The incidence of thrombocytopenia in adult patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies

Risk Factors of Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies

PURPOSE

Thrombocytopenia is among the most common chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicities. We aim to determine the predictors of oxaliplatin chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with gastrointestinal tumors to guide the clinic.

METHODS

Clinical data of 750 patients with a malignant gastrointestinal tumor were included as the primary cohort. Basic clinical data, serological indices, and anthropometric indices of these patients were collected. According to the presence or absence of CIT, univariate analysis was performed to identify significant factors for multivariate analysis. In R language software, nomogram was constructed based on the results of multi-factor analysis, and the calibration curve and ROC curve were drawn.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified 17 factors as closely related to CIT occurrence, namely age, lymph node metastasis (N) stage, metastasis (M) stage, lung metastasis, other site metastasis, chemotherapy regimen, course of treatment, total dose of oxaliplatin, AST, albumin, neutrophils, monocytes, baseline platelets, transferrin, natural killer (NK) cell, phase angle, and SMI (P < 0.10). The binary logistic multivariate regression analysis revealed five independent risk factors for developing CIT (P < 0.05), including the M stage, total dose of oxaliplatin, albumin, baseline thrombocyte count, and NK cell. Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, R software was used to establish a nomogram model. The calibration curve shows that the combined predictor has good consistency. The area under the ROC curve was 0.877 and the best cut-off value was 0.3579613 (sensitivity, 78.9%; specificity, 81.8%), which showed the better prediction efficiency.

CONCLUSION

The total dose of oxaliplatin, M stage, albumin, baseline platelet count, and NK cell was independent risk factors for CIT. The sequentially constructed histogram model had a good predictive effect on the risk of thrombocytopenia caused by oxaliplatin chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Risk and adverse clinical outcomes of thrombocytopenia among patients with solid tumors-a Danish population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about thrombocytopenia among patients with solid tumors is scarce. We examined the risk of thrombocytopenia among patients with solid tumors and its association with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Using Danish health registries, we identified all patients with incident solid tumors from 2015-2018 (n = 52,380) and a platelet count measurement within 2 weeks prior to or on their cancer diagnosis date. The risk of thrombocytopenia was categorized as grades 0 (any platelet count × 109/L): <150; 1: <100; 2: <75; 3: <50; 4: <25, and 5: <10. To study the outcomes, each patient with thrombocytopenia was matched with up to five cancer patients without thrombocytopenia by age, sex, cancer type, and stage. Cox regression was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) of bleeding, transfusion, or death, adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The 1-year risk of thrombocytopenia was 23%, increasing to 30% at 4 years. This risk was higher in patients receiving chemotherapy (43% at 1 year and 49% at 4 years). Overall, patients with thrombocytopenia had higher 30-days rates of bleeding (HR = 1.72 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.41-2.11]). Thrombocytopenia was also associated with an increased rate of transfusion, and death, but some of the risk estimates were imprecise.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of thrombocytopenia was substantial among patients with solid tumors and associated with adverse outcomes.

The double life of a chemotherapy drug: Immunomodulatory functions of gemcitabine in cancer

Although the development of immunotherapies has been revolutionary in the treatment of several cancers, many cancer types remain unresponsive to immune-based treatment and are largely managed by chemotherapy drugs. However, chemotherapeutics are not infallible and are frequently rendered ineffective as resistance develops from prolonged exposure. Recent investigations have indicated that some chemotherapy drugs have additional functions beyond their normative cytotoxic capacity and are in fact immune-modifying agents. Of the pharmaceuticals with identified immune-editing properties, gemcitabine is well-studied and of interest to clinicians and scientists alike. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug approved for the treatment of multiple cancers, including breast, lung, pancreatic, and ovarian. Because of its broad applications, relatively low toxicity profile, and history as a favorable combinatory partner, there is promise in the recharacterization of gemcitabine in the context of the immune system. Such efforts may allow the identification of suitable immunotherapeutic combinations, wherein gemcitabine can be used as a priming agent to improve immunotherapy efficacy in traditionally insensitive cancers. This review looks to highlight documented immunomodulatory abilities of one of the most well-known chemotherapy agents, gemcitabine, relating to its influence on cells and proteins of the immune system.

A real-world observation on thrombopoietic agents for patients with cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China: A multicenter, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Studies on various thrombopoietic agents for cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) in China are lacking. This study aimed to provide detailed clinical profiles to understand the outcomes and safety of different CTIT treatment regimens.

METHODS

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1664 questionnaires were collected from 33 hospitals between March 1 and July 1, 2021. Patients aged >18 years were enrolled who were diagnosed with CTIT and treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11), recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO), or a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The outcomes, compliance, and safety of different treatments were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 1437 analyzable cases, most patients were treated with either rhTPO alone (49.3%) or rhIL-11 alone (27.0%). The most common combination regimen used was rhTPO and rhIL-11 (10.9%). Platelet transfusions were received by 117 cases (8.1%). In multivariate analysis, rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery, platelet transfusion, and hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) than rhIL-11 alone. No significant difference was observed in the time taken to achieve a platelet count of >100 × 109/L and chemotherapy dose reduction due to CIT among the different thrombopoietic agents. The outcomes of thrombocytopenia in 170 patients who received targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy are also summarized. The results show that the proportion of platelet recovery was similar among the different thrombopoietic agents. No new safety signals related to thrombopoietic agents were observed in this study. A higher proportion of physicians preferred to continue treatment with TPO-RA alone than with rhTPO and rhIL-11.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides an overview of CTIT and the application of various thrombopoietic agents throughout China. Comparison of monotherapy with rhIL-11, rhTPO, and TPO-RA requires further randomized clinical trials. The appropriate application for thrombopoietic agents should depend on the pretreatment of platelets, treatment variables, and risk of bleeding.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

To provide an overview of the outcome of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China, our cross-sectional study analyzed 1437 cases treated with different thrombopoietic agents. Most of the patients were treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) and recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO). rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery and platelet transfusion compared with rhIL-11.

Predictive value of TCM tongue characteristics for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with lung cancer

This study aimed to investigate the clinical predictors, including traditional Chinese medicine tongue characteristics and other clinical parameters for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM), and then to develop a clinical prediction model and construct a nomogram. A total of 103 patients with lung cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. All of them were scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy regimens. Participants were randomly assigned to either the training group (n = 52) or the test group (n = 51). Tongue characteristics and clinical parameters were collected before the start of chemotherapy, and then the incidence of myelosuppression was assessed after treatment. We used univariate logistic regression analysis to identify the risk predictors for assessing the incidence of CIM. Moreover, we developed a predictive model and a nomogram using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, we evaluated the predictive performance of the model by examining the area under the curve value of the receiver operating characteristic, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. As a result, a total of 3 independent predictors were found to be associated with the CIM in multivariate regression analysis: the fat tongue (OR = 3.67), Karnofsky performance status score (OR = 0.11), and the number of high-toxic drugs in chemotherapy regimens (OR = 4.78). Then a model was constructed using these 3 predictors and it exhibited a robust predictive performance with an area under the curve of 0.82 and the consistent calibration curves. Besides, the decision curve analysis results suggested that applying this predictive model can result in more net clinical benefit for patients. We established a traditional Chinese medicine prediction model based on the tongue characteristics and clinical parameters, which could serve as a useful tool for assessing the risk of CIM.

Ischaemic heart disease in patients with cancer

Cardiologists are encountering a growing number of cancer patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Several factors account for the interrelationship between these two conditions, in addition to improving survival rates in the cancer population. Established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia and obesity, predispose to both IHD and cancer, through specific mechanisms and via low-grade, systemic inflammation. This latter is also fuelled by clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Furthermore, experimental work indicates that IHD and cancer can promote one another, and the CV or metabolic toxicity of anticancer therapies can lead to IHD. The connections between IHD and cancer are reinforced by social determinants of health, non-medical factors that modify health outcomes and comprise individual and societal domains, including economic stability, educational and healthcare access and quality, neighbourhood and built environment, and social and community context. Management of IHD in cancer patients is often challenging, due to atypical presentation, increased bleeding and ischaemic risk, and worse outcomes as compared to patients without cancer. The decision to proceed with coronary revascularization and the choice of antithrombotic therapy can be difficult, particularly in patients with chronic coronary syndromes, necessitating multidisciplinary discussion that considers both general guidelines and specific features on a case by case basis. Randomized controlled trial evidence in cancer patients is very limited and there is urgent need for more data to inform clinical practice. Therefore, coexistence of IHD and cancer raises important scientific and practical questions that call for collaborative efforts from the cardio-oncology, cardiology, and oncology communities.

Fibrinogen contribution to clot strength in patients with sepsis and hematologic malignancies and thrombocytopenia-a prospective, single-center, analytical, cross-sectional study

Background

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) frequently present thrombocytopenia and higher risk of bleeding. Although transfusion is associated with higher risk of adverse events and poor outcomes, prophylactic transfusion of platelets is a common practice to prevent hemorrhagic complications. Thromboelastometry has been considered a better predictor for bleeding than isolated platelet counts in different settings. In early stages of sepsis, hypercoagulability may occur due to higher fibrinogen levels.

Objectives

To evaluate the behavior of coagulation in patients with HM who develop sepsis and to verify whether a higher concentration of fibrinogen is associated with a proportional increase in maximum clot firmness (MCF) even in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia.

Methods

We performed a unicentric analytical cross-sectional study with 60 adult patients with HM and severe thrombocytopenia, of whom 30 had sepsis (sepsis group) and 30 had no infections (control group). Coagulation conventional tests and specific coagulation tests, including thromboelastometry, were performed. The main outcome evaluated was MCF.

Results

Higher levels of fibrinogen and MCF were found in sepsis group. Both fibrinogen and platelets contributed to MCF. The relative contribution of fibrin was significantly higher (60.5 ± 12.8% vs 43.6 ± 9.7%; P < .001) and that of platelets was significantly lower (39.5 ± 12.8% vs 56.4 ± 9.7%; P < .001) in the sepsis group compared with the control group.

Conclusion

Patients with sepsis and HM presented higher concentrations of fibrinogen than uninfected patients, resulting in greater MCF amplitudes even in the presence of thrombocytopenia.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, FMRS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs in solid tumors with CIT. The search was limited to articles published before April 30, 2022. Primary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reduction or delays, platelet transfusion, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and bleeding events. Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of platelet count > 400 × 109/L, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, thrombosis, and mortality.

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed six studies: five rigorous RCTs and one unique study comparing romiplostim to an observation group, involving a total of 489 patients. For primary outcomes, TPO-RAs significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the significance of the reduction in grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia incidence persisted (P = 0.008). TPO-RAs showed no significant impact on chemotherapy dose reduction or delays (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.01), platelet transfusion (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.48-2.27), or bleeding events (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.23-1.10). In terms of safety, there were no significant difference in the incidence of any AEs (RR = 0.98, 95% CI:0.92-1.04), serious AEs (RR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.45-1.40), thrombotic events (RR = 1.20, 95% CI:0.51-2.84) and mortality (RR = 1.15, 95% CI:0.55-2.41).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that TPO-RAs are generally well-tolerated. However, their efficacy in solid tumors with CIT appears limited, as they only demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.

Disparities in the consensus for treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is an arduous complication of chemotherapy to be dealt with, and there are many unmet needs in this field to be addressed on the global front. We have conducted this study to contribute to the understanding of existing knowledge gaps of CIT management and highlight the direction to focus future investigations.

Methods

This was an academic single-institution report on a cross-sectional study evaluating CIT management practices using platelet (PLT) transfusions by haematologists and oncologists in Armenia.

Results

Physicians' opinions differed significantly when it came to defining thrombocytopenia by PLT levels. 13.2% of those surveyed considered thrombocytopenia to be when PLT counts fall below 180 × 109/L, 42.1% defined thrombocytopenia to have a PLT threshold of 150 × 109/L, 15.8% and 21.0% specialists setting their thresholds at 140 × 109/L and 100 × 109/L, respectively.All physicians managed CIT by performing PLT transfusions for prophylactic purposes (i.e., when PLT count falls below a certain threshold) with none of them transfusing PLTs only on-demand to address active bleeding. 73.3% haematologists (adult), 57.1% medical oncologists, and 50% paediatricians deemed 10 × 109/L as the threshold PLT count for transfusing afebrile patients with haematologic malignancies (besides acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL)) and solid tumours.PLT products availability varied among the respondents, with only 53% of them responding that they had 24/7 access.

Conclusion

CIT is a complication of interest to physicians worldwide and has not been resolved yet. This is the first conducted survey regarding CIT and the initial step for further research.

Supportive Care in Older Lymphoma Patients to Reduce Toxicity and Preserve Quality of Life

The treatment paradigm in older patients with malignant hemopathies is the choice between an effective conservative treatment that preserves quality of life and an intensive, potentially curative treatment with more toxicities. For each patient, it is important to determine the risk/benefit ratio. The patient should be involved in the discussion, sufficiently informed and able to express himself and his expectations in terms of quality of life. However, this informed consent is conditioned by the ability of the patient to understand the risks and benefits of the treatment. Decline in quality of life is an important parameter for older patients with cancer and many prospective trials have now confirmed the impact of different side effects of treatment, such as recurrent hospitalization, loss of autonomy in daily activities, loss of contact with grandchildren and loss of cognitive functions. Interventions oriented to vulnerabilities detected in the older patients (by comprehensive geriatric assessment) and an optimal approach, including preventive measures to reduce treatment-related toxicity and mortality, are directly correlated to improvement in quality of life.

Transient EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia and ulcerative colitis recurrence during chemotherapy: A case of misleading platelet count results attributable to a laboratory artifact

Key Clinical Message

EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia as well as myelosuppression should be suspected when thrombocytopenia occurs in patients with autoimmune disease during chemotherapy.

Abstract

A patient with pancreatic cancer and ulcerative colitis developed transient ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia with exacerbation of ulcerative colitis during chemotherapy. Unfortunately, pseudothrombocytopenia could not be immediately detected because thrombocytopenia was masked by a reasonable time course of adverse events associated with chemotherapy and ulcerative colitis recurrence. When thrombocytopenia occurs during chemotherapy, especially in patients with autoimmune diseases, EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia and bone marrow suppression caused by anti-cancer agents should be suspected.

Bleeding and Thrombosis in Multiple Myeloma: Platelets as Key Players during Cell Interactions and Potential Use as Drug Delivery Systems

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy originated in the bone marrow and characterized by unhindered plasma cell proliferation that results in several clinical manifestations. Although the main role of blood platelets lies in hemostasis and thrombosis, platelets also play a pivotal role in a number of other pathological conditions. Platelets are the less-explored components from the tumor microenvironment in MM. Although some studies have recently revealed that MM cells have the ability to activate platelets even in the premalignant stage, this phenomenon has not been widely investigated in MM. Moreover, thrombocytopenia, along with bleeding, is commonly observed in those patients. In this review, we discuss the hemostatic disturbances observed in MM patients and the dynamic interaction between platelets and myeloma cells, along with present and future potential avenues for the use of platelets for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Evaluation and validation of the prognostic value of platelet indices in patients with leukemia

Platelets (PLTs) are believed to play a role in the process by which tumors can accelerate their growth rate, as well as offer the physical and mechanical support necessary to evade the immunological system and metastasis. There is, however, no literature available if PLTs have a role in leukemia. It is significant for PLTs to play a part in hematological malignancies from a therapeutic standpoint and to have the capacity to serve as a prognostic marker in the evolution of leukemia. This is because PLTs play a crucial role in the development of cancer and tumors. In this study, it will be shown that PLT count can be used to predict long-term prognosis after chemotherapy especially in the case of acute myeloid leukemia patients. Furthermore, low PLT-to-lymphocyte ratio and mean PLT volume, as well as high PLT distribution width, are associated with poor prognosis and may represent a novel independent prognostic factor.

Hetrombopag plus recombinant human thrombopoietin for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common hematological complication in patients with cancer. Hetrombopag is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has shown an additive effect in stimulating platelet production when combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO).

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag plus rhTPO compared with rhTPO alone for CIT.

METHODS

A total of 294 patients with solid tumors and CIT (platelet count, <50 × 109/L) who received either rhTPO plus hetrombopag (146 patients) or rhTPO alone (148 patients) at 3 centers from January to December 2022 were included in the study. The primary outcome was a platelet count at least 50 × 109/L higher than the baseline value within 14 days. Chemotherapy dose reductions/delays, bleeding, and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (82.2%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group vs 100 patients (67.6%) in the rhTPO group achieved the primary outcome (P = .005). This significant difference persisted in adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.12-3.60). A total of 115 patients (78.8%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group and 101 patients (68.2%) in the rhTPO group avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/delays (P = .041). There was no significant difference in bleeding rates, and adverse events were mild and similar between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Compared to rhTPO alone, our findings suggest that the combination of hetrombopag and rhTPO is safe and more effective in patients with CIT.

The prevalence of thrombocytopenia in patients with acute cancer-associated thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombocytopenia are frequently encountered complications in patients with cancer. Although there are several studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation regimens in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) with thrombocytopenia, there is a paucity of data assessing the scope of the concurrent diagnoses. This study evaluates the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients with acute CAT. A retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients with cancer was conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2010 and 2021 with CAT (acute VTE within 6 months after new diagnosis of malignancy). VTE included acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, abdominal or intrathoracic venous thrombosis, and cerebral sinus thrombosis. The lowest platelet count within 2 weeks of (before or after) the index VTE event was identified to assess the frequency and grade of concurrent thrombocytopenia. We identified 3635 patients with CAT (80% solid tumors, 18% hematologic malignancies, and 2% multiple concurrent cancer diagnoses). Thrombocytopenia (defined as platelet count <100 000/μL) occurred in 22% (95% CI 21%-24%) of patients with CAT with solid tumors diagnoses and 47% (95% CI 43%-51%) of patients with CAT and hematologic malignancies. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 000/μL) occurred in 7% (95% CI 6%-8%) of patients with solid tumors and 30% (95% CI 27%-34%) of patients with hematologic malignancies. Concurrent diagnoses of CAT and thrombocytopenia are very common, especially among patients with hematologic malignancies.

Association between Area under the Curve Estimated from Carboplatin Dose and Incidence of Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma on DeVIC Therapy

BACKGROUND

The degrees of adverse effects with carboplatin (CBDCA) are influenced by interindividual differences in the area under the curve (AUC), whereas renal function is not considered in the CBDCA dose design for dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and CBDCA (DeVIC) therapy. We conducted this study to evaluate the association between the AUC and incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with DeVIC with or without rituximab (DeVIC ± R).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data for 36 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received DeVIC ± R between May 2013 and January 2021 at the National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center. The AUC of CBDCA (AUCactual) was calculated backward using a variant of the Calvert formula.

RESULTS

The median AUCactual was 4.6 (interquartile range: 4.3-5.3) min mg/mL and AUCactual was negatively correlated with the nadir platelet count (r = -0.45; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that AUCactual ≥ 4.3 versus < 4.3 was an independent factor predictive of severe thrombocytopenia (odds ratio: 19.3, and 95% confidence interval: 1.45-258; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the CBDCA dosing design considering renal function can reduce the risk of severe thrombocytopenia in DeVIC ± R therapy.

Anticoagulation management and related outcomes in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) requiring anticoagulation and thrombocytopenia. The optimal management is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 5, 2022. Studies assessing adult patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L were included. Three anticoagulation management strategies were reported: full dose, modified dose, or no anticoagulation. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The incidence rates of thrombotic and bleeding outcomes by anticoagulation management strategies were descriptive, and were pooled using random effects model and expressed as events per 100 patient-months with associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

We included 19 observational cohort studies (N = 1728 patients) in the systematic review, with 10 included in the meta-analysis (N = 707 patients). Approximately 90 % of patients had hematological malignancies, with low-molecular-weight heparin being the main anticoagulant. The rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications were high regardless of management strategies - recurrent VTE on full dose: 2.65/100 patient-months (95 % CI 1.62-4.32), modified dose: 3.51/100 patient-months (95 % CI 1.00-12.39); major bleeding on full dose: 4.45/100 patient-months (95 % CI 2.80-7.06), modified dose: 4.16/100 patient-months (95 % CI 2.24-7.74). There was serious risk of bias in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia have high risks of both recurrent VTE and major bleeding, but current literature is significantly limited to guide the best management.

Prolonged prothrombin time does not correlate with clinical bleeding symptoms in newly diagnosed paediatric leukaemia patients

Prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and/or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are frequently seen in newly diagnosed paediatric leukaemia patients (NDPLP), which can lead to delayed diagnostic and therapeutic procedures due to concern for bleeding. A single-centre retrospective chart review of NDPLP between 2015 and 2018 aged 1-21 years. We analysed 93 NDPLP of whom 33.3% had bleeding symptoms within 30 days of presentation, predominantly mucosal bleeding (80.6%) and petechiae (64.5%). Median laboratory values: white blood cell count 15.7, haemoglobin 8.1, platelets 64, PT 13.2 and a PTT 31. Red blood cells were administered in 41.2%, platelets in 52.9%, fresh frozen plasma in 7.8% and vitamin K in 21.6% of patients. Prolonged PT was found in 54.8% of patients, while aPTT was prolonged in 5.4%. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia did not correlate with prolonged PT ( P  = 0.73 and P  = 0.18, respectively), or prolonged aPTT ( P  = 0.52 and 0.42). Leukocytosis showed significant correlation with elevated PT ( P  < 0.001), but not aPTT ( P  = 0.3). Bleeding symptoms upon presentation did not correlate with prolonged PT ( P  = 0.83), prolonged aPTT ( P  = 1) or anaemia ( P  = 0.06) but had a significant correlation with thrombocytopenia ( P  ≤ 0.0001). Therefore, a prolonged PT in NDPLP may not necessitate the reflexive use of blood product replacement, in the absence of significant bleeding, which is likely related to leukocytosis than to a true coagulopathy.

The predictive model for risk of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on antineoplastic drugs for solid tumors in eastern China

Chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a significant adverse event during chemotherapy, which can lead to reduced relative dose intensity, increased risk of serious bleeding and additional medical expenditure. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram model for prediction of CIT in patients with solid tumor. From Jun 1, 2018 to Sep 9, 2021, a total of 1541 patients who received 5750 cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors to establish the nomogram model for CIT. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia was 21.03% for patient-based and 10.26% for cycles of chemotherapy. The top five solid tumors with CIT are cervix, gastric, bladder, biliary systemic, and ovarian. The incidence of chemotherapy dose delays in any cycle because of CIT was 5.39%. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, treatment line, AST, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine were significantly associated with CIT. Moreover, we established a nomogram model for CIT probability prediction, and the model was well calibrated (Hosme-Lemeshow P = 0.230) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.844 (Sensitivity was 0.625, Specificity was 0.901). We developed a predictive model for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on readily available and easily assessable clinical characteristics. The predictive model based on clinical and laboratory indices represents a promising tool in the prediction of CIT, which might complement the clinical management of thrombocytopenia.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: literature review

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common condition that frequently results in reduced chemotherapy dosages, postponed treatment, bleeding, and unfavorable oncological outcomes. At present, there is no clear suggestions for preventing or treating CIT. Thrombopoietin (TPO) replacement therapy has been invented and used to treat CIT to promote the production of megakaryocytes and stimulate the formation of platelets. However, this treatment is limited to the risk of immunogenicity and cancer progression. Therefore, an unmet need exists for exploring alternatives to TPO to address the clinical issue of CIT. Application of appropriate therapeutic drugs may be due to understanding the potential mechanisms of CIT. Studies have shown that chemotherapy significantly affects various cells in bone marrow (BM) microenvironment, reduces their ability to support normal hematopoiesis, and may lead to BM damage, including CIT in cancer patients. This review focuses on the epidemiology and treatment of cancer patients with CIT. We also introduce some recent progress to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy inhibiting normal hematopoiesis and causing thrombocytopenia.

Sepsis-associated coagulopathy in onco-hematology patients presenting with thrombocytopenia: a multicentric observational study

Coagulation disorders increase mortality rate during septic shock, but the impact of concomitant hematological malignancies remains unknown. The study assessed coagulation disorders in onco-hematological patients with thrombocytopenia (<100 G/L) admitted to ICU for septic shock. Among 146 included patients, 50 patients had lymphoma and 49 patients had acute leukemia. ICU mortality rate was 43.8% (n = 64). Median increase in prothrombin time (PT) at day(d) 1 was 4.7 s (IQR 3.2-7.9) in ICU survivors vs. 6.4 s (IQR 4.5-13.7; p < 0.01) in non-survivors. Fibrinogen kinetics (increase in fibrinogen levels between d1 and d2) was +0.55 (-0.22-1.55) vs. +0.10 g/L (-0.40-0.50; p = 0.03) in surviving and non-surviving patients, respectively. PT increase ≥6 s at d1 (OR 5.5; 95% CI 1.1-6.0; p = 0.03) and mechanical ventilation (OR 7.4; 95% CI 3.3-17.7; p < 0.001) were independently associated with ICU mortality. This study provides information and new ways to identify hematological patients with high-risk mortality.

Thrombosis questions from the inpatient wards

The multifaceted pathophysiologic processes that comprise thrombosis and thromboembolic diseases take on a particular urgency in the hospitalized setting. In this review, we explore 3 cases of thrombosis from the inpatient wards: purpura fulminans, cancer-associated thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the use of dose-escalated anticoagulation therapy and antiplatelet agents. We discuss the evaluation and management of purpura fulminans and the roles of plasma transfusion, protein C and antithrombin replacement, and anticoagulation in treating this disease. We present a framework for evaluating the etiologies of thrombocytopenia in cancer and review 2 strategies for anticoagulation management in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia, including recent prospective data supporting the use of dose-modified anticoagulation based on platelet count. Last, we dissect the major clinical trials of therapeutic- and intermediate-dose anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, reviewing key recommendations from consensus guidelines while highlighting ways in which institutional and patient-tailored practices regarding antithrombotic therapies in COVID-19 may differ. Together, the cases highlight the diverse and dramatic presentations of macro- and microvascular thrombosis as encountered on the inpatient wards.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in pediatric oncology: Scope of the problem and opportunities for intervention

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a known hematologic complication of oncology treatment. This single-institution study examines the degree with which CIT impacts specific pediatric solid tumor cohorts reflected by platelet transfusion burden and treatment modifications.

PROCEDURE

Data regarding clinically relevant CIT were obtained via a retrospective chart review of pediatric solid tumor patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2013 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on histologic diagnoses as well as chemotherapy regimen. CIT impact was assessed through platelet transfusion means, chemotherapy dose reductions, and treatment delays.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were included with mean age 10.3 [0.2-21.0]. Patients receiving therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma and localized Ewing sarcoma, both of which included high-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, required the most platelet transfusions over the treatment course, with a mean of 13 and 9, respectively. Reduced relative dose intensity (RDI), due in part to CIT, was greatest for the patients receiving therapy for high-risk and intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma. Fifty-six percent of high-risk patients experienced a reduced RDI during the final two cycles of treatment and 69% of intermediate-risk patients experienced one during the final four cycles of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of CIT varied by the administered chemotherapy regimens and dose intensity of chemotherapy agents. This study demonstrated that CIT causes both marked platelet transfusion burden as well as treatment reduction and delay within certain solid tumor cohorts. This can lend to future studies aimed at reducing the burden of CIT and targeting the most at-risk populations.

EHA Guidelines on Management of Antithrombotic Treatments in Thrombocytopenic Patients With Cancer

In cancer patients, thrombocytopenia can result from bone marrow infiltration or from anticancer medications and represents an important limitation for the use of antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic agents. These drugs are often required for prevention or treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis or for cardioembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation in an increasingly older cancer population. Data indicate that cancer remains an independent risk factor for thrombosis even in case of thrombocytopenia, since mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia does not protect against arterial or venous thrombosis. In addition, cancer patients are at increased risk of antithrombotic drug-associated bleeding, further complicated by thrombocytopenia and acquired hemostatic defects. Furthermore, some anticancer treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk and may generate interactions affecting the effectiveness or safety of antithrombotic drugs. In this complex scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology has produced this scientific document to provide a clinical practice guideline to help clinicians in the management of patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia. The Guidelines focus on adult patients with active cancer and a clear indication for anticoagulation, single or dual antiplatelet therapy, their combination, or reperfusion therapy, who have concurrent thrombocytopenia because of either malignancy or anticancer medications. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendations were discussed according to a Delphi procedure and graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

Treatment of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenias

Several therapeutic agents can cause thrombocytopenia by either immune-mediated or non-immune-mediated mechanisms. Non-immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is due to direct toxicity of drug molecules to platelets or megakaryocytes. Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, on the other hand, involves the formation of antibodies that react to platelet-specific glycoprotein complexes, as in classic drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP), or to platelet factor 4, as in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Clinical signs include a rapid drop in platelet count, bleeding or thrombosis. Since the patient's condition can deteriorate rapidly, prompt diagnosis and management are critical. However, the necessary diagnostic tests are only available in specialized laboratories. Therefore, the most demanding step in treatment is to identify the agent responsible for thrombocytopenia, which often proves difficult because many patients are taking multiple medications and have comorbidities that can themselves also cause thrombocytopenia. While DITP is commonly associated with an increased risk of bleeding, HIT and VITT have a high mortality rate due to the high incidence of thromboembolic complications. A structured approach to drug-associated thrombocytopenia/thrombosis can lead to successful treatment and a lower mortality rate. In addition to describing the treatment of DITP, HIT, VITT, and vaccine-associated immune thrombocytopenia, this review also provides the pathophysiological and clinical information necessary for correct patient management.

Treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with non-hematologic malignancies

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of the treatment of non-hematologic malignancies. Many patient-related variables (e.g., age, tumor type, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, amount of bone marrow tumor involvement) determine the extent of CIT. CIT is related to the type and dose of chemotherapy, with regimens containing gemcitabine, platinum, or temozolomide producing it most commonly. Bleeding and the need for platelet transfusions in CIT are rather uncommon except in patients with platelet counts below 25x10⁹/L in whom bleeding rates increase significantly and platelet transfusions are the only treatment. Nonetheless, platelet counts below 70x10⁹/L present a challenge. In patients with such counts, it is important to exclude other causes of thrombocytopenia (medications, infection, thrombotic microangiopathy, post-transfusion purpura, coagulopathy and immune thrombocytopenia). If these are not present, the common approach is to reduce chemotherapy dose intensity or switch to other agents. Unfortunately decreasing relative dose intensity is associated with reduced tumor response and remission rates. Thrombopoietic growth factors (recombinant human thrombopoietin, pegylated human megakaryocyte growth and development factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag and hetrombopag) improve pretreatment and nadir platelet counts, reduce the need for platelet transfusions, and enable chemotherapy dose intensity to be maintained. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines permit their use but their widespread adoption awaits adequate phase III randomized, placebo-controlled studies demonstrating maintenance of relative dose intensity, reduction of platelet transfusions and bleeding, and possibly improved survival. Their potential appropriate use also depends on consensus by the oncology community as to what constitutes an appropriate pretreatment platelet count as well as identification of patient-related and treatment variables that might predict bleeding.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors provide recommendations for the appropriate use of growth factors in the clinical management of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT), and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Management and prevention of these sequelae are an integral part of supportive care for many patients undergoing cancer treatment. The purpose of these guidelines is to operationalize the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of FN, CIT, and CIA in adult patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and to enable the patient and clinician to assess management options for FN, CIT, and CIA in the context of an individual patient's condition. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of the important recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors, with particular emphasis on the incorporation of a newly developed section on CIT.

A Case Study Using Papaya Leaf Extract to Reverse Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a GBM Patient

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a critical condition in which platelet counts are abnormally reduced following the administration of chemotherapeutic compounds. CIT poses a treatment conundrum to clinicians given the increased risk of spontaneous bleeding, obstacles to surgical management of tumors, and exclusion from clinical trials. Treatment of CIT involves the removal of the offending agent combined with platelet infusion or thrombopoietin agonist treatment. However, due to the autoimmune and infection risks associated with infusions, this treatment is only reserved for patients with critically low platelet counts. One potential solution for patients in the mid to low platelet count range is Carica papaya leaf extract (CPLE). In this case, we report the novel use of CPLE as a method of bolstering platelet counts in a patient presenting with CIT. The patient was initiated on CPLE therapy consisting of 1 tablespoon twice daily with meals. Following CPLE treatment, the patient’s platelet counts rebounded from less than 10,000/µL to 113,000/µL. This clinical vignette supports the use of CPLE in the clinical context of CIT when thrombopoietin agonists are not a viable option. The potential benefits of CPLE as a method for increasing platelet count deserve further exploration, especially as a treatment option for refractory patients or those ill-suited for other traditional thrombocytopenia therapies.

Anticoagulation in cancer-associated thromboembolism with thrombocytopenia: a prospective, multi-center cohort study

In patients with cancer with VTE and thrombocytopenia, modified-dose anticoagulation was associated with a lower rate of major hemorrhage.

In this cohort, recurrent VTE was not observed after initiation of modified-dose anticoagulation.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) with concurrent thrombocytopenia is frequently encountered in patients with cancer. Therapeutic anticoagulation in the setting of thrombocytopenia is associated with a high risk of hemorrhage. Retrospective analyses suggest the utility of modified-dose anticoagulation in this population. To assess the incidence of hemorrhage or thrombosis according to anticoagulation strategy, we performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Patients with active malignancy, acute VTE, and concurrent thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 000/µL) were enrolled. The cumulative incidences of hemorrhage or recurrent VTE were determined considering death as a competing risk. Primary outcomes were centrally adjudicated and comparisons made according to initial treatment with full-dose or modified-dose anticoagulation. A total of 121 patients were enrolled at 6 hospitals. Seventy-five patients were initially treated with full-dose anticoagulation (62%) and 33 (27%) with modified-dose anticoagulation; 13 (11%) patients received no anticoagulation. Most patients who received modified-dose anticoagulation had a hematologic malignancy (31 of 33 [94%]) and an acute deep vein thrombosis (28 of 33 [85%]). In patients who initially received full-dose anticoagulation, the cumulative incidence of major hemorrhage at 60 days was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-20.8) and 6.6% (95% CI, 2.4-15.7) in those who received modified-dose anticoagulation (Fine-Gray hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.21-3.93). The cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE at 60 days in patients who initially received full-dose anticoagulation was 5.6% (95% CI, 0.2-11) and 0% in patients who received modified-dose anticoagulation. In conclusion, modified-dose anticoagulation appears to be a safe alternative to therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with cancer who develop deep vein thrombosis in the setting of thrombocytopenia.

The incidence of thrombocytopenia in adult patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the risk of thrombocytopenia in various cancers and chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

Structured patient-level data from the Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record database were used to identify adult patients who received chemotherapy for a solid tumor or hematologic malignancy from 2012 to 2017. Three-month cumulative incidence of thrombocytopenia was assessed based on platelet counts, overall and by grade of thrombocytopenia. Co-occurrence of anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 15,521 patients with solid tumors, 13% had thrombocytopenia within 3 months (platelet count < 100 × 10⁹ /L); 4% had grade 3 (25 to < 50 × 10⁹ /L), and 2% grade 4 (<25 × 10⁹ /L) thrombocytopenia. Of 2537 patients with hematologic malignancies, 28% had any thrombocytopenia, 16% with grade 3, and 12% with grade 4. Among patients with thrombocytopenia, it occurred without another cytopenia in 18% of solid tumors and 7% of hematologic malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, US-representative sample of patients undergoing chemotherapy in clinical practice, thrombocytopenia incidence varied across tumor and regimen types. Despite recommendations to alter chemotherapy to avoid severe thrombocytopenia, 4% of patients with solid tumors and 16% with hematologic malignancies experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Prediction and prevention of thrombocytopenia may help oncologists avoid dose modifications and their adverse effects on survival.