A risk score including microdeletions improves relapse prediction for standard and medium risk precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children

Prevalence and prognostic significance of IKZF1 deletion in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IKZF1 (IKAROS family Zinc Finger 1) alteration is an essential regulator of both T- and B-cell lineage specification with leukemogenic potential. IKZF1 deletion have been described in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with varying prevalence often influenced by underlying cytogenetics and also shown to have diverse prognostic significance. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of IKZF1 deletion among childhood ALL. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS were searched and 32 studies found eligible. Estimated prevalence of IKZF1 deletion among BCR::ABL1 negative and BCR::ABL1 positive ALL patients was 14% (95%CI:13-16%, I² = 79%; 26 studies) and 63% (95%CI:59-68% I² = 42%; 10 studies) respectively. Most common site of IKZF1 deletion was whole chromosome (exon1-8) deletion in 32.3% (95%CI: 23.8-40.7%) followed by exon 4-7 deletion in 28.6% (95%CI: 19.7-37.5%). A positive minimal residual disease at the end of induction was more common among patients with IKZF1 deletion, odds ratio: 3.09 (95%CI:2.3-4.16, I² = 54%; 15 studies). Event-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse for IKZF1 deletion, hazard ratio (HR): 2.10 (95%CI:1.90-2.32, I² = 28%; 31 studies) and HR: 2.38 (95%CI:1.93-2.93, I² = 40; 15 studies) respectively. In summary, the current meta-analysis highlights the frequency of IKZF1 deletion and its negative impact on survival in childhood ALL. Further studies exploring the influence of IKZF1 deletion in the presence of classical cytogenetic and other copy number alterations would further help in characterising its prognostic role.

The prognostic impact of IKZF1 deletions and UKALL genetic classifiers in paediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated according to NOPHO 2008 protocols

We investigated 390 paediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL) patients treated according to NOPHO ALL 2008, regarding copy number alterations (CNA) of eight loci associated with adverse prognosis, including IKZF1. The impact on outcome was investigated for each locus individually, combined as CNA profiles and together with cytogenetic information. The presence of IKZF1 deletion or a poor-risk CNA profile was associated with poor outcome in the whole cohort. In the standard-risk group, IKZF1-deleted cases had an inferior probability of relapse-free survival (pRFS) (p ≤ 0.001) and overall survival (pOS) (p ≤ 0.001). Additionally, among B-other patients, IKZF1 deletion correlated with poor pRFS (60% vs. 90%) and pOS (65% vs. 89%). Both IKZF1 deletion and a poor-risk CNA profile were independent factors for relapse and death in multivariable analyses adjusting for known risk factors including measurable residual disease. Our data indicate that BCP-ALL patients with high-risk CNA or IKZF1 deletion have worse prognosis despite otherwise low-risk features. Conversely, patients with both a good CNA and cytogenetic profile had a superior relapse-free (p ≤ 0.001) and overall survival (p ≤ 0.001) in the cohort, across all risk groups. Taken together, our findings highlight the potential of CNA assessment to refine stratification in ALL.

The Prognostic Effect of IKZF1 Deletions in ETV6::RUNX1 and High Hyperdiploid Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

IKZF1 deletions are an established prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, their relevance in patients with good risk genetics, namely ETV6::RUNX1 and high hyperdiploid (HeH), ALL remains unclear. We assessed the prognostic impact of IKZF1 deletions in 939 ETV6::RUNX1 and 968 HeH ALL patients by evaluating data from 16 trials from 9 study groups. Only 3% of ETV6::RUNX1 cases (n = 26) were IKZF1-deleted; this adversely affected survival combining all trials (5-year event-free survival [EFS], 79% versus 92%; P = 0.02). No relapses occurred among the 14 patients with an IKZF1 deletion treated on a minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided protocols. Nine percent of HeH cases (n = 85) had an IKZF1 deletion; this adversely affected survival in all trials (5-year EFS, 76% versus 89%; P = 0.006) and in MRD-guided protocols (73% versus 88%; P = 0.004). HeH cases with an IKZF1 deletion had significantly higher end of induction MRD values (P = 0.03). Multivariate Cox regression showed that IKZF1 deletions negatively affected survival independent of sex, age, and white blood cell count at diagnosis in HeH ALL (hazard ratio of relapse rate [95% confidence interval]: 2.48 [1.32-4.66]). There was no evidence to suggest that IKZF1 deletions affected outcome in the small number of ETV6::RUNX1 cases in MRD-guided protocols but that they are related to higher MRD values, higher relapse, and lower survival rates in HeH ALL. Future trials are needed to study whether stratifying by MRD is adequate for HeH patients or additional risk stratification is necessary.

Measurable residual disease analysis in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients with ABL-class fusions

Background

ABL-class fusions including NUP214-ABL1 and EBF1-PDGFRB occur in high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with gene expression patterns similar to BCR-ABL-positive ALL. Our aim was to evaluate new DNA-based measurable residual disease (MRD) tests detecting these fusions and IKZF1-deletions in comparison with conventional immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) markers.

Methods

Precise genomic breakpoints were defined from targeted or whole genome next generation sequencing for ABL-fusions and BCR-ABL1. Quantitative PCR assays were designed and used to re-measure MRD in remission bone marrow samples previously tested using Ig/TCR markers. All MRD testing complied with EuroMRD guidelines.

Results

ABL-class patients had 46% 5year event-free survival and 79% 5year overall survival. All had sensitive fusion tests giving high concordance between Ig/TCR and ABL-class fusion results (21 patients, n = 257 samples, r2 = 0.9786, P < 0.0001) and Ig/TCR and IKZF1-deletion results (9 patients, n = 143 samples, r2 = 0.9661, P < 0.0001). In contrast, in BCR-ABL1 patients, Ig/TCR and BCR-ABL1 tests were discordant in 32% (40 patients, n = 346 samples, r2 = 0.4703, P < 0.0001) and IKZF1-deletion results were closer to Ig/TCR (25 patients, n = 176, r2 = 0.8631, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

MRD monitoring based on patient-specific assays detecting gene fusions or recurrent assays for IKZF1-deletions is feasible and provides good alternatives to Ig/TCR tests to monitor MRD in ABL-class ALL.

An MRD-stratified pediatric protocol is as deliverable in adolescents and young adults as in children with ALL

Pediatric regimens have improved outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, results remain inferior to children with ALL. The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) ALL06 study (anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12611000814976) was designed to assess whether a pediatric ALL regimen (Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology and Oncology Group [ANZCHOG] Study 8) could be administered to patients aged 15 to 39 years in a comparable time frame to children as assessed by the proportion of patients completing induction/consolidation and commencing the next phase of therapy (protocol M or high-risk [HR] treatment) by day 94. Minimal residual disease (MRD) response stratified patients to HR treatment and transplantation. From 2012 to 2018, a total of 86 patients were enrolled; 82 were eligible. Median age was 22 years (range, 16-38 years). Induction/consolidation was equally deliverable in ALL06 as in Study 8. In ALL06, 41.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.7-52.9) commenced protocol M or HR therapy by day 94 vs 39.3% in Study 8 (P = .77). Median time to protocol M/HR treatment was 96 days (interquartile range, 87.5-103 days) in ALL06 vs 98 days in Study 8 (P = .80). Induction mortality was 3.6%. With a median follow-up of 44 months (1-96 months), estimated 3-year disease-free survival was 72.8% (95% CI, 62.8-82.7), and estimated 3-year overall survival was 74.9% (95% CI, 65.3-84.5). End induction/consolidation MRD negativity rate was 58.6%. Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and day 79 MRD positivity were associated with poorer disease-free survival and overall survival. Pediatric therapy was safe and as deliverable in AYA patients as in children with ALL. Intolerance of pediatric ALL induction/consolidation is not a major contributor to inferior outcomes in AYA ALL.

Minimal residual disease, long-term outcome, and IKZF1 deletions in children and adolescents with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a matched cohort study

Background

Patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia are at an increased risk of treatment-related mortality and relapse, which is influenced by unfavourable genetic aberrations (eg, IKZF1 deletion). We aimed to investigate the potential underlying effect of Down syndrome versus the effects of adverse cancer genetics on clinical outcome.

Method

Patients (aged 1–23 years) with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched non-Down syndrome patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (matched controls) from eight trials (DCOG ALL10 and ALL11, ANZCHOG ALL8, AIEOP-BFM ALL2009, UKALL2003, NOPHO ALL2008, CoALL 07-03, and CoALL 08-09) done between 2002 and 2018 across various countries (the Netherlands, the UK, Australia, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Germany) were included. Participants were matched (1:3) for clinical risk factors and genetics, including IKZF1 deletion. The primary endpoint was the comparison of MRD levels (absolute MRD levels were categorised into two groups, low [<0·0001] and high [≥0·0001]) between patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched controls, and the secondary outcomes were comparison of long-term outcomes (event-free survival, overall survival, relapse, and treatment-related mortality [TRM]) between patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched controls. Two matched cohorts were formed: for MRD analyses and for long-term outcome analyses. For both cohorts, matching was based on induction regimen; for the long-term outcome cohort, matching also included MRD-guided treatment group. We used mixed-effect models, Cox models, and competing risk for statistical analyses.

Findings

Of 251 children and adolescents with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia, 136 were eligible for analyses and matched to 407 (of 8426) non-Down syndrome patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (matched controls). 113 patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia were excluded from matching in accordance with predefined rules, no match was available for two patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia. The proportion of patients with high MRD at the end of induction treatment was similar for patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia (52 [38%] of 136) and matched controls (157 [39%] of 403; OR 0·97 [95% CI 0·64–1·46]; p=0·88). Patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia had a higher relapse risk than did matched controls in the IKZF1 deleted group (relapse at 5 years 37·1% [17·1–57·2] vs 13·2% [6·1–23·1]; cause-specific hazard ratio [HR_cs] 4·3 [1·6–11·0]; p=0·0028), but not in the IKZF1 wild-type group (relapse at 5 years 5·8% [2·1–12·2] vs 8·1% [5·1–12·0]; HR_cs 1·0 [0·5–2·1]; p=0·99). In addition to increased induction deaths (15 [6%] of 251 vs 69 [0·8%] of 8426), Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia was associated with a higher risk of post-induction TRM compared with matched controls (TRM at 5 years 12·2% [7·0–18·9] vs 2·7% [1·3–4·9]; HR_cs 5·0 [2·3–10·8]; p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Induction treatment is equivalently effective for patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and for matched patients without Down syndrome. Down syndrome itself provides an additional risk in individuals with IKZF1 deletions, suggesting an interplay between the germline environment and this poor risk somatic aberration. Different treatment strategies are warranted considering both inherent risk of relapse and high risk of TRM.

Funding

Stichting Kinder Oncologisch Centrum Rotterdam and the Princess Máxima Center Foundation, NHMRC Australia, The Cancer Council NSW, Tour de Cure, Blood Cancer UK, UK Medical Research Council, Children with Cancer, Swedish Society for Pediatric Cancer, Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund, Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation.

Whole-genome sequencing facilitates patient-specific quantitative PCR-based minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, neuroblastoma and Ewing sarcoma

Background

Minimal residual disease (MRD) measurement is a cornerstone of contemporary acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment. The presence of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) gene recombinations in leukaemic clones allows widespread use of patient-specific, DNA-based MRD assays. In contrast, paediatric solid tumour MRD remains experimental and has focussed on generic assays targeting tumour-specific messenger RNA, methylated DNA or microRNA.

Methods

We examined the feasibility of using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to design tumour-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MRD tests (WGS-MRD) in 18 children with high-risk relapsed cancer, including ALL, high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS) (n = 6 each).

Results

Sensitive WGS-MRD assays were generated for each patient and allowed quantitation of 1 tumour cell per 10⁻⁴ (0.01%)–10^–5 (0.001%) mononuclear cells. In ALL, WGS-MRD and Ig/TCR-MRD were highly concordant. WGS-MRD assays also showed good concordance between quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR formats. In serial clinical samples, WGS-MRD correlated with disease course. In solid tumours, WGS-MRD assays were more sensitive than RNA-MRD assays.

Conclusions

WGS facilitated the development of patient-specific MRD tests in ALL, HR-NB and EWS with potential clinical utility in monitoring treatment response. WGS data could be used to design patient-specific MRD assays in a broad range of tumours.

Proposal and clinical application of molecular genetic risk scoring system, "MRplus", for BCR-ABL1 negative pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia- report from a single centre

INTRODUCTION

We propose "MRplus", a molecular genetic risk score and check its clinical application in the risk-stratification of pediatric B-ALL.

METHODS

The genomic DNA of untreated pediatricBCR-ABL1 negative B-ALL patients was analyzed for deletions of IKZF1, PAX5, CDKN2A/B, BTG1, RB1, ETV6, EBF1, ERG, pseudoautosomal region(PAR) genes using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, along with the routine genetic work-up. The patients were assigned an 'M'score- 0 (M0) for low and 1 (M1) for high genetic-risk as per the criteria by Moorman et al., and another score "IKplus"-1 (IKplus1) for IKZF1plus as per the criteria by Stanulla et al., and 0 (IKplus0) for other patients. The final "MRplus" risk-score of 0 (MRplus0), 1 (MRplus1) or 2 (MRplus2) was obtained by adding both these scores. The association of risk scores with overall survival (OS) and event free survival(EFS) was seen using Cox proportion hazard model. The overall goodness of fit of the model was done using Cox-Snell residuals.

RESULTS

The median age of 320 patients was 6 years (1-18 years). The patients with score M1 were 139 (43.4 %), M0-181 (56.6 %); IKplus1-32 (10 %) and IKplus0-288 (90 %). The final "MRplus" score of 0,1,or 2 was obtained in 181(56.6 %), 107(33.4 %) and 32(10 %) patients respectively. The post-induction remission rate was 90.7 %, 77.8 %, 73.9 % (p = 0.004); 4-year OS 67 %, 48 %, 27 % (p < 0.001); and 4-year EFS 56 %, 34 %, 19 %(p < 0.001) in patients with "MRplus" score 0,1,and 2 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed "MRplus" scoring at baseline could identify three distinct risk groups-good (MRplus0), intermediate (MRplus1) and poor (MRplus2), with different outcomes; in pediatricBCR-ABL1 negative B-ALL. This may help in better risk-stratification and selection of patients for alternative treatment approaches.

Copy Number Alteration Profile Provides Additional Prognostic Value for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Treated on BFM Protocols

Simple Summary

Recent advances in genomic analyses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have identified novel prognostic markers associated with patient outcome. In this frame, copy number alterations (CNAs) are constantly gaining relevance as potential risk stratification markers. Herein, we present our data of a proposed CNA-profile risk-index applied on a Greek ALLIC-BFM cohort. The results of our study demonstrate that EFS for GR(good-risk)-CNA-profile patients was 96.0% versus 57.6% of PR(poor-risk)-CNA-profile ones (p < 0.001) in the whole cohort. EFS within the IR-group for the GR-CNA vs. PR-CNA subgroups was 100.0% vs. 60.0% (p < 0.001), and within the HR-group, 88.2% vs. 55.6% (p = 0.047), respectively. The above results indicate that the application of the proposed CNA-profile classifier is feasible in BFM-based protocols, adding prognostic value to the existing prognostic markers and successfully stratifying patients within prognostic subgroups. This novel genomic risk index can be incorporated in future risk-stratification algorithms, further refining MRD-based stratification and possibly reassigning optimal treatment strategies.

Abstract

We present our data of a novel proposed CNA-profile risk-index, applied on a Greek ALLIC-BFM-treated cohort, aiming at further refining genomic risk-stratification. Eighty-five of 227 consecutively treated ALL patients were analyzed for the copy-number-status of eight genes (IKZF1/CDKN2A/2B/PAR1/BTG1/EBF1/PAX5/ETV6/RB1). Using the MLPA-assay, patients were stratified as: (1) Good-risk(GR)-CNA-profile (n = 51), with no deletion of IKZF1/CDKN2A/B/PAR1/BTG1/EBF1/PAX5/ETV6/RB1 or isolated deletions of ETV6/PAX5/BTG1 or ETV6 deletions with a single additional deletion of BTG1/PAX5/CDKN2A/B. (2) Poor-risk(PR)-CNA-profile (n = 34), with any deletion of ΙΚΖF1/PAR1/EBF1/RB1 or any other CNA. With a median follow-up time of 49.9 months, EFS for GR-CNA-profile and PR-CNA-profile patients was 96.0% vs. 57.6% (p < 0.001). For IR-group and HR-group patients, EFS for the GR-CNA/PR-CNA subgroups was 100.0% vs. 60.0% (p < 0.001) and 88.2% vs. 55.6% (p = 0.047), respectively. Among FC-MRD_d15 + patients (MRD_d15 ≥ 10⁻⁴), EFS rates were 95.3% vs. 51.7% for GR-CNA/PR-CNA subjects (p < 0.001). Similarly, among FC-MRD_d33 + patients (MRD_d33 ≥ 10⁻⁴), EFS was 92.9% vs. 27.3% (p < 0.001) and for patients FC-MRD_d33 − (MRD_d33 < 10⁻⁴), EFS was 97.2% vs. 72.7% (p = 0.004), for GR-CNA/PR-CNA patients, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the CNA-profile was the most important outcome predictor. In conclusion, the CNA-profile can establish a new genomic risk-index, identifying a distinct subgroup with increased relapse risk among the IR-group, as well as a subgroup of patients with superior prognosis among HR-patients. The CNA-profile is feasible in BFM-based protocols, further refining MRD-based risk-stratification.

IKZF1 Deletion Subtyping and Outcome Analysis in BCR-ABL1-Negative Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience from North India

BACKGROUND

IKZF1 deletions are associated with adverse outcomes in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We assessed the prevalence and clinical impact of functional subtypes of IKZF1 deletions in pediatric BCR-ABL1-negative B-ALL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study of IKZF1 deletions was done in cases of pediatric BCR-ABL1-negative B-ALL. The genomic DNA of cases, over a 53-month period, was analyzed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. The deletions were divided into functional subgroups: (1) loss-of-function/haploinsufficiency, (2) dominant-negative, and (3) a combination of both types of deletion. The post-induction remission status, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were noted.

RESULTS

Out of 320 cases, 47 (14.7%) had IKZF1 deletions. Thirty-six of the 47 (77%) had loss-of-function deletions, 10 (21%) had dominant-negative deletions, and one (2%) had a combination of both types. The post-induction remission rates in cases with loss-of-function deletions (22/30, 73%; P = .060) and dominant-negative deletions (4/5, 80%; P = .517) were lower compared with those without deletions (215/248, 86.7%). These cases also had worse median EFS: 21.1 months (P = .006) for loss-of-function and 15.4 months (P = .156) for dominant-negative deletions, compared with 46.4 months in cases without IKZF1 deletions. They also had worse median OS: 23.4 months (P = .012) for loss-of-function deletions and 15.7 months (P = .233) for dominant-negative deletions, compared with median not reached in cases without IKZF1 deletions.

CONCLUSION

The IKZF1 deletions were seen in 14.7% of BCR-ABL1-negative pediatric B-ALL. Most of these deletions (77%) were loss-of-function type. The cases with loss-of-function deletions had lower remission rates and poor EFS and OS compared with cases without IKZF1 deletions. A similar trend of poor outcome was seen in the few cases with dominant-negative IKZF1 deletions.

CKLF and IL1B transcript levels at diagnosis are predictive of relapse in children with pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Disease relapse is the greatest cause of treatment failure in paediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL). Current risk stratifications fail to capture all patients at risk of relapse. Herein, we used a machine-learning approach to identify B-ALL blast-secreted factors that are associated with poor survival outcomes. Using this approach, we identified a two-gene expression signature (CKLF and IL1B) that allowed identification of high-risk patients at diagnosis. This two-gene expression signature enhances the predictive value of current at diagnosis or end-of-induction risk stratification suggesting the model can be applied continuously to help guide implementation of risk-adapted therapies.

The Yin and Yang-Like Clinical Implications of the CDKN2A/ARF/CDKN2B Gene Cluster in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant clonal expansion of lymphoid hematopoietic precursors that exhibit developmental arrest at varying stages of differentiation. Similar to what occurs in solid cancers, transformation of normal hematopoietic precursors is governed by a multistep oncogenic process that drives initiation, clonal expansion and metastasis. In this process, alterations in genes encoding proteins that govern processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and growth provide us with some of the clearest mechanistic insights into how and why cancer arises. In such a scenario, deletions in the 9p21.3 cluster involving CDKN2A/ARF/CDKN2B genes arise as one of the oncogenic hallmarks of ALL. Deletions in this region are the most frequent structural alteration in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and account for roughly 30% of copy number alterations found in B-cell-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Here, we review the literature concerning the involvement of the CDKN2A/B genes as a prognosis marker of good or bad response in the two ALL subtypes (BCP-ALL and T-ALL). We compare frequencies observed in studies performed on several ALL cohorts (adult and child), which mainly consider genetic data produced by genomic techniques. We also summarize what we have learned from mouse models designed to evaluate the functional involvement of the gene cluster in ALL development and in relapse/resistance to treatment. Finally, we examine the range of possibilities for targeting the abnormal function of the protein-coding genes of this cluster and their potential to act as anti-leukemic agents in patients.

Prognostic Impact of Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Childhood B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The high prevalence of relapse in pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) despite the improvements achieved using current risk stratification schemes, demands more accurate methods for outcome prediction. Here, we provide a concise overview about the key advances that have expanded our knowledge regarding the somatic defects across B-ALL genomes, particularly focusing on copy number alterations (CNAs) and their prognostic impact.

RECENT FINDINGS

The identification of commonly altered genes in B-ALL has inspired the development of risk classifiers based on copy number states such as the IKZF1^plus and the United Kingdom (UK) ALL-CNA classifiers to improve outcome prediction in B-ALL. CNA-risk classifiers have emerged as effective tools to predict disease relapse; though, their clinical applications are yet to be transferred to routine practice.

Combined analysis of IKZF1 deletions and CRLF2 expression on prognostic impact in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

This study aimed to investigate the combined impact of IKZF1 deletions/high expression of CRLF2 on the prognosis of pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). IKZF1 deletions and CRLF2 expression were assessed in bone marrow samples from 117 children with newly diagnosed BCP-ALL. Sixteen (13.7%) patients were found to harbor IKZF1 deletions, which was associated with inferior outcomes. The event-free survival (EFS) for patients with high -CRLF2 expression was significantly worse than that for low -CRLF2 expression. Moreover, combined modeling of IKZF1⁺ /CRLF2 ^high identified 7.8% of cases as the highest risk subgroup (7-year EFS 33.3 ± 15.7%). In a multivariate analysis, IKZF1⁺ /CRLF2 ^high remained a strong independent prognostic factor for EFS (HR: 14.263, p = 0.019). IKZF1 deletions and high -CRLF2 expression were associated with inferior outcomes, and the coexistence of IKZF1⁺ /CRLF2 ^high had a significant impact on an integrated prognostic model for high-risk BCP-ALL.

IKZF1 deletions in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: still a poor prognostic marker?

Improved personalized adjustment of primary therapy to the perceived risk of relapse by using new prognostic markers for treatment stratification may be beneficial to patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here, we review the advances that have shed light on the role of IKZF1 aberration as prognostic factor in pediatric ALL and summarize emerging concepts in this field. Continued research on the interplay of disease biology with exposure and response to treatment will be key to further improve treatment strategies.

Ibrutinib is not an effective drug in primografts of TCF3-PBX1

AIM

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) is effective in patients with multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia. We previously showed that primary cells of children with TCF3-PBX1 positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) express BTK and are sensitive to ibrutinib in vitro. However, preclinical studies in mice are lacking that justify clinical implementation.

METHODS

Immunocompromised NSG mice were engrafted with a luciferase-positive TCF3-PBX1 leukemic cell line or primary leukemic cells and treated with ibrutinib or placebo. Additionally, primary cells were exposed in vitro to 4 main induction drugs as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib.

RESULTS

Treatment with ibrutinib of mice engrafted with a TCF3-PBX1 cell line, TCF3-PBX1 positive or TCF3-PBX1 negative primary leukemic cells did not result in prolonged life span compared to placebo treated mice. In vitro sensitivity to ibrutinib was unaltered in leukemic cells obtained from engrafted mice compared to the original material. However, ibrutinib treatment did not affect leukemic cell viability and tumor outgrowth, nor could lymphocytosis be detected. Ibrutinib was biologically active, since hCD19⁺ cells harvested from ibrutinib treated mice had no detectable levels of phospho-BTK at tyrosine 223 (pBTK Y223), whereas pBTK Y223 was still detectable in placebo treated cases. In combination tests, we noticed an antagonistic effect of ibrutinib on vincristine sensitivity, which was not observed for prednisolone, L-asparaginase and daunorubicin.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ibrutinib is not the precision medicine of choice for TCF3-PBX1 positive BCP-ALL.

Examining treatment responses of diagnostic marrow in murine xenografts to predict relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

BACKGROUND

While current chemotherapy has increased cure rates for children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), the largest number of relapsing patients are still stratified as medium risk (MR) at diagnosis (50-60%). This highlights an opportunity to develop improved relapse-prediction models for MR patients. We hypothesised that bone marrow from MR patients who eventually relapsed would regrow faster in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model after induction chemotherapy than samples from patients in long-term remission.

METHODS

Diagnostic bone marrow aspirates from 30 paediatric MR-ALL patients (19 who relapsed, 11 who experienced remission) were inoculated into immune-deficient (NSG) mice and subsequently treated with either control or an induction-type regimen of vincristine, dexamethasone, and L-asparaginase (VXL). Engraftment was monitored by enumeration of the proportion of human CD45⁺ cells (%huCD45⁺) in the murine peripheral blood, and events were defined a priori as the time to reach 1% huCD45⁺, 25% huCD45⁺ (TT25%) or clinical manifestations of leukaemia (TTL).

RESULTS

The TT25% value significantly predicted MR patient relapse. Mutational profiles of PDXs matched their tumours of origin, with a clonal shift towards relapse observed in one set of VXL-treated PDXs.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, establishing PDXs at diagnosis and subsequently applying chemotherapy has the potential to improve relapse prediction in paediatric MR-ALL.

A validated novel continuous prognostic index to deliver stratified medicine in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Risk stratification is essential for the delivery of optimal treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, current risk stratification algorithms dichotomize variables and apply risk factors independently, which may incorrectly assume identical associations across biologically heterogeneous subsets and reduce statistical power. Accordingly, we developed and validated a prognostic index (PIUKALL) that integrates multiple risk factors and uses continuous data. We created discovery (n = 2405) and validation (n = 2313) cohorts using data from 4 recent trials (UKALL2003, COALL-03, DCOG-ALL10, and NOPHO-ALL2008). Using the discovery cohort, multivariate Cox regression modeling defined a minimal model including white cell count at diagnosis, pretreatment cytogenetics, and end-of-induction minimal residual disease. Using this model, we defined PIUKALL as a continuous variable that assigns personalized risk scores. PIUKALL correlated with risk of relapse and was validated in an independent cohort. Using PIUKALL to risk stratify patients improved the concordance index for all end points compared with traditional algorithms. We used PIUKALL to define 4 clinically relevant risk groups that had differential relapse rates at 5 years and were similar between the 2 cohorts (discovery: low, 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2%-4%]; standard, 8% [95% CI, 6%-10%]; intermediate, 17% [95% CI, 14%-21%]; and high, 48% [95% CI, 36%-60%; validation: low, 4% [95% CI, 3%-6%]; standard, 9% [95% CI, 6%-12%]; intermediate, 17% [95% CI, 14%-21%]; and high, 35% [95% CI, 24%-48%]). Analysis of the area under the curve confirmed the PIUKALL groups were significantly better at predicting outcome than algorithms employed in each trial. PIUKALL provides an accurate method for predicting outcome and more flexible method for defining risk groups in future studies.

IKZF1 alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The good, the bad and the ugly

Advances in genomics have deepened our understanding of the biology of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), defined novel molecular leukemia subtypes, discovered new prognostic biomarkers and paved the way to emerging molecularly targeted therapeutic avenues. Since its discovery, IKZF1 has generated significant interest within the leukemia scientific community.IKZF1 plays a critical role in lymphoid development and its alterations cooperate to mediate leukemogenesis. IKZF1 alterations are present in approximately 15% of childhood ALL, rise in prevalence among adults with ALL and become highly enriched within kinase-driven ALL. A cumulating body of literature has highlighted the adverse prognostic impact of IKZF1 alterations in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative and Ph-driven ALL. IKZF1 alterations thus emerge as an important prognostic biomarker in ALL. This article aims to provide a state-of-the-art review focusing on the prognostic clinical relevance of IKZF1 alterations in ALL, as well as current and future therapeutic strategies targeting IKZF1-altered ALL.

Enrichment of atypical hyperdiploidy and IKZF1 deletions detected by SNP-microarray in high-risk Australian AIEOP-BFM B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cohort

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy with the majority of patients being classified as B-cell lineage (B-ALL). The sub-classification of B-ALL is based on genomic architecture. Recent studies have demonstrated the capability of SNP-microarrays to detect genomic changes in B-ALL which cannot be observed by conventional cytogenetic methods. In current clinical trials, B-ALL patients at high risk of relapse are mainly identified by adverse cancer genomics and/or poor response to early therapy. To test the hypothesis that inclusion of SNP-microarrays in frontline diagnostics could more efficiently and accurately identify adverse genomic factors than conventional techniques, we evaluated the Australian high-risk B-ALL cohort enrolled on AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 study (n = 33). SNP-microarray analysis identified additional aberrations in 97% of patients (32/33) compared to conventional techniques. This changed the genomic risk category of 24% (8/33) of patients. Additionally, 27% (9/33) of patients exhibited a 'hyperdiploid' genome, which is generally associated with a good genomic risk and favourable outcomes. An enrichment of IKZF1 deletions was observed with one third of the cohort affected. Our findings suggest the current classification system could be improved and highlights the need to use more sensitive techniques such as SNP-microarray for cytogenomic risk stratification in B-ALL.

How I diagnose and manage Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Advances in our understanding of mechanisms of leukemogenesis and driver mutations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lead to a more precise and informative sub-classification, mainly of B-cell ALL. In parallel, in recent years, novel agents have been approved for the therapy of B-cell ALL, and many others are in active clinical research. Among the newly recognized disease subtypes, Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL is the most heterogeneous and thus, diagnostically challenging. Given that this subtype of B-cell ALL is associated with a poorer prognosis, improvement of available therapeutic approaches and protocols is a burning issue. Herein, we summarize, in a clinically relevant manner, up-to-date information regarding diagnostic strategies developed for the identification of patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL. Common therapeutic dilemmas, presented as several case scenarios, are also discussed. It is currently acceptable that patients with B-cell ALL, treated with an aim of cure, irrespective of their age, be evaluated for a Philadelphia-chromosome-like signature as early as possible. Following Philadelphia-chromosome-like recognition, a higher risk of resistance or relapse must be realized and treatment should be modified based on the patient’s specific genetic driver and clinical features. However, while active targeted therapeutic options are limited, there is much more to do than just prescribe a matched inhibitor to the identified mutated driver genes. In this review, we present a comprehensive evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL at different time-points during the disease course.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technical and Clinical Advances

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first neoplasm where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be a fundamental tool to guide therapeutic choices. The most standardized methods to study MRD in ALL are multi-parametric flow cytometry (MFC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based methods. Emerging technologies hold the promise to improve MRD detection in ALL patients. Moreover, novel therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) represent exciting advancements in the management of B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL.

Aims: Through a review of the literature and in house data, we analyze the current status of MRD assessment in ALL to better understand how some of its limitations could be overcome by emerging molecular technologies. Furthermore, we highlight the future role of MRD monitoring in the context of personalized protocols, taking into account the genetic complexity in ALL.

Results and Conclusions: Molecular rearrangements (gene fusions and immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor-IG/TR gene rearrangements) are widely used as targets to detect residual leukemic cells in ALL patients. The advent of novel techniques, namely next generation flow cytometry (NGF), digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR), and next generation sequencing (NGS) appear important tools to evaluate MRD in ALL, since they have the potential to overcome the limitations of standard approaches. It is likely that in the forthcoming future these techniques will be incorporated in clinical trials, at least at decisional time points. Finally, the advent of new powerful compounds is further increasing MRD negativity rates, with benefits in long-term survival and a potential reduction of therapy-related toxicities. However, the prognostic relevance in the setting of novel immunotherapies still needs to be evaluated.

Clinical use of SNP-microarrays for the detection of genome-wide changes in haematological malignancies

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays are commonly used for the clinical investigation of constitutional genomic disorders; however, their adoption for investigating somatic changes is being recognised. With increasing importance being placed on defining the cancer genome, a shift in technology is imperative at a clinical level. Microarray platforms have the potential to become frontline testing, replacing or complementing standard investigations such as FISH or karyotype. This 'molecular karyotype approach' exemplified by SNP-microarrays has distinct advantages in the investigation of several haematological malignancies. A growing body of literature, including guidelines, has shown support for the use of SNP-microarrays in the clinical laboratory to aid in a more accurate definition of the cancer genome. Understanding the benefits of this technology along with discussing the barriers to its implementation is necessary for the development and incorporation of SNP-microarrays in a clinical laboratory for the investigation of haematological malignancies.

Validation of the United Kingdom copy-number alteration classifier in 3239 children with B-cell precursor ALL

Genetic abnormalities provide vital diagnostic and prognostic information in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and are increasingly used to assign patients to risk groups. We recently proposed a novel classifier based on the copy-number alteration (CNA) profile of the 8 most commonly deleted genes in B-cell precursor ALL. This classifier defined 3 CNA subgroups in consecutive UK trials and was able to discriminate patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. In this study, we sought to validate the United Kingdom ALL (UKALL)-CNA classifier and reevaluate the interaction with cytogenetic risk groups using individual patient data from 3239 cases collected from 12 groups within the International BFM Study Group. The classifier was validated and defined 3 risk groups with distinct event-free survival (EFS) rates: good (88%), intermediate (76%), and poor (68%) (P < .001). There was no evidence of heterogeneity, even within trials that used minimal residual disease to guide therapy. By integrating CNA and cytogenetic data, we replicated our original key observation that patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics can be stratified into 2 prognostic subgroups. Group A had an EFS rate of 86% (similar to patients with good-risk cytogenetics), while group B patients had a significantly inferior rate (73%, P < .001). Finally, we revised the overall genetic classification by defining 4 risk groups with distinct EFS rates: very good (91%), good (81%), intermediate (73%), and poor (54%), P < .001. In conclusion, the UKALL-CNA classifier is a robust prognostic tool that can be deployed in different trial settings and used to refine established cytogenetic risk groups.