Resistance to photodynamic therapy in radiation induced fibrosarcoma-1 and Chinese hamster ovary-multi-drug resistant. Cells in vitro

Photodynamic therapy: Innovative approaches for antibacterial and anticancer treatments

Photodynamic therapy is an alternative treatment mainly for cancer but also for bacterial infections. This treatment dates back to 1900 when a German medical school graduate Oscar Raab found a photodynamic effect while doing research for his doctoral dissertation with Professor Hermann von Tappeiner. Unexpectedly, Raab revealed that the toxicity of acridine on paramecium depends on the intensity of light in his laboratory. Photodynamic therapy is therefore based on the administration of a photosensitizer with subsequent light irradiation within the absorption maxima of this substance followed by reactive oxygen species formation and finally cell death. Although this treatment is not a novelty, there is an endeavor for various modifications to the therapy. For example, selectivity and efficiency of the photosensitizer, as well as irradiation with various types of light sources are still being modified to improve final results of the photodynamic therapy. The main aim of this review is to summarize anticancer and antibacterial modifications, namely various compounds, approaches, and techniques, to enhance the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy.

Photodynamic Therapy: Targeting Cancer Biomarkers for the Treatment of Cancers

Simple Summary

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive treatment option that can kill cancerous cells by subjecting them to light irradiation at a specific wavelength. The main problem related to most photosensitizers is the lack of tumor selectivity, which leads to undesired uptake in normal tissues resulting in side effects. Passive targeting and active targeting are the two strategies to improve uptake in tumor tissues. This review focused on active targeting and summarizes recent active targeting approaches in which highly potent photosensitizers are rendered tumor-specific by means of an appended targeting moiety that interacts with a protein unique to, or at least significantly more abundant on, tumor cell surfaces compared to normal cells.

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-documented therapy that has emerged as an effective treatment modality of cancers. PDT utilizes harmless light to activate non- or minimally toxic photosensitizers to generate cytotoxic species for malignant cell eradication. Compared with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, PDT is appealing by virtue of the minimal invasiveness, its safety, as well as its selectivity, and the fact that it can induce an immune response. Although local illumination of the cancer lesions renders intrinsic selectivity of PDT, most photosensitizers used in PDT do not display significant tumor tissue selectivity. There is a need for targeted delivery of photosensitizers. The molecular identification of cancer antigens has opened new possibilities for the development of effective targeted therapy for cancer patients. This review provides a brief overview of recent achievements of targeted delivery of photosensitizers to cancer cells by targeting well-established cancer biomarkers. Overall, targeted PDT offers enhanced intracellular accumulation of the photosensitizer, leading to improved PDT efficacy and reduced toxicity to normal tissues.

Increased DNA repair capacity augments resistance of glioblastoma cells to photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved cancer therapy of low invasiveness. The therapeutic procedure involves administering a photosensitizing drug (PS), which is then activated with monochromatic light of a specific wavelength. The photochemical reaction produces highly toxic oxygen species. The development of resistance to PDT in some cancer cells is its main limitation. Several mechanisms are known to be involved in the development of cellular defense against cytotoxic effects of PDT, including activation of antioxidant enzymes, drug efflux pumps, degradation of PS, and overexpression of protein chaperons. Another putative factor that plays an important role in the development of resistance of cancer cells to PDT seems to be DNA repair; however, it has not been well studied so far. To explore the role of DNA repair and other potential novel mechanisms associated with the resistance to PDT in the glioblastoma cells, cells stably resistant to PDT were isolated from PDT sensitive cells following repetitive PDT cycles. Duly characterization of isolated PDT-resistant glioblastoma revealed that the resistance to PDT might be a consequence of several mechanisms, including higher repair efficiency of oxidative DNA damage and repair of DNA breaks. Higher activity of APE1 endonuclease and increased expression and activation of DNA damage kinase ATM was demonstrated in the U-87 MGR cell line, suggesting and proving that they are good targets for sensitization of resistant cells to PDT.

Remotely Phototriggered, Transferrin-Targeted Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis among all subtypes of breast cancer. Currently, no targeted treatment has been approved for TNBC. The goal of this study was to design a remotely triggered, targeted therapy for TNBC using polymeric nanoparticles and light. Active targeting of TNBC was achieved by conjugating the nanoparticles to a peptide (hTf) that binds to the transferrin receptor, which is overexpressed in TNBC. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was explored for TNBC treatment by remotely triggering benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid (BPD), a photosensitizer, using near-infrared light. In this study, we investigated the use of actively targeting polymeric nanoparticles for PDT against TNBC using in vitro imaging and cytotoxicity studies. Fluorescence imaging confirmed that the BPD-loaded nanoparticles showed greater fluorescence in TNBC cells compared to free BPD, but more importantly, actively targeted nanoparticles displayed stronger fluorescence compared to passively targeted nanoparticles. Moreover, fluorescence imaging following competition with empty targeted nanoparticles validated the specificity of the targeted nanoparticles for TNBC cells. The PDT killing results were in line with the fluorescence imaging results, where actively targeting nanoparticles exhibited the highest phototriggered cytotoxicity in TNBC cells, making them an attractive nanoplatform for TNBC treatment.

A threshold dose distribution approach for the study of PDT resistance development: A threshold distribution approach for the study of PDT resistance

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a technique with well-established principles that often demands repeated applications for sequential elimination of tumor cells. An important question concerns the way surviving cells from a treatment behave in the subsequent one. Threshold dose is a core concept in PDT dosimetry, as the minimum amount of energy to be delivered for cell destruction via PDT. Concepts of threshold distribution have shown to be an important tool for PDT results analysis in vitro. In this study, we used some of these concepts for demonstrating subsequent treatments with partial elimination of cells modify the distribution, which represents an increased resistance of the cells to the photodynamic action. HepG2 and HepaRG were used as models of tumor and normal liver cells and a protocol to induce resistance, consisted of repeated PDT sessions using Photogem® as a photosensitizer, was applied to the tumor ones. The response of these cells to PDT was assessed using a standard viability assay and the dose response curves were used for deriving the threshold distributions. The changes in the distribution revealed that the resistance protocol effectively eliminated the most sensitive cells. Nevertheless, HepaRG cell line was the most resistant one among the cells analyzed, which indicates a specificity in clinical applications that enables the use of high doses and drug concentrations with minimal damage to the surrounding normal tissue.

The effect of ephrin-A1 on resistance to Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the most prevalent cell type of esophageal cancer, remains a dismal disease with poor prognosis. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for early esophageal cancer. To explore possible factors involved in resistance to PDT in esophageal cancer cells, we selected PDT-resistant subcell lines by repeated treatment of CE48T/VGH (CE48T) ESCC cells with Photofrin-PDT and then analyzed the global gene modulations in the PDT-resistant cells by whole-genome microarray. More than 700 genes reached a fold change greater than 1.5 in each of the PDT-resistant cells compared to parental cells. Among these genes, both tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and EFNA1 genes were significantly upregulated in resistant cell lines. However, they were significantly downregulated in Photofrin-PDT-treated cells compared to untreated cells. The observations made in the microarray analysis were further confirmed by quantitative PCR. We observed that recombinant tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) activated the gene expression of EFNA1 at both the messenger RNA (mRNA) level and the protein level in CE48T cells. Functional analysis showed that when incubated with oligomeric and monomeric ephrin-A1 simultaneously, ESCC cells became significantly resistant to Photofrin-PDT. Functional analysis further suggested that transmembrane and soluble ephrin-A1 may cooperate to enhance resistance to Photofrin-PDT in ESCC cells.

Apoptosis and associated phenomena as a determinants of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy

Failure of neoplastic cells to respond to conventional chemotherapy is usually associated with factors that limit access of drugs to subcellular sites, differences in cell-cycle kinetics or mutations leading to loss of drug-activation pathways or other processes that govern response factors. For PDT, efficacy depends mainly on selective uptake of photosensitizers by neoplastic cells, oxygenation levels, the suitable direction of irradiation and the availability of pathways to cell death that are highly conserved among mammalian cell types. While it is possible to engineer PDT-resistant cell types, current evidence suggests that the major obstacles to cancer control relate to drug, light and oxygen distribution. This review discusses some of the factors that can govern PDT-induced cell death.

Isolation and characterization of PDT-resistant cancer cells

Even though the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treating premalignant and malignant lesions has been demonstrated, resistant tumor cells to this therapy occasionally appear.

Direct and indirect photodynamic therapy effects on the cellular and molecular components of the tumor microenvironment

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel cancer treatment. It involves the activation of a photosensitizer (PS) with light of specific wavelength, which interacts with molecular oxygen to generate singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) that lead to tumor cell death. When a tumor is treated with PDT, in addition to affect cancer cells, the extracellular matrix and the other cellular components of the microenvironment are altered and finally this had effects on the tumor cells survival. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in the availability of nutrients and oxygen in the different regions of a tridimensional tumor has a strong impact on the sensitivity of cells to PDT. In this review, we summarize how PDT affects indirectly to the tumor cells, by the alterations on the extracellular matrix, the cell adhesion and the effects over the immune response. Also, we describe direct PDT effects on cancer cells, considering the intratumoral role that autophagy mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) has on the efficiency of the treatment.

Mechanisms of resistance to photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the administration of a photosensitizer (PS) followed by illumination with visible light, leading to generation of reactive oxygen species. The mechanisms of resistance to PDT ascribed to the PS may be shared with the general mechanisms of drug resistance, and are related to altered drug uptake and efflux rates or altered intracellular trafficking. As a second step, an increased inactivation of oxygen reactive species is also associated to PDT resistance via antioxidant detoxifying enzymes and activation of heat shock proteins. Induction of stress response genes also occurs after PDT, resulting in modulation of proliferation, cell detachment and inducing survival pathways among other multiple extracellular signalling events. In addition, an increased repair of induced damage to proteins, membranes and occasionally to DNA may happen. PDT-induced tissue hypoxia as a result of vascular damage and photochemical oxygen consumption may also contribute to the appearance of resistant cells. The structure of the PS is believed to be a key point in the development of resistance, being probably related to its particular subcellular localization. Although most of the features have already been described for chemoresistance, in many cases, no cross-resistance between PDT and chemotherapy has been reported. These findings are in line with the enhancement of PDT efficacy by combination with chemotherapy. The study of cross resistance in cells with developed resistance against a particular PS challenged against other PS is also highly complex and comprises different mechanisms. In this review we will classify the different features observed in PDT resistance, leading to a comparison with the mechanisms most commonly found in chemo resistant cells.

Cytotoxic and Photodynamic Effects of Photofrin® on Sensitive and Multi-drug-resistant Friend Leukaemia Cells

To study cross-resistance to Photofrin (PF) photosensitization, a Friend leukaemia cell line (ADM-RFLC) with a high level of multi-drug resistance (MDR) and the parental sensitive cell line (FLC) have been used. PF uptake measured by HPLC shows a similar intracellular drug accumulation in both cell lines. The ID50s for cell growth inhibition by PF are also similar after exposure in the dark in the two cell lines, while after illumination they are slightly lower in ADM-RFLC than in FLC cells. Moreover, verapamil, known to reverse the MDR phenotype induced by P-glycoprotein over-expression (the drug efflux mechanism), affects equally ADM-RFLC and FLC cells sensitivity to PF. In addition, photodynamic treatment with PF did not reverse the resistance to rhodamine 123 and aclarubicin, but partly reverses resistance of ADM-RFLC cells to antitubulin drugs such as vinblastine or vincristine. These latter results could have clinical application in the treatment of tumours expressing the MDR phenotype.

In vitro survival of nonsmall cell lung cancer cells following combined treatment with ionizing radiation and photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

It has been suggested that combination high dose rate (HDR) intraluminal brachytherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may improve efficacy of treatment, reduce toxicity and enhance quality of life for patients. To provide a cellular basis for this we examined the in vitro sensitivity of MRC5 normal lung fibroblasts and four NSCLC cell lines following HDR radiation, PDT and combined HDR radiation and PDT. HDR radiation was cobalt-60 gamma rays (1.5-1.9 Gy min(-1)). For PDT treatment, cells were exposed to 2.5 microg mL(-1) Photofrin for 18-24 h followed by light exposure (20 mW cm(-2)). For combined treatment cells were exposed to Photofrin and then either exposed to light and 15-30 min later exposed to HDR radiation or exposed to HDR radiation and 15-30 min later exposed to light. D(37) values calculated from clonogenic survival curves indicated a six-fold difference in HDR radiation sensitivity and an eight-fold difference in PDT sensitivity. The effect of combined treatment was not significantly different from an additive effect of the individual treatment modalities for the NSCLC cells, but was significantly less than additive for the MRC5 cells. These results suggest an equivalent tumor cell kill may be possible at reduced systemic effects to patients.

Photodynamic therapy resistant human colon carcinoma HT29 cells show cross-resistance to UVA but not UVC light

The isolation of photodynamic therapy (PDT)-resistant HT29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells has been reported previously. These PDT-resistant variants show increased expression of the Hsp27 and BNip3 proteins and a decreased expression of mutant p53 protein compared with parental HT29 cells. Because mutant p53 and increased expression of Hsp27 have been associated with resistance to various chemotherapeutic agents, whereas BNip3 is a potent inducer of apoptosis, we were interested in determining whether these PDT-resistant cells were cross-resistant to other cytotoxic agents. In the present report, we examined the colony survival of the PDT-resistant HT29 variants and several other clonal variants of HT29 cells to ultraviolet light (UV) treatment. The HT29 PDT-resistant variants showed cross-resistance to long-wavelength UVA (320-400 nm) but not to short-wavelength UVC (200-280 nm) light. Cell sensitivity to UVA or UVC was then correlated with Hsp27, BNip3 and mutant p53 protein levels in the PDT-resistant variants as well as in several clonal variants of HT29 cells that express different levels of Hsp27, BNip3 and mutant p53. We show that increased expression of Hsp27 and BNip3 and decreased expression of mutant p53 correlated with increased resistance to UVA. In contrast, increased expression of Hsp27 and BNip3 correlated with increased sensitivity to UVC, whereas increased expression of mutant p53 showed no significant correlation with sensitivity to UVC. These results suggest that the PDT-resistant HT29 cell variants are differentially sensitized to UVA compared with UVC due, in part at least, through the altered expression levels of BNip3, Hsp27 and mutant p53.

Milestones in the development of photodynamic therapy and fluorescence diagnosis

Many reviews on PDT have been published. This field is now so large, and embraces so many sub-specialties, from laser technology and optical penetration through diffusing media to a number of medical fields including dermatology, gastroenterology, ophthalmology, blood sterilization and treatment of microbial-viral diseases, that it is impossible to cover all aspects in a single review. Here, we will concentrate on a few basic aspects, all important for the route of development leading PDT to its present state: early work on hematoporphyrin and hematoporphyrin derivative, second and third generation photosensitizers, 5-aminolevulinic acid and its derivatives, oxygen and singlet oxygen, PDT effects on cell organelles, mutagenic potential, the basis for tumour selectivity, cell cooperativity, photochemical internalization, light penetration into tissue and the significance of oxygen depletion, photobleaching of photosensitizers, optimal light sources, effects on the immune system, and, finally, future trends.

No cross-resistance between ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy and nitric oxide

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) interactions with nitric oxide (NO) are not well understood. In this work, we attempted to elucidate whether NO cytotoxicity and PDT from aminolevulinic acid (ALA) have independent cell damage mechanisms. We employed the murine mammary adenocarcinoma cell line LM3 and its NO-resistant variant LM3-SNP obtained after successive exposures to sodium nitroprusside (SNP). No cross-resistance was found between NO cytotoxicity and ALA-PDT; LM3-SNP cells were not more resistant to ALA-PDT than the parental line, instead they were more sensitive. We also induced resistance to ALA-PDT in LM3-SNP cells after multiple cycles of photodynamic treatment. We isolated two clones, identified as Clon 1 and Clon 3, which were 9.2 and 12.5 times more resistant to ALA-PDT than the parental lines, showing that resistance to NO did not interfere in the development of PDT resistance. In addition, the sensitivity to NO decreased in Clon 1 and increased in Clon 3, but they did not show any modifications in NO production. All the cell lines have similar GSH content and GSH transferases activities. However, GSSG content is markedly lower in LM3-SNP, Clon 1, and Clon 3 compared to parental LM3 line and consequently GSH/GSSG ratios are also higher. Our results suggest that different degrees of NO resistance of tumours would not correlate with resistance to PDT.

Increased BNip3 and decreased mutant p53 in cisplatin-sensitive PDT-resistant HT29 cells

We have reported previously the isolation of three photodynamic therapy (PDT)-resistant human colon carcinoma HT29 cell lines that show increased expression of the Hsp27 and BNip3 protein and a decreased expression of the mutant p53 protein compared to parental HT29 cells. Since mutant p53 and increased expression of Hsp27 have been associated with resistance to various chemotherapeutic agents, whereas BNip3 is a potent inducer of apoptosis, we were interested in determining whether these PDT-resistant cells were cross-resistant to other cytotoxic agents. We report here that the PDT-resistant HT29 cell lines showed a significant increase in cisplatin sensitivity and an increase in both spontaneous and cisplatin-induced apoptosis compared to parental HT29 cells. In addition, the cisplatin sensitivity of the PDT-resistant HT29 variants and several other clonal variants of HT29 cells correlated with increased BNip3 and decreased mutant p53 protein levels, but not Hsp27 protein levels.

Bypass of tumor drug resistance by antivascular therapy

Multidrug resistance (MDR) presents a major obstacle for the successful chemotherapy of cancer. Its emergence during chemotherapy is attributed to a selective process, which gives a growth advantage to MDR cells within the genetically unstable neoplastic cell population. The pleiotropic nature of clinical MDR poses a great difficulty for the development of treatment strategies that aim at blocking MDR at the tumor cell level. Targeting treatment to the nonmalignant vascular network-the lifeline of the tumor-is a promising alternative for the treatment of drug-resistant tumors. The present study demonstrates that MDR in cancer can be successfully circumvented by photodynamic therapy (PDT) using an antivascular treatment protocol. We show that, although P-glycoprotein-expressing human HT29/MDR colon carcinoma cells in culture are resistant to PDT with Pd-bacteriopheophorbide (TOOKAD), the same treatment induces tumor necrosis with equal efficacy (88% vs 82%) in HT29/MDR-derived xenografts and their wild type counterparts, respectively. These results are ascribed to the rapid antivascular effects of the treatment, supporting the hypothesis that MDR tumors can be successfully eradicated by indirect approaches that bypass their inherent drug resistance. We suggest that with progress in ongoing clinical trials, TOOKAD-PDT may offer a novel option for local treatment of MDR tumors.

Photosensitizer accumulation in spontaneous multidrug resistant cells: a comparative study with Rhodamine 123, Rose Bengal acetate and Photofrine

The influence both of overexpression of multidrug transporter proteins and of phenotype changes occurring in cells developing spontaneous resistance on the accumulation of photosensitizer molecules was studied on two tumor-derived cell lines (B16, A2780) expressing the MDR-1 phenotype. Rhodamine 123, Rose Bengal acetate (a fluorogenic substrate that is restored to the native active molecule by specific enzyme activity inside cells) and Photofrin were considered. The two resistant variants accumulate Rhodamine 123 to a lesser extent than the respective wild types. Treatment with verapamil markedly enhances Rhodamine 123 accumulation in resistant cells, blocking the drug's extrusion. The amount of Rose Bengal is larger in resistant cells than in wild type cells. Verapamil does not affect drug accumulation, although it significantly impairs the efflux process. The results are explained by the enhancement of both membrane traffic and esterase activity resulting in intracellular Rose Bengal production that counterbalances the increased ability in the outward transport of resistant cells. Photofrin is accumulated to a lower degree in resistant than in wild type cells. Verapamil does not alter the drug accumulation, although the release process is somewhat affected. Different intracellular turnovers of Photofrin take place in the cell variants, and the release of the monomeric fluorescent fractions is greater in resistant than in wild type cells.

Induction of Hsp60 by Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) invokes a number of cellular responses. Other studies have shown that PDT induces transcription and translation of heat shock proteins (Hsps). The expression of mitochondrial heat shock protein, Hsp60, was measured following in vitro Photofrin-mediated PDT in the colon cancer cell line HT29 and its PDT-induced resistant variant HT29-P14 as well as the radiation-induced fibrosarcoma cells RIF-1 and its PDT-induced resistant variant, RIF-8A. Basal levels of Hsp60 were found to be similar in the two murine cell lines. In the human model, the resistant HT29-P14 cell line showed a small increase in basal levels relative to its parental population. Incubation with Photofrin (PII) alone or photosensitization caused a significant increase in Hsp60 levels in all cell lines as determined by flow cytometry. A dose-dependent and temporal relationship for PDT response was observed, maximum levels were detected 6-8 h post PDT, at which time, Hsp60 induction was found to be significantly greater in the two resistant variants. Induction in the RIF cells was also found to be greater after incubation with PII alone at the highest doses tested. These results indicate that the presence of PII and the subsequent oxidative stress of PDT can induce Hsp60 and implicated it as a common factor that may contribute to the resistance observed in the induced resistant cells.

Effect of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC)-mediated photodynamic therapy on sensitive and multidrug-resistant human breast cancer cells

Meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) is in clinical trials for the photodynamic therapy (PDT) of localized-stage cancer. The PDT susceptibility of cells expressing multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype is an attractive possibility to overcome the resistance to cytotoxic drugs observed during cancer chemotherapy. The accumulation, photocytotoxicity and intracellular localization of mTHPC were examined using the doxorubicin selected MCF-7/DXR human breast cancer cells, expressing P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and the wild-type parental cell line, MCF-7. No significant difference in mTHPC accumulation was observed between the two cell lines up to 3 h contact. The photodynamic activity of mTHPC, measured 24 h after irradiation with red laser light (lambda=650 nm), was significantly greater in MCF-7/DXR as compared to MCF-7 cells. A light dose of 2.5 J cm(-2) inducing 50% of cytotoxicity in MCF-7, resulted in 85% cytotoxicity in MCF-7/DXR. The presence of P-gp inhibitors SDZ-PSC-833 and cyclosporin A did not modify the mTHPC-induced cytotoxicity. The difference in intracellular mTHPC distribution pattern between two cell lines may contribute to different photocytotoxicity. Our results indicate that mTHPC mediated PDT could be useful in killing cells expressing MDR phenotype.

In vitro induction of PDT resistance in HT29, HT1376 and SK-N-MC cells by various photosensitizers

Our approach to examine the mechanism(s) of action for photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been via the generation of PDT-resistant cell lines. In this study we used three human cell lines, namely, human colon adenocarcinoma (HT29), human bladder carcinoma and human neuroblastoma. The three photosensitizers used were Photofrin, Nile Blue A and aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate. The protocol for inducing resistance consisted of repeated in vitro photodynamic treatments with a photosensitizer to the 1-10%-survival level followed by regrowth of single surviving colonies. Varying degrees of resistance were observed. The three induced variants of the HT29 cell line were the most extensively studied. Their ratios of increased survival at the LD90 level range between 1.5- and 2.62-fold more resistant.

Investigation of cross-resistance to a range of photosensitizers, hyperthermia and UV light in two radiation-induced fibrosarcoma cell strains resistant to photodynamic therapy in vitro

Two distinct photodynamic therapy-resistant variants of the murine radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) cell line have been isolated. One strain displayed relative resistance over the parental RIF-1 strain to treatment with the porphyrin-based compound, polyhaematoporphyrin (PHP), whereas the other strain displayed relative resistance over the RIF-1 strain to treatment using the cationic zinc (II) pyridinium-substituted phthalocyanine (PPC). The PHP-resistant strain did not display cross-resistance to PPC-mediated treatment, and vice versa. In both PDT-resistant strains, the increased resistance could not be attributed to altered cellular growth rate, antioxidant capacity or intracellular sensitizer localization. The PHP-resistant strain displayed resistance to treatment with both short (1 h) and extended (16 h) sensitizer incubation periods, which may indicate that in this strain, the resistance has arisen through an alteration in a membrane component. Conversely, the PPC-resistant strain only displayed increased resistance over the parental cells to treatment involving the short drug incubation, which is likely to reflect the existence of a threshold effect caused by the alteration of an individual cellular target. Each resistant strain has been compared to the parental strain in terms of cellular sensitivity to treatment with a range of other photosensitizers, hyperthermia, UV light and the anticancer agent cis-diamminedichloroplatinum. The PHP-resistant strain exhibited crossresistance to photosensitization treatment using exogenously added protoporphyrin IX, and also to treatment with the anionic phthalocyanine sensitizers, zinc (II) tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine and zinc (II) tetraglycine-substituted phthalocyanine. The PPC-resistant strain did not display cross-resistance to any of the treatment strategies employed in this investigation. The results of this investigation indicate that there are at least two distinct mechanisms of PDT resistance in RIF cells, and that the mechanism of PHP resistance may, to some extent depend, upon the physical nature of the sensitizer molecule.

Photodynamic therapy for the hypercalcemic type of the small cell carcinoma of the ovary in a mouse xenograft model

OBJECTIVE

The hypercalcemic type of the small cell carcinoma of the ovary (HTSCCO) is a rapidly fatal ovarian tumor in young women. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) induces selective necrosis to malignant tissues. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the HTSCCO to PDT in a mouse xenograft model.

METHODS

Tumors were obtained from a patient with a HTSCCO and were transplanted into nude mice. Following photosensitization with m-THPC, either superficial or interstitial laser light was administered to the tumors. Necroses were measured by morphometry. Serum calcium levels were determined prior to and after PDT.

RESULTS

Superficial irradiation of m-THPC sensitized tumors showed over three times more necrosis than control tumors (P = 0.037). Interstitially irradiated tumors showed over seven times more necrosis than control tumors (P = 0.0012). All animals showed a highly significant hypercalcemia prior to PDT (P < 0.0001). PDT induced a significant decrease in serum calcium levels (P = 0.0297).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that PDT may be of therapeutic value for the HTSCCO.

Quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy of cervical dysplasia in vivo

The aims of this study were: (i) to quantify near-infrared optical properties of normal cervical tissues and high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (H-SIL); (ii) to assess the feasibility of differentiating normal cervical tissues from H-SIL on the basis of these properties; and (iii) to determine how cervical tissue optical properties change following photodynamic therapy (PDT) of H-SIL in vivo. Using the frequency domain photon migration technique, non-invasive measurements of normal and dysplastic ecto-cervical tissue optical properties, i.e. absorption (mu(a)) and effective scattering coefficients, and physiological parameters, i.e. tissue water and haemoglobin concentration, percentage oxygen saturation (%SO(2)), were performed on 10 patients scheduled for PDT of histologically-proven H-SIL. Cervix absorption and effective scattering parameters were up to 15% lower in H-SIL sites compared with normal cervical tissue for all wavelengths studied (674, 811, 849, 956 nm). Following PDT, all mu(a) values increased significantly, due to elevated tissue blood and water content associated with PDT-induced hyperaemia and oedema. Tissue total haemoglobin concentration ([TotHb]) and arterio-venous oxygen saturation measured in H-SIL sites were lower than normal sites ([TotHb]: 88.6 +/- 35.8 micromol/l versus 124.7 +/- 22.6 micromol/l; %SO(2): 76.5 +/- 14.7% versus 84.9 +/- 3.4%).

BPD-MA-mediated photosensitization in vitro and in vivo: cellular adhesion and beta1 integrin expression in ovarian cancer cells

Benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid (BPD-MA) photosensitization was examined for its effects on cellular adhesion of a human ovarian cancer cell line, OVCAR 3, to extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Mild BPD-MA photosensitization (approximately 85% cell survival) of OVCAR 3 transiently decreased adhesion to collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin and vitronectin to a greater extent than could be attributed to cell death. The loss in adhesiveness was accompanied by a loss of beta1 integrin-containing focal adhesion plaques (FAPs), although beta1 subunits were still recognized by monoclonal antibody directed against human beta1 subunits. In vivo BPD-MA photosensitization decreased OVCAR 3 adhesiveness as well. Photosensitized adhesion was reduced in the presence of sodium azide and enhanced in deuterium oxide, suggesting mediation by singlet oxygen. Co-localization studies of BPD-MA and Rhodamine 123 showed that the photosensitizer was largely mitochondrial, but also exhibited extramitochondrial, intracellullar, diffuse cytosolic fluorescence. Taken together, these data show that intracellular damage mediated by BPD-PDT remote from the FAP site can affect cellular-ECM interactions and result in loss of FAP formation. This may have an impact on long-term effects of photodynamic therapy. The topic merits further investigation.

In vivo resistance to photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy in radiation-induced fibrosarcoma cells resistant to in vitro Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

The effects of Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) on the in vitro cell survival and in vivo tumor growth of murine radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) cell tumors have been examined following in vivo PDT treatment of tumors. The response to in vivo PDT is examined in tumors derived from RIF-1 mouse fibrosarcoma cells and in tumors derived from RIF-8A cells, which show in vitro resistance to PDT. A significant reduction in tumor volume is observed over the first three days following in vivo PDT treatment of either 5 or 10 mg/ kg. The reduction in tumor volume is greater for a 10 compared to a 5 mg/ml dose and occurs to a similar extent for both RIF-1 and RIF-8A tumors. The re-growth is significantly delayed for RIF-1 compared to RIF-8A tumors, indicating a greater response for RIF-1 tumors compared to RIF-8A tumors following PDT. A reduced response of the RIF-8A compared to the RIF-1 tumor cells is also observed in the clonogenic survival of cells from tumors that were excised and explanted in vitro immediately following in vivo PDT treatment. These data indicate that the intrinsic cell sensitivity to PDT is an important component in the mechanism that leads to tumor response following in vivo photodynamic therapy.

Cross-resistance to photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy and UV light and recovery from photodynamic therapy damage in Rif-8A mouse fibrosarcoma cells measured using viral capacity

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) utilizes the localized delivery of light to activate a photosensitizing drug (such as Photofrin) which is selectively retained by the tumour tissues. The intrinsic in vitro sensitivity of tumour cells to PDT is thought to be an important determinant of clinical tumour response to PDT. In this work we show the feasibility of using a viral capacity assay for adenovirus (Ad) DNA synthesis as an indicator of cellular sensitivity to and recovery from Photofrin-mediated PDT. Rif-1 mouse fibrosarcoma cells and a PDT resistant derivative, Rif-8A, as well as Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and CHO-MDR multi-drug resistant mutant cells were studied. Consistent with the clonogenic survival of these cells, the capacity of PDT-treated cells for Ad DNA synthesis was greater for Rif-8A compared to Rif-1 cells and for CHO-MDR compared to CHO-N cells. Delaying infection of the Rif cells from immediately after, to 6 hours after PDT, resulted in an increased capacity for Ad DNA synthesis, which was greater for Rif-8A compared to Rif-1 cells, suggesting that the increased resistance of Rif-8A cells to PDT results from an elevated recovery and/or repair of PDT damage. The capacity of UV-irradiated cells for Ad DNA synthesis was also greater for Rif-8A compared to Rif-1 cells indicating a cross-resistance of Rif-8A cells to UV. These results suggest some overlap in the types of cellular damage induced by UV and PDT and/or overlap in the pathways for the repair of UV and PDT damage in Rif cells.

Subcellular localization of Photofrin and aminolevulinic acid and photodynamic cross-resistance in vitro in radiation-induced fibrosarcoma cells sensitive or resistant to photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

The subcellular and, specifically, mitochondrial localization of the photodynamic sensitizers Photofrin and aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin-IX (PpIX) has been investigated in vitro in radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumor cells. Comparisons were made of parental RIF-1 cells and cells (RIF-8A) in which resistance to Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) had been induced. The effect on the uptake kinetics of Photofrin of coincubation with one of the mitochondria-specific probes 10N-Nonyl acridine orange (NAO) or rhodamine-123 (Rh-123) and vice versa was examined. The subcellular colocalization of Photofrin and PpIX with Rh-123 was determined by double-label confocal fluorescence microscopy. Clonogenic cell survival after ALA-mediated PDT was determined in RIF-1 and RIF-8A cells to investigate cross-resistance with Photofrin-mediated PDT. At long (18 h) Photofrin incubation times, stronger colocalization of Photofrin and Rh-123 was seen in RIF-1 than in RIF-8A cells. Differences between RIF-1 and RIF-8A in the competitive mitochondrial binding of NAO or Rh-123 with Photofrin suggest that the inner mitochondrial membrane is a significant Photofrin binding site. The differences in this binding may account for the PDT resistance in RIF-8A cells. With ALA, the peak accumulations of PpIX occurred at 5 h for both cells, and followed a diffuse cytoplasmic distribution compared to mitochondrial localization at 1 h ALA incubation. There was rapid efflux of PpIX from both RIF-1 and RIF-8A. As with Photofrin, ALA-induced PpIX exhibited weaker mitochondrial localization in RIF-8A than in RIF-1 cells. Clonogenic survival demonstrated cross-resistance to incubation in PpIX but not to ALA-induced PpIX, implying differences in mitochondrial localization and/or binding, depending on the source of the PpIX within the cells.

The induction of partial resistance to photodynamic therapy by the protooncogene BCL-2

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an efficient inducer of apoptosis, an active form of cell death that can be inhibited by the BCL-2 oncoprotein. The ability of BCL-2 to modulate PDT-induced apoptosis and overall cell killing has been studied in a pair of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines that differ from one another by a transfected human BCL-2 gene in one of them (Bissonnette et al, Nature 359, 552-554, 1992). Cells were exposed to the phthalocyanine photosensitizer Pc 4 and various fluences of red light. Pc 4 uptake was identical in the two cell lines. The parental cells displayed a high incidence of apoptosis after PDT, whereas at each fluence there was a much lower incidence of apoptosis in the BCL-2-expressing cells. Apoptosis was monitored by (a) observation of 50 kbp and oligonucleosome-size DNA fragments by gel electrophoresis, (b) flow cytometry of cells labeled with fluorescently tagged dUTP by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and (c) fluorescence microscopy of acridine orange-stained cells. The time course of apoptosis varied with the PDT dose, suggesting that only after moderately high doses (> 99% loss of clonogenicity) was there a relatively synchronous and rapid entry of many cells into apoptosis. At PDT doses reducing cell survival by 90 or 99%, significant increases in apoptotic cells were found in the population after 6-12 h. Clonogenic assays showed that BCL-2 protein inhibited not only apoptosis but overall cell killing as well, effecting a two-fold resistance at the 10% survival level. Thus, BCL-2-expressing cells may be relatively resistant to PDT.

In vitro studies on the potential use of 5-aminolaevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy for gynaecological tumours

Results are reported on the sensitivity of various gynaecological tumour cell lines to 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX-sensitised photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) in vitro. All cell lines tested accumulated ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) and demonstrated good sensitivity to ALA-PDT. Localisation of PpIX in the mitochondria was demonstrated by fluorescence microscopy. Subcellular damage following ALA-PDT was observed using transmission electron microscopy. This damage was localised initially to the mitochondria, with damage to membranes and the nucleus and complete loss of intracytoplasmic organisation being observed subsequently. There was no apparent difference in ALA-PDT response between a multidrug-resistant ovarian carcinoma cell line and its parent line. These results indicate that ALA-PDT has potential for application to therapy of gynaecological malignancies.

Effects of photodynamic therapy combined with methotrexate on C6 rat glioma cells: a preliminary study

This study was undertaken to determine if methotrexate (MTX) is effective against tumor cells surviving photodynamic therapy (PDT). C6 rat glioma cells were exposed to Photofrin and irradiated at 630 nm using power densities of 1.2 or 4.8 J/cm2 to simulate the conditions for cells in solid tumors which survive PDT. Cells were then treated with MTX at 5.0, 0.5, or 0.05 microM concentrations. MTT assay of cell proliferation was performed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postirradiation. During the first 48 h of incubation, MTX alone was more effective than PDT and MTX. After 48 h, the combination treatment was more effective. Further studies of combined PDT and chemotherapy are warranted.

Flow cytometric technique for quantitating cytotoxic response to photodynamic therapy

A simple flow cytometric technique for rapid measurement of multilog cytotoxic responses to photosensitization of cellular systems is described. This technique is particularly useful for cell lines with a low colony-forming efficiency, for which a nonclonogenic assay is required. The assay separates cell-sized objects from cellular debris by gating on forward scatter versus side scatter, identifies viable cells by positive calcein AM and negative ethidium homodimer-1 staining and measures cell concentration relative to an internal standard of polystyrene beads. Large numbers of cells can be analyzed rapidly. Two patient-derived small cell lung cancer cell lines, NCI-H209 and SV-E, were used to test the technique. Photordiation survival curves of the response of these cell lines to 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoprophyrin IX photosensitization correlated with the extent of photosensitizer accumulation. There was good agreement between the results obtained using the tritiated thymidine incorporation assay and the flow cytometric cytotoxicity assay. The technique can be used to measure cytotoxic responses to photosensitization of cell lines regardless of their plating efficiencies.

Inhibition of the ATPase activity of P-glycoprotein by porphyrin photosensitization of multidrug-resistant cells in vitro

The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy against P-glycoprotein ATPase activity in multidrug-resistant cells was studied. Chinese hamster ovary AUXB1 (drug-sensitive) and CR1R12 (multidrug-resistant) cell lines were compared with respect to uptake of 14C-polyhematoporphyrin and porphyrin photosensitization. Phototoxicity of Photofrin was similar in both cell lines, and no major differences in uptake or efflux of 14C-polyhematoporphyrin were observed. Porphyrin photosensitization in vitro of CR1R12 cells or isolated plasma membranes from these cells caused inhibition of P-glycoprotein ATPase activity. Application of porphyrin photosensitization at a sublethal level to CR1R12 cells resulted in a small but significant increase in adriamycin-induced cytotoxicity. The hydrophobic "picket-fence" porphyrin, meso-tetrakis-(o-propionamidophenyl)porphyrin, alpha,alpha,alpha,beta-isomer, was more inhibitory toward P-glycoprotein ATPase activity than the two less hydrophobic porphyrins tetraphenylporphine tetrasulfonate and Photofrin.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy on original and recurrent rat mammary tumors

Photodynamic therapy has demonstrated efficacy toward primary, metastatic and recurrent human tumors. Here, we investigated the ability of photodynamic therapy, using Photofrin, to inhibit growth of R3230AC mammary adenocarcinomas when tumors were treated as original implants and again as lesions recurring at the initial treatment site. The results demonstrate that both initial implants and lesions recurring after the first photodynamic treatment respond similarly to the same photodynamic therapy protocol, with mean tumor volume doubling times of approximately 11 days in both cases. Cells cultured from original tumor implants or tumors that recurred after photodynamic treatment accumulate equivalent amounts of [14C]polyhematoporphyrin. Single cell suspensions prepared from either original or recurrent tumors from animals administered 5 mg/kg Photofrin and exposed to light in vitro displayed comparable phototoxicity. Additionally, examination of tumors by light microscopy revealed no morphological differences between the original tumor implants and the recurrent lesions. Taken together, these data indicate that lesions which recurred at the site of the initial photodynamic treatment were not resistant to a second identical course of photodynamic therapy.

Mitochondrial DNA damage by anticancer agents

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is susceptible to damage by a number of anticancer agents either directly or indirectly. This damage is of little consequence if only a few of the mtDNA molecules are damaged. However, multiple drug treatments could result in a significant effect on a cell's ability to survive. The differential effect of anticancer agents on either organ specific toxicities or selective tumor kill can be partially accounted for by differential mtDNA content of cells and on the basis of differential protective mechanisms within mitochondria of various organs or tumor tissue. The concept of damage to mitochondria, especially its genome, is a subject of active investigation in various laboratories. This area of research may provide mechanism(s) by which organ specific toxicities or tumor specific toxicities may be elaborated. Also, the concept of targeting tumor specific mitochondria and/or mtDNA by anticancer agents is very attractive but has not come to fruition due to a lack of understanding of the regulation of the genome in tumor cells. Future investigations in this arena will enhance our knowledge on the interaction between anticancer agents and extranuclear DNA.