Guidelines for the management of acne: recommendations from a French multidisciplinary group

The Risk of Hospital Admission for an Acute-Onset Psychiatric Disorder in Adolescents and Adults Treated with Isotretinoin: A French, Nationwide, Population-Based, Case-Time-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Oral isotretinoin is the only effective treatment for severe acne without an alternative. Isotretinoin has been linked to the occurrence of acute psychiatric disorders outside suicidal behaviors. There are few large-scale epidemiological studies in this area, and the putative associations are unclear. Our objective was to determine whether adolescents and young adults have an elevated risk of acute-onset psychiatric disorder requiring hospital treatment within 2 months of starting isotretinoin treatment.

METHODS

Our data source was the French national health insurance database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS), 2010-2015. We performed a case-time-control study nested in an exhaustive, nationwide cohort of all French adolescents and young adults aged 10-25 years treated with isotretinoin. The outcome was an acute-onset psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization (including anxiety, depressive, mood, adjustment, and psychotic disorders). A conditional logistic model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) for acute psychiatric events.

RESULTS

2,284 acute-onset psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization were recorded for the study population of 262,786 patients. Among the patients with at least one psychiatric event, 88 had started taking isotretinoin in the risk period (0-2 months before the date of the event), versus 81 in the reference period (2-4 months before the event). A comparison with the 383 and 355 time-trend matched controls who started taking isotretinoin in the risk and reference periods, respectively, yielded a case-time-control OR (95% CI) of 1.01 (0.72-1.41).

CONCLUSION

Psychiatric events managed outside the hospital system were not recorded. Our findings are reassuring for clinicians concerning the risk of severe acute-onset psychiatric events after isotretinoin initiation.

An update on the pharmacological management of acne vulgaris: the state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that affects approximately 9.4% of the global population. Current treatment strategies aim to target as many pathogenic factors involved in the appearance of acne lesions and are centered on a systematic treatment escalation based on disease severity, extension, and treatment response, starting with topical treatments for mild cases and progressing over to systemic therapies in more severe cases. A literature search, which included clinical guidelines, clinical studies, and review articles on acne treatment and maintenance, was conducted to review the pharmacological approaches currently available to treat this disease.

AREAS COVERED

Topical therapies such as topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, azelaic acid, salicylic acid, topical antibiotics, and clascoterone, as well as systemic treatments such as oral antibiotics and isotretinoin are discussed in detail. Combined oral contraceptives and spironolactone will not be discussed in this article.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for a blockbuster acne drug that simultaneously targets the four main pathogenic factors involved in the appearance of acne lesions while presenting with minimal side effects. Until such a drug exists, combination therapy will remain the standard of treatment for most acne patients.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of spironolactone in treating persistent facial acne in women: SAFA double-blinded RCT

Background

Acne is common, can cause significant impact on quality of life and is a frequent reason for long-term antibiotic use. Spironolactone has been prescribed for acne in women for many years, but robust evidence is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate whether spironolactone is clinically effective and cost-effective in treating acne in women.

Design

Pragmatic, parallel, double-blind, randomised superiority trial.

Setting

Primary and secondary healthcare and community settings (community and social media advertising).

Participants

Women aged 18 years and older with facial acne persisting for at least 6 months, judged to potentially warrant oral antibiotic treatment.

Interventions

Participants were randomised 1 : 1, using an independent web-based procedure, to either 50 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week 6, increasing to 100 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week 24. Participants continued usual topical treatment.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome was the adjusted mean difference in Acne-Specific Quality of Life symptom subscale score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included Acne-Specific Quality of Life total and subscales; participant self-assessed improvement; Investigator's Global Assessment; Participant's Global Assessment; satisfaction; adverse effects and cost-effectiveness.

Results

Of 1267 women assessed for eligibility, 410 were randomised (201 intervention, 209 control), 342 in the primary analysis (176 intervention, 166 control). Mean age was 29.2 years (standard deviation 7.2) and 7.9% (28/356) were from non-white backgrounds. At baseline, Investigator's Global Assessment classified acne as mild in 46%, moderate in 40% and severe in 13%. At baseline, 82.9% were using topical treatments. Over 95% of participants in both groups tolerated the treatment and increased their dose. Mean baseline Acne-Specific Quality of Life symptom subscale was 13.0 (standard deviation 4.7) across both groups. Mean scores at week 12 were 19.2 (standard deviation 6.1) for spironolactone and 17.8 (standard deviation 5.6) for placebo [difference favouring spironolactone 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.46) adjusting for baseline variables]. Mean scores at week 24 were 21.2 (standard deviation 5.9) in spironolactone group and 17.4 (standard deviation 5.8) in placebo group [adjusted difference 3.77 (95% confidence interval 2.50 to 5.03) adjusted]. Secondary outcomes also favoured spironolactone at 12 weeks with greater differences at 24 weeks. Participants taking spironolactone were more likely than those taking placebo to report overall acne improvement at 12 weeks {72.2% vs. 67.9% [adjusted odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.91)]} and at 24 weeks {81.9% vs. 63.3% [adjusted odds ratio 2.72 (95% confidence interval 1.50 to 4.93)]}. Investigator's Global Assessment was judged successful at week 12 for 31/201 (18.5%) taking spironolactone and 9/209 (5.6%) taking placebo [adjusted odds ratio 5.18 (95% confidence interval 2.18 to 12.28)]. Satisfaction with treatment improved in 70.6% of participants taking spironolactone compared with 43.1% taking placebo [adjusted odds ratio 3.12 (95% confidence interval 1.80 to 5.41)]. Adverse reactions were similar between groups, but headaches were reported more commonly on spironolactone (20.4% vs. 12.0%). No serious adverse reactions were reported. Taking account for missing data through multiple imputation gave an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of £27,879 (adjusted) compared to placebo or £2683 per quality-adjusted life-year compared to oral antibiotics.

Conclusions

Spironolactone resulted in better participant-reported and investigator-reported outcomes than placebo, with greater differences at week 24 than week 12.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN12892056 and EudraCT (2018-003630-33).

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/13/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 56. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Acne vulgaris commonly affects adults, adolescents, and preadolescents aged 9 years or older.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne.

METHODS

A work group conducted a systematic review and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline presents 18 evidence-based recommendations and 5 good practice statements. Strong recommendations are made for benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, and oral doxycycline. Oral isotretinoin is strongly recommended for acne that is severe, causing psychosocial burden or scarring, or failing standard oral or topical therapy. Conditional recommendations are made for topical clascoterone, salicylic acid, and azelaic acid, as well as for oral minocycline, sarecycline, combined oral contraceptive pills, and spironolactone. Combining topical therapies with multiple mechanisms of action, limiting systemic antibiotic use, combining systemic antibiotics with topical therapies, and adding intralesional corticosteroid injections for larger acne lesions are recommended as good practice statements.

LIMITATIONS

Analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time of the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne vulgaris.

Comparing the Efficacy of Topical 4% Benzoyl Peroxide Versus Topical 0.1% Adapalene for Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Skin of Color Population: A South Asian Perspective

Introduction Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin problems encountered in the dermatology department. It is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit, clinically presenting with comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. With its particularly high prevalence in the younger population, it has significant adverse sequelae on patient's quality of life. At present, due to an enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis of acne, various therapeutic modalities are available. The current management strategies generally follow a systematic treatment escalation based on disease severity and treatment response. However meticulous choice of appropriate anti-acne medicine for the acne type is the key to the management plan. Starting with mild to moderate types of acne as per the Leeds photometric grading scale, the most useful topical agents include topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, and topical antibiotics while systemic therapies such as oral antibiotics or isotretinoin are generally reserved for moderate to severe acne treatment. The skin of color (SOC) population is a relatively neglected group concerning the optimum and safe management strategies in different dermatological conditions and acne is no different, where there remains a need for comparing the available topical modalities for appropriate drug selection in the treatment of mild to moderate acne in SOC population. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of topical 4% benzoyl peroxide versus topical 0.1% adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris in the SOC population. Methods The participants were divided into two groups, groups A and B. A total of 64 patients of both genders, with acne vulgaris (duration > three months) were included in the study. In group A, 32 patients were administered topical 0.1% adapalene whereas, in group B, 32 patients were given topical 4% benzoyl peroxide. Both medicines were applied at night daily. Patients were called for follow-up after 12 weeks. In both groups, the final efficacy evaluation was done using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) score after 12 weeks of treatment period. Results In group A, the age ranged from 15 to 40 years with a mean age of 25.781±3.93 years while the duration of complaint was 5.843±1.27 months. GAGS score was 25.281±2.65 and mean BMI was 23.092±3.51 kg/m2. In group B, the mean age was 25.187± 4.06 years, the duration of complaint was 7.375±2.25 months, the GAGS score was 23.906± 2.60 while the mean BMI was 21.485±3.88 kg/m2. Efficacy in group A was noted in 25 (78.1%) patients as compared to 24 (75%) patients in group B (p =0.768). Conclusion The present study showed that the safety and efficacy of 0.1% adapalene the traditional drug 4% benzoyl peroxide in the SOC population was comparable.

Cost-effectiveness of Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne (SAFA): economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of oral spironolactone plus routine topical treatment compared with routine topical treatment alone for persistent acne in adult women from a British NHS perspective over 24 weeks.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation undertaken alongside a pragmatic, parallel, double-blind, randomised trial.

SETTING

Primary and secondary healthcare, community and social media advertising.

PARTICIPANTS

Women ≥18 years with persistent facial acne judged to warrant oral antibiotic treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised 1:1 to 50 mg/day spironolactone (increasing to 100 mg/day after 6 weeks) or matched placebo until week 24. Participants in both groups could continue topical treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost-utility analysis assessed incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L. Cost-effectiveness analysis estimated incremental cost per unit change on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale. Adjusted analysis included randomisation stratification variables (centre, baseline severity (investigator's global assessment, IGA <3 vs ≥3)) and baseline variables (Acne-QoL symptom subscale score, resource use costs, EQ-5D score and use of topical treatments).

RESULTS

Spironolactone did not appear cost-effective in the complete case analysis (n=126 spironolactone, n=109 control), compared with no active systemic treatment (adjusted incremental cost per QALY £67 191; unadjusted £34 770). Incremental cost per QALY was £27 879 (adjusted), just below the upper National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold value of £30 000, where multiple imputation took account of missing data. Incremental cost per QALY for other sensitivity analyses varied around the base-case, highlighting the degree of uncertainty. The adjusted incremental cost per point change on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale for spironolactone compared with no active systemic treatment was £38.21 (complete case analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate a high level of uncertainty, particularly with respect to estimates of incremental QALYs. Compared with no active systemic treatment, spironolactone was estimated to be marginally cost-effective where multiple imputation was performed but was not cost-effective in complete case analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12892056).

The Personalized Acne Treatment Tool - Recommendations to facilitate a patient-centered approach to acne management from the Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts

Background

Acne, a commonly treated skin disease, requires patient-centered management due to its varying presentations, chronicity, and impact on health-related quality of life. Despite this, evidence-based clinical guidelines focus primarily on clinical severity of facial acne, omitting important patient- and disease-related factors, including ongoing management.

Objectives

To generate recommendations to support patient-centered acne management, which incorporate priority and prognostic factors beyond conventional clinical severity, traditionally defined by grading the appearance and extent of visible lesions.

Methods

The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts consisted of 17 dermatologists who used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements regarding patient- and treatment-related factors pertaining to patient-centered acne management. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "agree" or "strongly agree."

Results

Recommendations based on factors such as acne sequelae, location of acne, high burden of disease, and individual patient features were generated and incorporated into the Personalized Acne Treatment Tool.

Limitations

Recommendations are based on expert opinion, which may differ from patients' perspectives. Regional variations in healthcare systems may not be represented.

Conclusions

The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts panel provided practical recommendations to facilitate individualized management of acne, based on patient features, which can be implemented to improve treatment outcomes, adherence, and patient satisfaction.

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for acne vulgaris published between January 2017 and July 2021

Background

Acne is very common, can cause considerable negative impact on quality of life and there is increasing concern over the use of long courses of oral antibiotics for this condition.

Objectives

(1) To critically appraise reporting in acne guidelines and compare this with previous systematic review of acne guidelines. (2) Examine acne treatment guidance on pre-specified acne treatments of interest and compare between acne guidelines.

Methods

Searches for new or updated guidelines were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, LILACS from 1 January 2017 to 31 July 2021, supplemented by searching a guideline-specific depository and checking for updates to guidelines included in previous review. We included guidelines, consensus statements or care protocols on the medical treatment of acne vulgaris in adults and/or children and excluded those that focused on a single intervention or subgroup of acne, regional adaptations of guidelines or guidelines included in previous review. AGREE II checklist was applied to critically appraise reporting of guidelines. Results were synthesised narratively.

Results

Of 807 abstracts identified nine guidelines were identified that were eligible for inclusion. All guidelines had AGREE II scores above average in at least one domain and reporting was substantially improved compared to the systematic review of acne carried out 5 years previously. There was consensus between guidelines on the key role of topical treatments as first-line acne treatment and most recommended continuing topical treatments as maintenance therapy. There was considerable variation between guidelines on classification of severity, indications for commencing oral antibiotics and on maximum duration of oral antibiotics. However, there was consensus on the need for co-prescription of a non-antibiotic topical treatment when using oral antibiotics. There were notable differences on recommendations regarding provision of information for patients on how to use topical treatments or how to mitigate against side effects.

Conclusions

Substantial differences in classification of acne severity hampered comparisons between guidelines. Although development and reporting of guidelines has improved over the past 5 years, differences in key recommendations remain, possibly reflecting uncertainties in the underlying evidence base. Differences between guidelines could have substantial implications for prevalence of antibiotic prescribing for acne.

Effectiveness of spironolactone for women with acne vulgaris (SAFA) in England and Wales: pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, double blind, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris in adult women.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, double blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary and secondary healthcare, and advertising in the community and on social media in England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Women (≥18 years) with facial acne for at least six months, judged to warrant oral antibiotics.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 50 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week six, increasing to 100 mg/day spironolactone or placebo until week 24. Participants could continue using topical treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12 (range 0-30, where higher scores reflect improved QoL). Secondary outcomes were Acne-QoL at week 24, participant self-assessed improvement; investigator's global assessment (IGA) for treatment success; and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

From 5 June 2019 to 31 August 2021, 1267 women were assessed for eligibility, 410 were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=201) or control group (n=209) and 342 were included in the primary analysis (n=176 in the intervention group and n=166 in the control group). Baseline mean age was 29.2 years (standard deviation 7.2), 28 (7%) of 389 were from ethnicities other than white, with 46% mild, 40% moderate, and 13% severe acne. Mean Acne-QoL symptom scores at baseline were 13.2 (standard deviation 4.9) and at week 12 were 19.2 (6.1) for spironolactone and 12.9 (4.5) and 17.8 (5.6) for placebo (difference favouring spironolactone 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.46), adjusted for baseline variables). Scores at week 24 were 21.2 (5.9) for spironolactone and 17.4 (5.8) for placebo (difference 3.45 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 4.75), adjusted). More participants in the spironolactone group reported acne improvement than in the placebo group: no significant difference was reported at week 12 (72% v 68%, odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.91)) but significant difference was noted at week 24 (82% v 63%, 2.72 (1.50 to 4.93)). Treatment success (IGA classified) at week 12 was 31 (19%) of 168 given spironolactone and nine (6%) of 160 given placebo (5.18 (2.18 to 12.28)). Adverse reactions were slightly more common in the spironolactone group with more headaches reported (20% v 12%; p=0.02). No serious adverse reactions were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Spironolactone improved outcomes compared with placebo, with greater differences at week 24 than week 12. Spironolactone is a useful alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN12892056.

Therapeutic inertia during isotretinoin treatment of juvenile acne by dermatologists, paediatricians and general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Isotretinoin is an effective treatment for severe juvenile acne, but it appears to be underused in relation to the recommendations. Therapeutic inertia is defined as a failure to initiate or intensify treatment even when warranted by the recommendations. The aim of this study was to investigate therapeutic inertia among dermatologists (D), paediatricians (P), and general practitioners (GPs) in initiating isotretinoin for moderate-to-very severe juvenile acne.

METHODS

Data were collected using a questionnaire distributed to French physicians through medical societies via Internet. The questions explored the role in inertia of factors related to physicians, patients, parents, and the healthcare system, and evaluated barriers and facilitators to prescribing isotretinoin.

RESULTS

In all, 768 physicians responded to the survey (528 D, 178P, and 61 GPs; mean age: 51 years; women: 78 %). Their responses revealed that 99 % of dermatologists felt comfortable prescribing isotretinoin, compared with 8 % and 15 % of paediatricians and GPs (p < 0.05); 93 % of dermatologists were aware of the current guidelines compared with 37 % of paediatricians and GPs. Under 50 % of the physicians had received training on acne in the previous 3 years, regardless of specialty. The most frequently identified factors for inertia were concerns over the psychological consequences of the treatment in adolescents, exclusive requests from parents, and patient unavailability. Paediatricians reported having insufficient knowledge of current recommendations, a lack of training, and a tendency to anticipate poor compliance. Paediatricians and GPs considered that access to first-time prescriptions and peer-to-peer exchanges would constitute facilitating factors in their use of isotretinoin.

DISCUSSION

Concerns over the psychiatric consequences of isotretinoin in adolescents, the need for frequent follow-up, and lack of continuing medical education were identified as factors favouring inertia in the initiation of isotretinoin treatment in patients with moderate-to-very severe juvenile acne, particularly among paediatricians and GPs. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers include regular training, simplified recommendations in French, and access to first-time prescription for paediatricians and GPs.

First use of the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) in the management of young people with severe acne treated with isotretinoin: a pilot study of an active monitoring of depressive disorders by dermatologists

BACKGROUND

During isotretinoin treatment, special attention is required to detect any symptom or change in the mental health of patients. The monitoring is complex for adolescents because of confounding factors such as mood changes associated with adolescence and puberty and the higher psychosocial impairment due to the acne itself.

AIM

To determine the utility of the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) for monitoring symptoms in adolescents before and during isotretinoin treatment in dermatology real-life practice.

METHODS

This was a national, multicentre prospective study that enrolled a random sample of dermatologists treating adolescents. An algorithm including ADRS score and its changes between consecutive visits was used. At each visit, dermatologists rated their satisfaction with ADRS and its ease of use, while patients rated the acceptability of the ADRS.

RESULTS

In total, 70 dermatologists used the algorithm for 1227 visits of 283 adolescents receiving isotretinoin. Of these 70 dermatologists, 80.8% were satisfied/very satisfied with the ADRS, 82.7% considered the use of the ADRS in clinical practice to be easy/very easy and 75% considered that the ADRS enabled them to discuss more easily the risk of depression with their patients. For the patients, acceptability of the ADRS was considered good by 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the ADRS could be valuable in dermatology practice, optimizing the monitoring of patients and the good use of isotretinoin.

The Personalised Acne Care Pathway-Recommendations to guide longitudinal management from the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts

BACKGROUND

Acne is a chronic disease with a varying presentation that requires long-term management. Despite this, the clinical guidelines for acne offer limited guidance to facilitate personalized or longitudinal management of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To generate recommendations to support comprehensive, personalized, long-term patient management that address all presentations of acne and its current and potential future burden.

METHODS

The Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel consisted of 13 dermatologists who used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements related to longitudinal acne management. The consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "agree" or "strongly agree." All voting was electronic and blinded.

RESULTS

Key management domains, consisting of distinct considerations, points to discuss with patients, and "pivot points" were identified and incorporated into the Personalised Acne Care Pathway. Long-term treatment goals and expectations and risk of (or fears about) sequelae are highlighted as particularly important to discuss frequently with patients.

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations are based on expert opinion, which could potentially differ from patients' perspectives. Regional variations in health care systems may not have been captured.

CONCLUSIONS

The Personalised Acne Care Pathway provides practical recommendations to facilitate the longitudinal management of acne, which can be used by health care professionals to optimize and personalize care throughout the patient journey.

Guidance for the pharmacological management of acne vulgaris

INTRODUCTION

Many international guidelines and expert consensuses are available to help the clinician diagnose and treat acne vulgaris; however, a simplified practical guidance that integrates current existing published recommendations is still lacking. This article aims to give practical and simplified insight into the treatment of acne.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the author discusses the treatment of comedonal, papulopustular, and nodular/cystic/conglobate acne. The author also proposes a simplified treatment escalation strategy that is based on disease severity and extension, starting with topical treatments for mild cases and progressing over to systemic therapies in more severe cases.

EXPERT OPINION

The ideal acne treatment would simultaneously and safely target all the pathogenic factors implicated in the appearance of acne lesions with minimal side effects. Since no such treatment currently exists, combination therapies are usually recommended for most types of acne. A major limitation in choosing an appropriate treatment plan is the discrepant use of classification systems across the published literature making it difficult to draw clear and succinct conclusions about the recommendations given. Acne is not a traditional infectious disease and so while antibiotics may improve symptoms, they do not reliably resolve the condition. Thus, there is currently a tendency to opt for antibiotic-sparing treatment strategies whenever possible.

Vulvar Fordyce adenitis: A cohort of 45 women

BACKGROUND

Recurrent episodes of painful papules and nodules, mostly located on the labia minora, have been reported under the denominations of vulvar sebaceous adenitis (14 published cases) and vulvar acne (16 published cases).

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to delve further into the clinical and pathological features of this condition. The secondary aim was to collect therapeutic data.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, files and photographs of patients with papules or nodules on the labia minora or the inner labia majora were extracted from a vulvar clinic database. Clinical, pathological and therapeutic data were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty-five women were included from 2002 to 2018. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 36 years (range: 16-60). The median time to diagnosis was 6.5 years. Clinical features included recurrent painful papules, pustules or nodules, suppuration (n=22), and pitted scars (n=10) on the labia minora (n=41), the inner labia majora (n=19), the outer labia majora (n=1), and the clitoral hood (n=1). Associated acne vulgaris was seen in 17 out of 26 patients for whom data were available. Hidradenitis suppurativa, androgenic alopecia and hirsutism were observed in 3, 1 and 1 cases respectively. Neutrophilic infiltrates were observed in the 4 available biopsies within or around the Fordyce sebaceous glands in 2 patients. Treatment with tetracyclines and oral zinc was not consistently effective. Isotretinoin led to complete remission in 4 patients unresponsive to tetracyclines.

DISCUSSION

Vulvar sebaceous adenitis/vulvar acne is a clinically identifiable cause of painful recurrent inflammatory lesions affecting the labia minora and the inner labia majora, which are coincidentally sites of Fordyce granules. We therefore suggest a more specific denomination: "vulvar Fordyce adenitis". The relationship with acne vulgaris and hidradenitis suppurativa requires further investigation. We suggest use of an oral anti-acne therapeutic strategy to reduce inflammation and to decrease the secretion of the sebaceous glands.

Increased prevalence of doxycycline low-susceptible Cutibacterium acnes isolated from acne patients in Japan caused by antimicrobial use and diversification of tetracycline resistance factors

The prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Cutibacterium acnes is an important concern for the antimicrobial treatment of acne vulgaris. We hypothesized that antimicrobial treatment regimens for acne vulgaris would change following the revisions in the Japanese acne treatment guidelines, which added a statement regarding appropriate antimicrobial usage. Here, we studied the changes in antimicrobial use and antimicrobial-resistant C. acnes isolated from acne patients. A total of 127 C. acnes isolates collected from 212 patients with acne between 2013 and 2018 were used. Roxithromycin and clindamycin resistance rates were approximately 50% and 40%, respectively. In contrast, the prevalence of low doxycycline-susceptible strains (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥8 μg/mL) in 2018 (17.4%) was 5.6-fold higher than that in 2013 (3.1%). Although the number of patients with severe and moderate acne did not change, the number of patients with a history of oral tetracycline use increased. The incidence of low doxycycline-susceptible strains was high in patients with a history of oral tetracycline use. The prevalence of strains with a 16S rRNA mutation, which confers reduced susceptibility to tetracyclines, increased by 8.6-fold (12.1%) from 2016 to 2018 in comparison with the previously revised guidelines (1.4%). Furthermore, the prevalence of low susceptibility strains with two resistance factors, 16S rRNA mutation and ribosomal S10 protein substitution, also increased. Approximately 10% of strains had the exogenous resistance gene, tet(W) (2013 to 2015, 10.1%; 2016 to 2018, 8.6%), and these strains showed different susceptibility to doxycycline dependent on the expression of tet(W) (MIC range 0.5-8 μg/mL). Our data show that the antimicrobial resistance pattern in C. acnes changes according to the trend of antimicrobial usage for acne treatment. Therefore, we should pay heed to the rapid dissemination of tetracycline resistance in C. acnes owing to acquisition of 16S rRNA mutation and tet(W).

The role and place of azelaic acid in the routes of patients with acne vulgaris

The review presents data from foreign and domestic clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of azelaic acid (Skinoren) in the treatment of acne vulgaris. New aspects of pathogenesis are presented, an analysis of the database of systematic reviews of Russian, European, American researchers is presented, including an analysis of the database of systematic reviews of the Cochrane Systematic Review Intervention Version of the Cochrane Skin Group (2020) comparative studies on the effectiveness of azelaic acid, Skinoren and other topical topical medications for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Possibilities of monotherapy with the preparation of azaelaic acid Skinoren and variants of combined treatment, in particular, a combination of azelaic acid with topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, systemic and topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne of varying severity, are shown. Reliable efficacy, safety, the possibility of long-term therapy, high compliance allow us to conclude that Skinoren is highly effective in treating acne, and a number of priority complex advantages, such as the presence of anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-keratinizing, antiandrogenic and anti-tyrosinase action, allow Skinoren to be considered as optimal. topical agent for long-term and safe treatment of acne and prevention of the development of post-acne symptom complex.

The role and place of azelaic acid in the routes of patients with acne vulgaris

The review presents data from foreign and domestic clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of azelaic acid (Skinoren) in the treatment of acne vulgaris. New aspects of pathogenesis are presented, an analysis of the database of systematic reviews of Russian, European, American researchers is presented, including an analysis of the database of systematic reviews of the Cochrane Systematic Review Intervention Version of the Cochrane Skin Group (2020) comparative studies on the effectiveness of azelaic acid, Skinoren and other topical topical medications for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Possibilities of monotherapy with the preparation of azaelaic acid Skinoren and variants of combined treatment, in particular, a combination of azelaic acid with topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, systemic and topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne of varying severity, are shown. Reliable efficacy, safety, the possibility of long-term therapy, high compliance allow us to conclude that Skinoren is highly effective in treating acne, and a number of priority complex advantages, such as the presence of anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-keratinizing, antiandrogenic and anti-tyrosinase action, allow Skinoren to be considered as optimal. topical agent for long-term and safe treatment of acne and prevention of the development of post-acne symptom complex.

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in patients with acne

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with acne. Three hundred acne patients were enrolled from January 2019 to December 2019. PHQ-9 and Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) survey was conducted to evaluate their depression status. Cronbach's α coefficient and test-retest reliability after 1 week were used to analyze the reliability of PHQ-9. Factor analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) were used for validity analysis of the PHQ-9.The screening validity was analyzed in different subgroups. Two hundred fifty-eight patients with acne completed the questionnaire. Forty-seven were diagnosed with depressive disorder. The best cut-off point for the PHQ-9 score is 9 points, with a sensitivity of 95.7%,a specificity of 88.6% and the area under the ROC curve(AUC) of 0.973.In validity analysis, the correlation coefficient between the total score of PHQ-9 and HAMD was 0.766,the kappa value was 0.530.Factor analysis revealed two common factors (cognitive-affective factor and somatic symptom factor),which explained 65.52% of the total variances. In reliability analysis, the Cronbach's α coefficient of the PHQ-9 was 0.851,the test-retest reliability value was 0.824.The time to complete the PHQ-9 was significantly less than the time to complete HAMD (P < .001).The PHQ-9 shows good reliability and validity for the diagnosis of depression in patients with acne, and can be used for preliminary screening of depression.

Comparison of guidelines and consensus articles on the management of patients with acne with oral isotretinoin

Guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with acne aim to give evidence-based, expert-group recommendations. This review compares current guidelines and consensus articles to provide a compilation of recommendations on the treatment of acne with oral isotretinoin. Ten common, relevant, clinical questions are addressed, based on published recommendations, including the indications of isotretinoin, the proposed daily dose, the cumulative isotretinoin dose and the laboratory monitoring needed. Recommendations on special considerations are also addressed, including the timing of procedures and the question of an association of depression or inflammatory bowel disease with isotretinoin. A major limitation is the use of different classification systems for acne across guidelines. The recommended daily dose ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg in the European guidelines to up to 1 mg/kg in the US guidelines. A specific duration of treatment of at least 6 months is only recommended in the European guidelines. All guidelines report the need of strict pregnancy prevention measures. The European, French and US guidelines recommend to monitor for symptoms of depression. Important clinical questions that are inconsistently addressed in guidelines include the age indication, the recommendation for a cumulative dose, the timing of procedures, the association of isotretinoin with IBD, the recommendation for preventing acne flares and for appropriate laboratory monitoring. These topics should be clearly included in the recommendations of guidelines as they are often raised in everyday clinical practice.

Topical benzoyl peroxide for acne

BACKGROUND

Acne is a common, economically burdensome condition that can cause psychological harm and, potentially, scarring. Topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is a widely used acne treatment; however, its efficacy and safety have not been clearly evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of BPO for acne.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to February 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched five trials registers and checked the reference lists of relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that compared topical BPO used alone (including different formulations and concentrations of BPO) or as part of combination treatment against placebo, no treatment, or other active topical medications for clinically diagnosed acne (used alone or in combination with other topical drugs not containing BPO) on the face or trunk.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. Primary outcome measures were 'participant global self-assessment of acne improvement' and 'withdrawal due to adverse events in the whole course of a trial'. 'Percentage of participants experiencing any adverse event in the whole course of a trial' was a key secondary outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 120 trials (29,592 participants randomised in 116 trials; in four trials the number of randomised participants was unclear). Ninety-one studies included males and females. When reported, 72 trials included participants with mild to moderate acne, 26 included participants with severe acne, and the mean age of participants ranged from 18 to 30 years. Our included trials assessed BPO as monotherapy, as add-on treatment, or combined with other active treatments, as well as BPO of different concentrations and BPO delivered through different vehicles. Comparators included different concentrations or formulations of BPO, placebo, no treatment, or other active treatments given alone or combined. Treatment duration in 80 trials was longer than eight weeks and was only up to 12 weeks in 108 trials. Industry funded 50 trials; 63 trials did not report funding. We commonly found high or unclear risk of performance, detection, or attrition bias. Trial setting was under-reported but included hospitals, medical centres/departments, clinics, general practices, and student health centres. We reported on outcomes assessed at the end of treatment, and we classified treatment periods as short-term (two to four weeks), medium-term (five to eight weeks), or long-term (longer than eight weeks). For 'participant-reported acne improvement', BPO may be more effective than placebo or no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 1.45; 3 RCTs; 2234 participants; treatment for 10 to 12 weeks; low-certainty evidence). Based on low-certainty evidence, there may be little to no difference between BPO and adapalene (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.10; 5 RCTs; 1472 participants; treatment for 11 to 12 weeks) or between BPO and clindamycin (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.34; 1 RCT; 240 participants; treatment for 10 weeks) (outcome not reported for BPO versus erythromycin or salicylic acid). For 'withdrawal due to adverse effects', risk of treatment discontinuation may be higher with BPO compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.93; 24 RCTs; 13,744 participants; treatment for 10 to 12 weeks; low-certainty evidence); the most common causes of withdrawal were erythema, pruritus, and skin burning. Only very low-certainty evidence was available for the following comparisons: BPO versus adapalene (RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.64; 11 RCTs; 3295 participants; treatment for 11 to 24 weeks; causes of withdrawal not clear), BPO versus clindamycin (RR 1.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 4.11; 8 RCTs; 3330 participants; treatment for 10 to 12 weeks; causes of withdrawal included local hypersensitivity, pruritus, erythema, face oedema, rash, and skin burning), erythromycin (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.26; 1 RCT; 60 participants; treatment for 8 weeks; withdrawal due to dermatitis), and salicylic acid (no participants had adverse event-related withdrawal; 1 RCT; 59 participants; treatment for 12 weeks). There may be little to no difference between these groups in terms of withdrawal; however, we are unsure of the results because the evidence is of very low certainty. For 'proportion of participants experiencing any adverse event', very low-certainty evidence leaves us uncertain about whether BPO increased adverse events when compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.70; 21 RCTs; 11,028 participants; treatment for 10 to 12 weeks), with adapalene (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.00; 7 RCTs; 2120 participants; treatment for 11 to 24 weeks), with erythromycin (no participants reported any adverse events; 1 RCT; 89 participants; treatment for 10 weeks), or with salicylic acid (RR 4.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 93.67; 1 RCT; 41 participants; treatment for 6 weeks). Moderate-certainty evidence shows that the risk of adverse events may be increased for BPO versus clindamycin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.58; 6 RCTs; 3018 participants; treatment for 10 to 12 weeks); however, the 95% CI indicates that BPO might make little to no difference. Most reported adverse events were mild to moderate, and local dryness, irritation, dermatitis, erythema, application site pain, and pruritus were the most common.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that BPO as monotherapy or add-on treatment may be more effective than placebo or no treatment for improving acne, and there may be little to no difference between BPO and either adapalene or clindamycin. Our key efficacy evidence is based on participant self-assessment; trials of BPO versus erythromycin or salicylic acid did not report this outcome. For adverse effects, the evidence is very uncertain regarding BPO compared with adapalene, erythromycin, or salicylic acid. However, risk of treatment discontinuation may be higher with BPO compared with placebo or no treatment. Withdrawal may be linked to tolerability rather than to safety. Risk of mild to moderate adverse events may be higher with BPO compared with clindamycin. Further trials should assess the comparative effects of different preparations or concentrations of BPO and combination BPO versus monotherapy. These trials should fully assess and report adverse effects and patient-reported outcomes measured on a standardised scale.

Isotretinoin and risk factors for suicide attempt: a population-based comprehensive case series and nested case-control study using 2010-2014 French Health Insurance Data

BACKGROUND

Although the causal role of isotretinoin in suicidal behaviour is controversial, suicide attempts (SA) do occur among patients taking isotretinoin.

OBJECTIVES

To describe patient profiles and the management of isotretinoin among patients who committed or attempted suicide under treatment. To assess the risk factors for SA under isotretinoin.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive case series of suicides and SAs under isotretinoin, and a case-control study, using Nationwide French Health Insurance database. The main analysis compared cases (subjects with a SA during a course of isotretinoin) to controls, individually matched for age, gender and rank of the current course; controls were to be exposed to isotretinoin at the index date (date of SA for the corresponding cases). The patients' psychiatric history at isotretinoin initiation was studied. In a secondary analysis, patients who continued their isotretinoin treatment after their SA were compared to patients who discontinued it.

RESULTS

In all, 328 018 subjects started a course of isotretinoin between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014 and 184 patients were hospitalized for a SA; half of them had a psychiatric history at initiation. In the multivariate analysis, psychiatric history and history of anxiety alone were risk factors for SA [Odds ratio (OR), 18.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 9.96-33.30 and 4.78; 95% CI, 2.44-9.33, respectively]. Among 176 cases of SA with sufficient follow-up, 103 (58.5%) carried on with their treatment after their SA. Treatment initiation by a dermatologist was inversely associated with the continuation of the treatment after a SA (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Suicide attempts under isotretinoin are rare events, and our results suggest that most of the patients concerned have a risk-prone profile detectable at the time of treatment initiation. The risk-benefit ratio of continuing isotretinoin after a SA warrants further careful evaluation.

Topical 2% ketoconazole cream monotherapy significantly improves adult female acne: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

The emergence of bacterial resistance is a global crisis. Prolonged use of antibiotics especially in acne is one issue of concern among dermatologists. Ketoconazole (KTZ) cream, a topical antifungal with anti-inflammatory and antiandrogenic actions, can decrease lipase activity of Cutibacterium acnes in vitro. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of KTZ cream in mild adult female acne (AFA) by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using KTZ 2% and placebo cream twice daily for 10 weeks. We assessed the improvement of clinical severity, measured by AFA score graded by investigators and participants, and the change of acne count. Forty-one participants enrolled in our study. The proportion of participants with acne improvement from baseline (42.9% vs 9.5%, P = 0.015) and the success rate (45.0% vs 14.3%, P = 0.043) in the KTZ group were significantly higher than that of the placebo group. The most common adverse events were dryness and itching. The percentage change of acne count decreased significantly compared with baseline but did not differ statistically between the two groups (P = 0.268). We concluded that the KTZ monotherapy showed a plausible effect in improving AFA with excellent safety profile. It should be considered as a viable option for mild AFA treatment.

How to Increase Adherence and Compliance in Acne Treatment? A Combined Strategy of SMS and Visual Instruction Leaflet

Introduction: Acne is a common skin disease with important psychosocial impact. Often inadequate compliance affects the efficacy of the therapy. Because of emerging use of mobile and electronic health technology, the recent literature evaluated the helpfulness of the tools in medication adherence. The first goal of our study was to evaluate the adherence to therapy with topical adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide (A-BPO) 2.5% in different groups of patients who received explicative information supported by different strategies. The second goal was to evaluate the patient’s quality of life and skin parameters. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 126 subjects with mild to severe acne vulgaris. They were randomized into 3 groups of 42 patients each and applied daily topical A-BPO (0.3%, 2.5%) for 12 weeks. The first group (G1) was trained on the gel application by an explicative leaflet. The second group (G2) received the same instructions as group 1 and a daily SMS to remind them of the application of the product. The third group (G3) only received standard instructions. Evaluations were performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 weeks (T1): assessment of acne severity using the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) Scale for Acne Severity, quality of life by the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) and the Patient-Doctor Relationship Depth-of-Relationship Scale (PDRDS), skin pH, grade of hydration and adherence to treatment with a 7-day recall calendar were also measured. Results: After 12 weeks of therapy, we observed a reduction in IGA in all groups confirming the clinical efficacy of the product. In the multiple comparison analysis of IGA score reduction, a significant difference was found in G2 versus G1 and G2 versus G3, while the G1 versus G3 comparison was not statistically significant. However, the leaflet group (G1) showed better results compared to the no-leaflet group (G3). Supporting these data, we observed that adherence days correlated positively with the improvement of the single parameters. Moreover, we observed that SMS and leaflet groups had a greater improvement in quality of life evaluated by CADI and PDRDS scores. Conclusions: According to our data, this experimental setup based on text message service and leaflet service is inexpensive and easy to use. Physicians could consider using these items in their practice to enhance patient adherence and satisfaction as well as treatment outcome.

Risk of suicide attempt associated with isotretinoin: a nationwide cohort and nested case-time-control study

Background

Isotretinoin is the only effective treatment for severe acne. An isotretinoin-related suicide risk is still debated and under scrutiny by regulatory agencies. Our objectives were: to assess the risk of suicide attempt before, during and after isotretinoin treatment; to detect any potential triggering effect of isotretinoin initiation on suicide attempt.

Methods

We implemented a cohort and nested case-time-control study of subjects treated with oral isotretinoin (course or initiation) aged 10–50 years, using the Nationwide French Health Insurance data (2009–2016). The main outcome was hospitalized suicide attempt. Standardized incidence ratios for hospitalized suicide attempts were calculated before, during and after isotretinoin treatment. The number of isotretinoin initiations was compared in risk and control periods of 2 months using a case-time-control analysis.

Results

In all, 443 814 patients (median age 20.0 years; interquartile range 17.0–27.0 years) were exposed to isotretinoin, amounting to 244 154 person-years, with a marked seasonality for treatment initiation. Compared with the French general population, the occurrence of suicide attempts under isotretinoin treatment was markedly lower, with a standardized incidence ratio of 0.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53–0.67]; the same applied, to a lesser extent, before and after isotretinoin treatment. In the case-time-control analysis, among cases of suicide attempt, 108 and 127 isotretinoin initiations were observed in the risk and control periods respectively (i.e. 0–2 months and 2–4 months before the date of suicide attempt). The comparison with the 1199 and 1253 initiations observed among matched controls in the same two periods yielded a case-time-control odds ratio of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.68–1.16). A sensitivity analysis using three-month periods and a complementary analysis adding completed suicides for case definition showed consistent results.

Conclusion

Compared with the general population, a lower risk of suicide attempt was observed among patients exposed to isotretinoin and there was no evidence for a triggering effect of isotretinoin initiation on suicide attempt. A selection of patients at lower risk for suicidal behaviour and appropriate treatment management could explain these findings. Risk management plans should therefore be maintained.