Contact allergy to topical budesonide in nasal spray

Systemic allergic dermatitis (systemic contact dermatitis) from pharmaceutical drugs: A review

The literature on systemic allergic dermatitis (SAD; also known as systemic contact dermatitis) is reviewed. Both topical drugs (from absorption through mucosae or skin) and systemic drugs (oral, parenteral, rectal) may be responsible for the disorder. The topical route appears to be rare with 41 culprit topical drugs found to cause SAD in 95 patients. Most reactions are caused by budesonide (especially from inhalation), bufexamac, and dibucaine. SAD from systemic drugs is infrequent with 95 culprit drugs found to cause SAD in 240 patients. The drugs most frequently implicated are mitomycin C, methylprednisolone (salt, ester), and hydrocortisone (salt). The largest group of culprit drugs consisted of corticosteroids (19%), being responsible for >30% of the reactions, of which nearly 40% were not caused by therapeutic drugs, but by drug provocation tests. The most frequent manifestations of SAD from drugs are eczematous eruptions (scattered, widespread, generalized, worsening, reactivation), maculopapular eruptions, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE [baboon syndrome]) and widespread erythema or erythroderma. Therapeutic systemic drugs hardly ever cause reactivation of previously positive patch tests and infrequently of previous allergic contact dermatitis. The pathophysiology of SAD has received very little attention. Explanations for the rarity of SAD are suggested.

Airborne contact dermatitis to drugs

Contact dermatitis is defined as "airborne" when the causative factor is present in the environment and may determine irritative or allergic skin reactions. It is often work-related. In this review of the literature, we focus our attention on airborne contact dermatitis due to pharmaceutical compounds. Contact reactions to medications, often occupation-related, occur mainly in two exposed groups: employees of pharmaceutical industries involved in the production of the drugs and healthcare workers who use the drugs for therapeutic aims.

Allergic Reactions to Inhalant Glucocorticosteroids: A Hot Topic for Pneumologists and Allergologists

Allergic contact dermatitis to topical glucocorticosteroids (GCS) is a delayed type cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction; it is frequently observed in dermatological and allergological practice, although its incidence is likely underestimated. By contrast, allergic contact sensitization to inhalant GCS is virtually unknown to most pneumologists. Here, we review some cases of adverse reactions to inhalant GCS in terms of pathogenetic mechanisms, risk factors, epidemiology, and allergic cross-sensitivity. In fact, this particular form of sensitization to drugs that have a wide spectrum of use in pneumological practice deserves more attention than in the past.

Pathophysiology and progression of nasal septal perforation

OBJECTIVE

To review the prevalence, causes, and treatments of nasal septal perforation (NSP).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed articles related to NSP using the keywords nasal septal perforation and septal perforation for articles published between January 1, 1969, and December 31, 2006, and references cited therein.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected based on their direct applicability to the subject matter.

RESULTS

Causes of NSPs include piercings, exposure to industrial chemicals, illicit drug use, intranasal steroid use, surgical trauma, bilateral cautery, and possibly improper use of nasal applicators. Prevalence is poorly reported. Mechanisms of substance-induced NSP formation are not understood. Progression from epistaxis to ulceration to NSP could not be substantiated by the literature.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the patient, NSP may be viewed as desirable (nose rings), problematic (whistling, congestion), or inconsequential. Understanding the pathogenesis of NSP is important for the practicing physician required to make decisions about whether to recommend surgical correction or medical treatment. Although the etiology of NSP is overwhelmingly iatrogenic, there is an association with a number of medical diseases in addition to use of illicit drugs and/or prescription nasal sprays.

[Connubial contact dermatitis to an inhaled corticosteroid]

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used in allergic asthma and rhinitis. They are most often used alone or sometimes in association. Allergic side-effects of inhaled corticosteroids are less frequent than those of topical corticosteroids. We report a case of a connubial dermatitis to a budesonide spray.

OBSERVATION

A 3-year old boy was treated for asthma by budesonide (Pulmicort) and terbutaline (Bricanyl) aerosols with an inhalation chamber (Babyhaler). From the fourth day of treatment onwards, his mother had swollen and itchy lesions on the face with conjunctivitis several hours after the administration of the corticosteroids using the inhalation chamber. The last eruptions were marked by extensive lesions. The patient reported a worsening of her eruption when she was treated with a desonide cream (Tridesonit). Prick-tests conducted later on confirmed the contact allergy to budesonide and Pulmicort spray. They were also positive for Tridesonit cream and triamcinolone acetonide. Repeated open application tests with a 17-butyrate hydrocortisone cream (Locoid) for three weeks remainded negative.

DISCUSSION

Our observation is original: allergic contact dermatitis to inhaled corticosteroids is rare, the clinical presentation mimicked angioedema although it was a delayed-type hypersensitivity, hypersensitivity was limited to group B corticosteroids and it was in fact a connubial contact dermatitis.

Corticosteroids

Up to 5% of dermatitis patients are allergic to corticosteroids. Because such allergy may be difficult to suspect due to the anti-inflammatory action of the corticosteroid, markers for corticosteroid allergy should be present in any standard series. Budesonide and tixocortol pivalate are two such markers, and they seem to detect a majority of corticosteroid allergy. The patch test concentration for a given corticosteroid may be crucial. A false-negative reaction may follow despite the patient being allergic, if too high a test concentration is used, because of the anti-inflammatory action of the corticosteroid. Patch test readings must be performed not only on Day 3 or Day 4 but also on a late occasion, i.e., Day 7 after test application, also because the anti-inflammatory action may suppress an allergic reaction at an early reading. Once a patient has reacted to a corticosteroid, an extended corticosteroid series should be tested, so that information may be given on which corticosteroids to use and, above all, which corticosteroids to avoid.

Skin reactions to inhaled corticosteroids

Corticosteroids intended for inhalation into the lungs or into the nose have been used since the 1970s. Only 2 attempts to assess contact allergy attributable to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis have been made, and only 1 single case of contact allergy attributable to budesonide and tixocortol pivalate was found. However, several case reports of allergic mucosal and skin symptoms caused by corticosteroids applied locally to the mucosa have been published. Local adverse effects from nasal corticosteroids have ranged from nasal congestion, pruritus, burning, and soreness to perforation of the nasal septum. Inhalation of corticosteroids into the lungs has been reported to cause pruritus, dryness, erythema and oedema of the mouth, a dry cough and odynophagia. Systemic signs reported from the use of nasal corticosteroids and inhalation of corticosteroids into the lungs have been eczematous lesions, particularly on the face, sometimes with spreading to the trunk and flexures. Urticaria has also been noted.

Treatment options for the child with allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is extremely common in pediatric populations. Its symptoms can interfere markedly with everyday life; moreover, untreated allergic rhinitis can predispose patients toward more serious respiratory diseases. Therapy focuses both on reducing the causes (avoidance, immunotherapy) and on controlling manifest symptoms (pharmacotherapy). Antihistamines, decongestants, anticholinergic agents, mast cell stabilizers, and intranasal corticosteroids constitute the pharmacotherapy arsenal. Of these, the intranasal corticosteroids most effectively control the major symptoms; many studies have found that their efficacy in persistent allergic rhinitis is greater than that of decongestants, antihistamines, and cromolyn sodium. Moreover, unlike systemic corticosteroids, they are generally free from adverse side effects. Thus, with appropriate attention to education and formulations most tolerable to children, they should be a wise choice for many pediatric patients.

Cutaneous-mucosal allergic contact reaction due to topical corticosteroids

We report the case of a 41-year-old nonatopic women with a previous history of eczematous reaction due to hydrocortisone who suffered worsening of her perennial rhinitis in association with perinasal dermatitis from the use of budesonide in nasal spray form, and stomatitis and pharyngitis due to budesonide in a bronchial inhaler. Patch tests with a series of 25 corticosteroids, some of them at different concentrations and in different vehicles, were positive to tixocortol pivalate, hydrocortisone, budesonide, prednisolone, hydrocortisone butyrate propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and fluocinolone acetonide. For some of them, a 1% solution in ethanol gave a positive reaction when a 20% mixture in petrolatum did not. Like other authors, we suggest that some multiple positives may represent sensitization to several steroids independently, true cross-reactions, or both, and that ethanol is a better vehicle than petrolatum.