Effects of seven low dose combined oral contraceptives on high density lipoprotein subfractions

Comparison of the metabolic effects of oral contraceptive and nonhormonal contraceptive use in women over 40 years old

The aim of this study was to compare metabolic changes during use of low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and those of nonhormonal contraceptives in perimenopausal women. Thirty-nine healthy women over 40 years old who attended the Family Planning Clinic of the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, were recruited, 20 in the COC group received COC preparations containing 30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 150 microg of levonorgestrel and 19 in the nonhormonal group were intrauterine device users. Blood samples were taken upon admission and 6 months later. Minor biochemical changes associated with low-dose COC use included an increase in glucose tolerance, triglycerides, serum albumin, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) levels but a decrease in fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels. There was no clinical significance for the metabolic changes. Low-dose COCs can be a satisfactory contraceptive choice for healthy perimenopausal women.

Effect of dienogest-containing oral contraceptives on lipid metabolism

In a double-blind, controlled, randomized, four-arm, bicentric clinical study, the effect of four oral contraceptives (OCs) on lipid metabolism was investigated. Four groups composed of 25 volunteers each (mean age 26.1 +/- 4.5 years; body mass index 21.9 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)) were treated for six cycles with monophasic combinations containing 21 tablets with either 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 2 mg dienogest (DNG) (30 EE/DNG), 20 microg EE + 2 mg DNG (20 EE/DNG), 10 microg EE + 2 mg estradiol valerate (EV) + 2 mg DNG (EE/EV/DNG), or 20 microg EE + 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG; EE/LNG). The study was completed by 91 women. Blood samples were taken by venipuncture after at least 12 h fasting on Days 21-26 of the control cycle and Days 18-21 of the first, third, and sixth treatment cycle. There were clear differences between the effects of EE/LNG and the formulations containing estrogens and DNG. Although EE/LNG did not change the triglycerides levels, a significant increase was observed during treatment with the DNG-containing preparations. Although EE/LNG significantly reduced HDL-CH and HDL(2)-CH, there was a nonsignificant increase with the DNG-containing OCs. No change was observed in the levels of HDL(3)-CH. A significant rise in apolipoprotein A1 occurred during intake with the three DNG-containing formulations, but not with EE/LNG. In contrast to the women treated with combinations of estrogens and DNG, apolipoprotein B rose significantly in the women in the EE/LNG group. Lipoprotein (a) was significantly reduced by 30 EE/DNG and EE/LNG and remained unaltered with 20 EE/DNG and EE/EV/DNG. Altogether, the changes in lipid metabolism caused by the DNG-containing formulations appeared to be more favorable than those observed with EE/LNG. In OCs with DNG, the EE dose does not seem to play a major role with respect to the effect on lipids.

Apolipoproteins E and C-III in apo B- and non-apo B-containing lipoproteins in middle-aged women from the Stanislas cohort: effect of oral contraceptive use and common apolipoprotein E polymorphism

Oral contraceptive (OC) use and common apo E polymorphism are well known to modify serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. The combined effect of OC use and apo E genotype on the concentration of apo E or apo C-III in apo B- (apo E-LpB or apo C-III-LpB) or in non-apo B-containing lipoparticles (apo E-Lp-non-B or apo C-III-Lp-non-B) are unknown. Our study comprised 613 women, aged 30-45 years, genotyped for common apo E polymorphism and who differed in their combined low-dose OC consumption. The concentrations of apo C-III, apo C-III-LpB and apo C-III-Lp-non-B were significantly higher in OC users than in non-users by 13, 23 and 8% respectively, without significant interaction with the apo E genotype. The concentrations of apo E and apo E-Lp-non-B were significantly lower (differences being -14% and -31% respectively) in OC users than in controls whereas the apo E-LpB concentration was significantly higher (+19%), resulting in a redistribution of apo E from Lp-non-B towards LpB. Total apo E and apo E-Lp-non-B concentrations were higher in subjects carrying the epsilon2 allele and lower in those with the epsilon4 allele when compared to epsilon3/epsilon3 subjects (P < 0.001). The opposite held for the apo E- LpB concentration (P < 0.05). The main finding is the significant interaction between apo E genotype and OC use (P < 0.01) on apo E-Lp-non-B concentration, the epsilon4 carriers showing the smallest differences between OC users and non-users in comparison with the epsilon2 or epsilon3/epsilon3 carriers. These results suggest that the common apo E polymorphism can modulate the OC use effect.

Implanon® contraceptive implants: effects on carbohydrate metabolism

The objective of the study was to assess the possible differences in effects of Implanon and Norplant implants on carbohydrate metabolism. This is a 2-year open randomized study of 80 implant (Implanon and Norplant) acceptors. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed before implant insertion and at 6, 12, and 24 months after implant insertion. Glycosylated hemoglobin A(1)C was measured in fasting samples and plasma samples during OGTT were tested for glucose and insulin levels. There was a significant increase in the area under the curve for both glucose and insulin during OGTT within each group with increasing duration of use. However, there was no significant change in the fasting plasma glucose values. There was no significant difference in the carbohydrate parameters between the two groups during implant use, except for a minimal but statistically significant rise in fasting glycosylated hemoglobin A(1)C levels at 24 months in the Implanon group. Both implants appear to induce mild insulin resistance but no significant change in serum glucose levels. These alterations in carbohydrate metabolism should have no clinical significance in healthy women.

Biological effects of eleven combined oral contraceptives on serum triglycerides, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin and other biochemical variables

The objectives of this paper are to update and quantify the biological effects of the most commonly used oral contraceptives (OC) on 15 biochemical tests currently determined in clinical laboratories and to compare these effects between the different types of OC. The sample population was constituted by 1604 women using combined OCs and the control group comprised 3466 women in the same age range not taking medication. Women taking OC were divided into 11 groups according to the estrogen/progestogen combination. The effects of OCs were studied after adjustment for age, weight, height, body mass index and alcohol and tobacco consumption. The changes observed with the new progestogens were less important than in the past. In comparison with the controls, the mean serum triglyceride concentration was significantly increased by +8.5% to +36.0% (p<0.05 to p<0.001) in each group while those of total cholesterol and gamma-glutamyltransferase were increased only in 3 and 4 estrogen/progestogen combinations respectively. Conversely, the mean concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, phosphate and albumin were significantly decreased. Using a discriminant analysis, three main groups according to the type of progestogen were defined: cyproterone acetate, DL-norgestrel and levonorgestrel, and all other progestogens. The changes in serum triglyceride concentration induced by OC intake must be considered by the clinician and are useful for taking a clinical and risk decision in an individual woman.

Effect of two oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene or norgestimate on different lipid and lipoprotein parameters

The effect of a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene (EE/GSD) on various lipid and lipoprotein parameters was compared with that of a monophasic formulation containing 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 250 micrograms norgestimate (EE/NGM). Blood samples were collected from 46 women on days 2, 11, and 21 of the preceding control cycle and of the third, sixth, and twelfth treatment cycles. There was no significant difference between formulations with regard to the influence on any measured parameter. As compared with controls, a significant increase was observed in the plasma levels of total triglycerides (24-78%), total phospholipids (7-20%), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides (61-76%), VLDL-phospholipids (14-60%), low density lipoprotein (LDL) triglycerides (8-35%), LDL-phospholipids (28-30%), high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (8-16%), HDL 3-cholesterol (11-20%), HDL-triglycerides (17-66%), HDL-phospholipids, HDL 3-phospholipids (7-11%), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (5-20%) and apo A-II (10-40%) during treatment with both formulations. In contrast, the LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly decreased. These changes in lipid metabolism appear to reflect a predominance of the effect of the estrogen component. The results indicate that both low dose oral contraceptives containing different progestins and different amounts of EE do not exert a deleterious effect on lipoprotein metabolism, as high HDL-cholesterol and low LDL-cholesterol levels are known as low risk factors of cardiovascular disease. In contrast to endogenous hypertriglyceridemia, an EE-induced rise in triglyceride levels does not appear to increase cardiovascular risk if LDL is not increased.

Influence of oral contraceptive use on lipoprotein (a) and other coronary heart disease risk factors

We have studied the influence of oral contraceptive use on lipoprotein (a) levels in a cohort of women aged 18, 21 and 24 years (n = 559). Data was available on oral contraceptive formulation and dosage, anthropometric variables, exercise, serum lipoprotein (a), insulin, lipid and apolipoprotein levels. Lipoprotein (a) was determined by radioimmunoassay. Differences were assessed with non-parametric statistical methods. Forty per cent of the study women used oral contraceptives. The use of desogestrel-containing monophasic preparations was associated with lower levels of lipoprotein (a) compared to triphasic/levonorgestrel formulations or to non-users (P = 0.005). This effect was seen only in non-smoking women. Oral contraceptive users had higher levels of serum apolipoprotein B, HDL3-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure, and lower serum lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity. Lifestyle factors (smoking, exercise) showed no significant influence on lipoprotein levels. In conclusion, the use of desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives has a marked lowering effect on lipoprotein levels. Prospective studies will be needed to assess the net influence of oral contraceptive use on cardiovascular health.

Twelve years of clinical experience with an oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel

The clinical experience with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol is reviewed. Fourteen clinical trials have been reported involving over 44,000 women for more than 190,000 cycles. None of the 17 pregnancies which occurred (overall Pearl Index 0.12) were due to method failure. The incidences of breakthrough bleeding and spotting after 6 treatment cycles varied from 0.1-6.0% and 2.8-11% of subjects, respectively, and at this time they were not significantly different from pretreatment in most trials. About 90% of subjects maintained regular cycles. The incidence of subjective side effects (approximately 5% for headache, 4% for breast tenderness, 2% for nausea) was low. No significant changes occurred in body weight or blood pressure. In all trials, the COC was well accepted and the rates of discontinuation were similar to those in other COC trials. Pharmacodynamic effects have been widely investigated. There were no significant changes in glucose metabolism or in haematological factors except for possibly minor increases in factors VII and X, fibrinogen and plasminogen. Over thirty studies of the effect of the COC on lipid metabolism have been published; significant increases occur in serum triglycerides, HDL-C and apoprotein A1. SHBG concentrations increase 2-3 fold with a consequent decrease in the levels of free testosterone. This effect can be particularly important therapeutically in women with hyperandrogenic skin disorders and 14 trials in women with these disorders have demonstrated significant clinical improvement with the COC. The findings from the various trials show the COC to be effective and acceptable with no adverse metabolic effects.

New progestins--clinical experiences: gestodene

Gestodene, one of three new gonane progestins, is the most potent on a per weight basis in regard to progestational effects and has little or no estrogenic effect. In in vivo animal studies, gestodene also has less androgenic activity compared with progestins found in older combination oral contraceptive formulations. It binds to mineralocorticoid receptors and consequently is a competitive aldosterone inhibitor, leading to speculation that it may be beneficial in hypertensive patients. Numerous large clinical trials have shown that the combination of gestodene and ethinyl estradiol is as effective in preventing pregnancies as other oral contraceptives presently on the market. Irregular bleeding and spotting rates appear to be at least as good as older formulations. In general, studies show that the incidence of side effects associated with the progestin and estrogen components tends to be low, with very little impact on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Gestodene-containing oral contraceptives have been associated with small increases in clotting factors, generally because of the estrogen component, with compensatory changes in the fibrinolytic system. Although gestodene-containing oral contraceptives have been used in Europe since 1987, they have not been available in the United States except for use in clinical trials. At present, a triphasic formulation containing 50 to 100 micrograms of gestodene plus 30 to 40 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol is awaiting approval by the Food and Drug Administration.

The role of reproductive hormones in vascular disease and hypertension

Review of pertinent research demonstrates a link between sex steroids and vascular disease. Evidence for this association includes: beneficial effect of estrogens on the blood lipids (elevation of high-density lipoproteins and lowering of low-density lipoproteins), adverse effect of high-dose synthetic estrogens on coagulation, vasodilating action of progesterone, and adverse effect of androgens and androgen-derived progestagens on lipoproteins. Natural steroids appear to differ in their impact from synthetic compounds; endogenous hormones from exogenous and parenterally administered preparations. Furthermore, steroids have different effects at different concentrations, doses, and ratios. Their actions also vary according to age, sex, pregnant or nonpregnant state, body weight, smoking, and other risk factors. In this article, the following areas will be considered in relation to the impact of sex steroids on cardiovascular phenomena and hypertension: menstrual cycle and its disturbances; amenorrhea and hyperandrogenism; pregnancy with its hyperdynamic state and a tendency to gestational hypertension; oral-contraception-induced, dose-related thromboembolic phenomena; menopause and estrogen deficiency states with increased incidence of atherogenesis; estrogen replacement therapy with its decrease in cardiovascular morbidity; other hormonal therapies which induce hypoestrogenism with its consequences. The evidence is emerging that hormonal modifications may be useful in the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity.

A comparative metabolic study of two low-estrogen-dose oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene progestins

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare the effects of low-estrogen-dose oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene progestins on metabolic risk markers for coronary heart disease.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional comparison of 70 women who used a formulation that contained 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel, 43 women who used a formulation that contained 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene, and 54 women who did not use steroidal contraceptives was performed.

RESULTS

Oral contraceptive users had higher concentrations of high-density lipoproteins than did women in the control group (+10% to +20%, p < 0.001) primarily because of increases in high-density lipoprotein subfraction 3. High-density lipoprotein subfraction 2 concentrations were higher in users of the desogestrel formulation. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were normal in oral contraceptive users, but triglyceride concentrations were high (+80% to +100%, p < 0.001). Fasting glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were similar in the three groups, but their responses to a glucose load were higher in oral contraceptive users than in controls (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001). The late plasma insulin response to glucose was higher in the women who used the gestodene formulation than in those who used the desogestrel formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolic profiles induced by these oral contraceptives were remarkably similar and may reflect the activity of the estrogen component.

Lipid metabolism effects with desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives

Desogestrel is a gonane progestogen that in early studies had an improved ratio between desired progestational effects and undesired androgenic effects. A review of more than 50 clinical studies suggests that desogestrel differs from progestins currently used in oral contraception in that it does not interfere with the estrogen effects on lipoprotein metabolism. This profile is attributable to the high selectivity of desogestrel.

Effect on lipid metabolism of a biphasic desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive: divergent changes in apolipoprotein B and E and transitory decrease in Lp(a) levels

The effect of a low dose biphasic oral contraceptive containing 40 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 25 micrograms desogestrel (7 tablets) and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 125 micrograms desogestrel (15 tablets) on lipid metabolism was investigated in 19 women during 6 cycles of treatment and compared to the values of the pre- and post-treatment cycle. During treatment, all components of HDL increased reversibly by 10 to 30%. The levels of total cholesterol (CH), LDL-CH and IDL-CH rose only slightly, while those of total triglycerides (TG), VLDL-TG and LDL-TG rose continuously by more than 100% until the 6th cycle. At the same time, plasma levels of VLDL-CH increased by 60% and of apolipoprotein B by 20%. Contrary to this, apolipoprotein E decreased by 25% during treatment, and Lp(a) was transitorily reduced during the 3rd cycle. After termination of intake, total CH, LDL-CH, IDL-CH and apolipoprotein B remained elevated, while total TG, VLDL-TG, VLDL-CH and LDL-TG decreased significantly, but were still elevated during the post-treatment cycle. The levels of apolipoprotein E returned to pre-treatment values. The results indicate a marked preponderance of the effect of the estrogen component. The rise in TG and VLDL synthesis seems to be outweighed by an enhanced removal of apolipoprotein E-containing remnants which might offer protection from the development of atherosclerosis.

Lipid and biochemical changes after low-dose oral contraception

A randomized double-blind study of the metabolic effects of 2 low-dose combined oral contraceptives was carried out in Singaporean women. The subjects comprised 58 women randomly allocated to two treatment groups (29 each): norethisterone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms (NET/EE) or levonorgestrel 150 micrograms/ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms (LNG/EE) and a control group of 23 women using intra-uterine devices (IUD). Blood samples were taken on admission and at 3 and 12 months after pills or insertion of IUDs. Fasting glucose levels were decreased while 2h glucose and triglyceride were increased throughout the treatment period in NET/EE group [corrected]. LNG/EE group only showed significant increase of 2h glucose at 12 months and decrease of LDL cholesterol at 3 months while total cholesterol was significantly suppressed at 3 and 12 months [corrected]. The atherogenic index, LDL/HDL cholesterol was significantly reduced by 12 months. Both groups had no change in hemoglobin, hematocrit and total protein levels but alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin and aspartate transaminase (SGOT) were suppressed. While NET/EE suppressed albumin significantly, this was not observed with LNG/EE group. However, these differences observed with use of each pill preparations, were not so obvious between treatment groups and control. Changes in total, HDL and LDL cholesterol and SGOT were not significantly different than the IUD group. Furthermore, except for 2h glucose, there was no increase in the number of abnormal parameters after treatment. On the contrary, there was a reduction of abnormal values in most liver function parameters. Thus, except for glucose intolerance, the observed changes in metabolic parameters may not constitute any clinical significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The role of progestins in hormone replacement therapy

Long-term estrogen replacement therapy prevents osteoporosis and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Progestins are used to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma but should not be prescribed for women who have had hysterectomies. Doses that decrease mitotic activity are sufficient. Recent data suggest that a continuous combined regimen of estrogen and progestin may increase bone mass in women who have established osteoporosis. Some progestins may oppose the beneficial effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system in some women. Critical cardiovascular effects of progestins include a reduction in the serum level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a direct effect on arterial tone, which may be mediated by an attenuation of prostacyclin production and other factors. Therefore it is prudent to prescribe the lowest effective dose of a progestin that demonstrates the least metabolic impact. The dose and type of progestin should be balanced with the estrogen component so that the estrogen-dominant metabolic effects prevail. With this approach the difference in mortality rates between women who use unopposed estrogen and women who use estrogen-progestin therapy will be minimized and will make the appropriate sequential addition of progestin an option in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

Serum lipid variations in women on copper intrauterine devices, triphasic oral contraceptives and monthly injectable contraceptives

This is a longitudinal, prospective, comparative controlled study. Patient selection excluded smokers, overweighed, hypertensive, and aged greater than 34 years. 168 women were distributed by random list into four groups: A) fitted with inert IUD (control); B) with Nova T (Cu-IUD); C) received triphasic gestodene (OC); and D) monthly norethisterone enanthate 50 mg + estradiol valerate 5 mg (injectable). Serum lipid patterns were assessed at the beginning of contraceptive use and at 1, 6 and 12 months. The results of the Cu-IUD group did not show any difference with the control group. The OC group showed an increase of HDL and a significant lowering of LDL cholesterol at 6 months but this reverted by 12 months. On the other hand, in the injectable group, a sharp decrease of total lipids, total cholesterol and LDL was observed from the first month, lasting throughout 12 months, yielding significant difference with controls and also with pre-treatment values. In sum, the monthly injectable showed quite favorable patterns that would deserve further study, especially in view of the scarcity of hitherto available information concerning this formulation.

Progestagen-only oral contraceptives: comparison of the metabolic effects of levonorgestrel and norethisterone

A 6-month single-blind study compared the use of a progestagen-only oral contraceptive containing norethisterone 350 micrograms/day (NE 350) with one containing levonorgestrel 30 micrograms (LN 30), to assess the metabolic effects. At the end of 6 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to plasma cholesterol, lipoproteins including HDL subfractions, triglycerides or glucose concentration. Levels of fibrinogen, plasminogen, Factor VII, Factor X and antithrombin III were also similar. Women changing from a combined oral contraceptive to LN 30 showed a significant fall in Factor X. Mean blood pressure fell on LN 30 by 7/9 mmHg, but the 6-month reading did not differ significantly from that in women on NE 350. Acceptability, and the metabolic effects of the two preparations were similar in this study. Further larger studies are warranted.

Desogestrel: using a selective progestogen in a combined oral contraceptive

Desogestrel is the most selective progestogen used in oral contraceptives (OCs). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic combined OC containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms EE per tablet (Marvelon) are in accordance with the strong progestogenic and minimal androgenic effects of desogestrel: a very high contraceptive efficacy is combined with minimal and, in the case of lipid metabolism, even potentially positive effects on metabolic parameters. Through increasing the plasma levels of sex hormone binding globulin, and thereby decreasing the plasma levels of free testosterone, the desogestrel-containing OC also has substantial beneficial effects on acne.

Effects of three combined oral contraceptive preparations containing desogestrel plus ethinyl estradiol on lipid metabolism in comparison with two levonorgestrel preparations

The effects of three different desogestrel-containing combined oral contraceptive preparations on lipid metabolism were compared with those of two levonorgestrel preparations. The following preparations were studied: (1) monophasic desogestrel (150/30), (2) monophasic desogestrel (150/20, containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol instead of 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol, (3) biphasic desogestrel, (4) monophasic levonorgestrel (150/30), and (5) triphasic levonorgestrel. The effects of these preparations were assessed on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, the ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the ratio of apolipoprotein A-I to apolipoprotein B after 3 months of treatment, and the percentage changes with regard to pretreatment were calculated. The monophasic desogestrel (150/30) and biphasic desogestrel preparations induced higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels than did their levonorgestrel-containing counterparts. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were increased in monophasic levonorgestrel and clearly decreased in the lowest ethinyl estradiol-containing monophasic desogestrel (150/20) and biphasic desogestrel preparations. Apolipoprotein B increased in all preparations. The antiatherogenic indexes (ratios of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I to apolipoprotein B were higher for monophasic desogestrel (150/30) and biphasic desogestrel than for comparable levonorgestrel-containing preparations. The differences seen between the desogestrel and levonorgestrel preparations can best be explained by the lower intrinsic androgenicity of 3-keto-desogestrel (active metabolite of desogestrel) than that of levonorgestrel.

Time-dependent alterations in lipid metabolism during treatment with low-dose oral contraceptives

The effect of sex steroids on lipid metabolism depends on the type and dose of the compounds, the route of administration, and the duration of treatment. Therefore the composition of an oral contraceptive determines the resultant effect on lipids and lipoproteins. During 12 months of treatment, the effects of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms of desogestrel (EE/DG) or 75 micrograms of gestodene (EE/GSD) on 19 serum parameters of lipid metabolism were followed in 11 women each. There was no change in total cholesterol and phospholipids. Total triglyceride levels were significantly elevated only by EE/GSD. After 3 and 6 months of intake of both preparations, a transitory increase in the triglyceride content of very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein and a decrease in low-density lipoprotein-phospholipids was observed. After 12 months, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein phospholipids, and apolipoprotein B were significantly elevated, whereas very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and all components of low-density lipoprotein were unchanged. Most of the components of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were increased as a result of a rise in HDL3 and apolipoprotein A2, whereas HDL2 and apolipoprotein A1 were not altered. There was no significant difference between the effects of the two preparations, although those of EE/GSD were mostly more pronounced. The increase in high-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, and total triglycerides reflects a slight preponderance of the effect of the estrogen component. Because low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol were not changed, treatment with both formulations is in all probability not associated with an elevated risk of atherosclerosis.

Intermittent GnRH antagonist plus progestin contraception conserving tonic ovarian estrogen secretion and reducing progestin exposure

The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a once-weekly regimen of GnRH antagonist followed by a progestin as a potential new contraceptive method. On menstrual cycle days 2, 9, 16, and 23 (onset of menses = Day 1) monkeys were divided into two groups: 1) those injected sc with 0.1 mg/kg Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist in saline and those given only vehicle (control). On cycle days 15 to 26, each treated female was administered 25 micrograms norgestimate/day orally. This was continued for three treatment cycles (84 days). Weekly injections of Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist effectively blocked completion of folliculogenesis, ovulation, and corpus luteum function as judged by serum LH, E2, and P levels. Serum progesterone was undetectable (less than 0.1 ng/ml) during the treatment cycles. Importantly, serum estradiol levels during GnRH antagonist plus norgestimate treatments were maintained at 35 +/- 7 pg/ml. Upon the cessation of norgestimate treatment on day 26 in each cycle, menses uniformly began within 2 or 3 days. Regarding recovery, apparently normal and presumably ovulatory menstrual cycles, as judged by timely estradiol elevations, midcycle LH surges, and luteal phase progesterone patterns, were manifest immediately following termination of the final GnRH antagonist plus norgestimate treatment cycle. Endometrial biopsies removed on day 26 of control cycles, and on day 26 of the third treatment cycle revealed appropriate late secretory phase endometrium having tortuous endometrial glands and superficial stromal edema. Histological sections of ovaries removed at the end of the GnRH antagonist plus norgestimate treatment revealed multiple small and medium-sized developing and atretic follicles, having maintained serial ablation of the potentially maturing follicles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of two triphasic contraceptives with different progestogens: effects on metabolism and coagulation proteins

This study compared the effects of two triphasic oral contraceptives (OCs) taken for 6 pill cycles. One preparation contained levonorgestrel (EE/LN), the other a new progestagen, gestodene (SHG 415G). There were no effects on body weight, dietary habits, blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol or carbohydrate metabolism. Both OCs caused a small but statistically significant increase in plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio and triglyceride concentration. Sex hormone binding globulin was increased by both preparations. Coagulation factor VII and fibrinogen were increased and antithrombin III levels reduced, indicating that both preparations had pro-coagulant activity. The gestodene triphasic preparation was associated with minor side effects similar to those experienced on EE/LN. The metabolic effects were similar despite the lower total steroid dose of the gestodene preparation.

Changes in lipid metabolism during 12 months of treatment with two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene or 150 micrograms desogestrel

The effect of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 75 micrograms gestodene (EE/GSD) or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 150 micrograms desogestrel (EE/DG) upon serum lipids and lipoproteins were measured in 11 women each on days 1, 10, and 21 of the first, third, sixth, and twelfth treatment cycle and compared to the levels on days 1, 10, and 21 of the preceding control cycle. There was no change in total cholesterol (CH) and phospholipids (PL), while total triglycerides (TG) were significantly elevated only during treatment with EE/GSD. After 3 and 6 months of intake of both oral contraceptives, a transitory increase in the TG content of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and a decrease in LDL-PL was observed. After 12 months, VLDL-CH, VLDL-PL, and apolipoprotein B were significantly elevated, while VLDL-TG and all components of LDL were unchanged. Most of the components of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were increased due to a rise in HDL3 and apolipoprotein A-II, while HDL2 and apolipoprotein A-I were not altered. There was no significant difference between the effects of the two preparations, although those of EE/GSD were mostly more pronounced. The time-dependent change in the effects of the oral contraceptives on various parameters of lipid metabolism demonstrates that the relevance of results of short-time studies may be questionable. There was also a significant alteration in some parameters between day 1 and 10 of the treatment cycles and a tendency to return to the pretreatment levels during the pill-free week, e.g., in total TG and in the PL component of VLDL, LDL and HDL. The increase in HDL, VLDL, and total TG reflects a slight preponderance of the effect of ethinylestradiol on lipid metabolism. The unchanged total CH and LDL-CH and the elevated HDL levels indicate that the risk of the development of atherosclerosis is in all probability not increased during treatment with both preparations.

Influence of a triphasic oral contraceptive preparation on plasma lipids and lipoproteins

The influence of a triphasic oral contraceptive preparation on plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels was studied in 20 women during 12 treatment cycles. Multiple blood samples representing all phases of the therapeutic cycle as well as posttherapy were obtained. Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol fluctuated transiently in the earlier part of the study but after 9 and 12 cycles of therapy did not differ from baseline. Cyclic elevations in total cholesterol corresponding to changes in LDL cholesterol were noted twice. Total high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol remained remarkably stable over the entire study while HDL2 cholesterol decreased and HDL3 cholesterol increased. Triglycerides (total and lipoprotein fractions) increased during treatment and fell to baseline levels within one posttreatment cycle. Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol was also elevated during the study. Apolipoprotein (apo) AI, apo AII, and apo B rose under therapy, the latter increase producing a lowered LDL cholesterol/apo B ratio. Apolipoprotein E showed a temporary decrease early in the study but otherwise remained unchanged.

Clinical aspects of three new progestogens: desogestrel, gestodene, and norgestimate

Three new 19-nortestosterone progestogens, which are chemically related to levonorgestrel, are now clinically available in combination oral contraceptives in Europe. Desogestrel and norgestimate must be transformed to metabolites for all or part of their biologic activity; gestodene is active in its original form. Compared with present low-dose monophasic and triphasic levonorgestrel formulations, the new combinations appear to be equivalent in efficacy and type and frequency of side effects. Cycle control may be slightly improved with the gestodene preparation and somewhat poorer with the desogestrel regimen. As with the present triphasics, most changes reported in coagulation indexes for the new combinations remained within normal limits, as did changes in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. There is no present evidence that either the norgestimate or aesogestrel formulation provides a clinical improvement over the levonorgestrel triphasic. In the gestodene combination, the progestogen's increased biologic activity allows further reduction of total steroid dose.

Selectivity in progesterone and androgen receptor binding of progestagens used in oral contraceptives

The relative binding affinities (RBAs) of four progestational compounds (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene) for the human progesterone and androgen receptors were measured in MCF-7 cytosol and intact MCF-7 cells. For the binding to the progesterone receptor, both Org 2058 and Org 3236 (or 3-keto-desogestrel) were used as labelled ligands. The following ranking (low to high) for the RBA of the nuclear (intact cells) progesterone receptor irrespective of the ligand used is found: norethisterone much less than levonorgestrel less than 3-keto-destogestrel less than gestodene. The difference between the various progestagens is significant with the exception of that between 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene, when Org 2058 is used as ligand. For the cytosolic progesterone receptor, the same order is found with the exception that similar RBAs are found for gestodene and 3-keto-desogestrel. The four progestagens clearly differ with respect to binding to the androgen receptor using dihydrotestosterone as labelled ligand in intact cells; the ranking (low to high) is: norethisterone less than 3 keto-desogestrel less than levonorgestrel and gestodene. The difference between 3-keto-desogestrel and levonorgestrel or gestodene is significant. The selectivity indices (ratio of the mean RBA for the progesterone receptor to that of androgen receptor) in intact cells are significantly higher for 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene than for levonorgestrel and norethisterone. From these results we conclude that the introduction of the 18-methyl in norethisterone (levonorgestel) increases both the binding to the progesterone and androgen receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Oral contraceptives and coronary heart disease: modulation of glucose tolerance and plasma lipid risk factors by progestins

Widespread use of oral contraceptive formulations by women throughout their reproductive life has given rise to concerns about the effects of oral contraceptives on risk factors for coronary heart disease. Oral contraceptive-induced changes in both carbohydrate and lipoprotein risk factors may contribute to an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Carbohydrate and lipoprotein risk factors for coronary heart disease are reviewed, and oral contraceptive-induced changes in carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism, which may lead to altered risk status for coronary heart disease, are discussed. The importance of methodology in evaluating the results of studies assessing such oral contraceptive-induced changes is stressed. The role of progestins in influencing coronary heart disease risk factors is surveyed, and differences among progestins commonly used in oral contraceptive formulations are discussed. In addition, the effect of various combination oral contraceptives on risk factor status is outlined. Finally, the implications of available evidence for the selection of progestins for oral contraceptive formulations of the future are discussed. Current data indicate that medium- and low-fixed-dose oral contraceptive formulations containing estrogen/norethindrone acetate have less metabolic impact than do comparable levonorgestrel-containing formulations, including multiphasic formulations. Triphasic formulations may have less effect on coronary heart disease risk factors, although data are not yet conclusive. Novel progestins such as desogestrel may also have lesser effects on metabolic functions, but the reduced androgenicity of such compounds may expose women to an increased risk of estrogen-induced hypertriglyceridemia.