• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4630235)   Today's Articles (5086)   Subscriber (49737)
For: Pfingst BE, Sutton D. Relation of cochlear implant function to histopathology in monkeys. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1983;405:224-39. [PMID: 6575647 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31635.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Zhou N, Dong L, Galvin JJ. A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users. J Neurosci Methods 2020;342:108802. [PMID: 32522551 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
2
Guo R, Ma X, Liao M, Liu Y, Hu Y, Qian X, Tang Q, Guo X, Chai R, Gao X, Tang M. Development and Application of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of Spiral Ganglion Neurons. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2019;5:6735-6741. [PMID: 33423491 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
3
Rate of Spiral Ganglion Cell Loss in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:e944-e949. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
4
Brochier T, McKay C, McDermott H. Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018;143:1214. [PMID: 29495682 DOI: 10.1121/1.5025048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
5
Within-subject comparison of word recognition and spiral ganglion cell count in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2015;35:1446-50. [PMID: 25120196 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
6
Zanin MP, Hellström M, Shepherd RK, Harvey AR, Gillespie LN. Development of a cell-based treatment for long-term neurotrophin expression and spiral ganglion neuron survival. Neuroscience 2014;277:690-9. [PMID: 25088914 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2014] [Revised: 06/13/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
7
Budenz CL, Pfingst BE, Raphael Y. The use of neurotrophin therapy in the inner ear to augment cochlear implantation outcomes. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012;295:1896-908. [PMID: 23044834 DOI: 10.1002/ar.22586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2012] [Accepted: 07/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
8
Chikar JA, Hendricks JL, Richardson-Burns SM, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE, Martin DC. The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function. Biomaterials 2011;33:1982-90. [PMID: 22182748 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2011] [Accepted: 11/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
9
Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs. Hear Res 2010;269:169-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2010] [Revised: 06/16/2010] [Accepted: 06/17/2010] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
10
Smit JE, Hanekom T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Hanekom JJ. Threshold predictions of different pulse shapes using a human auditory nerve fibre model containing persistent sodium and slow potassium currents. Hear Res 2010;269:12-22. [PMID: 20708672 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2009] [Revised: 06/29/2010] [Accepted: 08/04/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
11
Gassner HG, Shallop JK, Driscoll CLW. Long-term clinical course and temporal bone histology after cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2009;6:67-76. [PMID: 18792320 DOI: 10.1179/cim.2005.6.2.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
12
Kang SY, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Su GL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009;11:245-65. [PMID: 19902297 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0194-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2008] [Accepted: 10/01/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]  Open
13
Morphological changes in spiral ganglion cells after intracochlear application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in deafened guinea pigs. Hear Res 2008;244:25-34. [PMID: 18692557 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2007] [Revised: 07/01/2008] [Accepted: 07/02/2008] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
14
Chikar JA, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Di Polo A, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Over-expression of BDNF by adenovirus with concurrent electrical stimulation improves cochlear implant thresholds and survival of auditory neurons. Hear Res 2008;245:24-34. [PMID: 18768155 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2008] [Revised: 08/07/2008] [Accepted: 08/12/2008] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
15
Altschuler RA, O'Shea KS, Miller JM. Stem cell transplantation for auditory nerve replacement. Hear Res 2008;242:110-6. [PMID: 18585449 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2007] [Revised: 06/01/2008] [Accepted: 06/03/2008] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
16
Hendricks JL, Chikar JA, Crumling MA, Raphael Y, Martin DC. Localized cell and drug delivery for auditory prostheses. Hear Res 2008;242:117-31. [PMID: 18573323 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2007] [Revised: 05/09/2008] [Accepted: 06/02/2008] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
17
Pettingill LN, Richardson RT, Wise AK, O'Leary SJ, Shepherd RK. Neurotrophic factors and neural prostheses: potential clinical applications based upon findings in the auditory system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:1138-48. [PMID: 17551571 PMCID: PMC1886005 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2007.895375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
18
Hildebrand MS, de Silva MG, Gardner RJM, Rose E, de Graaf CA, Bahlo M, Dahl HHM. Cochlear implants for DFNA17 deafness. Laryngoscope 2007;116:2211-5. [PMID: 17146397 DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000242089.72880.f8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
19
Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB. Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 2005;115:672-7. [PMID: 15805879 DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
20
Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2811-24. [PMID: 15546789 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2004] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
21
Paasche G, Gibson P, Averbeck T, Becker H, Lenarz T, Stöver T. Technical report: modification of a cochlear implant electrode for drug delivery to the inner ear. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:222-7. [PMID: 12621336 DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200303000-00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
22
Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL, Leake PA. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2001;109:2035-2048. [PMID: 11386556 DOI: 10.1121/1.1365115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
23
Miller AL. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear Res 2001;151:1-14. [PMID: 11124447 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
24
Miller AL, Morris DJ, Pfingst BE. Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection thresholds. Hear Res 2000;144:175-86. [PMID: 10831876 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00066-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
25
Miller AL, Smith DW, Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses. Hear Res 1999;135:47-55. [PMID: 10491953 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00089-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
26
Pfingst BE, Holloway LA, Zwolan TA, Collins LM. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants. Hear Res 1999;134:105-15. [PMID: 10452380 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00079-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
27
Incesulu A, Nadol JB. Correlation of acoustic threshold measures and spiral ganglion cell survival in severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:906-11. [PMID: 9823838 DOI: 10.1177/000348949810701102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
28
Ylikoski J, Pirvola U, Virkkala J, Suvanto P, Liang XQ, Magal E, Altschuler R, Miller JM, Saarma M. Guinea pig auditory neurons are protected by glial cell line-derived growth factor from degeneration after noise trauma. Hear Res 1998;124:17-26. [PMID: 9822899 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00095-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
29
Smith DW, Finley CC. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1997;102:2228-2237. [PMID: 9348680 DOI: 10.1121/1.419636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
30
Miller AL, Morris DJ, Pfingst BE. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants. Hear Res 1997;109:21-33. [PMID: 9259233 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00037-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
31
Donaldson GS, Viemeister NF, Nelson DA. Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1997;101:3706-21. [PMID: 9193058 DOI: 10.1121/1.418330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
32
Mitchell A, Miller JM, Finger PA, Heller JW, Raphael Y, Altschuler RA. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig. Hear Res 1997;105:30-43. [PMID: 9083802 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00202-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
33
Pfingst BE, Holloway LA, Razzaque SA. Effects of pulse separation on detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Hear Res 1996;98:77-92. [PMID: 8880183 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00071-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
34
Miller CA, Faulkner MJ, Pfingst BE. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time. Hear Res 1995;92:100-11. [PMID: 8647732 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00205-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
35
Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens. Hear Res 1994;81:150-66. [PMID: 7737922 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90162-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
36
Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival. Hear Res 1994;78:11-26. [PMID: 7961173 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90039-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
37
el-Kashlan HK, Niparko JK, Altschuler RA, Miller JM. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: surface vs. penetrating stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105:533-43. [PMID: 1762791 DOI: 10.1177/019459989110500405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
38
Hartshorn DO, Miller JM, Altschuler RA. Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:311-9. [PMID: 1902931 DOI: 10.1177/019459989110400305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
39
Glass I, Spelman FA, Pfingst BE. Discrimination of complex electrical stimulation through a multichannel intracochlear implant. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1991;2:87-102. [PMID: 1786260 DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp.1991.2.1-2.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
40
Pfingst BE. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1990;50:225-36. [PMID: 2076974 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90047-s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
41
Pfingst BE, Rai DT. Effects of level on nonspectral frequency difference limens for electrical and acoustic stimuli. Hear Res 1990;50:43-56. [PMID: 2076982 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90032-k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
42
Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Bertschy M. Intensity operating range measures as predictors of word-recognition ability in cochlear implant subjects. SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY 1990;19:139-45. [PMID: 2237253 DOI: 10.3109/01050399009070765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
43
Pfingst BE. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear Res 1988;34:243-51. [PMID: 3139606 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90005-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
44
Johnsson LG. Otopathological aspects of cochlear implants. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA. SUPPLEMENTUM 1988;449:65-6. [PMID: 3201961 DOI: 10.3109/00016488809106379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
45
Miller JM, Sutton D, Carlisle L. Brainstem auditory pathway degeneration associated with chronic cochlear implants in the monkey. Am J Otolaryngol 1986;7:239-49. [PMID: 3755871 DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80045-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
46
Pfingst BE. Stimulation and Encoding Strategies for Cochlear Prostheses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1986. [DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31765-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
47
Banfai PDP, Karczag DA, Kubik PDS, Lüers P, Sürth W. Extracochlear Sixteen-Channel Electrode System. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1986. [DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31776-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
48
Glass I. Responses of cochlear nucleus units to electrical stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis: channel interaction. Hear Res 1985;17:115-26. [PMID: 3839235 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90015-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
49
Glass I. Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1983;12:223-37. [PMID: 6689010 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90108-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
50
Miller JM, Duckert LG, Malone MA, Pfingst BE. Cochlear prostheses: stimulation-induced damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983;92:599-609. [PMID: 6689259 DOI: 10.1177/000348948309200614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA