1
|
Wakiya T, Sakuma Y, Onishi Y, Sanada Y, Okada N, Hirata Y, Horiuchi T, Omameuda T, Takadera K, Sata N. Liver resection volume-dependent pancreatic strain following living donor hepatectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6753. [PMID: 38514681 PMCID: PMC10957952 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57431-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The liver and pancreas work together to recover homeostasis after hepatectomy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of liver resection volume on the pancreas. We collected clinical data from 336 living liver donors. They were categorized into left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left lobectomy, and right lobectomy (RL) groups. Serum pancreatic enzymes were compared among the groups. Serum amylase values peaked on postoperative day (POD) 1. Though they quickly returned to preoperative levels on POD 3, 46% of cases showed abnormal values on POD 7 in the RL group. Serum lipase levels were highest at POD 7. Lipase values increased 5.7-fold on POD 7 in the RL group and 82% of cases showed abnormal values. The RL group's lipase was twice that of the LLS group. A negative correlation existed between the remnant liver volume and amylase (r = - 0.326)/lipase (r = - 0.367) on POD 7. Furthermore, a significant correlation was observed between POD 7 serum bilirubin and amylase (r = 0.379)/lipase (r = 0.381) levels, indicating cooccurrence with liver and pancreatic strain. Pancreatic strain due to hepatectomy occurs in a resection/remnant liver volume-dependent manner. It would be beneficial to closely monitor pancreatic function in patients undergoing a major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiichi Wakiya
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
| | - Yasunaru Sakuma
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Onishi
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Sanada
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Noriki Okada
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Yuta Hirata
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Toshio Horiuchi
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Takahiko Omameuda
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Kiichiro Takadera
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Naohiro Sata
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anand AC, Nandi B, Acharya SK, Arora A, Babu S, Batra Y, Chawla YK, Chowdhury A, Chaoudhuri A, Eapen EC, Devarbhavi H, Dhiman RK, Datta Gupta S, Duseja A, Jothimani D, Kapoor D, Kar P, Khuroo MS, Kumar A, Madan K, Mallick B, Maiwall R, Mohan N, Nagral A, Nath P, Panigrahi SC, Pawar A, Philips CA, Prahraj D, Puri P, Rastogi A, Saraswat VA, Saigal S, Shalimar, Shukla A, Singh SP, Verghese T, Wadhawan M. Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2020; 10:477-517. [PMID: 33029057 PMCID: PMC7527855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACLF, Acute on Chronic liver Failure
- AKI, Acute kidney injury
- ALF, Acute Liver Failure
- ALFED score
- ALT, alanine transaminase
- AST, aspartate transaminase
- CNS, central nervous system
- CT, Computerized tomography
- HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets
- ICH, Intracrainial hypertension
- ICP, Intracrainial Pressure
- ICU, Intensive care unit
- INR, International normalised ratio
- LAD, Liver assist device
- LDLT, Living donor liver transplantation
- LT, Liver transplantation
- MAP, Mean arterial pressure
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- MLD, Metabolic liver disease
- NAC, N-acetyl cysteine
- PALF, Pediatric ALF
- WD, Wilson's Disease
- acute liver failure
- artificial liver support
- liver transplantation
- plasmapheresis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil C. Anand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaliga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Bhaskar Nandi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridababd, Haryana, India
| | - Subrat K. Acharya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
| | - Sethu Babu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500003, India
| | - Yogesh Batra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, SaritaVihar, New Delhi, 110 076, India
| | - Yogesh K. Chawla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kushabhadra Campus (KIIT Campus-5), Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Abhijit Chowdhury
- Department of Hepatology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, 700020, India
| | - Ashok Chaoudhuri
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, D-1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India
| | - Eapen C. Eapen
- Department of Hepatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Harshad Devarbhavi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, 560034, India
| | - Radha K. Dhiman
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Siddhartha Datta Gupta
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Dinesh Jothimani
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chrompet, Chennai, 600044, India
| | | | - Premashish Kar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201 012, India
| | - Mohamad S. Khuroo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dr Khuroo’ s Medical Clinic, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
| | - Kaushal Madan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Smart Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Bipadabhanjan Mallick
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Rakhi Maiwall
- Hepatology Incharge Liver Intensive Care, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, D-1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India
| | - Neelam Mohan
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Liver Transplantation, Medanta – the MedicityHospital, Sector – 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Aabha Nagral
- Department of Gastroenterology, Apollo and Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, 15, Dr Deshmukh Marg, Pedder Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026, India
| | - Preetam Nath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaliga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Sarat C. Panigrahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaliga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Ankush Pawar
- Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Okhla Road, New Delhi, 110 025, India
| | - Cyriac A. Philips
- The Liver Unit and Monarch Liver Lab, Cochin Gastroenterology Group, Ernakulam Medical Centre, Kochi 682028, Kerala, India
| | - Dibyalochan Prahraj
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaliga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Pankaj Puri
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Fortis Escorts Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute (FELDI), Fortis Escorts Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Medanta – the MedicityHospital, Sector – 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Vivek A. Saraswat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raibareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226 014, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Department of Hepatology, Department of Liver Transplantation, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 29, India
| | - Akash Shukla
- Department of Gastroenterology, LTM Medical College & Sion Hospital, India
| | - Shivaram P. Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, SCB Medical College, Dock Road, Manglabag, Cuttack, Odisha, 753 007, India
| | - Thomas Verghese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Government Medical College, Kozikhode, India
| | - Manav Wadhawan
- Institute of Liver & Digestive Diseases and Head of Hepatology & Liver Transplant (Medicine), BLK Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - The INASL Task-Force on Acute Liver Failure
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaliga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridababd, Haryana, India
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500003, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, SaritaVihar, New Delhi, 110 076, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kushabhadra Campus (KIIT Campus-5), Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
- Department of Hepatology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, 700020, India
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, D-1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India
- Department of Hepatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, 560034, India
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chrompet, Chennai, 600044, India
- Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201 012, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dr Khuroo’ s Medical Clinic, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Smart Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
- Hepatology Incharge Liver Intensive Care, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, D-1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Liver Transplantation, Medanta – the MedicityHospital, Sector – 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Apollo and Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, 15, Dr Deshmukh Marg, Pedder Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026, India
- Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Okhla Road, New Delhi, 110 025, India
- The Liver Unit and Monarch Liver Lab, Cochin Gastroenterology Group, Ernakulam Medical Centre, Kochi 682028, Kerala, India
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Fortis Escorts Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute (FELDI), Fortis Escorts Hospital, Delhi, India
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Medanta – the MedicityHospital, Sector – 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raibareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226 014, India
- Department of Hepatology, Department of Liver Transplantation, India
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 29, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, LTM Medical College & Sion Hospital, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, SCB Medical College, Dock Road, Manglabag, Cuttack, Odisha, 753 007, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Government Medical College, Kozikhode, India
- Institute of Liver & Digestive Diseases and Head of Hepatology & Liver Transplant (Medicine), BLK Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is a well-recognised complication of endoscopic procedures like endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography but not oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD). I report a case of a 33-year-old woman, admitted with severe epigastric pain and vomiting 2 hours after an elective OGD for evaluation of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Pancreatitis was diagnosed on the basis of elevated lipase (40 790 U/L; normal 11-82) and findings on imaging studies. Other common causes of acute pancreatitis such as gallstones, alcohol and medications were ruled out. She had an extended hospital course because of severe disease, characterised by systemic inflammatory response syndrome, pleural effusion and ascites but was successfully managed conservatively with bowel rest, hydration and pain management. Acute pancreatitis should be considered a rare complication of OGD and should be considered in differential diagnosis for abdominal pain post OGD. Pathogenesis is likely from direct trauma to pancreas or gas insufflation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Common but Often Overlooked Cause of Abdominal Pain in Post-Liver-Transplant Patients. Case Rep Transplant 2017; 2017:6047046. [PMID: 29201486 PMCID: PMC5671705 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6047046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In general population, gallstone pancreatitis is the most common cause of pancreatitis. However, there are very few literatures that address this topic in post-liver-transplant patients. Clinical Case A 69-year-old female who had a liver transplant in 2015 due to hepatocellular carcinoma and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis. She had a recent episode of acute cellular rejection that was treated with high dose methylprednisolone 1 week prior to admission. She presented with severe epigastric abdominal pain associated with nausea and vomiting. Her laboratory studies showed significantly elevated serum lipase, AST, and ALT from her baseline. She underwent urgent Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) that showed common bile duct stone that was extracted. Discussion Biliary sludge and stones accounted for 22% of late onset acute pancreatitis after liver transplant. Corticosteroids have been identified as one of the potential causes of drug-induced pancreatitis. However, she is more likely to have gall stone pancreatitis since she also had dilated common bile duct and intrahepatic duct. In addition, there was CBD stone noted on ERCP. Conclusion Acute gallstone associated pancreatitis after liver transplant is not uncommon. Patients generally have good outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
|
5
|
Russell TA, Park S, Agopian VG, Zarrinpar A, Farmer DG, O'Neill S, Korayem I, Ebaid S, Gornbein J, Busuttil RW, Kaldas FM. Peritransplant pancreatitis: A marker of high mortality and graft failure in liver transplant patients. Liver Transpl 2017; 23:925-932. [PMID: 28294516 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Perioperative pancreatitis is a significant comorbid condition in surgical patients. However, the degree to which pancreatitis affects graft and overall survival in liver transplant recipients has not been evaluated. This study assesses the impact of pancreatitis on graft and patient survival in adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). All patients undergoing OLT at a single academic institution from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Pancreatitis was classified by method of diagnosis (intraoperative/radiographic [IO/R] versus isolated serologic diagnosis) and timing (preoperative versus postoperative diagnosis). Twenty-three patients were identified with peritransplant pancreatitis (within 30 days preoperatively or postoperatively). A control group of patients without pancreatitis undergoing OLT was composed of 775 patients. Graft failure/death rates for patients with versus without pancreatitis were 7.4% versus 7.4% at 30 days, 33.3% versus 12.6% at 90 days, and 44.4% versus 26.9% at 12 months. Four patients with pancreatitis (17.4%) required emergent retransplantation and subsequently died within 90 days of their second transplant. Overall, 6 patients with pancreatitis (26.1%) died within 90 days of transplantation. Patients with pancreatitis had a hazard ratio (HR) for death or graft failure of 2.28 as compared with controls (P < 0.01). The effect of pancreatitis is most pronounced among those diagnosed by IO/R findings, with an adjusted HR of 2.53 (P < 0.01) and those diagnosed in the postoperative period, adjusted HR of 2.57 (P = 0.01). In conclusion, perioperative pancreatitis is associated with early graft failure and patient mortality, regardless of the method or timing of the diagnosis. Given these results, IO/R findings of pancreatitis should induce caution and potentially preclude OLT until resolved. Liver Transplantation 23 925-932 2017 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Surgery, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation
| | | | | | - Islam Korayem
- Surgery, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation
| | - Samer Ebaid
- Surgery, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation
| | - Jeffrey Gornbein
- Biomathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Fady M Kaldas
- Surgery, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Late liver function test abnormalities post-adult liver transplantation: a review of the etiology, investigation, and management. Hepatol Int 2015; 10:106-14. [PMID: 26603541 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-015-9685-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 24,000 liver transplants are performed annually worldwide, almost 7000 of which are performed in the USA. Survival is excellent and continues to improve, with 1-year survival currently exceeding 85 %, but effective management of patients after liver transplantation is critical to achieve optimal results. A plethora of diseases can affect the transplanted allograft, ranging from recurrence of the original disease to de novo liver pathology, and diagnosis can be complicated by nonclassical presentation, de novo disease, or inconclusive histology. Patients can remain asymptomatic despite significant damage to the transplanted liver, so prompt identification and treatment of liver disease after transplantation is crucial to preserve allograft function. Liver function tests are routinely taken throughout the postoperative period to monitor the graft. Although nonspecific, they are inexpensive, noninvasive, and sensitive for allograft disease and can quickly alert physicians to the presence of asymptomatic pathology. This review will outline possible causes of liver function test abnormalities in the late posttransplant period and provide guidance for investigation, diagnosis, and management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mejia J, Sucandy I, Steel J, Golas B, Humar A, Lee K, Zeh H, Marsh J, Tsung A. Indications and outcomes of pancreatic surgery after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2014; 28:330-6. [PMID: 24757720 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior liver transplantation and immunosuppression potentially translate into significant morbidity and poor outcomes after any type of pancreatic surgery. Little is known about the outcomes of pancreatic surgery after liver transplantation. This study was designed to review our experience regarding the indications and outcomes of pancreatic surgery following liver transplantation. METHODS A retrospective review of all liver transplant recipients who underwent pancreatic surgery between 1991 and 2009 was performed. RESULTS A total of 3196 patients underwent liver transplantation, of whom 18 (0.6%) subsequently required pancreatic surgery. The most common indications were necrotizing pancreatitis and lesions of the head and tail of the pancreas. Procedures performed included pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and pancreatic necrosectomy. The estimated blood loss was 500 mL and operative time was 430 ± 224 min. Pathology results revealed malignant lesions in six (33%) patients, pre-malignant lesions in 2 (11%) patients, and benign lesions in 10 (56%) patients. The median time from transplantation to pancreatic surgery was 61 months. The 30-d postoperative complication rate was 77.8%, with median hospital stay of 15 d. The three-, 12-, and 24-month survival rates were 78%, 48%, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic surgery after liver transplantation results in significant 30-d complications. Prior liver transplantation, however, should not be a contraindication for subsequent pancreatic surgery, due to its decent survival outcome.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chung HS, Kim YS, Lee JM, Hong SH, Lee SR, Park CS. Intraoperative calcium-related risk factors for biochemical acute pancreatitis after living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:1706-10. [PMID: 21693262 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2010] [Accepted: 12/20/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Laboratory-based biochemical acute pancreatitis (BAP) is considered to be a benign but common complication after liver transplantation (LT), which to compensate for transfusion-related hypocalcemia, usually demands a large quantity of exogenous calcium which may be associated with pancreatic injury. We sought to investigate the relationship between intraoperative calcium-related factors and BAP occurrence after living-donor LT. Perioperative data, including intraoperative calcium chloride administration and serum calcium levels, were reviewed from 217 patients who underwent living-donor LT. Hyperamylasemia (≥ 458 U/L) was used to define posttransplantation BAP according to previous reports. Posttransplantation BAP was identified among 37 patients (17.3%), who showed a greater death rate than those in the non-BAP group (21.6% vs 8.6%; P = .013). Compared to with calcium-related parameters, the 2 groups showed differences in the amount of calcium chloride administered during the preanhepatic phase, the serum calcium surge during the initial 2 h after the liver graft reperfusion, the last serum calcium level, and the amount of transfused pack red blood cells (P < .05). However, after multivariate adjustment, only the amount of administered calcium chloride during the preanhepatic phase (odds ratios, 2.11-5.87, depending an amount) and the serum calcium surge during the initial 2 hours after liver graft reperfusion (odds ratio, 2.34) were selected as risk factors for posttransplantation BAP. The risk ratio of posttransplantation BAP increased in proportion to the administered amount of calcium chloride. In conclusion, limiting excessive calcium administration during the preanhepatic phase and close monitoring of the serum calcium surge after reperfusion may be required to prevent posttransplantation BAP in living-donor LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zanus G, Boetto R, D'Amico F, Gringeri E, Vitale A, Carraro A, Bassi D, Scopelliti M, Bonsignore P, Burra P, Angeli P, Feltracco P, Cillo U. A novel approach to severe acute pancreatitis in sequential liver-kidney transplantation: the first report on the application of VAC therapy. Transpl Int 2010; 24:e23-7. [PMID: 21129043 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01198.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This work is the first report of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy applied as a life-saving surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis occurring in a sequential liver- and kidney-transplanted patient who had percutaneous biliary drainage for obstructive "late-onset" jaundice. Surgical exploration with necrosectomy and sequential laparotomies was performed because of increasing intra-abdominal pressure with hemodynamic instability and intra-abdominal multidrug-resistant sepsis, with increasingly difficult abdominal closure. Repeated laparotomies with VAC therapy (applying a continuous negative abdominal pressure) enabled a progressive, successful abdominal decompression, with the clearance of infection and definitive abdominal wound closure. The application of a negative pressure is a novel approach to severe abdominal sepsis and laparostomy management with a view to preventing compartment syndrome and fatal sepsis, and it can lead to complete abdominal wound closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Zanus
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mukhtar A, Aboulfetouh F, Obayah G, Salah M, Emam M, Khater Y, Akram R, Hoballah A, Bahaa M, Elmeteini M, Hamza A. The safety of modern hydroxyethyl starch in living donor liver transplantation: a comparison with human albumin. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:924-30. [PMID: 19690268 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aed54f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravascular volume replacement therapy is an important issue in the perioperative management of liver transplantation. There is paucity of data on the safety of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. We evaluated the safety of a new HES 130/0.4 in the perioperative management of liver transplantation, with a special emphasis on renal function. METHODS Forty patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation were prospectively randomized into two groups. Patients in the ALB group (n = 20) received 5% human albumin. Patients in the HES group (n = 20) received third generation HES (6% HES 130/0.4). Total colloid administration was limited to 50 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1). The volume was given to maintain pulmonary artery occlusion pressure or central venous pressure between 5 and 7 mm Hg. If additional fluids were required, balanced crystalloid solution was used. Anesthetic and surgical techniques were standardized. Serum creatinine and cystatin C plasma levels were measured from arterial blood samples after induction of anesthesia, at the end of surgery, and on the first 4 postoperative days. RESULTS All 40 enrolled patients completed the study. Demographic and intraoperative variables were comparable in both groups. Postoperatively, the mean +/- sd volume was 6229 +/- 1140 mL and 4636 +/- 1153 mL in HES and ALB groups, respectively (P = 0.003). There was significantly greater [corrected] net cumulative fluid balance in the HES [corrected] group 3047 +/- 2000 [corrected] mL compared with the ALB group 1100 +/- 900 [corrected] mL, P = 0.029. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and cystatin C plasma levels showed no significant differences between the two groups. One patient in each group developed acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSION The use of HES 130/0.4 as an alternative to human albumin resulted in equivalent renal outcome after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Mukhtar
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aydede H, Erhan Y, Ikgül O, Cilaker S, Sakarya A, Vatansever S. Effect of portal vein occlusion on the pancreas: an experimental model. World J Surg 2006; 30:1000-6. [PMID: 16736328 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7883-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of portal vein occlusion on the pancreas are not clearly understood. Therefore, we studied histomorphological changes induced in the rat pancreas by various periods of portal vein occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty female Wistar albino rats were randomly allocated into four groups of 15 each. In Group I (control), rats underwent sham laparotomy to expose the portal vein proximal to its bifurcation. In Groups II-IV, rats underwent laparotomy followed by portal vein occlusion by clamping for 15, 30, and 60 minutes respectively. The pancreas was removed immediately after sham laparotomy in Group I and immediately after clamp release in Groups II-IV. Pancreatic tissue specimens were subjected to histochemical analysis for cell typing and diagnosis, immunohistochemical analysis for identification of the inflammatory markers tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and inducible NOS (iNOS), and TUNEL analysis was carried out for identification of apoptotic cells. RESULTS Histochemistry revealed signs of inflammation in pancreatic tissue from rats subjected to portal vein occlusion. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the expression of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-1beta and the oxidative damage indicator iNOS in rat pancreatic tissue increased progressively with the duration of portal vein occlusion. TUNEL assay revealed no signs of apoptosis in any of the groups. CONCLUSION We conclude that portal vein occlusion triggers an inflammatory response in the pancreas that worsens the longer the occlusion lasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Aydede
- Department of Surgery, Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty, Manisa, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boggi U, Coletti L, Vistoli F, Del Chiaro M, Signori S, Croce C, Bartolo TV, Pietrabissa A, Marchetti P, Capocasale E, Dalla Valle R, Mazzoni MP, Mosca F. Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:563-5. [PMID: 15110594 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the use of Celsior has been recently described for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation, no data are available on its use for clinical pancreas preservation. METHODS We herein describe the results of 112 pancreas transplants preserved with either University of Wisconsin (UW; (n = 56) or Celsior (n = 56) solution at two Italian transplant centers. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 10.1 +/- 2.2 hours and 37.2 +/- 8.2 minutes for UW compared to 10.8 +/- 2.4 hours and 38.3 +/- 6.7 minutes for Celsior (P = NS). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in two UW-preserved grafts (3.6%). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 94.6% for UW as compared with 100% for Celsior (P = NS). Equivalent graft survival figures were 91.0% for UW as compared with 96.4% for Celsior (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Boggi
- Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Del Chiaro M, Signori S, Pietrabissa A, Costa A, Bartolo TV, Catalano G, Marchetti P, Del Prato S, Rizzo G, Jovine E, Pinna AD, Filipponi F, Mosca F. A simplified technique for the en bloc procurement of abdominal organs that is suitable for pancreas and small-bowel transplantation. Surgery 2004; 135:629-41. [PMID: 15179369 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2003.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft shortage makes multiorgan procurement mandatory. We describe the results of a simplified method for the en bloc procurement of multiple organs, which permits isolated transplantation of all abdominal grafts, including the pancreas and the small bowel, to different recipients. METHODS Three hundred forty-three multiorgan procurements were done with a simplified en bloc technique. RESULTS None of the 1374 grafts that were procured sustained injuries that potentially precluded transplantation. Seventy-two grafts that were procured from 18 donors (5%) who were diagnosed with a neoplasm were discarded. Overall, 339 grafts that were procured from 325 donors were discarded because of specific contraindications, and 963 grafts (74%) were transplanted. Ninety-seven pancreata were transplanted. In 3 instances the pancreas and the small bowel were procured simultaneously and transplanted to different recipients. A total of 287 liver grafts were also transplanted at 13 different institutions. In 42 instances, the liver was not allocated to our center. Forty liver teams (95%) from 11 different institutions agreed to procure their grafts according to the simplified en bloc technique. Our team performed 18 procurements, and a surgeon from the liver transplantation team, who was assisted by one of the members of our team, performed 22 procurements. In all, 576 kidneys were transplanted, either alone or simultaneously, with other abdominal grafts at 15 different institutions. CONCLUSIONS This procurement method has high yields, allows pancreas and small-bowel procurement, and can be learned readily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Trapianti e Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina, Università di Pisa, and U.O. Nefrologia e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Pisana, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Del Chiaro M, Signori S, Croce C, Pietrabissa A, Berchiolli R, Marchetti P, Del Prato S, Mosca F. Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions: a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study. Transplantation 2004; 77:1186-90. [PMID: 15114082 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000120535.89925.ca] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. METHODS A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Trapianti e Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Eghtesad B, Reyes JD, Ashrafi M, Arzate J, Osorio G, Fung JJ, Mazariegos GV. Pancreatitis after liver transplantation in children: a single-center experience. Transplantation 2003; 75:190-3. [PMID: 12548121 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000040865.61349.ca] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHOD Posttransplantation acute pancreatitis (PTAP) is a rare but serious complication after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). We performed a retrospective review in a large cohort of pediatric liver transplant recipients at a single institution to define the impact of this problem in children. RESULTS Between January 1986 and December 1999, 634 pediatric LTx were performed. Twenty-six patients developed serious acute pancreatitis. The mean age at transplantation was 7.7 years (9 months to 19 years), and the indications for transplantation were biliary atresia in seven, fulminant hepatic failure in six, chronic rejection in seven, and other etiologies in six patients. PTAP was more likely to occur early after LTx (61% within the first week), was associated with the presence of an infrarenal aortic graft in 14 (54%) of 26 patients, was more likely to occur after retransplantation (11/26 patients), and was associated with blood loss and prolonged surgery in four cases. Acute renal failure occurred in 15 (58%) of 26 patients. Mortality was 42% (11/26); causes of death were sepsis or multiple organ failure in nine and hemorrhage in two patients. Management of PTAP included antibiotics, sphincterotomy, debridement with drainage, hepatic arterial revascularization, and arterial ligation. Of the 14 patients with complicated pancreatitis, 5 were treated conservatively and died. Nine patients had extensive operative interventions and four survived (45%). CONCLUSIONS Several risk factors such as retransplantation, extensive dissection at the time of LTx, and use of infrarenal arterial graft contribute to development of PTAP in children. Early exploration and debridement in patients with complicated pancreatitis may result in a better outcome. Retransplantation in the presence of clinical pancreatitis has a high failure rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bijan Eghtesad
- The Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tissières P, Bugmann P, Rimensberger PC, Mentha G, Le Coultre C, Belli DC. Somatostatin in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst complicating acute pancreatitis in a child with liver transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 31:445-7. [PMID: 11045846 DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200010000-00022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P Tissières
- Département de Pédiatrie, Hôpital des Enfants, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kostopanagiotou G, Smyrniotis V, Arkadopoulos N, Theodoraki K, Papadimitriou L, Papadimitriou J. Anesthetic and Perioperative Management of Adult Transplant Recipients in Nontransplant Surgery. Anesth Analg 1999. [DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199909000-00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
18
|
Kostopanagiotou G, Smyrniotis V, Arkadopoulos N, Theodoraki K, Papadimitriou L, Papadimitriou J. Anesthetic and perioperative management of adult transplant recipients in nontransplant surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:613-22. [PMID: 10475290 DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Kostopanagiotou
- Anesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of acute pancreatitis with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) was first recognized in 1973. Since then, few studies have described the clinical profile of the FHF patient with acute pancreatitis. Identification of the distinguishing attributes of pancreatitis in combination with FHF will provide a more sound basis for clinical management. The purposes of this study were to identify distinguishing clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in FHF and to compare outcomes with those of patients with acutely decompensated chronic liver disease and acute pancreatitis (DECOMP). STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective survey of 30 patients with FHF and 30 with DECOMP admitted during the period July 1995 to July 1997. RESULTS The prevalence of acute pancreatitis in FHF and DECOMP was 33% and 23%, respectively. Acute pancreatitis was associated with severe hepatocellular synthetic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, requirement for endotracheal intubation, increased acuity of illness at the time of ICU admission, more rapid decompensation during the disease, and significantly greater mortality in both the FHF and DECOMP groups. CONCLUSIONS In both FHF and DECOMP, acute pancreatitis increases disease acuity and mortality. Acute pancreatitis does not occur with significantly greater frequency in FHF. Implementation of orthotopic liver transplantation may not be warranted in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P C Kuo
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tissières P, Simon L, Debray D, Branchereau S, Soubrane O, Gauthier F, Devictor D. Acute pancreatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation in children: incidence, contributing factors, and outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 26:315-20. [PMID: 9523868 DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199803000-00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation is a well-known complication in adults that has never been described in children. In adults, end-stage liver disease related to hepatitis B, intraoperative pancreatic injury caused by extensive peripancreatic dissection, the type of biliary anastomosis performed, and numerous drugs, have all been described as predisposing factors in acute pancreatitis after liver transplantation. The current retrospective review was undertaken to identify the incidence, the contributing factors, and the outcome of acute pancreatitis after liver transplantation in children. METHODS During a 10-year period, 375 children underwent 434 liver transplantations in the authors' institution. In seven patients (1.9%), clinical acute pancreatitis developed after orthotopic liver transplantation. Indication for initial liver transplantation was biliary atresia (n = 3), acute liver failure (n = 3), and type 1 Crigler-Najjar syndrome. In all seven patients, liver graft function was initially adequate. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical, biochemical, ultrasonographic, and surgical signs. RESULTS In six patients, acute pancreatitis appeared within the first week after transplantation. The diagnosis was confirmed by abdominal laparotomy in five children. In the current series, emergency liver transplantation (p < 0.001), retransplantations (p < 0.001), and infectious peritonitis (p < 0.001) were contributing factors. Despite supportive measures, three patients died (43%) because of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Acute pancreatitis is an uncommon but life-threatening complication after liver transplantation in children. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of infectious complications are major elements in the management of acute pancreatitis after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tissières
- Unité de Soins Intensifs, Département de Pédiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lupo L, Pirenne J, Gunson B, Nishimura Y, Mirza DF, Patapis P, Mayer AD, Buckels JA, McMaster P. Acute-pancreatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 1997; 29:473. [PMID: 9123088 DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00210-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Lupo
- Liver and Hepatobiliary Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|