1
|
Nørmark LP, McAuliffe F, Maindal HT, O'Reilly S, Davies A, Burden C, Skinner TC, Vrangbæk K, Callander E. Protocol for cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised trial of mHealth coaching (Bump2Baby and Me) compared with usual care for healthy gestational weight gain and postnatal outcomes in at-risk women and their offspring in the UK, Australia, Ireland and Spain. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080823. [PMID: 38772891 PMCID: PMC11110546 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gestational diabetes mellitus and overweight are associated with an increased likelihood of complications during birth and for the newborn baby. These complications lead to increased immediate and long-term healthcare costs as well as reduced health and well-being in women and infants. This protocol presents the health economic evaluation to investigate the cost-effectiveness of Bump2Baby and Me (B2B&Me), which is a health coaching intervention delivered via smartphone to women at risk of gestational diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using data from the B2B&Me randomised controlled trial, this economic evaluation compares costs and health effects between the intervention and control group as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Direct healthcare costs, costs of pharmaceuticals and intervention costs will be included in the analysis, body weight and quality-adjusted life-years for the mother will serve as the effect outcomes. To investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the trial, a Markov model will be employed. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be employed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The National Maternity Hospital Human Research and Ethics Committee was the primary approval site (EC18.2020) with approvals from University College Dublin HREC-Sciences (LS-E-20-150-OReilly), Junta de Andalucia CEIM/CEI Provincial de Granada (2087-M1-22), Monash Health HREC (RES-20-0000-892A) and National Health Service Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) (21/WA/0022). The results from the analysis will be disseminated in scientific papers, through conference presentations and through different channels for communication within the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12620001240932.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pirhonen Nørmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Fionnuala McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sharleen O'Reilly
- Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anna Davies
- Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christy Burden
- University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Timothy C Skinner
- Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karsten Vrangbæk
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Reilly SL, McAuliffe FM, Geraghty AA, Burden C, Davies A. Implementing weight management during and after pregnancy to reduce diabetes and CVD risk in maternal and child populations. Proc Nutr Soc 2023:1-12. [PMID: 38037711 DOI: 10.1017/s0029665123004883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining a healthy weight during pregnancy is critical for both women's and children's health. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can lead to complications such as gestational diabetes, hypertension and caesarean delivery. Insufficient GWG can cause fetal growth restriction and increase infant mortality risk. Additionally, postpartum weight retention raises risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases for both mother and child. This review seeks to identify current obstacles in weight management research during and after pregnancy and explore evidence-based strategies to overcome them. Pregnancy offers a window of opportunity for health behaviour changes as women are more receptive to education and have regular contact with health services. Staying within Institute of Medicine's recommended GWG ranges is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes. Systematic review evidence supports structured diet and physical activity pregnancy interventions, leading to reduced GWG and fewer complications. Health economic evaluation indicates significant returns from implementation, surpassing investment costs due to decreased perinatal morbidity and adverse events. However, the most effective way to implement interventions within routine antenatal care remains unclear. Challenges increase in the postpartum period due to competing demands on women physically, mentally and socially, hindering intervention reach and retention. Flexible, technology-supported interventions are needed, requiring frameworks such as penetration-implementation-participation-effectiveness and template-for-intervention-description-and-replication for successful implementation. Greater research efforts are necessary to inform practice and investigate fidelity aspects through pragmatic implementation trials during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Understanding the best ways to deliver interventions will empower women to maintain a healthy weight during their reproductive years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleen L O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Aisling A Geraghty
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Christy Burden
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Davies
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang Q, Zhong Y, Xu C, Li W, Wang H, Hou Y. Effectiveness of five interventions used for prevention of gestational diabetes: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29126. [PMID: 35475799 PMCID: PMC9276162 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with short- and long-term health issues for mother and child; preventing these complications is crucially important. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the relationships among 5 interventions used to prevent GDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to pool evidence from inception to June 30, 2020. The type of studies was confined to randomized control trials and quasi-randomized control trials published in English investigating the interventions for preventing GDM, including physical activity, dietary intervention, probiotic intervention, mixed intervention, and inositol supplementation. The data were pooled together to report the odds ratio (OR) of GDM with a corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI) and generate a network plot, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve plot, and contribution plot. In addition, loop inconsistency was examined, and a funnel plot combined with Egger test was used to measure heterogeneity. RESULTS The network meta-analysis included 46 randomized control trials involving 16,545 patients. Compared with placebo, physical activity (OR: 0.64, 95% CrI: 0.46-0.88) and probiotic intervention (OR: 0.57, 95% CrI: 0.34-0.96) reduced the incidence of GDM significantly. However, dietary intervention, a combination of physical activity and diet intervention, and inositol supplementation did not significantly alter GDM risk. CONCLUSIONS Physical activity and probiotic intervention are more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of developing GDM. Future work should focus on the type, duration, frequency, and timing of physical activity and probiotic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiongyao Tang
- Operating Theatre, Haikou Maternal, and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Ying Zhong
- Operating Theatre, Haikou Maternal, and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Chenyun Xu
- Longhua Outpatient Department, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Wangya Li
- Operating Theatre, Haikou Maternal, and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Haiyan Wang
- Operating Theatre, Haikou Maternal, and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Yu Hou
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Szewczyk Z, Weaver N, Rollo M, Deeming S, Holliday E, Reeves P, Collins C. Maternal Diet Quality, Body Mass Index and Resource Use in the Perinatal Period: An Observational Study. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12113532. [PMID: 33213030 PMCID: PMC7698580 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of pre-pregnancy obesity and maternal diet quality on the use of healthcare resources during the perinatal period is underexplored. We assessed the effects of body mass index (BMI) and diet quality on the use of healthcare resources, to identify whether maternal diet quality may be effectively targeted to reduce antenatal heath care resource use, independent of women’s BMI. Cross-sectional data and inpatient medical records were gathered from pregnant women attending publicly funded antenatal outpatient clinics in Newcastle, Australia. Dietary intake was self-reported, using the Australian Eating Survey (AES) food frequency questionnaire, and diet quality was quantified from the AES subscale, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). Mean pre-pregnancy BMI was 28.8 kg/m2 (range: 14.7 kg/m2–64 kg/m2). Mean ARFS was 28.8 (SD = 13.1). Higher BMI was associated with increased odds of caesarean delivery; women in obese class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m2) had significantly higher odds of caesarean delivery compared to women of normal weight, (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.39; p = 0.04). Using Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Group categories for birth admission, the average cost of the birth admission was $1348 more for women in the obese class II, and $1952 more for women in the obese class III, compared to women in a normal BMI weight class. Higher ARFS was associated with a small statistically significant reduction in maternal length of stay (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.00, 1.54; p = 0.05). There was no evidence of an association between ARFS and mode of delivery or “midwifery-in-the-home-visits”.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Szewczyk
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (N.W.); (S.D.); (E.H.); (P.R.)
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Correspondence: (Z.S.); (C.C.)
| | - Natasha Weaver
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (N.W.); (S.D.); (E.H.); (P.R.)
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Megan Rollo
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia;
- Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Simon Deeming
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (N.W.); (S.D.); (E.H.); (P.R.)
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Holliday
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (N.W.); (S.D.); (E.H.); (P.R.)
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (N.W.); (S.D.); (E.H.); (P.R.)
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Clare Collins
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia;
- Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Correspondence: (Z.S.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kelleher D, Barry L, McGowan B, Doherty E, Carey JJ, Kane D. Budget impact analysis of an early identification and referral model for diagnosing patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis in Ireland. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2020; 4:rkaa059. [PMID: 33364546 PMCID: PMC7749785 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To estimate the budget impact from the perspective of the Irish health-care system attributable to a reconfiguration in the diagnostic care pathway for patients with suspected RA by adopting an early identification and referral model (EIM). Methods The budget impact model evaluated the total health-care use and costs attributable to an EIM to diagnose patients with suspected RA relative to the reference scenario of current practice. The modelling also assessed a primary outcome of effect, which examined how many patients can be diagnosed by a rheumatologist within 3 months of symptom onset. The budget impact analysis model was estimated over a 5-year time frame. Results The EIM generated a cost saving for the Irish health-care system of €237 547 over the time frame relative to current practice. The cost savings were realized owing to a reduction in the number of general practitioner (GP) visits of 18 790 and a reduction in diagnostic tests carried out by GPs. The results showed that 1027 (510%) more patients were diagnosed within 3 months of symptom onset in the EIM compared with current practice. Conclusion This paper has presented an alternative rheumatologist-led service design that can be used in diagnosing patients with suspected RA. The rheumatologist-led service provision detailed in this study has the potential simultaneously to reduce demand for primary care services and to improve the health outcomes of patients. The use of an EIM sees rheumatologist activity incorporate patient demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Kelleher
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Luke Barry
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Bernie McGowan
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway
| | - Edel Doherty
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - John J Carey
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway
| | - David Kane
- Department of Medicine (Rheumatology), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- National Clinical Programme for Rheumatology, HSE, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Griffith RJ, Alsweiler J, Moore AE, Brown S, Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Interventions to prevent women from developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 6:CD012394. [PMID: 32526091 PMCID: PMC7388385 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012394.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing, with approximately 15% of pregnant women affected worldwide, varying by country, ethnicity and diagnostic thresholds. There are associated short- and long-term health risks for women and their babies. OBJECTIVES We aimed to summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of interventions for preventing GDM. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (6 August 2019) with key words 'gestational diabetes' OR 'GDM' to identify reviews pre-specifying GDM as an outcome. We included reviews of interventions in women who were pregnant or planning a pregnancy, irrespective of their GDM risk status. Two overview authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data and assessed quality of evidence using ROBIS and GRADE tools. We assigned interventions to categories with graphic icons to classify the effectiveness of interventions as: clear evidence of benefit or harm (GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a confidence interval (CI) that did not cross the line of no effect); clear evidence of no effect or equivalence (GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a narrow CI crossing the line of no effect); possible benefit or harm (low-quality evidence with a CI that did not cross the line of no effect or GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a wide CI); or unknown benefit or harm (GRADE low-quality evidence with a wide CI or very low-quality evidence). MAIN RESULTS We included 11 Cochrane Reviews (71 trials, 23,154 women) with data on GDM. Nine additional reviews pre-specified GDM as an outcome, but did not identify GDM data in included trials. Ten of the 11 reviews were judged to be at low risk of bias and one review at unclear risk of bias. Interventions assessed included diet, exercise, a combination of diet and exercise, dietary supplements, pharmaceuticals, and management of other health problems in pregnancy. The quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Diet Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of dietary advice versus standard care, on the risk of GDM: risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.04; 5 trials; 1279 women; very low-quality evidence. There was unknown benefit or harm of a low glycaemic index diet versus a moderate-high glycaemic index diet on the risk of GDM: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.31; 4 trials; 912 women; low-quality evidence. Exercise Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm for exercise interventions versus standard antenatal care on the risk of GDM: RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.84; 3 trials; 826 women; low-quality evidence. Diet and exercise combined Possible benefit: combined diet and exercise interventions during pregnancy versus standard care possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; 19 trials; 6633 women; moderate-quality evidence. Dietary supplements Clear evidence of no effect: omega-3 fatty acid supplementation versus none in pregnancy had no effect on the risk of GDM: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.26; 12 trials; 5235 women; high-quality evidence. Possible benefit: myo-inositol supplementation during pregnancy versus control possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.64; 3 trials; 502 women; low-quality evidence. Possible benefit: vitamin D supplementation versus placebo or control in pregnancy possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 4 trials; 446 women; low-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of probiotic with dietary intervention versus placebo with dietary intervention (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.89; 1 trial; 114 women; very low-quality evidence), or probiotic with dietary intervention versus control (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.92; 1 trial; 111 women; very low-quality evidence) on the risk of GDM. There was unknown benefit or harm of vitamin D + calcium supplementation versus placebo (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.84; 1 trial; 54 women; very low-quality evidence) or vitamin D + calcium + other minerals versus calcium + other minerals (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.73; 1 trial; 1298 women; very low-quality evidence) on the risk of GDM. Pharmaceutical Possible benefit: metformin versus placebo given to obese pregnant women possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.19; 3 trials; 892 women; moderate-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm:eight small trials with low- to very low-quality evidence showed unknown benefit or harm for heparin, aspirin, leukocyte immunisation or IgG given to women with a previous stillbirth on the risk of GDM. Management of other health issues Clear evidence of no effect: universal versus risk based screening of pregnant women for thyroid dysfunction had no effect on the risk of GDM: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.25; 1 trial; 4516 women; moderate-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of using fractional exhaled nitrogen oxide versus a clinical algorithm to adjust asthma therapy on the risk of GDM: RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.77; 1 trial; 210 women; low-quality evidence. There was unknown benefit or harm of pharmacist led multidisciplinary approach to management of maternal asthma versus standard care on the risk of GDM: RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 99.82; 1 trial; 58 women; low-quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS No interventions to prevent GDM in 11 systematic reviews were of clear benefit or harm. A combination of exercise and diet, supplementation with myo-inositol, supplementation with vitamin D and metformin were of possible benefit in reducing the risk of GDM, but further high-quality evidence is needed. Omega-3-fatty acid supplementation and universal screening for thyroid dysfunction did not alter the risk of GDM. There was insufficient high-quality evidence to establish the effect on the risk of GDM of diet or exercise alone, probiotics, vitamin D with calcium or other vitamins and minerals, interventions in pregnancy after a previous stillbirth, and different asthma management strategies in pregnancy. There is a lack of trials investigating the effect of interventions prior to or between pregnancies on risk of GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Griffith
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jane Alsweiler
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Abigail E Moore
- Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Brown
- School of Interprofessional Health Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Philippa Middleton
- Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emily Shepherd
- Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meertens LJE, Scheepers HCJ, van Kuijk SMJ, Roeleveld N, Aardenburg R, van Dooren IMA, Langenveld J, Zwaan IM, Spaanderman MEA, van Gelder MMHJ, Smits LJM. External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99:891-900. [PMID: 31955406 PMCID: PMC7317858 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. Material and methods Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies. Results The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models. Conclusions The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J E Meertens
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hubertina C J Scheepers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nel Roeleveld
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Aardenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo M A van Dooren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Jans Gasthuis Weert, Weert, The Netherlands
| | - Josje Langenveld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris M Zwaan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Marc E A Spaanderman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen M H J van Gelder
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J M Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moran PS, Wuytack F, Turner M, Normand C, Brown S, Begley C, Daly D. Economic burden of maternal morbidity - A systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227377. [PMID: 31945775 PMCID: PMC6964978 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To estimate the economic burden of common health problems associated with pregnancy and childbirth, such as incontinence, mental health problems, or gestational diabetes, excluding acute complications of labour or birth, or severe acute adverse maternal outcomes. Methods Searches for relevant studies were carried out to November 2019 in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EconLit databases. After initial screening, all results were reviewed for inclusion by two authors. An adapted version of a previously developed checklist for cost-of-illness studies was used for quality appraisal. All costs were converted to 2018 Euro using national consumer price indices and purchasing power parity conversion factors. Results Thirty-eight relevant studies were identified, some of which reported incremental costs for more than one health problem (16 gestational diabetes, 13 overweight/obesity, 8 mental health, 4 hypertensive disorders, 2 nausea and vomiting, 2 epilepsy, 1 intimate partner violence). A high level of heterogeneity was observed in both the methods used, and the incremental cost estimates obtained for each morbidity. Average incremental costs tended to be higher in studies that modelled a hypothetical cohort of women using data from a range of sources (compared to analyses of primary data), and in studies set in the United States. No studies that examined the economic burden of some common pregnancy-related morbidities, such as incontinence, pelvic girdle pain, or sexual health problems, were identified. Conclusion Our findings indicate that maternal morbidity is associated with significant costs to health systems and society, but large gaps remain in the evidence base for the economic burden of some common health problems associated with pregnancy and childbirth. More research is needed to examine the economic burden of a range of common maternal health problems, and future research should adopt consistent methodological approaches to ensure comparability of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick S. Moran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
- * E-mail:
| | | | | | - Charles Normand
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
- Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Brown
- General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cecily Begley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Daly
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou T, Huang L, Wang M, Chen D, Chen Z, Jiang SW. A Critical Review of Proteomic Studies in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Res 2020; 2020:6450352. [PMID: 32724825 PMCID: PMC7381988 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6450352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex pregnancy complication, which threatens both maternal and fetal health. It is urgent to screen for specific biomarkers for early diagnosis and precise treatment, as well as to identify key moleculars to better understand the pathogenic mechanisms. In the present review, we comprehensively summarized recent studies of gestational diabetes using mass spectrometry-based proteomic technologies. Focused on the entire experimental design and proteomic results, we showed that these studies have covered a broad range of research contents in terms of sampling time, sample types, and outcome associations. Although most of the studies only stayed in the stage of initial discovery, several proteins were further verified to be efficient for disease diagnosis. Functional analysis of all the combined significant proteins also showed that a small number of proteins are known to be involved in the regulation of insulin or indirect signaling pathways. However, many factors such as diagnostic criteria, sample processing, proteomic method, and statistical method can greatly affect the identification of reproducible and reliable protein candidates. Thus, we further provided constructive suggestions and recommendations for carrying out proteomic or follow-up studies of gestational diabetes or other pregnancy complications in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zhou
- Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Diseases, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Min Wang
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Daozhen Chen
- Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Diseases, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Zhong Chen
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Shi-Wen Jiang
- Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Diseases, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sosa-Rubi SG, Dainelli L, Silva-Zolezzi I, Detzel P, Espino Y Sosa S, Reyes-Muñoz E, Chivardi C, Ortiz-Panozo E, Lopez-Ridaura R. Short-term health and economic burden of gestational diabetes mellitus in Mexico: A modeling study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 153:114-124. [PMID: 31108135 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM To estimate the annual burden of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Mexico. METHODS A model was built to conduct estimates from a healthcare system perspective, namely, the incremental costs of GDM pregnancy compared with non-GDM pregnancy from the first trimester until childbirth. The model used probabilities from the literature and surveys, and costs obtained from the Ministry of Health and national healthcare institutions. Scenario analyses were performed to estimate the GDM burden at different levels of incidence. RESULTS Although a non-GDM pregnancy cost on average USD 1880.6 (low risk was USD 1043.9 and high risk was USD 1673.5), a pregnancy with GDM cost USD 2934.9. Therefore, the total additional cost was USD 1576.2 per case. Given the considerable variability of the GDM incidence in Mexico, the total burden could range from USD 86.8 to USD 827.4 million per year. CONCLUSIONS GDM is one of the most frequent complications of pregnancy, but research has been insufficient regarding its epidemiological and economic burden in Latin America. This paper shows that the GDM economic burden in Mexico is substantial despite only accounting for short-term medical costs. Further research to assess the GDM incidence and evaluate its long-term consequences from a broader societal perspective in Mexico is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Salvador Espino Y Sosa
- Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Enrique Reyes-Muñoz
- Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dong Y, Dai Z, Wang Z, Wang H, Yuan F, Zhu Y, Ye D, Wang B. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in systemic lupus erythematosus pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:179. [PMID: 31113392 PMCID: PMC6529995 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2329-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is well established that the risks of insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus are elevated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. However, the relationship between SLE pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is still obscure. We perform the present systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relationship between GDM and SLE pregnancy. Methods According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, relevant studies were carefully retrieved through PubMed, Cochrane library and Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database and China Biology Medicine database from inception till 30 August 2018. GDM risk ratio (RR) of pregnant SLE patients versus controls was calculated to evaluate the association between GDM and SLE. Pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects model by R software. Results The literature retrieval identified 339 potential studies in total, and five studies containing 3432 pregnant participants with 248 GDM events were included finally. Pooled analysis found that the risk of GDM were not significant increased in SLE patients compared to controls (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.49 to 2.41, Z = 0.19 and P = 0.848). Nevertheless, meta-regression identified that glucocorticoids use and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies positive of SLE patients were positively associated with the risk of GDM. Conclusions Our meta-analysis demonstrated that SLE pregnancy may not increase the risk of GDM, but the steroid use during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of GDM. Further large prospective and basic immunologic studies should be implemented for exploring the mechanism underlying glucocorticoids use and GDM. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2329-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Dong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Ziwei Dai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Zhihui Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Feifei Yuan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Ying Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Dongqing Ye
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China. .,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China. .,The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Griffith RJ, Alsweiler J, Moore AE, Brown S, Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Interventions to prevent women developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD012394. [PMCID: PMC6515838 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012394.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Overview). The objectives are as follows: To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews regarding the effects of interventions to prevent women developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Griffith
- University of AucklandDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth HealthAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Jane Alsweiler
- University of AucklandDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth HealthAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Abigail E Moore
- The University of AucklandLiggins Institute85 Park RoadAucklandNew Zealand1023
| | - Stephen Brown
- Auckland University of TechnologySchool of Interprofessional Health Studies90 Akoranga DriveAucklandNew Zealand0627
| | - Philippa Middleton
- Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteWomen's and Children's Hospital72 King William RoadAdelaideAustralia5006
| | - Emily Shepherd
- The University of AdelaideRobinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical SchoolAdelaideAustralia
| | - Caroline A Crowther
- The University of AucklandLiggins Institute85 Park RoadAucklandNew Zealand1023
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Al-Hashmi I, Hodge F, Nandy K, Thomas E, Brecht ML. The Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Intervention on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Actual Adherence to Healthy Behaviours Among Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2019; 18:e513-e519. [PMID: 30988972 DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-efficacy-enhancing intervention (SEEI) on perceived self-efficacy and actual adherence to healthy behaviours among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods This comparative pre-post study was conducted at the Antenatal Clinic of the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between October 2016 and January 2017. A total of 90 adult Omani women with GDM were randomised to either a control group receiving standard prenatal care or a SEEI group. The SEEI group received an additional health education session and biweekly text messages to encourage adherence to healthy behaviours. All participants completed self-reported standardised questionnaires to determine perceived self-efficacy and actual adherence at baseline and after four weeks. Results At baseline, there were no significant differences between the control and SEEI groups in mean scores for perceived self-efficacy (122.9 ± 19.9 versus 118.2 ± 19.5; P = 0.26) or actual adherence to healthy behaviours (3.1 ± 1.2 versus 3.2 ± 1.0; P = 0.23). However, after four weeks, there was a significant positive difference between the SEEI and control groups in terms of pre-post change in scores for both perceived self-efficacy (9.9 ± 19.6 versus -1.8 ± 17.6; P <0.05) and actual adherence to healthy behaviours (1.5 ± 1.1 versus 0.4 ± 0.8; P <0.01). Conclusion The SEEI was found to significantly improve perceived self-efficacy and actual adherence to healthy behaviours among a group of Omani women with GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Al-Hashmi
- Department of Maternal & Child Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Felicia Hodge
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Karabi Nandy
- Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth Thomas
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mary-Lynn Brecht
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu J, Ma J, Bao C, Di W, Zhang WH. Pregnancy outcomes among Chinese women with and without systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020909. [PMID: 29654043 PMCID: PMC5905749 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To completely and quantifiably determine the effect of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on pregnancy outcomes in a Chinese cohort. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING Data were collected at a tertiary medical centre located in Shanghai, China, from September 2011 to May 2017. PARTICIPANTS We assigned 338 pregnant women with SLE to the study cohort and 1014 randomly selected pregnant women without SLE (three for every woman with SLE) to a comparison cohort. The relevant medical records of all pregnant women were retrospectively reviewed. Cases of multiple pregnancy and cases in which an artificial abortion was performed for personal reasons were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Maternal and fetal outcomes were primary outcomes, and management of antenatal care was the secondary outcome. RESULTS The risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.75 to 4.09), pre-eclampsia (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.03) and premature rupture of membranes (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.46 to 4.40) were significantly different between women with and without SLE. Gestational diabetes was negatively associated with SLE in pregnant women (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.85). Pregnant women with SLE displayed significantly higher rates of fetal loss (OR 10.23, 95% CI 5.08 to 20.59), including spontaneous abortion (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.52 to 12.80), therapeutic abortion (OR 16.57, 95% CI 5.80 to 47.35) and stillbirth (OR 13.25, 95% CI 1.49 to 118.11), and a higher risk of preterm birth (OR 3.15, 95% CI 2.21 to 4.50), intrauterine growth restriction (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.58), a child who was small for the gestational age (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.13), a caesarean section (OR 4.73, 95% CI 3.30 to 6.80) or a neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.21 to 5.48) than women in the non-SLE population after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS In this study, SLE significantly increased the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, a preconception assessment and close antenatal monitoring by both rheumatologists and obstetricians should be performed in pregnant women with SLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayue Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai, China
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Jinghang Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunde Bao
- Department of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Rheumatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Di
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Hong Zhang
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- ResearchLaboratory for Human Reproduction, Facultyof Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lawrence RL, Brown J, Middleton P, Shepherd E, Brown S, Crowther CA. Interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016:CD012394. [PMCID: PMC6457994 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic Reviews regarding the effects of interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn L Lawrence
- The University of AucklandLiggins InstitutePrivate Bag 92019Victorial Street WestAucklandNew Zealand1142
| | - Julie Brown
- The University of AucklandLiggins InstitutePrivate Bag 92019Victorial Street WestAucklandNew Zealand1142
| | - Philippa Middleton
- Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteWomen's and Children's Hospital72 King William RoadAdelaideAustralia5006
| | - Emily Shepherd
- The University of AdelaideARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAdelaideAustralia5006
| | - Stephen Brown
- Auckland University of TechnologySchool of Interprofessional Health Studies90 Akoranga DriveAucklandNew Zealand0627
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lawrence RL, Wall CR, Bloomfield FH, Crowther CA. Dietetic management of gestational diabetes in New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey. Nutr Diet 2016; 74:95-104. [DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clare R. Wall
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Are There Benefits for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Treating Lower Levels of Hyperglycemia Than Standard Recommendations? Can J Diabetes 2016; 40:548-554. [PMID: 27423765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommendations for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are generating discussion regarding their universal adoption. Our centre is currently using stricter GDM diagnostic criteria than those proposed by the IADPSG. Evaluation of complication rates and their predictors in our cohort may provide insight for the care of this high-risk population. Therefore, we determined complication rates and identified antepartum maternal predictors of adverse outcomes in our cohort with mild GDM. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed between 2005 and 2011. It included women with and without GDM, which was diagnosed if fasting plasma glucose levels were 5.0 or above or 2-hour post 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were 7.8 mmol/L or higher. RESULTS A total of 3712 women, with and without diabetes, were included. Rates of macrosomia and pre-eclampsia were significantly higher in the group with GDM but were lower than the rates usually reported. Macrosomia, the need for insulin therapy or caesarean section and postpartum glucose intolerance predictors included prepregnancy body mass index, excessive gestational weight gain and OGTT screening results, although no specific threshold was found. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insight into GDM-related complications rates and the benefits of intervention in a large cohort of women with levels of hyperglycemia lower than those currently recommended for diagnosis of GDM. These findings suggest a continuous association between adverse outcomes and maternal hyperglycemia and highlight the important role of maternal risk factors other than glycemic results in the development of pregnancy-related complications. Milder forms of hyperglycemia that would not be identified by IADPSG guidelines may benefit from treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Danyliv A. Response to Dr. Coustan: Costs of gestational diabetes (comment on Danyliv, A. et al. Short- and long-term effects of gestational diabetes mellitus on healthcare cost: a cross-sectional comparative study in the ATLANTIC DIP cohort). Diabet Med 2016; 33:851-2. [PMID: 26337057 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Danyliv
- School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Coustan DR. Costs of gestational diabetes. Diabet Med 2016; 33:852-3. [PMID: 26361358 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D R Coustan
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kennelly MA, McAuliffe FM. Prediction and prevention of Gestational Diabetes: an update of recent literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 202:92-8. [PMID: 27235645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Revised: 03/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes (GDM) confers adverse risk to the health of the mother and fetus both in pregnancy and later life. The background rate in pregnancy varies between 2 and 14% with incidences reported to be as high as 40% in obese populations. GDM diagnoses are escalating because of rising numbers of overweight and obesity in the reproductive age group but also because of different screening and diagnostic criteria. Lifestyle modification in those diagnosed with GDM has been proven to be an effective treatment in attenuating the metabolic dysregulation associated with this and potentially avoiding the need for medical therapy with either metformin or insulin. Emerging evidence in previous years suggests lifestyle interventions (dietary±physical activity and behavior modification) either pre-pregnancy or antenatally may reduce the incidence of GDM. The first trimester is also becoming an important interrogation period for the prediction of many adverse obstetric outcomes including abnormal glucose metabolism. This review outlines the most contemporary evidence on the prediction and non-pharmacological antenatal prevention strategies used for Gestational Diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Kennelly
- UCD Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F M McAuliffe
- UCD Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Danyliv A, Gillespie P, O'Neill C, Tierney M, O'Dea A, McGuire BE, Glynn LG, Dunne FP. The cost-effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary and secondary care in the Republic of Ireland. Diabetologia 2016; 59:436-44. [PMID: 26670162 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3824-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in primary and secondary care settings, compared with a no-screening option, in the Republic of Ireland. METHODS The analysis was based on a decision-tree model of alternative screening strategies in primary and secondary care settings. It synthesised data generated from a randomised controlled trial (screening uptake) and from the literature. Costs included those relating to GDM screening and treatment, and the care of adverse outcomes. Effects were assessed in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The impact of the parameter uncertainty was assessed in a range of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Screening in either setting was found to be superior to no screening, i.e. it provided for QALY gains and cost savings. Screening in secondary care was found to be superior to screening in primary care, providing for modest QALY gains of 0.0006 and a saving of €21.43 per screened case. The conclusion held with high certainty across the range of ceiling ratios from zero to €100,000 per QALY and across a plausible range of input parameters. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION The results of this study demonstrate that implementation of universal screening is cost-effective. This is an argument in favour of introducing a properly designed and funded national programme of screening for GDM, although affordability remains to be assessed. In the current environment, screening for GDM in secondary care settings appears to be the better solution in consideration of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andriy Danyliv
- J. E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, H91TK33, Galway, Ireland.
- School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Paddy Gillespie
- J. E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, H91TK33, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciaran O'Neill
- J. E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, H91TK33, Galway, Ireland
| | - Marie Tierney
- School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Galway Diabetes Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Angela O'Dea
- School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Galway Diabetes Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Brian E McGuire
- Galway Diabetes Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Liam G Glynn
- Galway Diabetes Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Discipline of General Practice, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Fidelma P Dunne
- School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Galway Diabetes Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|