Modification of The Paris System for urinary tract washing specimens using diagnostic cytological features

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 1: Comparison of Bladder Cancer Grading System Performance

Grade is a key prognostic factor in determining progression in nonmuscle invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas. The 2 most common grading methods in use worldwide are the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 and 1973 schemes. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) organized the 2022 consensus conference in Basel, Switzerland on current issues in bladder cancer and tasked working group 1 to make recommendations for future iterations of bladder cancer grading. For this purpose, the ISUP developed in collaboration with the European Association of Urology a 10-question survey for their memberships to understand the current use of grading schemes by pathologists and urologists and to ascertain the areas of potential improvements. An additional survey was circulated to the ISUP membership for their opinion on interobserver variability in grading, reporting of urine cytology, and challenges encountered in grade assignment. Comprehensive literature reviews were performed on bladder cancer grading prognosis and interobserver variability along with The Paris System for urine cytology. There are notable differences in practice patterns between North American and European pathologists in terms of used grading scheme and diagnosis of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential. Areas of common ground include difficulty in grade assignment, a desire to improve grading criteria, and a move towards subclassifying high-grade urothelial carcinomas. The surveys and in-person voting demonstrated a strong preference to refine current grading into a 3-tier scheme with the division of WHO 2004 high grade into clinically relevant categories. More variable opinions were voiced regarding the use of papillary urothelial carcinoma with low malignant potential.

The Role of Urine and Washing Cytology in Primary Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours

INTRODUCTION

Urine cytology (UC) is a recommended tool for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies. Thus far, no specific recommendations regarding the role of washing cytology (WC) have been included in the guidelines. The goal of our study was to analyse the relationship between the histology of transurethrally (transurethral resection of the bladder [TURBT]) resected bladder tumours (BCa) and intraoperative UC or WC findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred consecutive primary TURBT cases conducted between November 2010 and 2015 at our department of the University Hospital Luebeck were retrospectively analysed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of UC and WC were evaluated to detect BCa. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to further examine associations between patient- and tumour-related factors and a bladder UC or WC positive for BCa.

RESULTS

UC was performed in 297 patients, WC in 294 patients, and both in 261 patients. Sensitivity was 50.7% in UC, 58.1% in WC, and 62.1% for both tests combined. Specificity was 97.8% for UC, 98.0% for WC, and 96.4% for the combined tests. PPV was 98.0% for UC, 98.1% for WC, and 97.2% for combined tests. NPV was 47.8% for UC, 54.5% for WC, and 55.9% for the combined tests. The multivariate analyses revealed no association between positive UC or WC results and subsequent radical cystectomy (UC OR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.3-5.7; WC OR 2.0, 95% CI: 0.4-11.4). Neither UC nor WC was significantly correlated with local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic testing is an important diagnostic tool in BCa detection, showing acceptable sensitivity of around 60% and excellent specificity of over 90%. UC and WC present similar sensitivity. Our results advocate, however, against cytologic testing during primary TURBT, especially with regard to the lack of value in assessing the risk of recurrence. The clinical benefit of taking both types of samples at once is minimal. Furthermore, intraoperative WC collection does not reliably predict subsequent cystectomies.

[How has the Paris System contributed to urine cytology? Evaluating the contribution of the Paris System to urine cytology. A comparative study of the Paris System and the Papanicolaou method in a tertiary centre]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The Paris System (PS) has replaced the classical Papanicolaou System (PapS) in reporting urine cytology, due to its improved sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) without loss of specificity. Furthermore, it has enabled the risk of malignancy to be established in each cytological category. The aim of this study is to compare the Paris System with previous results and determine the changes in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV and risk of malignancy in our centre, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of the diagnostic power of urine cytology by means of a retrospective cohort study, comparing two series of 400 cytological studies, one using the Papanicolaou System and the other the Paris System.

RESULTS

In the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, Paris System has better specificity (93.82% PapS vs 98.64% PS; P=.001) and PPV (39.5% PapS vs 70.6% PS; P=.044) than Papanicolaou System, without changes in sensitivity (53.5% PapS vs 37.5% PS; P=.299) or NPV (96.4% PapS vs 94.8% PS; P=.183). The risk of malignancy for the atypical category increases from low to high levels (1.6% PapS vs 40.0% PS; P=.001); the other categories showed no significant statistical changes.

CONCLUSION

The Paris System improves specificity and positive predictive value and establishes a better indication of risk of malignancy for each category, enabling specific clinical management in each case.

Digital image analysis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology confirms chromasia heterogeneity and reveals a subset with hypochromatic nuclei and another with extremely dark or "India ink" nuclei

BACKGROUND

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) uses hyperchromasia as major diagnostic criterion for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). The purpose of the study was to evaluate cases that were diagnosed as HGUC by TPS and determine whether there are different chromatin distribution patterns (ie, subsets).

METHODS

Digital image annotations were performed on microscopic images of HGUC urine specimens with surgical biopsy/resection follow-up. Median gray values were generated for each cell. Neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocyte [PMN]) were also enumerated in each case to serve as an internal control. A HGUC/PMN ratio was generated for each case, and the cases were distributed.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine HGUC cases yielded 2660 cells, including 2078 HGUC (30.1 cells/case) and 582 PMNs (8.4 cells/case). The average median gray value of an HGUC was 50.6 and of a PMN was 36.8 (P < .0001). Eight of 69 cases (11.6%) contained nuclei that, on average, were darker than or as dark as a PMN (extremely dark, ie, "India ink"). Fifty-one of 69 cases (74.0%) contained nuclei that, on average, were slightly brighter than a PMN (hyperchromatic). Ten of 69 cases (14.5%) contained nuclei that, on average, were much brighter than a PMN (hypochromatic). Within a single case, all cases showed heterogeneity with the hypochromatic cases showing the most dramatic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital image analysis reveals that there are large variations in chromasia between cases including a subset of cases with hypochromasia and another with extremely dark or "India ink" nuclei. There was much heterogeneity of chromasia seen within a single sample.

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis

The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management.

Effect of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology with histologic follow-up

BACKGROUND

The Paris system (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology provides a standardized reporting system whose main focus is the diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). We conducted a study to see the impact of The Paris System on our cytologic diagnoses with associated histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our pathology database regarding urinary specimens in the year before implementation of The Paris System and the year after. We gathered the data regarding cytologic diagnosis and concurrent/subsequent histology.

RESULTS

Over a 1-year period from 2016-2017, 486 urine cytology specimens were identified before implementation of The Paris System and diagnosed as follows: 83% benign/negative, 10% atypical, 2% suspicious, 5% HGUC, 0.2% low grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and 0.2% unsatisfactory. Over a next 1-year period from 2017 to 2018, 602 specimens used TPS and diagnosed as follows: 85% negative for HGUC, 6% atypical, 3% suspicious, 4% HGUC, 0.17% LGUN, and 2% unsatisfactory. Although, not listed as a standardized category in The Paris System, our institution used "Negative for high-grade, cannot rule out low-grade urothelial neoplasm (NHL)" as a subcategory of Negative for HGUC. 4% of the cases fell into this category. Focusing on the Atypical category before TPS, histology was available in 15/49 (31%) cases. Of these, 40% had HGUC. Regarding the Atypical category after TPS, histology was available in 21/36 (58%) cases. Of these, 52% were HGUC. For the NHL category, concurrent histology was available in 13/26 (50%) cases. Of these, 67% were low grade urothelial neoplasms.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TPS lowered the rate of Atypical from 10% to 6%. After the implementation of TPS, Atypical corresponded to a higher rate of high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Also, the NHL subcategory had a high positive predictive value for diagnosing low grade urothelial neoplasms.

Fluorescence Emitted by Papanicolaou-Stained Urothelial Cells Improves Sensitivity of Urinary Conventional Cytology for Detection of Urothelial Tumors

Background

Urinary conventional cytology (UCCy) is easy to perform, but its low sensitivity, especially for low-grade urothelial neoplasms (LGUNs), limits its indications in the management of patients at risk of bladder cancer. The authors aim at obtaining a complementary test that would effectively increase the sensitivity of UCCy on voided urines by analyzing fluorescence of Papanicolaou-stained urothelial cells with no change of method in slide preparation.

Methods

In this retrospective study of 155 patients, 91 Papanicolaou-stained voided urines were considered satisfactory under fluorescence microscopy (FMi). The results of FMi were compared with UCCy (using transmission microscopy) and correlated to cystoscopy, histology and follow-up data.

Results

The results are given for all patients and for two groups of them according to the patients’ main complaints (group 1: 33 patients followed up for a previously treated bladder tumor; group 2: 58 patients with persistent urinary symptoms). Overall negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of FMi were 100% vs. 73.7% and 64.3% respectively for UCCy (P = 0.0001). Sensitivity of FMi for LGUN was unexpectedly high with a value of 100% vs. 46.2% for UCCy (P = 0.0002). FMi was significantly superior to UCCy for detecting urothelial tumors in every group of patients and would allow a better characterization of atypical urothelial cells (AUCs) defined by the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology (TPS).

Conclusions

Because of its sensitivity and NPV of 100%, FMi could complement UCCy to screen voided urines allowing a better detection of primary urothelial tumors or early recurrences of previously treated urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, this “dual screening” would allow completing efficiently cystoscopy to detect flat dysplasia, carcinoma in situ (CIS) and extra bladder carcinoma.

Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature

INTRODUCTION

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 with clear objectives to standardize cytologic diagnostic criteria and provide uniform reporting, in order to improve patient stratification and associated clinical management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TPS and review the literature published since TPS was introduced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Original articles focusing on the utilization and performance of TPS in urinary cytology specimens were identified using PubMed for publications from January 2016 to July 2020, using the keywords "Paris System", "urine cytology", and "urinary cytology".

RESULTS

Twenty-three relevant articles in the literature regarding the use of TPS were included in the review from a total of 30,802 urine cytology specimens, of which 21,485 (69.8%) had available diagnoses. Distribution of cases among categories ranged from 50.5% to 95.3% for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), 1.2% to 23% for atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 0.2% to 6.6% for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (SHGUC), and 2.2% to 14.1% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). The calculated risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) ranged from 8.7% to 36.8% for NHGUC, 12.3% to 60.9%% for AUC, 33.3% to 100% for SHGUC, and 58.8% to 100% for HGUC. Mean ROHM weighted by sample size was calculated at 15.7% (±7.8%), 38.5% (±14.3%), 76.2% (±17.2%), and 88.8% (±12.7%) for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Reported sensitivity of TPS ranged from 40% to 84.7%, specificity from 73% to 100%, PPV from 62.3% to 100%, and NPV from 46% to 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of TPS in the selected series has improved the screening and surveillance potential of urine cytology, while reducing high rates of indeterminate diagnoses, improving sensitivity and providing proper risk stratification for patients.

The Paris system of Reporting Urinary Cytology: Strengths and opportunities

The Paris system for reporting urinary cytopathology (TPS) was created to address inherent weaknesses inherent in the practice of urinary cytopathology. While urothelial cytology has always performed well at finding high grade, genetically unstable urothelial carcinoma, it performs poorly when it comes to detecting low-grade urothelial neoplasia. TPS intends to improve the utility of urothelial cytology by focusing on what is important, high-grade urothelial carcinoma. This article is a snapshot of the current state of TPS as it heads into its second edition. Successes are described and further developments are considered.

High-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology: different spaces - different faces, highlighting morphologic variance

INTRODUCTION

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 to standardize reporting and placed a specific emphasis on high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). The urinary tract is anatomically divided into the upper tract (UT) and the lower tract (LT). A major morphologic criterion in TPS for HGUC defines the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio as ≥ 0.7. In this study, we evaluated N/C ratios of HGUC arising from UT and LT urine specimens, to ascertain differences due to location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Digital annotations of whole slide scanned images were performed and enumerated.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 59 ThinPrep specimens from 52 patients. The majority of the tumors were located in LT (39 of 59, 66.1%). A total of 590 cells were analyzed (10 cells per case). In UT, the average N/C was 0.58 and LT the average was 0.54 (P < 0.001). The average nuclear area for UT was 126.3 and for LT was 158.2 μm² (P = 0.01). The average cytoplasmic area for UT was 219.1 μm² and for LT was 296.2 μm² (P < 0.001). The average cellular circumference for UT was 59.4 μm and for LT was 66.1 μm (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that UT HGUCs have higher N/C ratios, smaller cell circumference, smaller nuclei, and less cytoplasm compared with LT. When UT was divided into renal pelvis and ureter, no statistical difference was identified.

Impact of the Paris system for reporting urine cytopathology on predictive values of the equivocal diagnostic categories and interobserver agreement

Background:

The Paris System (TPS) acknowledges the need for more standardized terminology for reporting urine cytopathology results and minimizing the use of equivocal terms. We apply TPS diagnostic terminologies to assess interobserver agreement, compare TPS with the traditional method (TM) of reporting urine cytopathology, and evaluate the rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of each TPS diagnostic category. A survey is conducted at the end of the study.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred urine samples were reviewed independently by six cytopathologists. The diagnosis was rendered according to TPS categories: negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). The agreement was assessed using kappa. Disagreements were classified as high and low impacts. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results:

Perfect consensus agreement was 31%, with an overall kappa of 0.362. Kappa by diagnostic category was 0.483, 0.178, 0.258, and 0.520 for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Both TM and TPS showed 100% specificity and PPV. TPS showed 43% sensitivity (38% by TM) and 70% accuracy (66% by TM). Disagreements with high clinical impact were 27%. Of the 100 cases, 52 were concurrent biopsy-proven HGUC. The detection rate of biopsy-proven HGUC was 43% by TPS (57% by TM). The rate of NHGUC was 54% by TPS versus 26% by TM. AUC rate was 23% by TPS (44% by TM). The PPV of the AUC category by TPS was 61% versus 43% by TM. The survey showed 33% overall satisfaction.

Conclusions:

TPS shows adequate precision for NHGUC and HGUC, with low interobserver agreement for other categories. TPS significantly increased the clinical significance of AUC category. Refinement and widespread application of TPS diagnostic criteria may further improve interobserver agreement and the detection rate of HGUC.

Practice Patterns in Urinary Cytopathology Prior to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology

CONTEXT.—

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology has been disseminated since its inception in 2013; however, the daily practice patterns of urinary tract cytopathology are not well known.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess urinary tract cytopathology practice patterns across a variety of pathology laboratories to aid in the implementation and future update of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.

DESIGN.—

A questionnaire was designed to gather information about urinary tract cytopathology practices and mailed in July 2014 to 2116 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program. The participating laboratories' answers were summarized.

RESULTS.—

Of the 879 of 2116 laboratories (41%) that participated, 745 (84.8%) reported processing urinary tract specimens in house. The laboratories reported processing various specimen types: voided urine, 735 of 738 (99.6%); bladder washing/barbotage, 639 of 738 (86.6%); and catheterized urine specimens, 653 of 738 (88.5%). Some laboratories used multiple preparation methods, but the most commonly used preparation techniques for urinary tract specimens were ThinPrep (57.4%) and Cytospin (45.5%). Eighty-eight of 197 laboratories (44.7%) reported preparing a cell block, but with a low frequency. Adequacy criteria were used by 295 of 707 laboratories (41.7%) for voided urine, and 244 of 707 (34.5%) assessed adequacy for bladder washing/barbotage. More than 95% of the laboratories reported the use of general categories: negative, atypical, suspicious, and positive. Polyomavirus was classified as negative in 408 of 642 laboratories (63.6%) and atypical in 189 of 642 (29.4%). One hundred twenty-eight of 708 laboratories (18.1%) performed ancillary testing, and of these, 102 of 122 (83.6%) reported performing UroVysion.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Most laboratories use the ThinPrep method followed by the Cytospin technique; therefore, the criteria published in The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology, based mostly on ThinPrep and SurePath, should be validated for Cytospin, and relevant information should be included in the revised edition of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.

Utility of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology in upper urinary tract specimens

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing upper urinary tract (UUT) lesions using cytology has been historically difficult because of a lack of standardized terminology, cytomorphologic criteria, and the presence of instrumentation artifact. The goal of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPSRUC) was to provide standardized terminology and cytomorphologic criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of TPSRUC in UUT cytology specimens at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single ThinPrep archival slides from 30 UUT cytology cases with corresponding histological follow-up were reviewed using TPSRUC. Those results were compared with the original cytology diagnoses.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) using TPSRUC were 71%, 100%, 100%, and 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

The TPSRUC was reliable at identifying HGUC. These data showed that this system had a lower sensitivity (71% versus 100%) and NPV (71% versus 100%) for UUT specimens compared with original cytology diagnoses. TPSRUC had a sensitivity and specificity that were comparable to reported overall sensitivity and specificity of UUT cytology for detection of HGUC. A major cause of discrepancy with TPSRUC was the classification of urine samples (n = 8) from histologically proven HGUC cases as only atypical (n = 6) or negative (n = 2), mainly owing to nuclear hypochromasia rather than hyperchromasia. Thus, hyperchromasia, a criteria used in TPSRUC, may not be as relevant in UUT specimens.