Clinical outcomes after interruption of entecavir therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with compensated cirrhosis

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection

The updated EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection provide comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for its management. Spanning ten thematic sections, the guidelines address diagnostics, treatment goals, treatment indications, therapeutic options, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, management of special populations, HBV reactivation prophylaxis, post-transplant care, HBV prevention strategies, and finally address open questions and future research directions. Chronic HBV remains a global health challenge, with over 250 million individuals affected and significant mortality due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These guidelines emphasise the importance of early diagnosis, risk stratification based on viral and host factors, and tailored antiviral therapy. Attention is given to simplified algorithms, vaccination, and screening to support global HBV elimination targets. The guidelines also discuss emerging biomarkers and evolving definitions of functional and partial cure. Developed through literature review, expert consensus, and a Delphi process, the guidelines aim to equip healthcare providers across disciplines with practical tools to optimise HBV care and outcomes worldwide.

Effect of nucleos(t)ide analogue discontinuation on the prognosis of HBeAg-negative hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Although nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are thought to reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the effect of NA discontinuation on the prognosis of HBV-related HCC after hepatectomy is rarely reported. We aimed to investigate the potential for hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg)-negative HBV-related HCC patients to discontinue NAs based on preoperative hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) status.

METHODS

This historical cohort study involved 1232 NA-treated HBeAg-negative patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for HBV-related HCC from 2014 to 2019. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients discontinuing NAs before surgery were compared with those continuing NAs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of all enrolled patients, 839 (68.1%) patients continued NAs, and 393 (31.9%) patients discontinued NAs. Continuation of NAs was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS (HR 2.047, 95% CI 1.348-3.109, p < 0.001 before PSM and HR 2.756, 95% CI 1.537-4.942, p < 0.001 after PSM) in HBsAg-negative patients. Similarly, subgroup survival analyses showed that NA discontinuation was associated with better RFS (p = 0.029 before PSM and p < 0.001 after PSM) and comparable OS (p = 0.935 before PSM and p = 0.115 after PSM) than NA continuation in HBsAg-negative patients. The interaction between HBsAg status and continuation or discontinuation of NAs was significant (p for interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the potential for HBeAg-negative HBV-related HCC patients who have achieved HBsAg seroclearance to discontinue NAs under strict monitoring.

Hepatocellular carcinoma reduced, HBsAg loss increased, and survival improved after finite therapy in hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) treatment can reduce HCC in patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis (HBV-LC). Earlier small cohort studies showed a comparable 5-year incidence of HCC in HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped and those continued Nuc therapy. This study aimed to validate these findings using a large cohort with 10-year follow-up.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

From 2 centers, 494 HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped (finite group) and 593 who continued (continuous group) Nuc therapy were recruited. HCC, HBsAg loss, liver-related mortality/transplantation, and overall survival rates were compared between 2 groups with 1:1 propensity score matching of sex, treatment history, types of Nuc, age, transaminases, platelet count, and HBsAg levels at end of therapy in finite group or 3-year on-therapy in continuous groups. During a median follow-up of 6.2 (3.4-8.9) years, the annual and 10-year HCC incidence were lower in finite group (1.6 vs. 3.3%/y and 10-y 15.7% vs. 26.8%, respectively; log-rank test, p <0.0001). The finite group showed greater HBsAg decline/year (-0.116 vs. -0.095 log 10 IU/mL, p =0.0026) and 7.6 times higher 10-year incidence of HBsAg loss (22.7% vs. 3%, p <0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression showed finite therapy an independent factor for HBsAg loss (adjusted HR: 11.79) but protective against HCC (adjusted HR: 0.593), liver-related mortality/transplantation (adjusted HR: 0.312), and overall mortality (adjusted HR: 0.382).

CONCLUSIONS

Finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative HBV-LC may reduce HCC incidence, increase HBsAg loss, and improve survival. Greater HBsAg decline/loss may reflect enhanced immunity and contribute to the reduction of hepatic carcinogenesis.

Higher HBeAg-reversion virological relapse and lower sustained remission after treatment cessation in tenofovir-treated HBeAg-positive patients

A complete investigation of the clinical outcomes after treatment cessation in HBeAg-positive patients with HBeAg loss is limited. We retrospectively recruited 242 HBeAg-positive patients with HBeAg loss after a median duration of 37.2 months with tenofovir (TDF, n = 77) or entecavir (ETV, n = 165) treatment. There were 77 (31.8%) patients with sustained virological remission (SVR), 85 (35.1%) with HBeAg-reversion virological relapse, 80 (33.1%) with HBeAg-negative virological relapse after treatment cessation, and 23 (9.5%) with HBsAg loss. Clinical data at baseline, on-treatment and during off-treatment follow-up were analyzed. The 3-year cumulative incidences of overall, HBeAg-reversion and HBeAg-negative virological relapse were 70.2%, 54%, and 53.5%, respectively. The common factors associated with HBeAg-reversion and HBeAg-negative virological relapse were tenofovir treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.411, p < 0.001; HR = 2.066, p = 0.006, respectively) and HBsAg at end of treatment (EOT) (HR = 1.461, p = 0.001; HR = 1.303, p = 0.019, respectively). The 5-year cumulative incidence of HBsAg loss in SVR patients was 13.7% and EOT HBsAg was the only associated factor (HR = 0.524, p = 0.024). Compared to that of ETV-treated patients, TDF-treated patients had a significantly higher 3-year cumulative incidence of virological relapse (87.3% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001), earlier HBeAg-reversion virological relapse (2.9 vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.001), a higher rate of HBeAg-reversion virological relapse (53.2% vs. 26.7%) and a lower SVR rate (15.6% vs. 39.4%) (p < 0.001). In summary, the clinical outcomes after treatment cessation in HBeAg-positive patients with HBeAg loss were composed of HBeAg-reversion virological relapse, HBeAg-negative virological relapse and SVR. TDF was significantly associated with off-treatment virological relapse. EOT HBsAg plays an important role in HBsAg loss among SVR patients and posttreatment virological relapse.

Chronic hepatitis B: a scoping review on the guidelines for stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

INTRODUCTION

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are effective in suppressing the replication of the hepatitis B virus. However, NAs cannot effectively induce hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, which represents the optimal treatment endpoint in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Hence, most CHB patients are advised for indefinite NA therapy, but recent data has supported the concept of finite NA therapy before HBsAg seroclearance.

AREAS COVERED

This article covered the latest evidence on stopping NAs in CHB, with a focused analysis on international guidelines. Articles were retrieved by a literature search on PubMed with the keywords 'chronic hepatitis B,' 'antiviral therapy,' 'nucleos(t)ide analogue,' 'cessation,' 'stopping', and 'finite.' Studies up till 1 December 2022 were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Finite NA therapy in CHB has the potential in enhancing HBsAg seroclearance, however it also carries rare but potentially severe risks. NA cessation before HBsAg seroclearance is only suitable for a highly selected group of patients, whereas the majority of CHB patients should be treated indefinitely or until HBsAg seroclearance. Current guidelines have provided recommendations on stopping NAs, but further research is required to optimize the monitoring and retreatment protocol after stopping NAs.

Systematic review: Clinical outcomes of discontinuation of oral antivirals in hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis

Background

Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) remains one of the most controversial topics in the management of hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis. However, clinical outcomes after NAs discontinuation have not been studied.

Aim

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate existing data on clinical outcomes of NAs withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

A literature search (until May 2022) was performed in order to identify all published studies including hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients who discontinued NAs in virological remission with off-therapy follow-up >12 months.

Results

Nineteen studies with 1,287 hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients were included. Most cirrhotic patients were compensated and achieved complete virological suppression when they stopped the antiviral therapy. The pooled proportions of virological relapse and clinical relapse after NAs discontinuation in cirrhotic patients were 55.23 (95% CI: 40.33-69.67) and 43.56% (95% CI: 26.13-61.85), respectively. HBsAg loss was observed in 56 of 500 (pooled proportion = 13.68%, 95% CI: 5.82-24.18) cirrhotic patients. And the pooled proportions of HCC development, hepatic decompensation and overall mortality were 8.76 (95% CI: 2.25-18.95), 3.63 (95% CI: 1.31-7.03), and 0.85% (95% CI: 0.35-1.57), respectively, after NAs discontinuation in cirrhotic patients.

Conclusion

In hepatitis B-related compensated cirrhosis, who have achieved complete virological suppression, discontinuation of oral antivirals still carries a high relapse rate, but the incidence of adverse events is generally low and controlled during follow-up of at least 12 months. Of attention is that discontinuation of NAs can achieve a high rate of HBsAg seroclearance. This study may be helpful in the management of NAs in cirrhotic patients.

Systematic review registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020170103.

A switch from tenofovir to entecavir prior to hepatitis B treatment cessation is associated with a reduced risk of off-therapy relapse: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, clinical relapse (CR) occurs more frequently, much earlier and often more severely after stopping tenofovir (TDF) and other nucleos(t)ide analogues (Nucs) than after stopping entecavir (ETV). It is unknown whether off-Nuc hepatitis flare can be alleviated by switching from one Nuc to another.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had stopped Nuc according to the APASL stopping rule and had been followed-up for > 48 weeks after Nuc cessation were recruited. Patients were classified as four groups: ETV monotherapy (mono-ETV), TDF monotherapy (mono-TDF), switched to ETV (switch-ETV), and switched to TDF (switch-TDF). Both switch groups had switched to the replacement Nuc > 12 weeks prior to end of therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize confounders among groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risks factors for off-Nuc CR and flares.

RESULTS

A total of 1309 patients (1022 mono-ETV, 219 mono-TDF, 40 switch-ETV and 28 switch-TDF) were enrolled. The median time to CR was 39, 13, 38 and 14 weeks in mono-ETV, mono-TDF, switch-ETV and switch-TDF respectively (P < 0.001). After PSM, the mono-ETV (adjusted HR: 0.39, P < 0.001) and switch-ETV patients (adjusted HR: 0.41, P = 0.003) had both significantly later occurrence and lower rates of CR and flare.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the incidence and timing of CR was determined by ETV or TDF in the last 3 months prior to end of treatment. Patients treated with non-ETV-Nuc switched to ETV > 12 weeks before end of the original Nuc therapy may reduce/defer CR.

Perspectives on current controversial issues in the management of chronic HBV infection

Clinical and basic research in the past decades has achieved consensus in the understanding of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the management of chronic hepatitis B and HBV-cirrhosis. However, debatable challenges to the existing consensus in the concept and/or definitions have emerged. These include (1). alanine aminotransferase upper limit of normal: traditional laboratory-defined vs fixed; (2). nomenclature for phases of chronic HBV infection: classical vs EASL proposal; (3). indication of antiviral therapy: to treat patients vs to treat HBV; (4). finite vs indefinite long-term antiviral therapy: A. finite therapy in HBV-cirrhosis; B. retreatment decision: biochemical markers vs HBsAg/ALT kinetics. The pros and cons of these controversial issues were reviewed, assessed, and discussed in depth based on relevant lines of scientific evidence, intended to clarify or solve these controversial issues.

The Role of Off-Therapy Viral Kinetics in the Timing and Severity of Flares in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B flare occurs earlier and is more severe in patients stopping tenofovir (TDF) compared with entecavir (ETV). This study investigated relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) kinetics, onset timing, and the severity of flares.

METHODS

Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who developed off-ETV or off-TDF hepatitis flare were recruited. Their HBV kinetics and the severity of flares were compared between patients with early (<6 months) and late (between 6 and 24 months) flares. Propensity score matching was performed at 1:1 adjusting for age, sex, cirrhosis, and end-of-treatment (EOT) hepatitis B surface antigen between off-ETV and off-TDF flares.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 76% and 15% of each 107 off-TDF and off-ETV patients, respectively, developed early flare. A much steeper HBV DNA upsurge (ΔHBV DNA/month) was observed in off-TDF than off-ETV flares (2.12 vs 0.73 log₁₀ IU/mL; P < .01). Greater ΔHBV DNA/month correlated with earlier timing and higher peak alanine aminotransferase levels of flares. ΔHBV DNA/month ≥2.5 log₁₀ IU/mL was an independent factor for severe off-TDF flare, and ≥1 log₁₀ IU/mL was a predictor for severe off-ETV flares.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater HBV DNA upsurge rate (ΔHBV DNA/month) ≥1 log₁₀ IU/mL is a key factor for an earlier onset and more severe flare. More frequent ΔHBV DNA/month ≥1 log₁₀ IU/mL in off-TDF than off-ETV flares may explain why off-TDF flare mostly occurred early and was more severe. More stringent monitoring in those with ΔHBV DNA/month ≥1 log₁₀ IU/mL at flare, especially ≥2.5 log₁₀ IU/mL in early off-TDF flares, is important for timely retreatment to prevent decompensation.

Biomarkers for predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs discontinuation and hepatitis B virus recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

To summarize HBV-related biomarkers predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) discontinuation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, providing references for clinical medication, so as to manage CHB patients more scientifically.

METHODS

Related pieces of literature were retrieved in PubMed and the results were sorted out. We then analyzed and summarized these articles.

RESULTS

We found that HBV related biomarkers maybe could predict NAs withdrawal safely and the possibility of relapse after treatment cessation, including hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pregenomic-RNA (pgRNA), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and models containing several indicators for predicting the effectiveness of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pgRNA, HBcrAg, anti-HBc, as well as the prediction models formed by several biomarkers could predict the safe discontinuation of NAs before HBsAg loss and recurrence.

Finite nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: From an "option" to an "active recommendation"

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) including entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide may suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA profoundly but have no direct action on covalently closed circular DNA, which is a very stable template for HBV production. Therefore, decades of long-term Nuc therapy are required to maintain HBV suppression and to achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. However, there are concerns including financial burden, adherence, and willingness for indefinite long-term Nuc therapy. Patients lost to follow-up and hence not monitored may risk severe relapse that may deteriorate to hepatic decompensation or even hepatic failure. Cessation of Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative patients was initially considered in early 2000s. Earlier findings in Asian patients that finite Nuc therapy over 2-3 years is feasible and safe have founded Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver stopping rule since 2008. Subsequent studies have confirmed the feasibility and safety of the strategy of finite Nuc therapy, which has finally been accepted as "an option" by American and European liver associations since 2016. More recent large studies since 2018 have further confirmed the pivotal finding of greatly increased HBsAg loss rate (~5-year 39%) after stopping Nuc therapy. With the high HBsAg loss rate as the main justification, the paradigm shift from indefinite long-term therapy to finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative patients has been changing from an "option" to an "active recommendation" aiming to achieve HBsAg loss. More studies are needed to fine-tuning the strategy, including research for the optimal duration of consolidation therapy, timing to stop, and to start retreatment.

Off-tenofovir hepatitis flares in HBeAg-negative patients occur earlier, more frequent and severe than those off-entecavir therapies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Clinical relapse occurs much earlier and more frequently in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after stopping tenofovir (TDF) therapy than those off-entecavir (ETV). Clinical relapse may subside or progress to hepatitis flare which poses a safety concern. This study compared the incidence, timing and severity of hepatitis flares after stopping TDF and ETV.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had stopped ETV or TDF were included in the study. Off-therapy hepatitis flare patterns were compared between off-ETV and off-TDF patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The off-therapy hepatitis flares occurred more frequently (2-year: 58% vs 38%, P < .001) and much earlier (12 vs. 38 weeks, P < .001) in TDF group, with higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (after PSM: 536 vs. 419 U/L, P = .020) and two times rate of hepatic decompensation (4.0% vs. 2.1%, P = .322). The cirrhotic status [aHR: 20.531 (2.645-159.365), P = .004] and off-TDF [aHR: 5.530 (1.728-17.694), P = .004] were two independent predictors for hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis flare occurred more frequently, earlier, and more severe in off-TDF than off-ETV patients. More stringent off-therapy monitoring within 6 months off-TDF is mandatory whereas more attention is needed after 6 months off-ETV.

Off-Therapy Response After Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Withdrawal in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: An International, Multicenter, Multiethnic Cohort (RETRACT-B Study)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Functional cure, defined based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, is rare during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy and guidelines on finite NA therapy have not been well established. We aim to analyze off-therapy outcomes after NA cessation in a large, international, multicenter, multiethnic cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

This cohort study included patients with virally suppressed CHB who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and stopped NA therapy. Primary outcome was HBsAg loss after NA cessation, and secondary outcomes included virologic, biochemical, and clinical relapse, alanine aminotransferase flare, retreatment, and liver-related events after NA cessation.

RESULTS

Among 1552 patients with CHB, cumulative probability of HBsAg loss was 3.2% at 12 months and 13.0% at 48 months of follow-up. HBsAg loss was higher among Whites (vs Asians: subdistribution hazard ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-16.8; P < .001) and among patients with HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL at end of therapy (vs ≥100 IU/mL: subdistribution hazard ratio, 22.5; 95% confidence interval, 13.1-38.7; P < .001). At 48 months of follow-up, Whites with HBsAg levels <1000 IU/mL and Asians with HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL at end of therapy had a high predicted probability of HBsAg loss (>30%). Incidence rate of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.48 per 1000 person-years and 0.29 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Death occurred in 7/19 decompensated patients and 2/14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The best candidates for NA withdrawal are virally suppressed, HBeAg- negative, noncirrhotic patients with CHB with low HBsAg levels, particularly Whites with <1000 IU/mL and Asians with <100 IU/mL. However, strict surveillance is recommended to prevent deterioration.

Hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment cessation in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Scarce data exist on the effect of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) discontinuation on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-). Therefore, we assessed whether HCC risk is increased in non-cirrhotic CHBe- patients who discontinue compared to those remaining on NAs.

METHODS

This cohort study included 650 consecutive non-cirrhotic Caucasian or Asian patients with CHBe- without a history of HCC who discontinued NAs after a median of 5 or 3 years (cases, n = 325; Caucasians: 143, Asians: 182) or remained on NA therapy beyond 5 or 3 years respectively (controls, n = 325; Caucasians: 223, Asians: 102). Propensity score (PS) 1:1 matching was applied to adjust for patients' origin, age and sex.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 44 months, HCC developed in 7/325 cases and 9/325 controls or 7/245 PS-matched cases and 7/245 PS-matched controls with 5-year cumulative HCC incidence of 5.1% and 4.9% respectively (log-rank, P = .836). No difference in 5-year HCC risk was observed between cases and controls of Caucasian (3.0% vs 4.8%; log-rank, P = .510) or Asian origin (1.3% vs 2.2%; log-rank, P = .873). In both cases and controls, HCC incidence was independently associated with age and PAGE-B score. In cases alone, HCC development after NA discontinuation was associated only with pretreatment platelet counts and PAGE-B score, but not with any type of relapse or HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that discontinuation of effective long-term NA therapy in non-cirrhotic CHBe- patients are not associated with increased HCC risk, which is not affected by post-NA relapses and/or HBsAg loss.

Highly significant differences in HBsAg kinetics among patients with two types of hepatitis B flare, with and without retreatment

BACKGROUND

Off-therapy hepatitis flare may be detrimental or, conversely, facilitate hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline. Retreatment decisions are crucial.

METHODS

HBsAg was quantified before and during flares, at peak/retreatment start and at Months 6 and 12 in 336 entecavir/tenofovir-retreated and 105 non-retreated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. Increasing HBsAg during ALT flare defined a 'virus-dominating flare' and decreasing HBsAg a 'host-dominating flare'.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-eight retreated patients with a virus-dominating flare showed greater 1 year HBsAg decline (-1.0 versus -0.01 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001), more frequent rapid decline (69.8% versus 8.3%; P < 0001) and higher 3 year incidence of HBsAg < 100 IU/mL (32% versus 12%; P = 0.026) than 48 patients with a host-dominating flare, of whom 16 (33.3%) showed 3.8-fold (2 to 52-fold) HBsAg rebound on retreatment (versus 2/288; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retreated controls, 1 year HBsAg decline was greater (-1.0 versus -0.47 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001) and faster (69.8% versus 42.5%; P < 0.0001) in patients with a virus-dominating flare, whereas 1 year HBsAg decline (-0.01 versus -0.16 log10 IU/mL) and 3 year HBsAg loss rate (0% versus 21%; P = 0.009) were lower in patients with a host-dominating flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir/tenofovir retreatment effectively decreases HBsAg level in patients with a virus-dominating flare but is ineffective/worse in patients with a host-dominating flare. These results support the use of combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics for the decision to retreat patients with a virus-dominating flare and withhold retreatment for patients with a host-dominating flare.

The Impact of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs Off-Therapy Among Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim: Although most chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients achieve effective virological suppression after receiving long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (Nucs) therapy, the safety of off-therapy is controversial under the monitor.

Methods: We identified studies through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1990 to February 2021. The eligible studies compare the long outcomes between discontinued and continued Nucs treatments groups among CHB patients. This study was conducted to investigate long-term outcomes, including biochemical, serological, and virological outcomes, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development rate between discontinued and maintained Nucs therapy groups among CHB patients.

Results: Five eligible studies covering 1,425 patients were selected for meta-analysis. Our result exhibits that patients with Nucs off-treatment have a higher risk of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares-up than those who continued Nucs therapy under the monitor (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87–22.78). Nucs off-therapy patients have a higher virological bound incidence (OR = 617.96, 95%CI = 112.48–3,395.14) and a higher HBV DNA level (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87–22.78) than those who continued Nucs therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hyperbilirubinaemia, hepatic decompensation, and HCC development between both two groups. Patients in Nucs off-therapy group demonstrate a higher HBsAg loss rate than those in the continued group (OR = 7.10, 95%CI = 6.68–13.69).

Conclusions: Nucs off-therapy patients may exhibit a higher chance of achieving HBsAg loss than those who continue Nucs therapy. It requires close monitoring after Nucs off-therapy and timely restarting of Nucs therapy when ALT concentrations increase.

Finite Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Cirrhosis

Antiviral therapy has greatly improved the survival and reduced the incidence of adverse liver events such as hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis (hepatitis B virus [HBV]-cirrhosis). However, hepatitis B surface antigen loss, regarded as the ultimate goal of therapy or functional cure, was rarely achieved during long-term indefinite nucleos(t)ide analogues (Nuc) treatment. Emerging issues such as medication adherence and loss-to-follow-up may lead to increased risk of hepatic decompensation, even catastrophic life-threatening events. Studies have shown that finite therapy is feasible and reasonably safe, even in patients with HBV-cirrhosis. This review critically assesses the scientific evidence of the pros and cons for finite Nuc therapy in HBV-cirrhosis and proposes how to stop Nuc therapy and monitor the off-therapy patients. It also proposes the perspective and unsolved issues to be investigated in the future.

APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is currently incurable. Long-term treatment with potent and safe nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis-related complications through profound viral suppression. However, indefinite therapy raises several crucial issues with pros and cons. Because seroclearance of hepatitis B surface (HBsAg) as functional cure is not easily achievable, a finite therapy including sequential 48-week pegylated interferon therapy may provide an opportunity to facilitate HBsAg seroclearance by the rejuvenation of exhausted immune cells. However, the cost of stopping NA is the high incidence of virological relapse and surge of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., decompensation, fibrosis progression, HCC, or liver-related mortality). So far, the APASL criteria to stop NA treatment is undetectable HBV DNA levels with normalization of ALT; however, this criterion for cessation of treatment is associated with various incidence rates of virological/clinical relapse and more than 40% of NA-stoppers eventually receive retreatment. A very intensive follow-up strategy and identification of low-risk patients for virological/clinical relapse by different biomarkers are the keys to stop the NA treatment safely. Recent studies suggested that decreasing HBsAg level at the end-of-treatment to < 100-200 IU/mL seems to be a useful marker for deciding when to discontinue NAs therapy. In addition, several viral and host factors have been reviewed for their potential roles in predicting clinical relapse. Finally, the APASL guidance has proposed rules to stop NA and the subsequent follow-up strategy to achieve a better prognosis after stopping NA. In general, for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who have stopped treatment, these measurements should be done every 1-3 months at the minimum until 12 months.

The impact of hepatitis flare on HBeAg loss was effective mainly in the first year of Nucleot(s)ide therapy in chronic hepatitis B

HBeAg loss during nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy is significantly higher in patients with hepatitis flare (ALT ≥ 5-times upper limited of normal). It is not clear whether ALT level higher above the hepatitis flare leads to greater HBeAg loss rate nor its durability. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pretherapy ALT level on HBeAg loss in each year of Nuc treatment. Entecavir or Tenofovir treated HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were recruited consecutively. Patients with prior treatment history that experienced HBeAg seroconversion and reversion were excluded. Pretherapy age, gender, cirrhosis, genotype, ALT, HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were analysed. The hazard function was calculated for the probability of HBeAg loss in each year. Of the 290 patients, the 3-year cumulative HBeAg loss rate was 58.1%, higher in patients with hepatitis flare than those without (67.6% vs. 39.6%, P < 0.001). The HBeAg loss rate in the first year correlated positively with higher ALT levels at a stepwise fashion. The hazard function in patients with hepatitis flare was 0.74 at half year, then dropped to 0.33 by the first year and was lower thereafter to a rate closer to that of the patients without hepatitis flare. In conclusion, the impact of pretherapy ALT levels on HBeAg loss rate was not long-lasting and was effective mainly in the first year of Nuc therapy. Strategies such as adding an immune-modulating agent may help enhance HBeAg loss rate after the first year of Nuc therapy for those who remained HBeAg positive. Word count: 249 (<250).

Effectiveness of entecavir in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma development is genotype-dependent in hepatitis B virus-associated liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The oral nucleos(t)ide analogue, entecavir (ETV) was demonstrated to reduce the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated liver cirrhosis. However, the reduction of HCC differs in various regions of the world.

AIM

To investigate the reduction of HCC development due to ETV therapy by meta-analysis.

METHODS

We surveyed the differences in HCC development following ETV treatment based on published articles using PubMed (2004-2019).

RESULTS

The regions with the most marked reduction in HCC development due to ETV therapy were Spain (1.0%/year) and Canada (Southern part, 1.3%/year), and the most ineffective areas were South Korea (3.6%-3.8%/year), China (3.3%/year), Taiwan (2.4%-3.1%/year), and Hong Kong (2.8%/year). Following ETV administration, the incidence of HCC in genotype D regions (1.89% ± 0.28%/year, mean ± SE) was significantly lower than that in genotype C regions (2.91% ± 0.24%/year, P < 0.01). With regard to the initial HBV-DNA level, in genotype C patients (average: 5.61 Log₁₀IU/mL) this was almost the same as that in genotype D patients (average: 5.46 Log₁₀IU/mL). Moreover, there was no association between the prevalence ratio of HBV and the incidence of HCC on ETV treatment.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of ETV in preventing HCC development in HBV-associated liver cirrhosis is genotype-dependent.

Long-term risk of primary liver cancers in entecavir versus tenofovir treatment for chronic hepatitis B

It remains controversial whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is associated with different clinical outcomes for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to compare the long-term risk of ETV versus TDF on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in CHB patients from a large multi-institutional database in Taiwan. From 2011 to 2018, a total of 21,222 CHB patients receiving ETV or TDF were screened for eligibility. Patients with coinfection, preexisting cancer and less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Finally, 7248 patients (5348 and 1900 in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively) were linked to the National Cancer Registry database for the development of HCC or ICC. Propensity score matching (PSM) (2:1) analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences. The HCC incidence between two groups was not different in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.02, p = 0.078) and in the PSM population (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65–1.06, p = 0.129). Among decompensated cirrhotic patients, a lower risk of HCC was observed in TDF group than in ETV group (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.30–0.98, p = 0.043, PSM model). There were no differences between ETV and TDF groups in the ICC incidence (HR 1.84; 95% CI 0.54–6.29, p = 0.330 in the entire population and HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.31–3.52, p = 0.954 in the PSM population, respectively). In conclusion, treatment with ETV and TDF showed a comparable long-term risk of HCC and ICC in CHB patients.

Perspectives on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) is the current first line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), recommended by most of the current guidelines. NAs prevent disease progression, liver failure, decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and have favorable safety profiles. However, low rates of on-therapy functional cure (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] loss), which is regarded as the optimal end point, prevent many patients from stopping NA therapy with the need for a lifelong treatment. The higher likelihood of HBsAg loss associated with stopping as compared to continuing NAs has got a lot of attention recently. Recommendations regarding endpoints allowing for safely stopping NA therapy differ between international guidelines. Whereas in HBeAg-positive patients, HBeAg seroconversion with at least one year of consolidation therapy is an acceptable endpoint of treatment, the recommendations for HBeAg-negative ones differ. Some guidelines propose ≥3 years of HBV DNA undetectability to stop NA while others regard HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint. Stopping NA can lead to substantial rates of virologic relapses and consequent ALT flares in some cases. Moreover, no reliable predictor(s) of post-NA relapses have been identified so far. Quantitative HBsAg is becoming an increasingly promising marker to predict safe NA cessation. On the other hand, investigating the role of the immune system in mediating sustained virologic responses after NA withdrawal is needed to suggest immunological biomarkers to safely stop NA. In this article, we will review relevant literature regarding NA stopping strategy and discuss promising viral and immunological biomarkers to predict antiviral responses and thus to help identify patients who are more likely to achieve HBsAg seroclearance.

Magnitude of and prediction for risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B taking entecavir or tenofovir therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) have been shown to reduce incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This systematic review aims to evaluate the magnitude, change over time, and prediction of residual HCC risks in CHB patients treated with ETV/TDF therapy.

METHODS

Available literature was systematically reviewed through searches of PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2006 to September 1, 2019, to identify cohort studies that reported HCC incidence in CHB patients during ETV/TDF therapy. Studies were screened by title and abstract and then evaluated for eligibility in terms of full text.

RESULTS

We identified 141 studies for full-text review, and 34 were eligible for analysis. From 19 studies with data separated by cirrhosis status, the 5-year cumulative incidence of HCC was 0.5-6.9% in patients without cirrhosis, 4.5-21.6% in compensated cirrhosis, and 36.3-46.5% in decompensated cirrhosis. All four studies that addressed temporal changes in HCC risks consistently found the incidence rate decreased over time in patients with cirrhosis, although the findings were inconsistent in patients without cirrhosis. Six predictive scores were developed and validated to predict incident HCC during ETV/TDF therapy in CHB patients. Common scoring variables included age, sex, cirrhosis (fibrosis grade), and hepatic function. Conflicting results were reported in seven individual studies and two meta-analyses that compared ETV versus TDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The residual risk of HCC remains during ETV/TDF treatment in CHB patients with cirrhosis but declines over time. Risk stratification is attainable by validated predictive scores.

The Incidence of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss Between Hepatitis B E Antigen-Negative Noncirrhotic Patients Who Discontinued or Continued Entecavir Therapy

BACKGROUND

We compared rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients without cirrhosis who continued or discontinued entecavir.

METHODS

Patients who discontinued entecavir treatment for at least 12 months (discontinued group; n = 234) and patients who continued entecavir treatment for at least 4 years (continued group; n = 226) were recruited.

RESULTS

In the discontinued group, the 5-year cumulative incidences of virological relapse (VR), clinical relapse (CR), and HBsAg loss were 71.9%, 58.9%, and 13%, respectively. Patients with sustained response, VR but no CR, and CR without retreatment were 49-, 13-, and 18-fold more likely to develop HBsAg loss than those with retreatment. Patients who discontinued entecavir therapy had a higher rate of HBsAg loss than those who continued entecavir therapy, in all and 360 propensity score (PS)-matched patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that the discontinued group was an independent predictor for HBsAg loss. There was no significant difference in HCC development between the 2 groups in all and PS-matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg-negative patients without cirrhosis who discontinued entecavir treatment exhibited a higher HBsAg loss rate without an increased risk of HCC compared to those who continued entecavir treatment.

Finite nucleos(t)ide analog therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: an emerging paradigm shift

Potent nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC), such as entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, are able to suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level. These agents have no direct action on cccDNA, which is a very stable template for HBV production, hence long-term or even life-long NUC therapy is required in HBeAg-negative patients to maintain HBV suppression and to achieve the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss. However, there are concerns of indefinite or life-long NUC therapy, including drug resistance, financial burden, adherence and willingness for indefinite long-term NUC therapy. Patients lost to follow-up and hence, not monitored may risk severe relapse that may deteriorate to hepatic decompensation or even hepatic failure. This Review integrated the cumulated evidence and assessed the strategy of finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients which was first tried in early 2000s. Earlier Asian findings that 2-year NUC therapy is feasible and safe have founded APASL stopping rule for patients on NUC therapy over 2-3 years since 2008. Subsequent studies have supported the strategy of finite NUC therapy, which has finally been accepted as an option by American and European liver associations since 2016. More recent studies have further shown greatly increased HBsAg loss rate (up to 5-year 39%) after stopping NUC therapy. The cumulated evidence has shown that the paradigm shift from indefinite long-term therapy to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients is emerging. More studies are needed to fine-tuning the strategy including research for the optimal duration of consolidation therapy, timing to stop and to start re-treatment.

Correlation between entecavir penetration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and HBV DNA decay during treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Recently, due to its high effectiveness and tolerability, the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir became a standard practice. However, limited knowledge is currently available about its pharmacokinetic behaviour and intracellular disposition. Recently, our group reported an inverse correlation between entecavir plasma concentrations and the HBV DNA decay at the first and third month of treatment, respectively. In this paper we investigated the penetration of entecavir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and in plasma, in order to evaluate the relationship between intracellular penetration and response, in a cohort of naive patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were prospectively enrolled and gave written informed consent: the monitoring of clinical parameters (for example, HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], alanine aminotransferase) was carried out at the baseline and then monthly. Entecavir intra-PBMC and plasma trough concentrations were measured at 1 month of treatment, through a validated method based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

While plasma entecavir analysis confirmed previous evidence of inverse correlation between drug concentrations and HBV DNA decrease after 3 months of treatment (r=-0.723; P<0.001), this correlation was not significant for intra-PBMC concentrations. When the intracellular disposition ratio (intra-PBMC/plasma concentration ratio) was considered, it showed a direct and significant correlation with HBV DNA decay at the third month (r=0.485; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the antiviral activity of entecavir is dependent on its intracellular uptake, thus resulting in lower plasma concentrations in patients who have a marked HBV DNA decrease during treatment.

Taiwan consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B

The experts of Taiwan Association for the Study of Liver (TASL) have actively participated and led the guidelines on hepatitis B virus (HBV) management by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) which is the first international association for the study of liver to publish the statement on HBV management before. However, there are more and more new data on the natural history and treatment of HBV infection in the past decade. These include new application of an old biomarker (quantitative HBsAg), clinical significance of HBV genotype and naturally occurring mutations, the role of non-invasive examination in evaluating severity of hepatic fibrosis, clinical significance of outcome calculators, new drug or new combination strategies towards more effective therapy and organ transplantation including liver and non-liver transplantation. It is time to publish the guidelines on HBV management of Taiwan. Hence, TASL have conducted an expert meeting to review, to discuss and to debate the relevant literatures, followed by draft the manuscript of HBV management guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines include general management, indications for fibrosis assessment, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patient receiving immune suppression or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, are also included.

Incidence and predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is a rare event during nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy. Limited data suggest that stopping Nuc therapy may increase HBsAg loss rate in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients. A large study was conducted to investigate this issue in more detail. Of the 1,075 hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients treated with Nuc for a median of 156 (61-430) weeks, 5 showed HBsAg seroclearance during treatment at an estimated annual incidence of 0.15%. Of the patients who remained HBsAg-seropositive, 691 (52.3 years old, 86% male, 44.6% cirrhosis) had stopped Nuc therapy by the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver stopping rule and then were prospectively followed up. Baseline and on-treatment clinical and viral features, treatment duration, consolidation duration, time to undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA, time to normal alanine aminotransferase, end-of-treatment HBsAg, and HBsAg log reduction were compared between patients with and without HBsAg seroclearance after end of treatment. During a median off-therapy follow-up period of 155 (2-614) weeks, HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed in 42 patients. The 6-year cumulative incidence was 13% with an estimated annual incidence of 1.78%. Cox regression analysis showed that shorter time to undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (<12 weeks), greater HBsAg reduction during therapy (>1 log₁₀ ), lower end-of-treatment HBsAg level (<100 IU/mL), patients with sustained response, and relapsers not retreated were factors for off-therapy HBsAg seroclearance.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of HBsAg seroclearance after stopping Nuc was much higher than that during therapy and highest in patients without virologic and clinical relapse; patients with clinical relapse who remained untreated had a 7.34 times higher incidence of HBsAg clearance than those who received retreatment, suggesting that transient untreated clinical relapse may drive sufficient immune control to functional cure. (Hepatology 2017).

Great and rapid HBsAg decline in patients with on-treatment hepatitis flare in early phase of potent antiviral therapy

HBsAg decline during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in chronic hepatitis B with lower pretherapy ALT is usually small and slow. This study aimed to investigate why ~10% of such patients showed "rapid HBsAg decline" ≥0.5 log₁₀ IU/mL by month 6 of therapy. Patients with persistent pretherapy ALT <5X ULN who had qHBsAg at baseline, months 6 and 12 of entecavir or tenofovir therapy were studied. "On-treatment ALT elevation" was defined as >10% increase above baseline to >2X ULN during first 6 months of therapy. Of the 256 patients treated, 51 experienced transient "on-treatment ALT elevation" [group A], including 30 (11.7%) with ALT elevation to 2-5X ULN [group A-1] and 21 (8.2%) flared to >5X ULN [group A-2]. The magnitude of qHBsAg decline and rate of "rapid HBsAg decline" by month 6 was significantly greater and more frequent in group A (-0.446 vs -0.042 log₁₀ IU/mL; 45.1 vs 8.8%, respectively, P = 0.000) than in the remaining 205 patients without on-treatment ALT elevation (group B), being greatest in patients with hepatitis flare (group A-2: -0.559 log₁₀ IU/mL and 57.1%, respectively). In patients with therapy ≥2 years, patients with "on-treatment ALT elevation" also showed significantly greater annual HBsAg decline, more frequent to <100 IU/mL and 4 times higher HBsAg seroclearance rate. "On-treatment ALT elevation," especially flare >5X ULN, during entecavir therapy or tenofovir therapy may enhance/accelerate HBsAg decline, suggesting the effect of immune restoration upon potent viral suppression.

Why not to stop antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir or tenofovir leads to viral suppression in almost all patients. However, prolonged or lifelong treatment is necessary. At present, there is no consensus among the three major guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B on whether or not to stop antiviral treatment. One of the main reasons for this controversy is that virological relapse has been well documented in patients with chronic hepatitis B who stop treatment. Relapse rate is particularly high in patients who are HBeAg-negative when treatment begins, with reported relapse rates of up to 70% 36 months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, hepatic decompensation, jaundice and death have been described in patients with cirrhosis after treatment discontinuation. The main reason for stopping antiviral treatment is related to cost, however there is no robust evidence to support treatment discontinuation in most patients.

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma decreases after the first 5 years of entecavir or tenofovir in Caucasians with chronic hepatitis B

Whether there is a change of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence in chronic hepatitis B patients under long-term therapy with potent nucleos(t)ide analogues is currently unclear. We therefore assessed the HCC incidence beyond year 5 of entecavir/tenofovir (ETV/TDF) therapy and tried to determine possible factors associated with late HCC occurrence. This European, 10-center, cohort study included 1,951 adult Caucasian chronic hepatitis B patients without HCC at baseline who received ETV/TDF for ≥1 year. Of them, 1,205 (62%) patients without HCC within the first 5 years of therapy have been followed for 5-10 (median, 6.8) years. HCCs have been diagnosed in 101/1,951 (5.2%) patients within the first 5 years and 17/1,205 (1.4%) patients within 5-10 years. The yearly HCC incidence rate was 1.22% within and 0.73% after the first 5 years (P = 0.050). The yearly HCC incidence rate did not differ within and after the first 5 years in patients without cirrhosis (0.49% versus 0.47%, P = 0.931), but it significantly declined in patients with cirrhosis (3.22% versus 1.57%, P = 0.039). All HCCs beyond year 5 developed in patients older than 50 years at ETV/TDF onset. Older age, lower platelets at baseline and year 5, and liver stiffness ≥12 kPa at year 5 were independently associated with more frequent HCC development beyond year 5 in multivariable analysis. No patient with low Platelets, Age, Gender-Hepatitis B score at baseline or year 5 developed HCC.

CONCLUSION

The HCC risk decreases beyond year 5 of ETV/TDF therapy in Caucasian chronic hepatitis B patients, particularly in those with compensated cirrhosis; older age (especially ≥50 years), lower platelets, and liver stiffness ≥12 kPa at year 5 represent the main risk factors for late HCC development. (Hepatology 2017;66:1444-1453).

Hepatitis B surface antigen loss and clinical outcomes between HBeAg-negative cirrhosis patients who discontinued or continued nucleoside analogue therapy

We investigated the incidence and predictors of post-treatment hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. After cessation of nucleoside analogue (NA) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with cirrhosis. The rates of HBsAg loss and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in HBeAg-negative patients with cirrhosis who continued NA treatment were compared with those who discontinued treatment. Patients with compensated cirrhosis who had discontinued NA treatment for at least 12 months (discontinuing group; n=73) and patients who continued entecavir treatment for at least 4 years (continuing group; n=158) were recruited. Serum HBsAg levels were analysed at the end of treatment (discontinuing group) or at 2.5-3 years of treatment (continuing group). In the discontinuing group, the 6-year cumulative incidence of post-treatment virological relapse and HBsAg loss were 56.3% and 46.7%, respectively. The end-of-treatment HBsAg level of 300 IU/mL was a cut-off value for subsequent post-treatment HBsAg loss and sustained response. In the continuing group, HBsAg loss occurred in five of 158 patients. Cox regression analysis showed that HBsAg levels in the discontinuing group were independent predictors for HBsAg loss in all patients and 104 propensity score (PS)-matched patients. There was no significant difference in HCC development between the groups in all patients and 104 PS-matched patients. Two patients experienced post-treatment alanine aminotransferase flare with hepatic decompensation, and neither of them died after retreatment. In conclusion, HBeAg-negative patients with cirrhosis who discontinued NA treatment might have a higher rate of HBsAg loss and their risk of developing HCC did not increase compared with those who continued entecavir treatment.

Discontinuation of lamivudine treatment in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a pilot study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Finite treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) is important in resource-limited countries. Outcome of treatment discontinuation in patients on long-term lamivudine (LVD) was assessed in a single centre observational pilot study in the current study.

METHODS

Non-cirrhotic patients on LVD for at least 5 years with undetectable HBV DNA on at least two consecutive assessments were offered to stop treatment. Biochemical, serological and virological measures were determined at 3-6 month intervals after treatment discontinuation. Serum quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was determined at treatment discontinuation and 5-6 years thereafter. NA treatment was re-instituted in patients with confirmed viral rebound defined as HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml. Relapser patients were no longer followed but were re-assessed 6 years after treatment cessation.

RESULTS

LVD was discontinued in 23 patients. 8 patients relapsed within 1 year and NA treatment was restarted; 15 patients (65%) were non-relapsers. Thirteen of them were followed for at least 5 years. Two patients had undetectable HBV DNA throughout the follow-up period. In the rest, HBV DNA fluctuated at low levels. Two patients cleared HBsAg 24 and 36 months after stopping treatment. Quantitative HBsAg levels 5-7 years after treatment discontinuation were lower in non-relapser compared to relapser patients (1.21 IU/ml ±0.98 versus 2.71 ±0.76; P=0.002). Of 8 relapser patients 1 patient had HBsAg levels less than 100 IU/ml compared to 11 out of 13 non-relapser patients (P=0.0022).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that cessation of NA treatment is a viable option after a reasonable treatment duration in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB and that HBsAg clearance may become an achievable target in these patients.

When can we stop nucleoside analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B?

Treatment with nucleoside analogue (NAs) is now the most common treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and is recommended by all guidelines. Stopping NAs is a controversial issue in these patients, unless the clinical endpoints of HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg seroclearance are achieved. While HBeAg seroconversion can occur in a significant number of patients, HBsAg seroclearance rates are low. HBsAg seroclearance is increasingly accepted as the ideal end of treatment, representing a functional cure. Treatment withdrawal leads to relapse in 50% of patients who achieve HBeAg seroconversion and complete at least 12 months of consolidation therapy. In HBeAg negative CHB, the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) stopping rules show that although clinical relapse occurs in approximately 43% and virological relapse occurs in 70%, very few patients experience flare or decompensation. NAs treatment for >2 years was associated with a lower rate of relapse. Recently, stopping NA therapy was shown to be associated with HBsAg in 20%-39% of HBeAg negative patients and more frequently in those with low quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg). However, the most optimal level is unclear. Quantitative HBsAg is becoming a useful tool to predict a sustained response or relapse before stopping therapy. In conclusion, stopping NA therapy is generally safe and can be an option in specific situations such as HBeAg seroconversion. However, it is associated with disease relapse. Thus, patient selection based on qHBsAg may help identify patients who are more likely to achieve HBsAg seroclearance or a sustained response.

Clinical Relapse After Cessation of Tenofovir Therapy in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Of the hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with more than 1 year of sustained hepatitis B virus (HBV) suppression during therapy, the 1-year clinical relapse rate after cessation of entecavir therapy was 45%, of which 25.6% occurred within 6 months. The events after cessation of another preferred drug tenofovir were investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective-prospective study was conducted in 85 hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with sustained HBV suppression who had stopped tenofovir therapy and were monitored every 1 to 3 months for a median duration of 39 weeks (range, 4-133 wk).

RESULTS

Clinical relapse occurred in 38 patients, 57.9% and 86.8% within 3 and 6 months, respectively, with an estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of 52%. The optimal duration of therapy and consolidation therapy were calculated to be 3 and 2 years, respectively. Of the relapsers, 81.6% and 57.9% showed an alanine aminotransferase level greater than 5 and 10 times the upper limit of normal, respectively, 23.7% showed a bilirubin level of 2 mg/dL or greater, and 2 developed hepatic decompensation. Relapsers had significantly higher pretherapy baseline hepatitis B surface antigen level, more prior anti-HBV therapy experience, later alanine aminotransferase level normalization, and a shorter duration of treatment and consolidation therapy. Cox regression analyses showed that treatment for more than 3 years combined with consolidation therapy for more than 2 years was an independent significant manageable factor of clinical relapse (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.387; P = .008). With this combination, the clinical relapse rate was reduced to 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical relapses occurred mostly within 6 months, with high alanine aminotransferase and serum bilirubin levels. Closer monitoring, monthly in the first 3 to 6 months, with timely re-treatment is mandatory for a safe cessation of tenofovir therapy.

Clinical outcomes after spontaneous and nucleos(t)ide analogue-treated HBsAg seroclearance in chronic HBV infection

BACKGROUND

Both spontaneous and nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc)-treated hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance are associated with excellent clinical outcomes.

AIM

To conduct a case-control study to explore whether there is difference of clinical outcomes between these two groups.

METHODS

A total of 312 chronic hepatitis B patients with spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance and 110 patients with Nuc-treated HBsAg seroclearance were recruited retrospectively. Propensity score (PS) matching method produced 98 patients in each group for comparison. The development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic complications and cumulative incidence of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was compared.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 107 months after HBsAg seroclearance, five patients developed HCC after a mean period of 75.3 months (four and one patients with spontaneous and Nuc-treated HBsAg seroclearance, respectively) in overall population. One died of pneumonia with sepsis and one experienced variceal bleeding in Nuc-treated patients but none in spontaneous group. The incidence of anti-HBs seroconversion was comparable between spontaneous and Nuc-treated HBsAg seroclearance (69.6% vs. 66.4%, respectively, P = 0.617). There were no significant differences in HCC development (2% vs. 1.1%), overall mortality (0% vs. 1%), variceal bleeding (0% vs. 4.2%) and 6-year cumulative incidence of anti-HBs seroconversion (62.3% vs. 61.5%) among PS-matched patients with spontaneous and Nuc-treated HBsAg seroclearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes between patients with spontaneous and Nuc-treated HBsAg seroclearance are comparable. HCC can develop at a low rate during long-term follow-up and periodic surveillance after HBsAg seroclearance is still mandatory.

Hepatitis B: treatment choice and monitoring for response and resistance

Despite effective preventive primary prevention with vaccination, many people remain infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and suffer from its complications. Effective treatments such as interferon-based regimens and oral nucleoside/nucleotides have been developed over the last 30 years, but they are not perfect. Each of the treatments has its own merits, but none can eradicate HBV from the host. As a result, regular monitoring of the response during treatment and after treatment is required. The choice and monitoring of selected treatments, new potential therapeutic agents, and treatment options for drug resistance are discussed in this review.

α-Fetoprotein level-dependent early hepatitis B surface antigen decline during entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis flare

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reduction during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy is related to ALT level. ALT reflects hepatocytolysis while α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥100 ng/mL during hepatitis flare reflects more extensive hepatocytolysis (bridging hepatic necrosis). The impact of AFP levels on early HBsAg kinetics during entecavir therapy was investigated.

METHODS

HBsAg level was measured at baseline and months 6 and 12 of entecavir therapy in 149 chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis flare, defined as ALT ≥5× upper limit of normal (ULN), and 58 patients with ALT <5× ULN.

RESULTS

There was a significantly greater HBsAg reduction in an ALT (<5, 5-10, 10-20 and ≥20× ULN, P = 0.001) and AFP (<20, 20-99 and ≥100 ng/mL, P = 0.000) level-dependent manner. In hepatitis flares with a peak AFP level ≥20 ng/mL, the differences in HBsAg reduction across all ALT levels became non-significant. HBsAg reduction was greater in genotype B- than genotype C-infected patients with baseline ALT ≥20× ULN, but the difference became non-significant in those with peak AFP ≥100 ng/mL. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that AFP level ≥100 ng/mL, baseline HBsAg level and genotype B were independent significant factors for greater HBsAg decline at month 6 of entecavir therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

During entecavir therapy, early HBsAg reduction increased in an AFP and ALT level-dependent manner, suggesting the impact of hepatocytolysis rather than nucleos(t)ide analogue per se. Notably, a higher AFP level during hepatitis flare, reflecting more extensive hepatic necrosis, was a more powerful factor than ALT and genotype for greater HBsAg decline.