Risk factors for status epilepticus after brain disorders in adults: A multi-cohort national register study

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe risks of status epilepticus (SE) after different brain disorders in adults using population-wide register data. Our hypothesis was that SE would be more common in disorders with widespread pathology and that the risk would increase with disorder severity.

METHODS

We analyzed five large datasets created from the Swedish National Patient Register, the Cause of Death Register, and national quality registers with adults in Sweden with brain infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke, and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Risk factors were assessed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

In adults with TBI, stroke, dementia, MS, or brain infections, the incidence rate of SE was highest in survivors of brain infections (64/100,000 person years) and stroke (64/100,000), followed by TBI (37/100,000), dementia (36/100,000), and MS (26/100,000). SE was considerably more common in patients with epilepsy after their brain disorder. Across all datasets severe disorder increased SE-risk. Herpes simplex encephalitis (HR 5.5 95 % CI: 2.6-12), progressive MS (HR 2.3, 95 % CI: 1.1-4.7), structural TBI (2.0, 95 % CI: 1.6-2.6), and intracerebral hemorrhage (HR 1.5, 95 % CI: 1.2-2.0) were the subtypes of brain disorders with the highest relative risk of SE. Having another CNS disorder increased SE-risk in TBI (HR 2.9, 95 % CI: 2.3-3.7), brain infections (HR 2.8, 95 % CI: 1.7-4.5), and dementia (HR 2.5, 95 % CI: 1.5-4.2).

CONCLUSION

SE-risk increases with disorder severity and number of CNS comorbidities. These findings can guide treatment strategy by allowing identification of high-risk patients. Pathophysiological studies are needed to better understand remote symptomatic SE.

Point prevalence of epilepsy in dementia: A "real-world" estimate

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have demonstrated a higher frequency of seizures and epilepsy in Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia as compared with healthy elderly individuals. However, incidence and prevalence of epilepsy in the general population of dementia are unknown since most previous studies were performed in secondary-tertiary referral centres. In addition, all prior studies but one provided "period" rather than "point" prevalence estimates.

METHODS

We assessed point prevalence estimate of epileptic manifestations requiring antiepileptic medication in patients Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and fronto-temporal dementia from a secondary clinical setting.

RESULTS

Point prevalence estimates were 6.4% (95% CI: 1.5 to 11.3) in Alzheimer's disease, 8.9% (95% CI: 1.4 to 16.4), in vascular dementia, and 6% (95% CI: 1.3 to 10.7) in fronto-temporal dementia, rates that were greater than those observed in the healthy elderly population. Regardless of the etiology of dementia, epilepsy was characterized by unprovoked seizures that lacked distinguishing clinical features.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings support epilepsy as part of the spectrum of dementia. The similar point prevalence of definite epilepsy requiring AED treatment in Alzheimer's disease and non Alzheimer dementias raised the possibility of similar underlying mechanism of epileptogenesis. Although this was not a population-based study, accurate point prevalence data from clinic setting would be important to better define the burden of epilepsy in dementia and the demands on health services to manage the condition.

Diagnosing epileptic seizures in patients with Alzheimer's disease and deciding on the appropriate treatment plan

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the predominant cause of dementia and a significant contributor to morbidity among the elderly. Patients diagnosed with AD face an increased risk of epileptic seizures.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the challenges in the diagnosis of seizures in patients with AD, the risks of seizures related to medications used in AD and the pharmacological treatment of seizures in AD. The authors also provide the reader with their expert opinion on the subject matter and future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Healthcare professionals should maintain a vigilant approach to suspecting seizures in AD patients. Acute symptomatic seizures triggered by metabolic disturbances, infections, toxins, or drug-related factors often have a low risk of recurrence. In such cases, addressing the underlying cause may suffice without initiating antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, unprovoked seizures in certain AD patients carry a higher risk of recurrence over time, warranting the use of ASMs. Although data is limited, both lamotrigine and levetiracetam appear to be reasonable choices for controlling seizures in elderly AD patients. Decisions should be informed by the best available evidence, the treating physician's clinical experience, and the patient's preferences.

Bidirectional relationship between late-onset epilepsy (LOE) and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

OBJECTIVE

To explore the bidirectional relationship of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) with dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

Using the common electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library databases and EMBASE, we systematically reviewed published cohort studies that assessed the risk of LOE in individuals comorbid with dementia or AD, and those with dementia or AD comorbid with LOE that had been published up to 31 March 2023. The data extraction process was carried out independently by two authors. The summary adjusted relative ratio (aRR) was calculated by employing Rev Man 5.3 for the inclusion of studies. To investigate the origins of heterogeneity, we conducted both subgroup and sensitivity analyses. In the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed. To evaluate potential publication bias, we utilized the funnel plot and conducted Begg's and Egger's tests.

RESULTS

We included 20 eligible studies in the final analysis after a rigorous screening process. Pooled results indicated that LOE was association with an increased risk of all-cause dementia (aRR: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.59) and AD (aRR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.16-5.32). In addition, the pooled effect size for LOE associated with baseline AD and all-cause dementia were 3.51 (95% CI: 3.47-3.56) and 2.53 (95% CI: 2.39-2.67), respectively. Both sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that these positive correlations persisted. According to the results of the Egger's and Begg's tests, as well as visual inspection of funnel plots, none of the studies appeared to be biased by publication.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggested that LOE is a potential risk factor for dementia and AD, and vice versa, dementia and AD are both potential risk indicators for LOE. Since there is substantial heterogeneity among the cohorts analyzed and more cohort studies should be conducted to confirm the correlations found in the current study.

Increasing Risk of Dementia Among Patients with Subsequent Epilepsy Within 2 Years Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Background

Although the association between neurodegenerative diseases, such as dementia, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) has long been known, the association between dementia and TBI with epilepsy has been controversial.

Aim

This data-driven population-based study is designed to investigate the association between dementia and epilepsy after TBI within a 2-year period.

Methods

This case-control cohort study was conducted using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000). We included 784 individuals ambulatory or hospitalized for TBI with epilepsy from 2001 to 2011, compared with 2992 patients with TBI without epilepsy who were matched for characteristics including sex, age, and healthcare resource use index date. Every participant was followed up for 5 years to ascertain any dementia development. Data were stratified and analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Through the 5-year follow-up period, 39 patients (5.21%) with TBI with epilepsy and 55 (1.53%) with TBI without epilepsy developed dementia. TBI with epilepsy was independently associated with a >3.03 times risk of dementia after correcting for age, sex, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

These findings suggest an increased risk of dementia in patients with TBI with epilepsy. Our research recommends that individuals with TBI and epilepsy be monitored more intensively.

The crosstalk between epilepsy and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy and dementia are bidirectional. The purpose of this review was to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of and to identify the risk factors for epilepsy in patients with dementia and dementia in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrieved the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Two individuals screened the articles, extracted the data, and used a random effects model to pool the estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

From 3475 citations, 25 articles were included. The prevalence of seizures/epilepsy was 4% among dementia patients and 3% among Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. For vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, and frontotemporal dementia, the pooled period prevalence of seizures/epilepsy was 6%, 3%, and 2%, respectively. Baseline early-onset AD was associated with the highest risk of 5-year epilepsy (pooled hazard ratios: 4.06; 95% CI: 3.25-5.08). Dementia patients had a 2.29-fold greater risk of seizures/epilepsy than non-dementia patients (95% CI: 1.37-3.83). Moreover, for baseline epilepsy, the pooled prevalence of dementia was 17% (95% CI: 10-25%), and that of AD was 15% (95% CI: 9-21%). The pooled results suggested that epilepsy is associated with a greater risk of dementia (risk ratio: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.64-4.88).

CONCLUSIONS

There are still gaps in epidemiology regarding the correlation between dementia types and epilepsy, vascular risk factors, and the impact of antiseizure medication or cognitive improvement drugs on epilepsy and AD comorbidity.

Epilepsy and epileptiform activity in late-onset Alzheimer disease: clinical and pathophysiological advances, gaps and conundrums

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated a link between Alzheimer disease (AD) and epilepsy. Late-onset epilepsy and epileptiform activity can precede cognitive deterioration in AD by years, and its presence has been shown to predict a faster disease course. In animal models of AD, amyloid and tau pathology are linked to cortical network hyperexcitability that precedes the first signs of memory decline. Thus, detection of epileptiform activity in AD has substantial clinical importance as a potential novel modifiable risk factor for dementia. In this Review, we summarize the epidemiological evidence for the complex bidirectional relationship between AD and epilepsy, examine the effect of epileptiform activity and seizures on cognition in people with AD, and discuss the precision medicine treatment strategies based on the latest research in human and animal models. Finally, we outline some of the unresolved questions of the field that should be addressed by rigorous research, including whether particular clinicopathological subtypes of AD have a stronger association with epilepsy, and the sequence of events between epileptiform activity and amyloid and tau pathology.

Latest advances in mechanisms of epileptic activity in Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy Bodies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) stand as the prevailing sources of neurodegenerative dementia, impacting over 55 million individuals across the globe. Patients with AD and DLB exhibit a higher prevalence of epileptic activity compared to those with other forms of dementia. Seizures can accompany AD and DLB in early stages, and the associated epileptic activity can contribute to cognitive symptoms and exacerbate cognitive decline. Aberrant neuronal activity in AD and DLB may be caused by several mechanisms that are not yet understood. Hyperexcitability could be a biomarker for early detection of AD or DLB before the onset of dementia. In this review, we compare and contrast mechanisms of network hyperexcitability in AD and DLB. We examine the contributions of genetic risk factors, Ca2+ dysregulation, glutamate, AMPA and NMDA receptors, mTOR, pathological amyloid beta, tau and α-synuclein, altered microglial and astrocytic activity, and impaired inhibitory interneuron function. By gaining a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms that cause neuronal hyperexcitability, we might uncover therapeutic approaches to effectively ease symptoms and slow down the advancement of AD and DLB.

Incidence and Risk Factors Epilepsy in Patients with Dementia: A Population-Based Study Using Regional Healthcare Databases in Umbria

Background

Dementia is prevalent among the elderly, also representing a risk for seizures/epilepsy. Estimations of epilepsy risk in dementia patients are not widely available.

Objective

Our research aims to ascertain the incidence of epilepsy and its associated risk factors in subjects with dementia in the Umbria region, based on data from healthcare databases.

Methods

In this retrospective study based on the healthcare administrative database of Umbria, we identified all patients diagnosed with dementia from 2013 to 2017, based on ICD-9-CM codes. For epilepsy ascertainment, we used a validated algorithm that required an EEG and the prescription of one or more anti-seizure medications post-dementia diagnosis. A case-control analysis was conducted, matching five non-dementia subjects by gender and age to each dementia patient. Cox proportional hazards models were then utilized in the analysis.

Results

We identified 7,314 dementia cases, also including 35,280 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Out of patients with dementia, 148 individuals (2.02%) were diagnosed with epilepsy. We observed a progressive increase in the cumulative incidence of seizures over time, registering 1.45% in the first year following the diagnosis, and rising to 1.96% after three years. Analysis using Cox regression revealed a significant association between the development of epilepsy and dementia (HR = 4.58, 95% CI = 3.67-5.72). Additional risk factors were male gender (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69) and a younger age at dementia onset (HR = 1.03, 95% CI=1.02-1.04).

Conclusions

Dementia increases epilepsy risk, especially with early onset and male gender. Clinicians should have a low threshold to suspect seizures in dementia cases.

The bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and epilepsy: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

There is a complex, bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and epilepsy. However, the causality of this association is unclear, as confounders play a role in this association.

METHODS

We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to clarify the causal relationship and direction of epilepsy on AD risk. We used publicly available summary statistics to obtain all genetic datasets for the MR analyses. AD and AD-by-proxy and late-onset AD (LOAD) cohorts were included in our study. The epilepsy cohort comprised all epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and its subtypes, as well as some epilepsy syndromes. Next, we conducted validation using another AD cohort.

RESULTS

Two correlations between AD and epilepsy using the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method are as follows: LOAD and focal epilepsy (ORIVW  = 1.079, pIVW  = .013), focal epilepsy-documented hippocampal sclerosis (HS) and AD (ORIVW  = 1.152, pIVW  = .017). The causal relationship between epilepsy-documented HS and AD has been validated (ORIVW  = 3.994, pIVW  = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Our MR study provides evidence for a causal relationship between focal epilepsy-documented HS and AD.

Alzheimer Disease and Epilepsy: A Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Observational studies suggested a bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer disease (AD) and epilepsies. However, it remains debated whether and in which direction a causal association exists. This study aims to explore the relationship between genetic predisposition to AD, CSF biomarkers of AD (β-amyloid [Aβ] 42 and phosphorylated tau [pTau]), and epilepsies with 2-sample, bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) method.

METHODS

Genetic instruments were obtained from large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis of AD (Ncase/proxy = 111,326, Ncontrol = 677,663), CSF biomarkers of AD (Aβ42 and pTau, N = 13,116), and epilepsy (Ncase = 15,212, Ncontrol = 29,677) of European ancestry. Epilepsy phenotypes included all epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, generalized epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures, focal epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (focal HS), and lesion-negative focal epilepsy. Main analyses were performed using generalized summary data-based MR. Sensitivity analyses included inverse variance weighted, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, MR-Egger, weighted mode, and weighted median.

RESULTS

For forward analysis, genetic predisposition to AD was associated with an increased risk of generalized epilepsy (odds ratio [OR] 1.053, 95% CI 1.002-1.105, p = 0.038) and focal HS (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.004-1.022, p = 0.004). These associations were consistent across sensitivity analyses and replicated using a separate set of genetic instruments from another AD genome-wide association study. For reverse analysis, there was a suggestive effect of focal HS on AD (OR 3.994, 95% CI 1.172-13.613, p = 0.027). In addition, genetically predicted lower CSF Aβ42 was associated with an increased risk of generalized epilepsy (β = 0.090, 95% CI 0.022-0.158, p = 0.010).

DISCUSSION

This MR study supports a causal link between AD, amyloid pathology, and generalized epilepsy. This study also indicates a close association between AD and focal HS. More effort should be made to screen seizure in AD, unravel its clinical implications, and explore its role as a putative modifiable risk factor.

The epidemiology of epilepsy in older adults: A narrative review by the ILAE Task Force on Epilepsy in the Elderly

In an aging world, it is important to know the burden of epilepsy affecting populations of older persons. We performed a selective review of epidemiological studies that we considered to be most informative, trying to include data from all parts of the world. We emphasized primary reports rather than review articles. We reviewed studies reporting the incidence and prevalence of epilepsy that focused on an older population as well as studies that included a wider age range if older persons were tabulated as a subgroup. There is strong evidence that persons older than approximately 60 years incur an increasing risk of both acute symptomatic seizures and epilepsy. In wealthier countries, the incidence of epilepsy increases sharply after age 60 or 65 years. This phenomenon was not always observed among reports from populations with lower socioeconomic status. This discrepancy may reflect differences in etiologies, methods of ascertainment, or distribution of ages; this is an area for more research. We identified other areas for which there are inadequate data. Incidence data are scarcer than prevalence data and are missing for large areas of the world. Prevalence is lower than would be expected from cumulative incidence, possibly because of remissions, excess mortality, or misdiagnosis of acute symptomatic seizures as epilepsy. Segmentation by age, frailty, and comorbidities is desirable, because "epilepsy in the elderly" is otherwise too broad a concept. Data are needed on rates of status epilepticus and drug-resistant epilepsy using the newer definitions. Many more data are needed from low-income populations and from developing countries. Greater awareness of the high rates of seizures among older adults should lead to more focused diagnostic efforts for individuals. Accurate data on epilepsy among older adults should drive proper allocation of treatments for individuals and resources for societies.

Recent Hospitalization and Initiation of Antiepileptics Among Persons With Alzheimer's Disease

OBJECTIVES

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently prescribed for persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but little is known on factors associated with AED initiation in this population. We investigated whether recent hospitalization is associated with AED initiation in persons with AD.

DESIGN

Nested case-control study in the nationwide register-based Medication use and Alzheimer's disease (MEDALZ) cohort.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS

The MEDALZ cohort includes 70,718 persons diagnosed with AD during 2005-2011 in Finland. Altogether 6814 AED initiators and 6814 age-, sex-, and time since AD diagnosis-matched noninitiators were included in this study. Matching date was the date of AED initiation.

METHODS

AED purchases were identified from the Prescription Register and hospitalizations from the Care Register for Health Care. Recent hospitalization was defined as hospitalization ending within 2 weeks before the matching date. Association between recent hospitalization and AED initiation was assessed with conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The most frequently initiated AEDs were pregabalin (42.9%) and valproic acid (32.2%). A bigger proportion of AED initiators (36.9%) than noninitiators (5.3%) were recently hospitalized [odds ratio (OR) 10.5, 95% CI 9.22-11.9]. Dementia was the most frequent discharge diagnosis among AED initiators (29.1%) and noninitiators (27.9%). Among AED initiators, the next most frequent diagnosis was epilepsy (20.6%). Musculoskeletal diagnoses and use of analgesics including opioids was more common among gabapentinoid initiators compared with other AED initiators.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Recent hospitalization was significantly related to AED initiation. Initiations of AED might have been related to common symptoms in persons with AD like neuropathic pain, epilepsy, and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

The clinical correlation between Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy

Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy are common nervous system diseases in older adults, and their incidence rates tend to increase with age. Patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease are more prone to have seizures. In patients older than 65 years, neurodegenerative conditions accounted for ~10% of all late-onset epilepsy cases, most of which are Alzheimer's disease. Epilepsy and seizure can occur in the early and late stages of Alzheimer's disease, leading to functional deterioration and behavioral alterations. Seizures promote amyloid-β and tau deposits, leading to neurodegenerative processes. Thus, there is a bi-directional association between Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy. Epilepsy is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and, in turn, Alzheimer's disease is an independent risk factor for developing epilepsy in old age. Many studies have evaluated the shared pathogenesis and clinical relevance of Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the clinical associations between Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy, including their incidence, clinical features, and electroencephalogram abnormalities. Clinical studies of the two disorders in recent years are summarized, and new antiepileptic drugs used for treating Alzheimer's disease are reviewed.

Bidirectional influences between seizures and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Dementia and seizures often co-exist, but the association between these two disorders is not well established. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between seizures and dementia.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, and CNKI databases were used to search for relevant publications from inception to August 25, 2021. Data extraction was performed by two authors independently. The random-effects model was adopted to evaluate the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

Two nested case-control studies and 18 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Seizures were associated with the development of dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the pooled relative risk (RR) was 2.51 [95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.87-3.36, p < 0.001] and 1.61 (95% CI = 1.42-1.82, p < 0.001), respectively. Pooled RR estimating the effect of dementia on seizures risk was 3.68 (95% CI = 3.05-4.44, p < 0.001). In addition, the pooled effect size of dementia on epilepsy risk was 3.02 (95% CI = 2.16-4.23, p < 0.001). The subgroup analyses suggested that vascular risk factors could confound the associations between these two disorders. Seizures might independently and significantly increase the risk of dementia, and in turn, dementia might predispose an individual to a higher risk of seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that dementia and seizures share common pathogenesis and might be treated with similar preventive treatment measures. Vascular changes in patients with dementia or seizures should also be examined.

Mechanisms Involved in Epileptogenesis in Alzheimer's Disease and Their Therapeutic Implications

Epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease (AD) incidence increases with age. There are reciprocal relationships between epilepsy and AD. Epilepsy is a risk factor for AD and, in turn, AD is an independent risk factor for developing epilepsy in old age, and abnormal AD biomarkers in PET and/or CSF are frequently found in late-onset epilepsies of unknown etiology. Accordingly, epilepsy and AD share pathophysiological processes, including neuronal hyperexcitability and an early excitatory-inhibitory dysregulation, leading to dysfunction in the inhibitory GABAergic and excitatory glutamatergic systems. Moreover, both β-amyloid and tau protein aggregates, the anatomopathological hallmarks of AD, have proepileptic effects. Finally, these aggregates have been found in the resection material of refractory temporal lobe epilepsies, suggesting that epilepsy leads to amyloid and tau aggregates. Some epileptic syndromes, such as medial temporal lobe epilepsy, share structural and functional neuroimaging findings with AD, leading to overlapping symptomatology, such as episodic memory deficits and toxic synergistic effects. In this respect, the existence of epileptiform activity and electroclinical seizures in AD appears to accelerate the progression of cognitive decline, and the presence of cognitive decline is much more prevalent in epileptic patients than in elderly patients without epilepsy. Notwithstanding their clinical significance, the diagnosis of clinical seizures in AD is a challenge. Most are focal and manifest with an altered level of consciousness without motor symptoms, and are often interpreted as cognitive fluctuations. Finally, despite the frequent association of epilepsy and AD dementia, there is a lack of clinical trials to guide the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs). There is also a potential role for ASMs to be used as disease-modifying drugs in AD.

Barbeau E, Pariente J, Dahan L, Valton L. Sleep: The Tip of the Iceberg in the Bidirectional Link Between Alzheimer's Disease and Epilepsy

The observation that a pathophysiological link might exist between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and epilepsy dates back to the identification of the first cases of the pathology itself and is now strongly supported by an ever-increasing mountain of literature. An overwhelming majority of data suggests not only a higher prevalence of epilepsy in Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy aging, but also that AD patients with a comorbid epileptic syndrome, even subclinical, have a steeper cognitive decline. Moreover, clinical and preclinical investigations have revealed a marked sleep-related increase in the frequency of epileptic activities. This characteristic might provide clues to the pathophysiological pathways underlying this comorbidity. Furthermore, the preferential sleep-related occurrence of epileptic events opens up the possibility that they might hasten cognitive decline by interfering with the delicately orchestrated synchrony of oscillatory activities implicated in sleep-related memory consolidation. Therefore, we scrutinized the literature for mechanisms that might promote sleep-related epileptic activity in AD and, possibly dementia onset in epilepsy, and we also aimed to determine to what degree and through which processes such events might alter the progression of AD. Finally, we discuss the implications for patient care and try to identify a common basis for methodological considerations for future research and clinical practice.

A Genetic Model of Epilepsy with a Partial Alzheimer's Disease-Like Phenotype and Central Insulin Resistance

Studies have suggested an important connection between epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease (AD), mostly due to the high number of patients diagnosed with AD who develop epileptic seizures later on. However, this link is not well understood. Previous studies from our group have identified memory impairment and metabolic abnormalities in the Wistar audiogenic rat (WAR) strain, a genetic model of epilepsy. Our goal was to investigate AD behavioral and molecular alterations, including brain insulin resistance, in naïve (seizure-free) animals of the WAR strain. We used the Morris water maze (MWM) test to evaluate spatial learning and memory performance and hippocampal tissue to verify possible molecular and immunohistochemical alterations. WARs presented worse performance in the MWM test (p < 0.0001), higher levels of hyperphosphorylated tau (S396) (p < 0.0001) and phosphorylated glycogen synthase kinase 3 (S21/9) (p < 0.05), and lower insulin receptor levels (p < 0.05). Conversely, WARs and Wistar controls present progressive increase in amyloid fibrils (p < 0.0001) and low levels of soluble amyloid-β. Interestingly, the detected alterations were age-dependent, reaching larger differences in aged than in young adult animals. In summary, the present study provides evidence of a partial AD-like phenotype, including altered regulation of insulin signaling, in a genetic model of epilepsy. Together, these data contribute to the understanding of the connection between epilepsy and AD as comorbidities. Moreover, since both tau hyperphosphorylation and altered insulin signaling have already been reported in epilepsy and AD, these two events should be considered as important components in the interconnection between epilepsy and AD pathogenesis and, therefore, potential therapeutic targets in this field.

Bi-directional associations of epilepsy with dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

OBJECTIVE

To assess the bi-directional associations of epilepsy with dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for longitudinal studies assessing the associations of epilepsy with dementia and AD up to 4 August 2021. Two authors independently extracted study characteristics, exposures, outcomes and covariates. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

From 8,545 articles identified in the initial research, 27 publications describing 20 longitudinal studies were included in the final analyses. There were 10 studies on epilepsy predicting risk of dementia, 5 studies on epilepsy predicting risk of AD, 11 studies on dementia predicting risk of epilepsy, and 6 studies on AD predicting risk of epilepsy. Baseline epilepsy was associated with higher risk of dementia (pooled HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.73-2.33) and AD (pooled HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.19-2.75). The pooled HRs for epilepsy associated with baseline dementia and AD were 2.91 (95% CI) 2.11-4.01) and 3.11 (95% CI 2.47-3.90), respectively. These positive associations persisted in sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested positive and bi-directional associations of epilepsy with dementia and AD. However, these associations should be carefully interpreted due to the presence of substantial heterogeneity, and they need to be verified in additional high-quality studies.

The Impact of Disease Registries on Advancing Knowledge and Understanding of Dementia Globally

To help address the increasing challenges related to the provision of dementia care, dementia registries have emerged around the world as important tools to gain insights and a better understanding of the disease process. Dementia registries provide a valuable source of standardized data collected from a large number of patients. This review explores the published research relating to different dementia registries around the world and discusses how these registries have improved our knowledge and understanding of the incidence, prevalence, risk factors, mortality, diagnosis, and management of dementia. A number of the best-known dementia registries with high research output including SveDem, NACC, ReDeGi, CREDOS and PRODEM were selected to study the publication output based on their data, investigate the key findings of these registry-based studies. Registries data contributed to understanding many aspects of the disease including disease prevalence in specific areas, patient characteristics and how they differ in populations, mortality risks, as well as the disease risk factors. Registries data impacted the quality of patients’ lives through determining the best treatment strategy for a patient based on previous patient outcomes. In conclusion, registries have significantly advanced scientific knowledge and understanding of dementia and impacted policy, clinical practice care delivery.

Risk of seizures and subclinical epileptiform activity in patients with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Seizures and subclinical epileptiform activity are common yet easily overlooked among demented patients. We aimed to investigate their epidemiological characteristics in patients with dementia from various aspects.

METHODS

We retrieved relevant observational studies from PubMed and Embase Library until March 2021. Pooled estimate effects were calculated using random-effects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020200949.

RESULTS

Of the 19144 identified studies, 27 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled period prevalence rates of seizures were 4.86% (95%CI: 3.43-6.51%), 2.68% (95%CI: 2.13-3.28%), 2.81% (95%CI: 2.02-3.71%）and 7.13% (95%CI: 2.67-13.14%) among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Dementia of Lewy Body (DLB), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Vascular dementia (VaD), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of seizures was [8.4 (95%CI: 4.2-12.7) per 1000 person-years] in AD patients. And the pooled relative risk of seizures in patients with AD was 3.35 (95%CI: 2.69-4.19). Besides, the pooled cumulative incidence rate and prevalence rate of subclinical epileptiform activity among AD patients were [21.41% (95%CI: 0.001-63.60%)] and 9.73% (95%CI: 0.26-28.38%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The accurate rates of seizures and subclinical epileptiform activities in the four major dementia types are high. Besides, patients with AD are likely at a higher risk of seizures.

Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?

The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific information is needed for clinical practice. This review describes etiology-specific recurrence risks in adults with a first remote seizure in stroke, traumatic brain injury, infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. Most studies are short, single center, and retrospective. Inclusion criteria, outcome ascertainment, and results vary. Few patient categories are clearly above the epilepsy threshold of recurrence risk, and there are surprisingly little data for important etiologies like brain infections. Beside stroke, severe TBI could have a sufficiently high recurrence risk for early epilepsy diagnosis, but more studies are needed, preferably prospective ones. The literature is uninformative regarding which seizures qualify as remote. The clinical implication of the low level of available evidence is that for other etiologies than stroke, seizure recurrence remains the most appropriate indicator of epilepsy for most patients with a first remote seizure. Nonetheless, there are worrying indications of a diagnostic drift, which puts patients with a preexisting brain disorder at risk of misdiagnosis. Although there are drawbacks to an intermediate term like "possible epilepsy," it could perhaps be useful in cases when the recurrence risk is high, but epilepsy criteria are not definitely met after a first remote seizure.

Prevalence and incidence of young onset dementia and associations with comorbidities: A study of data from the French national health data system

BACKGROUND

Dementia onset in those aged <65 years (young onset dementia, YOD) has dramatic individual and societal consequences. In the context of population aging, data on YOD are of major importance to anticipate needs for planning and allocation of health and social resources. Few studies have provided precise frequency estimates of YOD. The aim of this study is to provide YOD prevalence and incidence estimates in France and to study the contribution of comorbidities to YOD incidence.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Using data from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS) for 76% of the French population aged 40 to 64 years in 2016 (n = 16,665,795), we identified all persons with dementia based on at least 1 of 3 criteria: anti-Alzheimer drugs claims, hospitalization with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10) dementia codes (F00 to F03, G30, G31.0, G31.1, or F05.1), or registration for free healthcare for dementia. We estimated prevalence rate (PR) and incidence rate (IR) and estimated the association of comorbidities with incident YOD. Sex differences were investigated. We identified 18,466 (PRstandardized = 109.7/100,000) and 4,074 incident (IRstandardized = 24.4/100,000 person-years) persons with prevalent and incident YOD, respectively. PR and IR sharply increased with age. Age-adjusted PR and IR were 33% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 29 to 37) and 39% (95% CI = 31 to 48) higher in men than women (p < 0.001 both for PR and IR). Cardio- and cerebrovascular, neurological, psychiatric diseases, and traumatic brain injury prevalence were associated with incident YOD (age- and sex-adjusted p-values <0.001 for all comorbidities examined, except p = 0.109 for antihypertensive drug therapy). Adjustment for all comorbidities explained more than 55% of the sex difference in YOD incidence. The lack of information regarding dementia subtypes is the main limitation of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

We estimated that there were approximately 24,000 and approximately 5,300 persons with prevalent and incident YOD, respectively, in France in 2016. The higher YOD frequency in men may be partly explained by higher prevalence of cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases, substance abuse disorders, and traumatic brain injury and warrants further investigation.

Potential for improved retention rate by personalized antiseizure medication selection: A register-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

The first antiseizure medication (ASM) is ineffective or intolerable in 50% of epilepsy cases. Selection between more than 25 available ASMs is guided by epilepsy factors, but also age and comorbidities. Randomized evidence for particular patient subgroups is seldom available. We asked whether register data could be used for retention rate calculations based on demographics, comorbidities, and ASM history, and quantified the potential improvement in retention rates of the first ASM in several large epilepsy cohorts. We also describe retention rates in patients with epilepsy after traumatic brain injury and dementia, patient groups with little available evidence.

METHODS

We used medical, demographic, and drug prescription data from epilepsy cohorts from comprehensive Swedish registers, containing 6380 observations. By analyzing 381 840 prescriptions, we studied retention rates of first- and second-line ASMs for patients with epilepsy in multiple sclerosis (MS), brain infection, dementia, traumatic brain injury, or stroke. The rank of retention rates of ASMs was validated by comparison to published randomized control trials. We identified the optimal stratification for each brain disease, and quantified the potential improvement if all patients had received the optimal ASM.

RESULTS

Using optimal stratification for each brain disease, the potential improvement in retention rate (percentage points) was MS, 20%; brain infection, 21%; dementia, 14%; trauma, 21%; and stroke, 14%. In epilepsy after trauma, levetiracetam had the highest retention rate at 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65-89), exceeding that of the most commonly prescribed ASM, carbamazepine (p = .04). In epilepsy after dementia, lamotrigine (77%, 95% CI = 68-84) and levetiracetam (74%, 95% CI = 68-79) had higher retention rates than carbamazepine (p = .006 and p = .01, respectively).

SIGNIFICANCE

We conclude that personalized ASM selection could improve retention rates and that national registers have potential as big data sources for personalized medicine in epilepsy.

Treatment of epilepsy for people with Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Any type of seizure can be observed in Alzheimer's disease. Antiepileptic drugs seem to prevent the recurrence of epileptic seizures in most people with Alzheimer's disease. There are pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease, however there are no current systematic reviews to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of these treatments. This review aims to investigate these different modalities. This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2018.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease (including sporadic Alzheimer's disease and dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease).

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, on 3 August 2020 we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 31 July 2020). CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Cochrane Epilepsy. In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings; we also contacted trial authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials investigating treatment for epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease, with the primary outcomes of proportion of participants with seizure freedom and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to there being limited available data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one randomized controlled trial (RCT) on pharmacological interventions; the trial included 95 participants. No studies were found for non-pharmacological interventions. Concerning the proportion of participants with seizure freedom, no significant differences were found for the comparisons of levetiracetam versus lamotrigine (RR) 1.20, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.71; 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence), levetiracetam versus phenobarbital (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.19; 66 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or lamotrigine versus phenobarbital (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.02; 57 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It seemed that levetiracetam could improve cognition and lamotrigine could relieve depression, while phenobarbital and lamotrigine could worsen cognition, and levetiracetam and phenobarbital could worsen mood. The risk of bias relating to allocation, blinding and selective reporting was unclear. We judged the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support levetiracetam, phenobarbital or lamotrigine for the treatment of epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease. Regarding efficacy and tolerability, no significant differences were found between levetiracetam, phenobarbital and lamotrigine. Large RCTs with a double-blind, parallel-group design are required to determine the efficacy and tolerability of treatment for epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Systematic review of coexistent epileptic seizures and Alzheimer's disease: Incidence and prevalence

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Coexistent seizures add complexity to the burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aim to estimate the incidence and prevalence of coexistent seizures and AD and summarize characteristics.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO protocol registration CRD42020150479).

SETTING

Population-, community-, hospital-, or nursing home-based.

PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Thirty-nine studies reporting on seizure incidence and prevalence in 21,198 and 380,777 participants with AD, respectively, and AD prevalence in 727,446 participants with seizures. When statistical heterogeneity and inconsistency (assessed by Q statistic and I² ) were not shown, rates were synthesized using random effect.

RESULTS

Studies were conducted in Australia, Brazil, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States. The incidence of seizures among people with clinically diagnosed AD ranged from 4.2 to 31.5 per 1000 person-years. Prevalence of seizures among people with clinically diagnosed AD ranged from 1.5% to 12.7% generally, but it rose to the highest (49.5% of those with early-onset AD) in one study. Meta-analysis reported a combined seizure prevalence rate among people with pathologically verified AD at 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-19). Prevalence of seizure in autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) ranged from 2.8% to 41.7%. Being younger was associated with higher risk of seizure occurrence. Eleven percent of people with adult-onset seizures had AD (95%CI, 7-14).

CONCLUSION

Seizures are common in those with AD, and seizure monitoring may be particularly important for younger adults and those with ADAD.

Predictors of New-Onset Epilepsy in People With Younger-Onset Neurocognitive Disorders

Objective: People with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) have an increased risk of epilepsy. However, most studies investigating the risk of seizures in people with NCDs are limited to those with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD), and those who developed dementia after age 65 years. A knowledge gap exists regarding factors associated with development of epilepsy in people with younger-onset NCD, and those with non-AD and non-VD dementia subtypes. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors associated with the development of epilepsy in people with younger-onset NCDs of varied etiologies, the majority of whom had symptom onset prior to age 65 years. Participants and Methods: This was a retrospective study reviewing the medical records of consecutive people admitted with cognitive impairment to a tertiary neuropsychiatry unit between 1 January 2004 and 30 April 2019. People diagnosed with primary NCDs were included in the analysis. The prevalence and characteristics of epilepsy were described. The factors associated with developing epilepsy were identified in a binary logistic regression model. Results: A total of 427 people were included. One hundred fourteen had Alzheimer's disease, 104 frontotemporal dementia, 51 vascular dementia, 69 movement disorder-associated dementia, and 89 unspecified NCD. The median age on admission was 59 years (range 33-86) and 75.2% (n = 321/427) had young-onset NCD with onset before 65 years of age. 40/427 (9.4%) people had epilepsy, and epilepsy onset clustered between 2 years before and 6 years after the onset of cognitive decline in 80% (n = 32/40). The most frequent seizure type was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (35%, n = 14/40). Most of the people (94.7%, n = 36/38) achieved seizure freedom with one or two antiseizure medications. People with unspecified NCD (compared to frontotemporal dementia and movement disorder-associated dementia, age of onset of NCDs ≤50 years, and current smoking status were independently associated with higher risk of developing epilepsy. Conclusion: Epilepsy is common in people with younger-onset NCDs, and a high index of suspicion is warranted particularly for those with unspecified subtype and smoking status. Smoking reduction or cessation should be further investigated as a potentially modifiable factor for risk reduction.

Epilepsy after brain infection in adults: A register-based population-wide study

OBJECTIVE

To describe risk and risk factors of epilepsy after hospitalization for brain infection in adults in Sweden.

METHODS

This was a matched retrospective cohort study based on the comprehensive National Patient and Cause of Death Registers. All individuals age >18 without prior epilepsy who received inpatient care in 2000-2010 for a brain infection were included, with 3 age- and sex-matched unexposed controls per exposed individual (n = 12,101 exposed and 36,228 controls). Kaplan-Meier risks of epilepsy after different brain infections were calculated and risk factors identified by Cox regression. Patients were followed until the end of 2017.

RESULTS

The 10-year risk of epilepsy was 5.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-6.3) in cases and 1.2% (95% CI 1.0-1.4) in controls: 1.7% (95% CI 0.7-2.7) after tick-borne encephalitis, 4.1% (95% CI 3.3-4.9) after bacterial meningitis, 26.0% (95% CI 21.5-30.5) after herpes simplex virus encephalitis, and 30.2% (95% CI 27.1-33.3) after brain abscess. In Cox regression, seizure during the index admission and mechanical ventilation were epilepsy risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Epilepsy is common after several types of brain infections in adults. The type of infection, its severity, and propensity to cause seizures in the acute phase influence the risk of subsequent epilepsy.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that in adults, brain infection is associated with an increased risk of subsequent epilepsy.

Pharmacogenomics of Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Dementia

Symptomatic interventions for patients with dementia involve anti-dementia drugs to improve cognition, psychotropic drugs for the treatment of behavioral disorders (BDs), and different categories of drugs for concomitant disorders. Demented patients may take >6–10 drugs/day with the consequent risk for drug–drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADRs >80%) which accelerate cognitive decline. The pharmacoepigenetic machinery is integrated by pathogenic, mechanistic, metabolic, transporter, and pleiotropic genes redundantly and promiscuously regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4/5 geno-phenotypes are involved in the metabolism of over 90% of drugs currently used in patients with dementia, and only 20% of the population is an extensive metabolizer for this tetragenic cluster. ADRs associated with anti-dementia drugs, antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, sedatives, and antiepileptic drugs can be minimized by means of pharmacogenetic screening prior to treatment. These drugs are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of 58, 37, and 42 enzyme/protein gene products, respectively, and are transported by 40 different protein transporters. APOE is the reference gene in most pharmacogenetic studies. APOE-3 carriers are the best responders and APOE-4 carriers are the worst responders; likewise, CYP2D6-normal metabolizers are the best responders and CYP2D6-poor metabolizers are the worst responders. The incorporation of pharmacogenomic strategies for a personalized treatment in dementia is an effective option to optimize limited therapeutic resources and to reduce unwanted side-effects.

Epilepsy in immigrants and Swedish-born: A cohort study of all adults 18 years of age and older in Sweden

PURPOSE

We aimed to study the association between country of birth and incident epilepsy in several immigrant groups using Swedish-born individuals as referents.

METHOD

The study population included all adults aged 18 years and older in Sweden, living and deceased, 6,690,598 in the first-generation and 6,683,125 in the second-generation sub-study. Epilepsy was defined as having at least one registered diagnosis of epilepsy in the National Patient Register. The incidence of epilepsy in different immigrant groups, using Swedish-born as referents, was assessed by Cox regression, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The models were stratified by sex and adjusted for age, geographical residence in Sweden, educational level, marital status, and neighbourhood socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

In the first-generation sub-study, totally 76,541 individuals had at least one registered diagnosis of epilepsy (1.14 % in total; men 1.22 % and women 1.07 %), and in the second-generation study 72,545 (1.09 %; men 1.18 % and women 0.99 %). After adjusting for confounders, in first-generation immigrants compared to their Swedish-born counterparts the incidence was somewhat lower among both men (HR 0.92, 0.90-0.96) and women (HR 0.93, 0.90-0.96), and in the second-generation immigrants among women (HR 0.95, 0.92-0.99) but not men (HR 0.99; 0.96-1.02). Among immigrant groups, a higher incidence of epilepsy was observed among first-generation women from Africa and Iraq, and second-generation men and women from Bosnia, and women from Finland.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of epilepsy was lower in immigrants in general compared to the Swedish-born population; but with higher incidence in some specific groups.