Tisotumab vedotin in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer: results from the innovaTV 206 study

Cost-effectiveness of tisotumab vedotin as a second- or third-line therapy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tisotumab vedotin to treat recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in second- or third-line from the U.S. payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model with three-state was employed to simulate recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients who were administered either tisotumab vedotin or investigator's choice of chemotherapy based on the phase III, open-labeled innovaTV 301 randomized clinical trial. The data on cost and health preferences were collected from the literature.

RESULTS

Tisotumab vedotin generated an additional 0.25 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared to chemotherapy, but at an additional cost of $206,779. This results in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $839,107.88 per QALY. The results of the univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that cost of tisotumab vedotin, utility of progressive disease and progression-free survival had the greatest impacts on the outcomes. Probability sensitivity analysis showed that tisotumab vedotin had a 0% chance of being considered cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

Tisotumab vedotin was unlikely cost-effective compared to chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY from the perspective of a U.S. payer. Lowering the prices of tisotumab vedotin could potentially enhance its cost-effectiveness.

Insights into uveitis from Brentuximab vedotin in refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case report and brief review

This case report describes a 16-year-old patient with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed bilateral anterior and intermediate uveitis as an adverse reaction to Brentuximab vedotin (BV). This is a rare case of an ocular adverse reaction potentially related to BV, with symptoms like blurred vision, decreased visual acuity, photophobia, and redness. Potential mechanisms include BV targeting CD30+ T cells in the uveal tissue or an immune response triggered by the microtubule-disrupting agent MMAE within BV. This highlights the need for vigilant monitoring of ocular adverse events in BV-treated patients and further research into their mechanisms and management.

Exploring the Role of Target Expression in Treatment Efficacy of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Solid Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) offer a promising path for cancer therapy, leveraging the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and the cytotoxicity of linked drugs. The success of ADCs hinges on precise targeting of cancer cells based on protein expression levels. This review explores the relationship between target protein expression and ADC efficacy in solid tumours, focusing on results of clinical trials conducted between January 2019 and May 2023.

RECENT FINDINGS

We hereby highlight approved ADCs, revealing their effectiveness even in low-expressing target populations. Assessing target expression poses challenges, owing to variations in scoring systems and biopsy types. Emerging methods, like digital image analysis, aim to standardize assessment. The complexity of ADC pharmacokinetics, tumour dynamics, and off-target effects emphasises the need for a balanced approach. This review underscores the importance of understanding target protein dynamics and promoting standardized evaluation methods in shaping the future of ADC-based cancer therapies.

Ocular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates for cancer: evidence and management strategies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a fast-growing class of cancer drugs designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic payloads through antibody binding to cancer cells with high expression of the target antigen, thus reducing systemic exposure and minimizing off-target effects. However, ADCs are associated with various ocular adverse events (AEs) that may impact treatment administration and patient outcomes. In this review, we provide a summary of ocular AEs associated with approved and investigational ADCs, recommendations for the mitigation and management of ocular AEs, current guidelines and expert opinions, and recommendations for clinical practice. A literature search was performed, using PubMed and Google Scholar, for English-language articles published between January 1985 and January 2023 to identify studies reporting ocular AEs associated with ADC use. Search terms included generic and investigational names of all identified ADCs, and further searches were performed to identify strategies for managing ADC-associated ocular AEs. ADC-associated ocular AEs include symptoms such as blurred vision and foreign-body sensation and signs such as corneal fluorescein staining, corneal pseudomicrocysts, and conjunctivitis. Reported management strategies include ADC dose modification (eg, dose delay or reduction), cool compresses, artificial tears, topical vasoconstrictors, and topical steroids. Although ADC dose modification appears to be beneficial, the preventive and/or therapeutic benefits of the remaining interventions are unclear. Although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood, most ADC-associated ocular AEs are reversible with dose delay or dose reduction. Management of ocular AEs requires a multidisciplinary approach to minimize treatment discontinuation and optimize clinical outcomes.

Antibody-drug conjugates: A review of cutaneous adverse effects

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of anticancer agents that combine targeting antibodies with potent cytotoxic agents. Their molecular configuration allows for increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse-effect profiles compared to monoclonal antibodies or cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. ADCs cause off-target toxicities through several mechanisms, including premature deconjugation of the cytotoxic agent in the serum and the presence of the targeted antigen on normal tissues. Given cutaneous adverse events comprise 31.3% of all-grade adverse events in clinical trials involving ADCs, dermatologists are increasingly called upon to manage the cutaneous toxicities caused by these drugs. In this review, we summarize known cutaneous toxicities of the ADCs that have been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration to date. Dermatologists can play a key role in recognizing cutaneous reactions associated with ADCs, contributing to guidelines for their management, and aiding during clinical trials to generate detailed morphologic and histopathologic descriptions of cutaneous toxicities caused by ADCs.

Ocular toxicities associated with antibody drug conjugates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the structure, mechanism of action, and pathophysiology of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) used to treat gynecological malignancies associated with ocular adverse effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research shows tisotumab vedotin causes ocular toxicity localized to the conjunctiva, with common adverse effects being conjunctivitis, dry eye, blepharitis, and keratitis. Toxicity is likely due to targeting tissue factor (TF) in the conjunctiva, leading to direct delivery of the cytotoxic payload resulting in apoptosis and bystander killing. Mirvetuximab soravtansine causes blurred vision, keratitis, or dry eye with toxicity often localized in the cornea. Off-target inflammation appears to cause ocular adverse effects, with nonreceptor mediated macropinocytosis by corneal stem cells.

SUMMARY

Collaboration between oncologists and ophthalmologists with adherence to mitigation protocols can decrease the risk of ocular adverse events.

A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers

While strategies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy have become the first-line standard therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, acquired resistance is still inevitable in most cases. The introduction of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) provides a novel alternative. ADCs are a new class of anticancer drugs comprising the coupling of antitumor mAbs with cytotoxic drugs. Compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, ADCs have the advantages of good tolerance, accurate target recognition, and small effects on noncancerous cells. ADCs occupy an increasingly important position in the therapeutic field. Currently, there are 13 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‒approved ADCs and more than 100 ADC drugs at different stages of clinical trials. This review briefly describes the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved ADCs, and discusses the related problems and challenges to provide a reference for clinical work.

First-in-Class Humanized Antibody against Alternatively Spliced Tissue Factor Augments Anti-Metastatic Efficacy of Chemotherapy in a Preclinical Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Alternatively spliced tissue factor (asTF) promotes the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by activating β1-integrins on PDAC cell surfaces. hRabMab1, a first-in-class humanized inhibitory anti-asTF antibody we recently developed, can suppress PDAC primary tumor growth as a single agent. Whether hRabMab1 has the potential to suppress metastases in PDAC is unknown. Following in vivo screening of three asTF-proficient human PDAC cell lines, we chose to make use of KRAS G12V-mutant human PDAC cell line PaCa-44, which yields aggressive primary orthotopic tumors with spontaneous spread to PDAC-relevant anatomical sites, along with concomitant severe leukocytosis. The experimental design featured orthotopic tumors formed by luciferase labeled PaCa-44 cells; administration of hRabMab1 alone or in combination with gemcitabine/paclitaxel (gem/PTX); and the assessment of the treatment outcomes on the primary tumor tissue as well as systemic spread. When administered alone, hRabMab1 exhibited poor penetration of tumor tissue; however, hRabMab1 was abundant in tumor tissue when co-administered with gem/PTX, which resulted in a significant decrease in tumor cell proliferation; leukocyte infiltration; and neovascularization. Gem/PTX alone reduced primary tumor volume, but not metastatic spread; only the combination of hRabMab1 and gem/PTX significantly reduced metastatic spread. RNA-seq analysis of primary tumors showed that the addition of hRabMab1 to gem/PTX enhanced the downregulation of tubulin binding and microtubule motor activity. In the liver, hRabMab1 reduced liver metastasis as a single agent. Only the combination of hRabMab1 and gem/PTX eliminated tumor cell-induced leukocytosis. We here demonstrate for the first time that hRabMab1 may help suppress metastasis in PDAC. hRabMab1's ability to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy is significant and warrants further investigation.

Tisotumab Vedotin in Combination With Carboplatin, Pembrolizumab, or Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Results From the innovaTV 205/GOG-3024/ENGOT-cx8 Study

PURPOSE

Tissue factor is highly expressed in cervical carcinoma and can be targeted by tisotumab vedotin (TV), an antibody-drug conjugate. This phase Ib/II study evaluated TV in combination with bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or carboplatin for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC).

METHODS

This open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03786081) included dose-escalation arms that assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and identified the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of TV in combination with bevacizumab (arm A), pembrolizumab (arm B), or carboplatin (arm C). The dose-expansion arms evaluated TV antitumor activity and safety at RP2D in combination with carboplatin as first-line (1L) treatment (arm D) or with pembrolizumab as 1L (arm E) or second-/third-line (2L/3L) treatment (arm F). The primary end point of dose expansion was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled. In dose escalation (n = 41), no DLTs were observed; the RP2D was TV 2 mg/kg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 once every 3 weeks. In dose expansion (n = 101), the ORR was 54.5% (n/N, 18/33; 95% CI, 36.4 to 71.9) with 1L TV + carboplatin (arm D), 40.6% (n/N, 13/32; 95% CI, 23.7 to 59.4) with 1L TV + pembrolizumab (arm E), and 35.3% (12/34; 19.7 to 53.5) with 2L/3L TV + pembrolizumab (arm F). The median duration of response was 8.6 months, not reached, and 14.1 months, in arms D, E, and F, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (≥15%) were anemia, diarrhea, nausea, and thrombocytopenia in arm D and anemia in arm F (none ≥15%, arm E).

CONCLUSION

TV in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin, or pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging antitumor activity in treatment-naive and previously treated r/mCC.

The ever-expanding landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in solid tumors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The advent of targeted therapies signaled novel avenues for more optimal oncological outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have risen as a cornerstone of the ever-expanding targeted therapy era. The purpose of this systematic review is to delineate the rapidly evolving clinical landscape of ADCs for solid tumors.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for phase II and III clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were the objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 92 clinical trials (76 phase II and 16 phase III) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ADCs for a plethora of solid tumors. Out of the 30 investigated ADCs, 8 have received approval by regulatory organizations for solid tumors. Currently, 52 phase III clinical trials for ADCs are ongoing.

CONCLUSION

ADCs have shown promising results for several solid tumors and various cancer settings.

Adverse events of antibody-drug conjugates on the ocular surface in cancer therapy

Antibody-drug conjugates consist of a monoclonal antibody attached to a cytotoxic therapeutic molecule by a connector. This association allows a highly specific therapy, which increases their effectiveness and decreases their potential toxicity. This new therapy emerged approximately 20 years ago; since then, numerous combinations have appeared in the field of treatment-related neoplasms as an alternative for patients who do not achieve good results with conventional treatment options. Adverse effects of these drugs on the ocular surface are frequent and varied. Their prevalence ranges from 20 to 90% depending on the drug and administration condition, probably due to multiple receptor-mediated factors or mechanisms not mediated by specific receptors, such as macropinocytosis. These adverse events can greatly limit patients' comfort; thus, the objectives of this article were, in the first place, to compile the information currently available on different types of adverse effects of antibody-drug conjugates on the ocular surface, including pathophysiology, prevalence, and treatment, and in second place, to contribute to the correct identification and management of these events, which will result in a lower rate of cessation of treatment, which is necessary for the survival of candidate patients.

Advances in the Management of Recurrent Cervical Cancer: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to give an insight into the currently available options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cervical cancer (CC), along with the main future, potentially practice-changing perspectives in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improvements in terms of tumor responses were observed with the use of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) in the previously treated CC population, followed by emerging striking data in terms of both antitumor activity and survival rates with the addition of the ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in the first-line setting. Furthermore, the CC treatment landscape took another step forward in 2021 with the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the second-line setting, a highly targeted therapeutic strategy, which demonstrated to be a valid alternative option in the recurrent setting. R/M CC is a hard-to-treat disease. However, after several years of limited systemic therapeutic options for the recurrent setting, the year 2018 marked a turning point for R/M CC patients, with the introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm, which completely reshaped the therapeutic armamentarium of the disease. Besides, another valuable treatment option represented by ADCs demonstrated its efficacy in the recurrent setting, thus further widening the treatment landscape for those patients. Yet, the introduction of immunotherapy in the upfront setting brought along new issues to be addressed such as the emerging ICIs resistance and the following need for alternative options in the post-ICIs setting. Several innovative therapeutic strategies are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials, with the aim of overcoming ICIs resistance with the addition of immunomodulatory agents or bypassing the ICIs resistance with novel alternative drugs.

Peripheral neuropathy associated with monomethyl auristatin E-based antibody-drug conjugates

Since the successful approval of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a pivotal category of targeted therapies for cancer. Among these ADCs, the use of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) as a payload is prevalent in the development of ADC drugs, which has significantly improved overall therapeutic efficacy against various malignancies. However, increasing clinical observations have raised concerns regarding the potential nervous system toxicity associated with MMAE-based ADCs. Specifically, a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy has been reported in ADCs incorporating MMAE as payloads. Considering the increasing global use of MMAE-based ADCs, it is imperative to provide an inclusive overview of diagnostic and management strategies for this adverse event. In this review, we examine current information and what future research directions are required to better understand and manage this type of clinical challenge.

Investigational drugs for recurrent or primary advanced metastatic cervical cancer: what is in the clinical development pipeline?

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent or primary advanced metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC) has a poor prognosis with a 5-year-survival rate of 16.5%, demanding novel and improved therapies for the treatment of these patients. The first-line standard of care for R/M CC now benefits from the addition of the immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, to platinum-based chemotherapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Additionally, new options for second-line treatment have become available in recent years.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we review current investigational drugs and discuss their relative targets, efficacies, and potential within the R/M CC treatment landscape. This review will focus on recently published data and key ongoing clinical trials in patients with R/M CC, covering multiple modes of action, including immunotherapies, antibody-drug conjugates, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We searched clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing trials and pubmed.ncbi.nih.gov for recently published trial data, as well as recent years' proceedings from the annual conferences of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS).

EXPERT OPINION

Therapeutics currently attracting attention include novel immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapeutic vaccinations, antibody-drug conjugates, such as tisotumab vedotin, tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting HER2, and multitarget synergistic combinations.

Tisotumab vedotin in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an antibody-drug conjugate used for the treatment of adult patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. TV comprised of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent inhibitor of cell division. The innovaTV-201 and innovaTV-204/GO30xx/ENGOT-cx6 trials showed that TV has clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in pretreated patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. The innovaTV-204 trial showed that TV monotherapy resulted in an objective response rate of 24% (including 7% and 17% complete and partial responses, respectively). In September 2021, the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to TV for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. The ongoing randomized, open-label Phase 3 innovaTV-301/ENGOTcx12/GOG-30xx trial will assess the effect of TV in pre-treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Meanwhile, the phase 1b/2 trial ENGOT Cx8/GOG 3024/innovaTV-205 is testing other possible combination between TV and other treatments. TV is characterized by a promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile. Moreover, the preliminary data highlighted the feasibility of using TV in first line. In the first line, TV in combination with carboplatin or pembrolizumab provides an ORR of 55% and 41%, respectively Although the effect of adding TV to the current standard of care in first-line (carboplatin plus pembrolizumab) is still under evaluation, we expected to observe impressive results in the cervical cancer population.

A Review of Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tisotumab vedotin-tftv (TV), a first-in-class vectorized anti-tissue factor (TF) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and PubMed was conducted using the terms tisotumab vedotin AND cervical cancer from inception to June 30, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All applicable publications, package inserts, meeting abstracts, and clinical trials involving TV in the treatment of cervical cancer were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

TV is a fully human TF-specific monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E, which serves as a highly potent cytotoxic payload. In the pivotal phase II InnovaTV 204 clinical trial, TV demonstrated an objective response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-33%). The mean duration of response was 8.3 months. Common toxicities included abdominal pain, alopecia, conjunctivitis, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, dry eye, epistaxis, nausea/vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy. Unique and/or serious adverse events warranting careful monitoring include ocular complications, hemorrhaging, peripheral neuropathies, fetal-embryo toxicity, pneumonitis, and immunogenicity.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer remains a high-risk disease with limited treatment options. Using ADCs to target tumors with aberrant expression of TF appears to be a viable treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

TV is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved TF-directed ADC. With a manageable safety profile and promising anticancer activity, TV warrants consideration as a novel targeted agent for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Further studies are required to determine the optimal place in therapy for TV.