Non-genetic risk factors and the development of inhibitors in haemophilia: a comprehensive review and consensus report

Present status of scheduled vaccinations and vaccination-related bleeding in Chinese children with haemophilia

AIM

Many countries have detailed recommendations for haemophilia patients to reduce the risk of vaccination-related bleeding. However, data from developing countries are lacking. We investigated scheduled vaccinations and vaccination-related bleeding complications in Chinese children with haemophilia and analysed issues related to vaccinations.

METHODS

Children with haemophilia in the PUMCH Haemophilia Treatment Centre were contacted via telephone. We distributed a vaccination questionnaire to their parents. The severity of haemophilia, coagulation factor infusions before vaccination, injection mode, and vaccination-related complications were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 440 valid questionnaires were received from 27 of 34 provinces in China. 31.3% (138/440) of the children with haemophilia did not receive all of their vaccinations. Among the children who received vaccinations, 48.1% (197/409) experienced bleeding complications. In patients with severe haemophilia, those on regular prophylaxis had a lower incidence of local hematoma compared to those on intermittent or no prophylaxis (14.3% vs. 26.5% vs. 39.7%, P < 0.05). The incidence of local hematomas was lower by subcutaneous (SQ) injections than by intramuscular injections (24.6% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The vaccination rate is quite insufficient in Chinese children with haemophilia. Missed vaccinations are related to vaccination-related bleeding complications. Prophylaxis before vaccination and SQ injections would help reduce bleeding complications.

A post hoc analysis of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who developed inhibitors in the PUPs A-LONG trial

ABSTRACT

Inhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years old were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary end point. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe patients who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics and genotype) and nongenetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure and central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both patients who were inhibitor-positive and those who were inhibitor-negative (all P > .05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors (P = .028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Patients whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n = 5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n = 7; P = .033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n = 5; P = .047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are as important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02234323.

Final Results of the Prospective ADVATE® Immune Tolerance Induction Registry (PAIR) Study with Plasma- and Albumin-Free Recombinant Factor VIII

Introduction

Neutralizing antibodies to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) remain a major complication associated with FVIII replacement therapy.

Aim

To assess safety and efficacy of immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy with ADVATE^® (antihemophilic factor [recombinant] [rAHF]) in patients who participated in the Prospective ADVATE Immune Tolerance Induction Registry (PAIR) study.

Methods

The PAIR study was an international, multicenter, open-label, prospective, observational study in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors, prescribed rAHF ITI therapy in clinical practice. The primary endpoint was adverse event (AE) reporting; the secondary endpoints included incidence of central venous access device-related complications and success rates of ITI therapy. Maintenance of immune tolerance was monitored for 12 months post-ITI therapy.

Results

Of 44 patients, 36 completed ITI therapy, including 31 completing the 12-month follow-up. Most patients received rAHF 90–130 IU/kg/day (59.1%) and a mean of 6.0 doses/week; the median duration of rAHF ITI therapy during the PAIR study was 600 days. Overall, 284 AEs were reported; 56 AEs were serious, of which none were considered rAHF-related. Of 228 nonserious AEs, 14 (in six patients) were deemed rAHF-related: increase of FVIII inhibitors titer due to anamnestic response, nausea, catheter site pain, pyrexia, urticaria, upper respiratory tract infection, arthralgia, and hemarthrosis. None were severe or led to ITI discontinuation. Eighteen patients experienced ≥1 central venous access device-related complication, and 21 of 36 completers achieved a negative inhibitor titer. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of success for achievement of first negative titer at 18 months of ITI therapy was 68.3% (95% confidence interval 51.8–83.6%) among completers. Of patients with partial or complete success post-ITI, 87% (20/23) maintained immune tolerance at 12-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Data suggest that rAHF ITI therapy in the PAIR study was effective, with no unexpected safety signals reported.

Sports and Children with Hemophilia: Current Trends

Hemophilia is a sex-linked recessive disorder characterized by a lack of blood factors necessary for clotting. This review aims to investigate the benefits of sports activities in children with hemophilia in terms of both physical and psychological wellness. Sports activity is necessary for children with hemophilia to preserve joints’ range of motion, reduce joint bleeding, improve muscle mass and strength, enhance proprioception and prevent secondary chronic diseases. In the past, high-impact sports were usually forbidden in children with hemophilia because of their high bleeding risk. Recent studies, however, have shown that prophylaxis therapy can allow a hemophilic child to take part in vigorous activities or high-impact sports. The benefits of sports activity in children with hemophilia are expressed by a better muscular trophism and an improved bone mineral density. Moreover, physical activity has a positive impact on children’s psychosocial well-being. Due to prophylaxis therapy, the quality of life of children with hemophilia is similar to their peers, and this has allowed an improvement in sports participation, including team sports.

Judicialization of coagulation factors in severe hemophilia: compliance with the care protocol and associated factors Judicialization and severe hemophilia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the compliance with the assistance protocol and factors associated with the judicialization of coagulation factors in severe hemophilia patients.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2015 to May 2016 in adults with severe hemophilia in the Federal District, Brazil using data from their medical records and the Hemovida Web Coagulopathies System.

RESULTS

One-hundred and three patients from Federal District, the capital of Brazil, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 34.6±10.1. Ninety-three received prophylactic treatment (90.3%) and 53 received recombinant coagulation factors (51.7%). Judicialization occurred in 21 cases (20.4%), 13 of whom disagreed with the assistance protocol (12.6%). In the univariate analysis, an association was observed between reduced judicialization and treatment (4.8 vs. 47.6%; p<0.001) in the hemophilia treatment center and an increase that was associated with use of the recombinant coagulation factor in disagreement with the protocol (38.1 vs. 6.1%; p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the odds ratio for judicialization was 0.081 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.010-0.055) for treatment at the hemophilia treatment center and 5.067 (95%CI 1.392-18.446) for the use of recombinant coagulation factor not in compliance with the protocol. More inhibitor development in judicialized patients (33.3 vs. 4.9%; p<0.001) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of judicialization should be questioned, especially regarding coagulation factor prescriptions that are not in compliance with the protocol. The expense resulting from judicialization has not shown any benefit, and an even greater development of inhibitors during treatment in judicialized patients was found.

A previously treated severe haemophilia A patient developed high-titre inhibitor after vaccinations

The factor VIII (FVIII)-neutralizing antibody (inhibitor) seen in 25%–30% of patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA). Vaccination is a non-genetic risk factor of inhibitor development as ‘danger signal’ which may provide a pro-inflammatory microenvironment to increase FVIII immunogenicity. We reported a previously treated SHA patient postponed the first vaccination to 15-month age received diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus intramuscularly. At 18-month age, the patient received Hepatitis A intramuscularly and Varicella Zoster Virus subcutaneously with 2 weeks interval and FVIII infusion was given <24 h prior for each. Successive bleedings occurred 1 week later with inefficacy of FVIII replacement. High-titre inhibitor was tested at 117 exposure days. This case suggested that continuous vaccinations in close proximity to FVIII could induce inhibitor. The relationship between vaccination and FVIII immunogenicity still needs to be revealed by further study.

Clinical Care of Bone Health in Patients on the Immune Tolerance Induction's Protocols With an Immunosuppressive Agent for Inhibitor Eradication in Hemophilia

Nowadays, the development of factor VIII and IX inhibitors in patients with hemophilia is considered as the most challenging in the treatment of hemophilia. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is an approach for eradication of inhibitors. Some ITI protocols are routinely in use for the eradication of inhibitors in patients with hemophilia. Moreover, such a therapeutic regimen may facilitate the tendency to reduced bone density in patients with inhibitor. This study scheduled to investigate whether that predisposing role of ITI protocols with an immunosuppressive agent has considered or not. By a literature review, published ITI protocols in hemophilia with inhibitors were evaluated. Among them, 51 papers found and studied thoroughly. None of them had performed the bone mineral examination in patients with hemophilia and inhibitor under treatment. Since there are 2 coexisting facilitating factors in these protocols, considering the bone mineral density study for patients with inhibitor who are undergoing ITI protocols with an immunosuppressive agent is recommended.

Inhibitor development in mild haemophilia after a major surgery for periampullary cancer (Whipple's procedure) in an elderly man

Around the world, with the availability of factor concentrates, patients with haemophilia have undergone major and minor surgeries. Inhibitor development in early postoperative period leading to inadequate factor recovery and ongoing bleeding is a nightmare for both operating surgeon as well as haematologists. We describe a case of an elderly man with mild haemophilia A, who was diagnosed with pancreatic carcinoma and underwent Whipple's procedure. After an uneventful procedure, he developed high-titre inhibitors and bleeding a week after surgery posing major challenges in his management. The case highlights the importance of experienced surgeons, trained haematologists, regular monitoring of factor assay/inhibitors, adequate factor and bypassing-agent support while performing such procedures.

Incidence of inhibitor development in PUPs with severe Haemophilia A in the CEE region between 2005 and 2015

INTRODUCTION

This study analyses real-world data on 144 previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe Haemophilia A, from seven countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Serbia, and Slovenia), over a period of 11 years. It analyses the risk factors associated with development of inhibitors to factor VIII concentrates.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard risk of factors possibly influencing the development of inhibitors. Patients were followed for up to 100 exposure days (EDs).

RESULTS

Cumulative inhibitor incidence at the time of 100 EDs was 18.7%, slightly lower than the 25-35% incidence reported in most studies. Of PUPs who developed inhibitors, a majority (56%) developed them within the first 20 EDs and 88% by the 50th ED. FVIII class (recombinant or plasma-derived) did not influence the inhibitors' incidence rate (p = 0.64). We found a significant protective effect of prophylaxis compared to on-demand treatment (p = 0.003). PUPs who had an intensive peak treatment during the first 50 EDs were at significantly higher risk for inhibitor development (HR (95% CI) 5.3 (2.3-12.5), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Inhibitors are and will continue to be the most significant complication of haemophilia treatment with factor concentrates. This is particularly true for haemophilia A. In our cohort, we were able to show that the treatment regimen used during first 50EDs influenced significantly the inhibitor risk, but the class of the factor concentrate did not play an important role. Real world data will remain one of the important resources for improving our knowledge of haemophilia.

Origins, Development, Current Challenges and Future Directions with Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Treatment of Patients with Congenital Haemophilia with Inhibitors

Congenital haemophilia A (HA) is caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, leading to spontaneous or traumatic bleeding events. While FVIII replacement therapy can treat and prevent bleeds, approximately 30% of patients with severe HA develop inhibitor antibodies that render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. The bypassing agents (BPAs), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated FVII, first approved in 1977 and 1996, respectively, act to generate thrombin independent of pathways that involve factors IX and VIII. Both may be used in patients with congenital haemophilia and inhibitors (PwHIs) for the treatment and prevention of acute bleeds and quickly became standard of care. However, individual patients respond differently to different agents. While both agents are approved for on-demand treatment and perioperative management for patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors, aPCC is currently the only BPA approved worldwide for prophylaxis in PwHI. Non-factor therapies (NFTs) have a mechanism of action distinct from BPAs and have reported higher efficacy rates as prophylactic regimens. Nonetheless, treatment challenges remain with NFTs, particularly regarding the potential for synergistic action on thrombin generation with concomitant use of other haemostatic agents, such as BPAs, for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds and in perioperative management. Concomitant use of NFTs with other haemostatic agents could increase the risk of adverse events such as thromboembolic events or thrombotic microangiopathy. This review focuses on the origins, development and on-going role of aPCC in the evolving treatment landscape in the management of PwHI.

National registry of haemophilia and other coagulopathies: A multisector initiative in the Colombian Health System

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia is an orphan and high-cost disease worldwide and, especially in middle-income countries as Colombia. Given its burden of disease, in 2014, a national administrative registry was created to centralize demographic, clinical and economic information regarding to haemophilia and other coagulopathies.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the building and implementation processes of the Colombian registry of haemophilia and other coagulopathies.

METHODS

The 'consensus conference' methodology was used to design the registry. It was a multisector process, which included different actors of the health system (healthcare payers and providers, government institutions, academic and scientific organizations and patients).

RESULTS

Colombia's national registry includes 95 variables, grouped in four sections: (1) sociodemographic data, (2) clinical condition, (3) economic costs, and (4) administrative updates. According to a resolution, stated by the Ministry of Health, payers and providers of healthcare must report annually to the registry the information of new and existing patients with coagulopathies.

CONCLUSIONS

A national registry serves as an organized and interactive system for monitoring morbidity and mortality, assessing healthcare access and its impact on disease complications, as well as associated costs to medical assistance. Furthermore, registry information can guide a rational making decision process to use economic resources efficiently. On the other hand, data about orphan diseases can encourage health research and evidence-based care to improve quality of life and reduce associated disability.

Concomitant Use of rFVIIa and Emicizumab in People with Hemophilia A with Inhibitors: Current Perspectives and Emerging Clinical Evidence

Emicizumab, a humanized, bi-specific, monoclonal antibody subcutaneously administered, mimicking the function of FVIIIa, represents a milestone in treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A complicated with inhibitors. The HAVEN 1 and 2 studies have clearly established its superiority compared to bypassing agents for routine prophylaxis in preventing or reducing bleeding episodes in adult and pediatric patients with inhibitors. However, its protection against bleeding is only partial, and concomitant use of a bypassing agent may be required with potential prothrombotic risk. The emicizumab Phase III trials (HAVEN 1, 2 and 4) have shown that the traditional bypassing agents, activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), may be necessary for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds or surgery management. A post hoc analysis in particular has shown that the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa is safe and no thrombotic events have been described. The review describes the state of the art of the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa for treating acute bleeding and surgeries, its efficacy and safety and the lack of thrombotic events associated with this treatment modality. Data still derive mainly from HAVEN trials; however, the availability of emicizumab in clinical practice is progressively increasing the number of patients treated and no adverse events directly attributed to this agent have occurred. The availability of guidelines for the use and dosing of rFVIIa during emicizumab prophylaxis is useful in clinical practice for managing suspected or ongoing bleeding, emergency situations and elective invasive procedures. In the next years, careful prospective post-licensure surveillance to monitor safety of rFVIIa use during prophylaxis with emicizumab is highly recommended.

Tolerance to FVIII: Role of the Immune Metabolic Enzymes Indoleamine 2,3 Dyoxigenase-1 and Heme Oxygenase-1

The occurrence of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies is a major complication in the treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A. The immune response to FVIII is a complex, multi-factorial process that has been extensively studied for the past two decades. The reasons why only a proportion of hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrates develop a clinically significant immune response is incompletely understood. The "danger theory" has been proposed as a possible explanation to interpret the findings of some observational clinical studies highlighting the possible detrimental impact of inflammatory stimuli at the time of replacement therapy on inhibitor development. The host immune system is often challenged to react to FVIII under steady state or inflammatory conditions (e.g., bleeding, infections) although fine tuning of mechanisms of immune tolerance can control this reactivity and promote long-term unresponsiveness to the therapeutically administered factor. Recent studies have provided evidence that multiple interactions involving central and peripheral mechanisms of tolerance are integrated by the host immune system with the environmental conditions at the time of FVIII exposure and influence the balance between immunity and tolerance to FVIII. Here we review evidences showing the involvement of two key immunoregulatory oxygenase enzymes (IDO1, HO-1) that have been studied in hemophilia patients and pre-clinical models, showing that the ability of the host immune system to induce such regulatory proteins under inflammatory conditions can play important roles in the balance between immunity and tolerance to exogenous FVIII.

Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation of Oxidized Recombinant Full-Length Factor VIII

Anti-drug antibodies to coagulation factor VIII (fVIII), often termed inhibitors, present the greatest economical and treatment related obstacle in the management of hemophilia A. Although several genetic and environmental risk factors associated with inhibitor development have been identified, the precise mechanisms responsible for the immune response to exogenous fVIII therapies remain undefined. Clinical trials suggest there is an increased immunogenic potential of recombinant fVIII compared to plasma-derived products. Additional biochemical and immunological studies have demonstrated that changes in recombinant fVIII production and formulation can alter fVIII structure and immunogenicity. Recently, one study demonstrated increased immunogenicity of the recombinant fVIII product Helixate in hemophilia A mice following oxidation with hypochlorite (ClO⁻). It is widely reported that protein aggregates within drug products can induce adverse immune reactions in patients. Several studies have therefore investigated the prevalence of molecular aggregates in commercial recombinant products with and without use-relevant stress and agitation. To investigate the potential link between oxidation-induced immunogenicity and molecular aggregation, we analyzed the recombinant fVIII product, Helixate, via sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation following oxidation with ClO⁻. At 80 μM ClO⁻, a concentration that reduced the specific-activity by 67%, no detectable increase in large molecular aggregates (s > 12 S) was observed when compared to non-oxidized fVIII. This lack of aggregates was demonstrated both in commercial excipient as well as a HEPES buffered saline formulation. These data suggest that oxidation induced immunogenicity is independent of aggregate-mediated immune response. Therefore, our data support multiple, independent mechanisms underlying fVIII immunogenicity.

Healthcare costs among patients with hemophilia A treated with factor replacement or bypassing agents

Objective: To assess real-world costs for patients with hemophilia A treated with bypassing agents versus factor VIII (FVIII) replacement. Methods: Claims data from a large US health insurer during 1 January 2006-30 September 2014 were used for analysis. Treated patients with hemophilia A were identified based on ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis code for hemophilia A (ICD-9-CM 286.0) and ≥1 medical or pharmacy claim for bypassing therapy and/or FVIII replacement during 1 January 2007-31 August 2014. The bypassing therapy cohort comprised patients with ≥1 claim for bypassing therapy; all others were assigned to the factor replacement therapy cohort. Post-index hemophilia-related costs were computed as combined health plan plus patient paid amounts for medical claims with hemophilia A diagnosis code or hemophilia therapy procedure code (bypassing therapy, FVIII replacement therapy, desmopressin, antifibrinolytic therapy), as well as pharmacy claims for hemophilia therapy. Results: The study sample represented 580 patients: 50 (8.6%) in the bypassing therapy cohort (mean age: 38.5 years; mean post-index period: 2.1 years) and 530 (91.4%) in the factor replacement therapy cohort (mean age: 29.3 years; mean post-index period: 2.7 years). Compared with the factor replacement therapy cohort, mean per-patient-per-month hemophilia-related total costs were 4.8-fold higher in the bypassing therapy cohort ($57,232 vs. $11,899), comprising 4.4-fold higher medical costs ($45,911 vs. $10,352) and 7.3-fold higher outpatient pharmacy costs ($11,321 vs. $1547). Conclusions: Patients with hemophilia A treated with bypassing agents between 2007 and 2014 incurred substantially higher monthly hemophilia-related medical and pharmacy costs than patients treated only with FVIII replacement.

Efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in patients with severe hemophilia A: a review of clinical trial data from the GENA program

Simoctocog alfa (human-cl rhFVIII, Nuwiq®) is a 4th generation recombinant FVIII (rFVIII), without chemical modification or fusion with any other protein/fragment. Nuwiq® is produced in a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293F), which ensures human-specific post-translational protein processing. Nuwiq® was evaluated in seven prospective clinical studies in 201 adult and pediatric previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. The NuProtect study in 110 previously untreated patients (PUPs) is ongoing. The mean half-life of Nuwiq® was 15.1–17.1 h in PTP studies with adults and adolescents, and 12.5 h in children aged 2–12 years. Clinical trials in PTPs demonstrated the efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in the prevention and treatment of bleeds and as surgical prophylaxis. In the NuPreviq study of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided personalized prophylaxis in 66 adult PTPs, 83% of patients had no spontaneous bleeds during 6 months of personalized prophylaxis and 57% were treated ⩽2 per week. No FVIII inhibitors were detected in PTPs after treatment with 43,267 injections and >80 million IU of Nuwiq®. Interim data for 66 PUPs with ⩾20 exposure days to Nuwiq® in NuProtect demonstrated a low cumulative high-titer inhibitor rate of 12.8% [actual incidence 12.1% (8/66)] and convincing efficacy and safety.

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The development of new biologic agents able to restore thrombin generation has become the focus of innovation in hemophilia management. There is growing interest in the proposal of novel, non-replacement therapy with alternative mechanisms of action and route of administration, hoping to solve still unmet needs in treatment of hemophilic patients with or without inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the new molecules, in particular the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII and/or those which work by inhibiting the natural anticoagulants, their mechanism of action and the results of ongoing clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Exciting results in enhancing the protection against bleeding and improving quality of life are emerging from clinical trials. However, these molecules with their mechanisms of action also open new problems. Treatment of bleeding and management of surgery in subjects with a rebalanced hemostasis may be difficult, especially for the lack of laboratory tests perfectly reflecting the in vivo coagulation status. A careful surveillance is required to evaluate the risk of thrombotic complication in patients with rebalanced hemostasis, in addition to understand whether these new products offer the same protection on joints as regular prophylaxis with the missing clotting factors.

Consensus statements on vaccination in patients with haemophilia-Results from the Italian haemophilia and vaccinations (HEVA) project

Vaccination against communicable diseases is crucial for disease prevention, but this practice poses challenges to healthcare professionals in patients with haemophilia. Poor knowledge of the vaccination requirements for these patients and safety concerns often result in vaccination delay or avoidance. In order to address this issue, a panel of 11 Italian haemophilia and immunization experts conducted a Delphi consensus process to identify the main concerns regarding the safe use of vaccines in patients with haemophilia. The consensus was based on a literature search of the available evidence, which was used by the experts to design 27 consensus statements. A group of clinicians then rated these statements using the 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The main issues identified by the expert panel included vaccination schedule for haemophilic patients; protocol and optimal route of vaccine administration; vaccination of haemophilic patients with antibodies inhibiting coagulation factor VIII (inhibitors); and vaccination and risk of inhibitor development. This manuscript discusses these controversial areas in detail supported by the available literature evidence and provides evidence‐ and consensus‐based recommendations. Overall, participants agreed on most statements, except those addressing the potential role of vaccination in inhibitor formation. Participants agreed that patients with haemophilia should receive vaccinations according to the institutional schedule for individuals without bleeding disorders; however, vaccination of patients with haemophilia requires comprehensive planning, taking into account disease severity, type and route of vaccination, and bleeding risk. Data also suggest vaccination timing does not need to take into consideration when the patient received factor VIII replacement.

Pathogenic immune response to therapeutic factor VIII: exacerbated response or failed induction of tolerance?

Therapeutic factor VIII is highly immunogenic. Despite intensive research in the last decades, the reasons why 5-30% of patients with hemophilia A (of all severities) develop inhibitory anti-factor VIII antibodies (inhibitors) following replacement therapy remain an enigma. Under physiological conditions, endogenous factor VIII is recognized by the immune system. Likewise, numerous observations indicate that, in hemophilia A patients without inhibitors, exogenous therapeutic factor VIII is immunologically assessed and tolerated. A large part of the research on the immunogenicity of therapeutic factor VIII is attempting to identify the ‘danger signals’ that act as adjuvants to the deleterious anti-factor VIII immune responses. However, several of the inflammatory assaults concomitant to factor VIII administration initially hypothesized as potential sources of danger signals (e.g., bleeding, infection, and vaccination) have been disproved to be such signals. Conversely, recent evidence suggests that cells from inhibitor-negative patients are able to activate anti-inflammatory and tolerogenic mechanisms required to suppress deleterious immune responses, while cells from inhibitor-positive patients are not. Based on the available observations, we propose a model in which all hemophilia A patients develop anti-factor VIII immune responses during replacement therapy irrespective of associated danger signals. We further postulate that the onset of clinically relevant factor VIII inhibitors results from an inability to develop counteractive tolerogenic responses to exogenous factor VIII rather than from an exacerbated activation of the immune system at the time of factor VIII administration. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies will have repercussions on the clinical management of patients and highlight new strategies to achieve active immune tolerance to therapeutic factor VIII.

Prevalence of factor VIII inhibitors among Afghan patients with hemophilia A: a first report

: Prevalence of inhibitors in Afghan hemophilia patients has not been reported previously. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of factor VIII inhibitors among hemophilia A patients from the Kabul province of Afghanistan to identify and characterize the pattern of inhibitor formation. Clinical information and blood samples were collected from three hemophilia centers in Kabul, Afghanistan. Plasma samples were obtained from 62 patients with severe (80.5%) and 15 patients with moderate hemophilia A (19.5%) in this cross-sectional study design. All the patients were receiving on-demand treatment. The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used to detect inhibitors. Multiplex PCR, inverse-PCR, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and direct sequencing were performed for genotyping. Inhibitor activity was detected in one out of 15 (6.7%) patients with moderate hemophilia and in six out of 62 (9.7%) with severe disease. Apart from the intron 22 inversion, five different mutations including one missense, two large and two small deletions were detected. This is the first report showing that the prevalence of inhibitors in Afghan hemophilia A patients is much lower than in other populations.

Practical aspects of extended half-life products for the treatment of haemophilia

Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are congenital X-linked bleeding disorders caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX), respectively. The preferred treatment option for patients with haemophilia is replacement therapy. For patients with severe disease, prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor is the treatment of choice; this has been shown to reduce arthropathy significantly, reduce the frequency of bleeds and improve patients' quality of life. Prophylaxis with standard recombinant factor requires regular intravenous infusion at least two (FIX) to three (FVIII) times a week. Recombinant FVIII and FIX products with an extended half-life are in development, or have been recently licensed. With reported mean half-life extensions of 1.5-1.8 times that of standard products for FVIII and 3-5 times that of standard products for FIX, these products have the potential to address many of the unmet needs of patients currently treated with standard factor concentrates. For example, they may encourage patients to switch from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis and improve the quality of life of patients receiving prophylaxis. Indeed, extended half-life products have the potential to reduce the burden of frequent intravenous injections, reducing the need for central venous lines in children, promote adherence, improve outcomes, potentially allow for more active lifestyles and, depending on the dosing regimen, increase factor trough levels. Members of the Zürich Haemophilia Forum convened for their 19th meeting to discuss the practicalities of incorporating new treatments into the management of people with haemophilia. This review of extended half-life products considers their introduction in haemophilia treatment, including the appropriate dose and schedule of infusions, laboratory monitoring, patient selection, safety considerations, and the economic aspects of care.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Product type and other environmental risk factors for inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A

The development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies is currently the most challenging complication of treatment, affecting ~30% of severe hemophilia A patients. These inhibitors inactivate FVIII, rendering the treatment ineffective, causing disability and increasing morbidity and mortality. Inhibitor development results from a complex multicausal immune response involving both genetic and environmental risk factors. One of the most important modifiable risk factors is the source of FVIII products, eg, plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII. Other environmental risk factors, such as age at first treatment, regimen, and intensity of treatment, could contribute to inhibitor development. Severe bleeds, surgery, concomitant infections, or vaccinations may all be events initiating danger signaling resulting in an immune reaction towards administered FVIII. All in all, the etiology of inhibitor development still remains unclear. The risk factors have been stratified into genetic and environmental, but there are no definitive data to determine the impact of each of them.

Oxidation of factor VIII increases its immunogenicity in mice with severe hemophilia A

The development of antibodies against therapeutic factor VIII (FVIII) represents the major complication of replacement therapy in patients with severe hemophilia A. Amongst the environmental risk factors that influence the anti-FVIII immune response, the presence of active bleeding or hemarthrosis has been evoked. Endothelium damage is typically associated with the release of oxidative compounds. Here, we addressed whether oxidation contributes to FVIII immunogenicity. The control with N-acetyl cysteine of the oxidative status in FVIII-deficient mice, a model of severe hemophilia A, reduced the immune response to exogenous FVIII. Ex vivo exposure of therapeutic FVIII to HOCl induced a mild oxidation of the molecule as evidenced by the loss of free amines and resulted in increased FVIII immunogenicity in vivo when compared to native FVIII. The increased immunogenicity of oxidized FVIII was not reverted by treatment of mice with N-acetyl cysteine, and did not implicate an increased maturation of professional antigen-presenting cells. Our data document that oxidation influences the immunogenicity of therapeutic FVIII.

Low incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A treated with octanate® : Final report from a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Octanate^® is a human, plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with demonstrated haemostatic efficacy in previously treated patients with haemophilia A.

AIM

This prospective, open-label study aimed to assess the immunogenicity of octanate^® in previously untreated patients (PUPs).

METHODS

The study monitored development of FVIII inhibitors in 51 PUPs. Tolerability, viral safety, FVIII recovery and efficacy of octanate^® for the prevention and treatment of bleeds and in surgical procedures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Five (9.8%) of the 51 patients developed inhibitors during the study, 4 of which (7.8%) were high titre. Three inhibitor cases (5.9%) were considered clinically relevant; 2 were transient inhibitors that disappeared during regular octanate^® treatment without a change in dose or treatment frequency. Amongst 45 patients with FVIII:C <1% at baseline and who received ≥20 exposure days (EDs) or had <20 EDs but developed an inhibitor, inhibitor incidence was 11.1% (6.7% clinically relevant). All clinically relevant inhibitors developed within 20 EDs of on-demand treatment. No inhibitors developed in PUPs receiving prophylaxis. All patients who developed inhibitors had either intron 22 inversions or large deletions. Irrespective of the reason for administration, haemostatic efficacy was rated as "excellent" in 99.6% of all infusions (4700 of 4717 infusions), and no complications were reported in 23 surgical procedures. Mean incremental in vivo recovery was 2.0%/IU/kg (±0.7) and 1.9%/IU/kg (±0.5) for the first and second assessments, respectively. Tolerability was rated "very good" in 99.9% of infusions.

CONCLUSION

In PUPs with severe haemophilia A, octanate^® demonstrated haemostatic efficacy with a low rate of inhibitor development.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The prevention of bleeding by prophylactic factor replacement is the recommended approach for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis should be individualized to provide the best clinical benefit to each patient. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic approach is crucial. Areas covered: This review aims to concisely describe the basic principles of pharmacokinetics of FVIII, the role of population pharmacokinetic, the available different recombinant FVIII concentrates and the new extended half-life FVIII molecules with possible improvement in hemophilia A treatment. Expert opinion: Pharmacokinetic is a useful tool to predict the outcome of replacement therapy, even though a large inter-individual variability exists, becauseof several factors: age, weight, von Willebrand factor level, blood group, active bleed, presence of inhibitors to FVIII, FVIII concentrate. Among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates pharmacokinetic differences are minor and clinically not significant. The extended half-life FVIII products brings only moderate advances, as half life extension is limited to 1.5-1.8-fold in comparison to that of native FVIII. Thus, infusions could be done every fourth, rarely fifth day to ensure a safe through level and a significant benefit can be offered only to patients treated every other day or three times weekly.

Analyses of the FranceCoag cohort support differences in immunogenicity among one plasma-derived and two recombinant factor VIII brands in boys with severe hemophilia A

Around one third of boys with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies) against their therapeutic factor VIII product. This adverse effect may result in more life-threatening bleeding, disability, impaired quality of life, and costly care. We compared the incidence of inhibitors in boys treated with the three factor VIII products most used in France: one plasma-derived (Factane) and two recombinant products (Advate and Kogenate Bayer). A previously untreated cohort of patients was created in 1994 to investigate risk factors for inhibitor development. We selected boys with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII <1 IU/dL) first treated with one of the three factor VIII products studied. Details of product infusions, inhibitor assays and main fixed and time-varying inhibitor risk factors were recorded for the first 75 exposure days. Three outcomes (all inhibitors, high-titer inhibitors and subsequently treated inhibitors) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox models. We studied 395 boys first treated between 2001 and 2016 (131, 137, and 127 with Factane, Advate, and Kogenate Bayer, respectively). Clinically significant inhibitors were diagnosed in 121 patients (70 high-titer). The incidence of high-titer inhibitors was significantly associated with the factor VIII product received (P=0.005): the cumulative incidence at 75 exposure days was 12.7% (95% CI: 7.7-20.6) with Factane, 20.4% (95% CI: 14.0-29.1) with Advate, and 31.6% (95% CI: 23.5-41.7) with Kogenate Bayer. The low inhibitor incidence observed with Factane is concordant with recent findings from the SIPPET randomized trial. These consistent results from observational and experimental studies should lead to improved care for previously untreated patients and cost savings for healthcare systems worldwide.

Bypassing agent prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

People with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors are at high risk of bleeding complications. Infusion of bypassing agents, such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate, are suggested as alternative therapies to factor VIII (haemophilia A) or IX (haemophilia B) for individuals who no longer respond to these treatments because they develop inhibitory antibodies. The ultimate goal of treatment is to preserve the individual's joints, otherwise destroyed by recurrent bleeds.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of bypassing agent prophylaxis to prevent bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for relevant studies from the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched trial registries (16 February 2017) and bibliographic references of retrieved studies were reviewed for potential articles to be included in the review.Date of the last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Coagulopathies Trials Register: 12 December 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies (cross-over or parallel design) evaluating the effect of prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents compared with on-demand treatment, or studies evaluating the effects of high-dose compared with low-dose prophylaxis in males of any age with hemophilia with inhibitors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias according to standard Cochrane criteria. They assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four randomized studies (duration 7 to 15 months) involving 116 males. Risk of bias was judged to be high in two studies due to the open-label study design and in one study due to attrition bias.Two studies compared on-demand treatment to prophylaxis with bypassing agents. In one study (34 males) prophylaxis significantly reduced mean overall bleeding rates, MD - 7.27 (95% CI -9.92 to -4.62) (low quality evidence), mean number of overall bleeding events per month, MD -1.10 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.66), mean number of hemarthrosis, MD -6.60 (95% CI -9.32 to -3.88) (low quality evidence) and mean number of joints that had hemarthrosis, MD -0.90 (95% CI -1.36 to -0.44). The meta-analysis did not conclusively demonstrate significant benefit of prophylaxis on health-related quality of life as measured by Haem-A-QoL score, EQ-5D total score and utility score, EQ-5D VAS and SF-36 physical summary and mental summary score (low quality evidence for all health-related quality of life analyses).The remaining two studies compared dose regimens. The results from one study (22 males) did not conclusively demonstrate benefit or harm of high-dose versus low-dose recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as a prophylaxis for overall bleeding rate, MD -0.82 (95% CI -2.27 to 0.63) (moderate quality evidence), target joint bleeding rate, MD -3.20 (95% CI -7.23 to 0.83) (moderate quality evidence) and serious adverse events, RR 9.00 (95% CI, 0.54 to 149.50) (moderate quality evidence).The overall quality of evidence was moderate to low due to imprecision from limited information provided by studies with small sample sizes and incomplete outcome data in one study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that prophylaxis with bypassing agents may be effective in reducing bleeding in males with hemophilia with inhibitors. However, there is a lack of evidence for the superiority of one agent over the other or for the optimum dosage regimen. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of prophylaxis treatment on health-related quality of life, as well as the effects of dose of bypassing agents on the outcomes.

Subcutaneous diphtheria and tetanus vaccines in children with haemophilia: A pilot study and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous (SQ) vaccination has emerged as standard of care in children with severe bleeding disorders to reduce unnecessary factor exposure and avoid provoking an intramuscular bleed, but little is known about comparative immunogenicity to intramuscular (IM) vaccination.

AIM

To confirm immunogenicity of Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccines administered SQ to individuals <6 years old with haemophilia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective and prospective pilot study of tetanus and diphtheria antibody titres among patients evaluated at our Haemophilia Treatment Centre between 2015-2016. Children with haemophilia who had received three to four doses of DTaP containing vaccine administered SQ were eligible.

RESULTS

Eight children met inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of diphtheria and tetanus antibody testing was 21.1±17.8 months. All children who received SQ diphtheria and tetanus developed a positive antibody titre to both antigens. There was no statistically significant difference in distribution of titre values. The average time between the last dose of vaccine and antibody testing was 6.6±3.9 months among SQ vaccinated subjects. Minor injection site reactions were common with SQ vaccines.

CONCLUSION

SQ administration of diphtheria and tetanus vaccination appears to be immunogenic in a pilot study of Haemophilia patients and supports this practice as the standard of care for this population.

Hemophilia Care in the Pediatric Age

Hemophilia is the most common of the severe bleeding disorders and if not properly managed since early infancy can lead to chronic disease and lifelong disabilities. However, it enjoys the most efficacious and safe treatment among the most prevalent monogenic disorders. Hemophilia should be considered in the neonatal period in the case of unusual bleeding or in the case of positive family history. Later, hemophilia should be suspected mainly in males because of abnormal bruising/bleeding or unusual bleeding following invasive procedures-for example, tonsillectomy or circumcision. Prophylactic treatment that is started early with clotting-factor concentrates has been shown to prevent hemophilic arthropathy and is, therefore, the gold standard of care for hemophilia A and B in most countries with adequate resources. Central venous access catheters and arterovenous fistulas play an important role in the management of hemophilia children requiring repeated and/or urgent administration of coagulation factor concentrates. During childhood and adolescence, personalized treatment strategies that suit the patient and his lifestyle are essential to ensure optimal outcomes. Physical activity is important and can contribute to better coordination, endurance, flexibility and strength. The present article focuses also on questions frequently posed to pediatric hematologists like vaccinations, day-care/school access and dental care.

Treatment and Prevention of Bleeds in Haemophilia Patients with Inhibitors to Factor VIII/IX

The development of alloantibodies neutralising therapeutically administered factor (F) VIII/IX (inhibitors) is currently the most severe complication of the treatment of haemophilia. When persistent and at a high titre, inhibitors preclude the standard replacement treatment with FVIII/FIX concentrates, making patients’ management challenging. Indeed, the efficacy of bypassing agents, i.e., activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), needed to overcome the haemostatic interference of the inhibitor, is not comparable to that of factor concentrates. In addition, the therapeutical response is unpredictable, with a relevant inter-individual and even intra-individual variability, and no laboratory assay is validated to monitor the efficacy and safety of the treatment. As a result, inhibitor patients have a worse joint status and quality of life compared to inhibitor-free subjects and the eradication of the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction is the preeminent therapeutic goal, particularly in children. However, over the last decades, treatment with bypassing agents has been optimised, allowing home treatment and the individualisation of regimens aimed at improving clinical outcomes. In this respect, a growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of prophylaxis with both bypassing agents in reducing bleeding rates and improving the quality of life, although the impact on long-term outcomes (in particular on preventing/reducing joint deterioration) is still unknown. This review offers an update on the current knowledge and practice of the use of bypassing agents in haemophiliacs with inhibitors, as well as on debated issues and unmet needs in this challenging setting.

The prevalence of factor VIII and IX inhibitors among Saudi patients with hemophilia: Results from the Saudi national hemophilia screening program

Hemophilia A and B are X-linked diseases that predominantly affect male patients. Patients can develop coagulation factor inhibitors, which exponentially increases the treatment cost. However, the prevalence of factor VIII and IX inhibitors in Saudi Arabia is unclear.This study aimed to determine the Saudi prevalence of factor VIII and IX inhibitors.This 4-year, 7-center, cross-sectional study evaluated the Saudi prevalences of hemophilia A and B. We collected the patients' clinical data, evaluated their disease, and tested for factor inhibitors.We included 202 patients with hemophilia (median age at diagnosis: 0.13 years, range: birth-34.8 years). The patients included 198 male patients (98%), 148 patients with hemophilia A (73.3%), and 54 patients with hemophilia B (26.7%). The patients exhibited severe factor VIII activity (<1%; 121 patients; 5.2%), moderate activity (1-5%; 7 patients; 4.9%), and mild activity (14 patients; 9.9%). Among the patients with care-related data, most patients were treated for episodic bleeding (76.8%) or received prophylaxis (22.6%); 1 patient received both treatments. Among the patients with source-related data, the factor replacements were derived from plasma (48.4%), recombinant concentrates (22.9%), both sources (14.6%), or fresh frozen plasma (14.1%). Factor VIII inhibitors were observed in 43 (29.3%) of the 147 patients, and only 1 of the 54 patients developed factor IX inhibitors. Most patients who developed inhibitors had severe hemophilia (40/44; 90.9%), and inhibitors were also common among patients who received recombinant products (14/43; 32.6%).The Saudi prevalence of factor inhibitors was similar to those among other ethnic populations.

Acquired Inhibitors to Multiple Coagulation Factors (V, IX, and XII) Identified in a Unique Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

An acquired formation of inhibitors to coagulation factors is a rare type of coagulopathy. The development of inhibitors for multiple coagulation factors has never been reported. A 75-year-old Japanese female underwent interventional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Five days after the last intervention, her prothrombin time decreased to 10%, and her activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) lengthened to 265.1 sec. The activities for coagulation factors showed significantly reduced activities (<10%) of factors V, IX, and XII. A cross-mixing test demonstrated an inhibitor pattern, and inhibitory antibodies against factors V, IX, and XII were detected. We discuss our patient's etiology and pathogenesis.

Bayesian approach to the assessment of the population-specific risk of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients: a case study

Background

Developing inhibitors is a rare event during the treatment of hemophilia A. The multifacets and uncertainty surrounding the development of inhibitors further complicate the process of estimating inhibitor rate from the limited data. Bayesian statistical modeling provides a useful tool in generating, enhancing, and exploring the evidence through incorporating all the available information.

Methods

We built our Bayesian analysis using three study cases to estimate the inhibitor rates of patients with hemophilia A in three different scenarios: Case 1, a single cohort of previously treated patients (PTPs) or previously untreated patients; Case 2, a meta-analysis of PTP cohorts; and Case 3, a previously unexplored patient population – patients with baseline low-titer inhibitor or history of inhibitor development. The data used in this study were extracted from three published ADVATE (antihemophilic factor [recombinant] is a product of Baxter for treating hemophilia A) post-authorization surveillance studies. Noninformative and informative priors were applied to Bayesian standard (Case 1) or random-effects (Case 2 and Case 3) logistic models. Bayesian probabilities of satisfying three meaningful thresholds of the risk of developing a clinical significant inhibitor (10/100, 5/100 [high rates], and 1/86 [the Food and Drug Administration mandated cutoff rate in PTPs]) were calculated. The effect of discounting prior information or scaling up the study data was evaluated.

Results

Results based on noninformative priors were similar to the classical approach. Using priors from PTPs lowered the point estimate and narrowed the 95% credible intervals (Case 1: from 1.3 [0.5, 2.7] to 0.8 [0.5, 1.1]; Case 2: from 1.9 [0.6, 6.0] to 0.8 [0.5, 1.1]; Case 3: 2.3 [0.5, 6.8] to 0.7 [0.5, 1.1]). All probabilities of satisfying a threshold of 1/86 were above 0.65. Increasing the number of patients by two and ten times substantially narrowed the credible intervals for the single cohort study (1.4 [0.7, 2.3] and 1.4 [1.1, 1.8], respectively). Increasing the number of studies by two and ten times for the multiple study scenarios (Case 2: 1.9 [0.6, 4.0] and 1.9 [1.5, 2.6]; Case 3: 2.4 [0.9, 5.0] and 2.6 [1.9, 3.5], respectively) had a similar effect.

Conclusion

Bayesian approach as a robust, transparent, and reproducible analytic method can be efficiently used to estimate the inhibitor rate of hemophilia A in complex clinical settings.

Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

A close insight to factor VIII inhibitor in the congenital hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A (HA) has an X-linked pattern of inheritance and is the most common of the hemorrhagic disorders. HA is caused by a decreased or deficiency of the functional clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and effects 1 in 5000-10,000 male births. The common treatment for hemophilia is replacement therapy by plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII. Approximately 20-30% of people with a severe type of HA develop an inhibitor and this phenomenon is the main challenge in the management of these patients. Genetic factors and environmental determinants contribute to inhibitor development. Here, the roles of various genetic and environmental factors such as the type of FVIII concentrate used, the number of exposure days, and peak treatment time will be discussed in detail. It seems this information is helpful for hematologists.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was done in January 2016 on PubMed and Scopus using the following keywords:' h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII inhibitor', 'h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII alloantibody', 'h(a)emophilia A & inhibitor'. There was no time limitation; however, there was an English language limitation placed on the articles selected. Expert commentary: Influential genetic and environmental factors in developing inhibitors have been discussed. Most of the risk factors are related to previously untreated patients with hemophili.