Protocol biopsy-driven interventions after pediatric renal transplantation

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Rejection markers in kidney transplantation: do new technologies help children?

Recent insights in allorecognition and graft rejection mechanisms revealed a more complex picture than originally considered, involving multiple pathways of both adaptive and innate immune response, supplied by efficient inflammatory synergies. Current pillars of transplant monitoring are serum creatinine, proteinuria, and drug blood levels, which are considered as traditional markers, due to consolidated experience, low cost, and widespread availability. The most diffuse immunological biomarkers are donor-specific antibodies, which are included in routine post-transplant monitoring in many centers, although with some reproducibility issues and interpretation difficulties. Confirmed abnormalities in these traditional biomarkers raise the suspicion for rejection and guide the indication for graft biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard for rejection monitoring. Rapidly evolving new "omic" technologies have led to the identification of several novel biomarkers, which may change the landscape of transplant monitoring should their potential be confirmed. Among them, urinary chemokines and measurement of cell-free DNA of donor origin are perhaps the most promising. However, at the moment, these approaches remain highly expensive and cost-prohibitive in most settings, with limited clinical applicability; approachable costs upon technology investments would speed their integration. In addition, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and the study of blood and urinary extracellular vesicles have the potential for early identification of subclinical rejection with high sensitivity and specificity, good reproducibility, and for gaining predictive value in an affordable cost setting. In the near future, information derived from these new biomarkers is expected to integrate traditional tools in routine use, allowing identification of rejection prior to clinical manifestations and timely therapeutic intervention. This review will discuss traditional, novel, and invasive and non-invasive biomarkers, underlining their strengths, limitations, and present or future applications in children.

Subclinical Rejection and Immunosuppression in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients : Single Centre Study

Background: By the time of histological confirmation of rejection is achieved, renal scarring may for treatment as a realistic option . This study aims to study the subclinical pathological graft data and to evaluate the histopathological impact of different immunosuppression protocols in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Methods: This is a case series that included twenty living donor renal transplant recipients. All included cases received the classic triple immunotherapy for at least one month post-transplantation [Steroids, calconurine inhibitors (CNI), and mycofenlolic mofetile (MMF)]. Based on their immunological risk stratification; included cases were divided into 2 groups: group (A) continued on CNI based triple therapy protocol; group (B) shifted to evirolimus /low dose CNI protocol. Surveillance biopsies were done for all cases at one and four month post-transplantation. Results: One and four month biopsies revealed subclinical rejection (including borderline changes) in 4 (20%) cases and 6 (30%) cases respectively. The number of patients received tacrolimus/MMF therapy significantly increased (p=0.02) while that of patients on everloimus/low dose CNI significantly decreased (p=0.014) due to drug modifications based on four month surveillance biopsy data. Conclusion: Subclinical rejection is not uncommon in pediatric renal graft recipients which makes surveillance biopsy might be of help. Early usage of evirolimus/low CNI protocol is associated with higher rejection rate than triple therapy.

Early surveillance biopsy utilization and management of pediatric renal allograft acute T cell-mediated rejection in Canadian centers: Observations from the PROBE multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early TCMR surveillance with protocol kidney biopsy is used differentially among pediatric kidney transplant centers. Little has been reported about actual center-based differences, and this variability may influence TCMR ascertainment, treatment, and monitoring more broadly.

METHODS

Data from the PROBE multicenter study were used to identify patients from centers conducting ESB or LSIB. ESB was defined as >50% of patients having at least 1 surveillance biopsy in the first 9 months. Patients were compared for number of biopsies, rejection episodes, treatment, and follow-up monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 261 biopsies were performed on 97 patients over 1-2 years of follow-up. A total of 228 (87%) of biopsies were performed in ESB centers. Compared to LSIB centers, ESB centers had 7-fold more episodes of TCMR diagnosed on any biopsy [0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.4; P < .001] and a 3-fold higher rate from indication biopsies [0.3 ± 0.9 vs 0.1 ± 0.3; P = .04]. The proportion of rejection treatment varied based on severity: Banff borderline i1t1 (40%);>i1t1 and < Banff 1A (86%); and ≥ Banff 1A (100%). Biopsies for follow-up were performed after treatment in 80% of cases (n = 28) of rejection almost exclusively at ESB centers, with 17 (61%) showing persistence of TCMR (≥i1t1).

CONCLUSIONS

Practice variation exists across Canadian pediatric renal transplant centers with ESB centers identifying more episodes of rejection. Additionally, treatment of Banff borderline is not universal and varies with severity regardless of center type. Lastly, follow-up biopsies are performed inconsistently and invariably show persistence of rejection.

Yield and utility of surveillance kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at various time points post-transplant

BACKGROUND

Due to a lack of consensus on SB for pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we evaluated the yield and clinical utility of SB findings at various time points post-transplant.

METHODS

Patients transplanted at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 with at least one SB at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant were included. Additional biopsies were done for indication (IB). TCMR was classified by Banff criteria (score ≥i1t1).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients had 142 biopsies (SB = 113, IB = 29); 19 (40.4%) of whom experienced at least one TCMR episode in the first-year post-transplant. The greatest SB yield of any pathologic abnormality was at 6 months (57.1%; P < .001). Six months also had the highest yield for TCMR (42.9%), compared with 3.3%, 20.8%, 15.0%, and 9.1% at 1.5, 3, 12 months, and 24 months, respectively (P = .003). SB instigated intensification of immunosuppression (28.3% cases), reduction of immunosuppression (2.7% cases), and other non-immunosuppressant changes (1.8% cases). The 6-month SB led to the greatest number of changes in management (53.6%), compared with 1.5, 3, 12, and 24 months (13.3, 20.8, 25.0, and 36.4%, respectively; P = .012). There were no major biopsy-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SBs identify an important burden of subclinical rejection and other pathology leading to changes in clinical management. The greatest yield was at 6 months, whereas the least utility was at the 1.5 months. Selection of SB timing may be tailored such that the optimal yield is balanced against the procedural risk.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for detection of allograft rejection in pediatric kidney transplants

In pediatric transplantation, acute rejection is a major contributor of graft failure. Current approaches include kidney biopsy in response to graft dysfunction and/or the emergence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, biopsy is associated with potential complications. Thus, there is a need for non-invasive diagnostics. Detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA, AlloSure) > 1% is associated with rejection in adult kidney transplants. Here, we evaluate the utility of dd-cfDNA for identifying allograft rejection in pediatric patients. Between 10/2017 and 10/2019, 67 patients, who underwent initial testing with dd-cfDNA as part of routine monitoring or in response to clinical suspicion for rejection, were included. Biopsies were performed when dd-cfDNA > 1.0% or where clinical suspicion was high. Demographics, dd-cfDNA, antibody status, and biopsies were collected prospectively. Data were analyzed to determine predictive value of dd-cfDNA for identifying grafts at risk for rejection. 19 of 67 patients had dd-cfDNA testing as part of routine monitoring with a median dd-cfDNA score of 0.37 (IQR: 0.19-1.10). 48 of 67 patients who had clinical suspicion of rejection had median dd-cfDNA score of 0.47 (0.24-2.15). DSA-positive recipients had higher dd-cfDNA scores than those who were negative or had AT1R positivity alone (P = .003). There was no association between dd-cfDNA score and strength of DSA positivity. 7 of 48 recipients had a biopsy with a dd-cfDNA score <1%; two showed evidence of rejection. Neither DSA nor AT1R positivity was statistically associated with biopsy-proven rejection. However, dd-cfDNA >1% was diagnostic of rejection with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100% (AUC: 0.996, 0.98-1.00; P = .002). dd-cfDNA represents a non-invasive method for early detection of rejection in pediatric renal transplants. Our study shows dd-cfDNA to be highly predictive of histological rejection and superior to other indicators such as graft dysfunction or antibody positivity alone. Further studies are necessary to refine these initial observations.

Characterizing the frequency of modifiable histological changes observed on surveillance biopsies in pediatric kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Rejection is responsible for just under 50% of graft loss in the pediatric kidney transplant population. Early identification and treatment of allograft injury, specifically modifiable pathologies such as subclinical rejection (SCR), calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and BK virus nephropathy, may improve allograft survival. Protocol surveillance biopsy (SB) currently offers the earliest opportunity for targeted interventions.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of 215 kidney SBs obtained from 2008 to 2016 in 97 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. SBs were obtained at 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplantation. Frequency of abnormal histologic findings, estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of SB, and SB-related complications were recorded. Data were analyzed to investigate possible time trends and the presence of demographic or clinical associations with abnormal histologic findings.

RESULTS

Potentially modifiable histologic findings were seen in 38.1% of all SBs. SCR was found with increasing frequency across all time points with an estimated 49% increase in the odds of a SCR finding per additional 6 months post-transplantation (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.09, p = 0.022). Among follow-up biopsies in patients who underwent treatment for SCR, 50% had no SCR and 18.8% showed histologic improvement. The complication rate associated with SB was 1.9% (4/215 SBs) and consisted of only minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SBs are safe and offer the opportunity to identify and treat modifiable histologic changes in the pediatric kidney transplant population. The performance of SBs for up to 2 years after transplantation can have meaningful clinical impact.

The role of protocol biopsies after pediatric kidney transplantation

Data on protocol biopsies (PBs) after pediatric kidney transplantation are rare.We evaluated 6-month post-transplantation renal function in 86 children after PB as observational study. Patients were divided into 3 groups:Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and delta GFR were determined.PBs 6 months post-kidney transplantation did not influence the clinical course in stable pediatric patients and are therefore of questionable value. Decreased kidney function may however be stabilized by therapeutic intervention according to results of PB.

What's the score? A comparison of deceased donor kidney scoring systems and correlation with graft outcome

BACKGROUND

A number of deceased donor kidney scoring systems have been developed to predict post-transplant graft failure. However, studies comparing the predictive ability of these scoring systems to each other are lacking.

METHODS

We used single-center histopathologic and UNOS data from 140 marginal deceased donor kidneys and transplant recipients to compare the predictive accuracy of the Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI), Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI), Remuzzi, and Nyberg scoring systems for 2-year graft survival using time-dependent receiver operating curves and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

MAPI had the highest predictive accuracy (area under curve [AUC] = 0.81) compared to KDRI (AUC = 0.45), Remuzzi (AUC = 0.59), and Nyberg (AUC = 0.63) for 2-year graft survival. Furthermore, when analyzing each score according to its pre-defined risk strata, MAPI was the only scoring system for which 2-year graft survival was significantly different across strata (84.3% for low risk, 56.5% for intermediate risk, and 50% for high risk, P < .001). Additionally, MAPI was the only risk score significantly associated with 2-year graft survival (hazard ratio per point: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.23, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-center cohort of biopsied marginal kidneys used for transplantation, MAPI had the best predictive ability of these four scoring systems. When biopsy data are available for kidneys considered for transplantation, the MAPI score may provide additional information that could be used to better identify kidneys likely to have longer graft survival.

Cytokine Profiles in Children After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation With Acute Cellular Compared to Chronic Antibody-mediated Rejection and Stable Patients: A Pilot Study

Different patterns of plasma cytokines can be expected in the case of chronic active-antibody-mediated (cAMR) and acute cellular rejection (AR) after kidney transplantation (KTx).

Benefits and risks of protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation

Protocol biopsies are defined as sampling of allograft tissue at predetermined times regardless of function. This procedure can be justified due to the lack of non-invasive methods to reliably diagnose rejection (acute or subclinical). Changes in creatinine are not seen with subclinical rejection or early acute rejection and do not always correlate with efficacy of treatment. Parents and providers are still hesitant to pursue protocol biopsy due to the potential complications and lack of definitive evidence of a benefit from doing this procedure. Importantly, the rate of transplant renal biopsy complications requiring additional intervention is low. It is unclear if detection and treatment of subclinical rejection detected on protocol biopsy will lead to improved graft survival. Our goal is to review the literature on this topic and share some of the experience in our center. Definition, indications, and complications of diagnostic transplant renal biopsies are not included in this review.

Protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation: a precious tool for clinical management

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease. Early results have improved, but late graft loss is still a major problem. Non-invasive, fully reliable early biomarkers of acute rejection are currently missing.

METHODS

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of protocol biopsies (PBXs) in a pediatric population. During 11 years, 209 renal transplantations were performed in 204 pediatric patients. Biopsies were performed 3-6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation. Procedure-related complications were systematically looked for by means of ultrasound scans.

RESULTS

Unexpected findings (mainly subclinical rejections) requiring therapeutic intervention were found in 19.3% biopsies performed at 3-6 months, in 18.4% in 12-month biopsies and in none of those performed after 5 years. The 13.6% patients at 12-month biopsies and 23.6% at 5-year biopsies showed calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was found in 17.6 and 83.6% of patients at 12-month and 5-year biopsies, respectively. Complications of the PBX were infrequent. Five-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was not significantly different in patients who received treatment for any cause and patients with normal histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we do not have a control group, we may speculate that patients who received treatment returned to a "standard" condition possibly improving final outcome. Protocol biopsies are a powerful diagnostic tool for the management of pediatric renal transplant recipients. In view of the lack of evidence that biopsies taken 5 years after transplantation lead to any therapeutic change, their use should be reconsidered.

Safety and utility of surveillance biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant patients

There is currently no way to diagnose a rejection before a change in serum creatinine. This had led some to start doing SB, but little data exist on the utility and safety of SB in pediatric patients. There is also little known on practice patterns of pediatric nephrologists. A retrospective review of pediatric kidney transplant SB between January 2013 and January 2017 at a single center was performed. A survey went to the PedNeph email list. There were 47 SB; 15 at 6 months, 12 at 1 year, 13 at 2 years, and 7 at 3 years. There were 3 minor (1 gross hematuria and 2 hematomas) and no major complications. On 6-month SB, 1 had SC 1A ACR (6.7%) with no BR ACR. On the 12-month SB, there were 5 with SCBR ACR (41.7%) and 1 with SC AMR (8.3%). On the 2-year SB, there were 4 that had SCBR ACR (30.8%), and 1 with SC AMR (7.7%). On the 3-year SB, 1 had chronic transplant glomerulitis (14.3%). The survey showed that 34.3% of pediatric nephrologists perform SB. SB can be performed safely. By early identification of histological lesions, SB gives us an opportunity for individualized immunosuppressive regimens that may prevent chronic allograft dysfunction and improve long-term graft outcome.

The utility of surveillance biopsies in pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Surveillance biopsies (SBs) are performed in some pediatric kidney transplant programs, based on data obtained in earlier immunosuppressive eras that the treatment of subclinical acute rejection results in better graft survival. The benefit of SBs for patients on modern immunosuppression regimens is unclear. We have therefore evaluated the clinical utility of SBs in a population of children receiving a kidney transplant.

METHODS

We have performed SBs at 3, 6 and 12 months post-transplantation as standard of care at our institution since 2013 in patients on a regimen of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate and rapid steroid taper (RST; steroids maintained in some exceptions). We reviewed pathology reports of 82 SBs from 34 transplants in 34 children for all abnormal findings and adequacy of specimens. Clinical records were reviewed for changes in management resulting from SB findings and for significant procedure complications.

RESULTS

Of the 82 biopsies, 41 (50%) had abnormal findings separate from fibrosis, including five Banff Grade I rejections, ten borderline rejections, six calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity, four BK-virus nephropathy, five recurrent disease and three acute pyelonephritis. Moderate or more fibrosis was present in nine of the 82 (11%) biopsies. Management changes due to SB findings occurred in nine cases (11.0%). The proportion of abnormal findings or management changes did not differ between the RST or steroid-based groups. Patients performing clean intermittent catheterization showed inflammatory changes often read as rejection, but were managed differently. Three biopsies were deemed inadequate. No significant complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of the SBs performed under modern immunosuppression showed abnormal findings even when fibrosis was excluded. However, management changes due to the SB findings were less frequent, although they occurred in a clinically meaningful percentage of cases. Complications or inadequate specimens were rare.

Surveillance biopsies after paediatric kidney transplantation: A review

Kidney transplantation is the most effective means of treating children with end-stage kidney disease, and yet, there continues to be a limited "life span" of transplanted kidneys in paediatric recipients. Early graft monitoring, using the surveillance biopsy, has the potential to extend renal allograft survival in paediatric recipients. The surveillance biopsy provides important and timely information about acute and chronic graft pathology, particularly SCR and calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity, which can subsequently guide management decisions and improve long-term graft survival. The ostensible value of the surveillance biopsy is furthered by the limitations of conventional renal functional studies. However, there is still much debate surrounding the surveillance biopsy in paediatric recipients, particularly in regard to its overall utility, safety and timing. This review discusses the current literature regarding the utility, safety, and potential predictive value of surveillance biopsies for guiding post-transplant management in paediatric renal allograft recipients, as well as the viability of other potentially newer non-invasive strategies for renal allograft monitoring.

Can pre-implantation biopsies predict renal allograft function in pediatric renal transplant recipients?

Objectives:

To determine the utility of pre-implantation renal biopsy (PIB) to predict renal allograft outcomes.

Methods:

This is a retrospective review of all patients that underwent PIB from January 2003 to December 2011 at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London, United Kingdom. Thirty-two male patients (56%) aged 1.5-16 years (median: 10.2) at the time of transplantation were included in the study and followed-up for 33 (6-78) months. The results were compared with 33 controls.

Results:

The PIB showed normal histopathological findings in 13 patients (41%), mild chronic vascular changes in 8 (25%), focal tubular atrophy in one, moderate to severe chronic vascular change in 3, mild to moderate acute tubular damage in 6, and tissue was inadequate in one subject. Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 3 patients; 2 with vascular changes in PIB, and one with normal histopathological findings. Two subjects with PIB changes lost their grafts. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3-, and 6-months post-transplantation was lower in children with abnormal PIB changes compared with those with normal PIB. There was one case of DGF in the control group, and 4 children lost their grafts including the one with DGF.

Conclusion:

Pre-implantation renal biopsy can provide important baseline information of the graft with implications on subsequent medical treatment for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection is a diagnostic challenge in renal transplantation medicine. However, it is an important diagnosis to make, since chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) is the main cause of long-term graft loss. Antibody-mediated rejection is diagnosed by detecting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the blood in combination with observing typical histomorphological signs in kidney biopsy, as described in the Banff classification. Therapy is based on the removal of DSAs by administering intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), plasmapheresis, or immunoadsorption. Reoccurrence of antibodies is diminished by the use of rituximab, increased immunosuppression, and in some cases additional experimental substances. A combination of these techniques has been shown to be successful in the majority of cases of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Routine DSA monitoring is warranted for early detection of antibody-mediated rejection.

Histopathological diagnosis of acute and chronic rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation

ABO-compatible as well as ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation are well established in the pediatric population. There are particularities in the histopathological evaluation of pediatric kidney transplant biopsies as for example the recurrence of certain diseases different from the adult population. Furthermore, the challenging transition of pediatric renal transplant recipients to adulthood is associated with an increased rate of non-adherence triggered rejection episodes. With modern immunosuppressive drugs, T-cell-mediated rejection of renal allografts is well controlled. In contrast, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is increasingly recognized as one of the major reasons for allograft loss. However, the 2001 diagnostic Banff criteria for antibody-mediated rejection require further refinement, as the morphological spectrum of AMR expands while effective therapeutic strategies are lacking. For example, endarteritis, which traditionally has been attributed to T-cell-mediated rejection, has recently been shown to be part of the AMR spectrum in some cases. Many findings in transplant renal biopsies are not specific for a certain disease but need consideration of differential diagnoses. To use the term "chronic allograft nephropathy" as a diagnostic entity is no longer appropriate. Therefore, the precise identification of specific diseases is paramount in the assessment of transplant renal biopsies in order to enable tailored therapeutic management.

ESPR uroradiology task force and ESUR Paediatric Work Group--Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part VI: childhood renal biopsy and imaging of neonatal and infant genital tract. Minutes from the task force session at the annual ESPR Meeting 2012 in Athens on childhood renal biopsy and imaging neonatal genitalia

The European Society of Paediatric Radiology Uroradiology Task Force and the ESUR Paediatric Work Group jointly publish guidelines for paediatric urogenital imaging. Two yet unaddressed topics involving patient safety and imaging load are addressed in this paper: renal biopsy in childhood and imaging of the neonatal genital tract, particularly in girls. Based on our thorough review of literature and variable practice in multiple centers, procedural recommendations are proposed on how to perform renal biopsy in children and how to approach the genital tract in (female) neonates. These are statements by consensus due to lack of sufficient evidence-based data. The procedural recommendation on renal biopsy in childhood aims at improving patient safety and reducing the number of unsuccessful passes and/or biopsy-related complications. The recommendation for an imaging algorithm in the assessment of the neonatal genital tract focuses on the potential of ultrasonography to reduce the need for more invasive or radiating imaging, however, with additional fluoroscopy or MRI to be used in selected cases. Adherence to these recommendations will allow comparable data and evidence to be generated for future adaptation of imaging strategies in paediatric uroradiology.

Early protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation: interest for the adaptation of immunosuppression

GPB are often performed in PRT to detect subclinical acute rejection or IF/TA. Reducing immunosuppression side effects without increasing rejection is a major concern in PRT. We report the results of GPB in children transplanted with a steroid-sparing protocol adapted to immunological risk. Children under 18 yr who received a renal transplantation between April 1, 2009 and May 31, 2012 were included. Immunosuppression consisted of an antibody induction therapy, tacrolimus, and MMF for all recipients. CSs were administered to children under five yr old, or receiving a second allograft. Twenty-eight children were included, 50% were CSs free. GPB were performed between three and six months. IF/TA was documented in seven biopsies; four of these seven children were CS free. One child, with CSs, presented a borderline rejection, and another child, steroid free, with significant inflammatory interstitial infiltrate, considered as a subclinical rejection, was treated with CSs pulses. The median eGFR was stable (74, 67.5, and 82 mL/min/1.73 m² at, respectively, seven days, three months, and one yr). Patient and graft survival were 100%. These results have to be confirmed in a larger cohort, with long-term follow-up.

Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update

The evidence base relating to the use of everolimus in heart transplantation has expanded considerably in recent years, providing clinically relevant information regarding its use in clinical practice. Unless there are special considerations to take into account, all de novo heart transplant patients can be regarded as potential candidates for immunosuppression with everolimus and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Caution about the use of everolimus immediately after transplantation should be exercised in certain patients with the risk of severe proteinuria, with poor wound healing, or with uncontrolled severe hyperlipidemia. Initiation of everolimus in the early phase aftertransplant is not advisable in patients with severe pretransplant end-organ dysfunction or in patients on a left ventricular assist device beforetransplant who are at high risk of infection or of wound healing complications. The most frequent reason for introducing everolimus in maintenance heart transplant patients is to support minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor therapy, for example, due to impaired renal function or malignancy. Due to its potential to inhibit the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and to reduce cytomegalovirus infection, everolimus should be initiated as soon as possible after heart transplantation. Immediate and adequate reduction of CNI exposure is mandatory from the start of everolimus therapy.

Growing experience with mTOR inhibitors in pediatric solid organ transplantation

Controlled trials of mTOR inhibitors in children following solid organ transplantation are scarce, although evidence from prospective single-arm studies is growing. Everolimus with reduced CNI therapy has been shown to be efficacious and safe in de novo pediatric kidney transplant patients in prospective trials. Prospective and retrospective data in children converted from CNI therapy to mTOR inhibition following kidney, liver, or heart transplantation suggest preservation of immunosuppressive efficacy. Good renal function has been maintained when mTOR inhibitors are used de novo in children following kidney transplantation or after conversion to mTOR inhibition with CNI minimization. mTOR inhibition with reduced CNI exposure is associated with a low risk for developing infection in children. Growth and development do not appear to be impaired during low-dose mTOR inhibition, but more studies are required. No firm conclusions can be drawn as to whether mTOR inhibitors should be discontinued in children requiring surgical intervention or whether mTOR inhibition delays progression of hepatic fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that use of mTOR inhibitors in children undergoing solid organ transplantation is efficacious and safe, but a number of issues remain unresolved and further studies are required.

De novo therapy with everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine following pediatric kidney transplantation: a prospective, multicenter, 12-month study

Prospective data regarding the de novo use of everolimus following kidney transplantation in children are sparse. In a prospective, 12-month, single-arm, open-label study, pediatric kidney transplant patients received everolimus (target trough concentration ≥3 ng/mL) with reduced-exposure CsA and corticosteroids, with or without basiliximab induction. Sixteen of the 18 patients completed the study on-treatment. Age range was 2-16 yr (mean 10.9 yr); eight patients received a living donor graft. Mean (s.d.) everolimus level was 7.4 (3.1) ng/mL during the first 12 months post-transplant. There were no cases of BPAR, graft loss, or death during the study. Protocol biopsies were performed at month 12 in seven patients, with subclinical (untreated) acute rejection diagnosed in one case. Mean (s.d.) estimated GFR (Schwartz formula) was 98 (34) mL/min/1.73 m(2) at month 12. Three patients experienced one or more serious adverse events with a suspected relation to study medication. One patient discontinued study medication due to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (5.6%). Everolimus with reduced-dose CsA and corticosteroids achieved good efficacy and renal function and was well tolerated in this small cohort of pediatric kidney transplant patients. Controlled trials are required to answer remaining questions about the optimal use of everolimus in this setting.

Development and validation of a new statistical model for prognosis of long-term graft function after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

No adequate statistical model has been established to estimate future glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children after kidney transplantation (KTX). Equations based on simple linear regression analysis as used in adults are not established in children.

METHODS

An optimal prognostic model of GFR was generated for 63 children at 3-7 years after KTX. The main regression model for prediction of the log-transformed GFR (logGFR) included the mean monthly change of GFR in the period 3-24 months after KTX (∆GFR), the baseline GFR at 3 months (bGFR), and an intercept. Additionally, we investigated if the inclusion of cofactors leads to more precise predictions. The model was validated by leave-one-out cross-validation for years 3-7 after KTX. Prognostic quality was determined with the mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Results were compared with the simple linear regression model used in adults.

RESULTS

The following statistical model was calculated for every prognosis year (i = 3, …, 7):[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] Comparison of the new statistical model and the simple linear model for adults led to relevantly lower MSEs and MAEs for the new model (year 7: New model: MSE 0.1, MAE 0.3/adult model: MSE 1069, MAE 18). The benefit of inclusion of cofactors was not relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

This statistical model is able to predict long-term graft function in children with very high precision.

Protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Protocol biopsies can detect subclinical rejection and early signs of calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

In a prospective study, protocol biopsies 3 and 12 months after transplant in transplanted children from two centers were studied. One center used cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression and the other center used tacrolimus. Patients were on CsA (n = 26, group 1) or on tacrolimus (n = 10, group 2). Patients received basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone.

RESULTS

In patients on CsA, 26 kidney biopsies were performed during the 6 months after transplantation. Eighteen protocol biopsies were performed at 3 months post transplant; 13 were normal and five showed rejection (two borderline and three Banff II rejections). Eight biopsies were motivated by an increase of serum creatinine; four were normal and four revealed signs of acute rejection (two borderline and two Banff II). Twelve protocol biopsies were performed after 12 months; all were normal. For patients on tacrolimus (n = 10), ten protocol transplant biopsies were performed at 3 months post-transplant; none showed signs of rejection. No biopsy was performed for an increase of serum creatinine. There were no differences in patient age, number of human leukocyteantigen (HLA) incompatibilities, or other patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on tacrolimus had less acute rejection episodes detected on protocol biopsies 3 months after transplant. Protocol biopsies seem to play an important role in the detection of subclinical rejection in patients on CsA.