Mucin-rich variant of traditional serrated adenoma: a distinct morphological variant

Colorectal dysplasia in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: a contemporary consensus classification and interobserver study

The clinical management of patients with dysplasia in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is currently guided by Riddell et al.'s grading system (negative, indefinite, low grade, high grade) from 1983 which was based primarily on nuclear cytoarchitectural characteristics. Although most dysplasia in IBD resembles sporadic adenomas morphologically, other distinctive potential cancer precursors in IBD have been described over time. Recognizing the need for a updated comprehensive classification for IBD-associated dysplasia, an international working group of pathologists with extensive clinical and research experience in IBD devised a new classification system and assessed its reproducibility by having each participant assess test cases selected randomly from a repository of electronic images of potential cancer precursor lesions. The new classification system now encompasses three broad categories and nine sub-categories: 1) intestinal dysplasia (tubular/villous adenoma-like, goblet cell deficient, crypt cell, traditional serrated adenoma-like, sessile serrated lesion-like and serrated NOS), 2) gastric dysplasia (tubular/villous and serrated), and 3) mixed intestinal-gastric dysplasia. In the interobserver analysis, 67% of the diagnoses were considered definitive and achieved substantial inter-rater agreement. The key distinctions between intestinal and gastric lesions and between serrated and non-serrated lesions achieved substantial and moderate inter-rater agreement overall, respectively, however, the distinctions among certain serrated sub-categories achieved only fair agreement. Based on the Riddell grading system, definite dysplasia accounted for 86% of the collective responses (75% low grade, 11% high grade). Based on these results, this new classification of dysplasia in IBD can provide a sound foundation for future clinical and basic IBD research.

Serrated adenomas with a BRAF mutation in a young patient with familial adenomatous polyposis

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is typically characterized by more than hundred adenomatous polyps in the colorectum, caused by germline APC mutation. A small proportion of the polyps progress to colorectal adenocarcinoma via adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Serrated lesions and polyps, characterized by a serrated architecture of the epithelium, are noted for two types of genetic pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. BRAF and KRAS mutations are observed in the serrated pathway.

CASE REPORT

We report a young FAP patient with rectal serrated adenomas that were removed by colonoscopic procedures. The histological features with villiform projections and slit-like serration indicated traditional serrated adenoma. A genetic examination with next-generation sequencing showed a somatic BRAF mutation in the serrated adenoma and APC mutations in the tubular adenomas. His germline mutation was found at APC p.Q1928fs*.

CONCLUSION

Serrated adenomas with dual genetic alterations in a FAP patient may be associated with colorectal carcinogenesis and should be considered a target lesion for treatment. The present study demonstrated the malignant potential of serrated adenoma in a FAP patient.

Evolving pathologic concepts of serrated lesions of the colorectum

Here, we provide an up-to-date review of the histopathology and molecular pathology of serrated colorectal lesions. First, we introduce the updated contents of the 2019 World Health Organization classification for serrated lesions. The sessile serrated lesion (SSL) is a new diagnostic terminology that replaces sessile serrated adenoma and sessile serrated polyp. The diagnostic criteria for SSL were revised to require only one unequivocal distorted serrated crypt, which is sufficient for diagnosis. Unclassified serrated adenomas have been included as a new category of serrated lesions. Second, we review ongoing issues concerning the morphology of serrated lesions. Minor morphologic variants with distinct molecular features were recently defined, including serrated tubulovillous adenoma, mucin-rich variant of traditional serrated adenoma (TSA), and superficially serrated adenoma. In addition to intestinal dysplasia and serrated dysplasia, minimal deviation dysplasia and not otherwise specified dysplasia were newly suggested as dysplasia subtypes of SSLs. Third, we summarize the molecular features of serrated lesions. The critical determinant of CpG island methylation development in SSLs is patient age. Interestingly, there may be ethnic differences in BRAF/KRAS mutation frequencies in SSLs. The molecular pathogenesis of TSAs is divided into KRAS and BRAF mutation pathways. SSLs with MLH1 methylation can progress into favorable prognostic microsatellite instability-positive (MSI+)/CpG island methylator phenotype-positive (CIMP+) carcinomas, whereas MLH1-unmethylated SSLs and BRAF-mutated TSAs can be precursors of poor-prognostic MSI-/CIMP+ carcinomas. Finally, based on our recent data, we propose an algorithm for stratifying risk subgroups of non-dysplastic SSLs.

Clinicopathological and molecular correlations in traditional serrated adenoma

BACKGROUND

Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is the least common type of colorectal serrated polyp, which exhibits considerable morphological and molecular diversity.

METHODS

We examined the spectra of alterations in MAPK and WNT pathway genes and their relationship with clinicopathological features in 128 TSAs.

RESULTS

Sequencing analyses identified BRAF V600E, BRAF non-V600E, KRAS, and NRAS mutations in 77, 3, 45, and 1 lesion, respectively. Collectively, 124 lesions (97%) had mutations in MAPK pathway genes. Alterations in WNT pathway genes were identified in 107 lesions (84%), including RSPO fusions/overexpression, RNF43 mutations, ZNRF3 mutations, APC mutations, and CTNNB1 mutations in 47, 45, 2, 13, and 2 lesions, respectively. Ten lesions (8%) harbored GNAS mutations. There was significant interdependence between the altered MAPK and WNT pathway genes. RSPO fusions/overexpression was significantly associated with KRAS mutations (31/47, 66%), whereas most RNF43 mutations coexisted with the BRAF V600E mutation (40/45, 89%). Histologically, extensive slit-like serration was more common in lesions with the BRAF V600E mutation (71%) and those with RNF43 mutations (87%). Prominent ectopic crypt formation was more prevalent in lesions with RSPO fusions/overexpression (58%) and those with GNAS mutations (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations indicate that TSAs mostly harbor various combinations of concurrent WNT and MAPK gene alterations. The associations between genetic and morphological features suggest that the histological diversity of TSA reflects the underlying molecular heterogeneity.

Antibodies against aberrant glycans as cancer biomarkers

Introduction: The review provides a comprehensive overview about applicability of serological detection of autoantibodies against aberrant glycans as cancer biomarkers.Areas covered: Clinical usefulness of autoantibodies as cancer biomarkers is discussed for seven types of cancers with sensitivity and specificity of such biomarkers provided. Moreover, an option of using serological antibodies against a non-natural form of sialic acid - N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), which is taken into our bodies together with red meat, as a potential cancer biomarker is discussed shortly as well.Expert opinion: In the final part of the review, we discuss what measures need to be applied for selective implementation of autoantibody assays into a clinical practice. Moreover, we discuss key challenges ahead for reliable and robust detection of autoantibodies against aberrant glycans as biomarkers for disease diagnostics and for stratification of cancer patients.

An update on the morphology and molecular pathology of serrated colorectal polyps and associated carcinomas

Our understanding of serrated colorectal polyps has increased dramatically over the past two decades and has led to a modern classification scheme for these lesions. Sessile serrated polyps with dysplasia represent the most clinically significant serrated polyp; however, the morphologic heterogeneity of dysplasia in sessile serrated polyps has only recently been recognized and correlated with MLH1 immunohistochemistry. Detailed morphologic analysis of traditional serrated adenomas has led to the recognition of flat and early forms of this polyp. Robust data on the risk of metachronous lesions in patients with serrated polyps are also beginning to emerge. This review will summarize our current understanding of serrated polyps and associated carcinomas with a focus on diagnostic criteria, morphologic heterogeneity, molecular findings, and natural history. Controversial issues in the diagnosis and classification of these polyps are also discussed.

Traditional serrated adenoma: an overview of pathology and emphasis on molecular pathogenesis

Objective

To provide an overview of the pathology and molecular pathogenesis of traditional serrated adenomas (TSA).

Design

Describe the morphology and molecules that play a role in their pathogenesis.

Results

These exuberant polypoid lesions are typified by tall cells with deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm, elongated nuclei bearing delicate chromatin, ectopic crypt foci, deep clefting of the lining mucosa and an overall resemblance to small bowel mucosa.

Broadly, TSAs arise via three mechanisms. They may be BRAF mutated and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high: right sided, mediated through a microvesicular hyperplastic polyp or a sessile serrated adenoma, may also have RNF43 mutations and result in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancers (CRC). The second pathway that is mutually exclusive of the first is mediated through KRAS mutation with CIMP-low TSAs. These are left-sided TSAs, are not associated with another serrated polyp and result in MSS CRC. These TSAs also have RSPO3, RNF43 and p53 mutations together with aberrant nuclear localisation of β-catenin. Third, there is a smaller group of TSAs that are BRAF and KRAS wild type and arise by as yet unknown molecular events. All TSAs show retention of mismatch repair proteins.

Conclusion

These are characteristic unusual polyps with a complex molecular landscape.

The dark side of the colon: current issues surrounding the significance, prevalence, detection, diagnosis and management of serrated polyps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperplastic polyps, once considered to have no malignant potential, are now recognized to be part of a larger group of polyps known as serrated polyps. Serrated polyps can progress to CRC through an epigenetic pathway known as CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP), characterized by hypermethylation of specific DNA regions such as the promoter regions of the DNA mismatch repair genes like MLH1. The CIMP pathway is tightly linked with mutations of the oncogene BRAF. There are three subtypes of serrated polyps - hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). TSAs harbor cytologic dysplasia whereas hyperplastic polyps and SSPs are nondysplastic lesions. Currently, only SSPs and TSAs are believed to progress to CRC whereas hyperplastic polyps are thought to be benign with no malignant potential. This article will review the current evidence while highlighting some of the issues regarding serrated polyps.

RECENT FINDINGS

One challenge has been pathologically distinguishing hyperplastic polyps from SSPs, which is an important distinction, given the potential for progression of SSPs to CRC. Other challenges regarding serrated polyps include adequate detection and resection. Surveillance guideline recommendations for some serrated polyps have been changed in current guidelines to reflect the malignant potential, recommending closer surveillance intervals than the 10-year follow-up that has been traditionally provided for hyperplastic polyps.

SUMMARY

Given the difficulties in diagnosing as well as resecting, it is important for endoscopists to know how to detect, resect and manage follow-up in patients with serrated polyps.