A critical appraisal of the evidence for the role of splenectomy in adults and children with ITP

Is splenectomy a good strategy for refractory immune thrombocytopenia in adults?

Rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have profoundly changed the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) over the last 20 years. Even if most current guidelines put splenectomy, rituximab and TPO-RAs on the same treatment level, most clinicians and patients clearly prefer to postpone splenectomy and to multiply the lines of medical treatment before considering surgery. The management of ITP refractory to rituximab and TPO-RAs is challenging. Splenectomy is currently performed much less frequently because of a better knowledge of its complications, particularly severe late infections and deep vein thrombosis, and the inability to reliably predict its effectiveness. Furthermore, there is a reluctance to propose splenectomy when other treatments have been ineffective, based on the not well-documented risk that splenectomy could not be effective in such a case. The objective of this update was to review the most recent published data on the long-term tolerability and side effects of splenectomy and the predictors of response and efficacy, especially for patients exposed to multiple medical lines. This update can help physicians and patients with failure of multiple lines of therapy make an informed decision on the indication for splenectomy with the help of up-to-date data.

Fostamatinib or Thrombopoietin for the Treatment of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients: A Real-World Assessment of Safety, Effectiveness and Cost

INTRODUCTION

Chronic immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) in adults is a serious autoimmune disease in which platelets are prematurely destroyed, leaving the patient vulnerable to bruising and bleeding. Initial treatment starts with corticosteroids. In patients who become resistant or intolerant to corticosteroids, the thrombopoietic agents (TPOs), consisting of romiplostim (ROM), eltrombopag (ELT), and avatrombopag (AVA), or the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib (FOS), are appropriate next lines of therapy. In this study, the comparative safety, effectiveness, and cost of care between fostamatinib and the TPOs were evaluated in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 17 community hematology practices across the USA was conducted to identify adult ITP patients who received one of the four agents. Data collection consisted of patient demographics, disease characteristics, as well as number and type of prior treatments. From the first day until the end of treatment, data were also collected on platelet (PLT) counts, adverse events, the use of rescue IVIG, platelet transfusions, and corticosteroids. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare PLT-related endpoints between agents.

RESULTS

A sample of 179 ITP patients who had received at least one of the four agents was identified. This resulted in a final sample of 51, 87, 127, and 44 patients who received FOS, ELT, ROM, or AVA, respectively. At month six, there were no significant differences between FOS and the TPOs in terms of the proportion of patients with the PLT count being ≥30 × 103/μL, ≥50 × 103/μL as well as the proportion of patients whose PLT levels doubled relative to baseline. The frequency of thromboembolic events (TEs) was 3.9% in FOS patients compared to 9.2%, 4.7%, and 11.4% in the ELT, ROM, and AVA groups. The mean cost per patient with FOS was $99,209 (95% CI: $59,595-$115,074), compared to $92,426 (95% CI: $68,331-$115,519), $108,482 (95% CI: $84,782-$132,182), and $131,050 (95% CI: $83,327-$179,897) for ELT, ROM, or AVA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis, FOS was comparable to the TPOs in maintaining PLTs at clinically beneficial levels. Given these findings, the choice of therapy should be based on overall patient safety, preexisting risk factors for TEs, and cost effectiveness.

Primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Time for a rethink

There are not many publications that provide a holistic view of the management of primary and secondary ITP as a whole, reflecting the similarities and differences between the two. Given the lack of major clinical trials, we believe that comprehensive reviews are much needed to guide the diagnosis and treatment of ITP today. Therefore, our review addresses the contemporary diagnosis and treatment of ITP in adult patients. With respect to primary ITP we especially focus on establishing the management of ITP based on the different and successive lines of treatment. Life-threatening situations, "bridge therapy" to surgery or invasive procedures and refractory ITP are also comprehensively reviewed here. Secondary ITP is studied according to its pathogenesis by establishing three major differential groups: Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Central Defects, Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Blocked Differentiation and Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Defective Peripheral Immune Response. Here we provide an up-to-date snapshot of the current diagnosis and treatment of ITP, including a special interest in addressing rare causes of this disease in our daily clinical practice. The target population of this review is adult patients only and the target audience is medical professionals.

Mitral valve replacement in patients of rheumatic heart disease associated with immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia in association with rheumatic heart disease is not commonly seen. Surgical management of rheumatic heart disease becomes more challenging in the presence of immune thrombocytopenia. The risk of complications increases manifold and judicious medical management before, during, and after surgery is imperative. We discuss two such cases, the complications we faced and the problems we anticipated before, and their prevention. Both patients were managed without using immunoglobulins or doing splenectomy. The literature on valve replacement in patients of immune thrombocytopenia and the implications of immune thrombocytopenia in the management of patients with rheumatic heart disease is also reviewed.

Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura with Abdominal Splenosis: A Complex Case

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired thrombocytopenia resulting from immune-mediated platelet destruction via antiplatelet antibodies and T cells. Medical management of ITP includes corticosteroids and multiple other adjunct therapies, with splenectomy generally being reserved for severe, refractory cases. In this clinical case report, we describe the evaluation of a 35-year-old male with a history of prior traumatic splenic injury who presented to the emergency department endorsing easy bruising and a petechial rash, ultimately found to have severe thrombocytopenia. The patient was diagnosed with primary ITP that proved to be refractory to a number of first- and second-line medical therapies. His course was complicated by the presence of abdominal splenosis discovered at the time of planned splenectomy and intra-abdominal hemorrhage requiring splenic artery embolization thereafter. To our knowledge, this is one of few published cases of ITP complicated by abdominal splenosis, highlighting the need to consider splenosis and the presence of accessory splenic tissue in cases of refractory ITP.

Current approaches for the diagnosis and management of immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by the destruction of platelets and megakaryocytes, resulting in thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L). This review focuses on the diagnosis and current management of ITP. The diagnosis of ITP is based principally on the exclusion of other causes of isolated thrombocytopenia using patient history, physical examination, blood count, and evaluation of the peripheral blood film. The clinical treatment goals should be to resolve bleeding events and to prevent severe bleeding episodes. The platelet count should be improved to attain a minimum of > 20-30 × 10⁹/L. Therapy should be given as an inpatient in newly diagnosed ITP with a platelet count of > 20 × 10⁹/L or if there is active bleeding. Corticosteroids are considered the standard initial treatment for newly diagnosed patients. Subsequent medical therapies with robust evidence include thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab and fostamatinib. Surgical therapy with splenectomy may be considered for patients failing medical therapy. The choice between therapy options is highly dependent upon patient values and preferences.

Refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) after accessory splenectomy: A case report and literature review

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a platelet count of less than 100 x 109 /L, resulting from antibody-mediated platelet destruction. Treatment for ITP typically involves steroids, and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) can be added. Splenectomy is performed in cases with refractory ITP. Rituximab can suppress immunity but has limited efficacy in ITP cases. Herein, we present a rare case of a 30-year-old female who was first diagnosed with ITP and underwent a splenectomy two years later. However, seven years after surgery, she was presented with symptoms of ITP. A splenic scan showed an accessory spleen in the spleen bed, for which she underwent accessory spleen removal surgery. Her laboratory tests three days post-operation showed a rise in platelet count and hence was discharged a few days later. The patient had recurrent attacks of ITP even after the removal of the normal and accessory spleen, suggesting that accessory spleen removal may not always be an effective treatment for ITP. The patient eventually died. While splenectomy is a common treatment for ITP, it may not always be effective in all cases, and other treatments such as bone marrow transplantation may be necessary.

Nationwide Survey on the Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RA) for the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Current Clinical Practice in Italy

Background

Two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are currently widely adopted as second-line ITP therapy even in the absence of robust evidence on their comparative advantages over rituximab or splenectomy or their preferential use in some specific clinical contexts.

Methods

An online survey was distributed between May 2021 and June 2021 to collect standardized information on TPO-RA use in Italy.

Results

Eighty-eight hematologists from 79 centers completed the survey. Eighty-four percent would use TPO-RA earlier than formally indicated, without a preference for young or elderly in 82% of respondents. No clear preference for either romiplostim or eltrombopag was indicated. Seventy-two percent would use TPO-RA in young patients aiming at a complete response followed by tapering, a strategy considered by only 16% in the elderly. Switching between the two agents was considered appropriate in case of insufficient response or intolerance. Tapering schedule by reducing the dosage and prolonging the intervals between administrations was preferred by 73% of respondents. TPO-RA was considered a risk factor for thrombosis by only 35%, and 94% would administer TPO-RA in elderly patients also in the presence of other thrombotic risk factors. Thirty-three percent of respondents would withdraw TPO-RA in case of thrombosis. The TPORA administration has been reported to be preferred over anti-CD20 or splenectomy by about half of the participants due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions

Significant discrepancies in TPO-RA use emerged from the survey, and participants would appreciate consensus-based specific guidance on the practical use of TPO-RA.

Efficacy and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia, including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and Evans syndrome (ES). Patients in the tacrolimus group were treated with tacrolimus in combination with steroids, and the control group received only steroids. Of the 318 patients finally enrolled, 87 (27.4%) were males, with a median age of 45 (14-90) years. The tacrolimus group comprised 144 patients, including 120 ITP, 19 AIHA, and 5 ES patients, and the control group comprised 174 patients, including 141 ITP, 25 AIHA, and 8 ES patients. The optimal ORR of the tacrolimus group was comparable to that of the control group, and the optimal CRR was higher (p < 0.05). Patients receiving tacrolimus had a decreased relapse rate and prolonged relapse-free survival (p < 0.05) compared with the controls for both the whole cohort and the ITP and AIHA subgroups. Compared with the control group, the tacrolimus group had a lower cumulative steroid dosage and earlier discontinuation of steroids (p < 0.05), which resulted in a decreased incidence of steroid-related adverse events (p < 0.05) although the total side effects were similar between the two groups. Similar drug expenses were observed between the tacrolimus and control groups at the 18-month follow-up. In conclusion, the early addition of tacrolimus had a similar ORR, better CRR, lower relapse rate, and prolonged relapse-free survival compared to steroids alone, with reduced steroid-related adverse events.

Persistent Relapsing Immune Thrombocytopenia Following COVID-19 Infection

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune disease that presents along a spectrum of disease severity, ranging from asymptomatic thrombocytopenia to potentially life-threatening bleeding complications. Recent case reports and case series suggest that a COVID-19 infection can trigger secondary ITP and may be associated with higher rates of bleeding and lower nadir platelet counts compared to patients with ITP of other etiologies. Multiple ITP relapses have also been described in some COVID-19 patients. We report the case of a 30-year-old otherwise healthy woman who presented to the hospital with fatigue, easy bruising, and a platelet count of 11 x 10³/µL. She responded well to our initial treatment with prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) but experienced a persistent disease course with nine ITP relapses (defined as platelet count <30 x 10³/µL) over the next 10.5 months, requiring six additional hospital admissions for acute management as well as long-term maintenance medication adjustments. It is important for clinicians to recognize ITP as a potential complication of a COVID-19 infection and to initiate early therapy to prevent serious bleeding in these patients. Further studies will be needed to understand the natural history, optimal treatment, and prognosis for patients with relapsing COVID-19-associated ITP.

Splenectomy in the management of primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia and primary immune-mediated thrombocytopenia in dogs

Background

Current reports about the use of splenectomy for the management of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) or immune‐mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) or both in dogs are limited.

Objectives

To retrospectively describe the use of splenectomy as part of the management for IMHA, ITP, and concurrent IMHA and severe thrombocytopenia (CIST) in dogs. It was hypothesized that splenectomy would be beneficial in allowing for reduction of dose of immunosuppressive drugs or discontinuation in 1 or more of these groups.

Animals

Seventeen client‐owned dogs (7 with IMHA, 7 with ITP, and 3 with CIST) were identified across 7 UK‐based referral hospitals from a study period of 2005 to 2016.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively via questionnaires and included information about diagnosis, management and treatment response before and after splenectomy. Based on clinical outcome, treatment with splenectomy as part of the management protocol was classified as either successful or unsuccessful.

Results

Six of 7 dogs with ITP were managed successfully with splenectomy as part of their management protocol (3 complete and 3 partial responses), although 1 subsequently developed suspected IMHA. Of the 7 dogs with IMHA, splenectomy was part of a successful management protocol in 4 dogs (2 complete and 2 partial responses). In the CIST group, 1 case (1/3) responded completely to management with splenectomy as part of the management protocol.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Splenectomy was considered successful and well tolerated in most cases of isolated ITP. Whether there is a benefit of splenectomy in cases of IMHA and CIST could not be determined in the current study.

Recent advances in treatments of adult immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is isolated thrombocytopenia characterized by autoimmune-mediated disruption of platelet without other etiologies. Treatments for chronic ITP consist of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, immunosuppressants and splenectomy. Although current therapies are effective in over two-thirds of patients, some patients are refractory to therapies or fail to achieve long-term responses. Recently, great advance has been made in identifying various mechanisms involved in ITP pathogenesis, and new treatments targeting these pathways are being developed. Novel agents such as splenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton kinase inhibitor, plasma cell targeting therapies, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor, platelet desialylation inhibitor, and inhibition of the classical complement pathway are expected to be effective for ITP treatment. This review summarizes current strategies and emerging therapies of ITP.

The Value of Combined Detection of Megakaryocyte and Platelet Parameters for the Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Objective:To investigate the application value of bone marrow megakaryocyte count, the proportion of megakaryocytes at each stage, and the platelet parameter in the clinical diagnosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods: The megakaryocyte and platelet parameter level in 62 ITP and 40 control group patients were compared and analyzed. Linear correlation analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and ROC curves were performed for the correlation between megakaryocytes and platelet parameters. Results: Compared to the control group, the total number of megakaryocytes, the promegakaryocytes the granular megakaryocytes (GMeg), and naked megakaryocytes (NMeg), MPV, and P-LCR% in the ITP group increased. All differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). While the proportion of platelet-producing megakaryocytes (PMeg), PLT, and PCT decreased in the ITP group. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). PLT was strongly positively correlated with PCT (r = 0.921, p<0.01). PCT was weakly positively with MPV (r = 0.309, p<0.05). MPV was positively correlated with P-LCR (r = 0.856, p<0.01). PDW was weakly positively correlated with P-LCR (r = 0.296, p<0.05) and Meg (r = 0.301, p<0.05), and negatively correlated with PMeg (r = -0.336, p<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that PLT, PCT MPV and P-LCR% gave a high sensitivity（100.0%，81.0%，74.6%，90.5%，respectively.) and specificity (100.0%, 92.5%, 80.0%, 77.5%, respectively.) in diagnosis of ITP. Conclusion: The combined analysis of bone marrow megakaryocyte count, the proportion of megakaryocyte classification at each stage, and platelet parameters have an important reference value for auxiliary diagnosis of ITP.

Splenectomy for primary immune thrombocytopenia revisited in the era of thrombopoietin receptor agonists: New insights for an old treatment

Although splenectomy is still considered the most effective curative treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), its use has significantly declined in the last decade, especially since the approval of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). The main objective of the study was to determine whether splenectomy was still as effective nowadays, particularly for patients with failure to respond to TPO-RAs. Our secondary objective was to assess, among patients who relapsed after splenectomy, the pattern of response to treatments used before splenectomy. This multicenter retrospective study involved adults who underwent splenectomy for ITP in France from 2011 to 2020. Response status was defined according to international criteria. We included 185 patients, 100 (54.1%) and 135 (73.0%) patients had received TPO-RAs and/or rituximab before the splenectomy. The median follow-up after splenectomy was 39.2 months [16.5-63.0]. Overall, 144 (77.8%) patients had an initial response and 23 (12.4%) experienced relapse during follow-up, for an overall sustained response of 65.4%, similar to that observed in the pre-TPO-RA era. Among patients who received at least one TPO-RA or rituximab before splenectomy, 92/151 (60.9%) had a sustained response. Six of 13 (46%) patients with previous lack of response to both TPO-RAs and rituximab had a sustained response to splenectomy. Among patients with relapse after splenectomy, 13/21 (61.2%) patients responded to one TPO-RAs that failed before splenectomy. In conclusion, splenectomy is still a relevant option for treating adult primary ITP not responding to TPO-RAs and rituximab. Patients with lack of response or with relapse after splenectomy should be re-challenged with TPO-RAs.

Characterization and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in Europe: a qualitative observational study

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare disease, characterized by increased platelet destruction/suboptimal platelet production, leading to thrombocytopenia and risk of severe bleeding events.

METHODS

Interviews with 23 physicians and 12 payors, a survey with 113 physicians and validation using published data were used to define the current treatment paradigm and healthcare resource utilization and to determine the costs associated with managing acute bleeds in six European countries (Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Netherlands, UK). The study estimated a prevalence of 9 to 10 per 100,000 adults in 2020 across all six countries (disease severity split: 34% mild, 32% moderate, 33% severe (due to rounding up some values might not sum up to 100%).

RESULTS

Physician feedback showed that most patients with ITP (60%) received first-line treatment or were monitored by their physician; ∼75% of patients relapsed within 3-4 months. Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and rituximab were used to achieve disease stabilization in patients who relapse; patients could switch to an alternative TPO-RA to control symptoms, manage side-effects or improve adherence. The costs of rescue therapies and hospital services (e.g. surgery and admissions) accounted for the majority of healthcare resources to manage bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Physicians would welcome earlier use of TPO-RAs to help maintain long-term control of ITP bleeds and potentially reduce both hospitalization and therapy costs.

A retrospective analysis of 122 immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with dapsone: Efficacy, safety and factors associated with treatment response

BACKGROUND

The optimum second-line treatment or best sequence of treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are yet to be determined. Our institution has accumulated extensive experience regarding the use of dapsone as second-line therapy for ITP.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the efficacy rate and safety of dapsone treatment in ITP patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Here we report our experience in a retrospective study, including 122 patients, with a median treatment duration with dapsone of 6 months and a median follow-up period of 3.4 years.

RESULTS

The overall response rate in this cohort was 66%, including 24% of complete responses. Among responders, in 24% a relapse occurred while on treatment. Therefore, a sustained response was observed in 51% of patients. Interestingly, 81% of the responders maintained the response after the interruption of treatment, for a median time of 26 months. Side effects were reported in 16% of the patients in this cohort and treatment was interrupted due to side effects in 11% of patients. The main cause in these cases was hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Reductions in hemoglobin levels during the use of dapsone were seen in 94% of the patients. Responders presented significantly greater reductions in their hemoglobin levels than nonresponders did: median hemoglobin drop of 1.9 g/dl vs. 1.2 g/dl (p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that dapsone has adequate efficacy and is well tolerated. Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, our observation that the degree in the drop of hemoglobin is greater in responders suggest a possible role of the blockage of the reticuloendothelial system in the therapeutic effect of the drug.

Management of Adult Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Review on Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune process resulting in increased destruction and inadequate production of platelets that can result in bleeding, fatigue, and reduced health-related quality of life. While treatment is not required for many patients with ITP, the occurrence of bleeding manifestations, severe thrombocytopenia, and requirement for invasive procedures are among the reasons necessitating initiation of therapy. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immune globulin are typical first-line and rescue treatments, but these agents typically do not result in a durable remission in adult patients. Most patients requiring treatment therefore require subsequent line therapies, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, or a number of other immunosuppressive agents. In this focused review, we discuss management of adult ITP in the acute and chronic settings.

Comparison of Splenectomy and Eltrombopag Treatment in the Second-Line Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Objective:

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. While first-line treatments focus on inhibiting autoantibodies and platelet destruction, second- and third-line treatments include splenectomy and thrombopoietin receptor agonists. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficiency and toxicities of splenectomy and eltrombopag as second-line treatments in ITP.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with ITP and followed between 2015 and 2020. Patients who underwent splenectomy or received eltrombopag treatment as second-line or further therapy were included. For subgroup analyses, patients were further stratified according to whether they received eltrombopag in the second or third line of treatment.

Results:

There were 38 patients in the splenectomy group and 47 patients in the eltrombopag group. The mean age of patients in the splenectomy and eltrombopag groups was 43.2 and 50.5 years, respectively. Time to response was significantly shorter in the splenectomy arm (p=0.001). However, response rates at the 3^rd, 6^th, 12^th, and 24^th months did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between groups; nor did total duration of response and adverse events. Response rates at the 1^st, 3^rd, 6^th, 12^th, and 24^th months and the total duration of response did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between eltrombopag subgroups. Eltrombopag treatment was ceased for 20 patients after a median of 54.1 months (range: 1-151). Among them, 12 patients (60%) did not experience a loss of response.

Conclusion:

Comparing the splenectomy and eltrombopag arms, even though time to achieve response was in favor of the splenectomy group, this advantage disappeared when overall response rates and response rate at the 2^nd year were considered. Using eltrombopag in the second or third line of therapy does not yield any difference in terms of time to achieving response.

How I treat primary ITP in adult patients who are unresponsive to or dependent on corticosteroid treatment

Approximately 80% of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have treatment failure with corticosteroids or become dependent on them and require second-line therapy. Several new and effective therapies have been introduced during the past decade and our understanding of disease burden and its effect on quality of life has expanded. It is now recommended that splenectomy, the standard second-line therapy for decades, be delayed for at least 12 to 24 months, allowing for more patients to achieve remission on medical therapies before considering surgery. It is highly recommended that medical therapies be used that have abundant clinical trial evidence, such as the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) rituximab and fostamatinib. Unfortunately, there are no reliable biomarkers that help in treatment selection. These therapeutic medical options have variable efficacy, safety profiles, mechanisms of action, and modes of administration. This enables and mandates an individualized approach to treatment, where patient involvement, preferences and values have become central to the process of choosing the appropriate therapy. Both TPO-RAs and fostamatinib are maintenance therapies, whereas rituximab is given for a limited number of doses. Although the response is usually maintained while receiving a TPO-RA or fostamatinib therapy, half of rituximab responders will no longer respond 1 to 2 years after administration and require retreatment or other therapy.

Practical Recommendations for the Management of Patients with ITP During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The current COVID-19 pandemic requires revisiting our current approach to major blood disorders, including ITP (Immune Thrombocytopenia), stirring up the production of several disease-specific practical guidelines. This report describes an updated version of consensus-based practical guidelines on the management of ITP, adapted to the Italian health system and social context. It highlights the role of the hematologist in offering guidance for choosing differentiated approaches in relation to specific circumstances and is intended to provide them with a useful tool for sharing the decision-making process with their patients.

Probably, the greatest risk to avoid for a patient with suspected, ongoing or relapsed ITP - that is not severe enough to place him or her at risk for major bleeding - is to be infected in non-hospital and hospital healthcare settings. This risk must be carefully considered when adapting the diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

More in detail, the document first addresses the appropriate management for COVID-19 negative patients with newly diagnosed ITP or who experience a relapse of previous ITP, according to first and second lines of treatment and then the management of COVID-19 positive patients according to their severity, from paucisymptomatic to those requiring admission to Intensive Cure Units (ICU). The pros and cons of the different treatments required to correct platelet count are discussed, as are some specific situations, including chronic ITP, splenectomy, thromboembolic complication and anti COVID-19 vaccination.

Update on diagnosis and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a heterogeneous acquired disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia whose exact pathogenesis is not yet clear. Depending upon the presence or absence of an underlying treatable cause, ITP can be categorized as primary or secondary. Primary ITP is a diagnosis of exclusion and there is no gold standard test for its confirmation. Recent drug intake, infections, lymphoproliferative disorders, and connective tissue disorders should be ruled out before labeling a patient as primary ITP.

AREA COVERED

This review summarizes a comprehensive update on the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for ITP. We reviewed the literature using GOOGLE SCHOLAR, PUBMED and ClinicalTrial.gov databases as needed to support the evidence. We searched the literature using the following keywords: 'immune thrombocytopenia,' 'idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura,' 'thrombocytopenia,' 'immune thrombocytopenic purpura,' and 'isolated thrombocytopenia'.

EXPERT OPINION

We believe that more detailed studies are required to understand the exact pathophysiology behind ITP. The first-line drugs like corticosteroids have both short-term and long-term adverse effects. This brings the need to explore effective alternative medications and to reconsider their role in ITP treatment algorithm if guidelines can be modified based on new studies.

The Diagnostic Utility of Splenectomy in Idiopathic Splenomegaly

INTRODUCTION

With increasing frequency, patients with idiopathic splenomegaly are referred to surgeons for splenectomy. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of splenectomy and feasibility of a minimally invasive approach in the face of idiopathic splenomegaly.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who underwent splenectomy for idiopathic splenomegaly. The primary endpoint was the rate of definitive diagnosis based on final surgical pathology of the removed spleen.

RESULTS

Preoperative workup included a bone marrow biopsy and peripheral blood smear in 93% and 100% of patients, respectively, with none having lymphadenopathy warranting biopsy. Splenectomy provided a definitive diagnosis for 44 (64.7%) patients. Of these, 34 (50%) patients had an underlying malignancy, of which more than half were splenic marginal zone lymphoma. There were 33 (48.5%) laparoscopic, 23 (33.8%) open, 10 (14.7%) laparoscopic converted to open, and two (2.9%) laparoscopic hand-assist cases. Conversion to open was due to splenic size [median craniocaudal length 21.8 cm (cm)] in eight and staple line bleeding at the splenic hilum in two patients. Overall, the laparoscopic approach was completed in patients with a smaller splenic size compared to open (median craniocaudal length 15.2 vs. 26.0 cm, p < 0.0001). The open group had one (1.5%) intra-operative mortality due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Thirty-day complication rates were similar for laparoscopic and open approaches (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy is an effective diagnostic modality in determining a pathologic cause for splenomegaly in this patient population. Laparoscopic splenectomy can be performed safely in appropriate cases with craniocaudal splenic size having the largest influence on surgical approach.

Romiplostim in adults with newly diagnosed or persistent immune thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Three distinct phases are recognized in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): newly diagnosed (≤3 months after diagnosis), persistent (>3-12 months after diagnosis), and chronic (>12 months). Several international guidelines/expert recommendations have been released in the past 2 years regarding the treatment of newly diagnosed/persistent ITP. Areas covered: Across the guidelines/expert recommendations, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), including romiplostim (the focus of this review), are recommended in newly diagnosed or persistent ITP for patients who fail to respond to corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulin (or where these are contraindicated). To identify data relating to romiplostim in adults with newly diagnosed or persistent ITP, we conducted a search of PubMed (with no time limit applied) and abstracts from 2019 EHA/ASH meetings using the term 'romiplostim.' Expert opinion: The findings from nine clinical trials, six real-world studies and ten case reports provide insight into the early use of romiplostim, which could help to reduce exposure to the adverse effects associated with prolonged corticosteroid use, as well as reduce the risk of severe bleeding. Additionally, given the durable responses observed in patients with newly diagnosed/persistent ITP, as well as the potential for treatment-free responses following discontinuation, romiplostim might help to avoid the need for subsequent treatment.

A risk score for predicting hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia in ITP using nationally representative data

Infection is one of the primary causes of death from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and the lungs are the most common site of infection. We identified the factors associated with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in nonsplenectomized adults with ITP and established the [corrected] (ACPA) prediction model to predict the incidence of hospitalization for CAP. This was a retrospective study of nonsplenectomized adult patients with ITP from 10 large medical centers in China. The derivation cohort included 145 ITP inpatients with CAP and 1360 inpatients without CAP from 5 medical centers, and the validation cohort included the remaining 63 ITP inpatients with CAP and 526 inpatients without CAP from the other 5 centers. The 4-item ACPA model, which included age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, initial platelet count, and initial absolute lymphocyte count, was established by multivariable analysis of the derivation cohort. Internal and external validation were conducted to assess the performance of the model. The ACPA model had an area under the curve of 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.889) in the derivation cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.807-0.916) in the validation cohort, which indicated the good discrimination power of the model. Calibration plots showed high agreement between the estimated and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis indicated that ITP patients could benefit from the clinical application of the ACPA model. To summarize, the ACPA model was developed and validated to predict the occurrence of hospitalization for CAP, which might help identify ITP patients with a high risk of hospitalization for CAP.

Multidrug Therapy for Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Severe immune thrombocytopenia complicating pregnancy may require treatment beyond first-line medications (intravenous immunoglobulins or corticosteroids), but there is a paucity of literature on the use of such second-line agents in pregnancy.

CASE

The patient is a 29-year-old woman with early-onset severe immune thrombocytopenia at 13 weeks of gestation. Maternal platelet counts reached a nadir of less than 5×10/L. The thrombocytopenia persisted despite first-line medications. Romiplostim, rituximab, and azathioprine were added to the therapeutic regimen. Platelet counts eventually stabilized at greater than 150×10/L before delivery. After delivery at term, the neonate had transient B-cell suppression, which was presumed to be secondary to rituximab, but was otherwise doing well and meeting all milestones at 7 months of age.

CONCLUSION

The addition of second-line agents was associated with sustained elevation in maternal platelet counts and may have obviated the need for splenectomy.

The Clinical Conundrum of Managing Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia

Guidelines are lacking for management of acute ischemic stroke and stroke prevention in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Our aim is to highlight the dilemma inherent in managing patients with both significant bleeding and thrombotic risk factors. In this review, we present two patients with history of ITP who presented with acute ischemic stroke and received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a rare management strategy in this patient population. In addition, we identified 27 case reports of ischemic stroke in patients with ITP; none of them received tPA or EVT. Furthermore, there are 92 patients with significant thrombocytopenia with no available data regarding the cause of thrombocytopenia, who were acutely treated with tPA or EVT. Conclusive evidence cannot be determined based on these limited number of cases. Future multicenter prospective cohort studies in patients with ITP are needed to provide better evidence-based treatment plans. At present, treatment of acute ischemic stroke in patients with ITP requires close collaboration between hematology and vascular neurology experts to find a balance between the benefit and risk of hemorrhagic complications.

Report of a 'consensus' on the lines of therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults, promoted by the Italian Gruppo di Studio delle Piastrine

Despite the publication in 2009 of a paper on 'terms and definitions of immune thrombocytopenia' (ITP), some unresolved issues remain and are reflected by the disagreement in the treatment suggested for primary ITP in adults. Considering that these disagreements could be ascribed to non-shared goals, we generated a 'consensus' on some terms, definitions, and assertions useful for classifying the different lines of treatment for primary ITP in adults according to their indications and goals. Agreement on the appropriateness of the single assertions was obtained by consensus for the following indicators: 1. classification of four 'lines of therapy'; 2. acceptance of the expression 'sequences of disease' for the indications of the respective four lines of treatment; 3_I . practicability of splenectomy; 3_Ib . acceptance, with only some exceptions, of a 'timing for elective splenectomy of 12 months'; and 4_a-d . 'goals of the four lines of therapy.' On the basis of the consensus, a classification of four lines of treatment for primary ITP in adults was produced. In our opinion, this classification, whose validity is not influenced by the recently published new guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and reviews, could reduce the disagreement that still exists regarding the treatment of the disease.

Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children: Consensus and Controversies

Newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a relatively common disorder of childhood that does not require an exhaustive laboratory workup for diagnosis. A history and physical exam with a review of the peripheral smear are crucial for excluding secondary causes of thrombocytopenia. Several guidelines have been published to guide physicians in the management of ITP. However, the decision for treatment can be arduous. The management strategy should not be focussed on the platelet count but the severity of bleeding symptoms. Agents for treating acute ITP, including corticosteroids, immunoglobulin and anti-D immunoglobulin, do not seem to have a significant impact on the natural history of the disease. The majority of children with ITP do not need therapy and have a spontaneous resolution of the disease. Some children can develop chronic ITP that is not commonly life-threatening but can lead to impaired quality of life. Traditional therapies such as rituximab and splenectomy for chronic ITP are not without significant adverse effects. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists are newer agents for the treatment of chronic ITP and hold promise, however, their cost currently precludes use in most of the patients in low-middle-income countries. This review compares and contrasts the specific treatments available for the treatment of ITP to help the reader make a balanced choice. This review, based on a series of case examples, will help physicians in making decisions about choosing a practical management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed as well as chronic ITP.

Management of immune thrombocytopenia in women: current standards and special considerations

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder, with an incidence rate of 20-40/million adults/year and an estimated prevalence in women of childbearing age of 24.5/million.Areas covered: Authors discuss management of ITP in pregnancy, treatment-related toxicity, delivery, neonatal thrombocytopenia and breastfeeding, and other women's specific issues. The search of papers published between January 1990 and December 2019 was done on PubMed using combinations of the keywords below. The distinction between ITP and other thrombocytopenias in pregnancy is of paramount importance. The current belief (at variance with the past) that ITP is a relatively benign disease pregnancy is emphasized.Expert opinion: The lack of randomized, prospective, controlled studies hampers evidence-based statements. Remarkably, ITP diagnosis is still one of exclusion, there are no clinical or laboratory criteria for prognosis and we still need more solid data on the risks related to neonatal thrombocytopenia. Corticosteroids and IVIG remain the mainstay of treatment, since rituximab, thrombopoietin-receptor agonists, fostamatinib may be toxic in pregnancy. Safety and efficacy of recombinant-human-thrombopoietin, available in China, require confirmation studies. Quality of life and women-related toxicity of treatments in young girls, adults, and elders are still an orphan area of investigation.

Impact of Platelet Counts, Surgical Methods, and Preoperative Platelet Transfusion on the Outcome of Splenectomy for Immune Thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Splenectomy is an important and potentially curative treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has replaced open splenectomy (OS) as the standard approach. The prognostic role of platelet count and the clinical indication of preoperative platelet transfusion are not entirely clear.

METHODS

We designed a study to explore the prognostic impact of surgical methods, platelet count, and platelet transfusion in a large, single-institute, long-term cohort of ITP patients.

RESULT

In 118 ITP patients, there was no difference between OS and LS in response and surgical complications. The overall response rate was 77% and the complete response (CR) rate was 70%. Patients with a CR had a trend towards a higher baseline platelet count. A stable platelet count 14-28 days after splenectomy was associated with a sustained long-term response. Patients requiring preoperative platelet transfusion had a lower preoperative platelet count and were more likely to need postoperative transfusion of red blood cells and platelets. They also had a lower postoperative platelet count than the nontransfusion group. Relapse-free survival did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline and postoperative platelet counts are apparently associated with the treatment response to splenectomy but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Preoperative platelet transfusion did not overcome the disadvantage of thrombocytopenia and was not recommended when other preparative measures are available.

Treating ITP: What are the options in the era of new guidelines and new drugs?

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. Treating ITP may be challenging since different treatment modalities are available. While choosing the suitable option for every patient, a physician should take into account both patient's medical characteristics and wishes. The first line treatment options include: corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins and intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin. Second line treatment options comprise medical (thrombopoietin receptor agonists, rituximab, fostamatinib, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin A, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, danazol, dapsone, vinca-alcaloids) and surgical (splenectomy) approach. However, there are some treatment gaps which remain uncovered with existing treatment modalities. Therefore, development of novel therapeutic strategies is required. The aim of this review is to provide an illustrative overview of novel treatments for adult ITP.

Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia

Over the last decade, there have been numerous developments and changes in treatment practices for the management of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This article is an update of the International Consensus Report published in 2010. A critical review was performed to identify all relevant articles published between 2009 and 2018. An expert panel screened, reviewed, and graded the studies and formulated the updated consensus recommendations based on the new data. The final document provides consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and management of ITP in adults, during pregnancy, and in children, as well as quality-of-life considerations.

Sequence of Splenectomy and Rituximab for the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia: Does It Matter?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the sequence of treatment with rituximab and/or splenectomy on time to relapse for patients with steroid-refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 18 years or older with steroid-refractory immune thrombocytopenia who underwent treatment with splenectomy or rituximab from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2015, at Mayo Clinic. Evaluation included freedom from relapse (FFR) and response rates after treatment with rituximab or splenectomy as single or sequential interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 218 eligible patients with ITP who were treated according to standard of care were included in this analysis. Patients failing steroids treated with splenectomy had a higher 5-year FFR than did those treated with rituximab (67.4% vs 19.2%; P<.001, propensity-score matched). Patients who failed splenectomy and were then treated with rituximab had a 2-year FFR similar to that of patients who failed rituximab and were then treated with splenectomy (73.4% vs 59.9%; P=.52). Patients treated with rituximab after splenectomy had a longer 2-year FFR than did patients treated with rituximab as a second-line treatment (73.4% vs 29.0%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with ITP that relapse after treatment with steroids, splenectomy provides longer FFR than rituximab as a second-line therapy. Among patients who fail second-line treatment with splenectomy or rituximab, those who end up receiving sequential splenectomy-rituximab or rituximab-splenectomy therapy seem to derive similar benefit in the long term. Patients who received rituximab after splenectomy seem to derive superior benefit than do those who are treated with rituximab with an intact spleen.

Immune Thrombocytopenia: Are We Stuck in the Mud or Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?

The differences in diagnosis and management between immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and leukemia are striking. Leukemia diagnosis and management have evolved substantially over the past 30 years and are now relatively precise. The tendency for leukemic cells to be the overwhelming majority of circulating and/or bone marrow cells certainly continues to facilitate developments, as does improved molecular assessment. Furthermore, randomized controlled clinical trials of competing regimens in well-defined populations have advanced treatment as well. Currently, ITP diagnosis and management depend very much on the experience and preferences of the hematologist. There are no unequivocally useful molecular tests, no agreement on which testing needs to be performed, and no consensus on treatment. Future studies using advanced techniques would ideally change this over time but, thus far, progress in ITP has been slow. However, the increasing ability to do single-cell DNA and RNA studies and flow cytometric dissection of small populations of cells could radically change the approach to ITP if critical distinctions were uncovered.

Laparoscopic intrapancreatic accessory splenectomy: A case report of recurrent immune thrombocytopenia in a 33 years old male patient after 6 years of splenectomy

•

Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen (IPAS) is a rare embryological benign abnormality.

•

(IPAS) should be considered in patients with recurrent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

•

Although IPAS is a challenging diagnosis, it can be detected by the recent advancement of medical imaging.

Introduction

Intra-pancreatic Accessory Spleen (IPAS) is a rare benign abnormality of splenic embryology that should be considered in any patient with recurrence of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The case demonstrates that remission could be achieved if an IPAS is correctly identified and safely removed.

Case presentation

We report a 33-years-old male patient who presented with chronic ITP relapsed 3 years post initial splenectomy. The patient presented with severe thrombocytopenia requiring steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

Discussion

IPAS can be identified using enhanced CT scan along with Tc-99 m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. Our patient underwent CT scan of abdomen and pelvis and was found to have an IPAS originating from the tail of the pancreas which was subsequently removed laparoscopically. The patient was then tapered off steroids and was followed up regularly and found to have acceptable platelet levels and no symptoms for 30 months post-surgery.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of IPAS can be non-invasively made by an experienced radiologist with the recent advancement of medical imaging. Recognizing IPAS as a possible cause of ITP recurrence, and using minimally invasive approach can be performed safely and lead satisfactory outcomes.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists: ten years later

The two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), eltrombopag and romiplostim, were licensed in the US for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 2008 and, since then, their use has progressively increased around the world; they are currently used in more than 100 countries. The six largest randomized controlled trials conducted in ITP have used one of these two agents. All studies have demonstrated a platelet response rate between 50-90%, depending on the criteria used, with good safety and tolerability. TPO-RA were shown to be effective in reducing bleeding and the need for concomitant or rescue medication. Many other investigations of their mechanism of effect, prospective and retrospective trials, and studies focusing on toxicity have been performed widening our knowledge of these two agents. Initial concerns on issues such as myelofibrosis have not been confirmed. Only a small number of patients develop moderate-severe reticulin fibrosis and/or collagen fibrosis; however, these are usually reversed after discontinuation of TPO-RA. Studies indicate, however, that TPO-RA may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. Both TPO-RA are currently approved in patients with chronic ITP aged >1-year who are refractory to at least one other treatment. Eltrombopag has acquired two additional indications: severe aplastic anemia refractory to first-line treatment and hepatitis C patients undergoing treatment with interferon-ribavirin. Despite these wide-ranging studies, important questions still need to be answered. This summary review on TPO-RA will summarize what is known regarding efficacy in ITP, evaluate safety concerns in more depth, and focus on the questions that remain.

Long-term fostamatinib treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia during the phase 3 clinical trial program

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies demonstrated responses (≥50 000/μL) to fostamatinib in adults with long-standing immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The long-term safety and efficacy of fostamatinib were evaluated in a follow-on, open-label extension (OLE) study. Patients received double-blind fostamatinib in the randomized trials, and responders continued the same dose, 100 to 150 mg BID, in the OLE study. Nonresponders received 100 mg BID for 4 weeks and could escalate to 150 mg BID at week 4. Endpoints included stable response, platelet count ≥50 000/μL at 4/6 biweekly (randomized trials) or 2/3 monthly visits (OLE), and overall response, ≥1 platelet count ≥50 000/μL during weeks 1 to 12. A total of 146 patients received fostamatinib including 123 in the OLE study. Median treatment duration was 6.7 months. Baseline median ITP duration was 8 years and median platelet count was 16 000/μL; prior treatments included thrombopoietic (TPO) agents (47%), splenectomy (35%), and rituximab (32%). Twenty-seven (18%) patients achieved a stable response with median duration of >28 months and a median platelet count of 89 000/μL. Sixty-four (44%) patients achieved an overall response (including stable responders) with a median platelet count of 63 000/μL and a median response duration of >28 months. Twenty-four of 71 (34%) patients who had failed TPO agents achieved overall responses to fostamatinib. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, epistaxis, and abnormal liver function tests. Most AEs were mild/moderate and resolved or were managed with dose reduction, dose interruption, and/or secondary medication. Almost half of the patients achieved an overall response, and most of these maintained their responses for >2 years. No new or increased frequency of AEs was seen at up to 31 months of treatment.

Romiplostim in adult patients with newly diagnosed or persistent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) for up to 1 year and in those with chronic ITP for more than 1 year: a subgroup analysis of integrated data from completed romiplostim studies

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for second-line use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but its effects in patients with ITP for ≤1 year are not well characterized. This analysis of pooled data from 9 studies included patients with ITP for ≤1 year (n = 311) or >1 year (n = 726) who failed first-line treatments and received romiplostim, placebo or standard of care. In subgroup analysis by ITP duration, patient incidences for platelet response at ≥75% of measurements were higher for romiplostim [ITP ≤1 year: 74% (204/277); ITP >1 year: 71% (450/634)] than for placebo/standard of care [ITP ≤1 year: 18% (6/34); ITP >1 year: 9% (8/92)]. Of patients with ≥9 months on study, 16% with ITP ≤1 year and 6% with ITP >1 year discontinued romiplostim and maintained platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /l for ≥6 months without ITP treatment (treatment-free remission). Independent of ITP duration, rates of serious adverse events and bleeding were lower with romiplostim than placebo/standard of care and thrombotic events occurred at similar rates. In this analysis, romiplostim and placebo/standard of care had similar safety profiles and romiplostim increased platelet counts in patients with either ITP ≤1 year or ITP >1 year, with more treatment-free remission in those with ITP ≤1 year.

Management of immune thrombocytopenia in elderly patients

Despite the improvement in understanding its pathogenesis and the introduction of novel treatment options, the management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) still remains challenging. Considering its increased incidence with aging and prolonged life-expectancy, ITP is often diagnosed in elderly patients, a subset that deserves some special precautions. Ensure the diagnosis is a crucial step, and carefully attention must be given in excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia, especially among older people that frequently suffer from many comorbidities. When it comes to treatment decision, it is worth keeping into account that the elderly have an increased risk of bleeding, thrombosis and infections, that they often require many concomitant therapies, including antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, and that treatment-related toxicities are often increased and sometimes more dangerous that the disease itself. There are not dedicated guidelines, and only few specific studies. Steroids with or without IVIG remain the first-line treatment. Splenectomy is less effective than in youngers and burdened by an increased thrombotic and infectious risk. Rituximab is a good option in non-immunocompromised patients, but long-term remissions are few. Eltrombopag and romiplostim have a good safety and efficacy profile, and have become a prominent drug in this subset, even if they are associated with a possible increased risk of thrombosis, and long-term toxicity is unknown. Other drugs, such as dapsone and danazol, have a well-known efficacy and safety profile, and still represent a valid option among elderly patients.