Medication adherence in patients with apparent resistant hypertension: findings from the SYMPATHY trial

Chemical adherence testing in the clinical management of hypertension: a scoping review

Background

Despite growing use, questions remain surrounding the utility, acceptability and feasibility of chemical adherence testing (CAT) as part of hypertension management in clinical practice.

Objectives

This scoping review aimed to (i) identify and summarise studies using CAT in hypertension management, and (ii) describe and critically evaluate how CAT is currently being used in the clinical management of hypertension.

Eligibility criteria

Peer-reviewed and published studies in English, reporting original research in any setting, with any study design, were included. Search concepts included hypertension, medication adherence, CAT, and their synonyms.

Sources of evidence

Searches were carried out using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and PsycInfo (EBSCO), alongside manual searching of reference lists. Using Covidence software, we screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text articles. Data from the included articles were tabulated and summarised.

Results

Of the 618 studies identified, 48 were included. The studies cover diverse clinical settings, and were mostly observational in design. 7 studies reporting adherence analyses within clinical trials for hypertension therapies. The use of theoretical frameworks to guide reporting was rare, and there was considerable variation in key terminology and definitions, most notably in the definition of adherence.

Conclusion

The current body of evidence demonstrates considerable variability in the approach to implementing CAT for hypertension management in clinical practice, and a paucity of randomised controlled trials to evaluate its impact. Future research could (i) adopt a cohesive theoretical framework including clear operational definitions to standardise the approach to this important topic; (ii) further explore the impact of CAT on clinical outcomes using RCTs.

Prevalence of true resistant hypertension in those referred for uncontrolled hypertension in Malaysia: A comparison using different definitions

Resistant hypertension is a well-recognised clinical challenge. However, the definition and epidemiology of true resistant hypertension (RH) are less understood, especially in Asia. This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of RH referred from primary care clinics based on various guidelines. RH was defined as blood pressure (BP) being above the threshold using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring despite adequate lifestyle measures and optimal treatment with ≥3 medications at maximally tolerated doses. Between one in four (n = 94, 24.0% using Malaysian guidelines) and up to two-thirds (n = 249, 63.7% using 2018 American guidelines) of adults referred for uncontrolled hypertension met the criteria of true RH. Of those with RH, a further one-quarter (n = 26, 26.6%) were deemed to have refractory hypertension (elevated BP despite treatment with at least 5 antihypertensive medications). Adults with RH were generally younger, more likely to be male, had a higher BMI and were more likely to have gout, CKD, and angina compared to those with controlled hypertension. The prevalence of RH amongst Asian adults with poor hypertension control is high. A concerted effort is needed to reduce the high burden of RH, especially among this population.

Impact of poor medication adherence on clinical outcomes and health resource utilization in patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia: systematic review

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to summarize evidence on the effect of poor medication adherence on clinical outcomes and health resource utilization (HRU) among patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes and HRU for patients by status of adherence to antihypertensives and/or lipid-lowering medications was searched using Embase, MEDLINE, and MEDLINE In-Process and supplemented by manual searches of conference abstracts. In total, 45 studies were included, with most being retrospective observational studies (n = 36). Patients with poor adherence to antihypertensives and lipid-lowering medications compared with those with good adherence showed less reduction of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) after 6-12 months follow-up (∆ systolic BP: 1.2 vs. -4.5 mmHg; ∆LDL-c: -14.0 to -18.9 vs. -34.1 to -42.0 mg/dL). Poor adherence was also significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 1.1-1.9) and mortality (HR: 1.4-1.8) in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia and increased HRU (i.e. outpatient visits, risk of cardiovascular-related and all-cause hospitalization, annual inpatient days, total health-care costs).

EXPERT OPINION

Poor adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased HRU, highlighting the need to enhance medication adherence in patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia.

Measurement Tools and Utility of Hair Analysis for Screening Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication

Poor adherence to the prescribed antihypertensive therapy is an understated public health problem and is one of the main causes of the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa. Medication adherence is vital for the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment and is key to ameliorating the clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, it has often been ignored because the current methods used to assess medication adherence are not reliable, limiting their utilization in clinical practice. Therefore, the identification of the most accurate and clinically feasible method for measuring medication adherence is critical for tailoring effective strategies to improve medication adherence and consequently achieve blood pressure goals. This review not only explores various available methods for estimating medication adherence but also proposes therapeutic drug monitoring in hair for the measurement of medication adherence to the antihypertensive medication period.

Psychological determinants of drug adherence and severity of hypertension in patients with apparently treatment-resistant vs. controlled hypertension

PURPOSE

In a pilot study including 35 patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH), we documented associations between psychological profile, drug adherence and severity of hypertension. The current study aims to confirm and expand our findings in a larger and more representative sample of patients with ATRH, using controlled hypertensive patients as the comparator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ATRH were enrolled in hypertension centres from Brussels and Torino. The psychological profile was assessed using five validated questionnaires. Drug adherence was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples, and drug resistance by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was adjusted for drug adherence.

RESULTS

The study sample totalised 144 patients, including 81 ATRH and 63 controlled hypertensive patients. The mean adherence level was significantly lower in the "resistant" group (78.9% versus 92.7% in controlled patients, p-value = .022). In patients with ATRH, independent predictors of poor drug adherence were somatisation, smoking and low acceptance level of difficult situations, accounting for 41% of the variability in drug adherence. Independent predictors of severity of hypertension were somatisation, smoking, more frequent admissions to the emergency department and low acceptation, accounting for 63% of the variability in the severity of hypertension. In contrast, in patients with controlled hypertension, the single predictors of either drug adherence or severity of hypertension were the number of years of hypertension and, for the severity of hypertension, alcohol consumption, accounting for only 15-20% of the variability.

CONCLUSION

Psychological factors, mostly related to somatisation and expression of emotions are strong, independent predictors of both drug adherence and severity of hypertension in ATRH but not in controlled hypertensive patients.

Impact of medication adherence on the efficacy of Baroreflex activation therapy

Therapy adherence significantly determines the success of antihypertensive therapy, especially in patients with resistant hypertension. Our study investigates the impact of drug adherence on the efficacy of Baroreflex‐activation‐therapy (BAT). In this retrospective analysis, the authors measured blood pressure (BP) and antihypertensive medication adherence (by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry [GC‐MS] urine analysis) before and 6 months after BAT initiation. Adherence was defined as detection of ≥80% intake of prescribed medication at the time of follow‐up. Response to BAT was defined as BP drop ≥5 mmHg in systolic 24 h‐ambulatory BP (ABP) after 6 months. Overall patients (n = 38) median medication adherence was low, but rose from 60% (IQR 25%–100%) to 75% (IQR 38%–100%; p = .0194). After 6 months of BAT, mean systolic and diastolic office BP (‐21 ± 25 mmHg and ‐9 ± 15 mmHg; p < .0001 and .0004) as well as 24 h‐ABP dropped significantly (‐9 ± 17 mmHg and ‐5 ± 12 mmHg; p = .0049 and .0280). After 6 months of BAT, 21 patients (60%) could be classified as responders. There was neither significant difference in mean office systolic (‐21 ± 23 mmHg vs. ‐21 ± 28 mmHg; p = .9581) nor in 24 h‐systolic ABP decrease (‐11 ± 19 mmHg vs. ‐7 ± 15 mmHg; p = .4450) comparing adherent and non‐adherent patients. Whereas Antihypertensive Therapeutic Index (ATI) was unchanged in non‐responders, it significantly decreased in responders (from 50 ± 16 to 46 ± 16; p = .0477). These data are the first to show that BAT‐initiation leads to a clear BP reduction independently of patients´ medication adherence. Response to BAT is associated with a significant lowering of ATI, which might contribute to an underestimation of BAT efficacy.

Major disparities in patient-reported adherence compared to objective assessment of adherence using mass spectrometry: a prospective study in a tertiary-referral hypertension clinic

AIM

Many challenges exist in determining true rates of adherence to antihypertensive medications among individuals in a clinic setting. For the first time, we aimed to compare patient-reported antihypertensive adherence with objective evidence using mass spectrometry spot urinalysis in a tertiary referral clinic setting.

METHODS

A prospective observational single-centre cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral hypertension clinic, encompassing antihypertensive initiation and persistence. Patients were referred with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension or for suspected secondary causes. Participants completed a self-reported assessment of antihypertensive adherence and provided a spot urine sample. The presence of antihypertensive medications and/or their respective metabolites was evaluated using high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Patients were determined to be adherent if they demonstrated both self-reported adherence and objective mass spectrometry evidence.

RESULTS

Of all 105 eligible participants initially recruited, 73 (69.5%) met the eligibility criteria. Only 27.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.4) of participants demonstrated true adherence to their self-reported antihypertensives, despite 75.3% (0.6-0.8) reporting adherence. Greatest medication adherence was achieved with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (61%), with calcium-channel blockers and mineralocorticoid antagonists demonstrating least adherence (38%).

CONCLUSION

In patients attending a tertiary hypertension clinic, the combined use of spot urine mass spectrometry and self-reporting identifies higher rates of non-adherence when compared to either modality alone. Both techniques should be combined for more accurate detection of medication adherence.

Treatment of Resistant Hypertension With Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification: 3-Year Results From the CALM-FIM Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term (3-year) safety and effectiveness of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EVBA) from both the European and American CALM-FIM cohorts.

BACKGROUND

The CALM-FIM study demonstrated that EVBA in patients with resistant hypertension significantly lowered blood pressure (BP) with an acceptable safety profile during 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

The CALM-FIM studies were prospective, nonrandomized, first-in-human studies that enrolled patients with resistant hypertension (office systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mm Hg despite a stable regimen of ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic agent). The incidence of (serious) adverse events and changes in BP, heart rate, and prescribed antihypertensive medication up to 3 years after implantation were determined.

RESULTS

The Mobius device was implanted in 47 patients (30 in Europe, 17 in the United States; mean age 54 years, 23 women). Five serious adverse events (hypotension, n = 2; hypertension, n = 1; vascular access complications, n = 2) and 2 transient ischemic attacks occurred within 30 days postprocedure. Two strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack occurred more than 2 years postimplantation. Mean office BP at baseline was 181 ± 17/107 ± 16 mm Hg and decreased by 25/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 17-33/8-17 mm Hg) at 6 months and 30/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 21-38/8-17 mm Hg) at 3 years. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP at baseline was 166 ± 16/98 ± 15 mm Hg and decreased by 20/11 mm Hg (95% CI: 14-25/8-15 mm Hg) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

EVBA with the MobiusHD was effective in reducing BP at 3-year follow-up and appears to have an acceptable safety profile in patients with uncomplicated implantation, although data from randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risk-benefit profile. (Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_EUR], NCT01911897; Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_US], NCT01831895).

Nonadherence in Hypertension: How to Develop and Implement Chemical Adherence Testing

Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is common, especially in those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (true treatment-resistant hypertension requires exclusion of nonadherence), and its routine detection is supported by clinical guidelines. Chemical adherence testing is a reliable and valid method to detect adherence, yet methods are unstandardized and are not ubiquitous. This article describes the principles of chemical adherence testing for hypertensive patients and provides a set of recommendations for centers wishing to develop the test. We recommend testing should be done in either of two instances: (1) in those who have resistant hypertension or (2) in those on 2 antihypertensives who have a less than 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure on addition of the second antihypertensive medication. Furthermore, we recommend that verbal consent is secured before undertaking the test, and the results should be discussed with the patient. Based on medications prescribed in United Kingdom, European Union, and United States, we list top 20 to 24 drugs that cover >95% of hypertension prescriptions which may be included in the testing panel. Information required to identify these medications on mass spectrometry platforms is likewise provided. We discuss issues related to ethics, sample collection, transport, stability, urine versus blood samples, qualitative versus quantitative testing, pharmacokinetics, instrumentation, validation, quality assurance, and gaps in knowledge. We consider how to best present, interpret, and discuss chemical adherence test results with the patient. In summary, this guidance should help clinicians and their laboratories in the development of chemical adherence testing of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.

Renal denervation for resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension is highly prevalent among the general hypertensive population and the clinical management of this condition remains problematic. Different approaches, including a more intensified antihypertensive therapy, lifestyle modifications or both, have largely failed to improve patients' outcomes and to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk. As renal sympathetic hyperactivity is a major driver of resistant hypertension, in the last decade renal sympathetic ablation (renal denervation) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic alternative to treat this condition.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of renal denervation in individuals with resistant hypertension on clinical end points, including fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, quality of life, blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular and metabolic profile and kidney function, as well as the potential adverse events related to the procedure.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to 3 November 2020: Cochrane Hypertension's Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2020, Issue 11), Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (via CENTRAL) and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for ongoing trials. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared renal denervation to standard therapy or sham procedure to treat resistant hypertension, without language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. We summarised treatment effects on available clinical outcomes and adverse events using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using Chi² and I² statistics. We calculated summary treatment estimates as a mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty of evidence has been assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 15 eligible studies (1416 participants). In four studies, renal denervation was compared to sham procedure; in the remaining studies, renal denervation was tested against standard or intensified antihypertensive therapy. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias for allocation concealment and blinding.  When compared to control, there was low-certainty evidence that renal denervation had little or no effect on the risk of myocardial infarction (4 studies, 742 participants; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.84), ischaemic stroke (5 studies, 892 participants; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.95), unstable angina (3 studies, 270 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.89) or hospitalisation (3 studies, 743 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.11). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, renal denervation may reduce 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) systolic BP (9 studies, 1045 participants; MD -5.29 mmHg, 95% CI -10.46 to -0.13), ABPM diastolic BP (8 studies, 1004 participants; MD -3.75 mmHg, 95% CI -7.10 to -0.39) and office diastolic BP (8 studies, 1049 participants; MD -4.61 mmHg, 95% CI -8.23 to -0.99). Conversely, this procedure had little or no effect on office systolic BP (10 studies, 1090 participants; MD -5.92 mmHg, 95% CI -12.94 to 1.10). Moderate-certainty evidence suggested that renal denervation may not reduce serum creatinine (5 studies, 721 participants, MD 0.03 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.13) and may not increase the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (6 studies, 822 participants; MD -2.56 mL/min, 95% CI -7.53 to 2.42).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resistant hypertension, there is low-certainty evidence that renal denervation does not improve major cardiovascular outomes and renal function. Conversely, moderate-certainty evidence exists that it may improve 24h ABPM and diastolic office-measured BP. Future trials measuring patient-centred instead of surrogate outcomes, with longer follow-up periods, larger sample size and more standardised procedural methods are necessary to clarify the utility of this procedure in this population.

A literature review of pharmacist’s impact on lifestyle modifications among obese, hypertensive patients

Objectives

Previous trials have confirmed a positive relationship between obesity and hypertension. The purpose of this article is to identify the impact of pharmacists in lifestyle adherence among obese, hypertensive patients.

Methods

A literature search was performed at an academic institution using secondary databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and EBSCOhost. Reviews, observational and experimental reports published in English between 2010 and 2020 were included. Terms searched were pharmacy, pharmacist, lifestyle modifications, adherence, compliance, hypertension, obesity, consultation, intervention. Effect on lifestyle modifications consisted of change in blood pressure values, weight, body mass index, diet/sodium intake and/or exercise.

Key findings

Six hundred seventy-five articles were reviewed with 10 meeting inclusion criteria. The role of a pharmacist has a positive impact on compliance in lifestyle adherence with obese, hypertensive patients. Additionally, age, gender marital status, education, monthly income, knowledge level and beliefs of hypertension and co-morbidities all can affect adherence to lifestyle modifications.

Conclusions

The pharmacist has a vital role in the management of hypertension and obesity through frequent interactions with patients to increase adherence to lifestyle modifications.

Resistance to antihypertensive treatment and long-term risk: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

More stringent blood pressure (BP) goals have led to greater prevalence of apparent resistant hypertension (ARH), yet the long‐term prognostic impact of ARH diagnosed according to these goals in the general population remains unknown. We assessed the prognostic impact of ARH according to contemporary BP goals in 9612 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study without previous cardiovascular disease. ARH, defined as BP above goal (traditional goal <140/90 mmHg, more stringent goal <130/80 mmHg) despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive drug classes or any BP with ≥4 antihypertensive drug classes (one of which was required to be a diuretic) was compared with controlled hypertension (BP at goal with 1‐3 antihypertensive drug classes). Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race, study center, BMI, heart rate, smoking, eGFR, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, and diabetes. Using the traditional BP goal, 133 participants (3.8% of the treated) had ARH. If the more stringent BP goal was instead applied, 785 participants (22.6% of the treated) were reclassified from controlled hypertension to uncontrolled hypertension (n = 725) or to ARH (n = 60). Over a median follow‐up time of 19 years, ARH was associated with increased risk for a composite end point (all‐cause mortality, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure) regardless of whether traditional (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.23‐1.82) or more stringent (adjusted HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.20‐1.70) blood pressure goals were applied. We conclude that in patients free from cardiovascular disease, ARH predicted long‐term risk regardless of whether traditional or more stringent BP criteria were applied.

Eligibility for Baroreflex Activation Therapy and medication adherence in patients with apparently resistant hypertension

Uncontrolled hypertension is a main risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is an effective therapy option addressing true resistant hypertension. We evaluated patients’ eligibility for BAT in a staged assessment as well as adherence to antihypertensive drug therapy. Therefore, we analyzed files of 345 patients, attending the hypertension clinic at University Medicine Göttingen. Additionally, gas chromatographic‐mass spectrometric urine analyses of selected individuals were performed evaluating their adherence. Most common cause for a revoked BAT recommendation was blood pressure (BP) control by drug adjustment (54.2%). Second leading cause was presence of secondary hypertension (31.6%). Patients to whom BAT was recommended (59 (17.1%)) were significantly more often male (67.8% vs. 43.3%, P = .0063), had a higher body mass index (31.8 ± 5.8 vs. 30.0 ± 5.7 kg/m², P = .0436), a higher systolic office (168.7 ± 24.7 vs. 147.7 ± 24.1 mmHg, P < .0001), and 24h ambulatory BP (155.0 ± 14.6 vs. 144.4 ± 16.8 mmHg, P = .0031), took more antihypertensive drugs (5.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.4 ± 1.4, P < .0001), and suffered more often from numerous concomitant diseases. Eventually, 27 (7.8%) received a BAT system. In the toxicological analysis of 75 patients, mean adherence was 75.1%. 16 patients (21.3%) showed non‐adherence. Thus, only a small number of patients eventually received a BAT system, as treatable reasons for apparently resistant hypertension could be identified frequently. This study is—to our knowledge—the first report of a staged assessment of patients’ suitability for BAT and underlines the need for a careful examination and indication. Non‐adherence was proven to be a relevant issue concerning apparently resistant hypertension and therefore non‐eligibility for interventional antihypertensive therapy.

We evaluated the eligibility for baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) of 345 patients, attending the hypertension clinic at University Medicine Göttingen. Patients’ drug adherence was investigated by 75 toxicological analyses. Most common cause for a revoked BAT recommendation was blood pressure control by drug adjustment. Eventually, only less patients (7.8%) received a BAT system. Patients receiving a BAT recommendation showed specific characteristics and suffered numerous comorbidities, leading to a high cardiovascular risk, and therefore seem to greatly benefit from BAT implantation. 21.3% of patients showed non‐adherence, proving non‐adherence to be a relevant issue.

Biochemical Urine Testing of Medication Adherence and Its Association With Clinical Markers in an Outpatient Population of Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Analysis in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT)

OBJECTIVE

To assess adherence to the three main drug classes in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes using biochemical urine testing, and to determine the association of nonadherence with baseline demographics, treatment targets, and complications.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Analyses were performed of baseline data on 457 patients in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT) study. Adherence to oral antidiabetics (OADs), antihypertensives, and statins was determined by analyzing baseline urine samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Primary outcomes were microvascular and macrovascular complications and treatment targets of LDL cholesterol, HbA1c, and blood pressure. These were assessed cross-sectionally at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 89.3% of patients were identified as adherent. Adherence rates to OADs, antihypertensives, and statins were 95.7%, 92.0%, and 95.5%, respectively. The prevalence of microvascular (81.6% vs. 66.2%; P = 0.029) and macrovascular complications (55.1% vs. 37.0%; P = 0.014) was significantly higher in nonadherent patients. The percentage of patients who reached an LDL cholesterol target of ≤2.5 mmol/L was lower (67.4% vs. 81.1%; P = 0.029) in nonadherent patients. Binary logistic regression indicated that higher BMI, current smoking, elevated serum LDL cholesterol, high HbA1c, presence of diabetic kidney disease, and presence of macrovascular disease were associated with nonadherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although medication adherence of real-world type 2 diabetes patients managed in specialist care was relatively high, the prevalence of microvascular and macrovascular complications was significantly higher in nonadherent patients, and treatment targets were reached less frequently. This emphasizes the importance of objective detection and tailored interventions to improve adherence.

Antihypertensive medication adherence trends by sex and drug class: A pilot study

Introduction

Antihypertensive medication nonadherence is a prevalent issue but is very difficult to accurately assess. To clarify this problem among hypertensive patients attending a cardiovascular disease outpatient clinic, we utilized high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) to assess antihypertensive medication adherence and identify trends by sex and drug class.

Methods

Serum was extracted from blood samples obtained from patients with either drug-controlled or drug resistant hypertension (RHTN) and analyzed via HPLC-MS for antihypertensive drugs which were categorized by drug class as beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, diuretics, ACE inhibitor/ARBs, or calcium channel blockers. Clinic blood pressure (BP), sex, and prescription regimens were extracted from medical records at or near the time of blood collection. "Adherence" or "nonadherence" was determined by comparison of the patient's prescribed drug regimen and the presence/absence of prescribed drug(s) in their serum.

Results

Among 76 patients (47 women; mean age 63; 53% white), nonadherence was confirmed in 29%. RHTN was more frequently identified in women than men (55% vs 38%) and nonadherence was higher in women than men (34% vs 21%). BP in those who were adherent to prescribed antihypertensive drugs was significantly lower than in those who were nonadherent (129/75 vs 145/83 mmHg, p = 0.0015). Overall, ACE inhibitors/ARBs were associated with the least nonadherence. Among women, nonadherence was highest for aldosterone antagonists, whereas among men, nonadherence was highest for diuretics.

Conclusion

We observed nonadherence was more frequent among older women in a cohort of HTN and RHTN patients with cardiovascular disease based on HPLC-MS confirmed drug levels.

Arterial Stiffness, Cognitive Dysfunction and Adherence to Antihypertensive Agents. Is there a Link to Hypertensive Patients?

The incidence of hypertension (HTN) and its cardiovascular (CV) complications are increasing throughout the world. Blood pressure (BP) control remains unsatisfactory worldwide. Medical inertia and poor adherence to treatment are among the factors that can partially explain, why BP control rate remains low. The introduction of a method for measuring the degree of adherence to a given medication is now a prerequisite. Complex treatment regimes, inadequate tolerance and frequent replacements of pharmaceutical formulations are the most common causes of poor adherence. In contrast, the use of stable combinations of antihypertensive drugs leads to improved patient adherence. We aim to review the relationships between arterial stiffness, cognitive function and adherence to medication in patients with HTN. Large artery stiffening can lead to HTN. In turn, arterial stiffness induced by HTN is associated with an increased CV and stroke risk. In addition, HTN can induce disorders of brain microcirculation resulting in cognitive dysfunction. Interestingly, memory cognitive dysfunction leads to a reduced adherence to drug treatment. Compliance with antihypertensive treatment improves BP control and arterial stiffness indices. Early treatment of arterial stiffness is strongly recommended for enhanced cognitive function and increased adherence.

Is there any Hope for Monitoring Adherence in an Efficient and Feasible Way for Resistant Hypertension Diagnosis and Follow-Up?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is highly prevalent and represents a major factor affecting their effectiveness in hypertensive patients, thus contributing to apparent treatment resistance. It is however often overlooked because the methods to assess non-adherence are mainly subjective, limiting their usefulness in clinical practice. Non-adherence to treatment affects daily patient management, resulting in inappropriate, costly, and potentially harmful treatments and loss of the expected benefits from antihypertensive drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specialized centers now use a combination of objective screening tools. Firstly, snapshots of adherence levels can be provided by analytical drug detection in various biological matrixes using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and secondly electronic monitoring systems of drug delivery which provide longitudinal data on adherence. Routine utilization of those tools allows the detection of non-adherence in patients with resistant hypertension, thus enabling implementation of appropriate interventions to improve drug adherence and avoid unnecessary treatment intensification. Other complementary techniques, such as digital health feedback system with ingestible sensors, are currently evaluated. In the context of an increasing burden of uncontrolled and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, detecting non-adherence to antihypertensive therapy is, as acknowledged by the latest guidelines, a top priority to implement in clinical practice but still faces medical conservatism and disbelief.

The randomised Oslo study of renal denervation vs. Antihypertensive drug adjustments: efficacy and safety through 7 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

The blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) in treatment-resistant hypertension shows variation amongst the existing randomised studies. The long-term efficacy and safety of RDN require further investigation. For the first time, we report BP changes and safety up to 7 years after RDN, compared to drug adjustment in the randomised Oslo RDN study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, defined as daytime systolic ambulatory BP ≥135 mmHg after witnessed intake of ≥3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, were randomised to either RDN (n = 9) or drug adjustment (n = 10). The initial primary endpoint was the change in office BP after 6 months. The RDN group had their drugs adjusted after 1 year using the same principles as the Drug Adjustment group. Both groups returned for long-term follow-up after 3 and 7 years.

RESULTS

The decrease in office BP and ambulatory BP (ABPM) after 6 months did not persist, but gradually increased in both groups. From 6 months to 7 years follow-up, mean daytime systolic ABPM increased from 142 ± 10 to 145 ± 15 mmHg in the RDN group, and from 133 ± 11 to 137 ± 13 mmHg in the Drug Adjustment group, with the difference between them decreasing. In a mixed factor model, a significantly different variance was found between the groups in daytime systolic ABPM (p = .04) and diastolic ABPM (p = .01) as well as office diastolic BP (p<.01), but not in office systolic BP (p = .18). At long-term follow-up we unveiled no anatomical- or functional renal impairment in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

BP changes up to 7 years show a tendency towards a smaller difference in BPs between the RDN and drug adjustment patients. Our data support RDN as a safe procedure, but it remains non-superior to intensive drug adjustment 7 years after the intervention.

Confounding Factors in Renal Denervation Trials: Revisiting Old and Identifying New Challenges in Trial Design of Device Therapies for Hypertension

Recent randomized sham-controlled trials have demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions following renal denervation (RDN) in patients with hypertension, both in the presence and absence of antihypertensive therapy. These new data encouraged us to revisit previously published insights into potential clinical trial confounding factors that informed the design and conduct of forthcoming trials. Initially identified confounders related to procedural technique, medication variability, and selected patient subgroups have been addressed in contemporary trial design. Regarding procedural method and technology, blood pressure reductions may be improved by ensuring circumferential lesion creation in the distal renal arteries and branch vessels. Safety of the RDN procedure has been demonstrated in multiple independent meta-analyses including thousands of treated patients with low reported rates of renal vessel complications and maintenance of renal function. However, a newer generation of RDN trials has also introduced insights related to medication adherence, patient selection, and the definition of treatment response. Evolving evidence indicates that RDN therapy may be considered in higher risk populations of uncontrolled hypertension regardless of ethnicity and in patients expressing a strong preference for a nondrug therapy option. Despite advances in procedural technique and clinical trial conduct, inconsistent antihypertensive-drug adherence behavior remains perhaps the most critical clinical trial design issue for device-based hypertension therapies. As the balance in clinical equipoise increasingly favors RDN, justification of sham-controlled trial designs will be revisited, and novel study designs may be required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel devices and procedures intended to address the escalating prevalence of poorly controlled hypertension.

Design and rationale of DUTCH-AF: a prospective nationwide registry programme and observational study on long-term oral antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulation therapy is pivotal in the management of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Prospective registries, containing longitudinal data are lacking with detailed information on anticoagulant therapy, treatment adherence and AF-related adverse events in practice-based patient cohorts, in particular for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC). With the creation of DUTCH-AF, a nationwide longitudinal AF registry, we aim to provide clinical data and answer questions on the (anticoagulant) management over time and of the clinical course of patients with newly diagnosed AF in routine clinical care. Within DUTCH-AF, our current aim is to assess the effect of non-adherence and non-persistence of anticoagulation therapy on clinical adverse events (eg, bleeding and stroke), to determine predictors for such inadequate anticoagulant treatment, and to validate and refine bleeding prediction models. With DUTCH-AF, we provide the basis for a continuing nationwide AF registry, which will facilitate subsequent research, including future registry-based clinical trials.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The DUTCH-AF registry is a nationwide, prospective registry of patients with newly diagnosed 'non-valvular' AF. Patients will be enrolled from primary, secondary and tertiary care practices across the Netherlands. A target of 6000 patients for this initial cohort will be followed for at least 2 years. Data on thromboembolic and bleeding events, changes in antithrombotic therapy and hospital admissions will be registered. Pharmacy-dispensing data will be obtained to calculate parameters of adherence and persistence to anticoagulant treatment, which will be linked to AF-related outcomes such as ischaemic stroke and major bleeding. In a subset of patients, anticoagulation adherence and beliefs about drugs will be assessed by questionnaire.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was approved as exempt for formal review according to Dutch law by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands. Results will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific congresses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Trial NL7467, NTR7706 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7464).

Antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation-Dutch anticoagulant initiatives anno 2020

In recent years, as more and more experience has been gained with prescribing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), new research initiatives have emerged in the Netherlands to improve the safety and appropriateness of DOAC treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). These initiatives address several contemporary unresolved issues, such as inappropriate dosing, non-adherence and the long-term management of DOAC treatment. Dutch initiatives have also contributed to the development and improvement of risk prediction models. Although fewer bleeding complications (notably intracranial bleeding) are in general seen with DOACs in comparison with vitamin K antagonists, to successfully identify patients with high bleeding risk and to tailor anticoagulant treatment accordingly to mitigate this increased bleeding risk, is one of the research aims of recent and future years. This review highlights contributions from the Netherlands that aim to address these unresolved issues regarding the anticoagulant management in AF in daily practice, and provides a narrative overview of contemporary stroke and bleeding risk assessment strategies.

Clinical Applicability of Monitoring Antihypertensive Drug Levels in Blood

Dried blood spot (DBS) analysis is a novel analytical method for therapeutic drug monitoring to identify nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical applicability of measuring drug concentrations of 8 antihypertensive drugs, using DBS and venipuncture. Furthermore, this study aimed to provide more insight into the between-patient variability in drug concentrations. False-negative values from DBS compared with a venipuncture were determined to assess drug adherence. A generalized estimating equation was used to estimate the model parameters, including sex, dose, age, weight, and the time interval, between drug intake and sampling, on the C_plasma (drug concentration in plasma). No false-negative values were found when measuring nonadherence using DBS compared with venipuncture. A high variability in C_plasma between patients was observed, especially at peak concentrations with a fold change reaching from 2.3 to 35.2. The time of intake was significantly related to the height of the C_plasma in 7 of the 8 measured drugs with a P<0.05, but the influence of dose, weight, age, and sex on drug levels differed largely between the measured drugs. DBS is a reliable and convenient method to assess nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs in clinical practice. The C_plasma of the 8 antihypertensive drugs in this study show a large interindividual difference, and therefore, low plasma concentrations do not necessarily mean nonadherence. Nonadherence can only be confirmed if drug levels are undetectable, that is, values below the lower limit of detection.

Hyphenated mass spectrometry techniques for assessing medication adherence: advantages, challenges, clinical applications and future perspectives

Nonadherence to prescribed pharmacotherapy is an understated public health problem globally and is costing many patients their chance to return to good health and healthcare systems billions. Clinicians need an accurate assessment of adherence to medications to aid the clinical decision-making process in the event of poor patient progress and to maximise the patient health outcomes from the drug therapies prescribed. An overview of indirect and direct methods used to measure medication adherence is presented, highlighting the potential for accurate measuring of drugs in biological samples using hyphenated mass spectrometry (MS) techniques to provide healthcare professionals with a reliable evidence base for clinical decision making. In this review we summarise published applications of hyphenated MS techniques for a diverse range of clinical areas demonstrating the rise in the use of such direct methods for assessing medication adherence. Although liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods using plasma, serum and urine samples are the most popular, in recent years increased attention has been given to liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) methods and alternative biosample matrices including hair, saliva and blood microsamples. The advantages and challenges of using hyphenated MS techniques to address this healthcare problem are also discussed alongside future perspectives.

Recent advances in understanding and managing resistant/refractory hypertension

The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine.  Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.

A novel direct method to determine adherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease

AIMS

Objective methods to monitor statin adherence are needed. We have established a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of atorvastatin and its metabolites in blood. This study aimed to develop an objective drug exposure variable with cut-off values to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5), 20 mg (n = 6), 40 mg (n = 7) and 80 mg (n = 7) participated in a directly observed atorvastatin therapy study to confirm baseline adherence. After the directly observed therapy, half of the patients (test group) were instructed to stop taking atorvastatin and return for blood sample collection the subsequent 3 days. Levels of atorvastatin and metabolites were compared between the test group and the adherent control group.

RESULTS

The sum of parent drug and all measured primary metabolites correlated well with the atorvastatin dose administered (Spearman's rho = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-0.87). The dose-normalized atorvastatin plus metabolites concentrations completely separated the partially adherent test group from the controls at 0.18 nM/mg after 3 days without atorvastatin. To reduce the risk of misinterpreting adherent patients as partially adherent, a corresponding cut-off at 0.10 nM/mg is proposed. A metabolite level of 2-OH atorvastatin acid <0.014 nmol/L provided the optimal cut-off for nonadherence.

CONCLUSION

A direct method to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease has been developed. This tool may be important for novel studies on adherence and potentially useful in clinical practice.

A study on usefulness of modified medication adherence scale in assessing adherence among hypertensive patients

Background:

Adherence to medication is important for control of blood pressure (BP) and prevention of its complications. Identifying factors which improve adherence to treatment helps in improving cardiovascular outcome.

Aim:

The aim is to study the adherence of hypertensive patients to medication using modified medication adherence scale (MMAS).

Materials and Methods:

This study was done as a cross-sectional study in the Department of General medicine in Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, from May 2017 to October 2017. All adult patients of both sexes diagnosed to have hypertension were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. Adherence to hypertension was assessed using MMAS and results were analyzed. SPSS 22 software (International Business Machines Corporation, Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY) was used for statistical purposes.

Results:

A total of 150 patients were included in the study. There were 83 males and 67 females in the study. Good adherence was observed in 74 (49%) out of the total 150. Forty-nine (59%) males and 25 (37%) females were found adherent to treatment. Patients with monotherapy had a good adherence compared to those with polytherapy. Patients with good adherence had a good control of BP.

Conclusion:

MMAS is a simple and useful tool for assessing medication adherence among hypertensive patients.

Resistant Hypertension Updated Guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current definition as well as recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension (RH) based on the 2018 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines and recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

RH is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) on ≥ 3 anti-hypertensives, one of which should be a diuretic, prescribed at maximally tolerated doses and appropriate dosing frequency. The diagnosis of RH requires exclusion of white coat effect and medication non-adherence, underscoring the importance of out-of-office BP measurements. Secondary causes of hypertension must be excluded in all patients with RH. A step-wise approach to treatment focusing on lifestyle modifications and medication optimization can be effective in > 50% of the patients with RH. Device-based interventional therapies for RH are currently investigational. Out-of-office BP measurements are central to the diagnosis of RH. Medication optimization is successful in most patients. Further studies are needed to define the role of device-based interventions.

Screening of cardiovascular agents in plasma with LC-MS/MS: A valuable tool for objective drug adherence assessment

Adherence to cardiovascular preventive agents is important to prevent short and long term cardiovascular events. Recently, qualitatively compound screening using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has gained interest for drug adherence assessment in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, we developed and tested an assay including 52 compounds and metabolites, covering over 95% of the antihypertensive and antithrombotic agents available worldwide. Trichloroacetic acid was used as simple and fast method for protein precipitation. The assay was validated for lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), linearity, stability for freeze/thaw, room temperature, autosampler and matrix effects. The LLOQ for each compound was targeted under the population trough concentration (PTC) as reported in literature to assure high sensitivity for adherence detection. This was accomplished for 50 of 52 compounds with a LLOQ equal or lower compared to the PTC. Linearity was confirmed for all compounds (r² > 0.995), except for acetylsalicylic acid (r² = 0.991). For room temperature stability, 12 compounds showed degradation over 20% after 20 h. 3 compounds suffer from matrix effect with recoveries < 50%. After analytical validation, blood samples from 91 patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension were analyzed. Patients were unaware of adherence assessment. Adherence varied largely per agent and per concentration ratio (CR) (ratio of the detected concentration with LC-MS/MS and the PTC) cut-off value. Additionally, stratification by adherence group showed that the percentage of patients classified as non-adherent increased from 6.6% for qualitative analysis (pos/neg) to 19.8% for a CR cut-off of 0.5. The data imply that using the CR cut off values has a significant and relevant effect on patient adherence classification.

Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension in the INSPiRED pilot study

PURPOSE

Drug adherence may be a major problem in the therapy of hypertension and in the diagnosis of therapy resistance. Adherence can be assessed by indirect methods or by direct methods like drug detection in urine with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current analysis included patients with apparently treatment- resistant hypertension (TRH) referred for renal denervation (RDN) and included in the the INSPiRED pilot trial (NCT01505010). Adherence was repeatedly assessed by toxicological urine analysis over a time range of up to 17 months in a total of 18 patients.

RESULTS

In the first urine samples of 18 patients the adherence rate (percentage of number of detected vs. prescribed medical drugs) ranged from 0 to 100% with a median of 73.2%. In further urine samples collected during the following up to 17 months every individual patient exhibited considerable changes in the adherence rate, neither a constancy nor a tendency could be deduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine analysis results exhibit variation over time and an assessment at a certain time point cannot be regarded as representative or predictor for future behavior. Therefore, it appears necessary to perform drug adherence testing repeatedly over time.

Development and content validation of measures assessing adherence barriers and behaviors for use in clinical care

BACKGROUND

Providers are often unaware of poor adherence to prescribed medications for their patients with chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To develop brief, computer-administered patient-reported measures in English and Spanish assessing adherence behaviors and barriers. Design, Participants, and Main Measures: Item pools were constructed from existing measures of medication adherence behaviors and barriers, which informed development of a patient concept elicitation interview guide to identify medication adherence behavior and barrier-related concepts. Two hundred six patients either living with HIV (PLWH) or without were interviewed. Interviews were coded, concepts matched to item pool content, and new items were developed for novel concepts. A provider/investigator team highlighted clinically relevant items. Cognitive interviews were conducted with patients on final candidate items (n = 37). The instruments were administered to 2081 PLWH.

KEY RESULTS

Behavioral themes from concept elicitation interviews included routines incorporating time of day, placement, visual cues, and intentionality to miss or skip doses. Barrier themes included health-related (e.g. depressed mood, feeling ill), attitudes/beliefs (e.g., need for medication), access (e.g., cost/insurance problems), and circumstantial barriers (e.g., lack of privacy, disruption of daily routine). The final instruments included 6 behavior items, and 1 barrier item with up to 23 response options. PLWH endorsed a mean (SD) of 3.5 (1.1) behaviors. The 201 PLWH who missed ≥2 doses in the previous week endorsed a mean (SD) of 3.1 (2.5) barriers. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the numbers of behaviors endorsed in 61 PLWH after 4-16 days was 0.54 and for the number of barriers for the 20 PLWH with ≥2 missed doses the ICC was 0.89, representing fair and excellent test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSION

Measures of medication adherence behaviors and barriers were developed for use with patients living with chronic diseases focusing on clinical relevance, brevity, and content validity for use in clinical care.

Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification for Resistant Hypertension

Purpose of review

Most hypertension devices have been designed to interrupt or modify the sympathetic nervous system, which seems to be unbalanced in hypertension. Carotid baroreceptors play a pivotal role in maintaining adrenergic balance via a direct feedback interface and would be an exceptional target for intervention. The purpose of this review is to define the role of the baroreceptor in hypertension, to examine device-based therapies targeting the baroreflex and to explore future promises of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA).

Recent findings

In the last two decades, two therapeutic strategies targeting the carotid baroreceptor have evolved: baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and EBA. Both therapies enhance baroreceptor activity, either directly by electrical stimulation or indirectly by changing the geometric shape of the carotid sinus and increasing pulsatile wall strain.

Summary

By showing a significant, sympathetic inhibition-mediated effect on blood pressure, BAT has laid the foundation for baroreflex-targeting therapies for resistant hypertension. EBA is a less invasive therapy with promising first-in-man study results. Ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to better understand efficacy, durability, and long-term safety and define phenotypes that may most benefit from this treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11906-018-0840-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Medication adherence in patients with apparent resistant hypertension: findings from the SYMPATHY trial

AIMS

Hypertension is only controlled in approximately 35% of the patients, which could be partially due to nonadherence. Recently, bioanalytical assessment of adherence to blood pressure (BP) lowering drugs has gaining interest. Our aim was to explore possible determinants of nonadherence in treatment resistant hypertension, assessed by objective screening for antihypertensive agents in serum. The secondary aim was to study the effect of adherence on the change in BP.

METHODS

This project was a substudy of SYMPATHY; an open-label randomized-controlled trial to assess the effect of renal denervation on BP 6 months after treatment compared to usual care in patients with resistant hypertension. Stored serum samples were screened for antihypertensive agents to assess adherence at baseline and 6 months after intervention, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Office and 24-h BP were measured on the same day as blood was sampled. Patients and physicians were unaware of adherence measurements.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight baseline and 83 6-month samples were available for analysis. Sixty-eight percent [95% confidence interval (CI) 59-78%] of the patients was nonadherent (n = 67). For every onw pill more prescribed, 0.785 [95%CI 0.529-0.891] prescribed pill was less detected in blood. A decrease of one pill in adherence between baseline and 6 months was associated with a significant rise in office systolic BP of 4 (95%CI 0.230-8.932) mmHg.

CONCLUSION

Objective measurement of BP lowering drugs in serum, as a tool to assess adherence, showed that nonadherence was very common in patients with apparent resistant hypertension. Furthermore, the assessment results were related to (changes in) blood pressure. Our findings provide direct and objective methodology to help the physician to understand and to improve the condition of apparent resistant hypertension.