Beyond tamoxifen new endpoints for breast cancer chemoprevention, new drugs for breast cancer prevention

Effects of Genistein and Synergistic Action in Combination with Tamoxifen on the HepG2 Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line

Introduction: The flavonoids comprise a diverse group of polyphenolic compounds with antioxidant activity that is present in edible plants like soybeans and soy products. In vivo studies have concentrated on the effects of flavonoids on cancer and genistein (GE), a soy-derived isoflavone, has been reported to reduce prostate, colon, hepatic and breast adenocarcinoma risk. Tamoxifen (TAM) is an important drug for cancer treatment worldwide, which can induce apoptosis in various cancers, including examples in the liver, breast and ovaries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of GE and TAM, alone and in combination, on proliferation and apoptosis in the human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) HepG2 cell line. Materials and Methods: HepG 2 cells were treated with GE, TAM and GE/TAM and then MTT and flow cytometry assays were conducted to determine effects on viability and apoptosis, respectively. Results: GE and TAM inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in the HepG 2 cell lines. Discussion: Our findings clearly indicated that GE and TAM may exert inhibitory and apoptotic effects in liver cancer cells. Conclusion: GE and TAM can significantly inhibit growth of HCC cells and play a significant role in apoptosis.

Phytoestrogens in Botanical Dietary Supplements: Implications for Cancer

Phytoestrogens are plant constituents that possess either estrogenic or antiestrogenic activity. Although their activities are weak as compared with human endogenous estrogens, the consumption of phytoestrogens may have clinically significant consequences. A number of botanicals, or the compounds contained therein, have been identified as putative estrogenic agents, but consensus in the biomedical community has been hampered by conflicting data from various in vitro and in vivo models of estrogenic activity. Phytoestrogens may serve as chemopreventive agents while at the same time being capable of promoting growth in estrogen receptor positive cancer cell lines. Furthermore, they may exert their estrogenic influence through receptor-dependent and/or receptor-independent mechanisms. These findings have led to speculation that phytoestrogen intake might be ill advised for patients at an increased risk for hormone-dependent cancers, cancer patients, or cancer survivors. This article will attempt to sort out discrepancies between various experimental models and establish whether certain herbs possess estrogenic activity. The review will focus on 5 popular botanical dietary supplements: Trifolium pratense (red clover), Cimicifuga racemosa (black cohosh), Humulus lupulus (hops), Angelica sinensis (dong quai), and Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice). It will address their mechanisms of action, clinical evidence bases, and implications for use in cancer.

Development of a novel approach for breast cancer prediction and early detection using minimally invasive procedures and molecular analysis: how cytomorphology became a breast cancer risk predictor

With enhanced public awareness, advances in breast imaging, and emphasis on early breast cancer detection and prevention, more women are seeking consultation to assess the status of their breast health. Risk assessment has become an integral part of established multi-disciplinary breast care, and breast cancer risk reduction interventions have received a great deal of attention. Similarly, interest in identification of high-risk individuals has increased significantly. Atypical proliferative changes in breast epithelial cells are ranked high among various known breast cancer risk factors and, in recent years, have been the subject of several investigations. Breast tissue and fluid in the ductal system provide a rich source of cells and biomarkers that have the potential to aid in the assessment of short-term risk of breast cancer development, and assess responses to interventional prevention efforts. There are three minimally invasive procedures currently being utilized to sample breast tissue in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. These procedures are: fine-needle aspiration biopsy, nipple aspiration fluid, and ductal lavage. In this review article, the merits and limitations of each procedure are presented, and the contribution of cytomorphology and molecular analysis in breast cancer prediction is highlighted. In addition, the role of Masood Cytology Index as a surrogate endpoint biomarker in chemopreventative trials is discussed.

CpG island tumor suppressor promoter methylation in non-BRCA-associated early mammary carcinogenesis

BACKGROUND

Only 5% of all breast cancers are the result of BRCA1/2 mutations. Methylation silencing of tumor suppressor genes is well described in sporadic breast cancer; however, its role in familial breast cancer is not known.

METHODS

CpG island promoter methylation was tested in the initial random periareolar fine-needle aspiration sample from 109 asymptomatic women at high risk for breast cancer. Promoter methylation targets included RARB (M3 and M4), ESR1, INK4a/ARF, BRCA1, PRA, PRB, RASSF1A, HIN-1, and CRBP1.

RESULTS

Although the overall frequency of CpG island promoter methylation events increased with age (P<0.0001), no specific methylation event was associated with age. In contrast, CpG island methylation of RARB M4 (P=0.051), INK4a/ARF (P=0.042), HIN-1 (P=0.044), and PRA (P=0.032), as well as the overall frequency of methylation events (P=0.004), was associated with abnormal Masood cytology. The association between promoter methylation and familial breast cancer was tested in 40 unaffected premenopausal women in our cohort who underwent BRCA1/2 mutation testing. Women with BRCA1/2 mutations had a low frequency of CpG island promoter methylation (15 of 15 women had <or=4 methylation events), whereas women without a mutation showed a high frequency of promoter methylation events (24 of 25 women had 5-8 methylation events; P<0.0001). Of women with a BRCA1/2 mutation, none showed methylation of HIN-1 and only 1 of 15 women showed CpG island methylation of RARB M4, INK4a/ARF, or PRB promoters.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence of CpG island methylation of tumor suppressor gene promoters in non-BRCA1/2 familial breast cancer.

Hypermethylation of the Breast Cancer–Associated Gene 1 Promoter Does Not Predict Cytologic Atypia or Correlate with Surrogate End Points of Breast Cancer Risk

Mutation of the breast cancer-associated gene 1 (BRCA1) plays an important role in familial breast cancer. Although hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter has been observed in sporadic breast cancer, its exact role in breast cancer initiation and association with breast cancer risk is unknown. The frequency of BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was tested in (a) 14 primary breast cancer biopsies and (b) the initial random periareolar fine-needle aspiration (RPFNA) cytologic samples obtained from 61 asymptomatic women who were at increased risk for breast cancer. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was assessed from nucleotide -150 to nucleotide +32 relative to the transcription start site. RPFNA specimens were stratified for cytologic atypia using the Masood cytology index. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was observed at similar frequency in nonproliferative (normal; Masood <or=10: 18%, 2 of 11), hyperplastic (Masood 11-13: 15%, 6 of 41), and atypical cytology (Masood 14-17: 22%, 4 of 18; P = 0.79). BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was not associated with (a) family history of breast or ovarian cancer or (b) calculated Gail or BRCAPRO risk score. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was associated with (a) age (P = 0.028) and (b) the combined frequency of promoter hypermethylation of the retinoic acid receptor-beta2 (RARB) gene, estrogen receptor-alpha (ESR1) gene, and p16 (INK4A) gene (P = 0.003). These observations show that BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation (a) is not associated with breast cancer risk as measured by mathematical risk models and (b) does not predict mammary atypia in RPFNA cytologic samples obtained from high-risk women.

Mechanisms of fenretinide-induced apoptosis

Fenretinide, a synthetic retinoid, has emerged as a promising anticancer agent based on numerous in vitro and animal studies, as well as chemoprevention clinical trials. In vitro observations suggest that the anticancer activity of fenretinide may arise from its ability to induce apoptosis in tumor cells. Diverse signaling molecules including reactive oxygen species, ceramide, and ganglioside GD3 can mediate apoptosis induction by fenretinide in transformed, premalignant, and malignant cells. In many cell types, these signaling intermediates appear to be induced by mechanisms that are independent of retinoic acid receptor activation, and ultimately initiate the intrinsic or mitochondrial-mediated pathway of cell elimination. Numerous investigations conducted during the past 10 years have discovered a great deal about the apoptogenic activity of fenretinide. In this review we explore the mechanisms associated with fenretinide-induced apoptosis and highlight certain mechanistic underpinnings of fenretinide-induced cell death that remain poorly understood and thus warrant further characterization.

Optimization of estrogen receptor analysis by immunocytochemistry in random periareolar fine-needle aspiration samples of breast tissue processed as thin-layer preparations

Immunostaining of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) in samples of benign breast tissue obtained by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration (RPFNA) is a practical tool for breast cancer chemoprevention trials. The authors report an optimized method of ER immunostaining for use with thin-layer preparations of modified Cytolyt-fixed benign breast tissue acquired by RPFNA. Samples of benign breast tissue and MCF-7 controls processed as thin-layer preparations were tested for the effects of antibody titer, antigen retrieval temperature (90 degrees or 115 degrees C), buffer (20% nuclear decloaker, pH 9.3; 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6), and blocking solution (0.01% glucose oxidase or 0.3% H2O2) on ER immunostaining. The prevalence of positively stained breast epithelial cells, mean intensity of ER staining, and composite immunostaining score were evaluated for effect of immunostaining protocol. RPFNA samples and MCF-7 cells processed using nuclear decloaker and low-temperature antigen retrieval had more ER-positive cells (P<0.0001) and increased mean staining intensity and weighted staining indices (P<0.05) compared with samples prepared with citrate buffer and high-temperature antigen retrieval. Glucose oxidase increased ER-positive cells in comparison to hydrogen peroxide (P<0.04) when combined with low-temperature antigen retrieval and the use of nuclear decloaker. Staining was negative for all non-immune controls regardless of protocol. The combination of low-temperature antigen retrieval, diluted commercial nuclear decloaker solution, and a glucose oxidase blocking step yielded optimal ER immunostaining for thin-layer preparations of benign breast tissue harvested by RPFNA.

Chemoprevention of breast cancer among Asian women--its perspective and problems

Chemoprevention of breast cancer employing tamoxifen and others has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing the frequency of developing breast malignancy in Western countries. In Asian countries, the frequency of breast cancer as well as its premalignant lesions has recently increased. Therefore, the possible chemoprevention may benefit those women with potential high risks of developing breast cancer and with premalignant lesions. However, the details of these findings of chemoprevention in Western countries have not been available for women with Asian descendant. In addition, risk factors of developing breast cancer in healthy women have not been established in Asian countries compared to Western countries with relative paucity of familial breast cancer cases. Thus, possible chemoprevention of breast cancer in Asian countries may be targeted toward those with established premalignant breast lesions such as ductal carcinoma in situ and/or atypical ductal hyperplasia. However, due to their recent increment of their incidence, biological and/or clinical features of these premalignant breast lesions have not been extensively characterized in Asian women and further investigations are required for wide spread chemoprevention.

Mitochondria: A novel target for the chemoprevention of cancer

The mitochondria have emerged as a novel target for anticancer chemotherapy. This tenet is based on the observations that several conventional and experimental chemotherapeutic agents promote the permeabilization of mitochondrial membranes in cancerous cells to initiate the release of apoptogenic mitochondrial proteins. This ability to engage mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis directly using chemotherapy may be responsible for overcoming aberrant apoptosis regulatory mechanisms commonly encountered in cancerous cells. Interestingly, several putative cancer chemopreventive agents also possess the ability to trigger apoptosis in transformed, premalignant, or malignant cells in vitro via mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. This process may occur through the regulation of Bcl-2 family members, or by the induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition. Thus, by exploiting endogenous mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis-inducing mechanisms, certain chemopreventive agents may be able to block the progression of premalignant cells to malignant cells or the dissemination of malignant cells to distant organ sites as means of modulating carcinogenesis in vivo. This review will examine cancer chemoprevention with respect to apoptosis, carcinogenesis, and the proapoptotic activity of various chemopreventive agents observed in vitro. In doing so, I will construct a paradigm supporting the notion that the mitochondria are a novel target for the chemoprevention of cancer.

Retinoic Acid Receptor- 2 Promoter Methylation in Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspiration

Methylation of the retinoic acid receptor-beta2 (RARbeta2) P2 promoter is hypothesized to be an important mechanism for loss of RARbeta2 function during early mammary carcinogenesis. The frequency of RARbeta2 P2 methylation was tested in (a) 16 early stage breast cancers and (b) 67 random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) samples obtained from 38 asymptomatic women who were at increased risk for breast cancer. Risk was defined as either (a) 5-year Gail risk calculation > or = 1.7%; (b) prior biopsy exhibiting atypical hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ; or (c) known BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. RARbeta2 P2 promoter methylation was assessed at two regions, M3 (-51 to 162 bp) and M4 (104-251 bp). In early stage cancers, M4 methylation was observed in 11 of 16 (69%) cases; in RPFNA samples, methylation was present at M3 and M4 in 28 of 56 (50%) and 19 of 56 (38%) cases, respectively. RPFNAs were stratified for cytologic atypia using the Masood cytology index. The distribution of RARbeta2 P2 promoter methylation was reported as a function of increased cytologic abnormality. Methylation at both M3 and M4 was observed in (a) 0 of 10 (0%) of RPFNAs with Masood scores of < or = 10 (nonproliferative), (b) 3 of 20 (15%) with Masood scores of 11 to 12 (low-grade proliferative), (c) 3 of 10 (30%) with Masood scores of 13 (high-grade proliferative), and (d) 7 of 14 (50%) with Masood scores of 14 of 15 (atypia). Results from this study indicate that the RARbeta2 P2 promoter is frequently methylated (69%) in primary breast cancers and shows a positive association with increasing cytologic abnormality in RPFNA.

Apoptosis as a novel target for cancer chemoprevention

Cancer chemopreventive agents are typically natural products or their synthetic analogs that inhibit the transformation of normal cells to premalignant cells or the progression of premalignant cells to malignant cells. These agents are believed to function by modulating processes associated with xenobiotic biotransformation, with the protection of cellular elements from oxidative damage, or with the promotion of a more differentiated phenotype in target cells. However, an increasing number of chemopreventive agents (e.g., certain retinoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, polyphenols, and vanilloids) have been shown to stimulate apoptosis in premalignant and malignant cells in vitro or in vivo. Apoptosis is arguably the most potent defense against cancer because it is the mechanism used by metazoans to eliminate deleterious cells. Many chemopreventive agents appear to target signaling intermediates in apoptosis-inducing pathways. Inherently, the process of carcinogenesis selects against apoptosis to initiate, promote, and perpetuate the malignant phenotype. Thus, targeting apoptosis pathways in premalignant cells--in which these pathways are still relatively intact--may be an effective method of cancer prevention. In this review, we construct a paradigm supporting apoptosis as a novel target for cancer chemoprevention by highlighting recent studies of several chemopreventive agents that engage apoptosis pathways.

Cardiac hypertrophy and histone deacetylase-dependent transcriptional repression mediated by the atypical homeodomain protein Hop

Activation of multiple pathways is associated with cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Repression of antihypertrophic pathways has rarely been demonstrated to cause cardiac hypertrophy in vivo. Hop is an unusual homeodomain protein that is expressed by embryonic and postnatal cardiac myocytes. Unlike other homeodomain proteins, Hop does not bind DNA. Rather, it modulates cardiac growth and proliferation by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of serum response factor (SRF) in cardiomyocytes. Here we show that Hop can inhibit SRF-dependent transcriptional activation by recruiting histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity and can form a complex that includes HDAC2. Transgenic mice that overexpress Hop develop severe cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, and premature death. A mutant form of Hop, which does not recruit HDAC activity, does not induce hypertrophy. Treatment of Hop transgenic mice with trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, prevents hypertrophy. In addition, trichostatin A also attenuates hypertrophy induced by infusion of isoproterenol. Thus, chromatin remodeling and repression of otherwise active transcriptional processes can result in hypertrophy and heart failure, and this process can be blocked with chemical HDAC inhibitors.

Preventing cancer: dietary lifestyle or clinical intervention?

In Australia, colorectal, prostate and breast cancers are the most frequently occurring cancers in our society, a pattern that is quite different from that of underdeveloped countries. While diet is largely responsible for these differences, technological advances mean that the solutions can be viewed as systematic, financial, lifestyle or technological. They range from those that require self-discipline and care for personal well-being through to those that are seemingly a quick technological fix that will work in spite of an unhealthy lifestyle. There are three main approaches available for prevention of these cancers: dietary lifestyle, chemoprevention and screening. It has been estimated that the potential for prevention by a healthy dietary lifestyle is excellent and might reduce the burden of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer by 33-55%, 10-20% and 66-75%, respectively. This should be safe and inexpensive and have collateral benefit such as reduced cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. But, population compliance with more plant-based, less calorie dense foods is uncertain, the most healthy are likely to be the most compliant and evidence for effectiveness when interventional programs are undertaken is disappointing. It is not clear how dependable the dietary approach would be where inherited genetic factors determine risk for one of these cancers. Chemoprevention, the administration of natural or synthetic agents that delay, slow down or inhibit the process of tumorigenesis, are still under development and study. Hormone receptor modulators for breast and derivatives of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for colorectal cancers seem to have most promise and may reduce tumour incidence or death by as much as 50%. These agents are simpler to comply with than changing dietary lifestyle and they are more potent, hence they may be of particular value in high-risk settings. But they are likely to be more costly and run the risk of adverse effects with few collateral benefits. Screening, or the testing of an individual for a disease when that individual does not have any symptoms or signs suggesting that the disease is present, aims to prevent or delay the development of the cancer. Screening impacts on mortality more so than on incidence, reducing colorectal cancer mortality in the range 15-60% and breast cancer mortality by 23-37%. Screening has the advantage of being effective in high-risk as well as average-risk groups and is an 'easy' solution for the person who elects not to follow a healthy dietary lifestyle. Nonetheless, it is expensive, demanding on resources, provides no collateral benefits and does not have the same potential to reduce incidence of disease as does the dietary approach. With these Western cancers, we are fortunate that there are options for prevention. At least choices are available and some will suite certain circumstances and personalities more than others.

Prevention of HER-2/neu transgenic mammary carcinoma by tamoxifen plus interleukin 12

FVB-NeuN (N#202) female mice transgenic for the HER-2/neu protooncogene driven by the murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter develop mammary carcinomas with a progression from focal atypical hyperplasia to in situ carcinoma and to invasive carcinoma that closely resembles that of human neoplasia. Here we report that the combination of tamoxifen plus interleukin 12 (IL-12) results in a very effective prevention of mammary carcinogenesis, significantly higher than those obtained with either tamoxifen or IL-12 alone. At 1 year of age, 20% of control mice resulted tumor-free, whereas 80% of mice receiving the combined treatment were tumor-free. At 2 years of age, less than 5% of control mice were tumor-free, as opposed to 70% of mice treated with tamoxifen plus IL-12. The combined treatment inhibited mammary carcinogenesis mainly through a reduction in the number of mammary cells at risk of progression, a reduction in estrogen receptors (ERs) expression and a reduction in the angiogenic support to mammary development, likely due to cross-talk between tamoxifen and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) (the main downstream mediator elicited in vivo by IL-12). The addition of IL-12 to the tamoxifen treatment more than doubled mouse lifetime and did not exacerbate known side effects of tamoxifen.

[Can breast cancer be chemoprevented in 2003?]

Breast cancer is certainly not preventable at the same degree as lung cancer is by avoiding cigarette smoking or bladder cancer by avoiding exposure to some specific professional carcinogens. Despite the increased availability of screening mammography and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, breast cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women. Chemoprevention could be one of the possible weapons to decrease the morbidity and the mortality due to breast cancer. Experimental, epidemiological and clinical data suggest that one can prevent occurrence of breast cancer. The results of five trials including more than 25,000 patients comparing the effectiveness of tamoxifen with a placebo were published. The results of these trials, at first sight, do not agree. Only in the USA, the results of the five trials have led to licence tamoxifen for chemoprevention of breast cancer. But the Food and Drug Administration stresses the fact that the noxious side effects are too numerous for this molecule to be prescribed with all the patients. It must be reserved for the women presenting an increased risk. The means of identifying the women at increased risk are not yet perfect.

Update on clinical role of tamoxifen

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy amongst women in the United States and decreased mortality over the past decade has been attributed to a combination of screening and adjuvant therapies. There has been a resurgence of interest in hormonal therapies and this article discusses the clinical status of tamoxifen in the context of emerging alternative agents for treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tamoxifen has served as a prototype for the development of selective estrogen receptor modulators at the laboratory-clinical interface. Molecular technologies have permitted elucidation of mechanisms for tissue specific action and led to newer selective estrogen receptor modulators with potentially greater antitumour efficacy and attenuated uterotrophic profile. Publications over the past 12 months have emphasized the risks of thromboembolism and endometrial carcinoma associated with tamoxifen use which has accelerated application of other hormonal agents for treatment of advanced disease and as neoadjuvant therapy. This article reviews the current role of tamoxifen in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer together with its potential for chemoprevention. Models for quantitative risk assessment are being developed to identify women for whom chemoprotection is justified.

SUMMARY

Recent data showing a survival advantage for the aromatase inhibitor letrozole compared with tamoxifen in the advanced setting and improvement in disease-free survival for the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole versus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment may herald a major shift in standard first-line endocrine therapies for both advanced and early disease and ultimately chemoprevention of breast cancer. Other agents including newer SERMs and pure antiestrogens are undergoing phase III clinical trials and future endocrine and biological therapies are likely to include more selective and targeted therapies, which may be efficacious in both hormone-sensitive and receptor-negative disease.

Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues

An aggressive approach to breast cancer control based on preventing the disease must complement efforts at effective treatment. To date clinical trials testing new chemopreventative agents have not generally met with the kind of success expected. A wide range of new breast cancer chemopreventative agents are poised to be tested in clinical trials. We review these novel agents and approaches, including those for which clinical trials have been initiated and those that are promising in the preclinical arena. Further progress in this area requires not only new agents, but novel methods for screening for risk assessment, sampling and development of intermediate biomarkers. We review these novel potential surrogate endpoints, including new imaging-techniques, breast sampling approaches, and methods to assess biomarkers in breast epithelium. Factors that could contribute to a meaningful choice of the chemopreventive agents and the design of clinical trials are discussed.

Breast cancer chemoprevention: current challenges and a look toward the future

There is a need to develop new prevention agents for breast cancer risk reduction that would have fewer side effects than the approved agent, tamoxifen, and/or would be effective in preventing estrogen receptor-negative or tamoxifen-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. There also is a need to improve the accuracy of present risk assessment models and to incorporate tissue-based biomarkers to supplement risk prediction tools. Candidate risk biomarkers include the serum hormones insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding protein-3, mammographic breast density, nipple aspirate fluid production, and breast tissue evidence of proliferative breast disease (intraepithelial neoplasia). A variety of techniques have been developed to randomly sample breast tissue to detect precancerous changes and/or detect modulation of proliferation in response to a prevention agent. Based on molecular abnormalities observed in breast intraepithelial neoplasia, a number of drug classes and combinations are suggested as potential chemoprevention approaches. Clinical trial models have been developed to select the appropriate drug dose for subsequent biomarker modulation chemoprevention trials in which the use of surrogate endpoint biomarkers as indicators of efficacy is being explored. If these biomarkers can be validated and shown to reliably predict and monitor response in phase I/II prevention trials, and if favorable modulation is correlated with subsequent decreased cancer incidence, biomarkers may replace cancer incidence as the endpoint in future phase III trials, dramatically reducing the time and expense associated with new prevention drug development.