Induction of transplantation tolerance by feeding or portal vein injection pretreatment of recipient with donor cells

Inducción de tolerancia por vía oral en trasplante de órganos y tejidos. Revisión de la Literatura

Introducción. La tolerancia oral es la supresión de la respuesta inmune a antígenos administrados con anterioridad por vía oral; su inducción tiene el propósito de evitar el uso de fármacos inmunosupresores, los cuales, dado que son poco específicos a antígenos, vuelven al huésped más susceptible de contraer infecciones y desarrollar neoplasias.Objetivos. Realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre los referentes teóricos más relevantes de la inducción de a tolerancia oral en lo que respecta al trasplante de órganos y tejidos para demostrar que el uso de esta alternativa terapéutica es viable en pacientes trasplantados.Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura en PubMed, MEDLINE, LILACS y Embase mediante la siguiente estrategia de búsqueda: periodo de publicación: sin límites; idiomas: Inglés y Español; tipo de artículos: estudios caso-control, revisiones sistemáticas y de la literatura; términos de búsqueda: “T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory”, “Autoimmunity”, Immunosuppression”, “Immune system” and “Immune Tolerance”, y sus equivalentes en español.Resultados. La búsqueda inicial arrojó 719 registros, sin embargo solo 99 abordaban la inducción de la tolerancia oral. Una vez los registros duplicados y los artículos sin acceso a texto completo fueron removidos, se incluyeron 72 estudios en la revisión.Conclusiones. La administración oral de antígenos es una opción efectiva para inducir tolerancia inmunológica en pacientes trasplantados (modelos murinos), pues elimina los efectos adversos que conlleva la terapia inmunosupresora actualmente utilizada.

Vascularized composite allograft rejection is delayed by intrajejunal treatment with donor splenocytes without concomitant immunosuppressants

Background. Mucosal or oral tolerance, an established method for inducing low-risk antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness, has not been investigated in vascularized composite allograft (VCA) research. We studied its effects on recipient immune responses and VCA rejection. Methods. Lewis rats (n = 12; TREATED) received seven daily intrajejunal treatments of 5 × 10⁷ splenocytes from semiallogeneic Lewis-Brown-Norway rats (LBN) or vehicle (n = 11; SHAM). Recipients' immune responses were assessed by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) against donor antigen and controls. Other Lewis (n = 8; TREATED/VCA) received LBN hindlimb VCA and daily intrajejunal treatments of 5 × 10⁷ LBN splenocytes, or LBN VCA without treatment (n = 5; SHAM/VCA), until VCAs rejected. Recipients' immune responses were characterised and VCAs biopsied for histopathology. Immunosuppressants were not used. Results. LBN-specific hyporesponsiveness was induced only in treated Lewis recipients. Treatment significantly reduced MLR alloreactivity, significantly reduced VCA rejection on histopathology, and significantly delayed clinical VCA rejection (P < 0.0005; TREATED/VCA mean 9.6 versus 6.0 days for SHAM/VCA). Treatment significantly increased immunosuppressive IL-10/IL-4/TGF-β production and significantly decreased proinflammatory IFN-γ/TNF-α. Conclusion. Jejunal exposure to antigen conferred donor specific hyporesponsiveness that delayed VCA rejection. This method may offer a low-risk adjunctive treatment option to help protect VCAs from rejection.

Effects of Schwann cells and donor antigen on long-nerve allograft regeneration

Nerve allotransplantation has been used successfully in human subjects to restore function after traumatic nerve injury and avoid subsequent limb amputation. However, due to the morbidity associated with nonspecific immunosuppression, this reconstructive approach has been limited to patients with particularly severe nerve injuries. It would be desirable to broaden the indications for such procedures through development of less toxic antirejection therapies. A miniature swine model of nerve transplantation was used to investigate the effects of preoperative ultraviolet-B (UV-B)-irradiated donor alloantigen portal venous infusion and injection of cultured major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched Schwann cells into the nerve graft. The transplanted ulnar nerves were harvested at 20 weeks. Histomorphometry showed marked enhancement in nerve regeneration through allografts injected with Schwann cells. Serial mixed lymphocyte assays demonstrated suppression of the recipient immune response to the donor antigen after pretreatment, but no additional neuroregenerative effect of donor alloantigen pretreatment.

Induction of oral tolerance and the effect of interleukin-4 on murine skin allograft rejection

We studied the effect of oral and portal vein administration of alloantigens on mouse skin allograft survival. Graft receptor BALB/c mice received spleen cells (30, 90, 150 or 375 x 10(6)) from donor C57BL/6 mice intragastrically on three successive days, starting seven days before the skin graft. Allograft survival was significantly increased with the feeding of 150 x 10(6) allogeneic spleen cells by one gavage (median survival of 12 vs 14 days, P< or =0.005) or when 300 x 10(6) cells were given in six gavage (12 vs 14 days, P<0.04). A similar effect was observed when 150 x 10(6) spleen cells were injected into the portal vein (12 vs 14 days, P< or =0.03). Furthermore, prolonged allograft survival was observed with subcutaneous (12 vs 16 days, P< or =0.002) or systemic (12 vs 15 days, P< or =0.016) application of murine interleukin-4 (IL-4), alone or in combination with spleen cell injection into the portal vein (12 vs 18 days, P< or =0.0018). Taken together, these results showed that tolerance induction with spleen cells expressing fully incompatible antigens by oral administration or intraportal injection partially down-modulates skin allograft rejection. Furthermore, these findings demonstrated for the first time the effect of subcutaneous or systemic IL-4 application on allograft skin survival suggesting its use as a beneficial support therapy in combination with a tolerance induction protocol.

Oral exposure to alloantigen generates intragraft CD8+ regulatory cells

We have previously reported that oral administration of allogeneic rat spleen cells before kidney allotransplantation significantly prolongs graft survival. This prolongation was alloantigen specific and was associated with a decrease in graft-infiltrating cells (GIC) and an increase in transcription of IL-4 mRNA in the GIC. In this study increased splenic mixed lymphocyte responses from animals orally exposed to alloantigen before kidney transplantation suggested that the kidney allograft prolongation was not due to a masking of allorecognition, but to an immunomodulation of the immune response. We have assessed GIC T cell subsets on day 5 post-transplant and found decreased numbers of CD4(+) T cells in fed animals compared with controls, but there was no change in CD8(+) T cell numbers. The CD8(+) GIC from fed animals transcribed substantial levels of perforin, granzyme, and Fas ligand mRNA, indicating the presence of active CTL. Direct CTL assays showed that the GIC from fed recipients exhibited higher allo-CTL activity than GIC from control unfed recipients. In addition, the CD8(+) GIC exhibited high levels of IL-4 mRNA, suggesting Tc2-type regulatory cells. Prolonged graft survival in the face of active CTL and Tc2 cells suggests the presence of a CD8(+) regulatory cell population in the allograft. To confirm this, cell transfer experiments were performed. Prolongation of graft survival was transferred from rats orally exposed to alloantigen to naive animals by transfer of CD8(+) GIC. This is the first report that oral exposure to alloantigen prolongs kidney allograft survival by the generation of intragraft CD8(+) regulatory cells.

Implantation of xenografts into parkinsonian rat brain after portal venous administration of xenogeneic donor spleen cells

Object. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of pretransplantation portal venous immunization with ultraviolet B (UVB)—treated donor spleen cells on neural xenograft transplantation.

Methods. Cells from a murine catecholaminergic cell line derived from the B6/D2 F1 mouse, CATH.a, were used as a xenograft. Thirty hemiparkinsonian rats were divided into three different treatment groups. Group 1 received saline in the dopamine-denervated striatum; Group 2 received xenograft cells; and Group 3 received portal venous administration of UVB-irradiated B6/D2 F1 splenocytes 7 days before receiving xenograft cells. Xenograft function was determined by reviewing apomorphine-induced rotation at 2-week intervals, and xenograft survival was examined at 4 and 12 weeks after transplantation by immunohistochemical staining for murine tyrosine hydroxylase (THase). Rotational behavior was improved in both xenograft-transplanted groups (Groups 2 and 3); however, the animals in Group 3 displayed a significantly reduced rotational behavior compared with Group 2. In Group 2, many inflammatory cells and a few THase-positive cells were found at the graft sites 4 weeks after transplantation. In Group 3, however, a large number of THase-positive cells were found with few inflammatory cells. The THase-positive cells disappeared in the Group 2 rats at 12 weeks, but remained in Group 3 animals. In Group 3 rats proliferation of spleen cells in a mixed lymphocyte reaction was suppressed in a donor-specific fashion.

Conclusions. This work demonstrates improved neural xenograft survival and function by pretransplantation portal venous immunization with UVB-irradiated xenogeneic donor splenocytes. On the basis of these findings, the authors suggest the possibility of creating donor-specific immunological tolerance in the brain by administration of xenogeneic donor lymphocytes via the portal vein.