1
|
Hernández Fernández CP, Borrego L, Giménez Arnau AM, Sanz Sánchez T, Carrascosa Carrillo JM, Zaragoza Ninet V, Serra Baldrich E, Miquel Miquel FJ, Silvestre Salvador JF, Córdoba Guijarro S, Sánchez Gilo A, Mercader García P, Navarro Triviño F, Tous Romero F, Rodríguez Serna M, Melé Ninot G, Ruiz González I, Gómez de la Fuente E, Pastor Nieto MA, Sánchez-Pedreño Guillén P, Sánchez Pérez J, Pereyra Rodríguez JJ, Gatica Ortega ME, González Pérez R, García Doval I, Gallego Descalzo MA. Should Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) still be part of the Baseline Series? ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2025:S0001-7310(25)00106-1. [PMID: 40024601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.10.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/04/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC), or Lyral®, is a fragrance marker that is part of the Fragrance Mix II (FM II) and is still patched as an independent allergen within the European and other baseline series despite the European Commission banning its use in cosmetics in 2021. We aimed to study the prevalence of sensitization to the HICC in Spain and its simultaneous positivity with the FM II to determine whether it should be part of the Spanish baseline series. MATERIAL AND METHOD We analysed all consecutive patients simultaneously patch-tested with HICC and FM II within the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC) from June 1st, 2018 through December 31st, 2023. RESULTS A total of 96 (0.8%) out of 12,029 patients analysed yielded positive to HICC and 396 (3.3%) to FM II. In 53% and 64% of the patients, respectively, findings were considered currently relevant. A total of 72 out of 96 (75%) HICC positives would be detected if only FM II was patched. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of HICC sensitization in Spain is low and has decreased in recent years. HICC is a prohibited fragrance in cosmetics and FM II detects 3 in 4 sensitized patients. Our results suggest that HICC should remain outside the Spanish baseline series and support its exclusion from the European baseline series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Hernández Fernández
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España.
| | - L Borrego
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - A M Giménez Arnau
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, España
| | - T Sanz Sánchez
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, España
| | - J M Carrascosa Carrillo
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| | - V Zaragoza Ninet
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - E Serra Baldrich
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - F J Miquel Miquel
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, España
| | - J F Silvestre Salvador
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Doctor Balmis, ISABIAL, Alicante, España
| | - S Córdoba Guijarro
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, España
| | - A Sánchez Gilo
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - P Mercader García
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, España
| | - F Navarro Triviño
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - F Tous Romero
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - M Rodríguez Serna
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - G Melé Ninot
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, Grupo Quirónsalud, Barcelona, España
| | - I Ruiz González
- Servicio de Dermatología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España
| | | | - M A Pastor Nieto
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España
| | | | - J Sánchez Pérez
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, España
| | | | - M E Gatica Ortega
- Servicio de Dermatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - R González Pérez
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Araba, Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria, Araba, España
| | - I García Doval
- Unidad de Investigación, Fundación Piel Sana AEDV, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kalicińska J, Wiśniowska B, Polak S, Spiewak R. Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24076801. [PMID: 37047774 PMCID: PMC10094956 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to develop an in silico model to predict the sensitizing potential of cosmetic ingredients based on their physicochemical characteristics and to compare the predictions with historical animal data and results from "omics"-based in vitro studies. An in silico model was developed with the use of WEKA machine learning software fed with physicochemical and structural descriptors of haptens and trained with data from published epidemiological studies compiled into estimated odds ratio (eOR) and estimated attributable risk (eAR) indices. The outcome classification was compared to the results of animal studies and in vitro tests. Of all the models tested, the best results were obtained for the Naive Bayes classifier trained with 24 physicochemical descriptors and eAR, which yielded an accuracy of 86%, sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 90%. This model was subsequently used to predict the sensitizing potential of 15 emerging and less-studied haptens, of which 7 were classified as sensitizers: cyclamen aldehyde, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, dimethylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulphide, geraniol hydroperoxide, isobornyl acrylate, neral, and prenyl caffeate. The best-performing model (NaiveBayes eAR, 24 parameters), along with an alternative model based on eOR (Random Comittee eOR, 17 parameters), are available for further tests by interested readers. In conclusion, the proposed infotechnomics approach allows for a prediction of the sensitizing potential of cosmetic ingredients (and possibly also other haptens) with accuracy comparable to historical animal tests and in vitro tests used nowadays. In silico models consume little resources, are free of ethical concerns, and can provide results for multiple chemicals almost instantly; therefore, the proposed approach seems useful in the safety assessment of cosmetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jadwiga Kalicińska
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Barbara Wiśniowska
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Sebastian Polak
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ševčík V, Andraščíková M, Vavrouš A, Moulisová A, Vrbík K, Bendová H, Jírová D, Kejlová K, Hložek T. Market surveillance: analysis of perfuming products for presence of allergens and prohibited substances. CHEMICAL PAPERS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11696-022-02225-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
4
|
Contact Allergy to Fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
5
|
Neale H, Garza-Mayers AC, Tam I, Yu J. Pediatric allergic contact dermatitis. Part I: Clinical features and common contact allergens in children. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 84:235-244. [PMID: 33217510 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), a delayed hypersensitivity skin reaction to environmental allergens, has a prevalence that is similar in children and adults. However, diagnostic testing for ACD in pediatric populations accounts for less than one tenth of all patch tests. The relative infrequency of pediatric patch testing may be attributed to the difficulty in testing in this population, which includes a smaller surface area for patch test placement and maintaining cooperation during patch testing, especially in younger children. Diagnosis can be difficult in children because the appearance of ACD can mimic other common pediatric skin conditions, particularly atopic dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis. Comprehensive history taking, guided by patient presentation, age group, and location of dermatitis, helps build clinical suspicion. Such clinical suspicion is one of the major reasons behind patch testing, with additional indications being recalcitrant dermatitis and dermatitis with atypical distribution. US pediatric data have shown the top allergens to be metals, fragrances, topical antibiotics, preservatives, and emollients. These trends are important to recognize to guide management and accurate diagnosis, because ACD tends to persist if the allergen is not identified and can affect patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Neale
- University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Cristina Garza-Mayers
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Idy Tam
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - JiaDe Yu
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bruze M, Ale I, Andersen KE, Cannavó A, Diepgen T, Elsner P, Goh CL, Gonçalo M, Goossens A, McFadden J, Nixon R, Puangpet P, Sasseville D. Contact Allergy to Fragrance Mix II and Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde: A Retrospective Study by International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis 2020; 31:268-271. [DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Contact Allergy to Fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_86-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
8
|
An Update on Fragrance Contact Dermatitis. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-019-0196-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
9
|
Schnuch A, Griem P. Duftstoffe als Allergene. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-018-1675-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Del Bufalo A, Pauloin T, Alepee N, Clouzeau J, Detroyer A, Eilstein J, Gomes C, Nocairi H, Piroird C, Rousset F, Tourneix F, Basketter D, Martinozzi Teissier S. Alternative Integrated Testing for Skin Sensitization: Assuring Consumer Safety. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1089/aivt.2017.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Stiefel C, Schubert T, Morlock GE. Bioprofiling of Cosmetics with Focus on Streamlined Coumarin Analysis. ACS OMEGA 2017; 2:5242-5250. [PMID: 30023744 PMCID: PMC6044641 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Facing the widespread use of cosmetic products in daily use and recognizing the very limited information obtained by target analysis, a method suited for comprehensive characterization of cosmetics was aimed at. The biological activity of ingredients of 20 cosmetics taken from 16 different product groups and their coumarin contents were investigated via chromatography linked to bioassays (direct bioautography) and mass spectrometry. It allows for screening a large number of cosmetic products within a short time to generate a more valid database on their coumarin content and their contribution to the overall exposure. Bioactivity profiling of cosmetics with regard to bioactive ingredients opens new avenues for a comprehensive characterization of important substances in products of daily use, helpful for the legally required safety and risk assessment of cosmetic products, especially for multiple product usage. As for coumarin, a ubiquitary fragrance compound of allergenic potential, which is under recurrent discussion due to its hepatoxic properties, it is necessary to be able to estimate the regular intake via cosmetics for a valid risk assessment. This newly developed bioprofiling method allowed a selective determination of coumarin down to 1.3 mg kg-1, even for very matrix-rich cosmetics despite minimalism in sample preparation. The declaration limits according to European Cosmetics Regulation were completely covered. Mean coumarin contents of 20 cosmetic products reached up to 2218 mg kg-1. The repeatabilities (%RSD, n = 3) were between 1.1 and 2.9%, and the mean recoveries (n = 5) were between 96 and 102% for the different cosmetic matrices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Stiefel
- Chair of Food Science, Institute
of Nutritional Science, and Interdisciplinary Research Center (IFZ), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Tina Schubert
- Chair of Food Science, Institute
of Nutritional Science, and Interdisciplinary Research Center (IFZ), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Gertrud E. Morlock
- Chair of Food Science, Institute
of Nutritional Science, and Interdisciplinary Research Center (IFZ), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Uter W. Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends. Allergol Select 2017; 1:190-199. [PMID: 30402616 PMCID: PMC6040011 DOI: 10.5414/alx01604e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
. Several fragrances are important contact allergens. Compared to the immense multitude of more than 2,500 fragrances used in cosmetics, the spectrum of single substances and natural extracts used for patch testing appears limited, albeit comprising the supposedly most important contact allergens. The present review summarizes the most important results of the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products from July 2012. Clinical results beyond abovementioned screening allergens, animal results in terms of the LLNA and structure activity considerations point to 100 single substances and extracts, respectively, which, in addition to those 26 already identified, must be considered contact allergens, and the presence of which should be declared in cosmetics. In case of the most commonly used fragrance terpenes limonene and linalool hydroperoxides resulting from autoxidation constitute the major allergens. These have become available as patch test material recently. Altogether 12 single substances have caused a (very) high number of published cases of sensitization. Thus their use concentration should be (further) reduced or, in case of hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC, e.g., Lyral®), use should be abandoned altogether. This is also recommended in case of oak moss and tree moss due to their content of the strong sensitizers atranol and chloroatranol. As generic maximum dose for the remaining 11 single substances 0.8 µg/cm2 are suggested, which corresponds, under conservative assumptions, a maximum concentration of 100 ppm in the finished product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Uter
- Institut für Medizininformatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Gimenéz-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Uter W, Johansen JD. Immunological, chemical and clinical aspects of exposure to mixtures of contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77:133-142. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte M. Bonefeld
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Microbiology; University of Copenhagen; 2200 Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Carsten Geisler
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Microbiology; University of Copenhagen; 2200 Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Elena Gimenéz-Arnau
- Laboratory of Dermatochemistry, Institute of Chemistry-CNRS UMR 7177; University of Strasbourg; 67081 Strasbourg France
| | - Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin
- Laboratory of Dermatochemistry, Institute of Chemistry-CNRS UMR 7177; University of Strasbourg; 67081 Strasbourg France
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Jeanne D. Johansen
- Department of Dermatology-Allergy, National Allergy Research Centre; Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte; 2900 Hellerup Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deza G, García-Bravo B, Silvestre JF, Pastor-Nieto MA, González-Pérez R, Heras-Mendaza F, Mercader P, Fernández-Redondo V, Niklasson B, Giménez-Arnau AM. Contact sensitization to limonene and linalool hydroperoxides in Spain: a GEIDAC * prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 76:74-80. [PMID: 27896835 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Revised: 09/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limonene and linalool are common fragrance terpenes widely used in cosmetic, household and hygiene products. Their primary oxidation products formed after air exposure, the hydroperoxides, have been recognized as important contact haptens. OBJECTIVES To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to hydroperoxides of limonene (Lim-OOHs) and hydroperoxides of linalool (Lin-OOHs) in Spain, and to define the optimal concentration for screening in consecutive patients. METHODS Three different concentrations of Lim-OOHs (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% pet.) and Lin-OOHs (0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% pet.) were simultaneously tested in 3639 consecutive patients at 22 departments of dermatology in Spain. RESULTS Lim-OOHs at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% yielded positive patch test reactions in 1.4%, 3.4% and 5.1% of the tested patients, respectively; and Lin-OOHs at 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% yielded positive reactions in 1.3%, 2.9% and 4.9% of the tested patients, respectively. Few irritant (1.5-1.9%) and doubtful reactions (0.4-0.5%) to both terpene hydroperoxides were registered at the highest concentrations tested. CONCLUSIONS Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs can be considered as common causes of contact allergy, and their inclusion in an extended baseline patch test series therefore seems to be appropriate. The patch test preparations of Lim-OOHs 0.3% pet. and Lin-OOHs 1.0% pet. are useful tools for screening of contact sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Deza
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Begoña García-Bravo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Juan F Silvestre
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante- Fundación FISABIO, 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Maria A Pastor-Nieto
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Guadalajara, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
| | | | | | - Pedro Mercader
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, 30008 Murcia, Spain
| | - Virginia Fernández-Redondo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Bo Niklasson
- Chemotechnique Diagnostics, 235 39 Vellinge, Sweden
| | - Ana M Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Engfeldt M, Hagvall L, Isaksson M, Matura M, Mowitz M, Ryberg K, Stenberg B, Svedman C, Bruze M. Patch testing with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) - a multicentre study of the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 76:34-39. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Engfeldt
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; 205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Lina Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 413 45 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Marléne Isaksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; 205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Mihály Matura
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute and Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; 113 65 Stockholm Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; 205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Kristina Ryberg
- Department of Dermatology; Uddevalla Hospital; 451 80 Uddevalla Sweden
| | - Berndt Stenberg
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology & Venerology; Umeå University; 901 85 Umeå Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; 205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; 205 02 Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74:1029-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2014] [Revised: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
19
|
Vejanurug P, Tresukosol P, Sajjachareonpong P, Puangpet P. Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74:230-5. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patnapa Vejanurug
- Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Unit; Institute of Dermatology; 420/7 Rajavithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400 Thailand
| | - Poohglin Tresukosol
- Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Unit; Institute of Dermatology; 420/7 Rajavithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400 Thailand
| | - Praneet Sajjachareonpong
- Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Unit; Institute of Dermatology; 420/7 Rajavithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400 Thailand
| | - Pailin Puangpet
- Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Unit; Institute of Dermatology; 420/7 Rajavithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400 Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch R, Bruze M, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Svensson Å, Naldi L. Prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in the general population of five European countries: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173:1411-9. [PMID: 26332456 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contact allergy to fragrances is assessed mostly in clinical populations of patients. Studies in the general population are scarce and vary in their methodology across countries. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in the European general population and to assess the clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to different fragrances. METHODS In five European countries (Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden) a random sample from the general population aged 18-74 years was drawn. In total, 12 377 subjects were interviewed in this cross-sectional study and a random sample (n = 3119) was patch tested using the TRUE Test and Finn Chamber techniques. Patch test procedures were harmonized by mandatory training before the study and monitoring during the study. RESULTS The highest prevalence for contact allergy of 2·6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·1-3·2] was found for fragrance mix (FM) I in petrolatum, with a high content of atranol and chloratranol, followed by 1·9% (95% CI 1·5-2·4) for FM II in petrolatum. The conservatively estimated prevalence of fragrance contact allergy was 1·9% (95% CI 1·5-2·5). This is defined as the existence of a positive patch test to FM I or FM II; any of their individual materials; Myroxylon pereirae; sesquiterpene lactones or 3- and 4-hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde that show clinical relevance, defined conservatively as lifetime avoidance of scented products and an itchy skin rash lasting > 3 days in a lifetime. Using the reported lifetime prevalence of any contact dermatitis instead of the lifetime prevalence of any itchy skin rash, the prevalence is 0·8% (95% CI 0·5-1·2). The prevalence rates of contact allergy to fragrances in women are about twice those in men. CONCLUSIONS This study helps to identify targets for prevention of fragrance allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T L Diepgen
- Department of Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Thibautstraße 3, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Ofenloch
- Department of Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Thibautstraße 3, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital Malmö, S-20502, Malmö, Sweden
| | - S Cazzaniga
- Department of Dermatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Centro Studi GISED - FROM Presidio Ospedaliero Matteo Rota, Via Garibaldi 13/15, 24122, Bergamo, Italy
| | - P J Coenraads
- Occupational and Environmental, Dermatology Unit, State University Hospital, P.O. Box 30.001, NL-9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - P Elsner
- Klinik für Dermatologie und dermatologische Allergologie, Klinikum der FSU Jena, Erfurter Str. 35, D-07740, Jena, Germany
| | - M Goncalo
- Clinica de Dermatologia, Hospital da Universidade Praceta Motal Pinto, Rua Infanta D.Maria, n 30-A-3D, P-3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Å Svensson
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Malmö, S-20502, Malmö, Sweden
| | - L Naldi
- Department of Dermatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Centro Studi GISED - FROM Presidio Ospedaliero Matteo Rota, Via Garibaldi 13/15, 24122, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Frosch PJ, Duus Johansen J, Schuttelaar MLA, Silvestre JF, Sánchez-Pérez J, Weisshaar E, Uter W. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73:163-71. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Frosch
- Department of Dermatology; University of Witten/Herdecke; 58448 Witten Germany
- Department of Dermatology; Klinikum Dortmund; 44137 Dortmund Germany
| | - Jeanne Duus Johansen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology; National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen; 2900 Hellerup Denmark
| | - Marie-Louise A. Schuttelaar
- Dermatology; University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen; 9700 RB Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Juan F. Silvestre
- Department of Dermatology; Hospital General Universitario de Alicante; 03010 Alicante Spain
| | - Javier Sánchez-Pérez
- Department of Dermatology; Hospital Universitario la Princesa; 28006 Madrid Spain
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine; University Hospital Heidelberg; 69115 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Fragrances are a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis in Europe and in North America. They can affect individuals at any age and elicit a spectrum of reactions from contact urticaria to systemic contact dermatitis. Growing recognition of the widespread use of fragrances in modern society has fueled attempts to prevent sensitization through improved allergen identification, labeling, and consumer education. This review provides an overview and update on fragrance allergy. Part 1 discusses the epidemiology and evaluation of suspected fragrance allergy. Part 2 reviews screening methods, emerging fragrance allergens, and management of patients with fragrance contact allergy. This review concludes by examining recent legislation on fragrances and suggesting potential additions to screening series to help prevent and detect fragrance allergy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Uter W, Fieβler C, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact sensitization to fragrance mix I and II, toMyroxylon pereiraeresin and oil of tupentine: multifactorial analysis of risk factors based on data of the IVDK network. FLAVOUR FRAG J 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Cornelia Fieβler
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Olaf Gefeller
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; University of Göttingen; Germany
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; University of Göttingen; Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Fragrance mix I and II: results of breakdown tests. FLAVOUR FRAG J 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Georg-August University; 37075 Göttingen Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Holger Lessmann
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Georg-August University; 37075 Göttingen Germany
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Georg-August University; 37075 Göttingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dickel H, Kreft B, Geier J. Strip patch testing does not affect reaction profiles of standard allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73:36-43. [PMID: 25824375 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Revised: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been hypothesized that positive reactions in the strip patch test are irritant rather than allergic. OBJECTIVE To study reaction profiles of the baseline series patch test substances applied routinely on tape-stripped skin according to the reaction index (RI) and the positivity ratio (PR). PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand two hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients were routinely strip patch tested with the baseline series between January 2011 and June 2013 (intervention group). On the basis of test reactions at D3/D4, the RI, and the PR, 25 standard allergens were analysed, and the results were compared with those obtained in 1161 patients patch tested conventionally from July 2008 to December 2010 (historical control group). RESULTS Nickel sulfate, fragrance mix I, cobalt chloride, Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru) and colophonium showed the highest frequencies of positive reactions in both groups, without any significant differences. Of 25 patch test substances of the baseline series, 18 showed good reaction profiles in the intervention group, and 16 in the historical control group. CONCLUSIONS Reaction profiles of baseline series patch test substances remained largely unaffected by tape stripping the skin prior to patch testing. Thus, if conventional patch test results are presumed to be false-negative, performance of the strip patch test can be recommended independently of the standard allergen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr University Bochum, D-44791, Bochum, Germany
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06120, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Georg August University Göttingen, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fall S, Bruze M, Isaksson M, Lidén C, Matura M, Stenberg B, Lindberg M. Contact allergy trends in Sweden - a retrospective comparison of patch test data from 1992, 2000, and 2009. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72:297-304. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Fall
- Department of Dermatology; Örebro University Hospital; SE-701 82 Örebro Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Marléne Isaksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet; SE-171 77 Stockholm Sweden
| | - Mihaly Matura
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, SE-113 65 Stockholm County Council; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Berndt Stenberg
- Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine; Umeå University; SE-901 85 Umeå Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindberg
- Department of Dermatology; Örebro University Hospital; SE-701 82 Örebro Sweden
- Department of Dermatology; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University; SE-701 82 Örebro Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
González-Muñoz P, Conde-Salazar L, Vañó-Galván S. Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Cosmetic Products. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2014.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
29
|
González-Muñoz P, Conde-Salazar L, Vañó-Galván S. Dermatitis alérgica de contacto a cosméticos. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2014; 105:822-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2013.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2013] [Revised: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
30
|
Dinkloh A, Worm M, Geier J, Schnuch A, Wollenberg A. Contact sensitization in patients with suspected cosmetic intolerance: results of the IVDK 2006-2011. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 29:1071-81. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Dinkloh
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy; Charité Universitätsmedizin; Berlin Germany
| | - M. Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy; Charité Universitätsmedizin; Berlin Germany
| | - J. Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Georg-August University; Göttingen Germany
| | - A. Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Georg-August University; Göttingen Germany
| | - A. Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität; Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hagvall L, Bråred Christensson J. Cross-reactivity between citral and geraniol - can it be attributed to oxidized geraniol? Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71:280-8. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Revised: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Gröna Stråket 16 413 45 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Johanna Bråred Christensson
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Gröna Stråket 16 413 45 Gothenburg Sweden
- Dermatochemistry and Skin Allergy, Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology; University of Gothenburg; Kemigården 4 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (lyral) in patch test preparations under varied storage conditions. Dermatitis 2014; 24:246-8. [PMID: 24030363 DOI: 10.1097/der.0b013e318281d094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The common practice of preparing patch tests in advance has recently been called into question by researchers. It has been established that fragrance compounds are volatile and their testing efficacy may be affected by storage conditions and preparation. Allergens in fragrance mix I rapidly decrease in concentration after preapplication to test chambers. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the volatility of hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) in petrolatum when stored in test chambers and to explore the correlation between vapor pressure and allergen loss in petrolatum during preparation and storage. METHODS Standardized HICC in petrolatum was prepared and stored in IQ Chambers and Finn Chambers with covers at 5°C, 25°C, and 35°C, and concentration was analyzed at intervals for up to 9 days using gel permeation chromatography. RESULTS Changes in HICC concentrations were not statistically significant at 8 hours at 5°C, 25°C, and 35°C. After 9 days, HICC concentrations were found to fall approximately 30% when stored at 35°C, 10% at 25°C, and less than 5% at 5°C. There was no significant difference between IQ and Finn chambers. CONCLUSIONS Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde concentrations are more stable in petrolatum than many other studied fragrance allergens, but HICC is still at risk for decreasing concentration when exposed to ambient air or heat for prolonged periods.
Collapse
|
33
|
Schwitulla J, Gefeller O, Schnuch A, Uter W. Risk factors of polysensitization to contact allergens. Br J Dermatol 2014; 169:611-7. [PMID: 23647229 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 'Polysensitization' (PS) is usually defined as contact sensitization to three or more unrelated haptens of the baseline patch test series. Despite PS being an important clinical phenotype indicating increased susceptibility to contact allergy, statistical approaches to analyse PS have hitherto been preliminary. OBJECTIVES To apply an appropriate regression model for count data, namely, negative binomial hurdle regression, to a large set of clinical patch test data with the aim of estimating PS risk in more detail than previously achieved. METHODS The detailed information provided by the hurdle model includes a separate estimation of an 'increment factor' quantifying the likelihood of further positive reactions, i.e. PS. Clinical data of 126 878 patients patch tested by departments comprising the IVDK (Information Network of Departments of Dermatology) network (www.ivdk.org) between 1995 and 2010 were included. RESULTS Regarding anatomical sites as exposure (surrogate), the axillae and the feet were found to be strong PS risk factors. Moreover, age was a strong PS risk factor, and less so, female sex. In comparison, atopic eczema and occupational dermatitis were less important risk factors. Single allergens contributed to PS to a varying extent. CONCLUSIONS The data presented point to some, very likely exposure-related, risk factors which need to be considered in future PS research, e.g. addressing the genetic basis for PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Schwitulla
- Department of Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Waldstr. 4-6, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Isaksson M, Inerot A, Lidén C, Lindberg M, Matura M, Möller H, Stenberg B, Bruze M. Multicentre patch testing with fragrance mix II and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:187-9. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marléne Isaksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; Malmö SE-205 02 Sweden
| | - Annica Inerot
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Gothenburg SE-413 45 Sweden
| | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm SE-171 76 Sweden
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council; Stockholm SE-171 76 Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindberg
- Department of Dermatology; Örebro University Hospital; Örebro SE-701 85 Sweden
| | - Mihaly Matura
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm SE-171 76 Sweden
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council; Stockholm SE-171 76 Sweden
| | - Halvor Möller
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; Malmö SE-205 02 Sweden
| | - Berndt Stenberg
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Dermatology & Venereology; Umeå University; Umeå SE-901 85 Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; Malmö SE-205 02 Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Uter W, Johansen JD, Börje A, Karlberg AT, Lidén C, Rastogi S, Roberts D, White IR. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69:196-230. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Revised: 05/17/2013] [Accepted: 05/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; 91054 Erlangen; Germany
| | - Jeanne D. Johansen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre; Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen; 2900 Hellerup; Denmark
| | - Anna Börje
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology; University of Gothenburg; 41137 Gothenburg; Sweden
| | - Ann-Therese Karlberg
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology; University of Gothenburg; 41137 Gothenburg; Sweden
| | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; 17177 Stockholm; Sweden
| | | | - David Roberts
- Liverpool John Moores University; Liverpool, Merseyside L3 5UZ; UK
| | - Ian R. White
- Department of Cutaneous Allergy, St John's Institute of Dermatology; St Thomas' Hospital; London SE1 7EH; UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Uter W, Geier J, Schnuch A, Gefeller O. Risk factors associated with sensitization to hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69:72-7. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Revised: 01/17/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen; D-91054; Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology at the; University of Göttingen; Göttingen; D-37075; Germany
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology at the; University of Göttingen; Göttingen; D-37075; Germany
| | - Olaf Gefeller
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen; D-91054; Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wolf R, Orion E, Ruocco E, Baroni A, Ruocco V. Contact dermatitis: Facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2013; 31:467-478. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
38
|
Dermatitis de contacto alérgica por fragancias. Parte II. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2013; 104:29-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
39
|
Arribas M, Soro P, Silvestre J. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrances: Part 2. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2012.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
40
|
Jensen P, Menné T, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP. Facial allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrance ingredients released by an electric shaver. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:380-1. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02123.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Hagvall L, Karlberg AT, Christensson JB. Contact allergy to air-exposed geraniol: clinical observations and report of 14 cases. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:20-7. [PMID: 22681463 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02079.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fragrance terpene geraniol forms sensitizing compounds via autoxidation and skin metabolism. Geranial and neral, the two isomers of citral, are the major haptens formed in both of these activation pathways. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether testing with oxidized geraniol detects more cases of contact allergy than testing with pure geraniol. PATIENTS AND METHODS The pattern of reactions to pure and oxidized geraniol, and metabolites/autoxidation products, was studied to investigate the importance of autoxidation or cutaneous metabolism in contact allergy to geraniol. Pure and oxidized geraniol were tested at 2.0% petrolatum in 2227 and 2179 consecutive patients, respectively. In parallel, geranial, neral and citral were tested in 2152, 1626 and 1055 consecutive patients, respectively. RESULTS Pure and oxidized geraniol gave positive patch test reactions in 0.13% and 0.55% of the patients, respectively. Eight of 11 patients with positive patch test reactions to oxidized geraniol also reacted to citral or its components. Relevance for the positive patch test reactions in relation to the patients' dermatitis was found in 11 of 14 cases. CONCLUSIONS Testing with oxidized geraniol could detect more cases of contact allergy to geraniol. The reaction pattern of the 14 cases presented indicates that both autoxidation and metabolism could be important in sensitization to geraniol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
D'Erme AM, Agnoletti AF, Milanesi N, Gola M. Eyelid contact dermatitis caused by unusual allergens in hair dye: the importance of testing with additional series. Int J Dermatol 2012; 53:e108-9. [PMID: 22913413 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05613.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Massimiliano D'Erme
- Allergological and Occupational Dermatology UnitDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery University of Florence Florence Italy E-mail:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Basketter DA, McFadden JP, Kimber I. Assessing the severity of allergic reactions: a regulatory dilemma. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:3-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02102.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
Ever-changing exposure to contact allergens, partly due to statutory directives (e.g. nickel, chromate, methyldibromo glutaronitrile) or recommendations from industrial associations (e.g. hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde), requires on-going epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergy. In this paper, the current state with special focus in fragrances and preservatives is described on the basis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) of the year 2010. In 2010, 12,574 patients were patch tested in the dermatology departments belonging to the IVDK. Nickel is still the most frequent contact allergen. However the continuously improved EU nickel directive already has some beneficial effect; sensitization frequency in young women is dropping. In Germany, chromate-reduced cement has been in use now for several years, leading to a decline in chromate sensitization in brick-layers. Two fragrance mixes are part of the German baseline series; they are still relevant. The most important fragrances in these mixes still are oak moss absolute and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. However, in relation to these leading allergens, sensitization frequency to other fragrances contained in the mixes seems to be increasing. Among the preservatives, MCI/MI has not lost its importance as contact allergen, in contrast to MDBGN. Sources of MCI/MI sensitization obviously are increasingly found in occupational context. Methylisothiazolinone is a significant allergen in occupational settings, and less frequently in body care products.
Collapse
|
45
|
Peiser M, Tralau T, Heidler J, Api AM, Arts JHE, Basketter DA, English J, Diepgen TL, Fuhlbrigge RC, Gaspari AA, Johansen JD, Karlberg AT, Kimber I, Lepoittevin JP, Liebsch M, Maibach HI, Martin SF, Merk HF, Platzek T, Rustemeyer T, Schnuch A, Vandebriel RJ, White IR, Luch A. Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 69:763-81. [PMID: 21997384 PMCID: PMC3276771 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0846-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2011] [Revised: 08/29/2011] [Accepted: 09/20/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Contact allergies are complex diseases, and one of the important challenges for public health and immunology. The German ‘Federal Institute for Risk Assessment’ hosted an ‘International Workshop on Contact Dermatitis’. The scope of the workshop was to discuss new discoveries and developments in the field of contact dermatitis. This included the epidemiology and molecular biology of contact allergy, as well as the development of new in vitro methods. Furthermore, it considered regulatory aspects aiming to reduce exposure to contact sensitisers. An estimated 15–20% of the general population suffers from contact allergy. Workplace exposure, age, sex, use of consumer products and genetic predispositions were identified as the most important risk factors. Research highlights included: advances in understanding of immune responses to contact sensitisers, the importance of autoxidation or enzyme-mediated oxidation for the activation of chemicals, the mechanisms through which hapten-protein conjugates are formed and the development of novel in vitro strategies for the identification of skin-sensitising chemicals. Dendritic cell cultures and structure-activity relationships are being developed to identify potential contact allergens. However, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) presently remains the validated method of choice for hazard identification and characterisation. At the workshop the use of the LLNA for regulatory purposes and for quantitative risk assessment was also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Peiser
- Department of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - T. Tralau
- Department of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - J. Heidler
- Department of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - A. M. Api
- Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | | | | | - J. English
- Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - T. L. Diepgen
- Department of Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - A. A. Gaspari
- School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - J. D. Johansen
- Department of Derma-allergology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A. T. Karlberg
- Department of Chemistry, Dermatochemistry and Skin Allergy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - I. Kimber
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - M. Liebsch
- Department of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
| | - H. I. Maibach
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - S. F. Martin
- Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - H. F. Merk
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospitals Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - T. Platzek
- Department of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - T. Rustemeyer
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. Schnuch
- Department of Dermatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - R. J. Vandebriel
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - I. R. White
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - A. Luch
- Department of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Heisterberg MV, Menné T, Johansen JD. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 65:266-75. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01962.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
47
|
Nardelli A, Drieghe J, Claes L, Boey L, Goossens A. Fragrance allergens in ‘specific’ cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 64:212-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01877.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|