Incidence, risk factors and clinical consequences of neutropenia following kidney transplantation: a retrospective study

Silent Threat: Fatal Consequences of Occult Hepatitis C Viral Infection in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review

We present the case of a 54-year-old female patient with a history of treated hepatitis B who underwent living-related kidney transplantation from her son. The timing of the transplantation and immediate postoperative period was uneventful, with no significant complications. However, within 3 months, she was repeatedly hospitalized because of persistent jaundice, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, and liver function tests indicated considerable liver injury. Extensive investigations have revealed an occult hepatitis C virus infection that occurred before transplantation. The patient subsequently developed acute fulminant liver failure accompanied by severe gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite aggressive medical management, her condition deteriorated rapidly, leading to death. This case underscores the importance of comprehensive viral screening in transplant recipients, particularly those with risk factors or symptoms of hepatitis C virus infection, to prevent potentially life-threatening complications following transplantation.

Pulmonary Immunocompromise in Solid Organ Transplantation

This article reviews the multitude of factors contributing to immune dysfunction and pulmonary infection risk in solid organ transplant recipients and references relevant clinical scientific reports. The mechanisms of action of individual immunosuppressive agents are explained, and the clinical effects of these drugs are compared. In addition, specialized methods to assess the net state of immunosuppression in individual transplant recipients and their limitations are discussed.

Impact of Hepatoblastoma on Infectious Complications Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the standard therapy for end-stage liver disease in pediatric patients with biliary atresia (BA), congenital and metabolic conditions, and for an unresectable malignant tumor like hepatoblastoma (HB). BA is the leading indication for pediatric liver transplantation, while HB is the most common childhood liver cancer. Despite improved outcomes through advanced surgical techniques and novel immunosuppression, pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) is complicated by post-transplant infections.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of pLT recipients at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) and stratified patients by underlying disease to assess impact on post-transplant infectious events.

RESULTS

BA patients were youngest at pLT (12.5 months; p < 0.001) compared to other disease cohorts (HB 30.8, other 43.7). All HB patients received organs from deceased donors. In the year following pLT, 93% of the patients experienced at least one infectious event (IE). HB patients had the highest mean number of IE across disease groups (5.5 IE/patient vs. BA 4.5, other 4.0; p = 0.055), with significantly more patients with fever and neutropenia (p < 0.001) and EBV infections (p = 0.012). HB patients were more likely to develop IE earlier after pLT than non-HB groups (p = 0.013), especially Clostridioides difficile (p < 0.01) and fever and neutropenia (p < 0.01). Despite having variable IE experiences, 1-and-5-year survival across disease groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

IE were frequently observed in HB patients after pLT, possibly related to pre-and-postoperative chemotherapy and associated neutropenia. Underlying disease may help inform targeted infection-related patient management following pLT.

Current and emerging tools for simultaneous assessment of infection and rejection risk in transplantation

Infection and rejection are major complications that impact transplant longevity and recipient survival. Balancing their risks is a significant challenge for clinicians. Current strategies aimed at interrogating the degree of immune deficiency or activation and their attendant risks of infection and rejection are imprecise. These include immune (cell counts, function and subsets, immunoglobulin levels) and non-immune (drug levels, viral loads) markers. The shared risk factors between infection and rejection and the bidirectional and intricate relationship between both entities further complicate transplant recipient care and decision-making. Understanding the dynamic changes in the underlying net state of immunity and the overall risk of both complications in parallel is key to optimizing outcomes. The allograft biopsy is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection but is associated with inherent risks that warrant careful consideration. Several biomarkers, in particular, donor derived cell-free-DNA and urinary chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10), show significant promise in improving subclinical and clinical rejection risk prediction, which may reduce the need for allograft biopsies in some situations. Integrating conventional and emerging risk assessment tools can help stratify the individual's short- and longer-term infection and rejection risks in parallel. Individuals identified as having a low risk of rejection may tolerate immunosuppression wean to reduce medication-related toxicity. Serial monitoring following immunosuppression reduction or escalation with minimally invasive tools can help mitigate infection and rejection risks and allow for timely diagnosis and treatment of these complications, ultimately improving allograft and patient outcomes.

Impact of Neutropenia on Clinical Outcomes after Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Neutropenia is a frequent complication among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, there are limited studies analysing the frequency and impact of neutropenia in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Our aim was to analyse the frequency of neutropenia, the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) treatment within the first 18 months post-transplant and its association with acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), overall survival and the development of infections.

METHODS

This observational and retrospective study recruited 305 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2009 and 2019, with outpatient quarterly follow-up during the first 18 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

During this period, 51.8% of patients experienced at least one episode of neutropenia. Neutropenia was classified as mild in 50.57% of cases, moderate in 36.88% and severe in 12.54%. GCSF treatment was indicated in 23.28% of patients, with a mean dose of 3.53 units. No statistically significant association was observed between neutropenia or its severity and the development of acute rejection, CLAD or overall survival. However, the patients who received GCSF treatment had a higher mortality rate compared to those who did not. Sixteen patients (5.25%) developed infections during neutropenia, with bacterial infections being the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutropenia is common in the first 18 months after lung transplantation and most episodes are mild. We did not find an association between neutropenia and acute rejection, CLAD, or mortality. However, the use of GCSF were associated with worse post-transplant survival.

Post kidney transplant hematologic abnormalities and association of post-transplant anemia with graft function

Background

Haematological abnormalities following renal transplantation are frequently observed and have a significant effect on survival and graft outcomes. The pattern of haematological abnormalities varies globally. Few studies have been conducted in Asian countries. We aimed to evaluate the patterns of haematological abnormalities in post-transplant recipients in our center during the first year after post-renal transplant and the association of post-transplant anemia with graft function.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study was conducted on renal transplantation recipients between 2014 and 2019. The study included all patients who received kidney transplants from live/cadaveric donors and had follow-up data collected up to 12 months after the transplant. The outcome studied was the prevalence of haematological abnormalities and the association between post-transplant anemia (PTA) and graft function in post-transplant recipients.

Results

A total of 106 renal transplant recipients were included in the study. The prevalence of PTA was 98% in the first week, 75% at one month, 35% at three months, 32% at six months, and 27% at 12 months. The other cytopenia cases were leukopenia (43.4%), thrombocytopenia (33.2%), and pancytopenia (15.1%). Post-transplant erythrocytosis was observed in 17.9% of patients. 18 patients with severe PTA in the first week of transplant had significant allograft dysfunction (p=0.04). Patients with and without PTA had similar graft functions at six and 12 months (p=0.50).

Conclusions

Haematological abnormalities are common in renal transplant recipients. PTA is highly prevalent during the first week and improves over time. Other haematological abnormalities observed were leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, and post-transplant erythrocytosis. Leucopenia was primarily drug-induced, and thrombocytopenia and pancytopenia were frequently caused by infections in our cohort. Additionally, severe PTA was significantly associated with graft dysfunction in the first week post-transplant, whereas similar graft function was observed at 6 and 12 months post-transplant, irrespective of the presence or absence of PTA.

[Anesthesia for organ transplant patients]

Organ transplant patients who must undergo nontransplant surgical interventions can be challenging for the anesthesiologists in charge. On the one hand, it is important to carefully monitor the graft function in the perioperative period with respect to the occurrence of a possible rejection reaction. On the other hand, the ongoing immunosuppression may have to be adapted to the perioperative requirements in terms of the active substance and the route of administration, the resulting increased risk of infection and possible side effects (e.g., myelosuppression, nephrotoxicity and impairment of wound healing) must be included in the perioperative treatment concept. Furthermore, possible persistent comorbidities of the underlying disease and physiological peculiarities as a result of the organ transplantation must be taken into account. Support can be obtained from the expertise of the respective transplantation center.

Cytopenias in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: preceding factors and clinical consequences

BACKGROUND

Kidney trans plantation is associated with secondary complications, including the risk of developing posttransplant cytopenias. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics, identify predictors, and assess the management and consequences of cytopenias in the pediatric kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 89 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Possible factors preceding cytopenias were compared with the goal of recognizing predictors for posttransplant cytopenias. Posttransplant neutropenias were analyzed for the total study period and separately for the period beyond 6 months posttransplant (late neutropenias), to rule out confounding influences of induction and initial intensive therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (67%) developed at least one episode of posttransplant cytopenia. All episodes of posttransplant thrombocytopenias were mild or moderate. Posttransplant infections and graft rejection were found to be significant predictors for thrombocytopenia (HR 6.06, 95% CI 1.6-22.9, and HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.27-26.6, respectively). A total of 30% of posttransplant neutropenias were severe (ANC ≤ 500). Pretransplant dialysis and posttransplant infections were significant predictors for late neutropenias (HR 11.2, 95% CI 1.45-86.4, and HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.46-7.57, respectively). Graft rejection occurred in 10% of patients with cytopenia, all following neutropenia, within 3 months from cytopenia appearance. In all such cases, mycophenolate mofetil dosing had been held or reduced prior to rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant infections are substantial contributors to developing posttransplant cytopenias. Preemptive transplantation appears to reduce risk of late neutropenia, the accompanying reduction in immunosuppressive therapy, and the ensuing risk of graft rejection. An alternative response to neutropenia, possibly using granulocyte colony stimulating factor, may diminish graft rejection. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of multiple-day oral dosing of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy horses

BACKGROUND

Additional efficacious immunomodulatory treatment is needed for the management of immune-mediated disease in horses. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug that warrants assessment as a viable therapeutic agent for horses.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple-day oral dosing of MMF in healthy horses and to determine the tolerability of this dosing regimen.

ANIMALS

Six healthy Standardbred mares.

METHODS

Horses received MMF 10 mg/kg PO q12h for 7 days in the fed state. Serial sampling was performed over 12 hours on Days 1 and 7 with trough samples collected every 24 hours, immediately before morning drug administration. Noncompartmental PK analyses were performed to determine primary PK parameters, followed by calculation of geometric means and coefficients of variation. A CBC, serum biochemical profile, physical examination, and fecal scoring were used to assess dose tolerability.

RESULTS

Seven days of treatment resulted in a mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC0-12 ) of 12 594 h × ng/mL (8567-19 488 h × ng/mL) and terminal half-life (T1/2 ) of 11.3 hours (7.5-15.9 hours), yielding minor metabolite accumulation in all horses treated. Salmonellosis was detected in the feces of 2 horses by Day 7, and all horses developed myelosuppression, hyperbilirubinemia, hyporexia, decreased gastrointestinal motility, and decreased fecal output by the seventh day of treatment.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Administration of MMF at 10 mg/kg PO q12h resulted in hematologic and clinical toxicity within 1 week of treatment. A decreased MMF dose, frequency, or both is needed to avoid colic. Drug monitoring should include frequent hemograms, serum biochemical profiles, and strict biosecurity protocols.

Effects of Induction Therapy on Graft Functions in Terms of Immunologic Risk

BACKGROUND

Advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques have led to a significant reduction in the incidence of rejection within 1 year after kidney transplantation. Immunologic risk is an important factor affecting graft functions and guiding the clinician in the selection of induction therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate graft functions based on serum creatinine levels, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD- EPI) and proteinuria levels, frequency of leukopenia, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in patients with low and high immunologic risk.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 renal recipients. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: patients at low immunologic risk who received basiliximab only and those with high immunologic risk who received low-dose (1.5 mg/kg for 3 days) antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the 2 risk groups in terms of first, third, sixth, and 12th-month creatinine levels, CKD-EPI, proteinuria levels, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity.

CONCLUSION

One-year graft survivals did not differ significantly between these 2 treatment modalities. The combined use of low-dose antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in the induction treatment of patients with high immunologic risk seems promising in terms of graft survival, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity.

Cytomegalovirus Disease as a Risk Factor for Invasive Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients under Targeted Antiviral and Antimycotic Prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common opportunistic infection that occurs following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In addition to the direct infection-related symptoms, it also triggers an immunological response that may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes. CMV disease has been described as a predictor of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) but its role under an antiviral prophylaxis regimen is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 214 adult liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Universal antiviral prophylaxis was utilized in recipients with CMV mismatch; intermediate- and low-risk patients received pre-emptive treatment.

RESULTS

Six percent of patients developed CMV disease independent of their serostatus. The occurrence of CMV disease was associated with elevated virus load and increased incidence of leucopenia and IFIs. Furthermore, CMV disease was associated with higher one-year mortality and increased relapse rates within the first year of OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease causes significant morbidity and mortality in LTRs, directly affecting transplant outcomes. Due to the increased risk of IFIs, antifungal prophylaxis for CMV disease may be appropriate. Postoperative CMV monitoring should be considered after massive transfusion, even in low-risk serostatus constellations. In case of biliary complications, biliary CMV monitoring may be appropriate in the case of CMV-DNA blood-negative patients.

Entecavir-induced neutropenia in an adult living donor liver transplant recipient: Successful conversion to tenofovir alafenamide

At 22 weeks post-transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis, an adult woman developed neutropenia which was aggravated by COVID-19 (ANC 0.4 × 109/L). Covid resolution and all "conventional" modifications were ineffective. Success within 2 weeks was achieved by switching entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide. A step-by-step judicious approach to post-transplant neutropenia is vital.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in SARS-CoV-2 positive kidney transplant recipients - a case series with four patients

BACKGROUND

Despite vaccination coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated mortality caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains high in kidney transplant recipients. Nirmatrelvir is a protease inhibitor with activity against SARS-CoV-2. Nirmatrelvir reduces the risk for mortality and hospitalization, which is approved for treating adults at risk for severe disease. Nirmatrelvir is metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme CYP3A4 and is therefore co-administered with the irreversible CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir, which results in a drug interaction with tacrolimus. A limited number of patients with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and tacrolimus therapy after kidney transplantation have been reported to date. It has been reported that tacrolimus was paused during the five-day nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy and subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels were observed after finishing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in two patients. Therefore, optimization of tacrolimus dosing is urgently needed in transplant recipients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we present our first-hand experience with four patients receiving tacrolimus therapy following kidney transplantation and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy due to COVID-19. Tacrolimus was paused during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy in all patients, which resulted in stable therapeutic tacrolimus levels. Tacrolimus was continued directly after finishing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to avoid subtherapeutic levels in the first patient treated. This patient received his usual tacrolimus maintenance dose, which resulted in toxic levels. Based on this observation, tacrolimus therapy was continued 24 h after finishing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment at a reduced dose in the subsequent patients. In these patients, therapeutic to supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels were observed despite the therapeutic break and dose reduction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on altered CYP3A4 metabolism, tacrolimus levels have to be closely monitored after treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Our study suggests that tacrolimus treatment should be paused during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir medication and be continued 24 h after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy at a reduced dose and under close monitoring. Based on the limited number of patients in this study, results must be interpreted with caution.

Early post-transplant leukopenia in heart transplant recipients and its impact on outcomes

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia in the early period following heart transplantation (HT) is not well-studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the development of post-transplant leukopenia and its consequences for HT recipients.

METHODS

Adult patients at a large-volume transplant center who received HT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 were included. The incidence of leukopenia (WBC ≤3 × 10³ /μL) in the first 90-days following HT, individual risk factors, and its effect on 1-year outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 506 HT recipients, 184 (36%) developed leukopenia within 90-days. Median duration of the first leukopenia episode was 15.5 days (IQR 8-42.5 days). Individuals who developed leukopenia had lower pre-transplant WBC counts compared to those who did not (6.1 × 10³ /μL vs. 6.9 × 10³ /μL, p = .02). Initial immunosuppressive and infectious chemoprophylactic regimens were not significantly different between groups. Early leukopenia was associated with a higher mortality at 1-year (6.6% vs. 2.1%, p = .008; adjusted HR 3.0) and an increased risk of recurrent episodes. Rates of infection and rejection were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukopenia in the early period following HT is common and associated with an increased risk of mortality. Further study is needed to identify individuals at highest risk for leukopenia prior to transplant and optimize immunosuppressive and infectious chemoprophylactic regimens for this subgroup.

New Insights on CMV Management in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Prevention, Treatment, and Management of Resistant/Refractory Disease

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can have both direct and indirect effects after solid-organ transplantation, with a significant impact on transplant outcomes. Prevention strategies decrease the risk of CMV disease, although CMV still occurs in up to 50% of high-risk patients. Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the main drugs currently used for preventing and treating CMV. Emerging data suggest that letermovir is as effective as VGCV with fewer hematological side effects. Refractory and resistant CMV also still occur in solid-organ-transplant patients. Maribavir has been shown to be effective and have less toxicity in the treatment of refractory and resistant CMV. In this review paper, we discuss prevention strategies, refractory and resistant CMV, and drug-related side effects and their impact, as well as optimal use of novel anti-CMV therapies.

Neutropenia in pediatric solid organ transplant

Neutropenia is generally defined as an absolute neutrophil count in the circulation of less than 1500/mm³ and occurs in up to 25%-30% of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (SOT) within the first year after transplantation. In the SOT population, neutropenia is most often a result of drug-induced bone marrow suppression but can also be secondary to viral infection, nutritional deficiencies, lymphoproliferative infiltrate, and inherited causes. Outcomes for patients with neutropenia vary by degree of neutropenia and type of solid organ transplant. Management of neutropenia should begin by addressing the underlying cause, including reducing or removing medications when appropriate, treating infections, and addressing nutrient deficiencies; however, consultation with an experienced pediatric hematologist and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be helpful in some cases. Overall, data on clinical outcomes for G-CSF use remain limited, but observational studies may support its use in patients with infections or severe neutropenia.

Navigating medication-taking after kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Mixed methods are valuable in understanding multifaceted health behaviors like medication adherence. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have complex medication regimens and are more vulnerable to nonadherence relative to other transplant recipients. Yet mixed methods have not been widely applied to examine adherence among KTRs, especially in relation to prescribed medications beyond immunosuppressants.

OBJECTIVES

As part of a sequential approach, we used in-depth interviews to better understand findings from a previous quantitative study and to describe additional factors that influence prescription medication-taking among adult KTRs.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 14 adult KTRs recruited from a transplant center in Chicago, IL. Deductive and inductive content analysis was used to code transcripts and identify key themes.

RESULTS

Across the sample, we identified insurance challenges, disruptions in routine, and poor mental well-being as barriers to adherence at the patient level. For Black and Hispanic KTRs, poor communication between providers and disjointed care transitions posed additional barriers at the health system level. Compared with White KTRs, Black and Hispanic KTRs experienced greater medication burden due to comorbidities, while medication and digital literacy challenges were unique to Hispanic KTRs.

CONCLUSION

KTRs are often motivated to take medications as prescribed, but sometimes lack the capacity or support to do so. Eliciting KTR perspectives is necessary in addressing knowledge and resource gaps at the patient and health system levels to improve adherence. In addition, recognizing the relative burden of taking comorbidity medications compared with immunosuppressants may important, particularly for Black and Hispanic KTRs.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without immunosuppression reduction in neutropenic kidney transplant recipients

Neutropenia post-kidney transplantation is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes. We aimed to analyze the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use with and without immunosuppression reduction on graft outcomes in neutropenic recipients. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 120 recipients with neutropenia, within the first-year post-transplant. Of these, 45.0% underwent no intervention, 17.5% had immunosuppression reduced, 18.3% were only given G-CSF, and 19.2% had both interventions. Overall, 61 patients experienced the composite outcome of de-novo DSA, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and all-cause graft failure and the cumulative incidence of this outcome did not vary by any of the four interventions (p = 0.93). When stratifying the cohort by G-CSF use alone, those who received G-CSF were more likely to have had severe neutropenia (<500/mm³ :51.1%vs.12.0%, p<0.001), and immunosuppression reduction (51.1%vs.28.0%, p = 0.003). However, the composite outcome was not different in the G-CSF and no G-CSF cohort (53.3%vs.49.3%, p = 0.67), and in a multivariate model, G-CSF use was not associated with this outcome (aHR = 1.18, 95%CI:0.61-2.30). However, a trend towards higher DSA production was noted in the G-CSF cohort (87.5%vs.62.2%) and this observation warrants prospective evaluation. Overall, we conclude that G-CSF use with or without immunosuppression reduction was not associated with graft outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium study

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is common in the first year after pediatric kidney transplant and is associated with an increased risk of infection, allograft loss, and death. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases neutrophil production, but its use in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients remains largely undescribed.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of children with neutropenia within the first 180 days after kidney transplant. Multivariable linear regression and Poisson regression were used to assess duration of neutropenia and incidence of hospitalization, infection, and rejection.

RESULTS

Of 341 neutropenic patients, 83 received G-CSF during their first episode of neutropenia. Median dose of G-CSF was 5 mcg/kg for 3 (IQR 2-7) doses. G-CSF use was associated with transplant center, induction immunosuppression, steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression, hospitalization, and decreases in mycophenolate mofetil, valganciclovir, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole dosing. Absolute neutrophil count nadir was also significantly lower among those treated with G-CSF. G-CSF use was not associated with a shorter duration of neutropenia (p = .313) and was associated with a higher rate of neutropenia relapse (p = .002) in adjusted analysis. G-CSF use was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization (aIRR 0.25 (95%CI 0.12-0.53) p < .001) but there was no association with incidence of bacterial infection or rejection within 90 days of neutropenic episode.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF use for neutropenia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients did not shorten the overall duration of neutropenia but was associated with lower risk of hospitalization. Prospective studies are needed to determine which patients may benefit from G-CSF treatment.

Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive kidney transplant recipients treated with everolimus: A randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 4 trial

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) persists as the most frequent opportunistic infection among solid organ transplant recipients. This multicenter trial aimed to test whether treatment with everolimus (EVR) could decrease the incidence of CMV DNAemia and disease. We randomized 186 CMV seropositive kidney transplant recipients in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVR or mycophenolic acid (MPA) in association with basiliximab, cyclosporin, and steroids and 87 in each group were analyzed. No universal prophylaxis was administered to either group. The composite primary endpoint was the presence of CMV DNAemia, CMV treatment, graft loss, death, and discontinuation of the study at 6 months posttransplant. In the modified intent-to-treat analysis, 42 (48.3%) and 70 (80.5%) patients in the EVR and MPA groups reached the primary endpoint (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11-0.43, p < .0001). Fewer patients of the EVR group received treatment for CMV (21.8% vs. 47.1%, p = .0007). EVR was discontinued in 31 (35.6%) patients. Among the 56 patients with ongoing EVR treatment, only 7.4% received treatment for CMV. In conclusion, EVR prevents CMV DNAemia requiring treatment in seropositive recipients as long as it is tolerated and maintained.

Significant Correlations between p-Cresol Sulfate and Mycophenolic Acid Plasma Concentrations in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a commonly prescribed life-long immunosuppressant for kidney transplant recipients. The frequently observed large variations in MPA plasma exposure may lead to severe adverse outcomes; therefore, characterizations of contributing factors can potentially improve the precision dosing of MPA. Our group recently reported the potent inhibitory effects of p-cresol (a protein-bound uremic toxin that can be accumulated in kidney transplant patients) on the hepatic metabolism of MPA in human in vitro models. Based on these data, the hypothesis for this clinical investigation was that a direct correlation between p-cresol and MPA plasma exposure should be evident in adult kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using a prospective and observational approach, adult kidney transplant recipients within the first year after transplant on oral mycophenolate mofetil (with tacrolimus ± prednisone) were screened for recruitment. The exclusion criteria were cold ischemia time > 30 h, malignancy, pregnancy, severe renal dysfunction (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR, < 10 mL/min/1.73 m²), active graft rejection, or MPA intolerance. Patients' demographic and biochemistry data were collected. Total and free plasma concentrations of MPA, MPA glucuronide (MPAG), and total p-cresol sulfate (the predominant, quantifiable form of p-cresol in the plasma) were quantified using validated assays. Correlational and categorical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism.

RESULTS

Forty patients (11 females) were included: donor type (living/deceased: 20/20), induction regimen (basiliximab/thymoglobulin/basiliximab followed by thymoglobulin: 35/3/2), post-transplant time (74 ± 60 days, mean ± standard deviation), age (53.7 ± 12.4 years), bodyweight (79.8 ± 18.5 kg), eGFR (51.9 ± 18.0 mL/min/1.73 m²), serum albumin (3.6 ± 0.5 g/dL), prednisone dose (18.5 ± 13.2 mg, n = 33), and tacrolimus trough concentration (9.4 ± 2.4 µg/L). Based on Spearman analysis, significant control correlations supporting the validity of our dataset were observed between total MPA trough concentration (C₀) and total MPAG C₀ (correlation coefficient [R] = 0.39), ratio of total MPAG C₀-to-total MPA C₀ and post-transplant time (R = - 0.56), total MPAG C₀ and eGFR (R = - 0.35), and p-cresol sulfate concentration and eGFR (R = - 0.70). Our primary analysis indicated the novel observation that total MPA C₀ (R = 0.39), daily dose-normalized total MPA C₀ (R = 0.32), and bodyweight-normalized total MPA C₀ (R = 0.32) were significantly correlated with plasma p-cresol sulfate concentrations. Consistently, patients categorized with elevated p-cresol sulfate concentrations (i.e., ≥ median of 3.2 µg/mL) also exhibited increased total MPA C₀ (by 57 % vs those below median), daily dose-normalized total MPA C₀ (by 89 %), and bodyweight-normalized total MPA C₀ (by 62 %). Our secondary analyses with MPA metabolites, unbound concentrations, free fractions, and MPA metabolite ratios supported additional potential interacting mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

We have identified a novel, positive association between p-cresol sulfate exposure and total MPA C₀ in adult kidney transplant recipients, which is supported by published mechanistic in vitro data. Our findings confirm a potential role of p-cresol as a significant clinical variable affecting the pharmacokinetics of MPA. These data also provide the justifications for conducting subsequent full-scale pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies to further characterize the cause-effect relationships of this interaction, which could also rule out potential confounding variables not adequately controlled in this correlational study.

Characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of neutropenia after liver or kidney transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

While prior adult studies have shown that approximately 20%-38% of subjects undergoing solid-organ transplant develop neutropenia, similar analyses in pediatric subjects are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of liver transplant (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients at our center during the period 2008-2018. All of the KT and none of the LT subjects during this time period had induction with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or basiliximab at time of transplant. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value ≤1000/mm3 .

RESULTS

One hundred subjects with LT and 82 subjects with KT were included. The incidence of neutropenia within the first year of transplant in KT was higher compared to LT (54.8% vs 39%, p = .01). The median number of hospitalizations (p = .001) and infectious complications (p = .04) was significantly higher only in the KT subjects who developed neutropenia (compared to those who did not). Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with severity of liver disease at transplant, namely h/o upper gastrointestinal bleeding (p = .02), weight deficit (p = .01), and pre-LT ANC (p = .01), along with high or moderate risk cytomegalovirus status (p = .05) as predictors of neutropenia in LT subjects. Female gender (p = .03) predicted neutropenia, while BK virus infection was protective for neutropenia (p = .04) in KT subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of and morbidity associated with neutropenia within 1 year post-transplant is higher in KT subjects compared to LT subjects. The likely reason for this is the use of induction therapy (ATG, basiliximab) at the time of transplant in KT subjects.

Outcomes among CMV-mismatched and highly sensitized kidney transplants recipients who develop neutropenia

Limited data exist on the incidence and clinical outcomes of neutropenia among kidney transplant recipients. Our study included 572 adults who received a kidney transplant at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center between 2012 and 2018, and were CMV-mismatched or had a PRA ≥ 80%. Recipients with HIV, Hepatitis B and C, and primary non-function were excluded. Participants were followed for at least one year after transplantation. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count < 1000 cells/μL. Cox proportional hazards regression models using neutropenia as a time-varying predictor were used to determine the risk of mycophenolic acid and valganciclovir changes, rejection, hospitalizations and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Models were adjusted for demographics and transplant characteristics. Mean follow-up was 3.7 (SD, 1.8) years. The mean age of the cohort was 50.4 (13.1) years, and 57.5% were female. A total of 208 (36.3%) participants had neutropenia. Neutropenia was associated with an increased risk of valganciclovir or MPA dose reductions or discontinuations [adjusted hazard ratio, aHR: 7.78, 95% CI: 4.73- 12.81], rejection [aHR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.10-3.64] and hospitalizations [aHR 3.32, 95% CI: 2.12-5.19]. Neutropenia occurs frequently after kidney transplantation and leads to more medication changes and adverse clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Letermovir treatment for CMV infection in kidney and pancreas transplantation: A valuable option for complicated cases

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major challenge in solid organ transplantation. Ganciclovir has changed the prognosis, but with the expense of possible viral resistance. New antiviral drugs, such as letermovir, have not been studied sufficiently in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients. We reviewed abdominal organ transplants recipients with CMV infection from the national transplant registry and identified patients treated with letermovir from electronic medical records. We report on letermovir treatment in one kidney and three simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant patients with refractory or ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection (UL54/ UL97 mutation). In SPK patients, persistent leukopenia undermined immunosuppressive and antiviral treatment, favoring life-threatening bacterial infections or ganciclovir resistance. All patients achieved viral clearance after letermovir monotherapy of 1.5-6 months. Letermovir was well tolerated and leukopenia resolved. Adjustments of calcineurin inhibitor doses were challenging. One acute rejection occurred because of under immunosuppression. After the end of treatment, recurrent low-grade CMV-DNAemia was common requiring reinitiating antiviral therapy to achieve viral clearance. To conclude, letermovir was a well-tolerated valuable option for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection in kidney and pancreas transplantation.

Febrile neutropenia after kidney transplantation

Neutropenia is common after kidney transplant. There are few data on febrile neutropenia episodes (FNE) after kidney transplant. We studied FNE in a single-center retrospective cohort of 1682 kidney transplant recipients. Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <1000) occurred in 32% and FNE in 3%. There were 56 FNE. Median time to FNE was 143 days, and median time from onset of neutropenia to onset of FNE was 5.5 days. The most common sources of infection were urine, blood, and lungs, and in 20% of FNE no source was identified. No infectious organism was identified in 46% of FNE, and opportunistic infections were uncommon. Patient survival was similar among those with and without FNE, but FNE was associated with increased death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Following FNE, acute rejection occurred in 31% and DCGF in 15%, often in the setting of persistent reduced immunosuppression. In conclusion, FNE are common after kidney transplant and are associated with inferior long-term outcomes.

Short- and long-term impact of neutropenia within the first year after kidney transplantation

The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to investigate short- and long-term impact of neutropenia occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation, with a special emphasis on different neutropenia grades. In this unselected cohort, 225/721 patients (31%) developed 357 neutropenic episodes within the first year post-transplant. Based on the nadir neutrophil count, patients were grouped as neutropenia grade 2 (<1.5-1.0*10⁹ /L; n=105), grade 3 (<1.0-0.5*10⁹ /L; n=65), and grade 4 (<0.5*10⁹ /L; n=55). Most neutropenia episodes were presumably drug-related (71%) and managed by reduction/discontinuation of potentially responsible drugs (mycophenolic acid [MPA] 51%, valganciclovir 25%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 19%). Steroids were added/increased as replacement for reduced/discontinued MPA. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was only used in 2/357 neutropenia episodes (0.6%). One-year incidence of (sub)clinical rejection, one-year mortality as well as long-term patient and graft survival were not different among patient without neutropenia and neutropenia grade 2/3/4. However, the incidence of infections was about 3-times higher during neutropenia grade 3 and 4, but not increased during grade 2. In conclusion, neutropenia within the first year after kidney transplantation represents no increased risk for rejection and has no negative impact on long-term patient and graft survival. Adding/increasing steroids as replacement for reduced/discontinued MPA might supplement management of neutropenia.

Predictors and Complications of Post Kidney Transplant Leukopenia

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia occurs frequently following kidney transplantation and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased infectious risk. In this study we sought to characterize the causes and complications of leukopenia following kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In a cohort of adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent kidney transplant from Jan 2006-Dec 2017, we used univariable Cox proportional Hazards models to identify predictors of post-transplant leukopenia (WBC < 3500 mm³). Factors associated with post-transplant leukopenia were then included in a multivariable backwards stepwise selection process to create a prediction model for the outcome of interest. Cox regression analyses were subsequently used to determine if post-transplant leukopenia was associated with complications.

RESULTS

Of 388 recipients, 152 (39%) developed posttransplant leukopenia. Factors associated with leukopenia included antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy (HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.25-4.91), valganciclovir (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.25-2.70), tacrolimus (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.08-8.55), prior blood transfusion (HR 1.17 per unit, 95% CI 1.09- 1.25), and donor age (HR 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 26 patients with leukopenia (17.1%). Other than cytomegalovirus, leukopenia was not associated with posttransplant complications.

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia commonly occurred posttransplant and was associated with modifiable and non-modifiable pretransplant factors.

Risk Factors and Management of Leukopenia After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia is a common complication after kidney transplantation. The etiology is multifactorial, with medication adverse effects and cytomegalovirus infection as main causes. Optimal strategies to prevent or treat posttransplant leukopenia remain unknown. We aimed to identify risk factors for leukopenia and to investigate the benefit of switching the immunosuppressive therapy to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients with leukopenia after kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2017 at our center relative to age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

Leukopenia was associated with the degree of rejection therapy before leukopenia, the immunosuppressive therapy before transplantation, and an induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Patients with leukopenia exhibited increased mortality, an increased incidence of bacterial and viral infections, and more acute rejections. Switching to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion in patients with severe leukopenia decreased the duration of leukopenia and the incidence of subsequent viral infections, especially with cytomegalovirus.

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia is a risk factor for infectious complications and mortality, and it is associated with acute rejection. Switching immunosuppressive therapy to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion is a safe approach to reduce the duration of leukopenia and the incidence of viral infections.

Persistent Neutropenia after ABOi Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report

Post-transplant neutropenia (PTN) is frequently reported in the first-year after transplantation. Although prevalence and clinical consequences are widely described, there are no guidelines to manage diagnosis and treatment. We report here a case of persistent PTN occurred in a patient undergoing a kidney transplant from an AB0-incompatible living donor. The desensitization protocol consisted of Rituximab administration and immunoadsorption while the pre-transplant protocol, which was initiated 14 days before the transplant, included Tacrolimus, Mofetil Mycophenolate (MMF), antimicrobial and antiviral prophylaxis. Induction therapy consisted of anti-thymocyte globulins and steroids, while maintenance after transplantation consisted of steroid, tacrolimus and MMF. When the first occurrence of leukopenia was observed six weeks after the transplant, firstly antimicrobial/antiviral prophylaxis was stopped and later also MMF treatment was interrupted but severe neutropenia relapsed after MMF resuming treatment. Immunological and virological causes were excluded. The patient was treated with Filgrastim. Bone marrow biopsy, which was performed to exclude a hematological cause of severe persistent neutropenia, revealed a bone marrow hypoplasia with neutrophils maturation interrupted at the early stages. This case highlights the need to establish diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for PTN which take in consideration all the therapeutic steps including the pre-transplant phase in particular in the context of AB0i where immunosuppression is more consistent.

Factors associated with neutropenia post heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is a serious complication following heart transplantation (OHT); however, risk factors for its development and its association with outcomes is not well described. We sought to study the prevalence of neutropenia, risk factors associated with its development, and its impact on infection, rejection, and survival.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center analysis of adult OHT recipients from July 2004 to December 2017 was performed. Demographic, laboratory, medication, infection, rejection, and survival data were collected for 1 year post-OHT. Baseline laboratory measurements were collected within the 24 hours before OHT. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count ≤1000 cells/mm3. Cox proportional hazards models explored associations with time to first neutropenia. Associations between neutropenia, analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, with secondary outcomes of time to infection, rejection, or death were also examined.

RESULTS

Of 278 OHT recipients, 84 (30%) developed neutropenia at a median of 142 days (range 81-228) after transplant. Factors independently associated with increased risk of neutropenia included lower baseline WBC (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.11-1.24), pre-OHT ventricular assist device (1.63; 1.00-2.66), high-risk CMV serostatus [donor positive, recipient negative] (1.86; 1.19-2.88), and having a previous CMV infection (4.07; 3.92-13.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Neutropenia is a fairly common occurrence after adult OHT. CMV infection was associated with subsequent neutropenia, however, no statistically significant differences in outcomes were found between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients in this small study. It remains to be determined in future studies if medication changes in response to neutropenia would impact patient outcomes.

Initial mycophenolate dose in tacrolimus treated renal transplant recipients, a cohort study comparing leukopaenia, rejection and long-term graft function

The evidence supporting an initial mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose of 2 g daily in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients is limited. In a non-contemporaneous single-centre cohort study we compared the incidence of leukopaenia, rejection and graft dysfunction in patients initiated on MMF 1.5 g and 2 g daily. Baseline characteristics and tacrolimus trough levels were similar by MMF group. MMF doses became equivalent between groups by 12-months post-transplant, driven by dose reductions in the 2 g group. Leukopaenia occurred in 42.4% of patients by 12-months post-transplant. MMF 2 g was associated with a 1.80-fold increased risk of leukopaenia compared to 1.5 g. Rejection occurred in 44.8% of patients by 12-months post-transplantation. MMF 2 g was associated with half the risk of rejection relative to MMF 1.5 g. Over the first 7-years post-transplantation there was no difference in renal function between groups. Additionally, the development of leukopaenia or rejection did not result in reduced renal function at 7-years post-transplant. Leukopaenia was not associated with an increased incidence of serious infections or rejection. This study demonstrates the initial MMF dose has implications for the incidence of leukopaenia and rejection. Since neither dose produced superior long-term graft function, clinical equipoise remains regarding the optimal initial mycophenolate dose in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients.

Alternative pneumocystis prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients at two large transplant centers

BACKGROUND

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the drug of choice for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis and has activity against other opportunistic infections (OIs) after solid organ transplant (SOT). We aimed to describe the incidence, reasons for and outcomes of use of alternative prophylactic agents (APAs) across SOT programs in our high volume centers.

METHODS

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) at our centers from 1/2015-12/2016 were identified. Pharmacy records identified APA (pentamidine, atovaquone, or dapsone) use within 1 year. Records were reviewed for allergies, laboratory values at APA initiation, diagnostic tests for TMP-SMX-preventable OIs, and APA side effects.

RESULTS

An APA was initiated in 105/1173 (8.9%) SOTRs. Of these, 51 (48.6%) were because of sulfonamide allergy recorded pre-SOT, mostly rash/hives (58.8%). The remaining 54 (51.4%) had TMP-SMX discontinued post-SOT, mostly for neutropenia (48%) and renal effects (34%). Differences occurred across programs, with kidney transplant never stopping TMP-SMX for renal issues. Of those changed to APAs post-transplant, 19 (35%) were later successfully re-challenged with TMP-SMX. With thresholds in mind, 67 (64%) received an APA unnecessarily, accounting for up to $100 000/y excess cost. Potential TMP-SMX-preventable OIs occurred in 7 (5 Nocardia; 2 PJP). APA side effects occurred in 14/105 (13.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of APAs for PJP prophylaxis after SOT is less than previously reported but often unwarranted. Such decisions require scrutiny to avoid TMP-SMX-preventable OIs, cost and important APA side effects. Use of reasonable thresholds for cessation of TMP-SMX and data-driven approaches to re-challenge would substantially reduce APA use.

COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Case Series of 22 Cases From Belgium

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The world is facing a global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for viral infections, the impact of their chronic immunosuppressed status on the risk for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and disease severity is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

All cases of COVID-19 infection in our cohort of kidney transplant recipients were prospectively monitored. Clinical features, management, and outcomes were recorded. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization was applied: discontinue the antimetabolite drug and reduce trough levels of calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Unless contraindicated, hydroxychloroquine was administered only to hospitalized patients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

22 COVID-19 infections were diagnosed in our cohort of 1,200 kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Most common initial symptoms included fever, cough, or dyspnea. 18 (82%) patients required hospitalization. Of those patients, 3 had everolimus-based immunosuppression. Computed tomography of the chest at admission (performed in 15 patients) showed mild (n = 3), moderate (n = 8), extensive (n = 1), severe (n = 2), and critical (n = 1) involvement. Immunosuppression reduction was initiated in all patients. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 15 patients. 11 patients required supplemental oxygen; 2 of them were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with mechanical ventilation. After a median of 10 days, 13 kidney transplant recipients were discharged, 2 were hospitalized in non-ICU units, 1 was in the ICU, and 2 patients had died.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and short follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical presentation of COVID-19 infection was similar to that reported in the general population. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization and treatment was applied, with 11% mortality among kidney transplant recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

Individualized concept for the treatment of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease with end-stage renal disease

Management of children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) who develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains challenging because of concomitant liver disease. Patients with recurrent cholangitis are candidates for liver-kidney transplantation, while the treatment for patients with splenomegaly and pancytopenia due to portal hypertension is controversial. Herein, we report 7 children who were treated using an individualized treatment strategy stratified by liver disease. Two patients with recurrent cholangitis underwent sequential liver-kidney transplantation, while 4 patients with splenomegaly and pancytopenia but without recurrent cholangitis underwent splenectomy followed by isolated kidney transplantation. The remaining patient, who did not have cholangitis and pancytopenia, underwent isolated kidney transplantation. Blood cell counts were normalized after splenectomy was performed at the median age of 8.7 (range, 7.4-11.7) years. Kidney transplantation was performed at the median age of 8.8 (range, 1.9-14.7) years in all patients. Overwhelming post-splenectomy infections and cholangitis did not occur during the median follow-up period of 6.3 (range, 1.0-13.2) years. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at the last follow-up was 53 (range, 35-107) mL/min/1.73 m² . No graft loss occurred. Our individualized treatment strategy stratified by recurrent cholangitis and pancytopenia can be a feasible strategy for children with ARPKD who develop ESRD and warrants further evaluation.

Lung transplant outcomes are influenced by severity of neutropenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment

Although neutropenia is a common complication after lung transplant, its relationship with recipient outcomes remains understudied. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 228 adult lung transplant recipients between 2008 and 2013 to assess the association of neutropenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) treatment with outcomes. Neutropenia was categorized as mild (absolute neutrophil count 1000-1499), moderate (500-999), or severe (<500) and as a time-varying continuous variable. Associations with survival, acute rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were assessed with the use of Cox proportional hazards regression. GCSF therapy impact on survival, CLAD, and acute rejection development was analyzed by propensity score matching. Of 228 patients, 101 (42.1%) developed neutropenia. Recipients with severe neutropenia had higher mortality rates than those of recipients with no (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.41, P = .040), mild (aHR 14.508, 95% CI 1.58-13.34, P = .018), or moderate (aHR 3.27, 95% CI 0.89-12.01, P = .074) neutropenia. Surprisingly, GCSF treatment was associated with a higher risk for CLAD in mildly neutropenic patients (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 0.93-13.04, P = .063), although it did decrease death risk in severely neutropenic patients (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.88, P = .031). Taken together, our data point to an important relationship between neutropenia severity and GCSF treatment in lung transplant outcomes.

Calcineurin Inhibitors and Neutropenia: Is Cyclosporine Superior to Tacrolimus?

Patient: Female, 51

Final Diagnosis: Tacrolimus induced severe neutropenia

Symptoms: Abnormal lab values

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Transplantology

T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia in solid organ transplant recipients: case series and review of the literature

T-cell large granular lymphocyte (T-LGL) leukemia is a rare clonal proliferation of cytotoxic lymphocytes rarely described in solid organ transplant (SOT). We reviewed records from 656 kidney transplant recipients in follow-up at our Center from January 1998 to July 2017. In addition, we researched, through PubMed, further reports of T-LGL leukemia in SOT from March 1981 to December 2017. We identified six cases of T-LGL leukemia in our cohort of patients and 10 in the literature. This lymphoproliferative disorder was detected in one combined liver-kidney, one liver and 14-kidney transplant recipients. Median age at presentation was 46.5 years (IQR 39.2-56.9). The disease developed after a median age of 10 years (IQR 4.9-12) from transplantation. Anemia was the most common presentation (62.5%) followed by lymphocytosis (43.7%) and thrombocytopenia (31.2%). Splenomegaly was reported in 43.7% of the patients. Eight patients (50%) who experienced severe symptoms were treated with non-specific immunosuppressive agents. Six of them (75%) had a good outcome, whereas two (25%) remained red blood cell transfusion dependent. No cases progressed to aggressive T-LGL leukemia or died of cancer at the end of follow-up. These results suggest that T-LGL leukemia is a rare but potentially disruptive hematological disorder in the post-transplant period.

Interactions between anti-infective agents and immunosuppressants-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation provide an update on potential drug-drug interactions between anti-infectives and immunosuppressants, which are most notable with calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors. Drug-drug interactions may occur through pharmacokinetic mechanisms leading to altered drug concentrations of either the anti-infective or immunosuppressive drug, or by pharmacodynamic interactions increasing or decreasing the efficacy or toxicity of the medications. Many of the significant pharmacokinetic interactions occur through inhibition or induction of the cytochrome 3A4 system by anti-infective agents leading to increased or decreased immunosuppressive agent levels, respectively. The membrane transporter P-glycoprotein is also often involved in drug interactions. Since the last iteration of these guidelines, multiple new hepatitis C virus direct-acting antivirals have become available for use in SOT recipients. Of these agents, some are substrates of cytochrome and drug transporter systems, while others inhibit these systems and may affect immunosuppressive agents. Due to the high risk for drug-drug interactions in the solid organ transplant population, practitioners must be aware of potential interactions and be vigilant in monitoring and adjusting drug dosing when appropriate.

Usefulness of valacyclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after anti-thymocyte globulin as rejection therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) treatment for acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) can increase the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We aimed to evaluate the effect of valacyclovir prophylaxis against CMV infection after ATG administration as anti-rejection therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 55 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving ATG for steroid resistant TCMR. In all KTRs, we used intravenous ganciclovir during ATG injection. In 34 KTRs treated before July 2013, we performed preemptive therapy for CMV infection after ATG therapy. They were regarded as the historic control group (CONT). After July 2013, we used valacyclovir maintenance for 1 month after ATG therapy in 21 patients (VAL). The primary outcome was the incidence of CMV infection, and the secondary outcomes were subsequent acute rejection, and graft and patient outcome.

RESULTS

Valacyclovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CMV infection (VAL, 9.6% vs. CONT, 67.6%; p < 0.001), and CMV-free survival rate was higher in the VAL group compared to the CONT group (p = 0.009). In the VAL group, two cases of CMV infection were limited to CMV viremia, but CMV disease or syndrome (n = 3) was detected in the CONT group. There was no difference in graft failure (CONT, 70.5% vs. VAL, 47.6%; p = 0.152), incidence of subsequent rejection after ATG treatment (CONT, 41.1% vs. VAL, 33.3%; p = 0.776), and graft or patient survival between the two groups. There were no major adverse events associated with valacyclovir prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, valacyclovir prophylaxis is effective in the prevention of CMV infection after ATG treatment for steroid resistant TCMR.

Drug-Induced Hematological Cytopenia in Kidney Transplantation and the Challenges It Poses for Kidney Transplant Physicians

Drug-induced hematological cytopenia is common in kidney transplantation. Various cytopenia including leucopenia (neutropenia), thrombocytopenia, and anemia can occur in kidney transplant recipients. Persistent severe leucopenia or neutropenia can lead to opportunistic infections of various etiologies. On the contrary, reducing or stopping immunosuppressive medications in these events can provoke a rejection. Transplant clinicians are often faced with the delicate dilemma of balancing cytopenia and rejection from adjustments of immunosuppressive regimen. Differentials of drug-induced cytopenia are wide. Identification of culprit medication and subsequent modification is also challenging. In this review, we will discuss individual drug implicated in causing cytopenia and correlate it with corresponding literature evidence.

Patients immunodéprimés, quel pathogène pour quel déficit immunitaire ? (en dehors de l’infection à VIH)

Le nombre de patients immunodéprimés ne cesse d’augmenter en raison de l’amélioration du pronostic global du cancer et de l’utilisation croissante d’immunosuppresseurs tant en transplantation qu’au cours des maladies auto-immunes. Les infections sévères restent la première cause d’admission en réanimation dans cette population et sont dominées par les atteintes respiratoires. On distingue les déficits primitifs, volontiers révélés dans l’enfance, des déficits secondaires (médicamenteux ou non), les plus fréquents. Dans tous les cas, les sujets sont exposés à des infections inhabituelles de par leur fréquence, leur type et leur sévérité. À côté des pyogènes habituels, les infections opportunistes et la réactivation d’infections latentes font toute la complexité de la démarche diagnostique. Celle-ci doit être rigoureuse, orientée par le type de déficit, les antécédents, les prophylaxies éventuelles et la présentation clinicoradiologique. Elle permettra seule de guider le traitement probabiliste et les examens étiologiques, l’absence de diagnostic étant associée à une mortalité élevée.