Meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of fibroblast growth factor 21 analogues for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related fibrosis

FGF21 Analogues in Patients With Metabolic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver-related complications are frequent in patients with metabolic diseases, with limited treatment options currently available. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) analogues on hepatic steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in patients with metabolic diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of FGF21 analogues on hepatic steatosis evaluated by hepatic fat fraction (HFF), inflammation and fibrosis compared to placebo. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Treatment with FGF21 analogues was associated with metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) resolution without fibrosis worsening (5 studies, risk ratio [RR] 4.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.41, 8.03, p < 0.001) and fibrosis improvement by 1 grade without MASH worsening (6 studies, RR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.24, 2.59, p = 0.002). FGF21 analogues significantly lowered HFF compared to placebo (6 studies, SMD -1.08, 95% CI: -1.28, -0.88, p < 0.001), while patients receiving FGF21 analogues were more likely to exhibit a reduction in HFF by 30% (10 studies, RR 4.08, 95% CI: 3.08, 5.40, p < 0.001) or 50% (6 studies, RR 10.43, 95% CI: 5.47, 19.87, p < 0.001). HFF normalisation (≤ 5%) was more frequently achieved with FGF21 analogues (6 studies, RR 14.58, 95% CI: 4.70, 45.18, p < 0.001). The results remained robust after sensitivity analyses. Serious AE and AE leading to drug discontinuation were similar in patients receiving FGF21 analogues or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

FGF21 analogues can reduce hepatic steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in patients with metabolic diseases, representing a possible treatment option for steatotic liver disease.

Comparative efficacy of THR-β agonists, FGF-21 analogues, GLP-1R agonists, GLP-1-based polyagonists, and Pan-PPAR agonists for MASLD: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) agonists, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), GLP-1-based polyagonists, and pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Pan-PPAR) agonists in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

METHODS

A database search for relevant randomized double-blind controlled trials published until July 11, 2024, was conducted. Primary outcomes were the relative change in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and liver stiffness assessed non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and elastography. Secondary outcomes included histology, liver injury index, lipid profile, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and body weight.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven trials (5357 patients with MASLD) were identified. For HFF reduction, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective (mean difference [MD] -51.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -68.25 to -34.68; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 84.9) vs. placebo, followed by FGF-21 analogues (MD -47.08; 95 % CI: -58.83 to -35.34; SUCRA 75.5), GLP-1R agonists (MD -37.36; 95 % CI: -69.52 to -5.21; SUCRA 52.3) and THR-β agonists (MD -33.20; 95 % CI: -43.90 to -22.51; SUCRA 36.9). For liver stiffness, FGF-21 analogues were most potentially effective (MD -9.65; 95 % CI: -19.28 to -0.01; SUCRA 82.2) vs. placebo, followed by THR-β agonists (MD -5.79; 95 % CI: -9.50 to -2.09; SUCRA 58.2), and GLP-1RAs (MD -5.58; 95 % CI: -15.02 to 3.86; SUCRA 54.7). For fibrosis improvement in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by FGF-21 analogues, THR-β agonists, Pan-PPAR agonists, and GLP-1R agonists; For MASH resolution in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by THR-β agonists, GLP-1R agonists, FGF-21 analogues, and Pan-PPAR agonists. THR-β agonists are well-balanced in liver steatosis and fibrosis, and excel at improving lipid profiles; FGF-21 analogues are effective at improving steatosis and particularly exhibit strong antifibrotic abilities. GLP-1R agonists showed significant benefits in improving liver steatosis, glucose metabolism, and body weight. GLP-1-based polyagonists have demonstrated the most potential efficacy overall in terms of comprehensive curative effect. Pan-PPAR agonists showed distinct advantages in improving liver function and glucose metabolism.

CONCLUSION

These results illustrate the relative superiority of the five classes of therapy in the treatment of MASLD and may serve as guidance for the development of combination therapies.

Dawn of an era of effective treatments for MAFLD

Fatty liver disease is a commonly occurring disease resulting in hepatic and extrahepatic complications. To date, there have been few available treatments beyond conventional lifestyle modification. While lifestyle modifications resulting in weight loss >10% have shown to be beneficial for metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH), for the majority of patients, this is difficult to achieve. The recent approval of resmetirom (a thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist) by the Food and Drug Administration following positive results for histological outcomes in a phase 3 trial has opened the door for new treatments for metabolic (dysfunction)‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and MASH. There are currently a number of phase 3 trials targeting a variety of signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic steatohepatitis that are also promising. This review focuses on the currently available treatments for MAFLD and MASH, ongoing phase 3 clinical trials, and unresolved controversies in clinical trials in this area.

Hepatocyte-specific GDF15 overexpression improves high-fat diet-induced obesity and hepatic steatosis in mice via hepatic FGF21 induction

GDF15 and FGF21, stress-responsive cytokines primarily secreted from the liver, are promising therapeutic targets for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the interaction between GDF15 and FGF21 remains unclear. We examined the effects of hepatocyte-specific GDF15 or FGF21 overexpression in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice for 8 weeks. Hydrodynamic injection of GDF15 or FGF21 sustained high circulating levels of GDF15 or FGF21, respectively, resulting in marked reductions in body weight, epididymal fat mass, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis. In addition, GDF15 treatment led to early reduction in body weight despite no change in food intake, indicating the role of GDF15 other than appetite loss. GDF15 treatment increased liver-derived serum FGF21 levels, whereas FGF21 treatment did not affect GDF15 expression. GDF15 promoted eIF2α phosphorylation and XBP1 splicing, leading to FGF21 induction. In murine AML12 hepatocytes treated with free fatty acids (FFAs), GDF15 overexpression upregulated Fgf21 mRNA levels and promoted eIF2α phosphorylation and XBP1 splicing. Overall, continuous exposure to excess FFAs resulted in a gradual increase of β-oxidation-derived reactive oxygen species and endoplasmic reticulum stress, suggesting that GDF15 enhanced this pathway and induced FGF21 expression. GDF15- and FGF21-related crosstalk is an important pathway for the treatment of MASLD.

Efficacy and Safety of Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Analogues for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogues may benefit patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of FGF21 analogues versus placebo for treating patients with MASH in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH and MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Secondary outcomes were relative reduction ≥30% of the hepatic fat fraction (HFF) measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We included 7 RCTs (886 patients). FGF21 analogues had a higher probability of fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.22), MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (RR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.80, 6.06), and reduction ≥30% in the HFF by MRI-PDFF (RR: 3.03; 95% CI: 2.12, 4.33) than placebo, without significant difference in the risk of AEs. Subgroup analyses by the stage of fibrosis showed that FGF21 analogues improved fibrosis only among patients with fibrosis stages F1-F3.

CONCLUSION

FGF21 analogues appear to be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MASH, although the impact on fibrosis improvement may be limited to non-cirrhotic patients.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: where are we today?

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is defined by hepatic steatosis and cardiometabolic risk factors like obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Persistent metabolic injury may promote inflammatory processes resulting in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and liver fibrosis. Mechanistic insights helped to identify potential drug targets, thereby supporting the development of novel compounds modulating disease drivers.

AREAS COVERED

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently approved the thyroid hormone receptor β-selective thyromimetic resmetirom as the first compound to treat MASH and liver fibrosis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current and potential future pharmacotherapeutic options and their modes of action. Lessons learned from terminated clinical trials are discussed together with the first results of trials investigating novel combinational therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

Approval of resmetirom as the first anti-MASH agent may revolutionize the therapeutic landscape. However, long-term efficacy and safety data for resmetirom are currently lacking. In addition, heterogeneity of MASLD reflects a major challenge to define effective agents. Several lead compounds demonstrated efficacy in reducing obesity and hepatic steatosis, while anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects of monotherapy appear less robust. Better mechanistic understanding, exploration of combination therapies, and patient stratification hold great promise for MASLD therapy.

Pegbelfermin for reducing transaminase levels in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The efficacy of Pegbelfermin (PGBF) in treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to explore the effect and pattern of PGBF at different dosages and treatment durations on transaminase reduction in NASH patients.

Methods

We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and supplemented the search with gray literature and manual searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of PGBF in NASH patients were included. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. We used random-effects models, generalized least squares regression, constrained maximum likelihood, and restricted cubic splines to explore the dose-response relationship. Egger's linear regression was employed to assess publication bias. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023448024.

Results

Four RCT studies from the period 2018-2023, involving 546 participants, were included. No participants discontinued PGBF treatment due to adverse events. High-dose PGBF treatment significantly reduced transaminase levels in NASH patients compared to the low-dose group (ALT %: MD = 14.94, 95% CI = 2.11-27.77; AST %: MD = 9.05, 95% CI = 3.17-14.92). Longer treatment duration further decreased transaminase levels (ALT%: MD = 8.81, 95% CI = 4.07-13.56; AST%: MD = 6.72, 95% CI = 2.62-10.81). Egger's test did not reveal significant publication bias (p > 0.05). Further investigation indicated a ceiling effect of PGBF dosage on transaminase reduction at 30 mg/week, and NASH patients experienced a rebound in transaminase levels after 28 weeks of continuous treatment.

Conclusion

There is a positive correlation between PGBF dosage and transaminase reduction within a certain range, showing an overall non-linear dose-response relationship. This finding provides guidance for the clinical application of PGBF. Clinicians should be mindful of the dosage ceiling at 30 mg/week and monitor changes in transaminase levels after 28 weeks for timely adjustments in PGBF dosage.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, CRD42023448024. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=448024.