Migraine in a pediatric population: a clinical study in children younger than 7 years of age

Extended Phenotyping of Migraine in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Specialist Children's Headache Clinic

BACKGROUND

The pediatric migraine phenotype may exhibit differences to adults, leading to diagnostic challenges. We aimed to perform a cross-sectional systematic study to characterize the extended phenotype of pediatric migraine.

METHODS

New migraine patients presenting to the Children's Headache Clinic were included (n = 105). Data were collected via a detailed symptom questionnaire at the first clinical encounter and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Cohen kappa (k), Spearman correlation (ρ), and Poisson and binomial logistic regression models within SPSS.

RESULTS

Patients were 65% female and aged five to 17 years (median 14, interquartile range [IQR] 11 to 15), with a mean disease duration of 4.7 years (S.D. 2.8). Monthly headache frequency was 1 to 30 days (median 30, IQR 12 to 30). Attack duration varied between 2 and 168 hours (median 12, IQR 5 to 72). The majority (81%) experienced bilateral headache. Premonitory symptoms (PS) were reported by 93% (range 0 to 7; mood change and tiredness most commonly), cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS) by 58% (range 0 to 6; pallor and lacrimation most commonly), and premonitory CAS by 23%. Vertigo (53%) and allodynia (16%) were present. The laterality of headache and CAS showed agreement (k = 0.5, P < 0.001). For every year of disease duration, 1.07 times more PS were reported (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.12, P < 0.001). The number of CAS (odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.8, P = 0.01) significantly predicted allodynia.

CONCLUSIONS

Children display a more enriched PS phenotype with disease chronicity. CAS and allodynia may be markers of central sensitization with shared neurobiological mechanisms in the absence of peripheral nociceptor activation.

Idiopathic Non-Dental Facial Pain Syndromes in Italian Children: A Clinical Case Series

BACKGROUND

The orofacial pain syndromes (OFPs) are a heterogeneous group of syndromes characterized by painful attacks involving the orofacial structures. They may be summarily subdivided into two great categories: (1) orofacial pain mainly attributed to dental disorders such as dentoalveolar and myofascial orofacial pain or temporomandibular joint (TM) pain; (2) orofacial pain mainly attributed to non-dental pain as neuralgias, facial localization of primary headaches or idiopathic orofacial pain. The second group is uncommon, often described by single case reports, can often show overlapping symptoms with the first group, and represents a clinical challenge, carrying the risk of undervaluation and possibly invasive odontoiatric treatment. We aimed to describe a clinical pediatric series of non-dental orofacial pain and better to underline some topographic and clinical features associated with them. We retrospectively collected the data of children admitted to our headache centers (Bari, Palermo, Torino) from 2017 to 2021. Our inclusion criterion was the presence of non-dental orofacial pain following the topographic criteria of 3° International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3), and exclusion criteria included the pain syndromes attributed to the dental disorders and pain syndromes due to the secondary etiologies Results. Our sample comprised 43 subjects (23/20 M/F, in the range of ages 5-17). We classified them int: 23 primary headaches involving the facial territory during attacks, 2 facial trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, 1 facial primary stabbing headache, 1 facial linear headache, 6 trochlear migraines, 1 orbital migraine 3 red ear syndrome and 6 atypical facial pain. All patients described debilitating pain for intensity (moderate/severe), 31 children had episodic attacks, and 12 had continuous pain. Almost all received drugs for acute treatment (less than 50% were satisfied), and some received non-pharmacological treatment associated with drug therapy Conclusion. Although rare OFP can occur in pediatric age, it can be debilitating if unrecognized and untreated, affecting the psychophysical well-being of young patients. We highlight the specific characteristics of the disorder for a more correct and earlier identification during the diagnostic process, already difficult in pediatric age, and to define the approach and possible treatment to prevent negative outcomes in adulthood.

Migraine without aura

Migraine without aura is the commonest form of migraine in both children and adults. The diagnosis is made by applying the International Classification of Headache Disorders Third Edition subsection for migraine without aura (ICHD-3 subsection 1.1). Attacks in patients with migraine without aura are characterized by their polyphasic presentation (prodrome, headache phase, postdromal phase). The symptomatology of attacks is diverse and heterogeneous, with most common symptoms being photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting, and aggravation of pain by movement. The clinician and researcher who wants to learn about migraine without aura needs to be able to apply the ICHD-3 criteria with its specific symptomatology to make a correct diagnosis, but also needs to be aware about the plethora of symptoms patients may experience. In this chapter, the reader will explore the clinical phenotypical features of migraine without aura.

CGRP and PACAP-38 play an important role in diagnosing pediatric migraine

Background

An increasing number of studies have suggested that the important role of vasoactive peptides, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), in the pathophysiology of migraine seems undeniable in adults, but studies in pediatric migraine patients remain scarce. We prospectively investigated CGRP and PACAP-38 plasma levels in children with migraine during ictal and interictal periods and compared the results between migraine patients with aura and without aura. We were the first to explore the diagnostic value of a combination of CGRP and PACAP-38.

Methods

Seventy-six migraine patients aged 4–18 years and seventy-seven age-matched healthy children were included in the study. Plasma vasoactive peptides were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Differences and correlations of groups were analyzed using the independent samples t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple linear regression. We also performed logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses to evaluate the diagnostic value of CGRP and PACAP-38 in pediatric migraine.

Results

PACAP-38 and CGRP levels in migraine patients during the ictal and interictal periods were higher than those in controls (p < 0.001). PACAP-38 and CGRP levels in migraine patients with aura and without aura were higher than those in controls (p < 0.001). PACAP-38 and CGRP were independent risk factors in diagnosing pediatric migraine (adjusted OR (PACAP-38) =1.331, 95% CI: 1.177–1.506, p < 0.001; adjusted OR (CGRP) = 1.113, 95% CI: 1.064–1.165, p < 0.001). Area Under Curve (AUC) comparison: Combination (0.926) > CGRP (0.869) > PACAP-38 (0.867).

Conclusions

Our study found almost the same changes in CGRP and PACAP levels in pediatric migraine, suggesting that CGRP and PACAP-38 may work together to play an integral role in pediatric migraine. Higher CGRP levels were found in the ictal phase than in the interictal phase and with aura group than without aura group, indicating that CGRP may take part in the formation of pain and aura. Moreover, ROC and logistic regression analyses suggested that CGRP and PACAP-38 are good indicators to diagnose pediatric migraine, and the combination of CGRP and PACAP-38 was valuable in diagnosing pediatric migraine and differentiating pediatric migraine from non-migraine headaches.

Trial registration

The study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100043157).

Headache in Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the approach to a child or adolescent with headache, the criteria for common diagnoses, and the evidence base for treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

The guidelines for acute and preventive treatment of migraine were updated in 2019. These guidelines summarize the available evidence and outline the questions that should be addressed in future research. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of several new classes of drugs and devices to treat adult migraine in the past few years has resulted in ongoing or planned pediatric trials.

SUMMARY

Headache is a common symptom in children, and it is important to take a detailed history and perform a thorough physical examination to make the diagnosis. Nearly 1 in 10 children experience recurrent headaches due to migraine, which cause significant impairment in school performance and quality of life. The acute and preventive treatments that are currently available will help at least two-thirds of children with migraine, and several trials of new therapies offer hope for the future.

Migraine in Children Under 7 Years of Age: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the accumulation of a significant amount of data on pediatric headache, few studies have been conducted on its occurrence in children under 7 years of age. Within primary headaches in this age, migraine especially, turns out to be a disorder affecting up to 4% of the general population. An underestimate of its true prevalence can be due to lack of specific diagnostic markers, the frequent difficulty of describing pain in childhood, and the necessity of reliable parents' reports. Thus, migraine in children under 7 years of age represents an important challenge for clinicians. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of epidemiologic, clinic, and therapeutic aspects of migraine in this age.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature data show that migraine has some differences, especially in clinical and therapeutic terms, in this age group compared to subsequent ages. Furthermore, some evidences showing that an early onset of migraine may play an unfavorable role in its natural history, suggest an early identification and management of migraine in younger children. Moreover, we highlight the role that factors of prenatal and perinatal development can play in the predisposition and anticipation of migraine onset. Finally, open questions related to the several undefined features of migraine in this age are reported. Migraine in this pediatric population is absolutely not rare, represents an importan clinical challenge and probably has a negative predictive role.

Migraine in children under 6 years of age: A long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Early starting of migraine seems predictive for less favorable outcome in later ages, however follow-up investigations are very few and all with short-term prospective period. We report here the longest follow-up study in a population of children presenting with migraine under the age of 6.

METHODS

We followed-up 74 children under 6 years of age, referred for headache to our department between 1997 and 2003. The study was carried out between October 2016 and March 2018. Headache diagnoses were made according to the IHS criteria.

RESULTS

23/74 patients, 31% of the original cohort, were found at follow-up in a period ranging between 15 to 21 years after the first visit. Seven of them were headache free. The remaining 16 patients had migraine. In the migraine group, the localization of pain changed in 75% of the subjects, 11/16 (68.7%) had allodynia and 9/16 (56.25%) had cranial autonomic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the onset of migraine at very young age represents unfavorable prognostic factor for persistence of the disease at later ages. Some clinical features may change during clinical course, and the active persistence of the disorder may lead to an increase in allodynia.

Individual differences of maladaptive brain changes in migraine and their relationship with differential effectiveness of treatments

Migraine is a difficult disorder to identify with regard to its pathophysiological mechanisms, and its treatment has been primarily difficult owing to interindividual differences. Substantial rates of nonresponsiveness to medications are common, making migraine treatment complicated. In this review, we systematically analyzed recent studies concerning neuroimaging findings regarding the neurophysiology of migraine. We linked the current imaging research with anecdotal evidence from interindividual factors such as duration and pain intensity of migraine, age, gender, hormonal interplay, and genetics. These factors suggested the use of nonpharmacological therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and placebo therapy for the treatment of migraine. Finally, we discussed how interindividual differences are related to such nondrug treatments.

Pediatric and Adolescent Headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides the practicing neurologist with a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of headache in children and adolescents, with a focus on migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four triptans are now labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute migraine treatment in adolescents, and rizatriptan is labeled for use in children age 6 and older. For preventive migraine treatment, the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention trial demonstrated that approximately 60% of children and adolescents with migraine will improve with a three-pronged treatment approach that includes: (1) lifestyle management counseling (on sleep, exercise, hydration, caffeine, and avoidance of meal skipping); (2) optimally dosed acute therapy, specifically nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and triptans; and (3) a preventive treatment that has some evidence for efficacy. For the remaining 40% of children and adolescents, and for those who would not have qualified for the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention trial because of having continuous headache or medication-overuse headache, the clinician's judgment remains the best guide to preventive therapy selection.

SUMMARY

Randomized placebo-controlled trials have been conducted to guide first-line acute and preventive migraine treatments in children and adolescents. Future research is needed to guide treatment for those with more refractory migraine, as well as for children and adolescents who have other primary headache disorders.

Episodic syndromes of childhood associated with migraine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review covers recent advances in our understanding of episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine in children and adolescents, as well as what is known about the treatment of these disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The episodic syndromes include benign paroxysmal torticollis, benign paroxysmal vertigo, abdominal migraine, and cyclic vomiting syndrome. Infant colic, or excessive crying in an otherwise healthy and well fed infant, may also fit into this category and is included in the appendix section of the most recent edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

SUMMARY

Episodic syndromes are considered to be early life expressions of migraine in the developing brain. Additional research is needed to determine, which acute and preventive treatments are the most effective in managing these disorders.

Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Hospital Care for Pediatric Migraine: A National Study Using the Kids' Inpatient Dataset

BACKGROUND

Although migraine often starts in childhood or adolescence, hospital care for migraine in children is not well described. We examined patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospital care for migraine among children in the United States.

METHODS

We queried the Kids' Inpatient Database (2003 to 2009) for hospitalizations of children aged 3-20. Sociodemographic and hospital characteristics were compared between hospitalizations for migraine and for other common medical conditions. Multivariate logistic regression models estimated the associations between patient, hospital, and socioeconomic characteristics and inpatient migraine care.

RESULTS

We identified 11,696 pediatric migraine hospitalizations, the majority (68.7%) occurring at teaching hospitals, involving a female (68.8%) child, ages 13-20 (71%, mean age: 14.6 years). As compared to the overall inpatient sample, migraine hospitalizations were less likely to involve children who were Black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 0.60), Hispanic (AOR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.68), or Asian (AOR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.55), and more likely to involve females (AOR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.59). Migraine inpatients were more likely to live in higher income postal ZIP code areas (versus lowest ZIP code income quartile: AOR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.48). The average length of stay for migraine was 2.54 (SEM 0.6) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who are hospitalized for migraines have distinct sociodemographic characteristics and a short length of stay. Understanding the reasons for these variations will inform the design of interventions aimed at reducing the need for pediatric migraine hospitalization.

Age- and sex-related differences in the presentation of paediatric migraine: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction Although migraine is a common headache complaint in children and adolescents there remains a significant gap in understanding the unique aspects of the disease in these age groups and their evolution with development. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to identify migraine features that are influenced by age and sex. Methods The headache characteristics of 359 paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of migraine from a tertiary paediatric headache clinic were assessed. Patients retrospectively reported headache characteristics during a structured intake interview and clinical exam. Headache characteristics, description and associated symptoms were compared between children (age ≤ 12 years) and adolescents (age > 12 years), and between male and female migraineurs. Results Several migraine features differed significantly with age and/or sex, including: (i) a marked change from a 1:1 sex ratio in children to a 2:1 predominance of girls in adolescents; (ii) a higher frequency of headache attacks per month in adolescents and female migraineurs; (iii) a higher proportion of adolescents endorsed a 'throbbing' pain quality; (iv) a higher proportion of children reporting nausea and vomiting; and (v) a higher proportion of adolescents, particularly female migraineurs, had a diagnosis of a co-morbid anxiety. Conclusion The presentation of migraine, both in terms of its headache characteristics and associated symptoms, appear to vary as a function of age and sex. Given that migraine symptoms have a neural basis, it is not surprising that during the key period of neurodevelopment from childhood to adolescence this may impact their presentation.

From 0° to 18°: how headache changes over time

Recognize the presence of headache at early age is essential to prevent that the disorder interferes with physical, psychological and social functioning. However, there are several differences between adults and children in the clinical manifestation of headache such as quality and severity of pain, trigger, associated symptoms, gender, duration of attacks, number of daytime attacks, comorbidities and red flags of secondary headache. These differences can make the diagnosis more complex in early ages than in adults, so it is essential to know how headache changes over time to identify its presence in the earliest phases of childhood.

Factors Associated with Favorable Outcome of Topiramate Migraine Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are few studies that have investigated predictive factors related to migraine prophylaxis of which produced inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to identify factors that can predict the treatment response to topiramate prophylaxis in pediatric patients with migraine.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen patients who were older than 7 years and received topiramate for at least 3 months were recruited from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital outpatient clinic from 2005 to 2014. A positive response was defined as a reduction of more than 50% in the number of migraine episodes after topiramate treatment. Proposed predictive factors such as migraine characteristics including severity and frequency were assessed, as were other data on sex, disease duration, associated symptoms, family history, and impairment of daily activities.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (61.9%) responded to prophylactic treatment with topiramate. Patients who experienced significant impairment in daily activities showed significant benefit from the treatment (p=0.004). Sex, the severity, frequency, and duration of migraine episodes, disease duration, treatment duration, age at onset, and associated symptoms were not significantly related to a response to topiramate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine characteristics and associated symptoms were not significantly related to a response to topiramate treatment. However, patients with significant impairment in daily activities showed significant benefit from the treatment, and so prophylactic topiramate treatment should be strongly encouraged in this patient group.

Frequency of pediatric migraine with aura in a clinic-based sample

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and risk factors for pediatric migraine with aura (MWA) among patients presenting to pediatric neurology clinics.

BACKGROUND

Headache is a common complaint among children, and the prevalence of migraine is about 8%. Up to one third of adults with migraine report experiencing aura; however, the exact percentage in children is unknown.

METHODS

Medical records of children presenting with headache to three pediatric neurology clinics in Haifa in the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of migraine headache at 5-18 years of age.

RESULTS

Of 260 children (140 female) who had migraine, 26.2% experienced aura. MWA was more common among females compared to males (32.6% vs 18.9%, P < .01) and among older children (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.20-5.20; P < .01). Among those who experienced aura, visual aura was more common in females than males (66.7% vs 33.3%, P < .04). Family history of migraine was strongly related to MWA (P < .02): the odds of MWA were 2.46 times greater in children who had a family history of migraine. (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.08-5.62; P < .03).

CONCLUSIONS

MWA is as common in children as in adults. Aura is more common in older children. Children who have MWA are more likely to have a family history of migraine.