Safety and tolerability of semaglutide across the SUSTAIN and PIONEER phase IIIa clinical trial programmes

Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide on Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.

RESULTS

Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was -11.4% (-15.3% to -8.27%) and -7.3% (-8.3% to -6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of -4.84 kg (95% CI: -6.21 to -3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.

CONCLUSION

Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.

Nitro-oleic acid enhances mitochondrial metabolism and ameliorates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in mice

The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing, while treatment options are inadequate. Hypertension and obesity-related metabolic dysfunction contribute to HFpEF. Nitro-oleic acid (NO2-OA) impacts metabolic syndromes by improving glucose tolerance and adipocyte function. Here we show that treatment with NO2-OA ameliorates diastolic dysfunction and heart failure symptoms in a HFpEF mouse model induced by high-fat diet and inhibition of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proteomic analysis of left ventricular tissue reveals that one-third of identified proteins, predominantly mitochondrial, are upregulated in hearts of NO2-OA-treated HFpEF mice compared to naïve and vehicle-treated HFpEF mice. Increased mitochondrial mass and numbers, and enhanced mitochondrial respiration are linked with this response, as assessed by transmission electron microscopy and high-resolution respirometry. Activation of the 5'-adenosine-monophosphate-activated-protein-kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway mediates the enhancement of mitochondrial dynamics in hearts of NO2-OA-treated HFpEF mice. These findings suggest that targeting mitochondrial function with NO2-OA may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for HFpEF.

Safety considerations of semaglutide in the potential treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A pooled analysis of semaglutide in adults aged ≥ 65 years

INTRODUCTION

The evoke/evoke+ trials are investigating semaglutide in a population with early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Specific analyses of semaglutide safety data in older adults are limited; therefore, in the current analysis, we aimed to evaluate safety considerations with semaglutide in adults ≥ 65 years.

METHODS

Adverse event (AE) data from three semaglutide phase 3a programs in participants ≥ 65 years with type 2 diabetes and/or overweight/obesity were pooled. Change in body weight was also assessed in a smaller subset of participants ≥ 65 years.

RESULTS

The analysis included 3529 participants ≥ 65 years. Baseline mean age and body mass index in participants ≥ 65 years were 69.3 to 70.2 years and 29.7 to 35.4 kg/m2, respectively, compared to 47.8 to 58.5 years and 31.3 to 36.7 kg/m2 in the overall population. AEs with semaglutide occurred in 73.6% to 92.4% of participants ≥ 65 years versus 73.2% to 90.8% of the overall population. AEs with semaglutide leading to permanent discontinuation appeared to be more frequent in participants ≥ 65 years (9.3%-12.4%) versus the overall population (5.7%-8.7%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported AEs with semaglutide in participants ≥ 65 years (44.6%-73.8%) and in the overall population (39.1%-73.4%). Participants aged ≥ 65 years receiving semaglutide had an estimated weight loss of 3.8% at week 52 compared to 0.1% with placebo.

DISCUSSION

Age ≥ 65 years did not appear to affect the safety considerations of semaglutide. The ongoing evoke/evoke+ trials will elucidate the balance of efficacy and safety in the treatment of early AD with semaglutide.

Highlights

This was a post hoc analysis evaluating adverse event (AE) data of semaglutide in people ≥ 65 years.The most common AE with semaglutide was gastrointestinal (GI).GI event rates were similar in people ≥ 65 years and the overall study populations.

Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, has been established in persons with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. An assessment of the cardiovascular efficacy of oral semaglutide in persons with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both is needed.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven, superiority trial, we randomly assigned participants who were 50 years of age or older, had type 2 diabetes with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5 to 10.0%, and had known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both to receive either once-daily oral semaglutide (maximal dose, 14 mg) or placebo, in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis. The confirmatory secondary outcomes included major kidney disease events (a five-point composite outcome).

RESULTS

Among the 9650 participants who had undergone randomization, the mean (±SD) follow-up was 47.5±10.9 months, and the median follow-up was 49.5 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 579 of the 4825 participants (12.0%; incidence, 3.1 events per 100 person-years) in the oral semaglutide group, as compared with 668 of the 4825 participants (13.8%; incidence, 3.7 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.96; P = 0.006). The results for the confirmatory secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. The incidence of serious adverse events was 47.9% in the oral semaglutide group and 50.3% in the placebo group; the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders was 5.0% and 4.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among persons with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both, the use of oral semaglutide was associated with a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than placebo, without an increase in the incidence of serious adverse events. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; SOUL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03914326.).

GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with chronic kidney disease and either overweight or obesity

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as game-changers across the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) spectrum: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide are European Medicines Agency approved to improve metabolic control in T2DM and to decrease weight in persons with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2] or with overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m2) associated with weight-related comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, CVD and others. Additionally, liraglutide and semaglutide are approved to reduce CVD risk in patients with CVD and T2DM. Semaglutide is also approved to reduce CVD risk in patients with CVD and either obesity or overweight and in phase 3 clinical trials showed kidney and cardiovascular protection in patients with T2DM and albuminuric CKD (FLOW trial) as well as in persons without diabetes that had CVD and overweight/obesity (SELECT trial). Thus, nephrologists should consider prescribing GLP-1 RAs to improve metabolic control, reduce CVD risk or improve kidney outcomes in three scenarios: patients with overweight and a related comorbid condition such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia or CVD, patients with obesity and patients with T2DM. This review addresses the promising landscape of GLP-1 RAs to treat persons with overweight or obesity, with or without T2DM, within the context of CKD, assessing their safety and impact on weight, metabolic control, blood pressure and kidney and cardiovascular outcomes, as part of a holistic patient-centred approach to preserve CKM health.

The cost-effectiveness analysis of semaglutide for the treatment of adult and adolescent patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to systematically collect and synthesize available cost-effectiveness studies of semaglutide in patients with obesity or overweight in comparison with other interventions.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched multiple electronic databases to identify relevant literature. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of studies was appraised using the "Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards" (CHEERS) tool. This study is conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 252 items, after review, 32 articles were fully reviewed, and, finally, 7 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The discount rate was in the range of 1.5-3.5%. Studies included showed semaglutide offered more QALYs than anti-obesity drugs but because of higher cost, in some cases, ICER exceeds the willingness to pay threshold. Results show that semaglutide creates higher total cost compared to conventional interventions in patients with class I, II, and III obesities. Results show that in patients with class I obesity (BMI 33) lifestyle intervention (LI), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and semaglutide create $124,195; $126,732; $139,971; and $370,776, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current systematic review showed that semaglutide provides more QALYs and creates more costs in comparison with phentermine-topiramate, phentermine, and naltrexone-bupropion. Semaglutide may be cost-effective with substantial cost reduction. Semaglutide appears to be cost-effective versus diet and exercise (D&E) and liraglutide but it was not cost-effective versus sleeve gastrectomy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and gastric bypass.

Research Progress on Peptide Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes and the Possibility of Oral Administration

Diabetes is a global disease that can lead to a range of complications. Currently, the treatment of type 2 diabetes focuses on oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin analogues. Studies have shown that drugs such as oral metformin are useful in the treatment of diabetes but can limit the liver's ability to release sugar. The development of glucose-lowering peptides has provided new options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Peptide drugs have low oral utilization due to their easy degradation, short half-life, and difficulty passing through the intestinal mucosa. Therefore, improving the oral utilization of peptide drugs remains an urgent problem. This paper reviews the research progress of peptide drugs in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and proposes that different types of nano-formulation carriers, such as liposomes, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, and polymer particles, should be combined with peptide drugs for oral administration to improve their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract.

Real-World Use of Oral Semaglutide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the PIONEER REAL Netherlands Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

In this phase 4, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional PIONEER REAL Netherlands study, we assessed clinical outcomes associated with once-daily oral semaglutide use in real-world clinical practice in adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication.

METHODS

Participants initiated on oral semaglutide were followed for 34-44 weeks. Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS, the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7.0% at EOS and the composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points with BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ status/change). Safety was evaluated in all participants who initiated oral semaglutide treatment.

RESULTS

Oral semaglutide was initiated in 187 participants; 94.1% completed the study and 78.6% remained on treatment at EOS. At BL, 54.0% of participants were male, mean age was 58.8 years, mean duration of T2D was 8.7 years and mean body mass index was 35.1 kg/m2; mean HbA1c was 8.6% and mean BW was 103.1 kg. Significant improvements from BL to EOS were observed for HbA1c and BW (estimated change [95% confidence interval]: - 1.16%-points [- 1.48 to - 0.85]; p < 0.0001, and - 5.84 kg [- 6.88 to - 4.80]; p < 0.0001, respectively). At EOS, 47.5% of participants had an HbA1c level < 7.0%; 41.8% and 35.5% of participants achieved composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points plus BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5%, respectively. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 2.1 (p = 0.0003) and 10.8 points (p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 81.5% of participants. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world population, we reported clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, improved treatment satisfaction and no new safety concerns. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04601740.

Semaglutide in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Outcomes of Semaglutide in Heart Failure Patients

Heart failure (HF) stands as a formidable challenge in global healthcare casting a long shadow over both morbidity and mortality. A significant interplay between HF and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) manifests an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events in T2DM patients. Glucagon-like peptide 1 emerges as a pivotal player in T2DM, which is released in response to meals rich in glucose and lipids. We aim to assess the outcomes of using semaglutide in HF. A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, covering all records up to May 10, 2024. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Qualitative analysis was conducted to analyze the findings of the studies included. Four studies (three randomized controlled trials and one observational study) were included in our manuscript. There was a significant decrease in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (p< 0.001), body weight (p< 0.001), six-minute walk distance (p< 0.001), and CRP levels (p< 0.001). A statistically significant decrease in overall major adverse cardiac events was observed with a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.62, 0.92). Other factors and adverse effects were also discussed in our manuscript. Our study showed that semaglutide resulted in improvement in HF patients. Although adverse effects were observed, they were not as significant as the placebo itself.

The effect of incretin-based drugs on the riks of acute pancreatitis: a review

Objectives

In recent years, new hypoglycaemic drugs that affect the incretin system have become increasingly popular in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): glucagon-like receptor 1 agonists (GLP1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and the recently developed dual glucagon-like receptor 1 agonist and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (tirzepatide). Their main role of these drugs is to normalise blood glucose levels. In addition, GLP1RAs are approved for the treatment of excessive body weight. The efficacy of drugs affecting the incretin system is well described in the literature, however, there are still only few reports about their safety. This review aims to summarize the results of current research and meta-analyses on risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) during incretin-affecting drugs treatment.

Methods

A narrative review was performed using present literature in an attempt to identify the relationship between AP and incretin-affecting drugs. The following keywords were used: acute pancreatitis, glucagon-like receptor 1 agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and tirzepatide.

Results

It was demonstrated that the use of DPP4is is safe for the majority of patients with T2DM, whereas a risk of AP should be noted in case of GLP1RAs therapy. To date, most studies found no significant association between tirzepatide therapy and the increased risk of AP.

Conclusion

The majority of studies have shown that DPP4is, GLP1RAs and tirzepatide are effective and safe in most T2DM patients. However, the follow-up time for patients treated with tirzepatide is short, therefore more studies are required to confirm the safety of this drug.

GLP-1 receptor agonist improves metabolic disease in a pre-clinical model of lipodystrophy

Aims

Individuals with lipodystrophies typically suffer from metabolic disease linked to adipose tissue dysfunction including lipoatrophic diabetes. In the most severe forms of lipodystrophy, congenital generalised lipodystrophy, adipose tissue may be almost entirely absent. Better therapies for affected individuals are urgently needed. Here we performed the first detailed investigation of the effects of a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist in lipoatrophic diabetes, using mice with generalised lipodystrophy.

Methods

Lipodystrophic insulin resistant and glucose intolerant seipin knockout mice were treated with the GLP-1R agonist liraglutide either acutely preceding analyses of insulin and glucose tolerance or chronically prior to metabolic phenotyping and ex vivo studies.

Results

Acute liraglutide treatment significantly improved insulin, glucose and pyruvate tolerance. Once daily injection of seipin knockout mice with liraglutide for 14 days led to significant improvements in hepatomegaly associated with steatosis and reduced markers of liver fibrosis. Moreover, liraglutide enhanced insulin secretion in response to glucose challenge with concomitantly improved glucose control.

Conclusions

GLP-1R agonist liraglutide significantly improved lipoatrophic diabetes and hepatic steatosis in mice with generalised lipodystrophy. This provides important insights regarding the benefits of GLP-1R agonists for treating lipodystrophy, informing more widespread use to improve the health of individuals with this condition.

Recent advances in peptide-based therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes

Options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity have recently been expanded by the results of several large clinical trials with incretin-based peptide therapies. Most of these studies have been conducted with the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist semaglutide, which is available as a once weekly subcutaneous injection and once daily tablet, and the once weekly injected dual agonist tirzepatide, which interacts with receptors for GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). In individuals with T2DM these therapies have achieved reductions of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) by > 2% and lowered body weight by > 10%. In some studies, these agents tested in non-diabetic, obese individuals at much higher doses have lowered body weight by > 15%. Emerging evidence suggests these agents can also offer cardio-protective and potentially reno-protective effects. Other incretin-based peptide therapies in early clinical development, notably a triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonist (retatrutide) and a combination of semaglutide with the amylin analogue cagrilintide (CagriSema), have shown strong efficacy. Although incretin therapies can incur adverse gastrointestinal effects these are for most patients mild-to-moderate and transient but result in cessation of treatment in some cases. Thus, the efficacy of new incretin-based peptide therapies is enhancing the opportunity to control body weight and blood glucose and improve the treatment of T2DM and obesity.

Real-World Use of Oral Semaglutide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: The PIONEER REAL Switzerland Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data provide insight into how medications perform in clinical practice. The PIONEER REAL Switzerland study aimed to understand clinical outcomes with oral semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

PIONEER REAL Switzerland was a 34-44-week, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study of adults with T2D naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication who were initiated on oral semaglutide in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS); secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS and the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and the composite endpoints HbA1c reduction ≥ 1%-points with BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Safety was assessed in participants who received ≥ 1 dose of oral semaglutide.

RESULTS

Of the 185 participants (female/male, n = 67/118) initiating oral semaglutide, 168 (90.8%) completed the study and 143 (77.3%) remained on treatment with oral semaglutide at EOS. At BL, participants had a mean age of 62 years, diabetes duration of 6.4 years, HbA1c of 7.7%, BW of 95.6 kg and body mass index of 33.2 kg/m2; 56.2% of participants were receiving glucose-lowering medications. Significant reductions were observed for HbA1c (estimated change - 0.91%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.10, - 0.71; p < 0.0001) and BW (estimated change - 4.85%; 95% CI - 5.70, - 4.00; p < 0.0001). In total, 139 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 65 (35.1%) participants; most were mild or moderate. The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal disorders (27.0%); 31 AEs in 20 (10.8%) participants led to discontinuation of oral semaglutide. Six serious AEs were reported; all were considered unlikely to be related to oral semaglutide.

CONCLUSION

People living with T2D treated with oral semaglutide in Switzerland achieved clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, with no new safety signals.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04537624. A graphical abstract is available for this article.

Blockbuster Medications for Obesity: A Primer for Nephrologists

The prevalence of obesity in the United States and across the world continues to climb, imparting increased risk of chronic disease. This impact is doubly felt in nephrology because obesity not only increases the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but also exacerbates existing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The role of medical weight loss therapy in CKD has been debated, but increasing evidence suggests that intentional weight loss is protective against adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. This may be particularly true with the advent of novel pharmacotherapies taking advantage of the incretin system, resulting in weight loss approaching that seen with surgical interventions. Moreover, these novel therapies have repeatedly demonstrated protective effects on the cardiovascular system. Here, we review the impact of obesity and weight loss on CKD, and the biological basis and clinical evidence for incretin therapy. This perspective provides recommended prescribing practices as a practical tool to engage nephrologists and patients with CKD in the treatment of obesity-related morbidity.

Administration errors of compounded semaglutide reported to a poison control center-Case series

BACKGROUND

We aimed to increase pharmacists' and regulatory agencies' awareness of emerging issues regarding current practices of semaglutide use in the community that has led to increased reports of administration errors and adverse drug events to our regional poison control center.

CASE SUMMARY

We report 3 cases of adverse drug events after incorrect administration of semaglutide for weight loss obtained from compounding pharmacies and an aesthetic spa. Two patients self-administered 10-fold dosing errors. All patients experienced notable symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain with most symptoms lasting for days. Other symptoms of headache, anorexia, weakness, and fatigue were reported in one patient. One patient sought evaluation at a health care facility and responded well to an antiemetic and intravenous fluids. One patient who received their medication from a compounding pharmacy reported receiving a vial with syringes for self-administration; no pharmacist counseling was provided on proper drug administration. One patient reported dosing in milliliters and units rather than in milligrams.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These 3 semaglutide cases highlight the potential for patient harm given current practices. Vials of compounded semaglutide do not use safety features provided by prefilled manufactured pens and allow for large overdoses (e.g., 10-fold dosing errors). Use of syringes not intended for semaglutide contributes to the variability of dosing units (milliliters, units, milligrams), contributing to patient confusion. To address such issues, we encourage increased vigilance in labeling, dispensing, and counseling practices to ensure patients are confident in administering their medication regardless of the formulation. We additionally encourage boards of pharmacy and other regulatory agencies to promote proper use and dispensing of compounded semaglutide. Such vigilance and promotion could decrease the risk of more severe adverse drug events and avoidable hospital utilization that may arise from dosing errors.

Once-weekly semaglutide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from the SURE France multicentre, prospective, observational study

AIMS

Real-world data are required to support glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in type 2 diabetes (T2D). SURE France assessed once-weekly semaglutide in adults with T2D in real-world clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicentre, prospective, open-label, single-arm study included adults with T2D and ≥1 documented glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value ≤12 weeks before semaglutide initiation. The primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline to end of study (EOS; ~30 weeks). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to EOS in body weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC); and proportion achieving HbA1c targets. Baseline characteristics and safety were reported for the full analysis set (patients initiating semaglutide). Analysis of other endpoints was based on the effectiveness analysis set (study completers receiving semaglutide at EOS).

RESULTS

Of 497 patients initiating semaglutide (41.6% female, mean age 58.3 years), 348 completed the study on treatment. Baseline HbA1c, diabetes duration, BW and WC, were 8.3%, 10.0 years, 98.2 kg and 114.2 cm, respectively. The most common reasons for initiating semaglutide were to improve glycaemic control (79.7%), reduce BW (69.8%) and address cardiovascular risk (24.1%). At EOS, mean changes were: HbA1c, -1.2% points [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.32; -1.10]; BW, -4.7 kg (95% CI -5.38; -4.07); and WC, -4.9 cm (95% CI -5.94; -3.88). At EOS, 81.7%, 67.7% and 51.6% of patients achieved an HbA1c target of <8.0%, <7.5% and <7.0%, respectively. No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the benefits of semaglutide in a real-world setting in adults with T2D in France showing a significant reduction in HbA1c and body weight.