Short-course subcutaneous treatment with PQ Grass strongly improves symptom and medication scores in grass allergy

Full consideration of the pollen exposure effect in clinical trial design for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis

INTRODUCTION

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is global health concern with an increasing prevalence. Among them, pollen-induced AR (PIAR) exhibits more severe and intense symptoms, decreased quality of life, prominent local inflammation, and is thus more challenging to control. Due to the difficulties in disease control, in recent years, an increasing number of treatment methods, including pharmacotherapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy, and newly developed biologics, have focused on PIAR. It has been shown that the pollen exposure has a significant impact on the symptoms of PIAR and the efficacy of intervention. From this perspective, clinical trials for PIAR need to take full account of pollen exposure, especially when assessing efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarized the effect of pollen exposure on PIAR, including immune responses, symptoms and clinic visits. Current definitions for the pollen season (PS) and the peak pollen season (PPS) are discussed. Based on the previous PIAR-related clinical studies and the available recommendations for clinical trial design, a detailed account of trial protocols which fully considered pollen exposure is provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Pollen exposure has a significant impact on PIAR. With fully considering the pollen exposure in the clinical trial design for PIAR, future protocols for PIAR-related studies may be more objective and better harmonized and, therefore, comparable.

The combination of allergen immunotherapy and biologics for inhalant allergies: Exploring the synergy

The development of monoclonal antibodies that selectively target IgE and type 2 immunity has opened new possibilities in the treatment of allergies. Although they have been used mainly as single therapies found to have efficacy in the management of asthma and other T2-mediated diseases, there is a growing interest in using these monoclonal antibodies in combination with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT has transformed the treatment of allergic diseases by aiming to modify the underlying immune response to allergens rather than just providing temporary symptom relief. Despite the proven efficacy and safety of AIT, unmet needs call for further research and innovation. Combination strategies involving biologics and AIT exhibit potential in improving short-term efficacy, reducing adverse events, and increasing immunologic tolerance. Anti-IgE emerges as the most promising therapeutic strategy, not only enhancing AIT's safety and tolerability but also providing additional evidence of efficacy compared with AIT alone. Anti-interleukin-4 receptor offers a reduction in adverse effects and an improved immunologic profile when combined with AIT; however, its impact on short-term efficacy seems limited. The combination of cat dander subcutaneous immunotherapy with anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin was synergistic with enhanced efficacy and altered immune responses that persisted for 1 year after discontinuation compared with AIT alone. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained benefits and safety profiles of combination strategies.

Efficacy of Subcutaneous, Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy for Allergens: A Comparative Study

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous, sublingual, oral specific immunotherapy in patients who suffer from allergic conditions to pollen from trees, grasses and weeds, house dust mites and Alternaria alternata spores. A literature search was performed separately for each type of allergen and each administration route of the drug. As a result, it was found that all administration routes were quite effective. However, each type of immunotherapy was most effective for certain allergens. Subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy have proven effective for aeroallergens such as pollen from grass, trees, weeds and house dust mites. Despite this, subcutaneous immunotherapy had a number of disadvantages in the form of the duration of treatment and a greater prevalence of side effects. Some authors suggest that for allergies to house dust mites, the most effective method of immunotherapy was the subcutaneous method of administration, compared with sublingual and nasal. Sublingual therapy was safe enough for all types of allergens under study, however, to achieve the same effect as the subcutaneous method of administration. In addition, oral immunotherapy has been shown to be effective for food allergies with obvious symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders. In addition, oral immunotherapy is the only approved treatment for allergies in the elderly, due to the low risk of side effects. The time-accelerated and dosage-enhanced immunotherapy was also effective and safe. These data prove the effectiveness and safety of each administration route of specific allergens for specific immunotherapy in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma and even atopic dermatitis.

Six Injections of Modified Adjuvanted PQ Grass Is Effective and Well-Tolerated in a Pivotal Phase III Trial

BACKGROUND

PQ Grass 27600 SU (PQ Grass) cumulative dose is a pre-seasonal, six-injection, aluminium-free, modified subcutaneous immunotherapy product under development for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). A pivotal Phase III randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PQ Grass in subjects with seasonal AR.

METHODS

An adaptive group sequential trial PQGrass306 (G306) with one pre-defined interim analysis was designed, using 2 parallel groups applying a 1:1 active versus placebo randomisation of patients aged 18-65. The primary efficacy endpoint was the EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) Combined Symptom and Medication Score (EAACI-CSMS0-6) averaged over the peak grass pollen season (GPS).

RESULTS

858 subjects were screened and 555 subjects were randomised. Based on the results of the pre-defined interim analysis, the trial was stopped for success showing superiority in favour of PQ Grass. The primary endpoint EAACI-CSMS0-6 (peak GPS) demonstrated a highly significant and clinically meaningful point difference of PQ Grass over placebo of -0.27 points (95% CI: -0.42 to -0.12), corresponding to a relative difference of -20.3% (p = 0.0005). Highly consistent and beneficial results were obtained for PQ Grass for all key secondary endpoints. Significant induction of blocking IgG4 and IgA antibody subclasses occurred. PQ Grass was well tolerated, and no unexpected safety signals occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This pivotal Phase III trial demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful effect on the primary endpoint as well as highly consistent secondary endpoint results and a supportive safety profile.

On the role of antibody affinity and avidity in the IgE-mediated allergic response

Type I hypersensitivity, also known as classical allergy, is mediated via allergen-specific IgE antibodies bound to type I FcR (FcεRI) on the surface of mast cells and basophils upon cross-linking by allergens. This IgE-mediated cellular activation may be blocked by allergen-specific IgG through multiple mechanisms, including direct neutralization of the allergen or engagement of the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIb which blocks IgE signal transduction. In addition, co-engagement of FcεRI and FcγRIIb by IgE-IgG-allergen immune complexes causes down regulation of receptor-bound IgE, resulting in desensitization of the cells. Both, activation of FcεRI by allergen-specific IgE and engagement of FcγRIIb by allergen-specific IgG are driven by allergen-binding. Here we delineate the distinct roles of antibody affinity versus avidity in driving these processes and discuss the role of IgG subclasses in inhibiting basophil and mast cell activation.

Immunotherapy and new treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review comes at a time where new techniques in immunotherapy administration are being developed, new innovations are being incorporated to standard techniques, and new regulations are being adopted regarding the creation and storage of allergen extracts. Prior to the release of updated practice parameters regarding allergic rhinitis and immunotherapies, this review article provides a synopsis of current recommendations, a comparison of the practices in the United States and those of Europe, and an examination of experimental methods that are being studied.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article seeks to review and discuss the various methods of administration, build up schedules, efficacy, effect on other atopic symptoms, and safety associated with allergen immunotherapy.

SUMMARY

Innovations in standard techniques, such as new allergoids for SCIT, appear to be effective in improving symptoms and increasing IgG levels for grass allergens. Data for newer techniques is less clear. There appears to be increased treatment-related adverse events for ILIT, worse symptom scores compared with placebo for IDIT, and insufficient studies regarding the effectiveness of EPIT for aeroallergens. New regulations seek to standardize the documentation, storage, and creation of allergen extracts.

Novel therapeutic receptor agonists and antagonists in allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergic conjunctivitis is characterized by the development of pathophysiological changes to the ocular surface, which occurs when pro-allergic and pro-inflammatory mediators interact with their cognate receptors expressed on immune and nonimmune cells. Traditional treatments with antihistamines and corticosteroids provide relief, but there is a need for more efficacious and tolerable long-term therapy with a better safety profile. This article aims to provide an overview of the mode of action and clinical application of agonist therapies targeting glucocorticoid, melanocortin, and toll-like receptors, as well as antagonist therapies targeting cytokine, chemokine, integrin, and histamine receptors.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been considerable advancement in immunology and pharmacology, as well as a greater understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of allergic conjunctivitis. Recent research advancing therapy for allergic conjunctivitis has focused on developing synthetic molecules and biologics that can interfere with the process of the allergic immune reaction.

SUMMARY

This review discusses novel therapeutic receptors being explored agonistically or antagonistically to develop alternative treatment options for allergic conjunctivitis. These novel approaches hold promise for improving the management of allergic eye diseases, offering patients hope for more effective and safer treatment options in the future.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell transcriptome profile in a clinical trial with subcutaneous, grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment in allergic airway diseases. Underlying immunological mechanisms and candidate biomarkers, which may be translated into predictive/surrogate measures of clinical efficacy, remain an active area of research. The aim of this study was to evaluate Pollinex Quattro (PQ) Grass AIT induced immunomodulatory mechanisms, based on transcriptome profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

METHODS

119 subjects with grass pollen induced seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive a cumulative dose of PQ Grass as a conventional or extended pre-seasonal regimen, placebo, or placebo with MicroCrystalline Tyrosine. Gene expression analysis was an exploratory endpoint evaluated in a subgroup of 30 subjects randomly selected from the four treatment arms. Samples were collected at three time points: screening (baseline), before the start of the grass pollen season and at the end of the season. This study was funded by the manufacturer of PQ.

RESULTS

Transcriptome analysis demonstrated that the most significant changes in gene expression, for both treatment regimens, were at the end of the grass pollen season, with the main Th1 candidate molecules (IL-12A, IFNγ) upregulated and Th2 signature cytokines downregulated (IL-4, IL-13, IL-9) (p < .05). Canonical pathways analysis demonstrated Th1, Th2, Th17 and IL-17 as the most significantly enriched pathways based on absolute value of activation z-score (IzI score ≥ 2, p < .05). Upstream regulator analysis showed pronounced inhibition of pro-inflammatory allergic molecules IgE, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-25 (IL-17E) (IzI score ≥ 2, FDR < 0.05) and activation of pro-tolerogenic molecules IL-12A, IL-27, IL-35 (EBI3) at the end of the grass pollen season.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells transcriptome profile showed an inhibition of Th2, Th17 pro-inflammatory allergic responses and immune deviation towards Th1 responses. PQ Grass extended regimen exhibited a superior mechanistic efficacy profile in comparison with PQ conventional regimen.