Effectiveness of steroid treatment in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study

Myasthenia gravis-Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction resulting in skeletal muscle weakness. It is equally prevalent in males and females, but debuts at a younger age in females and at an older age in males. Ptosis, diplopia, facial bulbar weakness, and limb weakness are the most common symptoms. MG can be classified based on the presence of serum autoantibodies. Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies are found in 80%-85% of patients, muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies in 5%-8%, and <1% may have low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (Lrp4) antibodies. Approximately 10% of patients are seronegative for antibodies binding the known disease-related antigens. In patients with AChR MG, 10%-20% have a thymoma, which is usually detected at the onset of the disease. Important differences between clinical presentation, treatment responsiveness, and disease mechanisms have been observed between these different serologic MG classes. Besides the typical clinical features and serologic testing, the diagnosis can be established with additional tests, including repetitive nerve stimulation, single fiber EMG, and the ice pack test. Treatment options for MG consist of symptomatic treatment (such as pyridostigmine), immunosuppressive treatment, or thymectomy. Despite the treatment with symptomatic drugs, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy, a large proportion of patients remain chronically dependent on corticosteroids (CS). In the past decade, the number of treatment options for MG has considerably increased. Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology have led to new treatment options targeting B or T cells, the complement cascade, the neonatal Fc receptor or cytokines. In the future, these new treatments are likely to reduce the chronic use of CS, diminish side effects, and decrease the number of patients with refractory disease.

Effectiveness of early glucocorticoids in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

This study aimed to clarify the effect of early glucocorticoid (GC) application on achieving minimal manifestation (MM) status or better in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) in the early clinical phase.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 336 patients with MG who received GC therapy from January 2015 to September 2022 in the Zhengzhou University Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Myasthenia Gravis Biobank (ZMB). Patients were divided into two groups: the early mono-GC group (treated with GC within 6 months of MG onset) and the delayed mono-GC group.

Results

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the early mono-GC group achieved MM status earlier and more frequently than the delayed mono-GC group (log-rank test, p = 0.0082; hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; p = 0.011). The early mono-GC group had a lower maintenance oral GC dose than the delayed mono-GC group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, early mono-GC (HR, 1.50; p = 0.043), early-onset MG (EOMG) (HR, 1.74; p = 0.034), and ocular MG (OMG) (HR, 1.90; p = 0.007) were associated with MM status or better. In conclusion, early mono-GC, EOMG, and OMG were positive predictors of treatment goals. In EOMG, OMG, and acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG (AChR-MG) subgroups, the maintenance oral GC doses in the early mono-GC group were significantly lower than the doses in the delayed mono-GC group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early intervention with GC led to better long-term outcomes and reduced the necessary maintenance dose of oral GC for patients with MG. EOMG and OMG were positive predictors of MM status or better with mono-GC.

Serum metabolomics of treatment response in myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

High-dose prednisone use, lasting several months or longer, is the primary initial therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG). Upwards of a third of patients do not respond to treatment. Currently no biomarkers can predict clinical responsiveness to corticosteroid treatment. We conducted a discovery-based study to identify treatment responsive biomarkers in MG using sera obtained at study entry to the thymectomy clinical trial (MGTX), an NIH-sponsored randomized, controlled study of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone.

METHODS

We applied ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electro-spray quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry to obtain comparative serum metabolomic and lipidomic profiles at study entry to correlate with treatment response at 6 months. Treatment response was assessed using validated outcome measures of minimal manifestation status (MMS), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative MG (QMG) score, or a strictly defined composite measure of response.

RESULTS

Increased serum levels of phospholipids were associated with treatment response as assessed by QMG, MMS, and the Responders classification, but all measures showed limited overlap in metabolomic profiles, in particular the MG-ADL. A panel including histidine, free fatty acid (13:0), γ-cholestenol and guanosine was highly predictive of the strictly defined treatment response measure. The AUC in Responders' prediction for these markers was 0.90 irrespective of gender, age, thymectomy or baseline prednisone use. Pathway analysis suggests that xenobiotic metabolism could play a major role in treatment resistance. There was no association with outcome and gender, age, thymectomy or baseline prednisone use.

INTERPRETATION

We have defined a metabolomic and lipidomic profile that can now undergo validation as a treatment predictive marker for MG patients undergoing corticosteroid therapy. Metabolomic profiles of outcome measures had limited overlap consistent with their assessing distinct aspects of treatment response and supporting unique biological underpinning for each outcome measure. Interindividual variation in prednisone metabolism may be a determinate of how well patients respond to treatment.

Corticosteroid Treatment-Resistance in Myasthenia Gravis

Chronic, high-dose, oral prednisone has been the mainstay of myasthenia gravis treatment for decades and has proven to be highly beneficial in many, toxic in some way to all, and not effective in a significant minority. No patient characteristics or biomarkers are predictive of treatment response leading to many patients suffering adverse effects with no benefit. Presently, measurements of treatment response, whether taken from clinician or patient perspective, are appreciated to be limited by lack of good correlation, which then complicates correlation to biological measures. Treatment response may be limited because disease mechanisms are not influenced by corticosteroids, limits on dosage because of adverse effects, or individual differences in corticosteroids. This review evaluates potential mechanisms that underlie lack of response to glucocorticoids in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Adverse Side Effects Associated with Corticosteroid Therapy: A Study in 39 Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Background

The tolerability of high-dose oral corticosteroids in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) has not been systematically assessed. We evaluated adverse side effects (ASEs) of corticosteroid treatment in patients with gMG.

Material/Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted of ASEs reported as being related to corticosteroid treatment in 39 patients with gMG who were treated with oral corticosteroids for ≥1 year.

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 60 (21) years, 53.8% of patients were women, and 66.7% were aged ≤65 years. Median (IQR) prednisone treatment duration was 14 (2) months; median (IQR) daily dose was 40 (15) mg. The median number of ASEs reported as corticosteroid-related was 2/patient (IQR, 1). Pre-diabetes and weight gain were most common (each 43.6% of patients). Bruising, insomnia, and osteoporosis were more prevalent in patients aged >65 years, while irritability, osteopenia, and pre-diabetes were more common in patients aged ≤65 years, although differences were not statistically significant. Irritability and weight gain were more prevalent in women (P=0.010 for irritability); osteoporosis and pre-diabetes more common in men (P=0.015 for osteoporosis). ASEs were generally more common in the high-dose prednisone group (>30 mg/day), but were only statistically significant for irritability (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Corticosteroid-related ASEs were common in patients with gMG. Some of these ASEs can have serious medical consequences, and certain ASEs appeared to be associated with specific patient characteristics. Demographics and comorbidities of patients with gMG must be carefully considered before corticosteroid initiation. Potential ASEs, such as unanticipated osteoporosis in men, require extra vigilance.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as long-term monotherapy for myasthenia gravis

The objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. Immunosuppressive drug-naïve MG patients were administered tacrolimus, followed by thymectomy in some of the cases according to the clinical guideline for MG. Additional aggressive immunosuppressive therapies were allowed if the patients without thymectomy did not achieve minimal manifestation (MM) or better status after 3 weeks of tacrolimus administration or in the thymectomized patients by 1-2 weeks after the operation (i.e., 1st evaluation). Of all 14 patients included in this study, 8 of them (57%) achieved MM or better status at the 1st evaluation, and the remaining 6 (43%), who had failed to gain MM or better status at the 1st evaluation, also achieved MM or better status with 1 course of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. The quantitative MG (QMG) scores, MG-Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scales, and anti-acetylcholine receptor (AchR) antibody levels were significantly decreased at 6 months and maintained thereafter. At the end of the follow-up period (41-70 months), all patients were in MM or better status. None of the patients experienced severe adverse effects. Our small preliminary study indicates that long-term tacrolimus monotherapy is possibly effective and safe for MG patients.

Minimal manifestation status and prednisone withdrawal in the MGTX trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether sustained minimal manifestation status (MMS) with complete withdrawal of prednisone is better achieved in thymectomized patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

This study is a post hoc analysis of data from a randomized trial of thymectomy in MG (Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone Therapy [MGTX]). MGTX was a multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded 3-year trial that was followed by a voluntary 2-year extension for patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG without thymoma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to thymectomy plus prednisone vs prednisone alone. Participants were age 18-65 years at enrollment with disease duration less than 5 years. All patients received oral prednisone titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved MMS, which prompted a standardized prednisone taper as long as MMS was maintained. The achievement rate of sustained MMS (no symptoms of MG for 6 months) with complete withdrawal of prednisone was compared between the thymectomy plus prednisone and prednisone alone groups.

RESULTS

Patients with MG in the thymectomy plus prednisone group achieved sustained MMS with complete withdrawal of prednisone more frequently (64% vs 38%) and quickly compared to the prednisone alone group (median time 30 months vs no median time achieved, p < 0.001) over the 5-year study period. Prednisone-associated adverse symptoms were more frequent in the prednisone alone group and distress level increased with higher doses of prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS

Thymectomy benefits patients with MG by increasing the likelihood of achieving sustained MMS with complete withdrawal of prednisone.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT00294658.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with generalized MG with AChR antibody, those receiving thymectomy plus prednisone are more likely to attain sustained MMS and complete prednisone withdrawal than those on prednisone alone.

Maintenance immunosuppression in myasthenia gravis, an update

Therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG) include symptomatic and immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment. Options for immunosuppression include corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, eculizumab, intravenous immunoglobulin, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy. The practical aspects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in MG are critically reviewed in this article. Application of one or more of these specific therapies is guided based on known efficacy, adverse effect profile, particular disease subtype and severity, and patient co-morbidities.

A Neurologist's Perspective on Understanding Myasthenia Gravis: Clinical Perspectives of Etiologic Factors, Diagnosis, and Preoperative Treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a disease of neuromuscular transmission caused by antibodies directed toward proteins concentrated at the neuromuscular junction. Mild to life-threatening weakness varies in severity over time and with level of activity. Therefore, clinical diagnosis is often challenging. MG may be categorized by autoantibody type, thymic pathologic condition, and age of onset. Treatments are tailored for each group. A key management concern is severe exacerbation of weakness resulting from infections or exposure to certain medications, including antibiotics, which may be severe enough to produce respiratory decompensation. The article reviews key diagnostic issues and treatment options.

Satisfactory Response With Achieving Maintenance Low-Dose Prednisone in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the satisfactory response rate (SR%) with achieving maintenance, low-dose prednisone in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we estimate the SR% as defined by (remission/minimal manifestations status for at least 6 months using 7.5 mg or less of prednisone daily, for maintenance treatment at 2, 4, and 6 years after symptoms onset) for patients who were not taking steroid-sparing immunosuppressant (SSI) as a primary outcome and for patients taking an SSI as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were not taking an SSI at 2 years, 34 patients at 4 years, and 17 patients at 6 years; SR% was 44.4%, 64.7%, and 58.8%, respectively. Thirty-six patients were taking an SSI at 2 years, 22 patients at 4 years, and 15 patients at 6 years; the SR% was 50.0%, 45.4%, and 66.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of the generalized myasthenia gravis patients who were not taking an SSI achieved an SR.

Outcomes of Preoperative and Postoperative Corticosteroid Therapies in Myasthenia Gravis

AIMS

To compare the long-term outcomes of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) patients receiving pre-thymectomy (Pre-CS) or post-thymectomy corticosteroid (Post-CS) therapy.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 41 patients with MG were treated with Pre-CS therapy, and 110 were treated with Post-CS therapy.

RESULTS

In the MG cohorts, 9 of 40 patients (22.5%) in the Pre-CS group vs. 28 of 105 patients (26.7%) in the Post-CS group achieved a complete remission (CR) at 1 year, 29.7% (11/37) vs. 38.6% (32/83) at 2 years and 36.4% (8/22) in the Pre-CS group vs. 50.0% (28/56) in the Post-CS group achieved a CR at 5 years. For the entire population, Post-CS therapy (hazard rate [HR] 3.042, p = 0.020) was a positive predictor for remission, and a long preoperative interval (HR 0.936, p = 0.030) was a negative predictor. In 98 original ocular MG patients, Post-CS therapy (HR 2.663, p = 0.014) and an age at onset ≥15 years (HR 4.865, p = 0.001) were positive predictors for remission.

DISCUSSION

Post-CS therapy with a shorter preoperative interval increases the likelihood of CR in postpubertal and adult patients.

The Role of Osteopontin and Its Gene on Glucocorticoid Response in Myasthenia Gravis

Biomarkers that assess treatment response for patients with the autoimmune disorder, myasthenia gravis (MG), have not been evaluated to a significant extent. We hypothesized the pro-inflammatory cytokine, osteopontin (OPN), may be associated with variability of response to glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with MG. A cohort of 250 MG patients treated with standardized protocol of GCs was recruited, and plasma OPN and polymorphisms of its gene, secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), were evaluated. Mean OPN levels were higher in patients compared to healthy controls. Carriers of rs11728697*T allele (allele definition: one of two or more alternative forms of a gene) were more frequent in the poorly GC responsive group compared to the GC responsive group indicating an association of rs11728697*T allele with GC non-responsiveness. One risk haplotype (AGTACT) was identified associated with GC non-responsiveness compared with GC responsive MG group. Genetic variations of SPP1 were found associated with the response to GC among MG patients.

Neuromuscular junction disorders

Diseases of the neuromuscular junction comprise a wide range of disorders. Antibodies, genetic mutations, specific drugs or toxins interfere with the number or function of one of the essential proteins that control signaling between the presynaptic nerve ending and the postsynaptic muscle membrane. Acquired autoimmune disorders of the neuromuscular junction are the most common and are described here. In myasthenia gravis, antibodies to acetylcholine receptors or to proteins involved in receptor clustering, particularly muscle-specific kinase, cause direct loss of acetylcholine receptors or interfere with the agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor clustering necessary for efficient neurotransmission. In the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), loss of the presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels results in reduced release of the acetylcholine transmitter. The conditions are generally recognizable clinically and the diagnosis confirmed by serologic testing and electromyography. Screening for thymomas in myasthenia or small cell cancer in LEMS is important. Fortunately, a wide range of symptomatic treatments, immunosuppressive drugs, or other immunomodulating therapies is available. Future research is directed to understanding the pathogenesis, discovering new antigens, and trying to develop disease-specific treatments.

Perioperative management in myasthenia gravis: republication of a systematic review and a proposal by the guideline committee of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery 2014

Thymectomy is regarded as a useful therapeutic option for myasthenia gravis (MG), though perioperative management in MG patients is largely empirical. While evidence-based medicine is limited in the perioperative management of MG patients, treatment guidelines are required as a benchmark. We selected issues faced by physicians in clinical practice in the perioperative management of extended thymectomy for MG, and examined them with a review of the literature. The present guidelines have reached the stage of consensus within the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery.

Glucocorticoids in myasthenia gravis - if, when, how, and how much?

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the most commonly used immune-directed therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG). However, to date, GC have not proven their effectiveness in the setting of a randomized clinical trial that complies with currently accepted standards. The rationale for the use of GC in MG is the autoimmune nature of the disease, which is supported by consistent positive results from retrospective studies. Well-defined recommendations for treatment of MG with GC are lacking and further hampered by inter- and intra-individual differences in the disease course and responses to GC treatment. Uncertainties concerning GC treatment in MG encompass the indication for treatment initiation, exact dosage, dose adjustment in specific conditions (e.g., pregnancy, thymectomy), mode of tapering, and surveillance of adverse events (AE). This review illustrates the mode of action of GC in the treatment for MG, presents the currently available data on GC treatment in MG, and attempts to translate the currently available information into clinical recommendations.

Autoimmune neuromuscular disorders in childhood

OPINION STATEMENT

Autoimmune neuromuscular disorders in childhood include Guillain-Barré syndrome and its variants, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), along with other disorders rarely seen in childhood. In general, these diseases have not been studied as extensively as they have been in adults. Thus, treatment protocols for these diseases in pediatrics are often based on adult practice, but despite the similarities in disease processes, the most widely used treatments have different effects in children. For example, some of the side effects of chronic steroid use, including linear growth deceleration, bone demineralization, and chronic weight issues, are more consequential in children than in adults. Although steroids remain a cornerstone of therapy in JDM and are useful in many cases of CIDP and JMG, other immunomodulatory therapies with similar efficacy may be used more frequently in some children to avoid these long-term sequelae. Steroids are less expensive than most other therapies, but chronic steroid therapy in childhood may lead to significant and costly medical complications. Another example is plasma exchange. This treatment modality presents challenges in pediatrics, as younger children require central venous access for this therapy. However, in older children and adolescents, plasma exchange is often feasible via peripheral venous access, making this treatment more accessible than might be expected in this age group. Intravenous immunoglobulin also is beneficial in several of these disorders, but its high cost may present barriers to its use in the future. Newer steroid-sparing immunomodulatory agents, such as azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab, have not been studied extensively in children. They show promising results from case reports and retrospective cohort studies, but there is a need for comparative studies looking at their relative efficacy, tolerability, and long-term adverse effects (including secondary malignancy) in children.

Current and emerging treatments for the management of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder. There are several treatment options, including symptomatic treatment (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors), short-term immunosuppression (corticosteroids), long-term immunosuppression (azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, tacrolimus), rapid acting short-term immunomodulation (intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange), and long-term immunomodulation (thymectomy). This review explores in detail these different treatment options. Potential future treatments are also discussed.

Intercommunication between the neuroendocrine and immune systems: focus on myasthenia gravis

Crosstalk exists between the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, and perturbations in these interactions have been associated with disease. This includes production of neuroendocrine factors that alter immune system activity and increase susceptibility to or severity of immune-related conditions, such as myasthenia gravis (MG)--a T-cell-dependent, B-cell-mediated autoimmune disorder. MG results from impairment of transmission to the neuromuscular junction and involves the thymus--especially in early-onset disease, but the exact mechanism by which the thymus impacts disease is unclear. MG afflicts millions of individuals worldwide each year, and both men and women can develop symptoms. However, prevalence and age of onset differs between men and women. Women exhibit higher incidence and earlier age of onset compared to men, and disease fluctuates during pregnancy. This suggests that sex hormones play a role in influencing disease outcome. In this review, we will consider what is known about the manifestation of MG, theories on how different forms of MG are influenced or alleviated by steroid hormones, current treatment options, and what measures could be important to consider in the future.

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity

Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction in which patients experience fluctuating skeletal muscle weakness that often affects selected muscle groups preferentially. The target of the autoimmune attack in most cases is the skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR), but in others, non-AChR components of the neuromuscular junction, such as the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase, are targeted. The pathophysiological result is muscle endplate dysfunction and consequent fatigable muscle weakness. Clinical presentations vary substantially, both for anti-AChR positive and negative MG, and accurate diagnosis and selection of effective treatment depends on recognition of less typical as well as classic disease phenotypes. Accumulating evidence suggests that clinical MG subgroups might respond differently to treatment. In this Review, we provide current information about the epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment of MG, including emerging therapeutic strategies.

Corticosteroids for myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Although widely accepted as an appropriate immunosuppressive therapy, the efficacy of glucocorticosteroid treatment has only rarely been tested in controlled studies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of glucocorticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) medication in autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register in July 2004, MEDLINE (from January 1966 to June 2004) and EMBASE (from January 1980 to June 2004). We also checked the bibliographies in reviews and the randomised trials and contacted their authors to identify additional published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

From the articles identified we selected those open or controlled studies which allowed us to assess the outcome of treated and untreated patients at definite endpoints. Types of studies: quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

patients with myasthenia gravis of all ages and all degrees of severity. Types of interventions: any form of glucocorticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone treatment. Types of outcome measures:Primary outcome(1) improvement after at least three months in either the weakest muscles or all muscles. Secondary outcomes(1) proportion of patients improved after at least six months(2) proportion of patients in remission(3) number of episodes of worsening during the first six months(4) acetylcholine receptor antibody titres after at least three months of therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors extracted the data from the selected articles and one other checked them.

MAIN RESULTS

A trial of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (43 patients) did not show any advantage compared with placebo for the treatment of ocular myasthenia gravis. Two double-blind trials compared prednisone with placebo for generalised myasthenia gravis. In the first (13 patients), the improvement was slightly greater in the prednisone group at six months. In the second (20 patients) which was a short-term trial, the improvement was significantly greater at two weeks. Two trials compared glucocorticosteroids with azathioprine (41 and 10 patients respectively). In one of these the rate of treatment failure was greater in the prednisone group. In a trial of glucocorticosteroids versus intravenous immunoglobulin (33 patients) no differences in treatment responses were encountered during a treatment period of 14 days. An open trial (39 patients) evaluating different corticosteroid doses revealed a shorter time to improvement in the high-dose group. However only limited evidence can be drawn from the available randomised controlled trials due to numerous and important methodological flaws.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials suggests that corticosteroid treatment offers significant short-term benefit in myasthenia gravis compared with placebo. This supports the conclusions of observational studies and expert opinion. Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials does not show any difference in efficacy between corticosteroids and either azathioprine or intravenous immunoglobulin.

Treatment and outcome of myasthenia gravis: retrospective multi-center analysis of 470 Japanese patients, 1999–2000

To clarify the current status of treatments and outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) in Japan, a total of 470 patients (164 men and 306 women; mean age 41 years) were recruited from 19 Japanese tertiary medical centers in 1999-2000. Thymectomy was performed in 319 (68%) of the patients. Patients who received thymectomy were younger (p = 0.01) and had more severe disabilities (p < 0.01) than patients without thymectomy. Irrespective of receiving thymectomy, most of the patients were administered corticosteroids (64%), other immunosuppressive agents (10%), or cholinesterase inhibitors (86%). Of 395 patients followed up for more than 12 months after treatment (mean 8.0 years), 30% (34% of thymectomized and 21% of non-thymectomized patients) were in remission (no symptoms with/without medication), 34% had only ocular symptoms, and the remaining 35% still had weakness of bulbar or limb muscles at the end of follow-up. The prognosis of MG in Japan was generally favorable, but despite the frequent use of thymectomy and immunosuppressive treatments, approximately one-third of patients still had generalized weakness. More effective or intensive treatments are required to improve the prognosis.

Clinical evaluation and management of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a syndrome of fluctuating skeletal muscle weakness that worsens with use and improves with rest. Eye, facial, oropharyngeal, axial, and limb muscles may be involved in varying combinations and degrees of severity. Its etiology is heterogeneous, divided initially between those rare congenital myasthenic syndromes, which are genetic, and the bulk of MG, which is acquired and autoimmune. The autoimmune conditions are divided in turn between those that possess measurable serum acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and a smaller group that does not. The latter group includes those MG patients who have serum antibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). Therapeutic considerations differ for early-onset MG, late-onset MG, and MG associated with the presence of a thymoma. Most MG patients can be treated effectively, but there is still a need for more specific immunological approaches.

The management and outcome of patients with myasthenia gravis treated acutely in a neurological intensive care unit

The management and clinical course of patients with myasthenia gravis admitted to a neurological intensive therapy unit (ITU) over a 66 month period were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients were admitted in myasthenic crisis, eight of whom had multiple admissions. One patient had a cholinergic crisis and a further patient an acute myocardial infarction. A specific aetiological factor precipitating myasthenic crisis was identified in 19 instances: infection (8), reduction in medication (5), menstruation (4), and steroid administration (2). Thirteen patients with crisis had had a previous thymectomy, six with thymoma. Twenty-three out of 35 (66%) patients admitted in crisis required intubation; nine subsequently needed a tracheostomy. Twenty-nine patients received plasma exchange and seven intravenous immunoglobulin. Four patients in myasthenic crisis died in ITU [adult respiratory distress syndrome (1), disseminated intravascular coagulation and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis (1), cardiac failure (1) and multiple organ failure (1)]. Appropriate management of myasthenia gravis requires the easy availability of specialised neuro-intensive care facilities. Copyright Rapid Science Ltd

Thymectomy: its role in the management of myasthenia gravis

The management and clinical course of patients with myasthenia gravis admitted to a neurological intensive therapy unit (ITU) for thymectomy over a 66 month period were reviewed. There were 53 patients, 20 male and 33 female, mean age 35.2 years (18-74) and median ITU stay of 5 days (2-30). Indications for thymectomy were thymic enlargement on computed tomography (34%), persistence of generalized symptoms (38%), a combination of both (20%), steroid side effects or dependency (4%) and progressive bulbar symptoms (4%). Following thymectomy, thymic histology revealed thymic follicular hyperplasia (26/53; 49%), atrophy (11/53; 21%), thymoma (12/53; 23%) and normal thymus (4/53; 8%). Post-operatively 23% required prolonged intubation (> 48 hrs); two patients required a tracheostomy 10 and 13 days post-operatively. Plasma exchange was required for two patients (3.8%) due to persistent severe myasthenic weakness. Three patients (6%) developed a post-operative chest infection and one pseudomembranous colitis. There were no post-operative mortalities during the study period. After 2 years, 35% of patients were in remission and 46% had ocular or mild generalized symptoms only. Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis is followed by sustained clinical improvement in the majority of patients. The appropriate post-operative management of these patients is best undertaken in a specialized neuro-intensive care setting. Copyright Rapid Science Ltd