Efficacy and long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in haemodialysis patients

Is hepatitis-B immunization effective during chronic liver fibrosis? Investigation of secretory and cellular immune responses on an experimental model

OBJECTIVE

Adults with end-stage of chronic liver diseases have lower antibody titers after hepatitis-B vaccination. We have less amount of knowledge about the effect of non-viral cause chronic liver fibrosis on vaccination. In this study, we investigated the effect of non-viral chronic liver fibrosis on hepatitis B vaccine and the effect of tetanous toxoid co-administration at the level of humoral and cellular immune responses in an experimental model.

METHODS

Hepatitis B vaccine was administered either alone or in combination with tetanus toxoid in thioacetamide-induced fibrotic BALB/c mice. Fibrosis level was determined by Knodell scoring. Anti-HBsAg, biochemical parameters, inflammatory (IL-1β, TNF-α), and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine levels were investigated in serum samples by automated systems and ELISA; respectively. Frequencies of activated lymphocytes were determined in flow cytometer.

RESULTS

Antibody titers significantly decreased after immunization of fibrotic mice. However, co-administration of toxoid significantly elevated antibody titer. The percentage of CD19⁺CD69⁺ B lymphocytes was found to be lower in vaccinated fibrotic group compared to vaccinated naive group. Simultaneous administration of toxoid significantly increased the frequencies of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells expressing CD69 and CD127. Interestingly, CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1^high Breg cells were significantly reduced in the group vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine and toxoid, simultaneously. The reduction in Breg percentage did not expose a significant decrease in the level of IL-10.

CONCLUSION

Non-viral chronic liver fibrosis causes a reduction on specific antibody level after vaccination. Reduction on Breg cell frequency may have an effect on elevation of antibody level after co-administration of tetanus toxoid.

Immune Response after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Patients

Background and Objectives: The prospective study was conducted to evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine and possible relation with other factors (medication, etc.) in kidney transplant patients. Materials and Methods: Out of 167 vaccinated patients, 136 agreed to a follow-up visit three to six weeks after vaccination. Results: Only 39 patients (29%) developed antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 (≥35.2 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL) after full vaccination. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that predictive factors for good antibody response to the COVID-19 vaccine were better kidney function, higher hemoglobin level, and no use of mycophenolate mofetil for immunosuppression. For seropositive kidney transplant patients there was a significant negative correlation between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer and CD4/CD8 ratio (Spearman's correlation coefficient -0.4, p = 0.02), percentage of CD19+ cells (r = -0.37, p = 0.02), and a positive correlation with percentage of CD8+ cells (r = 0.4, p = 0.01). There was an increase of total leucocyte count after vaccination in the total studied population, and in the group of responders. Conclusions: Only one third of kidney transplant patients develop sufficient antibody responses after full COVID-19 vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech. Better kidney function, higher hemoglobin level, and no use of mycophenolate mofetil for immunosuppression increases the adequacy of response. The antibody titers correlated positively with relative number of CD8+ cells and negatively with CD4/CD8 ratio in responders.

Predicting related factors of immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients based on integration of decision tree classification and logistic regression

The non/hypo-response rate of the hepatitis B vaccine among hemodialysis (HD) patients is still high, it is of great significance to explore the influencing factors and their relationships. To study the related factors and their relationships using logistic regression model and Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) decision tree model. A randomized controlled trial was conducted between February 2014 and May 2015 in China. HD patients being serologically negative for HBsAg and anti-HBs were randomly assigned to receive three intramuscular injections of the standard dose (20 µg) or high dose (60 µg) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at months 0, 1, and 6. Those with anti-HBs concentrations <100 mIU/mL, and ≥100 mIU/mL at month 7 were considered as non/hypo-response and high-level response, respectively. The non/hypo-response was 31.34% (89/284). After adjustment for confounders, logistic analysis showed that males (OR = 2.203, 95%CI: 1.109-4.367) and those with higher dialysis frequency (>4 times per 2 weeks) (OR = 1.918, 95%CI: 1.015-3.626) had a significant risk of non/hypo-response. While the CHAID analysis showed that gender, dose, and dialysis frequency were influencing factors of non/hypo-response, and gender is most important. The interaction between gender and dialysis frequency had the greatest effect on immunization, and followed by the interaction between dialysis frequency and vaccine dose. Taken together, gender, dose and dialysis frequency were influencing factors of hepatitis B vaccine in HD patients.

Long-term persistent immunogenicity after successful standard and triple-dosed hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients: A 3-year follow-up study in China

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccines among hemodialysis patients has been documented, the long-term persistence of immunogenicity in this population remains largely unknown. We explored the long-term persistence of immunogenicity induced by different hepatitis B vaccine regimens in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

In initial study, we conducted a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial among hemodialysis patients in 13 hospitals in Shanxi Province, China. A total of 352 hemodialysis patients were allocated to receive 3-dose 20 μg (IM20 group) and 3-dose 60 μg (IM60 group) recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at months 0, 1, and 6. Vaccine-induced immune responses were measured at month 7. In this study, the responders (anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) were followed up at months 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42, respectively. We used the generalized log-rank test and generalized estimating equations (GEE) to analyze the long-term durability of responses and the kinetics of anti-HBs levels, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were involved in the extended follow-up period. The duration of vaccine-induced response with 75% of patients maintained protective antibody were 12 months and 18 months in the IM20 group and IM60 group, respectively (P = 0.291). The long-term persistent immunogenicity induced by 3-dose 60 μg was more satisfactory than that by 3-dose 20 μg hepatitis B vaccine in patients with hemodialysis duration ≥ five years (P = 0.023). The peak anti-HBs levels in 100-1000 mIU/mL or ≥ 1000 mIU/mL were more likely to maintain long-term protective antibody compared to anti-HBs levels in 10-100 mIU/mL (P ＜ 0.05). The kinetic profile was similar between the two groups (P = 0.334).

CONCLUSION

High-dose 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine could lead a satisfactory long-term durability of immunogenicity among patients with hemodialysis duration of five years or more. Peak anti-HBs level after vaccination was associated with the long-term persistence of immunogenicity.

Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination

There is substantial variation between individuals in the immune response to vaccination. In this review, we provide an overview of the plethora of studies that have investigated factors that influence humoral and cellular vaccine responses in humans. These include intrinsic host factors (such as age, sex, genetics, and comorbidities), perinatal factors (such as gestational age, birth weight, feeding method, and maternal factors), and extrinsic factors (such as preexisting immunity, microbiota, infections, and antibiotics). Further, environmental factors (such as geographic location, season, family size, and toxins), behavioral factors (such as smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, and sleep), and nutritional factors (such as body mass index, micronutrients, and enteropathy) also influence how individuals respond to vaccines. Moreover, vaccine factors (such as vaccine type, product, adjuvant, and dose) and administration factors (schedule, site, route, time of vaccination, and coadministered vaccines and other drugs) are also important. An understanding of all these factors and their impacts in the design of vaccine studies and decisions on vaccination schedules offers ways to improve vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy.

Immunogenicity, antibody persistence, and safety of the 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the immunogenicity, antibody persistence, and safety of the 60 µg hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients in China.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial including 352 hemodialysis patients who were centrally randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive a 20 µg (IM20 group) or 60 µg (IM60 group) recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at months 0, 1, and 6.

RESULTS

The vaccine-elicited antibody responses peaked at month 7, and declined at month 12. At month 7, the IM60 group had stronger GMC of anti-HBs, and a higher proportion of seroconversion and high-level response than the IM20 group did (P < 0.05). Better immune responses were observed in the IM60 group, especially for those aged or in the high-frequency hemodialysis population.

CONCLUSION

The high dose 60 µg recombinant hepatitis B vaccines elicited stronger immune responses than the 20 µg hepatitis B vaccine did among hemodialysis patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02963714.

A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of a PreS/S hepatitis B vaccine Sci-B-Vac™, as compared to Engerix B®, among vaccine naïve and vaccine non-responder dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients have a suboptimal response to hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination. This study aimed to compare the immunogenicity of two vaccines: the third-generation Sci-B-Vac™ vs. the second-generation Engerix B^®. The cohort included two groups of dialysis patients: naïve and previously vaccinated non-responders. Primary endpoints were antibody titers ≥10 IU/L at 3 and 7 month post-vaccination. Secondary objectives were seroprotection rates in vaccine-naïve patients and in previously vaccinated non-responders.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were assigned to vaccine (Sci-B-Vac™ or Engerix B^®) using computer-generated randomization, stratified by age, gender, diabetes, and previous HBV vaccination. Sci-B-Vac™ was administered in three doses, 10 μg, at 0, 1, and 6 months in naïve patients; or 20 μg in previously vaccinated non-responders. Engerix B^® included four doses, 40 μg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Each group had 43 patients. Seroconversion was 69.8% with Engerix B^® vs. 73.2% with Sci-B-Vac™. Antibody titers at 7 months were higher with Sci-B-Vac™ (266.4 ± 383.9, median 53.4) than with Engerix^® (193.2 ± 328.9, median 19). However, these differences were not significant, perhaps due to a suboptimal sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests comparable immunogenicity for both vaccines. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in seroconversion by vaccine type. It is noteworthy that naïve patients were vaccinated with a standard dose of Sci-B-Vac™, while Engerix B^® was administered at a double dose. Similarly, although mean antibody titer levels in the Sci-B-Vac™ group were higher than in the Engerix^® group, this difference did not reach significance. Consequently, a future clinical trial should recruit a larger cohort of patients, using a standard double-dose protocol in both groups.

Response to active hepatitis B vaccination and mortality in incident dialysis patients

All patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or on renal replacement therapy should receive active hepatitis B vaccination. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the association between the immune response to hepatitis B vaccination and all-cause, cardiovascular or infection-related mortality in incident dialysis patients starting dialysis between 2001 and 2008 (n=426) in two Austrian dialysis centers. Vaccination response was defined as follows: absent anti-HBs antibody titer or a titer <10IU/L was classified as non-response, seroconversion (SC) was defined as a titer ⩾10IU/L, and seroprotection (SP) as a titer ⩾100IU/L. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Models were used to determine the association between vaccination response and all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related mortality. Of all patients 207 (48.6%) were non-responders, SC was observed in 219 (51.4%), SP in 118 (27.7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 51.2 months 228 (53.5%) patients died. Patients with SP and SC showed a significantly lower all-cause (p<0.001 for both) and cardiovascular mortality (p=0.006 for SP, p=0.01 for SC). SP and SC were independently associated with a significant risk reduction for all-cause mortality (SP: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97, p=0.03; SC: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95, p=0.02). In conclusion, achieving seroconversion and seroprotection after active hepatitis B vaccination is associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality in incident dialysis patients. This simple and readily available tool allows estimation of patient survival independently of other well-known key parameters such as age, gender, the presence of diabetes and markers of malnutrition and inflammation.

Immunization in end-stage renal disease: opportunity to improve outcomes

Infection is the second most common cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), following cardiovascular causes. Immunization is a fairly simple, but underutilized, strategy for prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney failure. It is imperative for nephrologists and primary care providers to have an understanding of immunization as an essential component of preventive healthcare measures in this high-risk population. Patients with ESRD represent a unique population due to their immunosuppressed state, dialysis-related exposures and suboptimal response to routine vaccines. While the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) provides guidelines for vaccination of patients with renal disease against Hepatitis B, influenza and pneumococcal disease, the data on immunization against other commonly preventable infectious diseases are lacking. This article reviews the recent evidence on immunization in the ESRD population and synthesizes the related implications for maximizing prevention of infectious diseases in this high-risk population.

Immunogenicity of low-dose MF59-adjuvanted 2009 influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

In response to the pandemic 2009 A/H1N1 virus, monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccines were prepared. Recently, single 3.75-μg doses of MF59-adjuvanted vaccines have shown good immunogenicity in young adults. However, the immunogenicity of these vaccines has not been evaluated in dialysis patients.

METHODS

Dialysis patients received a single 3.75-μg dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine by intramuscular injection. For immunogenicity assays, serum samples were obtained before vaccination and 28 days after vaccination. All sera were tested by hemagglutination inhibition assays.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 34 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were included in immunogenicity analysis. In HD patients, geometric mean titers (GMTs) were significantly increased compared with baseline GMTs in both young (aged 18-60 years) and elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) patients (51.2 ± 51.4 vs. 14.1 ± 20.7 in young patients, P = 0.012; 37.9 ± 73.9 vs. 6.8 ± 8.0 in elderly patients, P = 0.018, respectively). The rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were 27.6 and 17.2 % in young patients and 31.6 and 26.3 % in elderly patients, respectively. Among PD patients, GMTs were increased only in young patients (39.8 ± 51.4 vs. 6.8 ± 5.0, P = 0.001). The rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were 36.0 and 36.0 % in young patients and 11.1 and 0.0 % in elderly patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A single 3.75-μg dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine was suboptimal to elicit protective antibody response in dialysis patients. Antibody responses against vaccine were compromised especially in elderly PD patients. Trials of different vaccination protocols such as a two-dose schedule or a higher hemagglutinin antigen dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine are necessary for improving antibody response in dialysis patients.

Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine among hemodialysis patients: effect of revaccination of non-responders and duration of protection

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for patients on hemodialysis, however, seroprotection after a primary vaccine series is suboptimum. Limited data are available on the effect of revaccination of non-responders and on persistence of immunity in this population.

METHODS

Hepatitis B vaccine (40 μg/dose) was given to 77 susceptible patients on hemodialysis (0, 1, and 6 month schedule). Levels of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) were tested ≥ 28 days after the third dose was administered, and non-responders revaccinated with an additional 3-dose series. Vaccine responders (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) were re-tested every 6 months and booster doses given as needed. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate the probability of maintaining protective antibody level. Cox-proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between time to loss of protective antibody levels and certain explanatory variables.

RESULTS

Overall primary vaccine-induced response was 79.2% (95% CI 68.2%, 87.3%), including 49/77 (63.6%; 95% CI 51.8%, 74.7%) patients who received the initial primary hepatitis B vaccine series and 12/21 (57.1%; 95% CI 34.4%, 77.4%) non-responders who were revaccinated with an additional series. Among weak responders (anti-HBs level 10.0-99.9 mIU/mL), protective antibody levels persisted in 44% for 12 months post-vaccination; whereas among strong responders (anti-HBs level ≥100 mIU/mL), protective antibody levels persisted in 92% for 12 months, and 68% for 24 months post-vaccination. A weak post-vaccination response increased the risk of losing protective antibody levels (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-28.5; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Revaccinating patients undergoing hemodialysis who do not respond to a primary vaccine series substantially increases the pool of protected patients. The threshold for defining hepatitis B vaccine-induced immunity should be revisited in this patient population to maximize the duration of protection.

Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational AS02(v)-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine in patients with renal insufficiency who failed to respond or to maintain antibody levels after prior vaccination: results of two open, randomized, comparative trials

An investigational AS02(v)-adjuvanted hepatitis B (HB-AS02) was compared with a licensed conventional recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HBVAXPRO™; Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) in pre-dialysis, peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients aged ≥18 years who had failed either to respond to prior vaccination with a conventional hepatitis B vaccine (Study A; n=251) or to maintain protective antibody concentrations after prior hepatitis B vaccination (Study B; n=181). These were open, randomized, comparative trials. Mean (range) age was 65.9 (31-92) and 64.6 (29-92) years in the two studies, respectively. In Study A, two doses of HB-AS02 given one month apart were found to be superior to two doses of the licensed vaccine in terms of seroprotection rate (76.9% versus 37.6%) and anti-HBs geometric mean antibody concentration (GMC; 139.3 versus 6.9mIU/ml), with antibody concentrations ≥100mIU/ml in 61.1% and 15.4% of subjects in the two groups, respectively. In Study B, one month after administration of a single booster dose, seroprotection rates were 89.0% in the HB-AS02 group and 90.8% in the licensed vaccine group, 81.3% and 60.9% of subjects had antibody concentrations ≥100mIU/ml, and anti-HBs GMCs were 1726.8 and 189.5mIU/ml. HB-AS02 was found to be more reactogenic than the licensed vaccine. In summary, the investigational HB-AS02 vaccine induced higher seroprotection rates and anti-HBs GMCs than a licensed conventional hepatitis B vaccine in uremic patients who had failed to respond or to maintain protective antibody titers after prior hepatitis B vaccination.

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine (HB-AS02V) in healthy adults

HB-AS02 is an investigational adjuvanted hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine for potential use in patients with renal insufficiency and other immunocompromized individuals. In this Phase III lot-to-lot consistency study, 450 healthy adult volunteers who had not previously been vaccinated against HBV were randomized to one of three production lots of HB-AS02 at 0 and 1 month and followed until one month after the last vaccine dose. Lot-to-lot consistency was established. High seroprotection rates were already achieved after the first vaccine dose (75.9%). All subjects were seroprotected (anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/ml) after two doses, with all but one subject achieving anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥100 mIU/ml (99.7%). Geometric mean anti-HBs antibody concentration was 4594.5 mIU/ml. Local and general symptoms were reported after 80.7% and 45.5% of doses, respectively. However, these were mainly of mild or moderate severity and no subject withdrew from the study due to adverse events.

Effects of oral levamisole as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in adults with end-stage renal disease: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Many patients receiving long-term dialysis do not produce protective antibodies to hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) after HBV vaccination. The results from several studies have suggested benefit of oral levamisole as an adjuvant to HBV vaccination in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, reliable information is still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety profile of oral levamisole as an adjuvant to HBV vaccine in patients with ESRD.

METHODS

This meta-analysis included prospective controlled clinical trials identified using literature searches of MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Institute for Scientific Information bibliographic database, and Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials for controlled clinical trials that weighted the seroprotection rate in patients with ESRD who received oral levamisole + HBV vaccine versus those who received the HBV vaccine alone (control). The fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was applied with the heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. The response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with seroprotective concentrations of antibodies to HBsAg (>10 mIU/mL) at completion and 6 to 10 months after completion of the HBV vaccine schedule, was the end point of interest and was also analyzed separately. For the tolerability assessment, studies that reported dose reduction, levamisole discontinuation, and their adverse effects including laboratory abnormalities were included.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 4 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria (328 patients). The mean ages of the patients in these studies ranged from 41 to 53 years, and sex distribution ranged from 52.6% to 68.0% male. Twenty-two patients received oral levamisole 100 mg/d for 12 days (from 6 days before to 6 days after each vaccination). A total of 106 patients received oral levamisole 80 to 120 mg for 4 to 6 months. Aggregation of study results suggested a significant increase in response rate in the group that received levamisole + HBV vaccine compared with the control group (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.77 [95% CI, 1.56-4.94]) after completion and 6 to 10 months after the vaccination period (pooled OR = 3.96 [95% CI, 1.71-9.18]). The test of heterogeneity was not statistically significant in either group. Five patients underwent dose reduction due to mild adverse events. In one trial, 3 patients died, 1 of whom was receiving levamisole; however, the authors did not provide the causes of death. No other serious adverse events were reported with levamisole administration.

CONCLUSION

The results from this meta-analysis suggest significant benefit in the administration of levamisole as an adjuvant to HBV vaccine to increase seroprotection in patients with ESRD.

Rapid, enhanced, and persistent protection of patients with renal insufficiency by AS02(V)-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine

The adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine, HB-AS04, elicits more rapid and persistent protective antibody concentrations than double doses of conventional recombinant vaccines in patients with renal insufficiency. We compared the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of the AS02(V)-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine HB-AS02 with that of HB-AS04. In this phase III, open, randomized study, 151 hepatitis B vaccine-naïve pre-dialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis patients aged 15 years and older received three doses of HB-AS02 at 0, 1, and 6 months. Another 149 similar patients received four doses of HB-AS04 at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months, and all were followed up for 12 months. HB-AS02 elicited more rapid and persistent seroprotection than HB-AS04, with rates of 77 and 39%, respectively, 1 month after the second vaccine dose, and 94 and 79%, respectively, at 12 months. Superiority of HB-AS02 over HB-AS04 in anti-hepatitis B geometric mean concentrations was found at all time points. HB-AS02 was more reactogenic than HB-AS04, but adverse events were mainly transient, of mild to moderate intensity with no reportable vaccine-related serious events. We conclude that a three-dose primary course of HB-AS02 induced more rapid, enhanced, and persistent protection in patients with renal insufficiency than the licensed four-dose primary schedule of HB-AS04. This adjuvanted vaccine affords greater protection with reduced need for booster doses in patients at high risk of hepatitis B infection.