Tamoxifen and endometrial cancer

Gynecologic Care of Black Breast Cancer Survivors

Purpose of Review

Black patients suffer from breast cancer-related racial health disparities, which could have implications on their gynecologic care. This review explores considerations in the gynecologic care of Black breast cancer survivors.

Recent Findings

Black people have a higher risk of leiomyoma and endometrial cancer, which could confound bleeding patterns such as in the setting of tamoxifen use. As Black people are more likely to have early-onset breast cancer, this may have implications on long-term bone and heart health. Black patients may be more likely to have menopausal symptoms at baseline and as a result of breast cancer treatment. Furthermore, Black patients are less likely to utilize assisted reproductive technology and genetic testing services.

Summary

It is important for healthcare providers to be well-versed in the intersections of breast cancer and gynecologic care. Black breast cancer survivors may have unique considerations for which practitioners should be knowledgeable.

MRI Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Uterine Corpus

자궁은 크게 자궁체부와 자궁경부로 나뉜다. 이 중 자궁내막과 자궁근층으로 이루어진 자궁체부에는 양성에서 악성 종양까지 다양한 질환이 발생한다. 비침습적인 일차적 평가로 초음파와 컴퓨터단층촬영이 있으나 비특이적인 영상 소견으로 감별이 어려운 경우가 있다. 반면높은 해상도와 병리학적 특성 파악이 가능한 자기공명영상은 병변의 위치 확인뿐만 아니라 조직학적 특징, 그 리고 악성 종양의 병기 설정에도 도움을 준다. 이 종설에서는 영상의학과의사들이 알아야 할 자궁체부에서 볼 수 있는 다양한 양성과 악성 종양들의 특징적인 자기공명영상 소견들과 이들의 감별점에 대해 정리했다.

Risk Factors Associated with Endometrial Pathology in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors associated with endometrial pathology during tamoxifen use in premenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of premenopausal BC patients treated with tamoxifen who underwent endometrial biopsy with or without hysteroscopy. Clinical characteristics were compared between women with endometrial pathology (endometrial hyperplasia or cancer) and those with normal histology or endometrial polyps.

RESULTS

Among 284 endometrial biopsies, endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed in 7 patients (2.5%), endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 5 patients (1.8%), normal histology was noted in 146 patients (51.4%), and endometrial polyp was present in 114 patients (40.1%). When comparing women with endometrial cancer (n=5) to women with normal histology, abnormal uterine bleeding was more common (p=0.007), and endometrial thickness was greater (p=0.007) in women with endometrial cancer. Chemotherapy for BC was also more common in patients with endometrial cancer (p=0.037). When comparing women with endometrial polyps and those with endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, the presence of abnormal uterine bleeding was more common in patients with endometrial hyperplasia or cancer (p<0.001); however, tamoxifen duration and endometrial thickness did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal BC patients treated with tamoxifen, abnormal uterine bleeding, increased endometrial thickness, and chemotherapy for BC were associated with the occurrence of endometrial cancer. These findings may provide useful information for gynecologic surveillance and counseling during tamoxifen treatment in premenopausal BC patients.

Enriching Personalized Endometrial Cancer Research with the Harmonization of Biobanking Standards

Endometrial cancer is the commonest gynecological cancer, with an incidence predicted to escalate by a further 50–100% before 2025, due to the rapid rise in risk factors such as obesity and increased life expectancy. Endometrial cancer associated mortality is also rising, depicting the need for translatable research to improve our understanding of the disease. Rapid translation of scientific discoveries will facilitate the development of new diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic strategies. Biobanks play a vital role in providing biospecimens with accompanying clinical data for personalized translational research. Wide variation in collection, and pre-analytic variations in processing and storage of bio-specimens result in divergent and irreproducible data from multiple studies that are unsuitable for collation to formulate robust conclusions. Harmonization of biobanking standards is thus vital, in facilitating international multi-center collaborative studies with valuable outcomes to improve personalized treatments. This review will detail the pitfalls in the biobanking of biosamples from women with cancer in general, and describe the recent international harmonization project that developed standardized research tools to overcome these challenges and to enhance endometrial cancer research, which will facilitate future development of personalized novel diagnostic strategies and treatments.

Elevated expression of G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with uterine cervical adenocarcinoma

Uterine cervical adenocarcinoma has a worse prognosis than that of squamous cell carcinoma and useful diagnostic and prognostic markers are needed. Estrogen is one of the key regulators of several cancers, however, the estrogen signaling has not been focused on in cervical adenocarcinoma. Here, we shows expression profile of classical estrogen receptor (ER) and a novel membrane type estrogen receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), in surgical specimens (n=53). GPR30 was strongly expressed on the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm in adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and adenocarcinoma, and its expression was especially strong at the invasion front in most of the cases of GPR30-positive adenocarcinoma. Nuclear staining of ER was strong in non-neoplastic glands, whereas it was almost absent in most of the AIS and adenocarcinoma cases. There was a weak but statistically significant negative correlation between immunoreactivity of GPR30 and that of ER in cervical AIS and adenocarcinoma lesions (Spearman's correlation, r=-0.324, p=0.017). ROC curve analysis revealed that immunoreactivity of GPR30 successfully distinguished neoplasms from non-neoplastic glands with high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (75.5%). GPR30 positivity was significantly correlated with histological type (p=0.009), tumor diameter (p=0.003), tumor size (p<0.001), lymphovascular infiltration (p=0.005) and UICC stage (p<0.001). ER expression was correlated only with tumor factor (p=0.047). GPR30-high patients had poor prognosis with a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) period (p=0.0309). GPR30 expression is a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker.

Retained products of conception in hysteroscopy in a patient with breast cancer on tamoxifen

Tamoxifen is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator widely used in breast cancer treatment, with good survival rates. Its partial agonist action on other tissues such as the uterus, however, promotes the development of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. It appears that tamoxifen does not alter the age of menopause and women may still get pregnant while on tamoxifen. We present the case of a 47-year-old Chinese woman with breast cancer on tamoxifen, who presented with one episode of heavy per vaginal bleeding after 2 years of amenorrhoea. Her urine pregnancy test was negative and the ultrasound scan was suspicious for malignancy. She underwent a hysteroscopic evaluation for abnormal bleeding on tamoxifen. Histopathology confirmed products of conception. This case illustrates the importance of understanding the rise and decline of human chorionic gonadotropin in pregnancy, as well as the pivotal role of contraception despite having amenorrhoea on tamoxifen.

Development of novel and safer anti-breast cancer agents, SS1020 and SS5020, based on a fundamental carcinogenic research

Tamoxifen (TAM) has been prescribed worldwide to patients with and women at high-risk of breast cancer. However, long-term use of TAM increases the incidence of endometrial cancer. The carcinogenic mechanisms of TAM have been extensively investigated. TAM is hydroxylated and sulfonated at α-carbon to form α-hydroxytamoxifen-O-sulfonate. This metabolite readily reacts with genomic DNA, particularly with 2′-deoxyguanosine, leading to DNA replication error. TAM also exerts estrogenic activity at endometrial tissue to induce endometrial hyperplasia. Therefore, our efforts focused on the development of novel and safer anti-estrogens to diminish carcinogenic potential of TAM based on chemical modifications. In this review, we describe a crucial idea of our drug design and introduce our compounds SS1020 and SS5020, possessing high effectiveness, and no genotoxic and estrogenic activities.

Risk and prognostic factors for endometrial carcinoma after diagnosis of breast or Lynch-associated cancers-A population-based analysis

We hypothesized that endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients with a prior cancer diagnosis, after accounting for EC arising after tamoxifen-treated prior breast carcinoma, are more likely to have an underlying genetic basis. We used information from a population-based study to compare measured risk factors, tumor characteristics, survival, and known mismatch repair (MMR) pathogenic variant status for EC subgroups according to prior diagnosis of cancer (none, breast cancer tamoxifen-treated or not, Lynch Syndrome (LS)-associated cancer). Family history of any cancer was increased for EC cases with prior breast cancer, both tamoxifen treated (P = 0.005) and untreated (P = 0.01). EC cases with prior LS-associated cancer more often reported family history of LS-associated cancer (P = 0.04) and breast cancer (P = 0.05). EC patients with a germline pathogenic MMR gene variant were more likely to report a prior cancer than cases with a MMR proficient tumor (P = 0.0001), but more than half (54.5%) of MMR carriers reported no prior cancer. Women developing EC after tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer were significantly more likely to develop EC of malignant mixed mullerian tumor subtype (13.2% vs 2.6%, P = 1.3 × 10-6 ), present with stage IV disease (8.8% vs 1.2%, P = 1.6 × 10-6 ), and have poorer survival (HRadj 1.96; P = 0.001). While report of prior cancer is an indicator of MMR pathogenic variant status, molecular analysis of all ECs at diagnosis is warranted to detect all patients with LS. Results also indicate the importance of longer-term monitoring of women treated with tamoxifen for symptoms of EC, and the need for studies assessing the biological mechanism underlying the poorer prognosis of this subset of EC patients.

Estrogen/GPR30 Signaling Contributes to the Malignant Potentials of ER-Negative Cervical Adenocarcinoma via Regulation of Claudin-1 Expression

Cervical adenocarcinomas are believed to lose estrogen response on the basis of no expression of a nuclear estrogen receptor such as ERα in clinical pathology. Here, we demonstrated that cervical adenocarcinoma cells respond to a physiological concentration of estrogen to upregulate claudin-1, a cell surface molecule highly expressed in cervical adenocarcinomas. Knockout of claudin-1 induced apoptosis and significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical adenocarcinoma cells and tumorigenicity in vivo. Importantly, all of the cervical adenocarcinoma cell lines examined expressed a membrane-bound type estrogen receptor, G protein–coupled receptor 30 (GPR30/GPER1), but not ERα. Estrogen-dependent induction of claudin-1 expression was mediated by GPR30 via ERK and/or Akt signaling. In surgical specimens, there was a positive correlation between claudin-1 expression and GPR30 expression. Double high expression of claudin-1 and GPR30 predicts poor prognosis in patients with cervical adenocarcinomas. Mechanism-based targeting of estrogen/GPR30 signaling and claudin-1 may be effective for cervical adenocarcinoma therapy.

The effect of tamoxifen therapy on the endometrium and ovarian cyst formation in patients with breast cancer

Objective

To evaluate the effect of tamoxifen on female reproductive organs in women with breast cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 309 women with breast cancer who were currently receiving tamoxifen and undergoing regular gynecological examination.

Results

We evaluated 92 pre- and 217 postmenopausal women. The prevalence of endometrial thickening was 12% in the pre- and 10.6% in the postmenopausal group. An endometrial biopsy was performed in 43 women and confirmed endometrial cancer in 1, endometrial polyps in 14, and endometrial hyperplasia in 4 women. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed 25 cases of newly developed ovarian cysts. Most ovarian cysts had disappeared during follow-up.

Conclusion

Tamoxifen use in women with breast cancer causes few complications and is considered safe for female reproductive organs in case of regular gynecological examination.

Utilization of gynecologic services in women with breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy

BACKGROUND

The selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen is now widely used for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Tamoxifen use has been associated with a variety of gynecologic problems. Despite the frequency with which hormonal therapy is used for the treatment of breast cancer, limited population-level data are available to describe the occurrence of gynecologic conditions and the use of surveillance testing in women receiving tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a population-based analysis among women with breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy with tamoxifen, a drug commonly used in premenopausal and sometimes postmenopausal women, to determine the frequency of gynecologic abnormalities and use of diagnostic and surveillance testing. We compared these findings to women treated with aromatase inhibitors, agents commonly used in postmenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN

The MarketScan database was used to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2009 through 2013 who underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy. Women receiving tamoxifen (age <50 vs ≥50 years) were compared to women ≥50 years of age treated with aromatase inhibitors. We examined the occurrence of gynecologic symptoms and diseases (vaginal bleeding, endometrial polyps, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer) and gynecologic procedures and interventions (transvaginal ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, hysteroscopy/dilation and curettage, and hysterectomy). Time-dependent analyses were performed to examine symptoms and testing.

RESULTS

A total of 75,170 women, including 15,735 (20.9%) age <50 years treated with tamoxifen, 13,827 (18.4%) age ≥50 years treated with tamoxifen, and 45,608 (60.7%) age ≥50 years treated with aromatase inhibitors were identified. The cumulative incidence of any gynecologic symptom or pathologic diagnosis during the study period was 20.2%, 12.3%, and 3.5%, respectively (P < .001), while the cumulative incidence of any gynecologic procedure or intervention during the study period was 34.2%, 20.9%, and 9.0%, respectively (P < .0001). Among women without symptoms or pathology, interventions were performed in 20.0%, 11.0%, and 6.8%, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to women taking aromatase inhibitors, gynecologic symptoms, procedures, and pathology are higher for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women with breast cancer on tamoxifen. Increased efforts to curb use of gynecologic interventions in asymptomatic women are needed.

Endometrial polyp surveillance in premenopausal breast cancer patients using tamoxifen

Objective

To describe the endometrial pathologic lesions in premenopausal breast cancer patients with a history of tamoxifen (TMX) use.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 premenopausal breast cancer patients with a history of TMX use that had undergone a gynecological examination.

Results

Among 120 patients, 44.2% (n=53) were asymptomatic with an endometrial thickness ≥5 mm, as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography. Of the patients that reported abnormal uterine bleeding, 5% (n=6) had an endometrial thickness <5 mm and 20% (n=24) had an endometrial thickness ≥5 mm by transvaginal ultrasonography. The final group of patients were asymptomatic, but showed an abnormal endometrial lesion, such as an endometrial polyp, by transvaginal ultrasonography (30.8%, n=37). Of the 56 benign lesions that were histologically reviewed, 50 (41.7%) were endometrial polyps, 3 (2.5%) were submucosal myomas, 2 (1.7%) were endometrial hyperplasias, and 1 (0.8%) was chronic endometritis. There were 64 (53.3%) other non-pathologic conditions, including secreting, proliferative, and atrophic endometrium, or in some cases, there was insufficient material for diagnosis. In our data, only one case was reported as a complex hyperplasia without atypia arising from an endometrial polyp, and one patient was diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

For premenopausal breast cancer patients with a history of TMX use, the majority of the patients were asymptomatic, and endometrial polyps were the most common endometrial pathology observed. Therefore, we believe that endometrial assessment before starting TMX treatment, and regular endometrial screening throughout TMX treatment, are reasonable suggestions for premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Evaluation of Metachronous Breast and Endometrial Cancers: Preroutine and Postroutine Adjuvant Tamoxifen Use

BACKGROUND

The time interval between diagnoses of breast cancer (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) is not well established in women with metachronous primary tumors. We sought to examine this interval and identify associations with treatment-related and clinicopathologic factors.

METHODS

We identified 141 patients who developed both cancers during 1966 to 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1, BC first, and group 2, EC first. Subanalysis performed of group 1 (59 patients) stratified around adjuvant tamoxifen use: pre-1990 BC diagnosis and post.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine and 82 patients were in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean time interval was comparable (76 vs 74 months, P = 0.861). Subanalysis divided group 1 into pre- (n = 27) and post- (n = 32) 1990 and resulted in different mean time intervals between diagnosis of metachronous cancers (106 vs 50 months, respectively [P = 0.042]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for EC were longer in the pre group (PFS, 51 vs 26 months [P = 0.169]; OS, 59 vs 27 months [P = 0.190]). Median PFS and OS for BC were also longer in this group (PFS, 147 vs 109 months [P = 0.005]; OS, 166 vs 114 months [P < 0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate the mean time interval between the diagnosis of EC and BC was approximately 6 years. Disease-specific EC survival was worse for patients with a previous diagnosis of BC. Stratification around implementation of tamoxifen use shows comparable grade and stage but different time interval and survival, suggesting resulting effects from adjuvant therapy for BC. These results are useful in counseling women at risk.

Effects of Pharmacogenetics on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tamoxifen

The antiestrogenic drug tamoxifen is widely used in the treatment of estrogen receptor-α-positive breast cancer and substantially decreases recurrence and mortality rates. However, high interindividual variability in response is observed, calling for a personalized approach to tamoxifen treatment. Tamoxifen is bioactivated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5, resulting in the formation of active metabolites, including 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and endoxifen. Therefore, polymorphisms in the genes encoding these enzymes are proposed to influence tamoxifen and active tamoxifen metabolites in the serum and consequently affect patient response rates. To tailor tamoxifen treatment, multiple studies have been performed to clarify the influence of polymorphisms on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Nevertheless, personalized treatment of tamoxifen based on genotyping has not yet met consensus. This article critically reviews the published data on the effect of various genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tamoxifen, and reviews the clinical implications of its findings. For each CYP enzyme, the influence of polymorphisms on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcome measures is described throughout this review. No clear effects on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were seen for various polymorphisms in the CYP encoding genes CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4/5. For CYP2D6, there was a clear gene-exposure effect that was able to partially explain the interindividual variability in plasma concentrations of the pharmacologically most active metabolite endoxifen; however, a clear exposure-response effect remained controversial. These controversial findings and the partial contribution of genotype in explaining interindividual variability in plasma concentrations of, in particular, endoxifen, imply that tailored tamoxifen treatment may not be fully realized through pharmacogenetics of metabolizing enzymes alone.

Tailored Tamoxifen Treatment for Breast Cancer Patients: A Perspective

Tamoxifen, an endocrine agent, is widely used in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. It has greatly reduced disease recurrence and mortality rates of breast cancer patients, however, not all patients benefit from tamoxifen treatment because in approximately 25% to 30% of the patients the disease recurs. Many researchers have sought to find factors associated with endocrine treatment outcome in the past years, however, this quest has not been finished. In this article, we focus on a factor that might influence outcome of tamoxifen treatment: interpatient variability in tamoxifen pharmacokinetics. In recent years it has become clear that tamoxifen undergoes extensive metabolism and that some of the formed metabolites are much more pharmacologically active than tamoxifen itself. Despite the wide interpatient variability in tamoxifen pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, all patients receive a standard dose of 20 mg tamoxifen per day. Different approaches can be pursued to individualize tamoxifen dosing: genotyping, phenotyping, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring seems to be the most direct and promising approach, however, further clinical research is warranted to establish the added value of individual dosing in tamoxifen treatment optimization.

Tamoxifen dose and serum concentrations of tamoxifen and six of its metabolites in routine clinical outpatient care

A sensitive and selective HPLC-MS/MS assay was used to analyze steady-state serum concentrations of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen (E)-endoxifen, (Z)-endoxifen, N-desmethyl-4'-hydroxytamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen to support therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with tamoxifen according to standard of care. When the (Z)-endoxifen serum concentration was below the predefined therapeutic threshold concentration of 5.9 ng/mL, the clinician was advised to increase the tamoxifen dose and to collect another serum sample. Paired serum samples from patients at one dose level at different time points during the tamoxifen treatment were used to assess the intra-patient variability. A total of 251 serum samples were analyzed, obtained from 205 patients. Of these patients, 197 used 20 mg tamoxifen per day and 8 patients used 10 mg/day. There was wide variability in tamoxifen and metabolite concentrations within the dosing groups. The threshold concentration for (Z)-endoxifen was reached in one patient (12 %) in the 10 mg group, in 153 patients (78 %) in the 20 mg group, and in 26 (96 %) of the patients who received a dose increase to 30 or 40 mg/day. Dose increase from 20 to 30 or 40 mg per day resulted in a significant increase in the mean serum concentrations of all analytes (p < 0.001). The mean intra-patient variability was between 10 and 20 % for all analytes. These results support the suitability of TDM for optimizing the tamoxifen treatment. It is shown that tamoxifen dose is related to (Z)-endoxifen exposure and increasing this dose leads to a higher serum concentration of tamoxifen and its metabolites. The low intra-patient variability suggests that only one serum sample is needed for TDM, making this a relatively noninvasive way to optimize the patient's treatment.

Anastrozole Use in Early Stage Breast Cancer of Post-Menopausal Women

The majority of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor and depend on estradiol (E2) for their growth. Hormonal therapy aims at depriving estrogen signaling either by using selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM)-that interfere with the binding of E2 to its receptor (ER)-or aromatase inhibitors (AI)-that block the aromatase-dependent synthesis of E2. While SERMs are recommended for both pre- and post-menopausal patients, AIs are indicated only for post-menopausal patients. For the past 20 years, the SERM tamoxifen has been considered the "gold standard" for the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancers. However, tamoxifen's role is now challenged by third generation AIs, such as anastrozole, which exhibit greater efficacy in the adjuvant setting in several recently reported trials. This review will focus on anastrozole's mechanism of action, dosing, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical applications. It will briefly discuss the clinical trials that determined anastrozole's efficacy in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and in the neoadjuvant setting. Finally, it will present the clinical trials that established anastrozole as a frontline agent in the treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.

XR5944: A potent inhibitor of estrogen receptors

The anticancer drug XR5944 was originally developed as a topoisomerase inhibitor and was subsequently shown to be a transcription inhibitor. It has shown exceptional anticancer activity both in vitro and in vivo and was significantly more potent than traditional topoisomerase inhibitors. The solution structure of the XR5944/DNA complex recently obtained in our laboratory indicates that XR5944 bis-intercalates at the 5'-(TpG):(CpA) site of duplex DNA, which is found in the consensus DNA-binding site of estrogen receptor (ER). Thus, we tested the ability of XR5944 to inhibit ER activity both in vitro and in cultured cells. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays, it is seen that the DNA binding of recombinant ERalpha protein, as well as ER from nuclear extracts, is inhibited by XR5944 in a dose-dependent manner. In luciferase reporter assays, XR5944 inhibited the reporter gene expression from an estrogen response element-containing promoter but not from a basal promoter sequence that lacks any cis-acting elements. In contrast, the RNA polymerase inhibitor actinomycin D inhibits the transcription from both the above-mentioned promoters. The specificity of XR5944 activity is displayed by a separate reporter assay in which the transactivation of reporter gene expression by Sp1 proteins was not inhibited by XR5944. Collectively, these data suggest that XR5944 is capable of specifically inhibiting the binding of ER to its consensus DNA sequence and its subsequent activity. This represents a novel mechanism of ER inhibition, which may allow the development of agents capable of overcoming resistance to current antiestrogens.

Fulvestrant ('Faslodex'): current and future role in breast cancer management

Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new type of estrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects, that reduces cellular levels of both estrogen and progesterone receptors. Results from two Phase III trials showed that fulvestrant is at least as effective as the third-generation selective aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer following progression on antiestrogen therapy, indicating the potential for second-line fulvestrant in this setting. In clinical practice, fulvestrant is well tolerated, with good rates of clinical benefit observed as first-line therapy and following progression on prior endocrine agents. Other endocrine agents have been shown to have good clinical activity when resistance to fulvestrant has developed, showing that fulvestrant lacks cross-resistance with other treatments. Ongoing trials are investigating the efficacy of fulvestrant after failure on aromatase inhibitors and evaluating its use in combination with therapies that target growth factor receptor signaling pathways.

Biological characteristics of the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant: overcoming endocrine resistance

Understanding the underlying mechanisms responsible for endocrine resistance remains a challenge in improving the treatment of breast cancer. The discovery that growth factor and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathways interact in endocrine resistant breast cancer has provided a rationale for disrupting these signaling cascades in ER-positive, endocrine-resistant tumors. In postmenopausal women, the ER signaling pathway may be targeted using fulvestrant ('Faslodex'), a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects. Fulvestrant binds, blocks and causes degradation of the ER, culminating in complete abrogation of estrogen-sensitive gene transcription. This unique mechanism of action may result in a lack of cross-resistance with other endocrine agents. Preclinical studies have confirmed the potential of fulvestrant to inhibit the growth of tamoxifen-resistant, as well as tamoxifen-sensitive, human breast cancer cell lines. Clinical studies have demonstrated that fulvestrant is an effective treatment option in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Furthermore, preclinical studies indicate that combining fulvestrant with growth factor targeted agents, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (IRESSA) or the anti-human HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab ('Herceptin'), may result in greater anti-tumor activity than either agent alone. A range of clinical trials are now ongoing to determine whether the combination of growth factor-targeting agents with fulvestrant will delay the onset of endocrine resistance and so provide new strategy for women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Endocrine therapy--current benefits and limitations

Endocrine therapy is a valuable option for the treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer due to its demonstrated efficacy and favorable safety profile. Although tamoxifen has been the established treatment for more than 20 years its long-term use is associated with several tolerability concerns and may lead to increased risk of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic complications. In addition, many patients who initially respond to treatment with endocrine agents such as tamoxifen eventually relapse with resistant disease. Sequential use of endocrine therapies is often used in patients as resistance to individual agents develops. Several endocrine approaches have been developed that deprive the tumor of estrogen stimulation, either by directly modulating the ER-signaling pathway or by lowering serum or tumor concentrations of estrogen. In the classic pathway of estrogen signal transduction, the steroid hormone binds to its intracellular ER, triggering a cascade of events that ultimately leads to altered gene transcription. More recently, it has become apparent that ER activation can also occur via estrogen-independent receptor activation or by non-nuclear action through cell surface receptors. Consequently, molecular cross-talk exists between the ER and growth factor signaling cascades, which is a key factor in de novo and acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. Inappropriate activation of growth factor signaling can readily promote endocrine therapy failure in breast cancer cells, either by overriding the growth-inhibitory properties of antiestrogenic drugs or by establishment of a new self-propagating autocrine loop that efficiently drives resistant cell growth. Fulvestrant is a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects that binds, blocks and causes degradation of the ER. As multiple signaling pathways are involved in the activation of ER, the use of agents such as fulvestrant that directly target the ER and lead to both degradation of the receptor and abrogation of ER signaling may prevent or delay the development of absolute endocrine resistance. In addition, combining antiestrogenic drugs with inhibitors of cell signaling molecules to target both the ER and growth factor signaling pathways is likely to provide a means of delaying endocrine therapy resistance, leading the way to more effective breast cancer treatment.

Is tamoxifen associated with high-risk endometrial carcinomas? A retrospective case series of 196 women with endometrial cancer

Tamoxifen therapy is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. There is controversy regarding the incidence of high-grade endometrial malignancies associated with tamoxifen therapy. This retrospective study assesses pathological features of endometrial malignancy in patients with and without a history of tamoxifen therapy. This is a retrospective case analysis from a district general hospital. The cases were identified from the pathology database and the medical notes reviewed. The period of the study was January 1994 to December 2001. One hundred and ninety six women with endometrial cancer were identified. 20 patients had a history of breast cancer being treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy and developed subsequently endometrial cancer. The histology in women who had not taken tamoxifen showed: adenocarcinoma (97.1%), 1.7% had mixed mullerian tumour. Women in the tamoxifen-treated group had: adenocarcinoma (85%), sarcoma (5%), mixed mullerian tumour (5%). In this study the tamoxifen-treated group of patients developed endometrial malignancies with a higher incidence of poor prognostic malignancies (p = 0.01). Further research is needed to analyse the precise tumour types and pathophysiology.

Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are more vulnerable to future cancers than individuals without cancer. As such, it is important to understand whether survivors are engaging in cancer screenings.

METHODS

The screening practices reported in response to the 2000 Health Interview Survey of 2151 individuals with cancer were examined and compared to those of 30,195 individuals without cancer.

RESULTS

The proportion of cancer survivors obtaining screenings ranged from 21% to 77%. Compared to individuals without cancer, women with cancer were more likely to have had a mammogram (odds ratio [OR]=1.8, 95% CI=1.5-2.1), a clinical breast exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9-2.5), and/or a Papanicolaou test (OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.1-1.5) in the recommended timeframe. Similarly, men with cancer were more likely than men without cancer to have had a prostate-specific antigen test performed (OR=2.5, 95% CI=2.0-3.0). All cancer survivors were more likely than individuals without a cancer diagnosis to have had a total body skin exam (OR=4.0, 95% CI=3.5-4.6), a fecal occult blood test (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.2-1.6), and/or a colorectal exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9-2.5). Similar results were obtained when individuals diagnosed with the cancer for which the screen was designed to detect were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that cancer survivors have higher screening rates than individuals without a cancer diagnosis. Despite this, the proportion of survivors obtaining screenings varies considerably by the type of screen. An understanding of the impact of cancer screening in cancer survivors, as well as the reasons for and against obtaining cancer screenings, is necessary.

The current status of aromatase inhibitors in the management of breast cancer

The third generation of specific AIs have made a very exciting contribution to the management of hormone responsive breast cancer. We can now state with confidence that their role in advanced breast cancer has overtaken that of tamoxifen, which should be relegated to a second-line treatment. Indeed, as a recent publication confirmed that first-line anastrozole followed by tamoxifen is an effective treatment sequence, this sequence may be considered the best choice for treating patients with hormone receptor-positive ABC. As far as the primary disease is concerned, the ATAC data certainly suggest that there is an alternative to tamoxifen in selected postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive disease. With more mature follow-up the study might even show that after a passage of nearly 20 years tamoxifen has lost its lead position in the adjuvant stakes as well.

Has tamoxifen had its day?

Tamoxifen is probably the most important drug in the history of the management of breast cancer and its development is a tribute to cross talk between laboratory scientists and clinical investigators. Its use as adjuvant therapy has led to a decrease of 20-30% in age-adjusted cause-specific mortality in the developed world and it is approved in the USA for the chemoprevention of breast cancer in high-risk women. The recent ATAC and IBIS trials have challenged the supremacy of tamoxifen. The present paper is a personal view of the implications for the future use of this drug in competition with the oral aromatase inhibitors. In the opinion of the author tamoxifen will probably remain the mainstay for adjuvant therapy of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive disease, but maturation of the ATAC data may allow a choice in selected cases. Anastrozole looks like a competitor for the future but we may have to wait another 10 years to find out.

Investigation of endometrial abnormalities in asymptomatic women treated with tamoxifen and an evaluation of the role of endometrial screening

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen is the most commonly prescribed adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer. It has agonist activity on the endometrium and is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether screening with transvaginal ultrasound (TV USS) with or without hysteroscopy is worthwhile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 487 women with breast cancer, 357 treated with tamoxifen and 130 controls, were screened with TV USS, and endometrial thickness was measured. Women with thickened endometrium underwent outpatient hysteroscopy.

RESULTS

Length of time on tamoxifen ranged from 5 to 191 months (mean, 66 months), and endometrial thickness ranged from 1 to 38 mm (mean, 7.3 mm). Women treated with tamoxifen had significantly thicker endometrium than did controls (P <.0001). There was a statistically significant (P <.0001) positive correlation between length of time on tamoxifen and endometrial thickness. One hundred forty-five women had endometrium greater than 5 mm on USS, and 134 underwent successful outpatient hysteroscopy, 61 of whom had atrophic endometrium, resulting in a 46% false-positive scan rate. The remaining women all had benign features to explain the USS findings.

CONCLUSION

TV USS detects a high incidence (41%) of apparent endometrial thickening in women treated with tamoxifen, although 46% had atrophic endometrium on further assessment, and none of the remaining asymptomatic women had significant lesions. Length of time on tamoxifen relates to endometrial thickening as measured by TV USS. TV USS is a poor screening tool because of the high false-positive rate. The low frequency of significant findings suggests that endometrial screening in asymptomatic women is not worthwhile.

The role of ultrasound in the detection of endometrial pathologies in asymptomatic postmenopausal breast cancer patients with tamoxifen treatment

Transvaginal ultrasonography is an effective diagnostic procedure, and thus, it can reasonably be used to determine which asymptomatic, postmenopausal breast cancer patient with tamoxifen treatment will require endometrial sampling. Overall, it seems that the contribution of pulsed Doppler flow in the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies in such patients is nonconclusive. It is suggested that sonohysterography is a useful diagnostic tool for the assessment of specific endometrial pathologies, especially of space-occupying lesions in the endometrial cavity, in such patients.

Treatment of endometrial hyperplasias with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists: pathological, clinical, morphometric, and DNA-cytometric data

On the basis of the recently reported observation that gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) can affect endometrial cell proliferation, both indirectly, through the hormonal axis, and directly, by acting on the GnRH-a receptors, we investigated how far GnRH-a can be used as a new treatment mode for endometrial hyperplasias. Forty-two women, aged 28-60 years, with histologically confirmed simple (n = 30) or complex (n = 12, 2 with atypias) hyperplasia of the endometrium were involved in the study. According to the protocol they were treated for 6 months with GnRH-a (leuprolide acetate or triptorelin), and each patient underwent uterine curettage in the third and the sixth month of treatment, and 6 and at least 12 months after cessation of the treatment, for histological examination and morphometric and DNA-cytometric evaluation of the endometrium (mean pathological follow-up, 19.2 months; mean clinical follow-up, 30.7 months). During treatment, most of the women first revealed endometrial atrophy, and, after cessation of the treatment, again an atrophic or mainly functional endometrium; in 7 women, all with initial diagnosis of simple hyperplasia, the endometrial hyperplasia reappeared, which led in all 7 cases to hysterectomy. The mean values of almost all morphometric and DNA-cytometric parameters during and after treatment showed statistically significant changes in relation to pretreatment values, indicating a decrease in the proliferative activity of the endometrial cells; the GnRH-a antiproliferative effect was still active for a long time after cessation of the therapy. Our results, based for the first time not only on histological but also on serial nuclear morphometric and DNA-cytometric examinations of the endometrial cells and on the longest follow-up time, support the view that in cases of endometrial hyperplasia, especially of complex type, the use of GnRH agonists, which decrease the proliferative tendency of endometrial cells, could represent an alternative conservative therapeutic approach, which, however, requires close monitoring of the endometrium.

Tamoxifen and secondary tumours. An update

The nonsteroidal antiestrogen tamoxifen is the most widely used anticancer drug. In women with breast cancer, adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen reduces relapse and improves overall survival. In advanced breast cancer, the response rate is more than 50% in hormonal dependent disease. In women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen the incidence of new primary breast cancers is decreased. This latter observation has led to the initiation of prevention trials. In 1989 the first report from a large prospective randomised trial showed a significant increase of endometrial carcinoma among women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. This effect may be linked to the somewhat paradoxical estrogenic properties of tamoxifen. The endometrial effects should be considered in the long term use of tamoxifen, and should also be taken into account in the evaluation of the prevention trials. Animal data indicate that tamoxifen can induce tumours in other organ systems, for example the liver, but no increase in primary liver cancer has been reported from the randomised trials. In some of these trials an increase in other gastrointestinal cancers (e.g. colon and gastric carcinoma) has been observed. The mechanism behind this may be different from that of the endometrium. In animal systems, tamoxifen has shown to induce DNA damage, with formation of DNA adducts. The risk of secondary gastrointestinal cancer needs to be further evaluated. The adverse effects of tamoxifen have led to the development of new anti-estrogenic drugs and other estrogen reducing agents (e.g. aromatase inhibitors).