Effect of rifampicin on metoprolol and antipyrine kinetics

The Unusual Adverse Effects of Antituberculosis Therapy in Kidney Patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are at a high risk of tuberculosis (TB), with a relative risk of developing active TB of 10%-25%. Similarly, glomerular disease increases the risk of TB due to diminished glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and immunosuppression use. Further, the first-line anti-TB drugs are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) even in patients with normal kidney functions.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 10 patients hospitalized with unusual adverse effects of antituberculosis therapy (ATT) from 2013 to 2022.

RESULTS

We found three cases of AKI caused by rifampicin: acute interstitial nephritis, crescentic glomerulonephritis, and heme pigment-induced acute tubular necrosis. We observed rifampicin-induced accelerated hypertension and thrombocytopenia in two patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Isoniazid caused pancreatitis and cerebellitis in two CKD patients, respectively. In a CKD patient, we detected acute gout secondary to pyrazinamide-induced reduced uric acid excretion. We also observed cases of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and hypercalcemia due to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with glomerular disease on ATT. Immediate discontinuation of the offending drug, along with specific and supportive management, led to a recovery in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The adverse effects of ATT may be unusually severe and varied in kidney patients due to decreased renal elimination. Early recognition of these adverse effects and timely discontinuation of the offending drug is essential to limit morbidity and mortality.

Predicting Interactions between Rifampin and Antihypertensive Drugs Using the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lack of blood pressure control is often seen in hypertensive patients concomitantly taking antituberculosis medications due to the complex drug-drug interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to understand the underlying mechanisms of these interactions to help formulate recommendations on the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients taking these medications concomitantly. Our objective was to assess the reliability of the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) to predict potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs and thus provide recommendations on the choice of antihypertensive drugs in patients receiving rifampin.

DESIGN

Evidence-based in vitro and in vivo predictions of drug-drug interactions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We systematically evaluated interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs using the theory of the BDDCS, taking into consideration the role of drug transporters and metabolic enzymes involved in these interactions. We provide recommendations on the selection of antihypertensive drugs for patients with tuberculosis. Antihypertensive drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the China National Medical Products Administration were included in this study. The drugs were classified into four categories under the BDDCS classification. Detailed information on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporters for each antihypertensive drug was searched in PubMed and other electronic databases. This information was combined with the effects of rifampin on CYP enzymes and drug transporters, and the direction and relative extent of the potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs were predicted. Recommendations were then made using the theory of BDDCS. A thorough systematic literature review was performed, and data from all published human studies and case reports were summarized for the validation of our predictions. Interventional and observational studies published in PubMed and two Chinese databases (CNKI and WanFang) through December 16, 2019, were included, and data were extracted for validation of the predictions. Using the BDDCS theory, class 3 active drugs were predicted to exhibit minimal interactions with rifampin. On reviewing case reports and pre-post studies, the predictions we made were found to be reliable. When antituberculosis medications that include rifampin are started in patients with hypertension, it is recommended that the use of calcium channel blockers and classes 1 and 2 β-blockers be avoided. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, olmesartan, class 3 β-blockers, spironolactone, and hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable because clinically relevant interactions would not be expected.

CONCLUSION

Application of the BDDCS to predict interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs for patients with both tuberculosis and hypertension was found to be reliable. It should be noted, however, that based on the CYP enzyme and drug transporter information we reviewed, the mechanisms of all of the interactions could not be elucidated, and the predictions are only based on theory. The real effects of rifampin on antihypertensive drugs need to be further observed. More studies in both animals and humans are needed in the future.

Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Involved in Metoprolol Metabolism and Use of Metoprolol as a CYP2D6 Phenotyping Probe Drug

Metoprolol is used for phenotyping of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, a CYP isoform considered not to be inducible by inducers of the CYP2C, CYP2B, and CYP3A families such as rifampicin. While assessing CYP2D6 activity under basal conditions and after pre-treatment with rifampicin in vivo, we surprisingly observed a drop in the metoprolol/α-OH-metoprolol clearance ratio, suggesting CYP2D6 induction. To study this problem, we performed in vitro investigations using HepaRG cells and primary human hepatocytes (before and after treatment with 20 μM rifampicin), human liver microsomes, and CYP3A4-overexpressing supersomes. While mRNA expression levels of CYP3A4 showed a 15- to 30-fold increase in both cell models, mRNA of CYP2D6 was not affected by rifampicin. 1'-OH-midazolam formation (reflecting CYP3A4 activity) increased by a factor of 5-8 in both cell models, while the formation of α-OH-metoprolol increased by a factor of 6 in HepaRG cells and of 1.4 in primary human hepatocytes. Inhibition studies using human liver microsomes showed that CYP3A4, 2B6, and 2C9 together contributed 19.0 ± 2.6% (mean ± 95%CI) to O-demethylation, 4.0 ± 0.7% to α-hydroxylation, and 7.6 ± 1.7% to N-dealkylation of metoprolol. In supersomes overexpressing CYP3A4, metoprolol was α-hydroxylated in a reaction inhibited by the CYP3A4-specific inhibitor ketoconazole, but not by the CYP2D6-specific inhibitor quinidine. We conclude that metoprolol is not exclusively metabolized by CYP2D6. CYP3A4, 2B6, and 2C9, which are inducible by rifampicin, contribute to α-hydroxylation, O-demethylation, and N-dealkylation of metoprolol. This contribution is larger after CYP induction by rifampicin but is too small to compromise the usability of metoprolol α-hydroxylation for CYP2D6 phenotyping.

Rifampicin and anti-hypertensive drugs in chronic kidney disease: Pharmacokinetic interactions and their clinical impact

Patients on dialysis have an increased incidence of tuberculosis (TB). Rifampicin, a first-line antitubercular therapy (ATT) drug, is a potent inducer of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP). There is potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampicin and anti-hypertensives that are CYP substrates: amlodipine and metoprolol. Therefore, hypertensive patients receiving rifampicin-based ATT are at risk for worsening of hypertension. However, this hypothesis has not yet been systematically studied. In this prospective study, hypertensive CKD 5D patients with TB were followed after rifampicin initiation. Blood pressure (BP) was ≤140/90 mmHg with stable anti-HT requirement at inclusion. Serum amlodipine, metoprolol, and prazosin levels were estimated by high-performance liquid chromatography at baseline and 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after rifampicin initiation. BP and anti-HT requirement were monitored for 2 weeks or until stabilization. All 24 patients in the study had worsening of hypertension after rifampicin and 83.3% required increase in drugs to maintain BP <140/90 mmHg. Serial amlodipine levels were estimated in 16 patients; metoprolol and prazosin in four patients each. Drug levels declined by >50% in all patients and became undetectable in 50-75%. Drug requirement increased from 4.5 ± 3.6 to 8.5 ± 6.4 units (P < 0.0001). Mean time to first increase in dose was 6.5 ± 3.6 days. Eleven (46%) patients experienced a hypertensive crisis at 9.1 ± 3.8 days. Three of them had a hypertensive emergency with acute pulmonary edema. In two patients, rifampicin had to be discontinued to achieve BP control. In conclusion, rifampicin caused a significant decrease in blood levels of commonly used anti hypertensives. This decrease in levels correlated well with worsening of hypertension. Thus, we suggest very close BP monitoring in CKD patients after rifampicin initiation.

Modeling, prediction, and in vitro in vivo correlation of CYP3A4 induction

CYP3A4 induction is not generally considered to be a concern for safety; however, serious therapeutic failures can occur with drugs whose exposure is lower as a result of more rapid metabolic clearance due to induction. Despite the potential therapeutic consequences of induction, little progress has been made in quantitative predictions of CYP3A4 induction-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from in vitro data. In the present study, predictive models have been developed to facilitate extrapolation of CYP3A4 induction measured in vitro to human clinical DDIs. The following parameters were incorporated into the DDI predictions: 1) EC(50) and E(max) of CYP3A4 induction in primary hepatocytes; 2) fractions unbound of the inducers in human plasma (f(u, p)) and hepatocytes (f(u, hept)); 3) relevant clinical in vivo concentrations of the inducers ([Ind](max, ss)); and 4) fractions of the victim drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (f(m, CYP3A4)). The values for [Ind](max, ss) and f(m, CYP3A4) were obtained from clinical reports of CYP3A4 induction and inhibition, respectively. Exposure differences of the affected drugs in the presence and absence of the six individual inducers (bosentan, carbamazepine, dexamethasone, efavirenz, phenobarbital, and rifampicin) were predicted from the in vitro data and then correlated with those reported clinically (n = 103). The best correlation was observed (R(2) = 0.624 and 0.578 from two hepatocyte donors) when f(u, p) and f(u, hept) were included in the predictions. Factors that could cause over- or underpredictions (potential outliers) of the DDIs were also analyzed. Collectively, these predictive models could add value to the assessment of risks associated with CYP3A4 induction-based DDIs by enabling their determination in the early stages of drug development.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part II: prophylactic treatments

The present part II review highlights pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (excluding those of minor severity) of medications used in prophylactic treatment of the main primary headaches (migraine, tension-type and cluster headache). The principles of pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and the interactions of medications for acute treatment are examined in part I. The overall goal of this series of two reviews is to increase the awareness of physicians, primary care providers and specialists regarding pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of headache medications. The aim of prophylactic treatment is to reduce the frequency of headache attacks using beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, antidepressants, antiepileptics, lithium, serotonin antagonists, corticosteroids and muscle relaxants, which must be taken daily for long periods. During treatment the patient often continues to take symptomatic drugs for the attack, and may need other medications for associated or new-onset illnesses. DDIs can, therefore, occur. As a whole, DDIs of clinical relevance concerning prophylactic drugs are a limited number. Their effects can be prevented by starting the treatment with low dosages, which should be gradually increased depending on response and side effects, while frequently monitoring the patient and plasma levels of other possible coadministered drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Most headache medications are substrates of CYP2D6 (e.g., beta-blockers, antidepressants) or CYP3A4 (e.g., calcium-channel blockers, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, corticosteroids). The inducers and, especially, the inhibitors of these isoenzymes should be carefully coadministered.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin : clinical relevance

The antituberculosis drug rifampicin (rifampin) induces a number of drug-metabolising enzymes, having the greatest effects on the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 in the liver and in the small intestine. In addition, rifampicin induces some drug transporter proteins, such as intestinal and hepatic P-glycoprotein. Full induction of drug-metabolising enzymes is reached in about 1 week after starting rifampicin treatment and the induction dissipates in roughly 2 weeks after discontinuing rifampicin. Rifampicin has its greatest effects on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs that are metabolised by CYP3A4 and/or are transported by P-glycoprotein. Thus, for example, oral midazolam, triazolam, simvastatin, verapamil and most dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists are ineffective during rifampicin treatment. The plasma concentrations of several anti-infectives, such as the antimycotics itraconazole and ketoconazole and the HIV protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir, are also greatly reduced by rifampicin. The use of rifampicin with these HIV protease inhibitors is contraindicated to avoid treatment failures. Rifampicin can cause acute transplant rejection in patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporin. In addition, rifampicin reduces the plasma concentrations of methadone, leading to symptoms of opioid withdrawal in most patients. Rifampicin also induces CYP2C-mediated metabolism and thus reduces the plasma concentrations of, for example, the CYP2C9 substrate (S)-warfarin and the sulfonylurea antidiabetic drugs. In addition, rifampicin can reduce the plasma concentrations of drugs that are not metabolised (e.g. digoxin) by inducing drug transporters such as P-glycoprotein. Thus, the effects of rifampicin on drug metabolism and transport are broad and of established clinical significance. Potential drug interactions should be considered whenever beginning or discontinuing rifampicin treatment. It is particularly important to remember that the concentrations of many of the other drugs used by the patient will increase when rifampicin is discontinued as the induction starts to wear off.

Clinically significant interactions with drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis

Clinically significant interactions occurring during antituberculous chemotherapy principally involve rifampicin (rifampin), isoniazid and the fluoroquinolones. Such interactions between the antituberculous drugs and coadministered agents are definitely much more important than among antituberculous drugs themselves. These can be associated with consequences even amounting to therapeutic failure or toxicity. Most of the interactions are pharmacokinetic rather than pharmacodynamic in nature. The cytochrome P450 isoform enzymes are responsible for many interactions (especially those involving rifampicin and isoniazid) during drug biotransformation (metabolism) in the liver and/or intestine. Generally, rifampicin is an enzyme inducer and isoniazid acts as an inhibitor. The agents interacting significantly with rifampicin include anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, anti-infectives, cardiovascular therapeutics, contraceptives, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, psychotropics, sulphonylureas and theophyllines. Isoniazid interacts principally with anticonvulsants, theophylline, benzodiapines, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and some food. Fluoroquinolones can have absorption disturbance due to a variety of agents, especially the metal cations. Other important interactions of fluoroquinolones result from their enzyme inhibiting potential or pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Geriatric and immunocompromised patients are particularly at risk of drug interactions during treatment of their tuberculosis. Among the latter, patients who are HIV infected constitute the most important group. This is largely because of the advent of new antiretroviral agents such as the HIV protease inhibitors and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the armamenterium of therapy. Compounding the complexity of drug interactions, underlying medical diseases per se may also contribute to or aggravate the scenario. It is imperative for clinicians to be on the alert when treating tuberculosis in patients with difficult co-morbidity requiring polypharmacy. With advancement of knowledge and expertise, it is hoped that therapeutic drug monitoring as a new paradigm of care can enable better management of these drug interactions.

Medical issues and emergencies in the dermatology office

We review the medical issues and emergencies potentially encountered in the practice of general or surgical dermatology. Traditional guidelines have largely consisted of dated extrapolations from the nondermatologic literature concerning procedures that are primarily irrelevant to dermatology. This article outlines a rational approach to organizing an office emergency plan for anaphylaxis, stroke, status epilepticus, myocardial infarction, and hypertensive crisis. We discuss the literature that has influenced current office behavior regarding endocarditis prophylaxis, the use of electrosurgery with pacemakers, arrhythmogenic drug interactions, vasovagal syncope, lidocaine "allergy," and bleeding complications from oral anticoagulants. Recommendations for managing these issues in a dermatologic context are provided.

Effect of rifampin on the plasma concentration and the clinical effect of haloperidol concomitantly administered to schizophrenic patients

We assessed the changes of plasma haloperidol concentrations and clinical responses repeatedly up to 4 weeks after coadministration or discontinuation of rifampin in 12 schizophrenic patients taking haloperidol alone (group I) and 5 patients taking haloperidol and antituberculotic drugs (group II). After coadministration of rifampin in group I, daily trough haloperidol concentrations rapidly decreased and reached 63% of baseline level by day 3, 41.3% by day 7, and 30% by day 28. On the other hand, after discontinuation of rifampin in group II, plasma haloperidol concentration increased to 140.7% of baseline level by day 3, 228.7% by day 7, and 329% by day 28. In this study, a 30% or greater change in the clinical rating scale was considered a positive clinical response of the drug interaction. Using this criterion, 50% of the group I subjects responded according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score, and 25% responded according to the BPRS subscale for psychiatric symptoms. No positive responses were observed in group II patients. These results strongly suggest that rifampin interacts with the clinical effects as well as the plasma concentrations of coadministered haloperidol, and careful monitoring should be considered when coadministration or discontinuation of rifampin is needed in a schizophrenic patient taking haloperidol.

beta-blockers. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The clinician prescribing beta-blockers for his or her patients is faced with an often difficult situation. There are many beta-blockers, each with its own pharmacological profile. Patients are often taking multiple medications, thus increasing the risk of both anticipated and unexpected drug interactions. Reports of drug interactions are frequently anecdotal. The prescriber may not be aware of the patient's other medications or lifestyle habits. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions involving beta-blockers are documented in the literature, but these studies often examine small numbers of patients. For these reasons, it is difficult for the practitioner to distill guidelines for the administration of beta-blockers in conjunction with other medication. In general, beta-blockers are well tolerated, and symptomatic drug interactions are relatively infrequent. It is incumbent upon the clinical practitioner to have knowledge of his or her patient's drug profile and to be aware of the various drug interactions as well as each patient's unique pathophysiological profile when prescribing any medication, including beta-blockers. beta-Blockers may interact with a large number of commonly prescribed drugs, including antihypertensive and antianginal drugs, inotropic agents, anti-arrhythmics, NSAIDs, psychotropic drugs, anti-ulcer medications, anaesthetics, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, warfarin, oral hypoglycaemics and rifampicin (rifampin).

Induction and autoinduction properties of rifamycin derivatives: a review of animal and human studies

Animal studies have demonstrated that the mouse and rabbit are far more responsive to the inductive properties of rifamycin derivatives than the rat and guinea pig. The rat hepatic cytochrome P450 system seems to be resistant to the action of rifampicin unless very high doses are used. Mouse hepatic microsomal mixed-function oxidase activity is markedly increased by repeated dosing with rifampicin, whereas administration of rifabutin may be ineffective. In humans, both rifampicin and rifabutin are extensively metabolized and induce their own metabolism. The induced metabolic pathways remain essentially unknown. Under autoinduction conditions, the elimination half-life of rifampicin decreases, whereas that of rifabutin is not altered. Although the effects of repeated administration of rifampicin and rifabutin on the various forms of cytochrome P450 in humans have not been extensively examined, there is convincing evidence that the P4503A subfamily is induced by either drug, whereas the P4501A subfamily and P4502D6 do not appear to be affected by rifampicin. Limited reliable information is available concerning the induction of human glucuronyltransferase activities by rifampicin and rifabutin which, however, do not seem to influence zidovudine glucuronide formation in healthy subjects.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampin and zidovudine

A potential pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampin (Rimactan, Rifadin) and zidovudine (AZT, Retrovir) was investigated in the population of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients at our hospital. The results from four patients who were on long-term (> or = 6 months) combination therapy with zidovudine and rifampin are presented. In all cases of combined use of zidovudine and rifampin, a lower area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and, consequently, a higher apparent clearance of zidovudine were found, compared with a reference population of zidovudine users. Patients had a low to normal maximum concentration of zidovudine in plasma. Elimination half-lives were normal in all but one patient. Zidovudine glucuronide concentrations were determined in three patients and three control subjects. The patients all had relatively higher peak plasma concentrations and higher AUCs of zidovudine glucuronide than the control subjects. In one patient, zidovudine and zidovudine glucuronide were also measured 2.5 months after discontinuation of rifampin. The AUC of zidovudine increased by a factor of 2. These data are in agreement with an enzyme-inducing effect of rifampin on the glucuronidation of zidovudine. They indicate that long-term combination therapy of rifampin and zidovudine leads to increased clearance of zidovudine, which may have therapeutic consequences.

Two- and four-day rifampin chemoprophylaxis regimens induce oxidative metabolism

The effects of two short-term chemoprophylaxis regimens of rifampin (2 or 4 days) on oxidative metabolism were investigated in 14 healthy subjects. Seven subjects received 600 mg of rifampin twice daily on study days 6 and 7 (group A), and seven subjects received 600 mg of rifampin once daily on days 4, 5, 6, and 7 (group B). Antipyrine (18 mg/kg of body weight) was administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15. Short-term rifampin regimens increased oral clearance of antipyrine in both groups compared with the baseline value (P less than 0.05), and group B displayed a larger percent increase over the baseline value than group A did (70.5 +/- 14.3 versus 33.1 +/- 18.1; P less than 0.05). The partial metabolic clearance (CLM) of antipyrine to 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine (HMA) on day 8 increased 71 and 108% for regimens A and B, respectively (P less than 0.05 for both). The corresponding increases in CLM to norantipyrine (NORA) were 57 and 98% (P less than 0.05 for both). CLM to 4-hydroxyantipyrine (OHA) on day 8 increased 64% for regimen A (P = 0.08) and 97% for regimen B (P less than 0.05) compared with the baseline. Although CLM to HMA and OHA on day 15 remained greater than 50% over the baseline with both regimens, CLM to NORA on day 15 was less than 25% over the baseline with both regimens. Thus, both short-term rifampin chemoprophylaxis regimens increased antipyrine clearance for at least 1 week. The increase tended to be higher with the 4-day regimen. The pattern observed for the CLMS suggests that more than one P-450 enzyme is affected.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with rifampicin

Rifampicin, an antituberculosis drug, is usually administered for 4 to 12 months with other antituberculosis drugs or medications from other classes. A potential for drug interactions often exists because rifampicin is a potent inducer of hepatic drug metabolism, as evidenced by a proliferation of smooth endoplasmic reticulum and an increase in the cytochrome P450 content in the liver. The induction is a highly selective process and not every drug metabolised via oxidation is affected. Case reports and studies have demonstrated enhanced metabolism of several drugs; most of these interactions are clinically important. At the start of rifampicin treatment, and again at the end, clinicians must check the dosages of any accompanying medications with which rifampicin may potentially interact. Monitoring of clinical response and blood drug concentrations is essential to adjust the drug dosage during rifampicin therapy. Rifampicin also interacts with cholephils such as bilirubin and bromosulphthalein. Its pharmacokinetics are reported to be altered by ethambutol, p-aminosalicylic acid (through its excipient component), ketoconazole, cyclosporin, clofazimine, probenecid and phenobarbital through one or other of the following mechanisms--impaired absorption of rifampicin, competition between the drug and rifampicin for hepatic uptake and altered hepatic metabolism of rifampicin. Most interactions affecting rifampicin have been relatively minor or are not expected to alter its therapeutic efficacy.

Drug interactions in hypertensive patients. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and genetic considerations

Antihypertensive treatment has proven benefits, and the number of patients being treated with these drugs is significant. Hypertensive patients may have other medical illnesses for which they receive medications, and interactions between antihypertensive agents and other drugs is likely. Some of these interactions may lead to undesirable effects or even loss of blood pressure control. However, drug interactions can also be beneficial when 2 antihypertensive drugs with different pharmacological actions are prescribed in combination and with a clear therapeutic objective in mind. Clinicians should be aware of the mechanisms and the consequences of the different types of interaction in hypertensive patients, so that a desired pharmacological response can be achieved with the fewest side effects in the patients.

Interaction of tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive activity

The interaction of the new beta-receptor antagonist tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine was investigated in ten patients with arterial hypertension (WHO stages I-II). They were treated orally with a single dose of tertatolol 5 mg alone and, after randomized allocation, with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 1 week each (tertatolol 5 mg was concurrently administered on the seventh day of the treatment phases). Following each therapeutic phase, circadian blood pressure values as well as kinetic parameters were obtained. On treatment with tertatolol alone, maximum plasma concentrations were 123.7 +/- 32.4 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) and were reached after 1.95 +/- 1.77 hours. The tertatolol elimination half-life was 9.0 +/- 7.1 hours. Coadministration of ranitidine did not significantly alter the kinetic parameters and antihypertensive effect of tertatolol. Rifampicin, however, decreased the maximum plasma levels of tertatolol to 80.6 +/- 18.5 ng/ml and markedly shortened the elimination half-life to 3.4 +/- 2.6 hours (p less than 0.01 compared with tertatolol alone). Urinary excretion of parent tertatolol and unchanged 4-hydroxy tertatolol was decreased under rifampicin, and a tendency to a reduction in the effect of tertatolol on circadian blood pressure values was observed. Twenty-four hours after administration, the heart rate in those patients on tertatolol alone (68 +/- 6 beats/min) was lower than in those on tertatolol plus rifampicin (74 +/- 7 beats/min). In conclusion, a pronounced pharmacokinetic interaction, with a limited consequence in terms of pharmacodynamic effects, was found in the present study when tertatolol was administered with rifampicin, but not with ranitidine.

Enzyme induction and inhibition

The rate and extent of drug metabolism significantly influences drug effect. Enzyme induction by increasing the metabolism of drugs may result in important drug interactions. Other implications of enzyme induction include alterations in the metabolism of endogenous substrates, vitamins and activity of extrahepatic enzyme systems. Similarly a wide range of drugs may produce clinically significant drug interactions following enzyme inhibition. Assessment of enzyme induction and inhibition in man involves diverse methods including the use of model drugs.

A case of variant angina exacerbated by administration of rifampicin

Rifampicin, an antituberculosis agent, is known to be a potent inducer of microsomal drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver. Elimination or clearance of many drugs has been reported to be enhanced, and their effectiveness reduced; however, no report in the literature has dealt with the interaction between rifampicin and dihydropiridine calcium entry-blocking drugs such as nifedipine. We present here evidence for the possible interaction between rifampicin and nifedipine in a patient with angina pectoris, which was exacerbated during coadministration or rechallenge with rifampicin. The peak plasma level and area under the curve were reduced and the apparent oral clearance of nifedipine was increased by rifampicin, suggesting that rifampicin enhanced the elimination of nifedipine via induction of a hepatic microsomal drug-metabolizing enzyme, as has been reported on other drugs widely metabolized in the liver.

Pharmacokinetics of antituberculosis drugs in patients

The pharmacokinetics of rifampin, isoniazid, and ethambutol were determined in 26 ambulatory male patients (aged 49.5 +/- 9.9 yr) with tuberculosis. Rifampin and isoniazid were given individually or together, with or without ethambutol; studies were done after a single dose and after chronic administration. Under the study conditions, with large variability in the extent of disease and physical status and history of alcohol and tobacco abuse and narrow age range, the pharmacokinetics of these three antituberculosis drugs were not modified significantly by patient age. Furthermore, appreciable drug-drug interactions did not occur when the three drugs were administered concurrently. Self-induction of rifampin clearance by chronic dosing with the drug may lead to subtherapeutic levels of rifampin. Administration of isoniazid and ethambutol in two divided doses resulted in peak plasma concentrations below the accepted therapeutic levels of the two drugs. Our findings indicate that at least in the middle-aged patients with tuberculosis, the current single daily dose, multiple-drug regimen is therapeutically sound pharmacokinetically, and clinicians do not have to make adjustments in dosages of these drugs for age and the extent of disease.

Pharmacokinetics of antipyrine in epileptic patients

The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine were examined after oral and intravenous administration to 20 epileptic subjects receiving antiepileptic drug therapy. Bioavailability was essentially complete (mean bioavailability 101.2% +/- 14.4 (s.d.] indicating that even in enzyme induced subjects, antipyrine behaves as a restrictively eliminated compound with negligible presystemic elimination in the gut or liver. Of the generally used measures of enzyme induction (oral clearance, oral half-life and intravenous half-life) oral clearance was the most closely related to the intravenous clearance of antipyrine (r = 0.919, P less than 0.001). Oral antipyrine administration is an alternative to intravenous administration in epileptic subjects who are enzyme-induced.

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Induction of mixed function oxidase activity in man by rifapentine (MDL 473), a long-acting rifamycin derivative

The effects of rifapentine (MDL 473) administration on hepatic mixed function oxidase activity in man have been investigated in six healthy volunteers. Administration of rifapentine (600 mg 48 h-1) for 10 days resulted in a significant reduction in antipyrine half-life (from 13.2 +/- 1.0 h to 7.7 +/- 0.4 h) and a corresponding increase in its total body clearance (from 41.8 +/- 5.5 ml min-1 to 67.4 +/- 5.6 ml min-1). Twelve days after stopping rifapentine administration, these values had largely returned to base-line. 24-Hour excretion of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol was significantly increased, by approximately three-fold, following administration of rifapentine for 10 days. Again, 12 days after stopping drug administration, 6 beta-hydroxycortisol excretion had returned to pretreatment values. Clearance of antipyrine to its three oxidative metabolites was increased by rifapentine administration, although the increase for 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine was not significant. The greatest increase (+140%) was observed for norantipyrine. Twelve days after the last dose of rifapentine, all values had returned to control levels. It is concluded that, like rifampicin, rifapentine is a potent inducer of mixed function oxidase activity in man and that the possibility of clinically significant drug interactions should be anticipated in the therapeutic use of this compound.

Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin

In 6 healthy volunteers the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol under steady-state conditions was investigated over three consecutive phases: over 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily per os, 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily plus 400 mg of cimetidine t.i.d. and 14 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol and 600 mg of rifampicin once daily with adequate intervals free of medication. After therapy with bisoprolol alone peak plasma levels (Cssmax) of the beta-blocker were 55.5 +/- 6.4 ng/ml (means +/- SEM), area under the plasma level-time curve (AUC tau) was 597 +/- 70 ng/ml.h, total body clearance (CL) 15.8 +/- 1.8 l/h and elimination half-lives (t1/2 beta) 10.1 +/- 1.2 h. Cimetidine did not cause any significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol. Co-administration of rifampicin resulted in a decrease in Cssmax (43.0 +/- 6.9 ng/ml), AUC tau (397 +/- 54 ng/ml X h) and t1/2 beta (6.2 +/- 0.4 h). Accordingly, total body clearance increased to 23.8 +/- 2.5 l/h (p less than 0.05). In conclusion bisoprolol showed a statistically significant but probably clinically not important interaction with the enzyme-inducing drug rifampicin, but not with the enzyme inhibitor cimetidine.

Influence of rifampicin treatment on antipyrine clearance and metabolite formation in patients with tuberculosis

The influence of an 8-day therapy with rifampicin (600 mg daily) was studied on antipyrine plasma clearance and metabolite formation in seven patients with tuberculosis (age 18-79 years), who were also treated with isoniazid and pyrazinamide. After rifampicin treatment the elimination half-life of antipyrine had decreased in all patients from 12.9 +/- 5.0 to 8.8 +/- 2.0 h (P less than 0.05). Antipyrine clearance had increased from 2.2 +/- 0.9 to 2.9 +/- 0.7 l/h (P less than 0.05), while no change in apparent volume of distribution was observed. The increase in antipyrine clearance was primarily due to a selective increase in the rate of formation of norantipyrine by 80% from 6.9 +/- 3.4 to 12.4 +/- 3.4 ml/min. Rifampicin seems to induce preferentially the cytochrome P-450 (iso-) enzyme(s) involved in the demethylation of antipyrine to norantipyrine. Other pathways of antipyrine metabolism were hardly affected. This provides further evidence for the involvement of different iso-enzymes of the cytochrome P-450 system in antipyrine metabolism in man.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antituberculosis drugs

The quantitative aspects of the disposition in man of 12 antituberculosis drugs [isoniazid, rifampicin, (rifampin), ethambutol, para-aminosalicylic acid, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, kanamycin, ethionamide, cycloserine, capreomycin, viomycin and thiacetazone] are reviewed. Isoniazid appears to be the only agent for which plasma concentrations and clearance are related to hereditary differences in acetylator status and for which there is an appreciable 'first-pass' effect. Recent data cast doubt on the suggestion that isoniazid may be more hepatotoxic for rapid as opposed to slow acetylators. Continuous administration of rifampicin leads to induction of enzymes in the liver with a concomitant decrease in maximum plasma concentrations, the time required to achieve this level, elimination half-life, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Coadministration of para-aminosalicylic acid leads to increases in the serum concentrations and elimination half-life of isoniazid. With a few exceptions, the metabolites of the antituberculosis drugs are devoid of antimicrobial activity; the exceptions are 25-desacetylrifampicin which accounts for approximately 80% of the drug's antimicrobial activity in human bile, the acetylated and glycylated metabolites of para-aminosalicylic acid, and the sulphoxide metabolites of ethionamide. The effect of renal impairment is relatively unimportant for the excretion of isoniazid, rifampicin and para-aminosalicylic acid, but the elimination half-life of streptomycin increases to 100 hours when the blood urea nitrogen level is greater than 100mg/100ml, and ototoxicity is strikingly more frequent. In states of malnutrition, such as kwashiorkor, the protein binding of para-aminosalicylic acid decreases from 15% to essentially zero and in the case of ethionamide and streptomycin binding decreases by 6% and 16% respectively. Of the data concerning age-related effects, most notable are the prolonged elimination half-life of isoniazid in neonates (up to 19.8 hours), and the lower peak serum concentrations of rifampicin in children of one-third to one-tenth those of adults following a similar dose on a weight basis. For kanamycin, the maximum plasma concentration varies inversely with age but is not influenced by birthweight; however, the clearance is directly dependent upon birthweight and postnatal age. For the elderly, age is an insignificant factor for the elimination of isoniazid when compared with young adults of similar acetylator status, and the metabolism of rifampicin may be considered globally unaltered in this age group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Prediction of metabolic drug interactions involving beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs

There is evidence, from human and animal studies, that drug-metabolising enzymes exist in multiple forms, the individual enzymes having selective, but not specific, substrate requirements. Consequently drug interactions may arise when two drugs bind to the same enzyme. The degree of enzyme inhibition will be partly dependent on the relative affinities of the drugs for the enzyme and on their rates of turnover. The decrease in drug clearance produced by enzyme inhibition is dependent on the fraction of the drug normally metabolised by the inhibited pathway(s). Cimetidine, a P-450 enzyme inhibitor, increases the systemic bioavailability of propranolol and labetalol, which undergo extensive metabolism, but does not affect the clearance of atenolol, which is excreted largely unchanged. In this situation, both the extent and type of biotransformation are important. Thus, cimetidine has no effect on the clearance of penbutolol, even though the drug is eliminated almost entirely by biotransformation. The major metabolite is penbutolol glucuronide, and it has been shown recently that cimetidine does not inhibit glucuronylation. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers also act as enzyme inhibitors themselves. For example, antipyrine clearance is decreased by propranolol and to a lesser extent by metoprolol, whereas atenolol has no effect. It has been suggested, therefore, that there is a relationship between the lipid-solubility of beta-adrenoceptor blockers and their ability to inhibit drug metabolism. The clearance of lipophilic beta-adrenoceptor blockers is dependent on hepatic enzyme activity, and is therefore sensitive to enzyme induction. For drugs with high hepatic clearance and subsequent high presystemic elimination, a moderate increase in the extraction ratio will produce a marked decrease in systemic bioavailability. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enzyme induction and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs

All beta-adrenergic receptor blockers that require metabolism prior to elimination are potentially subject to drug interactions due to enzyme induction. However, data is only available in man for propranolol, metoprolol and alprenolol. Cross-sectional population studies suggest that environmental factors, such as smoking in the young, are able to influence the oral clearance of propranolol. Long-term studies comparing within-subject clearances of metoprolol, alprenolol and propranolol before and after rifampicin and pentobarbitone, indicate that oral clearance is increased by 50%-500%. Inducing agents can influence intrinsic clearance, liver blood flow, and protein binding in addition to drug metabolising ability, indicating that changes in pharmacokinetic disposition may be complex. Enzyme induction exhibits both dose and time dependency relationships. The maximal extent of enzyme induction is similar between subjects. The range of intersubject variation in drug metabolism is similar before and after induction. The reduction in steady-state beta-adrenergic receptor drug concentration following enzyme induction is sufficiently large that an altered pharmacodynamic response would be expected if no dosage modification is made.

Induction of propranolol metabolism by rifampicin

The effect of rifampicin on the blood concentration-time curve of propranolol at steady-state following oral administration of 120 mg every 8 h was investigated in six normal, young, male subjects. After an initial 2 week dosing period, all individuals additionally received 600 mg rifampicin daily for 3 weeks followed by a 4 week period during which again only the propranolol was given. In four of the subjects the effects of 900 and 1200 mg rifampicin daily was also studied. Changes in disposition were assessed by estimation of propranolol's oral clearance and elimination half-life during the dosage interval. Rifampicin (600 mg/day) caused a large increase in propranolol's oral clearance (35.7 +/- 16.3 vs 96.1 +/- 26.9 ml min-1 kg-1, mean +/- s.d.), but neither the elimination half-life nor extent of plasma binding were affected. Increasing the daily dosage to 900 and 1200 mg did not cause any additional changes in oral clearance. Four weeks after discontinuing rifampicin, propranolol's oral clearance had essentially returned to its pre-induction level. The oral clearance of propranolol was significantly smaller (89.5 +/- 14.4%) during the dosage interval immediately after administration of the last rifampicin dose than the value measured 24 h later. The findings are consistent with rifampicin causing induction of the drug metabolizing enzymes responsible for propranolol's biotransformation. The marked reduction in the steady-state propranolol blood concentration that results from chronic rifampicin administration would be expected to result in a significant change in clinical effectiveness of the beta-adrenoceptor blocker when the two drugs are used concurrently.

Beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs: adverse reactions and drug interactions

Beta adrenoceptor blocking drugs are relatively well tolerated and adverse reactions to them are not common. The ones that do occur are reviewed in this paper under the following headings: Short term adverse reactions, drug interactions, long term adverse reactions, risks in pregnancy and hazards of abrupt withdrawal. Predictable short term effects may be caused either by the actions of these drugs on the beta 1- or beta 2-receptors. The beta 1 adverse effects are hypotension, bradycardia and cardiac failure; these are best avoided by not giving beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs to susceptible patients with cardiac disease. The beta 2 adverse effects on the bronchi, the peripheral arteries and various metabolic functions may be reduced to some extent by using a relatively cardioselective drug. Unpredictable short term effects such as fatigue, sexual dysfunction and gastrointestinal symptoms may occur but are not common problems with this group of drugs. Similarly, serious drug interactions are infrequent. Under the heading of long term adverse effects the practolol problem and the risk of causing malignant disorders have been considered. There is no evidence that any of the currently available drugs will cause either a practolol syndrome or malignant disease in man. However, the need for careful appraisal by drug regulatory bodies and continued vigilance by all prescribers of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs remains. The possible adverse effects of treatment during pregnancy are also considered. It now appears that beta-adrenoceptor drugs can be used safely in pregnancy but since neonatal bradycardia and hypoglycemia may occur, care should be taken to look for these complications. A serious deterioration may occur when beta-adrenoceptor drugs, given to patients with significant ischemic heart disease, are suddenly stopped. This is a rare occurrence but prescribers should be aware of it.