A survey of severe asthma in Canada: results from the CASCADE practice reflective program

BACKGROUND

Since the last guidance was published by the Canadian Thoracic Society, there have been several advances in the clinical management of severe asthma. To gain a better understanding of the current standards of care and treatment patterns of patients, the CASCADE practice reflective program was established to conduct a real-world analysis of severe asthma management among specialists in Canada with a goal of identifying areas of opportunity to enhance patient management and outcomes.

METHODS

The CASCADE program was a two-part practice reflective and assessment program delivered through an on-line portal for selected specialists (Respirologists and Allergists) in Canada. The program consisted of a one-time overview survey of physician practice to establish overall practice parameters, followed by a review of at least 5 severe asthma patients to establish the current landscape of severe asthma management.

RESULTS

The program collected practice overview surveys from 78 specialists (52 Respirologists, 24 Allergists, and 2 General practice physicians with an interest in respiratory disease) in 8 provinces. Practices included a variety of types in both large metropolitan centres and smaller regional settings. There were 503 patients reviewed and included in the program. Most (65%) patients were currently using a biologic treatment, 30% were biologic naive, and 5% had used a biologic treatment in the past. Most patients (53%) were reported to have mixed allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes, despite a perception that allergic, eosinophilic and mixed phenotypes were evenly balanced in the physician practice. Overall, patients currently treated with biologic agents had parameters suggesting higher control and were more satisfied with treatment. However, there was less than optimal treatment satisfaction for more than half of all patients, particularly for those patients not treated with a biologic agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotyping is hampered by poor availability for several assessments, and the full range of treatments are not currently fully utilized, partly due to physician familiarity with the agents and partly due to prescribing restrictions. Even when treated with biologic agents, patient satisfaction can still be improved.

Comparing Achievement of National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets among Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab versus Other Biologics in Clinical and Real-World Studies

INTRODUCTION

The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends evaluating patient response to treatment at week 12, with a target response of ≤ 1% body surface area (BSA) affected by plaque psoriasis and an acceptable response of BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement. This post hoc analysis compared the achievement of NPF target and acceptable responses for ixekizumab (IXE) versus other biologics.

METHODS

Outcomes were evaluated at week 12 for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from four head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs; UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) and one real-world prospective observational study (Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes; PSoHO). RCT patients were treated with IXE or etanercept (ETN; UNCOVER-2/3), guselkumab (GUS; IXORA-R), or ustekinumab (UST; IXORA-S). PSoHO patients were treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (IXE, secukinumab, SEC) and other approved biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients with missing outcomes were imputed as non-responder imputation. For RCT data, statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using Fisher's exact test with no multiplicity adjustments. For real-world data, adjusted comparative analyses were performed using frequentist model averaging (FMA) and reported as odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

Across the four head-to-head clinical trials analyzed, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved target and acceptable responses at week 12 with IXE versus ETN, GUS, or UST. Likewise, the proportion of PSoHO patients achieving target and acceptable response at week 12 was higher with IXE compared with other individual biologics. Adjusted comparative analyses showed that IXE had significantly greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus SEC, GUS, risankizumab (RIS), adalimumab (ADA), UST, and tildrakizumab (TILD) and numerically greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus brodalumab (BROD).

CONCLUSION

Across both clinical studies and real-world settings, more patients treated with IXE achieved NPF target and acceptable responses at week 12 compared with those treated with other biologics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177); IXORA-R (NCT03573323); IXORA-S (NCT02561806); PSoHO (EUPAS24207).

Patient-Physician Communication and Perception of Treatment Goals in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Online Survey of Patients and Physicians

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate patient-physician communication and patients' understanding of treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey of patients with RA and physicians treating RA was conducted between 16 and 30 June 2021. Participants were asked to rate the importance of 17 goals on a 6-point Likert scale, and mean scores were compared between patients and physicians by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Patients' satisfaction with physician communication and their understanding of treatment goals were also assessed.

RESULTS

The responses of 502 patients and 216 physicians were analyzed. The most common patient age group was 50-59 years (28.5%), and the mean disease duration was 10.3 years. Physicians had a mean of 19.2 years of treatment experience and were treating a mean of 44.3 patients. Among the 17 goals assessed, patients placed significantly more importance on drug tapering or discontinuation as short-term goals (3-6 months) and on performing basic activities of daily living, being able to engage in daily tasks, achieving and maintaining remission, maintaining better laboratory values, and drug tapering or discontinuation as long-term goals (5-10 years; all adjusted p < 0.05). Patient treatment satisfaction was significantly associated with disease activity, a feeling of treatment effectiveness, satisfaction with physician communication, and agreement with physician goals.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist among patients with RA and physicians treating RA regarding the importance of short- and long-term treatment goals. Good patient-physician communication appears to be important for improving patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network identifier: UMIN000044463.

Goals, preferences, and concerns of patients with acute myeloid leukemia at time of treatment decision

INTRODUCTION

Current cancer value-based models require documentation of patient goals of care and an evidence-based treatment course commensurate with patient goals. This feasibility study assessed the utility of an electronic tablet-based questionnaire to elicit patient goals, preferences, and concerns at a treatment decision making time point in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven patients were recruited from three institutions prior to seeing the physician for treatment decision-making visit. Questionnaires included demographics, patient beliefs, and decision-making preferences. Analyses included standard descriptive statistics appropriate for the level of measurement.

RESULTS

Median age was 71 (range = 61-88), 64.9% female, 87.0% white, and 48.6% college educated. On average, patients completed the surveys unassisted in 16.24 min and providers reviewed the dashboard in 3.5 min. All but one patient completed the survey prior to starting treatment (98.7%). Providers reviewed the survey results prior to seeing the patient 97.4% of the time. When asked their goals of care, 57 (74.0%) patients agreed with the statement "my cancer is curable" and 75 (97.4%) agreed that the treatment goal was to get rid of all cancer. Seventy-seven (100%) agreed the goal of care is to feel better and 76 (98.7%) agreed the goal of care is live longer. Forty-one (53.9%) indicated they wanted to make treatment decisions together with the provider. The top two concerns were understanding treatment options (n = 24; 31.2%) and making the right decision (n = 22; 28.6%).

DISCUSSION

This pilot demonstrated the feasibility of using technology for decision-making at the point of care. Eliciting patient goals of care, treatment outcomes expectations, decision-making preferences, and top concerns may provide clinicians with information to inform the treatment discussion. A simple electronic tool may provide valuable insight into patient understanding of disease to better tailor patient-provider discussion and treatment decision-making.

Current treatment goals are achieved by the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis treated with tralokinumab: results from a multicentric, multinational, retrospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tralokinumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-13 that is approved for the treatment of moderate-severe atopic dermatitis. Studies analyzing the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in a real-world setting are scarce.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A European, multicentric, real-world, retrospective cohort study was defined to assess the effectiveness and safeness profile of tralokinumab, investigating the achievement of pre-specified treatment goals; and to detect potential differences in terms of effectiveness and safeness across some selected patient subcohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 194 adult patients were included in this study. A significant improvement in physician-assessed disease severity was detected at each follow-up visit as compared with baseline and similar trend was observed for patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. No meaningful difference in effectiveness was found when considering patient age (<65 versus ≥65 years), neither dissecting patient cohort in dupilumab-naive vs dupilumab-treated subjects. Among tralokinumab-treated patients, 88% achieved at least one currently identified real-world therapeutic goal at week 16.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective multicenter study confirmed the effectiveness and safeness of tralokinumab throughout 32 weeks of observation, showing the achievement of therapeutic goals identified in both trial and real-world settings in a large proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients.

Patient and Physician Perceptions of Psoriatic Disease in the United States: Results from the UPLIFT Survey

INTRODUCTION

The Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) survey study was conducted globally in 2020 to understand how disease perceptions, including disease severity, treatment goals, and quality of life (QoL), have evolved recently, especially for mild-to-moderate psoriatic disease. Here, key findings from the UPLIFT survey based on respondents located in the US are presented. Leveraging results from the UPLIFT survey could lead to more effective interactions between patients and physicians and greater patient satisfaction.

METHODS

UPLIFT was a multinational web-based survey of dermatologists, rheumatologists, and patients who self-reported a healthcare provider diagnosis of psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) conducted from March 2, 2020, to June 3, 2020.

RESULTS

US respondents included 1006 patients (26.4% of global population; PsO only, n = 535; PsA only, n = 72; PsO and PsA, n = 399) and 216 physicians (dermatologists, n = 115; rheumatologists, n = 101). Most patients (66.4%) reported a body surface area (BSA; assessed by number of palms) of ≤ 3; of these, 56.2% rated their disease as moderate or severe. Most patients with PsO felt they were somewhat (40.1%) or very (49.3%) closely aligned with their dermatologists regarding treatment goals. Alternately, most patients with PsA felt that they were not too closely (32.1%) or not at all (59.3%) aligned with their rheumatologists. Most patients reported either a moderate (PsO, 35.5%; PsA, 31.8%) or strong (PsO, 47.7%; PsA, 53.9%) need for better treatments. Across BSA subgroups, most patients (60.8% to 86.1%) had a Dermatology Life Quality Index score ≥ 6, indicating at least a moderately impacted QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more treatment options, management of psoriatic disease remains suboptimal, with many patients reporting moderate-to-severe disease and impaired QoL, even with limited skin involvement. Results further suggest an unmet need for alignment between patients and physicians in the US to optimize the management of PsO and PsA.

Development and validation of a tool for the assessment of benefit from treatment of allergic rhinitis in children and adolescents (PBI-AR-K)

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is frequent in children and adolescents and can severely affect their lives. This article describes the development and validation of a questionnaire to assess treatment needs and benefits in children and adolescents, the PBI-AR-K, in a sample of patients receiving grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy.

Patients and methods

The PBI-AR-K was developed based on an open survey including children and adolescents and expert consensus between methodologists, patients, and physicians. The PBI-AR-K assesses patient needs before the treatment and perceived benefit during or at the end of a treatment. A weighted benefit score can be calculated ranging from 0 to 4 (4 = highest possible benefit). The validation was conducted in children (5–12 years) and adolescents (13–17 years) receiving sublingual immunotherapy. Subscales were developed based on factor analysis. Psychometric properties of items and scales were assessed with descriptive statistics, internal consistency, and convergent validity.

Results

The final PBI-AR-K consists of 19 items. For validation, data from 345 patients (mean age 11.1; 60.9% male; n = 223 children; n = 122 adolescents) was analysed. Factor analyses resulted in four subscales for children and three subscales for adolescents. The items with the highest importance ratings were about choice of leisure activities (mean value in children: 3.5) and about being free of AR symptoms (adolescents: 3.3). The weighted PBI-AR-K scores reflected considerable patient-reported benefit (2.08–2.82) in both children and adolescents. Internal consistency of all scales was good or acceptable. In the children’s sample, the global scale and three of four subscales were quite consistently correlated with convergent variables, while the subscale ‘treatment burden’ was significantly correlated only with change in average impairments due to rhinitis symptoms. The adolescents’ sample showed more inconsistent results with only change in rhinitis severity being significantly associate with all subscales.

Conclusion

The newly developed PBI-AR-K is a reliable and valid questionnaire for use in children; for the use in adolescents, it should be further elaborated.

Treatment Goals for Psoriasis as Measured by Patient Benefit Index: Results of a National Psoriasis Foundation Survey

INTRODUCTION

This cross-sectional survey was conducted with National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) to capture treatment perspectives and expectations in patients with psoriasis (PsO) using Patient Needs Questionnaire (PNQ) of Patient Benefit Index (PBI).

METHODS

Adult participants with self-reported diagnosis of PsO responded to the PNQ portion of PBI by indicating how much they valued different treatment attributes. All the treatment goals were captured on a five-point Likert scale (0 = "Not important", 4 = "Very important"). Treatment goals were obtained for overall population and subgroups based on severity of disease Patient Global Assessment (PGA), age, gender, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score. All data were expressed as mean and standard deviation [SD].

RESULTS

A total of 1200 participants completed the survey (mean age 51.5 years). Top treatment goal in the overall population was "to have confidence in the therapy" (3.46 [1.01]). Unique to the higher severity subgroup (PGA ≥ 3), "to find a clear diagnosis and therapy" was a top five goal and "to get better skin quickly" was for those with lesser severity (PGA < 3). "To be free of itching" (3.36 [0.99]) was the unique goal in the < 40 age group whereas it was "to get better skin quickly" (3.27 [1.12]) in the ≥ 40 group. In women and men, "to be free of itching" (3.38 [1.13]) and "to get better skin quickly" (3.20 [1.09]) were top five goals, respectively. Patients with ≥ 10 DLQI scores expressed higher treatment goal "to regain control of the disease" (3.66 [0.67]) compared to those with ≤ 10 DLQI scores who expressed "to have confidence in the therapy" (3.40 [1.11]) as the topmost treatment goal.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in patients with PsO, treatment preferences can vary with different characteristics such as age, severity, and gender as measured by using PNQ. Further exploration of this data will help inform treatment decisions and optimize patient outcomes.

The relationship between depression, anxiety, and pain interference with therapy referral and utilization among patients with hand conditions

INTRODUCTION

Patients with upper extremity conditions may also experience symptoms of depression, anxiety, and pain that limit functional recovery.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study examined the impact of mental health and pain symptoms on referral rates to therapy and utilization of therapy services to achieve functional recovery among patients with common hand conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients from one orthopedic center.

METHODS

Data extraction provided demographics, the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision diagnoses, therapy referral, therapy visit counts, treatment goal attainment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression, Anxiety, and Pain Interference scores. The chi-square test, t-test, and logistic regression analyses assessed associations between baseline PROMIS depression, anxiety, and pain interference to therapy referral, the number of therapy visits, and goal attainment.

RESULTS

Forty-nine percent (172/351) of patients were referred to hand therapy. There was no relationship between three baseline PROMIS scores based on physician referral (t-test P values .32-.67) and no association between PROMIS scores and therapy utilization or goal attainment (Pearson correlation (r): 0.002 to 0.020, P > .05). Referral to therapy was most strongly associated with having a traumatic condition (P < .01). Patients with high depression, anxiety, and pain interference scores on average required one more therapy visit to achieve treatment goals (average visits: 3.7 vs 3.1; 4.1 vs 2.7; 3.4 vs 2.3, respectively). Fewer patients with high depression scores (50%) achieved their long-term goals than patients with low depression scores (69%, P = .20).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' baseline level of depressive symptoms and anxiety do not predict referrals to hand therapy by orthopedic hand surgeons. There is some indication that patients with increased depressive symptoms, anxiety, and pain interference require more therapy with fewer achieving all goals, suggesting that mental health status may affect response to therapy. Therapists may address mental health needs in treatment plans. Future studies should examine if nonreferred patients with depressive symptoms achieve maximal functional recovery.

Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey

OBJECTIVES

To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients' experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

METHODS

A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS.

RESULTS

Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were "completely" or "somewhat satisfied" with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered "burdensome" or "very burdensome" for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as "very important" were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician's goals for their therapy matched their own goals "very" or "somewhat closely." Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months.

CONCLUSION

SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities regarding health outcomes. Our aim was to study whether healthcare professionals know these priorities.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study we included older patients who had to make a treatment decision, their general practitioners (GPs) and their medical specialists. Agreement between the patients' main health outcome as prioritised by using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and the perception of the same outcome by their healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included. Median age was 76 years, 87.4% of patients presented with malignant disease. The majority prioritised maintaining independence (51.7%), followed by extending life (27.6%). The agreement between patients and healthcare professionals was low (GPs 41.7%, kappa 0.067, p = 0.39), medical specialists 40.3%, kappa 0.074, p = 0.33). Positively related to agreement was patient's age > 75, and a longer relation with their patients (for GPs), and the patient having no partner (for medical specialist). Having a malignant disease, dependent living and functional deficits were negatively related to agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals have poor perceptions of their patients' priorities.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

To realise patient-centered care, it is crucial to discuss priorities explicitly with all patients.

Reaching Treatment Goals in Psoriasis with Conventional Systemic Drugs: How Long Are We Willing to Wait?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the attainment of treatment goals according to the European Consensus Programme (ECP-TGs) from 2011 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis (Pso) treated with the first conventional systemic therapy and to identify factors that might compromise the attainment of these treatment goals.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective observational study, patients with moderate to severe Pso, defined as either body surface area (BSA) >10% or psoriasis area severity index (PASI) >10 and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) >10, received a conventional systemic therapy that could be modified at each follow-up visit over the course of 18 months. All subjects signed an informed consent form, were ≥18 years of age as well as systemic therapy naïve, and had regular study visits at months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 after baseline. Among others and in addition to demographic and disease-related characteristics at baseline, we documented BSA, PASI, DLQI, and the physician-reported attainment of treatment goals at each follow-up visit. Factors related to a failure in achieving the ECP-TGs (i.e., either Δ PASI ≥75 or Δ PASI ≥50 and <75 with a DLQI ≤5) at month 18 were investigated by multiple logistic regression. Descriptive results are presented as the mean ± SD for interval data, and absolute as well as relative frequencies for nominal data. For this part of the analysis, data at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18 are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 133 Pso patients with a mean age and disease duration of 49.5 ± 14.4 and 15.6 ± 12.8 years, respectively, were included in the analysis; 54.1% (n = 72) were male. The mean baseline disease-related outcomes were: BSA: 21.5 ± 15.8%, PASI: 13.7 ± 7.14, and DLQI: 12.0 ± 6.11. The most common conventional systemic therapies initiated at baseline were fumaric acid esters (n = 74, 55.6%), methotrexate (n = 46, 34,6%), and ciclosporin (n = 6, 4.5%). The ECP-TGs were achieved by 58 patients (43.6%) at month 6, 86 patients (64.7%) at month 12, and 97 patients (72.9%) at month 18. An optimized reduced logistic regression model identified the presence of onycholysis/nail dystrophy at two or more digits to be associated with failing to attain the ECP-TGs (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.5-46.7, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with onycholysis/nail dystrophy at two or more digits were identified as having a higher risk of not achieving ECP-TGs under conventional systemic therapy. The ECP-TGs from 2011 were attained by 43.6% of our patients 6 months after starting conventional systemic therapies. In the era of safe, fast, and efficacious Pso therapies, much higher treatment goals might be achieved during therapy. New treatment goals are only of use if patients and dermatologists strive to attain them.

Application of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines to nationwide data of patients with a recent myocardial infarction: a simulation study

AIMS

To estimate the proportion of patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) who would be eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, and to simulate the effects of expanded lipid-lowering therapy on attainment of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target as recommended by the guidelines.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the nationwide SWEDEHEART register, we included 25 466 patients who had attended a follow-up visit 6-10 weeks after an MI event, 2013-17. While most patients (86.6%) were receiving high-intensity statins, 82.9% of the patients would be eligible for expanded lipid-lowering therapy, as they had not attained the target of an LDL-C level of <1.4 mmol and a ≥50% LDL-C level reduction. When maximized use of high-intensity statins followed by add-on therapy with ezetimibe was simulated using a Monte Carlo model, the LDL-C target was reached in 19.9% using high-intensity statin monotherapy and in another 28.5% with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, while 50.7% would still be eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. When use of alirocumab or evolocumab was simulated in those who were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, around 90% of all patients attained the LDL-C target.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that, even with maximized use of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, around half of patients with MI would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Considering the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, the financial implications of the new guidelines may be substantial.

Effects of evolocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes with and without atherogenic dyslipidemia: An analysis from BANTING and BERSON

Background

Atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD), characterized by increased concentrations of apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing particles, is often present in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), cholesterol transported by apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing particles), and total apoB are considered secondary goals of lipid-lowering therapy to guide treatment of residual cardiovascular risk. The BANTING and BERSON studies demonstrated that evolocumab added to statin therapy reduced atherogenic lipid and lipoproteins concentrations in patients with T2DM.

Methods

This post-hoc analysis combined data from two randomized, placebo-controlled trials, BANTING and BERSON, to investigate the effect of evolocumab (140 mg every two weeks [Q2W] or 420 mg monthly [QM]) on atherogenic lipid (LDL-C, non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, remnant cholesterol) and lipoproteins (ApoB, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a])), and achievement of 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society lipid treatment goals in individuals with and without AD.

Results

In individuals with high TGs with (n = 389) and without (n = 196) AD receiving background statin therapy, evolocumab, compared with placebo, substantially reduced the cholesterol levels from all ApoB atherogenic lipoproteins (least squares (LS) mean LDL-C by 66.7% to 74.3%, non-HDL-C by 53.4% to 65.8%, median remnant cholesterol by 28.9% to 34.2%, VLDL-C by 16.1% to 19.6%) and median TGs levels (by 17.5% to 19.6%) at the mean of weeks 10 and 12. LS mean ApoB was significantly reduced by 41.5% to 56.6% at week 12. Results were consistent in diabetic individuals with normal TGs (n = 519). Evolocumab was also associated with a significant reduction in median Lp(a) by 35.0% to 53.9% at the mean of weeks 10 and 12. A majority (74.7% to 79.8%) of evolocumab-treated individuals achieved the goal of both an LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L and an LDL-C reduction of at least 50%, > 75% achieved non-HDL-C < 2.2 mmol/L at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, and > 67% achieved ApoB < 65 mg/dL at week 12.

Conclusions

Evolocumab effectively reduced LDL-C, non-HDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a), and remnant cholesterol in individuals with T2DM with and without AD. Evolocumab Q2W or QM enabled most individuals at high/very-high cardiovascular disease risk to achieve their LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and ApoB recommended goals.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-021-01287-6.

Patient-Selected Treatment Goals in Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Goal-orientated health care accounts for patient preferences and values, not just physician treatment aims. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) management strategy states that clinicians should elicit patients' own treatment goals as a central part of care. Despite this recommendation, data on patients' treatment goals are sparse among patients with severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between rates of treatment adherence and goal achievement, and patient-selected goals.

METHODS

Thematic analysis was used to characterize patient-selected goals. Previously undescribed goal categories in asthma were identified, quantified, and related to clinical characteristics. Goal achievement was aligned with objectively measured treatment adherence.

RESULTS

Three categories of patients-selected goals were identified from 2 randomized control trials: disease-specific (n = 98 [51%] and n = 92 [54%], respectively), function-related (n = 90 [48%] and n = 61 [36%]), and knowledge (n = 1 [1%] and n = 17 [10%]). Only 53% of goals aligned with clinician treatment goals. Patients who chose disease-specific goals were more likely to achieve both control and their specified goal (n = 98 [45%], odds ratio: 1.789, confidence interval: 1.066-3.001). Male participants are more likely to focus on disease-specific goals. Patients who achieved their goals were more likely to be T2-high, have an elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) at their first visit, and have a lower FeNO value at their final visit. Interestingly, adherence rates decline significantly for those who achieve their goals.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patient-selected goals do not align with GINA clinical asthma management goals. Participants who chose goals that do align with clinicians were more likely to achieve them.

Follow-Up Functional Class and 6-Minute Walk Distance Identify Long-Term Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend specific treatment goals for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients: functional class I or II, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) ≥ 380 to 440 m, normal natriuretic peptide levels, and normal right-sided invasive hemodynamics. Only observational registry data support this recommendation. Our aim was to test these goals in a large group 1 PAH cohort against long-term survival.

METHODS

We analyzed the PHIRST and TRIUMPH populations (n = 563, age 53.5 ± 14.7 years, female sex 79%). The predictor variables were the treatment goals measured at the end of the placebo-controlled phase (16 and 12 weeks, respectively). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the end of follow-up during the open-label extension phase.

RESULTS

There were 73 deaths during median follow of 1072 days (range 27 to 2177). Patients who achieved a functional class I or II had better survival. Both a 6MWD ≥ 380 m and ≥ 440 m were associated with lower mortality, but survival was better in patients able to walk ≥ 440 m. The best long-term survival was achieved with functional class I or II and 6MWD ≥ 440 m. In a subset of the population, cardiac index > 2.5 L/min/m² was weakly associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

WHO functional class I or II, 6MWD ≥ 440 m and CI > 2.5 L/min/m² measured 12-16 weeks after the introduction of PAH-targeted therapy are associated with better long-term survival in PAH. Best survival is observed by reaching both the functional class and the 6MWD goals.

The EXPECT trial

Purpose

Misconceptions regarding activity and toxicity of therapeutic interventions are common among cancer patients. There is little knowledge about the factors that contribute to a more realistic perception by patients.

Methods

This pilot study was designed as a prospective questionnaire survey and included 101 therapy-naïve patients treated at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna. After obtaining written informed consent, patients’ expectations about treatment aims, side effects and the satisfaction with their oncologic consultation were interrogated before the first treatment cycle by questionnaires.

Results

Of 101 patients, 53 (53%) were female and 67/101 (66%) were treated with curative attempt in an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting. The most common diagnoses were lung cancer (31%) and breast cancer (30%). Although 92% of patients were satisfied with the information given by their oncologist, palliative patients were more likely to declare that not everything was explained in an intelligible manner (p = 0.01). Patients with a first language other than German stated more often that their physician did not listen carefully enough (p = 0.02). Of 30 patients, 26 (87%) receiving chemotherapy with palliative intent believed that their disease was curable. Concerning adverse events, female patients anticipated more frequently hair loss (p = 0.003) and changes in taste (p = 0.001) compared to men. Patients under curative treatment were more likely to expect weight loss (p = 0.02) and lack of appetite (p = 0.01) compared to patients with palliative treatment intent.

Conclusion

In conclusion, cancer patients were satisfied with the patient-doctor communication. This prospective study aggregated patients’ concerns on side effects and the perception of therapeutic goals in therapy-naïve patients. Of note, the majority of patients treated in the palliative setting expected their treatment to cure the disease.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-020-05826-x.

Relatives of deceased patients with metastatic lung cancer's views on the achievement of treatment goals and the choice to start treatment: a structured telephone interview study

Background

Lung cancer has a high impact on both patients and relatives due to the high disease burden and short life expectancy. Previous studies looked into treatment goals patients have before starting a systemic treatment. However, studies on relatives’ perceptions of treatment at the end of life are scarce. Therefore, we studied the perspectives of relatives in hindsight on the achievement of treatment goals and the choice to start treatment for metastatic lung cancer of their loved one.

Methods

We conducted a structured telephone interview study in six hospitals across the Netherlands, one academic and five non-academic hospitals, between February 2017 and November 2019. We included 118 relatives of deceased patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer who started a systemic treatment as part of usual care (chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and who completed a questionnaire on their treatment goals before the start of treatment and when treatment was finished. We asked the relatives about the achievement of patients’ treatment goals and relatives’ satisfaction with the choice to start treatment. This study is part of a larger study in which 266 patients with metastatic lung cancer participated who started a systemic treatment and reported their treatment goals before start of the treatment and the achievement of these goals after the treatment.

Results

Relatives reported the goals ‘quality of life’, ‘decrease tumour size’ and ‘life prolongation’ as achieved in 21, 37 and 41% respectively. The majority of the relatives (78%) were satisfied with the choice to start a treatment and even when none of the goals were achieved, 70% of the relatives were satisfied. About 50% of relatives who were satisfied with the patients’ choice mentioned negative aspects of the treatment choice, such as the treatment did not work, there were side effects or it would not have been the relatives’ choice. Whereas, 80% of relatives who were not satisfied mentioned negative aspects of the treatment choice. The most mentioned positive aspects were that they tried everything and that it was the patient’s choice.

Conclusion

The majority of relatives reported patients’ treatment goals as not achieved. However, relatives were predominantly satisfied about the treatment choice. Satisfaction does not provide a full picture of the experience with the treatment decision considering that the majority of relatives mentioned (also) negative aspects of this decision. At the time of making the treatment decision it is important to manage expectations about the chance of success and the possible side effects of the treatment.

Relevant Patient Benefit of Sublingual Immunotherapy with Birch Pollen Allergen Extract in Allergic Rhinitis: An Open, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study

INTRODUCTION

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with birch pollen extract has been shown to be an efficacious treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). An as-yet unanswered question is whether and how clinical benefit translates into patient benefit, i.e. what benefit patients derive from this treatment.

METHODS

This 1-year, open, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study conducted in 75 German centers measured patient-relevant benefit of birch pollen SLIT (Staloral^® Birch) using the questionnaire "Patient Benefit Index for Allergic Rhinitis (PBI-AR)". At treatment onset, patients rated the importance of 25 treatment needs; after the first birch pollen season on treatment, goal achievement was evaluated. A preference-weighted benefit index was calculated and its association with gender, asthma, allergy status, and severity of AR symptoms was determined.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 291 adult patients was 38.8 years; 58.4% were female. The most important treatment goals were to "be able to stay outdoors without symptoms" (87.3% quite or very important), "no longer have a runny or stuffed-up nose" (86.9%), and "be able to breathe through your nose more freely" (86.9%). The treatment goals with the highest benefit ratings (referring to those patients to whom the respective goal applied) were to "have confidence in the therapy" (60.5% has helped "quite" or "very much"), "have an easily applicable treatment" (55.6%), and "be able to breathe through my nose more freely" (51.7%). The average PBI-AR global score was 2.19 (SD 1.04) (0-4; with 4 indicating maximum benefit). No significant differences in PBI-AR global score or subscales were found between men and women, poly- and monoallergic patients, or patients with severe versus mild rhinoconjunctivitis. Patients with asthma reported relevant but lower benefit than patients without asthma.

CONCLUSION

After 1 year of birch pollen SLIT treatment, patients reported considerable benefit, mainly due to a reduction of physical symptoms and treatment burden.

Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability

Background

Consensus-orientated Delphi studies are increasingly used in various areas of medical research using a variety of different rating scales and criteria for reaching consensus. We explored the influence of using three different rating scales and different consensus criteria on the results for reaching consensus and assessed the test-retest reliability of these scales within a study aimed at identification of global treatment goals for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

We conducted a two-stage study consisting of two surveys and consecutively included patients scheduled for TKA from five German hospitals. Patients were asked to rate 19 potential treatment goals on different rating scales (three-point, five-point, nine-point). Surveys were conducted within a 2 week period prior to TKA, order of questions (scales and treatment goals) was randomized.

Results

Eighty patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years; 70% females) completed both surveys. Different rating scales (three-point, five-point and nine-point rating scale) lead to different consensus despite moderate to high correlation between rating scales (r = 0.65 to 0.74). Final consensus was highly influenced by the choice of rating scale with 14 (three-point), 6 (five-point), 15 (nine-point) out of 19 treatment goals reaching the pre-defined 75% consensus threshold. The number of goals reaching consensus also highly varied between rating scales for other consensus thresholds. Overall, concordance differed between the three-point (percent agreement [p] = 88.5%, weighted kappa [k] = 0.63), five-point (p = 75.3%, k = 0.47) and nine-point scale (p = 67.8%, k = 0.78).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that consensus depends on the rating scale and consensus threshold within one population. The test-retest reliability of the three rating scales investigated differs substantially between individual treatment goals. This variation in reliability can become a potential source of bias in consensus studies. In our setting aimed at capturing patients’ treatment goals for TKA, the three-point scale proves to be the most reasonable choice, as its translation into the clinical context is the most straightforward among the scales. Researchers conducting Delphi studies should be aware that final consensus is substantially influenced by the choice of rating scale and consensus criteria.

Barriers to treatment optimization and achievement of patients' goals: perspectives from people living with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated patients' own treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this real-world, cross-sectional study of US patients with RA was to identify factors that patients believed influenced their physician's treatment decisions. Secondary objectives included reasons patients tolerated sub-optimal disease control and their perceived barriers to treatment optimization.

METHODS

Eligible participants were enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry, ≥ 19 years, had physician-diagnosed RA, unchanged treatment within 3 months of baseline, prior/current disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DMARDs), and computer/smartphone access. In December 2017, participants completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Computerized Adaptive Tests (PROMIS-CAT) for pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and physical function. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) provided disease activity scores (0-30). Participants completed an online survey on barriers to treatment optimization, including self-perception of disease compared to RAPID3/PROMIS scores.

RESULTS

A total of 249 participants met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Mean age (SD) was 52 (11) years, and the majority were female (92%) with high RAPID3 disease activity (175/249 [70%]; median score 18). The main reason participants did not change treatment was their physician's recommendation (66%; n = 32). Of participants with high RAPID3 disease activity, 66 (38%) were offered a treatment change; 19 (29%) of whom declined the change. Most participants who intensified treatment did so because their symptoms had remained severe or worsened (51%; n = 65); only 16 (25%) participants intensified because they had not reached a specified treatment goal. Among participants who self-reported their disease activity as "none/low" or "medium" (n = 202; 81% of cohort), most still had RAPID3 high disease activity (137/202 [68%]; score > 12). Most PROMIS scores showed moderate agreement with participants' self-assessment of health status, in contrast to RAPID3 (weighted kappa: 0.05 [95% CI - 0.01, 0.11]).

CONCLUSIONS

Most participants trusted their rheumatologist's treatment decisions and prioritized their physician's treatment goals over their own. Patients should be encouraged to share their treatment goals/expectations with their rheumatologist, in line with the treat-to-target approach. RAPID3 may be inappropriate for setting patient-centric treatment goals given the poor agreement with self-reported disease activity; most PROMIS scores showed better alignment with patients' own assessments.

[Guideline for the planning of personalized, interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment]

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) should be delivered in a personalized, mechanism- and goal-oriented manner on the basis of an individual case conception. To the authors' knowledge, a practical instrument for planning IMPT does not exist. The model and guideline presented here for treatment should help practitioners to optimize the planning of IMPT and execute it efficiently. Based on the relevant interference mechanisms, goals for change and treatment are set and possible interventions are proposed. This involves explicitly including the patient's existing resources.

Understanding Treatment Preferences in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the USA: Results from a Cross-Sectional Patient Survey

Introduction

The goal of psoriasis (PsO) treatment is to improve quality of life by lessening the extent and severity of the disease. Traditional systemic drugs and biologic agents are used for the treatment of moderate to severe PsO and recent research emphasizes understanding patient goals and preferences for treatment, to improve overall outcomes.

Methods

An online survey was administered to collect data from 500 adult patients with moderate to severe PsO in the USA. Patients were required to have current or previous systemic therapy use and were excluded if aged 75 or older. Data on demographics, disease burden, treatment use, and patients’ treatment goals and expectations were collected. Descriptive and multivariate analyses examined the factors that predict treatment goals. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, gender, severity, comorbid psoriatic arthritis (PsA), location of PsO, and biologic experience. All analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4 and R v3.4.

Results

Of the 500 adult patients included, 71.6% reported moderate PsO. Patients had a mean (SD) score of 62.4 (23.0) for skin pain, 60.0 (26.3) for fatigue, and 6.6 (2.1) for itch on a scale of 0–100, 0–100, and 0–10 respectively. Mean (SD) score for quality of life (QoL), assessed using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), was 18.3 (7.3), with more than 90% having moderate/very large/extremely large effect on life. The majority of patients considered “keeping skin clear for 2–3 years” (94%), “overall relief of symptoms” (93.8%), and effective in clearing certain areas” (92.2%) as important attributes of a systemic treatment. Overall, patients expected 50% clear skin in about 2 weeks and completely clear skin in about 4 weeks.

Conclusions

Overall, in this study with more than 70% of patients with moderate disease, patients reported high burden of disease and impact on QoL. This study demonstrates the importance of considering patient perspectives in treatment decisions that are critical for optimizing patient outcomes.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company.

Long-term effectiveness of a type 2 diabetes comprehensive care program. The CAIPaDi model

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive care program to achieve and maintain goals in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The CAIPaDi program includes 9 interventions delivered in 7 h. It seeks to achieve metabolic goals, identify and resolve barriers that would make implementation difficult, and provide self-efficacy and empowerment to patients by identifying personal profiles to establish individualized strategies. The program consists of a 4 intervention visits (1, 2, 3, and 4 months) and two follow up visits (12 and 24 months). Outcomes are compared between every visit. Main outcome was the attainment of the USA National Committee for Quality Assurance treatment goals.

RESULTS

1104 patients completed the first 4 visits, 545 the 12 month evaluation, and 218 the 24 month evaluation. After the conclusion of the four monthly sessions, 80.6% had HbA1c <7%, 72.1% had BP <130/80 mmHg and 71.6% had LDL- cholesterol <100 mg/dl. After twelve months, the percentage of goals achieved were 65.9%, 67.7% and 43.3% respectively (p < 0.001). For the 2-year evaluation the percentages were 61.0%, 70.6%, and 40.8% respectively (p < 0.001). All patients had renal, eye, foot and dental evaluations. Empowerment and quality of life showed significant changes; anxiety and depression scores remained low at annual follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAIPaDI program results in sustained improvement and maintenance of treatment goals.

Evaluation of a Novel Preference Assessment Tool for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Background

We developed a preference assessment tool to help assess patient goals, values, and preferences for multiple sclerosis (MS) management. All preference items in the tool were generated by people with MS. The aim of this study was to evaluate this tool in a national sample of people with MS.

Methods

English-speaking patients with MS aged 21 to 75 years with access to the internet were recruited. Participants completed the preference tool online, which included separate modules assessing three core preference areas: treatment goals, preferences for attributes of disease-modifying therapies, and factors influencing a change in treatment. The tool generated a summary of participants' treatment goals and preferences. Immediately after viewing the summary, participants were asked to evaluate the tool. Rankings of preference domains were compared with rankings obtained in another study.

Results

In 135 people with MS who completed the tool and evaluation, the highest ranked goal was brain health (memory, thinking, brain), followed by disability concerns (walking, strength, vision). Rankings were highly similar to those in the referent study. Nearly all participants reported that the tool helped them understand their goals and priorities regarding MS and that the summary appropriately reflected what is important to them. Most participants (87%) wanted to discuss their treatment goals and priorities with their clinician.

Conclusions

This preference assessment tool successfully captured patients' goals, values, and preferences for MS treatment and could potentially be used to help patients communicate their preferences to their clinician.

[Treatment goals in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity following injection of botulinum toxin A : Results of the German-Austrian subgroup of the ULIS-II study]

BACKGROUND

The ULIS-II was an international cohort study (NCT01020500) evaluating current treatment of upper limb spasticity in post-stroke adult patients with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in real-life practice.

OBJECTIVE

Post hoc analysis to compare current management of post-stroke adult patients regarding goal setting and attainment with BoNT-A in Germany (D) and Austria (A) with the full cohort of ULIS-II.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ULIS-II was a global, open-label, prospective, multicenter observational study with 2 visits conducted in 84 centers worldwide. A total of 468 patients aged ≥18 years with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were included. The primary outcome measure was the responder rate defined as achievement of a goal attainment scale (GAS) score of 0, 1 or 2 after 1 cycle of BoNT-A.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients from D/A were included in the efficacy analysis. The number of patients in D/A and the full cohort achieving the primary (78.9% vs. 79.6%) and secondary treatment goal (76.8% vs. 75.6%), respectively, was comparable. Deviating from the full cohort, the most common primary treatment goal in D/A was related to impairment (33.3%). Compared to baseline there was a marked reduction in concomitant therapies at the follow-up visit after 3-5 months in the D/A group: patients receiving oral anti-spastic medication 61.4% vs. 40.4%, positioning 50.9% vs. 36.8% and splinting 43.9% vs. 31.6%. Injection control techniques were less frequently used in the D/A group compared to the global study cohort (electrical stimulation: 26.3% vs. 45.8% and electromyography: 12.3% vs. 29.2%). No adverse events were documented in the D/A cohort.

CONCLUSION

A single injection of BoNT-A in adult patients with post-stroke spasticity of the arm led to a high response rate of approximately 80% in both cohorts. The BoNT-A injections in post-stroke adult patients contributed to an improvement in the daily life of patients and their carers beyond simple reduction of muscle tone or spasticity.

Entertaining accurate treatment expectations while suffering from chronic pain: an exploration of treatment expectations and the relationship with patient- provider communication

BACKGROUND

Accurate patient expectations are important to optimise treatment success, especially for complex conditions such as chronic pain. Communication may be the key to managing patient expectations. This study aimed to explore whether health care provider communication influences patient expectations and which communication aspects are most important.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analyses on data that had been collected between September and November 2012. 2603 patients suffering from chronic pain were invited to complete a survey.

RESULTS

Although 69.9% of patients achieved or surpassed their treatment goal, 30.2% of patients were unsatisfied. Even though overall health care provider communication and shared decision making were unrelated to patient expectations, several affective communication aspects were related. These aspects were attentive listening, taking enough time, building patient's trust in the physician's competence and giving patients the feeling that the physician is doing all he or she can (p's < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though treatment goals are not always explicitly discussed, patients still form expectations regarding treatment outcomes. Affective communication may be more important for managing patient expectations than sharing information. Building a good therapeutic relationship by showing affective communication may be important to increase the accuracy of patient expectations.

Managing Canine Aggression in the Home

Canine aggression occurring in the home can be a dangerous diagnosis with costly consequences to all members of the household. Management is a key modality in the treatment of canine aggression in the home. A thorough history will detail each trigger, target, and context and allow for the veterinary team to put together a comprehensive management plan. Management allows for the avoidance of future aggressive episodes and minimizes the risks associated with living with a patient with these diagnoses. Although risk cannot be mitigated 100%, thorough management can create a safe environment for the implementation of the behavior treatment plan.

Women, Hypertension, and the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Hypertension accounts for approximately 1 in 5 deaths in American women and is the major contributor to many comorbid conditions. Although blood pressure lowering reduces cardiovascular disease outcomes, considerable uncertainty remains on best management in women. Specifically, female blood pressure treatment goals have not been established, particularly among older and African American and Hispanic women, for whom hypertension prevalence, related adverse outcomes, and poor control rates are high. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) planned to clarify optimal blood pressure management in both sexes. Although confirming that a lower blood pressure goal is generally better, because female enrollment and event rates were low and follow-up shortened, outcomes differences in women were not statistically significant. Thus optimal blood pressure goals for women have not been established with the highest evidence. This review addresses SPRINT's significance and key remaining knowledge gaps in optimal blood pressure management to improve women's health.

Life and treatment goals of patients with advanced, incurable cancer

PURPOSE

Goals of care conversations have been suggested as a strategy for helping patients with advanced cancer manage the uncertainty and distress associated with end-of-life care. However, knowledge deficits about patient goals limit the utility of such conversations. We described the life and treatment goals of patients with incurable cancers, including goal values and expectancies. We examined the associations between paramount goals and patient prognosis, performance status, and psychological adjustment.

METHODS

Patients with advanced lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, or melanoma (N = 84) completed measures of prognosis for 12-month survival, hope, optimism, depression, and anxiety. Oncologists provided patient performance status and prognosis for 12-month survival. We conducted interviews with a subset of patients (N = 63), eliciting life and treatment goals, values, and expectancies.

RESULTS

Patient life goals resembled goals among healthy populations; whereas, treatment goals were perceived as separate and more important. Cure and fight cancer emerged as the most important goals. Patients who valued cure the most had worse performance status (M = 1.46 vs. 0.78) and more depressive symptoms (M = 6.30 vs. 3.50). Patients who valued fight cancer the most had worse self-prognosis (M = 69.23 % vs. 86.11 %), fewer treatment goals (M = 2.08 vs. 3.16), and lower optimism (M = 15.00 vs. 18.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced cancer perceive treatment goals as separate from and more important than life goals. They hold optimistic expectancies for achieving their goals and for survival. Valuing cure highly may put patients at risk for experiencing psychological maladjustment.

How effective are the ESC/EAS and 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines in treating dyslipidemia? Lessons from a lipid clinic

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of data regarding the attainment of lipid-lowering treatment goals according to the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. The aim of the present study was to assess how applicable these 2013 recommendations are in the setting of an Outpatient University Hospital Lipid Clinic.

METHODS

This was a retrospective (from 1999 to 2013) observational study including 1000 consecutive adults treated for hyperlipidemia and followed up for ≥3 years. Comparisons for the applicability of current European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) and recent ACC/AHA guidelines were performed.

RESULTS

Achievement rates of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets set by ESC/EAS were 21%, 44% and 62% among patients at very high, high and moderate cardiovascular risk, respectively, receiving statin monotherapy. Among individuals on high-intensity statins only 47% achieved the anticipated ≥50% LDL-C reduction, i.e. the ACC/AHA target. The corresponding rate was significantly greater among those on statin + ezetimibe (76%, p < 0.05). Likewise, higher rates of LDL-C target attainment according to ESC/EAS guidelines were observed in patients on statin + ezetimibe compared with statin monotherapy (37, 50 and 71% for the three risk groups, p < 0.05 for the very high risk group).

CONCLUSION

The application of the ACC/AHA guidelines may be associated with undertreatment of high risk patients due to suboptimal LDL-C response to high-intensity statins in clinical practice. Adding ezetimibe substantially increases the rate of the ESC/EAS LDL-C target achievement together with the rate of LDL-C lowering response suggested by the ACC/AHA.

Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment goals among dyslipidemic individuals in the Levant: the CEntralized Pan-Levant survey on tHE Undertreatment of hypercholeSterolemia (CEPHEUS) study

BACKGROUND

Several studies that evaluated achieving lipid goals have demonstrated an undertreatment of dyslipidemia. We evaluated the use and efficacy of lipid-lowering agents (LLAs) in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to recommended levels in the Levant region.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A multi-center, cross-sectional survey enrolled 1002 dyslipidemic patients (August 2010 - January 2011) on LLAs for ≥3 months. Collection of data and blood samples was done over one visit. Physicians and patients filled out questionnaires pertaining to dyslipidemia diagnosis and treatment. LDL-C target levels were defined according to international guidelines.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 992 patients. Mean age was 58.0 ± 11.6 years (41% women, 65.7% diabetics and 51.5% had history of coronary heart disease). LLAs were prescribed for primary prevention or secondary prevention or familial hypercholesterolemia in 45.8% and 52.8% and 1.4% of patients; respectively. Overall, 64.0% and 56.8% of the patients attained their LDL-C goal recommended by the NCEP ATP III and TJETF guidelines, respectively. According to the 2004 NCEP ATP III updated guidelines, about 24.8% of the very high risk group attained their LDL goal of ≤70 mg/dL. Smoking, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, history of cardiovascular disease, increased waist circumference, and elevated pre-treatment LDL-C level were all associated with not reaching LDL-C goals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the study cohort was a relatively high risk group and might not be representative of the general population, we found that about 60% of enrolled individuals achieved the LDL-C treatment goals and 24.8% of the very high risk group achieved the recommended LDL-C targets of ≤70 mg/dl; national strategies and aggressive awareness campaigns to effectively control lipid levels to recommended target levels, especially in the high risk groups, are urgently needed.