Immunohistological recognition of cyclin D1 expression by non-lymphoid cells among lymphoid neoplastic cells

Rosai-Dorfman Disease between Proliferation and Neoplasia

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare myeloproliferative disorder of histiocytes with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and peculiar morphologic features (accumulation of histiocytes with emperipolesis). Typically, the patient with RDD shows bilateral painless, massive cervical lymphadenopathy associated with B symptoms. Approximately 43% of patients presented with extranodal involvement. According to the 2016 revised histiocytosis classification, RDD belongs to the R group, including familial and sporadic form (classical nodal, extranodal, unclassified, or RDD associated with neoplasia or immune disease). Sporadic RDD is often self-limited. Most RDD needs only local therapies. Nevertheless, a small subpopulation of patients may be refractory to conventional therapy and die of the disease. Recent studies consider RDD a clonal neoplastic process, as approximately 1/3 of these patients harbor gene mutations involving the MAPK/ERK pathway, e.g., NRAS, KRAS, MAP2K1, and, rarely, the BRAF mutation. In addition to typical histiocytic markers (S100/fascin/CD68/CD163, etc.), recent studies show that the histiocytes in RDD also express BCL-1 and OCT2, which might be important in pathogenesis. Additionally, the heterozygous germline mutation involving the FAS gene TNFRSF6 is identified in some RDD patients with an autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type Ia. SLC29A3 germline mutation is associated with familial or Faisalabad histiocytosis and H syndrome.

The Effectiveness of Dual-Staining Immunohistochemistry in the Detection of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Bone Marrow

OBJECTIVES

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a useful method for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) detection in the bone marrow (BM). However, recognition of the neoplastic B cells can be challenging, especially when there is low-level disease.

METHODS

We examined BM from 105 patients with MCL. IHC was performed using cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual stains, which were compared with single stains that included CD20, CD79a, cyclin D1, and CD5 and with multiparameter flow cytometry (FC).

RESULTS

Based on the FC data, the overall sensitivity of the dual IHC stains was 95.6%. Both dual IHC stains showed better efficacy for detecting MCL cells compared with the aggregated single stains (P = .012). While three cases were positive by FC analysis but negative for dual staining, four cases showed cells positive for cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual staining that were not detected by FC. Two of these latter cases were in patients with minimal or focal disease involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual IHC staining is an efficient procedure for the detection of MCL in the marrow and is particularly helpful in low-level or focal involvement by MCL. This approach can be particularly useful when marrow aspirates are inadequate or unavailable.

Utility of Cyclin D1 in the Diagnostic Workup of Hematopoietic Neoplasms: What Can Cyclin D1 Do for Us?

Cyclin D1, encoded by CCND1, promotes cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase. Its expression is induced by MAPK/ERK pathway as well as translocations/rearrangements involving CCND1 gene. The evaluation of cyclin D1 expression by immunohistochemistry plays an important role in the diagnostic workup of various hematopoietic diseases. In this review, we aimed to discuss the value of cyclin D1 immunostain in the diagnosis and different diagnosis of hematopoietic neoplasms.

Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma

The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is much more cost‐ and time‐efficient, and can be readily applied to routinely prepared formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, we performed tissue FISH and IHC employing FFPE specimens, and examined the usefulness of IHC as a tool for detecting CCND1,NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements. CD138 signals were used to identify plasma cells in tissue FISH and IHC analyses. With cohort 1 (n = 70), we performed tissue FISH and subsequently IHC, and determined IHC cut‐off points. In this cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.90 and ≥.96, respectively. With cohort 2, using MM cases with an unknown gene status (n = 120), we performed IHC, and the gene status was estimated using the cut‐off points determined with cohort 1. The subsequent FISH analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.92 and ≥.98, respectively. CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements were estimated accurately by IHC, suggesting that conventional FISH assays can be replaced by IHC.

Cyclin D1 expression and novel mutational findings in Rosai-Dorfman disease

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is an enigmatic histiocytic disorder classically diagnosed by a distinctive combination of pathological features: emperipolesis, or migration of intact haematological cells through the voluminous cytoplasm of lesional histiocytes, and expression of S100 by these histiocytes. The pathogenesis has long been elusive until the recent detection of recurrent and mutually exclusive mutations in several oncogenes in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Based on these findings, we investigated a cohort of 21 RDD patients and found that the lesional histiocytes in 86% (18/21) of patients exhibited strong and diffuse nuclear Cyclin D1 expression, which not only may provide a diagnostic marker for this sometimes pathologically challenging disease, but also probably reflects constitutive MAPK pathway activation because we additionally identified phosphorylated-ERK expression in 90% (19/21) of cases. Further, we performed massively parallel sequencing on a subset (6/18) of the CyclinD1 positive cases, identifying several mutations that have not been previously reported in RDD. Taken together, our findings bolster the concept of RDD as a disease of MAPK activation in a substantial percentage of cases and enhance the current understanding of the pathogenesis of RDD.

Langerin staining identifies most littoral cell angiomas but not most other splenic angiomatous lesions

Although littoral cell angiomas (LCAs) are phenotypically well characterized, the antibodies used to support the diagnosis identify many other cells in the normal spleen, and some may be found in other angiomatous lesions. Based on a langerin/CD207+ LCA index case, langerin and other selected immunohistochemical staining was performed on 10 LCAs, 20 other splenic angiomatous lesions, and 7 reactive lymph nodes to further investigate the role of langerin as a diagnostic tool. Ninety percent (9/10) of LCAs were langerin positive, whereas only 1 (5%) of 20 other splenic vascular lesions was partially positive (P < .00001). All LCAs were CD1a-, CD68+, CD34-, and CD8-; 20% were S100+, 70% CD21+, and 90% cyclin D1+. Ultrastructural studies of one LCA did not show Birbeck-type granules in definite lining cells. Sinus lining cells in 7 of 7 reactive lymph nodes showed partial langerin positivity, and 4 of 4 showed partial cyclin D1 positivity. In conclusion, langerin staining is an easily interpreted and highly sensitive and specific (sensitivity [0.90], specificity [0.95]) ancillary study to help distinguish LCA from other vascular tumors of the spleen. Whether this represents cross-reactivity or true CD207 expression is uncertain, as other immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies do not support a Langerhans cell origin. The cyclin D1 staining seen in most LCA would be consistent with their expression of other selected vascular and histiocytic markers. The similar staining pattern in some lymph node sinus lining cells suggests a possible similar cell of origin, although LCA of lymph nodes is not described.

First pathological report of a de novo CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient presenting with Guillain-Barré syndrome-like neuropathy due to neurolymphomatosis

Peripheral neuropathy occurs in approximately 5% of the patients with lymphoma. Two major causes of peripheral neuropathy associated with lymphoma are neurolymphomatosis and paraneoplastic neuropathy such as demyelinating neuropathy. The differential diagnosis between neurolymphomatosis and demyelinating neuropathy is difficult, because electrophysiological findings suggestive of demyelination are frequently observed even in patients with neurolymphomatosis. Here, we report a patient with de novo CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who presented with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)-like neuropathy. Demyelination due to paraneoplastic neuropathy was clinically suspected. However, autopsy demonstrated that the cause of the neuropathy was neurolymphomatosis. Clinical courses of neurolymphomatosis vary and neurolymphomatosis cases presenting with GBS-like neuropathy are reported. In addition, DLBCL is the most frequent histological type of malignant lymphoma that develops neurolymphomatosis. Furthermore, "CD5-positive" DLBCL may tend to develop neurolymphomatosis. If a patient with "CD5-positive" DLBCL develops peripheral neuropathy, neurolymphomatosis should be considered and imaging studies performed and, if possible, nerve tissue biopsy, regardless of clinical symptoms of the neuropathy. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with de novo CD5-positive DLBCL with neurolymphomatosis who presented with GBS-like neuropathy.

Cyclin D1 expression by histiocytes may mimic cyclin D1-positive proliferation centres of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

AIMS

Cyclin D1, generally considered to be absent in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), has been reported in the proliferation centres (PCs) of recent CLL/SLL cases. Cyclin D1 immunostaining in CLL/SLL may lead to diagnostic confusion. The objective of this study was to identify the types of stained cells and the impact on diagnosis.

METHODS

Cyclin D1 expression was assessed by immunostaining samples from 46 cases of CLL/SLL. CD68 and double immunostaining with CD20/CyclinD1, CD68/CyclinD1, and CD163/CyclinD1 were then performed in cases of CLL/SLL positive for cyclinD1 in the PCs.

RESULTS

Dim-positive cyclin D1 staining in randomly scattered cells in the CLL/SLLs were observed in 38/46 cases (82.6%). In five (10.9%) cases, more than 50 cyclin D1-positive cells per high-power field were detected within the PCs in CLL/SLL with weak to moderate intensity. Double immunochemical staining in these cases showed that cyclin D1 in these positive cells was mostly co-expressed with CD68 and CD163 and the cells were negative for CD20.

CONCLUSIONS

The cyclin D1-positive CLL/SLL cells in this study were mostly histiocytes. The expression of cyclin D1 by histiocytes may mimic cyclin D1+ CLL/SLL; thus, the recognition of cyclin D1 expression by non-lymphoid cells in lymphoma is important.

Diagnostic utility of SOX11 immunohistochemistry in differentiating cutaneous spread of mantle cell lymphoma from primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with the worst prognosis among low-grade B-cell lymphomas. While cutaneous involvement by nodal or systemic MCL is uncommon, its differentiation from primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL) or cutaneous involvement by other extra-cutaneous BCL is challenging as neither histomorphology nor immunophenotype can be absolutely specific. We analyzed the diagnostic utility of SOX11 immunohistochemistry in differentiating secondary cutaneous MCL from other low-grade CBCL.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining with anti-SOX11 antibody was performed on 8 cases of secondary cutaneous MCL, 16 secondary cutaneous CLL, 20 primary cutaneous MZL, 12 cutaneous FCL (6 primary, 6 secondary), 7 primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type, 5 systemic DLBCL and 3 B-ALL. SOX11 and cyclin D1 staining were compared in secondary cutaneous MCL.

RESULTS

Nuclear SOX11 staining was seen in seven of eight cases (88%) of secondary cutaneous MCL, including a case with minimal cyclin D1 expression. All other CBCL lacked detectable nuclear SOX11 expression. The sensitivity and specificity for SOX11 in MCL were 87.5 and 100%, respectively. Both the sensitivity and specificity for combined SOX11 and cyclin D1 immunohistochemistry were 100%.

CONCLUSION

SOX11 immunohistochemistry could be a useful adjunct in distinguishing secondary cutaneous MCL from other CBCL.