Food-induced anaphylaxis in infancy compared to preschool age: A retrospective analysis

Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management

Food allergies pose significant challenges including the risk for severe allergic reactions. This review article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the historic standard management approach-avoidance and carrying epinephrine in case of accidental ingestion-and argues, based on accumulating evidence, that oral immunotherapy (OIT) should play a key role in preschool food allergy management. Firstly, our review will highlight pitfalls with the 'wait-and-see' approach to natural resolution of food allergies, with recent data pointing to lower resolution than previously thought. For those who do not outgrow their allergies, waiting until school age to offer OIT means missing the window of opportunity where OIT is safest, and prolongs unnecessary dietary restrictions. For those who do outgrow their allergies, research indicates they may not reintroduce the food due to fear and aversion and can become re-sensitised, putting them at risk of severe reactions. Secondly, the risks associated with allergen avoidance are higher than previously believed. Allergen avoidance is imperfect and carries an increased risk of severe reactions when compared with the risk of severe reactions while on OIT, particularly in preschoolers. Although an allergic reaction can be stressful, it is preferable to have this occur during OIT where caregivers are vigilant following a scheduled dose, rather than having this occur at a potentially unexpected time following an accidental exposure. Lastly, there is a growing body of evidence supporting favourable safety and effectiveness of OIT in preschoolers, and preliminary data suggesting higher likelihood of remission in infants. OIT has the potential to significantly improve quality of life, and future research is needed to answer this important question in preschoolers. In summary, while ongoing research will further clarify cost-effectiveness, long-term adherence and psychosocial impacts of OIT, this review suggests that OIT should play a key role in preschool food allergy management.

Discrepancies in anaphylaxis protocols across emergency medical services in the United States: Opportunities for improvement

BACKGROUND

Across the United States, there are significant inconsistencies in the protocols used by emergency medical services (EMS) in the prehospital treatment of anaphylaxis. These discrepancies include variations in the definition of anaphylaxis and treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To identify gaps in the recognition of anaphylaxis and to provide areas for improvement in prehospital management through an analysis of state-wide anaphylaxis protocols.

METHODS

States with mandatory or model state-wide protocols were included (total of 30). Each allergic reaction and/or anaphylaxis protocol was reviewed-emphasis was placed on the definitions used to identify reactions and treatment algorithms.

RESULTS

Of the 30 states, only 50% (15) included gastrointestinal symptoms in the definition of anaphylaxis and only 40% (12) included neurologic manifestations. In addition, 47% (14) used a 2-organ system definition. For anaphylactic reactions, 100% (30) of the protocols recommended diphenhydramine and epinephrine. However, 90% (27) recommended albuterol, if respiratory symptoms were present, and 60% (18) recommended steroids. Epinephrine was the first-line recommendation for anaphylaxis in 97% (29) of the protocols. Overall, 25 states (83%) allowed epinephrine autoinjectors and 17 (57%) provided autoinjectors.

CONCLUSION

Many EMS anaphylaxis protocols are incomplete and/or outdated. Many protocols do not consider gastrointestinal or neurologic manifestations. In addition, many contain outdated recommendations, including the use of steroids and first-generation antihistamines. Despite the convenience of epinephrine autoinjectors, many protocols do not permit or provide them. Given the frequency of EMS activation for allergic reactions, our communities would benefit from standardized protocols using current evidence-based guidelines for the management of anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis in infancy: An area that needs to be highlighted

Anaphylaxis, the most severe end of the spectrum of allergic reactions, has shown increasing incidence globally over recent years. This hypersensitivity reaction can occur at any age, including infancy. Recent data, although scarce, show that anaphylaxis is increasingly reported in infancy, with food identified as the leading cause of anaphylaxis cases in this age group. Infants constitute a unique subgroup with specific challenges regarding diagnosis of anaphylaxis due to a variety of factors, such as lack of age-specific diagnostic criteria, inability of infants to describe their symptoms, and the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations that may be mistaken as normal findings. Additionally, there are special issues in reference to the treatment of anaphylaxis during infancy, such as the limited availability of weight-appropriate epinephrine autoinjectors for infants weighing <15 kg. In this study, we review the current literature regarding specific characteristics of anaphylaxis in infants as well as unique challenges in terms of diagnosis, acute treatment, and long-term management of this medical emergency in this vulnerable age group.

Milk-induced anaphylaxis among children presenting to Canadian emergency departments

BACKGROUND

Cow's milk is one of the most common and burdensome allergens in pediatrics, and it can induce severe anaphylactic reactions in children. However, data on cow's milk-induced anaphylaxis are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology of pediatric cow's milk-induced anaphylaxis and to determine risk factors for repeat emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration.

METHODS

Between April 2011 and May 2023, data were collected on children with anaphylaxis presenting to 10 Canadian EDs. A standardized form documenting symptoms, triggers, treatment, and outcome was used. Multivariate logistic regression was used.

RESULTS

Of 3118 anaphylactic reactions, 319 milk-induced anaphylaxis cases were identified (10%). In the prehospital setting, 54% of patients with milk-induced anaphylaxis received intramuscular epinephrine. In those with milk-induced anaphylaxis, receiving epinephrine before presenting to the ED was associated with a reduced risk of requiring 2 or more epinephrine doses in the ED (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.90-0.99]). Children younger than 5 years of age were more likely to experience a mild reaction compared with that in older children, who experienced a moderate reaction more often (P < .0001). Compared with other forms of food-induced anaphylaxis, children presenting with milk-induced anaphylaxis were younger; a greater proportion experienced wheezing and vomiting, and less experienced angioedema.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital epinephrine in pediatric milk-induced anaphylaxis is underused; however, it may decrease risk of requiring 2 ED epinephrine doses. Milk-induced anaphylaxis in children younger than 5 years of age may be less severe than in older children. Wheezing and vomiting are more prevalent in milk-induced anaphylaxis compared with that of other foods.

Real-World Sensitization and Tolerance Pattern to Seafood in Fish-Allergic Individuals

BACKGROUND

Seafood is a common cause of food allergy and anaphylaxis, but there are limited published real-world data describing the clinical presentation of fish and shellfish allergies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics, immunological profile, and tolerance pattern to fish, crustaceans, and mollusks in fish-allergic individuals.

METHODS

Patients presenting with IgE-mediated fish allergy between 2016 and 2021 were recruited. A comprehensive sensitization profile including specific IgE and skin prick test to various fish and shellfish species and a detailed clinical history including individuals' recent seafood consumption were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 249 fish-allergic individuals (aged 4.2 ± 5.8 years) were recruited from 6 allergy clinics in Hong Kong, and they had experienced their fish-allergic reaction 2.2 ± 3.4 years before enrollment. Seventy-five subjects (30%) reacted to either grass carp, salmon, grouper, or cod in oral food challenges. We identified an IgE sensitization gradient that corresponded to the level of β-parvalbumin in fish. In total, 40% of fish-allergic individuals reported tolerance to 1 or more types of fish, more commonly to fish with a lower β-parvalbumin level such as tuna and salmon, compared with β-parvalbumin-rich fish such as catfish and grass carp. Despite fish and shellfish cosensitization, 41% of individuals reported tolerance to crustaceans, mollusks, or both, whereas shellfish avoidance occurred in half of the fish-allergic individuals, of whom 33% lacked shellfish sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Fish allergy commonly presents in early childhood. A considerable proportion of fish-allergic patients are selectively tolerant to certain fish, typically those with lower levels of β-parvalbumin. There is an unmet need to promote precision medicine for seafood allergies.

Anaphylaxis: A 2023 practice parameter update

This practice parameter update focuses on 7 areas in which there are new evidence and new recommendations. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis have been revised, and patterns of anaphylaxis are defined. Measurement of serum tryptase is important for diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify underlying mast cell disorders. In infants and toddlers, age-specific symptoms may differ from older children and adults, patient age is not correlated with reaction severity, and anaphylaxis is unlikely to be the initial reaction to an allergen on first exposure. Different community settings for anaphylaxis require specific measures for prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis. Optimal prescribing and use of epinephrine autoinjector devices require specific counseling and training of patients and caregivers, including when and how to administer the epinephrine autoinjector and whether and when to call 911. If epinephrine is used promptly, immediate activation of emergency medical services may not be required if the patient experiences a prompt, complete, and durable response. For most medical indications, the risk of stopping or changing beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication may exceed the risk of more severe anaphylaxis if the medication is continued, especially in patients with insect sting anaphylaxis. Evaluation for mastocytosis, including a bone marrow biopsy, should be considered for adult patients with severe insect sting anaphylaxis or recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis. After perioperative anaphylaxis, repeat anesthesia may proceed in the context of shared decision-making and based on the history and results of diagnostic evaluation with skin tests or in vitro tests when available, and supervised challenge when necessary.

Epidemiology of anaphylaxis: is the trend still going up?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand the current global scale of anaphylaxis and identify possible strategies to increase the accuracy of epidemiological data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anaphylaxis mortality and morbidity statistics may gain new perspectives with the global implementation of the ICD-11. Improving the quality of epidemiological data related to anaphylaxis should clarify some areas of uncertainty about risk factors, leading to better targeting of strategies to protect those patients at risk, and support decision-making to facilitate health care planning and implementation of public health measures to prevent anaphylaxis.

SUMMARY

The true rate of anaphylaxis is unknown due to a number of factors, such as misdiagnosis, miscoding and undernotification. Moreover, there is lack of information about anaphylaxis epidemiology in many countries. Difficulties on collecting accurate and comparable data should be acknowledged and anaphylaxis data can vary widely. Currently, most robust data are derived from hospitalization datasets and national mortality databases. Anaphylaxis accounts for up to 0.26% of overall hospital admissions. It is suggested that the number of hospital admissions for anaphylaxis is increasing in many countries, both with respect to all-causes of anaphylaxis and by trigger, but the mortality rate remains low. However, there are still great challenges in capturing quality anaphylaxis mortality and morbidity statistics. Better understanding of anaphylaxis trends should clarify some areas of uncertainty about risk factors and prospect effective prevention strategies. As the knowledge derived from populations is key information for more realistic decision-making, the construction of the new section addressed to anaphylaxis in the ICD-11 will allow the collection of more accurate epidemiological data to support high quality management of patients, and to better facilitate health care planning to implement public health measures, reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to anaphylaxis.

Allergenicity of partially hydrolyzed whey and casein formulas evaluated by ImmunoCAP inhibition assay and basophil activation test

Background

When exclusive breastfeeding is not possible, partially hydrolyzed formula (PHF) is often used as a starter formula for infants. Some children develop allergic symptoms, including anaphylaxis, after the first intake of cow protein. Therefore, the tolerability of PHF in infants with cow's milk allergy (CMA) is important information. Partially hydrolyzed whey formula (PHWF) is well characterized, but those containing both whey and casein are also available. We evaluated the characteristics of two whey and casein PHFs, PHF1 and PHF2, in vitro and ex vivo, and compared them with a PHWF, PHWF1.

Methods

Residual antigenicity of β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) and casein in the formulas was measured using ELISA. The molecular weight profile was determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography. IgE reactivity and allergenic activity of the formulas were evaluated by ImmunoCAP inhibition assay and by basophil activation test using blood from patients with CMA, respectively.

Results

All the participants (n = 10) had casein-specific IgE. The antigenicity of β-LG in PHF1 was similar to that in PHWF1, but it was slightly higher than that in PHWF1 for casein. PHF1 had a higher IgE reactivity than PHWF1. However, PHF1 and PHWF1 had a similar ability to activate basophils. PHF2 had lower antigenicity of casein and β-LG, IgE reactivity and basophil activation than PHWF1.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the tolerability of PHF1 and PHF2 in patients with CMA is similar to and higher than that of PHWF1, respectively, and that the degree of IgE binding to PHFs does not necessarily correspond to basophil activation.

Prehospital epinephrine administration for treating anaphylaxis among those with comorbid asthma: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Prompt and correct use of epinephrine for treating anaphylaxis is considered essential in reducing the risk of fatal outcomes from anaphylaxis. Nevertheless, prehospital use of epinephrine remains low. Although asthma is a common comorbidity in individuals experiencing severe allergic reactions, little attention has been given to whether asthma functions as a predictor of prehospital epinephrine administration.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a scoping review of the extant literature on using epinephrine to manage anaphylaxis in patients with comorbid asthma before presenting to the emergency department.

METHODS

Per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review guidelines, peer-reviewed articles published in English or French were searched for within the Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Embase databases between June 11 and June 18, 2021. We excluded studies that did not contain primary data.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1022 articles that were screened at the title and abstract level by 2 independent reviewers. Of these, 90 (8.8%) advanced to full-text review, and ultimately, 8 studies (0.8% of all articles; 8.9% of full-text articles) were included in the analysis. Overall, the association between comorbid asthma and epinephrine use in the prehospital setting for managing anaphylaxis was inconsistently reported in the literature. Three studies reported a positive association, whereas 2 others suggested a link, but their results were no longer significant when controlling for other study variables. Three studies described no significant association.

CONCLUSION

Although asthma is frequently comorbid in individuals experiencing anaphylaxis, the association between comorbid asthma and prehospital epinephrine treatment rates remains an understudied area of patient care.

Different age groups present different clinics in anaphylaxis with children: one size does not fit all children

BACKGROUND

Childhood anaphylaxis presents with a heterogeneous clinic. Elicitors and epidemiologic factors associated with anaphylaxis differ with age, geographic location and lifestyle. This study aimed to determine the clinical features and age-specific patterns of childhood anaphylaxis in a single referral center in Turkey.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of anaphylaxis in children aged between 0 and 18 years of age, attending an allergy department in a children's hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 95 children diagnosed with anaphylaxis were analyzed. Among all, 35.8% of the first anaphylaxis episodes occurred ininfancy and 57.9% in preschool age. Foods were the most common culprits (57.9%) and followed by drugs (15.8%). Patients with foodinduced anaphylaxis were younger in age (p < 0.001). Food-related anaphylaxis was most common with cow's milk (36.4%) and followed by tree nuts (20%). Cow's milk played a significant role as a trigger in infancy, and tree nuts as a trigger in preschoolers and school-age children. Mucocutaneous manifestations were almost universally present (94.7%), followed by respiratory compromise (56.8%), with gastrointestinal (55.8%), cardiovascular (9.5%), and neurologic (4.2%) symptoms being less common. Respiratory and cardiovascular system-related symptoms were found more frequently in school-age children (p = 0.02 and p = 0.014, respectively). The severity of anaphylaxis was higher in school-age children (p = 0.015).

DISCUSSION

Findings reveal that children diagnosed with anaphylaxis differ in terms of etiological and clinical findings according to age groups. This difference shows the dynamically changing clinic of anaphylaxis over time and the importance of evaluating childhood anaphylaxis according to age groups.

Cow's milk and hen's egg anaphylaxis: A comprehensive data analysis from the European Anaphylaxis Registry

BACKGROUND

Cow's milk (CM) and hen's egg (HE) are leading triggers of anaphylaxis in early childhood. The aim of this study was to identify clinical phenotypes and therapeutic measures for CM anaphylaxis (CMA) compared to HE anaphylaxis (HEA) in children up to 12 years of age, based on a large pan-European dataset from the European Anaphylaxis Registry.

METHODS

Data from 2007 to 2020 on clinical phenotypes and treatment from 10 European countries, as well as Brazil, were analysed. The two-step cluster analysis was used to identify the most frequent phenotypes. For each trigger, three clusters were extracted based on sex, age, and existence of symptoms in four vitally important systems.

RESULTS

Altogether 284 children with CMA and 200 children with HEA were identified. They were characterised as male (69% vs. 64%), infants (65% vs. 61%), with a most frequent grade III of Ring&Messmer classification (62% vs. 64%), in CMA versus HEA, respectively. Respiratory symptoms occurred more often in CMA (91% vs. 83%, p = 0.010), especially in infants (89% vs. 79%, p = 0.008). Cardiovascular symptoms were less frequent in CMA (30% vs. 44%, p = 0.002), in both infants (33% vs. 46%, p = 0.027), and older children (25% vs. 42%, p = 0.021). The clusters extracted in the CMA group were characterised as: (1) mild dermal infants with severe GI (40%), 2. severe dermal (35%), 3. respiratory (25%). While in HEA group: 1. infants with severe GI and/or reduction of alertness (40%), (2) conjunctival (16%), (3) mild GI without conjunctivitis (44%). The severity of the reaction was independent from the amount of ingested allergen protein, regardless of trigger. The first-line adrenaline application differed between the countries (0%-92%, as well as the reasons for not administering adrenaline, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the similarity of their age, sex, and severity grade, the clinical profiles differed between the CMA and HEA children. Adrenaline was underused, and its administration was country dependent. Further studies are needed to assess to what extent the differences in the clinical profiles are related to matrix and/or absorption effects, and/or the allergen itself.

Impact of public health interventions for food allergy prevention on rates of infant anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Eleven percent of Australian infants have confirmed food allergy. We hypothesized earlier introduction may lead to higher rates of infant anaphylaxis, irrespective of whether the overall rate of food allergy in the population was ultimately reduced.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a public health campaign, targeting earlier introduction of allergenic foods, affected rates of infant anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from St John Ambulance (SJA) Western Australia and Western Australian emergency departments (ED) on infant (≤12 months) anaphylaxis over a 5-year period (July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2020). Adrenaline administration data were collected in the SJA dataset. Poisson regression was undertaken to assess trends in anaphylaxis over time. Segmented regression analysis was undertaken to assess differences in anaphylaxis rates before and after intervention.

RESULTS

The SJA and ED datasets included 172 and 294 events, respectively, coded as infant anaphylaxis. Rates of infant anaphylaxis increased over time for both SJA and ED datasets, with a 1-year increase rate ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.35; P value < .01) and 1.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.20; P = .01), respectively. Segmented regression indicated no significant difference in rates after intervention. Adrenaline was not coded as being administered in 109 of the 172 anaphylaxis events.

CONCLUSION

Rates of infant anaphylaxis increased over the 5-year reporting period; however, there was no clear increase related to the timing of the public health campaign implementation. Reported adrenaline use was suboptimal. Assessing rates of food allergy in all age groups is required to determine whether there has been an overall reduction in food allergy owing to the intervention.

Overview of registries for anaphylaxis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to describe the scope and operational features of anaphylaxis registries, and to assess their contribution to improving knowledge of anaphylaxis and care of patients who experience anaphylaxis by measuring their research output.

INTRODUCTION

Structured data collection and reporting systems, such as registries, are needed to better understand the burden of anaphylaxis and to protect the growing number of patients with severe allergy. There is a need to characterize current anaphylaxis registries to identify their value in anaphylaxis surveillance, management, and research. Information synthesized in this review will provide knowledge on benefits and gaps in current registries, which may inform the implementation and global standardization of future anaphylaxis reporting systems.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This scoping review considered literature describing registries worldwide that enroll patients who have experienced anaphylaxis. Published and gray literature sources were included if they described the scope and operational features of anaphylaxis registries.

METHODS

This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched for relevant articles. Identified keywords and index terms were adapted for searches of gray literature sources, using Google advanced search functions. Only full-text studies in English were considered for inclusion. Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening and those that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. The full text of potentially relevant articles were retrieved; full-text screening and data extraction were also conducted by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Tables and a narrative summary were used to describe and compare the scope and features (eg, inclusion criteria, patient demographics, clinical symptoms) of the identified anaphylaxis registries, and to outline their output to assess their contribution to research and clinical practice for anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 77 full-text publications and eight gray literature sources were used to extract data. The literature search identified 19 anaphylaxis registries, with sites in 28 countries including Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States, Korea, and Australia. The main purposes of the identified registries were to collect clinical data for research; provide clinical support tools to improve patient care; and operate as allergen surveillance systems to protect the wider community with allergies. Differences in inclusion and health care settings exist, with 11 collecting data on anaphylaxis of any cause, two on food reactions alone, three on fatal anaphylaxis, one on perioperative anaphylaxis, and two on allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis). Five registries enroll cases in allergy centers, five in hospital settings, one in schools, and others target a combination of general practitioners, specialists in emergency departments, and other relevant hospital departments and allergy outpatient clinics. Only three registries operate under a mandatory framework. A total of 57 publications were considered research outputs from registries. All registries except two have published studies from collected data, with the greatest number of articles published from 2019 to the present. Publications mostly addressed questions regarding demographic profile, causes and cofactors, severity, fatal reactions, and gaps in management.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrated that anaphylaxis registries differ in their scope and operation, having been established for different purposes. Importantly, registries have contributed significantly to research, which has highlighted gaps in anaphylaxis management, provoking allergens, and informed targets for prevention for severe and fatal events. Beyond this, registries relay information about anaphylaxis to clinicians and regulatory bodies to improve patient care and protect the community. The ability to link registry data with other health datasets, standardization of data across registries, and incorporation of clinical care indicators to promote quality health care across the health system represent important targets for future systems.

Pediatric Anaphylaxis: A 20-Year Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is a steadily increasing global problem defined as an acute hypersensitivity multisystem reaction that is potentially fatal. In the pediatric age, the leading cause is food. In other allergic diseases, intrinsic heterogeneity has been reported in the clinical presentation, severity, and triggers of anaphylaxis. This study analyzes the features and management approach of the anaphylactic reactions in children evaluated at the pediatric clinic in Pavia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with anaphylaxis between 2001 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients with a median age of 5 years were enrolled, and 80% of the patients had other atopic comorbidities that were correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis. The main trigger of anaphylaxis was food. Most reactions involved mucocutaneous, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems, and occurred at home. Adrenaline was administered only in a minority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt management, the use of adrenaline should be implemented. Our data also suggest the importance of educating and spreading awareness of anaphylactic management within the medical community.

Incidence, triggering factors, symptoms, and treatment of anaphylaxis in a pediatric hospital

Objective

Assess the incidence of anaphylaxis in the emergency room (ER) of a private pediatric hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, and describe associated factors.

Method

This was a cross-sectional, retrospective, and observational study based on the medical records of patients from 0 to 18 years old seen at the emergency unit during the years of 2016-2019, who had a diagnosis potentially related to anaphylaxis according to ICD-10. All medical records were individually reviewed for the presence of compatible signs and symptoms that identified "possible" cases of anaphylaxis. Cases were considered probable anaphylaxis when medical history was compatible and indicative of anaphylaxis in the opinion of at least 2 allergists.

Results

The incidence of anaphylaxis was 0.013%. Among the 56 patients identified (mean age 4.2 years), food was the most predominant suspected factor (53%), followed by unknown factors (32%), and drugs (12.5%). All patients presented with cutaneous symptoms, 74% with respiratory, and 53% with gastrointestinal. Allergic disease as a comorbidity was found in 39% of the children and 11% had a history of previous anaphylaxis. There were neither cases of syncope or shock, nor deaths. Intramuscular (IM) adrenaline was prescribed in 37.5% of cases.

Conclusions

The incidence of anaphylaxis was low when compared to the worldwide incidence. The severity of most cases was mild, cutaneous symptoms were predominant, and food was the suspected trigger most frequently associated with reactions.

Anaphylaxis in Chinese Children: Different Clinical Profile Between Children with and without a History of Asthma/Recurrent Wheezing

Purpose

Asthma and recurrent wheezing (RW) have been identified as risk factors for anaphylaxis; however, little is known about the characteristics of anaphylaxis in children with a history of asthma or RW in Chinese children.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective, observational chart review of children who were diagnosed with anaphylaxis in a tertiary children's hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients' demographics, symptoms, triggers and presence of physician-diagnosed asthma/RW history were collected from medical charts.

Results

A total of 399 anaphylactic reactions in 264 patients were analyzed; 119 patients (45.1%) had a history of asthma/RW. Food was the most common cause (85.5%, 341/399). Compared with patients without a history of asthma/RW, buckwheat-induced anaphylaxis was significantly more common in the asthma/RW group (9.4% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001), patients with a history of asthma/RW had higher rates of oropharyngeal symptoms (17.3% vs 8.6%, p = 0.011) and wheezing (34.5% vs 15.9%, p < 0.001). Ninety-one reactions (22.8%, 91/399) presented as severe anaphylaxis, but no difference existed between asthma/RW and non-asthma/RW groups. Children with a history of asthma/RW were more likely to receive inhaled β agonists than children without a history of asthma/RW (11.8% vs 2.5%, p = 0.003). A larger proportion of children without asthma/RW history were treated with epinephrine (11.7%) than children with asthma/RW history (6.9%).

Conclusion

Our finding revealed that different clinical profiles of anaphylaxis in children with and without a history of asthma/RW. Our study did not find that children with a history of asthma/RW have more severe anaphylactic reactions compared with children without asthma/RW. Buckwheat-induced anaphylaxis was more common in the asthma/RW group, wheezing and oropharyngeal symptoms affected a higher proportion of the asthma/RW group.

The cannabinoid WIN55212-2 impairs peanut allergic sensitization and promotes the generation of allergen-specific regulatory T cells

BACKGROUND

Cannabinoids are lipid-derived mediators with anti-inflammatory properties in different diseases. WIN55212-2, a non-selective synthetic cannabinoid, reduces immediate anaphylactic reactions in a mouse model of peanut allergy, but its capacity to prevent peanut allergic sensitization and the underlying mechanisms remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the capacity of WIN55212-2 to immunomodulate peanut-stimulated human dendritic cells (DCs) and peanut allergic sensitization in mice.

METHODS

Surface markers and cytokines were quantified by flow cytometry, ELISA and qPCR in human monocyte-derived DCs (hmoDCs) and T cell cocultures after stimulation with peanut alone or in the presence of WIN55212-2. Mice were epicutaneously sensitized with peanut alone or peanut/WIN55212-2. After peanut challenge, drop in body temperature, hematocrit, clinical symptoms, peanut-specific antibodies in serum and FOXP3⁺ regulatory (Treg) cells in spleen and lymph nodes were quantified. Splenocytes were stimulated in vitro with peanut to analyse allergen-specific T cell responses.

RESULTS

WIN55212-2 reduced peanut-induced hmoDC activation and promoted the generation of CD4⁺ CD127^- CD25⁺ FOXP3⁺ Treg cells, while reducing the induction of IL-5-producing T cells. In vivo, WIN55212-2 impaired the peanut-induced migration of DCs to lymph nodes and their maturation. WIN55212-2 significantly reduced the induction of peanut-specific IgE and IgG₁ antibodies in serum during epicutaneous peanut sensitization, reduced the clinical symptoms score upon peanut challenge and promoted the generation of allergen-specific FOXP3⁺ Treg cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthetic cannabinoid WIN55212-2 interferes with peanut sensitization and promotes tolerogenic responses, which might well pave the way for the development of novel prophylactic and therapeutic strategies for peanut allergy.

Management of Anaphylaxis in Infants and Toddlers

Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that can be caused by food, drugs, insect bites, or unknown triggers in infants and toddlers. Anaphylaxis rates are increasing. Infants and toddlers may have increased exposure to known and unknown allergens, decreased ability to describe their symptoms, and an expanded differential diagnosis for consideration on presentation. The most common symptoms in these age groups are cutaneous and gastrointestinal. Age-specific language may be helpful for caregivers to identify and describe the symptoms of anaphylaxis in infants and toddlers. Long-term management of anaphylaxis includes allergy evaluation to guide avoidance and assess prognosis and education on allergic reaction management; this incorporates the prescription of epinephrine autoinjector and provision of an allergy emergency plan.

Plant-Based Formulas and Liquid Feedings for Infants and Toddlers

Exclusive breastfeeding is the recommended feeding for all infants. Recent research has focused on the importance of balanced feeding during the first 1000 days, starting at conception with a balanced diet of the pregnant woman, up to the age of two years. The following step, a balanced diet after the age of two years is a challenge, as the dietary intake becomes more diversified. The role of young-child formula in this process is debated. This paper discusses the use of planted-based drinks, since they are a valuable and progressively more popular alternative for cow's milk, if nutritionally adapted to the requirements of toddlers. Plant-based drinks are per definition lactose free.

Developments in the field of allergy in 2020 through the eyes of Clinical and Experimental Allergy

While 2020 will be remembered for the global coronavirus pandemic, there were also important advances in the field of allergy. In this review article, we summarize key findings reported in Clinical and Experimental Allergy during 2020. We hope this provides readers with an accessible snapshot of the work published in our journal during this time.

Food-induced anaphylaxis morbidity: Emergency department and hospitalization data support preventive strategies

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is a recognized public health issue. There is no doubt that food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA) has tremendous impact on the quality of life of patients and their families and increases direct and indirect costs. FIA is associated with increasing rates of emergency department admissions and hospitalizations and implies the risk of death. Morbidity epidemiological data are a key to tailor public health actions to this non-communicable disease. The aim of this article was to review published morbidity epidemiological data relating to FIA and potential risk factors, in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to reduce the risk of severe adverse outcomes.

METHODS

We identified published studies available in PUBMED/MEDLINE (1966-2020), EMBASE (1980-2020) and CINAHL (1982-2020). The systematic review was carried out using MeSH terms related to FIA ED admissions and hospitalizations.

RESULTS

A total of 25 articles were selected, 80% published in the last 5 years. After critical analysis of methodological and clinical characteristics reported in the data selected, we were able to propose preventive strategies.

CONCLUSION

Anaphylaxis is a recognized public health issue. FIA is associated with increasing rates of ED admissions and hospitalizations and imply in risk of death. More than reviewing and critically interpreting the key patterns related to FIA morbidity published data, we proposed strategies in order to promote quality care of patients suffering from FIA. Our World Health Organization Collaborative Center is deeply involved in this process, and we believe that the proposed strategies will inform future healthcare policies on anaphylaxis. The long-term objective would be to improve clinical care and quality of life of patients and their families, and develop risk-stratified, cost-effective preventive measures.

Age-related differences in characteristics of anaphylaxis in Chinese children from infancy to adolescence

BACKGROUND

Little is known about anaphylaxis in Chinese children. This study aimed to determine the age-specific patterns of anaphylaxis in Chinese children.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of anaphylaxis cases attending an allergy department in a tertiary children's hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 279 anaphylactic reactions in 177 patients were analyzed. Overall, 57.6% (102/177) of first anaphylaxis events occurred in infants (0-2 ys). Foods were the most common culprits (88.5%), followed by food + exercise/exercise (4.7%), and drugs (4.3%). The main food allergens were cow's milk (32.9%), egg (21.4%), and wheat (20.7%) in infants, compared with fruits/vegetables at 35.9% in preschool-age children (3-6 ys) and 31.6% in school-age children (7-12 ys). The most commonly implicated drug triggers were vaccines (n = 5, comprising DTaP n = 2, group A + C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine n = 1, Sabin vaccine n = 1, and not specified n = 1). Among the 5 vaccine-induced anaphylaxis patients, 4 had severe cow's milk allergy. The clinical manifestations were mainly mucocutaneous (86.0%), followed by respiratory (68.8%), gastrointestinal (23.7%), neurological (10.4%), and cardiovascular (0.7%). Compared with patients of other ages, infants had higher rates of hives (0-2ys 77.4%, 3-6ys 50%,7-12ys 57.9%, 13-17ys 38.9%, p = 0.016) and vomiting (0-2ys 20.7%, 3-6ys 1.6%,7-12ys 8.8%, p < 0.001), while wheezing was more frequent in school-age children (0-2ys 21.4%, 3-6ys 25%, 7-12ys 38.6%, 13-17ys 5.6%, p = 0.017) and abdominal pain was more common in adolescents (0-2ys 2.1%,3-6ys 15.6%, 7-12ys 14.0%, 13-17ys 72.3%, p < 0.001). Regarding treatment, 9.3% of anaphylaxis events and 24.1% of life-threatening reactions were treated with epinephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed age-related clinical patterns of anaphylaxis in this study, with hives and vomiting most commonly reported in infants and cardiovascular symptoms rarely reported in children. Wheat was the third most culprit food allergen after egg and milk in infancy. Education regarding more aggressive use of epinephrine in the emergency setting is clearly needed. Recognition of age-related symptoms in anaphylaxis can aid physicians in prompt diagnosis and acute management.

Is the clinical manifestation of anaphylaxis in children influenced by the trigger of reaction?

INTRODUCTION

The number of anaphylaxis diagnoses in children is rising, being still based on the clinical picture.

AIM

To determine whether triggers of anaphylaxis influence its clinical characteristics in children and adolescents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group included 114 children (5 months-17 years, mean age: 8.0 ±4.8 years), (66%: boys) with the episode of anaphylaxis up to 1 year back. Medical data were entered to the NORA Registry by means of a validated structured on-line questionnaire.

RESULTS

Three most frequent triggers of anaphylaxis were: insect venom (47.4%), food (35.1%), drugs (5.3%), with a predominance of food (egg white, cow's milk, nuts and peanuts) in the 0-6 years age group, while insect venom (bee predominance) in the 7-17 years age group (p = 0.016). Clinical manifestations differed between food vs. venom allergic reactions and presented as gastro-intestinal (GI) (61.4%) (p = 0.004), respiratory (RS) (93.9%) (p = 0.036), and cardiovascular (CVS) (74.6%) (p = 0.022) symptoms. Among objective symptoms, vomiting was the most common symptom in the 0-2 years age group (47.1%) (p = 0.006), while hypotension in those aged 7-12 years (40%) (p = 0.010). Severity of symptoms evaluated as Mueller's grade (IV - 74.5%) and as Ring and Messmer's grade (III - 65.8%), depended on the trigger (p = 0.028, p = 0.029, respectively). Life-threatening symptoms occurred in 26 children (fall of the blood pressure - 22%, loss of consciousness - 4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestation of anaphylaxis in children is both trigger and age dependent, irrespective of the gender. A typical patient with food anaphylaxis was younger, presenting predominantly GI symptoms, while a typical patient with venom anaphylaxis was older, with mostly cardiovascular symptoms.

Food-induced anaphylaxis in early childhood and factors associated with its severity

Background: Several factors that increase the risk of severe food-induced anaphylaxis have been identified. Objective: We aimed to determine the demographic, etiologic, and clinical features of food-induced anaphylaxis in early childhood and also any other factors associated with severe anaphylaxis. Methods: We carried out a medical chart review of anaphylaxis cases from 16 pediatric allergy and immunology centers in Turkey. Results: The data of 227 patients with 266 food-induced anaphylaxis episodes were included in the study. The median (interquartile range) age of the first anaphylaxis episode was 9 months (6-18 months); 160 of these patients were boys (70.5%). The anaphylaxis episodes were mild in 75 cases (28.2%), moderate in 154 cases (57.9%), and severe in 37 cases (13.9%). The most frequent food allergens involved were cow's milk (47.4%), nuts (16.7%), and hen's egg (15.8%). Epinephrine was administered in only 98 (36.8%) of these anaphylaxis episodes. A logistic regression analysis revealed two statistically significant factors that were independently associated with severe anaphylaxis: the presence of angioedema and hoarseness during the anaphylactic episode. Urticaria was observed less frequently in patients who developed hypotension. In addition, confusion and syncope were associated with 25.9- and 44.6-fold increases, respectively, in the risk of concomitant hypotension. Conclusion: Cow's milk, nuts, and hen's egg caused the majority of mild and moderate-to-severe anaphylaxis episodes. The presence of angioedema and hoarseness in any patient who presents with a history of food-induced anaphylaxis should alert clinicians that the reaction may be severe. In addition, the presence of confusion, syncope, or stridor probably indicates concomitant hypotension.

Clinical Management of Infant Anaphylaxis

Anaphylaxis is a condition that is likely increasing in prevalence and commonly treated by allergists as well as other first responders and emergency room providers. Although a relatively rare event, anaphylaxis can occur in infants, with the most common cause attributed to foods. Infant anaphylaxis can present with unique diagnostic challenges and treatment considerations. While infants can present with classic signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis (eg, urticaria, angioedema, dyspnea, wheeze, and vomiting) they can also present with non-classical signs. Non-classical signs of infant anaphylaxis can include ear pulling, tongue thrusting, fussiness, and increase clinginess to the caregiver. These non-classic signs of infant anaphylaxis can often mimic normal infant behavior further complicating the diagnosis. Additionally, when treating infant anaphylaxis, there are special considerations regarding the use of epinephrine. These include determining appropriate needle length, dosages appropriate to administer depending on the weight of the infant, and the availability of different epinephrine auto-injectors. In this article, we aim to review the clinical management of infant anaphylaxis including diagnosis, recognition, treatment, strategies for follow-up and special considerations regarding epinephrine administration in this demographics.

Prevention and management of allergic reactions to food in child care centers and schools: Practice guidelines

Food allergy management in child care centers and schools is a controversial topic, for which evidence-based guidance is needed. Following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, we conducted systematic literature reviews of the anticipated health effects of selected interventions for managing food allergy in child care centers and schools; we compiled data about the costs, feasibility, acceptability, and effects on health equity of the selected interventions; and we developed the following conditional recommendations: we suggest that child care centers and schools implement allergy training and action plans; we suggest that they use epinephrine (adrenaline) to treat suspected anaphylaxis; we suggest that they stock unassigned epinephrine autoinjectors, instead of requiring students to supply their own personal autoinjectors to be stored on site for designated at-school use; and we suggest that they do not implement site-wide food prohibitions (eg, "nut-free" schools) or allergen-restricted zones (eg, "milk-free" tables), except in the special circumstances identified in this document. The recommendations are labeled "conditional" due to the low quality of available evidence. More research is needed to determine with greater certainty which interventions are likely to be the most beneficial. Policymakers might need to adapt the recommendations to fit local circumstances.

Emergency department revisits and rehospitalizations among infants and toddlers for acute allergic reactions

Background and Objective: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, are rising among children. Little is known about health care utilization among infants and toddlers. Our objective was to characterize health care utilization and charges for acute allergic reactions (AAR). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trends in emergency department (ED) visits and revisits, hospitalizations and rehospitalizations, and charges among infants and toddlers (ages < 3 years), with an index ED visit or hospitalization for AAR (including anaphylaxis). We used data from population-based multipayer data: State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases from New York and Nebraska. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ED revisits and rehospitalizations. Results: Between 2006 and 2015, infant and toddler ED visits for AAR increased from 27.8 per 10,000 population to 35.2 (P_trend < 0.001), whereas hospitalizations for AAR remained stable (P_trend = 0.11). In the one year after an index AAR visit, 5.1% of these patients had at least one AAR ED revisit and 5.9% had at least one AAR rehospitalization. Factors most strongly associated with AAR ED revisits included an index visit hospitalization and receipt of epinephrine. Total charges for AAR ED visits (2009-2015) and hospitalizations (2011-2015) were more than $29 million and $11 million, respectively. Total charges increased more than fourfold for both AAR ED revisits for AAR rehospitalizations during the study period. Conclusion: Infants and toddlers who presented with an AAR were at risk for ED revisits and rehospitalizations for AAR within the following year. The charges associated with these revisits were substantial and seemed to be increasing.

A severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions to avoid the delay of epinephrine administration

BACKGROUND

Substantial discrepancies among anaphylaxis severity scores may delay epinephrine administration.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to develop a transparent severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions with a decision model for epinephrine use.

METHODS

The natural course of 315 acute food-induced allergic reactions in children hospitalized at the Allergology department between May 2016 and July 2019 owing to follow-up treatment and allergy diagnostics was evaluated. The severity of episodes was classified according to the 5 most accepted grading systems. The interrater reliability of classification between anaphylaxis severity scores was assessed. All symptoms were grouped into a heat map according to their real-life incidence and clinical relevance. Based on the heat map analysis, a severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions in children with the epinephrine administration decision model was created.

RESULTS

Data from 259 food-induced anaphylaxis episodes in 157 children were included in the analysis. Comparing the grading systems, we observed a 24.7% to 70.2% disagreement between severity scores. The heat map illustrated a strong association between 29 symptoms and their categorization. A new severity grading system was developed and a 2-stage decision model was proposed: "epinephrine yes" (any rapidly progressing symptoms, even mild ones or from 1 organ system; any symptoms from more than 1 organ system; or every grade of anaphylaxis), and "epinephrine available and prepared to use" (nonprogressing mild systemic allergic reaction from 1 system area only; no anaphylaxis).

CONCLUSION

A new severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions in children could serve as a clinical tool for health care professionals to avoid epinephrine administration delay.

Epidemiology of anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand the current global epidemiological data of anaphylaxis and identify potential strategies to improve patients' care and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anaphylaxis mortality and morbidity statistics (MMS) may gain new perspectives with the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 in the forthcoming years. Improving the quality of epidemiological data related to anaphylaxis should clarify some areas of uncertainty about risk factors, leading to better targeting of strategies to protect those patients at risk, and support decision-making to facilitate healthcare planning and implementation of public health measures to prevent anaphylaxis.

SUMMARY

Anaphylaxis is a complex noncommunicable diseases with adverse impact on health-related quality of life of patients and their carriers and a significant proportion of deaths may be preventable. It requires an integrated holistic plan to improve quality of healthcare and gathering accurate and comparable epidemiological data is key. Morbidity related to anaphylaxis seems to be increasing worldwide whereas mortality of anaphylaxis appears to be low and stable, but this still has great challenges in capturing quality anaphylaxis MMS. Improving the quality of epidemiological data related to anaphylaxis should clarify some areas of uncertainty about risk factors, leading to better targeting of strategies to protect those patients at risk. As knowledge derived from populations is key information for more realistic decision-making, the construction of the new section addressed to anaphylaxis in the ICD-11 will allow the collection of more accurate epidemiological data to support quality management of patients, and better facilitate healthcare planning to implement public health measures to prevent and reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to these conditions.

Infant Anaphylaxis: A Diagnostic Challenge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infant anaphylaxis has been increasing in incidence; however, significant gaps in the literature remain. The aim of this article is to review the most recent literature pertaining to infant anaphylaxis and discuss recent findings related to epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no accurate report of the incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis in infancy. Food is the most common trigger for infant anaphylaxis reported. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis in infants is often missed, and, even when the diagnosis is made, epinephrine continues to be under-utilized. An epinephrine autoinjector with a shorter needle and lower dose is now available for infants. Concise criteria specifically focusing on infant anaphylaxis is needed to streamline its diagnosis and management. Diagnosis is underrecognized in infants leading to improper treatment. When the diagnosis is made, epinephrine continues to be under-utilized and under-prescribed in infants.

Community Use of Epinephrine for the Treatment of Anaphylaxis: A Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Community use of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis is low. Knowledge of rates of epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting along with identification of barriers to its use will contribute to the development of policies and guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

A search was conducted on PubMed and Embase in April 2020. Our systematic review focused on 4 domains: (1) epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting; (2) barriers to epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting; (3) cost evaluation and cost-effectiveness of epinephrine use; and (4) programs and strategies to improve epinephrine use during anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Two meta-analyses with logit transformation were conducted to: (1) calculate the pooled estimate of the rate of epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting among cases of anaphylaxis and (2) calculate the pooled estimate of the rate of biphasic reactions among all cases of anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

Epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting was significantly higher for children compared with adults (20.98% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.38%, 26.46%] vs 7.17% [95% CI: 2.71%, 17.63%], respectively, P = .0027). The pooled estimate of biphasic reactions among all anaphylaxis cases was 3.92% (95% CI: 2.88%, 5.32%). Our main findings indicate that pre-hospital use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis remains suboptimal. Major barriers to the use of epinephrine were identified as low prescription rates of epinephrine autoinjectors and lack of stock epinephrine in schools, which was determined to be cost-effective. Finally, in reviewing programs and strategies, numerous studies have engineered effective methods to promote adequate and timely use of epinephrine.

CONCLUSION

The main findings of our study demonstrated that across the globe, prompt epinephrine use in cases of anaphylaxis remains suboptimal. For practical recommendations, we would suggest considering stock epinephrine in schools and food courts to increase the use of epinephrine in the community. We recommend use of pamphlets in public areas (ie, malls, food courts, etc.) to assist in recognizing anaphylaxis and after that with prompt epinephrine administration, to avoid the rare risk of fatality in anaphylaxis cases.

Trends in US Emergency Department Visits for Anaphylaxis Among Infants and Toddlers: 2006-2015

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction. The overall prevalence of anaphylaxis appears to be rising in children, but temporal trends among infants and toddlers are not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the trends in US emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among infants and toddlers with anaphylaxis from 2006 to 2015.

METHODS

We conducted a study of temporal trends in anaphylaxis among children (age <18 years) and, more specifically, infants and toddlers (age <3 years) presenting to the ED between 2006 and 2015 using a large, nationally representative database. For internal consistency, we defined anaphylaxis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes and excluded visits with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes (late 2015). We calculated trends in the number and proportion of ED visits and hospitalizations and used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among infants and toddlers, the proportion of ED visits for anaphylaxis per year increased from 20 per 100,000 visits to 50 per 100,000 visits (P_trend < .001). The rate of ED visits for anaphylaxis increased from 15 to 32 ED visits per 100,000 population of infants and toddlers (P_trend < .001). Food was the most commonly identified trigger. The proportion of hospitalization among anaphylaxis-related ED visits decreased from 19% to 6% (P_trend < .001). Among ED patients, those more likely to be hospitalized were male, privately insured, from higher income families, and presenting to urban, metropolitan teaching hospital EDs.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, nationally representative US database, from 2006 to 2015, ED visits by infants and toddlers with anaphylaxis increased, whereas hospitalization of these patients decreased.

Association Between Allergen Sensitization and Anaphylaxis in Patients Visiting a Pediatric Emergency Department

Background and Objectives: Anaphylaxis, a severe allergic disease, can be triggered by various causes. This study investigated the association between allergic sensitization and anaphylactic symptoms and the severity of anaphylaxis in children. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of 107 pediatric patients with anaphylaxis was performed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017; 74 patients underwent allergen testing for specific immunoglobulin E. Allergic sensitizations and associations with anaphylactic symptoms and severity were investigated. Results: Overall, 64 (86.5%) patients were sensitized to food or inhalant allergens. In children under 2 years of age, 90.5% were sensitized to food (P = 0.001); in those over 6 years of age, 84.6% were sensitized to inhalant allergens (P = 0.001). Milk sensitization was significantly associated with severe anaphylaxis (P = 0.036). The following symptoms showed significant associations with certain allergen sensitizations: facial edema with food; wheezing with milk; dyspnea with mite, etc. Certain allergen sensitizations presenting as risk factors for anaphylactic symptoms: wheat (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.644, P = 0.044) and nuts (aOR=3.614, P = 0.041) for wheezing, nuts (aOR=5.201, P = 0.026) for dyspnea, and milk (aOR=4.712, P = 0.048) for vomiting. Conclusion: The allergen sensitization status differed according to the age of the children experiencing anaphylaxis. The severity, symptoms, and signs of anaphylaxis differed depending on the allergen sensitization status.

Cow's Milk Protein Allergy in Term and Preterm Infants: Clinical Manifestations, Immunologic Pathophysiology, and Management Strategies

Cow's milk allergy is a common food allergy among infants. Symptoms of cow's milk allergy are wide-ranging and depend on the mechanism involved. There are immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and mixed mechanisms of food allergy. Symptoms of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy may be mild or may progress to anaphylaxis, which can be life-threatening. Non-IgE-mediated allergy includes food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, food protein-induced enteropathy, and Heiner syndrome (pulmonary hemosiderosis). These diagnoses comprise about half of all cow's milk allergies. The most common manifestation of cow's milk allergy in infants is FPIAP. FPIAP is commonly seen in healthy, full-term infants who present with rectal bleeding and are otherwise well-appearing. This can occur in both formula-fed and exclusively breastfed infants. Food proteins secreted in maternal breast milk can contribute to the development of these symptoms. Maternal cow's milk elimination diet is often successful in helping resolve symptoms. A period of reintroduction of cow's milk resulting in re-emergence of symptoms in stable asymptomatic infants is an excellent diagnostic tool to confirm a cow's milk allergy. Preterm infants are susceptible to food allergy, as demonstrated from several case reports of necrotizing enterocolitis-like illnesses that responded clinically to cow's milk elimination. Further study is needed about food allergy in the preterm infant population.

Caregiver-Reported Presentation of Severe Food-Induced Allergic Reactions in Infants and Toddlers

BACKGROUND

Recognizing anaphylaxis in infants and toddlers can be challenging for health care providers and caregivers, and current diagnostic criteria and anaphylaxis action plans do not specifically address this younger population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe symptoms and signs observed by primary caregivers of infants and toddlers during severe food-induced allergic reactions.

METHODS

We conducted a national online survey among primary caregivers of children who experienced a severe food-induced allergic reaction when less than 36 months of age. Respondents who were present during the child's most severe reaction were asked to report symptoms and signs observed. The survey asked about infant- and toddler-specific symptoms and signs in lay language for caregivers. Data were compared with patient-reported data from past studies to identify distinct patterns among the younger population.

RESULTS

The survey was completed for 374 children (193 infants, 181 toddlers). The most common symptoms and signs reported were skin reactions (90%), facial and extremity swelling (59%), gastrointestinal issues (51%), and coughing/wheezing (45%). Infants (aged <12 months) more frequently experienced skin reactions, skin mottling, and ear pulling/scratching or putting fingers in ears, as compared with toddlers (aged 12-35 months). Toddlers experienced throat itching and coughing/wheezing more frequently than infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaphylaxis presentation demonstrates similarities and differences in infants and toddlers. Modifying the terminology used in the current criteria allowed for reporting of symptoms and signs of anaphylaxis that are more common in infants and toddlers. Diagnostic criteria, clinical guidelines, and anaphylaxis action plans may be enhanced to address this young, often nonverbal, population.

Food-induced anaphylaxis in infants, as compared to toddlers and preschool children in Turkey

BACKGROUND

The literature includes scarce data on infants with food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of the patients diagnosed with FIA aged 0-6 years between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 451 instances of FIA in 314 patients, of which 175 (38.8%) occurred in 160 infants (50.9%). The median (IQR) age of infants was 7 months (6-9 months) with a male predominance (67.5%), of which 7.5% had multiple instances (≥2) and 60% atopic dermatitis. The most common triggers were cow's milk (51.4%), tree nuts (16.6%), and hen's egg (15.4%), whereas tree nut was the most common trigger in toddlers (35.8%) and preschool children (35.2%). Skin and neurologic symptoms, and nausea-vomiting occurred more frequently (P = .003, P ≤ .001, and P = .003, respectively), whereas respiratory symptoms occurred less commonly in infants compared to toddlers and preschool children (P ≤ .001). In infants, 65 (37.1%) mild, 92 (52.6 %) moderate, and 18 (10.3%) severe episodes of anaphylaxis were detected. History of recurrent wheezing (OR: 6.837 [95% CI: 1.940-24.097], P = .003) and tree nut allergy (OR: 2.849 [95% CI: 1.056-7.688], P = .039) were found to be independent risk factors for moderate-to-severe anaphylactic reactions. 40.6% of the infants received adrenaline, which was lower than the toddlers (49.7%) and preschool children (57.6%) (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

There is no doubt that food-induced anaphylaxis is a medical emergency, specifically in young children. Pediatricians should be aware of the distinct features of infant anaphylaxis, particularly gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms to provide effective treatment as soon as possible.

Anaphylaxis in children

Anaphylaxis in children is a potential acute life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Anaphylaxis fatality rate is estimated to be 0.65% to 2%. Food is the main anaphylaxis trigger in children, notably cow's milk, peanuts, and tree nuts. Mucocutaneous manifestations are observed in more than 90% of cases, but it is not essential for diagnosis. Deaths are rather secondary to the laryngeal edema, observed in 40%-50% of cases. Personal history of asthma, allergy to particular foods such as peanuts and tree nuts, and adolescence are known risk factors for anaphylaxis and more severe reactions. Epinephrine (adrenaline) is the medication of choice for the first-aid treatment of anaphylaxis. However, adrenaline auto-injectors (AAIs) are commercially available in only 32% of world countries. There are still considerable unmet needs in the field of anaphylaxis in children. Therefore, the Montpellier WHO Collaborating Centre aims to start the global action plan applied to anaphylaxis.

What is new in anaphylaxis?

Available information suggests that anaphylaxis must be promptly recognized keeping in mind the airway patency, breathing (ventilation and respiration), circulation and mental status and treated. The first treatment is adrenaline. After successful treatment of an anaphylactic episode, attention must be paid to the prevention of early recurrences (biphasic anaphylaxis) and assessment of causes. Children should not be discharged before prescribing self-injectable adrenaline and explain how and under what circumstances it must be injected, An action plan must be communicated to their communities. Inform the school about potential reactions, how to prevent them and avoidance measures.