Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease

SUMMARYFungal infections are on the rise, driven by a growing population at risk and climate change. Currently available antifungals include only five classes, and their utility and efficacy in antifungal treatment are limited by one or more of innate or acquired resistance in some fungi, poor penetration into "sequestered" sites, and agent-specific side effect which require frequent patient reassessment and monitoring. Agents with novel mechanisms, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles including good oral bioavailability, and fungicidal mechanism(s) are urgently needed. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of novel antifungal agents, with both improved known mechanisms of actions and new antifungal classes, currently in clinical development for treating invasive yeast, mold (filamentous fungi), Pneumocystis jirovecii infections, and dimorphic fungi (endemic mycoses). We further focus on inhaled antifungals and the role of immunotherapy in tackling fungal infections, and the specific PK/pharmacodynamic profiles, tissue distributions as well as drug-drug interactions of novel antifungals. Finally, we review antifungal resistance mechanisms, the role of use of antifungal pesticides in agriculture as drivers of drug resistance, and detail detection methods for antifungal resistance.

Safety and efficacy of new generation azole antifungals in the management of recalcitrant superficial fungal infections and onychomycosis

INTRODUCTION

Terbinafine is considered the gold standard for treating skin fungal infections and onychomycosis. However, recent reports suggest that dermatophytes are developing resistance to terbinafine and the other traditional antifungal agents, itraconazole and fluconazole. When there is resistance to terbinafine, itraconazole or fluconazole, or when these agents cannot used, for example, due to potential drug interactions with the patient's current medications, clinicians may need to consider off-label use of new generation azoles, such as voriconazole, posaconazole, fosravuconazole, or oteseconazole. It is essential to emphasize that we do not advocate the use of newer generation azoles unless traditional agents such as terbinafine, itraconazole, or fluconazole have been thoroughly evaluated as first-line therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the clinical evidence, safety, dosage regimens, pharmacokinetics, and management algorithm of new-generation azole antifungals.

EXPERT OPINION

Antifungal stewardship should be the top priority when prescribing new-generation azoles. First-line antifungal therapy is terbinafine and itraconazole. Fluconazole is a consideration but is generally less effective and its use may be off-label in many countries. For difficult-to-treat skin fungal infections and onychomycosis, that have failed terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, we propose consideration of off-label voriconazole or posaconazole.

Oteseconazole for the Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Drug Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to describe and analyze the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oteseconazole as well as the clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of oteseconazole in treating recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (2015-June 2023). Search terms included "oteseconazole" OR "VT-1161" or "VIVJOA" AND "RVVC" or "recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis" or "vulvovaginal candidiasis." Conference abstracts, bibliographies, clinical trials, and drug monographs were included for review.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant studies in English and clinical trials conducted in humans were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Oteseconazole is approved for the treatment of RVVC. In 2 identical phase III studies, oteseconazole was superior to placebo through 48 weeks for preventing recurrence of RVVC (6.7% vs 42.8%, P < 0.001 and 3.9% vs 39.4%, P < 0.001). In the only phase III trial comparing oteseconazole against active drug, oteseconazole was well tolerated and exhibited noninferiority to fluconazole in acute treatment and superiority to placebo for prevention maintenance through 50 weeks (5.1% vs 42.2%, P < 0.001).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

This review describes the use of oteseconazole for the treatment of RVVC as compared with fluconazole. Oteseconazole is an effective treatment option for common pathogens causing vulvovaginal candidiasis, including Candida and fluconazole-resistant Candida.

CONCLUSIONS

Oteseconazole is an effective and safe treatment option for the management of RVVC though current research lacks comparison with established maintenance regimens. Additional research is needed to ascertain the placement of oteseconazole in the treatment of RVVC.

Amphotericin B in the Era of New Antifungals: Where Will It Stand?

Amphotericin B (AmB) has long stood as a cornerstone in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), especially among immunocompromised patients. However, the landscape of antifungal therapy is evolving. New antifungal agents, boasting novel mechanisms of action and better safety profiles, are entering the scene, presenting alternatives to AmB's traditional dominance. This shift, prompted by an increase in the incidence of IFIs, the growing demographic of immunocompromised individuals, and changing patterns of fungal resistance, underscores the continuous need for effective treatments. Despite these challenges, AmB's broad efficacy and low resistance rates maintain its essential status in antifungal therapy. Innovations in AmB formulations, such as lipid complexes and liposomal delivery systems, have significantly mitigated its notorious nephrotoxicity and infusion-related reactions, thereby enhancing its clinical utility. Moreover, AmB's efficacy in treating severe and rare fungal infections and its pivotal role as prophylaxis in high-risk settings highlight its value and ongoing relevance. This review examines AmB's standing amidst the ever-changing antifungal landscape, focusing on its enduring significance in current clinical practice and exploring its potential future therapeutic adaptations.

Combatting antifungal resistance: Paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of onychomycosis and dermatomycosis

Antifungal resistance has become prevalent worldwide. Understanding the factors involved in spread of resistance allows the formulation of strategies to slow resistance development and likewise identify solutions for the treatment of highly recalcitrant fungal infections. To investigate the recent explosion of resistant strains, a literature review was performed focusing on four main areas: mechanisms of resistance to antifungal agents, diagnosis of superficial fungal infections, management, and stewardship. The use of traditional diagnostic tools such as culture, KOH analysis and minimum inhibitory concentration values on treatment were investigated and compared to the newer techniques such as molecular methods including whole genome sequencing, and polymerase chain reaction. The management of terbinafine-resistant strains is discussed. We have emphasized the need for antifungal stewardship including increasing surveillance for resistant infection.

Relative impact of traditional vs. newer oral antifungals for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis: a network meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of evidence regarding the relative therapeutic efficacy of treatments for onychomycosis.

OBJECTIVES

We determined the relative efficacy of monotherapies for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis with Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL to identify studies that investigated the efficacy of monotherapy with oral antifungals for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis in adults. In this paper, 'regimen' corresponds to a given agent and its dosage. The relative effects and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of the various regimens were estimated; evidence quality was assessed at the study level and across networks.

RESULTS

Data from 21 studies were used. Our two efficacy-related endpoints were: (i) mycological and (ii) complete cure at 1 year; safety--related endpoints were: (i) 1-year count of any adverse event (AE), (ii) 1-year odds of discontinuation due to any AE, (iii) 1-year odds of discontinuation due to liver issues. Thirty-five regimens were identified; the newer agents among these included posaconazole and oteseconazole. We compared the efficacy of newer regimens with traditional ones like 'terbinafine 250 mg daily for 12 weeks' and 'itraconazole 200 mg daily for 12 weeks. We found that an agent's dosage was associated with its efficacy; for example, the 1-year odds of mycological cure with terbinafine 250 mg daily for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 92.4%) were significantly greater than those of terbinafine 250 mg daily for 12 weeks (SUCRA = 66.3%) (odds ratio 2.62, 95% credible interval 1.57-4.54). We also found that booster regimens can increase efficacy. Our results showed that some triazoles could be more effective than terbinafine.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first NMA study of monotherapeutic antifungals - and their various dosages - for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis. Our findings could provide guidance for the selection of the most appropriate antifungal agent, especially amid the growing concerns about terbinafine resistance.

Onychomycosis: Old and New

Onychomycosis is a common chronic fungal infection of the nail that causes discoloration and/or thickening of the nail plate. Oral agents are generally preferred, except in the case of mild toenail infection limited to the distal nail plate. Terbinafine and itraconazole are the only approved oral therapies, and fluconazole is commonly utilized off-label. Cure rates with these therapies are limited, and resistance to terbinafine is starting to develop worldwide. In this review, we aim to review current oral treatment options for onychomycosis, as well as novel oral drugs that may have promising results in the treatment of onychomycosis.

Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future

Human fungal pathogens cause a broad plethora of infections, spanning cutaneous dermatophytoses to invasive infections in immunocompromised hosts. As eukaryotic pathogens are capable of morphotype switching, they present unique challenges both for drug development and the immunological response. Whilst current antifungal therapies are limited to the orally available triazoles, intravenous echonocandins and polyenes, and flucytosine and terbinafine, there has been recent significant progress in the antifungal armamentorium with ibrexafungerp, a novel orally available terpanoid that inhibits 1,3-beta-D-glucan-approved by Food and Drug Administration in 2021, and fosmanogepix, an orally available pro-drug of manogepix, which targets glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein maturation entering Phase 3 studies for candidaemia. A number of further candidates are in development. There has been significant use of existing immunotherapies such as recombinant interferon-γ and G-CSF for fungal disease in immunocompromised patients, and there are emerging opportunities for monoclonal antibodies targeting TH2 inflammation. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody in asthma, is now used routinely for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and further agents targeting IL-4 and IL-5 are being evaluated. In addition, T-cell CAR therapy is showing early promise for fungal disease. Thus, we are likely to see rapid advances to our approach to the management of fungal disease in the near future.

New Antifungal Agents with Azole Moieties

Fungal conditions affect a multitude of people worldwide, leading to increased hospitalization and mortality rates, and the need for novel antifungals is emerging with the rise of resistance and immunocompromised patients. Continuous use of azole drugs, which act by inhibiting the fungal CYP51, involved in the synthesis of ergosterol, essential to the fungal cell membrane, has enhanced the resistance and tolerance of some fungal strains to treatment, thereby limiting the arsenal of available drugs. The goal of this review is to gather literature information on new promising azole developments in clinical trials, with in vitro and in vivo results against fungal strains, and complementary assays, such as toxicity, susceptibility assays, docking studies, among others. Several molecules are reviewed as novel azole structures in clinical trials and with recent/imminent approvals, as well as other innovative molecules with promising antifungal activity. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies are displayed whenever possible. The azole moiety is brought over as a privileged structure, with multiple different compounds emerging with distinct pharmacophores and SAR. Particularly, 1,2,3-triazole natural product conjugates emerged in the last years, presenting promising antifungal activity and a broad spectrum against various fungi.

Updated Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Onychomycosis

Onychomycosis is the most common nail disease encountered in clinical practice and can cause pain, difficulty with ambulation, and psycho-social problems. A thorough history and physical examination, including dermoscopy, should be performed for each patient presenting with nail findings suggestive of onychomycosis. Several approaches are available for definitive diagnostic testing, including potassium hydroxide and microscopy, fungal culture, histopathology, polymerase chain reaction, or a combination of techniques. Confirmatory testing should be performed for each patient prior to initiating any antifungal therapies. There are several different therapeutic options available, including oral and topical medications as well as device-based treatments. Oral antifungals are generally recommended for moderate to severe onychomycosis and have higher cure rates, while topical antifungals are recommended for mild to moderate disease and have more favorable safety profiles. Oral terbinafine, itraconazole, and griseofulvin and topical ciclopirox 8% nail lacquer, efinaconazole 10% solution, and tavaborole 5% solution are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of onychomycosis in the United States and amorolfine 5% nail lacquer is approved in Europe. Laser treatment is approved in the United States for temporary increases in clear nail, but clinical results are suboptimal. Oral fluconazole is not approved in the United States for onychomycosis treatment, but is frequently used off-label with good efficacy. Several novel oral, topical, and over-the-counter therapies are currently under investigation. Physicians should consider the disease severity, infecting pathogen, medication safety, efficacy and cost, and patient age, comorbidities, medication history, and likelihood of compliance when determining management plans. Onychomycosis is a chronic disease with high recurrence rates and patients should be counseled on an appropriate plan to minimize recurrence risk following effective antifungal therapy.

Pharmacodynamics, Mechanisms of Action and Resistance, and Spectrum of Activity of New Antifungal Agents

Several new antifungals are currently in late-stage development, including those with novel pharmacodynamics/mechanisms of action that represent new antifungal classes (manogepix, olorofim, ATI-2307, GR-2397). Others include new agents within established classes or with mechanisms of action similar to clinically available antifungals (ibrexafungerp, rezafungin, oteseconazole, opelconazole, MAT2203) that have been modified in order to improve certain characteristics, including enhanced pharmacokinetics and greater specificity for fungal targets. Many of the antifungals under development also have activity against Candida and Aspergillus strains that have reduced susceptibility or acquired resistance to azoles and echinocandins, whereas others demonstrate activity against species that are intrinsically resistant to most clinically available antifungals. The tolerability and drug–drug interaction profiles of these new agents also appear to be promising, although the number of human subjects that have been exposed to many of these agents remains relatively small. Overall, these agents have the potential for expanding our antifungal armamentarium and improving clinical outcomes in patients with invasive mycoses.

Oteseconazole: First Approval

Oteseconazole (VIVJOA™) is an orally administered azole antifungal agent developed by Mycovia Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of fungal infections. It inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 51, thereby affecting the formation and integrity of the fungal cell membrane, but has a low affinity for human CYP enzymes due to its tetrazole metal-binding group. Oteseconazole is the first agent to be approved (in April 2022) for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) in the USA, where it is indicated to reduce the incidence of RVVC in females with a history of RVVC who are NOT of reproductive potential. Clinical development for the treatment of onychomycosis, and invasive and opportunistic infections is ongoing. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of oteseconazole leading to this first approval for reducing the incidence of RVVC in females with a history of RVVC who are NOT of reproductive potential.

Invasive candidiasis: Investigational drugs in the clinical development pipeline and mechanisms of action

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of invasive Candida infections is evolving. Infections caused by non-albicans Candida spp. are increasing; however, the antifungal pipeline is more promising than ever and is enriched with repurposed drugs and agents that have new mechanisms of action. Despite progress, unmet needs in the treatment of invasive candidiasis remain and there are still too few antifungals that can be administered orally or that have CNS penetration.

AREAS COVERED

The authors shed light on those antifungal agents active against Candida that are in late-stage clinical development. Mechanisms of action and key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties are discussed. Insights are offered on the potential future roles of the investigational agents MAT-2203, oteseconazole, ATI-2307, VL-2397, NP-339, and the repurposed drug miltefosine.

EXPERT OPINION

Ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix have novel mechanisms of action and will provide effective options for the treatment of Candida infections (including those caused by multiresistant Candida spp). Rezafungin, an echinocandin with an extended half-life allowing for once weekly administration, will be particularly valuable for outpatient treatment and prophylaxis. Despite this, there is an urgent need to garner clinical data on investigational drugs, especially in the current rise of azole-resistant and multi-drug resistant Candida spp.

Novel antifungal agents in clinical trials

Invasive fungal diseases due to resistant yeasts and molds are an important and increasing public health threat, likely due to a growing population of immunosuppressed hosts, increases in antifungal resistance, and improvements in laboratory diagnostics.  The significant morbidity and mortality associated with these pathogens bespeaks the urgent need for novel safe and effective therapeutics.  This review highlights promising investigational antifungal agents in clinical phases of development: fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, rezafungin, encochleated amphotericin B, oteseconazole (VT-1161), VT-1598, PC945, and olorofim.  We discuss three first-in-class members of three novel antifungal classes, as well as new agents within existing antifungal classes with improved safety and tolerability profiles due to enhanced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Review of the alternative therapies for onychomycosis and superficial fungal infections: posaconazole, fosravuconazole, voriconazole, oteseconazole

Terbinafine and itraconazole are the most commonly used oral antifungals to treat onychomycosis and superficial dermatomycoses. Recently, poor response to oral terbinafine has been reported. We have summarized the most appropriate dosing regimens of posaconazole, fosravuconazole, voriconazole, and oteseconazole (VT-1161) to treat onychomycosis and superficial fungal infections. A structured search on PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted. Additionally, the bibliographies of selected articles were searched to identify relevant records. The number of records identified from the searches was 463, with 50 articles meeting the inclusion criteria for review. None of the new azoles are US FDA approved for onychomycosis treatment; however, an increasing number of studies have evaluated these agents. The efficacies (complete cure and mycologic cure) of the antifungal agents for dermatophyte great toenail onychomycosis treatment are terbinafine 250 mg/day × 12 weeks (Phase III trial) (38%, 70%), itraconazole 200 mg/day × 12 weeks (Phase III trial) (14%, 54%), posaconazole 200 mg/day × 24 weeks (Phase IIB) (54.1%, 70.3%), fosravuconazole 100 mg/day ravuconazole equivalent × 12 weeks (Phase III) (59.4%, 82.0%), and oteseconazole 300 mg/day loading dose × 2 weeks (Phase II), followed by 300 mg/week × 10 weeks (maintenance dose) (45%, 70%). Guidelines for monitoring are also presented.

Construction and activity evaluation of novel dual-target (SE/CYP51) anti-fungal agents containing amide naphthyl structure

With the increase of fungal infection and drug resistance, it is becoming an urgent task to discover the highly effective antifungal drugs. In the study, we selected the key ergosterol bio-synthetic enzymes (Squalene epoxidase, SE; 14 α-demethylase, CYP51) as dual-target receptors to guide the construction of novel antifungal compounds, which could achieve the purpose of improving drug efficacy and reducing drug-resistance. Three different series of amide naphthyl compounds were generated through the method of skeleton growth, and their corresponding target products were synthesized. Most of compounds displayed the obvious biological activity against different Candida spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus. Among of them, target compounds 14a-2 and 20b-2 not only possessed the excellent broad-spectrum anti-fungal activity (MIC₅₀, 0.125-2 μg/mL), but also maintained the anti-drug-resistant fungal activity (MIC₅₀, 1-4 μg/mL). Preliminary mechanism study revealed the compounds (14a-2, 20b-2) could block the bio-synthetic pathway of ergosterol by inhibiting the dual-target (SE/CYP51) activity, and this finally caused the cleavage and death of fungal cells. In addition, we also discovered that compounds 14a-2 and 20b-2 with low toxic and side effects could exert the excellent therapeutic effect in mice model of fungal infection, which was worthy for further in-depth study.

Future Directions for Clinical Respiratory Fungal Research

There has been a growing appreciation of the importance of respiratory fungal diseases in recent years, with better understanding of their prevalence as well as their global distribution. In step with the greater awareness of these complex infections, we are currently poised to make major advances in the characterization and treatment of these fungal diseases, which in itself is largely a consequence of post-genomic technologies which have enabled rational drug development and a path towards personalized medicines. These advances are set against a backdrop of globalization and anthropogenic change, which have impacted the world-wide distribution of fungi and antifungal resistance, as well as our built environment. The current revolution in immunomodulatory therapies has led to a rapidly evolving population at-risk for respiratory fungal disease. Whilst challenges are considerable, perhaps the tools we now have to manage these infections are up to this challenge. There has been a welcome acceleration of the antifungal pipeline in recent years, with a number of new drug classes in clinical or pre-clinical development, as well as new focus on inhaled antifungal drug delivery. The "post-genomic" revolution has opened up metagenomic diagnostic approaches spanning host immunogenetics to the fungal mycobiome that have allowed better characterization of respiratory fungal disease endotypes. When these advances are considered together the key challenge is clear: to develop a personalized medicine framework to enable a rational therapeutic approach.

Antifungal Pipeline

In many ways, fungal diseases are forgotten or neglected. Given the significantly lower frequency compared to similar bacterial etiologies across the spectrum of infectious syndromes, it makes sense that anti-bacterial agents have seen the bulk of development in recent decades. The vast majority of new antifungal medications approved for use in the past 10 years have been new versions in the same class as existing agents. Clinical mycology is crying out for new mechanisms of action in the setting of rising resistance and emergence of new organisms. Fortunately, this trend appears to be reversing. There are numerous agents in advanced stages of development offering novel dosing regimens and mechanisms of action to combat these threats. Herein we review seven antifungal agents that we hope to see come to market in the coming years to aid physicians in the treatment of mucocutaneous and invasive fungal infections.

Advances in anti-fungal therapies

Anti-fungal therapies remain sub-optimal, and resistant pathogens are increasing. New therapies are desperately needed, especially options that are less toxic than most of the currently available selection. In this review, I will discuss anti-fungal therapies that are in at least phase I human trials. These include VT-1161 and VT-1598, modified azoles with a tetrazole metal-binding group; the echinocandin rezafugin; the novel β-1,3-d-glucan synthase inhibitor ibrexafungerp; fosmanogepix, a novel anti-fungal targeting Gwt1; the arylamidine T-2307; the dihydroorotate inhibitor olorofim; and the cyclic hexapeptide ASP2397. The available data including spectrum of activity, toxicity and stage of clinical development will be discussed for each of these so clinicians are aware of promising anti-fungal agents with a strong likelihood of clinical availability in the next 5–7 years.

Recent advances and future perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of Candida auris infections

INTRODUCTION

Candida auris is responsible for hospital outbreaks worldwide. Some C. auris isolates may show concomitant resistance to azoles, echinocandins, and polyenes, thereby possibly leaving clinicians with few therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

Antifungal agents both in early and in late phases of clinical development showing anti-C. auris activity.

EXPERT OPINION

The research on antifungal agents active against C. auris has made important steps forward in recent years: (i) the development of drugs with novel mechanisms of action, such as ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix, could provide a valid option against C. auris strains resistant to one or more older antifungals, including pan-resistant strains; (ii) rezafungin could allow once weekly administration of an active drug in the case of echinocandin-susceptible isolates, providing an effective outpatient treatment, while at the same time relieving selective pressure on novel classes; (iii) the development of oral formulations could allow step-down therapy and/or early discharge, or even to avoid hospitalization in mild or noninvasive diseases; (iv) according to available data, these novel agents show a good safety profile and a low potential for drug-drug interactions.

How urgent is the need for new antifungals?

Introduction: Invasive fungal infection carries a high morbidity, mortality and economic cost. In recent times, a rising incidence of fungal infection and antifungal resistance is occurring which has prompted the development of novel antifungal agents.Areas covered:In this perspective, the authors describe the current status of registered antifungals and their limitations in the treatment of invasive fungal infection. They also go on to describe the new antifungal agents that are in the clinical stage of development and how they might be best utilized in patient care in the future.Expert opinion: The antifungal drug development pipeline has responded to a growing need for new agents to effectively treat fungal disease without concomitant toxicity or issues with drug tolerance. Olorofim (F901318), ibrexafungerp (SCY-078), fosmanogepix (APX001), rezafungin (CD101), oteseconazole (VT-1161), encochleated amphotericin B (MAT2203), nikkomycin Z (NikZ) and ATI-2307 are all in the clinical stage of development and offer great promise in offering clinicians better agents to treat these difficult infections.

Novel antifungal agents in clinical trials

Invasive fungal diseases due to resistant yeasts and molds are an important and increasing public health threat, likely due to a growing population of immunosuppressed hosts, increases in antifungal resistance, and improvements in laboratory diagnostics.  The significant morbidity and mortality associated with these pathogens bespeaks the urgent need for novel safe and effective therapeutics.  This review highlights promising investigational antifungal agents in clinical phases of development: fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, rezafungin, encochleated amphotericin B, oteseconazole (VT-1161), VT-1598, PC945, and olorofim.  We discuss three first-in-class members of three novel antifungal classes, as well as new agents within existing antifungal classes with improved safety and tolerability profiles due to enhanced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Cure Rates of Control Interventions in Randomized Trials for Onychomycosis Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The efficacy of antifungals for onychomycosis has been determined in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); interestingly their control arms have demonstrated some therapeutic effects. These controls constitute either placebos (inert pills) or vehicles (all but the antifungal component of the creams). The objective of this research was to determine (i) whether RCT controls exhibited statistically-relevant efficacy rates (i.e. beyond the "placebo effect"), (ii) whether oral and topical controls differed in their efficacies, and (iii) if the efficacy rates of the controls correlated with those of the active comparator associated with that control.

Methods: RCTs of oral and topical monotherapies for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis were identified through a systematic literature search. For our meta-analyses of cure rates the double arcsine transformation was used. The N-1 chi squared test was used to determine whether the cure rates significantly differed between topical and oral controls. Correlation was investigated using Kendall rank correlation tests.

Results: The pooled mycological, complete, and clinical cure rates of all control interventions (n = 19 trials) were 9%, 1%, and 6%, respectively. The pooled efficacy rates for oral and topical controls were: mycological cure rate, 7% and 12% (p=0.0016); complete cure rate, 1% for both; and clinical cure rate, 4% and 8%, respectively (p=0.0033). For oral RCTs, the respective cure rates of the active therapies were not correlated with controls. However, for topical RCTs, as the mycological and clinical cure rates of the active therapy increased, so did those of the topical vehicle associated with the active therapy in question, and vice versa.

Conclusions: The topical vehicle cure rates were often higher than the oral placebo cure rates, likely due to the presence of non-antifungal chemicals (e.g. moisturizers, urea) with antifungal and debriding properties, which are not present in oral controls.

.

Investigational Agents for the Treatment of Resistant Yeasts and Molds

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes the investigational antifungals in clinical development with the potential to address rising drug resistance patterns. The relevant pharmacodynamics, spectrum of activity, preclinical studies, and latest clinical trial data are described.

Recent Findings

Agricultural and medicinal antifungal use has been selected for inherently drug-resistant fungi and acquired resistance mechanisms. The rates of fungal infections and immunocompromised populations continue to grow as few new antifungals have hit the market. Several agents with the potential to address the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) molds and yeasts are in clinical development.

Summary

Evolved formulations of echinocandins, polyenes, and triazoles offer less toxicity, convenient dosing, and greater potency, potentially expanding these classes’ indications. Ibrexafungerp, olorofim, oteseconazole, and fosmanogepix possess novel mechanisms of actions with potent activity against MDR fungi. Successful clinical development is neither easy nor guaranteed; thus, perpetual efforts to discover new antifungals are needed.

Roles for Structural Biology in the Discovery of Drugs and Agrochemicals Targeting Sterol 14α-Demethylases

Antifungal drugs and antifungal agrochemicals have significant limitations. These include several unintended consequences of their use including the growing importance of intrinsic and acquired resistance. These problems underpin an increasingly urgent need to improve the existing classes of antifungals and to discover novel antifungals. Structural insights into drug targets and their complexes with both substrates and inhibitory ligands increase opportunity for the discovery of more effective antifungals. Implementation of this promise, which requires multiple skill sets, is beginning to yield candidates from discovery programs that could more quickly find their place in the clinic. This review will describe how structural biology is providing information for the improvement and discovery of inhibitors targeting the essential fungal enzyme sterol 14α-demethylase.