Review article: the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors--overview and clinical implications

Identification of arginine-vasopressin receptor 1a (Avpr1a/AVPR1A) as a novel candidate gene for chronic visceral pain

Chronic abdominal pain in the absence of ongoing disease is the hallmark of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). While the etiology of DGBIs remains poorly understood, there is evidence that both genetic and environmental factors play a role. In this study, we report the identification and validation of Avpr1a as a novel candidate gene for visceral hypersensitivity (VH), a primary peripheral mechanism underlying abdominal pain in DGBI/IBS. Comparing two C57BL/6 (BL/6) substrains (C57BL/6NTac and C57BL/6J) revealed differential susceptibility to the development of chronic VH following intrarectal zymosan (ZYM) instillation, a validated preclinical model for post-inflammatory IBS. Using whole genome sequencing, we identified a SNP differentiating the two strains in the 5' intergenic region upstream of Avpr1a, encoding the protein arginine-vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A). We used behavioral, histological, and molecular approaches to identify distal colon-specific gene expression differences and neuronal hyperresponsiveness covarying with Avpr1a genotype and VH susceptibility. While the two BL/6 substrains did not differ across other gastrointestinal (GI) phenotypes (e.g., GI motility), VH-susceptible BL/6NTac mice had higher colonic Avpr1a mRNA and protein expression. Moreover, neurons of the enteric nervous system were hyperresponsive to the AVPR1A agonist AVP, suggesting a role for enteric neurons in the pathology underlying VH. These results parallel our findings that patients' colonic Avpr1a mRNA expression was higher in patients with higher pain ratings. Taken together, these findings implicate differential regulation of Avpr1a as a novel mechanism of VH-susceptibility as well as a potential therapeutic target specific to VH.

Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescription Evaluated by Using Serological Markers

Inappropriate prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has been widely reported, often lacking initial exclusion of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection and evaluation of gastric functional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of gastric functional tests to define the acid output, as well as HP status, in order to better direct PPI therapy prescription. Dyspeptic patients without alarm symptoms from a primary care population were evaluated. For each patient, serum Pepsinogen I (PGI) and II (PGII), gastrin 17 (G17) and anti-HP IgG antibodies (Biohit, Oyj, Finland) were determined. For each subject, data were collected regarding symptoms, past medical history of HP infection, and PPI use. Therapeutic response to PPIs was determined according to PGI and G17 values, where G17 > 7 in the presence of elevated PGI and absence of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) was considered an adequate response. Among 2583 dyspeptic patients, 1015/2583 (39.3%) were on PPI therapy for at least 3 months before serum sampling, and were therefore included in the study. Active HP infection and CAG were diagnosed in 206 (20.2%) and 37 (3.6%) patients, respectively. Overall, an adequate therapeutic response to PPIs was observed in 34.9%, reaching 66.7% at the highest dose. However, 41.1% and 20.4% of patients showed low (G17 1-7) or absent (G17 < 1) response to PPI, regardless of the dosage used. According to gastric functional response, most patients currently on PPI maintenance therapy lack a proper indication for continuing this medication, either because acid output is absent (as in CAG) or because gastrin levels fail to rise, indicating absence of gastric acid negative feedback. Lastly, HP eradication is warranted in all patients, and gastric function testing ensures this pathogen is sought for and adequately treated prior to initiating long-term PPI therapy.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Were Associated With Reduced Pseudocysts in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a systemic inflammatory disorder with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can range from mild to severe. Previous preclinical study results suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can inhibit exocrine pancreatic secretion and exert anti-inflammatory properties, which might in turn improve the outcome of AP.

Aim: We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study to investigate the potential effects of PPIs on the mortality, and total duration of hospital stay and local complication occurrence of patients with AP.

Methods: A total of 858 patients with AP were included. All patients presented to the hospital within 48 h of symptom onset and were divided into the following two groups: patients who were treated with PPIs (n = 684) and those not treated with PPIs (n = 174). We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to reduce confounding bias before comparing the outcomes between the two groups.

Results: Before PSM analysis, there were significant differences in a number of parameters between the two groups, including age, sex, hematocrit, blood urea nitrogen, peritonitis signs, Ranson’s score, and Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II score and organ failure occurrence. Before PSM, the PPIs group had a higher rate of mortality than the control group [RR = 1.065; 95% confidence ratio (CI) 1.045–1.086; p = 0.001]. After PSM, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR = 1.009; 95% CI, 0.999–1.019; p = 0.554) or total hospital stay (p = 0.856), although the PPIs group had a lower occurrence of pancreatic pseudocyst (RR = 0.416; 95% CI 0.221–0.780; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This study showed that PPIs therapy was not associated with reduced mortality or total hospital stay, but was associated with a reduction in the occurrence of pseudocysts in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Modulations in extracellular calcium lead to H+-ATPase-dependent acid secretion: a clarification of PPI failure

The H⁺,K⁺-ATPase was identified as the primary proton secretory pathway in the gastric parietal cell and is the pharmacological target of agents suppressing acid secretion. Recently, we identified a second acid secretory protein expressed in the parietal cell, the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase (V-type ATPase). The aim of the present study was to further characterize H⁺-ATPase activation by modulations in extracellular calcium via the calcium sensing receptor (CaSR). Isolated gastric glands were loaded with the pH indicator dye BCECF-AM [2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester] to measure intracellular pH. Experiments were conducted in the absence of sodium and potassium to monitor H⁺-ATPase-specific transport activity. CaSR was activated with the calcimimetic R568 (400 nM) and/or by modulations in extracellular Ca²⁺. Elevation in calcium concentrations increased proton extrusion from the gastric parietal cell. Allosteric modification of the CaSR via R568 and calcium increased vacuolar H⁺-ATPase activity significantly (ΔpH/min_lowCa²⁺_(0.1mM) = 0.001 ± 0.001, ΔpH/min_normalCa²⁺_(1.0mM) = 0.033 ± 0.004, ΔpH/min_highCa²⁺_(5.0mM) = 0.051 ± 0.005). Carbachol significantly suppressed calcium-induced gastric acid secretion via the H⁺-ATPase under sodium- and potassium-free conditions. We conclude that the V-type H⁺-ATPase is tightly linked to CaSR activation. We observed that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure does not modulate H⁺-ATPase activity. This elevated blood calcium activation of the H⁺-ATPase could provide an explanation for recurrent reflux symptoms while taking a PPI therapy. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study emphasizes the role of the H⁺-ATPase in acid secretion. We further demonstrate the modification of this proton excretion pathway by extracellular calcium and the activation of the calcium sensing receptor CaSR. The novelty of this paper is based on the modulation of the H⁺-ATPase via both extracellular Ca (activation) and the classical secretagogues histamine and carbachol (inactivation). Both activation and inactivation of this proton pump are independent of PPI modulation.

Gut Microbiota Composition Before and After Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Recently, problems associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use have begun to surface. PPIs influence the gut microbiota; therefore, PPI use may increase the risk of enteric infections and cause bacterial translocation. In this study, we investigated fecal microbiota composition, fecal organic acid concentrations and pH, and gut bacteria in the blood of the same patients before and after PPI use.

METHODS

Twenty patients with reflux esophagitis based on endoscopic examination received 8 weeks of treatment with PPIs. To analyze fecal microbiota composition and gut bacteria in blood and organic acid concentrations, 16S and 23S rRNA-targeted quantitative RT-PCR and high-performance liquid chromatography were conducted.

RESULTS

Lactobacillus species were significantly increased at both 4 and 8 weeks after PPI treatment compared with bacterial counts before treatment (P = 0.011 and P = 0.002, respectively). Among Lactobacillus spp., counts of the L. gasseri subgroup, L. fermentum, the L. reuteri subgroup, and the L. ruminis subgroup were significantly increased at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment compared with counts before treatment. Streptococcus species were also significantly increased at 4 and 8 weeks after PPI treatment compared with counts before treatment (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the total organic acid concentrations before and after PPI treatment. Detection rates of bacteria in blood before and after PPI treatment were 22 and 28%, respectively, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our quantitative RT-PCR results showed that gut dysbiosis was caused by PPI use, corroborating previous results obtained by metagenomic analysis.

Transplantation of fecal microbiota from patients with irritable bowel syndrome alters gut function and behavior in recipient mice

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder characterized by altered gut function and often is accompanied by comorbid anxiety. Although changes in the gut microbiota have been documented, their relevance to the clinical expression of IBS is unknown. To evaluate a functional role for commensal gut bacteria in IBS, we colonized germ-free mice with the fecal microbiota from healthy control individuals or IBS patients with diarrhea (IBS-D), with or without anxiety, and monitored gut function and behavior in the transplanted mice. Microbiota profiles in recipient mice clustered according to the microbiota profiles of the human donors. Mice receiving the IBS-D fecal microbiota showed a taxonomically similar microbial composition to that of mice receiving the healthy control fecal microbiota. However, IBS-D mice showed different serum metabolomic profiles. Mice receiving the IBS-D fecal microbiota, but not the healthy control fecal microbiota, exhibited faster gastrointestinal transit, intestinal barrier dysfunction, innate immune activation, and anxiety-like behavior. These results indicate the potential of the gut microbiota to contribute to both intestinal and behavioral manifestations of IBS-D and suggest the potential value of microbiota-directed therapies in IBS patients.

Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD or non-ulcer dyspepsia) is defined as continuous or frequently recurring epigastric pain or discomfort for which no organic cause can be found. Acid suppressive therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been proposed as a therapeutic option in FD, but its efficacy remains controversial. While PPIs are generally considered safe and well tolerated, they have been associated with adverse events, especially in the long term. For this reason, decisions on whether to initiate or continue PPI therapy should be made based on an appropriate clinical indication. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether PPI therapy provides symptomatic relief in FD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life compared to placebo, H2 receptor antagonists or prokinetics, in people with functional dyspepsia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched in the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Library (to May 2017), MEDLINE (OvidSP; to May 2017), Embase (OvidSP; to May 2017), and SIGLE grey literature (up to May 2017) and clinical trial registries; we handsearched abstracts from conferences up to May 2017. We screened non-systematic reviews, systematic reviews and guidelines to identify any additional trials. We contacted trialists to obtain missing information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any PPI with placebo, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) or prokinetics for the treatment of FD of at least two weeks' duration. Participants were adults (aged 16 years or greater) with an adequate diagnosis of FD (any validated criteria such as Rome I, II, III or Lancet Working Group).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted data. We collected data on dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life and number of overall adverse events. Specific adverse events were beyond the scope of this review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25 RCTs from 27 papers (with 8453 participants) studying the effect of PPIs versus placebo, H2RAs or prokinetics for improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life in people with FD. Low-dose PPIs had similar efficacy as standard-dose PPIs, therefore we combined these subgroups for the analysis. PPI was more effective than placebo at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.94; participants = 6172; studies = 18; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 11; moderate quality evidence). PPIs may have little or no effect compared with H2RAs (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.04; participants = 740; studies = 2; low quality evidence), and may be slightly more effective than prokinetics (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; participants = 1033; studies = 5; NNTB 16; low quality evidence) at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD. PPIs plus prokinetics have probably little or no effect compared with PPIs alone at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; participants = 407; studies = 2; moderate quality evidence).There was no difference when subgrouped by Helicobacter pylori status, country of origin, or presence of reflux or Rome III subtypes. There were no differences in the number of adverse events observed between PPIs and any of the other treatments. There were fewer adverse events in the combination of PPI plus prokinetics compared to prokinetics alone (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; participants = 407; studies = 2; moderate quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that PPIs are effective for the treatment of FD, independent of the dose and duration of treatment compared with placebo. PPIs may be slightly more effective than prokinetics for the treatment of FD; however, the evidence is scarce. The trials evaluating PPIs versus prokinetics are difficult to interpret as they are at risk of bias. Although the effect of these drugs seems to be small, the drugs are well tolerated.

Esophageal Acidification During Nocturnal Acid-breakthrough with Ilaprazole Versus Omeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background/Aims

Though nocturnal acid-breakthrough (NAB) is common in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, its clinical importance results from esophageal acidification, which has been shown to be uncommon. Ilaprazole, a long-acting proton pump inhibitor, may cause NAB infrequently. Accordingly, we studied prospectively, (1) frequency and degree of esophageal acidification during NAB, and (2) frequency and severity of NAB while on ilaprazole versus omeprazole.

Methods

Fifty-eight consecutive patients with GERD on once daily ilaprazole, 10 mg (n = 28) or omeprazole, 20 mg (n = 30) for > one month underwent 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring prospectively. NAB was defined as intra-gastric pH < 4 for > one hour during night, and esophageal acidification as pH < 4 for any duration. Nocturnal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain) were also recorded.

Results

Of the 58 patients (age 35.5 [inter-quartile range 26.5-46.0] years, 38 [65.5%], 42 (72.4%) had NAB. Though patients with NAB had lower nocturnal intra-gastric pH than without (2.8 [1.9-4.1] vs 5.7 [4.6-6.8], P < 0.001), frequency and duration of nocturnal esophageal acidification (17/42 vs 4/16, P = 0.360 and 0.0 [0.0-1.0] vs 0.0 [0.0-0.3] minutes, P = 0.260, respectively) and symptoms were comparable (13/42 vs 6/16, P = 0.750). Though ilaprazole was associated with less NABs (1 [range 1-2, n = 19] vs 1 [range 1-3, n = 23], P = 0.010) than omeprazole, the frequency, duration, and mean intra-gastric pH during NAB were comparable (19/28 vs 23/30, P = 0.560; 117 [0-315] vs 159 [69-287] minutes, P = 0.500; 1.02 [0.7-1.4] vs 1.04 [0.44-1.3], P = 0.620, respectively).

Conclusions

Though NAB was common while patients were on a proton pump inhibitor, esophageal acidification was uncommon. Frequency and severity of NAB were comparable among patients on ilaprazole and omeprazole, except for the lesser number of NABs with ilaprazole.

Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD or non-ulcer dyspepsia) is defined as continuous or frequently recurring epigastric pain or discomfort for which no organic cause can be found. Acid suppressive therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been proposed as a therapeutic option in FD, but its efficacy remains controversial. While PPIs are generally considered safe and well tolerated, they have been associated with adverse events, especially in the long term. For this reason, decisions on whether to initiate or continue PPI therapy should be made based on an appropriate clinical indication. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether PPI therapy provides symptomatic relief in FD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life compared to placebo, H2 receptor antagonists or prokinetics, in people with functional dyspepsia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched in the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Library (to January 2016), MEDLINE (OvidSP; to February 2016), Embase (OvidSP; to February 2016), and SIGLE grey literature (up to February 2016) and clinical trial registries; we handsearched abstracts from conferences up to February 2016. We screened non-systematic reviews, systematic reviews and guidelines to identify any additional trials. We contacted trialists to obtain missing information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any PPI with placebo, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) or prokinetics for the treatment of FD. Participants were adults (aged 16 years or greater) with an adequate diagnosis of FD (any validated criteria such as Rome I, II, III or Lancet Working Group).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data. We collected data on dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life and number of overall adverse events. Specific adverse events were beyond the scope of this review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 23 RCTs from 22 papers (with 8759 participants) studying the effect of PPIs versus placebo, H2RAs or prokinetics for improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life in people with FD. Low-dose PPIs had similar efficacy as standard-dose PPIs, therefore we combined these subgroups for the analysis. Two to eight weeks of therapy with PPI was slightly more effective than placebo at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.94; participants = 5968; studies = 16; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13; moderate quality evidence). PPIs may be slightly more effective than H2RAs (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.04; participants = 740; studies = 2, NNTB 13; low quality evidence), and slightly more effective than prokinetics (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00; participants = 892; studies = 4; NNTB 20; low quality evidence) at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD. PPIs plus prokinetics were possibly slightly more effective than PPIs alone at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; participants = 407; studies = 2; NNTB 18; moderate quality evidence).The was no difference when subgrouped by Helicobacter pylori status, country of origin, or presence of reflux or Rome III subtypes. There were no differences in the number of adverse events observed between PPIs and any of the other treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that PPIs are effective for the treatment of FD, independent of the dose and duration of treatment compared with placebo. PPIs may be slightly more effective than H2RAs for the treatment of FD; however, the evidence is scarce. The trials evaluating PPIs versus prokinetics are difficult to interpret as they are at risk of bias. Although the effect of these drugs seems to be small, the drugs are well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Multiple-Infusion Ilaprazole in Healthy Chinese Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor that provides effective and long lasting inhibition of intragastric acid secretion. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of intravenous ilaprazole after multiple administrations in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

This was an open-label and multiple-dose clinical study. Ten healthy Chinese subjects received 10 mg ilaprazole infusion once daily for 5 days. Helicobacter pylori status was examined. Blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded for 24 h. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

There was no accumulation after multiple administrations. The mean steady-state half-life and clearance were comparable to those following single administration. Ilaprazole provided sustainable and significant intragastric pH control in terms of percentage time at pH >4, pH >6 within 24 h and mean 24-h pH values. The pH value within 24 h was affected by Helicobacter pylori infection in subjects with continuous infusion. Intravenous ilaprazole was safe and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ilaprazole provided stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at a dose of 10 mg once daily for 5 days, and was well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Management of NSAID-associated peptic ulcer disease

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use increases the risk of gastrointestinal complications such as ulcers or bleeding. The presence of factors like advanced age, history of peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents increase this risk further. COX-2 inhibitors and antisecretory drugs, particularly proton pump inhibitors, help to minimize the risk of gastrointestinal complications in high-risk patients. This review presents a practical approach to the prevention and treatment of NSAID-associated peptic ulcer disease and examines the new advances in the rational use of NSAIDs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous ilaprazole in healthy subjects after single ascending doses

1. Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor and this is the first study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of intravenous ilaprazole in healthy volunteers. 2. In this open-label, single-dose, randomized and four-period crossover study, 16 healthy Chinese subjects received ilaprazole 5, 10 or 20 mg intravenously, or 10 mg orally. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded within 24 h. The percentage time of intragastric pH > 6 was the major index. Safety was assessed throughout the study. 3. Plasma exposure of intravenous ilaprazole increased proportionally over the dose of 5-20 mg. Clearance and volume of distribution were independent of dose. Ilaprazole was not eliminated through urine and the absolute bioavailability was 55.2%. For the intravenous dose of 5, 10, 20 mg, and oral dose of 10 mg, the mean percentages time of intragastric pH > 6 were 47.3%, 52.8%, 68.2% and 47.5%, respectively. 4. Ilaprazole showed linear pharmacokinetics over the dose of 5-20 mg. Intravenous ilaprazole provided rapid onset of action and the potency of effect were exhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Intravenous ilaprazole was safe and well tolerated except for elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT).

Changes in Epithelial Barrier Function in Response to Parasitic Infection: Implications for IBD Pathogenesis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mast cells [MCs] are implicated in epithelial barrier alterations that characterize inflammatory and functional bowel disorders. In this study, we describe mast cell proteinases [chymases and tryptases] and tight junction [TJ] proteins kinetics in a rat model of postinfectious gut dysfunction.

METHODS

Jejunal tissues of control and -infected rats were used. Inflammation-related changes in MCs and the expression of TJ-related proteins were evaluated by immunostaining and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Epithelial barrier function was assessed in vitro (Ussing chambers) and in vivo.

RESULTS

After infection, intestinal inflammation was associated with a generalized overexpression of MC chymases, peaking between Days 6 and 14. Thereafter, a mucosal MC hyperplasia and a late increase in connective tissue MC counts were observed. From Day 2 post-infection, TJ proteins occludin and claudin-3 expression was down-regulated whereas the pore-forming protein claudin-2 was overexpressed. The expression of proglucagon, precursor of the barrier-enhancing factor glucagon-like peptide-2, was reduced. These changes were associated with an increase in epithelial permeability, both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Proteinases expression and location of mucosal and connective tissue MCs indicate a time-related pattern in the maturation of intestinal MCs following infection. Altered expression of TJ-related proteins is consistent with a loss of epithelial tightness, and provides a molecular mechanism for the enhanced epithelial permeability observed in inflammatory conditions of the gut.

Oral Chemotherapy Food and Drug Interactions: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Oral chemotherapies are associated with medication and food interactions. It is essential that health care providers evaluate patients' concurrent medications to provide accurate patient education, therapeutic monitoring, and alternative recommendations whenever oral chemotherapy is prescribed.

The pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole for gastro-esophageal reflux treatment

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of the Western population is affected by gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). To date, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent the mainstay of GERD medical treatment. However, despite their undoubted benefit, about 40% of GERD patients display an inadequate response to these drugs. Recently, a new PPI, ilaprazole , at oral doses of 10 mg has shown higher suppression of gastric acid secretion, more prolonged plasma half-life, and similar safety compared to 20 mg omeprazole.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an update on the following points: pharmacokinetic profile and metabolism of ilaprazole in relation to its pharmacodynamic properties; comparative data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ilaprazole with currently available PPIs; and implications for studies on the therapeutic efficacy of ilaprazole in GERD.

EXPERT OPINION

Different studies show that ilaprazole, a benzimidazole derivative, has an extended plasma half-life in comparison with all other approved PPIs. In addition, ilaprazole metabolism is not significantly influenced by CYP2C19, compared to the available PPIs. Furthermore, the pharmacological characteristics of ilaprazole confer theoretical advantages that are expected to translate into an improved acid control, particularly at night time. However, studies comparing the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ilaprazole with those of second-generation PPIs are insufficient. Moreover, further investigations assessing the efficacy of ilaprazole in the management of GERD are required. In healthy volunteers, as well as in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers, ilaprazole has not shown clinically relevant changes in hematology and biochemistry testing, nor significant treatment-related adverse symptoms.

Proton pump inhibitors: impact on glucose metabolism

Diabetes mellitus is a complex chronic disease associated with an absolute insulin deficiency in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and a progressive deterioration of β-cell function in type 2 diabetes (T2D). T2D pathophysiology has numerous defects including incretin deficiency/resistance. Gastrin has demonstrated to be an islet growth factor (like glucagon-like peptide-1, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-α,…) and be able to restore a functional β-cell mass in diabetic animals. This hormone is likely to stimulate insulin secretion during an ordinary protein-rich meal, this is, to have an incretin-like effect. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can raise serum gastrin concentration significantly and therefore, affect to glucose metabolism through promoting β-cell regeneration/expansion and also enhancing insulin secretion. The present paper aims to review studies concerning the effect of PPIs on glucose metabolism. Several research groups have recently explored the potential role of this class of drugs on glycemic control, mainly in T2D. The results show antidiabetic properties for the PPIs with a global glucose-lowering power around 0.6-0.7 % points of HbA1c, but the level of evidence for the available literature is still not high. If these data start to become demonstrated in the ongoing clinical trials, PPIs could become a new antidiabetic agent with a good and safe profile for T2D and even useful for T1D, particularly in the area of islet transplantation to preserve β-cell mass.

Oropharyngeal flora in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit: clinical factors and acid suppressive therapy

Acid suppression therapy in critically ill patients significantly reduces the incidence of stress ulceration and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding; however, recent studies suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase the risk of pneumonia. We wanted to test the hypothesis that acid suppressive therapy promotes alteration in the bacterial flora in the GI tract and leads to colonization of the upper airway tract with pathogenic species, potentially forming the biological basis for the observed increased incidence of pneumonia in these patients. This was a prospective observational study on patients (adults 18 years or older) admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a tertiary care centre. Exclusion criteria included all patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia at admission, with infection in the upper airway, or with a history of significant dysphagia. Oropharyngeal cultures were obtained on day 1 and days 3 or 4 of admission. We collected data on demographics, clinical information, and severity of the underlying disease using APACHE II scores. There were 110 patients enrolled in the study. The mean age was 49±16 years, 50 were women, and the mean APACHE II score was 9.8 ± 6.5. Twenty per cent of the patients had used a PPI in the month preceding admission. The first oropharyngeal specimen was available in 110 cases; a second specimen at 72-96 h was available in 68 cases. Seventy-five per cent of the patients admitted to the MICU had abnormal flora. In multivariate logistic regression, diabetes mellitus and PPI use were associated with abnormal oral flora on admission. Chronic renal failure and a higher body mass index reduced the frequency of abnormal oral flora on admission. Most critically ill patients admitted to our MICU have abnormal oral flora. Patients with diabetes and a history of recent PPI use are more likely to have abnormal oral flora on admission.

Study of the pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH of rabeprazole given as successive intravenous infusion to healthy Chinese volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rabeprazole (RPZ) given as successive intravenous infusion to healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

A total of 63 subjects (33 males and 30 females) were recruited at four research centers and given a 5-day therapeutic course of RPZ (10, 20, or 40 mg) administered as single daily doses during a 30-min period. Plasma concentrations were monitored by sampling at very short intervals for the first 330, 360, or 420 min post-RPZ administration. Intragastric pH was recorded 24 h post-RPZ administration on day 1 and day 5.

RESULTS

After receiving a single and repeated doses of RPZ, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-τ)) was 51.9 ± 22.1, 96.7 ± 27.6, and 188.4 ± 65.8 mg·min/L on day 1 and 59.3 ± 23.9, 106.7 ± 27.8, and 200.3 ± 79.0 mg·min/L on day 5 for the low-, middle-, and high-dose groups, respectively. The corresponding peak concentrations (C(max)) were 0.64 ± 0.11, 1.30 ± 0.26, and 2.6 ± 0.54 μg/mL on day 1 and 0.76 ± 0.15, 1.39 ± 0.25, and 2.91 ± 0.53 μg/mL on day 5, respectively. Although the mean AUC and C(max) values increased from a single dose to repeated doses in the three groups, the difference was not significant. The mean AUC((0, τ)) and C(max) ratios of repeated dose to single dose were 1.14, 1.10, and 1.06 on day 1 and 1.19, 1.07, and 1.12 on day 5 for the low-, middle-, and high-dose groups, respectively. After administration of a single dose, the 24-h pH value was significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group. After repeated doses, significant increases in pH were observed in the low-, middle-, and high-dose groups; however, the between-group differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RPZ, with the latter depending in part on the duration of administration, as evidenced by a higher AUC or C(max) and intragastric pH from repeated dosing.

Prodrugs available on the Brazilian pharmaceutical market and their corresponding bioactivation pathways

The aim of this paper was to emphasize the importance of prodrug design to therapy, by examining examples available on the Brazilian pharmaceutical market. The principles of prodrug design are briefly discussed herein. Examples of prodrugs from many important therapeutic classes are shown and their advantages relative to the drugs they are derived from are also discussed. Considering the importance of these therapeutic classes, from both therapy and economic standpoints, prodrug design is a very valuable aspect in the research of new drugs and for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole.

Effect of a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist and a proton pump inhibitor association in an animal model of gastritis

It has been proposed that reactive oxygen species play a causative role of gastric mucosal damage induced by increased gastric secretion. Gastrin-releasing peptide is a typical neuropeptide that stimulates acid secretion by release of gastrin. In the present work we have investigated the mechanism of indomethacin (IDM)-induced gastric ulcer caused by ROS and determined the effects of a selective gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist, RC-3095, alone and in association with omeprazole (OM) and compared it with an established antioxidant compound N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). Adult male Wistar rats were pre-treated for 7 days with OM, RC-3095, NAC, both drugs and water (control). The animals were then submitted to fasting for 24h; IDM was administered. Rats were killed 6h after that and the stomachs were used for evaluation of macroscopic damage and oxidative stress parameters. Our results showed that IDM increased mitochondrial superoxide production; OM and RC-3095 alone did not prevent such effect, but the combination of these drugs was effective. TBARS assay revealed that IDM-induced lipid peroxidation in gastric tissue and that OM and RC-3095, alone or in combination, prevented this effect with superior action that NAC. Finally, we verified that IDM increased protein carbonyl content and that this effect was prevented RC-3095, alone or in combination with OM, being similar to standard antioxidant. The present results support the view that, besides the inhibition of acid secretion, the protective effects exerted by OM and RC-3095 against IDM-induced gastric damage can be ascribed to a reduction of gastric oxidative injury.

Effect of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

CYP2C19 polymorphisms have been inconsistently reported to associate with the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether CYP2C19 polymorphism affect H. pylori eradication rates obtained with first-line PPI-based triple therapies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted up to July 2007 using Medline, PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, CNKI (Chinese), and Wanfang (Chinese) digital database. MeSH terms and keywords included proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, or esomeprazole, cytochrome P4502C19 or CYP2C19, and Helicobacter pylori or H. pylori. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria, and were included in the meta-analysis by using Review Manager 4.2.8.

RESULTS

Eradication rates were significantly different between poor metabolizers (PM) and heterozygous extensive metabolizers (HetEM) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.73, p = .002) and between PM and homozygous extensive metabolizers (HomEM) (OR = 2.79, p < .0001). Moreover, eradication rates were also significant difference between HetEM and HomEM (OR = 2.00, p < .0001). Triple omeprazole and lansoprazole therapies achieved higher H. pylori eradication rates in PM than in HomEM (OR = 4.28, p = .0005 for omeprazole and OR = 3.06, p = .001 for lansoprazole), and higher in HetEM than those in HomEM (OR = 3.22, p < .0001 for omeprazole and OR = 1.95, p = .040 for lansoprazole). Rabeprazole therapies had no significant effect on H. pylori eradication rates (between PM and HomEM, OR = 1.35, p = .610 and between HetEM and HomEM, OR = 1.57, p = .190). No significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates between PM and HetEM was observed in the three individual PPI therapies.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of omeprazole- and lansoprazole-based first-line triple therapies at the standard doses is dependent on CYP2C19 genotype status, which appears not to affect the efficacy of the regimens including rabeprazole.

Racial and geographic issues in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder that is associated with a huge economic burden in the western countries and significantly decreased quality of life. This review focuses on the various multicultural issues in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of GERD. The prevalence of GERD appears to be highest in North America and Europe, whereas epidemiologic data from the Indian subcontinent, Africa, South America, and the Middle East are sparse. A limited number of studies have elucidated ethnic differences in GERD in multiracial populations. African Americans and Asians appear to be at a lower risk for the development of complicated GERD including Barrett's esophagus (BE). Whether the pathophysiology of GERD differs among different populations remains to be answered satisfactorily. It appears that most of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of GERD, as described in western populations, are present in Asians but at a lower scale. The current recommendations for the management of GERD by the American College of Gastroenterology may not meet the need for different ethnic groups or for different geographic regions. Recognition of language barriers in understanding the common terms used to describe reflux symptoms should be borne in mind while treating GERD patients with different ethnic backgrounds. In addition, a universally accepted definition for treatment success in GERD patients is lacking. Given the negative impact on health-related quality of life, significant cost ramifications, and increased risk for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, the study of multicultural issues in GERD should be considered.

Optimal dose regimens of esomeprazole for gastric acid suppression with minimal influence of the CYP2C19 polymorphism

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, we attempted to determine the optimal dosage regimens of esomeprazole for treatment of GERD with minimal influence of the CYP2C19 polymorphism through a study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole given at 3 different dosage regimens with the same total daily dose.

METHODS

Each of the 3 genotypes of CYP2C19, homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous EMS (hetEMs), and poor metabolizers (PMs) were recruited in this clinical trial. Subjects were given a placebo followed by the administration of esomeprazole, at a dose of 40 mg once daily (40QD), 20 mg twice daily (20TD), or 10 mg 4 times daily (10Q4D) for 7 days. Twenty-four-hour and nocturnal intragastric pH and plasma esomeprazole concentrations were all determined on day 7.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic parameters and dynamic characteristics differed among the 3 CYP2C19 genotype groups. With esomeprazole 40QD, gastric acid suppression was insufficient to achieve a therapeutic effect, while 20TD and 10Q4D were found to be effective in controlling both daytime and nocturnal gastric acidity for all 3 genotype groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It was confirmed that intragastric pH values and plasma esomeprazole concentrations potentially depended on the CYP2C19 genotype status for treatment with esomeprazole. Dosage regimens of divided doses of 20TD or 10Q4D esomeprazole yielded improved antisecretory effects with a minimal influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms.

Plasma concentration of rabeprazole after 8-week administration in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients and intragastric pH elevation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The plasma concentration of rabeprazole in patients treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has not been reported, although the concentration in healthy volunteers has been reported previously. Here, CYP2C19 genotype effects of rabeprazole on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the pH elevation were studied in GERD patients.

METHODS

Rabeprazole 10 mg/day was administrated for 8 weeks. AUC of rabeprazole in 18 Helicobacter pylori-negative GERD subjects (five CYP2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizers [homEM], eight heterozygous extensive metabolizers [hetEM] and five poor metabolizers [PM]) were determined after the final medication. Intragastric pH was recorded for 24 h at baseline and after the final medication.

RESULTS

The AUC in the PM group (957 ng x h/mL) was significantly higher than those of homEM (375 ng x h/mL) and hetEM (542 ng x h/mL) groups. Median 24-h pH curves, median 24-h pH values and 24-h and nocturnal pH > 4 and pH > 3 holding times did not significantly differ among these groups. Disappearance of erosive lesions was observed after the treatment in all subjects with grade A, B or C at baseline irrespective of CYP2C19 genotypes.

CONCLUSION

The AUC of rabeprazole depended on the CYP2C19 genotypes in Japanese GERD patients; however, the intragastric pH elevation was independent of CYP2C19 genotypes, which is consistent with the CYP2C19 genotype-independent healing efficacy of erosive lesions by rabeprazole. The present low AUC values indicated that abnormal accumulative effects on AUC did not occur during the period of the 8-week administration of rabeprazole.

Intravenous proton pump inhibitor use in hospital practice

AIM

North American studies suggest that intravenous proton pump inhibitors are used inappropriately in hospital practice, but little is known of prescribing patterns in Europe. Our aim was to examine intravenous proton pump inhibitors prescribing in a single university teaching hospital.

METHODS

Observational study of 101 consecutive hospital patients administered intravenous proton pump inhibitors over a 3-month period in a single hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Demographic, clinical, biochemical, haematological, endoscopic and follow-up data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent (65 of 101) of the patients had no objective evidence of gastrointestinal blood loss and 85 were haemodynamically stable before treatment. Two patients underwent endoscopic haemostasis before IV administration. The remaining 99 were treated for ulcer prophylaxis, presumed gastrointestinal haemorrhage, unrelated gastrointestinal conditions or for unknown reasons. Relatively senior nonconsultant staff prescribed intravenous therapy in most cases. Only six patients in the study were deemed to have received intravenous therapy for an appropriate indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous proton pump inhibitors use in hospital practice is usually inappropriate. It may be that other valid indications exist within hospital practice, but these might reasonably be evaluated in randomized trials that would assess the risks and costs of intravenous treatments as well as their benefits.

Efficacy of esomeprazole, mosapride and lifestyle enhancement in the treatment of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: an analysis of 58 cases and comparative study

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of lifestyle enhancement on patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) based on the combined treatment of esomeprazole and mosapride.

METHODS: A total of 112 NERD patients were divided into control group (n = 54) and test group (n = 58). All the patients were given esomeprazole (40 mg, qd) and mosapride (5 mg, tid) for 8 wk. Besides, the lifestyle in test group was enhanced (adjusting lifestyle, diet, mental status and movement intensity). Chi-square test was conducted to compare the efficacy between the two groups.

RESULTS: In the test group, notable efficacy was found in 42 cases, effectivity in 12 cases, and inefficacy in 4 cases and the total effective rate was 93.10% (54/58). In the control group, notable efficacy was observed in 26 cases, effectivity in 18 cases, and inefficacy in 10 cases are ineffective, and the total effective rate was 81.84% (44/54). There was significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 7.39, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: On the basis of treatment by esomeprazole and mosapride, lifestyle enhancement can improve the compliance and clinical symptoms of NERD patients.

Significant enhancement of esophageal pre-epithelial defense by tegaserod: implications for an esophagoprotective effect

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Tegaserod, a serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 receptor agonist, is thought to stimulate intestinal secretions. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of tegaserod vs placebo on salivary and esophageal protective factors in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 38 GERD patients treated with tegaserod 6 mg twice a day vs placebo. Salivary samples were collected basally and during mastication. In addition, in 32 GERD patients, salivary and esophageal secretions also were collected during infusion of NaCl, HCl/pepsin, and NaCl in a consecutive fashion using a specially designed esophageal catheter. Saliva and esophageal perfusates were assessed for the pH, volume, content of buffers, protein, mucin, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), and prostaglandin E (PGE)2 and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Salivary flow rates during administration of tegaserod increased over corresponding values during both basal conditions (P < .01) and mastication (P < .001). The rate of secretion of salivary bicarbonate and nonbicarbonate buffers also increased in basal conditions (P < .001 and P < .01, respectively) and during mastication (P < .05 and P = .05). Salivary EGF increased during mastication (P < .05), whereas PGE2 and TGF alpha increased in basal conditions (P < .05 and P < .01). Esophageal perfusate volumes increased during administration of tegaserod in basal conditions (P < .05), whereas esophageal EGF secretion increased after mucosal exposure to HCl/pepsin and subsequent final perfusion with NaCl (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant stimulatory impact of 5-HT4 agonist on several salivary protective factors as well as esophageal EGF secretion may have esophagoprotective implications in patients with GERD and may help to address new therapies in the future.

Combined analysis of three crossover clinical pharmacology studies of effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy volunteers

AIM

To compare antisecretory effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole after single and repeat dosing in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Results were pooled from three smaller, open, crossover, randomized studies to obtain data from 80 subjects. The studies compared: (a) 5 days' dosing of 20 mg rabeprazole and esomeprazole (n = 24); (b) single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 27) and (c) 5 days' dosing of rabeprazole 10 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 29). Washout periods were > or =14 days. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously for 24 h on days 0, 1 and 5.

RESULTS

Single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg maintained 24-h intragastric pH >4 for longer than esomeprazole 20 mg (45% vs. 32%; P < 0.001); rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg were equivalent in their effects. After 5 days' dosing, rabeprazole 20 mg maintained pH >4 for longer than esomeprazole 20 mg (62% vs. 56%; P = 0.046); the reverse was true for esomeprazole 20 mg vs. rabeprazole 10 mg (56% vs. 48%; P = 0.035). In general, intragastric pH AUC during 0-5 h after dosing was higher after esomeprazole than rabeprazole, whereas the reverse was true during the night.

CONCLUSIONS

The order of effects on 24-h pH was: rabeprazole 10 mg < or = esomeprazole 20 mg < rabeprazole 20 mg = esomeprazole 40 mg. Esomeprazole acts faster, whereas rabeprazole's effect lasts longer.

Liquid chromatographic–mass spectrometry analysis and pharmacokinetic studies of a novel rabeprazole formulation, sterile powder for injection, in dogs and rats

Rabeprazole is among the most potent proton pump inhibitors (PPI) identified to date and it has been demonstrated that it is effective in such diseases as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer. There is currently interest in developing a new formulation: rabeprazole sterile powder for injection (RSPI). This investigation was conducted to evaluate the preclinical pharmacokinetics of RSPI in rats and at the same time a comparative study was carried out in dogs between RSPI and Pariet tablets using liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometry analysis. The liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometry method was first conducted and validated as being specific, and having accuracy, precision, sensitivity and a satisfactory recovery. After intravenous administration of RSPI (i.v.: 2, 6 and 18 mg/kg) to rats, no significant dose-dependency was found in the CL (4.20-5.72 l/h/kg), V(area) (d) (0.94-1.32 l/kg), dose-normalized AUC (197.20-245.82 microg/l*h based on 1 mg/kg) and t(1/2) (p>0.05). In the dog, a randomized, open-label, crossover experiment was carried out to show that the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) after i.v. administration of RSPI was at least four times larger than that following oral administration of Pariet tablet at an equivalent dose but the elimination half-life of these two formulation was similar (p>0.05). The results showed that the pharmacokinetics of RSPI was linear (r(2) = 0.98) in the dose range 2-18 mg/kg and the RSPI had a much higher AUC(0-infinity) and similar t(1/2) values compared with the enteric-coated tablet.

Protective effects of proton pump inhibitors against indomethacin-induced lesions in the rat small intestine

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to be effective in preventing gastric and duodenal ulcers in high-risk patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); by contrast, scarce information is available concerning the effects of PPIs on intestinal damage induced by NSAIDs in humans or in experimental animals. We examined the effects of lansoprazole and omeprazole on the intestinal injury induced by indomethacin in the conscious rat. PPIs were administered by the intragastric route at 30, 60 and 90 micromol/kg, 12 h and 30 min before and 6 h after indomethacin treatment. The effects of omeprazole and lansoprazole were evaluated on: (1) macroscopic and histologic damage; (2) mucosal polymorphonuclear cell infiltration; (3) oxidative tissue damage and (4) bacterial translocation from lumen into the intestinal mucosa. Lansoprazole and omeprazole (at 90 micromol/kg) significantly decreased (P<0.01) the macroscopic and histologic damage induced by indomethacin in the rat small intestine. Furthermore, both drugs greatly reduced (P<0.01) the associated increases in myeloperoxidase levels and lipid peroxidation induced by indomethacin, whereas they only moderately affected (P<0.05) the translocation of enterobacteria from lumen into the intestinal mucosa. These data demonstrate that omeprazole and lansoprazole can protect the small intestine from the damage induced by indomethacin in the conscious rat. The intestinal protection, possibly related to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of these drugs, may suggest new therapeutic uses of PPIs in intestinal inflammatory diseases.

Effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

To compare antisecretory effects of single doses of rabeprazole and esomeprazole.

METHODS

Open, randomised, 2-way crossover, clinical pharmacology study. 24 healthy subjects (10 men; mean age 26.2 y) received a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg, with a 14-day 'washout'. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously from 24 h before to 24 h after dosing.

RESULTS

Mean intragastric pH was higher after esomeprazole than rabeprazole during 0-5 h after dosing (P=0.0001); the reverse was true from 14-24 h (P=0.0002). Mean % time pH>3 and >4 was greater after esomeprazole than rabeprazole during 0-14 h (P=0.041 and 0.044), but the reverse was true during 14-24 h (P=0.0005 and 0.001). In the 0-24 h interval as a whole, there was no difference between treatments in mean pH or % time pH>3 or >4.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose rabeprazole 20 mg was as effective as esomeprazole 40 mg in increasing intragastric pH and maintaining pH>3 and >4, despite the 2-fold difference in dose.

CYP2C19 genotype and the PPIs--focus on rabeprazole

Amongst all the proton pump inhibitors (PPI), the hepatic metabolism of rabeprazole is least dependent on the CYP4502C19 system. Rabeprazole is therefore the PPI least affected by CYP4502C19 genetic polymorphism. This unique feature of rabeprazole complements rabeprazole's fast onset of action, and may lead to profound and consistent inhibition of gastric acid secretion in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

The effect of a therapeutic trial of high-dose rabeprazole on symptom response of patients with non-cardiac chest pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic trials with high-dose lansoprazole and omeprazole have been shown to be sensitive clinical tools for diagnosing patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

AIM

To determine the clinical value of a therapeutic trial of high-dose rabeprazole over 7 days in detecting patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive cardiac work-up were enrolled into the study. Oesophageal mucosal disease was determined by upper endoscopy and 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring assessed acid exposure. Patients were then randomized to either placebo or rabeprazole 20 mg am and 20 mg pm for 7 days. After a washout period of 1 week, patients crossed over to the other arm of the study for an additional 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing severity and frequency of chest pain throughout the baseline, treatment and wash-out periods. The rabeprazole therapeutic trial was considered as a diagnostic tool, if chest pain scores improved > or =50% from baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients enrolled, 16 (46%) were diagnosed as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive and 19 (54%) as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative. Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive patients, 12 of 16 (75%) had a significant symptom improvement on rabeprazole when compared with 3 of 16 (19%) on placebo (P = 0.029). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative group, only two of 19 (11%) improved significantly on the medication and four of 19 (21%) on placebo (P = 0.6599). The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the rabeprazole therapeutic trial was 75% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A rabeprazole therapeutic trial is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain patients.

Management of esophageal symptoms following fundoplication

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has emerged as a widely used and effective management option for the properly selected patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Poor symptomatic outcomes occur even in the best of hands, the most common being recurrent or persistent heartburn (or atypical symptoms) and dysphagia. When heartburn predominates, the initial management step is an anatomical and physiologic evaluation to determine whether acid reflux is controlled and if the postoperative neoanatomy is appropriate. If anatomical evaluation indicates surgical failure (eg, slipped or loose fundoplication, recurrent hiatal hernia), earlier re- operation may be warranted. Objective evidence of ongoing acid reflux or a reflux-symptom association despite anatomical integrity indicates reintroduction of antireflux medical therapy. Evidence favoring physiologic and anatomical success should direct treatment toward functional heartburn, including the use of tricyclic antidepressants. Dysphagia in the immediate postoperative setting mandates reassurance, as conservative measures alone often suffice while postoperative changes resolve. With persistent dysphagia, anatomical and physiologic evaluation is again indicated in the search for a mechanical-, motility-, or reflux-related symptom basis. Dilation techniques can prevent the need for re-operation, but persistent dysphagia associated with distorted postoperative anatomy will likely require surgical intervention. Regardless of the indication, re-operation carries substantial morbidity and reduced success rates compared with the initial procedure. These procedures mandate careful patient selection and referral to a center with thorough surgical experience.

Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--where next?

Proton-pump inhibitor failure has become a common clinical dilemma in gastrointestinal clinics and has been increasingly encountered at the primary care level as well. Underlying mechanisms are diverse and may overlap. Most patients who have proton-pump inhibitor failure are likely to originate from the non-erosive reflux disease phenotype. Currently, available diagnostic modalities provide limited clues to the exact underlying cause. Treatment relies primarily on escalating dosing of proton-pump inhibitors. However, new insights into the pathophysiology of proton-pump inhibitor failure are likely to provide alternative therapeutic options.