Hepatocellular carcinoma and its impact on quality of life: A review of the qualitative literature

Unraveled cancer cell survival-associated amino acid metabolism of HepG2 cells altered by Thai rat-tailed radish microgreen extract examined by untargeted LC-MS/MS analysis

Thai rat-tailed radish (RS) microgreens are enriched in macro- and micronutrients and phytochemicals with anticancer potential. This study investigates the antiproliferative effects of RS in the liver HepG2 cell model and untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics analysis. RS was partitioned in water and dichloromethane (DCM). DCM was collected and evaporated to yield crude extract. The extract exhibited antiproliferation with inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 612.5 ± 24.7 μg/ml at 24 h and 568.6 ± 11.0 μg/ml at 48 h. Metabolic pathways relevant to the anticancer effects are amino acid metabolism, including (1) alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; (2) nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism; and (3) cysteine and methionine metabolism. Significantly, glutamine was upregulated, and aspartic acid, NAD, 5'-methylthioadenosine, cystathionine, and S-adenosylhomocysteine were downregulated. This finding suggested plausible effects of RS on liver cancer cell survival and invasion activities.

Timing and Method of Patient-Provider Communication for Abnormal Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Results in Cirrhosis

PURPOSE

Patients with cirrhosis undergo frequent abdominal imaging including semiannual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening, with results released immediately via the patient portal. We characterized time from patient review to patient-provider communication (PPC) for patients with abnormal liver imaging results.

METHODS

We identified patients with cirrhosis enrolled in the patient portal with a new abnormal liver lesion (LI-RADS, LR) on ambulatory liver ultrasound (US) or multiphasic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging findings were grouped into low-risk (US-2, LR-2), intermediate-risk (US-3, LR-3), and high-risk (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, LR-TIV) results. We extracted three date-time events from the electronic health record, including result release to the patient, patient review of the result, and result-related PPC. We compared communication methods and the median time with PPC after patient review of results between groups.

RESULTS

The cohort included 133 patients (median age, 62 years, 56% male) with 34 (25.6%) low-risk, 61 (45.9%) intermediate-risk, and 38 (28.6%) high-risk results. PPC for high-risk results was predominantly via telephone calls (60.5%), whereas portal messages were most commonly used for low- and intermediate-risk results (61.8% and 45.9%, respectively; P < .001). For patients who reviewed their result on the portal, most (79.3%) reviewed the result before PPC, among whom the median time between review and PPC was 55.8 (IQR, 22.0-219.0), 167 (IQR, 42.7-324.0), and 47.3 (IQR, 25.8-78.8) hours for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk results, respectively (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Portal-based review of abnormal imaging results by patients before provider communication is common, including results concerning a new HCC diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes, such as psychological distress, associated with this method of disclosing cancer-related results.

Health-related quality of life in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with SIRT and nivolumab: a sub-analysis of the NASIR-HCC trial

BACKGROUND

The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) influences decision-making and treatment outcomes. The present study reports HRQoL results from NASIR-HCC, a single-arm study of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Y90 resin microspheres followed by nivolumab for unresectable HCC.

METHODOLOGY

Participants completed the EQ-5D-3 L, EQ-VAS, and FACT-Hep at baseline and on the first day of each nivolumab cycle. Linear mixed-effect models were used to calculate changes in outcomes in participants with the baseline and ≥ 1 follow-up measurement. Changes were assessed for clinical meaningfulness versus published minimally important differences.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients from NASIR-HCC were included. Completion rates exceeded 70% at 62% of time points. Across EQ-5D-3 L domains, minimal changes were reported. Most patients had no problems at almost all time points. Mean index values were 0.864 at baseline and 0.763 in cycle 8, but this difference was not clinically meaningful. The small EQ-VAS increase, from 74.8 at baseline to 75.9 in cycle 8, was also not clinically meaningful. The various FACT scales remained stable, although transient but not clinically meaningful declines occurred for some scales. The median time to deterioration was 5.5 months for the FACT-Hep score.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining SIRT with nivolumab did not compromise HRQoL in patients with unresectable HCC. Study results were limited by the small number of patients but, combined with the previously reported clinical outcomes, suggested that the treatment combination deserves further consideration in this difficult-to-treat population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE OF REGISTRATION

NCT03380130. First submitted on 2017-10-20; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03380130 .

End-of-life in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Palliative Care and Social Factors Impact Care and Cost

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the impacts of palliative care consults, race, and socioeconomic status on the prevalence of invasive procedures in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

BACKGROUND

Palliative care, race, and socioeconomic status can all influence end-of-life care preferences, but their roles in HCC have not been adequately explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of patients with HCC from 2016 to 2019 using the National Inpatient Sample. Terminal and nonterminal hospitalizations were assessed with logistical regression evaluating associations between palliative care, race, income, and procedures along with do-not-resuscitate orders and cost. Procedures included mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among others.

RESULTS

A total of 217,060 hospitalizations in patients with HCC were included, 18.1% of which included a palliative care encounter. The mean age was 65.0 years (SD = 11.3 y), 73.9% were males and 55.5% were white. Procedures were increased in terminal hospitalizations in black [CPR adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.57, P < 0.001] and Hispanic patients (tracheostomy aOR = 3.64, P = 0.018) compared with white patients. Palliative care encounters were associated with reduced procedures during terminal hospitalizations (mechanical ventilation aOR = 0.47, P < 0.001, CPR aOR = 0.24, P < 0.001), but not in nonterminal hospitalizations. No association between income and end-of-life procedures was found. Palliative care was associated with decreased mean cost in terminal ($23,608 vs $31,756, P < 0.001) and nonterminal hospitalizations ($15,786 vs $19,914, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care is associated with less aggressive end-of-life care and decreased costs in patients with HCC. Black and Hispanic race were both associated with more aggressive end-of-life care.

Tislelizumab versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life in RATIONALE-301 Study

Introduction

RATIONALE-301 (NCT03412773) was a global, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with sorafenib as first-line (1L) treatment in adult patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that met its primary endpoint of noninferiority in overall survival (OS). This analysis compared health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes between the arms.

Methods

Systemic therapy-naive adults with HCC were randomized 1:1 to receive tislelizumab (n = 342) or sorafenib (n = 332). HRQOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18, and EQ-5D-5L. At cycles 4 and 6, a mixed model for repeated measures was performed using key-prespecified patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints of the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-HCC18. Time to deterioration was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method using the PRO endpoints.

Results

At cycles 4 and 6, patients in the tislelizumab arm had better HRQOL outcomes than the patients in the sorafenib arm per mean-change difference in GHS/QOL, QLQ-C30 physical functioning and fatigue, and QLQ-HCC18 symptom index; however, no differences for pain were observed. Patients in the tislelizumab arm had lower risk of deterioration in GHS/QOL (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.94), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32-0.63) and fatigue (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36-0.61), QLQ-HCC18 symptom index (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34-0.81), and HCC-specific fatigue (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.79). For pain, both arms had similar risk of deterioration (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56-1.09). At cycles 4 and 6, patients in the tislelizumab arm maintained in EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale, whereas scores decreased for the patients in the sorafenib arm.

Conclusion

Patients with 1L HCC treated with tislelizumab had favorable HRQOL outcomes compared with patients treated with sorafenib, particularly in fatigue and physical functioning. These results, along with favorable safety profile, better response rate, and OS noninferiority, support tislelizumab as a potential 1L treatment option for unresectable HCC.

Patient Experience of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Their Treatment Goals: An International Qualitative Study and Patient Journey Map

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the patient journey of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may inform future clinical decision-making and enhance the patient experience. The objectives of this study were to explore the patient experience of HCC in relation to treatment options, treatment decision-making and treatment goals throughout the disease journey. This study also aimed to determine the symptoms and impacts of HCC across early, intermediate and advanced HCC.

METHODS

Semi-structured 60-min interviews were conducted with n = 50 patients with HCC and n = 12 healthcare professionals (HCPs) with experience of treating patients with HCC. Interview data were analyzed using directed content analysis techniques with a hybrid inductive and deductive approach. An assessment of conceptual saturation was conducted for patients' symptom experience.

RESULTS

Patients described treatment decisions as mostly HCP-led. In this study, surgery/resection was the most frequently offered treatment option across the HCC journey, and most patients were satisfied with the treatment options presented to them. Overall, patients described extending their overall survival (OS) and preserving quality of life (QoL) as their most important treatment goals, with patients diagnosed with advanced/unresectable HCC prioritizing QoL. HCPs also prioritized OS and progression-free survival (PFS) though reported that QoL became more important as HCC progressed. Patients experienced various symptoms across the HCC journey including fatigue, nausea, appetite loss, diarrhea and pain.

CONCLUSION

Overall, HCPs and patients collaborate throughout the treatment journey regarding treatment decisions and shared treatment goals. OS is critically important to patients and HCPs, though treatment goals may change depending on various clinical factors.

Cancer stigma: the need for policy and programmatic action

Cancer is a stigmatized disease in many countries that impacts the quality of life and mental health of people affected by cancer. This commentary examines some dimensions of cancer stigma and has been developed based on insights from participants in a Union for International Cancer Control program dedicated to cancer patient organizations in low- and middle-income countries. Aimed at program managers and policy makers, this commentary highlights the importance of developing strategies to reduce cancer stigma in cancer control programs in different contexts, working closely with community-based civil society organizations and those with lived experience of cancer to understand, evaluate, and take action regarding the impact of cancer stigma on health-seeking behavior and patients' quality of life.

Stigmatization of drinking patients with liver cancer: The role of socioeconomic status

Patients with liver cancer may face stigmatization due to cancer, alcohol consumption, or both. This study addresses gaps in the existing literature regarding stigmatization of alcohol-related liver cancer patients, particularly its connection with socioeconomic status (SES). The study explores whether the SES of a fictional character with alcohol addiction and liver cancer influences stigma levels reported by participants. Additionally, it investigates how participants' personal characteristics, such as alcohol consumption and healthcare professional status, impact stigmatization. This study aims to provide new insights regarding the role of stigmatization in liver cancer treatment and management, emphasizing in socioeconomic determinants. The method is based on three scenarios describing a woman character with alcohol abuse and liver cancer. The scenarios depicted a woman character with either low, medium or high SES. Each participant (N = 991) was randomly assigned to one of the three scenarios. After reading it, each participant answered questionnaires assessing negative attitudes towards the character. Four scales were used: "Negative attributions about people with health problems", "Causality of cancer", "Controllability of drinking" and "Reluctance to helping behavior". Data were analyzed using ANOVA and t-tests. The scenario describing a character with a low SES significantly received more "Negative attributions about people with health problems" than the character with medium or high SES. Participants having higher alcohol consumption themselves showed lower stigma scores for three out of four scales than participants with lower consumption. In addition, participants identified as health professionals had lower stigma scores regarding the scales "Negative attributions about people with health problems" and "Controllability of drinking", and higher scores for the subscale "Reluctance to helping behavior", compared with non-professionals. A character with low SES received more negative attributions than the one with higher SES. Participants' own alcohol consumption and professional status (being health professional or not), influenced their stigmatizing attitudes.

Global status of research on gastrointestinal cancer patients' quality of life: A bibliometric and visual analysis from 2003 to 2023

Objective

To analyze the current research status, hotspots, and frontiers in the field of Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and quality of life (QoL) through the bibliometrics method, and to provide references and guidance for future research.

Methods

Literature related to GI cancer and QoL from April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2023 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace 6.2.R1 was performed for collaboration analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and document co-citation analysis.

Results

A total of 1224 publications were included in this study. There has been a significant increase in the number of publications in this field over the past two decades. The United States, the Karolinska Institute and the University of Amsterdam, and Pernilla Lagergren are the most prolific country, institution, and author, respectively. The links between most of the research constituents were relatively thin (centrality <0.1). The keyword analysis indicates that the benefits of physical activity on QoL, the levels of psychological distress and its relationship with QoL, as well as the development and validation of QoL measurement tools have been the research hotspots. Open-label/double-blind trials exploring therapeutic interventions and more targeted new drugs or more effective drug combinations, and longitudinal studies determining the direction of the association between psychological distress and QoL at different time points, may be emerging trends in this field.

Conclusion

The cooperation among countries, institutions, and authors in this field should be strengthened. In addition, the health benefits of light physical activity, interventions for QoL, trajectory and direction of the relationship between psychological distress and QoL may be the focus of future research.

Long-Term Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma following Second-Line Tumor Treating Fields Therapy and Sorafenib: A Case Report

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive solid tumor associated with high mortality. Surgery is the main treatment consideration for early disease, but patients who present with locally advanced or metastatic HCC at diagnosis have limited treatment options. There has been great progress in locoregional, immunotherapy, and targeted treatments for advanced HCC. Standard of care for HCC has changed due to results demonstrating safety and efficacy in phase 3 studies, namely, for atezolizumab concomitant with bevacizumab. Nonetheless, additional therapeutic approaches are still warranted to further increase overall survival in HCC. A first-in-class treatment option investigated in patients with HCC is Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy, which is delivered locoregionally to the tumor site from a portable medical device. TTFields are electric fields that interfere with critical cancer cell processes, hindering tumor progression.

Case Presentation

Here, we report on a case study of a 62-year-old male patient with HCC receiving TTFields concomitant with sorafenib as second-line therapy. Although the patient experienced adverse events with previous nivolumab, they achieved a complete response and continued on treatment for 51 months until disease progression, which led to treatment cessation. We report that during 39 months of subsequent treatment with TTFields therapy and sorafenib, the patient experienced a good quality of life, low systemic toxicity, and stable disease following a partial response.

Conclusions

These promising findings, along with those of the pilot phase 2 HEPANOVA clinical study, warrant further investigation of TTFields therapy in HCC.

An offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management caring program effectively improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

This study designed an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management (OOCBSM) caring program, intending to investigate its effect on mental health and quality of life (QoL) using multiple scales in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

254 postoperative HCC patients were randomly (1:1) allocated into OOCBSM (included a 10-week offline CBSM and subsequent online CBSM until M6) and normal care (NC) groups (10-week NC). Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety (SAS) and depression scale (SDS), FACIT-SP, European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed over 6 months (M).

RESULTS

HADS-defined-anxiety rates at M3 (P = 0.036) and M6 (P = 0.025), SAS-defined-anxiety rate at M6 (P = 0.049), HADS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.026) and M6 (P = 0.049), and SDS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.015) and M6 (P = 0.043) were all lower in OOCBSM group compared to NC group. Furthermore, FACIT-SP scores at M1 (P = 0.004), M3 (P = 0.003), and M6 (P<0.001) were higher in OOCBSM group compared with NC group. EQ-5D scores at M1 (P = 0.025) and M3 (P = 0.030) but not M6 (P = 0.128), and QLQ-C30-symptom score at M3 (P = 0.014) but not M1 (P = 0.198) and M6 (P = 0.058) were lower in OOCBSM group versus NC group; QLQ-C30-global-health-status scores at M3 (P = 0.027) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.312), QLQ-C30-function scores at M3 (P = 0.005) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.084) were higher in OOCBSM group versus NC group. Patients with younger ages or higher education benefited more from OOCBSM.

CONCLUSION

OOCBSM improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and QoL in postoperative HCC patients, especially in those with younger ages or higher education.

Mini-organs with big impact: Organoids in liver cancer studies

Hepatocellular carcinoma, the most common primary liver cancer and a leading cause of death, is a difficult disease to treat due to its heterogeneous nature. Traditional models, such as 2D culture and patient-derived xenografts, have not proven effective. However, the development of 3D culture techniques, such as organoids, which can mimic the tumor microenvironment (TME) and preserve heterogeneity and pathophysiological properties of tumor cells, offers new opportunities for treatment and research. Organoids also have the potential for biomarker detection and personalized medication, as well as genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 to study the behavior of certain genes and therapeutic interventions. This review explores to-the-date development of organoids with a focus on TME modeling in 3D organoid cultures. Further, it discusses gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 in organoids, the challenges faced, and the prospects in the field of organoids.

Effect of multi-disciplinary team care program on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after surgery: A randomized, controlled study

Objective

Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) collaboration enables hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to achieve better survival through precise diagnosis and individualized treatment. This study aimed to further investigate the effect of MDT care program (MDT-CP) on quality of life (QoL), anxiety and depression in HCC patients after surgery.

Methods

Totally, 150 postoperative HCC patients were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the MDT-CP group (N = 76) to receive MDT care for 6 months and the normal care program (N-CP) group (N = 74) to receive routine care for 6 months.

Results

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status score at 1 month (M1), M3 and M6, QLQ-C30 functions score at M3 and M6 elevated while QLQ-C30 symptom score at M1 and M3 decreased in MDT-CP group compared with N-CP group (all P < 0.05). In addition, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety score at M3 and M6, anxiety occurrence rate at M6, anxiety degree at M6, were all reduced in MDT-CP group compared with N-CP group (all P < 0.05). HADS-Depression score at M6, and depression occurrence rate at M3, were both lessened in MDT-CP group compared to N-CP group (both P < 0.05), while there was no distinction of depression degree at any time points between groups.

Conclusion

MDT-CP improves QoL, relieves anxiety and depression to a certain extent in HCC patients after surgery.