Loss of myoepithelium is variable in solid papillary carcinoma of the breast

Diagnostic Pitfalls in Breast Cancer Pathology With an Emphasis on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens

CONTEXT.—

Breast pathology has many mimics and diagnostic pitfalls. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions, particularly in the biopsy setting, can be especially challenging, with diagnostic errors having significant management implications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the pitfalls encountered when evaluating ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, providing histologic clues and guidance for appropriate use and interpretation of immunohistochemistry to aid in the correct diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from review of pertinent literature of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas and from the experience of the authors as practicing breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Awareness of the pitfalls in diagnosing breast cancers is important when creating a differential diagnosis for each breast lesion evaluated. This review will cover some of these scenarios to aid in the diagnostic process.

Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: does it have a native basement membrane?

BACKGROUND

Encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) is surrounded by a thick fibrous capsule-like structure, which is interpreted as a thickened basement membrane (BM). This study aimed to describe the geometric characteristics of the EPC capsule and to refine whether it is an expansion of the BM or a stromal reactive process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In all, 100 cases were divided into four groups: EPC, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), normal breast tissue and invasive tumours, with an additional encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma (EPTC) control group. Representative slides from each case were stained with picrosirius red (PSR) stain and examined using polarised microscopy. Images were analysed using ImageJ, CT-FIRE, and Curve align image analysis programmes.

RESULTS

Compared to the normal and DCIS BM, the EPC group showed a significant increase of collagen fibre width, straightness, and density, and a decrease of fibre length. The EPC capsule showed less alignment of fibres with a more perpendicular arrangement, and it was enriched with disorganised collagen type I (stromal collagen) fibres. Compared to other groups, the EPC capsule showed significant variation in the thickness, evenness, distribution of collagen fibres, and significant intracapsular heterogeneity. Compared to BM-like material in the invasive group, the EPC capsule showed a higher density of collagen fibres with longer, straighter, and more aligned fibres, but there was no difference in the distribution of both collagen types I and III. Conversely, compared to EPTC, there were no differences between both EPC and EPTC capsules except that the fibres in the EPC capsule were straighter. Although differences between normal ducts and lobules and DCIS BM collagen fibre density, straightness, orientation, and alignment were detected, both were significantly different from EPC capsule.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that the EPC capsule is a reactive process rather than a thickened native BM characteristic of normal and in situ lesions, which provides further evidence that EPC is an indolent invasive carcinoma based on capsule characteristics.

Canine and feline in situ mammary carcinoma: A comparative review

Carcinoma in situ of the breast is a well-known entity in humans. In veterinary medicine, particularly in canine and feline mammary literature, there is no agreement whether the term in situ should be used to indicate a specific carcinoma histotype or the noninvasive status of a carcinoma of any histotype. Moreover, in the most recent histologic classification of mammary tumors published by the Davis-Thompson Foundation, it is suggested to abandon the term carcinoma in situ given the lack of standardized criteria defining this entity, replacing it with epitheliosis or ductal/lobular hyperplasia with severe atypia. This publication presents a critical review of the term in situ in human and veterinary medicine considering the evolution of the term over the years and its heterogeneous use by different authors, including variations in immunohistochemical markers for classification. This review aims to point out the lack of uniformity in the nomenclature and classification issues in veterinary medicine regarding the use of the term in situ, laying the ground for a process of standardization in future publications.

Papillary lesions of the breast - review and practical issues

Papillary lesions of the breast represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasm featuring fibrovascular cores covered by epithelial cells with or without intervening myoepithelial cells. According to the World Health Organization classification of breast tumors, papillary lesions of the breast are further classified into intraductal papilloma (including intraductal papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia /ductal carcinoma in situ), papillary ductal carcinoma in situ, encapsulated papillary carcinoma, solid papillary carcinoma (in situ and invasive) and invasive papillary carcinoma. The overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles make accurate diagnosis of breast papillary lesion a challenge for pathologists. In this review, the morphological and relevant immunohistochemical features of papillary lesions are discussed, with further emphasis on some commonly encountered practical diagnostic issues. A simple diagnostic algorithm will be established. The relevant molecular characteristics will be discussed as well.

Quality Issues in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Breast Pathology

Immunohistochemistry techniques have been incorporated into surgical pathology for nearly a half-century and have since become intimately intertwined with its practice. In the realm of breast pathology, immunohistochemistry serves several purposes, including providing crucial prognostic and predictive data. Among its other applications, assessment of stromal invasion and establishment of mammary origin are crucial from a diagnostic standpoint. In these regards, sole reliance on immunohistochemistry may lead to misdiagnosis. In this review, we highlight pitfalls of immunohistochemistry commonly encountered in the practice of breast pathology and emphasize the importance of careful histopathological evaluation.

Papillary Neoplasms of the Breast: Diagnostic Features and Molecular Insights

Papillary neoplasms of the breast are a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by fibrovascular cores lined by epithelium, with or without myoepithelial cells. Papillary neoplasms include benign, atypical, and malignant tumors that show varying histopathologic features and clinical outcomes. Appropriate pathologic classification is crucial to guide clinical treatment. Classification of papillary neoplasms is largely based on morphology, with immunohistochemistry playing an ancillary role to establish diagnoses. Recent molecular studies have provided insight into the genomics of these lesions. This review summarizes the histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of papillary neoplasms of the breast that are important for diagnosis and treatment.

Papillary Breast Tumors: Continuing Controversies and Commentary on WHO's 2019 Criteria and Classification

The category of papillary breast tumors includes a limited number of entities. Nonetheless, this relatively uncommon group of tumors seems to instigate a disproportionate degree of diagnostic disquiet. As a group, papillary breast tumors suffer from a relatively high rate of discordant interpretation. The latter is due to the inherent complexity of the lesions compounded by conflicting criteria as well as simmering controversies. For instance, "encapsulated" papillary carcinoma remains contentious with regards to whether these are noninvasive or not, and the assessment of the extent of the invasive versus noninvasive components in many solid papillary carcinomas can be problematic. The latest classification system of breast tumors enunciated by the World Health Organization (WHO), that is, Breast Tumors, which appeared in 2019, mainly sought to incorporate advances in basic and clinical sciences into diagnostic criteria for the entire spectrum of breast neoplasms-including papillary ones. The latter category of tumors is discussed at some length in Breast Tumors; however, it still appears to suffer from some lack of clarity in its subclassification. It is our intent in this communication to provide an overview of the controversies around papillary breast tumors, and offer comments on its coverage in Breast Tumors-so that any tangible or perceived ambiguities therein could be addressed in its next edition.

Breast carcinomas of low malignant potential

Some breast carcinomas have a very low likelihood of metastasis to regional lymph nodes and distant sites and may be considered carcinomas of low malignant potential. In this article, we review the clinical, pathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of selected breast carcinomas of low malignant potential including low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma, encapsulated papillary carcinoma, solid papillary carcinoma, and tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity.

Solid Papillary Carcinoma and Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical-Pathologic Features and Basement Membrane Studies of 50 Cases

INTRODUCTION

Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) of the breast are usually considered in situ lesions due to favorable prognosis, despite the variable presence of myoepithelial cells. We aimed to describe clinical-pathologic features including basement membrane (BM) studies in these tumors.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SPC and EPC in 2000-2019 were retrospectively identified. Microscopic slides and clinical history were reviewed. Immunohistochemical stains for BM and myoepithelial markers were performed.

RESULTS

Of 23 SPCs and 27 EPCs, there were 5/23 (21.7%) pure SPCs and 9/27 (33.3%) pure EPCs, while 4/23 (17.4%) and 12/27 (44.5%) were associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 6/23 (26.1%) and 6/27 (22.2%) with invasive carcinoma, respectively; 8/23 (34.8%) SPCs were considered invasive. The median tumor size was 1.7 cm (range 0.1-16). All tumors were positive for hormone receptors and negative for HER2. Myoepithelial cells were absent in 20 tumors (40%) and focally present in 30 (60%). Collagen IV and laminin were negative in most invasive lesions, but they were expressed in 21/21 (100%) and 18/21 (85.7%) of EPCs without invasion, and 16/17 (94.1%) and 10/17 (58.8%) SPCs, including invasive SPCs, respectively. Lymph node involvement was identified in 3/26 (11.5%) patients, including micrometastasis in 1 EPC associated with DCIS, macrometastasis in 1 EPC associated with invasive carcinoma, and isolated tumor cells in 1 invasive SPC. Of 31 patients with outcome data (median follow-up 35 months, range 1-85), 2 (6.5%; 1 SPC, 1 EPC) developed local recurrence, both associated with invasive carcinoma. No distant recurrences or deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms favorable prognosis of SPCs and EPCs, with 2 local recurrences occurring in the presence of invasion. SPCs are more commonly associated with invasive carcinoma or considered invasive compared to EPCs (60.9 vs. 22.2%). The presence of BM material and lack of lymph node involvement in most cases indicates that the majority of these tumors may represent in situ lesions; however, some may behave as low-grade invasive malignancy with metastatic potential even in the absence of conventional invasion.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast-reviewing the spectrum

Papillary neoplasms of the breast encompass a wide range of tumor types ranging from the benign intraductal papilloma to in situ and invasive papillary carcinomas. In this review, we considered each tumor entity listed under the Papillary Neoplasms category in the latest WHO Classification of Breast Tumors (5th edition), namely intraductal papilloma, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ, encapsulated papillary carcinoma, solid-papillary carcinoma, and invasive papillary carcinoma. We examined their pathological features, current issues pertaining to diagnosis and prognostication, as well as the latest molecular findings. We also briefly addressed adenomyoepithelioma and the newly included tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity, highlighting areas where they overlap with papillary neoplasms.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast including upgrade rates and management of intraductal papilloma without atypia diagnosed at core needle biopsy

Papillary neoplasms of the breast are a heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors nearly entirely composed of papillae. Their classification rests on the characteristics of the epithelium and the presence and distribution of the myoepithelial cells along the papillae and around the tumor. Papillary neoplasms of the breast can be diagnostically challenging, especially if only core needle biopsy (CNB) material is available. This review summarizes salient morphological and immunohistochemical features, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses of papillary neoplasms of the breast. We include a contemporary appraisal of the upgrade rate to carcinoma (invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and atypical hyperplasias in surgical excision specimens obtained following CNB diagnosis of papilloma without atypia, and a review of the available follow-up data in cases without immediate surgical excision.

An Update on Endocrine Mucin-producing Sweat Gland Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic Study of 63 Cases and Comparative Analysis

Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma (EMPSGC) is a rare, low-grade adnexal neoplasm with predilection for the periorbital skin of older women. Histologically and immunophenotypically, EMPSGC is analogous to another neoplasm with neuroendocrine differentiation, solid papillary carcinoma of the breast. Both lesions are spatially associated with neuroendocrine mucinous adenocarcinomas of the skin and breast, respectively. EMPSGC is ostensibly a precursor of neuroendocrine-type mucinous sweat gland adenocarcinoma (MSC), a lesion of uncertain prognosis. Non-neuroendocrine MSC has been deemed locally aggressive with metastatic potential, and previous works speculated that EMPSGC-associated (neuroendocrine-type) MSC had similar recurrence and metastatic potential with implications for patient follow-up. Only 96 cases of EMPSGC have been reported (12 cases in the largest case series). Herein, we present 63 cases diagnosed as "EMPSGC" in comparison with aggregated results from known published EMPSGC cases. We aim to clarify the clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of the neuroendocrine differentiation of EMPSGC and its associated adenocarcinoma and to determine the nosological relevance of EMPSGC association in the spectrum of MSC histopathogenesis. Results established an overall female predominance (66.7%) and average presenting age of 64 years. EMPSGC lesions were associated with adjacent MSC in 33.3% of cases. The recurrence rate for neuroendocrine-type MSC was ~21%, less than the reported 30% for non-neuroendocrine MSC. There were no cases of metastasis. EMPSGC and neuroendocrine-type MSC are distinct entities with more indolent behavior than previously reported, supporting a favorable prognosis for patients.

Invasive solid papillary carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation of the breast: a case report and literature review

Background

Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) of the breast is a rare breast cancer that accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers. The optimal clinical management of SPC remains controversial. Here, we report a case of invasive SPC with neuroendocrine differentiation in addition to review of the current literature.

Case presentation

A premenopausal 46-year-old female presented with a mass in her left breast that tended to increase in size over a 10-month period. Mammography and ultrasonography revealed a mass in the left upper-inner quadrant. The resulting images suggested a category 3 breast tumor according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). A core needle biopsy (CNB) was performed, and the pathological findings showed a solid papillary pattern and atypical cells suggestive of noninvasive SPC. After a left partial mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the specimens were sent for histopathological analysis for further investigation. Postoperative pathological findings suggested invasive SPC. Whole-breast radiation therapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy were performed as postoperative treatments. Three years after surgery, multiple lung metastases were detected, and the patient was treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and an aromatase inhibitor. Five months later, multiple liver metastases and bone metastases appeared, and oral 5-fluorouracil was chosen for the subsequent treatment. The patient has been treated for 5 years to date, and she is continuing to take oral 5-fluorouracil and is alive without any further disease progression.

Conclusions

We report a rare case of premenopausal invasive SPC with multiple metastases. Further study is needed to clarify the molecular characteristics and clinical behaviors of SPC and to explore the optimal treatment strategy.

Solid papillary carcinoma of breast; a detailed clinicopathological study of 65 cases of an uncommon breast neoplasm with literature review

Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) is an uncommon breast tumor whose prognosis depends on invasive component. We studied clinicopathological features of SPC by reviewing 65 cases. Invasive component was seen in 75.4% cases. Almost all tumors with grade III nuclei had invasive component. Mean patients' age of invasive tumors was significantly higher than that of non-invasive tumors (P = .036). All patients were alive and disease free except for a single patient who developed distant metastasis and died of disease. SPC have excellent clinical course. Careful search for invasive component is mandatory, especially in tumors with older patient's age and higher nuclear grade.

Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: A clinicopathological study of 49 cases

BACKGROUND

Encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) has been considered as a variant of ductal carcinoma in situ. Recent studies suggest that EPC could be invasive, as it often lacks myoepithelial cells (MECs) at their periphery. The current study was performed to investigate the biological features of EPC.

METHODS

Forty-nine EPC patients admitted to the Tai׳an Central Hospital and Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2004-December 2014 were included in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological findings, the presence and distribution of MECs, as well as the outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 68.5 years. The mean tumor size was 2.0 cm. MECs were completely absent in all the 49 cases. Most tumors were estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive (95.9%). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 1+ immunoreactivity was seen in only 8 cases. Twenty-five patients underwent lumpectomy and 24 underwent mastectomy. Thirty-nine received evaluation of lymph node (LN), and 3 (7.7%) patients had LN involvement. Follow-up information was available in 29 patients (8-104 months, mean 47 months), among which 5 developed local recurrences and 2 distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

EPC is an indolent invasive carcinoma with biological features between in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma, with predominance of the latter. EPC rarely showed LN involvement and was characterized by favorable prognosis. EPC can be treated with adequate local therapy and hormonal therapy, whereas the benefit of radiation after lumpectomy remains uncertain.

Invasive Solid Papillary Carcinoma of the Nipple With Pagetoid Extension and Nodal Metastasis

We report a case of invasive solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) of the nipple with Pagetoid extension to the skin and lymph node metastasis. SPC is an uncommon primary breast cancer accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers. Only 2 cases occurring in the nipple have been reported. However, both cases were without Pagetoid extension or lymph node metastasis. The presently reported tumor consisted of irregularly shaped solid cell nests with delicate fibrovascular cores. The tumor cells had round nuclei with low-grade atypia and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Neuroendocrine differentiation was confirmed by immunohistochemical positivity for CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A. Immunohistochemistry also confirmed the absence of myoepithelial cells around the tumor cell nests. Therefore, a diagnosis of invasive SPC was made. Additionally, tumor cell deposits in the intramammary and axillary lymph nodes were identified, and these deposits had the same histological characteristics as the invasive SPC of the nipple. The invasiveness of SPC can be difficult to determine. However, the tumor cell nests in the current case exhibited a retraction artifact, which is known to be associated with invasive carcinoma and a poor prognosis, as well as morphological patterns that have been previously identified as characteristic of invasive SPC. Although SPC is widely recognized as having a favorable outcome, the existence of exceptionally aggressive cases occurring in the nipple must be recognized. Additional cases of invasive SPC of the nipple are needed to analyze the clinicopathological correlation.

Papillary Lesions of the Breast: An Update

CONTEXT

-Papillary lesions of the breast, characterized by the presence of arborescent fibrovascular cores that support epithelial proliferation, constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with overlapping clinical manifestation and histomorphologic features, but may have divergent biological behavior. These lesions are exclusively intraductal neoplasms, although an invasive carcinoma may rarely have a predominantly papillary architecture. Although recognition of a papillary architecture is typically not challenging, the histologic distinction of these entities is not always straightforward. Historically, different terminologies and variable criteria have been proposed for a given entity by various authorities. The difficulty in classifying these lesions has been further confounded by the scarcity of data and the heterogeneity across different studies with regard to the molecular genetic characteristics of this group of lesions.

OBJECTIVE

-To provide an overview focusing on the current concepts in the diagnosis and classification of papillary lesions of the breast incorporating recent molecular genetic advances.

DATA SOURCES

-Data were obtained from pertinent peer-reviewed English-language literature.

CONCLUSIONS

-The recent evolution of molecular techniques has enhanced our knowledge of the pathogenesis of papillary carcinomas of the breast. This, along with emerging outcome studies, has led to prognosis-based reclassification of some of these entities. Additional studies focusing on the molecular signatures are needed to identify potential decision tools to further stratify these lesions with respect to prognostic significance.

Pathological criteria and practical issues in papillary lesions of the breast - a review

Papillary lesions of the breast include a broad spectrum of lesions, ranging from benign papilloma, papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to papillary carcinoma. The accurate diagnosis of mammary papillary lesions is a challenge for pathologists, owing to the overlapping features among these lesions. In this review, some of the diagnostic criteria of papillary lesions are discussed, with special emphasis on some key morphological features, namely fibrovascular cores, epithelial proliferation in a solid pattern, intraductal papilloma complicated by ADH or DCIS, and invasion and its mimics. The roles of immunohistochemistry, and the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers, hormone receptors, and high molecular weight cytokeratin, are addressed. Finally, novel biomarkers and genetic aberrations in papillary lesions are summarized.

Practical Considerations in Breast Papillary Lesions: A Review of the Literature

Context.—Diagnosis of papillary breast lesions, especially in core biopsies, is challenging for most pathologists, and these lesions pose problems for patient management. Distinction between benign, premalignant, and malignant components of papillary lesions is challenging, and the diagnosis of invasion is problematic in lesions that have circumscribed margins. Obtaining a balance between overtreatment and undertreatment of these lesions is also challenging.

Objectives.—To provide a classification and a description of the histologic and immunohistochemical features and the differential diagnosis of papillary breast lesions, to provide an update on the molecular pathology of papillary breast lesions, and to discuss the recommendations for further investigation and management of papillary breast lesions. This review provides a concise description of the histologic and immunohistochemical features of the different papillary lesions of the breast.

Data Sources.—The standard pathology text books on breast pathology and literature on papillary breast lesions were reviewed with the assistance of the PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed).

Conclusions.—Knowledge of the clinical presentation, histology, immunoprofile, and behavior of papillary breast lesions will assist pathologists with the diagnosis and optimal management of patients with papillary breast lesions.

Mucinous carcinoma of the breast: a comparative study on cytohistological findings associated with neuroendocrine differentiation

OBJECTIVE

Mucinous carcinoma (MCA) may show neuroendocrine differentiation (ND), but the cytological features characteristic of ND remains elusive. We compared fine needle aspiration (FNA) findings of MCA between cases with high and low degrees of ND.

METHODS

Histological sections of 37 MCA cases were immunohistochemically evaluated for expression of chromogranin A and synaptophysin, and were graded as 0 to 3+ degrees of ND. They were divided into low ND (grade 0 and 1+) and high ND (grade 2+ and 3+) groups. Pre-operative FNA samples of each group were assessed for cytological features.

RESULTS

The mean age of the high ND group (n = 18) was higher than the low ND group (n = 19, P = 0.01). In FNA samples of the high ND group, 17 cases showed moderate to severe degrees of discohesiveness, but low ND cases mainly showed no or only mild discohesiveness (P < 0.001). Nine of the low ND cases displayed overlapped, cohesive cell clusters, whereas, in the high ND cases, the cells were arranged in a loose, flat and monolayered pattern (P = 0.045). Fourteen of the high ND cases had round nuclei, but oval nuclei were predominant in the low ND cases (P = 0.027). The nuclei were eccentrically located in 12 of the high ND cases but were centrally located in 14 of the low ND cases (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucinous carcinoma with high ND may be diagnosed by the presence of discohesiveness, a flat, monolayered pattern, and round or eccentrically located nuclei. Features of ND in carcinomas in other organs, such as intracytoplasmic granules and coarse chromatin, may not be reliable cytological features of ND in MCA.

Invasive papillary breast carcinoma, solid variant with neuroendocrine differentiation

Invasive papillary carcinoma, solid variant is a rarely observed breast tumor. It is encountered in patients of advanced ages and has a good prognosis. After the physical examination, mammography, and ultrasonography examinations, modified radical mastectomy were applied to the 72-year-old patient, who came to our hospital complaining of a mass in the left breast. During the macroscopic analysis, a well-limited, necrotic, and bleeding tumor with a diameter of 7 cm was found in the left breast, covering almost the whole area. The case was diagnosed as invasive papillary carcinoma, solid variant with neuroendocrine differentiation, which has been reported in the literature as a result of the histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis.

Papillary and neuroendocrine breast lesions: the WHO stance

In this review, we highlight adaptations in the WHO 2012 classification of papillary and neuroendocrine breast lesions as compared with the previous 2003 version. Consensus criteria for distinguishing atypical ductal hyperplasia from ductal carcinoma in situ within an intraductal papilloma are proposed. The absence of myoepithelial cells around the wall of an encapsulated papillary carcinoma, although raising consideration of an indolent tumour with minimal invasion, is currently regarded as in-situ disease for staging purposes. The majority of solid papillary carcinomas are classified as in-situ tumours, but lesions with irregular tumour islands within desmoplastic stroma may be considered to be invasive. The diagnosis of solid papillary carcinoma without further qualification as either in-situ or invasive disease is discouraged. When invasive papillary carcinoma is seen in the breast, metastatic papillary carcinoma from other organ sites needs to be excluded. WHO 2012 classifies neuroendocrine breast tumours as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour, small-cell carcinoma, and invasive breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. There is currently no clinical impact of identifying neuroendocrine differentiation in conventional invasive breast carcinomas, apart from acknowledging its frequent occurrence in subtypes such as the hypercellular variant of mucinous carcinoma and solid papillary carcinoma.

Complexities and challenges in the pathologic assessment of size (T) of invasive breast carcinoma

Size (the "T" in the TNM System) of invasive breast carcinoma is a proven independent prognostic factor; however, its accurate determination can be challenging. The purpose of this review is to discuss the complexities inherent in determining "T"-including those encountered in the clinical measurement ("cT", ie, physical and radiologic assessment) as well as pathologic determination (pT) of invasive breast carcinomas. Pathologic estimation of tumor size, macroscopic, as well as microscopic, can be problematic due to the complexity of multiple situations, seeming confusion regarding staging guidelines, and interobserver variation in interpretation. Additional problematic scenarios in determination of "T" include those incurred in excisions performed after the performance of needle core biopsies, and in cases wherein there are multiple foci of invasive carcinoma, as well as in carcinomas status post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It can also be difficult to determine "T" in certain types of invasive carcinoma, particularly those of the lobular type. In this communication, some of the complexities and challenges in determing "T" are discussed, and modest suggestions are offered to assist in optimizing such assessments.

Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast: a pathologically and clinically distinct breast tumor

Solid papillary carcinomas are tumors morphologically characterized by round, well-defined nodules composed of low-grade ductal cells separated by fibrovascular cores. These tumors are rare and affect predominantly older women. Although they are considered in situ carcinomas, debate and uncertainty still exist regarding their true nature, because immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial cells has shown absence of myoepithelial cell layer along the epithelial-stromal interface of the tumor in many cases. Clinically, these tumors present as a palpable, centrally located mass or as bloody nipple discharge. Pathologically, solid papillary carcinomas exhibit low-grade features, and often the tumors display neuroendocrine and mucinous differentiation. In the majority of cases an associated invasive carcinoma is present, with colloid and neuroendocrine carcinomas being the most common. The pathologic differential diagnosis is broad and ranges from benign to malignant lesions. The treatment for solid papillary carcinomas is surgical excision. When invasive carcinoma is not present, the prognosis is excellent.

Papillary carcinoma of the breast: an overview

Papillary carcinoma of the breast represents approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer. The prevalence of both invasive and in situ papillary carcinoma seems to be greater in older postmenopausal women and, in relative terms, in males. Histologic features of the tumor include cellular proliferations surrounding fibrovascular cores, with or without invasion. In this review, characteristics of both in situ and invasive disease are outlined. Immunohistochemical analyses of papillary carcinoma suggest the utility of markers such as smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, calponin, p63, and high molecular weight keratins, which can characterize the myoepithelial cell layer. With respect to radiographic evaluation of papillary carcinoma, ultrasonography is the most extensively studied imaging modality, though magnetic resonance mammography has potential utility. Available data suggest improved outcome for papillary carcinoma as compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. Treatment-related information for patients with papillary carcinoma is limited, and patterns noted in available series suggest a variable approach to this disease. The scarcity of information underscores the need for further treatment- and outcome-related studies in papillary carcinoma of the breast.

Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast: imprint cytological and histological findings

Solid papillary carcinoma is a rare breast lesion, but this entity remains poorly recognized. In this article, we report a case of solid papillary carcinoma of the breast with focus on cytological and histological findings. A 66-year-old Japanese woman presented with nipple discharge. Imprint cytology obtained from the surgically resected breast specimens showed a plasmacytoid appearance and spindle cell morphology with low-grade atypia. Histologically, the tumor revealed findings of solid papillary carcinoma and predominantly showed an intraductal lesion with focal minimal invasion into the breast parenchyma. Fibrovascular cores with hyalinization were seen. Proliferation of short spindle cells was also focally observed. Pseudorosette formation or nuclear palisading at the stromal-glandular interface was seen, and intracellular or extracellular mucin deposition was occasionally identified. Nuclear atypia generally showed low grade. Finally, clinicians, cytotechnologists, and pathologists should recognize this rare tumor entity because this tumor is a malignant neoplasm showing characteristic pathological findings.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast: a review

CONTEXT

Interpretation of papillary lesions of the breast remains a challenging task because of the wide morphologic spectrum encountered in the benign, atypical, and malignant subtypes. Data on clinical significance and outcome of papillary lesions, with superimposed atypia or areas similar to ductal carcinoma in situ partially replacing the benign elements, are sparse. Furthermore, complete excision of even a fully developed papillary carcinoma confined to a dilated or cystic duct is associated with an excellent prognosis, whereas a complex papilloma extending into multiple branches of a duct may ultimately recur as a carcinoma because of incomplete excision of microscopic foci. This makes an outcome-based classification difficult.

OBJECTIVE

An arbitrary yet practical approach to classification is outlined, with discussion of methods to circumvent the various diagnostic difficulties. The limitations in precise diagnosis of papillary lesions in aspirates are addressed, and the implications of finding papillary lesions in core biopsies are discussed. Although the focus is on intraductal lesions, associated invasive carcinomas and invasive micropapillary carcinoma are also presented.

DATA SOURCES

The literature on papillary lesions and invasive micropapillary carcinoma is reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

It would be prudent to completely excise any papillary lesion that has not been entirely removed by the initial core biopsy. The optimal management of localized papillary lesions is complete excision with a small rim of uninvolved breast tissue without any prior needle instrumentation if and when the papillary nature can be determined by imaging. Thus managed, most of these lesions behave indolently, and outcome is usually excellent.

Use of Myoepithelial Cell Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign, In situ, and Invasive Lesions of the Breast

Immunohistochemical markers for myoepithelial cells are commonly used to distinguish invasive from noninvasive lesions in the breast. The approach takes advantage of the fact that conventional invasive carcinomas lack surrounding myoepithelial cells, whereas nearly all benign lesions and in situ carcinomas retain their myoepithelial cell layer. Although conceptually straightforward, the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers can be complicated by misleading patterns of reactivity (such as stromal or tumor cell staining) or lack of reactivity (due to reduced numbers of myoepithelial cells or variable antigenicity). In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used myoepithelial cell markers, their general utility in distinguishing invasive from noninvasive processes, and pitfalls in their interpretation. We also examine whether the detection of myoepithelial cells is helpful in the evaluation of papillary lesions, another common application. Myoepithelial cell markers can be diagnostically useful in the distinction of many benign, in situ, and invasive lesions, but they must be interpreted in conjunction with careful morphologic analysis.

The role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast

Papillary lesions of the breast represent a heterogeneous group with differing biological behaviour. Correct diagnosis is crucial but may be difficult, as many benign and malignant papillary lesions have similar appearances. Immunohistochemistry plays a useful role in their differentiation. Myoepithelial markers can help in differentiating papilloma from papillary carcinoma, as the former usually shows a continuous layer of myoepithelial cells. In intracystic papillary carcinoma, there is controversy as to the presence of a complete myoepithelial cell layer around these lesions. p63 is the marker of choice as the staining is nuclear, cross-reactivity is minimal, and sensitivity is high. Papilloma may frequently be complicated by superimposed different types of epithelial hyperplasia, which range from usual to atypical or even ductal carcinoma in situ, and they many be morphologically similar. Basal cytokeratins (CKs) are useful to differentiate these entities; as usual hyperplasia is positive for basal CKs with a mosaic staining pattern. CK5/6 is probably the best marker. Neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A and synaptophysin) may be positive in papillary carcinoma, particularly in the solid type, and there may be some overlap with the ductal carcinoma in situ with spindle cells or endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ. A panel of CK5/6, p63 and neuroendocrine markers can be useful in the diagnostic investigation of problematic papillary lesions of the breast. As the experience with these markers remains rather limited, it is too early to recommend basing treatment choices on these marker studies alone. Complete removal of lesion is probably still the treatment of choice.