A prospective pilot study to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer

Genomic landscape defines peritoneal metastatic pattern and related target of peritoneal metastasis in colorectal cancer

The primary objective of this study is to develop a prediction model for peritoneal metastasis (PM) in colorectal cancer by integrating the genomic features of primary colorectal cancer, along with clinicopathological features. Concurrently, we aim to identify potential target implicated in the peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer through bioinformatics exploration and experimental validation. By analyzing the genomic landscape of primary colorectal cancer and clinicopathological features from 363 metastatic colorectal cancer patients, we identified 22 differently distributed variables, which were used for subsequent LASSO regression to construct a PM prediction model. The integrated model established by LASSO regression, which incorporated two clinicopathological variables and seven genomic variables, precisely discriminated PM cases (AUC 0.899; 95% CI 0.860-0.937) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = .147). Model validation yielded AUCs of 0.898 (95% CI 0.896-0.899) and 0.704 (95% CI 0.622-0.787) internally and externally, respectively. Additionally, the peritoneal metastasis-related genomic signature (PGS), which was composed of the seven genes in the integrated model, has prognostic stratification capability for colorectal cancer. The divergent genomic landscape drives the driver genes of PM. Bioinformatic analysis concerning these driver genes indicated SERINC1 may be associated with PM. Subsequent experiments indicate that knocking down of SERINC1 functionally suppresses peritoneal dissemination, emphasizing its importance in CRCPM. In summary, the genomic landscape of primary cancer in colorectal cancer defines peritoneal metastatic pattern and reveals the potential target of SERINC1 for PM in colorectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery

BACKGROUND

Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) affects 15% of patients at initial colorectal cancer diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option, however there is limited data describing its efficacy in advanced peritoneal disease. This study evaluated the effect of NAC on survival in patients with high volume CRPM undergoing CRS with or without HIPEC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM from 2004 to 2019 at our institution was performed. The cohort was divided based on peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) at surgery: Low Volume (PCI ≤ 16) and High Volume (PCI > 16).

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. There were 39 patients (12%) with High Volume disease, and 15 of these (38%) received NAC. Patients with High Volume disease had significantly longer operating time, lower likelihood of complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0 score), longer intensive care unit length of stay and longer hospital stay compared to Low Volume disease. In High Volume disease, the NAC group had a significantly shorter median survival of 14.4 months compared to 23.8 months in the non-NAC group (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Patients with High Volume CRPM achieved good median survival following CRS with HIPEC, which challenges the current PCI threshold for offering CRS. The use of NAC in this cohort did not increase perioperative morbidity but was associated with significantly shorter median survival compared to upfront surgery.

Intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX/CAPOX plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (the iPac-02 trial): study protocol of a single arm, multicenter, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The safety of intraperitoneally administrated paclitaxel (op PTX) was demonstrated in the phase I trial of ip PTX combined with conventional systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Moreover, the median survival time was 29.3 months, which was longer than that observed in previous studies. Here, we planned the phase II trial of ip PTX: the iPac-02 trial.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single assignment interventional clinical study includes patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. FOLFOX-bevacizumab or CAPOX-bevacizumab is administered concomitantly as systemic chemotherapy. PTX 20 mg/m2 is administered weekly through the peritoneal access port in addition to these conventional systemic chemotherapies. The response rate is the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival, overall survival, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate, rate of negative peritoneal lavage cytology, safety, and response rate to peritoneal metastases are the secondary endpoints. A total of 38 patients are included in the study. In the interim analysis, the study will continue to the second stage if at least 4 of the first 14 patients respond to the study treatment. The study has been registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031220110).

RESULTS

We previously conducted phase I trial of ip PTX combined with conventional systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis [1]. In the study, three patients underwent mFOLFOX, bevacizumab, and weekly ip PTX, and the other three patients underwent CAPOX, bevacizumab, and weekly ip PTX treatment. The dose of PTX was 20 mg/m [2]. The primary endpoint was the safety of the chemotherapy, and secondary endpoints were response rate, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate, rate of negative peritoneal lavage cytology, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed, and the adverse events of ip PTX combined with oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy were similar to those described in previous studies using systemic chemotherapy alone [3, 4]. The response rate was 25%, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate was 50%, and cytology in peritoneal lavage turned negative in all the cases. The progression-free survival was 8.8 months (range, 6.8-12 months), and median survival time was 29.3 months [5], which was longer than that observed in previous studies.

CONCLUSION

Here, we planned the phase II trial of ip paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: the iPac-02 trial.

Determination of whether HIPEC is beneficial in patients with synchronous peritoneal and liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Review)

Peritoneal carcinomatosis, as well as the presence of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, has been long considered as the sign of a systemic disease, transforming the patient into a candidate for palliation and best supportive care. However, in recent decades, progress in the field of medical and surgical oncology has allowed scientists worldwide to produce curative therapeutic strategies for these cases such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or extended liver resection. In addition, the association of these two therapies has also been performed with encouraging results. The aim of the current study was to review articles published thus far in regard to the association of these two therapeutic strategies, in order to identify which cases can benefit the most, which is the most efficient agent or combination of agents, and whether these types of therapy should be performed as monotherapy or as a two-stage procedure.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CR-PM). However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to CRS-HIPEC is poorly understood. A retrospective review of adult patients with CR-PM who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC from 2000-2017 was performed. Among 298 patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC, 196 (65.8%) received NAC while 102 (34.2%) underwent surgery first (SF). Patients who received NAC had lower peritoneal cancer index score (12.1 + 7.9 vs. 14.3 + 8.5, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV complications (22.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.650), readmission (32.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.114), or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.411) between groups. NAC patients experienced longer overall survival (OS) (median 32.7 vs. 22.0 months, p = 0.044) but similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 13.8 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.456). After controlling for confounding factors, NAC was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.80) or RFS (OR 1.04). Among patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC for CR-PM, the use of NAC was associated with improved OS that did not persist on multivariable analysis. However, NAC prior to CRS+/-HIPEC was a safe and feasible strategy for CR-PM, which may aid in the appropriate selection of patients for aggressive cytoreductive surgery.

Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review

The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.

Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6)

Background

Upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in the Netherlands. This study investigates whether addition of perioperative systemic therapy to CRS-HIPEC improves oncological outcomes.

Methods

This open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study is performed in nine Dutch tertiary referral centres. Eligible patients are adults who have a good performance status, histologically or cytologically proven resectable PM of a colorectal adenocarcinoma, no systemic colorectal metastases, no systemic therapy for colorectal cancer within six months prior to enrolment, and no previous CRS-HIPEC. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1) to perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront CRS-HIPEC alone (control arm) by using central randomisation software with minimisation stratified by a peritoneal cancer index of 0–10 or 11–20, metachronous or synchronous PM, previous systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. At the treating physician’s discretion, perioperative systemic therapy consists of either four 3-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX), six 2-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or six 2-weekly neoadjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by four 3-weekly (capecitabine) or six 2-weekly (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) adjuvant cycles of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Bevacizumab is added to the first three (CAPOX) or four (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. The first 80 patients are enrolled in a phase II study to explore the feasibility of accrual and the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy. If predefined criteria of feasibility and safety are met, the study continues as a phase III study with 3-year overall survival as primary endpoint. A total of 358 patients is needed to detect the hypothesised 15% increase in 3-year overall survival (control arm 50%; experimental arm 65%). Secondary endpoints are surgical characteristics, major postoperative morbidity, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, health-related quality of life, costs, major systemic therapy related toxicity, and objective radiological and histopathological response rates.

Discussion

This is the first randomised study that prospectively compares oncological outcomes of perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC with upfront CRS-HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal PM.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02758951, NTR/NTR6301, ISRCTN/ISRCTN15977568, EudraCT/2016–001865-99.

Timing of Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Timing of systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is controversial. Preoperative systemic chemotherapy may offer benefits.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of timing of systemic chemotherapy on survival.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy from January 2004 until June 2015 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The influence of patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors on survival were investigated using Cox regression models. Main outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 280 consecutive patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In group A, 78 patients (28%) were treated with preoperative or perioperative chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In group B, 169 patients (60%) were intentionally treated with cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In group C, 33 patients (12%) had received their chemotherapy before peritoneal carcinomatosis was diagnosed. Median overall survival was 36.9 months (interquartile range, 20.6-79.7 mo) in group A, 43.1 months (interquartile range, 25.7-95.9 mo) in group B, and 34.0 months (interquartile range, 20.0-53.7 mo) in group C (p = 0.19). The extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis (region count of 3-5, HR = 1.58 (95% CI, 1.02-2.45), and 6-7, HR = 3.34 (95% CI, 1.66-6.72) vs 1-2 regions), a higher lymph node ratio (HR = 7.96 (95% CI, 2.16-29.31)), and cycles of systemic chemotherapy (0 cycles, HR = 2.52 (95% CI, 1.48-4.29)) and partial chemotherapy (HR = 2.15 (95% CI, 1.27-3.65) vs complete chemotherapy) were associated with poorer overall survival.

LIMITATIONS

Selection bias is present because of the retrospective design of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of systemic chemotherapy does not appear to have impact on survival in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

The Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM), increasing overall survival in selected patients. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with CPM undergoing CRS and HIPEC, compared with those who receive CRS and HIPEC alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database, and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines formed the structure of the review. Data regarding publication details, study design, patient pathology, treatments received, follow-up periods, overall survival and safety were collected and tabulated, and study quality was assessed using the MINORS score for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 288 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven publications related to the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and there was no strong evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of note, one study observed worse survival outcomes when neoadjuvant therapy was used. Fourteen studies investigated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and there was limited evidence that adjuvant systemic chemotherapy improves survival following CRS and HIPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with improved overall survival, but the role of systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy cannot be determined by the currently available evidence. The delivery of a combination of the two modes of systemic chemotherapy has not been investigated in a randomized controlled trial to date. Further research designed to investigate the role of these modalities in the patient's treatment is required.

Oxaliplatin versus Mitomycin C for HIPEC in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis

OBJECTIVE

Compare long-term outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) treated with peritonectomy/HIPEC using oxaliplatin versus MMC.

BACKGROUND

Peritonectomy and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) greatly improves patient survival in CRC PC. This procedure is not uniform across centres and the optimal choice of HIPEC chemotherapeutic is unclear. Oxaliplatin and Mitomycin C (MMC) are the most commonly used agents and comparative studies have reported varying results.

METHOD

201 patients were retrospectively selected from the St George Hospital database, all of which had undergone peritonectomy/HIPEC for CRC PC. Oxaliplatin and MMC were used in 106 and 96 patients, respectively. Each patient's baseline characteristics, operative details, choice of chemotherapeutic agent and survival were noted.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly at baseline. Patients receiving oxaliplatin had significantly greater unadjusted median survival compared to MMC (56.0 ± 8.1 vs. 29.0 ± 3.4 months) which translated into a hazards ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.91, p = 0.017). Subgroup analysis further confirmed an advantage with oxaliplatin in females, moderate-well differentiated tumours, tumours without signet ring pathology and PCI 10-15.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests oxaliplatin offers a survival advantage over MMC when used for HIPEC in CRC PC. Further studies to understand its efficacy, complications and ideal preparation are required. A Phase III randomised control trial comparing oxaliplatin and MMC would enhance decision-making.

Role of multi-modality therapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis and visceral metastasis: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Treatment for advanced stage colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and hepatic metastasis (HM) has progressed significantly over the past 10 years.

Case report

We present the case of a 39-year-old female patient with stage IV colorectal cancer with bilateral HM, pulmonary oligometastatic disease, and diffuse PC who underwent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for her intra-abdominal disease. The patient had an uneventful immediate post-operative recovery, and subsequently tolerated multiple cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary lesions. At her 22-month follow-up assessment, the patient remains alive with disease.

Conclusion

Current recommendations for surgical management of synchronous colorectal cancer PC and HM indicate that patients with less than three HMs, a low peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and good functional status will benefit most from CRS and HIPEC. Our patient had an elevated PCI of 12 as measured by computed tomography imaging, and five HMs (all less than 3 cm in size); however, given that her life expectancy on systemic chemotherapy was estimated to be approximately 12 months, we have observed carefully selected patients to benefit from an aggressive multi-modality approach. This case report demonstrates an all too common scenario for surgeons managing patients with advanced CRC, and highlights the importance of patient selection for surgical management as part of multidisciplinary cancer care in this patient population.

Recent insights into the pathophysiology of omental metastases

Although, useful in inflammatory conditions, the greater omentum represents an important site of metastasis in peritoneal carcinomatosis and is therefore frequently removed as a staging or therapeutic tool. Apart from the milky spots, omental adipose stem cells, and adipocytes have recently been identified to play a role in the preferential homing of tumor cells to the omentum. The extent of omentectomy and whether a routine omentectomy should be done are still known unknowns.