Incretin-based glucose-lowering medications and the risk of acute pancreatitis and malignancies: a meta-analysis based on cardiovascular outcomes trials

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in children with obesity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) and expert joint perspective 2025

Introduction

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Expert Joint Perspective examines steatotic liver disease (SLD), which is composed of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in children with obesity. The prevalence of obesity is increasing, rates have tripled since 1963 from 5 % to now 19 % of US children affected in 2018. MASLD, is the most common liver disease seen in children, can be a precursor to the development of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) and is the primary reason for liver transplant listing in young adults. We must be vigilant in prevention and treatment of MASLD in childhood to prevent further progression.

Methods

This joint clinical perspective is based upon scientific evidence, peer and clinical expertise. The medical literature was reviewed via PubMed search and appropriate articles were included in this review. This work was formulated from the collaboration of eight hepatologists/gastroenterologists with MASLD expertise and two physicians from the OMA.

Results

The authors who are experts in the field, determined sentinel questions often asked by clinicians regarding MASLD in children with obesity. They created a consensus and clinical guideline for clinicians on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of MASLD associated with obesity in children.

Conclusions

Obesity and the comorbidity of MASLD is increasing in children, and this is a medical problem that needs to be addressed urgently. It is well known that children with metabolic associated chronic disease often continue to have these chronic diseases as adults, which leads to reduced life expectancy, quality of life, and increasing healthcare needs and financial burden. The authors of this paper recommend healthy weight reduction not only through lifestyle modification but through obesity pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Therefore, this guidance reviews available therapies to achieve healthy weight reduction and reverse MASLD to prevent progressive liver fibrosis, and metabolic disease.

Comparative Safety of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Agents in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multinational Real-World Evidence From LEGEND-T2DM

Background

As prescribing of newer antihyperglycemic agents expands, there remains limited comparative safety data for older adults-a population particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events and underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the real-world safety of second-line antihyperglycemic agents among older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We conducted a multinational cohort study using nine harmonized electronic health record and claims databases from the U.S. and Europe, applying a consistent analytical framework based on the LEGEND-T2DM initiative. Among adults aged ≥65 years who initiated a second-line agent after metformin monotherapy, we compared safety outcomes across four drug classes: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is), DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4Is), and sulfonylureas (SUs). We used propensity score adjustment, empirical calibration, and prespecified diagnostics to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for 18 safety outcomes.

Results

In a cohort of 1.8 million older adults, both GLP1RAs and SGLT2Is were linked to significantly lower risks of hypoglycemia (HR 0.21 [95% CI, 0.16-0.27] for GLP1RA vs SU; HR 0.21 [0.13-0.33] for SGLT2I vs SU) and hyperkalemia (HR 0.63 [0.50-0.81] for GLP1RA vs SU; HR 0.75 [0.63-0.90] for SGLT2I vs SU) and peripheral edema (HR 0.81 [0.71-0.92] for GLP1RAs vs. DPP4Is; HR 0.62 [0.46-0.84] for SGLT2Is vs. SU). However, SGLT2Is were associated with a higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis compared to both GLP1RAs (HR 2.03 [1.38-2.99]) and SUs (HR 1.64 [1.27-2.11]). GLP1RAs had significantly higher risks of nausea (HR 0.63 [0.55-0.72]) and vomiting (HR 0.63 [0.57-0.69]) relative to SGLT2Is. Results were consistent across both on-treatment and intent-to-treat sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

In older adults with type 2 diabetes, GLP1RAs and SGLT2Is demonstrated more favorable safety profiles than SUs and DPP4Is across multiple clinically relevant outcomes. These results support more informed, safety-conscious prescribing in a population underrepresented in clinical trials yet highly susceptible to adverse effects.

Drug-induced pancreatitis: a real-world analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and network pharmacology

Background

Drug-induced pancreatitis is a rare disease but frequently reported, owing to the vast number of medications.

Aim

To summarize potential drugs causing pancreatitis and to speculate on underlying mechanisms.

Methods

We extracted more than 60,000 reports of pancreatitis submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (January 2004 to March 2023). Data on patient age, sex, weight, time to onset, and outcome (death et al.) were collected. Disproportionality analysis was used in data mining to identify associations between drugs and pancreatitis events. Seven databases, commonly used for network pharmacology analysis, were searched to identify potential targets.

Results

Of 867 drugs with 3 or more reports, 101 drugs met all criteria using disproportionality analysis and indicated a potential risk of pancreatitis. The risk of 40 drugs had not been previously noted in "UpToDate" database. Patients taking the drugs had a similar sex distribution, were mostly 45-64 years old, and were heavier (median, 88 kg; P < 0.0001). The median time to onset was 199 days (interquartile range, 27-731.5). Ponatinib (16.48%), tigecycline (14.12%) and valproic acid (13.41%) had higher fatality rates. Potential targets related to pancreatitis were identified in 50 of the 101 drugs.

Conclusion

Clinicians providing the 101 drugs for treatment should stay vigilant to detect pancreatitis early.

Real-world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer GLP-1RA-based weight-loss therapies

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as key agents for weight management, based on their marked efficacy as observed in randomized controlled trials. While still limited, real-world studies on GLP-1RA use in populations with obesity are increasingly available. This narrative review discusses contemporary real-world evidence demonstrating the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of the currently approved GLP-1RA-based weight-loss therapies, that is, liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide. The observed weight reduction in clinical practice overall tends to be lower than in randomized controlled trials; however, outcomes approach those seen in trials when focusing on highly adherent patients. Real-world studies demonstrate high discontinuation rates of GLP-1RAs (20%-50%) within the first year, and the use of much lower doses than those evaluated in clinical trials. Evidence from observational studies within type 2 diabetes or obesity populations suggests frequent gastrointestinal disturbances in GLP-1RA users, as also observed in trials, but no clear increase in risks of severe events like pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer, thyroid disorders, or depression and self-harm. Further evidence is needed to understand possible real-world associations of GLP-1RAs with eye disease and other rare outcomes. We provide 10 areas of particular importance for further research on GLP-1RA within the real-world space, including improved understanding of the exact drivers of early discontinuation and suboptimal dosing, studies of the effects of stopping GLP-1RA treatment, and investigations of clinical and cost-effectiveness for hard clinical outcomes in real-world settings, including not only cardio-reno-metabolic outcomes but also obesity-induced diseases like neuropsychiatric disease, cancer, musculoskeletal disease, and infections. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Recent advancements in weight-loss medications have sparked a lot of interest. The so-called GLP-1 receptor agonist medications (GLP-1RAs) have gained a lot of attention, because they have shown to be very effective, leading to significant weight loss in patients participating in clinical trials. GLP-1RAs, like liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, help manage weight by mimicking hormones that control blood sugar and appetite. However, how these medications perform in real life can be different from the controlled settings of clinical trials, in which patients are carefully selected and their treatment plans closely followed. This literature review looks at how these medications are used and their effectiveness and safety in real-world settings. In real-life practice, GLP-1RAs are often less effective than in clinical trial conditions. This is usually because patients don't follow their medication plans as strictly as in trials. Real-world data shows that many patients use lower doses and do not stick to their treatment as strictly as participants in a controlled trial might, leading to less weight loss. However, those who do follow their plans closely can achieve results similar to those in trials. A major issue with GLP-1RAs is that many patients stop using them within the first year due to side effects or high costs of the medications, especially if not covered by insurance. Common side effects include nausea and digestive problems, which are the main reasons patients stop taking these treatments. These side effects are often manageable and decrease over time, and this reviews found no strong real-world evidence that GLP-1RAs cause severe side effects in many users. Despite these challenges, when GLP-1RAs are used effectively and consistently, they show substantial benefits in weight loss, most so the newest medications semaglutide and tirzepatide. These medications are also likely to help manage and prevent weight-related health conditions like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but evidence for these beneficial outcomes is still scarce in real-world settings. The review emphasizes the need for more research to understand why many patients stop using these medications and how to improve dosing. It also calls for studies on the long-term effects of these therapies on various health outcomes, including mental health, cardiometabolic health, cancer, and rare conditions like eye diseases. Overall, while GLP-1RAs are a valuable tool for weight management, their real-world use requires careful consideration of individual patient factors, such as the ability to stick to treatment plans, manage side effects, and afford the medications. Further research will help make these treatments more effective for a wider range of people that need them.

Novel pharmacotherapies for weight loss: Understanding the role of incretins to enable weight loss and improved health outcomes

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) are widespread diseases that significantly impact cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. In the recent years, intensive research has been performed to assess the role of adipose tissue and body fat distribution in the development of metabolic and non-metabolic complications in individuals with obesity. In addition to lifestyle modifications, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RA) have become a meaningful treatment expansion for the management of both disorders. In addition to improving metabolic control and reducing body weight, treatment with GLP-1-RAs reduces cardiovascular and renal events in individuals with obesity with and without diabetes. These important benefits of GLP-1-RAs have triggered new interest in other enteroendocrine and enteropancreatic peptides for treating obesity and its metabolic and non-metabolic consequences. The first peptide dual-agonist targeting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptors has been approved for the treatment of T2D and obesity. GIP/GLP-1 dual-agonism appear to provide better metabolic control and greater weight reduction compared with GLP-1-R mono-agonism. Other peptide and non-peptide co-agonists are in clinical development for obesity, T2D, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and other metabolic disorders. This narrative review aims to summarize the available data on approved and emerging enteroendocrine and enteropancreatic based treatment approaches for obesity and metabolic disorders. In addition to available clinical efficacy measures, side effects, limitations and open challenges will also be addressed.

Safety and effectiveness in an uncontrolled setting of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy: Real-life experience from a national reference network

AIM

To describe the effects of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) assessed in a real-life setting in a national reference network.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with FPLD in the French lipodystrophy reference network, who initiated GLP-1RA. Data were recorded before, at one-year (12 ± 6 months) and at the latest follow-up on GLP-1RA therapy (≥18 months).

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (89.4% of women), diagnosed with LMNA-related FPLD2 (n = 57), PPARG-related FPLD3 (n = 4), PLIN1-related FPLD4 (n = 5) or FPLD1 (n = 10) initiated GLP-1RA therapy between 2008 and 2024. Patients were aged a median (IQR) 48 years (34.5-57), body mass index (BMI) was 26.0 kg/m2 (23.9-29.5), HbA1c 8.3% (7.5-9.3), triglycerides 2.31 mmol/L (1.62-3.88). GLP-1RA were used in addition to previously used antidiabetics, 50% of patients being insulin-treated. After one year with GLP-1RA therapy, BMI, HbA1c and triglycerides significantly decreased to 25.6 kg/m2 (22.7-29.1), 7.3% (6.6-8.3) and 1.97 mmol/L (1.5-3.2) respectively (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), without significant changes in other antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs. Gamma-glutamyl-transferase and alanine-aminotransferase levels also significantly decreased. Effects on HbA1c, BMI and triglycerides persisted in the long term. One case of acute pancreatitis occurred during follow-up, associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia in a non-observant patient. Gastrointestinal symptoms affected 34% of patients, leading to GLP-1RA withdrawal in six patients.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1RA significantly improved BMI, HbA1c and triglycerides in a large majority of patients with FPLD. Larger and prospective controlled studies are warranted for identification of predictive factors and safety.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer risk: advancing precision medicine through mechanistic understanding and clinical evidence

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as a primary first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes. This has raised concerns about their impact on cancer risk, spurring extensive research. This review systematically examines the varied effects of GLP-1RAs on the risk of different types of tumors, including overall cancer risk and specific cancers such as thyroid, pancreatic, reproductive system, liver, and colorectal cancers. The potential biological mechanisms underlying their influence on cancer risk are complex, involving metabolic regulation, direct antitumor effects, immune modulation, and epigenetic changes. A systematic comparison with other antidiabetic agents reveals notable differences in their influence on cancer risk across drug classes. Additionally, critical factors that shape the relationship between GLP-1RAs and cancer risk are thoroughly analyzed, including patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment regimens, and lifestyle factors, offering essential insights for developing individualized treatment protocols. Despite significant research progress, critical gaps remain. Future research should prioritize elucidating the molecular mechanisms behind the antitumor effects, refining individualized treatment strategies, investigating early tumor prevention applications, assessing potential benefits for non-diabetic populations, advancing the development of novel therapies, establishing robust safety monitoring frameworks, and building precision medicine decision-making platforms. These efforts aim to establish novel roles for GLP-1RAs in cancer prevention. and treatment, thereby advancing the progress of precision medicine.

What is the evidence regarding the safety of new obesity pharmacotherapies

The use of gut-hormone receptors agonists as new therapeutic options for obesity and some of its related comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes, has resulted in an unprecedented efficacy in the medical management of people living with obesity (PLWO). Appraisal of the safety of these drugs is of utmost importance considering the large number of PLWO, and the potentially long exposure to these pharmacotherapies. In this narrative review we summarize the evidence on the safety of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide as derived from randomized clinical trials conducted in adults living with obesity. Additionally, the safety of these drugs is put into perspective with that of other drugs currently approved for the treatment of PLWO. Overall, the available data support a favorable efficacy versus safety balance for gut-hormone hormone receptor analogues in the treatment of these subjects. Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that in the context of a chronic disease that has reached epidemic proportions, data from randomized clinical trials aimed primarily at proving the efficacy of these drugs may have been insufficient to unveil all the safety issues. Thus, continuous surveillance on the adverse effects of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide is required as we use these drugs in a broader population than that represented in currently available clinical trials.

Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in people with history of acute pancreatitis: TriNetX analysis

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are used in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, concerns over their association with acute pancreatitis (AP) have emerged. Our aim was to evaluate the risk of recurrence of AP in subjects on GLP-1RAs with a history of AP.

METHODS

This retrospective study deployed the TriNetX platform. We identified adult cohorts of subjects with a history of AP and analyzed the impact of individual medications (GLP-1RAs, SGLT2i, or DPP4i) on the risk of recurrence of AP. To adjust for baseline differences, propensity score matching was done in cohorts with and without risk factors for AP.

RESULTS

Our analysis of 672,069 patients with a history of AP and T2D revealed significant risk reductions associated with GLP-1RAs compared to other treatments. Over one to five years, GLP-1RAs consistently showed a lower risk of AP recurrence compared to SGLT2i and DPP-4i. Specifically, over a one-year period, GLP-1RAs users had a risk reduction of -0.071 (95 % CI:0.085 to -0.057) (p < 0.001) compared to SGLT2i, and -0.064 (95 % CI:0.080 to -0.048) (p< 0.001) compared to DPP-4i. These trends persisted, with the risk differences further widening by the fifth year to -0.086 and -0.094, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, we conclude that GLP-1RAs may be safely used in subjects with a history of acute pancreatitis. While our analysis showed that there was a significantly lower risk of AP recurrence in subjects on GLP-1compared to DPP-IV inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors, as this is a retrospective analysis we suggest that these findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Alcohol Use Disorder

In the search for novel treatment strategies for alcohol use disorder (AUD), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) approved for treating Type 2 diabetes and obesity have caught much attention. GLP-1 is a naturally occurring peptide produced in the small intestines and the brain, regulating plasma glucose levels and satiety. This focused review will report on the preclinical studies, case stories, register-based cohort studies, brain-imaging data and secondary analysis of clinical data supporting the role of GLP-1RAs as a novel treatment of AUD. Several clinical trials are ongoing, examining the potential effects of the GLP-1RA semaglutide in AUD.

Proteomic changes upon treatment with semaglutide in individuals with obesity

Obesity and type 2 diabetes are prevalent chronic diseases effectively managed by semaglutide. Here we studied the effects of semaglutide on the circulating proteome using baseline and end-of-treatment serum samples from two phase 3 trials in participants with overweight or obesity, with or without diabetes: STEP 1 (n = 1,311) and STEP 2 (n = 645). We identified evidence supporting broad effects of semaglutide, implicating processes related to body weight regulation, glycemic control, lipid metabolism and inflammatory pathways. Several proteins were regulated with semaglutide, after accounting for changes in body weight and HbA1c at end of trial, suggesting effects of semaglutide on the proteome beyond weight loss and glucose lowering. A comparison of semaglutide with real-world proteomic profiles revealed potential benefits on disease-specific proteomic signatures including the downregulation of specific proteins associated with cardiovascular disease risk, supporting its reported effects of lowering cardiovascular disease risk and potential drug repurposing opportunities. This study showcases the potential of proteomics data gathered from randomized trials for providing insights into disease mechanisms and drug repurposing opportunities. These data also highlight the unmet need for, and importance of, examining proteomic changes in response to weight loss pharmacotherapy in future trials.

Pancreatic Safety of Tirzepatide and Its Effects on Islet Cell Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulate islet cell function. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been associated with an elevated risk of acute pancreatitis. Data on the pancreatic safety of tirzepatide (a dual GLP-1 and GIP agonist) and its effects on islet cell function in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce. Moreover, no meta-analysis has comprehensively examined such effects of tirzepatide.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs with tirzepatide as the intervention and a placebo or active comparator as the control. The primary outcome was adjudication-confirmed pancreatitis; secondary outcomes were the percent changes from baseline in serum pancreatic amylase, lipase, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR).

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs with 18 published reports involving 14,645 subjects were analyzed. Over a follow-up duration of 12-72 weeks, tirzepatide had identical risks of pancreatitis to placebo (tirzepatide 5 mg: RR 2.04, 95% CI [0.27-15.69], p = 0.49; 10 mg: RR 0.63, 95% CI [0.08-5.12], p = 0.67; and 15 mg: RR 1.26, 95% CI [0.36-4.98], p = 0.72). Tirzepatide was also associated with comparable risks of pancreatitis to insulin and GLP-1RAs. However, tirzepatide (at all doses) caused greater increases in pancreatic amylase and lipase than placebo and insulin. Individuals on tirzepatide 15 mg and GLP-1RAs had similar risks of having increased lipase levels. The percent reductions in fasting insulin were greater with tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg than with placebo. All doses of tirzepatide caused greater percent reductions in fasting insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon than GLP-1RAs. Compared to placebo and GLP-1RAs, the percent reductions in HOMA2-IR were greater with all doses of tirzepatide.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provides evidence of the safety of tirzepatide regarding pancreatitis and establishes its positive effect on islet cell functions and insulin resistance.

Transforming steatotic liver disease management: The emerging role of GLP-1 receptor agonists

Chronic liver disease is a major cause of mortality, with approximately 2 million deaths worldwide each year, and it poses a significant economic burden. The most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States and Europe is steatotic liver disease (SLD), which includes metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated SLD, and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). Effective treatment of these conditions is essential to reduce the liver disease burden, with promising approaches including treating cardiometabolic risk factors and excessive alcohol intake. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, both as monotherapy and in combination with other drugs, are gaining attention for their beneficial impact on cardiometabolic risk factors and excessive alcohol intake. In this review, we examine the molecular and clinical effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, focusing on their direct hepatic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis but also the indirect influence on cardiometabolic risk factors and excessive alcohol intake as key features of SLD. We also explore the future implications of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for treating metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated SLD, alcohol-associated liver disease, and the potential challenges.

Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity

The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes and obesity was followed by data establishing the cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA in select patient populations. In ongoing trials investigators are interrogating the efficacy of these agents for new indications, including metabolic liver disease, peripheral artery disease, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer disease. The success of GLP-1-based medicines has spurred the development of new molecular entities and combinations with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, exemplified by tirzepatide, a GIP-GLP-1 receptor coagonist. Simultaneously, investigational molecules such as maritide block the GIP and activate the GLP-1 receptor, whereas retatrutide and survodutide enable simultaneous activation of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. Here I highlight evidence establishing the efficacy of GLP-1-based medicines, while discussing data that inform safety, focusing on muscle strength, bone density and fractures, exercise capacity, gastrointestinal motility, retained gastric contents and anesthesia, pancreatic and biliary tract disorders, and the risk of cancer. Rapid progress in development of highly efficacious GLP-1 medicines, and anticipated differentiation of newer agents in subsets of metabolic disorders, will provide greater opportunities for use of personalized medicine approaches to improve the health of people living with cardiometabolic disorders.

Assessing the therapeutic and toxicological profile of novel GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

GLP-1 receptor agonists provide multiple benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, there are also several significant adverse effects associated with these agents. A thorough understanding of both therapeutic and toxicological profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists is crucial for appropriate utilization of this medication class. A literature search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was carried out to inform discussion on the topic.

AREAS COVERED

This review article discusses the key advantages and disadvantages derived from the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Landmark trials which helped characterize the cardiovascular and renal benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists are highlighted. We also discuss key studies still in progress and new formulations under investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

GLP-1 receptor agonists provide glycemic and complication-risk reduction benefits for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Current data suggests there is a lot of potential for further applications, even outside of type 2 diabetes management. It would be of particular interest to see the range of benefits conferred from GLP-1 receptor agonists in individuals without type 2 diabetes. Broader application of these medications could be expected given the ongoing development of new oral formulations and combination agents.

The role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity

INTRODRODUCTION

Obesity and its associated metabolic conditions have become a significant global health problem in recent years, with many people living with obesity fulfilling criteria for pharmacological treatment. The development of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for chronic weight management has triggered new interest in the incretins and other hormones as targets for obesity, and investigations into dual and triple co-agonists.

METHODS

The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the available data on approved and emerging incretin-based agents for the treatment of obesity.

RESULTS

In clinical trials of currently available agents in people with overweight or obesity, weight loss of between 6% and 21% of baseline body weight has been observed, with between 23% and 94% of participants achieving 10% or higher weight loss, depending on the study and the agent used. Favourable outcomes have also been seen with regard to cardiovascular risk and outcomes, diabetes prevention, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis and prevention of weight regain after metabolic surgery. Limitations associated with these agents include high costs, the potential for weight regain once treatment is stopped, the potential loss of lean body mass and gastrointestinal adverse events; potential issues with respect to gallbladder and biliary diseases require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Many dual and triple co-agonists are still in development, and more data are needed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these emerging therapies versus the established incretin-based therapies; however, data are promising, and further results are eagerly awaited.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of semaglutide: Post-marketing pharmacovigilance data

AIM/INTRODUCTION

The recent adverse reactions associated with semaglutide have led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue a "black box warning", and it is necessary to analyze all reports of adverse reactions to improve the safety of its clinical use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Statistical analyses and signal mining were performed by obtaining the adverse event reports related to semaglutide in the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023. We used disproportionality and Bayesian analysis to examine clinical and demographic attributes, trends reported quarterly, and contrasts between two distinct indications (obesity and type 2 diabetes).

RESULTS

We found 10 unexpected adverse signals related to "pancreatic cancer", "intestinal obstruction", "cholecystitis", and "polycystic ovary" and both the two different indications had the same serious adverse reaction events occurring.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified many unexpected signals of serious adverse reactions, suggesting the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance of semaglutide to understand its potential risks.

Glycemic Variability in Pancreatogenic Diabetes Mellitus: characteristics, Risks, Potential Mechanisms, and Treatment Possibilities

In recent years, pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus has garnered significant attention due to its high incidence, complications, and mortality rates. Glycemic variability (GV) can increase the risk of pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus and its associated complications; however, the precise mechanism remains unclear. The effective control of GV is crucial for preventing the onset of pancreatic diabetes mellitus and improving prognosis. Both diet and antidiabetic medications have substantial effects on GV. However, many patients are prescribed suboptimal or even harmful drugs. Therefore, to provide a comprehensive treatment basis for clinicians to prevent and treat pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus, this study aimed to elucidate the relationship between GV and pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus; investigate the potential mechanisms (such as oxidative stress, inflammatory response, insulin resistance, and lipid metabolism disorders); provide lifestyle guidance; and recommend drug selections to reduce the GV in patients with pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus.

Non-functional alpha-cell hyperplasia with glucagon-producing NET: a case report

Introduction

Alpha-cell hyperplasia (ACH) is a rare pancreatic endocrine condition. Three types of ACH have been described: functional or nonglucagonoma hyperglucagonemic glucagonoma syndrome, reactive or secondary to defective glucagon signaling, and non-functional. Few cases of ACH with concomitant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) have been reported and its etiology remains poorly understood. A case report of non-functional ACH with glucagon-producing NET is herein presented.

Case report

A 72-year-old male was referred to our institution for a 2 cm single pNET incidentally found during imaging for acute cholecystitis. The patient's past medical history included type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosed 12 years earlier, for which he was prescribed metformin, dapagliflozin, and semaglutide. The pNET was clinically and biochemically non-functioning, apart from mildly elevated glucagon 217 pg/ml (<209), and 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT positive uptake was only found at the pancreatic tail (SUVmax 11.45). The patient underwent a caudal pancreatectomy and the post-operative 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT was negative. A multifocal well-differentiated NET G1, pT1N0M0R0 (mf) strongly staining for glucagon on a background neuroendocrine alpha-cell hyperplasia with some degree of acinar fibrosis was identified on pathology analysis.

Discussion and conclusion

This case reports the incidental finding of a clinically non-functioning pNET in a patient with T2D and elevated glucagon levels, unexpectedly diagnosed as glucagon-producing NET and ACH. A high level of suspicion was required to conduct the glucagon immunostaining, which is not part of the pathology routine for a clinically non-functioning pNET, and was key for the diagnosis that otherwise would have been missed. This case highlights the need to consider the diagnosis of glucagon-producing pNET on an ACH background even in the absence of glucagonoma syndrome.

GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: a narrative review

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) present major global health challenges, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as a pivotal treatment option for both conditions, demonstrating efficacy in blood glucose management, weight reduction, cardiovascular disease prevention, and kidney health improvement. GLP-1, an incretin hormone, plays a crucial role in glucose metabolism and appetite regulation, influencing insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, and gastric emptying. The therapeutic use of GLP-1RAs has evolved significantly, offering various formulations that provide different efficacy, routes of administration, and flexibility in dosing. These agents reduce HbA1c levels, facilitate weight loss, and exhibit cardiovascular protective effects, making them an integral component of T2DM and obesity management. This review will discuss the currently approved medication for T2DM and obesity, and will also highlight the advent of novel agents which are dual and triple hormonal agonists which represent the future direction of incretin-based therapy.

Funding

National Institutes of HealthNIDDKU24 DK132733 (FCS), UE5 DK137285 (FCS), and P30 DK040561 (FCS).

The incidence of acute pancreatitis with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in individuals with a known history of pancreatitis

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been reported to increase the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). This real-world study did not observe a higher frequency of AP with GLP-1RA exposure in adults with T2D and a prior history of AP regardless of etiology.

Advances in small-molecule insulin secretagogues for diabetes treatment

Diabetes, a metabolic disease caused by abnormally high levels of blood glucose, has a high prevalence rate worldwide and causes a series of complications, including coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, and retinopathy. Small-molecule compounds have been developed as drugs for the treatment of diabetes because of their oral advantages. Insulin secretagogues are a class of small-molecule drugs used to treat diabetes, and include sulfonylureas, non-sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, and other novel small-molecule insulin secretagogues. However, many small-molecule compounds cause different side effects, posing huge challenges to drug monotherapy and drug selection. Therefore, the use of different small-molecule drugs must be improved. This article reviews the mechanism, advantages, limitations, and potential risks of small-molecule insulin secretagogues to provide future research directions on small-molecule drugs for the treatment of diabetes.

A comprehensive meta-analysis on the association of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs with vascular diseases, digestive diseases and fractures

AIM

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are two new classes of antidiabetic agents. We aimed to evaluate the association between these two drug classes and risk of various vascular diseases, digestive diseases and fractures.

METHODS

Large randomized trials of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs were included. Outcomes of interest were the various serious adverse events related to vascular diseases, digestive diseases and fractures. We performed meta-analyses using synthesize risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect size.

RESULTS

We included 27 large trials. SGLT2is had significant association with less hypertension (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91), hypertensive crisis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84), varicose vein (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.92), and vomiting (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97); but more spinal compression fracture (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.92) and tibia fracture. GLP-1RAs had significant association with more deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.00), pancreatitis (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07-2.22), and cholecystitis acute (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.08-2.09); but less rib fracture (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.97). Sensitivity analyses suggested that our findings were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2is may have protective effects against specific vascular and digestive diseases, whereas they may increase the incidence of site-specific fractures (e.g., spinal compression fracture). GLP-1RAs may have protective effects against site-specific fractures (i.e., rib fracture), whereas they may increase the incidence of specific vascular and digestive diseases. These findings may help to make a choice between SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in clinical practice.

Evaluating the safety profile of semaglutide: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Semaglutide is increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Ensuring the safety of this medication is crucial for its clinical use. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety profile of semaglutide across patient populations and treatment durations.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials assessing the safety of semaglutide vs. placebo, with specified treatment durations were identified. The primary outcome was occurrence of any cardiovascular adverse events. Secondary outcomes included sudden cardiac death, adverse events leading to death, adverse events, gastrointestinal side effects, occurrence of hypoglycemia, and new-onset neoplasm.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria with a combined sample size of 57,911 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that the adverse event associated with semaglutide is gastrointestinal in nature (nausea and vomiting). No significant differences were observed between semaglutide and comparator groups.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide appears to have a favorable safety profile across diverse patient populations and treatment durations, supporting its continued use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. It is generally well-tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. Clinicians should be aware of these findings and monitor patients accordingly. Further long-term studies are warranted to assess the safety of semaglutide in clinical practice.

Incretin mimetics and acute pancreatitis: enemy or innocent bystander?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incretin enhancers and mimetics, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and GLP-1/GIP co-agonists, have become mainstays in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, the approval of certain GLP-1RA and GLP-1/GIP co-agonists for the treatment of obesity has broadened their popularity and use. In this review, we summarize the evidence for an association of these drugs with acute pancreatitis and other adverse events of special interest to gastroenterologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to pancreatic islets, GLP-1 receptors are expressed in the exocrine cells of the pancreas. There is inconsistent evidence for an association of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1RA and co-agonists with risk for acute pancreatitis in individual trials. Meta-analyses of long-term randomized controlled trials indicate a small risk of acute pancreatitis associated with DPP-4 inhibitors but not GLP-1RA or co-agonists. Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis may be more common among those treated with GLP-1RA and GLP-1/GIP co-agonists. There is no evidence that any of these drugs are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

SUMMARY

While drugs that leverage the incretin system are increasingly being used for patients with T2D and obesity, caution in warranted in those with a history of pancreatitis and gallbladder disease.

The benefits of oral glucose-lowering agents: GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 and SGLT-2 inhibitors on myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease that, on average, results in 8.5 million deaths worldwide each year. Timely revascularization of occluded vessels is a critical method of myocardial salvage. However, reperfusion paradoxically leads to the worsening of myocardial damage known as myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury (MI/RI). Therefore, reducing the size of myocardial infarction after reperfusion is critical and remains an important therapeutic goal. The susceptibility of the myocardium to MI/RI may be increased by diabetes. Currently, some traditional antidiabetic agents such as metformin reduce MI/RI by decreasing inflammation, inhibiting oxidative stress, and improving vascular endothelial function. This appears to be a new direction for the treatment of MI/RI. Recent cardiovascular outcome trials have shown that several oral antidiabetic agents, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), and sodium-glucose-linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), not only have good antidiabetic effects but also have a protective effect on myocardial protection. This article aims to discuss the mechanisms and effects of oral antidiabetic agents, including GLP-1RAs, DPP-4is, and SGLT-2is, on MI/RI to facilitate their clinical application.

Association between nonalcholic fatty liver disease and pancreatic cancer: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and antidiabetic medication

Extrahepatic malignancies are the leading cause of death in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Of these cancers, pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal; however, the link between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer remains unclear. Recently, various research results have been reported on the association between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer, and the results of compiling this information revealed the following. First, the prevalence of pancreatic cancer in patients with NAFLD is at 0.26%. Second, the currently evident pathogenesis includes intrapancreatic risk factors, such as: (1) non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease, and (2) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; and extrapancreatic risk factors, such as: (1) insulin resistance and adipocytokines, (2) proinflammatory cytokines, and (3) dysbiosis. Finally, metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors may reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in diabetes patients with NAFLD. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence on the epidemiology and mechanisms for NAFLD-related pancreatic cancer. We further discuss the impact of anti-diabetic medication on pancreatic cancer.

Underuse of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the management of type 2 diabetes despite a favorable benefit-safety profile

INTRODUCTION

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular protection is a key objective in T2DM.

AREAS COVERED

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have proven their efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with T2DM in placebo-controlled trials, a finding confirmed in observational studies compared with other glucose-lowering agents. Overall, GLP-1RAs have a good safety profile associated with a favorable benefit/risk ratio for the management of T2DM, even if their cost-effectiveness might be questionable. International guidelines recommend GLP-1RAs as preferred glucose-lowering agents in patients with ASCVD and as a valuable alternative in overweight/obese patients with T2DM. However, real-life studies worldwide revealed that only a minority of patients receive a GLP-1RA, despite a positive trend for increased prescriptions in recent years. Surprisingly, however, fewer patients with established ASCVD are treated with these cardioprotective antihyperglycemic agents versus patients without ASCVD.

EXPERT OPINION

The reasons for GLP-1RA underuse in clinical practice are multiple. Multifaceted and coordinated interventions targeting all actors of the health-care system must be implemented to stimulate the adoption of GLP-1RAs as part of routine cardiovascular care among patients with T2DM, especially in those with ASCVD.

The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

Despite its considerable and growing burden, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or its progressive form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and other agents are in various phases of clinical development for use in MASH; an ideal therapy should reduce liver fat content, improve chronic liver disease, help mitigate metabolic comorbidities and decrease all-cause mortality. Because of interconnected disease mechanisms, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/MASH often coexists with type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity and cardiovascular disease. Various GLP-1RAs are Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in T2D, and two, liraglutide and semaglutide, are approved for overweight and obesity. GLP-1RAs decrease glucose levels and body weight and improve cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In addition, GLP-1RAs have been reported to reduce liver fat content and liver enzymes, reduce oxidative stress and improve hepatic de novo lipogenesis and the histopathology of MASH. Weight loss may contribute to these effects; however, the exact mechanisms are unknown. Adverse events that are commonly associated with GLP-1RAs include vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea. There is a lack of evidence from meta-analyses regarding the increased risk of acute pancreatitis and various forms of cancer with GLP-1RAs. Large-scale, phase 3 trials, which will provide definitive data on GLP-1RAs and other potential therapies in MASH, are ongoing. Given the spectrum of modalities under investigation, it is hoped that these trials will support the identification of pharmacotherapies that provide clinical benefit for patients with MASH.

Risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma for anti-diabetic medications: findings from real-world safety data analysis and systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The existing evidence from pre- and post-marketing studies is conflicting on the risk of pancreatic events for anti-diabetic medications.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective case/non-case study was conducted by using spontaneous reports on pancreatic events for anti-diabetic medications from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and VigiBase. Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), and Information Component (IC) were calculated by a disproportionality analysis. Furthermore, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on anti-diabetic drugs with pancreatic outcomes.

RESULTS

The FAERS data analysis found strong signals on incretin mimetics causing pancreatic events, with sitagliptin having the highest risk [PRR = 24.2, lower bound (LB) ROR = 24.4, IC025 = 4.4 for pancreatitis, and PRR = 15.4, LB ROR = 14.9, IC025 = 3.8 for pancreatic carcinoma]. Empagliflozin was the most pancreatitis-risk sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor [PRR = 4.0, LB ROR = 3.5, IC025 = 1.8]. VigiBase reiterated these findings and identified some new signals for novel anti-diabetics. Meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma with anti-diabetic medications was insignificant. However, compared to the placebo/active comparator, gliptins had a higher risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.03, 2.01; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from the post-marketing safety data analysis identified a strong association between incretin mimetics and pancreatic events. Fewer events in RCTs may justify insignificant meta-analysis results.

Obesity medications: A narrative review of current and emerging agents

The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize the available data describing the efficacy and safety of medications approved for obesity management and to provide an overview of upcoming agents in development. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases identified relevant articles describing medications approved in the U.S., Australia, U.K., and/or Europe. Papers were selected based on relevance and originality, with phase 3 clinical trials and meta-analyses preferentially included. Six medications are widely approved for long-term weight management in conjunction with lifestyle interventions in people with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 ​kg/m2 or BMI ≥27 ​kg/m2 and at least one medical condition related to excess weight. Compared with lifestyle interventions alone, all medications approved for obesity management are more effective for long-term weight loss and improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors. Older obesity medications are associated with mean weight losses in the range of 5-10%. The new generation of agents, including the injectable incretin analogues semaglutide and tirzepatide are associated with sustained mean weight reductions of 15-20%, along with substantial benefits on a range of health outcomes. Several novel agents are under development, with multi-hormone receptor agonists and oral formulations likely to become available in the coming years. As effective treatment options expand, cost and availability will need to be addressed to enable equitable access to treatment. Other important challenges for clinical practice and research include the need for long-term strategies to prevent and manage weight regain and loss of lean muscle and bone mineral density.

Effects of GLP-1 and Other Gut Hormone Receptors on the Gastrointestinal Tract and Implications in Clinical Practice

Agonists targeting the receptors of incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, have been well established for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. There is increasing awareness that gastroenterologists and hepatologists should be treating obesity when patients present to their clinics. In addition, gastroenterologists and hepatologists should be aware of the effects of these classes of medications prescribed by other providers. Therefore, given the widespread use of incretin agonists for obesity treatment and weight loss, it is important to recognize their effects in the gastrointestinal tract, which could constitute significant benefits in weight loss and cardiometabolic benefits, but can be associated with adverse effects that constitute a potential barrier to their use, particularly at higher doses. Multiple studies reviewed in this article document the diverse effects of these drugs on the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors that are widely expressed in the human body, including the nervous system modulating appetite, the gastrointestinal tract modifying gastric emptying, and lipid metabolism regulation leading to reduction in fat deposition. The objective of this review is to summarize the mechanism of action of incretin receptor agonists, their effects in the gastrointestinal tract, and implications in clinical practice, particularly in the practice of gastroenterology, endoscopy, and surgery.

Pancreatitis with use of new diabetic medications: a real-world data study using the post-marketing FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Background: Pancreatitis is characterized by inflammation of the pancreas and significantly affects quality of life. Less than 5% of pancreatitis cases are drug-induced, but recent evidence suggests a substantial risk associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of developing pancreatitis between those using GLP-1 RAs and those using sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Methods: This study was done using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2019 to 2021. This database contains information from diverse submissions from healthcare providers, patients, and manufacturers. To ensure fairness and accuracy, the risk of pancreatitis associated with other hypoglycemic agents (SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors) was also investigated. Traditional and Bayesian statistical analysis methods were used to identify disproportionate statistics and included the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), and information component (IC). A drug-adverse-event combination that met the criteria of all four indices was deemed a signal. Results: The analysis of 2,313 pancreatitis reports linked to hypoglycemic agents revealed a predominant association with GLP-1 RA (70.2%) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (15%) and SGLT2 (14.7%). Most of these reports involved female patients (50.4%), and the highest incidence occurred in those over 50 years old (38.4%). Additionally, 17.7% of the reports were associated with serious events. The ROR was significant for the risk of pancreatitis when using DPP-4 (13.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.84-14.70), while the ROR for GLP-1 was 9.65 (95% CI 9.17-10.16). The EBGM was highest with DPP-4 (12.25), followed by GLP-1 (8.64), while IC was highest with DPP-4 inhibitors (3.61). Liraglutide had the greatest association with pancreatitis among the GLP-1 RAs (ROR: 6.83, 95% CI 6.60-7.07). Conclusion: The findings show that pancreatitis has a strong link with DPP-4 inhibitors and GPL1 agonists, which pose a greater risk. Among the GLP-1 agonist medications, liraglutide has been found to have an association with pancreatitis.

Oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and combinations of entero-pancreatic hormones as treatments for adults with type 2 diabetes: where are we now?

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) have changed the landscape of type 2 diabetes (T2D) management due to their cardio-renal benefits, their glucose-lowering efficacy and weight loss (WL) maintenance. However, the response to GLP-1 RA monotherapy is heterogeneous. Additionally, the majority of GLP-1 RAs are injectable treatments. Oral GLP-1 RAs and injectable combinations of GLP-1 with other entero-pancreatic hormones (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon and amylin) are under development for T2D and obesity management.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we review the data on (i) oral GLP-1 RAs (oral semaglutide 25/50 mg and orforglipron) and (ii) dual/triple agonists (tirzepatide, cagrilintide 2.4 mg/semaglutide 2.4 mg, survodutide, mazdutide, retatrutide) that have recently completed phase 3 trials for T2D or are currently in phase 3 clinical trials. Tirzepatide is the first approved dual agonist (GLP-1/GIP) for T2D and obesity management.

EXPERT OPINION

We are in a new era in T2D management where entero-pancreatic hormone-based treatments can result in ≥15% WL and euglycemia for many people with T2D. Multiple molecules with different mechanisms of action are under development for T2D, obesity and other metabolic complications. Data on their cardio-renal benefits, long-term efficacy and safety as well as their cost-effectiveness will better inform their position in treatment algorithms.

Cancer biology in diabetes update: Focusing on antidiabetic drugs

The association of type 2 diabetes with certain cancer risk has been of great interest for years. However, the effect of diabetic medications on cancer development is not fully understood. Prospective clinical trials have not elucidated the long-term influence of hypoglycemic drugs on cancer incidence and the safety for cancer-bearing patients with diabetes, whereas numerous preclinical studies have shown that antidiabetic drugs could have an impact on carcinogenesis processes beyond the glycemic control effect. Because there is no evidence of the safety profile of antidiabetic agents on cancer biology, careful consideration would be required when prescribing any medicines to patients with diabetes and existing tumor. In this review, we discuss the potential influence of each diabetes therapy in cancer 'initiation', 'promotion' and 'progression'.

Association of glucose-lowering drug target and risk of gastrointestinal cancer: a mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Glucose-lowering drug is associated with various cancers, but the causality with gastrointestinal cancer risk is rarely reported. We aimed to explore the causality between them in this Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

METHODS

Two-sample MR, summary-data-based (SMR), mediation MR, and colocalization analyses was employed. Ten glucose-lowering drug targets (PPARG, DPP4, GLP1R, INSR, SLC5A2, ABCC8, KCNJ11, ETFDH, GPD2, PRKAB1) and seven types of gastrointestinal cancer (anal carcinoma, cardia cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), pancreatic cancer, rectum cancer) were included. Patients with gastrointestinal cancers from six different large GWAS databases, including the UK Biobank and Finnish cohorts were incorporated, for discovery and external validation. Meta-analysis was employed to integrate the results from both discovery and validation cohorts, thereby ensuring the reliability of findings.

RESULTS

ABCC8/KCNJ11 were associated with pancreatic cancer risk in both two-sample MR (odds ratio (OR): 15.058, per standard deviation unit (SD) change of glucose-lowering durg target perturbation equivalent to 1 SD unit of HbA1c lowering; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.824-59.295; P-value = 0.0001) and SMR (OR: 1.142; 95% CI: 1.013-1.287; P-value = 0.030) analyses. The mediation effect of body mass index (OR: 0.938; 95% CI: 0.884-0.995; proportion of mediation effect: 3.001%; P-value = 0.033) on ABCC8/KCNJ11 and pancreatic cancer was uncovered. Strong connections of DPP4 with anal carcinoma (OR: 0.123; 95% CI: 0.020-0.745; P-value = 0.023) and ICC (OR: 7.733; 95% CI: 1.743-34.310; P-value = 0.007) were detected. PPARG was associated with anal carcinoma (OR: 12.909; 95% CI: 3.217-51.795; P-value = 0.0003), HCC (OR: 36.507; 95% CI: 8.929-149.259; P-value < 0.0001), and pancreatic cancer (OR: 0.110; 95% CI: 0.071-0.172; P-value < 0.0001). SLC5A2 was connected with pancreatic cancer (OR: 8.096; 95% CI: 3.476-18.857; P-value < 0.0001). Weak evidence indicated the connections of GLP1R, GPD2, and PRKAB1 with anal carcinoma, cardia cancer, ICC, and rectum cancer. In addition, the corresponding results were consistently validated in both the validation cohorts and the integrated outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Some glucose-lowering drugs were associated with gastrointestinal cancer risk, which might provide new ideas for gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Diabetes of the Exocrine Pancreas: Implications for Pharmacological Management

Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus, pancreatic cancer-related diabetes, and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes are often underappreciated. As a result, a substantial proportion of people with these sub-types of diabetes receive antidiabetic medications that may be suboptimal, if not harmful, in the context of their underlying disease of the exocrine pancreas. The present article delineates both classical (biguanides, insulin, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, and meglitinides) and newer (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, amylin analogs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, D2 receptor agonists, bile acid sequestrants, and dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor co-agonists) therapies and provides recommendations for managing people with diabetes of the exocrine pancreas based on the most up-to-date clinical evidence. Also, several emerging directions (lipid-enriched pathways, Y4 receptor agonism, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor co-agonism) are presented with a view to informing the process of new drug discovery and development.

The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent disease, associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, which can lead to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in some patients. Apart from lifestyle modifications, which are the cornerstone for its management, several drugs are under evaluation, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-R1RAs). In this review, we summarized major clinical data concerning the effects of GLP-1RAs on NAFLD, trying to highlight existing knowledge and to elucidate areas of uncertainty, thus providing clues to potential clinical implications and research.

AREAS COVERED

Selected clinical studies on GLP-R1As in NAFLD are presented in this narrative review.

EXPERT OPINION

There is evidence that treatment with GLP-R1As in NAFLD has beneficial effects on NAFLD, i.e. improvement in liver function tests and histological improvement in hepatic steatosis and inflammation, but not fibrosis. Further research is required toward the early use of GLP-R1Αs, i.e. in NAFLD patients without fibrosis to evaluate whether they may prevent the progression to fibrosis, or in patients with advanced disease in combination with other medications, which may have additive or even synergistic effects on NAFLD.

Obesity, diabetes, and cancer: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and potential interventions

The proportion of deaths attributable to cancer is rising, and malignant neoplasms have become the leading cause of death in high-income countries. Obesity and diabetes are now recognized as risk factors for several types of malignancies, especially endometrial, colorectal, and postmenopausal breast cancers. Mechanisms implicated include disturbances in lipid-derived hormone secretion, sex steroids biosynthesis, hyperinsulinemia, and chronic inflammation. Intentional weight loss is associated with a mitigation of risk for obesity-related cancers, a phenomenon observed specially with bariatric surgery. The impact of pharmacological interventions for obesity and diabetes is not uniform: while metformin seems to protect against cancer, other agents such as lorcaserin may increase the risk of malignancies. However, these interpretations must be carefully considered, since most data stem from bias-prone observational studies, and high-quality randomized controlled trials with appropriate sample size and duration are needed to achieve definite conclusions. In this review, we outline epidemiological and pathophysiological aspects of the relationship between obesity, diabetes, and malignancies. We also highlight pieces of evidence regarding treatment effects on cancer incidence in these populations.

Management of diabesity: Current concepts

The global prevalence of obesity is increasing rapidly with an exponential rise in incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in recent years. 'Diabesity', the term coined to show the strong interlink between obesity and diabetes, is the direct cons-equence of the obesity pandemic, and poses significant challenges in the management of the disease. Without addressing the clinical and mechanistic complications of obesity such as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and obstructive sleep apnoea, a rational management algorithm for diabesity cannot be developed. Several classes of anti-diabetic medications including insulins, sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones and meglitinides are associated with the risk of weight gain and may potentially worsen diabesity. Therefore, appropriate selection of antidiabetic drug regimen is crucial in the medical management of diabesity. The role of non-pharmacological measures such as dietary adjustments, exercise interventions and bariatric procedures should also be emphasised. Unfortunately, the importance of appropriate and optimal management of diabesity is often overlooked by medical professionals when achieving adequate glycemic control which results in inappropriate management of the disease and its complications. This review provides a narrative clinical update on the evidence behind the management of diabesity.

Early type 2 diabetes treatment intensification with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in primary care: An Australian perspective on guidelines and the global evidence

Early and intensive management of type 2 diabetes has been shown to delay disease progression, reduce the risk of cardiorenal complications and prolong time to treatment failure. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are being increasingly recognized for their potential in early disease management, with recent guideline updates recommending second-line use of this injectable drug class alongside oral glucose-lowering drugs. GLP-1RAs target at least six of the eight core defects implicated in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and offer significant glycaemic and weight-related improvements over other second-line agents in head-to-head trials. In addition, placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown cardiovascular protection with GLP-1RA use. Even so, this therapeutic class is underused in primary care, largely owing to clinical inertia and patient-related barriers to early intensification with GLP-1RAs. Fortunately, clinicians can overcome barriers to treatment acceptance through patient education and training, and management of treatment expectations. In this review we comment on global and Australian guideline updates and evidence in support of early intensification with this therapeutic class, and provide clinicians with practical advice for GLP-1RA use in primary care.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Therapy: From Discovery to Type 2 Diabetes and Beyond

The therapeutic benefits of the incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1), for people with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, are now firmly established. The evidence-base arising from head-to-head comparative effectiveness studies in people with type 2 diabetes, as well as the recommendations by professional guidelines suggest that GLP1 receptor agonists should replace more traditional treatment options such as sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Furthermore, their benefits in reducing cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes beyond improvements in glycaemic control has led to numerous clinical trials seeking to translate this benefit beyond type 2 diabetes. Following early trial results their therapeutic benefit is currently being tested in other conditions including fatty liver disease, kidney disease, and Alzheimer's disease.

Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: risk reduction and early intervention

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) than those without. This increased risk begins with pre-diabetes, potentially 7-10 years before T2D is diagnosed. Selecting medication for patients with T2D should focus on reducing the risk of CVD and established CVD. Within the last decade, several antihyperglycemic agents with proven CV benefit have been approved for the treatment of hyperglycemia and for the prevention of primary and secondary CV events, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. T2D treatment guidelines recommend that an antihyperglycemic agent with proven CV benefit should be used after metformin in patients with high risk of or established CVD, regardless of glycated hemoglobin levels. Despite the availability of antihyperglycemic agents with proven CV benefit, and guidelines on when to use them, less than one in four patients with T2D and CVD receive this type of therapy. These findings suggest a potential gap between current recommendations and clinical practice. This article reviews the approved agents with CV indications, with a focus on injectable GLP-1RAs, and their place in the T2D treatment paradigm according to current guidelines. We aim to provide primary healthcare providers with in-depth information on subsets of patients who would benefit from this type of therapy and when it should be initiated, taking into consideration safety and tolerability and other disease factors. An individualized treatment approach is increasingly recommended in the management of T2D, employing a shared decision-making strategy between patients and healthcare professionals.

Obesity, diabetes mellitus, and pancreatic carcinogenesis: Correlations, prevention, and diagnostic implications

The prevalence of obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), and pancreatic cancer (PC) has been consistently increasing in the last two decades worldwide. Sharing various influential risk factors in genetics and environmental inducers in pathogenesis, the close correlations of these three diseases have been demonstrated in plenty of clinical studies using multiple parameters among different populations. On the contrary, most measures aimed to manage and treat obesity and DM effectively reduce the risk and prevent PC occurrence, yet certain drugs can inversely promote pancreatic carcinogenesis instead. Most importantly, an elevation of blood glucose with or without a reduction in body weight, along with other potential tools, may provide valuable clues for detecting PC at an early stage in patients with obesity and DM, favoring a timely intervention and prolonging survival. Herein, the epidemiological and etiological correlations among these three diseases and the supporting clinical evidence of their connections are first summarized to favor a better and more thorough understanding of obesity- and DM-related pancreatic carcinogenesis. After comparing the distinct impacts of different weight-lowering and anti-diabetic treatments on the risk of PC, the possible diagnostic implications of hyperglycemia and weight loss in PC screening are also addressed in detail.