Constitutive expression of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes by variants of Ino2 activator defective for interaction with Opi1 repressor

Mechanism and engineering of endoplasmic reticulum-localized membrane protein folding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Correct folding of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized membrane proteins, such as cytochrome P450, endows a synthetic biology host with crucial catalytic functions, which is of vital importance in the field of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology. However, due to complexed interaction with cellular membrane environment and other proteins (e.g., molecular chaperone) regulation, a substantial proportion of heterologous membrane proteins cannot be properly folded in the ER of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a widely used synthetic biology host. In this review, we first introduce the four steps in membrane protein folding process and the affecting factors including the amino acid sequence of membrane protein, the folding process, molecular chaperones, quality control mechanism, and lipid environment in S. cerevisiae. Then, we summarize the metabolic engineering strategies to enhance the correct folding of ER-localized membrane proteins, such as by engineering and de novel design of membrane protein, regulation of the co-translational folding process, co-expression of molecular chaperones, modulation of ER quality, and lipids engineering. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current strategies and propose future research directions to address the key issues.

The stability of the Opi1p repressor for phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on its interactions with Scs2p and Ino2p

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Opi1p negatively regulates phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Under derepressing conditions, Opi1p binds to the endoplasmic reticulum/nuclear membrane with the aid of the membrane protein Scs2p and phosphatidic acids under derepressing conditions. Under repressing conditions, it enters the nucleus to inhibit the positive transcription factors Ino2p and Ino4p. While the spatial regulation of Opi1p is understood, the regulation of its abundance remains unclear. We investigated the role of Scs2p and Ino2p in Opi1p stability by overexpressing these proteins in yeast cells. Opi1p was stable in the presence of Scs2p, but mutations in residues required for interaction with Scs2p caused Opi1p unstable. Even in the absence of Scs2p, Opi1p remained stable in the strain having a mutation to increase phosphatidic acid levels. Conversely, overproduction of Ino2p reduced Opi1p stability, whereas a mutant Ino2p that cannot interact with Opi1p did not. Additionally, Opi1p was stable in strains lacking Ino2p or with a mutated Ino2p-binding domain. These findings suggest that regulation, adding another layer to the regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression by Opi1p.

ChEC-seq2: an improved chromatin endogenous cleavage sequencing method and bioinformatic analysis pipeline for mapping in vivo protein-DNA interactions

Defining the in vivo DNA binding specificity of transcription factors (TFs) has relied nearly exclusively on chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). While ChIP reveals TF binding patterns, its resolution is low. Higher resolution methods employing nucleases such as ChIP-exo, chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC-seq) and CUT&RUN resolve both TF occupancy and binding site protection. ChEC-seq, in which an endogenous TF is fused to micrococcal nuclease, requires neither fixation nor antibodies. However, the specificity of DNA cleavage during ChEC has been suggested to be lower than the specificity of the peaks identified by ChIP or ChIP-exo, perhaps reflecting non-specific binding of transcription factors to DNA. We have simplified the ChEC-seq protocol to minimize nuclease digestion while increasing the yield of cleaved DNA. ChEC-seq2 cleavage patterns were highly reproducible between replicates and with published ChEC-seq data. Combined with DoubleChEC, a new bioinformatic pipeline that removes non-specific cleavage sites, ChEC-seq2 identified high-confidence cleavage sites for three different yeast TFs that are strongly enriched for their known binding sites and adjacent to known target genes.

The leucine zipper domain of the transcriptional repressor Opi1 underlies a signal transduction mechanism regulating lipid synthesis

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the transcriptional repressor Opi1 regulates the expression of genes involved in phospholipid synthesis responding to the abundance of the phospholipid precursor phosphatidic acid at the endoplasmic reticulum. We report here the identification of the conserved leucine zipper (LZ) domain of Opi1 as a hot spot for gain of function mutations and the characterization of the strongest variant identified, Opi1N150D. LZ modeling posits asparagine 150 embedded on the hydrophobic surface of the zipper and specifying dynamic parallel homodimerization by allowing electrostatic bonding across the hydrophobic dimerization interface. Opi1 variants carrying any of the other three ionic residues at amino acid 150 were also repressing. Genetic analyses showed that Opi1N150D variant is dominant, and its phenotype is attenuated when loss of function mutations identified in the other two conserved domains are present in cis. We build on the notion that membrane binding facilitates LZ dimerization to antagonize an intramolecular interaction of the zipper necessary for repression. Dissecting Opi1 protein in three polypeptides containing each conserved region, we performed in vitro analyses to explore interdomain interactions. An Opi11-190 probe interacted with Opi1291-404, the C terminus that bears the activator interacting domain (AID). LZ or AID loss of function mutations attenuated the interaction of the probes but was unaffected by the N150D mutation. We propose a model for Opi1 signal transduction whereby synergy between membrane-binding events and LZ dimerization antagonizes intramolecular LZ-AID interaction and transcriptional repression.

Identification of novel proteins regulating lipid droplet biogenesis in filamentous fungi

Lipid droplets (LDs) are storage organelles for neutral lipids which are critical for lipid homeostasis. Current knowledge of fungal LD biogenesis is largely limited to budding yeast, while LD regulation in multinucleated filamentous fungi which exhibit considerable metabolic activity remains unexplored. In this study, 19 LD-associated proteins were identified in the multinucleated species Aspergillus oryzae using a colocalization screening of a previously established enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion library. Functional screening identified 12 lipid droplet-regulating (LDR) proteins whose loss of function resulted in irregular LD biogenesis, particularly in terms of LD number and size. Bioinformatics analysis, targeted mutagenesis, and microscopy revealed four LDR proteins that localize to LD via the putative amphipathic helices (AHs). Further analysis revealed that LdrA with an Opi1 domain is essential for cytoplasmic and nuclear LD biogenesis involving a novel AH. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the patterns of gene evolution were predominantly based on gene duplication. Our study identified a set of novel proteins involved in the regulation of LD biogenesis, providing unique molecular and evolutionary insights into fungal lipid storage.

ChEC-seq2: an improved Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage sequencing method and bioinformatic analysis pipeline for mapping in vivo protein-DNA interactions

Defining the in vivo DNA binding specificity of transcription factors (TFs) has relied nearly exclusively on chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). While ChIP reveals TF binding patterns, its resolution is low. Higher resolution methods employing nucleases such as ChIP-exo, chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC-seq) and CUT&RUN resolve both TF occupancy and binding site protection. ChEC-seq, in which an endogenous TF is fused to micrococcal nuclease, requires neither fixation nor antibodies. However, the specificity of DNA cleavage during ChEC has been suggested to be lower than the specificity of the peaks identified by ChIP or ChIP-exo, perhaps reflecting non-specific binding of transcription factors to DNA. We have simplified the ChEC-seq protocol to minimize nuclease digestion while increasing the yield of cleaved DNA. ChEC-seq2 cleavage patterns were highly reproducible between replicates and with published ChEC-seq data. Combined with DoubleChEC, a new bioinformatic pipeline that removes non-specific cleavage sites, ChEC-seq2 identified high-confidence cleavage sites for three different yeast TFs that are strongly enriched for their known binding sites and adjacent to known target genes.

Opi1-mediated transcriptional modulation orchestrates genotoxic stress response in budding yeast

In budding yeast, the transcriptional repressor Opi1 regulates phospholipid biosynthesis by repressing expression of genes containing inositol-sensitive upstream activation sequences. Upon genotoxic stress, cells activate the DNA damage response to coordinate a complex network of signaling pathways aimed at preserving genomic integrity. Here, we reveal that Opi1 is important to modulate transcription in response to genotoxic stress. We find that cells lacking Opi1 exhibit hypersensitivity to genotoxins, along with a delayed G1-to-S-phase transition and decreased gamma-H2A levels. Transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing reveals that Opi1 plays a central role in modulating essential biological processes during methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-associated stress, including repression of phospholipid biosynthesis and transduction of mating signaling. Moreover, Opi1 induces sulfate assimilation and amino acid metabolic processes, such as arginine and histidine biosynthesis and glycine catabolism. Furthermore, we observe increased mitochondrial DNA instability in opi1Δ cells upon MMS treatment. Notably, we show that constitutive activation of the transcription factor Ino2-Ino4 is responsible for genotoxin sensitivity in Opi1-deficient cells, and the production of inositol pyrophosphates by Kcs1 counteracts Opi1 function specifically during MMS-induced stress. Overall, our findings highlight Opi1 as a critical sensor of genotoxic stress in budding yeast, orchestrating gene expression to facilitate appropriate stress responses.

Establishment and inheritance of epigenetic transcriptional memory

For certain inducible genes, the rate and molecular mechanism of transcriptional activation depends on the prior experiences of the cell. This phenomenon, called epigenetic transcriptional memory, accelerates reactivation and requires both changes in chromatin structure and recruitment of poised RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) to the promoter. Forms of epigenetic transcriptional memory have been identified in S. cerevisiae, D. melanogaster, C. elegans, and mammals. A well-characterized model of memory is found in budding yeast where memory of inositol starvation involves a positive feedback loop between gene-and condition-specific transcription factors, which mediate an interaction with the nuclear pore complex and a characteristic histone modification: histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4me2). This histone modification permits recruitment of a memory-specific pre-initiation complex, poising RNAPII at the promoter. During memory, H3K4me2 is essential for recruitment of RNAPII and faster reactivation, but RNAPII is not required for H3K4me2. Unlike the RNAPII-dependent H3K4me2 associated with active transcription, RNAPII-independent H3K4me2 requires Nup100, SET3C, the Leo1 subunit of the Paf1 complex and can be inherited through multiple cell cycles upon disrupting the interaction with the Nuclear Pore Complex. The H3K4 methyltransferase (COMPASS) physically interacts with the potential reader (SET3C), suggesting a molecular mechanism for the spreading and re-incorporation of H3K4me2 following DNA replication. Thus, epigenetic transcriptional memory is a conserved adaptation that utilizes a heritable chromatin state, allowing cells and organisms to alter their gene expression programs in response to recent experiences over intermediate time scales.

Structural Analysis of Ino2p/Ino4p Mutual Interactions and Their Binding Interface with Promoter DNA

Gene expression is mediated by a series of regulatory proteins, i.e., transcription factors. Under different growth conditions, the transcriptional regulation of structural genes is associated with the recognition of specific regulatory elements (REs) in promoter DNA. The manner by which transcription factors recognize distinctive REs is a key question in structural biology. Previous research has demonstrated that Ino2p/Ino4p heterodimer is associated with the transcriptional regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Mechanistically, Ino2p/Ino4p could specifically recognize the inositol/choline-responsive element (ICRE), followed by the transcription activation of the phospholipid biosynthetic gene. While the promoter DNA sequence for Ino2p has already been characterized, the structural basis for the mutual interaction between Ino2p/Ino4p and their binding interface with promoter DNA remain relatively unexplored. Here, we have determined the crystalline structure of the Ino2pDBD/Ino4pDBD/DNA ternary complex, which highlights some residues (Ino2pHis12/Glu16/Arg20/Arg44 and Ino4pHis12/Glu16/Arg19/Arg20) associated with the sequence-specific recognition of promoter DNA. Our biochemical analysis showed that mutating these residues could completely abolish protein-DNA interaction. Despite the requirement of Ino2p and Ino4p for interprotein-DNA interaction, both proteins can still interact-even in the absence of DNA. Combined with the structural analysis, our in vitro binding analysis demonstrated that residues (Arg35, Asn65, and Gln69 of Ino2pDBD and Leu59 of Ino4pDBD) are critical for interprotein interactions. Together, these results have led to the conclusion that these residues are critical to establishing interprotein-DNA and protein-DNA mutual interactions.

Mitotically heritable, RNA polymerase II-independent H3K4 dimethylation stimulates INO1 transcriptional memory

For some inducible genes, the rate and molecular mechanism of transcriptional activation depend on the prior experiences of the cell. This phenomenon, called epigenetic transcriptional memory, accelerates reactivation, and requires both changes in chromatin structure and recruitment of poised RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to the promoter. Memory of inositol starvation in budding yeast involves a positive feedback loop between transcription factor-dependent interaction with the nuclear pore complex and histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4me2). While H3K4me2 is essential for recruitment of RNAPII and faster reactivation, RNAPII is not required for H3K4me2. Unlike RNAPII-dependent H3K4me2 associated with transcription, RNAPII-independent H3K4me2 requires Nup100, SET3C, the Leo1 subunit of the Paf1 complex and, upon degradation of an essential transcription factor, is inherited through multiple cell cycles. The writer of this mark (COMPASS) physically interacts with the potential reader (SET3C), suggesting a molecular mechanism for the spreading and re-incorporation of H3K4me2 following DNA replication.

Recent progress in strategies for steroid production in yeasts

As essential structural molecules of fungal cell membrane, ergosterol is not only an important component of fungal growth and stress-resistance but also a key precursor for manufacturing steroid drugs of pharmaceutical or agricultural significance. So far, ergosterol biosynthesis in yeast has been elucidated elaborately, and efforts have been made to increase ergosterol production through regulation of ergosterol metabolism and storage. Furthermore, the same intermediates shared by yeasts and animals or plants make the construction of heterologous sterol pathways in yeast a promising approach to synthesize valuable steroids, such as phytosteroids and animal steroid hormones. During these challenging processes, several obstacles have arisen and been combated with great endeavors. This paper reviews recent research progress of yeast metabolic engineering for improving the production of ergosterol and heterologous steroids. The remaining tactics are also discussed.

Ice2 promotes ER membrane biogenesis in yeast by inhibiting the conserved lipin phosphatase complex

Cells dynamically adapt organelle size to current physiological demand. Organelle growth requires membrane biogenesis and therefore needs to be coordinated with lipid metabolism. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can undergo massive expansion, but the underlying regulatory mechanisms are largely unclear. Here, we describe a genetic screen for factors involved in ER membrane expansion in budding yeast and identify the ER transmembrane protein Ice2 as a strong hit. We show that Ice2 promotes ER membrane biogenesis by opposing the phosphatidic acid phosphatase Pah1, called lipin in metazoa. Specifically, Ice2 inhibits the conserved Nem1‐Spo7 complex and thus suppresses the dephosphorylation and activation of Pah1. Furthermore, Ice2 cooperates with the transcriptional regulation of lipid synthesis genes and helps to maintain cell homeostasis during ER stress. These findings establish the control of the lipin phosphatase complex as an important mechanism for regulating ER membrane biogenesis.

Random sub-diffusion and capture of genes by the nuclear pore reduces dynamics and coordinates inter-chromosomal movement

Hundreds of genes interact with the yeast nuclear pore complex (NPC), localizing at the nuclear periphery and clustering with co-regulated genes. Dynamic tracking of peripheral genes shows that they cycle on and off the NPC and that interaction with the NPC slows their sub-diffusive movement. Furthermore, NPC-dependent inter-chromosomal clustering leads to coordinated movement of pairs of loci separated by hundreds of nanometers. We developed fractional Brownian motion simulations for chromosomal loci in the nucleoplasm and interacting with NPCs. These simulations predict the rate and nature of random sub-diffusion during repositioning from nucleoplasm to periphery and match measurements from two different experimental models, arguing that recruitment to the nuclear periphery is due to random sub-diffusion and transient capture by NPCs. Finally, the simulations do not lead to inter-chromosomal clustering or coordinated movement, suggesting that interaction with the NPC is necessary, but not sufficient, to cause clustering.

Regulation of Inositol Biosynthesis: Balancing Health and Pathophysiology

Inositol is the precursor for all inositol compounds and is essential for viability of eukaryotic cells. Numerous cellular processes and signaling functions are dependent on inositol compounds, and perturbation of their synthesis leads to a wide range of human diseases. Although considerable research has been directed at understanding the function of inositol compounds, especially phosphoinositides and inositol phosphates, a focus on regulatory and homeostatic mechanisms controlling inositol biosynthesis has been largely neglected. Consequently, little is known about how synthesis of inositol is regulated in human cells. Identifying physiological regulators of inositol synthesis and elucidating the molecular mechanisms that regulate inositol synthesis will contribute fundamental insight into cellular processes that are mediated by inositol compounds and will provide a foundation to understand numerous disease processes that result from perturbation of inositol homeostasis. In addition, elucidating the mechanisms of action of inositol-depleting drugs may suggest new strategies for the design of second-generation pharmaceuticals to treat psychiatric disorders and other illnesses.

Transcription Activation Domains of the Yeast Factors Met4 and Ino2: Tandem Activation Domains with Properties Similar to the Yeast Gcn4 Activator

Eukaryotic transcription activation domains (ADs) are intrinsically disordered polypeptides that typically interact with coactivator complexes, leading to stimulation of transcription initiation, elongation, and chromatin modifications. Here we examined the properties of two strong and conserved yeast ADs: Met4 and Ino2. Both factors have tandem ADs that were identified by conserved sequence and functional studies. While the AD function of both factors depended on hydrophobic residues, Ino2 further required key conserved acidic and polar residues for optimal function. Binding studies showed that the ADs bound multiple Med15 activator-binding domains (ABDs) with similar orders of micromolar affinity and similar but distinct thermodynamic properties. Protein cross-linking data show that no unique complex was formed upon Met4-Med15 binding. Rather, we observed heterogeneous AD-ABD contacts with nearly every possible AD-ABD combination. Many of these properties are similar to those observed with yeast activator Gcn4, which forms a large heterogeneous, dynamic, and fuzzy complex with Med15. We suggest that this molecular behavior is common among eukaryotic activators.

Opi1p translocation to the nucleus is regulated by hydrogen peroxide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

During exposure of yeast cells to low levels of hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ), the expression of several genes is regulated for cells to adapt to the surrounding oxidative environment. Such adaptation involves modification of plasma membrane lipid composition, reorganization of ergosterol-rich microdomains and altered gene expression of proteins involved in lipid and vesicle traffic, to decrease permeability to exogenous H₂ O₂ . Opi1p is a transcriptional repressor that is inactive when present at the nuclear membrane/endoplasmic reticulum, but represseses transcription of inositol upstream activating sequence (UAS_INO )-containing genes, many of which are involved in the synthesis of phospholipids and fatty acids, when it is translocated to the nucleus. We investigated whether H₂ O₂ in concentrations inducing adaptation regulates Opi1p function. We found that, in the presence of H₂ O₂ , GFP-Opi1p fusion protein translocates to the nucleus and, concomitantly, the expression of UAS_INO -containing genes is affected. We also investigated whether cysteine residues of Opi1p were implicated in the H₂ O₂ -mediated translocation of this protein to the nucleus and identified cysteine residue 159 as essential for this process. Our work shows that Opi1p is redox-regulated and establishes a new mechanism of gene regulation involving Opi1p, which is important for adaptation to H₂ O₂ in yeast cells. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Promoter recruitment of corepressors Sin3 and Cyc8 by activator proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

It is generally assumed that pathway-specific transcriptional activators recruit pleiotropic coactivators (such as chromatin-modifying complexes or general transcription factors), while specific repressors contact pleiotropic corepressors creating an inaccessible chromatin by the action of histone deacetylases. We have previously shown that the negative regulator Opi1 of yeast phospholipid biosynthesis inhibits transcription by recruiting corepressors Sin3 and Cyc8 in the presence of precursor molecules inositol and choline. To get access to its target genes, Opi1 physically contacts and counteracts DNA-bound activator Ino2. By using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show that Sin3 and Cyc8 can be detected at Opi1 target promoters INO1 and CHO2 under repressing and derepressing conditions and that corepressor binding is effective even in the absence of Opi1, while Ino2 is absolutely required. Thus, corepressors may be recruited not only by repressors but also by activators such as Ino2. Indeed, we could demonstrate direct interaction of Ino2 with Sin3 and Cyc8. The Opi1 repressor interaction domain within Ino2 is also able to contact Sin3 and Cyc8. Recruitment of corepressors by an activator is not a regulatory exception as we could show that activators Pho4 and Hac1 also contain domains being able to interact with Sin3 and Cyc8.

Opi1 mediates repression of phospholipid biosynthesis by phosphate limitation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Structural genes of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transcribed when precursor molecules inositol and choline (IC) are limiting. Gene expression is stimulated by the heterodimeric activator Ino2/Ino4, which binds to ICRE (inositol/choline-responsive element) promoter sequences. Activation is prevented by repressor Opi1, counteracting Ino2 when high concentrations of IC are available. Here we show that ICRE-dependent gene activation is repressed not only by an excess of IC but also under conditions of phosphate starvation. While PHO5 is activated by phosphate limitation, INO1 expression is repressed about 10-fold. Repression of ICRE-dependent genes by low phosphate is no longer observed in an opi1 mutant while repression is still effective in mutants of the PHO regulon (pho4, pho80, pho81 and pho85). In contrast, gene expression with high phosphate is reduced in the absence of pleiotropic sensor protein kinase Pho85. We could demonstrate that Pho85 binds to Opi1 in vitro and in vivo and that this interaction is increased in the presence of high concentrations of phosphate. Interestingly, Pho85 binds to two separate domains of Opi1 which have been previously shown to recruit pleiotropic corepressor Sin3 and activator Ino2, respectively. We postulate that Pho85 positively influences ICRE-dependent gene expression by phosphorylation-dependent weakening of Opi1 repressor, affecting its functional domains required for promoter recruitment and corepressor interaction. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Transcription factors dynamically control the spatial organization of the yeast genome

In yeast, inducible genes such as INO1, PRM1 and HIS4 reposition from the nucleoplasm to nuclear periphery upon activation. This leads to a physical interaction with nuclear pore complex (NPC), interchromosomal clustering, and stronger transcription. Repositioning to the nuclear periphery is controlled by cis-acting transcription factor (TF) binding sites located within the promoters of these genes and the TFs that bind to them. Such elements are both necessary and sufficient to control positioning of genes to the nuclear periphery. We have identified 4 TFs capable of controlling the regulated positioning of genes to the nuclear periphery in budding yeast under different conditions: Put3, Cbf1, Gcn4 and Ste12. In each case, we have defined the molecular basis of regulated relocalization to the nuclear periphery. Put3- and Cbf1-mediated targeting to nuclear periphery is regulated through local recruitment of Rpd3(L) histone deacetylase complex by transcriptional repressors. Rpd3(L), through its histone deacetylase activity, prevents TF-mediated gene positioning by blocking TF binding. Many yeast transcriptional repressors were capable of blocking Put3-mediated recruitment; 11 of these required Rpd3. Thus, it is a general function of transcription repressors to regulate TF-mediated recruitment. However, Ste12 and Gcn4-mediated recruitment is regulated independently of Rpd3(L) and transcriptional repressors. Ste12-mediated recruitment is regulated by phosphorylation of an inhibitor called Dig2, and Gcn4-mediated gene targeting is up-regulated by increasing Gcn4 protein levels. The ability to control spatial position of genes in yeast represents a novel function for TFs and different regulatory strategies provide dynamic control of the yeast genome through different time scales.

Strategies to regulate transcription factor-mediated gene positioning and interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery

In yeast, transcription factors mediate gene positioning at the nuclear periphery and interchromosomal clustering. These phenomena are regulated by several different strategies that lead to dynamic changes in the spatial arrangement of genes over different time scales.

In budding yeast, targeting of active genes to the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and interchromosomal clustering is mediated by transcription factor (TF) binding sites in the gene promoters. For example, the binding sites for the TFs Put3, Ste12, and Gcn4 are necessary and sufficient to promote positioning at the nuclear periphery and interchromosomal clustering. However, in all three cases, gene positioning and interchromosomal clustering are regulated. Under uninducing conditions, local recruitment of the Rpd3(L) histone deacetylase by transcriptional repressors blocks Put3 DNA binding. This is a general function of yeast repressors: 16 of 21 repressors blocked Put3-mediated subnuclear positioning; 11 of these required Rpd3. In contrast, Ste12-mediated gene positioning is regulated independently of DNA binding by mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of the Dig2 inhibitor, and Gcn4-dependent targeting is up-regulated by increasing Gcn4 protein levels. These different regulatory strategies provide either qualitative switch-like control or quantitative control of gene positioning over different time scales.

Induction of intranuclear membranes by overproduction of Opi1p and Scs2p, regulators for yeast phospholipid biosynthesis, suggests a mechanism for Opi1p nuclear translocation

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes is suppressed by the Opi1p negative regulator. Opi1p enters into the nucleoplasm from the nuclear membrane to suppress the gene expression under repressing conditions. The binding of Opi1p to the nuclear membrane requires an integral membrane protein, Scs2p and phosphatidic acid (PA). Although it is demonstrated that the association of Opi1p with membranes is affected by PA levels, how Opi1p dissociates from Scs2p is unknown. Here, we found that fluorescently labelled Opi1p accumulated on a perinuclear region in an Scs2p-dependent manner. Electron microscopic analyses indicated that the perinuclear region consists of intranuclear membranes, which may be formed by the invagination of the nuclear membrane due to the accumulation of Opi1p and Scs2p in a restricted area. As expected, localization of Opi1p and Scs2p in the intranuclear membranes was detected by immunoelectron microscopy. Biochemical analysis showed that Opi1p recovered in the membrane fraction was detergent insoluble while Scs2p was soluble, implying that Opi1p behaves differently from Scs2p in the fraction. We hypothesize that Opi1p dissociates from Scs2p after targeting to the nuclear membrane, making it possible to be released from the membrane quickly when PA levels decrease.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae essential genes with an Opi- phenotype

The overproduction and secretion of inositol (i.e., Opi⁻) phenotype is associated with defects in regulation of phospholipid biosynthesis in yeast. Here we report a screen of the essential yeast gene set using a conditional-expression library. This screen identified novel functions previously unknown to affect phospholipid synthesis.

Integrated analysis, transcriptome-lipidome, reveals the effects of INO-level (INO2 and INO4) on lipid metabolism in yeast

Background

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, genes containing UAS_INO sequences are regulated by the Ino2/Ino4 and Opi1 transcription factors, and this regulation controls lipid biosynthesis. The expression level of INO2 and INO4 genes (INO-level) at different nutrient limited conditions might lead to various responses in yeast lipid metabolism.

Methods

In this study, we undertook a global study on how INO-levels (transcription level of INO2 and INO4) affect lipid metabolism in yeast and we also studied the effects of single and double deletions of the two INO-genes (deficient effect). Using 2 types of nutrient limitations (carbon and nitrogen) in chemostat cultures operated at a fixed specific growth rate of 0.1 h-1 and strains having different INO-level, we were able to see the effect on expression level of the genes involved in lipid biosynthesis and the fluxes towards the different lipid components. Through combined measurements of the transcriptome, metabolome, and lipidome it was possible to obtain a large dataset that could be used to identify how the INO-level controls lipid metabolism and also establish correlations between the different components.

Results

In this study, we undertook a global study on how INO-levels (transcription level of INO2 and INO4) affect lipid metabolism in yeast and we also studied the effects of single and double deletions of the two INO-genes (deficient effect). Using 2 types of nutrient limitations (carbon and nitrogen) in chemostat cultures operated at a fixed specific growth rate of 0.1 h-1 and strains having different INO-level, we were able to see the effect on expression level of the genes involved in lipid biosynthesis and the fluxes towards the different lipid components. Through combined measurements of the transcriptome, metabolome, and lipidome it was possible to obtain a large dataset that could be used to identify how the INO-level controls lipid metabolism and also establish correlations between the different components.

Conclusions

Our analysis showed the strength of using a combination of transcriptome and lipidome analysis to illustrate the effect of INO-levels on phospholipid metabolism and based on our analysis we established a global regulatory map.

Multiple histone deacetylases are recruited by corepressor Sin3 and contribute to gene repression mediated by Opi1 regulator of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast genes of phospholipid biosynthesis are negatively regulated by repressor protein Opi1 when precursor molecules inositol and choline (IC) are available. Opi1-triggered gene repression is mediated by recruitment of the Sin3 corepressor complex. In this study, we systematically investigated the regulatory contribution of subunits of Sin3 complexes and identified Pho23 as important for IC-dependent gene repression. Two non-overlapping regions within Pho23 mediate its direct interaction with Sin3. Previous work has shown that Sin3 recruits the histone deacetylase (HDAC) Rpd3 to execute gene repression. While deletion of SIN3 strongly alleviates gene repression by IC, an rpd3 null mutant shows almost normal regulation. We thus hypothesized that various HDACs may contribute to Sin3-mediated repression of IC-regulated genes. Indeed, a triple mutant lacking HDACs, Rpd3, Hda1 and Hos1, could phenocopy a sin3 single mutant. We show that these proteins are able to contact Sin3 in vitro and in vivo and mapped three distinct HDAC interaction domains, designated HID1, HID2 and HID3. HID3, which is identical to the previously described structural motif PAH4 (paired amphipathic helix), can bind all HDACs tested. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies finally confirmed that Hda1 and Hos1 are recruited to promoters of phospholipid biosynthetic genes INO1 and CHO2.

INO1 induction requires chromatin remodelers Ino80p and Snf2p but not the histone acetylases

Transcriptional co-activators contribute to gene expression through different mechanisms. We used various biochemical tools available for Saccharomyces cerevisiae to examine the mechanism of INO1 expression. INO1 encodes inositol-3-phosphate synthase, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of inositol, a key player in phospholipid biosynthesis. Herein, we had demonstrated that the recruitment of histone acetylases Gcn5p and Esa1p mainly relied on the presence of transcriptional activator Ino2p during INO1 activation. However, the presence of the chromatin remodelers, Ino80p and Snf2p, may contribute to the additive effect of Gcn5p recruitment. We also showed that the recruitment of chromatin remodelers, Ino80p and Snf2p, is independent of the presence of histone acetylases. Furthermore, INO1 expression can be activated exclusively by the activator and chromatin remodelers, suggesting a dispensable role of histone acetylases in INO1 induction. Therefore, our data provide a mechanism for cross talk within transcriptional co-activators during INO1 activation.

Regulation of phospholipid synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with its full complement of organelles, synthesizes membrane phospholipids by pathways that are generally common to those found in higher eukaryotes. Phospholipid synthesis in yeast is regulated in response to a variety of growth conditions (e.g., inositol supplementation, zinc depletion, and growth stage) by a coordination of genetic (e.g., transcriptional activation and repression) and biochemical (e.g., activity modulation and localization) mechanisms. Phosphatidate (PA), whose cellular levels are controlled by the activities of key phospholipid synthesis enzymes, plays a central role in the transcriptional regulation of phospholipid synthesis genes. In addition to the regulation of gene expression, phosphorylation of key phospholipid synthesis catalytic and regulatory proteins controls the metabolism of phospholipid precursors and products.

Yet1p-Yet3p interacts with Scs2p-Opi1p to regulate ER localization of the Opi1p repressor

A major phospholipid regulatory circuit in yeast is controlled by Scs2p, an ER membrane protein that binds the transcriptional repressor protein Opi1p. Here we show that the Yet1p–Yet3p complex acts in derepression of INO1 through physical association with Scs2p–Opi1p.

Lipid sensing mechanisms at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) coordinate an array of biosynthetic pathways. A major phospholipid regulatory circuit in yeast is controlled by Scs2p, an ER membrane protein that binds the transcriptional repressor protein Opi1p. Cells grown in the absence of inositol sequester Scs2p–Opi1p at the ER and derepress target genes including INO1. We recently reported that Yet1p and Yet3p, the yeast homologues of BAP29 and BAP31, are required for normal growth in the absence of inositol. Here we show that the Yet1p–Yet3p complex acts in derepression of INO1 through physical association with Scs2p–Opi1p. Yet complex binding to Scs2p–Opi1p was enhanced by inositol starvation, although the interaction between Scs2p and Opi1p was not influenced by YET1 or YET3 deletion. Interestingly, live-cell imaging analysis indicated that Opi1p does not efficiently relocalize to the ER during inositol starvation in yet3Δ cells. Together our data demonstrate that a physical association between the Yet complex and Scs2p–Opi1p is required for proper localization of the Opi1p repressor to ER membranes and subsequent INO1 derepression.

Pleiotropic corepressors Sin3 and Ssn6 interact with repressor Opi1 and negatively regulate transcription of genes required for phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Repressor protein Opi1 is required to negatively regulate yeast structural genes of phospholipid biosynthesis in the presence of precursor molecules inositol and choline (IC). Opi1 interacts with the paired amphipathic helix 1 (PAH1) of pleiotropic corepressor Sin3, leading to recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs). Mutational analysis of the Opi1-Sin3 interaction domain (OSID) revealed that hydrophobic OSID residues L56, V59 and V67 of Opi1 are indispensable for gene repression. Our results also suggested that repression is not executed entirely via Sin3. Indeed, we could show that OSID contacts a second pleiotropic corepressor, Ssn6 (=Cyc8), which together with Tup1 is also able to recruit HDACs. Interestingly, mutations sin3 and ssn6 turned out as synthetically lethal. Our analysis further revealed that OSID not only binds to PAH1 but also interacts with tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) of Ssn6. This interaction could no longer be observed with Opi1 OSID variants. To trigger gene repression, Opi1 must also interact with activator Ino2, using its activator interaction domain (AID). AID contains a hydrophobic structural motif reminiscent of a leucine zipper. Our mutational analysis of selected positions indeed confirmed that residues L333, L340, V343, V350, L354 and V361 are necessary for repression of Opi1 target genes.

Derepression of INO1 transcription requires cooperation between the Ino2p-Ino4p heterodimer and Cbf1p and recruitment of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 gene encodes the structural enzyme inositol-3-phosphate synthase for the synthesis de novo of inositol and inositol-containing phospholipids. The transcription of INO1 is completely derepressed in the absence of inositol and choline (I(-) C(-)). Derepression requires the binding of the Ino2p-Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) heterodimer to the UAS(INO) promoter element. We report here the requirement of a third bHLH protein, centromere-binding factor 1 (Cbf1p), for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription. We found that Cbf1p regulates INO1 transcription by binding to sites distal to the INO1 promoter and encompassing the upstream SNA3 open reading frame (ORF) and promoter. The binding of Cbf1p requires Ino2p-Ino4p binding to the UAS(INO) sites in the INO1 promoter and vice versa, suggesting a cooperative mechanism. Furthermore, Cbf1p binding to the upstream sites was required for the binding of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex to the Ino2p-Ino4p-binding sites on the INO1 promoter. Consistent with this, ISW2 was also required for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription.

Multiple bHLH proteins regulate CIT2 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins comprise a eukaryotic transcription factor family involved in multiple biological processes. They have the ability to form multiple dimer combinations and most of them also bind a 6 bp site (E-box) with limited specificity. These properties make them ideal for combinatorial regulation of gene expression. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae CIT2 gene, which encodes citrate synthase, was previously known to be induced by the bHLH proteins Rtg1p and Rtg3p in response to mitochondrial damage. Rtg1p-Rtg3p dimers bind two R-boxes (modified E-boxes) in the CIT2 promoter. The current study tested the ability of all nine S. cerevisiae bHLH proteins to regulate the CIT2 gene. The results showed that expression of CIT2-lacZ reporter was induced in a rho(0) strain by the presence of inositol via the Ino2p and Ino4p bHLH proteins, which are known regulators of phospholipid synthesis. Promoter mutations revealed that inositol induction required a distal E-box in the CIT2 promoter. Interestingly, deleting the INO2, INO4 genes or the cognate E-box revealed phosphate induction of CIT2 expression. This layer of expression required the two R-boxes and the Pho4p bHLH protein, which is known to be required for phosphate-specific regulation. Lastly, the data show that the Hms1p and Sgc1p bHLH proteins also play important roles in repression of CIT2-lacZ expression. Collectively, these results support the model that yeast bHLH proteins coordinate different biological pathways.

Mediator subunits and histone methyltransferase Set2 contribute to Ino2-dependent transcriptional activation of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

To activate eukaryotic genes, several pathways which modify chromatin and recruit general factors of the transcriptional machinery are utilized. We investigated the factors required for activation of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes, depending on activator protein Ino2 which binds to the inositol/choline-responsive element (ICRE) upstream promoter motif together with its partner protein Ino4. We used a set of 15 strains each defective for one of the non essential subunits of yeast mediator complex and identified med2, med3, med15, med18 and med19 as impaired for inositol biosynthesis. In these mutants, ICRE-dependent gene activation was reduced to 13-22% of the wild-type level. We also demonstrate synthetic growth and activation defects among mediator mutants and mutants lacking defined histone modifications (snf1, gcn5) and transcriptional coactivators (sub1). Analysis of mutants defective for histone methylation (set1, set2 and dot1) and demethylation (jhd1, jhd2, gis1, rph1 and ecm5) revealed the importance of the H3 Lys36-specific Set2 methyltransferase for ICRE-dependent gene expression. Although defined mediator subunits are critical for gene activation, we could not detect their interaction with Ino2. In contrast, Ino2 directly binds to the Set2 histone methyltransferase. Mapping of interaction domains revealed the importance of the SET core domain which was necessary and sufficient for binding Ino2.

Membrane expansion alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress independently of the unfolded protein response

Increasing the size of the ER by lipid synthesis helps the cell deal with ER stress.

Cells constantly adjust the sizes and shapes of their organelles according to need. In this study, we examine endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane expansion during the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that membrane expansion occurs through the generation of ER sheets, requires UPR signaling, and is driven by lipid biosynthesis. Uncoupling ER size control and the UPR reveals that membrane expansion alleviates ER stress independently of an increase in ER chaperone levels. Converting the sheets of the expanded ER into tubules by reticulon overexpression does not affect the ability of cells to cope with ER stress, showing that ER size rather than shape is the key factor. Thus, increasing ER size through membrane synthesis is an integral yet distinct part of the cellular program to overcome ER stress.

The inositol regulon controls viability in Candida glabrata

Inositol is essential in eukaryotes, and must be imported or synthesized. Inositol biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by three non-essential genes that make up the inositol regulon: ScINO2 and ScINO4, which together encode a heterodimeric transcriptional activator, and ScOPI1, which encodes a transcriptional repressor. ScOpi1p inhibits the ScIno2-ScIno4p activator in response to extracellular inositol levels. An important gene controlled by the inositol regulon is ScINO1, which encodes inositol-3-phosphate synthase, a key enzyme in inositol biosynthesis. In the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans, homologues of the S. cerevisiae inositol regulon genes are 'transcriptionally rewired'. Instead of regulating the CaINO1 gene, CaINO2 and CaINO4 regulate ribosomal genes. Another Candida species that is a prevalent cause of infections is Candida glabrata; however, C. glabrata is phylogenetically more closely related to S. cerevisiae than C. albicans. Experiments were designed to determine if C. glabrata homologues of the inositol regulon genes function similarly to S. cerevisiae or are transcriptionally rewired. CgINO2, CgINO4 and CgOPI1 regulate CgINO1 in a manner similar to that observed in S. cerevisiae. However, unlike in S. cerevisiae, CgOPI1 is essential. Genetic data indicate that CgOPI1 is a repressor that affects viability by regulating activation of a target of the inositol regulon.

Yas3p, an Opi1 family transcription factor, regulates cytochrome P450 expression in response to n-alkanes in Yarrowia lipolytica

In the alkane-assimilating yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, the expression of ALK1, a gene encoding cytochrome P450 that catalyzes the first step of n-alkane oxidation, is induced by n-alkanes. We previously demonstrated that two basic helix-loop-helix proteins, Yas1p and Yas2p, activate the transcription of ALK1 in an alkane-dependent manner by forming a heterocomplex and binding to alkane-responsive element 1 (ARE1), a cis-acting element in the ALK1 promoter. Here we identified an Opi1 family transcription factor, Yas3p, involved in the alkane-dependent transcription regulation of ALK genes. Deletion of YAS3 caused a significant increase in ALK1 mRNA in cells grown on glucose, glycerol, and n-alkanes. The YAS3 deletion also resulted in a marked elevation of reporter gene expression driven by an ARE1-containing promoter on glycerol and n-decane. Bacterially expressed Yas3p bound specifically to Yas2p, but not to Yas1p, in vitro. In addition, although green fluorescent protein-tagged Yas3p was localized in the nucleus in glucose-containing medium, it changed its localization to an endoplasmic reticulum-like compartment upon transfer to medium containing n-decane. These findings suggest that Yas3p functions as a master regulator of transcriptional response, which changes its localization between the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum membrane in response to different carbon sources. Furthermore, quantitative real time PCR analysis of 12 ALK genes in YAS1, YAS2, and YAS3 deletion mutants suggested that Yas3p is involved in the transcriptional repression of a variety of ALK genes, including ALK1. In contrast, YAS3 deletion did not affect the mRNA level of an INO1 ortholog in Y. lipolytica, indicating functional diversity of Opi1 family transcription factors.

Activator-dependent recruitment of SWI/SNF and INO80 during INO1 activation

Transcriptional activation of yeast INO1 requires SWI/SNF and INO80 for nucleosome disruption at the promoter. However, the cooperative interplay among remodelers and their recruitment dynamics in activation have thus far been vague. Here, we showed, using chromatin immunoprecipitation, that both SWI/SNF and INO80 are present at the promoter and are restricted to the promoter, indicating that they directly participate in localized INO1 chromatin remodeling. Furthermore, both SWI/SNF and INO80 are absent at the INO1 promoter in ino2Delta cells, suggesting that these are activator-dependent remodelers. We have also found that the presence of INO80 is required for SWI/SNF recruitment, indicating that INO80 arrives first at the promoter followed by SWI/SNF. In light of these findings, we proposed a model which describes the order of events in INO1 activation.

Dimerization of yeast transcription factors Ino2 and Ino4 is regulated by precursors of phospholipid biosynthesis mediated by Opi1 repressor

Structural genes of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast S. cerevisiae are activated by the heterodimeric transcription factor Ino2 + Ino4, binding to ICRE (inositol/choline-responsive element) promoter motifs. In the presence of phospholipid precursors inositol and choline, Ino2-dependent activation is inhibited by the Opi1 repressor which interacts with Ino2. In this work, we systematically investigated the importance of regulatory mechanisms possibly affecting ICRE-dependent gene expression. Autoregulatory expression of INO2, INO4 and OPI1 was abolished by promoter exchange experiments, showing that autoregulation of regulators contributes to the degree of differential gene expression but is not responsible for it. Using GFP fusion proteins, Ino2 and Ino4 were found to localize to the nucleus under conditions of repression and derepression. Interestingly, nuclear localization of Ino2 required a functional INO4 gene. Targeting of a lexA-Ino2 fusion to a heterologous promoter containing lexA operator motifs revealed a constitutive gene activation which was not influenced by phospholipid precursors. We could show that Ino2-dependent activation of a lexA-Ino4 fusion is affected by inositol and choline. Since gene activation required interaction of Ino2 and Ino4 mediated by their helix-loop-helix domains, formation/dissociation of the heterodimer must be considered as an important step of target gene regulation.

A SWI/SNF- and INO80-dependent nucleosome movement at the INO1 promoter

Transcriptional activation in yeast INO1 chromatin was studied using the indirect end-labeling technique. INO1 chromatin is organized into an ordered, overlapping nucleosomal array under repressing conditions. Nucleosome positions were only disrupted at the promoter region under inducing conditions in the presence of SWI/SNF and INO80. Mutants lacking either remodeler demonstrated identical positioning patterns as the wild type under repressing conditions. This indicates that these two remodelers are responsible and essential for local nucleosomal mobilization at the INO1 promoter. The area of local nucleosome movement is consistent with the previously identified region of histone deacetylation activity. In light of these findings, we suggest that nucleosomes subject to local mobilization are also targets for local histone modifications.

Ribosomal protein genes in the yeast Candida albicans may be activated by a heterodimeric transcription factor related to Ino2 and Ino4 from S. cerevisiae

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, structural genes of phospholipid biosynthesis are activated by a heterodimer of basic helix-loop-helix proteins, Ino2 and Ino4, which bind to the inositol/choline-responsive element (ICRE) UAS element. In silico, we identified Candida albicans genes, which encode proteins similar to Ino2 and Ino4 (designated CaIno2 and CaIno4). CaINO4 contains an intron with an unusual branch point sequence. Although neither CaINO2 nor CaINO4 could individually complement S. cerevisiae mutations ino2 and ino4, respectively, coexpression of both CaINO2 and CaINO4 restored inositol auxotrophy of an ino2 ino4 double mutant. CaIno2 and CaIno4 could interact in vivo as well as in vitro and together were able to bind to the ICRE from S. cerevisiae INO1. Similar to Ino2 of S. cerevisiae, CaIno2 contains two transcriptional activation domains. CaIno2 and CaIno4 interact with CaSua7 (basal transcription factor TFIIB) but not with Sua7 from S. cerevisiae. Surprisingly, CaIno2 + CaIno4 were unable to stimulate expression of a CaINO1-lacZ reporter gene while an INO1-lacZ fusion was efficiently activated. This result agrees with the finding that promoter scanning of the CaINO1 upstream region gave no evidence for CaIno2 + CaIno4 binding in vitro. We derived a consensus binding site for CaIno2 + CaIno4 (BWTCASRTG), which could be detected upstream of 25 ribosomal protein genes. Since we failed to obtain homozygous deletion mutations for CaINO2 and CaINO4, we conclude that CaIno2 and CaIno4 acquired new essential target genes among which may be ribosomal protein genes.

Multiple endoplasmic reticulum-to-nucleus signaling pathways coordinate phospholipid metabolism with gene expression by distinct mechanisms

In many organisms the coordinated synthesis of membrane lipids is controlled by feedback systems that regulate the transcription of target genes. However, a complete description of the transcriptional changes that accompany the remodeling of membrane phospholipids has not been reported. To identify metabolic signaling networks that coordinate phospholipid metabolism with gene expression, we profiled the sequential and temporal changes in genome-wide expression that accompany alterations in phospholipid metabolism induced by inositol supplementation in yeast. This analysis identified six distinct expression responses, which included phospholipid biosynthetic genes regulated by Opi1p, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal protein folding chaperone and oxidoreductase genes regulated by the unfolded protein response pathway, lipid-remodeling genes regulated by Mga2p, as well as genes involved in ribosome biogenesis, cytosolic stress response, and purine and amino acid metabolism. We also report that the unfolded protein response pathway is rapidly inactivated by inositol supplementation and demonstrate that the response of the unfolded protein response pathway to inositol is separable from the response mediated by Opi1p. These data indicate that altering phospholipid metabolism produces signals that are relayed through numerous distinct ER-to-nucleus signaling pathways and, thereby, produce an integrated transcriptional response. We propose that these signals are generated in the ER by increased flux through the pathway of phosphatidylinositol synthesis.

Transcriptional regulation of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes

The last several years have been witness to significant developments in understanding transcriptional regulation of the yeast phospholipid structural genes. The response of most phospholipid structural genes to inositol is now understood on a mechanistic level. The roles of specific activators and repressors are also well established. The knowledge of specific regulatory factors that bind the promoters of phospholipid structural genes serves as a foundation for understanding the role of chromatin modification complexes. Collectively, these findings present a complex picture for transcriptional regulation of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. The INO1 gene is an ideal example of the complexity of transcriptional control and continues to serve as a model for studying transcription in general. Furthermore, transcription of the regulatory genes is also subject to complex and essential regulation. In addition, databases resulting from a plethora of genome-wide studies have identified regulatory signals that control one of the essential phospholipid biosynthetic genes, PIS1. These databases also provide significant clues for other regulatory signals that may affect phospholipid biosynthesis. Here, we have tried to present a complete summary of the transcription factors and mechanisms that regulate the phospholipid biosynthetic genes.

Genomic analysis of the Opi- phenotype

Most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are coordinately regulated in response to inositol and choline. Inositol affects the intracellular levels of phosphatidic acid (PA). Opi1p is a repressor of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes and specifically binds PA in the endoplasmic reticulum. In the presence of inositol, PA levels decrease, releasing Opi1p into the nucleus where it represses transcription. The opi1 mutant overproduces and excretes inositol into the growth medium in the absence of inositol and choline (Opi(-) phenotype). To better understand the mechanism of Opi1p repression, the viable yeast deletion set was screened to identify Opi(-) mutants. In total, 89 Opi(-) mutants were identified, of which 7 were previously known to have the Opi(-) phenotype. The Opi(-) mutant collection included genes with roles in phospholipid biosynthesis, transcription, protein processing/synthesis, and protein trafficking. Included in this set were all nonessential components of the NuA4 HAT complex and six proteins in the Rpd3p-Sin3p HDAC complex. It has previously been shown that defects in phosphatidylcholine synthesis (cho2 and opi3) yield the Opi(-) phenotype because of a buildup of PA. However, in this case the Opi(-) phenotype is conditional because PA can be shuttled through a salvage pathway (Kennedy pathway) by adding choline to the growth medium. Seven new mutants present in the Opi(-) collection (fun26, kex1, nup84, tps1, mrpl38, mrpl49, and opi10/yol032w) were also suppressed by choline, suggesting that these affect PC synthesis. Regulation in response to inositol is also coordinated with the unfolded protein response (UPR). Consistent with this, several Opi(-) mutants were found to affect the UPR (yhi9, ede1, and vps74).

Analysis of Opi1p repressor mutants

Opi1p is the only known repressor protein specific to the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Opi1p is required for repression in response to inositol and choline supplementation. However, the mechanism of Opi1p repression is not completely understood. In part, this is because previously identified opi1 mutants contained nonsense mutations and thus provided little insight into the mechanism of Opi1p function. We have recently reported isolating novel opi1 mutants (rum and dim mutants) that contain missense mutations. Here, we show that these opi1 mutants produce Opi1p product at levels comparable to a wild-type strain. However, these mutants mis-regulate expression of two target genes, INO2-HIS3 and INO1-lacZ, and are also defective in autoregulation. An opi1-S339F mutant is particularly interesting because it completely eliminated autoregulation, but only abated regulation of an INO1-lacZ reporter. Two of the mutations in OPI1 (V343Q and S339F) provide genetic evidence for an interaction between Opi1p and the Ino2p activator since they reside in a region of Opi1p recently shown to interact with Ino2p in vitro. A third mutation (L252F) resides in a region of Opi1p with no known function.