Increased breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis with B-domain deleted factor VIII - a robust meta-analytic finding

Safety of recombinant coagulation factors in treating hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, new FVIII/IX concentrates have been developed for the treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A/B. Significant progress has been achieved regarding their half-life, but the old issue of immunogenicity and new concerns about safety need to be addressed.

AREAS COVERED

After the implementation of virucidal methods, both plasma-derived and recombinant clotting factor concentrates achieved a very safe profile. The development of anti-FVIII antibodies is the major adverse event of replacement therapy with both FVIII concentrates. Furthermore, the new extended half-life concentrates, protein fused or pegylated, raised some concerns about their side effects.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of hemophilia A with inhibitors by induction of immunotolerance and using by-passing concentrates, improved the quality of life of patients but did not allow them to have a life expectancy like that of patients without inhibitors. The new humanized monoclonal antibody (MAb) ACE910, mimicking FVIII function, seems to be able to reduce the bleedings of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. The post-marketing surveillance will clarify if the adverse events observed during the phase III clinical trials and compassionate use were due to the association with a Prothrombin activated complex concentrate or to the prothrombotic effect of the drug itself.

A critical appraisal of one-stage and chromogenic assays of factor VIII activity

Accurate and precise potency determination by manufacturers of different types of factor VIII product (plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII [rFVIII]) is vital to clinicians and patients using FVIII concentrates. A separate, but related, requirement is ascertaining the FVIII activity levels in clinical samples for diagnosing and treating hemophilia A. The one-stage clotting assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) are the main assays used for these measurements, with both assays being used for potency assignments, and the OSA also being widely used for clinical monitoring. Although the assays can produce concordant results, discrepancies often occur, e.g. when measuring FVIII levels in patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, or when assaying high-purity FVIII products. Modifications to rFVIII proteins, such as B-domain deletion (BDD), and technologies for improving the pharmacokinetic profile of rFVIII may exacerbate assay discrepancies. The CSA appears to be essentially unaffected by these modifications. However, the OSA underestimates the FVIII activity levels and therapeutic potential of some further modified BDD rFVIII products, especially those conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol); the extent of the effects is dependent on the specific OSA reagents used. Although the OSA remains the preferred choice for clinical monitoring in Europe and the USA, an awareness of the limitations of that assay has prompted more laboratories to adopt the CSA.

Recombinant factor VIII in the management of hemophilia A: current use and future promise

Hemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disorder due to mutation of the gene that encodes the coagulation protein factor VIII. Historically, prior to the availability of treatment with factor VIII preparations, most boys died from uncontrolled bleeding, either spontaneous bleeding or after injury, before reaching 20 years of age. One of the most impressive triumphs of modern medicine is that with current recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy, a boy born in the 21st century with severe hemophilia A can anticipate a normal life expectancy with essentially no permanent complications from bleeding. For severe hemophilia A, current optimal treatment should have two goals: first, to provide sufficient factor VIII to prevent spontaneous bleeding, and second, to provide sufficient factor VIII to have normal coagulation function after any trauma. However, the replacement therapy requires tremendous resources for effective use, and remains extraordinarily expensive. Thus there are opportunities for further advances in therapy for hemophilia A. Two major concerns continue to trouble current optimal treatment approaches: some patients will develop neutralizing antibodies during the first 50 infusions of therapeutic factor VIII, and second, to administer therapeutic factor VIII every other day in young boys often requires placement of a central venous access device, and such use carries the life-threatening risks of infection and thrombosis. Because of the effectiveness of current therapy, any new developments in treatment will require significant concerns for safety, both immediate and in the long term. A number of research groups seek to prolong the biological efficacy of infused recombinant factor VIII. Currently, one such promising development is in the advanced stages of clinical trial. The goals will be to improve further the quality of life of an individual with severe hemophilia A, and to reduce the burden of current treatment strategies on families and medical resources. Hopefully, the hemophilia community will continue to participate actively in the clinical trials needed to address these new challenges.

Haemophilia therapies

In the last few decades dramatic improvements in the management of haemophilia patients have occurred. Haemophilia has moved from a fatal or disabling disease to a hereditary disorder with available treatment and much better clinical outcomes. The safety of antihaemophilic factor concentrates has been dramatically improved and, in a multidisciplinary environment including haematologists, orthopaedic surgeons, paediatrics, infectiologists, specialised nurses and physiotherapists, complications related to haemophilia are now limited, markedly improving the quality of life of haemophiliacs. One can even think that the cure of haemophilia through gene therapy might occur in the next decades. Keeping this ultimate aim in mind, efforts at present are mainly focused on bioengineered Factor VIII/Factor IX concentrates with increased efficacy or longer half-life or decreased immunogenicity. In addition, several preclinical and clinical studies are being carried out for optimising and individually tailoring the therapeutic regimens of antihaemophilic therapies using global haemostasis tests in combination with the routine coagulation assays.

Role of the B domain in proteolytic inactivation of activated coagulation factor VIII by activated protein C and activated factor X

Hereditary deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII), haemophilia A, is treated by plasma-derived FVIII (pd-FVIII) or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) infusions. B-domain-deleted FVIII (BDD-rFVIII), although generally safe and effective, was less effective than pd-FVIII in prophylaxis -- evidenced by a 2.5-fold higher bleeding incidence. Assessment of BDD-rFVIII activity in chromogenic and one-stage clotting assays gives up to 50% difference in activity values. As earlier studies demonstrated identical activation and cofactor activity of BDD-rFVIII and pd-FVIII, we decided to study susceptibility of thrombin-activated pd-FVIII, full-length rFVIII and BDD-rFVIII to proteolytic inactivation by activated protein C (APC) and activated factor X (FXa) in a purified system. Proteolysis was monitored by Western blot using monoclonal antibodies C5 and R8B12 specific for the A1 and A2 domains, respectively. Inactivation was monitored by measuring the residual cofactor activity of FVIII forms in a one-stage clotting assay. Proteolysis of A1 and A2 domains of activated BDD-rFVIII proceeded 11 or 13 times faster than that of pd-FVIII or full-length rFVIII. Inactivation of activated BDD-rFVIII was two to three times faster by APC and five to six times faster by FXa. We suggest that differences in proteolytic inactivation may contribute to differences between BDD-rFVIII and pd-FVIII in assaying and in clinical use.

A postmarketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of ReFactoR (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with haemophilia A

This clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ReFacto (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A over a period of 6 months or 50 exposure days (EDs), whichever occurred first. Sixty patients, 58 previously treated and two previously untreated, were enrolled into this study. This was an open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study in which patients received prophylaxis or on-demand treatment as determined by their doctor. Surgical prophylaxis was evaluated in seven patients requiring elective surgery. Thirty-two patients aged <1 to 66 years (median 19.5) received prophylaxis and 28 patients, aged 1-71 years (median 33.5), received on-demand treatment. The majority of patients had severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 2%): 84.4% in the prophylaxis group and 85.7% in the on-demand group. Prophylaxis with ReFacto was associated with a median of 6.7 bleeds per year (range: 0-37). The investigator's assessment of final outcome for prophylactic treatment was excellent or effective for 93.1% of patients. ReFacto resolved 92.8% of bleeds with one or two infusions. The investigator's assessment was excellent or good for 98.2% of bleeds treated with ReFacto. Haemostasis was achieved for all seven surgical cases and ReFacto gave an excellent or good response for each. The nature and incidence of adverse events was as expected and no new safety concerns emerged. One previously treated patient (PTP) developed a high-titre inhibitor (maximum 75 BU) and one minimally treated patient (MTP) developed a low-titre inhibitor while on the study but eventually achieved high titres (maximum 30 BU) after immune tolerance therapy was initiated with a plasma-derived FVIII product. One previously untreated patient (PUP) developed a transient low-titre inhibitor (0.4 BU). Other serious adverse events (SAEs) were unrelated to study treatment. There were no allergic events. The results of this study are consistent with the previously published ReFacto pivotal studies.

Haemophilia A: from mutation analysis to new therapies

Haemophilia is caused by hundreds of different mutations and manifests itself in clinical conditions of varying severity. Despite being inherited in monogenic form, the clinical features of haemophilia can be influenced by other genetic factors, thereby confounding the boundary between monogenic and multifactorial disease. Unlike sufferers of other genetic diseases, haemophiliacs can be treated successfully by intravenous substitution of coagulation factors. Haemophilia is also the most attractive model for developing gene-therapy protocols, as the normal life expectancy of haemophiliacs allows the side effects of gene therapy, as well as its efficiency, to be monitored over long periods.