1
|
Sonnenberg EM, Markmann JF. Machine Perfusion in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: Promises of Improved Outcomes but Gaps in Implementation. Am J Kidney Dis 2025; 85:651-653. [PMID: 39892463 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | - James F Markmann
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oh S, Kim K, Na O, Ha J, Koo TY, Yang J. Evaluating non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys in Korea. Sci Rep 2025; 15:2588. [PMID: 39833548 PMCID: PMC11746993 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86998-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Considering the low deceased donation rates despite increasing rates of end-stage kidney disease in Asia, minimizing donor kidney discard is important. This study aimed to investigate the current situation of donor kidney discard in Korea. This nationwide study included deceased donor kidneys of candidates for kidney transplantation (KT) between 2013 and 2018 in Korea. Kidney discard was defined as no procurement or discarding after procurement of kidneys. Among 5592 deceased donor kidneys, no-procurement, single-procurement, and double-procurement were 385, 63, and 5144, respectively. All unilaterally procured kidneys, except for one, were transplanted. Bilaterally procured kidneys were accompanied by two KT (n = 5058), one KT with the other kidney discarded (n = 33), or both kidneys discarded (n = 20). The overall kidney discard rate was 7.9%. The cause of non-procurement was universally organ damage, and the common causes of kidney discard after procurement were organ damage, absence of available candidates, and malignancy. While the kidney donor profile index was higher in the discarded group than in the KT group, a large overlap was observed. The risk factors for kidney non-utilization were old age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high serum creatinine levels, low hemoglobin levels, and non-cerebrovascular causes of death. KT using contralateral kidney in the discard group showed graft failure and mortality rates comparable to those of KT in the no-discard group. The discard rate of deceased donor kidneys was low, and the discard of one kidney does not necessarily rule out the utilization of contralateral kidney, especially in Korea with a long waiting time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhyun Oh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Keonhwa Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Omi Na
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhyung Ha
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Tai Yeon Koo
- Department of Nephrology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Q, Guo J, Han S, Wang T, Xia K, Yu B, Liu Y, Qiu T, Zhou J. The impact of donor diabetes on recipient postoperative complications, renal function, and survival rate in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a single-center analysis. Ren Fail 2024; 46:2391067. [PMID: 39177237 PMCID: PMC11346333 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2024.2391067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
As the global incidence of diabetes rises and diagnoses among younger patients increase, transplant centers worldwide are encountering more organ donors with diabetes. This study examined 80 donors and 160 recipients, including 30 donors with diabetes (DD) and their 60 recipients (DDR). The control group comprised 50 non-diabetic donors (ND) and 100 recipients (NDR). We analyzed clinical, biochemical, and pathological data for both diabetic and control groups, using logistic regression to identify risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. Results showed that pre-procurement blood urea nitrogen levels were significantly higher in DD [18.20 ± 10.63 vs. 10.86 ± 6.92, p = 0.002] compared to ND. Renal pathological damage in DD was notably more severe, likely contributing to the higher DGF incidence in DDR compared to NDR. Although DDR had poorer renal function during the first three months post-transplant, both groups showed similar renal function thereafter. No significant differences were observed in 1-year or 3-year mortality rates or graft failure rates between DDR and NDR. Notably, according to the Renal Pathology Society (RPS) grading system, kidneys from diabetic donors with a grade > IIb are associated with significantly lower postoperative survival rates. Recipient gender [OR: 5.452 (1.330-22.353), p = 0.013] and pre-transplant PRA positivity [OR: 34.879 (7.698-158.030), p < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of DGF in DDR. In conclusion, transplant centers may consider utilizing kidneys from diabetic donors, provided they are evaluated pathologically, without adversely impacting recipient survival and graft failure rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Chen
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jiayu Guo
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shangting Han
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Tianyu Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Kang Xia
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Bo Yu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yiting Liu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Tao Qiu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jiangqiao Zhou
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giorgakis E, Hardgrave H, Callais N, Wells A. Machine learning-driven virtual biopsy system may increase organ discards at aggressive kidney transplant centers. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10323. [PMID: 39614083 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53702-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/01/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Giorgakis
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Division of Solid Organ Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Hailey Hardgrave
- Division of Solid Organ Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Nicholas Callais
- Division of Solid Organ Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Allison Wells
- Division of Solid Organ Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mella A, Calvetti R, Barreca A, Congiu G, Biancone L. Kidney transplants from elderly donors: what we have learned 20 years after the Crystal City consensus criteria meeting. J Nephrol 2024; 37:1449-1461. [PMID: 38446386 PMCID: PMC11473582 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01888-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Based on the current projection of the general population and the combined increase in end-stage kidney disease with age, the number of elderly donors and recipients is increasing, raising crucial questions about how to minimize the discard rate of organs from elderly donors and improve graft and patient outcomes. In 2002, extended criteria donors were the focus of a meeting in Crystal City (VA, USA), with a goal of maximizing the use of organs from deceased donors. Since then, extended criteria donors have progressively contributed to a large number of transplanted grafts worldwide, posing specific issues for allocation systems, recipient management, and therapeutic approaches. This review analyzes what we have learned in the last 20 years about extended criteria donor utilization, the promising innovations in immunosuppressive management, and the molecular pathways involved in the aging process, which constitute potential targets for novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Mella
- Renal Transplant Center" A. Vercellone," Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Division, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Bramante, 88, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Ruggero Calvetti
- Renal Transplant Center" A. Vercellone," Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Division, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Bramante, 88, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonella Barreca
- Division of Pathology, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Congiu
- Renal Transplant Center" A. Vercellone," Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Division, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Bramante, 88, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Luigi Biancone
- Renal Transplant Center" A. Vercellone," Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Division, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Bramante, 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yi Z, Xi C, Menon MC, Cravedi P, Tedla F, Soto A, Sun Z, Liu K, Zhang J, Wei C, Chen M, Wang W, Veremis B, Garcia-Barros M, Kumar A, Haakinson D, Brody R, Azeloglu EU, Gallon L, O'Connell P, Naesens M, Shapiro R, Colvin RB, Ward S, Salem F, Zhang W. A large-scale retrospective study enabled deep-learning based pathological assessment of frozen procurement kidney biopsies to predict graft loss and guide organ utilization. Kidney Int 2024; 105:281-292. [PMID: 37923131 PMCID: PMC10892475 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Lesion scores on procurement donor biopsies are commonly used to guide organ utilization for deceased-donor kidneys. However, frozen sections present challenges for histological scoring, leading to inter- and intra-observer variability and inappropriate discard. Therefore, we constructed deep-learning based models to recognize kidney tissue compartments in hematoxylin & eosin-stained sections from procurement needle biopsies performed nationwide in years 2011-2020. To do this, we extracted whole-slide abnormality features from 2431 kidneys and correlated with pathologists' scores and transplant outcomes. A Kidney Donor Quality Score (KDQS) was derived and used in combination with recipient demographic and peri-transplant characteristics to predict graft loss or assist organ utilization. The performance on wedge biopsies was additionally evaluated. Our model identified 96% and 91% of normal/sclerotic glomeruli respectively; 94% of arteries/arterial intimal fibrosis; 90% of tubules. Whole-slide features of Sclerotic Glomeruli (GS)%, Arterial Intimal Fibrosis (AIF)%, and Interstitial Space Abnormality (ISA)% demonstrated strong correlations with corresponding pathologists' scores of all 2431 kidneys, but had superior associations with post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rates in 2033 and graft loss in 1560 kidneys. The combination of KDQS and other factors predicted one- and four-year graft loss in a discovery set of 520 kidneys and a validation set of 1040 kidneys. By using the composite KDQS of 398 discarded kidneys due to "biopsy findings", we suggest that if transplanted, 110 discarded kidneys could have had similar survival to that of other transplanted kidneys. Thus, our composite KDQS and survival prediction models may facilitate risk stratification and organ utilization while potentially reducing unnecessary organ discard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengzi Yi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Caixia Xi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Fasika Tedla
- The Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute (RMTI), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alan Soto
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zeguo Sun
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Keyu Liu
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Jason Zhang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Chengguo Wei
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Man Chen
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Wenlin Wang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Brandon Veremis
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Monica Garcia-Barros
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Danielle Haakinson
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rachel Brody
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Evren U Azeloglu
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA
| | - Lorenzo Gallon
- Northwestern Medicine Organ Transplantation Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Philip O'Connell
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ron Shapiro
- The Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute (RMTI), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen Ward
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Fadi Salem
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Weijia Zhang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoo D, Divard G, Raynaud M, Cohen A, Mone TD, Rosenthal JT, Bentall AJ, Stegall MD, Naesens M, Zhang H, Wang C, Gueguen J, Kamar N, Bouquegneau A, Batal I, Coley SM, Gill JS, Oppenheimer F, De Sousa-Amorim E, Kuypers DRJ, Durrbach A, Seron D, Rabant M, Van Huyen JPD, Campbell P, Shojai S, Mengel M, Bestard O, Basic-Jukic N, Jurić I, Boor P, Cornell LD, Alexander MP, Toby Coates P, Legendre C, Reese PP, Lefaucheur C, Aubert O, Loupy A. A Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Biopsy System For Kidney Transplant Patients. Nat Commun 2024; 15:554. [PMID: 38228634 PMCID: PMC10791605 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44595-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, day-zero biopsies are used to assess organ quality and discriminate between donor-inherited lesions and those acquired post-transplantation. However, many centers do not perform such biopsies since they are invasive, costly and may delay the transplant procedure. We aim to generate a non-invasive virtual biopsy system using routinely collected donor parameters. Using 14,032 day-zero kidney biopsies from 17 international centers, we develop a virtual biopsy system. 11 basic donor parameters are used to predict four Banff kidney lesions: arteriosclerosis, arteriolar hyalinosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and the percentage of renal sclerotic glomeruli. Six machine learning models are aggregated into an ensemble model. The virtual biopsy system shows good performance in the internal and external validation sets. We confirm the generalizability of the system in various scenarios. This system could assist physicians in assessing organ quality, optimizing allograft allocation together with discriminating between donor derived and acquired lesions post-transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Yoo
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
| | - Gillian Divard
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marc Raynaud
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Andrew J Bentall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Transplant Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Juliette Gueguen
- Néphrologie-Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Paul Sabatier University, INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Antoine Bouquegneau
- Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shana M Coley
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John S Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Erika De Sousa-Amorim
- Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antoine Durrbach
- Department of Nephrology, AP-HP Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, Île de France, France
| | - Daniel Seron
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry - Laboratory Medicine & Pathology Dept, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Soroush Shojai
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry - Laboratory Medicine & Pathology Dept, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Mengel
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry - Laboratory Medicine & Pathology Dept, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nikolina Basic-Jukic
- Department of nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and transplantation, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ivana Jurić
- Department of nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and transplantation, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mariam P Alexander
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - P Toby Coates
- Department of Renal and Transplantation, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital Campus, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Peter P Reese
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, PA, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, F-75015, Paris, France.
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alsolami E, Lotfy K, Alkhunaizi A, Cuerden M, Weir MA, House AA. Impact of Donation After Circulatory Death on Outcomes of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:50-57. [PMID: 38199855 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys experience suboptimal outcomes compared with standard criteria donor kidneys. To examine the additional impact of deceased organ category, donation after circulatory death (DCD), and neurologic determination of death (NDD) on ECD outcomes, we examined 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival in all ECD kidney recipients in our institution between January 2008 and December 2017. Of 166 ECD recipients, 49 (29.5%) were DCD and 117 (70.5%) were NDD. Delayed graft function was higher in the DCD/ECD group 61.2 % vs 32.0 % among NDD/ECD recipients. Graft loss was significantly increased among DCD/ECD (hazard ratio for graft loss 4.81 [95% CI1.78-13.01], P = .002 at 1 year and 2.03 [95% CI 1.03-4.0], P = .042 at 3 years). Death-censored graft loss was higher among DCD/ECD (hazard ratio was 10.12 [95% CI, 2.14, 47.92], P = .004 at 1 year and 2.83 [95% CI, 1.24, 6.46], P = .014 at 3 years). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality. Our study demonstrated that DCD/ECD kidneys have lower graft survival compared with NDD/ECD kidneys. Time on dialysis, waiting time, and panel reactive antibody should be taken into account when offering these organs to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enad Alsolami
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khaled Lotfy
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Ahd Alkhunaizi
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Meaghan Cuerden
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Matthew A Weir
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Andrew A House
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sageshima J, Than P, Goussous N, Mineyev N, Perez R. Prediction of High-Risk Donors for Kidney Discard and Nonrecovery Using Structured Donor Characteristics and Unstructured Donor Narratives. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:60-68. [PMID: 37910090 PMCID: PMC10620675 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite the unmet need, many deceased-donor kidneys are discarded or not recovered. Inefficient allocation and prolonged ischemia time are contributing factors, and early detection of high-risk donors may reduce organ loss. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) classification of donors with kidneys that are used vs not used for organ transplant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study used donor information (structured donor characteristics and unstructured donor narratives) from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). All donor offers to a single transplant center between January 2015 and December 2020 were used to train and validate ML models to predict donors who had at least 1 kidney transplanted (at our center or another center). The donor data from 2021 were used to test each model. EXPOSURES Donor information was provided by UNOS to the transplant centers with potential transplant candidates. Each center evaluated the donor and decided within an allotted time whether to accept the kidney for organ transplant. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcome metrics of the test cohort included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1 score, accuracy, precision, and recall of each ML classifier. Feature importance and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) summaries were assessed for model explainability. RESULTS The training/validation cohort included 9555 donors (median [IQR] age, 50 [36-58] years; 5571 male [58.3%]), and the test cohort included 2481 donors (median [IQR] age, 52 [40-59] years; 1496 male [60.3%]). Only 20% to 30% of potential donors had at least 1 kidney transplanted. The ML model with a single variable (Kidney Donor Profile Index) showed an AUROC of 0.69, F1 score of 0.42, and accuracy of 0.64. Multivariable ML models based on basic a priori structured donor data showed similar metrics (logistic regression: AUROC = 0.70; F1 score = 0.42; accuracy = 0.62; random forest classifier: AUROC = 0.69; F1 score = 0.42; accuracy = 0.64). The classic NLP model (bag-of-words model) showed its best metrics (AUROC = 0.60; F1 score = 0.35; accuracy = 0.59) by the logistic regression classifier. The advanced Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers model showed comparable metrics (AUROC = 0.62; F1 score = 0.39; accuracy = 0.69) only after appending basic donor information. Feature importance and SHAP detected the variables (and words) that affected the models most. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this cohort study suggest that models using ML can be applied to predict donors with high-risk kidneys not used for organ transplant, but the models still need further elaboration. The use of unstructured data is likely to expand the possibilities; further exploration of new approaches will be necessary to develop models with better predictive metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Than
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento
| | - Naeem Goussous
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento
| | - Neal Mineyev
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento
| | - Richard Perez
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scurt FG, Fischer-Fröhlich CL, Wassermann T, Ernst A, Schwarz A, Becker JU, Chatzikyrkou C. Histological and clinical evaluation of discarded kidneys in a European cohort of deceased brain death donor kidneys of marginal quality. J Nephrol 2023; 36:2587-2600. [PMID: 37856068 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01785-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite organ shortages, the discard rate of deceased donor kidneys is high. Risk factors for this trend warrant further study. METHODS We investigated reasons for discard in a cohort of brain death donors with marginal kidneys and procurement biopsies. Paraffin embedded procurement biopsies were systematically reevaluated and graded for the purpose of the study. Assessment included percentage of global glomerulosclerosis, Banff Lesion scores and tubular epithelial damage. Donor-, transplant process-, perfusion quality-, histopathology-, and recipient-related parameters were compared between discarded and transplanted organs. RESULTS Although most clinical characteristics were similar between donors whose kidneys were transplanted and those whose kidneys were procured but discarded, discarded kidneys were more likely to be from donors with hepatitis C, to have undergone wedge biopsies, to show changes of acute and chronic injury and to be deemed poor quality. Except for obvious anatomic abnormalities, kidneys were often discarded due to the findings of procurement biopsies. Donors of kidneys discarded for histologic reasons more often had hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke, and increased serum creatinine. The reason for discard was unknown in 20% of cases. Discarded kidneys came from donors who appeared to be clinically similar to donors whose kidneys were utilized for transplant. CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of discarded kidneys were of acceptable quality. The analysis of the outcome of every recovered organ could help to overcome this problem. Procurement biopsies more often lead to discard than to transplantation of recovered organs. Proper handling during allocation has to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian G Scurt
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Otto-von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Tamara Wassermann
- Otto-von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30655, Hannover, Germany
| | - Angela Ernst
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anke Schwarz
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30655, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jan U Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christos Chatzikyrkou
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30655, Hannover, Germany.
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lim WH, Au E, Teixeira-Pinto A, Ooi E, Opdam H, Chapman J, Johnson DW, Kanellis J, Davies CE, Wong G. Donors With a Prior History of Cancer: Factors of Non-Utilization of Kidneys for Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11883. [PMID: 38020745 PMCID: PMC10643206 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Cancer transmission from deceased donors is an exceedingly rare but potentially fatal complication in transplant recipients. We aimed to quantify the likelihood of non-utilization of kidneys for transplantation from donors with a prior cancer history. We included all intended and actual deceased donors in Australia and New Zealand between 1989 and 2017. Association between prior cancer history and non-utilization of donor kidneys was examined using adjusted logistic regression. Of 9,485 deceased donors, 345 (4%) had a prior cancer history. Of 345 donors with a prior cancer history, 197 (57%) were utilized for transplantation. Donor characteristics of age, sex and comorbidities were similar between utilized and non-utilized donors with prior cancer. The time from cancer to organ donation was similar between utilized and non-utilized donors, irrespective of cancer subtypes. Donors with a prior cancer history were less likely to be utilized [adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.29 (1.68-3.13)] than donors without prior cancer. Of all actual donors, the adjusted OR for non-utilization among those with prior cancer was 2.36 (1.58-3.53). Non-melanoma skin cancer was the most frequent prior cancer type for utilized and non-utilized potential donors. Donors with prior cancers were less likely to be utilized for transplantation, with no discernible differences in cancer characteristics between utilized and non-utilized donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai H. Lim
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eric Au
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Esther Ooi
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Helen Opdam
- DonateLife, Organ and Tissue Authority, Canberra, NSW, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeremy Chapman
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David W. Johnson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Integrated Nephrology and Transplant Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - John Kanellis
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher E. Davies
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zaza G, Cucchiari D, Becker JU, de Vries APJ, Eccher A, Florquin S, Kers J, Rabant M, Rossini M, Pengel L, Marson L, Furian L. European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT)-TLJ 3.0 Consensus on Histopathological Analysis of Pre-Implantation Donor Kidney Biopsy: Redefining the Role in the Process of Graft Assessment. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11410. [PMID: 37470063 PMCID: PMC10353313 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
The ESOT TLJ 3.0. consensus conference brought together leading experts in transplantation to develop evidence-based guidance on the standardization and clinical utility of pre-implantation kidney biopsy in the assessment of grafts from Expanded Criteria Donors (ECD). Seven themes were selected and underwent in-depth analysis after formulation of PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) questions. After literature search, the statements for each key question were produced, rated according the GRADE approach [Quality of evidence: High (A), Moderate (B), Low (C); Strength of Recommendation: Strong (1), Weak (2)]. The statements were subsequently presented in-person at the Prague kick-off meeting, discussed and voted. After two rounds of discussion and voting, all 7 statements reached an overall agreement of 100% on the following issues: needle core/wedge/punch technique representatively [B,1], frozen/paraffin embedded section reliability [B,2], experienced/non-experienced on-call renal pathologist reproducibility/accuracy of the histological report [A,1], glomerulosclerosis/other parameters reproducibility [C,2], digital pathology/light microscopy in the measurement of histological variables [A,1], special stainings/Haematoxylin and Eosin alone comparison [A,1], glomerulosclerosis reliability versus other histological parameters to predict the graft survival, graft function, primary non-function [B,1]. This methodology has allowed to reach a full consensus among European experts on important technical topics regarding pre-implantation biopsy in the ECD graft assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluigi Zaza
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University/Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan Ulrich Becker
- Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Albino Eccher
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sandrine Florquin
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jesper Kers
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michele Rossini
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University/Hospital of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Oxford, United Kindom
| | - Lorna Marson
- Department of Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Masutani K. Progress in Pathological Diagnosis after Kidney Transplantation: Current Trend and Future Perspective. J Atheroscler Thromb 2023; 30:720-732. [PMID: 37245995 PMCID: PMC10322740 DOI: 10.5551/jat.rv22005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in immunosuppressive therapy; posttransplant management of allograft rejection; and measures against infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and malignancy dramatically improved graft and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT). Among them, kidney allograft biopsy is an important tool and the gold standard for the diagnosis of various kidney allograft injuries, including allograft rejection, virus-induced nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and posttransplant glomerular diseases. The Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology has contributed to establishing the diagnostic criteria for kidney allograft rejection and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy that are used as a common standard worldwide. In addition to the for-cause biopsy, many transplant centers perform protocol biopsies in the early and late posttransplant periods to detect and treat allograft injury earlier. Preimplantation biopsy in deceased-donor KT has also been performed, especially in the marginal donor, and attempts have been made to predict the prognosis in combination with clinical information and the renal resistance of hypothermic machine perfusion. Regarding the preimplantation biopsy from a living kidney donor, it can provide useful information on aging and/or early changes in lifestyle diseases, such as glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial changes, and arterial and arteriolar sclerosis, and be used as a reference for the subsequent management of living donors. In this review, morphologic features of important kidney allograft pathology, such as allograft rejection and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, according to the latest Banff classification and additional information derived from protocol biopsy, and future perspectives with recently developed technologies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Masutani
- Division of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Werenski H, Stratta RJ, Sharda B, Garner M, Farney AC, Orlando G, McCracken E, Jay CL. Knowing When to Ignore the Numbers: Single-Center Experience Transplanting Deceased Donor Kidneys with Poor Perfusion Parameters. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:848-857. [PMID: 36735482 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypothermic machine perfusion is frequently used in evaluating marginal kidneys with poor perfusion parameters (PPP) contributing to delays in kidney placement or discard. We examined outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants with PPP compared with those with optimal perfusion parameters (OPP). STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study from 2001 to 2021 comparing PPP (n = 91) with OPP (n = 598) deceased donor kidney transplants. PPP was defined as terminal flow ≤80 mL/min and terminal resistance ≥0.40 mmHg/mL/min. OPP was defined as terminal flow ≥120 mL/min and terminal resistance ≤0.20 mmHg/mL/min. RESULTS Mean terminal flow was PPP 66 ± 16 vs OPP 149 ± 21 mL/min and resistance was PPP 0.47 ± 0.10 vs OPP 0.15 ± 0.04 mmHg/mL/min (both p < 0.001). Donor age, donation after cardiac death, and terminal serum creatinine levels were similar between groups. Mean Kidney Donor Profile Index was higher among PPP donors (PPP 65 ± 23% vs OPP 52 ± 27%, p < 0.001). The PPP transplant group had more females and lower weight and BMI. Delayed graft function was comparable (PPP 32% vs OPP 27%, p = 0.33) even though cold ischemia times trended toward longer in PPP kidneys (PPP 28 ± 10 vs OPP 26 ± 9 hours, p = 0.09). One-year patient survival (PPP 98% vs OPP 97%, p = 0.84) and graft survival (PPP 91% vs OPP 92%, p = 0.23) were equivalent. PPP did predict inferior overall and death-censored graft survival long-term (overall hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.23 and death-censored hazard ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.74). At 1 year, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was higher with OPP kidneys (PPP 40 ± 17 vs OPP 52 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Short-term outcomes in PPP kidneys were comparable to OPP kidneys despite higher Kidney Donor Profile Index and longer cold ischemia times, suggesting a role for increased utilization of these organs with careful recipient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope Werenski
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang CJ, Wetmore JB, Wey A, Miller J, Snyder JJ, Israni AK. Impact of donor kidney biopsy on kidney yield and posttransplant outcomes. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:387-392. [PMID: 36695677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Procurement biopsy is performed to determine kidney quality, but evidence supporting such association is poor. We investigated the impact of glomerulosclerosis percentage (GS%) on kidney yield and patient outcomes. Information on deceased kidney donors from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, was collected. Association between GS% and kidney yield (number of kidneys procured per donor) and posttransplant graft and patient outcomes were studied. Maximal GS% and minimal GS% were calculated to determine the relationship between GS% and kidney yield; minimal GS% only for correlation with posttransplant outcomes. Multinomial logistic regression and Cox models with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to analyze the association of GS% with kidney yield and posttransplant outcomes, respectively. The kidney yield was 1.63 when maximal GS% and minimal GS% were <5%, but was 0.88 when both GS% were >20%. The hazard ratio for graft failure 1 year after transplant was 1.05 when minimal GS% was 16% to 20%, but was 1.3 for GS% of >20%. The hazard ratio for mortality increased from 1 to 1.2 when minimal GS% reached >20%. In summary, higher GS% was associated with lower kidney yield and inferior posttransplant outcomes. Incorporation of GS% into Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients models may reassure organ procurement organizations and transplant centers pursuing kidneys with relatively high GS% levels, thereby reducing kidney discard rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie J Wang
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James B Wetmore
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew Wey
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan Miller
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vinson AJ, Cardinal H, Parsons C, Tennankore KK, Mainra R, Maru K, Treleaven D, Gill J. Disparities in Deceased Donor Kidney Offer Acceptance: A Survey of Canadian Transplant Nephrologists, General Surgeons and Urologists. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581231156855. [PMID: 36861114 PMCID: PMC9969426 DOI: 10.1177/20543581231156855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Significant variability in organ acceptance thresholds have been demonstrated across the United States, but data regarding the rate and rationale for kidney donor organ decline in Canada are lacking. Objective To examine decision making regarding deceased kidney donor acceptance and non-acceptance in a population of Canadian transplant professionals. Design A survey study of theoretical deceased donor kidney cases of increasing complexity. Setting Canadian transplant nephrologists, urologists, and surgeons making donor call decisions responding to an electronic survey between July 22 and October 4, 2022. Participants Invitations to participate were distributed to 179 Canadian transplant nephrologists, surgeons, and urologists through e-mail. Participants were identified by contacting each transplant program and requesting a list of physicians who take donor call. Measurements Survey respondents were asked whether they would accept or decline a given donor, assuming there was a suitable recipient. They were also asked to cite reasons for donor non-acceptance. Methods Donor scenario-specific acceptance rates (total acceptance divided by total number of respondents for a given scenario and overall) and reasons for decline were determined and presented as a percentage of the total cases declined. Results In all, 72 respondents from 7 provinces completed at least one question of the survey, with considerable variability between acceptance rates for centers; the most conservative center declined 60.9% of donor cases, whereas the most aggressive center declined only 28.1%, P-value < .001. There was an increased risk of non-acceptance with advancing age, donation after cardiac death, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and comorbidities. Limitations As with any survey, there is the potential for participation bias. In addition, this study examines donor characteristics in isolation, however, asks respondent to assume there is a suitable candidate available. In reality, whenever donor quality is considered, it should be considered in the context of the intended recipient. Conclusion In a survey of increasingly medically complex deceased kidney donor cases, there was significant variability in donor decline among Canadian transplant specialists. Given relatively high rates of donor decline and apparent heterogeneity in acceptance decisions, Canadian transplant specialists may benefit from additional education regarding the benefits achieved from even medically complex kidney donors for appropriate candidates relative to remaining on dialysis on the transplant waitlist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. J. Vinson
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax,
Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,A. J. Vinson, Division of Nephrology,
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Room 5081, 5th Floor Dickson
Building, Victoria General Hospital, 5820 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 1V8,
Canada.
| | - H. Cardinal
- Centre de recherche du Centre
hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - C. Parsons
- Organ and Tissue Donation and
Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - K. K. Tennankore
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax,
Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - R. Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Canada
| | - K. Maru
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
| | - D. Treleaven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - J. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Husain SA, King KL, Cron DC, Lentine KL, Adler JT, Mohan S. Influence of organ quality on the observed association between deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy findings and graft survival. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2842-2854. [PMID: 35946600 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Deceased donor kidney procurement biopsies findings are the most common reason for kidney discard. Retrospective studies have found inconsistent associations with post-transplant outcomes but may have been limited by selection bias because kidneys with advanced nephrosclerosis from high-risk donors are typically discarded. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of kidneys transplanted in the United States from 2015 to 2019 with complete biopsy data available, defining "suboptimal histology" as glomerulosclerosis ≥11%, IFTA ≥mild, and/or vascular disease ≥mild. We used time-to-event analyses to determine the association between suboptimal histology and death-censored graft failure after stratification by kidney donor profile index (KDPI) (≤35%, 36%-84%, ≥85%) and final creatinine (<1 mg/dl, 1-2 mg/dl, >2 mg/dl). Among 30 469 kidneys included, 36% had suboptimal histology. In adjusted analyses, suboptimal histology was associated with death-censored graft failure among kidneys with KDPI 36-84% (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36), but not KDPI≤35% (HR 1.24, 0.94-1.64) or ≥ 85% (HR 0.99, 0.81-1.22). Similarly, suboptimal histology was associated with death-censored graft failure among kidneys from donors with creatinine 1-2 mg/dl (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.60) but not <1 mg/dl (HR 1.07, 0.93-1.23) or >2 mg/dl (HR 0.95, 0.75-1.20). The association of procurement histology with graft longevity among intermediate-quality kidneys that were likely to be both biopsied and transplanted suggests biopsies provide independent organ quality assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - David C Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scurt FG, Ernst A, Hammoud B, Wassermann T, Mertens PR, Schwarz A, Becker JU, Chatzikyrkou C. Effect of creatinine metrics on outcome after transplantation of marginal donor kidneys. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:973-982. [PMID: 36043436 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicting outcome after transplantation of marginal kidneys is a challenging task. Donor creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are integral components of the respective risk scores. However, there is uncertainty on which of their values obtained successively during procurement is the most suitable. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study of 221 adult brain death donors with marginal kidneys, transplanted in 223 recipients. We applied logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between initial (at hospital admission), nadir (lowest), zenith (highest) and terminal (at recovery) donor eGFR with primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), 3- and 12-month graft function and 1- and 3-year patient- and death-censored graft survival. RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, admission, terminal, and the lowest donor eGFR could most accurately predict DGF. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.875 [0.771-0.993], 0.818 [95% CI: 0.726-0.922] and 0.793 [0.689-0.900]. Although not being significant for DGF (OR 0.931 [95% CI: 0.817-1.106]), the highest eGFR was the best predictor of 3-month graft function (adjusted b coefficient 1.161 [95% CI: 0.355-1.968]). Analysis of primary nonfunction showed that determination of initial and the highest eGFR proved to be the best predictors. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.804 [0.667-0.968] and 0.750 [0.611-0.919]. There were no differences in the risk associations of each of the four eGFR recordings with patient- and graft survival. CONCLUSION The various eGFR recordings determined during the procurement process of marginal donors can predict PNF, DGF and 3- and 12-month graft function. Regarding short-term patient- and graft survival, there appears to be impacted by recipient factors rather than donor kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian G Scurt
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Angela Ernst
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ben Hammoud
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Tamara Wassermann
- Department of Pneumology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter R Mertens
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Anke Schwarz
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jan U Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christos Chatzikyrkou
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,PHV Dialysis Center, Halberstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Das D, Wagler J, Ohara S, Nguyen M, Frasco PE, Smith M, Khamash H, Mathur AK, Budhiraja P, Reddy K, Heilman R, Jadlowiec C. Outcomes of Dual Kidney Transplants from High KDPI Kidneys are Superior Compared to Single Kidney High KDPI Transplants at One-Year. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14737. [PMID: 35633507 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Dual kidney transplantation (DKT), utilizing two adult kidneys from the same donor for one recipient, has been used as way to expand the available donor pool. These kidneys often come from high Kidney Donor Profile Index donors (KDPI >85%). Data comparing outcomes between high KDPI DKT and single kidney transplants (SKT) remain limited. We assessed outcomes of 336 high KDPI kidney transplants performed at our center; 11.0% (n = 37) were DKT. Recipients of DKT were older (p = 0.02) and donors had a higher KDPI score (median 96% vs. 91%, p<0.0001). DKT operative time was higher compared to SKT (+1.4 hours, p<0.0001). There were no differences in delayed graft function (54.1% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.77) and hospital length of stay (median 4.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.21) between DKT and SKT. Grade I Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in 8.1% of DKT and 13.7% of SKT (p = 0.008). There were no grade IVa, IVb or V complications in either group. DKT had more glomerulosclerosis (p = 0.04), interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02), tubular atrophy (p = 0.01), and arterial thickening (p = 0.03) on one-year protocol biopsies. Estimated glomerular filtration was higher for DKT at one- (p = 0.004) and two-years post-transplant (p = 0.01). There were no differences in patient (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.3, p = 0.58) or graft (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.3, p = 0.83) survival. Good outcomes can be achieved with DKT using high KDPI kidneys with moderate chronic changes. DKT is a good option to help further utilize high KDPI kidneys and minimize discard. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devika Das
- Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Josiah Wagler
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Stephanie Ohara
- Division of Surgery, Valleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michelle Nguyen
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Peter E Frasco
- Division of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Maxwell Smith
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Hasan Khamash
- Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Kunam Reddy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Caroline Jadlowiec
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosaasen C, Rosaasen N, Mainra R, Trachtenberg A, Ho J, Parsons C, Delaney S, Mansell H. Waitlisted and Transplant Patient Perspectives on Expanding Access to Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221100291. [PMID: 35615070 PMCID: PMC9125065 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221100291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A concerning number of kidneys (eg, expanded donor criteria, extended criteria, or marginal kidneys) are discarded yearly while patients experience significant morbidity and mortality on the transplant waitlist. Novel solutions are needed to solve the shortage of kidneys available for transplant. Patient perceptions regarding the use of these less than ideal kidneys remain unexplored. Objective: To explore the perspectives of patients who have previously received a less than ideal kidney in the past and patients awaiting transplant who could potentially benefit from one. Design: Qualitative description study. Setting: 2 provinces in Canada participated (Saskatchewan and Manitoba). Patients: Patients with end-stage kidney disease who were awaiting kidney transplant and were either (a) aged 65 years and older, or (b) 55 years and older with other medical conditions (eg, diabetes). Methods: Criterion sampling was used to identify participants. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted virtually, which explored perceived quality of life, perceptions of less than ideal kidneys, risk tolerance for accepting one, and educational needs to make such a choice. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: 15 interviews were conducted with usable data (n = 10 pretransplant; n = 5 posttransplant). Participants were a mean of 65.5 ± 8.8 years old. Four interrelated themes became prominent including (1) patient awareness and understanding of their situation or context, (2) a desire for information, (3) a desire for freedom from dialysis, and (4) trust. Subthemes of transparency, clarity, standardization, and autonomy were deemed important for participant education. The majority of pretransplant participants (n = 8/10) indicated that between 3 and 5 years off of dialysis would make the risk of accepting a less than ideal kidney feel worthwhile. Limitation: The study setting was limited to 2 Canadian provinces, which limits the generalizability. Furthermore, the participants were homogenous in demographics such as ethnicity. Conclusion: These findings indicate that patients are comfortable to accept a less than ideal kidney for transplant in situations where their autonomy is respected, they are provided clear, standardized, and transparent information, and when they trust their physician. These results will be used to inform the development of a new national registry for expanding access to deceased-donor kidney transplant. Trial Registration: Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Canute Rosaasen
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Nicola Rosaasen
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Aaron Trachtenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Immunology, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | | | - Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Raza SS, Agarwal G, Anderson D, Deierhoi M, Fatima H, Hanaway M, Locke J, MacLennan P, Orandi B, Young C, Mannon RB, Seifert ME. Abnormal time-zero histology is predictive of kidney transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14676. [PMID: 35437836 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Time-zero biopsies can detect donor-derived lesions at the time of kidney transplantation, but their utility in predicting long-term outcomes is unclear under the updated Kidney Allocation System. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 272 consecutive post-reperfusion time-zero biopsies. We tested the hypothesis that abnormal time-zero histology is a strong indicator of donor quality that increases the precision of the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) score to predict long-term outcomes. We detected abnormal biopsies in 42% of the cohort, which were independently associated with a 1.2-fold increased hazard for a composite of acute rejection, allograft failure, and death after adjusting for clinical characteristics including KDPI. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the relationship between abnormal time-zero histology and the composite endpoint was only significant in the subgroup of deceased donor kidney transplants with KDPI scores > 35. Abnormal time-zero histology, particularly vascular intimal fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis scores, was independently associated with lower 12-month estimated GFR. In conclusion, abnormal time-zero histology is relatively common and identifies a group of kidney recipients at increased risk for worse long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal patient population in which to deploy time-zero biopsies as an additional surveillance tool. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Sikandar Raza
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gaurav Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Douglas Anderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mark Deierhoi
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Huma Fatima
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Michael Hanaway
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jayme Locke
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Paul MacLennan
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Babak Orandi
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Carlton Young
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Michael E Seifert
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Verstraeten L, Jochmans I. Sense and Sensibilities of Organ Perfusion as a Kidney and Liver Viability Assessment Platform. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10312. [PMID: 35356401 PMCID: PMC8958413 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Predicting organ viability before transplantation remains one of the most challenging and ambitious objectives in transplant surgery. Waitlist mortality is high while transplantable organs are discarded. Currently, around 20% of deceased donor kidneys and livers are discarded because of “poor organ quality”, Decisions to discard are still mainly a subjective judgement since there are only limited reliable tools predictive of outcome available. Organ perfusion technology has been posed as a platform for pre-transplant organ viability assessment. Markers of graft injury and function as well as perfusion parameters have been investigated as possible viability markers during ex-situ hypothermic and normothermic perfusion. We provide an overview of the available evidence for the use of kidney and liver perfusion as a tool to predict posttransplant outcomes. Although evidence shows post-transplant outcomes can be predicted by both injury markers and perfusion parameters during hypothermic kidney perfusion, the predictive accuracy is too low to warrant clinical decision making based upon these parameters alone. In liver, further evidence on the usefulness of hypothermic perfusion as a predictive tool is needed. Normothermic perfusion, during which the organ remains fully metabolically active, seems a more promising platform for true viability assessment. Although we do not yet fully understand “on-pump” organ behaviour at normothermia, initial data in kidney and liver are promising. Besides the need for well-designed (registry) studies to advance the field, the catch-22 of selection bias in clinical studies needs addressing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Verstraeten
- Lab of Abdominal Transplantation, Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Lab of Abdominal Transplantation, Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Ina Jochmans,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Long-standing donor diabetes and pathologic findings are associated with shorter allograft survival in recipients of kidney transplants from diabetic donors. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:128-134. [PMID: 34584213 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00927-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 6% of deceased kidney donors (DKDs) are diabetic; their kidneys may be associated with worse allograft survival, but published studies suggest that recipient diabetes status has a greater impact on mortality and survival. Since biopsy findings are the most common reason for organ discard, we sought to understand histologic and clinical factors that influence graft survival in patients who receive a kidney from a diabetic DKD. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional experience from 2005 to 2019, and re-evaluated pre-implantation and earliest post-transplant biopsies. Histologic findings were compared against a control cohort of non-diabetic DKD. Of 829 adult DKD transplants, 37 (4.5%) came from diabetic donors. There was no significant difference in diabetic vs. non-diabetic DKD graft survival for all-comers; however, when stratified by duration of donor diabetes, donor diabetes ≥6 years was associated with graft failure. In 25 patients with post-transplant biopsies available, diabetic DKD allografts had significantly greater non-glomerular chronic injury than non-diabetic DKD allografts. Moderate arteriolar hyalinosis (in 24%), moderate tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis (IFTA, in 36%), and diabetic glomerulopathy (in 24%) on early post-transplant biopsy were associated with allograft failure. Pre-implantation frozen section discrepancies were more common in long-standing donor diabetes, and arteriolar hyalinosis and IFTA scores on frozen accurately prognosticated graft loss. There was no morphologic improvement in lesions of diabetic nephropathy on short-term follow-up. In conclusion, donor diabetes ≥6 years, and histologic findings on frozen section and early post-transplant biopsy are associated with diabetic DKD allograft loss.
Collapse
|
24
|
Goulamhoussen N, Slapcoff L, Baran D, Boucher A, Houde I, Masse M, Albert M, Marsolais P, Cardinal H, Bouchard J. Factors Associated With the Use of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581211048338. [PMID: 36062213 PMCID: PMC9434662 DOI: 10.1177/20543581211048338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with an increased risk of graft
loss. The use of cold hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been shown to
reduce the incidence of DGF in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs),
especially when extended-criteria donors (ECDs) are used. HMP can also
improve graft survival. However, there is a paucity of data on the
determinants of HMP use in clinical practice. Objective: We aimed to determine the factors associated with the use of HMP in a cohort
of donors and KTRs. Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Setting: 5 transplant centers in Quebec. Patients: 159 neurologically deceased donors (NDD) and 281 KTR. Measurements: Use of HMP. Methods: We collected data on consecutive NDD admitted to a dedicated donor unit in a
single university-affiliated center and their KTRs between June 2013 and
December 2018 in 5 adult transplant centers across the province of Quebec,
Canada. All organs were recovered in a single hospital center where a HMP
device was available for every organ recovered and the decision to use HMP
was left at the discretion of the procurement surgeon. Generalized
estimating equations were used to predict the use of HMP. Results: The cohort included 159 NDDs and their 281 KTRs. Thirty-three percent of
donors were ECDs, and 59% of KTRs received organs placed on HMP. The median
cold ischemia time (CIT) was 12.5 (IQR 7.9-16.3) hours. In univariate
analysis, none of the donors’ characteristics were associated with the use
of HMP. ECD represented 33% of KTR on HMP vs 35% of those not placed on HMP
(P = .77). In univariate analysis, the use of HMP was
associated with KTR race (non-Caucasian), longer CIT, use of
basiliximab/alemtuzumab, year of transplant, and transplant center. The use
of HMP varied largely across transplant centers, ranging from 15% to 82%. In
multivariate analysis, use of HMP was associated with longer CIT (odds ratio
[OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.25), transplant center as
well as transplantations performed after 2013. Limitations: One dedicated donor unit including NDD only, absence of specific data on
surgeons’ experience and personal or logistic reasons for using or not
HMP. Conclusions: We found that use of HMP remains low and varies largely across transplant
centers. The use of HMP was strongly associated with the transplant center
where the surgeons practiced, suggesting that surgeon preference/training
plays an important role in determining the use of HMP. Availability of HMP
at the time of organ procurement might also be limited by logistic issues
such as difficulty in returning the device. Further studies aimed at
determining the reasons underlying the barriers precluding the use of HMP
could help increasing its use and improve transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadir Goulamhoussen
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Slapcoff
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dana Baran
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anne Boucher
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Houde
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Mélanie Masse
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Albert
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Marsolais
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Heloïse Cardinal
- Research center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Josée Bouchard
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jadav P, Mohan S, Husain SA. Role of deceased donor kidney procurement biopsies in organ allocation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2021; 30:571-576. [PMID: 34545039 PMCID: PMC8490331 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There has been an increased emphasis by the transplant community and the federal government to increase the utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Procurement biopsies during allocation are the most common reason for kidney discards. This manuscript reviews the evidence of procurement biopsies practices and utility. RECENT FINDINGS Procurement biopsies are performed in over half of all the kidneys recovered in the United States and account for more than one third of the kidney discards. However, there is a significant heterogeneity across the organ procurement organizations regarding the indications for biopsy, biopsy techniques and their reporting. Procurement biopsy findings are not reproducible and poorly correlate to postimplantation histology, although reasons for these limitations are not clear. Procurement biopsy findings are not associated with posttransplant outcomes after accounting for readily available donor clinical characteristics. SUMMARY Procurement biopsies contribute to deceased donor kidney discards but do not predict posttransplant outcomes. Research to establish the best practices for procurement biopsies is needed to improve organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paresh Jadav
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Darius T, Nath J, Mourad M. Simply Adding Oxygen during Hypothermic Machine Perfusion to Combat the Negative Effects of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Fundamentals and Current Evidence for Kidneys. Biomedicines 2021; 9:993. [PMID: 34440197 PMCID: PMC8394874 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of high-risk renal grafts for transplantation requires optimization of pretransplant preservation and assessment strategies to improve clinical outcomes as well as to decrease organ discard rate. With oxygenation proposed as a resuscitative measure during hypothermic machine preservation, this review provides a critical overview of the fundamentals of active oxygenation during hypothermic machine perfusion, as well as the current preclinical and clinical evidence and suggests different strategies for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Darius
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
- Pole de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jay Nath
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Southmead Hospital Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK;
| | - Michel Mourad
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
- Pole de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Luque Y, Jamme M, Aubert O, Roux A, Martinez F, Amrouche L, Tinel C, Galmiche L, Duong Van Huyen JP, Audenet F, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Rabant M. A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero-time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1506-1516. [PMID: 34097778 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The utility of zero-time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero-time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single-centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero-time KB among ECD. Ninety-two zero-time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero-time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P < 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero-time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1- and 5-year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero-time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero-time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosu Luque
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Renal Emergencies and Kidney Transplantation Department, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, UMR_S1155, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Jamme
- Intensive care Unit, Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye hospital, Poissy, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- UMR_S970, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Inserm, Paris, France.,Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Arthur Roux
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Frank Martinez
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Lucile Amrouche
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Claire Tinel
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Louise Galmiche
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - François Audenet
- Urology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research U1151, Paris, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research U1151, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Husain SA, King KL, Coley S, Natarajan K, Perotte A, Mohan S. Association between procurement biopsy findings and deceased donor kidney outcomes: a paired kidney analysis. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1239-1250. [PMID: 33964036 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Unfavourable procurement biopsy findings are the most common reason for deceased donor kidney discard in the United States. We sought to assess the association between biopsy findings and post-transplant outcomes when donor characteristics are accounted for. We used registry data to identify 1566 deceased donors of 3132 transplanted kidneys (2015-2020) with discordant right/left procurement biopsy classification and performed time-to-event analyses to determine the association between optimal histology and hazard of death-censored graft failure or death. We then repeated all analyses using a local cohort of 147 donors of kidney pairs with detailed procurement histology data available (2006-2016). Among transplanted kidney pairs in the national cohort, there were no significant differences in incidence of delayed graft function or primary nonfunction. Time to death-censored graft failure was not significantly different between recipients of optimal versus suboptimal kidneys. Results were similar in analyses using the local cohort. Regarding recipient survival, analysis of the national, but not local, cohort showed optimal kidneys were associated with a lower hazard of death (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90, P = 0.006). In conclusion, in a large national cohort of deceased donor kidney pairs with discordant right/left procurement biopsy findings, we found no association between histology and death-censored graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shana Coley
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karthik Natarajan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adler Perotte
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bellini MI, Tortorici F, Amabile MI, D’Andrea V. Assessing Kidney Graft Viability and Its Cells Metabolism during Machine Perfusion. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:1121. [PMID: 33498732 PMCID: PMC7865666 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the golden treatment for end-stage renal disease. Static cold storage is currently considered the standard method of preservation, but dynamic techniques, such as machine perfusion (MP), have been shown to improve graft function, especially in kidneys donated by extended criteria donors and donation after circulatory death. With poor organ quality being a major reason for kidneys not being transplanted, an accurate, objective and reliable quality assessment during preservation could add value and support to clinicians' decisions. MPs are emerging technologies with the potential to assess kidney graft viability and quality, both in the hypothermic and normothermic scenarios. The aim of this review is to summarize current tools for graft viability assessment using MP prior to implantation in relation to the ischemic damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Irene Bellini
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Roma, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, 00152 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (V.D.)
| | - Francesco Tortorici
- National Nuclear Physics Institute, INFN, 95123 Catania, Italy;
- Department of Physics, Catania University, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Ida Amabile
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, 00152 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (V.D.)
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, 00152 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Marsh JN, Liu TC, Wilson PC, Swamidass SJ, Gaut JP. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Quantify Glomerulosclerosis in Kidney Biopsy Specimens. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2030939. [PMID: 33471115 PMCID: PMC7818108 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A chronic shortage of donor kidneys is compounded by a high discard rate, and this rate is directly associated with biopsy specimen evaluation, which shows poor reproducibility among pathologists. A deep learning algorithm for measuring percent global glomerulosclerosis (an important predictor of outcome) on images of kidney biopsy specimens could enable pathologists to more reproducibly and accurately quantify percent global glomerulosclerosis, potentially saving organs that would have been discarded. OBJECTIVE To compare the performances of pathologists with a deep learning model on quantification of percent global glomerulosclerosis in whole-slide images of donor kidney biopsy specimens, and to determine the potential benefit of a deep learning model on organ discard rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prognostic study used whole-slide images acquired from 98 hematoxylin-eosin-stained frozen and 51 permanent donor biopsy specimen sections retrieved from 83 kidneys. Serial annotation by 3 board-certified pathologists served as ground truth for model training and for evaluation. Images of kidney biopsy specimens were obtained from the Washington University database (retrieved between June 2015 and June 2017). Cases were selected randomly from a database of more than 1000 cases to include biopsy specimens representing an equitable distribution within 0% to 5%, 6% to 10%, 11% to 15%, 16% to 20%, and more than 20% global glomerulosclerosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Correlation coefficient (r) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) with respect to annotations were computed for cross-validated model predictions and on-call pathologists' estimates of percent global glomerulosclerosis when using individual and pooled slide results. Data were analyzed from March 2018 to August 2020. RESULTS The cross-validated model results of section images retrieved from 83 donor kidneys showed higher correlation with annotations (r = 0.916; 95% CI, 0.886-0.939) than on-call pathologists (r = 0.884; 95% CI, 0.825-0.923) that was enhanced when pooling glomeruli counts from multiple levels (r = 0.933; 95% CI, 0.898-0.956). Model prediction error for single levels (RMSE, 5.631; 95% CI, 4.735-6.517) was 14% lower than on-call pathologists (RMSE, 6.523; 95% CI, 5.191-7.783), improving to 22% with multiple levels (RMSE, 5.094; 95% CI, 3.972-6.301). The model decreased the likelihood of unnecessary organ discard by 37% compared with pathologists. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this prognostic study suggest that this deep learning model provided a scalable and robust method to quantify percent global glomerulosclerosis in whole-slide images of donor kidneys. The model performance improved by analyzing multiple levels of a section, surpassing the capacity of pathologists in the time-sensitive setting of examining donor biopsy specimens. The results indicate the potential of a deep learning model to prevent erroneous donor organ discard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon N Marsh
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
- Institute for Informatics (I 2 ), Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ta-Chiang Liu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Parker C Wilson
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - S Joshua Swamidass
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
- Institute for Informatics (I 2 ), Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Joseph P Gaut
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singh N, Washburn K, Schenk A, El-Hinnawi A, Bumgardner G, Logan A, Rajab A. The impact of donor and recipient diabetes on renal transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14115. [PMID: 33048383 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The use of diabetic kidneys is increasing worldwide with better outcome than being on waitlist and possible reversal of diabetic changes in transplanted kidneys. But particular caution is warranted in diabetic donor-recipient combination. Total 1223 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at our center between 2008 and 2018. 689 from non-diabetic donor (NDD) to non-diabetic recipient, 400 from non-diabetic donor to diabetic recipient, 97 from diabetic to non-diabetic recipient, and 32 from diabetic donor (DD) to diabetic recipient. The DD was older than NDDs (median age 48 vs 39 years, P < 0.0001). DD had higher BMI (35.6 vs 26.9, P < 0.0001), higher KDPI (74% vs 37%, P < 0.0001), and higher terminal creatinine (1.10 mg/dl vs 0.95 mg/dl, p 0.0046) than the NDD. Diabetes recipients were comparatively older (57 vs 54, P < 0.001). DD recipients had higher serum creatinine at 6 months (1.70 vs 1.50 mg/dl, p 0.00304) and 2 years post-transplant (1.70 vs 1.50 mg/dl P < 0.0002). DD recipients had more favorable end CPRA than NDD recipients (77.5% at 0% vs 67.4% at 0, P = 0.0074). Ten-year patient and graft survival was best in NDD-recipient pair and worse in DD-recipient pair. Diabetic donor kidneys to diabetic recipients have lower 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navdeep Singh
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kenneth Washburn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Austin Schenk
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ashraf El-Hinnawi
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ginny Bumgardner
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - April Logan
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amer Rajab
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Becker F, Pascher A, Brockmann JG. [Machine perfusion for conditioning liver and kidneys before transplantation]. Chirurg 2020; 91:913-917. [PMID: 32613274 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01227-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Machine perfusion will become established as the standard of care for solid organ transplantation in the near future. Ongoing studies are investigating the appropriate perfusion algorithms for each specific organ. Although it is neither proven which perfusion principle nor type of device is superior, it has already been sufficiently shown that the increasing number of marginal organs that are currently transplanted in Germany would benefit from machine perfusion for conditioning before transplantation. The addition of hypothermic and normothermic perfusion sequences opens up the possibility of conditioning of previously damaged organs as well as viability testing. Overall, machine perfusion increases the safety for the recipient and can counteract the increasingly more difficult scenario of working hour restrictions because solid organ transplantations in the future will be plannable and carried out during the day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Becker
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland
| | - A Pascher
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland
| | - J G Brockmann
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Activation of HMGB1-TLR4 Pathway and Inflammasome Contribute to Enhanced Inflammatory Response in Extended Criteria and Kidneys With KDPI ≥85. Transplantation 2020; 104:724-730. [PMID: 31764760 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metrics for evaluating low-quality kidneys have failed to predict outcomes or reduce the kidney refusal and discard rates. Kidneys from extended-criteria donors (ECDs) and kidneys with ≥85% kidney donor profile indexes (KDPIs) might have different sensitivities to the proinflammatory milieu generated by brain death. We aimed to identify gene expression profile differences in innate immunity pathways between low-quality and ideal kidneys. METHODS Preimplantation kidney biopsies from ECD (n = 41) and standard-criteria donor (n = 39) were evaluated for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction gene expression using the TaqMan Gene Expression Array Plates system for genes Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4), high-mobility group box 1, nuclear factor kappa beta, myeloid differentiation primary response 88, interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)1-β, tumor necrosis factor alpha, caspase-1 (CASP1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1, IL-10, heme oxygenase 1 hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), monocyte chemotactic protein 1, transforming growth factor beta 1, TIR-domain containing adapter inducing interferon-β (TRIF), TRIF-related adaptor molecule, interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3), receptor-interacting protein 1, IFNβ-1, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin protein 3 complex. Gene expression was also evaluated in kidneys with KDPI ≥85. RESULTS ECD biopsies showed significantly higher expression of IL-10, TLR4, high-mobility group box 1, IFN-γ, TRIF-related adapter molecule, IRF-3, HIF-1, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin protein 3 complex, CASP1, and IL-1β (P < 0.05) compared with standard-criteria donor biopsies. IRF-3, HIF-1, and CASP1 were exclusively upregulated in ECD kidneys. Compared with kidneys with KDPIs <85%, kidneys with KDPIs ≥85% had very similar gene transcripts as those observed in ECD kidneys, except that tumor necrosis factor alpha and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 expression was only elevated in kidneys with KDPIs ≥85%. Significant positive correlations were found between the different genes upregulated and the increase in KDPIs. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that TLR4 and inflammasome pathways are enhanced in low-quality kidneys and suggest that blocking of some targets might improve transplant outcomes and reduce discard rates.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ex Vivo Analysis of Kidney Graft Viability Using 31P Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spectroscopy. Transplantation 2020; 104:1825-1831. [PMID: 32675744 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of organs for kidney transplantation is a growing concern. Expansion in organ supply has been proposed through the use of organs after circulatory death (donation after circulatory death [DCD]). However, many DCD grafts are discarded because of long warm ischemia times, and the absence of reliable measure of kidney viability. P magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) spectroscopy is a noninvasive method to detect high-energy phosphate metabolites, such as ATP. Thus, pMRI could predict kidney energy state, and its viability before transplantation. METHODS To mimic DCD, pig kidneys underwent 0, 30, or 60 min of warm ischemia, before hypothermic machine perfusion. During the ex vivo perfusion, we assessed energy metabolites using pMRI. In addition, we performed Gadolinium perfusion sequences. Each sample underwent histopathological analyzing and scoring. Energy status and kidney perfusion were correlated with kidney injury. RESULTS Using pMRI, we found that in pig kidney, ATP was rapidly generated in presence of oxygen (100 kPa), which remained stable up to 22 h. Warm ischemia (30 and 60 min) induced significant histological damages, delayed cortical and medullary Gadolinium elimination (perfusion), and reduced ATP levels, but not its precursors (AMP). Finally, ATP levels and kidney perfusion both inversely correlated with the severity of kidney histological injury. CONCLUSIONS ATP levels, and kidney perfusion measurements using pMRI, are biomarkers of kidney injury after warm ischemia. Future work will define the role of pMRI in predicting kidney graft and patient's survival.
Collapse
|
36
|
Eccher A, Girolami I, Brunelli M, Novelli L, Mescoli C, Malvi D, D'Errico A, Luchini C, Furian L, Zaza G, Cardillo M, Boggi U, Pantanowitz L. Digital pathology for second opinion consultation and donor assessment during organ procurement: Review of the literature and guidance for deployment in transplant practice. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 34:100562. [PMID: 32576430 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Telepathology has been an important application for second opinion consultation ever since the introduction of digital pathology. However, little is known regarding teleconsultation for second opinion in transplantation. There is also limited literature on telepathology during organ donor procurement, typically utilized when general pathologists on-call request back-up to help assess donor biopsies for organ suitability or to diagnose newly discovered tumors with urgent time constraints. In this review, we searched Pubmed/Embase and websites of transplant organizations to collect and analyze published evidence on teleconsultation for donor evaluation and organ procurement. Of 2725 records retrieved using the key terms 'telepathology', 'second opinion' and 'transplantation', 26 suitable studies were included. Most records were from North America and included validation studies of telepathology being used for remote frozen section interpretation of donor biopsies with whole slide imaging. The data from these published studies supports the transition towards digital teleconsultation in transplant settings where consultations among pathologists are still handled by pathologists being called on site, via telephone and/or email.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albino Eccher
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Girolami
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Novelli
- Institute for Histopathology and Molecular Diagnosis, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Mescoli
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Deborah Malvi
- Pathology Unit, University of Bologna, Policlinico St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonia D'Errico
- Pathology Unit, University of Bologna, Policlinico St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University and Hospital Trust of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Zaza
- Renal Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, UPMC Shadyside Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Husain SA, Shah V, Alvarado Verduzco H, King KL, Brennan C, Batal I, Coley SM, Hall IE, Stokes MB, Dube GK, Crew RJ, Perotte A, Natarajan K, Carpenter D, Sandoval PR, Santoriello D, D’Agati V, Cohen DJ, Ratner L, Markowitz G, Mohan S. Impact of Deceased Donor Kidney Procurement Biopsy Technique on Histologic Accuracy. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5:1906-1913. [PMID: 33163711 PMCID: PMC7609887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The factors that influence deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy reliability are not well established. We examined the impact of biopsy technique and pathologist training on procurement biopsy accuracy. Methods We retrospectively identified all deceased donor kidney-only transplants at our center from 2006 to 2016 with both procurement and reperfusion biopsies performed and information available on procurement biopsy technique and pathologist (n = 392). Biopsies were scored using a previously validated system, classifying “suboptimal” histology as the presence of at least 1 of the following: glomerulosclerosis ≥11%, moderate/severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, or moderate/severe vascular disease. We calculated relative risk ratios (RRR) to determine the influence of technique (core vs. wedge) and pathologist (renal vs. nonrenal) on concordance between procurement and reperfusion biopsy histologic classification. Results A total of 171 (44%) procurement biopsies used wedge technique, and 221 (56%) used core technique. Results of only 36 biopsies (9%) were interpreted by renal pathologists. Correlation between procurement and reperfusion glomerulosclerosis was poor for both wedge (r2 = 0.11) and core (r2 = 0.14) biopsies. Overall, 34% of kidneys had discordant classification on procurement versus reperfusion biopsy. Neither biopsy technique nor pathologist training was associated with concordance between procurement and reperfusion histology, but a larger number of sampled glomeruli was associated with a higher likelihood of concordance (adjusted RRR = 1.12 per 10 glomeruli, 95% confidence interval = 1.04−1.22). Conclusions Biopsy technique and pathologist training were not associated with procurement biopsy histologic accuracy in this retrospective study. Prospective trials are needed to determine how to optimize procurement biopsy practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Correspondence: S. Ali Husain, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, 622 West 168th Street PH4-124, New York, New York 10032, USA.
| | - Vaqar Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hector Alvarado Verduzco
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Corey Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shana M. Coley
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - M. Barry Stokes
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Geoffrey K. Dube
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - R. John Crew
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adler Perotte
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karthik Natarajan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dustin Carpenter
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - P. Rodrigo Sandoval
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dominick Santoriello
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivette D’Agati
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - David J. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lloyd Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Glen Markowitz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Peris A, Fulceri GE, Lazzeri C, Bonizzoli M, Li Marzi V, Serni S, Cirami L, Migliaccio ML. Delayed graft function and perfusion parameters of kidneys from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death. Perfusion 2020; 36:299-304. [PMID: 32650710 DOI: 10.1177/0267659120938928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Better preservation and evaluation of kidneys from donors after circulatory death serve to increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation and hypothermic machine perfusion has been shown to decrease ischemia reperfusion injury and delayed graft function. Data on relation between hemodynamic parameters during hypothermic machine perfusion and delayed graft function in kidneys from donors after circulatory death are so far scarce and not univocal. We aimed at assessing whether hemodynamic parameters measured during hypothermic machine perfusion (flow, mean perfusion pressure, and renal resistance) are associated with delayed graft function in 26 kidneys retrieved from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death. In our series, the incidence of delayed graft function was 57.7% (15/26). Recipients who developed delayed graft function had a longer warm ischemic time (p = 0.04). All hemodynamic parameters measured during hypothermic machine perfusion were comparable between recipients with delayed graft function and those without. According to our data, in kidneys from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death, a longer warm ischemic time (that is the overall time of no flow, as the sum of the no-flow and the no-touch period) is associated with delayed graft function. This finding underscores the pivotal role of ischemic injury in terms of absence of flow in affecting graft function. No association was detectable between hemodynamic parameters during hypothermic machine perfusion and the development of delayed graft function in our series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Peris
- Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Enzo Fulceri
- Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Lazzeri
- Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuela Bonizzoli
- Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Li Marzi
- Department of Urological Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urological Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lino Cirami
- Department of Nephrology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Migliaccio
- Tuscany Authority for Transplantation (Centro Regionale Allocazione Organi e Tessuti CRAOT), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pandey GS, Sharma A, Kenwar DB, Patil SS, Seth A, Kallepalli V, Rally S, Thakur V, Mandwar M, Pattanaik S, Kaur R, Singh S. Analysis of Organ Utilization From Deceased Organ Donation in India. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1647-1649. [PMID: 32576472 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This report presents an audit of utilization of various organs from deceased donors in different states of India over a 3-year period METHODS: Data released by the various regions on their official website was analyzed from 2015 to 2017.Regions with less than 25 donations per year were excluded while calculating utilization rates. RESULTS Total organ donation in India had increased from 570 to 843 donations from 2015 to 2017 (47.8% increase) with southern states performing exceedingly well compared with northern states. Total organs retrieved during the 3-year period were 6659 with a 54.7% increase in organ retrieval in 2017 compared with 2015 (2592 vs 1675 respectively). The net utilization rate of kidneys was 87.35%. Total liver transplants done during this period were 1894. Net liver utilization rate was 86.81% over 3 years. Total Heart transplants during this period were 641 with net utilization rate of 28.98%. An increase in utilization rates was observed from 2015 to 2017 (19.33%-34.46%). A total of 217 lung transplants were done with net utilization rate of 8.86% with an increase in yearly utilization rate from 6.5% in 2015 to 11.97% in 2017. Total pancreas transplants remained low with 48 transplants over 3 year duration with net utilization rate of 2.25% but an increase in utilization rate was observed. (0.92% in 2015 to 2.1% in 2017). CONCLUSION There is a significant regional variability in organ utilization in India. Evaluating and addressing the cause of high variability can further increase the transplant activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Shankar Pandey
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Deepesh Benjamin Kenwar
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shivakumar S Patil
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Abhinav Seth
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vidyasagar Kallepalli
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sahil Rally
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vivek Thakur
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Milind Mandwar
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Smita Pattanaik
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajinder Kaur
- Department of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sarbpreet Singh
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Building, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Butler CR, Perkins JD, Johnson CK, Blosser CD, De Castro I, Leca N, Sibulesky L. Contemporary patterns in kidney graft survival from donors after circulatory death in the United States. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233610. [PMID: 32469937 PMCID: PMC7259576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplants from donors after circulatory death (DCD) make up an increasing proportion of all deceased donor kidney transplants in the United States (US). However, DCD grafts are considered to be of lower quality than kidneys from donors after brain death (DBD). It is unclear whether graft survival is different for these two types of donor kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US deceased donor kidney recipients using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing from 12/4/2014 to 6/30/2018. We employed a Cox proportional hazard model with mixed effects to compare all-cause graft loss and death-censored graft loss for DCD versus DBD deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. We used transplant center as the random effects term to account for cluster-specific random effects. In the multivariable analysis, we adjusted for recipient characteristics, donor factors, and transplant logistics. RESULTS Our cohort included 27,494 DBD and 7,770 DCD graft recipients transplanted from 2014 to 2018 who were followed over a median of 1.92 years (IQR 1.08-2.83). For DCD compared with DBD recipients, we did not find a significant difference in all-cause graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.05 in univariable and HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.95-1.13] in multivariable analysis) or for death-censored graft loss (HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.06) in univariable and 1.05 (95% CI 0.99-1.11) in multivariable analysis). CONCLUSIONS For a contemporary cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, we did not find a difference in the likelihood of graft loss for DCD compared with DBD grafts. These findings signal a need for additional investigation into whether DCD status independently contributes to other important outcomes for current kidney transplant recipients and indices of graft quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R. Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - James D. Perkins
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Christopher K. Johnson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, United States of America
| | - Christopher D. Blosser
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Iris De Castro
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Lena Sibulesky
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Degree of Glomerulosclerosis in Procurement Kidney Biopsies from Marginal Donor Kidneys and Their Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051469. [PMID: 32422905 PMCID: PMC7291279 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the association between the percentage of glomerulosclerosis (GS) in procurement allograft biopsies from high-risk deceased donor and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: The UNOS database was used to identify deceased-donor kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) score > 85% from 2005 to 2014. Deceased donor kidneys were categorized based on the percentage of GS: 0-10%, 11-20%, >20% and no biopsy performed. The outcome included death-censored graft survival, patient survival, rate of delayed graft function, and 1-year acute rejection. Results: Of 22,006 kidneys, 91.2% were biopsied showing 0-10% GS (58.0%), 11-20% GS (13.5%), >20% GS (19.7%); 8.8% were not biopsied. The rate of kidney discard was 48.5%; 33.6% in 0-10% GS, 68.9% in 11-20% GS, and 77.4% in >20% GS. 49.8% of kidneys were discarded in those that were not biopsied. Death-censored graft survival at 5 years was 75.8% for 0-10% GS, 70.9% for >10% GS, and 74.8% for the no biopsy group. Among kidneys with >10% GS, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival between 11-20% GS and >20% GS. Recipients with >10% GS had an increased risk of graft failure (HR = 1.27, p < 0.001), compared with 0-10% GS. There was no significant difference in patient survival, acute rejection at 1-year, and delayed graft function between 0% and 10% GS and >10% GS. Conclusion: In >85% KDPI kidneys, our study suggested that discard rates increased with higher percentages of GS, and GS >10% is an independent prognostic factor for graft failure. Due to organ shortage, future studies are needed to identify strategies to use these marginal kidneys safely and improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
42
|
Ibrahim M, Vece G, Mehew J, Johnson R, Forsythe J, Klassen D, Callaghan C, Stewart D. An international comparison of deceased donor kidney utilization: What can the United States and the United Kingdom learn from each other? Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1309-1322. [PMID: 31758833 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In transplant, meaningful international comparisons in organ utilization are needed. This collaborative study between the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) aimed to develop a kidney utilization metric allowing for legitimate intercountry comparisons. Data from the UK and US transplant registries, including all deceased donor kidneys recovered from 2006 to 2017, were analyzed. To identify a potentially comparable kidney utilization rate (UR), several denominators were assessed. We discovered that the proportion of transplanted kidneys from elderly donors in the UK (10.7%) was 18 times greater than that in the US (0.6%). Conversely, en bloc pediatric kidney transplant was more common in the US. Donation after circulatory death utilization has risen in both countries but is twice as prevalent in the UK (39% of transplants) vs the US (20%). In addition, US and UK URs are not directly comparable due to fundamental system differences. However, using a suite of URs revealed practice areas likely to yield the most benefit if improved, such as efforts to increase kidney offer acceptance in the US and to reduce postacceptance discard in the UK. Methods used in this study, including novel intracountry risk-adjusted UR trend logistic regression analyses, can be translated to other international transplant registries in pursuit of further global learning opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Gabe Vece
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jenny Mehew
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - John Forsythe
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - David Klassen
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Howard RJ. We listed patients and we should transplant them. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13882. [PMID: 32294274 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Twenty percent of kidneys recovered for transplantation are discarded. The most common reason for not transplanting these kidneys is to organ quality and biopsy findings. Yet, organ quality measures are not associated with discard rates and kidneys with poorer quality measures lead to greater life span for the recipient compared to staying on dialysis. Biopsy findings are not correlated with graft survival in most cases. The risk aversion of transplant centers from using "high-risk" kidneys can be, in part at least, attributed to negative consequences of poor graft survival with possible program sanctions or possible loss of insurance contracts. CMS has taken a first step by eliminating short-term graft survival as a performance measure for transplant centers. Many of the discarded kidneys will provide good results if transplanted and would recognize that patients value getting a transplant above graft survival.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The shortage of kidneys for transplantation has led to an urgent need to efficiently utilize the available cadaveric kidneys. Efficient use of machine perfusion may potentially lead to increased use of marginal kidneys by lowering the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and improving graft outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Machine perfusion has had a resurgence in the last 10-15 years over static cold storage (SCS). Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), the most commonly utilized type of machine perfusion reduces the rates of DGF when compared with SCS with a trend towards improving the overall graft survival. SUMMARY Despite reduction in the rates of DGF by HMP, its effect on long-term renal and patient outcomes is not clearly known. There is limited clinical literature in the use of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) but a few pilot studies have shown its potential to resuscitate commonly discarded kidneys. In addition to preservation, machine perfusion also allows for various diagnostic and therapeutic interventions during the preservation period to assess and optimize the viability of the procured kidney.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kidney transplantation following uncontrolled donation after circulatory death. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 25:144-150. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
46
|
Wang Z, Durai P, Tiong HY. Expanded criteria donors in deceased donor kidney transplantation - An Asian perspective. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:89-94. [PMID: 32549658 PMCID: PMC7279103 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_269_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing gulf between demand and supply for kidneys in end-stage renal failure patients worldwide, especially Asia. Renal transplantation is often the treatment of choice for long-suffering patients who have to undergo dialysis on a regular basis. The utilization of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) to address the donor pool shortage has been proven to be a legitimate solution. Metzger first described the classification of standard criteria donor and ECD in 2002. Since then, the criterion has undergone various modifications, with the key aims of optimizing organ procurement rate while minimizing discard and rejection rates. We review the methods to improve selection, characterization of risks, and surgical techniques. Although the ECD kidneys have a higher risk of impaired donor and recipient outcome than the "standard criteria" transplants, it may be justified by the improved overall survival of these patients compared to those who remained on dialysis. It is, therefore, crucial that we perform meticulous selection, along with state of the art surgical techniques to maximize the use of this scarce resource. In this article, we review the pre-procurement and post-procurement processes implemented to preserve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziting Wang
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Pradeep Durai
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ho Yee Tiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kidney Perfusion as an Organ Quality Assessment Tool-Are We Counting Our Chickens Before They Have Hatched? J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030879. [PMID: 32210197 PMCID: PMC7141526 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The final decision to accept an organ for transplantation remains a subjective one. With “poor organ quality” commonly cited as a major reason for kidney discard, accurate, objective, and reliable quality assessment is essential. In an era of increasingly higher-risk deceased donor kidneys, the catch is to accept those where the risk–benefit scale will tip in the right direction. Currently available assessment tools, such as risk-scores predicting outcome and zero-time biopsy, perform unsatisfactory, and assessment options during static cold storage are limited. Kidney perfusion technologies are finding their way into clinical practice, and they bring a new opportunity to assess kidney graft viability and quality, both in hypothermic and normothermic conditions. We give an overview of the current understanding of kidney viability assessment during ex situ kidney perfusion. A pragmatic framework to approach viability assessment is proposed as an interplay of three different compartments: the nephron, the vascular compartment, and the immune compartment. Although many interesting ways to assess kidney injury and function during perfusion have been proposed, none have reached the stage where they can reliably predict posttransplant outcome. Larger well-designed studies and validation cohorts are needed to provide better guidance.
Collapse
|
48
|
Husain SA, King KL, Batal I, Dube GK, Hall IE, Brennan C, Stokes MB, Crew RJ, Carpenter D, Alvarado Verduzco H, Rosen R, Coley S, Campenot E, Santoriello D, Perotte A, Natarajan K, D'Agati VD, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE, Markowitz G, Mohan S. Reproducibility of Deceased Donor Kidney Procurement Biopsies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:257-264. [PMID: 31974289 PMCID: PMC7015101 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.09170819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Unfavorable histology on procurement biopsies is the most common reason for deceased donor kidney discard. We sought to assess the reproducibility of procurement biopsy findings. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We compiled a continuous cohort of deceased donor kidneys transplanted at our institution from 1/1/2006 to 12/31/2016 that had at least one procurement biopsy performed, and excluded cases with missing biopsy reports and those used in multiorgan transplants. Suboptimal histology was defined as the presence of advanced sclerosis in greater than or equal to one biopsy compartment (glomeruli, tubules/interstitium, vessels). We calculated κ coefficients to assess agreement in optimal versus suboptimal classification between sequential biopsy reports for kidneys that underwent multiple procurement biopsies and used time-to-event analysis to evaluate the association between first versus second biopsies and patient and allograft survival. RESULTS Of the 1011 kidneys included in our cohort, 606 (60%) had multiple procurement biopsies; 98% had first biopsy performed at another organ procurement organization and their second biopsy performed locally. Categorical agreement was highest for vascular disease (κ=0.17) followed by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (κ=0.12) and glomerulosclerosis (κ=0.12). Overall histologic agreement (optimal versus suboptimal) was κ=0.15. First biopsy histology had no association with allograft survival in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. However, second biopsy optimal histology was associated with a higher probability of death-censored allograft survival, even after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.75; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Deceased donor kidneys that underwent multiple procurement biopsies often displayed substantial differences in histologic categorization in sequential biopsies, and there was no association between first biopsy findings and post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and .,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Corey Brennan
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York.,Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - R John Crew
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and
| | - Dustin Carpenter
- Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Adler Perotte
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York; and
| | - Karthik Natarajan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York; and
| | | | | | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Khan FN, Truong LD, Nguyen DT, Graviss EA, Bhatti MI, Frost AE, Osama Gaber A, Suki WN. Outcomes of kidney transplantation using deceased donors with history of diabetes. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13775. [PMID: 31863607 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Deceased diabetic kidneys are increasingly utilized in transplantation. The relationship of donor's history of diabetes to clinical and histological outcomes was examined. Forty-nine diabetic deceased donor kidneys (D-DM) were transplanted into 26 normal (R-N/D-DM) and 23 diabetic recipients (R-DM/D-DM) and compared to 211 diabetic recipients of normal kidneys(R-DM/D-N) and 466 normal recipients of normal kidneys (R-N/D-N). Patient survival at 5 years was 89.7% in R-N/D-N, 96.2% in R-N/D-DM, 80.1% in R-DM/D-N, and a 71.6% in R-DM/D-DM (P = .008). Death-censored graft survival at 5 years was 86.3% in R-N/D-N, 87.4% in R-N/D-DM, 93.5% in R-DM/D-N, and 87.5% in R-DM/D-DM (P = .24). Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared to non-diabetic recipients, diabetic recipients had a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of mortality. In this cohort, there was no impact on death-censored graft survival of diabetic donor status. Only 6 of 26 post-perfusion biopsies showed evidence of diabetic nephropathy (<IIa), and on repeat biopsies 70% showed no evidence of progression. Survival of recipients of diabetic donor kidneys appears dependent on the diabetic status of the recipient with the worst survival being in diabetic recipients of a diabetic donor kidney. In this cohort, donor kidneys had paucity of structural diabetic lesions and most did not show progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza N Khan
- Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Hospital, Temple, Texas.,Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas.,Houston Methodist Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Luan D Truong
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Muhammad I Bhatti
- Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Hospital, Temple, Texas
| | - Adaani E Frost
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, J.C. Walter Transplant Center, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas.,The Houston Methodist Hospital, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Wadi N Suki
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas.,Houston Methodist Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gelpi R, Paredes D, Rodríguez-Villar C, Roque R, Ruiz A, Adalia R, Peri-Cusí L, Sole M, Oppenheimer F, Diekmann F. The development of a predictive model of graft function in uncontrolled donors after circulatory death: validity of a pulsatile renal preservation machine cut-off value for kidney acceptance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; 34:531-538. [PMID: 30085267 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The criteria for kidney suitability in uncontrolled donors after circulatory death (uDCD) procured after regional normothermic perfusion are based on macroscopic appearance and renal haemodynamic values with final renal resistance (FRR). However, these criteria have not been analysed to predict the future graft function. This study presents a model to predict the outcome in uDCD kidneys and define the predictive FRR value. METHODS All uDCD kidney transplants performed in our hospital from 2004 to 2016 were included. Donors and recipients and pre-transplantation data are described. The endpoint was glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥30 mL/min at 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS A total of 194 recipients were included. FRR in donors ≥60 years old was (mean ± SD) 0.27 ± 0.11 versus 0.22 ± 0.09 mmHg/mL/min in donors <60 years (P = 0.042). Kidney survival was 88.2% versus 84% at 12 months and 60.7% versus 30.8% at 120 months (P = 0.067). For the group of recipients from donors ≥60 years, the FRR was 0.37 ± 0.08 mmHg/mL/min in the GFR <30 mL/min group versus 0.18 ± 0.06 mmHg/mL/min in the GFR ≥30 mL/min group (P < 0.001). The value FRR ≥0.3 mmHg/mL/min predicts 59-79% of GFR <30 mL/min [odds ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-6.40; P < 0.001]. The predictive accuracy of FRR for GFR by ROC curve was 0.968 (95% CI). The best cut-off for FRR was 0.3 mmHg/mL/min to predict GFR at 6 months with a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that in uDCD donors the combination of donor age ≥60 years together with FRR ≥0.3 mmHg/mL/min could predict poor outcome at 6 months after transplantation in low immunological risk recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosana Gelpi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Camino Rodríguez-Villar
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rebeca Roque
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Ruiz
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Adalia
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Peri-Cusí
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Sole
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Donation and Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|