Open dose-ranging trial of flunarizine as add-on therapy in epilepsy

Treatment of postictal headache: a systematic review and future directions

BACKGROUND

Postictal headache (PIH) is a common complaint among patients with epilepsy. The prevalence of PIH is 43%. In the current endeavor, we systematically reviewed the existing treatment options for PIH in order to depict the state of the field and also to propose a research agenda to advance this topic.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase from the inception to 4 February, 2021 were systematically searched for related published articles. In all electronic databases, the following search strategy was implemented and these key words (in all fields) were used: "post-ictal" AND "Headache" AND "Treatment".

RESULTS

The primary search yielded 626 studies; only five studies were related to the topic and were included in the current systematic review. None of these studies provided a good class of evidence. These studies suggested that flunarizine and sumatriptan may help patients with PIH.

CONCLUSION

While PIH is a common and disabling condition, its treatment is overlooked by the epilepsy society. Flunarizine and sumatriptan can be good candidates to be used in future clinical trials of the treatment of PIH. To obtain the desired evidence on the efficacy of either flunarizine or sumatriptan in treating PIH in patients with epilepsy, we need well-designed, randomized controlled trials.

Anti-prion Drugs Targeting the Protein Folding Activity of the Ribosome Reduce PABPN1 Aggregation

Prion diseases are caused by the propagation of PrPSc, the pathological conformation of the PrPC prion protein. The molecular mechanisms underlying PrPSc propagation are still unsolved and no therapeutic solution is currently available. We thus sought to identify new anti-prion molecules and found that flunarizine inhibited PrPSc propagation in cell culture and significantly prolonged survival of prion-infected mice. Using an in silico therapeutic repositioning approach based on similarities with flunarizine chemical structure, we tested azelastine, duloxetine, ebastine, loperamide and metixene and showed that they all have an anti-prion activity. Like flunarizine, these marketed drugs reduced PrPSc propagation in cell culture and in mouse cerebellum organotypic slice culture, and inhibited the protein folding activity of the ribosome (PFAR). Strikingly, some of these drugs were also able to alleviate phenotypes due to PABPN1 nuclear aggregation in cell and Drosophila models of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD). These data emphasize the therapeutic potential of anti-PFAR drugs for neurodegenerative and neuromuscular proteinopathies.

Is Cerebral Arteritis the Cause of the Landau-Kleffner Syndrome? Four Cases in Childhood with Angiographic Study

Four children with Landau-Kleffner syndrome were studied over a six year period. They presented with acquired aphasia, epilepsy, and focal or generalized EEG discharges which were exacerbated during sleep. In addition, cerebral angiography demonstrated isolated arteritis of some branches of the carotid arteries in all cases. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images were normal. Nicardipine in a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kg/day, added to conventional anticonvulsant drugs provided effective supplementary control of seizures, of paroxysmal EEG discharges, and of language and behavioural disturbances, even several years after the onset of the disorder and in patients whose response to other medications, including steroids, had been poor. Interruption of nicardipine administration was followed by relapse of the language disorder. Repeat angiography was performed in all four patients and showed recanal-ization of obstructed vessels in two cases. Focal cerebral vasculitis may be the pathogenesis of the Landau-Kleffner syndrome and calcium channel blockers such as nicardipine may be effective and specific therapy.

Calcium antagonists as an add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library 2001, Issue 4.Nearly a third of people with epilepsy do not have their seizures controlled with current treatments. Continuous attempts have been made to find new antiepileptic drugs based on increasing knowledge of the cellular and molecular biology involved in the genesis of epilepsy and seizures. Therefore, calcium antagonists that can alter the effects of calcium on brain cells have been investigated for their effect on epileptic seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of calcium antagonists when used as an add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (29 January 2013), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1948 to 29 January 2013) and SCOPUS (all years to 29 January 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled or active-controlled add-on trials of any calcium antagonist in people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (MH and JP) independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, cognition and quality of life. Analyses were by intention to treat.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included with a total of 424 participants, one parallel-group and seven cross-over trials of flunarizine, two cross-over trials of nimodipine and one cross-over trial of nifedipine.For flunarizine, the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency in a single parallel trial was 1.53 (95% CI 0.59 to 3.96) indicating a non-significant advantage of flunarizine. We were unable to acquire data for this outcome from the other seven cross-over trials. The overall RR for treatment withdrawal of flunarizine was 7.11 (95% CI 1.73 to 29.30) indicating individuals were significantly more likely to have flunarizine withdrawn than placebo. No adverse effects were associated statistically with flunarizine.For nifedipine, we were unable to acquire the data we required for our specified outcomes.For nimodipine, we had data only from the first treatment period from one of the two cross-over trials (17 participants). The RR for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 7.78 (99% CI 0.46 to 130.88) and for treatment withdrawal the RR was 2.25 (99% CI 0.25 to 20.38).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Flunarizine may have a weak effect on seizure frequency but had a significant withdrawal rate, probably due to adverse effects, and should not be recommended for use as an add-on treatment. Similarly, there is no convincing evidence to support the use of nifedipine or nimodipine as add-on treatments for epilepsy.

Experimental re-evaluation of flunarizine as add-on antiepileptic therapy

Background:

Experimental studies have found several calcium channel blockers with anticonvulsant property. Flunarizine is one of the most potent calcium channel blockers, which has shown anticonvulsant effect against pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures. However, further experimental and clinical trials have shown varied results. We conducted a PTZ model experimental study to re-evaluate the potential of flunarizine for add-on therapy in the management of refractory epilepsy.

Materials and Methods:

Experiments were conducted in PTZ model involving Swiss strain mice. Doses producing seizures in 50% and 99% mice, i.e. CD₅₀ and CD₉₉ values of PTZ were obtained from the dose-response study. Animals received graded, single dose of sodium valproate (100–300 mg/kg), lamotrigine (3–12 mg/kg) and flunarizine (5–20 mg/kg), and then each group of mice was injected with CD₉₉ dose of PTZ (65mg/kg i.p.). Another group of mice received single ED₅₀ dose (dose producing seizure protection in 50% mice) of sodium valproate and flunarizine separately in left and right side of abdomen. Results were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on Ranks test.

Results:

As compared to control, sodium valproate at 250 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg produced statistical significant seizure protection. At none of the pre-treatment dose levels of lamotrigine, the seizure score with PTZ differed significantly from that observed in the vehicle-treated group. Pre-treatment with flunarizine demonstrated dose-dependent decrease in the seizure score to PTZ administration. As compared to control group, flunarizine at 20 mg/kg produced statistical significant seizure protection.

Conclusion:

As combined use of sodium valproate and flunarizine has shown significant seizure protection in PTZ model, flunarizine has a potential for add-on therapy in refractory cases of partial seizures. It is therefore, we conclude that further experimental studies and multicenter clinical trials involving large sample size are needed to establish flunarizine as add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy.

Effects of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil on the anticonvulsant action of topiramate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in micePresented in part at the 11th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies, Brussels, Belgium, 25–28 August 2007

To assess the effect of 3 calcium channel antagonists (amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil) on the anticonvulsant action of topiramate (a new generation antiepileptic drug) in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure (MES) model. Amlodipine (20 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of topiramate in the MES test in mice, reducing its ED50 value from 54.83 to 33.10 mg/kg (p < 0.05). Similarly, diltiazem (5 and 10 mg/kg) markedly potentiated the antiseizure action of topiramate against MES, lowering its ED50 value from 54.83 to 32.48 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 28.68 mg/kg (p < 0.01), respectively. In contrast, lower doses of amlodipine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and diltiazem (2.5 mg/kg) and all doses of verapamil (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) had no significant impact on the antiseizure action of topiramate. Pharmacokinetic verification of the interaction of topiramate with amlodipine and diltiazem revealed that neither amlodipine nor diltiazem affected total brain topiramate concentration in experimental animals, and thus, the observed interactions were concluded to be pharmacodynamic in nature. The favorable combinations of topiramate with amlodipine or diltiazem deserve more attention from a clinical viewpoint because the enhanced antiseizure action of topiramate was not associated with any pharmacokinetic changes in total brain topiramate concentration.

Anticonvulsant profile of flunarizine and relation to Na(+) channel blocking effects

The present study will summarize our findings concerning the anticonvulsant properties of the Ca2+ channel blocker flunarizine in a variety of experimental models of epilepsy. Flunarizine exhibits anticonvulsant effects against tonic seizures induced by electroshock or various chemoconvulsants in mice, however, did not protect against pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic seizures. In the MES test, the efficacy of clinically established antiepileptics was increased by co-medication. In the rotarod test, a minimal "neurotoxic" dose (TD50) of 18.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally was determined. In models of complex partial seizures like the hippocampal stimulation and the amygdala kindling in rats, flunarizine showed only a moderate activity. Thus, it can be suggested that the anticonvulsant potency of flunarizine in various screening tests is lower than that of standard antiepileptics such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. Concerning the possible mode of action, whole-cell patch-clamp experiments with cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes showed that flunarizine depressed the fast inward Na+ current in a concentration- and frequency-dependent manner well comparable with the action of phenytoin. It is concluded that the use-dependent inhibition of voltage-dependent Na+ channels may essentially contribute to the anticonvulsant activity of flunarizine in models for generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The clinical efficacy as add-on therapy is critically discussed in view of the present data.

Niguldipine impairs the protective activity of carbamazepine and phenobarbital in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats

There is evidence that some calcium (Ca(2+)) channel inhibitors enhance the protective activity of antiepileptic drugs. Since clinical trials have not provided consistent data on this issue, the objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of a dihydropyridine, niguldipine, with conventional antiepileptics in amygdala-kindled rats. Niguldipine (at 7.5 but not at 5 mg/kg) displayed a significant anticonvulsant effect, as regards seizure and afterdischarge durations in amygdala-kindled convulsions in rats, a model of complex partial seizures. No protective effect was observed when niguldipine (5 mg/kg) was combined with antiepileptics at subeffective doses, i.e. valproate (75 mg/kg), diphenylhydantoin (40 mg/kg), or clonazepam (0.003 mg/kg). Unexpectedly, the combined treatment of niguldipine (5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (20 mg/kg) or phenobarbital (20 mg/kg) resulted in a proconvulsive action. BAY k-8644 (an L-type Ca(2+) channel activator) did not modify the protective activity of niguldipine (7.5 mg/kg) or the opposite action of this dihydropyridine (5 mg/kg) in combinations with carbamazepine or phenobarbital. A pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable since niguldipine did not affect the free plasma levels of the antiepileptics. These data indicate that the opposite actions of niguldipine alone or combined with carbamazepine (or phenobarbital) were not associated with Ca(2+) channel blockade. The present results may argue against the use of niguldipine as an adjuvant antiepileptic or for cardiovascular reasons in patients with complex partial seizures.

Proof of efficacy trials: choosing the dose

It is apparent from current usage of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and from retrospective review of their drug development programmes, that the doses currently used in clinical practice differ from those which were used in clinical trials. This raises the question of how dose and titration schedules are selected in early development. An integral component of a drug development programme should be an assessment of dose response. The International Council on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [1994. Guidelines for industry: Dose-response information to support drug registration. ICH-E4. Federal Register] regulatory guidelines suggest that, at a minimum, three elements of dosing should be characterised: a maximum well tolerated dose, a minimum effective dose, and an appropriate rate of titration. Several specific designs can be utilised to assess dose response, which fall broadly into four categories, namely free titration, forced titration and dose escalation, parallel dose response, and dose reduction studies. In addition to these standard approaches, concentration-defined trials are an alternative in some circumstances and have been used with success in the development of newer AEDs. The designs chosen to address these elements are dependent upon the phase of development of the drug, and the severity of the disease, however, it is clear that conducting dose response studies earlier in the development programme may reduce the number of failed Phase 3 studies.

Amlodipine enhances the activity of antiepileptic drugs against pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures

Amlodipine (AML), which belongs to the 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists, possesses pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profile that distinguishes it from other agents of this class. Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced clonic and tonic convulsions in mice were significantly reduced by administration of AML at 10 mg/kg. At this dose AML remained without influence upon the plasma level of PTZ. The ED50 value of AML against clonic seizures induced by PTZ was 5.4 mg/kg. This calcium channel antagonist (at 2.5 mg/kg) combined with ethosuximide (ETX), valproate magnesium (VPA) or phenobarbital (PB) significantly reduced their ED50 values against clonic phase of PTZ-induced seizures. AML administered alone or in combination with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) worsened the motor performance of mice in the chimney test. However, these treatments remained without significant influence on the retention time in the passive avoidance test. Plasma levels of antiepileptics remained unchanged in the presence of AML. The results indicate that AML does not seem a good candidate for a combination therapy in epileptic patients because of its adverse potential.

Effect of amlodipine upon the protective activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

Amlodipine, a calcium channel antagonist of the dihydropyridine class, up to 10 mg kg(-1)(i.p.) did not significantly affect the threshold for electroconvulsions. However, this calcium channel antagonist (10 mg kg(-1)) enhanced the anticonvulsive activity of carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Furthermore, amlodipine (5 mg kg(-1)) intensified the protection offered by carbamazepine. This effect was associated with the increased free plasma level of carbamazepine in the presence of amlodipine. Amlodipine did not influence the free or total plasma level of phenobarbital and valproate, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable for valproate and phenobarbital. The anticonvulsive action and free plasma level of diphenylhydantoin was not modified by amlodipine. The combined treatment of the calcium channel antagonist and antiepileptics caused motor impairment (evaluated in the chimney test). Long-term memory (assessed in the passive avoidance test) in case of combinations of amlodipine with carbamazepine or diphenylhydantoin was not affected. The combination of amlodipine with valproate or phenobarbital significantly influenced the retention in this test. A possible usefulness of amlodipine as add-on therapy in epileptic patients may be limited by its considerable adverse effect revealed by behavioural tests. The pharmacokinetic interaction between carbamazepine and amlodipine might have some clinical importance for patients treated with these drugs.

Effects of dotarizine and flunarizine on chromaffin cell viability and cytosolic Ca2+

Dotarizine (a novel piperazine derivative with antimigraine properties) and flunarizine (a Ca2+ channel antagonist) were compared concerning: first, their ability to cause chromaffin cell damage in vitro; second, the possible correlation of their octanol/water partition coefficients and those of another 28 compounds (i.e., Ca2+ channel antagonists, blockers of histamine H1 receptors, antimycotics, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, neuroleptics), with their ability to cause cell damage; third, their capacity to protect the cells against the damaging effects of veratridine; and fourth, their capabilities to enhance the basal cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in fura-2-loaded single chromaffin cells, or to modify the pattern of [Ca2+]i oscillations elicited by veratridine. After 24-h exposure to 1-30 microM dotarizine, the viability of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells (measured under phase contrast or as lactate dehydrogenase, released into the medium) was similar to that of control, untreated cells; at 100 microM, 80% lactate dehydrogenase release was produced. At 1-3 microM flunarizine caused no cell damage; however 10 microM caused 20% lactate dehydrogenase release and 30 and 100 microM over 90% lactate dehydrogenase release. The time course of cell damage was considerably faster for flunarizine, in comparison to dotarizine. Out of 30 molecules tested (at 10 microM), having different octanol/water partition coefficients (log P), dotarizine was among the molecules causing no cell damage; flunarizine caused 20% cell loss, lidoflazine and verapamil over 50% cell loss, and penfluridol, draflazine, astemizole or nifedipine over 80% cell loss. No correlation was found between log P and cytotoxicity. Both dotarizine (10-30 microM) and flunarizine (3-10 microM) provided protection against veratridine-induced cell death; however, at 30 microM dotarizine afforded a pronounced protection while flunarizine enhanced the cytotoxic effects of veratridine. Dotarizine (30 microM) (but not flunarizine) caused a prompt transient elevation of the basal [Ca2+]i. Both compounds abolished the K+-induced increases of [Ca2+]i as well as the oscillations of [Ca2+]i induced by veratridine. The blocking effects of dotarizine were readily reversed after washout, while those of flunarizine were long-lasting. These differences might be relevant to the clinical use of dotarizine as an antimigraine drug.

'Wide-spectrum Ca2+ channel antagonists': lipophilicity, inhibition, and recovery of secretion in chromaffin cells

Repetitive application of short depolarizing K+ pulses (70 mM K+, 2 mM Ca2+ Krebs-HEPES solution, for 10 s every 5 min) produced reproducible catecholamine secretory responses from superfused bovine chromaffin cells. At 10 microM for 15 min, the piperazine derivatives dotarizine, flunarizine and lidoflazine inhibited secretion by around 90%; cinnarizine halved the secretory response. Recovery of secretion after 30-min washout with Krebs-HEPES solution amounted to 75% in the case of dotarizine, 8% for flunarizine, 46% for lidoflazine and 21% for cinnarizine. The benzothiazol derivatives (10 microM) (+)-S-lubeluzole and R91154 (the (-)-R-enantiomer of lubeluzole) blocked the response by 75%; sabeluzole inhibited secretion by only 34% and R56865 (N-[1-(4-(4-fluorophenoxy)butyl]-4-piperidinyl-N-methyl-2-benzo-thiaz olamine) by 61%. Recoveries were around 70% in the case of these four benzothiazol derivatives. The diphenylbutyl-piperazine derivatives fluspirilene and penfluridol inhibited secretion by over 80%; no recovery was produced after 30-min washout. The inhibition of secretion was time dependent, as the recovery of the response was. Blockade of secretion by dotarizine and flunarizine occurred even in the absence of intermittent K+ stimulations of the cells. No obvious correlation was seen between the octanol/water partition coefficients of the ten compounds tested (that ranged between 6 and 4.61), the rate and extent of blockade of secretion, and the recovery of the secretory response upon washout. Rather than non-specific actions on ion channels (and secretion) due to their high lipophilicity, we believe that blockade of various Ca2+ channels relates to their binding properties to specific channel micro and macrodomains, as the case might be for 'narrow' (omega-conotoxin GVIA) and 'wide-spectrum' (omega-conotoxin MVIIC) peptide toxins.

Influence of isradipine, niguldipine and dantrolene on the anticonvulsive action of conventional antiepileptics in mice

We report the effects of two new dihydropyridine derivatives, isradipine (4-(4'-benzofurazanyl)-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-pyridinedic arboxylic acid methylisopropylester) and niguldipine (1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-3,5-pyridinecarboxylic acid 3-(4,4-diphenyl-1-piperidinyl)-propyl methyl ester hydrochloride), and of dantrolene (1-[(5-[p-nitrophenyl]furfurylidene)-amino]hydantoin sodium, an inhibitor of Ca2+ release from intracellular stores) on the protective efficacy of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. It was shown that dantrolene (5-20 mg/kg), isradipine (5-10 mg/kg) and niguldipine (up to 2.5 mg/kg) did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold in mice, although a higher dose of niguldipine (5 mg/kg) significantly elevated it. Dantrolene (10-20 mg/kg) and isradipine (1 mg/kg) did not affect the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs. In contrast, niguldipine (2.5-5 mg/kg) impaired the protective action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital. No effect of niguldipine (2.5-5 mg/kg) was observed upon the anticonvulsive efficacy of diphenylhydantoin and valproate. BAY k-8644 (methyl-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-5-nitro-4- [(2-trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]-pyridine-5-carboxylate, an L-type Ca2+ channel agonist) did not reverse the action of niguldipine alone or the niguldipine-induced impairment of the anticonvulsive action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital. Niguldipine did not influence the free plasma levels of carbamazepine and phenobarbital, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. The results suggest that in contrast to the anticonvulsive activity of niguldipine against electroconvulsions, this Ca2+ channel inhibitor significantly weakened the protective action of both carbamazepine and phenobarbital. These effects do not seem to result from the blockade of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Isradipine and dantrolene did not have a modulatory action on the threshold for electroconvulsions or on the anticonvulsive activity of antiepileptic drugs. It may be concluded that the use of niguldipine, isradipine, and dantrolene in epileptic patients seems questionable.

Influence of nicardipine, nimodipine and flunarizine on the anticonvulsant efficacy of antiepileptics against pentylenetetrazol in mice

Among three calcium channel inhibitors, only nicardipine (10-40 mg/kg) significantly inhibited clonic seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol administered at its CD97 (convulsive dose 97%) of 81 mg/kg, subcutaneously. Nimodipine and flunarizine (both up to 80 mg/kg) did not suppress pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic seizures per se. Co-administration of nicardipine (5 mg/kg) resulted in a significant enhancement of the protective potency of either ethosuximide (50 mg/kg) or valproate (100 mg/kg) against clonic seizures in this test. Similar effects were noted in case of combined treatment of nimodipine (20-40 mg/kg) with these antiepileptics. On the contrary, flunarizine (up to 20 mg/kg) did not modify the anticonvulsive action of these antiepileptic drugs. Moreover, none of the studied calcium channel inhibitors influenced the protective activity of clonazepam (0.01 mg/kg). The antiepileptic drugs, administered alone in above doses, were ineffective against pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic convulsions. In case of ethosuximide and valproate, the motor performance in the chimney test was worsened by co-administration of nimodipine (40 mg/kg). We found no pharmacokinetic interactions (at least in relation to the plasma levels of ethosuximide and valproate) that could explain the observed results. Thus, we conclude that a combination of some calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs may provide more efficient protection against experimental seizures which may bear a potential clinical significance.

Flunarizine of limited value in children with intractable epilepsy

Fourteen ambulatory children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy were studied in an open phase II study to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flunarizine as an add-on treatment. Flunarizine was given in increasing doses starting with 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/day until effect was observed or a steady-state plasma concentration of 50-60 ng/ml was reached. Treatment was continued for 3 months at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were determined during the immediate posttreatment period. Positive antiepileptic effect (> or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency) was observed in 4 of 14 patients (29%; 95% CI: 52-5). Independently of antiepileptic effect, 10 of 14 parents (71.4%; 95% CI: 95-48) observed positive cognitive effects. In all patients treatment was withdrawn due to either lack of effect or weight gain. Flunarizine was rapidly absorbed; mean time of peak concentration (Tmax) was 2.7 hours (range: 1-8). The mean terminal half-life was 23.2 days (range: 7-48), the total plasma clearance of flunarizine per fraction of the dose absorbed (CLp/F) was 0.28 ml/min/kg (range: 0.07-042), and the volume of distribution of flunarizine per fraction of the dose absorbed (Vd/F) was 187 L/kg (range: 99-348). We conclude that flunarizine (0.1-0.3 mg/kg/day) seems to be of limited antiepileptic value in children with intractable epilepsy. The pharmacokinetic profile of flunarizine complicates its clinical use.

Nimodipine as an add-on therapy for intractable epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of nimodipine in patients with intractable epilepsy.

DESIGN

We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study in 95 patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nimodipine was used as add-on therapy (60 mg four times a day) in a 1-year placebo-controlled crossover study in 71 patients with localization-related epilepsy and 24 with generalized seizure disorders. Of the 95 patients, 81 were receiving two or more antiepileptic drugs. Patients diaries were used to record the number of seizures and any side effects.

RESULTS

Nimodipine seemed to be well tolerated during the study; only two patients were unable to complete the study because of probable adverse effects. The trial demonstrated no significant crossover effect and no significant effect of nimodipine on either the mean or the median number of seizures or seizure days. The peak median serum nimodipine level was less than 5 ng/mL in the 78 patients who completed the study.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial found no beneficial effect with use of nimodipine as add-on therapy for intractable epilepsy. Potential reasons for the absence of efficacy of nimodipine may be the inclusion of patients with very refractory seizure disorders or the relatively low serum nimodipine concentrations related to the pharmacokinetic effect of concurrent antiepileptic medication.

New anticonvulsant drugs. Focus on flunarizine, fosphenytoin, midazolam and stiripentol

In the past decade, several new antiepileptic drugs have been tested. Most recently, 5 new antiepileptic drugs have been launched onto European and US markets. These include vigabatrin, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine in Europe, and felbamate and gabapentin in the US. In addition to these, 3 additional drugs are in the clinical investigational stage: flunarizine, fosphenytoin and stiripentol. A fourth agent is midazolam, which was originally introduced in 1986, but recently has shown effectiveness in the treatment of status epilepticus. Flunarizine is a selective calcium channel blocker that has shown anticonvulsant properties in both animal and human studies. It is a long-acting anticonvulsant that clinical studies have shown to have effects similar to those of phenytoin and carbamazepine in the treatment of partial, complex partial and generalised seizures. Fosphenytoin was developed to eliminate the poor aqueous solubility and irritant properties of intravenous phenytoin. It is rapidly converted to phenytoin after intravenous or intramuscular administration. In clinical studies, this prodrug showed minimal evidence of adverse events and no serious cardiovascular or respiratory adverse reactions. It may have a clear advantage over the present parenteral formulation of phenytoin. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine that is more potent than diazepam as a sedative, muscle relaxant and in its influence on electroencephalographic measures. It has been shown to be an effective treatment for refractory seizures in status epilepticus. Stiripentol has anticonvulsant properties as well as the ability to inhibit the cytochrome P450 system. There are significant metabolic drug interactions between stiripentol and phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone). Stiripentol has been studied in patients with partial seizures, refractory epilepsy and refractory absence seizures with some efficacious results.

Antiepileptic drugs in development: prospects for the near future

Among some 14 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), those most extensively tested in humans include felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). All are currently marketed in some but not all countries. Although no large, comparative studies on efficacy have been conducted, all of these new AEDs are effective in adult localization-related epilepsies, and some have activity in specific syndromes. Although these drugs all have some CNS side effects, especially when administered in combination with other AEDs, they also all have low toxicity profiles. The availability of AEDs with different mechanisms of action may facilitate rational polytherapy. FBM is not teratogenic in animals. Half-life of FBM in humans is 11-28 h. Daily FBM dosages are 15-45 mg/kg in children and 2,400-4,800 mg in adults. Side effects include insomnia and anorexia, with weight loss. FBM increases phenytoin (PHT) and valproate (VPA) concentrations, and FBM concentration may be affected by other drugs. It is available in the United States for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial seizures in adults. GBP is very water soluble. Half-life of GBP in humans is 5-7 h and daily dosages range from 900 to 2,400 mg in adults. Few side effects have been observed. GBP is not metabolized by the liver and has no drug interactions. It is available in the United Kingdom and the United States. LTG has no teratogenicity in animal models. Half-life of LTG in humans depends on co-medication: with enzyme inducers it is 15-24 h, and with VPA it is approximately 60 h. LTG dosages are 100-600 mg/day in adults. LTG is available in Europe. OCBZ is rapidly metabolized to 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (MHD), the active compound. Animal studies have shown similar efficacy but superior toxicity to carbamazepine (CBZ) in animal models. For MHD, half-life ranges from 10 to 15 h in patients. OCBZ dosages range from 300 to 1,800 mg/day. VGB is a potent, irreversible inhibitor of GABA transaminase which elevates GABA levels in the CNS. Daily dosages of 2,000-4,000 mg of VGB are needed in adults. Although intramyelinic edema has developed in rats and dogs, it has not yet presented in other mammals or humans. ZNS is a sulfonamide effective in animal models of epilepsy. Half-life of ZNS is 27-36 h. ZNS daily dosage is 400-600 mg. ZNS has been effective in some cases of Baltic myoclonic epilepsy.

Increasing plasma concentration tolerability study of flunarizine in comedicated epileptic patients

Twelve patients with intractable partial seizures [4 receiving carbamazepine (CBZ), 4 phenytoin (PHT), and 4 both] entered a study of the tolerability of flunarizine (FNR) at specified plasma concentrations. After an 8-week baseline period, a single-dose pharmacokinetic study was performed for each patient to calculate a loading dose and maintenance dosage necessary to achieve a target plasma FNR concentration of 30 ng/ml. The first 8 patients received the loading dose (as divided doses) during a 1-week hospitalization and the maintenance dosage for the ensuing 8 weeks. These patients proceeded to treatment periods with target concentrations of 60 and then 120 ng/ml, using doses based on an assumed linear relation between dose and plasma concentration. The last 4 patients were studied only at the 120- ng/ml target level. Results indicated that this procedure successfully approximated target levels of 30 and 60 ng/ml, but observed concentrations in the last period exceeded the 120-ng/ml target level and continued to increase with time, often necessitating a dosage reduction owing to intolerability. Calculated doses for a given target concentration varied by a factor of 12. The most frequently reported adverse experiences were sedation and increased fatigue; reports of dizziness, headache, and lethargy were also common. Based on this study, a target concentration of at least 60 but < 120 ng/ml is recommended for a controlled clinical trial of the antiepileptic efficacy of FNR.

Calcium antagonist nimodipine in intractable epilepsy

The influx of Ca2+ into the neuron seems to play an important role in the genesis of epileptic seizures, and current research suggests that calcium entry blockers may have anticonvulsant activity. We used nimodipine, a calcium antagonist with high central nervous system affinity at a fixed dosage of 30 mg, t.i.d., in 21 patients with intractable epilepsy caused by organic brain lesions in addition to basal antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. After a 12-week treatment period 14 patients (67%) showed a decrease in seizure frequency, four patients had no change, and three had an increase. In eight patients (38%) seizure frequency decreased by greater than 40%. The p value with one-tailed t-test was 0.0491. No significant modifications in AED or electrolyte serum levels were found. One patient had a lowering of blood pressure at this dosage.

Nifedipine for epilepsy? A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The movement of calcium into neurons may be the common denominator for the triggering and propagation of seizure activity. We report results of the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with the dihidropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine (NFD) as adjuvant therapy in refractory epilepsy. Twenty-two students (12 male, 10 female, age 17-22 years) attending Lingfield Hospital School received NFD retard and matched placebo for 8 weeks in 2 doses (20 and 40 mg b.i.d. each for 4 weeks) with a washout period of 8 weeks between treatment phases. In the 20 students who completed the trial, fewer partial seizures (p less than 0.05) were documented during the first 2 weeks of NFD administration. Similarly, fewer seizure days (p less than 0.05) were reported in the first month of active treatment. This response was not sustained into the second month of the trial. Blind scoring of EEGs suggested a small improvement with NFD (p less than 0.05). More patients reported headache when receiving NFD (p less than 0.02) than placebo, but heart rate and erect and supine blood pressure remained unaffected. Mean maximum NFD concentrations were 13.1 +/- 10.4 ng/ml. A weak correlation was noted between total (p less than 0.05) and partial (p = 0.025) seizure numbers and NFD concentrations following 8 weeks of treatment. This study does not support important anticonvulsant efficacy for NFD as adjuvant therapy for refractory epilepsy at doses appropriate for the treatment of angina or hypertension. Further trials are recommended using higher doses of NFD in less severely affected patients.

Effect of flunarizine on electroencephalogram recovery and brain temperature in gerbils after brain ischemia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether flunarizine enhances the rate of brain recovery as measured by electroencephalography after cerebral ischemia and whether these effects are attributable to changes in brain temperature.

METHODS

Male gerbils (n = 81) were treated with either 10 mg/kg flunarizine or its vehicle, beta-cyclodextrin, intraperitoneally, 60 minutes before bilateral carotid occlusion of either 4 or 6 minutes' duration. The electroencephalogram was continuously recorded in the preischemic, ischemic, and postischemic stages of the experiment and rated for the time necessary for the return of 4-6, 7-10, and 11-15 Hz activity. In a second set of experiments, intracerebral temperature was monitored for 60 minutes before ischemia, during 10 minutes of carotid occlusion, and for 60 minutes after ischemia.

RESULTS

Flunarizine pretreatment resulted in significantly more rapid return of electroencephalographic activity in each of the three frequency categories monitored when compared with those animals pretreated with vehicle alone (p less than 0.001). Flunarizine had no effect on brain temperature before, during, or up to 60 minutes after termination of ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Flunarizine, which has been of efficacy in reducing neuronal death, mortality, and functional impairment when administered after ischemic insults, may have prophylactic value in accelerating brain recovery from ischemia, but does not have this effect as a result of altered brain temperature.

Drug interactions in epilepsy

The abolition of seizures using a single antiepileptic agent can be expected in more than 80% of patients, although not necessarily with the first drug tried. The remainder often receive polypharmacy, and current evidence suggests that perhaps only around 10% of these benefit significantly in terms of improved seizure control. Many more experience complicated drug interactions. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone (metabolized in part to phenobarbital) all induce the synthesis of hepatic monooxygenase and conjugating enzymes. This will result in an acceleration in the metabolism of other lipid-soluble drugs with likely attenuation of their pharmacological effects. Valproate, on the other hand, is a minor enzyme inhibitor. Pharmacokinetic interactions are almost invariable when more than one antiepileptic drug is coprescribed. The extent and direction of interactions with combinations of these drugs are varied and unpredictable. Discontinuation of an enzyme inducer or inhibitor will influence the concentrations of the remaining drug(s). Pharmacodynamic interactions also cause problems in epileptic patients. A number of commonly prescribed psychoactive drugs, such as tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics, can worsen seizure control by reducing the convulsion threshold. In addition, there seems little doubt that ethanol abuse and withdrawal can precipitate seizures in susceptible patients. Antiepileptic polypharmacy is more likely to impair cognitive function than the same drugs used singly. In addition, the more antiepileptic drugs received by a patient in the first trimester of pregnancy, the higher the risk of teratogenesis in the exposed infant. Drug interactions prolong and complicate the process of new drug assessment, particularly when introduced in treated patients with refractory epilepsy. The candidate antiepileptic drug may alter the concentration of concomitant therapy, or its own breakdown may be influenced by coprescribed enzyme inducers or inhibitors. Even if the new drug is excreted unchanged by the kidney, unexpected interactions can be uncovered. Pharmacodynamic interactions need not always be detrimental. Currently, there is no rational approach to the treatment of intractable epilepsy. As more new drugs with single mechanisms of action become available, the potential exists for combining these synergistically. This approach may revolutionize the pharmacological management of the epileptic patient in the 21st century.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of flunarizine as add-on therapy in refractory childhood epilepsy

Flunarizine (FLN) has been suggested as an add-on treatment in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. In view of the discordant experiences and of the paucity of controlled trials in children, we studied its effectiveness in 20 patients aged 6 to 18 years (10 males and 10 females), affected by drug-resistant epilepsy. 14 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy (the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in 10; other forms in 4); 3 had cryptogenic generalized epilepsy (the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in 2; myoclonic absences epilepsy in 1); 3 had symptomatic partial epilepsy (temporal lobe epilepsy). 7 of them were withdrawn: only 1 because of side effects. An initial four-month baseline pretrial period was followed by two four-month periods of administration of FLN or a placebo, under double blind conditions, in a randomized sequence. Preexisting antiepileptic (AEDs) medication was maintained at a constant dose throughout the study. FLN was administered as drops in a single evening dose of 5 mg (patients less than 10 years) or 10 mg. (patients greater than 10 years). During the pretrial phase, after phase 1 and phase 2, a waking EEG was recorded and blood samples were taken for hematology, hepatic-function tests, and AED serum levels. The evaluation of the activity of FLN was based on the total number of seizures. A 30-60% reduction in seizure frequency was found in 5 out of the 13 patients completing the trial (no changes occurred in the remainders). This result did not appear to be due to changes in the plasma levels of the AEDs. No significant differences were seen in the EEG paroxysmal activity in the three phases of the study. Side effects were rare. The serum FLN levels ranged between 16.4 and 109 ng/ml. It seems that the antiepileptic properties of FLN need further validation, particularly in childhood.

Nimodipine in refractory epilepsy: a placebo-controlled, add-on study

Twenty-two patients (8 male, 14 female) with refractory epilepsy entered a balanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of nimodipine as adjunctive therapy. Treatment periods of 12 weeks (nimodipine 30 mg tds, 60 mg tds, 90 mg tds each for 4 weeks and matched placebo) were followed by wash-out intervals of 4 weeks. Five patients withdrew (2 side-effects, 1 intercurrent illness, 2 non-compliance). Median values (placebo vs. nimodipine) did not vary for total (17 vs. 18), partial (14 vs. 18) and generalised tonic-clonic seizures (2 vs. 5) or seizure days (13 vs. 13). Monthly analysis also failed to uncover any benefit for nimodipine. Side-effects were reported no more frequently with nimodipine than with placebo and pulse and blood pressure did not alter significantly. Antiepileptic drug levels were not affected by nimodipine treatment but circulating nimodipine concentrations were low. In this trial, nimodipine did not fulfil the promise of its success in animal models of epilepsy. Enzyme induction by concurrent antiepileptic therapy may provide an explanation.

Effects of the dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel antagonist nimodipine on kainic acid-induced limbic seizures

The effects of the dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel antagonist nimodipine on kainic acid-induced seizures were studied in 30 0.5% halothane anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Each animal received low dose kainic acid 0.5 mg/kg i.v. to allow study of the progression of neuronal excitability and epileptiform activity. Preadministration of nimodipine 1.0 mg/kg i.p. increased the latency but did not prevent kainic acid-induced epileptic activity. For example, the latency from kainic acid administration to the appearance of the first seizure and status epilepticus was 75.6 +/- 9.1 min and 85.9 +/- 9.4 min in controls vs. 117.3 +/- 9.3 min and 128.0 +/- 8.7 min in the nimodipine group (P less than 0.005). It is hypothesized that nimodipine attenuated excitability by blocking Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent L-channels secondary to kainic acid-induced membrane depolarization.

Nifedipine as an add-on drug in the management of refractory epilepsy

We report the effects of the addition of nifedipine, a calcium channel antagonist, to the antiepileptic therapy of 20 patients with severe medically refractory epilepsy. Six patients developed side effects and in two the drug had to be discontinued because of these. The commonest side effects were headaches, dizziness and lethargy. Two patients experienced deterioration in seizure control and only 2 patients showed improved seizure control. One of these patients subsequently developed tolerance at 5 months. In 16 patients there was no change.

Flunarizine does not delay the development of generalized seizures by amygdala kindling

Adult rats underwent amygdala kindling after the administration of vehicle, flunarizine 20 mg/kg/day, or flunarizine 40 mg/kg/day. Stimuli were delivered thrice daily at current intensities twice after-discharge threshold (ADT). Flunarizine did not alter initial or post-kindling ADT and did not affect the latency (number of stimuli) to the first stage 5 seizure. Apart from a tendency to increase the latency between the first and the 4th stage 5 seizures, flunarizine had little if any effect on amygdala kindling in this protocol.

Flunarizine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in neurological disorders

Flunarizine is a class IV calcium antagonist with a pharmacological profile which suggests its therapeutic potential in a number of neurological and cerebrovascular disorders. It is an effective prophylactic treatment for common or classic migraine in children and adults, and it appears at least as effective as a number of other agents which act by different pharmacological mechanisms, including pizotifen (pizotyline), cinnarizine, methysergide, nimodipine, metoprolol, propranolol, aspirin and cyclandelate. Flunarizine is also effective in reducing the frequency of seizures, when used as an 'add-on' treatment, in some patients with partial or generalised epilepsy resistant to maximal therapy with a combination of several conventional antiepileptic drugs. Placebo-controlled studies show that flunarizine is effective in the treatment of vertigo and associated symptoms of either peripheral or central origin, and in the treatment of cerebrovascular insufficiency where psychological symptoms, rather than vertigo, are the primary symptoms. In the treatment of vertigo, flunarizine appears at least as effective as cinnarizine and more effective than nicergoline, betahistine dichlorhydrate, pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline) and vincamine. Flunarizine therefore is useful in the prophylaxis of migraine, an effective treatment for vertigo and a worthwhile alternative as 'add-on' therapy in patients with epilepsy resistant to conventional drugs.

Calcium, neuronal hyperexcitability and ischemic injury

Due to tight regulatory controls, a 10,000-fold concentration gradient exists between intracellular and extracellular free Ca2+ concentrations. With appropriate stimulus Ca2+ will rapidly flow into neurons through various types of membrane channels including voltage-dependent and receptor-operated channels. Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations are then quickly restored primarily through Ca2+-ATPase, Na+/Ca2+ exchange, and endoplasmic reticulum sequestration. It is well-known that Ca2+ is essential for neurotransmitter release. More recent investigations indicate that Ca2+ influx is essential for neuronal excitability independent from synaptic function. In fact, abnormal Ca2+ metabolism may play a dominant role in both the initiation and propagation of seizure discharge. Accordingly, Ca2+ channel blockers may represent a new therapeutic modality to treat epilepsy. Analyzed in this article are the major mechanisms by which neurons control Ca2+ fluxes and the evidence supporting the role of Ca2+ in seizure phenomena. Thereafter, an integrative theory for the role of calcium in neuronal hyperexcitability and ischemic cell death is constructed.

Double-blind cross-over placebo controlled study of flunarizine in patients with therapy resistant epilepsy

Twenty-five patients with long-standing therapy resistant epilepsy were studied in an eight-month double-blind cross-over add-on trial with a daily dose of 15 mg flunarizine. In five patients the seizure frequency decreased 50% or more. The mean seizure frequency reduction in the patients on flunarizine was 35%. Particularly the control of secondary generalized seizures improved. Flunarizine did not significantly alter the plasma levels of the regular anticonvulsant drugs. Minimal adverse side effects were reported equally in the flunarizine and the placebo group. In three patients depressive symptoms improved and two patients became free of postictal headaches. Flunarizine appears to be a safe adjuvant anticonvulsant.

Flunarizine as a supplementary medication in refractory childhood epilepsy: a double-blind crossover study

We report a double blinded cross-over study involving Flunarizine versus placebo in the treatment of refractory childhood epilepsy. The patients studied were between the ages of 2 and 18; and were having more than 4 seizures per month not responsive to regular anticonvulsant medications. Of the 34 patients treated, 8 had a 50% decrease in their seizures during the placebo phase, 5 had a 50% decrease during the Flunarizine phase, and 1 patient had a 50% increase in seizures while taking Flunarizine. The remaining 25 patients showed no change in seizure activity in either phase. Patients having partial seizures with secondary generalization tended to do better on Flunarizine than those with other seizure types. Monitoring serum Flunarizine levels showed no significant difference between patients having improved seizure control and those who were unimproved. No significant side effects were noted with this medication, nor were any significant drug interactions noted.

[Nifedipine as a coadjuvant drug in the treatment of uncontrolled epilepsy: a preliminary report]

The authors report the use of nifedipine as a coadjuvant drug in the treatment of three patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.

Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of flunarizine as adjunct therapy in epilepsy with complex partial seizures

Flunarizine was compared to placebo in a double-blind cross-over trial of 2 16-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week wash-out period. The patients had epilepsy with complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalised seizures. Twenty-nine patients entered the trial, but 7 dropped out. Of the 22 patients completing the trial, 13 were women; the median was 39 years (range 15-58) and the median duration of epilepsy 23 years (range 4-55). There was no statistically significant difference between flunarizine 15 mg daily and placebo as adjunct therapy in total seizure frequency, neuropsychological tests, and patient's preferences. No interactions with concomitant antiepileptic drugs and no laboratory abnormalities were registered.

Pharmacokinetic profile of flunarizine after single and multiple dosing in epileptic patients receiving comedication

This preliminary clinical study describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of flunarizine (FLN) following single and multiple dosing in epileptic patients receiving comedication. Three groups [phenytoin (PHT) only, carbamazepine (CBZ) only, and PHT plus CBZ] of four patients each were studied. Large interindividual differences, but no statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, were observed between the three groups. Following a single dose, mean values (and ranges) for apparent clearance, volume distribution, and elimination half-life (t1/2) were 0.504 L/h/kg (0.086-1.119), 12,431 L (1,959-20,920), and 308 h (61-506), respectively. FLN had no effect on PHT or CBZ steady-state levels but PHT or CBZ appeared to induce the metabolic disposition of FLN. The effect of dose on FLN kinetics could not be evaluated in this preliminary study.

Abnormal aluminium, cobalt, manganese, strontium and zinc concentrations in untreated epilepsy

The concentration of 38 trace and bulk elements in the serum from 19 patients with recent onset of epilepsy and 20 age- and sex-matched controls was estimated by neutron activation analysis or inductively coupled plasma source by mass spectrometry. The concentrations of aluminium, strontium and zinc were significantly higher and the concentrations of cobalt and manganese were significantly lower than controls. Low concentrations of manganese and high concentrations of zinc in epilepsy have been previously reported but the abnormalities of aluminium, cobalt and strontium are new findings. The possible significance of these results in the pathogenesis of epilepsy is discussed.

Neuroendocrinological evidence of an anti-dopaminergic effect of flunarizine

The effect of a one month treatment with flunarizine (5 mg/day) on pituitary responsiveness to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (TRH) and arginine infusion was assessed in 17 adolescents (11 M, 6 F) treated with the drug to prevent migraine attacks. Basal prolactin concentrations as well as the prolactin response to TRH were significantly (p less than 0.05) increased after flunarizine treatment. Flunarizine had no effect on the folliclestimulating and luteinising hormone response to GnRH stimulation, growth hormone response to arginine infusion or thyrotrophin response to TRH stimulation. Our data suggest that flunarizine may interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-prolactin axis decreasing dopaminergic inhibitory tonus.

Acute effect of TRH, flunarizine, lithium and zotepine on amygdaloid kindled seizures induced with low-frequency stimulation

We assessed the acute effects of various drugs on amygdaloid kindled seizures induced with low-frequency stimulations. We used the number of stimulating pulses required for the induction of epileptic afterdischarge (pulse-number threshold; PNT) as an indicator of the seizure generating threshold and the duration of induced seizures (AD duration; ADD) as an indicator of the seizures. TRH increased the PNT without affecting the ADD at a high dose (1.2 mg/kg). Flunarizine decreased the PNT and ADD simultaneously at a high dose (50 mg/kg). Lithium increased the PNT without affecting the ADD at two doses (100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg). Zotepine decreased the PNT without affecting the ADD at two doses (8 mg/kg, 16 mg/kg). We propose that the technique of low-frequency kindling is a useful experimental model in assessing the effects of antipsychotic or antiepileptic drugs on the excitability of the limbic regions.

Effects of flunarizine on Metrazol-induced seizures in developing rats

Antimetrazol action of flunarizine (5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg i.p.) was tested during ontogenesis on male Wistar rats aged 7, 12, 18, 25 and 90 days. The latencies and incidences of jerks, minimal Metrazol seizures and major Metrazol seizures remained unchanged by flunarizine in all age groups. A specific action (an abolition of the tonic phase of major seizures) was seen throughout the development and was reflected in lower scores of seizures.

Suppression of pentylenetetrazole seizures by oral administration of a dihydropyridine Ca2+ antagonist

We previously demonstrated that the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, nimodipine, is an effective anticonvulsant in experimental seizures when administered parentally. Reported now are the results for the oral administration of nimodipine in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures in the rabbit. Twenty rabbits were randomly assigned into 10 controls and 10 treated with nimodipine 5 mg/kg/day orally for 5 days. All animals received increasing doses of the convulsant PTZ intravenously (i.v). The epileptogenecity of this agent was assessed in all animals (mg/kg) by four electrocorticographic criteria: first seizure greater than 5 s, two seizures within 5 min, epileptiform activity for 1 h, and status epilepticus. In all four categories, nimodipine increased the seizure threshold by 50-60%. The dose of PTZ required to produce the first seizure was 27.0 +/- 5.4 mg/kg in controls and 49.6 +/- 9.9 mg/kg in treated animals (p less than 0.001). Similar values were obtained for the other three electrocorticographic categories. There were no observable adverse side effects. The results confirm our previous findings that calcium influx is critical for seizure induction, and that selective central nervous system (CNS) calcium channel blockers may emerge as a new class of anticonvulsants.

Different epileptogenic activities of murine and ovine corticotropin-releasing factor

The behavioral and EEG effects of rat and ovine corticotropin releasing factor (r- and o-CRF) were compared. Both peptides were injected intracerebroventricularly into rats through chronically implanted cannulae. At the doses of 0.1 and 1 microgram both peptides activated the EEG and stimulated motor activity. At the dose of 10 micrograms they produced spiking activity. However, while o-CRF-induced spiking activity was present both in the hippocampus and in the cortical leads and was associated with generalized myoclonic movements, that induced by r-CRF was confined in the hippocampus and was not accompanied by myoclonic movements. Spiking activity induced by r-CRF was suppressed by verapamil, but was not influenced by naloxone.

Calcium channels and calcium channel antagonists

Changes in free intracellular Ca2+ levels provide signals that allow nerve and muscle cells to respond to a host of external stimuli. A major mechanism for elevating the level of intracellular Ca2+ is the influx of extracellular Ca2+ through voltage-dependent channels in the cell membrane. Recent research has yielded new insights into the physiological properties, molecular structure, biochemical regulation, and functional heterogeneity of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. In addition, Ca2+ channel antagonist drugs have been developed that are valuable both as probes of channel structure and function and as therapeutic agents. Preliminary evidence suggests that these drugs may be useful in the treatment of diverse neurological disorders, including headache, subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, and epilepsy.