Efficacy and safety of short-term adalimumab treatment in patients with active Crohn's disease who lost response or showed intolerance to infliximab: a prospective, open-label, multicentre trial

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

OBJECTIVE

To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an incurable disease characterized by remission-relapse cycles throughout its course. Both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two main forms of IBD, exhibit tendency to develop complications and substantial heterogeneity in terms of frequency and severity of relapse, thus posing great challenges to the clinical management for IBD. Current treatment strategies are effective in different ways in induction and maintenance therapies for IBD. Recent advances in studies of genetics, pharmacogenetics, proteomics and microbiome provide a strong driving force for identifying molecular markers of prognosis and treatment response, which should help clinicians manage IBD patients more effectively, and then, improve clinical outcomes and reduce treatment costs of patients. In this review, we summarize and discuss precision medicine in IBD, focusing on predictive markers of disease course and treatment response, and monitoring indices during therapeutic drug monitoring.

Long-term Outcomes of Perianal Fistulas in Pediatric Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of Crohn's disease-related perianal fistulas heal in the adult population with conventional medical and surgical interventions. This healing rate remains unknown in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the healing rate of pediatric perianal Crohn's fistulas and identify factors associated with healing.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

A quaternary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients aged <18 years with a Crohn's perianal fistula, seen between January 1, 1991, and August 1, 2021, were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with perianal fistula healing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healing of Crohn's perianal fistula at the date of last clinical encounter, defined as the clinical note reporting a healed fistula or normal perianal examination.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients aged <18 years with a Crohn's disease-related perianal fistula were identified (59% female, 76% white). The mean (SD) age at Crohn's diagnosis was 12 (±4) years. The mean follow-up after Crohn's diagnosis was 10 (±7) years. Overall, 89% of patients had a perianal fistula, 2% had an anovaginal fistula, and 10% had an ileal pouch-associated fistula. Patients underwent a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-5) operations. A seton was placed in 60% of patients, 47% underwent abscess drainage, and 44% underwent fistulotomy or fistulectomy. Fistula healing occurred in 71% of patients over a median of 1.3 (0.4-2.5) years. Seven patients (7%) underwent proctectomy, and 3 (3%) underwent ileal pouch excision. After multivariable adjustment, younger age at diagnosis of perianal fistula was associated with an increased likelihood of healing (OR 0.56 for each increased year; 95% CI, 0.34-0.92).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

Over two-thirds of fistulas heal in pediatric Crohn's disease patients with conventional surgical and medical intervention. Younger age at fistula development is associated with an increased likelihood of healing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C185 .

RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE LAS FSTULAS PERIANALES EN LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN EN PACIENTES PEDITRICOS

ANTECEDENTES:Aproximadamente el 30% de las fístulas perianales relacionadas con la enfermedad de Crohn se curan en la población adulta con intervenciones médicas y quirúrgicas convencionales. Esta tasa de curación sigue siendo desconocida en pacientes pediátricos.OBJETIVO:Determinar la tasa de curación de las fístulas de Crohn perianales en población pediátrica e identificar los factores asociados con la curación.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectiva.ESCENARIO:Un centro de referencia cuaternario.PACIENTES:Pacientes menores de 18 años con fístula(s) perianal(es) por enfermedad de Crohn, atendidos entre el 1 de enero de 1991 y el 1 de agosto de 2021.INTERVENCIONES:Regresión logística multivariable para identificar factores asociados de forma independiente con la cicatrización de la fístula perianal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Curación de la fístula perianal de Crohn en la fecha del último encuentro clínico, definida como la nota clínica que informa una fístula curada o un examen perianal normal.RESULTADOS:Se identificó un total de 91 pacientes <18 años de edad con una fístula perianal relacionada con la enfermedad de Crohn (59% mujeres, 76% blancos). La edad media (DE) al diagnóstico de Crohn fue de 12 (±4) años. El seguimiento medio tras el diagnóstico de Crohn fue de 10 (±7) años. En general, el 89 % de los pacientes tenía fístula perianal, el 2 % tenía fístula anovaginal y el 10 % de los pacientes tenía fístula asociada a reservorio ileal. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a una mediana (RIC) de 2 (1-5) operaciones. En el 60% de los pacientes se colocó sedal, en el 47% se drenó el absceso y en el 44% se realizó fistulotomía o fistulectomía. La curación de la fístula se produjo en el 71% de los pacientes durante una mediana de 1,3 (0,4-2,5) años. Siete pacientes (7%) se sometieron a proctectomía y 3 (3%) se sometieron a escisión del reservorio ileal. Después del ajuste multivariable, la edad más joven en el momento del diagnóstico de la fístula perianal se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de curación (OR 0,56 por cada año de aumento, IC del 95%, 0,34-0,92).LIMITACIONES:Retrospectivo, institución única.CONCLUSIONES:Más de dos tercios de las fístulas se curan en pacientes pediátricos con enfermedad de Crohn con intervención médica y quirúrgica convencional. Una edad más joven en el momento del desarrollo de la fístula se asocia con una mayor probabilidad de curación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C185 . (Traducción--Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Disease recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease after biologic therapy or surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Relapse is a problem in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) after medical therapy (including biologics) and after surgery to treat acute inflammation. It is unclear whether the recurrence rate over time is higher after surgical therapy than after continuous drug treatment.

AIM

We sought to compare clinical relapse rates and the need for re-interventions (resection or therapeutic endoscopic intervention) in patients with CD.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The need for one of the three re-interventions (surgery, biologics or both) increased over time. The recurrence rates in patients after ileocecal resection were lower than the rates under biologic therapy. The odds ratio for clinical recurrence under biologics versus after surgical treatment was 2.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-4.08, p-value < 0.001). The odds ratio for surgical recurrence under biologics versus after surgery was 3.60 (95% CI 1.06-12.3, p-value 0.041).

CONCLUSION

These findings support surgical resection as a treatment option in patients with CD with limited disease.

Recommendations of the Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Spanish Working Group (GETECCU) for the treatment of perianal fistulas of Crohn's disease

Recommendations are advice that is given and considered to be beneficial; however, they are still suggestions and are therefore open to different interpretations. In this sense, the final objective of the review has been to try to homogenize, with the evidence available, the approach to the diagnosis and medical/surgical treatment of one of the most complex manifestations of Crohn's disease, such as simple and complex perianal fistulas.

Crohn's disease - treatment with biological medication

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

Pharmacological Approach to the Management of Crohn's Disease Patients with Perianal Disease

Perianal localization of Crohn's disease involves significant morbidity, affects quality of life and results in an increased use of healthcare resources. Medical and surgical therapies contribute to its management. The objective of this review is to address the current understanding in the management of perianal Crohn's disease, with the main focus in reviewing pharmacological therapies, including stem cells. In complex fistulas, once local sepsis has been controlled by surgical drainage and/or antibiotics, anti-TNF drugs (infliximab, adalimumab) are the first-line therapy, with or without associated immunomodulators. Combining surgery and anti-TNF therapy has additional benefits for healing. However, response is inadequate in up to half of cases. A possible role of new biological drugs in this context (vedolizumab, ustekinumab) is an area of ongoing investigation, as is the local application of autologous or allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells. These are non-hematopoietic multipotent cells with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, the use of which may successfully treat refractory patients, and seem to be a promising and safe alternative to achieving fistula healing in Crohn's disease, without known systemic effects.

A multicenter, prospective, observational study of the long-term outcomes of Crohn's disease patients under routine care management in Greece

Background

Real-world data on management patterns and long-term outcomes of patients with inadequately controlled Crohn’s disease (CD) in Greece are scarce.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective observational study of 18–65-year-old CD patients whose physicians judged that their current therapy was inadequate to control their condition and therefore decided to switch treatment. Data were collected at enrollment (time of switch), and 30, 54 and 104 weeks post-enrollment.

Results

Sixty-six eligible patients (median age: 35.8 years; 56.1% males; median CD diagnosis duration: 2.3 years) were enrolled by nine hospital sites. At the time of treatment switch, 66.7% had “mild” (CD activity index [CDAI] <220) and 30.3% “moderate-to-severe” (220≤CDAI≤450) disease activity. Ileocolonic involvement, extraintestinal manifestations, prior CD-related surgeries and prior corticosteroid use were reported in 65.2%, 51.5%, 24.2% and 78.8% of patients, respectively. Throughout the study, most patients were managed with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medications (74.2%/74.1% infliximab; 10.6%/13.8% adalimumab at enrollment/end of study, respectively). At 54 and 104 weeks post-enrollment, the baseline CDAI score (median 174.5) decreased to 145.5 and 146.0 points (P<0.001) and the baseline C-reactive protein level (median: 13.6 mg/L) decreased to 3.5 and 3.0 mg/L (P<0.001), respectively, not differing statistically between patients with “mild” and “moderate-to-severe” disease activity. In this patient population, 56.1% were corticosteroid-free throughout observation, while for the remaining 43.9%, the mean percentage corticosteroid-free period was 80.2%. CD-related surgeries and hospitalizations were reported in 8.1% and 19.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

Under routine care in Greece, inadequately controlled CD patients were mainly switched to anti-TNFs, which lowered disease activity and reduced corticosteroid use.

Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Adalimumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease Following Loss of Response or Intolerance to Infliximab: 96-Week Efficacy Data From GAIN/ADHERE Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the 4-week GAIN clinical trial, adalimumab was efficacious in inducing remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease [CD] who had prior loss of response/intolerance to infliximab. The efficacy and safety of adalimumab in these patients are reported here for up to 96 weeks or for 3 years, respectively, in the ADHERE open-label extension study.

METHODS

Patients who completed GAIN could enrol in ADHERE and receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Efficacy variables included clinical response (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] decrease from baseline ≥70/≥100 points [CR-70/CR-100]) and remission [CDAI<150], steroid discontinuation and fistula remission [absence of drainage]. Data were reported using hybrid non-responder imputation [hNRI], last observation carried forward and as-observed analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by randomized group in GAIN and by Week 4 efficacy in GAIN. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients from GAIN enrolled in ADHERE. CR-70, CR-100 and remission rates at Week 96 were 39.0%, 35.5%, and 26.5% [hNRI], respectively. Of the patients with CR-70 response or remission at Week 4 of GAIN, 45.5% and 44.4% [hNRI], respectively, maintained the effect at Week 96. Steroid discontinuation and steroid-free remission rates increased from Week 12 to 96 in patients using corticosteroids at GAIN baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term adalimumab maintenance therapy led to sustained clinical remission and response, and steroid discontinuation in a considerable proportion of patients with CD previously treated with infliximab. No new safety signals were observed in this patient population.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults

Crohn's disease is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology with genetic, immunologic, and environmental influences. The incidence of Crohn's disease has steadily increased over the past several decades. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved since the last practice guideline was published. These guidelines represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology and were developed under the auspices of the Practice Parameters Committee for the management of adult patients with Crohn's disease. These guidelines are established for clinical practice with the intent of suggesting preferable approaches to particular medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When exercising clinical judgment, health-care providers should incorporate this guideline along with patient's needs, desires, and their values in order to fully and appropriately care for patients with Crohn's disease. This guideline is intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. To evaluate the level of evidence and strength of recommendations, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments at a later time.

A Meta-Analysis of Adalimumab for Fistula in Crohn's Disease

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic value of adalimumab (ADA) for fistula in Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods

A computerized search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google scholar, and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to October 2016, was performed. Randomized controlled trials (rcts) or nonrandomized controlled trials (n-rcts) were included in this article to evaluate the role of ADA in the management of fistula in CD. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS evaluation tools) was used to assess the quality of every study.

Result

Overall, seven studies and 379 patients comforted to the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. The result showed that 36% (95% CI: 0.31–0.41) of patients with complete fistula closure and 31% (95% CI: 0.031–0.61) of patients with partial response were received in CD with ADA treatment.

Conclusion

We concluded that ADA is effective and safe for the treatment of fistula in CD according to current evidence.

Unusual case of duodenobiliary fistula complicating Crohn's disease successfully treated with Adalimumab

Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by transmural inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which predisposes to the formation of fistula. Duodenal involvement occurs in less than 5% of cases and often leads to clinically relevant strictures. However, fistula formation in the duodenum is exceptional. Herein, we report an unusual case of duodenobiliary fistula due to CD occurring in a 65-year-old patient who was successfully treated by anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. This case report highlights the efficacy of anti-TNF alpha agents in the treatment of a bilioenteric fistula because it increases the probability of clinical remission and mucosal healing and therefore reduces the need for surgical treatment which may be associated morbidity.

Interpreting Registrational Clinical Trials of Biological Therapies in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

The use of biologics to treat inflammatory bowel disease is supported by robust randomized controlled trials in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Nonetheless, an understanding of the principles of clinical trial design is necessary to extrapolate study findings to clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a review of inflammatory bowel disease registrational clinical trials of biologics to determine how differences in trial design potentially influence results and interpretation.

RESULTS

Registrational trials of biological agents have used diverse patient populations, outcome measures, and designs, which makes comparisons of results among studies difficult. Key differences among trials include patient populations, choice of symptom-based measures or objective outcomes as endpoints, and overall trial design. Additional factors, including analytical methods, can also influence the interpretation of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The most robust evidence is derived from comparative effectiveness trials. In the absence of these, clinicians should be aware of the various methodological issues which could impact interpretation of efficacy and safety outcomes, including differences in patient population, study design, and analytic methodology.

Treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing seton drainage and anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment

AIM

The introduction of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF; infliximab and adalimumab) has changed the management of Crohn's perianal fistula from almost exclusively surgical treatment to one with a much larger emphasis on medical therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the success rates of setons and anti-TNF for Crohn's perianal fistula.

METHOD

Studies evaluating the effect of setons and anti-TNF on Crohn's perianal fistula were included. Studies assessing perianal fistula in children, rectovaginal and rectourinary fistulae were excluded. The primary end-point was the fistula closure rate. Partial closure and recurrence rates were secondary end-points.

RESULTS

Ten studies on seton drainage were included (n = 305). Complete closure varied from 13.6% to 100% and recurrence from 0% to 83.3%. In 34 anti-TNF studies (n = 1449), complete closure varied from 16.7% and 93% (partial closure 8.0-91.2%) and recurrence from 8.0% to 40.9%. Four randomized controlled trials (n = 1028) comparing anti-TNF with placebo showed no significant difference in complete or partial closure in meta-analysis (risk difference 0.12, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.30 and 0.09, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.41, respectively). Subgroup analysis (n = 241) showed a significant advantage for complete fistula closure with anti-TNF in two trials with follow-up > 4 weeks (46% vs 13%, P = 0.003 and 30% vs 13%, P = 0.03). Of four included cohort studies, two revealed a significant difference in response in favour of combined treatment (P = 0.001 and P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Closure and recurrence rates after seton drainage as well as anti-TNF vary widely. Despite a large number of studies, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the preferred strategy. However, combination therapy with (temporary) seton drainage, immunomodulators and anti-TNF may be beneficial in achieving perianal fistula closure.

Effectiveness of anti-TNFα drugs in patients with Crohn's disease who do not achieve remission with their first anti-TNFα agent

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF treatment is effective for Crohn's disease (CD); however, some patients did not achieve remission with these drugs.

AIMS

To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of a second anti-TNF in CD patients who did not achieve remission with the first one and to assess its durability.

METHODS

Patients who did not achieve remission with their first anti-TNF were included. The short-term response of the second anti-TNF was assessed, the long-term response was evaluated in patients who achieved remission (Kaplan-Meier). Cox-regression was performed to identify predictors of loss of efficacy.

RESULTS

In all, 118 CD patients received a second anti-TNF after primary failure of the first. The first anti-TNF was discontinued because of non-response in 54% of patients and partial response in 46%. Fifty-one percent of patients achieved remission in the short-term. The probability of remission was lower in patients for whom the drug indication was perianal disease (OR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1-0.7, P=0.005). The dose was increased in 33% of patients, and 37% achieved/regained remission. The probability of maintaining remission was 76%, 68% and 64% at 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the patients achieved remission with a second anti-TNF after primary failure of the first, this strategy was less effective in patients with perianal disease.

Modern Treatments and Stem Cell Therapies for Perianal Crohn's Fistulas

Crohn's disease (CD) is a complex disorder with important incidence in North America. Perianal fistulas occur in about 20% of patients with CD and are almost always classified as complex fistulas. Conventional treatment options have shown different success rates, yet there are data indicating that these approaches cannot achieve total cure and may not improve quality of life of these patients. Fibrin glue, fistula plug, topical tacrolimus, local injection of infliximab, and use of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are newly suggested therapies with variable success rates. Here, we aim to review these novel therapies for the treatment of complex fistulizing CD. Although initial results are promising, randomized studies are needed to prove efficacy of these approaches in curing fistulizing perianal CD.

Maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: should it be indefinite?

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, persistent, and destructive disorder with different forms of clinical behavior and the disease appears to be progressive over the long term. Providing greater levels of mucosal healing and resolution of clinical symptoms may modify the course of CD. This will often necessitate long-term therapy with immunosuppressant or biological therapies. Both these classes of drugs have side-effects and the latter are also very expensive. Identification of a subgroup of patients with a low risk of relapse and validation of the relevant predictors in various cohort studies are the key points to be able to cease immunosuppressant and/or biological therapy in patients with CD in stable remission. The individual parameters 'mucosal healing', 'deep remission', 'fecal calprotectin', and 'C-reactive protein' or various combinations of these parameters seem to be promising tools for predicting successful withdrawal of maintenance therapy.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed

BACKGROUND

One-third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving anti-TNFs do not respond to treatment, and a relevant proportion experience loss of response or intolerance.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a second anti-TNF agent after primary/secondary failure or intolerance to a first drug.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

studies evaluating the efficacy of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) and certolizumab-pegol (CZP) as the second anti-TNF in CD or UC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Bibliographical searches (PubMed/Embase).

DATA SYNTHESIS

percentage of response/remission; the meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

We included 46 studies (37 CD, 8 UC, 1 pouchitis). The CD studies comprised 32 switching IFX→ADA, 4 IFX→CZP and 1 ADA→IFX. Overall, the second anti-TNF after the failure of IFX in CD induced remission in 43% and response in 63% of patients. The remission rate was higher when the reason to withdraw the first anti-TNF was intolerance (61%) than after secondary (45%) or primary failure (30%); response rates were, respectively, 72%, 62% and 53%. All UC studies switched IFX→ADA, six of them reporting remission rates ranging from 0% to 50%. Adverse events rate ranged from 0% to 81% in CD, most of them mild (serious adverse event 0-21%, discontinuation rate <20%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of a second anti-TNF in CD patients largely depends on the cause for switching. The remission rate is higher when the reason to withdraw the first anti-TNF is intolerance (61%), compared with secondary (45%) or primary failure (30%). Further studies of switch ADA→IFX are needed to evaluate this strategy. PROSPERO-registry-number: CRD42014012943.

Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: The Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (TSIBD) Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Only moderate to severe Crohn's Disease (CD) patients without a satisfactory conventional therapy effect are eligible to get reimbursement from the National Health Insurance of Taiwan for using adalimumab. These are more stringent criteria than in many Western countries and Japan and Korea. We aim to explore the efficacy of using adalimumab in CD patients under such stringent criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in nine medical centers in Taiwan and we collected the results of CD patients receiving adalimumab from Sep 2009 to Mar 2014. The clinical characteristics, response measured by CDAI (Crohn's Disease Activity Index), adverse events and survival status were recorded and analyzed. CR-70, CR-100, and CR-150 were defined as attaining a CDAI decrease of 70, 100 or 150 points compared with baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 103 CD patient records were used in this study. Sixty percent of these patients received combination therapy of adalimumab together with immunomodulators. CR-70 was 68.7%, 74.5% and 88.4% after week 4, 8 and 12 of treatment, respectively. The steroid-free rate, complications and survival were 47.6%, 9.7% and 99% of patients, respectively. In considering the mucosal healing, only 25% patients achieve mucosal healing after treatment for 6 to 12 months. Surgery was still needed in 16.5% of patients. Combination treatment of adalimumab with immunomodulators further decreased the level of CDAI at week 8 when compared with the monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Even under the stringent criteria for using adalimumab, the response rate was comparable to those without stringent criteria.

Effects of infliximab retreatment after consecutive discontinuation of infliximab and adalimumab in refractory Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Switches between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) occur in case of treatment failure, intolerance, or patient preference. No data are currently available on the usefulness of a second infliximab treatment after earlier discontinuation and previous switch to an alternative anti-tumor necrosis factor agent. In this study, we evaluated the clinical benefit of infliximab retreatment in patients with CD after sequential use of both infliximab and adalimumab.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with CD who had received earlier treatments with sequential infliximab and adalimumab and were then restarted on infliximab were retrieved from a multicenter registry designed for the follow-up of adalimumab treatment for CD. Short-term and sustained effects of infliximab retreatment were evaluated retrospectively by reviewing clinical records. Follow-up was 18 months for all patients.

RESULTS

In 13/29 (45%) patients, infliximab was reintroduced at intensified dosing schedule (>5 mg/kg or <8 wk) for 23/29 (79%) of patients similar to the schedule who were on at time of previous discontinuation. During the second infliximab treatment course, dosing was further intensified in 11 out of 29 (38%) patients. After 18 months 18/29 (62%), patients were still on continued therapy of their second infliximab treatment. Infliximab was discontinued (after a median of 7 mo) in 11 out of 29 patients for loss of response (n = 7 [24%]), intolerance (n = 3 [10%]), or non-compliance (n = 1 [3%]). Use of induction schedule or concomitant immunomodulators were not significantly associated with treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with CD benefit from a second treatment with infliximab after previous treatment with infliximab and adalimumab, which offer a meaningful therapeutic option in often highly refractory patients.

Adalimumab combined with ciprofloxacin is superior to adalimumab monotherapy in perianal fistula closure in Crohn's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (ADAFI)

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a combination of adalimumab and ciprofloxacin is superior to adalimumab alone in the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (CD).

DESIGN

Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial in eight Dutch hospitals. In total, 76 CD patients with active perianal fistulising disease were enrolled. After adalimumab induction therapy (160/80 mg week 0, 2), patients received 40 mg every other week together with ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, adalimumab was continued. Follow-up was 24 weeks. Primary endpoint (clinical response) was defined as 50% reduction of fistulas from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included remission (closure of all fistulas), Perianal Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ).

RESULTS

Clinical response was observed in 71% of patients treated with adalimumab plus ciprofloxacin and in 47% treated with adalimumab plus placebo (p=0.047). Likewise, remission rate at week 12 was significantly higher (p=0.009) in the combination group (65%) compared with adalimumab plus placebo (33%). Combination treatment was associated with a higher mean CDAI change and mean IBDQ change at week 12 (p=0.005 and p=0.009, respectively). At week 24, no difference in clinical response between the two treatment groups was observed (p=0.22). No difference in safety issues was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of adalimumab and ciprofloxacin is more effective than adalimumab monotherapy to achieve fistula closure in CD. However, after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy, the beneficial effect of initial coadministration is not maintained.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00736983.

Imaging techniques and combined medical and surgical treatment of perianal Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disease which may involve any segment of the gastrointestinal tract, most frequently the terminal ileum, the large intestine, and the perianal region. The symptoms of perianal Crohn's disease include skin disorders, hemorrhoids, anal ulcers, anorectal stenosis, perianal abscesses and fistulas, rectovaginal fistulas and carcinoma of the perianal region. The perianal manifestations of Crohn's disease cause great discomfort to the patient and are among the most difficult aspects to treat. Management of perianal disease requires a combination of different imaging modalities and a close cooperation between gastroenterologists and dedicated surgeons.

Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

The management of patients with IBD requires evaluation with objective tools, both at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease, to determine the location, extension, activity and severity of inflammatory lesions, as well as, the potential existence of complications. Whereas endoscopy is a well-established and uniformly performed diagnostic examination, the implementation of radiologic techniques for assessment of IBD is still heterogeneous; variations in technical aspects and the degrees of experience and preferences exist across countries in Europe. ECCO and ESGAR scientific societies jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for imaging in IBD using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and including also other radiologic procedures such as conventional radiology or nuclear medicine examinations for different clinical situations that include general principles, upper GI tract, colon and rectum, perineum, liver and biliary tract, emergency situation, and the postoperative setting. The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas such as the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between different techniques, the value for therapeutic monitoring, and the prognostic implications of particular findings.

Clinical effects of adalimumab treatment with concomitant azathioprine in Japanese Crohn’s disease patients

AIM: To assess adalimumab’s efficacy with concomitant azathioprine (AZA) for induction and maintenance of clinical remission in Japanese Crohn’s disease (CD) patients.

METHODS: This retrospective, observational, single-center study enrolled 28 consecutive CD patients treated with adalimumab (ADA). Mean age and mean disease duration were 38.1 ± 11.8 years and 11.8 ± 10.1 years, respectively. The baseline mean Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) and C-reactive protein were 177.8 ± 82.0 and 0.70 ± 0.83 mg/dL, respectively. Twelve of these patients also received a concomitant stable dose of AZA. ADA was subcutaneously administered: 160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, followed by 40 mg every other week. Clinical response and remission rates were assessed via CDAI and C-reactive protein for 24 wk.

RESULTS: The mean CDAI at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 24 was 124.4, 120.2, 123.6, and 135.1, respectively. The CDAI was significantly decreased at weeks 2 and 4 with ADA and was significantly suppressed at 24 wk with ADA/AZA. Overall clinical remission rates at weeks 4 and 24 were 66.7% and 63.2%, respectively. Although no statistically significant difference in C-reactive protein was demonstrated, ADA with AZA resulted in a greater statistically significant improvement in CDAI at 24 wk, compared to ADA alone.

CONCLUSION: Scheduled ADA with concomitant AZA may be more effective for clinical remission achievement at 24 wk in Japanese Crohn’s disease patients.

Effectiveness of infliximab after adalimumab failure in Crohn's disease

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of infliximab as a second-line therapy in Crohn’s disease patients after adalimumab failure.

METHODS: A historical cohort study in a community-based gastroenterology practice evaluated Crohn’s disease patients treated with infliximab (induction plus maintenance) after adalimumab failure. Patients were identified using a large Spanish database (ENEIDA).

RESULTS: We included 15 Crohn’s disease patients who received infliximab after adalimumab failure. Five patients discontinued adalimumab due to loss of response, 3 due to adverse events and 7 due to partial response. After infliximab therapy was started, all patients who had interrupted adalimumab due to loss of efficacy regained response. All patients who discontinued adalimumab due to adverse events responded to infliximab and maintained this response; one of these patients had an uneventful course on infliximab, but 2 developed adverse events. None of the 7 patients who interrupted adalimumab due to partial response reached remission with infliximab.

CONCLUSION: Switching from adalimumab to infliximab may be useful in patients who develop adverse effects or loss of response, however, the benefit of infliximab in primary nonresponders was not established.

Use of the tumor necrosis factor-blockers for Crohn's disease

The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease represents the most important advance in the care of these patients since the publication of the National Co-operative Crohn's disease study thirty years ago. The recommendations of numerous consensus groups worldwide are now supported by a wealth of clinical trials and several meta-analyses. In general, it is suggested that tumor necrosis factor-α blockers (TNFBs) are indicated (1) for persons with moderately-severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) who have failed two or more causes of glucocorticosteroids and an acceptably long cause (8 wk to 12 wk) of an immune modulator such as azathioprine or methotrexate; (2) non-responsive perianal disease; and (3) severe UC not responding to a 3-d to 5-d course of steroids. Once TNFBs have been introduced and the patient is responsive, therapy given by the IV and SC rate must be continued. It remains open to definitive evidence if concomitant immune modulators are required with TNFB maintenance therapy, and when or if TNFB may be weaned and discontinued. The supportive evidence from a single study on the role of early versus later introduction of TNFB in the course of a patient's illness needs to be confirmed. The risk/benefit profile of TNFB appears to be acceptable as long as the patient is immunized and tested for tuberculosis and viral hepatitis before the initiation of TNFB, and as long as the long-term adverse effects on the development of lymphoma and other tumors do not prone to be problematic. Because the rates of benefits to TNFB are modest from a population perspective and the cost of therapy is very high, the ultimate application of use of TNFBs will likely be established by cost/benefit studies.

When to use biological agents in inflammatory bowel disease

The use of biological agents in inflammatory bowel diseases across the Asia-Pacific region is increasing. As new molecules and targets are identified, knowledge regarding the indications, utility, optimization and adverse effects of biological agents grows. Careful patient selection, attention to communication and patient education will maximize the benefit of these drugs. Tertiary referral centers with specific interest in inflammatory bowel diseases and experience play an important role in their use. There is enormous opportunity for patients to benefit from biological agents in the therapy of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Use of these agents has been studied across a variety of indications and populations, and at different stages in the disease course. Failure to respond or loss of response can result from different causes, and can be medically managed in many cases. More research on the pleiotropic effects, safety of biological agents and biomarkers in the prediction of response will provide a sounder basis for individually directing therapy. Adverse events such as opportunistic infection and malignancy can occur, and screening prior to therapy and discussion on risk-benefit of the various management options are important. Cost of these medications especially with maintenance therapy remains an important issue in many Asia-Pacific countries. New and more specific agents will better target therapy and minimize adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease: a single centre study

BACKGROUND

Infliximab and adalimumab are highly effective in Crohn's Disease (CD). This is supported by clinical trials and open-label studies using either infliximab or adalimumab, thus not allowing a proper comparison between these anti-TNFs in CD.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in active CD.

METHODS

In a longitudinal study, CD patients with indication for anti-TNFs were treated with infliximab or adalimumab.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were treated with infliximab (n = 44) or adalimumab (n = 49). In the infliximab group, the induction was completed by 77.3% of patients, due to no response (n = 2), delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) or infusion reactions (n = 8). Maintenance with infliximab was completed by 60% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 5), DHR or infusion reactions (n = 5). In the adalimumab group, all patients completed the induction, while maintenance was completed by 67% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 8), DHR (n = 1), other causes (n = 7). In both groups, the CDAI significantly reduced at baseline vs. each visit (P < 0.04). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed to evaluate the risk of steroid-free remission in patients treated with infliximab vs. adalimumab detected no differences (log-rank test P = 0.4). Cox proportional-hazards regression identified two predictors of steroid-free remission using anti-TNFs: no smokers [HR = 2.94 (1.52-5.70), P = 0.001] and non stricturing non penetrating behaviour [HR = 3.116 (1.06-9.13), P = 0.03826].

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab and adalimumab showed a similar efficacy. No smoking and non-stricturing non-penetrating behaviour were predictors of steroid-free remission.

Advances in treatment of Crohn's disease with adalimumab

Adalimumab is a subcutaneously administered, fully humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal IgG1 antibody and represents an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of Crohn's disease for its convenient mode of administration and less adverse events. Adalimumab is effective in inducing and maintaining clinical response and remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease, which permits to spare potential steroid usage, achieve mucosal healing and improve the quality of life in these patients. Adalimumab has also been shown to be beneficial to patients who lose response or are intolerant to infliximab and to promote the closure of the fistula orifice. This article reviews the recent advances in the treatment of Crohn's disease with adalimumab.

The effects of anti-TNF-α treatment with adalimumab on growth in children with Crohn's disease (CD)

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab is used to treat children with Crohn's disease (CD), but the effects of adalimumab on growth in CD have not been studied.

AIM

To study growth and disease activity over 12 months (6 months prior to (T-6), baseline (T0) and for 6 months following (T+6) adalimumab).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Growth and treatment details of 36 children (M: 22) who started adalimumab at a median (10th, 90th) age of 14.7 years (11.3, 16.8) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 36 cases, 28 (78%) went into remission. Overall 42% of children showed catch up growth, which was more likely in: (i) those who achieved remission (median change in height SDS (ΔHtSDS) increased from -0.2 (-0.9, 1.0) at T0 to 0.2 (-0.6, 1.6) at T+6, (p=0.007)), (ii) in those who were on immunosuppression ΔHtSDS increased from -0.2 (-0.9, 1.0) at T0 to 0.1 (-0.8, 1.3) at T+6, (p=0.03) and (iii) in those whose indication for using adalimumab therapy was an allergic reaction to infliximab, median ΔHtSDS increased significantly from -0.3 (-0.9, 1.0) at T0 to 0.3 (-0.5, 1.6) at T+6, (p=0.02). Median ΔHtSDS also increased from -0.4 (-0.8, 0.7) at T0 to 0.0 (-0.6, 1.6) at T+6, (p=0.04) in 15 children who were on prednisolone therapy when starting adalimumab.

CONCLUSION

Clinical response to adalimumab therapy is associated with an improvement in linear growth in a proportion of children with CD. Improved growth is more likely in patients entering remission and on immunosuppression but is not solely due to a steroid sparing effect.

Long-term durability of response to adalimumab in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is an effective treatment for Crohn's disease (CD), but may also be associated with loss of response. Few reports provide insight into the durability of treatment of CD with adalimumab for periods longer than 12 months in clinical practice.

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term durability of adalimumab maintenance treatment and to identify predictive factors associated with loss of response.

METHODS

CD patients who initially responded to adalimumab were evaluated in a historical cohort study. Maintenance of long-term response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictive factors for loss of efficacy.

RESULTS

In all, 380 CD patients were included (mean age, 38 years; 52% female). Of these, 43% had ileocolic CD, 50% inflammatory CD, and 41% perianal CD. Median follow-up with adalimumab was 8 months (range, 4-75 months). The annual risk of loss of response to adalimumab was 18% per patient-year of follow-up. Twenty-eight percent of patients were anti-TNF-naïve and 72% anti-TNF-experienced. The loss of efficacy was 8% per patient-year of follow-up in the anti-TNF-naïve patients and 22% in the anti-TNF-experienced group (P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of extraintestinal manifestations (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-2.9) and previous experience with other anti-TNF agents (HR = 2.5,95% CI = 1.2-5.3) were associated with higher risk of loss of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

A relevant proportion of CD patients on long-term adalimumab lost response. The risk of loss of response was higher (more than 2-fold) in anti-TNF-experienced than in anti-TNF-naïve patients (22% vs. 8% per patient-year of treatment). Having extraintestinal manifestations seems to increase the risk of loss of efficacy.

Practical application of anti-TNF therapy for luminal Crohn's disease

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy to treat inflammatory bowel disease has been available for more than a decade. Although extensive data on the outcome of anti-TNF therapy from individual clinical trials and patient cohorts are available, integrated guidance on the best use of such therapy to achieve optimal clinical outcomes when managing patients with luminal Crohn's disease is lacking. This review combines published data to establish practical strategies for anti-TNF therapy with respect to effective and safe timing of introduction, use of concurrent immunosuppressive therapy, dose escalation, managing relapse, changing drugs, pregnancy and breast feeding, and stopping drug treatment.

Adalimumab as second line anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy for Crohn's disease: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-response, loss of response, or intolerance to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy is well recognised in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Data concerning outcomes following the use of a second anti-TNFα therapy, particularly in patients who do not respond to a first anti-TNFα agent, are still emerging. The aim of this study was to assess response and tolerability to adalimumab following infliximab failure in a single centre cohort of CD patients.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on 44 patients who received adalimumab therapy following infliximab failure. Initial response to adalimumab therapy at 6weeks following induction was defined using a two point decrease in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, with remission at this point defined using a Harvey Bradshaw index≤4. Sustained clinical benefit at the last point of follow up was determined using a physician's global assessment. Corticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit was also assessed at this point.

RESULTS

Thirty-four (77%) patients had initial response to adalimumab therapy, with 28 (64%) having sustained clinical benefit. Corticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit was achieved in nine (53%) of 17 patients requiring steroids at commencement of adalimumab. Four (44%) of the 9 patients who were primary non-responders to infliximab responded to adalimumab. The majority of CD patients who failed adalimumab therapy required surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-line anti-TNFα therapy with adalimumab is effective at both inducing remission and maintaining response in CD patients who have failed infliximab, regardless of the reason for infliximab failure.

Adalimumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease

Introduction:

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a relapsing-remitting course with trans-mural inflammation of potentially any section of the digestive tract. Adalimumab (ADA) is a subcutaneously administered, recombinant, fully human, IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and specificity to human TNF-alpha, thus modulating its biologic functions and its proinflammatory effects.

Aims:

To review the available data on ADA in CD for biological properties, efficacy, and safety.

Methods:

Electronic searches were conducted using the Pubmed and SCOPUS databases from the earliest records to April 2008. The search terms used were “adalimumab”, “anti-TNF”, “TNF-alpha”, “biologicals”, “inflammatory bowel disease”, and “Crohn’s disease”. Reference lists of all relevant articles were searched for further studies.

Results:

Available studies suggest that ADA has the potential to induce and maintain clinical response and remission in moderate-severe CD, both in anti-TNF-naïve patients and in subjects who lost their response and/or became intolerant to infliximab (IFX). ADA seems also effective in maintaining corticosteroid-free remission and obtaining complete fistula closure (although no specific randomized trials are available). No concomitant immunosuppressors seem to be necessary. Side effects appear similar to IFX, while site-injection reactions are frequent and specific. Data on immunogenicity and its clinical impact are uncertain.

Conclusions:

ADA appears to be effective in inducing and maintain clinical remission in CD, including patients not manageable with IFX. Successive clinical practice and further on going trials will confirm a positive role for ADA as a new anti-TNF treatment in CD. The impact on clinical management or on resources should be more studied.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Crohn's disease

Adalimumab (ADA) is a subcutaneously (SC) self-administered fully human Ig G1 monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFce). In the CLASSIC dose-ranging trial, ADA was superior to placebo for inducing remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) naive to TNFa inhibitor therapy. In CLASSIC II, patients in remission following CLASSIC I maintained remission for up to 56 weeks while on ADA. In CHARM, approximately 40% of the 499 patients with moderate-to-severe CD who responded to ADA, maintained remission at 26 and 52 weeks, thus confirming long-term efficacy. ADA demonstrated steroid-sparing properties, beneficial effects in patients with perianal fistulas, and decreases in rates of hospitalization and surgery. Sub-group analyses demonstrated similar remission rates irrespective of concomitant immunosuppressive use or previous exposure to other TNFa inhibitor therapy. In the GAIN trial, 325 patients who had either lost response or become intolerant to infliximab (IFX) were randomized to recieve ADA induction therapy or placebo. In this difficult-to-treat patient population, 21% achieved remission and half demonstrated clinical benefit from ADA induction therapy. Injection site reactions may occur with SC ADA (2-5% of patients), which are generally less dramatic in nature than infusion reactions experienced with intravenous IFX. Immunogenicity occurs with all monoclonal antibodies; however, in the CD development program anti-ADA antibodies were detected at low rates (0.7 and 2.6% of patients in the CLASSIC I and CLASSIC II studies, respectively). Based on robust short- and long-term efficacy data from large randomized controlled trials and a favorable safety signal, ADA has become a key addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD.

Adalimumab is effective in long-term real life clinical practice in both luminal and perianal Crohn's disease. The Madrid experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in CD patients of the Madrid area and identify predictors of response.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with adalimumab in 9 hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain). Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of response was performed.

RESULTS

174 patients included (50% males) with a median follow-up of 40 weeks. 30% had active perianal fistulizing disease at the beginning of the therapy with adalimumab. 59% had been previously treated with infliximab, being the lost of response (42.2%) the most frequent cause of withdrawal of the drug. 33% of patients needed dose escalation from every-other week to every week. The median time for this dose escalation was 33 weeks (range 2-120). The percentages of complete response at 4 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up were 63, 70 and 63% in luminal disease and 49, 50 and 41% in perianal disease respectively. The prevalence of adverse events was 18% (most frequent was: 5 abscesses) causing the withdrawal of the drug in 21% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab is effective and safe for the management of CD, even in refractory cases to infliximab.

Perianal Crohn’s disease: Is there something new?

Perianal lesions are common in patients with Crohn’s disease, and display aggressive behavior in some cases. An accurate diagnosis is necessary for the optimal management of perianal lesions. Treatment of perianal Crohn’s disease includes medical and/or surgical options. Recent discoveries in the pathogenesis of this disease have led to advances in medical and surgical therapy with good results. Perianal lesions in Crohn’s disease remain a challenging aspect for both gastroenterologists and surgeons and lead to a greatly impaired quality of life for all patients affected by this disease. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to obtain the best results.

A British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition survey of the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in children with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is efficacious therapy for adults with Crohn's disease (CD).

AIM

To summarise the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland paediatric adalimumab experience.

METHODS

British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) members with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients <18 years old commencing adalimumab with at least 4 weeks follow-up. Patient demographics and details of treatment were then collected. Response and remission was assessed using the Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI)/Physicians Global Assessment (PGA).

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients [70 CD, 1 ulcerative colitis (UC), 1 IBD unclassified (IBDU)] from 19 paediatric-centres received adalimumab at a median age of 14.8 (IQR 3.1, range 6.1-17.8) years; 66/70 CD (94%) had previously received infliximab. A dose of 80 mg then 40 mg was used for induction in 41(59%) and 40 mg fortnightly for maintenance in 61 (90%). Remission rates were 24%, 58% and 41% at 1, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Overall 43 (61%) went into remission at some point, with 24 (35%) requiring escalation of therapy. Remission rates were higher in those on concomitant immunosuppression cf. those not on immunosuppression [34/46 (74%) vs. 9/24 (37%), respectively, (χ(2) 8.8, P=0.003)]. There were 15 adverse events (21%) including four (6%) serious adverse events with two sepsis related deaths in patients who were also on immunosuppression and home parenteral nutrition (3% mortality rate).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab is useful in treatment of refractory paediatric patients with a remission rate of 61%. This treatment benefit should be balanced against side effects, including in this study a 3% mortality rate.

Adalimumab - an effective and promising treatment for patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease: a case series

Introduction

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease of unknown etiology which may affect any part of the bowel. Fistulas are a common and often serious complication of Crohn's disease. The treatment for fistulizing Crohn's disease can be medical, surgical or a combination of the two. Recently, adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has been suggested as a safe and effective treatment for the induction and maintenance of remission in adult patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease, who are refractory to conventional therapy or intolerant to infliximab. However, large studies focusing on evaluating the efficacy of adalimumab in fistulizing Crohn's disease have not yet been published.

Case presentation

We report the cases of three patients, of European Caucasian ethnicity and Greek nationality, with active luminal and fistulizing Crohn's disease. All of the cases were treated successfully with adalimumab. Patient 1 (a 44-year-old man) and patient 2 (an 18-year-old woman) developed early post-surgical enterocutaneous fistulas, while patient 3 (a 20-year-old woman) had peri-anal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Adalimumab treatment (160 mg subcutaneously at week zero, 80 mg at week two, and 40 mg every other week) was used for three different indications: (1) after the failure of other conservative medical treatments for Crohn's disease (patient 1); (2) as a monotherapy in treating a naive patient (patient 2); (3) after an intolerance to infliximab (patient 3). A remission of the active luminal and fistulizing disease was achieved soon after the initiation of adalimumab and sustained thereafter with maintenance doses. No further surgical intervention was required and no adverse effects were observed in any of the cases.

Conclusions

Fistulizing Crohn's disease remains a challenge in clinical practice. Adalimumab seems to be an effective, well-tolerated and safe treatment option for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe peri-anal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Furthermore, adalimumab seems to be a promising treatment option for patients with moderate to severe fistulizing Crohn's disease with enterocutaneous fistulas. However, this clinical observation needs to be investigated in further clinical trials.

Review article: medical, surgical and radiological management of perianal Crohn's fistulas

BACKGROUND

Crohn's anal fistulas are common and cause considerable morbidity. Their management is often difficult; medical and surgical treatments rarely lead to true healing with frequent recurrence and complications.

AIM

To examine medical treatments previously and currently used, surgical techniques and the important role of optimal imaging.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in the Pub Med database using Crohn's, Anal Fistula, Surgery, Imaging and Medical Treatment as search terms.

RESULTS

Antibiotics and immunosuppressants have a role, but slow initial response, side effects and relatively low remission rates of up to around a third with frequent recurrence limit their value. Long-term infliximab produces clinical remission in 36-58% of patients with combined medical and surgical management achieving optimal outcomes. Traditional and newer surgical procedures often have a high rate of recurrence with a significant risk of temporary or, in up to 10% of cases, permanent stomas, incontinence and unhealed or slowly healing wounds in 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of Crohn's anal fistulas remains challenging. Established principles are to drain infection, use setons as required, aggressively manage active proctitis, give antibiotics, immunosuppressants and employ anti-TNFα therapy, and they demand significant co-operation between gastroenterologists and surgeons.

Evaluation of adalimumab therapy in multidisciplinary strategy for perianal Crohn's disease patients with infliximab failure

BACKGROUND

Infliximab has improved the management of perianal Crohn's disease, but intolerance and loss of efficacy can occur. The use of a second antibody can be less effective.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine if the use of adalimumab, based on a multidisciplinary strategy, can enhance outcomes for patients with fistulizing disease and infliximab failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with perianal disease and infliximab failure were treated with adalimumab. Complex fistulas were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with severe conditions as determined by radiology were examined under anesthesia, and seton placement was performed when appropriate. Setons were removed when external discharge had ceased and there was no radiological evidence of fistula activity.

RESULTS

Nine patients (56%) underwent MRI. Setons were inserted in seven (43%). The baseline perianal disease activity index (PDAI) decreased after 4 weeks and remained at similar levels 24 and 48 weeks after treatment. The complete response rate was 50% after four weeks and 87.5% of these patients remained in remission after 48 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas and infliximab failure, adalimumab as a multidisciplinary approach to management, using MRI to guide surgical drainage when necessary, results in a favourable response and low recurrence rate.

Biological therapies of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by increasing morbidity and, if suboptimally treated, poor prognosis. Recent evidence strongly suggests that dysfunctional immune responses play an important role in the pathogenesis of IBD. Therefore, immunologically downregulating the overactivated innate and adaptive immune responses may be a better approach to treat IBD than currently used pharmaceutical therapies. In recent years, many new biological therapies have been developed. These therapies are shown to be effective for inducing remission, preventing complications, improving life quality of the patients, and reducing hospitalization and surgical rates. This article introduces and discusses these new biological agents that have been used effectively in clinic for IBD patients.

Treatment of ulcerative colitis with adalimumab or infliximab: long-term follow-up of a single-centre cohort

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 522-528 Summary Background Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that anti-TNF agents are efficacious in inducing remission in cases of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, response rates for anti-TNF agents in 'real life' clinical practice are less well-defined. Aims To examine the response rates and long-term outcomes of infliximab and adalimumab treatment for out-patients with ulcerative colitis and to study the variables associated with response rates. Methods In a prospective study, a single-centre out-patient cohort was treated and followed up according to a structured protocol of clinical care. Response to treatment was assessed using a physician's global assessment that focused on normalization of bowel frequency, absence of blood with defecation and tapering of corticosteroids to zero. Results Fifty-three ulcerative colitis patients were included in the study. Responses to induction therapy were 96.4% (27/28) for infliximab and 80% (20/25) for adalimumab (P = 0.0889). Responses to maintenance therapy were similar: infliximab 77.8% (14/18) and adalimumab 70.0% (14/20) (P = 0.7190). Multivariate analyses of the induction and maintenance responses did not reveal confounding elements. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions This long-term follow-up of a single-centre cohort of ulcerative colitis patients demonstrates that 'real-life' out-patient treatment with infliximab and adalimumab is effective in induction and maintenance of response.

Role of the tumor necrosis factor antagonists in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: an update

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis represent the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent research points out the role of uncontrolled intestinal inflammation in the pathogenesis of IBD. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing novel biologic therapies targeting specific molecules of the inflammatory cascade. Among them, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (i.e. infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) have proved to be effective, particularly for patients with refractory IBD. These biological therapies have changed, at least partially, the clinical course and medical management of IBD. However, the administration of anti-TNF drugs has also been associated with serious side-effects, which have raised concerns on the application of these drugs in clinical practice. The goal of this review is to provide an update and analyze the pros and cons of using anti-TNF therapies in the treatment of IBD.

Adalimumab treatment in children with refractory Crohn's disease

Information on safety and efficacy of adalimumab in children with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. We present a case-series of 14 children with severe CD treated with adalimumab during a 3.5-year period. Fourteen children (nine boys, five girls), aged 13.9 years (range 1.9-19.1) were treated with adalimumab during 12.5 months (range 7-42). All had steroid or immunosuppression-drugs refractory disease. Ten patients (71%) had been previously treated with infliximab, 13/14 were treated with different immunosuppressive drugs and all were steroid-dependent or resistant. Seven children (50%) showed full clinical response and 5/14 (35%) improved partially. Two children (15%) had loss of response after a period of transient improvement. Adalimumab treatment enabled complete steroids withdrawal in 8/14 (57%) of steroid-dependent children. Currently, five children are in complete remission with adalimumab monotherapy for a median 14 months (range 9-24). Adalimumab may induce and maintain remission in children with severe, refractory CD. Prospective safety and efficacy confirmation of this data in children is necessary.