allergy syndrome, OAS
- Oral food challenge, OFC
- Oral immunotherapy
- Oral induction tolerance, OIT
- Pathogenesis related protein type 10, PR-10
- Peanut
- Platelet-activating factor, PAF
- Pollen-food syndrome, PFS
- Precautionary Allergen Labels, (PAL)
- Skin prick test, SPT
- Tree nut
- Tree nut, TN
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Midun
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva and University of Geneva, Rue Willy Donzé 6, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland, University Lyon 1 Claude Bernard, 43 Boulevard Du 11-Novembre-1918, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
- Corresponding author.
| | - Suzana Radulovic
- Paediatric Allergy Group, Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, Paediatric Allergy Group, Peter Gorer Dept of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, Guys' Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Children's Allergy Service, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Brough
- Paediatric Allergy Group, Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, Paediatric Allergy Group, Peter Gorer Dept of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, Guys' Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Children's Allergy Service, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva and University of Geneva, Rue Willy Donzé 6, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schoos AMM, Nwaru BI, Borres MP. Component-resolved diagnostics in pet allergy: Current perspectives and future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:1164-1173. [PMID: 33444632 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Furry mammals kept as pets are important allergen sources. The prevalence of sensitization to dander from various animals appears to be increasing worldwide. Several mammalian allergens from diverse species and distinct protein families have been characterized, and some are available for component-resolved diagnostics (CRD). This review presents an overview of mammalian aeroallergens, with a focus on cat, dog, and horse allergens. The potential of CRD in fine-tuning the diagnostic workup following traditional methods based on whole- allergen extracts and allergen immunotherapy is discussed. The review highlights the clinical utility of CRD, particularly as a marker/predictor of increased asthma risk and disease severity. Finally, several perspectives of the future implications of CRD are offered in the context of furry animal allergens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie M Schoos
- COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood (COPSAC), Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Pediatrics, Slagelse Sygehus, Slagelse, Denmark.
| | - Bright I Nwaru
- Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Magnus P Borres
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ring J, Beyer K, Biedermann T, Bircher A, Fischer M, Fuchs T, Heller A, Hoffmann F, Huttegger I, Jakob T, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Kugler C, Lange L, Pfaar O, Rietschel E, Rueff F, Schnadt S, Seifert R, Stöcker B, Treudler R, Vogelberg C, Werfel T, Worm M, Sitter H, Brockow K. Guideline (S2k) on acute therapy and management of anaphylaxis: 2021 update: S2k-Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Professional Association of Pediatricians (BVKJ), the Society for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care (GNPI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the German Society of Pharmacology (DGP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the patient organization German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB), the German Working Group of Anaphylaxis Training and Education (AGATE). Allergo J Int 2021; 30:1-25. [PMID: 33527068 PMCID: PMC7841027 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-020-00158-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Ring
- Department Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University Munich, Biedersteiner Straße 29, 80802 Munich, Germany
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité—University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Department Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University Munich, Biedersteiner Straße 29, 80802 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Bircher
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Fischer
- Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, ALB FILS Hospitals Göppingen, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Axel Heller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Florian Hoffmann
- Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isidor Huttegger
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Gießen (UKGM), Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center of Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias V. Kopp
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kugler
- Department Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University Munich, Biedersteiner Straße 29, 80802 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ernst Rietschel
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Franziska Rueff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabine Schnadt
- German Allergy and Asthma Association, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Roland Seifert
- Institute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Britta Stöcker
- Medical practice for pediatrics and youth medicine, Poppelsdorfer Allee, Bonn, Germany
| | - Regina Treudler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Leipzig Interdisciplinary Allergy Center, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Vogelberg
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Immunodermatology and Experimental Allergology Unit, Department of Dermatology, Allergology, and Venereology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité—University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute for Surgical Research, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University Munich, Biedersteiner Straße 29, 80802 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Campbell E, Hesser LA, Nagler CR. B cells and the microbiota: a missing connection in food allergy. Mucosal Immunol 2021; 14:4-13. [PMID: 33106585 DOI: 10.1038/s41385-020-00350-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Food allergies are a major public health concern due to their widespread and rising prevalence. The increase in food allergy is partially due to Western lifestyle habits which deplete protective commensal microbiota. These microbial perturbations can result in adverse host-microbe interactions, altering the phenotype of various immune cells and instigating allergic sensitization. Although B cells are critical to allergic pathology, microbial influences on B cells have been somewhat overlooked. Here, we focus on direct and indirect interactions between bacteria and B cells and how such interactions regulate B-cell phenotype, namely antibody production (IgA, IgE, IgG1, and IgG4) and regulatory B-cell (Breg) function. Understanding how microbes modulate B-cell activity in the context of food allergies is critical to both tracing the development of disease and assessing future treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Campbell
- Committee on Microbiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pathology and Committee on Immunology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lauren A Hesser
- Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cathryn R Nagler
- Department of Pathology and Committee on Immunology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cho EJ, Chang AL. First reported allergic reaction in the United States to pili nut (Canarium ovatum). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021; 9:537-538. [PMID: 32942049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Cho
- Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif
| | - Angela L Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Breiteneder H, Peng Y, Agache I, Diamant Z, Eiwegger T, Fokkens WJ, Traidl‐Hoffmann C, Nadeau K, O'Hehir RE, O'Mahony L, Pfaar O, Torres MJ, Wang D, Zhang L, Akdis CA. Biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of therapy responses in allergic diseases and asthma. Allergy 2020; 75:3039-3068. [PMID: 32893900 PMCID: PMC7756301 DOI: 10.1111/all.14582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Modern health care requires a proactive and individualized response to diseases, combining precision diagnosis and personalized treatment. Accordingly, the approach to patients with allergic diseases encompasses novel developments in the area of personalized medicine, disease phenotyping and endotyping, and the development and application of reliable biomarkers. A detailed clinical history and physical examination followed by the detection of IgE immunoreactivity against specific allergens still represents the state of the art. However, nowadays, further emphasis focuses on the optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic standards and a large number of studies have been investigating the biomarkers of allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, urticaria and anaphylaxis. Various biomarkers have been developed by omics technologies, some of which lead to a better classification of distinct phenotypes or endotypes. The introduction of biologicals to clinical practice increases the need for biomarkers for patient selection, prediction of outcomes and monitoring, to allow for an adequate choice of the duration of these costly and long‐lasting therapies. Escalating healthcare costs together with questions about the efficacy of the current management of allergic diseases require further development of a biomarker‐driven approach. Here, we review biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, viral infections, chronic rhinosinusitis, food allergy, drug hypersensitivity and allergen immunotherapy with a special emphasis on specific IgE, the microbiome and the epithelial barrier. In addition, EAACI guidelines on biologicals are discussed within the perspective of biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heimo Breiteneder
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Ya‐Qi Peng
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University Zurich Davos Switzerland
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
- Otorhinolaryngology Hospital The First Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Ioana Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - Zuzana Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology Institute for Clinical Science Skane University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden
- Department of Respiratory Medicine First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen Netherlands
| | - Thomas Eiwegger
- Translational Medicine Program, Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program The Hospital for Sick Children Departments of Paediatrics and Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Wytske J. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centres Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Claudia Traidl‐Hoffmann
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
- ZIEL ‐ Institute for Food & Health Technical University of Munich Freising‐Weihenstephan Germany
| | - Kari Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Robyn E. O'Hehir
- Department of Allergy, immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Service Alfred Health Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Liam O'Mahony
- Departments of Medicine and Microbiology APC Microbiome Ireland National University of Ireland Cork Ireland
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Maria J. Torres
- Allergy Unit Regional University Hospital of Malaga‐IBIMA‐UMA‐ARADyAL Malaga Spain
| | - De‐Yun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Allergy Beijing TongRen Hospital Beijing China
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University Zurich Davos Switzerland
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bastiaan-Net S, Batstra MR, Aazamy N, Savelkoul HFJ, van der Valk JPM, Gerth van Wijk R, Schreurs MWJ, Wichers HJ, de Jong NW. IgE cross-reactivity measurement of cashew nut, hazelnut and peanut using a novel IMMULITE inhibition method. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58:1875-1883. [PMID: 32083439 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Tree nut-allergic individuals are often sensitised towards multiple nuts and seeds. The underlying cause behind a multi-sensitisation for cashew nut, hazelnut, peanut and birch pollen is not always clear. We investigated whether immunoglobulin E antibody (IgE) cross-reactivity between cashew nut, hazelnut and peanut proteins exists in children who are multi-allergic to these foods using a novel IMMULITE®-based inhibition methodology, and investigated which allergens might be responsible. In addition, we explored if an allergy to birch pollen might play a role in this co-sensitisation for cashew nut, hazelnut and peanut. Methods Serum of five children with a confirmed cashew nut allergy and suffering from allergic symptoms after eating peanut and hazelnut were subjected to inhibition immunoassays using the IMMULITE® 2000 XPi. Serum-specific IgE (sIgE) to seed storage allergens and pathogenesis-related protein 10 (PR10) allergens were determined and used for molecular multicomponent allergen correlation analyses with observed clinical symptoms and obtained inhibition data. Results IgE cross-reactivity was observed in all patients. Hazelnut extract was a strong inhibitor of cashew nut sIgE (46.8%), while cashew nut extract was less able to inhibit hazelnut extract (22.8%). Peanut extract showed the least inhibition potency. Moreover, there are strong indications that a birch pollen sensitisation to Bet v 1 might play a role in the observed symptoms provoked upon ingestion of cashew nut and hazelnut. Conclusions By applying an adjusted working protocol, the IMMULITE® technology can be used to perform inhibition assays to determine the risk of sIgE cross-reactivity between very different food components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna Bastiaan-Net
- Wageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manou R Batstra
- Medische Immunologie, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Nasrin Aazamy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Huub F J Savelkoul
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna P M van der Valk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco W J Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J Wichers
- Wageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Food Chemistry, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolette W de Jong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lange L, Gernert S. [Pitfalls in the diagnostics of food allergies in children and adolescents]. Hautarzt 2020; 71:903-13. [PMID: 32997217 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-020-04692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
For the diagnostics of food allergies several points need to be considered. Firstly, it is important to recognize the various clinical pictures that can be caused by a food allergy. The assignment to a disease decides which further examinations are necessary and reasonable. In immunoglobulin (Ig) E‑mediated allergies, the detection of sensitization by determining the specific IgE or the prick test in addition to the medical history is an important mainstay of the diagnostics. Crucial is the fact that the detection of a sensitization against an extract from an allergen source only rarely implies an actual allergy. The majority of positive findings are not clinically relevant. The modern procedure of component-resolved allergy diagnostics improves the significance. Nevertheless, the diagnosis can often only be achieved by oral provocation tests. This article points out possible difficulties with the interpretation of the findings.
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Vicente F, Sanchiz A, Rodríguez-Pérez R, Pedrosa M, Quirce S, Haddad J, Besombes C, Linacero R, Allaf K, Cuadrado C. Influence of Instant Controlled Pressure Drop (DIC) on Allergenic Potential of Tree Nuts. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25071742. [PMID: 32290123 PMCID: PMC7180768 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pistachio and cashew contain allergenic proteins, which causes them to be removed from the diet of allergic people. Previous studies have demonstrated that food processing (thermal and non-thermal) can produce structural and/or conformational changes in proteins by altering their allergenic capacity. In this study, the influence of instant controlled pressure drop (DIC) on pistachio and cashew allergenic capacity has been studied. Western blot was carried out using IgG anti-11S and anti-2S and IgE antibodies from sera of patients sensitized to pistachio and cashew. DIC processing causes changes in the electrophoretic pattern, reducing the number and intensity of protein bands, as the pressure and temperature treatment increment, which results in a remarkable decrease in detection of potentially allergenic proteins. The harshest conditions of DIC (7 bar, 120 s) markedly reduce the immunodetection of allergenic proteins, not only by using IgG (anti 11S and anti 2S) but also when IgE sera from sensitized patients were used for Western blots. Such immunodetection is more affected in pistachio than in cashew nuts, but is not completely removed. Therefore, cashew proteins are possibly more resistant than pistachio proteins. According these findings, instant controlled pressure drop (DIC) can be considered a suitable technique in order to obtain hypoallergenic tree nut flour to be used in the food industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Vicente
- Food Technology DepartmentSGIT-INIA, Ctra. La Coruña Km. 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (F.V.); (A.S.)
| | - Africa Sanchiz
- Food Technology DepartmentSGIT-INIA, Ctra. La Coruña Km. 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (F.V.); (A.S.)
| | - Rosa Rodríguez-Pérez
- Allergy Service, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (R.R.-P.); (M.P.); (S.Q.)
| | - Maria Pedrosa
- Allergy Service, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (R.R.-P.); (M.P.); (S.Q.)
| | - Santiago Quirce
- Allergy Service, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (R.R.-P.); (M.P.); (S.Q.)
| | - Joseph Haddad
- Laboratory Engineering Science for Environment (UMR 7356 CNRS), La Rochelle University, venue Michel Crepeau, 17042 La Rochelle, France; (J.H.); (C.B.); (K.A.)
| | - Colette Besombes
- Laboratory Engineering Science for Environment (UMR 7356 CNRS), La Rochelle University, venue Michel Crepeau, 17042 La Rochelle, France; (J.H.); (C.B.); (K.A.)
| | - Rosario Linacero
- Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology Department, Biology Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Karim Allaf
- Laboratory Engineering Science for Environment (UMR 7356 CNRS), La Rochelle University, venue Michel Crepeau, 17042 La Rochelle, France; (J.H.); (C.B.); (K.A.)
| | - Carmen Cuadrado
- Food Technology DepartmentSGIT-INIA, Ctra. La Coruña Km. 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (F.V.); (A.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-91-347-6925
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sugita K, Akdis CA. Recent developments and advances in atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Allergol Int 2020; 69:204-214. [PMID: 31648922 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2019.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This review highlights recent advances in atopic dermatitis (AD) and food allergy (FA), particularly on molecular mechanisms and disease endotypes, recent developments in global strategies for the management of patients, pipeline for future treatments, primary and secondary prevention and psychosocial aspects. During the recent years, there has been major advances in personalized/precision medicine linked to better understanding of disease pathophysiology and precision treatment options of AD. A greater understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of AD through substantial progress in epidemiology, genetics, skin immunology and psychological aspects resulted in advancements in the precision management of AD. However, the implementation of precision medicine in the management of AD still requires the validation of reliable biomarkers, which will provide more tailored management, starting from prevention strategies towards targeted therapies for more severe diseases. Cutaneous exposure to food via defective barriers is an important route of sensitization to food allergens. Studies on the role of the skin barrier genes demonstrated their association with the development of IgE-mediated FA, and suggest novel prevention and treatment strategies for type 2 diseases in general because of their link to barrier defects not only in AD and FA, but also in asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis and inflammatory bowel disease. The development of more accurate diagnostic tools, biomarkers for early prediction, and innovative solutions require a better understanding of molecular mechanisms and the pathophysiology of FA. Based on these developments, this review provides an overview of novel developments and advances in AD and FA, which are reported particularly during the last two years.
Collapse
|
46
|
McWilliam VL, Perrett KP, Dang T, Peters RL. Prevalence and natural history of tree nut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 124:466-472. [PMID: 32044450 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tree nuts are common causes of food-related allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. Resolution of tree nut allergy is thought to be low, yet studies of the natural history of tree nut allergy are limited. This review summarizes the available literature regarding tree nut allergy prevalence and natural history and discusses emerging diagnostic and prognostic developments that will inform clinical management of tree nut allergy. DATA SOURCES A comprehensive literature search using PubMed was performed. STUDY SELECTIONS Peer-reviewed publications relating to tree nut allergy prevalence, resolution, and diagnosis were selected, and findings were summarized using a narrative approach. RESULTS Tree nut allergy prevalence varies by age, region, and food allergy definition, and ranges from less than 1% to approximately 3% worldwide. Reports on the natural history of tree nut allergy data are limited to retrospective clinical data or cross-sectional survey data of self-reported food allergy, with reported resolution ranging from 9% to 14%. Component-resolved diagnostics and basophil activation testing offer the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy and predicted prognosis of specific tree nut allergy, but studies are limited. CONCLUSION Tree nut allergy remains an understudied area of food allergy research with limited region-specific studies based on robust food allergy measures in population cohorts with longitudinal follow-up. This currently limits our understanding of tree nut allergy prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki L McWilliam
- Population Allergy Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Population Allergy Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| | - Thanh Dang
- Population Allergy Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| | - Rachel L Peters
- Population Allergy Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nilsson C, Berthold M, Mascialino B, Orme M, Sjölander S, Hamilton R. Allergen components in diagnosing childhood hazelnut allergy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020; 31:186-196. [PMID: 31301691 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hazelnut-specific IgE antibodies (sIgEs) in serum support the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy, but extract-based tests have low diagnostic specificity, commonly leading to over-diagnosis. Measuring sensitization to individual allergen components may enhance the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy. We systematically examined data on diagnostic accuracy of sIgE to commercially available hazelnut components to compare their individual contributions in diagnosing hazelnut allergy. METHODS Seven databases were searched for diagnostic studies on patients suspected of having hazelnut allergy. Studies employing component-specific IgE testing on patients whose final diagnosis was determined by oral food challenges were included in the meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed as recommended by Cochrane. RESULTS Seven cross-sectional studies and one case-control study were identified, seven presenting data on children (N = 635), and one on a mixed age population. Overall, the diagnostic accuracies of sIgE to both Cor a 9 and Cor a 14 were significantly higher than for Cor a 1-sIgE (P < .05). In children, the specificity of Cor a 14-sIgE at 0.35 kUA /L cutoff was 81.7% (95% CI 77.1, 85.6), and 67.3% (60.3, 73.6) for Cor a 9-sIgE. The specificities for Cor a 1-sIgE and hazelnut-sIgE were 22.5% (7.4, 51.2) and 10.8% (3.4, 29.8), respectively. The sensitivity of Cor a 1-sIgE (60.2% [46.9, 72.2]) was lower than for hazelnut extract-sIgE (95.7% [88.7, 98.5]), while their specificities did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION sIgE to Cor a 14 and Cor a 9 hazelnut storage proteins increases diagnostic specificity in assessing hazelnut allergy in children. The combined use of hazelnut extract and hazelnut storage proteins may improve diagnostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Nilsson
- Institute Education and Clinical Research, Karolinska Institutet and Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Eiwegger T, Hung L, San Diego KE, O'Mahony L, Upton J. Recent developments and highlights in food allergy. Allergy 2019; 74:2355-2367. [PMID: 31593325 DOI: 10.1111/all.14082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The achievement of long-lasting, safe treatments for food allergy is dependent on the understanding of the immunological basis of food allergy. Accurate diagnosis is essential for management. In recent years, data from oral food challenges have revealed that routine allergy testing is poor at predicting clinical allergy for tree nuts, almonds in particular. More advanced antigen-based tests including component-resolved diagnostics and epitope reactivity may lead to more accurate diagnosis and selection of therapeutic intervention. Additional diagnostic accuracy may come from cellular tests such as the basophil activation test or mast cell approaches. In the context of clinical trials, cellular tests have revealed specific T-cell and B-cell populations that are more abundant in food-allergic individuals with distinct mechanistic features. Awareness of clinical markers, such as the ability to eat baked forms of milk and egg, continues to inform the understanding of natural tolerance development. Mouse models have allowed for investigation into multiple mechanisms of food allergy including modification of epithelial metabolism, and the induction of regulatory cell subsets and the microbiome. Increasing numbers of children who underwent food immunotherapy enlarged the body of evidence on mechanisms and predictors of treatment success. Experimental immunological markers in conjunction with clinical determinants such as lower age and lower initial specific IgE appear to be of benefit. More research on the optimal dose, preparation, and route of application integrating a high-level safety and efficacy is demanded. Alternatively, biologics blocking TSLP, IL-33, IL-4 and IL-13, or IgE may help to achieve that.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Eiwegger
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program Departments of Paediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Lisa Hung
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | | | - Liam O'Mahony
- Departments of Medicine and Microbiology APC Microbiome Ireland National University of Ireland Cork Ireland
| | - Julia Upton
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program Departments of Paediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Blazowski L, Majak P, Kurzawa R, Kuna P, Jerzynska J. Food allergy endotype with high risk of severe anaphylaxis in children-Monosensitization to cashew 2S albumin Ana o 3. Allergy 2019; 74:1945-1955. [PMID: 31131460 DOI: 10.1111/all.13810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergy in children can be life-threatening. Component-resolved diagnostics approach to food anaphylaxis is rarely assessed in children. The aim of the study was to identify the food allergen components as the triggers responsible for severe anaphylaxis, with regard to characteristics and associated risks, among children in a large, population-based setting. METHODS Two hundred and seventy-one children who were hospitalized due to systemic allergic reaction (SAR) and food anaphylaxis were recruited. Medical history was assessed, and culprit allergen source and anaphylaxis severity grade were established. Specific IgE to 112 allergen components using multiplex ImmunoCAP ISAC immunoassay and specific IgE to hazelnut, Cor a 14, and cashew, Ana o 3, using singleplex ImmunoCAP immunoassay were determined. RESULTS We analyzed data from 237 SAR/anaphylaxis in 237 children. Trigger at allergen component level was defined for every episode. The most common triggers of SAR/anaphylaxis were seeds (50.6%), among them, the storage proteins. Anaphylaxis triggered by Ana o 3, 2S albumin from cashews (aOR = 15.0; 95% CI: 3.27 to 73.47); Tri a 19 from wheat (aOR = 9.93; 95% CI: 1.73 to 56.97); and Cor a 9 from hazelnut (aOR = 6.53; 95% CI: 1.16 to 36.72) had the worst clinical presentation including cardiovascular and severe respiratory symptoms (grade IV-V vs I-III in Cox scale). Thirteen out of 237 (5.5%) SAR/anaphylaxis patients were triggered by Ana o 3. Almost 82% of patients with severe Ana o 3 anaphylaxis were sensitized only to this component and had no concomitant food sensitization. CONCLUSION Monosensitization to Ana o 3 is, irrespective of other parameters, connected with high risk of severe anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Blazowski
- Department of Allergology National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Rabka‐Zdroj Poland
- Faculty of Medicine University of Rzeszow Rzeszow Poland
- Pediatric and Allergology Department Specialist Hospital Jaslo Poland
| | - Pawel Majak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
| | - Ryszard Kurzawa
- Department of Allergology National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Rabka‐Zdroj Poland
- Institute of Health Science, Podhale State College of Applied Sciences Nowy Targ Poland
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
| | - Joanna Jerzynska
- Department of Pediatrics and Allergy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
- Copernicus Memorial Hospital Lodz Poland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sato S, Movérare R, Ohya Y, Ito K, Nagao M, Borres MP, Ebisawa M. Ana o 3-specific IgE is a predictive marker for cashew oral food challenge failure. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7:2909-2911.e4. [PMID: 31108216 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|