Characterization of CD4, CD8, CD56 positive lymphocytes and C4d deposits to distinguish acute cellular rejection from recurrent hepatitis C in post-liver transplant biopsies

Recurrent Autoimmune Hepatitis and De Novo Autoimmune Hepatitis in the Liver Allograft

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a form of severe hepatitis that can recur after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Presentation of AIH in patients with OLT who do not have a history of AIH is called de novo AIH (DNAIH). We evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics of AIH and DNAIH.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic and outcome measures of 11 patients with recurrent AIH (RAIH) and 22 with DNAIH identified between 2000 and 2017 were compared.

RESULTS

Both cohorts showed female predominance. The mean clinical follow-up was 13 and 7.8 years in the in the RAIH and DNAIH groups, respectively (P = .1). Moderate portal inflammation was more common in patients with RAIH (64% vs 27%, P = .043). A trend was observed for more cases of DNAIH showing severe inflammation (36% vs 9%, P = .09) and submassive necrosis compared with RAIH (23% vs 0%, P = .086). A trend for more advanced fibrosis was also noted in the RAIH group (27% vs 5%, P = .059). Three patients with RAIH lost their grafts because of RAIH. Five-year disease-specific graft survival (GS) (P = .012) and overall GS (P = .015) were worse in patients with RAIH. Complement component 4d immunohistochemistry was positive in 2 patients with RAIH and 3 with DNAIH but showed no correlation with GS or other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

RAIH seems to have a more aggressive clinical course than DNAIH and warrants closer clinical follow-up and aggressive treatment.

Immunostaining Patterns of Posttransplant Liver Biopsies Using 2 Anti-C4d Antibodies

Histopathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in posttransplant liver biopsies is challenging. The recently proposed diagnostic criteria by the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology require positive C4d immunohistochemical staining to establish the diagnosis. However, the reported C4d staining patterns vary widely in different studies. One potential explanation may be due to different antibody preparations used by different investigators. In this study, posttransplant liver biopsies from 69 patients histopathologically diagnosed with acute cellular rejection, chronic rejection, or recurrent hepatitis C were immunohistochemically stained using 2 polyclonal anti-C4d antibodies. On the basis of the distribution of C4d immunoreactivity, 5 different staining patterns were observed: portal vein and capillary, hepatic artery, portal stroma, central vein, and sinusoids. The frequency, extent, and intensity of positive C4d staining with the 2 antibody preparations differed significantly for portal veins/capillaries and central veins, but not for hepatic arteries and portal stroma. Positive sinusoidal staining was seen in only 1 case. There were no significant differences in the frequency, extent, and intensity of positive C4d staining among the acute cellular rejection, chronic rejection, and recurrent hepatitis C groups with the 2 anti-C4d antibodies. These data show that different anti-C4d antibodies can show different staining patterns, which may lead to different interpretation. Caution is thus needed when selecting C4d antibodies for clinical use to aid in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.

Incidence of Post-Liver Transplant Hepatic Dysfunction After Sustained Virologic Response Following Direct-Acting Anti-Hepatitis C Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Newly developed, direct-acting antiviral therapy is effective in over 90% of cases to eradicate hepatitis C virus infection. Direct-acting antiviral therapy is also effective in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection. However, hepatic function after sustained virologic response in transplant recipients is unknown. Here, we aimed to uncover the incidence of hepatic dysfunction in this patient group at our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 40 consecutive (January 2014 to February 2016) and compliant posttransplant recipients who achieved sustained viral response from direct-acting antiviral therapy. Patients were investigated for incidence and causes of hepatic dysfunction.

RESULTS

In our patient group, 4 (10%) experienced hepatic dysfunction with stable baseline immunosuppression, with 2 having drastic increases in alanine aminotransferase at 15 and 32 weeks after direct-acting antiviral therapy. Biopsies showed hepatitis, and both patients were treated with hydrocortisone, which increased their baseline immunosuppression. The 3rd patient had an increase in bilirubin at 21 weeks posttherapy, with biopsy showing macrovascular steatosis. The 4th patient had a rapid increase in bilirubin at 7 weeks after direct-acting antiviral therapy, with biopsy showing significant duct loss.

CONCLUSIONS

During the study period, 10% of patients experienced hepatic dysfunction after sustained viral response. Presumed causative factors included partial immune reconstitution and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The Diagnostic Impact of C4d, CD68, and NF-κB Expression in the Differentiation Between Recurrent Hepatitis C and Acute Cellular Rejection After Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the selected treatment for patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis, mostly as a complication of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recurrent HCV and acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the graft are the most common causes of graft failure. The distinction between the 2 conditions is essential because they are managed differently. In some cases, the clinical and histopathologic features may overlap between recurrent hepatitis C and ACR, making differentiation difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of C4d, CD68, and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) in the differentiation between ACR and recurrent HCV in the post-liver-transplant biopsy using immunohistochemistry. C4d expression in endothelial cells of portal or central veins (P=0.001) and the number of macrophages highlighted by CD68 (P=0.02) were in favor of ACR, whereas NF-κB expression by hepatocytes was in favor of recurrent hepatitis C. Vascular injury demonstrated by endothelial expression of C4d and prominent macrophage infiltration identified by CD68 expression were the distinguishing criteria for ACR and representing humoral and cellular-mediated immunity as evoking factors for graft injury. The upregulation of NF-κB in the hepatocytes of recurrent hepatitis C could be an immune response to infection or it may be induced by HCV itself.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplant

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared with its allograft cohorts of the kidney and lung. Acute AMR is diagnosed based on specific clinical and histopathologic criteria: serum donor specific antibodies, C4d staining, histopathologic findings on liver biopsy, and exclusion of other entities. In contrast, the histologic features of chronic AMR are not as specific and it is a more challenging diagnosis to make. Treatments of acute and chronic AMR include some combination of steroids, immune-modulating agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and proteasome inhibitors.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Prevention and treatment of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and the role of the 'two-hit hypothesis'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, prevention strategies, and possible treatment options for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although rare, severe acute AMR (aAMR) usually occurs in patients with high mean fluorescence intensity despite serial dilutions or high-titer preformed class I donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). The diagnosis is suspected when allograft dysfunction occurs with DSA, diffuse C4d staining, and a microvascular injury, and may be aided by the aAMR score. However, the incidence of and treatment approach to combined T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with DSA present and some but not all features of AMR is yet to be determined. Chronic liver allograft AMR is characterized by low-grade chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis with DSA, the chronic AMR (cAMR) score may facilitate diagnosis. The 'two-hit' hypothesis, whereby a coexistent insult upregulates human leukocyte antigen class II target antigens on the microvascular endothelium, may explain why suboptimal donors with lower sensitization levels might suffer from acute AMR and those with chronic complications (e.g., recurrent original disease) might be more susceptible to chronic AMR. Although treatment algorithms are needed, prevention is preferable and at a minimum includes transfusion minimization, and medication adherence.

SUMMARY

Severe acute AMR is rare but diagnosable, and there is need to determine the incidence of and optimal therapy for less severe combined AMR and TCMR. Chronic AMR is likely more common and of significant relevance to long-term allograft survival improvement. The two-hit hypothesis may help to explain the rarity of both findings and shed insight onto future prevention and treatment strategies.

ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) studies have lagged behind parallel efforts in kidney and heart because of a comparative inherent hepatic resistance to AMR. Three developments, however, have increased interest: first, solid phase antibody testing enabled more precise antibody characterization; second, increased expectations for long-term, morbidity-free survival; and third, immunosuppression minimization trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two overlapping liver allograft AMR phenotypic expressions are beginning to emerge: acute and chronic AMR. Acute AMR usually occurs within the several weeks after transplantation and characterized clinically by donor-specific antibodies (DSA) persistence, allograft dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and hypocomplementemia. Acute AMR appears histopathologically similar to acute AMR in other organs: diffuse microvascular endothelial cell hypertrophy, C4d deposits, neutrophilic, eosinophilic, and macrophag-mediated microvasculitis/capillaritis, along with liver-specific ductular reaction, centrilobular hepatocyte swelling, and hepatocanalicular cholestasis often combined with T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Chronic AMR is less well defined, but strongly linked to serum class II DSA and associated with late-onset acute TCMR, fibrosis, chronic rejection, and decreased survival. Unlike acute AMR, chronic AMR is a slowly evolving insult with a number of potential manifestations, but most commonly appears as low-grade lymphoplasmacytic portal and perivenular inflammation accompanied by unusual fibrosis patterns and variable microvascular C4d deposition; capillaritis can be more difficult to identify than in acute AMR.

SUMMARY

More precise DSA characterization, increasing expectations for long-term survival, and immunosuppression weaning precipitated a re-emergence of liver allograft AMR interest. Pathophysiological similarities exist between heart, kidney, and liver allografts, but liver-specific considerations may prove critical to our ultimate understanding of all solid organ AMR.

Quantification of C4d deposition and hepatitis C virus RNA in tissue in cases of graft rejection and hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Histology is the gold standard for diagnosing acute rejection and hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. However, differential diagnosis between the two can be difficult. We evaluated the role of C4d staining and quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels in liver tissue. This was a retrospective study of 98 liver biopsy samples divided into four groups by histological diagnosis: acute rejection in patients undergoing liver transplant for hepatitis C (RejHCV+), HCV recurrence in patients undergoing liver transplant for hepatitis C (HCVTx+), acute rejection in patients undergoing liver transplant for reasons other than hepatitis C and chronic hepatitis C not transplanted (HCVTx-). All samples were submitted for immunohistochemical staining for C4d and HCV RNA quantification. Immunoexpression of C4d was observed in the portal vessels and was highest in the HCVTx- group. There was no difference in C4d expression between the RejHCV+ and HCVTx+ groups. However, tissue HCV RNA levels were higher in the HCVTx+ group samples than in the RejHCV+ group samples. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between tissue and serum levels of HCV RNA. The quantification of HCV RNA in liver tissue might prove to be an efficient diagnostic test for the recurrence of HCV infection.

The immunophenotype of antigen presenting cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system in normal human liver--a systematic review

The mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS), comprised of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, is essential in tissue homeostasis and in determining the balance of the immune response through its role in antigen presentation. It has been identified as a therapeutic target in infectious disease, cancer, autoimmune disease and transplant rejection. Here, we review the current understanding of the immunophenotype and function of the MPS in normal human liver. Using well-defined selection criteria, a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases identified 76 appropriate studies. The majority (n=67) described Kupffer cells (KCs), although the definition of KC differs between sources, and little data were available regarding their function. Only 10 papers looked at liver dendritic cells (DCs), and largely confirmed the presence of the major dendritic cell subsets identified in human blood. Monocytes were thoroughly characterized in four studies that utilized flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy and highlighted their prominent role in liver homeostasis and displayed subtle differences from circulating monocytes. There was some limited evidence that liver DCs are tolerogenic but neither liver dendritic cell subsets nor macrophages have been thoroughly characterized, using either multi-colour flow cytometry or multi-parameter fluorescence microscopy. The lobular distribution of different subsets of liver MPS cells was also poorly described, and the ability to distinguish between passenger leukocytes and tissue resident cells remains limited. It was apparent that further research, using modern immunological techniques, is now required to accurately characterize the cells of the MPS in human liver.

Liver transplant complications in hepatitis C infected recipients: recurrence versus rejection

Despite improvement on outcomes post liver transplantation (LT), complications such as HCV recurrence (HCV-rec) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) continue to be a challenge for transplant physicians. Accurate diagnostic tools to better dissect between those complications post-LT are crucial for prompt and correct diagnosis and treatment. It is well known that the overlapping features of clinical and histo-pathological characteristics between these conditions turn difficult the appropriate differential diagnosis. Recently, new technological advances had supported the field of biomarker discovery in many diseases. Disease biomarkers capable to differentiate ACR versus HCV-rec post-LT is a long waited task in the transplant community. This editorial describes and discusses potential biomarkers of disease differentiation including recent reports in the field of genomics, proteomics, immunohistochemistry among other technologies.

Tissue biopsy monitoring of operational tolerance in liver allograft recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Highly selected, long-surviving, liver allograft recipients with normal/near normal liver injury tests can be weaned from immunosuppression. Baseline biopsies document changes before weaning and can help stratify risk of rejection or dysfunction after weaning; biopsies after weaning are used to study mechanisms of operational tolerance and to monitor for subclinical events.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinicopathological features associated with successful weaning include a lack of sensitization [negative donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and lack of tissue C4d deposits]; 'inexperienced' recipient immune system with limited potential for cross-reactivity (less immunological memory; infant recipients); noninflamed allograft in those with nonviral, nonimmunological original diseases; upregulation of liver genes associated with iron metabolism; allograft colonization with 'immunosuppressive' cells (Treg and γδ-1>γδ-2); and longer time on immunosuppression, which might signal slow clonal deletion or silencing. The differential diagnosis of histopathological findings detected before and after weaning includes emerging infections, typical and atypical cellular rejection, indolent antibody-mediated rejection, 'autoimmunity', and other causes of progressive fibrosis.

SUMMARY

Operationally tolerant liver allograft recipients can be successfully managed with very low, and sometimes no immunosuppression, but challenges exist. Newer approaches to tissue pathology and tissue, serum, and cross-platform analytics are needed to predict successful weaning and to monitor for subclinical events.

Antibody-mediated rejection in the liver allograft

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is increasing evidence to suggest that antibody-mediated mechanisms play a role in the pathogenesis of liver allograft rejection. This article will review the pathology of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) focusing on recent studies which have improved our understanding of the clinicopathological features and diagnostic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have investigated the patterns of immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a tissue marker of AMR in posttransplant biopsies, and have correlated these findings with other histopathological changes and with the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). These studies have highlighted the diagnostic applications and limitations of C4d immunostaining. They have also emphasized the importance of using strict criteria for defining 'pure' AMR in the liver allograft - that is, graft dysfunction associated with compatible histological findings (typically resembling biliary obstruction), the presence of DSAs and diffusely positive staining for C4d.

SUMMARY

Pure AMR is relatively uncommon in ABO-compatible grafts - it should be diagnosed on the basis of strict criteria and requires treatment with antibody-depleting immunosuppression. C4d immunostaining in isolation has limited diagnostic value. However, the presence of diffuse C4d immunostaining (involving endothelium or stroma in >50% of portal tracts or sinusoids) suggests a significant component of antibody-mediated graft damage. In a person with suggestive histological features, this finding should prompt testing for DSAs. Even in the absence of typical histological features of AMR, the combined presence of DSAs and diffuse C4d positivity is associated with more frequent or severe acute and chronic rejection, which may also warrant treatment with antibody-depleting immunosuppression.

The value of C4d deposit in post liver transplant liver biopsies

BACKGROUND

Presence of C4d in renal and cardiac allografts is a sign of antibody-mediated rejection and is associated with worse outcomes. The value of C4d in liver specimens is controversial. We aimed to determine the association of C4d deposition with acute cellular rejection (ACR), hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence, and clinical outcome after ABO compatible liver transplants (OLT).

METHODS

Using immunohistochemical stain, 70 liver biopsies (44 study and 26 control groups) were evaluated for C4d deposition. Study group included for-cause post OLT biopsies. Staining of endothelial cells was considered positive.

RESULTS

In the study group C4d was positive in 22.7% versus 3.8% in controls (P=0.03), all had portal vein deposits. In 17 biopsies with ACR, 3 had positive C4d (17.6%) versus 7/27 with HCV recurrence (25.9%) (P=0.4). In HCV recurrence, 3/7 biopsies with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis had positive C4d (42.9%) versus 4/20 without these features (20%) (P=0.24). Out of 10 recipients with positive C4d 4 had poor outcomes versus 3/22 with negative C4d (P=0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

C4d staining was significantly more frequent in post OLT biopsies compared with controls. C4d is not specifically associated with ACR and does not differentiate it from HCV recurrence but is associated with a trend toward poorer outcome.

Sinusoidal C4d deposits in liver allografts indicate an antibody-mediated response: diagnostic considerations in the evaluation of liver allografts

There is a paucity of data concerning the correlation of complement component 4d (C4d) staining in liver allografts and antibody-mediated rejection. Data about the location and character of C4d deposits in native and allograft liver tissues are inconsistent. We performed C4d immunofluorescence (IF) on 141 fresh-frozen liver allograft biopsy samples and native livers, documented the pattern of C4d IF staining, and correlated the findings with the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs). A linear/granular sinusoidal pattern of C4d IF was noted in 18 of 28 biopsy samples obtained after transplantation from patients with positive crossmatch and detectable donor-specific alloantibody (pos-XM/DSA) findings. None of the 59 tested biopsy samples from patients with negative crossmatch and detectable donor-specific alloantibody (neg-XM/DSA) findings were C4d-positive (P < 0.001). No significant association was found between pos-XM/DSA and C4d IF staining in other nonsinusoidal liver compartments. To compare the results of sinusoidal C4d staining with IF and 2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques, C4d IHC was performed on 19 liver allograft biopsy samples in which a sinusoidal pattern of C4d IF had been noted. Sinusoidal C4d IHC findings were negative for 17 of the 19 biopsy samples; 2 showed weak and focal staining, and both patients had pos-XM/DSA findings. Portal vein endothelium staining was present in only 1 IF-stained biopsy sample (pos-XM/DSA) but in 11 IHC-stained biopsy samples (2 of the 11 samples had neg-XM/DSA findings). We conclude that sinusoidal C4d deposits detected by IF in frozen tissue samples from liver allograft recipients correlate with the presence of DSAs and an antibody-mediated alloresponse. These observations are similar to findings reported for other solid organ transplants and can provide relevant information for patient management. Further validation of IHC techniques for C4d detection in liver allograft tissue is required.

Recurrence and rejection in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease affecting the bile ducts, leading to fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis in most patients. Its etiology is unknown and so far no effective medical therapy is available. Liver transplantation (LTX) is the only curative treatment and at present PSC is the main indication for LTX in the Scandinavian countries. Close to half of the PSC patients experience one or more episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR) following transplantation and approximately 1/5 of the transplanted patients develop recurrent disease in the graft. In addition, some reports indicate that ACR early after LTX for PSC can influence the risk for recurrent disease. For these important post-transplantation entities affecting PSC patients, we have reviewed the current literature on epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and the possible influence of rejection on the risk of recurrent disease in the allograft.

Re-examination of the lymphocytotoxic crossmatch in liver transplantation: can C4d stains help in monitoring?

C4d-assisted recognition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) from donor-specific antibody-positive (DSA+) renal allograft recipients prompted study of DSA+ liver allograft recipients as measured by lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (XM) and/or Luminex. XM results did not influence patient or allograft survival, or cellular rejection rates, but XM+ recipients received significantly more prophylactic steroids. Endothelial C4d staining strongly correlates with XM+ (<3 weeks posttransplantation) and DSA+ status and cellular rejection, but not with worse Banff grading or treatment response. Diffuse C4d staining, XM+, DSA+ and ABO- incompatibility status, histopathology and clinical-serologic profile helped establish an isolated AMR diagnosis in 5 of 100 (5%) XM+ and one ABO-incompatible, recipients. C4d staining later after transplantation was associated with rejection and nonrejection-related causes of allograft dysfunction in DSA- and DSA+ recipients, some of whom had good outcomes without additional therapy. Liver allograft FFPE C4d staining: (a) can help classify liver allograft dysfunction; (b) substantiates antibody contribution to rejection; (c) probably represents nonalloantibody insults and/or complete absorption in DSA- recipients and (d) alone, is an imperfect AMR marker needing correlation with routine histopathology, clinical and serologic profiles. Further study in late biopsies and other tissue markers of liver AMR with simultaneous DSA measurements are needed.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

Complement component 4d immunostaining in liver allografts of patients with de novo immune hepatitis

De novo immune hepatitis (DNIH) is a form of late graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. The fine mechanisms leading to the development of DNIH are not known, and whether this hepatitis is a form of rejection or a result of an auto/alloimmune injury has not been established. In our patients, DNIH was always preceded by the production of donor-specific antibodies against the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) enzyme because of a genetic mismatch in which the donors carried the wild-type gene and the recipients displayed the null genotype. Complement component 4d (C4d) immunopositivity in 12 paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples from 8 patients diagnosed with DNIH associated with anti-GSTT1 antibodies was retrospectively evaluated. Six patients with a diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR) and 7 patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence were included as control groups. Among the patients with DNIH, 7 showed C4d-positive immunostaining localized in the portal tracts, whereas in the tested biopsy samples of the 2 control groups, this staining pattern was absent. Four biopsy samples of the CR group showed C4d-positive sinusoidal staining. This study confirms the activation of the complement pathway in the presence of donor-specific antibodies, which was shown by the deposition of C4d elements in liver biopsy samples of patients with DNIH. The use of C4d as a marker of antibody-mediated rejection in liver allografts in the presence of antidonor antibodies is discussed, and it may contribute to improved differential diagnoses based on biopsy findings.

Noninvasive diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: a proteomic signature validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) requires liver biopsy with its attendant expense and risk. Our first aim was to prospectively determine in an exploratory analysis whether there is a serum proteome signature associated with histologically confirmed ACR. Our second aim was to use simpler and faster enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assays for proteins identified as differentially abundant in the proteomic analysis to identify patients with ACR in a separate validation cohort. We used sequential high-abundance protein depletion and isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to characterize the serum proteome in serum samples of patients with or without ACR. Seven of the 41 proteins identified as differentially abundant [serum amyloid A, complement component 4 (C4), fibrinogen, complement component 1q (C1q), complement component 3, heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), and HSP70] could be measured with ELISA-based assays in a validation cohort consisting of patients with ACR (n = 25) and patients without ACR (n = 21). The mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with ACR and in patients without ACR were 198 ± 27 and 153 ± 34 U/L, respectively. Among the 7 proteins for which ELISA assays were available, C4 and C1q were both independent predictors of ACR. C4 had the greatest predictivity for differentiating patients with or without ACR. A C4 level ≤ 0.31 g/L had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 62%, a positive predictive value of 74%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. A C4 level ≤ 0.31 g/L and an ALT level ≥ 70 IU/mL together had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 81%, a positive predictive value of 86%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. In summary, in this exploratory analysis, serum C4 and ALT levels were highly predictive of ACR in liver transplant recipients. Confirmation in a prospective, larger, and diverse population is needed.

Molecular pathways differentiate hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence from acute cellular rejection in HCV liver recipients

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence (HCVrec) are common complications after liver transplantation (LT) in HCV patients, who share common clinical and histological features, making a differential diagnosis difficult. Fifty-three liver allograft samples from unique HCV LT recipients were studied using microarrays, including a training set (n = 32) and a validation set (n = 19). Two no-HCV-ACR samples from LT recipients were also included. Probe set intensity values were obtained using the robust multiarray average method (RMA) method. Analysis of variance identified statistically differentially expressed genes (P ≤ 0.005). The limma package was used to fit the mixed-effects models using a restricted maximum likelihood procedure. The last absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model was fit with HCVrec versus ACR as the dependent variable predicted. N-fold cross-validation was performed to provide an unbiased estimate of generalization error. A total of 179 probe sets were differentially expressed among groups, with 71 exclusive genes between HCVrec and HCV-ACR. No differences were found within ACR group (HCV-ACR vs. no-HCV-ACR). Supervised clustering analysis displayed two clearly independent groups, and no-HCV-ACR clustered within HCV-ACR. HCVrec-related genes were associated with a cytotoxic T-cell profile, and HCV-ACR-related genes were associated with the inflammatory response. The best-fitting LASSO model classifier accuracy, including 15 genes, has an accuracy of 100% in the training set. N-fold cross-validation accuracy was 78.1%, and sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 50.0%, 90.9%, 71.4% and 80.0%, respectively. Arginase type II (ARG2), ethylmalonic encephalopathy 1 (ETHE1), transmembrane protein 176A (TMEM176A) and TMEM176B genes were significantly confirmed in the validation set. A molecular signature capable of distinguishing HCVrec and ACR in HCV LT recipients was identified and validated.

The significance of donor-specific HLA antibodies in rejection and ductopenia development in ABO compatible liver transplantation

The role of humoral alloreactivity in ABO-compatible liver transplantation remains unclear. To understand the significance of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) in liver rejection, we applied the currently used strategy for detection of antibody-mediated rejection of other solid allografts. For this purpose we reviewed the data on 43 recipients of ABO identical/compatible donor livers who had indication liver biopsy stained for complement element C4d and contemporaneous circulating DSA determination. Seventeen (40%) patients had significant circulating DSA in association with diffuse portal C4d deposition (DSA+/diffuse C4d+). These DSA+/diffuse C4d+ subjects had higher frequency of acute cellular rejection (ACR) 15/17 versus 13/26 (88% vs. 50%), p = 0.02, and steroid resistant rejection 7/17 versus 5/26 (41% vs. 19%), p = 0.03. Based on detection of the combination DSA+/diffuse C4d+, 53.6% of cases of ACR had evidence of concurrent humoral alloreactivity. Six of the 10 patients with ductopenic rejection had circulating DSA and diffuse portal C4d, three of whom (2 early and 1 late posttransplantation) developed unrelenting cholestasis, necessitating specific antibody-depleting therapy to salvage the allografts. Thus, in ABO-compatible liver transplantation humoral alloreactivity mediated by antibodies against donor HLA molecules appears to be frequently intertwined with cellular mechanisms of rejection, and to play a role in ductopenia development.

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Histological assessments continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of liver allograft rejection. The changes occurring in acute and chronic rejection are well recognized and liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing these two conditions. Recent interest has focused on the diagnosis of late cellular rejection, which may have different histological appearances to early acute rejection and instead has features that overlap with so-called 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' and 'idiopathic post-transplant chronic hepatitis'. There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'central perivenulitis' may be an important manifestation of late rejection, although other causes of centrilobular necro-inflammation need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. There are also important areas of overlap between rejection and recurrent hepatitis C infection and the distinction between these two conditions continues to be a problem in the assessment of liver allograft biopsies. Studies using immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated damage have found evidence of C4d deposition in liver allograft rejection, but the functional significance of these observations is currently uncertain. This review will focus on these difficult and controversial areas in the pathology of rejection, documenting what is currently known and identifying areas where further clarification is required.

Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation: biomarkers of disease and fibrosis progression

End-stage liver disease due to hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is the principal indication for liver transplantation. In the USA, over a third of available liver allografts are transplanted into recipients with chronic HCV infection. Reinfection of the graft is universal, but the impact of reinfection on short- and long-term liver function is highly variable. HCV infection in liver transplantation recipients is characterized by an accelerated fibrogenesis, with approximately a third of patients developing cirrhosis within 5 years of follow-up. HCV is associated with decreased patient and graft survival when compared with other indications of orthotopic liver transplantation. The mechanisms responsible for the accelerated liver damage in HCV-infected orthotopic liver transplantation recipients remain largely unknown.

ELISA-based detection of C4d after liver transplantation--a helpful tool for differential diagnosis between acute rejection and HCV-recurrence?

Hepatitis-C is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV is universal leading to graft failure in up to 40% of all patients. The differentiation between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis-C is crucial as rejection treatments are likely to aggravate HCV-recurrence. Histological examination of liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection but has failed in the past to distinguish between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis-C. In a retrospective study we have recently reported that C4d as a marker of the activated complement cascade is detectable in a hepatic specimen in acute rejection after liver transplantation and may serve as a valuable tool in differential diagnosis between ACR and HCV-recurrence. We performed a prospective analysis by ELISA measurement of C4d concentration in cryo-preserved liver biopsies of LTX patients who had either experienced acute rejection, hepatitis-C recurrence or displayed no pathological alterations (controls). Opposed to our immunohistologically based findings in paraffinized tissue we were unable to detect significant differences of C4d concentration in ELISA of cryo-preserved liver tissue. Consequently the role and potential value of C4d as a diagnostic marker may not be determined using ELISA-based tissue evaluation.

Advances in research on antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation

T cell- and antibody-mediated immunity are also called cellular and humoral immunity, respectively. Both cellular and humoral immunity are known to mediate the rejection after allogeneic/xenogeneic organ transplantation. Liver transplantation is the most common type of organ transplantation. At present, many studies have shown that antibody-mediated immunity plays an important role in the development of rejection after liver transplantation. In this article, we will review the recent advances in understanding the basic theory, mechanism, pathological diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation.

Humoral and cellular rejection after combined liver-kidney transplantation in low immunologic risk recipients

Combined liver-kidney transplantation is considered a low risk for immunologic complication. We report an unusual case of identical ABO liver-kidney recipient without preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, transplanted across a T- and B-cell-negative cross-match and complicated by early acute humoral and cellular rejection, first in the liver then in the kidney. While analyzing the immunologic complications in our cohort of 12 low-risk combined liver-kidney recipients, only one recipient experienced a rejection episode without detection of anti-HLA antibody over time. Although humoral or cellular rejection is rare after combined kidney-liver transplantation, our data suggest that even in low-risk recipients, the liver does not always systematically protect the kidney from acute rejection. Indeed, the detection of C4d in the liver should be carefully followed after combined liver-kidney transplantation.

An immunohistochemical evaluation of C4d deposition in pediatric inflammatory liver diseases

C4d is a marker of the activated complement cascade used to assess the humoral component of rejection, mostly in kidney allograft transplants. The role of C4d deposition has recently been addressed in hepatic allograft but has never been tested in a series of inflammatory liver diseases without previous liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare the immunohistochemistry profile of C4d deposition in a pediatric population, between a cohort of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and a series of patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 64 liver biopsies. C4d deposition was observed in 25 (83%) of 30 AIH biopsies examined, in 6 (40%) of 15 hepatitis C biopsies, and in 17 (89%) of 19 hepatitis B biopsies. No expression of C4d was observed in 4 noninflammatory liver specimens used as negative controls. In the AIH group, a staining of the periportal sinusoids was often observed, as well as focal periductal reinforcement. Centrolobular vein staining was observed in the 3 hepatitis groups with a higher frequency in viral hepatitis B biopsies. Regardless of the etiology, lymphoid aggregates demonstrated an accentuation of the staining. These results confirm a role for a humoral immune response in pediatric autoimmune as well as in viral hepatitis. The relative ratios of positive cases imply that this immunostaining does not represent a strong diagnostic criterion in the differentiation between viral hepatitis and AIH. However, differences in the pattern of the staining were observed, depending on the etiology of the disease. The high prevalence of C4d reactivity in viral hepatitis strongly suggests that C4d does not represent a useful marker in the differentiation between acute rejection and viral hepatitis relapse in liver transplants.

Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility

The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility and preformed antibodies in liver transplantation remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate, in a single-center cohort comprising 896 liver transplants, whether the degree of donor-recipient compatibility and preformed antibodies modified graft survival. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that donor-recipient HLA compatibility had a marginal impact on allograft survival. As for compatibility at individual antigen loci, 2 mismatches at HLA-A conferred a survival advantage in retransplanted allografts (P = 0.011). HLA-B and HLA-DR loci did not play a significant role in outcome in any pathology. The concordance of results on preformed antibodies detected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and a multiple bead assay (Luminex xMAP) showed a strong correlation between both techniques (P < 0.0001). Both CDC-detected and Luminex-detected antibodies were associated with shorter graft survival within the first year post-transplant (P = 0.01 and P = 0.016, respectively). Positive CDC T crossmatches and Luminex-detected HLA class II antibodies played a significant role in decreasing graft survival (P = 0.043 and P = 0.0019 at 1 year, respectively, and P = 0.005 and P = 0.038 at 5 years, respectively). A correlation was also observed between the presence of preformed Luminex-detected class II or Luminex I and II antibodies and allograft rejection (P = 0.001 and P = 0.042, respectively). In conclusion, although HLA typing is not a prerequisite for transplantation, screening of HLA antibodies with Luminex techniques and CDC crossmatch may be useful in the detection of at-risk patients that could benefit from increased surveillance and tailored therapy following transplantation.

Significance of C4d staining in ABO-identical/compatible liver transplantation

Complement degradation product C4d has become an important marker of humoral or antibody-mediated rejection in renal and heart allograft biopsies. Although there have been several reports on the detection of C4d in liver allografts, the significance of C4d in liver transplantation and its relationship with humoral rejection are still not clear. We investigated the frequency and pattern of C4d staining in liver allograft biopsies with reference to preoperative lymphocyte crossmatch tests, which detect donor-reactive lymphocyte antibody. Survival rates at 5 years were 77% for crossmatch-negative patients and 53% for crossmatch-positive patients (P=0.009). In crossmatch-negative patients, reproducible positive staining was obtained in 28 of 86 (33%) biopsies taken within 90 days after transplantation and 33 of 96 (34%) biopsies 90 days or after transplantation. Most C4d staining was observed in the portal areas, and no clear correlation was observed between C4d positivity and histological diagnosis. In crossmatch-positive patients, 9 of 11 (82%) biopsies showed positivity for C4d. C4d stained perivenular areas as well as portal areas. Histology of crossmatch-positive patients included acute rejection and cholangitis, but did not include periportal changes that were seen in humoral rejection in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. In summary, focal C4d deposition was seen in various types of liver allograft injury and had little clinical impact on crossmatch-negative patients, but extensive C4d staining in crossmatch-positive patients may be associated with humoral rejection and poor graft survival.

Liver transplantation: an update 2007

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent attention in liver transplantation has focused on equity in organ allocation and management of posttransplant complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease for liver allocation has been successful in implementing a system based on medical urgency rather than waiting time. Refinements are being studied in improving the prediction of mortality and improving transplant benefit by balancing pretransplant mortality and posttransplant survival. Emerging literature is examining expansion of the current criteria for transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma and the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation is a source of considerable morbidity. Nephron-sparing immunosuppression regimens are emerging with encouraging results. Hepatitis C virus infection is difficult to differentiate histologically from rejection, although newer markers are being developed. Antiviral and immunosuppressive strategies for reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence are discussed. Alcohol relapse is common after liver transplant in alcoholic liver disease patients and can lead to worse outcomes.

SUMMARY

Organ allocation tends to evolve under the model for end-stage liver disease with a focus on maximizing transplant benefit. Hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic renal dysfunction and alcohol relapse are major challenges, and continued research in these areas will undoubtedly lead to better outcomes for transplant recipients.