Analytical and clinical performance of a new, automated assay panel for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

A thrombin-driven neural net diagnoses the antiphospholipid syndrome without the need for interruption of anticoagulation

ABSTRACT

Thrombosis is an important manifestation of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The thrombin generation (TG) test is a global hemostasis assay, and increased TG is associated with thrombosis. APS is currently diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory criteria, the latter defined as anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, or lupus anticoagulant (LA). APS testing is often performed after a thrombotic episode and subsequent administration of anticoagulation, which might hamper the interpretation of clotting assays used for LA testing. We set out to develop an artificial neural network (NN) that can diagnose APS in patients who underwent vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment, based on TG test results. Five NNs were trained to diagnose APS in 48 VKA-treated patients with APS and 64 VKA-treated controls, using TG and thrombin dynamics parameters as inputs. The 2 best-performing NNs were selected (accuracy, 96%; sensitivity, 96%-98%; and specificity, 95%-97%) and further validated in an independent cohort of VKA-anticoagulated patients with APS (n = 33) and controls (n = 62). Independent clinical validation favored 1 of the 2 selected NNs, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94% for the diagnosis of APS. In conclusion, the combined use of TG and NN methodology allowed for us to develop an NN that diagnoses APS with an accuracy of 92% in individuals with VKA anticoagulation (n = 95). After further clinical validation, the NN could serve as a screening and diagnostic tool for patients with thrombosis, especially because there is no need to interrupt anticoagulant therapy.

Association of anti-β2-glycoprotein I/HLA-DR complex antibody with arterial thrombosis in female patients with systemic rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) complexed with human leukocyte antigen DR (β2GPI/HLA-DR) was found to be a major autoantibody target in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This study aimed to reveal the association between anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibodies and vascular thromboses in women with systemic rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study. We measured anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibodies and compared them with anti-phospholipid antibody (aPL) profiles and the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we determined the best cut-off value for arterial thrombosis. We also evaluated the validity of anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibodies by adding to conventional cardiovascular risk factors in multivariate logistic analysis.

RESULTS

We evaluated 704 patients, including 66 (obstetric or thrombotic) APS, 13 primary APS, and 78 asymptomatic aPL carriers. Seventy-seven patients had a history of arterial thrombosis, and 14 patients had both arterial and venous thrombosis. These 14 patients, as well as patients with aGAPSS > 10 or triple-positive aPL profiles, displayed high anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibody titers. The ROC curve showed a sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for arterial thrombosis of 33.8%, 91.4%, and 0.6009, respectively, with a cut-off value of 172.359 U/mL. The anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibody positivity using this cut-off value yielded an odds ratio of 5.13 (95%CI: 2.85-9.24), significantly improving the AUC from 0.677 to 0.730.

CONCLUSION

Anti-β2GPI/HLA-DR antibodies are associated with arterial thrombosis in female patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

Neuroimaging features of antiphospholipid antibody-related stroke compared with atrial fibrillation-related stroke

Recognizing the lesion pattern of antiphospholipid antibody-related stroke (aPL-stroke) may contribute to establishing the cause in patients with cryptogenic stroke. We aimed to describe the neuroimaging features of aPL-stroke compared with atrial fibrillation-related stroke (AF-stroke), a major hidden cause of cryptogenic stroke. Using a prospective stroke registry, we identified consecutive aPL- and AF-stroke patients without other potential causes of stroke. Neuroimaging features based on diffusion-weighted imaging and angiographic findings at admission were compared. A total of 56 and 333 patients were included in the aPL- and AF-stroke groups, respectively. aPL-stroke patients more often presented with single small lesions (aPL-stroke, 30.4% vs. AF-stroke, 7.5%, p < 0.001), while the predominant pattern in AF-stroke patients was large territorial lesions (26.8% vs. 56.5%, p < 0.001). aPL-stroke patients had smaller infarct volume (1.58 mL [0.45; 9.41] vs. 11.32 mL [2.82; 33.08], p < 0.001) and less experience of relevant artery occlusion (17.9% vs. 54.7%, p < 0.001). The proportion of multi-territory lesions, an embolic pattern, was similar between the two groups (28.6% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.44). In comparison only including patients with multi-territory lesions as well, aPL-stroke patients showed small lesion dominance and smaller infarct volume. Multivariate analyses showed independent associations between mild neuroimaging features (small lesion prevalence, smaller infarct volume, and absence of relevant artery occlusion) and aPL-stroke. Patterns of small lesion prevalence, small infarct volume, and absence of relevant artery occlusion were suggestive of aPL-stroke rather than AF-stroke. Cryptogenic stroke patients with such neuroimaging features may benefit from aPL testing for a precise diagnosis.

Current status and role of antiphospholipid antibody testing in cryptogenic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although it is not recognized as essential to test for antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) in stroke of unknown cause, aPL-related stroke may account for a considerable number of cryptogenic strokes. We aimed to assess the current status and diagnostic value of aPL testing in cryptogenic stroke patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke were examined to confirm the factors associated with performing aPL testing and with positive aPL test results in real-world practice. Cryptogenic stroke patients were separately examined in the same manner. The antibody profiles of cryptogenic stroke patients with aPL positivity were compared by age.

RESULTS

Among 2947 patients, 606 (20.6%) were tested for aPLs and 129 (21.3%) were positive. Physicians tended to perform aPL testing in patients aged <50 years and in cryptogenic stroke patients. Cryptogenic stroke was a strong predictor of positive aPL results (adjusted odds ratio 3.70, 95% confidence interval 2.38-5.76). However, aPL positivity did not differ by age in stroke patients. Among 283 cryptogenic stroke patients, 136 (48.1%) were tested for aPLs and 56 (41.2%) were positive. aPL tests were performed predominantly in patients aged <50 years rather than in older patients, even among cryptogenic stroke patients. The two age groups had similar positivity rates of >40% (<50 years: 43.2%; ≥50 years: 40.4%; p = 0.92) and their antibody profiles were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients with cryptogenic stroke had positive aPL results regardless of age. aPL testing may offer additional diagnostic opportunities in cryptogenic stroke patients, and thus may reduce the incidence of cryptogenic stroke.

Study of antiphospholipid antibodies by enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescent methods in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus (preliminary data)

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a family of different autoantibodies that lead to recurrent vascular thrombosis of any localization and caliber, and/or obstetric pathology - fetal loss. Serological markers of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include only three types of aPL - lupus anticoagulant (VA), antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) classes IgG and IgM, antibodies to β2-glycoprotein1 (aβ2GP1) classes IgG and IgM. Medium and high levels of aCL and aß2HP1 (IgG and / or IgM) were selected as serological markers of APS in the 2006 classification criteria. However, the threshold of values used from low to moderately high levels has not been standardized. aPL standardization issues are still unresolved, resulting in heterogeneous results of the ongoing studies. The aim of the study was to assess the comparability IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-ab2GP1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescent analysis in patients with APS with and without (systemic lupus erythematosus) SLE. The study included 70 patients (49 women and 21 men) with APS, of which 21 (30%) were with primary APS (pAPS) and 49 (70%) with APS in combination with SLE. All study participants underwent determination of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent. A study was performed by the chemiluminescent analysis: IgG/IgM-aCL - in 70 patients; IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1 - in 69 patients. Results. According to preliminary data, the determination of IgG-aCL and IgG-aβ2GP1 by the chemiluminescent analysis is informative in assessing positivity according to the manufacturer, compared with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent (p < 0.05). However, when taking into account the levels of antibody positivity determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent, the level of positive values according to chemiluminescent analysis was much higher than the performance of the manufacturer.

Laboratory Approaches to Test the Function of Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder caused by the presence of aPLs (antiphospholipid antibodies, i.e., anti-β₂-glycoprotein I and anti-cardiolipin). Everyday practice in terms of laboratory diagnostics of APS includes determination of aPLs and well-known functional assays assessing for lupus anticoagulant (LA), in turn using various tests. According to recent guidelines, the recommended method for LA identification or exclusion is based on the Russell Viper Venom test and a sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time assay. Despite the fact that LA can be quantified in laboratory practice in this way, LA is still used as a binary parameter that is just one of the risk factors of thrombosis in APS. As of today, there are no other functional assays to routinely assess the risk of thrombosis in APS. It is well-known that APS patients display a wide range of clinical outcomes although they may express very similar laboratory findings. One way to solve this dilemma, could be if antibodies could be further delineated using more advanced functional tests. Therefore, we review the diagnostic approaches to test the function of aPLs. We further discuss how thrombin generation assays, and rotational thromboelastometry tests can be influenced by LA, and how experimental methods, such as flow cytometric platelet activation, surface plasmon resonance, or nano differential scanning fluorimetry can bring us closer to the puzzling interaction of aPLs with platelets as well as with their soluble protein ligand. These novel approaches may eventually enable better characterization of aPL, and also provide a better linkage to APS pathophysiology.

Deciphered coagulation profile to diagnose the antiphospholipid syndrome using artificial intelligence

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by the presence of lupus anticoagulant and/or antibodies against cardiolipin or β₂-glycoprotein-1 and the occurrence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. The assessment of overall coagulation is known to differ in APS patients compared to normal subjects. The accelerated production of key factor thrombin causes a prothrombotic state in APS patients, and the reduced efficacy of the activated protein C pathway promotes this effect. Even though significant differences exist in the coagulation profile between normal controls and APS patients, it is not possible to rely on a single test result to diagnose APS. A neural network is a computing system inspired by the human brain that can be trained to distinguish between healthy subjects and patients based on subject specific data. In a first cohort of patients, we developed a neural networking that diagnoses APS. We clinically validated this neural network in a separate cohort consisting of APS patients, normal controls, controls visiting the hospital for other indications and two diseased control groups (thrombosis patients and auto-immune disease patients). The positive predictive value ranged from 62% in the hospital controls to 91% in normal controls and the negative predictive value of the neural network ranged from 86% in the thrombosis control group to 95% in the hospital controls. The sensitivity of the neural network was higher than 90% in all control groups. In conclusion, we developed a neural network that accurately diagnoses APS in the validation cohort. After further clinical validation in newly diagnosed patients, this neural network could possibly be clinically implemented to diagnose APS based on thrombin generation data.

High Prevalence of Acquired Thrombophilia Without Prognosis Value in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

Background Recent literature reports a strong thrombotic tendency in patients hospitalized for a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This characteristic is unusual and seems specific to COVID-19 infections, especially in their severe form. Viral infections can trigger acquired thrombophilia, which can then lead to thrombotic complications. We investigate for the presence of acquired thrombophilia, which could participate in this phenomenon, and report its prevalence. We also wonder if these thrombophilias participate in the bad prognosis of severe COVID-19 infections. Methods and Results In 89 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, we found a 20% prevalence of PS (protein S) deficiency and a high (ie, 72%) prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies: mainly lupus anticoagulant. The presence of PS deficiency or antiphospholipid antibodies was not linked with a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time nor with D-dimer, fibrinogen, or CRP (C-reactive protein) concentrations. These coagulation abnormalities are also not linked with thrombotic clinical events occurring during hospitalization nor with mortality. Conclusions We assess a high prevalence of positive tests detecting thrombophilia in COVID-19 infections. However, in our series, these acquired thrombophilias are not correlated with the severity of the disease nor with the occurrence of thrombotic events. Albeit the strong thrombotic tendency in COVID-19 infections, the presence of frequent acquired thrombophilia may be part of the inflammation storm of COVID-19 and should not systematically modify our strategy on prophylactic anticoagulant treatment, which is already revised upwards in this pathological condition. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04335162.

[Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: Myth or reality?]

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or obstetrical manifestations and the persistent presence, at least 12 weeks apart, of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA) and/or anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL) and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). The finding of patients with clinical profile highly suggestive of APS but who are negative for conventional biological criteria has led to the concept of seronegative APS. In the last few years, new antigen targets and methodological approaches have been employed to more clearly identify this syndrome in patients with thrombosis or obstetrical complications without conventional aPL. Although seronegative APS is still controversial, there is increasing recognition of the existence of this subgroup. However, clinical relevance of non conventional aPL need to be confirmed by efforts toward standardizing new biological tools and longitudinal studies involving large cohort of patients.

Clinical performance of automated chemiluminescent methods for anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies detection in a large cohort of Chinese patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

To assess the clinical performance and correlations of automated chemiluminescence assay (CIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

The study recruited 505 subjects, including 192 with APS, 193 with connective tissue diseases other than APS, and 120 healthy donors. We measured anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies IgG, IgM, and IgA in all the samples using both CIA and ELISA.

RESULTS

Total agreement between the two methods ranged from 83.50% for anti-β2GPI IgG antibodies to 92.76% for anti-β2GPI IgM antibodies in all the groups. Anti-β2GPI and aCL IgG assays showed the highest Spearman's rho coefficients (anti-β2GPI IgG = 0.742, aCL IgG = 0.715). Anti-β2GPI IgG CIA showed the highest sensitivity for diagnosis of APS at 80.21%, which was significantly higher than the sensitivity of anti-β2GPI IgG ELISA (52.08%). For diagnosis of APS, anti-β2GPI IgG CIA had the best discrimination power with the area under the curves (AUC) of 0.922, followed by aCL IgG CIA (AUC of 0.905). While the CIA AUC was slightly higher in all cases, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

CIA measurements had a good agreement and correlation with comparative ELISA assays. The CIA anti-β2GPI IgG however was significantly more sensitive for APS diagnosis. The two assay methodologies showed comparable predictive powers and support the value of the CIA method for improved diagnosis and management of patients with APS.

Prothrombin conversion is accelerated in the antiphospholipid syndrome and insensitive to thrombomodulin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a condition in which the presence of antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins is associated with thrombophilia and/or pregnancy morbidity. Although antiphospholipid antibodies have anticoagulant characteristics in vitro, they are associated with thromboembolic complications. Thrombin generation (TG) is a sensitive global test of coagulation, and elevated TG is associated with thrombosis. Increased TG can be caused by increased prothrombin conversion, decreased thrombin inactivation, or a combination of both. In this study, we measured TG in APS patients and healthy controls with and without vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at 1 and 5 pM tissue factor and with thrombomodulin. Prothrombin conversion and thrombin inactivation were determined by thrombin dynamics analysis. The TG peak was increased in nontreated APS patients at 1 pM TF compared with nontreated controls. Prothrombin conversion was significantly increased in nontreated APS patients. In contrast, prothrombin conversion did not differ in controls and patients that were on VKA therapy. Thrombin inactivation was comparable between controls and APS patients in the presence and absence of VKAs. Both TG (peak and ETP) and prothrombin conversion were significantly higher in APS patients with prior thrombosis compared with patients without a history of thrombosis. In this study, we demonstrate that in APS, the hemostatic balance shifts toward a more prothrombotic phenotype due to elevated prothrombin conversion but unchanged thrombin inactivation rates. Within the group of APS patients, increased TG and prothrombin conversion are associated with a history of thrombosis.

The Clinical Performance of a New Chemiluminescent Immunoassay in Measuring Anti-β2 Glycoprotein 1 and Anti-Cardiolipin Antibodies

BACKGROUND Laboratory criterion is needed for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which contain anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (aβ2GP1). They are commonly identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), but lack standardized kits, resulting in substantial variations in the antibody positivity between different laboratories. The emergence of chemiluminescence automated -BIO-FLASH may improve the situation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We selected 185 patients with APS, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), infertility, connective tissue disease (CTD), and other conditions in Peking University Third Hospital. We tested the aCL and aβ2GP1 levels by EUROIMMUN ELISA and 105 patients had at least one positive result for aCL and aβ2GP1, while the others had negative results. We retested them by chemiluminescence assay (CIA) and analyzed the result and compared the coincidence rate. The IgM levels were retested by AESKU ELISA. Data were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS Our result suggested that CIA had good performance for IgG isotype of aCL and aβ2GP1 in the coincidence rate. The positive coincidence rate of aCL IgM between CIA and EUROIMMUN ELISA was only 41.67%, but two ELISA kits showed good coincidence, CIA and AESKU ELISA had an obviously higher positive rate. CIA and AESKU had a higher coincidence than that of AESKU and EUROIMMUN in aβ2GP1-IgM. CONCLUSIONS The new automated CIA BIO-FLASH is suitable for detecting aCL and aβ2GP1 antibodies, especially IgG isotype, which may provide an alternative to time-consuming conventional ELISA method.

Prevalence, persistence and clinical correlations of classic and novel antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

aPL are frequently present in SLE. In a well characterized SLE cohort we aimed at investigating the prevalence of aPL and assessing their analytical performance and clinical association by testing criteria specificities including LA, aCL IgG and IgM, anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (antiβ2GP1) IgG and IgM, as well as the non-criteria aPS-PT IgG and IgM and anti-β2GP1 domain 1 (aD1) IgG.

Methods

We included 178 patients satisfying the ACR SLE classification criteria, from whom 283 samples and thrombotic events were collected longitudinally. Each sample was tested for criteria and non-criteria aPL using validated techniques in a single centre.

Results

All assays provided highly reproducible results. Of the samples, 42.5% were positive for at least one criteria assay, 20.5% showed double positivity and 12.6% triple positivity. All criteria and non-criteria specificities persisted over time. Most antibody titres were only moderately correlated; however, strong correlation was observed on one hand between aD1 IgG, antiβ2GP1 IgG and aCL IgG, and on the other between aPS-PT IgG and LA. aD1 IgG titres were extremely elevated in triple-positive samples. aPS-PT IgG by itself, and jointly with LA, was associated with thrombosis, an association mostly driven by venous thrombotic events.

Conclusions

In this SLE cohort, the non-criteria aPL aD1 IgG and aPS-PT IgG performed differently. aD1 IgG was highly enriched in triple-positive samples, and aPS-PT IgG, jointly with LA, was associated with thrombotic events.

Assessment of diagnostic methods for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-βeta2 glycoprotein I antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

We assessed the performance characteristics and correlations of the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and beta₂ glycoprotein (anti-β₂GPI) antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for APS.

METHODS

Patients (n = 216) referred to ARUP Laboratories for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or aCL or anti-β₂GPI IgG/IgM antibodies evaluation were assessed by ELISA and CIA methods. Diagnostic accuracies, correlations between methods and specific clinical manifestations in APS were investigated.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve (%) for APS using LAC with CIA (74, 95% CI: 65-82) or ELISA (70, 95% CI: 61-79) aPLs were comparable. The overall agreements and linear regression correlations between methods for aPL antibody of the same specificity were variable: aCL IgG 87.3%; R² = 0.7491, aCL IgM 71.6%; R² = 0.2656, anti-β₂GPI IgG 77.2%; R² = 0.7688 and anti-β₂GPI IgM 81.7%; R² = 0.3305.

CONCLUSIONS

With inclusion of LAC, the ELISA and CIA show comparable performance for the diagnosis of APS. However, correlations of APS-specific manifestations were dependent on method of detecting the aPL antibodies suggesting platforms may not be used interchangeable.

How to Identify High-Risk APS Patients: Clinical Utility and Predictive Values of Validated Scores

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical disorder characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that are pathogenic and have pro-coagulant activities. Thrombosis in APS tends to recur and require prophylaxis; however, the stereotypical treatment for APS patients is inadequate and stratification of the thrombotic risks is important as aPL are prevalently observed in various diseases or elderly population.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is previously known that the multiple positive aPL or high titre aPL correlate to thrombotic events. To progress the stratification of thrombotic risks in APS patients and to quantitatively analyse those risks, antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) and the Global Anti-phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) were defined. These scores were raised from the large patient cohort data and either aPL profile classified in detail (aPL-S) or simplified aPL profile with classical thrombotic risk factors (GAPSS) was put into a scoring system. Both the aPL-S and GAPSS have shown a degree of accuracy in identifying high-risk APS patients, especially those at a high risk of thrombosis. However, there are several areas requiring improvement, or at least that clinicians should be aware of, before these instruments are applied in clinical practice. One such issue is standardisation of the aPL tests, including general testing of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). Additionally, clinicians may need to be aware of the patient's medical history, particularly with respect to the incidence of SLE, which influences the cutoff value for identifying high-risk patients.

[The scoring system for the risk-stratification in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome]

  Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical disorder characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistence of the pathogenic autoantibodies, the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Recurernt thrombosis is often observed in patients with APS which requires persistent prophylaxis. However, an uniform prophylactic treatment for APS patients is inadequate and stratification of the thrombotic risks is important as aPL are prevalently observed in other various diseases or elderly population. It is previously known that the multiple positivity or high titre of aPL correlate to the thrombotic events. To progress the stratification of the thrombotic risks and to quantitatively analyze them, antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) and the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) were defined as the scoring-systems. Both of these scoring-systems were raised from the large patient cohort data and either aPL profile classified in detail (aPL-S) or simplified aPL profile with classical thrombotic risk factors (GAPSS) were put into scoring system. They have shown a degree of accuracy in identifying high-risk APS patients, especially those at a high risk of thrombosis. However, there are several areas requiring improvement, or at least that clinicians should be aware of, before these instruments are applied in clinical practice. One such issue is standardisation of the aPL tests, including general testing of phosphatidylserine dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT).

Antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, such as lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies. APS can present with a variety of clinical phenotypes, including thrombosis in the veins, arteries and microvasculature as well as obstetrical complications. The pathophysiological hallmark is thrombosis, but other factors such as complement activation might be important. Prevention of thrombotic manifestations associated with APS includes lifestyle changes and, in individuals at high risk, low-dose aspirin. Prevention and treatment of thrombotic events are dependent mainly on the use of vitamin K antagonists. Immunosuppression and anticomplement therapy have been used anecdotally but have not been adequately tested. Pregnancy morbidity includes unexplained recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death and late obstetrical manifestation such as pre-eclampsia, premature birth or fetal growth restriction associated with placental insufficiency. Current treatment to prevent obstetrical morbidity is based on low-dose aspirin and/or low-molecular-weight heparin and has improved pregnancy outcomes to achieve successful live birth in >70% of pregnancies. Although hydroxychloroquine and pravastatin might further improve pregnancy outcomes, prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Possible relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies and embolic events in infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies may activate platelets and contribute to vegetation growth and embolisation in infective endocarditis (IE). We aimed to determine the value of aPL as predictors of embolic events (EE) in IE.

METHODS

We studied 186 patients with definite IE (Duke-Li criteria, all types of IE) from the Nanc-IE prospective registry (2007-2012) who all had a frozen blood sample and at least one imaging procedure to detect asymptomatic or confirm symptomatic EE. Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β₂-glycoprotein I (β₂GPI) antibodies (IgG and IgM) were assessed after the end of patients' inclusion. The relationship between antibodies and the detection of EE after IE diagnosis were studied with Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

At least one EE was detected in 118 (63%) patients (52 cerebral, 95 other locations) after IE diagnosis in 80 (time interval between IE and EE diagnosis: 5.9±11.3 days). At least one aPL antibody was found in 31 patients (17%).Detection of EE over time after IE diagnosis was more frequent among patients with anti-β₂GPI IgM (log-rank P=0.0036) and that of cerebral embolisms, among patients with aCL IgM and anti-β₂GPI IgM (log-rank P=0.002 and P<0.0001, respectively).Factors predictive of EE were anti-β₂GPI IgM (HR=3.45 (1.47-8.08), P=0.0045), creatinine (2.74 (1.55-4.84), P=0.0005) and vegetation size (2.41 (1.41-4.12), P=0.0014). Those of cerebral embolism were aCL IgM (2.84 (1.22-6.62), P=0.016) and anti-β₂GPI IgM (4.77 (1.79-12.74), P=0.0018).

CONCLUSION

The presence of aCL and anti-β₂GPI IgM was associated with EE, particularly cerebral ones, and could contribute to assess the embolic risk of IE.

Diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome: 'extra-criteria' manifestations and technical advances

First described in the early 1980s, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a unique form of acquired autoimmune thrombophilia in which patients present with clinical features of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and persistently test positive for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one lab-based (positive test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) criterion have to be met for a patient to be classified as having APS. However, the clinical spectrum of APS encompasses additional manifestations that can affect many organs and cannot be explained exclusively by patients being in a prothrombotic state; clinical manifestations not listed in the classification criteria (known as extra-criteria manifestations) include neurologic manifestations (chorea, myelitis and migraine), haematologic manifestations (thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia), livedo reticularis, nephropathy and valvular heart disease. Increasingly, research interest has focused on the development of novel assays that might be more specific for APS than the current aPL tests. This Review focuses on the current classification criteria for APS, presenting the role of extra-criteria manifestations and lab-based tests. Diagnostic approaches to difficult cases, including so-called seronegative APS, are also discussed.

Direct oral anticoagulants: an alternative treatment for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome?

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrate a lower risk–benefit ratio than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for secondary thromboprophylaxis of thrombotic events. But there are no data on the efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of thrombotic recurrence in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of DOACs to prevent recurrences of thrombotic events in patients with APS.

Methods

This was a single-center pilot, using a multi-step Fleming design. If seven or fewer patients presented treatment failure with rivaroxaban, the study could conclude efficacy.

Results

A total of 23 patients were included. APS involved the veins only ( n = 19), arteries only ( n = 2) or both ( n = 1) and 1 patient exhibited catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). Overall, two patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies and anticardiolipid antibodies (triple positivity). The mean duration of follow up was 35.6 (range, 29–40) months. A total of six treatment failures were reported: one patient, with triple positivity, developed bilateral distal pulmonary embolism (PE) after 20 months of treatment with rivaroxaban, two patients refused to take rivaroxaban, the treatment was stopped in three other patients: two with adverse effects and one with chronic iron-deficiency anemia.

Conclusions

Rivaroxaban may represent an alternative for secondary thromboprophylaxis for thrombo-embolism in patients with APS, in particular, those with poor international normalized ratio (INR) control and those who are not at the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, such as those with triple positivity.

Transient desialylation in combination with a novel antithrombin deficiency causing a severe and recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation therapy

An in-depth focused study of specific cases of patients with recurrent thrombosis may help to identify novel circumstances, genetic and acquired factors contributing to the development of this disorder. The aim of this study was to carry out a detailed and sequential analysis of samples from a patient suffering from early and recurrent venous and arterial thrombosis. We performed thrombophilic tests, biochemical, functional, genetic and glycomic analysis of antithrombin and other plasma proteins. The patient carried a new type I antithrombin mutation (p.Ile218del), whose structural relevance was verified in a recombinant model. Experiments with N-glycosidase F and neuraminidase suggested a nearly full desialylation of plasma proteins, which was confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis of transferrin glycoforms. However, partial desialylation and normal patterns were detected in samples collected at other time-points. Desialylation was noticeable after arterial events and was associated with low antithrombin activity, reduced platelet count and glomerular filtration rate. This is the first description of a global and transient desialylation of plasma proteins associated with thrombosis. The decrease in the strong electronegative charge of terminal glycans may modulate hemostatic protein-protein interactions, which in combination with a strong prothrombotic situation, such as antithrombin deficiency, could increase the risk of thrombosis.

Evaluation of antiphospholipid antibody assays using latent class analysis to address the lack of a reference standard

BACKGROUND

Method evaluation of new assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as anti-cardiolipin (aCL) or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI) is challenging, as no internationally accepted reference material is available yet. Besides a lack of standardization, unacceptable inter-laboratory comparability of established tests is regularly observed. Owing to the absence of a commonly accepted reference standard, the evaluation of two research surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor assays was performed using statistical methods from latent class analysis (LCA).

METHODS

aCL and aβ2-GPI IgG and IgM were measured in sera from 63 antiphospholipid syndrome patients, fulfilling the Sydney criteria, and in 34 healthy controls with four commercial assays. LCA was performed on the results and sera were assigned to the antibody-positive or antibody-negative group. Sera were subsequently evaluated in the SPR assays for aCL and aβ2-GPI. Optimal cutoffs and diagnostic performances of the research systems were established employing the LCA-derived gold standard.

RESULTS

With area under the curve results of 0.96 and 0.89 for the detection of aCL and aβ2-GPI, the research SPR assays discriminated well between antibody-positive and antibody-negative sera. Their sensitivities and specificities were comparable to the investigated commercial immunoassays.

CONCLUSIONS

SPR assays are a suitable tool for the detection of aCL and aβ2-GPI with diagnostic performances not different from currently available commercial tests. LCA enabled the calculation of sensitivities and specificities for aPL assays in absence of a reference standard.

Distribution of antiphospholipid antibodies in a large population-based German cohort

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired thrombophilia. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) above the 99th percentile of a reference group. Data on the distribution of aPL in the population are limited. The distribution of aPL including diagnostic cutoffs should be determined in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based cohort aged 35-74 years. We determined the presence of antibodies against cardiolipin (aCL, IgG, and IgM), β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI, IgG, and IgM), and domain 1 of β2-glycoprotein I (anti-domain 1, IgG) in a sample of 4979 participants.

RESULTS

aPL titers were similar in the whole sample and in an apparently healthy subgroup of 1049 individuals. There was a strong age-dependent increase of both aCL and anti-β2GPI IgM, while aPL IgG titers were stable or tended to decrease with age. A relevant decrease was observed for aCL IgG in women and anti-domain 1 IgG in both sexes. There was no association of aPL titers with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that for IgM aPL, age-dependent reference ranges should be used. In fact, the controversy regarding the clinical utility of IgM aPL might be related to the use of inappropriate reference ranges among other causes. In our population, aPLs were not associated with a history of VTE.

A multicenter study to assess the reproducibility of antiphospholipid antibody results produced by an automated system

Essentials Inter-lab variation studies for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with the same assay are lacking. We carried out an assessment of repeatability and reproducibility of an automated aPL assay. High intra-center repeatability for anticardiolipin and aβ2 GPI makes duplicate testing unnecessary. Inter-lab reproducibility was high except for aβ2GPI IgG.

SUMMARY

Background Inter-assay variability is a well-known problem in antiphospholipid antibody testing, because of the lack of standardization. Inter-laboratory reproducibility for the same assay is similarly important. Objectives Testing repeatability and reproducibility of HemosIL® AcuStar for anticardiolipin (aCL) and antiβ2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG and IgM. Patients/Methods In this observational study, out of 420 samples from the thrombophilia centers of Ghent and Geneva, 100 samples were randomly selected and successively analyzed in three centers: Ghent (C1, in duplicate for repeatability evaluation), Geneva (C2) and Frankfurt (C3). Results Results from 99 samples were available, including 25 from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 74 from non-APS patients. The intra-center repeatability expressed as intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was higher than 0.99 for each parameter. Differences between two measurements rarely exceeded 1 U mL-1 for values below 100 U mL-1 , except for aβ2GPI IgG, where differences varied from -4 to 4 U mL-1 . The inter-center ICCs were higher than 0.99, except for aCL IgM (ICC = 0.961). These ICCs remained high even when considering values below 100 U mL-1 (0.943, 0.964 and 0.977 for aCL IgG, aCL gM and aβ2GPI IgM, respectively), except for aβ2GPI IgG (ICC = 0.652). Qualitative comparison showed less than 5% discordant classification between centers, with somewhat more discordant results for aβ2GPI IgG. Conclusions In terms of discriminating properties, the HemosIL® AcuStar has excellent intra-center repeatability and a good inter-center reproducibility for aCL IgG, aCL IgM and aβ2GPI IgM. Some concern may arise for aβ2GPI IgG.

IgG/IgM antiphospholipid antibodies present in the classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome: a critical review of their association with thrombosis

Essentials The clinical value of IgM antibodies in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is debated. By review of literature, we reconsidered the clinical value of IgM antibodies in thrombotic APS. More significant correlations with thrombosis were found for the IgG compared to IgM isotype. Unavailability of paired IgG/IgM results hampers evaluating the added value of IgM positivity. Click to hear Dr de Groot's perspective on antiphospholipid syndrome

SUMMARY

Background Despite the update of the classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), difficulties persist in the identification of patients at risk for thrombosis. Current guidelines include assays detecting IgG/IgM anti-β2 -glycoprotein I and anti-cardiolipin antibodies, although the relevance of IgM antibodies has been debated. Objectives Through a review of the literature from 2001 to 2014, we aimed to formally establish the thrombotic risk stratification potential of IgM as compared with IgG anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Patients/methods One thousand two hundred and twenty-eight articles were selected by a computer-assisted search of the literature. Of the 177 studies that met our inclusion criteria, the clinical value of IgG/IgM aPLs was established through analysis of odds ratios for thrombosis or percentage of positives in the thrombotic population. Results/conclusions We clearly found more significant correlations with thrombosis for the IgG than for the IgM isotype. Nonetheless, in a minority of studies, significant associations with thrombosis were found for IgM but not IgG antibodies. The unavailability of paired results of IgG and IgM for each separate patient hampers evaluation of the added value of isolated IgM positivity. To fully take advantage of results obtained by future studies, we strongly encourage scientists to provide all studied information per patient. We planned a large multicenter study to investigate clinical associations of isolated/combined positivity for criteria/non-criteria aPLs. Importantly, because of the presence of non-pathogenic aPLs, quantitative assays are characterized by a high false-positivity rate. Optimization of functional assays, such as thrombin generation measuring the whole scheme of coagulation, may help to reduce APS-related morbidity and mortality.

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Novel Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Detection of Anticardiolipin and Anti-Beta2-Glycoprotein 1 Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Detection of antiphospholipid antibodies represents the first-line approach for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of a novel chemiluminescence assay (CIA) in detection of IgG/IgM/IgA anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and IgG/IgM/IgA anti-β2 glycoprotein 1 (aβ2GP1) antibodies and to compare it with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from the same manufacturer.A total of 227 sera were tested in this study, including 84 samples from patients with APS, 104 samples from patients with non-APS diseases as disease controls, and 39 healthy controls. Serum IgG/IgM/IgA aCL and IgG/IgM/IgA aβ2GP1 were determined by both ELISA (QUANTA Lite™ ELISA) and CIA (QUANTA Flash®assays).Significant quantitative correlations were identified between ELISA and CIA in IgG/IgM/IgA aCL and IgG/IgM/IgA aβ2GP1 autoantibodies detection (P < 0.001), with the rho value ranging from 0.51 to 0.87. In addition, ELISA and CIA demonstrated good qualitative agreements in IgG/IgM/IgA aCL and IgM/IgA aβ2GP1 autoantibodies determination with kappa coefficient ranged from 0.52 to 0.77. In contrast, ELISA and CIA showed a moderate qualitative agreement in IgG aβ2GP1 detection with a kappa value of 0.2. Notably, significantly higher IgG aβ2GP1 positive sera were detected by CIA, compared to those detected by ELISA in both primary APS (52.9% vs. 8.8%) and APS associated to other diseases sera (70.0% vs. 8.0%). For diagnosis of APS, IgG aβ2GP1 detection by CIA (IgG aβ2GP1 CIA) demonstrated the highest sensitivity (63.1%), followed by IgG aCL CIA (48.8%). More importantly, IgG aβ2GP1 CIA demonstrated the highest ability to predict the thrombotic events in patients with APS, with an OR of 3 (95% CI: 1.1-7.9).Our data suggest that this novel CIA assay had good performance in detecting aCL and aβ2GP1 antibodies, especially in the detection of IgG aβ2GP1 antibodies. Our findings could shed insight on the application of CIA in the laboratory diagnosis of APS in China.

Clinical utility of automated chemiluminescent antiphospholipid antibody assay

BACKGROUND

The threshold for clinically relevant levels of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remains a matter of debate. As new technologies for antibody detection are introduced, their performance characteristics must be clearly understood and compared to traditional assays.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the analytical performance and clinical utility of fully automated anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) chemiluminescent immunoassays (CIA) in comparison to the traditional ELISA tests.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Samples from 220 autoimmune patients were studied (primary APS - 74; secondary APS - 47, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without APS - 99). All samples were tested for IgG and IgM aCL and β2GPI antibodies using both CIA and ELISA, and for lupus anticoagulant (LAC).

RESULTS

Good qualitative agreement and quantitative correlation were found between methods in regard to individual antibodies and their categories (profiles). All assays showed good clinical performance in APS, and strong correlation with APS-related clinical symptoms. Importance of determining individual laboratory 99 percentile values for a healthy population as normal cut-off values was shown. Additionally, based on a clinical approach, this study has established the low/medium threshold for QUANTA Flash aCL IgG and IgM assays.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed good clinical performance and strong correlation of the new automated CIA aPL assays with APS clinical symptoms. It also enabled us to determine the corresponding low/medium antibody threshold for the aCL antibody methods with different unit types.

"New" antigenic targets and methodological approaches for refining laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are a heterogeneous group of antibodies directed against phospholipids or protein/phospholipid complexes. Currently, aPLs are assessed using either "solid-phase" assays that identify anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies or "liquid-phase" assay that identifies lupus anticoagulant. However, in the last few years, "new" antigenic targets and methodological approaches have been employed for refining laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this review the potential diagnostic value of antibodies to domains of β2-GPI, prothrombin/phosphatidylserine, vimentin/cardiolipin, protein S, protein C, annexin A2, annexin A5, and phospholipid antigens is discussed. Moreover, new technical approaches, including chemiluminescence, multiline dot assay, and thin layer chromatography (TLC) immunostaining, which utilize different supports for detection of aPL, have been developed. A special focus has been dedicated on "seronegative" APS, that is, those patients with a clinical profile suggestive of APS (thromboses, recurrent miscarriages, or foetal loss), who are persistently negative for the routinely used aPL. Recent findings suggest that, in sera from patients with SN-APS, antibodies may be detected using "new" antigenic targets (mainly vimentin/cardiolipin) or methodological approaches different from traditional techniques (TLC immunostaining). Thus, APS represents a mosaic, in which antibodies against different antigenic targets may be detected thanks to the continuously evolving new technologies.

Diagnosis of inherited von Willebrand disease: comparison of two methodologies and analysis of the discrepancies

Diagnostics of von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes assessment of factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), and more specific tests as multimeric and genetic analyses are necessary for the correct VWD classification. The ACL AcuStar analyzer introduces chemiluminescence (CL) technology in detection of VWD with automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays. Compare VWF:Ag-ELISA and VWF:RCo by aggregometry conventional assays with new CL VWF:Ag-IL and VWF:RCo-IL assays, investigate the ability to make accurate VWD diagnosis and concordance with multimeric and genetic analyses. 146 patients with congenital VWD (51 Type 1; 34 Type 2A; 16 Type 2B; 31 Type 2M; 5 Type 2N; 9 Type 3) and 30 healthy normal subjects were included. A comparison was made between CL and conventional methods. Diagnostic evaluation included: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, multimeric distribution (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]-agarose gel) of VWF and genetic analysis in 110 of 146 patients. CL and conventional methods revealed good correlation. Kappa test agreement diagnosis was >0.8. CL diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and specificity 97%. Multimeric and genetic analysis were of help in clarifying 13 discrepancies of diagnosis between methods, of which six discrepancies were explained by lack of conventional methods′ sensibility. CL methodology can detect VWD and discriminate between type 1, 3 and variant forms and offers an automated, faster, sensitive and less cumbersome method when compared to conventional assays, in particular VWF:RCo by aggregometry. In some cases, even with all phenotype and genetic analyses, discrepancies exist in the classification of VWD.

Antiphospholipid antibody testing and standardization

The laboratory criteria that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). All assays show methodological shortcomings and the combination of the three tests, each with different sensitivity and specificity, and hence, differences in clinical utility make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. Consensus guidelines and proposals for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) testing have been published in the last 20 years and have led to a substantial improvement. Despite efforts so far, standardization is not reached yet, but progress has been made. On-going efforts to reduce the interlaboratory/interassay variations remain important; even an absolute standardization cannot be feasibly achieved. Taking into account the methodological shortcomings of the means we have available, more detailed guidelines may help in adequate performance of aPL testing. This review will focus on the efforts and achievements in standardization and on the weaknesses and strengths of the current available laboratory methods.

Refinement of the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar assay for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

The HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) is a fully automated assay using chemiluminescent technology for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies. This assay showed excellent agreement between results of different laboratories. The cutoff values to define positivity were calculated in 250 healthy blood bank donors but were associated with large confidence intervals (CIs).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to more precisely determine the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay by increasing the number of healthy blood bank donors through a multicenter study and by applying a normalization procedure of the distribution of each antibody.

METHODS

Five laboratories participated to this study, allowing the inclusion of 626 samples. We used a Box-Cox power transformation method to normalize the distribution and calculate the 99th percentile and the corresponding 95%CI for each antibody.

RESULTS

The revised cutoff values were overall lower than those initially calculated with more stringent CIs and yielded a 4.2% increase in sensitivity with a 2.7% decrease in specificity regarding thrombotic events or obstetric complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide refined cutoff values for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies with the HemosIL AcuStar Antiphospholipid assay that should be preferred for routine use.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a recent classification for an old defined disorder

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is now being recognized as a distinct entity from vascular APS. Pregnancy morbidity includes >3 consecutive and spontaneous early miscarriages before 10weeks of gestation; at least one unexplained fetal death after the 10th week of gestation of a morphologically normal fetus; a premature birth before the 34th week of gestation of a normal neonate due to eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia or placental insufficiency. It is not well understood how antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), beyond their diagnostic and prognostic role, contribute to pregnancy manifestations. Indeed aPL-mediated thrombotic events cannot explain the obstetric manifestations and additional pathogenic mechanisms, such as a placental aPL mediated complement activation and a direct effect of aPLs on placental development, have been reported. Still debated is the possible association between aPLs and infertility and the effect of maternal autoantibodies on non-vascular manifestations in the babies. Combination of low dose aspirin and unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin is the effective treatment in most of the cases. However, pregnancy complications, in spite of this therapy, can occur in up to 20% of the patients. Novel alternative therapies able to abrogate the aPL pathogenic action either by interfering with aPL binding at the placental level or by inhibiting the aPL-mediated detrimental effect are under active investigation.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: evaluation of the thrombotic risk

The laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) via antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), or anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies remains a challenge. Coagulation tests for LAC as well as solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI have methodological shortcomings, although for LAC large progress have been made in standardization. All assays are associated with clinical APS-criteria (thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications) but with limited specificity. Besides, clinical studies demonstrating the association between the presence of aPL and thrombosis are not always well designed and result in wide ranges of odds ratio with large variation between studies. The best association between thrombotic complications and aPL is found for LAC. The association between thrombosis and aCL or aβ2GPI is at least inconsistent. The inclusion of more specific assays, such as the domain-I-β2GPI.antibodies is too premature and depends on further investigation in large clinical studies and the commercial availability. The search for new assays should proceed to identify patients with aPL with increased risk for thrombosis, preferable in large prospective studies. Meanwhile, with the current available LAC, aCL and aβ2GPI assays it is strongly recommended to make antibody profiles. Multiple positivity of tests seems clinically more relevant. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory criteria for APS are discussed in view of their role in risk stratification of patients with thrombotic events.

Standardization of antiphospholipid antibody assays. Where do we stand?

The laboratory criteria (lupus anticoagulants (LA), and/or anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI)) that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were set in the Sapporo and Sydney criteria published in 1999 and 2006, respectively, and led to a substantial improvement in the recognition of APS. In addition, guidelines for LA detection were published by the Scientific Standardisation Subcommittee (SSC) of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) in 2009. However, a number of questions on this respect remain unresolved. Recommendations for the aCL and aβ2GPI assays intended to ameliorate the performance of these solid-phase assays. Despite efforts over the years, standardization has not been reached. This review will focus on methodological issues of the three antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtypes that are the subject of debate. The use of an international standard for aPL detection might help solve many of the problems caused by a lack of standardization of these assays.

Evaluation of a new set of automated chemiluminescense assays for anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in the laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the demonstration of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL): lupus anticoagulant (LAC) measured through coagulation assays, anticardiolipin IgG or IgM antibodies (aCL) and/or anti-β2glycoprotein I IgG or IgM antibodies (aβ2GPI), usually detected by ELISA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic value of aCL and aβ2GPI measured by a new automated system using the chemiluminescence principle, the immunoanalyzer Zenit RA (Menarini).

RESULTS

Results of aCL and aβ2GPI were correlated with the clinical background of the patients and with results of ELISA (n=314). Correlated to the clinical background sensitivity/specificity ranged for aCL IgG between 7.5-45.2% / 54.2-98.8%, for aCL IgM 3.4-5.5% / 89.9-94%, for aβ2GPI IgG 5.5-25.3% / 75.6-100% and aβ2GPI IgM 3.4-4.8% / 89.9-92.3%, depending on the cut-off used. Sensitivity with manufacturer's cut-offs was comparable to ELISA, except for aβ2GPI IgG with a significantly lower sensitivity compared to ELISA (5.5% vs 11.6%). In the APS patient population (n=30) sensitivity of aCL IgG and aβ2GPI IgG was higher measured by ELISA compared to Zenit RA (46.7% vs 30.0%, and 46.7% vs 26.7%, respectively). Agreement between Zenit RA results and ELISA results for the four parameters was moderate (Kappa-values ranging 0.509-0.565). Sensitivity was 38.5%, 53.3%, 40% and 69.2% for aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG and aβ2GPI IgM, respectively, applying the highest cut-off value for Zenit RA, raising towards 64.3%, 100%, 57.1%, for aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, respectively, in a APS patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

The new technology of chemiluminescense for measuring aPL showed good performance characteristics. Interpretation of results with a cut-off value associated with a good discrimination for disease, resulted in a lower sensitivity for the diagnosis of APS for aβ2GPI IgG measured by Zenit RA assays compared to ELISA; sensitivity for aCL IgG was comparable to ELISA. Specificity for all parameters was high and comparable for aCL and aβ2GPI.

Fully automated immunoassay for quantitative determination of FXIII

Coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) is essential for clot stabilization. Deficiency of FXIII is associated with a risk of bleeding and impaired wound healing. Substitution therapy with FXIII remedies for patients with low plasma levels of FXIII requires diagnostic quantification of the factor before and during therapy. Here, we describe a prototype of a preliminary research immunoassay for quantification of FXIII antigen on automated coagulation instruments. The prototype assay is based on a monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against FXIII A chain, whereas the mAbs are coupled to latex particles. FXIII in a plasma specimen causes agglutination of the latex particles, which can be quantified turbidimetrically. Performance data of the assay prototype processed on BCS® XP and Sysmex® CA-1500 instruments demonstrate a good correlation to the Berichrom® factor XIII activity assay1 from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (r = 0.94). Results: Comparability of instruments was excellent (r = 0.98). Coefficients of variation of total imprecision measurements ranged from 2.2 to 3.4%. Linearity was excellent over the range tested (12–121% FXIII). Analytical sensitivity was 0.51% FXIII on BCS XP and 0.44% FXIII on Sysmex CA-1500, respectively. No interference (> 10% bias) was observed with haemoglobin (up to 400 mg/dl), cholesterol (up to 300 mg/dl), bilirubin (up to 60 mg/dl) or triglycerides (up to 3000 mg/dl). Conclusion: The preliminary research assay prototype has the potential for excellent analytical sensitivity, precision, and dynamic range suitable to measure reliably FXIII antigen levels in human plasma.

Evaluation of three commercial ELISA kits for anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in the laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The laboratory criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG or IgM.

METHODS

We evaluated three commercial ELISAs for aCL and aβ2GPI IgG and IgM: Asserachrom® ('Stago'), Bio-Rad ('BR') and the Bindazyme™ (the Binding Site, 'BS').

RESULTS

Results of all assays and of LAC were correlated with the clinical background (n=228). Sensitivity for Stago/BS/BR aCL IgG was 14%/15%/18%, for aCL IgM 1%/5%/4%, for aβ2GPI IgG 9%/10%/17% and for aβ2GPI IgM 4%/4%/3%. The specificity for Stago/BS/BR for all assays ranged from 86% to 98%. The positive predictive value (PPV) for Stago/BS/BR aCL IgG was 46%/52%/40%, for aCL IgM 8%/36%/19%, for aβ2GPI IgG 70%/67%/45% and for aβ2GPI IgM 23%/23%/20%. Combining LAC with aCL and aβ2GPI antibodies increased the sensitivity (Stago/BS/BR IgG: 26%/27%/31%, IgM: 22%/21%/26%) and PPV (Stago/BS/BR IgG: 41%/46%/36%, IgM: 34%/40%/36%). Comparing the diagnostic power of the tests, only Stago/BS aβ2GPI IgG had a Chi-square P-value lower than 0.05. The combination of LAC and IgG ELISAs of BS resulted in the lowest P-value (0.098) compared to the other combinations.

CONCLUSION

All evaluated ELISAs are a practical tool in the laboratory diagnosis of APS. The diagnostic performance shows slight differences between the ELISAs from the different manufacturers.